As
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
April 28, 2011
Registration
No. 333-172741
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
AMB Property
Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
6798
|
|
94-3281941
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 394-9000
(Address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of
registrants principal executive offices)
Tamra D. Browne, Esq.
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 394-9000
(Name, address, including
zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent
for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam O. Emmerich, Esq.
Robin Panovka, Esq.
David K. Lam, Esq.
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
(212) 403-1000
|
|
Michael T. Blair, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
77 West Wacker Drive,
Suite 3100
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 456-8400
|
|
Edward J. Schneidman, Esq.
Michael L. Hermsen, Esq.
David Malinger, Esq.
Mayer Brown LLP
71 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(312) 782-0600
|
|
Edward S. Nekritz, Esq.
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, CO 80239
(303) 567-5000
|
Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon
completion of the mergers described in the enclosed document.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check
the following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, check the following box and list the
Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier
effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fee
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
|
276,921,060(1)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$9,900,672,285(2)
|
|
|
$1,149,469(3)(4)
|
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series Q, par value
$0.01 per share
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
$11,273(4)(5)
|
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series R, par value
$0.01 per share
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
$13,938(4)(5)
|
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, Series S, par value
$0.01 per share
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
$14,216(4)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such dates as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
(Footnotes
on following page)
|
|
(1) |
Based on (a)(i) 570,550,345 common shares of beneficial
interest, par value $0.01 per share, of ProLogis (ProLogis
common shares) outstanding as of April 21, 2011,
(ii) 7,808,254 ProLogis common shares reserved for issuance
upon exercise or settlement of outstanding equity-based awards
under various ProLogis share plans as of April 21, 2011,
(iii) 447,426 ProLogis common shares reserved for issuance
upon redemption or exchange of outstanding partnership units of
ProLogis Fraser, L.P. held by limited partners of ProLogis
Fraser, L.P. as of April 21, 2011, (iv) 312,487
ProLogis common shares reserved for issuance upon redemption or
exchange of outstanding partnership units of ProLogis Limited
Partnership I held by limited partners of ProLogis Limited
Partnership I as of April 21, 2011, and (v) 41,224,363
ProLogis common shares reserved for issuance upon the conversion
of the convertible debt of ProLogis outstanding as of
April 21, 2011, and (b) the exchange ratio of
0.4464 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of AMB Property Corporation for each ProLogis common share.
|
|
|
(2) |
Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(f)(1) and Rule 457(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, solely for the
purpose of calculating the registration fee based on the average
of the high and low prices for ProLogis common shares as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange on April 21, 2011
($15.96 per share), multiplied by the estimated maximum number
of shares (620,342,875) that may be exchanged or converted for
the securities being registered.
|
|
|
(3) |
The registration fee for the securities registered hereby has
been calculated pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities
Act of 1933.
|
|
|
(4) |
$1,161,132 of the registration fee was previously paid in
connection with the filing of the initial
Form S-4.
|
|
|
(5) |
The registration fee for such securities has been calculated and
paid in connection with the filing of the initial
Form S-4,
and none of such information has changed.
|
Information
contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A
registration statement relating to these securities has been
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted
prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective.
This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or the
solicitation of any offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of
these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer,
solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or
qualification under the securities laws of any such
jurisdiction.
|
PRELIMINARY SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION DATED APRIL 28, 2011
MERGER
PROPOSED YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
The board of directors of AMB Property Corporation and the board
of trustees of ProLogis have each approved an agreement to
combine the two companies through a merger of equals. The
proposed transaction will create a truly global owner, operator
and developer of industrial real estate. The combined company,
which will be named ProLogis, Inc. and will be
organized as an umbrella partnership real estate investment
trust, or UPREIT, is expected to have a pro forma
equity market capitalization of approximately $14 billion,
a total market capitalization in excess of $24 billion, and
gross assets owned and managed of approximately
$46 billion. We believe that the combined company will
create a stronger, more liquid enterprise poised to take
advantage of changing market conditions to become the leading
global provider of industrial real estate.
In the proposed transactions, ProLogis shareholders will receive
0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB common stock for each
ProLogis common share that they own. This exchange ratio is
fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes
prior to the closing. AMB common stock and ProLogis common
shares are each traded on the New York Stock Exchange, under the
ticker symbols AMB and PLD,
respectively. Based on the closing price of AMB common stock on
the New York Stock Exchange (which we refer to as the
NYSE) of $32.86 on January 26, 2011, the last
trading day before ProLogis common share and AMB common stock
prices may have been affected by market speculation regarding a
potential transaction involving the companies, the exchange
ratio represented approximately $14.67 in AMB common stock for
each ProLogis common share. Based on the closing price of AMB
common stock on the NYSE of $32.93 on January 28, 2011, the
last trading day before public announcement of the proposed
transactions, the exchange ratio represented approximately
$14.70 in AMB common stock for each ProLogis common share. Based
on the closing price of AMB common stock on the NYSE of $36.52
on April 26, 2011, the latest practicable date before the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange
ratio represented approximately $16.30 in AMB common stock for
each ProLogis common share. The value of the merger
consideration will fluctuate with changes in the market price of
AMB common stock. We urge you to obtain current market
quotations of AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares.
The merger of AMB and ProLogis will be accomplished through a
first-step merger of ProLogis and an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of ProLogis and a second-step merger of a parent
entity of that subsidiary with AMB. ProLogis will continue its
existence as a subsidiary of the combined company. If the merger
of AMB and ProLogis is completed, each share of each series of
ProLogis preferred shares will be converted into a share of AMB
preferred stock of corresponding series having rights,
privileges, powers and preferences substantially identical to
those of the relevant series of ProLogis preferred shares.
Holders of ProLogis preferred shares and AMB preferred stock are
not entitled to, and are not being requested to, vote at the
special meetings.
Based upon the number of outstanding shares on the record date
for each special meeting, we anticipate that AMB will issue
254,693,674 shares of common stock and
12,000,000 shares of preferred stock in connection with the
mergers described herein, and will reserve approximately
22,227,386 shares of common stock for issuance in respect
of ProLogis equity awards, convertible notes and other
arrangements that AMB will assume in connection with the merger.
Upon completion of the transactions, we estimate that former AMB
stockholders will own approximately 40% of the common stock of
the combined company and former ProLogis shareholders will own
approximately 60% of the common stock of the combined company.
Each of the mergers is intended to qualify as a reorganization
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and, accordingly,
assuming the transaction so qualifies, ProLogis shareholders
generally will not recognize any gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes on the surrender of their
ProLogis common shares and receipt of AMB common stock, except
with respect to cash received in lieu of any fractional shares
of AMB common stock.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of
shares you own. The combination of AMB and
ProLogis cannot be completed without the approval of both the
AMB stockholders and the ProLogis shareholders, including the
approval by AMB stockholders of certain amendments to the AMB
bylaws. Each of AMB and ProLogis is holding a special meeting to
vote on the proposals necessary to complete the merger
transactions. We urge you to read this joint proxy
statement/prospectus carefully. The obligations of AMB and
ProLogis to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction
or waiver of several conditions set forth in the merger
agreement. More information about AMB, ProLogis, the special
meetings and the merger is included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You should also consider carefully the
risks that are described in the Risk Factors section
beginning on page 23.
Whether or not you plan to attend your companys special
meeting, please submit your proxy as soon as possible to make
sure that your shares of AMB common stock or ProLogis common
shares are represented at that meeting.
The AMB board of directors recommends that AMB stockholders
vote FOR the proposal to approve the merger with
ProLogis, including the issuance of AMB common stock and
preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders, the proposed
amendments to the AMB bylaws, which approvals are necessary to
complete the merger, and the proposed amendments to the AMB
charter.
The ProLogis board of trustees recommends that ProLogis
shareholders vote FOR the proposal to approve the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
which approval is necessary to complete the merger.
We join our respective boards in their recommendation, and look
forward to the successful combination of AMB and ProLogis.
|
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
Sincerely,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hamid R. Moghadam
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Walter C. Rakowich
Chief Executive Officer
ProLogis
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or determined that this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is accurate or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated April 28,
2011 and is first being mailed to the stockholders of AMB and
shareholders of ProLogis on or about May 2, 2011.
AMB
Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 394-9000
NOTICE
OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On June 1, 2011
Dear Stockholders of AMB Property Corporation:
We are pleased to invite you to attend a special meeting of
stockholders of AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland
corporation. The meeting will be held at AMB Property
Corporations global headquarters, which are located at
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111,
on June 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., local time, to consider and
vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the merger of New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland
corporation and currently a wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis,
with and into AMB, with AMB continuing as the surviving
corporation (which will occur following the merger of an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of New Pumpkin with and into
ProLogis), including the issuance of AMB common stock and
preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection therewith;
|
|
|
a proposal to amend certain provisions of the amended and
restated bylaws of AMB, which will be the bylaws of the combined
company, effective upon the consummation of the merger described
above, to provide for certain features of the leadership
structure of the combined company;
|
|
|
a proposal to amend the AMB charter (which, including the AMB
articles of incorporation, we refer to as the AMB
charter), which will be the charter of the combined
company, effective upon the consummation of the merger, to
provide that (1) the board of directors of the combined
company, with the approval of a majority of the entire board,
and without action by the stockholders of the combined company,
may amend the charter of the combined company to increase or
decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock of the combined
company or the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that the combined company has authority to issue and (2)
notwithstanding any provision of law permitting or requiring any
action to be taken or approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of shares entitled to cast a greater number of votes,
any such action shall be effective and valid if declared
advisable by the board of directors and taken or approved by the
affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast a
majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter,
provided that (i) any amendment to any provision of the
charter which expressly requires for any purpose a greater
proportion of the votes entitled to be cast shall require the
proportion of votes specified in that provision, (ii) any
amendment to this provision shall require the affirmative vote
of the holders of shares entitled to cast two-thirds of all of
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter and (iii) any
action requiring a different vote as expressly provided in the
charter shall require such different vote; and
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the AMB special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the above proposals if there are
insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve
such proposals.
|
The approval by AMB stockholders of both the proposal to approve
the merger and the proposal to amend certain provisions of the
bylaws is required for the completion of the merger. However,
approval of the proposal to amend the AMB charter is not a
condition to completion of the merger.
Please refer to the attached joint proxy statement/prospectus
for further information with respect to the business to be
transacted at the AMB special meeting.
Holders of record of shares of AMB common stock at the close of
business on April 21, 2011 are entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournments or
postponements of the special meeting.
The proposal to approve the merger, including the issuance of
AMB common and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in
connection therewith, requires the affirmative vote of holders
of two-thirds of the outstanding AMB common stock. The proposal
to approve the bylaw amendment requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding AMB common stock.
The proposal to approve the amendment to the AMB charter
requires the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding AMB common stock. A proposal to adjourn the AMB
special meeting would require the affirmative vote of holders of
a majority of the AMB common stock, represented in person or by
proxy, at the AMB special meeting and entitled to vote on the
proposal.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend
the AMB special meeting in person, we urge you to vote your
shares as promptly as possible by (1) accessing the
Internet website specified on your proxy card; (2) calling
the toll-free number specified on your proxy card; or
(3) signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the
postage-paid envelope provided, so that your shares may be
represented and voted at the AMB special meeting. If your
shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other
fiduciary, please follow the instructions on the voting
instruction card furnished by the record holder.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
TAMRA D. BROWNE, ESQ.
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
April 28, 2011
San Francisco, California
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, CO 80239
(303) 567-5761
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held On June 1,
2011
Dear Shareholders of ProLogis:
We are pleased to invite you to attend a special meeting of
shareholders of ProLogis, a Maryland real estate investment
trust. The meeting will be held at ProLogis world
headquarters, 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239, on
June 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., local time, to consider and
vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the merger of Pumpkin LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of ProLogis, with and into ProLogis, with ProLogis continuing as
the surviving entity and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland corporation and current wholly
owned subsidiary of ProLogis, followed by the merger of New
Pumpkin with and into AMB Property Corporation, with AMB
continuing as the surviving corporation under the name
ProLogis, Inc., pursuant to which each outstanding
ProLogis common share of beneficial interest will be converted
into the right to receive 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB
common stock (we refer to the foregoing mergers together as the
Merger); and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the ProLogis special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the proposal to approve the Merger if there
are insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to
approve such proposal.
|
Please refer to the attached joint proxy statement/prospectus
for further information with respect to the business to be
transacted at the ProLogis special meeting.
Holders of record of ProLogis common shares at the close of
business on April 21, 2011 are entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, the special meeting and any adjournments or
postponements of the special meeting.
The proposal to approve the Merger requires the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis common
shares. A proposal to adjourn the ProLogis special meeting would
require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on
the matter by the holders of the ProLogis common shares
represented, in person or by proxy, at the ProLogis special
meeting.
Your vote is important. Whether or not you expect to attend
the ProLogis special meeting in person, we urge you to vote your
shares as promptly as possible by (1) accessing the
Internet website specified on your proxy card; (2) calling
the toll-free number specified on your proxy card; or
(3) signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the
postage-paid envelope provided, so that your shares may be
represented and voted at the ProLogis special meeting. If
your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other
fiduciary, please follow the instructions on the voting
instruction card furnished by the record holder.
For the Board of Trustees,
Edward S. Nekritz
Secretary
April 28, 2011
Denver, Colorado
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
important business and financial information about AMB and
ProLogis from other documents that are not included in or
delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
information is available to you without charge upon your
request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting them in
writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the
following addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
ProLogis
|
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 394-9000
Attn: Investor Relations
|
|
4545 Airport Way
Denver, Colorado 80239
(800) 820-0181
Attn: Investor Relations
|
or
|
|
or
|
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
|
|
Georgeson Inc.
|
105 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10016
Call Collect:
(212) 929-5500
Call Toll Free
(800) 322-2885
Email: proxy@mackenziepartners.com
|
|
199 Water Street 26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800
Call Toll Free: (888) 867-6963
|
Investors may also consult the websites of AMB or ProLogis for
more information concerning the Merger described in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The website of AMB is www.AMB.com
and the website of ProLogis is www.ProLogis.com.
Information included on these websites is not incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
If you would like to request any documents, please do so by
May 25, 2011 in order to receive them before the
meetings.
For more information, see Where You Can Find More
Information.
ABOUT
THIS DOCUMENT
This joint proxy statement/prospectus, which forms part of a
registration statement on
Form S-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by AMB
Property Corporation (File
No. 333-172741),
constitutes a prospectus of AMB under Section 5 of the
U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (which we refer to
as the Securities Act), with respect to the AMB
common stock and AMB preferred stock to be issued to ProLogis
shareholders in connection with the Merger. This document also
constitutes a joint proxy statement of AMB and ProLogis under
Section 14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (which we refer to as the Exchange
Act). It also constitutes a notice of meeting with respect
to the special meeting of AMB stockholders and a notice of
meeting with respect to the special meeting of ProLogis
shareholders, at which AMB stockholders and ProLogis
shareholders, respectively, will be asked to vote upon certain
proposals to approve the Merger and certain related matters.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you
with information that is different from that contained in, or
incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is
dated April 27, 2011. You should not assume that the
information contained in, or incorporated by reference into,
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date
other than the date on the front cover of those documents.
Neither our mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
AMB stockholders or ProLogis shareholders nor the issuance of
AMB common stock or preferred stock in connection with the
Merger will create any implication to the contrary.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any
securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction
in which or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any
such offer or solicitation in such jurisdiction. Information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding AMB
has been provided by AMB and information contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus regarding ProLogis has been provided
by ProLogis.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS
The following are answers to some questions that you, as a
stockholder of AMB Property Corporation (which we refer to as
AMB) or a shareholder of ProLogis, may have
regarding the proposed transactions between AMB and ProLogis and
the other matters being considered at the stockholder meeting of
AMB and at the shareholder meeting of ProLogis. AMB and ProLogis
urge you to read carefully the remainder of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus because the information in this section
does not provide all the information that might be important to
you with respect to the Merger and the other matters being
considered at the special meetings. Additional important
information is also contained in the annexes to and the
documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the Merger? |
|
A: |
|
AMB and ProLogis have agreed to a merger of equals between AMB
and ProLogis under the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of January 30, 2011 and amended as of
March 9, 2011 (which we refer to as the merger
agreement), by and among AMB, AMB Property, L.P. (which we
refer to as AMB LP), ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin LLC
(which we refer to as Upper Pumpkin), New Pumpkin
Inc. (which we refer to as New Pumpkin) and Pumpkin
LLC. Each of Pumpkin LLC, Upper Pumpkin, and New Pumpkin is a
direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis. A copy
of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
Pursuant to the merger agreement, AMB and ProLogis will combine
through a multi-step process: |
|
|
|
first, ProLogis will be reorganized into an umbrella
partnership real estate investment trust (which we refer to as
an UPREIT) by merging Pumpkin LLC with and into
ProLogis, with ProLogis continuing as the surviving entity and
as a wholly owned subsidiary of Upper Pumpkin and an indirect
wholly owned subsidiary of New Pumpkin (we refer to this as the
ProLogis merger);
|
|
|
|
following the ProLogis merger, New Pumpkin will be
merged with and into AMB, with AMB continuing as the surviving
corporation under the name of ProLogis, Inc. (we
refer to this as the Topco merger, and we refer to
the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger together as the
Merger); and
|
|
|
|
following the Topco merger, the combined company
will contribute all of the outstanding equity interests of Upper
Pumpkin to AMB LP (which we refer to as the
contribution), in exchange for the issuance of
equity interests in AMB LP (which we refer to as the
issuance), and AMB LP will be renamed
ProLogis, L.P..
|
|
|
|
ProLogis will continue its existence as a subsidiary of the
combined company. The shares of common stock of the combined
company will be listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol
PLD. |
|
Q: |
|
Why is the combined company being structured as an UPREIT? |
|
A: |
|
The parties believe that the UPREIT structure, by which the
combined company will own substantially all of its assets and
conduct substantially all of its operations through an operating
partnership, will give the combined company greater flexibility
to acquire assets using a tax-deferred acquisition currency. |
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
The Merger cannot be completed unless: |
|
|
|
the holders of AMB common stock vote to approve the
Topco merger (including the issuance of AMB common stock and
preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the
Topco merger);
|
|
|
|
the holders of AMB common stock vote to approve a
proposal to amend certain provisions of the amended and restated
bylaws of AMB (we refer to the amended and restated bylaws of
AMB as the AMB bylaws and to the amendment as the
bylaw amendment), which will be the bylaws of the
combined company effective upon the consummation of the Topco
merger, to provide for certain features of the leadership
structure of the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
the holders of ProLogis common shares of beneficial
interest (which we refer to as ProLogis common
shares) vote to approve the Merger.
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
Each of AMB and ProLogis will hold separate special meetings to
obtain these approvals. At the AMB special meeting, AMB
stockholders also will be asked to vote to approve certain
amendments to the AMB charter (we refer to the AMB charter,
including the AMB articles of incorporation, as the AMB
charter and to the amendments as the charter
amendment). However, approval of the proposal to amend the
AMB charter is not a condition to completion of the Topco merger. |
|
|
|
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains important
information about the Merger and the other proposals being voted
on at the special meetings, and you should read it carefully. It
is a joint proxy statement because the AMB board of directors is
soliciting proxies from its stockholders and the ProLogis board
of trustees is soliciting proxies from its shareholders. It is a
prospectus because AMB will issue shares of its common stock and
preferred stock in the Topco merger. The enclosed voting
materials allow you to vote your shares without attending your
respective meeting. |
|
|
|
Your vote is important. We encourage you to vote as soon as
possible. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where will the special meetings be held? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The AMB special meeting will be held at AMB Property
Corporations global headquarters, which are located at
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, on
June 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., local time. The ProLogis
special meeting will be held at ProLogis world
headquarters, 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239, on
June 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., local time. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a holder of record of AMB common stock as of the
record date for the AMB special meeting or a holder of record of
ProLogis common shares as of the record date for the ProLogis
special meeting, you may vote in person by attending your
special meeting or, to ensure your shares are represented at the
meeting, you may vote by: |
|
|
|
accessing the Internet website specified on your
proxy card;
|
|
|
|
calling the toll-free number specified on your proxy
card; or
|
|
|
|
signing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the
postage-paid envelope provided.
|
|
|
|
If you hold AMB common stock or ProLogis common shares in the
name of a broker, bank or nominee, please follow the voting
instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee to ensure
that your stock or shares are represented at your special
meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What am I being asked to vote upon? |
|
A: |
|
AMB. AMB stockholders are being asked to vote
to approve the Topco merger (including the issuance of AMB
common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in
connection with the Topco merger), to approve the bylaw
amendment and to approve the charter amendment. |
|
|
|
ProLogis. ProLogis shareholders are being
asked to vote to approve the Merger. |
|
|
|
The Merger cannot be completed without the approval by AMB
stockholders of the proposals relating to the Topco merger and
the bylaw amendment and cannot be completed without the approval
by ProLogis shareholders of the proposal relating to the Merger.
However, approval of the proposal to amend the AMB charter is
not a condition to completion of the Merger. |
|
Q: |
|
How do the AMB board of directors and the ProLogis board of
trustees recommend that I vote? |
|
A: |
|
AMB. The AMB board of directors unanimously
recommends that holders of AMB common stock vote
FOR the Topco merger (including the issuance
of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders
in connection with the Topco merger), FOR the
bylaw amendment, FOR the charter amendment
and FOR the AMB adjournment proposal. |
|
|
|
ProLogis. The ProLogis board of trustees
unanimously recommends that holders of ProLogis common shares
vote FOR the Merger and FOR
the ProLogis adjournment proposal. |
v
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve each proposal? |
|
A: |
|
AMB. The proposals at the AMB special meeting
to approve the Topco merger (including the issuance of AMB
common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in
connection with the Topco merger), and to approve the charter
amendment each require approval by the affirmative vote of
holders of two-thirds of the outstanding AMB common stock. The
proposal to approve the bylaw amendment requires approval by the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding AMB
common stock. The proposal to adjourn the AMB special meeting,
if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies
requires approval by the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of AMB common stock represented, in
person or by proxy, at the AMB special meeting and entitled to
vote on the proposal. |
|
|
|
ProLogis. The proposal at the ProLogis special
meeting to approve the Merger requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis common
shares. The proposal to adjourn the ProLogis special meeting, if
necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies requires
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the
matter by the holders of the ProLogis common shares represented,
in person or by proxy, at the ProLogis special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How many votes do I have? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
AMB. You are entitled to one vote for each
share of AMB common stock that you owned as of the close of
business on the record date. As of the close of business on
April 21, 2011, the record date for the AMB special
meeting, there were 169,550,440 outstanding shares of AMB common
stock, approximately 2.5% of which were beneficially owned by
the directors and executive officers of AMB. |
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis. You are entitled to one vote for
each ProLogis common share that you owned as of the close of
business on the record date. As of the close of business on
April 21, 2011, the record date for the ProLogis special
meeting, there were approximately 570,550,345 outstanding
ProLogis common shares, less than 1% of which were beneficially
owned by the trustees and executive officers of ProLogis. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
A: |
|
AMB. Stockholders who hold a majority of the
AMB common stock outstanding on the record date and who are
entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy to
constitute a quorum at the AMB special meeting. |
|
|
|
ProLogis. Shareholders who hold a majority of
the ProLogis common shares outstanding on the record date and
who are entitled to vote must be present or represented by proxy
to constitute a quorum at the ProLogis special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
If you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or if your
shares are held by a bank or nominee (that is, in street
name), you must provide the record holder of your shares
with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the
voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee.
Please note that you may not vote shares held in street name by
returning a proxy card directly to AMB or ProLogis or by voting
in person at your special meeting unless you provide a
legal proxy, which you must obtain from your broker,
bank or nominee. Further, brokers who hold shares of AMB common
stock or ProLogis common shares on behalf of their customers may
not give a proxy to AMB or ProLogis to vote those shares without
specific instructions from their customers. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if I fail to vote or I abstain from
voting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
AMB. If you are an AMB stockholder and fail to
vote, fail to instruct your broker, bank or nominee to vote or
abstain from voting, it will have the same effect as a vote
against the Topco merger (including the issuance of AMB common
stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection
with the Topco merger), a vote against the bylaw amendment and a
vote against the charter amendment. If you fail to vote or fail
to instruct your broker, bank or nominee to vote, and as a
result your shares are not represented at the meeting, it will
have no effect on the adjournment proposal. If your shares are
represented at the meeting but you abstain from voting or your
shares are otherwise not voted in favor of the adjournment
proposal, it will have the effect of a vote against that
proposal. |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis. If you are a ProLogis shareholder
and fail to vote, fail to instruct your broker, bank or nominee
to vote or abstain from voting, it will have the same effect as
a vote against the proposal to approve the Merger, but it will
have no effect on the ProLogis adjournment proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if I fail to instruct my broker, bank or
nominee how to vote? |
|
A: |
|
AMB. If you are an AMB stockholder and you do
not instruct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your
shares, your broker may not vote your shares on the proposal to
approve the Topco merger, the proposal to approve the bylaw
amendment or the proposal to approve the charter amendment. This
will have the same effect as a vote against each of such
proposals. |
|
|
|
ProLogis. If you are a ProLogis shareholder
and you fail to instruct your broker, bank or nominee to vote,
it will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to
approve the Merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I return my proxy card without indicating how to
vote? |
|
A: |
|
If you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how to
vote on any particular proposal, your shares will be voted in
accordance with the recommendation of the AMB board of directors
or ProLogis board of trustees, as applicable, with respect to
such proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have returned a proxy or voting
instruction card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at your special meeting. You can do this in one of three
ways: |
|
|
|
you can send a signed notice of revocation;
|
|
|
|
you can grant a new, valid proxy bearing a later
date; or
|
|
|
|
if you are a holder of record, you can attend your
special meeting and vote in person, which will automatically
cancel any proxy previously given, or you may revoke your proxy
in person, but your attendance alone will not revoke any proxy
that you have previously given.
|
|
|
|
If you choose either of the first two methods, you must submit
your notice of revocation or your new proxy to the secretary of
AMB or secretary of ProLogis, as appropriate, no later than the
beginning of the applicable special meeting. If your shares are
held in street name by your broker, bank or nominee, you should
contact your broker, bank or nominee to change your vote. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the Merger to U.S. holders of ProLogis common shares? |
|
A: |
|
Each of the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger is intended to
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. Assuming each of the ProLogis merger and the Topco
merger qualifies as a reorganization, a U.S. holder of ProLogis
common shares generally will not recognize any gain or loss upon
surrender of ProLogis common shares and receipt of shares of AMB
common stock, except with respect to cash received in lieu of a
fractional share of AMB common stock. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the Merger to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
AMB and ProLogis are working to complete the Merger in the
second quarter of 2011. However, the Merger is subject to
various regulatory approvals and other conditions, and it is
possible that factors outside the control of both companies
could result in the Merger being completed at a later time, or
not at all. There may be a substantial amount of time between
the respective AMB and ProLogis special meetings and the
completion of the Merger. AMB and ProLogis expect to complete
the Merger as soon as reasonably practicable following the
receipt of all required approvals. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
Carefully read and consider the information contained in and
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including its annexes. |
|
|
|
In order for your shares to be represented at your special
meeting: |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
you can attend your special meeting in person;
|
|
|
|
you can vote through the Internet or by telephone by
following the instructions included on your proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
you can indicate on the enclosed proxy or voting
instruction card how you would like to vote and return the card
in the accompanying postage-paid envelope.
|
|
Q: |
|
Do I need to do anything with my share certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. You should not submit your share certificates at
this time. After the Merger is completed, if you held
certificates representing ProLogis common shares or preferred
shares prior to the Merger, the exchange agent for the combined
company will send you a letter of transmittal and instructions
for exchanging your shares for the merger consideration. Upon
surrender of the certificates for cancellation along with the
executed letter of transmittal and other required documents
described in the instructions, a ProLogis shareholder will
receive the merger consideration. |
|
|
|
If you are an AMB stockholder, you are not required to take any
action with respect to your AMB stock certificates. Such
certificates will continue to represent shares of the combined
company after the Topco merger. However, after the Topco merger
is completed, the exchange agent for the combined company will
send you a letter of transmittal and instructions for exchanging
your AMB stock certificates for stock certificates of the
combined company. Upon surrender of the certificates for
cancellation along with the executed letter of transmittal and
other required documents described in the instructions, an AMB
stockholder will receive a stock certificate of the combined
company. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I need identification to attend the AMB special meeting or
ProLogis special meeting in person? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. Please bring proper identification, together with proof
that you are a record owner of AMB common stock or ProLogis
common shares. If your shares are held in street name or through
an AMB or ProLogis retirement plan, please bring acceptable
proof of ownership, such as a letter from your broker or an
account statement stating or showing that you beneficially owned
shares of AMB common stock or ProLogis common shares, as
applicable, on the applicable record date. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
AMB stockholders or ProLogis shareholders who have questions
about the Merger or the other matters to be voted on at the
special meetings or who desire additional copies of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or additional proxy or voting
instruction cards should contact: |
|
|
|
if you are an AMB stockholder:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc. 105 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10016 (212) 929-5500 (Call Collect) or Call Toll-Free (800) 322-2885
|
|
if you are a ProLogis shareholder:
Georgeson Inc. 199 Water Street - 26th Floor New York, New York 10038 Banks and Brokers Call: (212) 440-9800 or Call Toll Free: (888) 867-6963
|
Email: proxy@mackenziepartners.com
|
|
|
viii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all
the information that is important to you. AMB and ProLogis urge
you to read carefully the remainder of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the attached annexes, and the
other documents to which we have referred you because this
section does not provide all the information that might be
important to you with respect to the Merger and the related
matters being considered at the applicable special meeting. See
also Where You Can Find More Information. We have
included page references to direct you to a more complete
description of the topics presented in this summary.
Information
about the Companies
AMB
Property Corporation
(See
page 31)
AMB, a Maryland corporation, is a self-administered and
self-managed real estate investment trust (which we refer to as
a REIT) for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
AMB, together with its subsidiaries, is a global owner, operator
and developer of industrial real estate, focused on major hub
and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and
Asia. As of December 31, 2010, the company owned, or had
investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development
projects expected to total approximately 159.6 million
square feet (14.8 million square meters) in 49 markets
within 15 countries.
The business of AMB is operated primarily through its operating
partnership, AMB Property, L.P. (which we refer to as AMB
LP). As of December 31, 2010, AMB owned an
approximate 98.2% general partnership interest in AMB LP,
excluding preferred units, and, as its sole general partner, AMB
has the full, exclusive and complete responsibility for and
discretion in the
day-to-day
management and control of AMB LP. AMB LP holds substantially all
the assets of AMB and directly or indirectly holds the ownership
interests in AMBs joint ventures.
The principal offices of AMB are located at Pier 1, Bay 1,
San Francisco, California 94111 and its telephone number is
(415) 394-9000.
AMB common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (which
we refer to as the NYSE), trading under the symbol
AMB.
Additional information about AMB and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and Where You Can Find More
Information.
ProLogis
(See
page 31)
ProLogis, a Maryland real estate investment trust, is the
leading global provider of distribution facilities, with more
than 435 million square feet (40 million square
meters) of industrial space in markets across North America,
Europe and Asia. The company leases its industrial facilities to
more than 4,400 customers, including manufacturers, retailers,
transportation companies, third-party logistics providers and
other enterprises with large-scale distribution needs. ProLogis
owns and manages a global portfolio of properties in 19
countries, comprising over $31 billion in assets. New
Pumpkin, a Maryland corporation, Upper Pumpkin, a Delaware
limited liability company, and Pumpkin LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company, are direct or indirect wholly owned
subsidiaries of ProLogis and were formed for the purpose of
effecting the Merger.
The principal offices of ProLogis are located at 4545 Airport
Way, Denver, Colorado 80239 and its telephone number is
(303) 567-5000.
ProLogis common shares of beneficial interest (which we refer to
as ProLogis common shares) are listed on the NYSE,
trading under the symbol PLD.
Additional information about ProLogis and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and Where You Can Find More
Information.
The
Combined Company
(See
page 32)
The combined company will be named ProLogis, Inc.
and will be a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered
and self-managed REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The combined company is expected to be a leading global owner,
operator and developer of industrial real estate. The combined
company is expected to have a pro forma equity market
capitalization of approximately $14 billion, a total market
capitalization in excess of
1
$24 billion, and gross assets owned and managed of
approximately $46 billion. The combined company will own or
manage approximately 600 million square feet (approximately
55 million square meters) of modern distribution facilities
located in key gateway markets and logistics corridors in 22
countries.
References to the combined company in this document
shall be to AMB Property Corporation after the effective time of
the Merger, which will be renamed as ProLogis, Inc.
The business of the combined company will be operated through an
operating partnership, ProLogis, L.P. On a pro forma basis
giving effect to the Merger, the combined company will own an
approximate 99.3% general partnership interest in the operating
partnership, excluding preferred units, and, as its sole general
partner, the combined company will have the full, exclusive and
complete responsibility for and discretion in the
day-to-day
management and control of the operating partnership.
The corporate headquarters of the combined company will be
located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111
and its telephone number will be
(415) 394-9000.
The operational headquarters of the combined company will be
located at 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239 and its
telephone number will be
(303) 567-5000.
The common stock of the combined company will be listed on the
NYSE, trading under the symbol PLD.
Risk
Factors (See page 23)
Before voting at the AMB special meeting or the ProLogis special
meeting, you should carefully consider all of the information
contained in or as incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, as well as the specific factors
under the heading Risk Factors.
The
Merger
The
Merger Agreement
(See
page 77)
AMB and ProLogis have entered into the merger agreement attached
as Annex A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
AMB board of directors and the ProLogis board of trustees have
both unanimously approved the combination of AMB and ProLogis in
what the parties intend to be a merger of equals.
AMB and ProLogis encourage you to read the entire merger
agreement carefully because it is the principal legal document
governing the Merger.
Form
of the Merger
(See
page 77)
Pursuant to the merger agreement, AMB and ProLogis will combine
through a multi-step process:
|
|
|
|
|
first, in the ProLogis merger, ProLogis will be reorganized into
an UPREIT by merging Pumpkin LLC with and into ProLogis, with
ProLogis continuing as the surviving entity and as a wholly
owned subsidiary of Upper Pumpkin and an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of New Pumpkin;
|
|
|
|
following the ProLogis merger, in the Topco merger, New Pumpkin
will be merged with and into AMB, with AMB continuing as the
surviving corporation under the name of ProLogis,
Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
following the Topco merger, the combined company will contribute
all of the outstanding equity interests of Upper Pumpkin to AMB
LP, which will be renamed ProLogis, L.P., in
exchange for the issuance of partnership units to the combined
company.
|
ProLogis will continue its existence as a subsidiary of the
combined company. The shares of common stock of the combined
company will be listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol
PLD.
We expect that the former shareholders of ProLogis and the
former stockholders of AMB will own approximately 60% and 40%,
respectively, of the outstanding common stock of the combined
company.
Merger
Consideration
(See
page 77)
Upon completion of the Merger, holders of ProLogis common shares
will receive 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB common stock
for each ProLogis common share they own at the effective time of
the Topco merger,
2
with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. The exchange ratio
is fixed and will not be adjusted for changes in the market
value of ProLogis common shares or AMB common stock. Because of
this, the implied value of the consideration to ProLogis
shareholders will fluctuate between now and the completion of
the Merger. Based on the closing price of AMB common stock on
the NYSE of $32.86 on January 26, 2011, the last trading
day before ProLogis common share and AMB common stock prices may
have been affected by market speculation regarding a potential
transaction involving the companies, the exchange ratio
represented approximately $14.67 in AMB common stock for each
ProLogis common share. Based on the closing price of AMB common
stock on the NYSE of $32.93 on January 28, 2011, the last
trading day before public announcement of the Merger, the
exchange ratio represented approximately $14.70 in AMB common
stock for each ProLogis common share. Based on the closing price
of AMB common stock on the NYSE of $36.52 on April 26,
2011, the latest practicable date before the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio represented
approximately $16.30 in AMB common stock for each ProLogis
common share. See Comparative Stock Prices and
Dividends.
The following table presents trading information for AMB common
stock and ProLogis common shares on January 26, 2011, the
last trading day before ProLogis common share and AMB common
stock prices may have been affected by market speculation
regarding a potential transaction involving the companies,
January 28, 2011, the last trading day before public
announcement of the Merger, and April 26, 2011, the latest
practicable date before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Equivalent per share prices for ProLogis
common shares, adjusted by the exchange ratio of 0.4464, are
also provided for each of these dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
AMB Common Stock
|
|
ProLogis Common
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
(Close)
|
|
Shares (Close)
|
|
Price
|
|
January 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
32.86
|
|
|
$
|
14.70
|
|
|
$
|
14.67
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
32.93
|
|
|
$
|
15.21
|
|
|
$
|
14.70
|
|
April 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
36.52
|
|
|
$
|
16.43
|
|
|
$
|
16.30
|
|
The market prices of AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares
fluctuate. As a result, we urge you to obtain current market
quotations of AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares.
Treatment
of ProLogis Share Options and Other Equity-Based Awards
(See
page 78)
Upon completion of the Topco merger, outstanding share options
to purchase ProLogis common shares, share unit awards with
respect to ProLogis common shares, dividend equivalent units
with respect to ProLogis common shares and performance share
awards denominated in ProLogis common shares will generally be
converted into stock options, stock unit awards, dividend
equivalent units and performance stock awards with respect to
common stock of the combined company, after giving effect to the
exchange ratio. Equity awards of AMB will remain outstanding
upon completion of the Merger as equity awards of the combined
company.
The ProLogis Employee Share Purchase Plan will be automatically
suspended effective as of the earlier of June 30, 2011 or
ProLogis payroll period ending immediately prior to the
closing of the Topco merger, but in no event less than ten
business days prior to the closing of the Topco merger, and any
contributions made for the offering period in effect as of
January 30, 2011, the date of the merger agreement, will be
applied to the purchase of ProLogis common shares, and any cash
remaining in the ProLogis Employee Share Purchase Plan after
such suspension date will be promptly refunded to plan
participants. See The Merger Treatment of
ProLogis Share Options and Other Equity-Based Awards.
Treatment
of ProLogis Preferred Shares in the Merger
(See
page 77)
Upon completion of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
each outstanding Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share of Beneficial Interest of ProLogis (which we refer to as
ProLogis Series C preferred shares) will be
exchanged for one newly issued share of Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, Series Q, of AMB (which we refer to as
AMB Series Q preferred stock);
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
each outstanding Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share of Beneficial Interest of ProLogis (which we refer to as
ProLogis Series F preferred shares) will be
exchanged for one newly issued share of Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, Series R, of AMB (which we refer to as
AMB Series R preferred stock); and
|
|
|
|
each outstanding Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Share of Beneficial Interest of ProLogis (which we refer to as
ProLogis Series G preferred shares) will be
exchanged for one newly issued share of Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, Series S, of AMB (which we refer to as
AMB Series S preferred stock).
|
Recommendations
of the AMB Board of Directors
(See
page 39)
After careful consideration, the AMB board of directors, on
January 30, 2011, unanimously approved the merger agreement
and declared the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby (including the Topco merger, the bylaw
amendment and the charter amendment) to be advisable and in the
best interests of AMB and the stockholders of AMB.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that holders
of AMB common stock vote FOR the Topco merger
(including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock
to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco merger),
FOR the bylaw amendment, FOR
the charter amendment and FOR the AMB
adjournment proposal.
For the factors considered by the AMB board of directors in
reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
recommendations of the AMB board of directors, see The
Merger AMBs Reasons for the Topco Merger;
Recommendations of the AMB Board of Directors.
Recommendation
of the ProLogis Board of Trustees
(See
page 42)
After careful consideration, the ProLogis board of trustees, on
January 30, 2011, unanimously approved the merger agreement
and declared the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the Merger, to be advisable and
in the best interests of ProLogis and the shareholders of
ProLogis.
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously recommends that the
ProLogis shareholders vote FOR the proposal
to approve the Merger and FOR the ProLogis
adjournment proposal.
For the factors considered by the ProLogis board of trustees in
reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
recommendations of the ProLogis board of trustees, see The
Merger ProLogis Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendations of the ProLogis Board of Trustees.
Opinion
of AMBs Financial Advisor
(See
page 45)
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (which we refer to as J.P.
Morgan) delivered its opinion to the AMB board of
directors that, as of January 30, 2011, and based upon and
subject to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications
and limitations set forth therein, the exchange ratio of 0.4464
provided for in the Topco merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to AMB. The full text of the written opinion of
J.P. Morgan, dated January 30, 2011, which sets forth
the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered,
and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by
J.P. Morgan in connection with its opinion, is attached
hereto as Annex D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and is incorporated herein by reference. The opinion of
J.P. Morgan was directed to the AMB board of directors for
the information and assistance of the AMB board of directors in
connection with its evaluation of the Topco merger and addressed
only the fairness as of the date of the opinion, from a
financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to AMB. The
opinion of J.P. Morgan was not intended to, and does not,
constitute a recommendation to any holder of AMB common stock as
to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to the
Topco merger or any other matter.
4
Opinion
of ProLogis Financial Advisor
(See
page 52)
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (which we refer to
as Morgan Stanley) delivered its opinion to the
ProLogis board of trustees that, as of January 30, 2011,
and based upon and subject to the assumptions, procedures,
factors, qualifications and limitations set forth therein, the
exchange ratio of 0.4464 pursuant to the merger agreement was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of ProLogis
common shares. The full text of the written opinion of Morgan
Stanley, dated January 30, 2011, which sets forth the
assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and
qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by
Morgan Stanley in connection with its opinion, is attached
hereto as Annex E to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and is incorporated herein by reference. The opinion of Morgan
Stanley was directed to the ProLogis board of trustees,
addressed only the fairness as of the date of the opinion, from
a financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to the holders
of ProLogis common shares and does not address any other aspect
of the transaction. The opinion of Morgan Stanley was not
intended to, and does not, constitute a recommendation to any
holder of ProLogis common shares or AMB common stock as to how
such shareholder or stockholder should vote or act with respect
to the Merger or any matter.
Interests
of AMB Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
(See
page 65)
In considering the recommendation of the AMB board of directors
that AMB stockholders vote to approve the Topco merger, AMB
stockholders should be aware that some of the executive officers
and directors of AMB have financial interests in the Merger that
are different from, or in addition to, the interests of AMB
stockholders generally. The AMB board of directors was aware of
and considered these interests, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the Topco
merger, in approving the merger agreement, and in recommending
that the AMB stockholders approve the Topco merger (including
the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis
shareholders in connection with the Topco merger). For purposes
of all of the AMB agreements and plans described below, the
completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will constitute a change in control of AMB.
In connection with the Topco merger, AMB LP entered into letter
agreements with each AMB executive officer which, conditioned
upon and effective as of the consummation of the Topco merger,
amend their existing change in control agreements with AMB LP.
The general purpose of such amendments was to provide that the
vesting of the equity awards held by the AMB executive officers
would accelerate only upon a severance-qualifying termination
following a change in control (instead of immediate acceleration
following the change in control). These change in control
agreements with AMB LP, as amended by the letter agreements,
provide severance and other benefits in the case of qualifying
terminations of employment within two years following a change
in control of AMB, such as the Topco merger or another change in
control of the combined company.
The terms of the deferred compensation plans of AMB provide that
upon a change in control, such as the Topco merger, participants
will receive a lump-sum payment equal to his or her vested
account balance. Each of AMBs executive officers (with the
exception of Mr. Eugene F. Reilly) is a participant under
such plans. Conditioned upon the consummation of the Topco
merger, AMB also adopted a new supplemental non-qualified
deferred compensation plan to provide an opportunity for
participants under AMBs existing deferred compensation
plan to continue to receive tax-deferred earnings with respect
to the shares or cash withheld to pay taxes as a result of the
required, non-waivable, distributions under the existing
deferred compensation plans which will be triggered by the
consummation of the Topco merger. These grants would not make
participants whole for taxes paid on the required distributions,
but only whole to the extent that those taxes will be paid
earlier than both they and AMB anticipated when deferrals under
the existing deferred compensation plans were made.
Following the consummation of the Merger, Mr. Hamid R.
Moghadam, Ms. Lydia H. Kennard, Mr. J. Michael Losh,
Mr. Jeffrey L. Skelton and Mr. Carl B. Webb, each of
whom is currently a member of the AMB board of directors, will
be elected to the board of directors of the combined company.
Mr. Moghadam will serve as chairman and co-chief executive
officer of the combined company until no later than
December 31, 2012, following which he will become sole
chief executive officer and remain chairman of the combined
company. Mr. Olinger, the current chief financial officer
of AMB, will serve as the chief integration officer of the
combined company until no later than December 31, 2012,
following which he will become the chief financial officer of
the combined company.
5
Interests
of ProLogis Trustees and Executive Officers in the Merger
(See
page 68)
In considering the recommendation of the ProLogis board of
trustees that ProLogis shareholders vote to approve the Merger,
you should be aware that some of the trustees and executive
officers of ProLogis have interests in the Merger that are
different from, or in addition to, the interests of ProLogis
shareholders generally. The board of trustees of ProLogis was
aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the Merger,
in approving the merger agreement, and in recommending that the
ProLogis shareholders approve the Merger.
In connection with the Topco merger, ProLogis has entered into
letter agreements with certain executive officers (and expects
to enter into letter agreements with other non-executive senior
officers) which, conditioned upon and effective as of the
consummation of the Topco merger, amend their existing executive
protection agreements with ProLogis. These executive protection
agreements with ProLogis, as amended by the letter agreements,
provide severance and other benefit protections in the case of
qualifying terminations of employment for a limited period of
time following the Topco merger or another change in control of
the combined company.
ProLogis also entered into an employment agreement with
Mr. Walter C. Rakowich which will become effective on
January 1, 2012, provided that the Topco merger has
occurred by that date. Among other things, the new employment
agreement provides that he will provide services as the co-chief
executive officer of the combined company until
December 31, 2012, subject to earlier termination in
accordance with its terms. Under the new employment agreement,
Mr. Rakowich waived his right to resign his employment in a
constructive discharge under his current employment agreement
with ProLogis solely due to his position as co-chief executive
officer of the combined company following the consummation of
the Topco merger.
Following the consummation of the Merger, six persons selected
by ProLogis, Mr. Walter C. Rakowich, Mr. Irving F. Lyons III,
Mr. George L. Fotiades, Ms. Christine Garvey, Mr. D. Michael
Steuert and Mr. William D. Zollars, each of whom (other than Mr.
Zollars) is currently a member of the ProLogis board of
trustees, will be elected to the board of directors of the
combined company. Mr. Rakowich will also become the
chairman of the executive committee of the board of directors of
the combined company, and Mr. Lyons will become the lead
independent director of the combined company. In addition,
Mr. Rakowich will become co-chief executive officer of the
combined company, until no later than December 31, 2012,
when his employment as a director and co-chief executive officer
will expire and he will retire from both positions. Furthermore,
Mr. William E. Sullivan, the current chief financial
officer of ProLogis, will become chief financial officer of the
combined company, and his employment as chief financial officer
of the combined company will continue until December 31,
2012, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the
terms of his employment.
See The Merger Interests of ProLogis Trustees
and Executive Officers in the Merger for additional
information about these interests.
Directors
and Management Following the Merger
(See
page 71)
Following the consummation of the Merger, the board of directors
of the combined company will have eleven members, consisting of
Mr. Moghadam, Mr. Rakowich, Mr. Fotiades,
Ms. Garvey, Ms. Kennard, Mr. Losh,
Mr. Lyons, Mr. Skelton, Mr. Steuert,
Mr. Webb and Mr. Zollars. Mr. Moghadam will become
chairman of the board of directors of the combined company and
Mr. Rakowich will become the chairman of the executive
committee of the board of directors of the combined company.
Mr. Lyons will become the lead independent director of the
combined company.
Following the Merger, the senior leadership team of the combined
company will include Mr. Moghadam and Mr. Rakowich as
co-chief executive officers, Mr. Sullivan as chief
financial officer, Mr. Olinger as chief integration
officer, Mr. Michael S. Curless as chief investment
officer, Mr. Guy F. Jaquier as CEO, Private Capital,
Mr. Gary E. Anderson as CEO, Europe & Asia,
Mr. Eugene F. Reilly as CEO, The Americas, Mr. Edward
S. Nekritz as chief legal officer and general counsel and
Ms. Nancy Hemmenway as chief human resources officer.
See The Merger Directors and Management
Following the Merger for additional information about
these interests.
6
Accounting
Treatment
(See
page 73)
AMB and ProLogis prepare their financial statements,
respectively, in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (which we refer to as
GAAP). The Merger will be accounted for by applying
the purchase method of accounting, with ProLogis treated as the
acquirer. See The Merger Accounting
Treatment.
Expected
Timing of the Merger
(See
page 79)
We currently expect to complete the Merger in the second quarter
of 2011, subject to receipt of required shareholder and
regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of the other
closing conditions summarized below. It is possible that factors
outside the control of both companies could result in the Merger
being completed at a later time, or not at all. There may be a
substantial amount of time between the respective AMB and
ProLogis special meetings and the completion of the Merger. AMB
and ProLogis hope to complete the Merger as soon as reasonably
practicable following the receipt of all required approvals.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
(See
page 73)
Competition approvals for the Merger were sought and obtained in
Canada, Germany and Mexico. At any time before or after the
combination, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department
of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, or a
U.S. state attorney general could take action under the
antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public
interest, including seeking to enjoin the Merger or seeking
divestiture of assets of AMB or ProLogis or their subsidiaries.
Private parties may also bring legal actions under the antitrust
laws under certain circumstances. While AMB and ProLogis do not
expect any such action to be taken, they can give no assurance
that a challenge to the Merger will not be made or, if made,
would be unsuccessful. See The Merger
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger.
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger
(See
page 87)
As more fully described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and in the merger agreement, the completion of the Merger
depends on a number of conditions being satisfied or, where
legally permissible, waived. These conditions include, among
others:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of the requisite approvals of AMB stockholders and
ProLogis shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the approval for listing of shares of AMB common stock, AMB
Series R preferred stock and AMB Series S preferred
stock to be issued or reserved for issuance in connection with
the Merger on the NYSE;
|
|
|
|
the SEC having declared effective the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any judgment or other legal prohibition or
binding order of any court or other governmental entity
prohibiting the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of regulatory approvals required in connection with
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the correctness of all representations and warranties made by
the parties in the merger agreement and performance by the
parties of their obligations under the merger agreement (subject
in each case to certain materiality standards);
|
|
|
|
the receipt of a legal opinion from tax counsel of ProLogis
regarding the qualification of the ProLogis merger as a
reorganization for U.S. federal income tax
purposes; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of legal opinions from the respective tax counsels
of AMB and ProLogis regarding the qualification of the Topco
merger as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax
purposes and the qualification of each of the parties as a REIT.
|
We cannot be certain when, or if, the conditions to the Merger
will be satisfied or waived, or that the Merger will be
completed.
7
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
(See
page 90)
The merger agreement may be terminated prior to the effective
time of the Merger, whether before or after the required
approvals of the AMB stockholders and ProLogis shareholders are
obtained:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of AMB and ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if the Merger is not consummated by
September 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if a court or other governmental
entity issues a final and nonappealable order prohibiting the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if the required approvals of either
the AMB stockholders or the ProLogis shareholders are not
obtained;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if there is a breach of the
representations or covenants of the other party that would
result in the failure of the related closing condition to be
satisfied, and such breach is not cured or is not curable by
September 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if the board of the other party
changes its recommendation in favor of the Topco merger, in the
case of the board of AMB, or the ProLogis merger or Topco merger
in the case of the board of ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, if the special meeting of the other
party is not called and held as required by the merger
agreement; or
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis, upon a material breach of the other
partys non-solicitation obligations under the merger
agreement.
|
Expenses
and Termination Fees
(See
page 90)
Generally, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
Merger and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement
will be paid by the party incurring those expenses. See
The Merger The Merger Agreement
Fees and Expenses. The merger agreement further provides
that, upon termination of the merger agreement under certain
circumstances, AMB may be obligated to pay ProLogis a
termination fee of $210 million, ProLogis may be obligated
to pay AMB a termination fee of $315 million and either
party may be obligated to reimburse up to $20 million of
the expenses of the other party. See The
Merger The Merger Agreement Termination
of the Merger Agreement for a complete discussion of the
circumstances under which termination fees will be required to
be paid.
No
Appraisal or Dissenters Rights
(See
page 75)
Under Maryland law, the holders of ProLogis common shares and
preferred shares and AMB common stock and preferred stock are
not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the Merger.
See The Merger No Appraisal or
Dissenters Rights.
Litigation
Relating to the Merger
(See
page 75)
ProLogis, the members of the ProLogis board of trustees, New
Pumpkin, Upper Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC, AMB and AMP LP have each
been named as defendants in lawsuits brought by holders of
ProLogis common shares challenging the Merger and seeking, among
other things, to enjoin the Merger, direct defendants to
exercise their fiduciary duties, rescind the merger agreement
and award the plaintiffs damages and expenses. The parties to
the lawsuits brought in Maryland have executed a memorandum of
understanding that embodies their agreement in principle on the
structure of a proposed settlement, and the parties to the
lawsuits brought in Colorado have also reached an agreement in
principle on a proposed settlement. ProLogis and AMB believe
that the claims are without merit and, absent court approval of
the proposed settlement, intend to vigorously defend against
these actions. See The Merger Litigation
Relating to the Merger for more information about
litigation related to the Merger.
8
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (See
page 94)
Each of the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger is intended to
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (which we refer to as the Code), and the
merger agreement is intended to be and is adopted as a separate
plan of reorganization for each of the ProLogis
merger and the Topco merger for purposes of Sections 354
and 361 of the Code. Assuming each of the ProLogis merger and
the Topco merger qualifies as such a reorganization, a
U.S. holder of ProLogis common shares generally will not
recognize any gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax
purposes upon surrender of ProLogis common shares and receipt of
shares of AMB common stock, except with respect to cash received
in lieu of a fractional share of AMB common stock. It is a
condition to the completion of the Merger that ProLogis receive
a written opinion from its counsel to the effect that the
ProLogis merger will qualify as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, and that AMB and
ProLogis receive written opinions from their respective counsel
to the effect that the Topco merger will qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code.
Tax matters are very complicated and the tax consequences of the
Merger to each ProLogis shareholder may depend on such
shareholders particular facts and circumstances. ProLogis
shareholders are urged to consult their tax advisors to
understand fully the tax consequences to them of the Merger. See
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences.
The AMB
Special Meeting (See page 116)
The AMB special meeting will be held at AMB Property
Corporations global headquarters, which are located at
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, at
9:00 a.m., local time, on June 1, 2011. You may vote
at the AMB special meeting if you owned shares of AMB common
stock at the close of business on April 21, 2011, the
record date for the AMB special meeting. On that date, there
were 169,550,440 shares of AMB common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote. You may cast one vote for each share of AMB
common stock that you owned on that date.
At the AMB special meeting, AMB stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the Topco merger (including the issuance
of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders
in connection with the Topco merger);
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the bylaw amendment;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the charter amendment; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adjourn the AMB special meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the
foregoing proposals.
|
The approval of both the Topco merger (including the issuance of
AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders in
connection with the Topco merger) and the bylaw amendment is
required for the completion of the Merger. The bylaw amendment
and the charter amendment will take effect only upon the
consummation of the Topco merger. However, approval of the
charter amendment is not a condition to completion of the Topco
merger.
The proposals at the AMB special meeting to approve the Topco
merger (including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred
stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco
merger) and to approve the charter amendment each require
approval by the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding AMB common stock. The proposal to approve the bylaw
amendment requires approval by the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the outstanding AMB common stock. The proposal
to adjourn the AMB special meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to solicit additional proxies requires approval by the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of AMB
common stock represented, in person or by proxy, at the AMB
special meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.
As of April 21, 2011, the record date for the AMB special
meeting, approximately 2.5% of the outstanding shares of AMB
common stock were held by AMB directors and executive officers
and their affiliates. AMB currently expects that the AMB
directors and executive officers will vote their shares in favor
of the Topco merger
9
(including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock
to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco merger),
the bylaw amendment, the charter amendment and the AMB
adjournment proposal, although none has entered into any
agreements obligating them to do so.
The board of directors of AMB unanimously recommends that AMB
stockholders vote FOR all of the proposals
set forth above. See AMB Special Meeting for further
discussion of the AMB special meeting.
The
ProLogis Special Meeting (See page 123)
The special meeting of ProLogis shareholders will be held at
ProLogis world headquarters, 4545 Airport Way, Denver,
Colorado 80239, at 9:00 a.m., local time, on June 1,
2011. You may vote at the ProLogis special meeting if you owned
ProLogis common shares at the close of business on
April 21, 2011, the record date for the ProLogis special
meeting. On that date, there were 570,550,345 ProLogis common
shares outstanding and entitled to vote. You may cast one vote
for each ProLogis common share that you owned on that date.
At the ProLogis special meeting, shareholders of ProLogis will
be asked to consider and vote upon:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to adjourn the ProLogis special meeting, if necessary
or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the
proposal to approve the Merger.
|
The approval of the Merger requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis common shares.
The approval of the ProLogis adjournment proposal requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter
by the holders of the ProLogis common shares represented, in
person or by proxy, at the ProLogis special meeting.
As of April 21, 2011, the record date for the ProLogis
special meeting, less than 1% of the outstanding common shares
of ProLogis were held by its trustees and executive officers and
their affiliates. ProLogis currently expects that the trustees
and executive officers of ProLogis will vote their shares in
favor of the Merger and the ProLogis adjournment proposal,
although none has entered into any agreements obligating them to
do so.
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously recommends that
ProLogis shareholders vote FOR all of the
proposals set forth above. See ProLogis Special
Meeting for further discussion of the ProLogis special
meeting.
Rights of
ProLogis Shareholders Will Change as a Result of the Merger (See
page 137)
ProLogis shareholders will have different rights once they
become stockholders of the combined company, due to differences
between the governing documents of AMB and ProLogis. These
differences are described in detail under Comparison of
Rights of AMB Stockholders and ProLogis Shareholders.
Recent
Developments
ProLogis has an ownership interest in, and provides management
services to, ProLogis European Properties (which we refer to as
PEPR), a publicly traded real estate investment
fund. In April 2011, a group of third-party investors in PEPR
announced their interest in potentially acquiring ProLogis
ownership interest in PEPR at a price of 6 per ordinary
unit, and ProLogis management agreement with PEPR. On
April 12, 2011, ProLogis announced that it intended to
retain both its ownership interest in, and its management
agreement with, PEPR.
On April 14, 2011, ProLogis announced that it had purchased
additional ordinary units in PEPR from a third party, raising
ProLogis ownership interest in PEPR from approximately
33.1% to approximately 38.9% of the outstanding ordinary units.
Pursuant to applicable Luxembourg law, on April 22, 2011,
ProLogis commenced a tender offer to acquire any or all of the
outstanding ordinary units and convertible preferred units of
PEPR that it does not currently own. ProLogis has offered
6.10 per ordinary unit and 6.10 per convertible
preferred unit in cash, plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The
offer has no material conditions to closing and is expected to
expire on May 6, 2011. Pursuant to applicable Luxembourg
law, if all conditions to closing are met, ProLogis will be
required to acquire all units tendered into the tender offer on
the expiration date.
10
If all outstanding ordinary units and convertible preferred
units are tendered, the aggregate consideration to be paid by
ProLogis would be equal to approximately
730.1 million (or approximately $1.1 billion).
ProLogis expects to fund the purchase by drawing on its existing
global line of credit and with funds borrowed pursuant to a new
Senior Bridge Loan Agreement with J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,
N.A., an affiliate of J.P. Morgan, providing ProLogis with
the ability to borrow up to 500 million (or
approximately $730.9 million). Borrowings under the Senior
Bridge Loan Agreement will bear interest at a rate equal to the
rate at which Euro deposits in the Brussels interbank market are
quoted plus a margin based upon the credit rating for
ProLogis senior debt. Any borrowings under the Senior
Bridge Loan will mature in November 2011. The aggregate
consideration to be paid by ProLogis, and the resulting funding
requirement, will be proportionate to the percentage of units
not already owned by ProLogis tendered and acquired in the offer.
PEPRs financial position and results of operations and
cash flows currently are not consolidated with those of ProLogis
for financial reporting purposes, but ProLogis may be required
to so consolidate PEPR in the future depending on the amount, if
any, by which its ownership interest in PEPR increases. In
addition, ProLogis interest in PEPRs net book value
and net income or loss will increase to the extent of the
percentage of units, if any, that it acquires in the tender
offer. ProLogis intends to keep the management agreement between
ProLogis and PEPR in place if ProLogis does not succeed in
acquiring all of the outstanding units of PEPR.
11
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF AMB
The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial
information for AMB. The selected financial data as of and for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 represents
preliminary operating and balance sheet data. AMBs results
of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are
not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for
any future period.
The selected statement of operations data for each of the years
in the five-year period ended December 31, 2010 and the
selected balance sheet data as of December 31 for each of the
years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2010 have
been derived from the consolidated financial statements of AMB
that were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The following
information should be read together with the consolidated
financial statements of AMB, the notes related thereto and the
related reports of management on the financial condition and
performance of AMB, all of which are contained in the reports of
AMB filed with the SEC and incorporated herein by reference. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
Private capital revenues
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Merger transaction costs and restructuring charges
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Fund costs and other expenses
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures, net
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest expense, amortization and other income, net
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income and gains from discontinued operations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Noncontrolling interests share of net income
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Preferred stock dividends & allocation to
participating securities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share available to common
stockholders Basic
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share available to common
stockholders Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate (at cost)
|
|
$
|
6,841
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,421
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
Total liabilities and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
4,118
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Total stockholders equity (excluding preferred stock)
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
Number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
678
|
|
|
$
|
636
|
|
|
$
|
679
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(124
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
(28
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common
stockholders per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
Income from discontinued operations available to common
stockholders per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.37
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
|
$
|
2.29
|
|
Cash dividends per common shares
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate (at cost)
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
6,709
|
|
|
$
|
6,604
|
|
|
$
|
6,710
|
|
|
$
|
6,576
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,373
|
|
|
$
|
6,842
|
|
|
$
|
7,302
|
|
|
$
|
7,262
|
|
|
$
|
6,714
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
3,331
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
$
|
3,990
|
|
|
$
|
3,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,437
|
|
Total liabilities and noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
4,052
|
|
|
$
|
3,902
|
|
|
$
|
4,787
|
|
|
$
|
4,498
|
|
|
$
|
4,547
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
|
$
|
223
|
|
Total stockholders equity (excluding preferred stock)
|
|
$
|
3,097
|
|
|
$
|
2,717
|
|
|
$
|
2,292
|
|
|
$
|
2,541
|
|
|
$
|
1,943
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Funds from operations (FFO), as
adjusted(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
(50
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Adjustments to derive FFO, as defined by NAREIT from
consolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive FFO, as defined by NAREIT from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations, as defined by
NAREIT(1)
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for impairment charges, restructuring charges,
preferred unit redemption (discount) premium and debt
extinguishment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate impairment
losses(2)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Pursuit costs and tax reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred unit redemption (discount) premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Allocation to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO, as
adjusted(1)
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Allocation to participating securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core funds from operations (Core FFO), as
adjusted(1)
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
$
|
(587
|
)
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
(882
|
)
|
|
$
|
(632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(881
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
(298
|
)
|
|
$
|
580
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
AMB believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, AMB considers funds from operations, as adjusted
(FFO, as adjusted), funds from operations, as
defined by NAREIT (FFO, as defined by NAREIT) and
core funds from operations, as adjusted (Core FFO, as
adjusted, which together with FFO, as adjusted and FFO, as
defined by NAREIT, we refer to as the FFO Measures, as
adjusted) to be useful supplemental measures of its
operating performance. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net
income (or loss) available to common stockholders, calculated in
accordance with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions
of real estate held for investment purposes and real
estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive
AMBs pro rata share of FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated
and unconsolidated joint ventures. AMB calculates Core FFO, as
adjusted, as FFO, as adjusted excluding the share of development
profits of AMB. These calculations also include adjustments for
items as described below.
|
|
|
|
Unless stated otherwise, AMB
includes the gains from development, including those from
value-added conversion projects, before depreciation recapture,
as a component of FFO, as adjusted. AMB believes gains from
development should be included in FFO, as adjusted, to more
completely reflect the performance of one of our lines of
business. AMB believes that value-added conversion dispositions
are in substance land sales and as such should be included in
FFO, as adjusted, consistent with the real estate investment
trust industrys long standing practice to include gains on
the sale of land in funds from operations. However, AMBs
interpretation of FFO, as adjusted, may not be consistent with
the views of others in the real estate investment trust
industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts
(NAREIT) definition, and may not be comparable to
funds from operations or funds from operations per share
reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret
the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In
connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
may warehouse assets that are
acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly
formed venture. Some of the properties held for contribution
may, under certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated
under GAAP. AMB includes in its calculation of FFO, as adjusted,
gains or losses related to the contribution of previously
depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although it is a
departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such
calculation of FFO, as adjusted, better reflects the value
created as a result of the contributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as
adjusted, to exclude impairment and restructuring charges, debt
extinguishment losses and preferred unit redemption
discounts/premiums. The impairment charges were principally a
result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and
deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted
values. The restructuring charges reflected costs associated
with the reduction in global headcount and cost structure of
AMB. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the costs of
repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches
of senior unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in
response to the current financing environment, resulting in
greater debt extinguishment costs. The preferred unit redemption
discounts/premiums reflect the gain/loss associated with the
liquidation preference in the preferred unit redemption price
less costs incurred as a result of the redemption. In 2008, AMB
also recognized charges to write-off pursuit costs related to
development projects it no longer planned to commence and to
establish a reserve against tax assets associated with the
reduction of its development activities. Although difficult to
predict, these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of
the current economic climate and its adverse effects on the real
estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or unusual in
nature, these items result from market fluctuations that can
have inconsistent effects on the results of operations of AMB.
The economics underlying these items reflect market and
financing conditions in the short-term but can obscure the
performance of AMB and the value of the long-term investment
decisions and strategies of AMB. AMB management believes FFO, as
adjusted, is significant and useful to both it and its
investors. FFO, as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the
value and strength of the business model of AMB and its
potential performance isolated from the volatility of the
current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains)
resulting from the management of AMB of its financing profile in
response to the tightening of the capital markets. However, in
addition to the limitations of the FFO Measures, as adjusted,
generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not present a
comprehensive measure of the financial condition and operating
performance of AMB. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT
definition of funds from operations and should not be used as an
alternative to net income or cash flow from operations as
defined by GAAP.
|
|
|
|
AMB believes that the FFO Measures,
as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for
real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes
that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over
time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization
expenses. However, since real estate values have historically
risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry
investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating
results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, are supplemental measures of operating performance for
real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net
income available to common stockholders, as defined by GAAP. AMB
believes that the use of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, combined
with the required GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in
improving the understanding of operating results of real estate
investment trusts among the investing public and making
comparisons of operating results among such companies more
meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to be
useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and
financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses
related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate
assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, can help the investing public compare the
operating performance of a companys real estate between
periods or as compared to other companies. While funds from
operations is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures,
as adjusted, do not represent cash flow from operations or net
income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as
alternatives to those measures in evaluating the liquidity or
operating performance of AMB. The FFO Measures, as adjusted,
also do not consider the costs associated with capital
expenditures related to the real estate assets of AMB nor are
the FFO Measures, as adjusted, necessarily indicative of cash
available to fund the future cash requirements of AMB. AMB
management compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures,
as adjusted, by providing investors with financial statements
prepared according to GAAP, along with this detailed discussion
of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, and a reconciliation of the
FFO Measures, as adjusted, to net income available to common
stockholders, a GAAP measurement.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes adjustments for AMBs
share of real estate impairment losses from unconsolidated and
consolidated joint ventures.
|
15
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF PROLOGIS
The following tables set forth selected consolidated financial
information for ProLogis. The selected financial data as of and
for the three months ended March 31, 2011 represents
preliminary operating and financial condition data.
ProLogis results of operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results
that may be expected for any future period.
The selected data presented below under the captions
Operating Data, Common Share
Distributions, Cash Flow Data and
Financial Position for, and as of the end of, each
of the years in the five-year period ended December 31,
2010, are derived from the consolidated financial statements of
ProLogis and subsidiaries, which financial statements have been
audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm. The information presented below under the caption
FFO is not included in the consolidated financial
statements. The consolidated financial statements and schedule
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the
reports thereon, are incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The following information should be
read together with the consolidated financial statements of
ProLogis, the notes related thereto and the related reports of
management on the financial condition and performance of
ProLogis, all of which are contained in the reports of ProLogis
filed with the SEC and incorporated herein by reference. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
205.3
|
|
|
$
|
187.5
|
|
Property management fees and other income
|
|
|
33.5
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
238.8
|
|
|
|
217.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
63.3
|
|
|
|
56.3
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
42.0
|
|
Merger integration expenses and reduction in workforce
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and other
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
206.4
|
|
|
|
188.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from unconsolidated investees, net
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47.6
|
)
|
Net gains on dispositions of investments in real estate
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
Interest, income taxes and other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(98.1
|
)
|
|
|
(114.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(48.4
|
)
|
|
|
(113.3
|
)
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
$
|
(40.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(84.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(46.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(91.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to common shares
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to common shares
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
570.6
|
|
|
|
475.0
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
570.6
|
|
|
|
475.0
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate properties owned, excluding land held for
development, before depreciation
|
|
$
|
11,541.5
|
|
Land held for development or targeted for disposition
|
|
$
|
1,600.0
|
|
Net investments in properties
|
|
$
|
11,484.7
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
|
|
$
|
2,084.7
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,935.7
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
6,415.0
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
7,309.3
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
ProLogis shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,608.7
|
|
Number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
570.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
5,944
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
Total
expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
1,503
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
4,897
|
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
Operating income
(loss)(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
(594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
1,022
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
461
|
|
|
$
|
373
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
294
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations(2)
|
|
$
|
(1,582
|
)
|
|
$
|
(346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(359
|
)
|
|
$
|
853
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
|
$
|
205
|
|
|
$
|
269
|
|
Consolidated net earnings
(loss)(2)
|
|
$
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(450
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
|
$
|
878
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common
shares(2)
|
|
$
|
(1,296
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,028
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.20
|
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares -
Basic(2)
|
|
$
|
(2.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares -
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.93
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.48
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.09
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shares
Diluted(2)
|
|
$
|
(2.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.82
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.86
|
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
Common Share Distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common share cash distributions paid
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
Common share distributions paid per share
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
$
|
1.60
|
|
FFO(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to FFO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common
shares(2)
|
|
$
|
(1,296
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(479
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,028
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
Total NAREIT defined adjustments
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO, as defined by NAREIT
|
|
|
(1,055
|
)
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
Our defined adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange losses (gains), net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Current income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Our share of reconciling items from unconsolidated investees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange losses (gains), net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses (gains) on derivative contracts, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to common shares as defined by ProLogis,
including significant non-cash items
|
|
|
(1,101
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
Add (deduct) significant non-cash items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of real estate
properties(2)
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill and other
assets(2)
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment (net gain) related to China operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off deferred financing fees associated with credit
facility restructuring
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of certain losses recognized by the property funds, net
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO attributable to common shares as defined by ProLogis,
excluding significant non-cash items
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
$
|
1,206
|
|
|
$
|
945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities(1)
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
888
|
|
|
$
|
1,230
|
|
|
$
|
664
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
$
|
1,235
|
|
|
$
|
(1,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,076
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,047
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
2,742
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate properties owned, excluding land held for
development, before depreciation
|
|
$
|
11,346
|
|
|
$
|
12,606
|
|
|
$
|
13,234
|
|
|
$
|
14,414
|
|
|
$
|
12,482
|
|
Land held for development or targeted for
disposition(2)
|
|
$
|
1,534
|
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
$
|
2,483
|
|
|
$
|
2,153
|
|
|
$
|
1,397
|
|
Net investments in properties
|
|
$
|
11,284
|
|
|
$
|
13,508
|
|
|
$
|
14,134
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
|
$
|
12,615
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
|
|
$
|
2,025
|
|
|
$
|
2,107
|
|
|
$
|
2,195
|
|
|
$
|
2,252
|
|
|
$
|
1,300
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,903
|
|
|
$
|
16,797
|
|
|
$
|
19,210
|
|
|
$
|
19,652
|
|
|
$
|
15,827
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
6,506
|
|
|
$
|
7,978
|
|
|
$
|
10,711
|
|
|
$
|
10,217
|
|
|
$
|
8,387
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
7,382
|
|
|
$
|
8,790
|
|
|
$
|
12,452
|
|
|
$
|
11,848
|
|
|
$
|
9,376
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
ProLogis shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,505
|
|
|
$
|
7,987
|
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
|
$
|
7,725
|
|
|
$
|
6,399
|
|
Number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2010 and 2009, ProLogis
contributed certain properties with any resulting gain or loss
reflected as net gains in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations of ProLogis and as cash provided by investing
activities. In 2008 and previous years, ProLogis reflected these
contributions as gross revenues and expenses as cash provided by
operating activities. See the Consolidated Financial Statements
of ProLogis contained in Item 8 of ProLogis
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 for more information.
|
|
(2) |
|
During 2010, ProLogis recognized
impairment charges of $824.3 million on certain of its real
estate properties, which includes $87.7 million in
Discontinued Operations and $412.7 million related to
goodwill and other assets. During 2009, ProLogis recognized
impairment charges of $331.6 million on certain of its real
estate properties and $163.6 million related to goodwill
and other assets. During 2008, ProLogis recognized impairment
charges of $274.7 million on certain of its real estate
properties and $320.6 million related to goodwill and other
assets. In addition, during 2008, ProLogis recognized impairment
charges of $198.2 million in Discontinued Operations
related to the net assets of ProLogis China operations
that were reclassified as held for sale and its share of
impairment charges recorded by an unconsolidated investee of
$108.2 million. See ProLogis Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in Item 8 of ProLogis
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 in for more
information.
|
|
(3) |
|
Funds from operations
(FFO) is a non-GAAP measure that is commonly used in
the real estate industry. The most directly comparable GAAP
measure to FFO is net earnings. Although the NAREIT has
published a definition of FFO, modifications to the NAREIT
calculation of FFO are common among REITs, as companies seek to
provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their
business. FFO, as ProLogis defines it, is presented as a
supplemental financial measure. FFO is not used by ProLogis as,
nor should it be considered to be, an alternative to net
earnings computed under GAAP as an indicator of the operating
performance of ProLogis or as an alternative to cash from
operating activities computed under GAAP as an indicator of the
ability of ProLogis to fund its cash needs.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
FFO is not meant to represent a
comprehensive system of financial reporting and does not
present, nor does ProLogis intend it to present, a complete
picture of its financial condition and operating performance.
ProLogis believes net earnings computed under GAAP remains the
primary measure of performance and that FFO is only meaningful
when it is used in conjunction with net earnings computed under
GAAP. Further, ProLogis believes that its consolidated financial
statements, prepared in accordance with GAAP, provide the most
meaningful picture of its financial condition and operating
performance.
|
|
|
|
At the same time that NAREIT
created and defined its FFO concept for the REIT industry, it
also recognized that management of each of its member
companies has the responsibility and authority to publish
financial information that it regards as useful to the financial
community. ProLogis believes that financial analysts,
potential investors and shareholders who review the operating
results of ProLogis are best served by a defined FFO measure
that includes other adjustments to net earnings computed under
GAAP in addition to those included in the NAREIT defined measure
of FFO. The FFO measures of ProLogis are discussed in
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Funds
From Operations in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 which is
incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. See Where You Can Find More Information.
|
19
SUMMARY
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The following table shows summary unaudited pro forma combined
condensed financial information about the combined financial
condition and operating results after giving effect to the
Merger. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial
information assumes that the Merger is accounted for by applying
the purchase method of accounting with ProLogis treated as the
acquirer. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance
sheet data gives effect to the Merger as if it had occurred on
December 31, 2010. The unaudited pro forma combined
condensed statement of operations data gives effect to the
Merger as if it had become effective at January 1, 2010,
based on the most recent valuation data available. The summary
unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information
listed below has been derived from and should be read in
conjunction with (i) the more detailed unaudited pro forma
combined condensed financial information, including the notes
thereto, appearing elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and (ii) the consolidated financial
statements and the related notes of both AMB and ProLogis
contained in their respective Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, all of which are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Unaudited Pro Forma Combined
Condensed Financial Information and Where You Can
Find More Information:
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information
is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of the combined operating results or
financial position that would have occurred if such transactions
had been consummated on the dates and in accordance with the
assumptions described herein, nor is it necessarily indicative
of the future operating results or financial position of the
combined company. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed
financial information does not give effect to (i) any
potential revenue enhancements or cost synergies that could
result from the Merger or (ii) any transaction or
integration costs relating to the Merger. In addition, as
explained in more detail in the accompanying notes to the
unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information,
the preliminary allocation of the pro forma purchase price
reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed
financial information is subject to adjustment and may vary
significantly from the definitive allocation of the final
purchase price that will be recorded subsequent to completion of
the Merger. The determination of the final purchase price will
be based on the trading price of ProLogis common shares at
closing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
per share amounts)
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
1,536
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,575
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(1,621
|
)
|
Loss from continuing operations per share attributable to
common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate
|
|
$
|
23,742
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
25,581
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
9,906
|
|
ProLogis, Inc. shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
13,626
|
|
20
EQUIVALENT
AND COMPARATIVE PER SHARE INFORMATION
The following table sets forth, for the year ended
December 31, 2010, selected per share information for
ProLogis common shares on a historical and pro forma combined
basis and for AMB common stock on a historical and pro forma
equivalent basis. You should read the table below together with
the historical consolidated financial statements and related
notes of AMB and ProLogis contained in their respective Annual
Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, all of which are
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
The ProLogis pro forma combined loss per share was calculated
using the methodology as described below under the heading
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial
Information, and are subject to all the assumptions,
adjustments and limitations described thereunder. The pro forma
financial information described below is presented as if the
Merger occurred on January 1, 2010 for the results of
operations and December 31, 2010 for financial position. As
this is a reverse acquisition, the AMB pro forma equivalent per
common share amounts were calculated by multiplying the ProLogis
pro forma combined per share amounts by 40%, representing the
approximate share of the combined company that will be owned by
pre-Merger shareholders of AMB. You should not rely on the pro
forma amounts as being indicative of the financial position or
results of operations of the combined company that actually
would have occurred had the Merger been completed as of the
dates indicated above, nor is it necessarily indicative of the
future operating results or financial position of the combined
company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
Combined
|
|
Historical
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
Loss from continuing operations available to common share, per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.56
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.56
|
)
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
12.55
|
|
|
$
|
30.80
|
|
|
$
|
18.36
|
|
|
$
|
12.32
|
|
21
RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED
CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
The following table sets forth the ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred stock dividends of AMB for the
periods indicated. The ratio of earnings to combined fixed
charges and preferred stock dividends was computed by dividing
the earnings of AMB by its combined fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends. For purposes of calculating these ratios,
earnings includes pretax income from continuing
operations before extraordinary items, excluding the equity
earnings in a less than 50% owned subsidiary, plus fixed charges
and reduced by capitalized interest. Fixed charges
consists of interest expensed and capitalized and the amortized
premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to
indebtedness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Consolidated ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and
preferred stock
dividends(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The consolidated ratio of earnings
to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends was less
than
one-to-one
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. For
the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, earnings
were insufficient to cover combined fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends by $40.8 million, $183.1 million and
$100.4 million, respectively.
|
22
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included and
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed in
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements, you should carefully consider the following
risks before deciding how to vote. In addition, you should read
and consider the risks associated with each of the businesses of
AMB and ProLogis because these risks will also affect the
combined company. These risks can be found in the respective
Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 of AMB and ProLogis,
each of which is filed with the SEC and incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You should
also read and consider the other information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Merger
The
exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of
any change in the stock prices of either AMB or
ProLogis.
Upon the closing of the Merger, each ProLogis common share will
be converted into the right to receive 0.4464 of a newly issued
share of AMB common stock, with cash paid in lieu of fractional
shares. The exchange ratio was fixed in the merger agreement,
and while it will be adjusted in the event of a
recapitalization, merger, subdivision, issuer tender or exchange
offer or other similar transaction involving AMB or ProLogis,
the exchange ratio will not be adjusted for changes in the
market price of either AMB common stock or ProLogis common
shares. Changes in the price of AMB common stock prior to the
Merger will affect the market value of the merger consideration
that ProLogis shareholders will receive on the closing date of
the Merger. Stock price changes may result from a variety of
factors (many of which are beyond our control), including the
following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in our respective businesses, operations, assets,
liabilities and prospects;
|
|
|
|
changes in market assessments of the business, operations,
financial position and prospects of either company;
|
|
|
|
market assessments of the likelihood that the Merger will be
completed, including related considerations regarding regulatory
approvals of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
interest rates, general market and economic conditions and other
factors generally affecting the price of AMB common stock and
ProLogis common shares; and
|
|
|
|
federal, state and local legislation, governmental regulation
and legal developments in the businesses in which ProLogis and
AMB operate.
|
The price of AMB common stock at the closing of the Merger may
vary from its price on the date the merger agreement was
executed, on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and on the date of the special meetings of AMB and ProLogis. As
a result, the market value of the merger consideration
represented by the exchange ratio will also vary. For example,
based on the range of trading prices of AMB common stock during
the period after January 26, 2011, the last trading day
before ProLogis common share and AMB common stock prices may
have been affected by market speculation regarding a potential
transaction involving the companies, through April 26,
2011, the latest practicable date before the date of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio of 0.4464
represented a market value ranging from a low of $14.60 to a
high of $16.42.
Because the Merger will be completed after the date of the
special meetings, at the time of your special meeting, you will
not know the exact market value of the AMB common stock that
ProLogis shareholders will receive upon completion of the
Merger. You should consider the following two risks:
|
|
|
|
|
If the price of AMB common stock increases between the date the
merger agreement was signed or the date of the AMB special
meeting and the closing of the Merger, ProLogis shareholders
will receive shares of AMB common stock that have a market value
upon completion of the Merger that is greater than the market
value of such shares calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio
on the date the merger agreement was signed or on the date of
the AMB special meeting, respectively.
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
If the price of AMB common stock declines between the date the
merger agreement was signed or the date of the ProLogis special
meeting and the closing of the Merger, including for any of the
reasons described above, ProLogis shareholders will receive
shares of AMB common stock that have a market value upon
completion of the Merger that is less than the market value of
such shares calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio on the
date the merger agreement was signed or on the date of the
ProLogis special meeting, respectively.
|
Therefore, while the number of shares of AMB common stock to be
issued per ProLogis common share is fixed, ProLogis shareholders
cannot be sure of the market value of the consideration they
will receive upon completion of the Merger.
Failure
to complete the Merger could negatively affect the stock prices
and the future business and financial results of AMB and
ProLogis.
If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing businesses of AMB or
ProLogis may be adversely affected and AMB and ProLogis will be
subject to numerous risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
AMB being required, under certain circumstances, to pay ProLogis
a termination fee of $210 million and reimburse ProLogis
for up to $20 million of its expenses in connection with
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
ProLogis being required, under certain circumstances, to pay AMB
a termination fee of $315 million and reimburse AMB for up
to $20 million of its expenses in connection with the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
each of AMB and ProLogis having to pay certain costs relating to
the proposed Merger, such as legal, accounting, financial
advisor, filing, printing and mailing fees; and
|
|
|
|
the management of each of AMB and ProLogis focusing on the
Merger instead of on pursuing other opportunities that could be
beneficial to the companies, in each case, without realizing any
of the benefits of having the Merger completed.
|
If the Merger is not completed, AMB and ProLogis cannot assure
their shareholders that these risks will not materialize and
will not materially affect the business, financial results and
stock prices of AMB or ProLogis.
The
merger agreement contains provisions that could discourage a
potential acquirer of either AMB or ProLogis or could result in
any acquisition proposal being at a lower price than it might
otherwise be.
The merger agreement contains provisions that, subject to
limited exceptions, restrict the ability of each of AMB and
ProLogis to solicit, encourage, facilitate or discuss
third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of
AMB or ProLogis. Further, even if the AMB board of directors or
ProLogis board of trustees withdraws or modifies its
recommendation of the Topco merger or the Merger, respectively,
they will still be required to submit the matter to a vote of
their respective stockholders or shareholders at the special
meetings. In addition, either AMB or ProLogis generally has an
opportunity to offer to modify the terms of the proposed merger
agreement in response to any acquisition proposal that may be
made to the other party before the board of directors or board
of trustees, as the case may be, may withdraw or modify its
recommendation in response to such acquisition proposal. In some
circumstances, on termination of the merger agreement, one of
the parties may be required to pay a substantial termination fee
to the other party. See The Merger Termination
of the Merger Agreement.
These provisions could discourage a potential acquirer that
might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of
AMB or ProLogis from considering or proposing such an
acquisition, even if it were prepared to pay consideration with
a higher per share cash or market value than that market value
proposed to be received or realized in the Merger, or might
result in a potential acquirer proposing to pay a lower price
than it might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the
added expense of the termination fee that may become payable in
certain circumstances under the merger agreement.
The
pendency of the Merger could adversely affect the business and
operations of AMB and ProLogis.
In connection with the pending Merger, some customers or vendors
of each of AMB and ProLogis may delay or defer decisions, which
could negatively affect the revenues, earnings, cash flows and
expenses of AMB and ProLogis, regardless of whether the Merger
is completed. Similarly, current and prospective employees of
AMB
24
and ProLogis may experience uncertainty about their future roles
with the combined company following the Merger, which may
materially adversely affect the ability of each of AMB and
ProLogis to attract and retain key personnel during the pendency
of the Merger. In addition, due to operating covenants in the
merger agreement, each of AMB and ProLogis may be unable, during
the pendency of the Merger, to pursue strategic transactions,
undertake significant capital projects, undertake certain
significant financing transactions and otherwise pursue other
actions, even if such actions would prove beneficial.
Some
of the directors and executive officers of AMB and trustees and
executive officers of ProLogis have interests in seeing the
Merger completed that are different from, or in addition to,
those of the other AMB stockholders and ProLogis
shareholders.
Some of the directors and executive officers of AMB and trustees
and executive officers of ProLogis have arrangements that
provide them with interests in the Merger that are different
from, or in addition to, those of the stockholders of AMB or the
shareholders of ProLogis. These interests include, among other
things, the continued service as a director or an executive
officer of the combined company and, in the case of AMB
directors and executive officers, the opportunity to participate
in the new non-qualified deferred compensation plan (which we
refer to as the new NQDC plan) which is conditioned
on the consummation of the Topco merger. These interests, among
other things, may influence or may have influenced the directors
and executive officers of AMB and trustees and executive
officers of ProLogis to support or approve the Topco merger or
Merger, respectively.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Combined Company
Operational
Risks
The
combined company expects to incur substantial expenses related
to the Merger.
The combined company expects to incur substantial expenses in
connection with completing the Merger and integrating the
business, operations, networks, systems, technologies, policies
and procedures of the two companies. There are a large number of
systems that must be integrated, including billing, management
information, purchasing, accounting and finance, sales, payroll
and benefits, fixed asset, lease administration and regulatory
compliance. Although AMB and ProLogis have assumed that a
certain level of transaction and integration expenses would be
incurred, there are a number of factors beyond their control
that could affect the total amount or the timing of their
integration expenses. Many of the expenses that will be
incurred, by their nature, are difficult to estimate accurately
at the present time. Due to these factors, the transaction and
integration expenses associated with the Merger could,
particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that the
combined company expects to achieve from the elimination of
duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale
and cost savings related to the integration of the businesses
following the completion of the Merger. As a result of these
expenses, both AMB and ProLogis expect to take charges against
their earnings before and after the completion of the Merger.
The charges taken in connection with the Merger are expected to
be significant, although the aggregate amount and timing of such
charges are uncertain at present.
Following
the Merger, the combined company may be unable to integrate the
businesses of AMB and ProLogis successfully and realize the
anticipated synergies and related benefits of the Merger or do
so within the anticipated timeframe.
The Merger involves the combination of two companies that
currently operate as independent public companies. AMB and
ProLogis expect that the transaction will generate $80 million
of annual gross savings in general and administrative expenses,
based on preliminary estimates of certain personnel and
non-personnel reductions. The personnel cost reductions are
estimated to be approximately $65 million and relate to
anticipated reductions of certain positions at both AMB and
ProLogis that are believed to be redundant for the combined
company. The non-personnel cost reductions are estimated to be
approximately $15 million and relate to duplicative corporate
infrastructure and public company operating expenses. AMB and
ProLogis expect to realize these savings on an annualized
run-rate basis by December 31, 2012.
25
However, the combined company will be required to devote
significant management attention and resources to integrating
the business practices and operations of AMB and ProLogis.
Potential difficulties the combined company may encounter in the
integration process include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to successfully combine the businesses of AMB and
ProLogis in a manner that permits the combined company to
achieve the cost savings anticipated to result from the Merger,
which would result in the anticipated benefits of the Merger not
being realized in the timeframe currently anticipated or at all;
|
|
|
|
lost sales and customers as a result of certain customers of
either of the two companies deciding not to do business with the
combined company;
|
|
|
|
the complexities associated with managing the combined
businesses out of several different locations and integrating
personnel from the two companies;
|
|
|
|
the additional complexities of combining two companies with
different histories, cultures, regulatory restrictions, markets
and customer bases;
|
|
|
|
the failure to retain key employees of either of the two
companies;
|
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses,
delays or regulatory conditions associated with the
Merger; and
|
|
|
|
performance shortfalls at one or both of the two companies as a
result of the diversion of managements attention caused by
completing the Merger and integrating the companies
operations.
|
For all these reasons, you should be aware that it is possible
that the integration process could result in the distraction of
the combined companys management, the disruption of the
combined companys ongoing business or inconsistencies in
the combined companys products, services, standards,
controls, procedures and policies, any of which could adversely
affect the ability of the combined company to maintain
relationships with customers, vendors and employees or to
achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger, or could
otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of
the combined company.
Following
the Merger, the combined company may be unable to retain key
employees.
The success of the combined company after the Merger will depend
in part upon its ability to retain key AMB and ProLogis
employees. Key employees may depart either before or after the
Merger because of issues relating to the uncertainty and
difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the
combined company following the Merger. Accordingly, no assurance
can be given that AMB, ProLogis or, following the Merger, the
combined company will be able to retain key employees to the
same extent as in the past.
The
Merger will result in changes to the board of directors and
management of the combined company that may affect the strategy
of the combined company as compared to that of AMB and
ProLogis.
If the parties complete the Merger, the composition of the board
of directors of the combined company and management team will
change from the boards and management teams of AMB and ProLogis.
The board of directors of the combined company will consist of
11 members, with five directors selected by the current board of
directors of AMB and six directors selected by the current board
of trustees of ProLogis. The combined company will also have
executive officers from both AMB and ProLogis. This new
composition of the board of directors and the management team of
the combined company may affect the business strategy and
operating decisions of the combined company upon the completion
of the Merger.
The
future results of the combined company will suffer if the
combined company does not effectively manage its expanded
operations following the Merger.
Following the Merger, the combined company may continue to
expand its operations through additional acquisitions and other
strategic transactions, some of which involve complex
challenges. The future success of the combined company will
depend, in part, upon the ability of the combined company to
manage its expansion opportunities, which pose substantial
challenges for the combined company to integrate new operations
into its
26
existing business in an efficient and timely manner, and upon
its ability to successfully monitor its operations, costs,
regulatory compliance and service quality, and to maintain other
necessary internal controls. The combined company cannot assure
you that its expansion or acquisition opportunities will be
successful, or that the combined company will realize its
expected operating efficiencies, cost savings, revenue
enhancements, synergies or other benefits.
The
trading price of shares of the common stock of the combined
company may be affected by factors different from those
affecting the price of shares of AMB common stock or ProLogis
common shares before the Merger.
If the Merger is completed, ProLogis shareholders will become
holders of approximately 60%, and AMB stockholders will hold
approximately 40%, of the outstanding shares of common stock of
the combined company. The results of operations of the combined
company, as well as the trading price of the common stock of the
combined company, after the Merger may be affected by factors
different from those currently affecting AMBs or
ProLogis results of operations and the trading prices of
AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares. These factors
include:
|
|
|
|
|
a greater number of shares of the combined company outstanding
as compared to the number of currently outstanding shares of AMB;
|
|
|
|
different stockholders;
|
|
|
|
different businesses; and
|
|
|
|
different assets and capitalizations.
|
Accordingly, the historical trading prices and financial results
of AMB and ProLogis may not be indicative of these matters for
the combined company after the Merger. For a discussion of the
business of AMB and ProLogis and of certain factors to consider
in connection with that business, see the documents incorporated
by reference by AMB or ProLogis into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus referred to under Where You Can Find
More Information.
Regulatory
and Legal Risks
Counterparties
to certain significant agreements with AMB or ProLogis may
exercise contractual rights under such agreements in connection
with the Merger.
AMB and ProLogis are each party to certain agreements that give
the counterparty certain rights following a change in
control, including in some cases the right to terminate
the agreement. Under some such agreements, the Merger will
constitute a change in control and therefore the counterparty
may exercise certain rights under the agreement upon the closing
of the Merger. Certain AMB and ProLogis funds, joint ventures,
management and servicing contracts, leases and debt obligations
have agreements subject to such provisions. Any such
counterparty may request modifications of their respective
agreements as a condition to granting a waiver or consent under
their agreement. There is no assurance that such counterparties
will not exercise their rights under the agreements, including
termination rights where available, that the exercise of any
such rights will not result in a material adverse effect or that
any modifications of such agreements will not result in a
material adverse effect.
In
connection with the announcement of the merger agreement,
several lawsuits have been filed and are pending, seeking, among
other things, to enjoin the Merger and rescind the merger
agreement, and an adverse judgment in any of the lawsuits may
prevent the Merger from being effective or from becoming
effective within the expected timeframe.
ProLogis, the members of the ProLogis board of trustees, New
Pumpkin, Upper Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC, AMB and AMP LP, have each
been named as defendants in several lawsuits brought by holders
of ProLogis common shares challenging the Merger, and seeking,
among other things, to enjoin the Merger, direct the defendants
to exercise their fiduciary duties, rescind the merger
agreement, and award the plaintiffs damages and expenses. If the
plaintiffs are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting
the parties from completing the Merger on the agreed upon terms,
the injunction may prevent the completion of the Merger in the
expected timeframe (if at all). For more information about
litigation related to the Merger, including the agreements in
principle with respect to the proposed settlement of the
litigation, see The Merger Litigation Relating
to the Merger.
27
REIT
Risks
The
combined company would succeed to, and may incur, adverse tax
consequences if AMB or ProLogis has failed or fails to qualify
as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
If either AMB or ProLogis has failed or fails to qualify as a
REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes and the Merger is
completed, the combined company generally would succeed to and
may incur significant tax liabilities, and the combined company
could possibly lose its REIT status should disqualifying
activities continue after the Merger.
REITs
are subject to a range of complex organizational and operational
requirements.
As REITs, each of AMB and ProLogis must distribute with respect
to each year at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its
stockholders or shareholders, as applicable. Other restrictions
apply to a REITs income and assets. For any taxable year
that AMB or ProLogis fails to qualify as a REIT, it will not be
allowed a deduction for dividends paid to its stockholders or
shareholders, as applicable, in computing taxable income and
thus would become subject to U.S. federal and state income
tax as if it were a regular taxable corporation. In such an
event, AMB or ProLogis, as the case may be, could be subject to
potentially significant tax liabilities. Unless entitled to
relief under certain statutory provisions, AMB or ProLogis, as
the case may be, would also be disqualified from treatment as a
REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it
lost its qualification. If AMB or ProLogis failed to qualify as
a REIT, the market price of the common stock of the combined
company may decline and the combined company may need to reduce
substantially the amount of distributions to its stockholders
because of its increased tax liability.
Other
Risks
In
connection with the Merger, the combined company is planning to
refinance a significant amount of indebtedness, and cannot
guarantee that it will be able to obtain the necessary funds on
favorable terms or at all.
The closing of the Merger may trigger termination of each of
AMBs and ProLogis respective credit agreements and
the mandatory prepayment of the amounts outstanding thereunder,
and the mandatory prepayment of certain secured mortgage debt of
AMB, ProLogis or their affiliates. AMB and ProLogis are engaged
in discussions with certain potential financing providers
regarding one or more bank credit facilities to be entered into
by the combined company at the time of the closing of the
Merger, funds from which would be used in part to make such
mandatory prepayments and to provide a source of liquidity for
the combined company. However, the combined companys
ability to obtain such financing will depend on, among other
factors, prevailing market conditions at the time of the closing
of the Merger and other factors beyond the control of the
combined company. AMB and ProLogis cannot assure you that the
combined company will be able to obtain additional financing on
terms acceptable to the combined company or at all. Completion
of the Merger is not conditioned on completing such financing
transactions.
If the combined company is unable to obtain such financing, or
is unable to do so on terms acceptable to the combined company,
the combined company or, prior to the closing of the Merger, AMB
and ProLogis, may seek to obtain waivers or amendments of the
mandatory prepayment provisions under the terms of AMB and
ProLogis respective bank credit facilities. ProLogis
sought and obtained a waiver of the termination and mandatory
prepayment provisions of its bank credit facility with respect
to the effect of the signing of the merger agreement, but such
waiver does not extend to the termination and prepayment
provisions which would be triggered by the closing of the
Merger. In addition, AMB and ProLogis have sought certain
consents related to mandatory prepayments of secured mortgage
debt of the parties which may be triggered by the closing of the
Merger. As of the date hereof, substantially all of the consents
related to such mortgage debt requested by AMB have been
received. ProLogis has delivered its requests for consents and
waivers required under such mortgage debt, which has an
aggregate principal amount of approximately $407 million
(and could require the payment of associated prepayment
penalties of approximately $45 million), and is awaiting
responses to such requests. AMB and ProLogis cannot assure you
that any further consents or waivers will be obtained if sought,
or that the combined company will have sufficient funds
available to make such mandatory prepayments if necessary.
28
The
combined company will have a substantial amount of indebtedness
and may need to incur more in the future.
The combined company will have substantial indebtedness. For
example, as of December 31, 2010, the combined company
would have had an estimated fixed charge coverage ratio of 2.5x
and an estimated debt as a percentage of total market
capitalization of 41.3% (by comparison, as of that date, the
standalone figures for AMB were 2.6x and 37.2%, respectively,
and for ProLogis were 2.3x and 42.9%, respectively). In
addition, in connection with executing the combined
companys business strategies following the Merger, the
combined company expects to continue to evaluate the possibility
of acquiring additional properties and making strategic
investments, and the combined company may elect to finance these
endeavors by incurring additional indebtedness. Its substantial
indebtedness could have material adverse consequences for the
combined company, including (i) reducing the combined
companys credit ratings and thereby raising its borrowing
costs, (ii) hindering the combined companys ability
to adjust to changing market, industry or economic conditions,
(iii) limiting the combined companys ability to
access the capital markets to refinance maturing debt or to fund
acquisitions or emerging businesses, (iv) limiting the
amount of free cash flow available for future operations,
acquisitions, dividends, stock repurchases or other uses,
(v) making the combined company more vulnerable to economic
or industry downturns, including interest rate increases and
(vi) placing the combined company at a competitive
disadvantage compared to less leveraged competitors.
Moreover, to respond to competitive challenges, the combined
company may be required to raise substantial additional capital
to execute its business strategy. The combined companys
ability to arrange additional financing will depend on, among
other factors, the combined companys financial position
and performance, as well as prevailing market conditions and
other factors beyond the combined companys control. If the
combined company is able to obtain additional financing, the
combined companys credit ratings could be further
adversely affected, which could further raise the combined
companys borrowing costs and further limit its future
access to capital and its ability to satisfy its obligations
under its indebtedness.
The
historical and unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial
information included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus may not be representative of the combined
companys results after the Merger, and accordingly, you
have limited financial information on which to evaluate the
combined company.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus has
been presented for informational purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of the financial position or results of
operations that actually would have occurred had the Merger been
completed as of the date indicated, nor is it indicative of the
future operating results or financial position of the combined
company. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial
information reflects adjustments, which are based upon
preliminary estimates, to allocate the purchase price to
AMBs assets and liabilities. The purchase price allocation
reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined condensed
financial information included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is preliminary, and the final allocation of
the purchase price will be based upon the actual purchase price
and the fair value of the assets and liabilities of AMB as of
the date of the completion of the Merger. The unaudited pro
forma combined condensed financial information does not reflect
future events that may occur after the Merger, including the
costs related to the planned integration of the two companies
and any future nonrecurring charges resulting from the Merger,
and does not consider potential impacts of current market
conditions on revenues or expense efficiencies. The unaudited
pro forma combined condensed financial information presented
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus is based in
part on certain assumptions regarding the Merger that AMB and
ProLogis believe are reasonable under the circumstances. AMB and
ProLogis cannot assure you that the assumptions will prove to be
accurate over time.
AMB
and ProLogis face other risks.
The risks listed above are not exhaustive, and you should be
aware that, following the Merger, the combined company will face
various other risks, including those discussed in reports filed
by AMB and ProLogis with the SEC. See Where You Can Find
More Information.
29
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus and the documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and
Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking
statements, which are based on current expectations, estimates
and projections about the industry and markets in which AMB and
ProLogis operate and beliefs of and assumptions made by AMB
management and ProLogis management , involve uncertainties that
could significantly affect the financial results of AMB or
ProLogis or the combined company. Words such as
expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates, variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical
in nature. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to, statements about the benefits of the business
combination transaction involving AMB and ProLogis, including
future financial and operating results, the combined
companys plans, objectives, expectations and intentions.
All statements that address operating performance, events or
developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the
future including statements relating to rent and
occupancy growth, development activity and changes in sales or
contribution volume of developed properties, general conditions
in the geographic areas where we operate and the availability of
capital in existing or new property funds are
forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties
and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Although we
believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking
statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no
assurance that our expectations will be attained and therefore,
actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is
expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements. Some
of the factors that may affect outcomes and results include, but
are not limited to, those set forth under Risk
Factors as well as the following:
|
|
|
|
|
national, international, regional and local economic climates,
|
|
|
|
changes in financial markets, interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates,
|
|
|
|
increased or unanticipated competition for our properties,
|
|
|
|
risks associated with acquisitions,
|
|
|
|
maintenance of REIT status,
|
|
|
|
availability of financing and capital,
|
|
|
|
changes in demand for developed properties,
|
|
|
|
risks associated with achieving expected revenue synergies or
cost savings,
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the ability to consummate the merger and
the timing of the closing of the merger, and
|
|
|
|
those additional risks and factors discussed in reports filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (which we refer to
as the SEC) by AMB and ProLogis from time to time,
including those discussed under the heading Risk
Factors in their respective most recently filed reports on
Forms 10-K
and 10-Q.
|
Neither AMB nor ProLogis undertakes any duty to update any
forward-looking statements appearing in this document, except as
may be required by applicable securities laws.
30
INFORMATION
ABOUT THE COMPANIES
AMB
Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 394-9000
AMB, together with its subsidiaries, is a global owner, operator
and developer of industrial real estate, focused on major hub
and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and
Asia. As of December 31, 2010, AMB owned, or had
investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development
projects expected to total approximately 159.6 million
square feet (14.8 million square meters) in 49 markets
within 15 countries.
The business of AMB is operated primarily through its operating
partnership, AMB LP. As of December 31, 2010, AMB owned an
approximate 98.2% general partnership interest in the operating
partnership, excluding preferred units. As the sole general
partner of AMB LP, AMB has the full, exclusive and complete
responsibility for and discretion in its
day-to-day
management and control. AMB LP holds substantially all of the
assets of AMB and directly or indirectly holds the ownership
interests in AMBs joint ventures.
AMB, a Maryland corporation, is a self-administered and
self-managed REIT, and it expects that it has qualified, and
will continue to qualify, as a REIT for U.S. federal income
tax purposes beginning with the year ended December 31,
1997. As a self-administered and self-managed REIT, the
employees of AMB perform its corporate, administrative and
management functions, rather than the company relying on an
outside manager for these services. AMB believes that real
estate is fundamentally a local business and is best operated by
local teams in each of its markets. As a vertically integrated
company, AMB actively manages its portfolio of properties. In
select markets, AMB may, from time to time, establish
relationships with third-party real estate management firms,
brokers and developers that provide some property-level
administrative and management services under the companys
direction.
AMB was incorporated in the state of Maryland in 1997, and AMB
LP was formed in the state of Delaware in 1997. AMB common stock
is listed on the NYSE, trading under the symbol AMB.
The primary office of AMB is located in San Francisco,
California.
Additional information about AMB and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, Colorado 80239
(303) 567-5000
ProLogis is a leading global provider of industrial distribution
facilities. ProLogis is organized as a Maryland real estate
investment trust and has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the
Code. The world headquarters of ProLogis are located in Denver,
Colorado. The European headquarters of ProLogis are located in
the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with its European customer service
headquarters located in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The primary
office of ProLogis in Asia is located in Tokyo, Japan.
ProLogis was formed in 1991, primarily as a long-term owner of
industrial distribution space operating in the United States.
Over time, the business strategy of ProLogis evolved to include
the development of properties for contribution to property funds
in which ProLogis maintains an ownership interest and the
management of those property funds and the properties they own.
Originally, ProLogis sought to differentiate itself from its
competition by focusing on the distribution space requirements
of its corporate customers on a national, regional and local
basis and providing customers with consistent levels of service
throughout the United States. However, as the needs of its
customers expanded to markets outside the United States, so did
the portfolio and management team of ProLogis.
31
Today, ProLogis is an international real estate company with
operations in North America, Europe and Asia. The business
strategy of ProLogis is to integrate international scope and
expertise with a strong local presence in its markets, thereby
becoming an attractive choice for its targeted customer base,
the largest global users of distribution space, while achieving
long-term sustainable growth in cash flow.
ProLogis common stock is listed on the NYSE, trading under the
symbol PLD.
New Pumpkin Inc., a Maryland corporation, Upper Pumpkin LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company, and Pumpkin LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, are direct and indirect, wholly owned
subsidiaries of ProLogis and were formed in January 2011 for the
purpose of effecting the Merger.
Additional information about ProLogis and its subsidiaries is
included in documents incorporated by reference into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
The
Combined Company
Corporate
Headquarters:
San Francisco, California
94111
(415) 394-9000
Operational
Headquarters:
Denver, Colorado 80239
(303) 567-5000
The combined company will be named ProLogis, Inc.
and will be a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered
and self-managed REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The combined company is expected to be a leading global owner,
operator and developer of industrial real estate. The combined
company is expected to have a pro forma equity market
capitalization of approximately $14 billion, a total market
capitalization in excess of $24 billion, and gross assets
owned and managed of approximately $46 billion. The
combined company will own or manage approximately
600 million square feet (approximately 55 million
square meters) of modern distribution facilities located in key
gateway markets and logistics corridors in 22 countries.
References to the combined company in this document
shall be to AMB Property Corporation after the effective time of
the Merger, which will be renamed as ProLogis, Inc.
The business of the combined company will be operated through an
operating partnership, ProLogis, L.P. On a pro forma basis
giving effect to the Merger, the combined company will own an
approximate 99.3% general partnership interest in the operating
partnership, excluding preferred units, and, as its sole general
partner, the combined company will have the full, exclusive and
complete responsibility for and discretion in the
day-to-day
management and control of the operating partnership.
The common stock of the combined company will be listed on the
NYSE, trading under the symbol PLD.
32
THE
MERGER
The following is a discussion of the Merger and the material
terms of the merger agreement between AMB and ProLogis. You are
urged to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety, a copy of which is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and incorporated by reference
herein.
Background
of the Merger
The boards and management teams of AMB and ProLogis have
periodically and in the ordinary course evaluated and considered
a variety of financial and strategic opportunities as a part of
their respective long-term strategies to maximize shareholder
value. In 2001 and 2005, members of the management teams of AMB
and ProLogis engaged in preliminary discussions regarding a
potential strategic business combination between the two
companies, but these prior discussions never resulted in any
agreement regarding a potential combination and the discussions
were terminated.
Throughout 2009 and early 2010, AMB management discussed with
the AMB board of directors a variety of potential strategic
growth opportunities that they believed might be available at
attractive prices, in part due to the continuing effects of the
financial crisis and resulting market disruptions. In addition,
AMB management discussed with the AMB board of directors a
possible merger with ProLogis. During 2010, ProLogis management
had several strategic discussions with the ProLogis board of
trustees regarding the future growth in its fund management
business and international expansion, including the possible
reentry into China and expansion into Brazil. In addition,
ProLogis management discussed with the ProLogis board of
trustees the need to continue to strengthen ProLogis
balance sheet in the months and years ahead.
In May 2010, a large private equity firm, which we refer to as
Company A, approached ProLogis management regarding
a potential transaction involving ProLogis. The parties engaged
in various discussions involving the net asset value and future
growth potential of ProLogis and ProLogis management kept the
board of trustees apprised of the status of such discussions.
Despite such discussions, the parties did not discuss any
specific terms of a possible transaction nor did Company A make
any proposal regarding a possible transaction involving ProLogis.
In September 2010, Company A again approached ProLogis
management and expressed interest in a transaction involving a
potential acquisition of ProLogis. Management informed the
ProLogis board of trustees as to such expression of interest
and, in light of previous discussions with Company A, ProLogis
management stated that if Company A put forth a specific
proposal regarding an acquisition or other transaction, ProLogis
could evaluate whether to enter into a confidentiality agreement
and provide further information on ProLogis to Company A. In
mid-October 2010, after numerous
follow-up
conversations between members of management of ProLogis and
Company A, Company A informed ProLogis that it did not believe
that it could provide an acquisition proposal that it would
expect to be acceptable to ProLogis based upon, among other
things, the increase in the trading price of ProLogis common
shares, ProLogis significant land holdings and limitations
on Company As ability to place substantial additional debt
on ProLogis as a result of covenants under ProLogis
indenture.
In September 2010, Mr. Eugene F. Reilly, President, The
Americas for AMB, and Mr. Ted R. Antenucci, President and
Chief Investment Officer of ProLogis, had discussions regarding
how Mr. Hamid R. Moghadam, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of AMB, could approach Mr. Walter C. Rakowich,
Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis, to initiate a discussion
regarding a possible merger.
Following a meeting of the AMB board of directors in September
2010, Mr. Moghadam initiated an informal discussion with
Mr. William E. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of
ProLogis, at an event organized by Morgan Stanley to discuss
whether ProLogis management would be receptive to engage in
discussions regarding a possible business combination between
AMB and ProLogis. Mr. Sullivan informed Mr. Moghadam
that ProLogis was currently occupied with pursuing certain
transactions which he could not discuss, and that ProLogis
management may have greater availability to engage in such
discussions following the completion of such transactions. At
that time, ProLogis was nearing an announcement of a sale of a
portfolio of industrial assets and in substantive discussions
with a potential buyer of a portfolio of non-core retail and
mixed-use assets.
33
In early November 2010, Mr. Moghadam called
Mr. Rakowich to determine whether they could meet to
discuss a potential business combination between the two
companies. Mr. Rakowich agreed to meet with
Mr. Moghadam and, prior to the meeting, informed the
ProLogis board of trustees of such meeting.
Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich met on November 6, 2010
following a conference hosted by J.P. Morgan in Napa
Valley, California that they both attended. During this meeting,
Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich had informal discussions
about their respective companies, their preliminary views of the
rationale for a strategic business combination of AMB and
ProLogis, and governance and operational issues that would need
to be addressed in connection with such a combination, including
issues relating to selecting the management team of the combined
company, related succession planning issues, the name of the
combined company, and the location of the headquarters of the
combined company.
On November 10, 2010, Mr. Rakowich convened a
telephonic meeting of the board of trustees of ProLogis at which
he informed the board of trustees of his discussions with
Mr. Moghadam. The ProLogis board discussed some of the
issues that would need to be addressed in a possible business
combination and determined that it should engage Morgan Stanley
to act as its financial advisor and to prepare financial
analyses for its upcoming board meeting in December.
During the remainder of November 2010, Messrs. Moghadam and
Rakowich had further informal discussions by phone regarding a
potential strategic business combination of the two companies.
During these discussions, Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich
acknowledged that governance and operational issues, including
the selection of the management team of the combined company and
the determination of where the headquarters of the combined
company would be located, would need to be resolved in a manner
satisfactory to both parties in order to enable continuity of
management and an effective and timely integration of the two
companies operations and to otherwise achieve the
financial and strategic benefits of a business combination.
During this period Mr. Moghadam updated Jeffrey
L. Skelton, the lead outside director of AMB, on the status
of his discussions with ProLogis, and Mr. Skelton in turn
updated other members of the AMB board of directors.
On November 29, 2010, the ProLogis board of trustees held a
telephonic meeting at which Mr. Rakowich summarized the
status of the current discussions with AMB. Representatives of
Mayer Brown LLP and Greenberg Traurig, LLP, legal counsel to
ProLogis, also participated in this meeting and discussed with
the ProLogis board their duties as trustees in considering a
potential business combination transaction.
On December 6 and 7, 2010, the ProLogis board held a regularly
scheduled board meeting at which Mr. Rakowich again
discussed the potential combination of ProLogis and AMB. A
representative of Morgan Stanley attended part of this meeting
and provided a preliminary financial overview of such a
potential business combination. The ProLogis board of trustees
discussed the financial and strategic benefits of a potential
transaction, as well as several issues that would need to be
addressed to the satisfaction of the board, including governance
of the combined company, operational structuring, achievement of
synergies and integration. The ProLogis board authorized
Mr. Rakowich to continue preliminary discussions regarding
a potential business combination with a view toward whether the
issues discussed at the meeting could be resolved and requested
that Mr. Rakowich continue to keep the ProLogis board of
trustees apprised of any such discussions.
On December 9, 2010, Mr. Moghadam updated the AMB
board of directors about his discussions with Mr. Rakowich.
The AMB board of directors expressed its support of senior
management in continuing to engage in preliminary discussions
with members of ProLogis management regarding such potential
strategic combination. Later that day, Mr. Rakowich called
Mr. Moghadam to continue their discussion of a potential
business combination.
On December 10, 2010, Mr. Moghadam met Mr. Irving
F. Lyons, a member of the ProLogis board of trustees, for a
previously scheduled breakfast in San Francisco. During the
breakfast and afterward during a visit to AMBs offices,
Messrs. Moghadam and Lyons discussed the strategic business
rationale for the proposed combination of AMB and ProLogis.
On December 11 and 12, 2010, Messrs. Rakowich and Lyons and
Messrs. Moghadam and Lyons had a series of conversations
regarding potential alternatives to address the issues of a
combined companys governance and operational structure,
including the composition of the initial management team,
management succession planning, the composition of the board of
directors, the location of the headquarters of the combined
company and the name of
34
the combined company. On December 13, 2010,
Mr. Rakowich had a further conversation with
Mr. Moghadam focusing on these issues.
On December 15, 2010, the ProLogis board of trustees met
telephonically and Messrs. Rakowich and Lyons reported
on their recent discussions with Mr. Moghadam.
Mr. Rakowich recommended to the ProLogis board that he and
Mr. Lyons have an in-person meeting with Mr. Moghadam
to determine whether and on what terms the governance and
operational issues could be resolved. The ProLogis board of
trustees expressed its support for these discussions.
On December 16, 2010, Messrs. Rakowich and Lyons met
with Mr. Moghadam in San Francisco to continue to
discuss the terms of a potential business combination, including
the governance arrangements and the operational structure of the
combined company.
From December 17 to December 20, 2010,
Messrs. Rakowich and Moghadam continued to engage in
communications regarding terms for a potential business
combination. A preliminary understanding was reached in the
course of these communications that any transaction would be a
merger of equals, that the exchange ratio would be
determined on an
at-the-market
basis (i.e., based on the relative market prices of shares of
AMB and ProLogis, although Messrs. Rakowich and Moghadam did not
discuss any specific figures for the exchange ratio at that
time), that the board of the combined company would consist of a
majority of persons nominated by ProLogis, that
Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich would share the position of
chief executive officer of the combined company with
Mr. Rakowich stepping down from such role at some future
date, that the corporate headquarters would be located in
San Francisco and the operational headquarters would be
located in Denver and that the combined company would operate
under the ProLogis name. Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich
acknowledged that any preliminary understanding between them
would be subject to the approval of the boards of AMB and
ProLogis following further due diligence and an exploration of
the remaining terms of a strategic business combination
transaction.
On December 22, 2010, the AMB board of directors had a
telephonic meeting with members of senior management,
representatives of J.P. Morgan, who had been invited the
previous day to participate in the meeting as AMBs
financial advisor in connection with a potential transaction,
and representatives of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,
AMBs legal advisor in connection with a potential
transaction. Mr. Moghadam reported to the AMB board of
directors on the progress of discussions with ProLogis about a
potential strategic business combination, including his
preliminary understanding with Mr. Rakowich on the form of
transaction, governance arrangements and name of the combined
company. The AMB board of directors then discussed with
Mr. Moghadam and AMBs advisors open issues with
respect to the transaction. J.P. Morgan and Wachtell Lipton
discussed with the AMB board that the potential business
combination was proposed to be structured as a merger of
equals and engaged in discussion with the AMB board on the
features of a merger of equals transaction.
Following discussion by the AMB board with senior management and
AMBs advisors, the AMB board expressed its support for
management and AMBs advisors to continue to explore a
strategic business combination transaction, and, in the event
further progress was made in the negotiations, engaging with
ProLogis in a mutual due diligence review process.
On December 22, 2010, the ProLogis board of trustees had a
telephonic meeting with members of the senior management of
ProLogis and representatives of Greenberg Traurig, LLP and Mayer
Brown LLP. Mr. Rakowich summarized the discussions with
Mr. Moghadam regarding a potential business combination of
ProLogis and AMB and explained the business rationale for such a
transaction. Mr. Rakowich described the proposed structure
of the transaction as a merger of equals and
described the other aspects of the proposed transaction. The
ProLogis board of trustees discussed with Mr. Rakowich the
business rationale for such a transaction and the potential
impact of such a transaction on ProLogis. Mr. Rakowich
further discussed with the ProLogis board of trustees open
issues with respect to the transaction. Following such
discussion, the ProLogis board of trustees confirmed its support
for management to continue discussions with AMB regarding a
merger of equals and, if further progress was made
in such discussions, to provide an updated financial analysis of
such a transaction for the boards consideration. In the
event that the discussions with AMB did not result in the
pursuit of a merger with AMB, the ProLogis board of trustees did
not intend for ProLogis to pursue other business combinations
and was prepared to have ProLogis continue as a stand-alone
company.
From December 28, 2010 through December 31, 2010,
Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich had a series of conversations
to discuss the management structure of the combined company.
During this period, representatives of the two companies
discussed potential timing for negotiating and signing a merger
agreement, and continued negotiations over governance
arrangements, transaction structure and the business plan of a
combined company, and engaged in due diligence reviews of the
other partys publicly available information.
35
On December 31, 2010, AMB and ProLogis, with the assistance
of their advisors, entered into a confidentiality agreement that
included mutual standstill and confidentiality restrictions.
On January 5, 2011, Mr. Rakowich, together with
Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Edward S. Nekritz, General
Counsel of ProLogis, met with Mr. Moghadam, Mr. Thomas
S. Olinger, Chief Financial Officer of AMB, Ms. Tamra D.
Browne, General Counsel of AMB, and Ms. Nancy Hemmenway,
Senior Vice President, Human Resources of AMB, in
San Francisco to discuss the various business functions of
the combined company that would be located in Denver and
San Francisco, and to discuss the strategy and operations
of the combined company, as well as the integration of the AMB
and ProLogis businesses.
On January 6, 2011, the ProLogis board of trustees met in
San Francisco with Messrs. Sullivan, Antenucci and
Nekritz, representatives of Morgan Stanley and representatives
of Mayer Brown LLP and Greenberg Traurig, LLP in connection with
the potential transaction. Mr. Rakowich reviewed the
background of the negotiations with AMB and provided an update
of the negotiations since the December 22 meeting of the
ProLogis board of trustees. Mr. Rakowich described the
current proposal for governance and management structure and
succession and the various functions of the combined company,
with a corporate headquarters located in San Francisco and
an operational headquarters located in Denver. Representatives
of Morgan Stanley then provided an updated financial analysis to
the ProLogis board of trustees of the proposed transaction,
including potential cost savings and other financial and
operational synergies that could result from such a transaction
based on the financial projections and cost-savings estimates
provided by the management of ProLogis and AMB. The ProLogis
board of trustees discussed the combined companys cost of
capital and strategies for growth, and the impact of the
potential business combination on customers of ProLogis as well
as its employees. The board also discussed the terms and
conditions under which Mr. Rakowich might continue his role
as chief executive officer of ProLogis and, in the event that an
agreement was reached with respect to a transaction, the
combined company. After further discussion with the members of
senior management of ProLogis and the financial and legal
advisors of ProLogis, the ProLogis board of trustees authorized
ProLogis management to continue discussions with AMB regarding a
business combination transaction consistent with the terms
described to the ProLogis board of trustees.
From January 6 to January 11, 2011, the two companies, with
the assistance of their advisors, continued to negotiate
governance arrangements (including the composition of the
initial management team, management succession planning, the
composition and committee structure of the board of directors,
and the provisions of the combined companys charter and
bylaws), potential transaction structures, proposed transaction
terms, and the business plan of a combined company.
On January 9, 2011, members of AMB management, including
Messrs. Moghadam and Olinger, Mmes. Browne and Hemmenway,
members of ProLogis management, including Messrs. Rakowich,
Sullivan and Nekritz, and their respective legal and financial
advisors met in Denver, Colorado to discuss the proposed
structure of a potential business combination and to negotiate
terms of the transaction. The participants in the discussions
agreed that the business combination should be structured in a
manner that achieves the greatest operational, tax and
accounting efficiencies, regardless of which legal entities
survived as a technical matter. In particular, both parties
acknowledged the importance of the combined company operating
under an UPREIT structure and structuring the transaction in an
efficient manner to accomplish that goal. The discussions
focused on a three-step transaction in which ProLogis would be
reorganized into an UPREIT structure with a newly formed
subsidiary of ProLogis as the new holding company and ProLogis
as an indirect subsidiary of the new holding company, the
subsequent merger of the new holding company into AMB, with AMB
changing its name to ProLogis Inc., and the
subsequent contribution of ProLogis to AMBs operating
partnership.
On January 12, 2011, the AMB board of directors met with
AMB senior management and AMBs outside legal and financial
advisors. Mr. Moghadam, J.P. Morgan and Wachtell
Lipton updated the AMB board on the status of negotiations with
ProLogis. J.P. Morgan then reviewed and discussed with the
AMB board financial information regarding ProLogis, AMB and the
transaction. Wachtell Lipton and members of management then
reviewed and discussed with the AMB board the proposed terms of
a business combination.
Over the course of the next week, AMB and ProLogis and their
respective advisors continued to work to negotiate terms for a
potential business combination, including the negotiation of
transaction documentation. During this time,
Messrs. Moghadam and Rakowich came to a preliminary
understanding that Mr. Rakowich would
36
serve as co-chief executive officer and board member of the
combined company until December 31, 2012. On
January 15, 2011, each of ProLogis and AMB opened its
electronic data room to the other party, and the parties and
their advisors commenced due diligence review of the information
made available.
On January 16, 2011, Mr. Moghadam, Ms. Hemmenway,
Mr. Guy P. Jaquier, President Europe and Asia and
President, Private Capital of AMB, and Mr. Reilly, met in
Denver with Messrs. Rakowich and Nekritz, Mr. Gary E.
Anderson, Head of Global Operations and Investment Management of
ProLogis, and Mr. Michael S. Curless, Managing Director of
Global Capital Deployment of ProLogis. The parties engaged in
detailed discussions of various matters that would be important
to the strategic success of the potential transaction, including
the operational structure and roles of the proposed members of
the management team of the combined company as well as other
personnel of the combined company. Additional meetings were held
by Messrs. Sullivan and Olinger in Denver on
January 16, 2011 to engage in a detailed discussion and
negotiation of the integration of many of the corporate
functions.
On January 16, 2011, an initial draft of a merger agreement
was distributed by Wachtell Lipton to ProLogis and its legal
advisors. Over the course of the next two weeks, AMB and
ProLogis and their respective legal and financial advisors
continued to negotiate the merger agreement and other
transaction documentation and to conduct their financial and
legal due diligence reviews. The parties and their advisors also
discussed both governmental and third-party approvals and
consents that would be required in connection with a business
combination, and continued their analysis of the integration of
the two companies and the potential synergies from the
combination.
On January 20, 2011, the AMB board of directors received an
update from AMB senior management and AMBs outside
advisors about the progress of the discussions between AMB and
ProLogis. Senior management and AMBs outside advisors also
discussed the potential benefits and risks of the proposed
transaction at this meeting. Later that evening, at the
invitation of the ProLogis board of trustees,
Messrs. Moghadam, Jaquier, Olinger and Reilly and
Ms. Hemmenway met the ProLogis board of trustees and
Messrs. Nekritz and Antenucci for dinner in
San Francisco to introduce themselves and to discuss some
of the rationales for the business combination.
On January 21, 2011, the ProLogis board of trustees met
with members of senior management of ProLogis and their
financial and legal advisors. Representatives of Morgan Stanley
provided a detailed review and update to the ProLogis board of
trustees on the status of its financial due diligence services,
including its review of potential G&A, financial and
operational synergies. The representatives from Morgan Stanley
also presented an analysis of exchange ratio considerations.
Morgan Stanley then reviewed the financial structure and
benefits of a combined company. Legal representatives from
Greenberg Traurig, LLP and Mayer Brown LLP then provided the
ProLogis board of trustees with a summary of the structure of
the transaction and the proposed terms of the merger agreement.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the ProLogis board of trustees
expressed its support for continuing to pursue the potential
business combination and requested that management continue its
work as to the achievement of the potential G&A, financial
and operational synergies from the proposed business
combination. The board also considered the terms and conditions
upon which members of ProLogis management and ProLogis employees
would be offered continuing employment with the combined company
and appropriate retention and severance arrangements. At the
invitation of the ProLogis board of trustees, Mr. Moghadam
also joined the meeting to present his views on the strategic
priorities of the combined company.
During the afternoon of January 21, 2011 and during the
course of the day on January 22, 2011,
Messrs. Rakowich and Moghadam and other members of the
senior management teams of ProLogis and AMB continued to meet in
San Francisco to discuss in detail specific means for the
achievement of cost and financial synergies from the proposed
business combination as well as the integration of the two
companies and specific roles of personnel of both companies.
On the evening of January 22, 2011, Messrs. Moghadam
and Rakowich came to a preliminary understanding with respect to
the exchange ratio that they would present to their respective
boards. They had previously discussed proceeding on the basis of
an
at-the-market
exchange ratio, and, after examining the market prices of AMB
common stock and ProLogis common shares over various time
periods and reviewing whether those prices were consistent with
each companys internal estimates of value, they agreed to
present to their respective boards an exchange ratio of 0.4464.
37
On January 26, 2011, following published reports of a
potential transaction between AMB and ProLogis by various media
outlets, including the Wall Street Journal, members of
AMB management, members of ProLogis management and its board of
trustees and their respective legal and financial advisors held
discussions as to how the parties would respond to the
publications. AMB and ProLogis agreed that each company would
publish a press release stating that AMB and ProLogis were
engaged in discussions regarding a potential merger of equals,
in which the two companies would combine in an all-stock,
at-market transaction, based upon the unaffected trading prices
of the two companies stock prior to media reports of a
possible merger. Each press release further noted that it was
not certain if or when a definitive agreement would be reached.
On January 28 and 29, 2011, members of AMB management, members
of ProLogis management, and their respective legal and financial
advisors met at the offices of Wachtell Lipton to finalize
negotiation of the merger agreement and other transaction
documentation, including employment arrangements.
On January 29, 2011, the directors and trustees,
respectively, of AMB and ProLogis came to New York City for a
joint board dinner at the offices of J.P. Morgan.
On January 30, 2011, the AMB board of directors met to
consider the proposed strategic business combination of AMB and
ProLogis. At this meeting, AMB management, Wachtell Lipton and
J.P. Morgan provided an update to the AMB board on the
negotiation of the proposed transaction and the results of the
due diligence review of ProLogis, and reviewed the strategic
rationale and the anticipated benefits of the proposed
transaction to AMB stockholders. Representatives of
J.P. Morgan then reviewed with the AMB board the financial
terms of the proposed transaction and presented J.P.
Morgans financial analysis of the proposed Topco merger.
After further discussion with the AMB board, J.P. Morgan
then delivered to the AMB board its oral opinion (as
subsequently confirmed in writing in an opinion dated
January 30, 2011), as described under
Opinion of AMBs Financial Advisor,
that, as of the date of that opinion and based upon and subject
to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and
limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio of
0.4464 provided for in the Topco merger was fair, from a
financial point of view, to AMB. Representatives of Wachtell
Lipton discussed with the AMB board the duties applicable to its
decisions with respect to its review and consideration of the
proposed transaction, and reviewed the material terms of the
proposed merger agreement and the post-closing governance
arrangements, as well as compensation and benefits issues in
connection with the transaction. Following these presentations
and discussions, and other discussions by the AMB board
concerning, among other things, the matters described below
under AMBs Reasons for the Topco Merger;
Recommendations of the AMB Board of Directors, the AMB
board of directors, by a unanimous vote of all directors,
concluded that the proposed merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Topco merger,
were advisable and in the best interests of AMB and its
stockholders, and approved the merger agreement.
On January 30, 2011, the ProLogis board of trustees also
met to consider the proposed strategic business combination of
AMB and ProLogis. At this meeting, ProLogis senior
management reviewed with the ProLogis board of trustees the
business terms of the proposed transaction. ProLogis management,
together with ProLogis legal and financial advisors,
reviewed the results of the due diligence review of AMB, and
reviewed the strategic rationale and the anticipated benefits of
the proposed transaction to ProLogis shareholders.
Representatives of Morgan Stanley then reviewed with the
ProLogis board of trustees the financial terms of the proposed
transaction and presented its financial analysis of the proposed
transaction. After further discussion with the ProLogis board of
trustees, Morgan Stanley then delivered to the ProLogis board of
trustees its oral opinion (as subsequently confirmed in writing
in an opinion dated January 30, 2011), as described under
Opinion of ProLogis Financial
Advisor, that, as of the date of that opinion and based
upon and subject to the assumptions, procedures, factors,
qualifications and limitations set forth in its opinion, the
exchange ratio of 0.4464 pursuant to the merger agreement was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of ProLogis
common shares. Representatives of Mayer Brown LLP and Greenberg
Traurig, LLP discussed with the ProLogis board of trustees the
duties applicable to its decisions with respect to its review
and consideration of the proposed transaction, and reviewed the
material terms of the proposed merger agreement and the
post-closing governance arrangements, as well as compensation
and benefits issues in connection with the transaction.
Following these presentations and discussions, and other
discussion by the ProLogis board of trustees concerning, among
other things, the matters described below under
ProLogis Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendations of the ProLogis Board of Trustees, the
ProLogis board of trustees, by a unanimous vote of all trustees,
concluded that the proposed merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated
38
thereby, including the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger,
were advisable and in the best interests of ProLogis and its
shareholders, and approved the merger agreement.
Following the approvals of the AMB board of directors and
ProLogis board of trustees, AMB and ProLogis finalized and
executed the merger agreement and other transaction
documentation. On January 31, 2011, AMB and ProLogis issued
a joint press release announcing the transaction.
AMBs
Reasons for the Topco Merger; Recommendation of the AMB Board of
Directors
After careful consideration, the AMB board of directors, by a
unanimous vote of all directors, at a meeting held on
January 30, 2011, determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the Topco
merger, are advisable and in the best interests of AMB and its
stockholders, and approved the merger agreement. In reaching its
decision, the AMB board of directors consulted with AMBs
senior management and its financial and legal advisors, and
considered a number of factors that the board of directors
believed supported its decision, including the following
material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Considerations. The AMB board of
directors believed that the Merger will provide a number of
significant strategic opportunities, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to bring together two of the most complementary
customer franchises in real estate to create an integrated
industrial REIT and a stronger platform for value creation;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that, by combining two companies with businesses
in complementary geographic regions, the combined company would
be a well-positioned and diversified global player that is
active on four continents with profitable scale, with
approximately 600 million square feet of modern
distribution facilities in important markets and logistics
corridors in 22 countries, enabling it to expand its
relationships with its large, multinational customers that
require space in multiple locations and to better serve the
needs of multi-market customers in about 78% of the global
economy in a profitable manner;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combination will more rapidly advance a
number of priorities underway at AMB, including by improving
operational efficiencies, achieving profitable scale, deepening
the presence in AMBs current markets and expanding
AMBs geographic footprint by adding presence in the United
Kingdom and Eastern Europe;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined company would have an improved
cost of capital, with greater operating and financial
flexibility to capture opportunities across business cycles and
to manage currency risk;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined company would be able to
better serve the needs of its customers because of the larger
geographic footprint and the wider land bank of the combined
company, enabling the combined company to expand its
relationships with its large multinational customers that
require space in multiple locations;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combination will result in improved
liquidity for the stockholders of AMB as a result of the
increased equity capitalization and the increased shareholder
base of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the transaction will create synergies and
be immediately accretive, with the full expected annual gross
savings in general and administrative expenses of
$80 million expected to be realized by the end of 2012;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined company will be a leader in
the industrial real estate private capital sector, with a broad
range of product offerings across the risk/return spectrum and
across the Americas, Europe and Asia;
|
|
|
|
the expectation that the combined company will have a
diversified customer base, with the largest customer accounting
for less than 2.6% of the overall rents of the combined company;
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
the expectation that transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will enhance the level of management depth and
experience of the combined company, while also providing for the
continuation of certain members of AMB senior management;
|
|
|
|
the belief that the combined company will be stronger and more
diversified and therefore will be better positioned to benefit
from the growing recovery in the general economy and in rental
prices in particular; and
|
|
|
|
the belief that there was no merger partner other than ProLogis
that would provide AMB with all of the strategic benefits noted
above, including the customer franchise and global scale that
ProLogis would provide.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Exchange Ratio. AMB considered that the
fixed exchange ratio, which will not fluctuate as a result of
changes in the price of AMB common stock or ProLogis common
shares, provides certainty to the shareholders of both parties
as to their respective pro forma percentage ownership of the
combined company.
|
|
|
|
Merger of Equals. The combination has been
structured as a merger of equals, with an exchange ratio that
reflected an
at-the-market
transaction based on the unaffected market prices of AMB common
stock and ProLogis common shares and no payment of a control
premium to the stockholders of AMB or the shareholders of
ProLogis. The AMB board of directors viewed this structure as
favorable, in that AMB is engaging in a strategic combination
with a company with similarities to AMB. The AMB board of
directors also considered that the combination would allow AMB
and its stockholders to achieve many of the same objectives of a
large acquisition (e.g., increasing size and total market
capitalization) without paying the premium typical of many
acquisition transactions. Further, the AMB board of directors
believed that the combination will allow AMB stockholders to
participate in the growth and future value creation of the
combined company and to share pro rata in the benefits of the
expected synergies.
|
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor. The AMB board of
directors considered the opinion of J.P. Morgan that, as of
January 30, 2011 and based upon and subject to the
assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations
set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio of 0.4464 provided
for in the Topco merger was fair, from a financial point of
view, to AMB, as more fully described elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Participation in Future Appreciation. The AMB
board of directors considered the fact that the Merger would
allow AMB stockholders to participate in potential further
appreciation of the combined company after the Merger.
|
|
|
|
Tax-Free Transaction. The AMB board of
directors considered the expectation that the Merger will
generally qualify as a tax-free transaction to the AMB
stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
Governance. The AMB board of directors
considered that the following governance arrangements provided
by the merger agreement would enable continuity of management
and an effective and timely integration of the two
companies operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of the combined company would be composed
of five appointees chosen by the AMB board of directors and six
appointees chosen by the ProLogis board of trustees, and the key
leadership of the combined company after completion of the
Merger would be drawn from senior executives from each of AMB
and ProLogis; and
|
|
|
|
the arrangements providing for Mr. Moghadam of AMB to serve
as chairman of the board and co-chief executive officer of the
combined company and Mr. Rakowich of ProLogis to serve as
chairman of the executive committee of the board and co-chief
executive officer of the combined company after the Merger until
December 31, 2012, at which point Mr. Moghadam would
remain as chairman and become sole chief executive officer of
the combined company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Familiarity with Businesses. The AMB board of
directors considered its knowledge of AMBs business,
operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects and of
ProLogiss business, operations, financial condition,
earnings and prospects, taking into account the results of
AMBs due diligence review of
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis, as well as its knowledge of the current and
prospective environment in which AMB and ProLogis operate,
including economic and market conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Likelihood of Consummation. The AMB board
of directors considered the commitment on the part of both
parties to complete the business combination between AMB and
ProLogis pursuant to their respective obligations under the
terms of the merger agreement, and the likelihood that the
regulatory and stockholder approvals needed to complete the
transaction would be obtained in a timely manner.
|
The AMB board of directors also considered a variety of risks
and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger
agreement and the Merger, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the Merger may not be completed, or that
completion may be unduly delayed, for reasons beyond the control
of AMB or ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
the risk that failure to complete the Merger could negatively
affect the stock prices and the future business and financial
results of AMB;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with integrating two businesses, including
the risks associated with having two chief executive officers
for a period of time and the risk that the combined company may
experience operational interruptions or the loss of key
employees or customers;
|
|
|
|
the risk associated with being able to accomplish the continuity
of management and management succession contemplated by the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the risk of not capturing all of the anticipated operational
synergies and cost savings between AMB and ProLogis and the risk
that other anticipated benefits might not be realized on the
expected timeframe or at all;
|
|
|
|
the substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
transaction, including the costs of integrating the businesses
of AMB and ProLogis, termination and severance costs of both
companies, system conversions, and the transaction expenses
arising from the Merger, which are estimated to be approximately
$160 million to $180 million in the aggregate;
|
|
|
|
the weaker debt coverage (not taking into account expected
synergies or the business plan of the combined company) and
higher leverage that the combined company was expected to have
relative to AMB currently;
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of AMBs business between
the date of the merger agreement and the date of the
consummation of the proposed Merger;
|
|
|
|
the merger agreements provisions imposing restrictions on
AMB from soliciting alternative transactions and the termination
fee of $210 million and up to $20 million in expense
reimbursement amount that AMB would be required to pay if the
merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances could
limit the willingness of a third party to propose a competing
business combination transaction with AMB;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement could trigger the termination of, and mandatory
prepayments of all amounts outstanding under, AMBs
existing credit agreements unless appropriate lender consents or
waivers are received or replacement credit agreements of the
combined company are entered into in connection with the closing
of the Merger, as anticipated;
|
|
|
|
the potential risk of diverting management focus and resources
from other strategic opportunities and from operational matters
while working to implement the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
the other factors described under Risk Factors.
|
In addition to considering the factors described above, the AMB
board of directors considered the fact that some of AMBs
directors and executive officers have other interests in the
Merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of AMB stockholders, as discussed under
Interests of AMB Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger.
The AMB board of directors concluded that the potentially
negative factors associated with the Merger were outweighed by
the potential benefits that it expected the AMB stockholders
would achieve as a result of the Merger.
41
Accordingly, the AMB board of directors determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Merger, are advisable, fair to, and in the best
interests of, AMB and its stockholders.
The above discussion of the factors considered by the AMB board
of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but does set
forth the material factors considered by the AMB board of
directors. In reaching its decision to approve the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, the AMB board of directors did not quantify or assign
any relative weights to the factors considered, and individual
directors may have given different weights to different factors.
The AMB board of directors considered all these factors as a
whole, including discussions with, and questioning of, AMB
management and AMBs financial and legal advisors, and
overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to
support, its determination.
For the reasons set forth above, the AMB board of directors
unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the Topco merger,
are advisable and in the best interests of AMB and its
stockholders, and unanimously approved the merger agreement. The
AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that the AMB
stockholders vote FOR the Topco merger, including
the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis
shareholders in connection with the Topco merger,
FOR the bylaw amendment, and FOR the
charter amendment.
ProLogis
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the ProLogis Board of
Trustees
After careful consideration, the ProLogis board of trustees, by
a unanimous vote of all of its trustees, at a meeting held on
January 30, 2011, determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the ProLogis
merger and the Topco merger, are advisable and in the best
interests of ProLogis and its shareholders, and approved the
merger agreement. In reaching its decision, the ProLogis board
of trustees consulted with ProLogis senior management and
its financial and legal advisors, and considered a number of
factors that the board of trustees believed supported its
decision, including the following material factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Strategic Considerations. The ProLogis board
of trustees believed that the Merger will provide a number of
significant strategic opportunities, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combined company was expected to have approximately
600 million square feet of industrial distribution space
worldwide. The combination was expected to enhance
ProLogis platform in North America, Western Europe and
Japan, while giving ProLogis immediate and less costly access to
China and Brazil through AMBs existing platform than that
which ProLogis could have accomplished on its own in the current
economic cycle. ProLogis believed that the combined company will
benefit from the combination of complementary assets and
resources, enabling the combined company to expand its
relationships with its large, multinational customers that
require space in multiple locations and to better serve the
needs of its multinational customers. In addition, ProLogis
believed that the combined company will have a diversified
customer base, with the largest customer accounting for less
than 2.6% of the overall rents of the combined company.
|
|
|
|
The ProLogis board of trustees considered that ProLogis is
engaging in a strategic combination with a company with
similarities to ProLogis, and believed that the combination will
more rapidly advance a number of priorities underway at
ProLogis, including improving operational efficiencies,
increasing assets in major logistics markets and increasing
asset utilization by stabilizing the operating portfolio,
leasing up the development portfolio and monetizing the land
bank.
|
|
|
|
The combined company was expected to have an estimated total
equity market capitalization of $14 billion and to be among
the largest REITs as measured by enterprise value as well as
total assets under management. The combined company was expected
to have total assets owned and under management of approximately
$46 billion. As a result of its larger size and enhanced
balance sheet and credit profile, the combined company is
expected to have greater financial flexibility and improved
access to capital markets with a lower cost of capital.
|
|
|
|
The combined company was expected to have approximately
$25.8 billion of assets under management in 19 funds on
four continents, making it one of the largest and most
diversified investment management businesses in the real estate
industry. This was expected to allow the combined company to
provide a
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
broader spectrum of product offerings, making the combined
company an attractive option for institutional investors seeking
exposure to the industrial distribution sector across a variety
of risk/return profiles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis believed that the combined company can generate
significant synergies by eliminating duplicative general and
administrative expenses, with the full expected annual gross
savings in general and administrative expenses of
$80 million expected to be realized by the end of 2012.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis believed that the combination will result in improved
liquidity for its shareholders as a result of the increased
equity capitalization and the increased shareholder base of the
combined company.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis believed that the combination will strengthen
ProLogis balance sheet as the combined company was
expected to initially have a total debt to total undepreciated
real estate assets ratio of 42.6%, as opposed to a ratio of
44.0% for ProLogis on a stand-alone basis as of
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis believed that transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will enhance the level of management depth and
experience of the combined company, while also providing for the
continuation of certain members of ProLogis senior management.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis believed that there was no merger partner other than
AMB that would provide ProLogis with all of the strategic
benefits noted above, and therefore ProLogis did not seek
alternative business combination transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis Name. The ProLogis board of trustees
also considered that the combined company would continue to use
the ProLogis name.
|
|
|
|
Transaction Structure. The combined company
will be structured as an UPREIT, which the ProLogis board of
trustees believes will give the combined company a greater
ability to acquire assets using a
tax-deferred
acquisition currency. In addition, ProLogis noted that the
transaction structure did not present any unusual regulatory or
third-party required approvals.
|
|
|
|
Fixed Exchange Ratio. ProLogis believed that
the fixed exchange ratio, which will not fluctuate as a result
of changes in the price of ProLogis common shares or AMB common
stock, provides certainty to the shareholders of both parties as
to their respective pro forma percentage ownership of the
combined company.
|
|
|
|
Merger of Equals. The combination has been
structured as a merger of equals, with an exchange ratio that
reflected an
at-the-market
transaction based on the unaffected market prices of ProLogis
common shares and AMB common stock and no payment of a control
premium to the shareholders of ProLogis or the stockholders of
AMB. The ProLogis board of trustees also considered that the
combination would allow ProLogis and its shareholders to achieve
many of the same objectives of a large acquisition (e.g.,
increasing size and total market capitalization) without paying
the premium typical of many acquisition transactions. Further,
the ProLogis board of trustees believed that the combination
will allow ProLogis shareholders to participate in the growth
and future value creation of the combined company and to share
pro rata in the benefits of the expected synergies.
|
|
|
|
Participation in Future Appreciation. The
ProLogis board of trustees considered the fact that the Merger
would allow ProLogis shareholders to participate in potential
further appreciation of the combined company after the Merger.
|
|
|
|
Tax-Free Transaction. The ProLogis board of
trustees considered the expectation that the Merger will
generally qualify as a tax-free transaction to the ProLogis
shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
Governance. The ProLogis board of trustees
considered that the following governance arrangements provided
by the merger agreement would enable continuity of management
and an effective and timely integration of the two
companies operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of the combined company would be composed
of a majority of appointees chosen by the ProLogis board of
trustees, and the key leadership after completion of the Merger
would be drawn from senior executives from each of ProLogis and
AMB; and
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
the arrangements providing for Mr. Rakowich of ProLogis to
serve as chairman of the executive committee of the board and
co-chief executive officer of the combined company of the
combined company after the Merger until December 31, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor. ProLogis
board of trustees also considered the opinion of Morgan Stanley
that, as of January 30, 2011 and based upon and subject to
the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and
limitations set forth in its opinion, the exchange ratio of
0.4464 pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of ProLogis common
shares, as more fully described elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Familiarity with Businesses. The ProLogis
board of trustees considered its knowledge of ProLogis
business, operations, financial condition, earnings and
prospects and of AMBs business, operations, financial
condition, earnings and prospects, taking into account the
results of ProLogs due diligence review of AMB, as well as
its knowledge of the current and prospective environment in
which ProLogis and AMB operate, including economic and market
conditions.
|
ProLogis board of trustees also considered a variety of
risks and other potentially negative factors concerning the
merger agreement and the Merger, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The operations, technologies and personnel of the two companies
may not be successfully integrated. The combined company may
also experience operational interruptions or the loss of key
employees or customers.
|
|
|
|
The proposed transaction presents the potential risk of
diverting management focus and resources from other strategic
opportunities and from operational matters while working to
implement the Merger.
|
|
|
|
The combined company may not realize the synergies and cost
savings that ProLogis expects from the combination. In addition,
many of the benefits the combined company hopes to realize as
part of the combination are difficult to quantify and may only
be realized, if at all, over time.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis and AMB are expected to incur substantial costs in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the costs of integrating the businesses of
AMB and ProLogis, termination and severance costs of both
companies, system conversions, and the transaction expenses
arising from the Merger, which are estimated to be approximately
$160 million to $180 million in the aggregate.
|
|
|
|
Completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement requires lender consents or waivers under certain
existing debt of ProLogis. If ProLogis does not receive any of
such lender consents or waivers (or refinance such debt), and
all of such lenders elect to declare a default and accelerate
the maturity of their respective indebtedness, ProLogis could be
obligated to immediately repay the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of such debt plus prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
The merger agreement includes restrictions on the conduct of
ProLogis business between the date of the merger agreement
and the date of the consummation of the proposed Merger.
|
|
|
|
The Merger may not be completed, or completion may be unduly
delayed, for reasons beyond the control of ProLogis or AMB
|
|
|
|
The risk that failure to complete the Merger could negatively
affect the stock prices and future business and financial
results of ProLogis.
|
|
|
|
The merger agreements provisions imposing restrictions on
ProLogis soliciting alternative transactions and the
termination fee of up to $315 million and up to
$20 million in expense reimbursement that ProLogis would be
required to pay if the merger agreement is terminated under
certain circumstances could limit the willingness of a third
party to propose a competing business combination transaction
with ProLogis.
|
|
|
|
ProLogis board of trustees also considered the other
factors described under Risk Factors.
|
In addition to considering the factors described above, the
ProLogis board of trustees considered the fact that some of
ProLogis trustees and executive officers have other
interests that are different from, or in addition to, the
44
interests of the ProLogis shareholders, as discussed under
Interests of ProLogis Trustees and Officers
in the Merger.
The ProLogis board of trustees concluded that the potentially
negative factors associated with the Merger were outweighed by
the potential benefits that it expected the ProLogis
shareholders would achieve as a result of the Merger.
Accordingly, the ProLogis board of trustees determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger, are
advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of, ProLogis and
its shareholders.
The above discussion of the factors considered by ProLogis
board of trustees is not intended to be exhaustive, but does set
forth the material factors considered by ProLogis board of
trustees. In reaching its decision to approve the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, the ProLogis board of trustees did not quantify or
assign any relative weights to the factors considered, and
individual trustees may have given different weights to
different factors. The ProLogis board of trustees considered all
these factors as a whole, including discussions with, and
questioning of, ProLogis management and ProLogiss
financial and legal advisors, and overall considered the factors
to be favorable to, and to support, its determination.
For the reasons set forth above, the ProLogis board of
trustees unanimously determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the ProLogis
merger and Topco merger, are advisable and in the best interests
of ProLogis and its shareholders, and unanimously approved the
merger agreement. The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously
recommends that the ProLogis shareholders vote FOR
the Merger.
Opinion
of AMBs Financial Advisor
At the meeting of the AMB board of directors on January 30,
2011, J.P. Morgan rendered its oral opinion to the AMB
board of directors that, as of such date and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its written
opinion, the exchange ratio in the Topco merger was fair from a
financial point of view to AMB. J.P. Morgan subsequently
confirmed its oral opinion by delivering its written opinion,
dated January 30, 2011, to the AMB board of directors. No
limitations were imposed by the AMB board of directors upon
J.P. Morgan with respect to the investigations made or
procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion.
The full text of the written opinion of J.P. Morgan,
dated January 30, 2011, which sets forth, among other
things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered and limitations on the review undertaken in rendering
its opinion, is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex D. The summary of
J.P. Morgans opinion set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion. AMB stockholders should read
this opinion carefully and in its entirety.
J.P. Morgans opinion is addressed to the AMB board of
directors, is directed only to the fairness from a financial
point of view of the exchange ratio in the Topco merger to AMB
as of the date of the opinion, and does not address any other
aspect of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
J.P. Morgan provided its advisory services and opinion for
the information and assistance of the AMB board of directors in
connection with its consideration of the Topco merger. The
opinion of J.P. Morgan does not constitute a recommendation
as to how any AMB stockholder should vote with respect to the
Topco merger. In addition, this opinion does not in any manner
address the price at which AMB common stock or ProLogis common
shares will trade at any time subsequent to the date of the
opinion. J.P. Morgans opinion was approved by
J.P. Morgans fairness committee.
In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft dated January 29, 2011 of the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information concerning AMB and ProLogis and the industries in
which they operate;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial and operating performance of AMB and
ProLogis with publicly available information concerning certain
other companies J.P. Morgan deemed relevant and reviewed
the current and
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
historical market prices of AMB common stock and ProLogis common
shares and certain publicly traded securities of such other
companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial data, analyses and forecasts
prepared or approved by management of AMB or management of
ProLogis relating to their respective businesses, as well as the
estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related
expenses and synergies expected to result from the Topco merger
(which we refer to as the synergies); and
|
|
|
|
performed such other financial studies and analyses and
considered such other information as J.P. Morgan deemed
appropriate for the purposes of its opinion.
|
In addition, J.P. Morgan held discussions with certain
members of the management of AMB and ProLogis with respect to
certain aspects of the Topco merger, and the past and current
business operations of AMB and ProLogis, the financial condition
and future prospects and operations of AMB and ProLogis, the
effects of the Topco merger on the financial condition and
future prospects of AMB and certain other matters
J.P. Morgan believed necessary or appropriate to its
inquiry.
In giving its opinion, J.P. Morgan relied upon and assumed
the accuracy and completeness of all information that was
publicly available or was furnished to or discussed with
J.P. Morgan by AMB and ProLogis or otherwise reviewed by or
for J.P. Morgan, and J.P. Morgan did not independently
verify (nor did J.P. Morgan assume responsibility or
liability for independently verifying) any such information or
its accuracy or completeness. J.P. Morgan did not conduct
and was not provided with any valuation or appraisal of any
assets or liabilities (including real estate assets and
liabilities), nor did J.P. Morgan evaluate the solvency of
AMB, ProLogis or any other party to the merger agreement under
any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to J.P. Morgan or derived therefrom, including the
synergies, J.P. Morgan assumed that they had been
reasonably prepared based on assumptions reflecting the best
then-available estimates and judgments by management of AMB or
management of ProLogis, as applicable, as to the expected future
results of operations and financial condition of AMB and
ProLogis, respectively, to which such analyses or forecasts
relate. J.P. Morgan expressed no view as to such analyses
or forecasts (including the synergies) or the assumptions on
which they were based. J.P. Morgan also assumed that each
of the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, and will be consummated as described in the merger
agreement, and that the definitive merger agreement does not
differ in any material respects from the draft thereof furnished
to J.P. Morgan. J.P. Morgan also assumed that the
representations and warranties made by AMB and ProLogis in the
merger agreement and the related agreements are and will be true
and correct in all respects material to J.P. Morgans
analysis. J.P. Morgan is not a legal, regulatory or tax
expert and relied on the assessments made by advisors to AMB
with respect to such issues. J.P. Morgan further assumed
that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and
approvals necessary for the consummation of the Topco merger
will be obtained without any material adverse effect on AMB or
ProLogis, or on the contemplated benefits of the Topco merger.
J.P. Morgans opinion is necessarily based on economic,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to J.P. Morgan as of, the date of
J.P. Morgans opinion. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect J.P. Morgans
opinion and J.P. Morgan does not have any obligation to
update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion. J.P. Morgans
opinion is limited to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, to AMB of the exchange ratio in the Topco merger and
J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the
Topco merger to the holders of any class of securities,
creditors or other constituencies of AMB or as to the underlying
decision by AMB to engage in the Topco merger. Furthermore,
J.P. Morgan expressed no opinion with respect to the amount
or nature of any compensation to any officers, directors, or
employees of any party to the Topco merger, or any class of such
persons relative to the exchange ratio or with respect to the
fairness of any such compensation. J.P. Morgan expressed no
opinion as to the price at which AMB common stock or ProLogis
common shares will trade at any time subsequent to the date of
the opinion.
In accordance with customary investment banking practice,
J.P. Morgan employed generally accepted valuation methods
in reaching its opinion. The following is a summary of certain
of the financial analyses undertaken by J.P. Morgan and
delivered to the AMB board of directors on January 30,
2011, which analyses were among those considered by
J.P. Morgan in connection with delivering its opinion.
46
Historical
Exchange Ratio Analysis
J.P. Morgan calculated (1) the daily implied historical
exchange ratios during the five years ending January 25,
2011 by dividing the daily volume weighted average price (which
we refer to as VWAP) per ProLogis common share by
that of AMB common stock for each trading day during that
period, (2) the average of those daily implied historical
exchange ratios for the
one-day,
one-week, two-week, since January 3, 2011, four-week,
12-week,
26-week,
52-week, three-year and five-year periods ending
January 25, 2011 and (3) the historical exchange ratio
for the
one-day
closing price by dividing the closing price per share as of
January 25, 2011 of ProLogis common shares by that of AMB
common stock. J.P. Morgan also noted the median, low and
high exchange ratios for each period referenced in
clause (2) above. The analysis resulted in the following
implied exchange ratios for the periods indicated, as compared
to the exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for in the Topco
merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
1-day
closing price
|
|
|
0.4412
|
x
|
1-day VWAP
|
|
|
0.4374
|
x
|
1-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4326
|
x
|
2-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4409
|
x
|
Since January 3, 2011 average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4440
|
x
|
4-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4462
|
x
|
12-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4509
|
x
|
26-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4488
|
x
|
52-week average VWAP
|
|
|
0.4618
|
x
|
3-year
average VWAP
|
|
|
0.6141
|
x
|
5-year
average VWAP
|
|
|
0.7930
|
x
|
J.P. Morgan noted that a historical exchange ratio analysis is
not a valuation methodology and that such analysis was presented
merely for reference purposes.
Contribution
Analysis
J.P. Morgan analyzed the contribution of each of AMB and
ProLogis to the pro forma combined company with respect to
EBITDA (as defined in AMB Unaudited Prospective
Financial Information), FFO (as defined as Core
FFO in AMB Unaudited Prospective Financial
Information) and AFFO (as defined in AMB
Unaudited Prospective Financial Information) for CY11 and
CY12. For purposes of the contribution analysis,
J.P. Morgan assumed that the contribution with respect to
EBITDA reflected each companys contribution to the
combined companys pro forma firm value. Equity value
contributions and relative ownership interests were then derived
by adjusting firm value contributions for outstanding net debt,
preferred equity and non-controlling interests of both
companies. J.P. Morgan further assumed that the
contributions with respect to FFO and AFFO reflected each
companys contribution to the combined companys pro
forma equity value and relative ownership interests. The
analyses yielded the following pro forma diluted equity value
contributions and ownership interests and implied exchange
ratios, as compared to the pro forma diluted ownership interest
of 40.4% implied by the exchange ratio provided for in the Topco
merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
CY11
|
|
|
|
CY12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB contribution / ownership
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
|
|
37.3
|
%
|
Implied exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.5892
|
x
|
|
|
0.5095
|
x
|
FFO
|
|
|
CY11
|
|
|
|
CY12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB contribution / ownership
|
|
|
39.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
Implied exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.4568
|
x
|
|
|
0.4784
|
x
|
AFFO
|
|
|
CY11
|
|
|
|
CY12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB contribution / ownership
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
40.5
|
%
|
Implied exchange ratio
|
|
|
0.4662
|
x
|
|
|
0.4448
|
x
|
47
Public
Trading Analysis
Using publicly available information, including published equity
research analysts estimates of funds from operations (FFO)
per share and estimated adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)
per share for calendar year 2011 (which we refer to as
CY11) and calendar year 2012 (which we refer to as
CY12), J.P. Morgan analyzed certain trading
multiples of selected other publicly traded REITs. None of the
selected companies are identical to AMB or ProLogis. However,
the selected companies were chosen because they are publicly
traded REITs with operations that, for purposes of the analysis
of J.P. Morgan, may be considered similar to those of AMB
and ProLogis, including primarily the ownership of commercial
real estate, as well as tenure in the public markets,
capitalization strategies, relative market position and
management leadership qualities. These other REITS were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Property Group, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Boston Properties, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Equity Residential;
|
|
|
|
Federal Realty Investment Trust; and
|
|
|
|
Public Storage.
|
For each of the other REITs, J.P. Morgan calculated the
multiple of equity market price per share to the median estimate
of its CY11 and CY12 FFO per share and AFFO per share, as
reported by equity research analysts as of January 25,
2011. J.P. Morgan also calculated the same trading
multiples for AMB and ProLogis based on equity research analyst
data and data provided by AMB management. In J.P. Morgans
view, the FFO and AFFO metrics used by equity research analysts
and AMB management were sufficiently similar so as not to
materially affect this analysis.
The following presents the results of this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price / FFO per
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Multiple
|
|
Price / AFFO per Share Multiple
|
|
|
|
|
CY11
|
|
CY12
|
|
CY11
|
|
CY12
|
|
Simon Property Group, Inc.
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
15.2x
|
|
14.2x
|
|
17.2x
|
|
16.5x
|
Boston Properties, Inc.
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
21.0x
|
|
19.1x
|
|
32.7x
|
|
27.2x
|
Equity Residential
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
21.4x
|
|
18.5x
|
|
25.4x
|
|
22.4x
|
Federal Realty Investment Trust
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
19.6x
|
|
18.7x
|
|
22.9x
|
|
21.8x
|
Public Storage
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
19.3x
|
|
18.2x
|
|
21.0x
|
|
19.9x
|
Other REITs
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
19.6x
|
|
18.5x
|
|
22.9x
|
|
21.8x
|
AMB
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
24.0x
|
|
21.4x
|
|
33.7x
|
|
28.9x
|
|
|
Management estimate
|
|
24.4x
|
|
22.2x
|
|
30.7x
|
|
24.7x
|
ProLogis
|
|
Median equity research estimate
|
|
22.2x
|
|
18.6x
|
|
29.3x
|
|
24.2x
|
|
|
Management estimate
|
|
23.4x
|
|
20.2x
|
|
28.9x
|
|
24.1x
|
J.P. Morgan applied a range of these multiples to the CY11 and
CY12 FFO per share and AFFO per share estimates for AMB and
ProLogis as provided by AMB management, which resulted in the
following range of implied share prices for each share of AMB
and ProLogis, as compared to the (1) closing price per
share of AMB common stock as of January 25, 2011 of $33.18,
(2) closing price per ProLogis common share as of
January 25, 2011 of $14.64 and (3) implied price per
share of ProLogis common shares of $14.81 based on the exchange
ratio of
48
0.4464x provided for in the Topco merger applied to the closing
price per share of AMB common stock as of January 25, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY11 FFO per Share
|
|
|
CY12 FFO per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
25x
|
|
|
$
|
34.10
|
|
|
|
23x
|
|
|
$
|
34.30
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
19x
|
|
|
$
|
25.90
|
|
|
|
18x
|
|
|
$
|
26.90
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
25x
|
|
|
$
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
23x
|
|
|
$
|
16.70
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
19x
|
|
|
$
|
11.90
|
|
|
|
18x
|
|
|
$
|
13.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CY11 AFFO per share
|
|
|
CY12 AFFO per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
share price
|
|
|
Multiple
|
|
|
share price
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
34x
|
|
|
$
|
36.80
|
|
|
|
29x
|
|
|
$
|
38.90
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
23x
|
|
|
$
|
24.90
|
|
|
|
22x
|
|
|
$
|
29.50
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
|
34x
|
|
|
$
|
17.20
|
|
|
|
29x
|
|
|
$
|
17.60
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
23x
|
|
|
$
|
11.60
|
|
|
|
22x
|
|
|
$
|
13.30
|
|
J.P. Morgan compared the results of the implied equity values
per share for AMB and ProLogis. For each comparison,
J.P. Morgan compared the highest equity value per share for
ProLogis to the lowest equity value per share for AMB to derive
the highest exchange ratio implied by each pair of estimates.
J.P. Morgan also compared the lowest equity value per share
for ProLogis to the highest equity value per share for AMB to
derive the lowest exchange ratio implied by each pair of
estimates. The implied exchange ratios resulting from this
analysis, as compared to the exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided
for in the Topco merger, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
FFO per Share
|
|
AFFO per Share
|
|
|
CY11
|
|
CY12
|
|
CY11
|
|
CY12
|
|
Highest ProLogis equity value per share to lowest AMB equity
value per share
|
|
0.6023x
|
|
0.6208x
|
|
0.6908x
|
|
0.5966x
|
Lowest ProLogis equity value per share to highest AMB equity
value per share
|
|
0.3490x
|
|
0.3819x
|
|
0.3152x
|
|
0.3419x
|
Dividend
Discount Analysis
J.P. Morgan performed a dividend discount analysis of AMB common
stock and ProLogis common shares for the purpose of determining
the fully diluted implied equity value per share of each
company. In performing this analysis, J.P. Morgan used five-year
projections of dividends per share for AMB as provided by AMB
management and five-year extrapolations thereof that were
reviewed and approved by AMB management. J.P. Morgan also used
five-year projections of dividend per share payout ratios (as a
percentage of FFO per share) for ProLogis as provided by AMB
management and five-year extrapolations thereof that were
reviewed and approved by AMB management. The dividend per share
payout ratios (as a percentage of FFO per share) for ProLogis
that were provided to J.P. Morgan by AMB management for 2011,
2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively, were as follows: 71.7%;
68.6%; 64.2%; 67.0%; and 68.5%. A dividend discount analysis is
a method of evaluating the equity value of a company using
estimates of future dividends to shareholders generated by the
company and taking into consideration the time value of money
with respect to those future dividends by calculating their
present value. Present value refers to
the current value of the future dividends to shareholders paid
by the company and is obtained by discounting those future
dividends back to the present using a discount rate that takes
into account macro-economic assumptions, estimates of risk, the
opportunity cost of capital and other appropriate factors.
Based on the dividends AMB was projected to distribute during
fiscal years 2011 through 2020, J.P. Morgan discounted the
dividend stream to present values using a range of discount
rates from 8.25% to 8.75%, which was chosen by J.P. Morgan
based upon an analysis of the cost of equity for AMB derived
from the capital asset pricing model. J.P. Morgan also
calculated a range of terminal values for the company at the end
of the
10-year
period
49
ending fiscal year 2020 by applying a perpetual dividend growth
rate ranging from 4.25% to 4.75%, which was chosen by J.P.
Morgan based upon AMB managements estimates for AMBs
long-term FFO growth rate, and discounted the terminal value
using a range of discount rates from 8.25% to 8.75%, which was
chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the cost of
equity for AMB derived from the capital asset pricing model.
Terminal value refers to the capitalized value of
all future dividends to shareholders paid by the company for
periods beyond the financial forecast.
Based on the dividends ProLogis was projected to distribute
during fiscal years 2011 through 2020, J.P. Morgan
discounted the dividend stream to present values using a range
of discount rates from 8.75% to 9.25%, which was chosen by
J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of the cost of equity
for ProLogis derived from the capital asset pricing model.
J.P. Morgan also calculated a range of terminal values for
the company at the end of the
10-year
period ending fiscal year 2020 by applying a perpetual dividend
growth rate ranging from 4.25% to 4.75%, which was chosen by
J.P. Morgan based upon AMB managements estimates for
ProLogis long-term FFO growth rate, and discounted the
terminal value using a range of discount rates from 8.75% to
9.25%, which was chosen by J.P. Morgan based upon an analysis of
the cost of equity for ProLogis derived from the capital asset
pricing model.
The analysis yielded the following implied equity value per
share, compared to the implied ProLogis price per common share
of $14.81 based on the exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for in
the Topco merger applied to the closing price per share of AMB
common stock as of January 25, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
39.40
|
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
31.70
|
|
|
$
|
13.20
|
|
J.P. Morgan compared the results for AMB to the results for
ProLogis. For each comparison, J.P. Morgan compared the
highest equity value per share for ProLogis to the lowest equity
value per share for AMB to derive the highest exchange ratio
implied by each pair of estimates. J.P. Morgan also
compared the lowest equity value per share for ProLogis to the
highest equity value per share for AMB to derive the lowest
exchange ratio implied by each pair of estimates. The implied
exchange ratios resulting from this analysis, as compared to the
exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for in the Topco merger, were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
ProLogis to AMB
|
|
|
|
|
Highest ProLogis equity value per share to lowest AMB equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.5047x
|
|
Lowest ProLogis equity value per share to highest AMB equity
value per share
|
|
|
0.3350x
|
|
Value
Creation Analysis
Intrinsic Value. J.P. Morgan prepared a value
creation analysis that compared the intrinsic equity value per
share of AMB common stock based on the dividend discount
analysis to the pro forma combined company equity value per
share. The pro forma combined company equity value per share was
equal to: (1) (a) the mid-point intrinsic equity value of
AMB, plus (b) the mid-point intrinsic equity value of
ProLogis, plus (c) the present value of expected synergies
calculated by discounting the expected cash flows from AMB
managements estimated $90 million of run-rate
synergies, comprised of an estimated $80 million of
run-rate G&A synergies plus an estimated $10 million
of run-rate non-G&A synergies, by a discount rate of 8.75%
based on the blended midpoint of discount rates utilized in the
dividend discount analyses for AMB and ProLogis, less
(d) an estimated $150 million of costs to achieve such
synergies and transaction-related expenses; divided by
(2) pro forma diluted shares of the combined company common
stock. There can be no assurance that the synergies, estimated
cost to achieve such synergies or estimated transaction-related
expenses will not be substantially greater or less than the AMB
management estimate described above. The value creation analysis
at the exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for in the Topco
merger yielded accretion to the holders of AMB common stock of
4.0%.
Market Value. J.P. Morgan prepared a value
creation analysis that compared the closing share price of AMB
common stock on January 25, 2011 to the pro forma combined
company equity value per share for the Topco merger. The pro
forma combined company equity value per share was equal to: (1)
(a) the market equity value of AMB as of January 25,
2011, plus (b) the market equity value of ProLogis as of
January 25, 2011, plus (c) the value
50
of expected synergies calculated by applying a blended FFO
multiple of 23.8x to AMB managements estimate of
$90 million of run-rate synergies, comprised of an
estimated $80 million of run-rate G&A synergies plus
an estimated $10 million of run-rate non-G&A
synergies, less (d) an estimated $150 million of costs
to achieve such synergies and transaction-related expenses;
divided by (2) pro forma diluted shares of the combined
company common stock. There can be no assurance that the
synergies, estimated cost to achieve such synergies or estimated
transaction-related expenses will not be substantially greater
or less than the AMB management estimate described above. The
value creation analysis at the exchange ratio of 0.4464x
provided for in the Topco merger yielded accretion to the
holders of AMB common stock of 13.2%.
The foregoing summary of certain material financial analyses
does not purport to be a complete description of the analyses or
data presented by J.P. Morgan.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. J.P. Morgan believes that the foregoing
summary and its analyses must be considered as a whole and that
selecting portions of the foregoing summary and these analyses,
without considering all of its analyses as a whole, could create
an incomplete view of the processes underlying the analyses and
its opinion. In arriving at its opinion, J.P. Morgan did
not attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors
considered by it and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor (positive or negative), considered
in isolation, supported or failed to support its opinion.
Rather, J.P. Morgan considered the totality of the factors
and analyses performed in determining its opinion. Analyses
based upon forecasts of future results are inherently uncertain,
as they are subject to numerous factors or events beyond the
control of the parties and their advisors. Accordingly,
forecasts and analyses used or made by J.P. Morgan are not
necessarily indicative of actual future results, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than suggested by those
analyses. Moreover, J.P. Morgans analyses are not and
do not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold.
As a part of its investment banking business, J.P. Morgan
and its affiliates are continually engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, investments for passive and control purposes,
negotiated underwritings, secondary distributions of listed and
unlisted securities, private placements, and valuations for
estate, corporate and other purposes. J.P. Morgan was
selected on the basis of such experience and its familiarity
with AMB to advise AMB in connection with the Merger and to
deliver a fairness opinion to the AMB board of directors
addressing only the fairness from a financial point of view of
the exchange ratio in the Topco merger to AMB as of the date of
such opinion.
For services rendered in connection with the Merger (including
the delivery of its opinion), AMB has agreed to pay
J.P. Morgan a fee of $20 million in the aggregate,
$2 million of which was payable upon the earlier of public
announcement of a transaction or delivery by J.P. Morgan of
its opinion and $18 million of which is contingent upon the
consummation of the Topco merger. In addition to the transaction
fee, AMB may, at its sole discretion, pay J.P. Morgan an
additional discretionary fee at closing of $2.5 million,
based on AMBs evaluation of the quality and quantity of
the work performed by J.P. Morgan in connection with services
rendered in connection with the Merger. In addition, AMB has
agreed to reimburse J.P. Morgan for its reasonable expenses
incurred in connection with its services, including the
reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel, and will indemnify
J.P. Morgan against certain liabilities, including
liabilities arising under the federal securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of its opinion,
J.P. Morgan and its affiliates had commercial and
investment banking relationships with AMB and ProLogis, for
which J.P. Morgan and its affiliates received customary
compensation. J.P. Morgans services for AMB have
included: (1) acting as joint bookrunner for AMBs
offerings of common stock in April 2010 and March 2009,
respectively, (2) acting as joint bookrunner for AMBs
offering of debt securities in August 2010 and November 2010,
respectively, and (3) acting as dealer manager for
AMBs tender offers for certain of its outstanding debt
securities in May 2009 and December 2009, respectively. Such
services for ProLogis during such period have included:
(1) acting as joint bookrunner for ProLogis offering
of common shares in October 2010, (2) acting as joint
bookrunner for ProLogis offering of convertible notes in
March 2010, (3) acting as joint bookrunner for
ProLogis offering of debt securities in August 2009,
(4) acting as solicitation agent for ProLogis consent
solicitation with respect to certain of its debt securities in
September 2009, (5) acting as co-managing underwriter of
ProLogis offering of common shares in April 2009 and
(6) acting as
51
dealer manager for ProLogis tender offer for certain of
its outstanding debt securities in May 2009. Subsequent to the
delivery of J.P. Morgans opinion, (1) J.P.
Morgan was engaged to act as financial advisor to ProLogis in
connection with ProLogis acquisition of additional
ordinary units of PEPR and ProLogis tender offer for the
outstanding PEPR ordinary units and convertible preferred units
(as described under Summary Recent
Developments), for which J.P. Morgan will be paid a
fee in an amount to be determined, and (2) J.P. Morgan
Chase Bank, N.A., an affiliate of J.P. Morgan, entered into
a new Senior Bridge Loan Agreement with ProLogis pursuant to
which it is acting as lender to ProLogis in connection with such
transactions. In addition, J.P. Morgans commercial
banking affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under certain
outstanding credit facilities of AMB and one of its affiliates
and a lender to ProLogis, for which it receives customary
compensation or other financial benefits. In the ordinary course
of their businesses, J.P. Morgan and its affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities of AMB or ProLogis
for their own account or for the accounts of customers and,
accordingly, they may at any time hold long or short positions
in such securities.
Opinion
of ProLogis Financial Advisor
In connection with the Merger, on January 30, 2011, Morgan
Stanley rendered its oral opinion to the ProLogis board of
trustees, subsequently confirmed in writing, to the effect that,
as of such date and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations set forth
therein, the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger agreement was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of ProLogis
common shares.
The full text of Morgan Stanleys fairness opinion,
dated January 30, 2011, is attached as Annex E to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. You should read the opinion in
its entirety for a discussion of the assumptions made,
procedures followed, factors considered and limitations upon the
review undertaken by Morgan Stanley in rendering its opinion.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
full text of such opinion. Morgan Stanleys opinion is
directed to the ProLogis board of trustees, addresses only the
fairness of the exchange ratio from a financial point of view to
the holders of ProLogis common shares, and does not address any
other aspect of the transaction. Morgan Stanleys opinion
did not in any manner address the prices at which the AMB common
stock will trade following consummation of the transaction or at
any time, and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any
shareholders of ProLogis or AMB stockholders should vote at any
stockholders meetings held in connection with the
transaction or whether to take any other action in connection
with the transaction.
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of ProLogis and AMB,
respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
operating data concerning ProLogis and AMB, respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
managements of ProLogis and AMB, respectively;
|
|
|
|
reviewed information relating to certain strategic, financial
and operational benefits anticipated from the transaction,
prepared by the managements of ProLogis and AMB, respectively;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of ProLogis, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the transaction, with senior
executives of ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of AMB, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the transaction, with senior
executives of AMB;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the pro forma impact of the transaction on AMBs
FFO per share, cash flow, consolidated capitalization and
financial ratios;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the
ProLogis common shares and the AMB common stock;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of ProLogis and AMB and the
prices and trading activity of the ProLogis common shares and
the AMB common stock with that of certain other publicly-traded
companies comparable with ProLogis and AMB, respectively, and
their securities;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of ProLogis and AMB and certain parties and
their financial and legal advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the merger agreement and certain related
documents; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Morgan Stanley deemed appropriate.
|
In arriving at its opinion, Morgan Stanley assumed and relied
upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and
completeness of the information that was publicly available or
supplied or otherwise made available to Morgan Stanley by
ProLogis and AMB, and formed a substantial basis for its
opinion. With respect to the financial projections, including
information relating to certain strategic, financial and
operational benefits anticipated from the transaction, Morgan
Stanley assumed that they had been reasonably prepared on bases
reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments
of the respective managements of ProLogis and AMB of the future
financial performance of ProLogis and AMB. In addition, Morgan
Stanley assumed that the Merger, the contribution and the
issuance of AMB LP partnership units will each be consummated in
accordance with the terms set forth in the merger agreement
without any waiver, amendment or delay of any terms or
conditions, including, among other things, that the ProLogis
merger and the Topco merger will each be treated as tax-free
reorganizations pursuant to the Code. Morgan Stanley assumed
that, in connection with the receipt of all the necessary
governmental, regulatory or other approvals and consents
required for the proposed transaction, no delays, limitations,
conditions or restrictions will be imposed that would have a
material adverse effect on the contemplated benefits expected to
be derived in the proposed transaction. Morgan Stanley is not a
legal, tax or regulatory advisor. Morgan Stanley is a
financial advisor only and relied upon, without independent
verification, the assessment of ProLogis and AMB and their
respective legal, tax or regulatory advisors with respect to
legal, tax or regulatory matters. Morgan Stanley expressed no
opinion with respect to the fairness of the amount or nature of
the compensation to any of ProLogis officers, trustees or
employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the
consideration to be received by the holders of ProLogis common
shares in the transaction. Morgan Stanley also expressed no
opinion as to the relative fairness of any portion of the merger
consideration to holders of any series of common or preferred
shares of ProLogis. Morgan Stanley did not make any independent
valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of ProLogis
or AMB, nor was Morgan Stanley furnished with any such
appraisals. Morgan Stanleys opinion was necessarily based
on financial, economic, market and other conditions as in effect
on, and the information made available to Morgan Stanley as of,
the date of its opinion. Events occurring after the date of
Morgan Stanleys opinion may affect its opinion and the
assumptions used in preparing it, and Morgan Stanley did not
assume any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion.
The following is a brief summary of the material analyses
performed by Morgan Stanley in connection with its oral opinion
and the preparation of its written opinion dated
January 30, 2011. Although each analysis was provided to
the ProLogis board of trustees, in connection with arriving at
its opinion, Morgan Stanley considered all of its analysis as a
whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any
analysis described below. This summary of financial analyses
includes information presented in tabular format. In order to
fully understand the financial analyses used by Morgan Stanley,
the tables must be read together with the text of each summary.
The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the
financial analyses. The analyses listed in the tables and
described below must be considered as a whole; considering any
portion of such analyses and of the factors considered, without
considering all analyses and factors, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of the process underlying Morgan
Stanleys fairness opinion.
Relative
Valuation and Leverage
Morgan Stanley reviewed the implied relative valuation metrics
of ProLogis and AMB based on each companys closing price
as of January 26, 2011, the last trading day before
ProLogis common share and AMB common stock prices may have been
affected by market speculation regarding a potential transaction
involving the
53
companies and each companys internal forecasts. Morgan
Stanley observed that ProLogis and AMBs valuation
multiples were similar based on a variety of metrics. The
metrics observed included each companys January 26,
2011 closing price divided by managements forecast of 2011
and 2012 FFO and adjusted FFO. Morgan Stanley also evaluated
each companys aggregate value divided by managements
forecast of 2011 EBITDA.
Morgan Stanley observed that ProLogis and AMBs relative
valuations were generally similar, and in particular when
evaluating FFO and EBITDA multiples. Morgan Stanley also
observed the relative leverage of both ProLogis and AMB as
evidenced by each companys debt to total capitalization
and debt to estimated 2011 EBITDA. Morgan Stanley noted that AMB
was less levered relative to ProLogis based on the leverage
metrics evaluated. In addition, Morgan Stanley observed each
companys credit ratings from third party ratings agencies
(Moodys, S&P, and Fitch Ratings). Morgan Stanley
observed that Moodys, S&P, and Fitch each had a
higher senior unsecured credit rating assigned to AMB than
ProLogis.
The following tables list the valuation and leverage metrics, as
well as the third party credit ratings observed by Morgan
Stanley:
Relative
Valuation and Leverage Statistics Financial Figures
Based on Management Forecasts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
2011E
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
Price / FFO
|
|
|
24.0x
|
|
|
|
21.6x
|
|
|
|
23.5x
|
|
|
|
20.2x
|
|
Price / AFFO
|
|
|
30.0x
|
|
|
|
23.5x
|
|
|
|
24.9x
|
|
|
|
22.5x
|
|
Aggregate Value/2011 EBITDA
|
|
|
21.0x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
Debt / 2011 EBITDA
|
|
|
8.6
|
x
|
|
|
9.4
|
x
|
Debt / Total Capitalization
|
|
|
41.5
|
%
|
|
|
50.3
|
%
|
Moodys Senior Unsecured Credit Rating
|
|
|
Baa1
|
|
|
|
Baa2
|
|
S&P Senior Unsecured Credit Rating
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
−
|
Fitch Senior Unsecured Credit Rating
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
Historical
Exchange Ratio Analysis
Morgan Stanley reviewed the stock price performance and trading
volumes of ProLogis and AMB (i) during various periods
ending on January 28, 2011, the last full trading day prior
to the rendering of Morgan Stanleys opinion dated
January 30, 2011, (ii) on January 28, 2011 and
(iii) on January 26, 2011 (the last trading day before
ProLogis common share and AMB common stock prices may have been
affected by market speculation regarding a potential transaction
involving the companies).
Morgan Stanley then calculated historical exchange ratios on
certain dates and during certain periods between August 1,
2010 (180 days prior to January 28, 2011) and
January 28, 2011 implied by dividing the AMB closing price
for the relevant date, or the average AMB closing price for the
relevant period, as the case may be, by the ProLogis closing
price for such date, or the ProLogis average price for such
period, as the case may be. Morgan
54
Stanley next compared the exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for
in the merger agreement with historical exchange ratios for such
dates and periods. The following table lists the implied
exchange ratios for these dates and periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
Closing Price on January 26, 2011
|
|
|
0.447x
|
|
Closing Price on January 28, 2011
|
|
|
0.462x
|
|
15-Day
Average Closing Price
|
|
|
0.445x
|
|
30-Day
Average Closing Price
|
|
|
0.448x
|
|
60-Day
Average Closing Price
|
|
|
0.447x
|
|
90-Day
Average Closing Price
|
|
|
0.452x
|
|
180-Day
Average Closing Price
|
|
|
0.449x
|
|
Low / High Closing Price for Trading Week Between
January 14, 2011 through January 21, 2011
|
|
|
0.428x/0.452x
|
|
Low / High Price for
30-Day
Period (since December 29, 2010)
|
|
|
0.427x/0.467x
|
|
Research
Analyst Price Targets and Net Asset Value Analysis
Morgan Stanley reviewed public market trading price targets for
ProLogis common shares and AMB common stock prepared and
published by fourteen available equity research analysts that
provided targets for both ProLogis and AMB prior to
January 26, 2011 as well as price targets from additional
equity research analysts that provided targets for either
ProLogis or AMB. Morgan Stanley reviewed the most recent price
target published by each analyst prior to such date. These
targets reflect each analysts estimate of the future
public market trading price of ProLogis or AMB common stock, as
applicable, at the time the price target was published.
Morgan Stanley calculated the exchange ratio implied by each
analysts price targets for ProLogis and AMB by dividing
the ProLogis price target by the AMB price target. With respect
to the 14 available equity research analysts that provided price
targets for both ProLogis and AMB, Morgan Stanleys
analysis implied a range of exchange ratios of 0.433x to 0.500x
based on such price targets (when excluding the two highest and
two lowest implied ratios) and a range of exchange ratios of
0.385x to 0.593x (when including all 14 available data points).
The average exchange ratio was 0.471x when considering all 14
available equity data points. With respect to the consensus
price targets of each company, Morgan Stanleys analysis
implied an average exchange ratio of 0.467x. The consensus price
target is available on Bloomberg and incorporates all analysts
reporting price targets to
55
Bloomberg. Morgan Stanley noted that the merger agreement
provided for an exchange ratio of 0.4464x. The table below
outlines the price targets used by Morgan Stanley:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLD
|
|
AMB
|
|
Ex. Ratio
|
|
Barclays Capital
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
$
|
31.00
|
|
|
|
0.452
|
|
BofA Merrill Lynch
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
34.00
|
|
|
|
0.471
|
|
Citi
|
|
$
|
14.00
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
0.500
|
|
Deutsche Bank
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
29.00
|
|
|
|
0.517
|
*
|
FBR Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
$
|
35.00
|
|
|
|
0.471
|
|
Gleacher & Company
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
$
|
26.00
|
|
|
|
0.385
|
*
|
Goldman Sachs & Co.
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
0.400
|
*
|
ISI Group
|
|
$
|
13.00
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
0.464
|
|
Jefferies & Co.
|
|
$
|
13.00
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
|
|
0.464
|
|
JPMorgan
|
|
$
|
15.00
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
0.500
|
|
Macquarie Research
|
|
$
|
13.00
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
0.433
|
|
RBC Capital Markets
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
0.593
|
*
|
Stifel Nicolaus
|
|
$
|
16.00
|
|
|
$
|
34.50
|
|
|
|
0.464
|
|
UBS (US)
|
|
$
|
13.00
|
|
|
$
|
27.25
|
|
|
|
0.477
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.471
|
|
Consensus
|
|
$
|
13.99
|
|
|
$
|
29.98
|
|
|
|
0.467
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exchange ratios excluded in calculating implied range. |
Morgan Stanley also reviewed equity research analyst estimates
of net asset value per share for each of ProLogis and AMB.
Morgan Stanley reviewed the most recent estimates of net asset
value published by analysts prior to January 26, 2011. With
respect to the estimates of net asset value by Green Street
analysts, who have a reputation for having REIT expertise,
Morgan Stanleys analysis implied an exchange ratio of
0.446x (using Green Street net asset value estimates of $12.50
and $28.00 for ProLogis and AMB, respectively) and with respect
to the estimates of net asset value by consensus analysts,
Morgan Stanleys analysis implied an average exchange ratio
of 0.480x using consensus net asset values of $13.42 (an average
of 7 data points) and $27.95 (an average of 8 data points) for
ProLogis and AMB, respectively. The consensus net asset values
are available from SNL Financial and incorporate all analysts
reporting net asset value estimates to SNL Financial. Morgan
Stanley noted that the merger agreement provided for an exchange
ratio of 0.4464x.
The public market trading price targets and estimates of net
asset value per share published by securities research analysts
do not necessarily reflect current market trading prices for
ProLogis common shares and shares of AMB common stock and these
targets and estimates are subject to uncertainties, including
the future financial performance of ProLogis and AMB and future
financial market conditions.
Discounted
Cash Flow Analysis
Morgan Stanley performed a discounted cash flow analysis, which
is designed to provide an implied value of a company by
calculating the present value of the estimated future cash flows
and terminal value of the company. Morgan Stanley calculated
ranges of implied equity values per share for each of ProLogis
and AMB, based on estimates of future cash flows for calendar
years 2011 through 2015 prepared by the management of each of
ProLogis and AMB, respectively.
In arriving at the estimated equity values per ProLogis common
share, Morgan Stanley noted the estimated consolidated net
operating income for calendar years 2011 through 2015 and then
calculated the terminal value by (i) applying a range of
terminal capitalization rates ranging from 6.60% to 6.80% with
respect to ProLogis real estate assets, (ii) applying
a range of capitalization rates ranging from 7.10% to 7.30% with
respect to net operating income from the real estate portion of
ProLogis investment management business and
(iii) applying a terminal multiple of 11.0x with respect to
the operating income from management fees associated with
ProLogis investment
56
management business. The capitalization rates used by Morgan
Stanley (i) with respect to ProLogis real estate
assets were based on Green Streets implied market
capitalization rate based on the price per share of each of
ProLogis and AMB on January 26, 2011 (the last trading day
before ProLogis common share and AMB common stock prices may
have been affected by market speculation regarding a potential
transaction involving the companies) and (ii) with respect
to the real estate portion of ProLogis investment
management business, was 50 basis points higher than the
capitalization rate used with respect to ProLogis real
estate assets. The terminal multiple used by Morgan Stanley with
respect to ProLogis investment management business was the
midpoint of ProLogis range of net cash flow multiples used
to value the investment management businesses in ProLogis
2010 net asset value analysis. The consolidated net
operating income and the terminal value were then discounted to
present values using a range of discount rates from 8.3% to
8.8%. The discount rates used by Morgan Stanley were based on
the weighted average cost of capital for ProLogis. The cost of
equity, a contributor to the weighted average cost of capital,
was analyzed using the capital asset pricing model, which is
impacted by the relative historical volatility of ProLogis
share price. Morgan Stanley did not, as a part of its analysis,
undertake a separate valuation of the assets or operations of
PEPR, ProLogis proportionate share thereof, or the income
ProLogis otherwise derives from PEPR. Nor were the cash flows
attributable to PEPR accorded differential treatment in Morgan
Stanleys analysis. Based on the calculations set forth
above, this analysis implied a range for ProLogis common shares
of approximately $13.49 to $14.69 per share.
In arriving at the estimated equity values per share of AMB
common stock, Morgan Stanley noted the estimated consolidated
net operating income for calendar years 2011 through 2015 and
then calculated the terminal value by (i) applying a range
of terminal capitalization rates ranging from 6.10% to 6.30%
with respect to AMBs real estate assets,
(ii) applying a range of capitalization rates ranging from
6.60% to 6.80% with respect to net operating income from the
real estate portion of AMBs investment management business
and (iii) applying a terminal multiple of 11.0x with
respect to the operating income from management fees associated
with AMBs investment management business. The
capitalization rates used by Morgan Stanley (i) with
respect to AMBs real estate assets were based on Green
Streets implied market capitalization rate based on the
price per share of each of ProLogis and AMB on January 26,
2011 (the last trading day before ProLogis common share and AMB
common stock prices may have been affected by market speculation
regarding a potential transaction involving the companies) and
(ii) with respect to the real estate portion of AMBs
investment management business, was 50 basis points higher
than the capitalization rate used with respect to AMBs
real estate assets. The terminal multiple used by Morgan Stanley
with respect to AMBs investment management business was
the midpoint of AMBs range of net cash flow multiples used
to value the investment management businesses in AMBs
2010 net asset value analysis. The consolidated net
operating income and the terminal value were then discounted to
present values using a range of discount rates from 7.7% to
8.2%. The discount rates used by Morgan Stanley were based on
the weighted average cost of capital for AMB. The cost of
equity, a contributor to the weighted average cost of capital,
was analyzed using the capital asset pricing model, which is
impacted by the relative historical volatility of AMBs
share price. Based on the calculations set forth above, this
analysis implied a range for AMB common shares of approximately
$33.65 to $36.95 per share.
Morgan Stanley noted that the discounted cash flow analysis of
each of ProLogis and AMB indicated a range of implied exchange
ratios of 0.365x to 0.437x, compared to an exchange ratio of
0.4464x provided for in the merger agreement. Morgan Stanley
further noted that, using an 8.25% discount rate (which is the
approximate midpoint of a shared discount rate), the discounted
cash flow analysis of each of ProLogis and AMB indicated a range
of implied exchange ratios of 0.385x to 0.461x, compared to an
exchange ratio of 0.4464x provided for in the merger agreement.
Contribution
Analysis
Morgan Stanley also performed a contribution analysis which
reviewed the pro forma contribution of each of ProLogis and AMB
to the combined entity and implied contributions based on
certain operational and financial metrics using management plans
for both ProLogis and AMB. Such operational and financial
metrics included consolidated net operating income (which
includes no contributions from unconsolidated joint venture
properties), consolidated EBITDA (which includes cash
distributions from unconsolidated entities), look through EBITDA
(which includes the pro-rata share of EBITDA from unconsolidated
entities), consensus EBITDA, consolidated
57
FFO, consensus FFO, Green Street net asset value estimates and
consensus net asset value estimates. Based on the relative
contributions of each company for the unlevered income
estimates, Morgan Stanley derived an implied equity contribution
for each company by multiplying the cumulative total enterprise
value of the two standalone companies by the respective
contribution percentages and subtracting net debt attributable
to each standalone company. Morgan Stanley also noted the
implied exchange ratio derived from the implied equity
contributions across the selected metrics. For the unlevered and
levered income estimates, Morgan Stanley held the ProLogis share
price constant at the closing price on January 26, 2011
when calculating the implied exchange ratio.
The computations resulted in the following implied equity
contributions and implied exchange ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
Equity Contribution Analysis
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
2011 Unlevered Income Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Net Operating Income
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
0.429x
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
0.462x
|
|
Look Through EBITDA
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
0.492x
|
|
Mean Consensus EBITDA
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
0.452x
|
|
Levered Income Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Consolidated FFO
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
0.451x
|
|
2011 Consensus FFO
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
0.476x
|
|
Net Asset Value Estimates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Street NAV Estimates
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
0.446x
|
|
Mean Consensus NAV Estimates
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
0.480x
|
|
Market Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Price on January 26, 2011
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
0.447x
|
|
Closing Price on January 28, 2011
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
0.462x
|
|
Morgan Stanley noted that the 0.4464 exchange ratio of ProLogis
common shares to AMB common stock provided for in the merger
agreement would result in pro forma ownership of the combined
company for holders of ProLogis common shares equal to
approximately 60%.
Pro
Forma Accretion/Dilution Analysis
Using financial projections and estimates of cost savings
resulting from the transaction provided by the managements of
ProLogis and AMB, Morgan Stanley calculated the
accretion/dilution of the FFO per ProLogis common share and the
FFO per share of AMB common stock as a result of the
transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2012, Morgan
Stanley compared the FFO per share of the pro forma entity to
the FFO per share estimate of ProLogis and AMB, each as a
standalone entity. The analysis indicated that the transaction
would be accretive to the FFO per share of each of ProLogis and
AMB for calendar year 2012. The accretion to AMB in 2012 is
greater on both an absolute and a relative basis when compared
to the accretion to ProLogis in 2012 principally due to the
underlying assumed growth of FFO per share between 2011 and 2012
for each of the companies. Though the management projections
show greater FFO per share growth during this period for
ProLogis as compared to AMB, the compound aggregate growth rate
for each of AMB and ProLogis is substantially the same over the
five-year projection period, which suggests that FFO accretion
will be more evenly shared over the longer term. Morgan Stanley
evaluated accretion to ProLogis and AMB core FFO. Core FFO is
defined as FFO excluding significant non-cash items and
non-recurring items, as well as gains or losses from sales of
real estate.
In performing its analysis, Morgan Stanley made numerous
assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of ProLogis or AMB. Any estimates
contained in Morgan Stanleys analysis are not necessarily
indicative of future results or actual values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the
estimates. These analyses were prepared solely as part of the
analysis of Morgan Stanley of the fairness of the exchange ratio
pursuant to the
58
merger agreement from a financial point of view to the holders
of ProLogis common shares and were conducted in connection with
the delivery of Morgan Stanleys opinion to ProLogis
board of trustees.
General
In connection with the review of the transaction by the ProLogis
board of trustees, Morgan Stanley performed a variety of
financial and comparative analyses for purposes of rendering its
opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex
process and is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis
or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Morgan
Stanley considered the results of all of its analyses as a whole
and did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or
factor it considered. Morgan Stanley believes that selecting any
portion of its analyses, without considering all analyses as a
whole, would create an incomplete view of the process underlying
its analyses and opinion. In addition, Morgan Stanley may have
given various analyses and factors more or less weight than
other analyses and factors, and may have deemed various
assumptions more or less probable than other assumptions. As a
result, the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular
analysis described above should not be taken to be Morgan
Stanleys view of the actual value of ProLogis or AMB. In
performing its analyses, Morgan Stanley made assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business and
economic conditions and other matters. Many of these assumptions
relate to factors that are beyond the control of ProLogis or
AMB. Any estimates contained in Morgan Stanleys analyses
are not necessarily indicative of future results or actual
values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than
those suggested by such estimates.
Morgan Stanley conducted the analyses described above solely as
part of its analysis of the fairness of the exchange ratio
pursuant to the merger agreement from a financial point of view
to the holders of ProLogis common shares and in connection with
the delivery of its opinion to the ProLogis board of trustees.
These analyses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which ProLogis common shares or AMB common stock might
actually trade.
The exchange ratio was determined through arms-length
negotiations between ProLogis and AMB and was approved by the
ProLogis board of trustees. Morgan Stanley provided advice to
ProLogis during these negotiations. Morgan Stanley did not,
however, recommend any specific exchange ratio to ProLogis or
that any specific exchange ratio constituted the only
appropriate merger consideration for the transaction. In
addition, Morgan Stanleys opinion did not in any manner
address the prices at which the AMB common stock will trade at
any time, and Morgan Stanley expressed no opinion or
recommendation as to how shareholders of ProLogis or
stockholders of AMB should vote at the stockholders
meetings to be held in connection with the transaction.
Morgan Stanleys opinion and its presentation to the
ProLogis board of trustees was one of many factors taken into
consideration by the ProLogis board of trustees in deciding to
approve the merger agreement. Consequently, the analyses as
described above should not be viewed as determinative of the
view of the ProLogis board of trustees with respect to the
exchange ratio or of whether the ProLogis board of trustees
would have been willing to agree to a different exchange ratio.
Morgan Stanleys opinion was approved by a committee of
Morgan Stanley investment banking and other professionals in
accordance with its customary practice.
Morgan Stanley is a global financial services firm engaged in
the securities, investment management and individual wealth
management businesses. Morgan Stanleys securities business
is engaged in securities underwriting, trading and brokerage
activities, foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives
trading, prime brokerage, as well as providing investment
banking, financing and financial advisory services. Morgan
Stanley, its affiliates, directors and officers may at any time
invest on a principal basis or manage funds that invest, hold
long or short positions, finance positions, and may trade or
otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their own
account or the accounts of its customers, in debt or equity
securities or loans of ProLogis, AMB, or any other company, or
any currency or commodity, that may be involved in the
transaction, or any related derivative instrument.
ProLogis retained Morgan Stanley to act as its exclusive
financial advisor in connection with the transaction because of
its qualifications, expertise and reputation. As compensation
for its services, which included advisory services as well as
the rendering of a fairness opinion, ProLogis has agreed to pay
Morgan Stanley a fee of $20 million in the aggregate,
$2 million of which was payable upon execution of the
merger agreement and $18 million of which is contingent
upon the consummation of the transaction. In addition to the
transaction fee, ProLogis may, at its sole discretion, pay
Morgan Stanley an additional discretionary fee at closing of
$2.5 million, based on ProLogis evaluation of the
quality and quantity of the work performed by Morgan Stanley in
connection with services rendered
59
in connection with the transaction. ProLogis has also agreed to
reimburse Morgan Stanley for its expenses incurred in performing
its services. In addition, ProLogis has agreed to indemnify
Morgan Stanley and its affiliates, their respective directors,
officers, agents and employees and each person, if any,
controlling Morgan Stanley or any of its affiliates against
certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities
under the federal securities laws, related to or arising out of
Morgan Stanleys engagement. During the two years preceding
the date of its opinion, Morgan Stanley and its affiliates had
commercial and investment banking relationships with ProLogis
and AMB, for which Morgan Stanley and its affiliates received
customary compensation. Morgan Stanleys services for
ProLogis have included: (1) acting as joint bookrunner for
ProLogis offerings of common shares in April 2009 and
October 2010, respectively, (2) acting as joint bookrunner
for ProLogis offering of debt securities in August 2009,
(3) acting as joint bookrunner for ProLogis offering
of convertible notes in March 2010, (4) acting as dealer
manager for ProLogis tender offer for certain of its
outstanding debt securities in May 2009, (5) acting as a
manager for ProLogis continuous equity offering program
established in March 2010, (6) acting as financial advisor
to ProLogis on the sale of its Japan and China portfolios in
February 2009, (7) acting as a financial advisor to PEPR, in
connection with an asset sale in May 2009 and (8) acting as
sole bookrunner for PEPRs offering of convertible
preferred units in December 2009. Morgan Stanleys services
for AMB during such period have included: (1) acting as
joint bookrunner for AMBs offerings of common stock in
March 2009 and April 2010, respectively, (2) acting as
joint bookrunner for AMBs offerings of debt securities in
November 2009, August 2010 and November 2010, respectively,
(3) acting as dealer manager for AMBs tender offer
for certain of its outstanding debt securities in December 2009
and (4) acting as a financial advisor to AMB in connection with
the formation of a joint venture in China in March 2011. In
addition, Morgan Stanleys commercial banking affiliate is
a lender under certain outstanding credit facilities of AMB,
ProLogis and PEPR. Morgan Stanley may also seek to provide such
services to AMB and ProLogis in the future and expects to
receive fees for the rendering of these services.
AMB
Unaudited Prospective Financial Information
AMB does not as a matter of course make public long-term
projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due
to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, AMB is including this
unaudited prospective financial information that was made
available to the AMB board of directors, the ProLogis board of
trustees, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley in connection with
the evaluation of the Merger. The inclusion of this information
should not be regarded as an indication that any of AMB,
ProLogis, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley or any other
recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it
to be necessarily predictive of actual future results.
The unaudited prospective financial information was, in general,
prepared solely for internal use and is subjective in many
respects. As a result, there can be no assurance that the
prospective results will be realized or that actual results will
not be significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since the
unaudited prospective financial information covers multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive
with each successive year. AMB stockholders and ProLogis
shareholders are urged to review AMBs SEC filings for a
description of risk factors with respect to AMBs business.
See Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Where You Can Find More
Information. The unaudited prospective financial
information was not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure, nor was it prepared with a view toward compliance
with GAAP, published guidelines of the SEC or the guidelines
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective
financial information. In addition, the unaudited prospective
financial information requires significant estimates and
assumptions that make it inherently less comparable to the
similarly titled GAAP measures in AMBs historical GAAP
financial statements. Neither AMBs independent registered
public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants,
have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect
to the unaudited prospective financial information contained
herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of
assurance on such information or its achievability. The report
of AMBs independent registered public accounting firm
contained in AMBs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, relates
to AMBs historical financial information. It does not
extend to the unaudited prospective financial information and
should not be read to do so. Furthermore, the unaudited
prospective financial information does not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date it was prepared.
60
The following table presents selected unaudited prospective
financial data for the fiscal years ending 2011 through 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
692
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
Core funds from operations (Core FFO)
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
364
|
|
|
$
|
454
|
|
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
For purposes of the unaudited prospective financial information
provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and presented
herein, EBITDA is calculated as net earnings before gains plus
(i) preferred unit distributions, (ii) depreciation
and amortization, (iii) non-cash cost of stock-based
compensation awards, (iv) consolidated interest expense,
(v) income tax expense, (vi) certain other non-cash
charges, and (vii) AMBs pro rata share of EBITDA from
unconsolidated joint ventures; less non-controlling interest
holders share of EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures.
For purposes of the unaudited prospective financial information
provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and presented
herein, Core funds from operations (Core FFO) is
calculated as operating income less interest expense, preferred
share dividends, and other reconciling line items, adjusted for
certain non-cash items, non-recurring items, and gains. For
purposes of the unaudited prospective financial information
provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and presented
herein, Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) is
calculated as Core FFO less (i) recurring capital
expenditures and (ii) pro rata share of straight line rent
adjustments (FAS 13); plus (i) amortized deferred
financing costs and (ii) non-cash cost of stock-based
compensation awards.
In addition to the summary metrics presented above, AMB also
provided a 2011 estimate of net operating income of $442
million. For purposes of the unaudited prospective financial
information provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and
presented herein, net operating income represents consolidated
rental revenues less consolidated property operating expenses.
In addition to the summary metrics presented above, AMB also
provided an estimate of gross dividends per year for each year
between 2011 through 2015. The estimate provided by AMB for each
of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 was $193 million,
$213 million, $235 million, $271 million and
$309 million, respectively.
ProLogis and AMB calculate certain non-GAAP financial metrics
including EBITDA, AFFO and NOI using different methodologies.
The differences relate to the following categories: (i)
treatment of each companys share of income and cash flow
from joint ventures and other unconsolidated investments (ii)
treatment of minority interest share of consolidated income and
cash flow; and (iii) definitional differences related to certain
adjustments made to calculate AFFO. AMB has made conforming
methodology changes to the financial data received from
ProLogis. Consequently, the financial metrics presented in each
companys prospective financial information disclosures and
in the sections of this joint proxy statement/prospectus with
respect to the opinions of the financial advisors to AMB and
ProLogis may not be directly comparable to one another.
In preparing the foregoing unaudited projected financial
information, AMB made a number of assumptions regarding, among
other things, interest rates, corporate financing activities,
including amount and timing of the issuance of senior and
secured debt, AMB common stock price appreciation and the timing
and amount of common stock issuances, annual dividend levels,
occupancy and customer retention levels of its owned and managed
portfolios, changes in rent, the amount, timing and cost of
existing and planned developments, lease-up rates of existing
and planned developments, the amount and timing of asset sales
and asset acquisitions, including the return on such
acquisitions, the formation of, and expected terms of, including
yield on, future fund formations, the amount of income taxes
paid, and the amount of general and administrative costs.
No assurances can be given that the assumptions made in
preparing the above unaudited prospective financial information
will accurately reflect future conditions. The estimates and
assumptions underlying the unaudited prospective financial
information involve judgments with respect to, among other
things, future economic, competitive, regulatory and financial
market conditions and future business decisions which may not be
realized and that are inherently subject to significant
business, economic, competitive and regulatory uncertainties and
contingencies, including, among others, risks and uncertainties
described under Risk Factors and Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, all of
which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the
control of AMB and/or ProLogis and will be beyond the control of
the combined company. There can be
61
no assurance that the underlying assumptions will prove to be
accurate or that the projected results will be realized, and
actual results likely will differ, and may differ materially,
from those reflected in the unaudited prospective financial
information, whether or not the Merger is completed.
In addition, although presented with numerical specificity, the
above unaudited prospective financial information reflects
numerous assumptions and estimates as to future events made by
AMB management that AMB management believed were reasonable at
the time the unaudited prospective financial information was
prepared. The above unaudited prospective financial information
does not give effect to the Merger. AMB stockholders and
ProLogis shareholders are urged to review AMBs most recent
SEC filings for a description of AMBs reported and
anticipated results of operations and financial condition and
capital resources during 2010, including Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in AMBs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on the unaudited prospective
financial information set forth above. No representation is made
by AMB, ProLogis or any other person to any AMB stockholder or
any ProLogis shareholder regarding the ultimate performance of
AMB compared to the information included in the above unaudited
prospective financial information. The inclusion of unaudited
prospective financial information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication
that such prospective financial information will be an accurate
prediction of future events, and such information should not be
relied on as such.
AMB DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE
UNAUDITED PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT
CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT
THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR
ALL OF THE ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE, EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED
BY LAW.
ProLogis
Unaudited Prospective Financial Information
ProLogis does not as a matter of course make public long-term
projections as to future revenues, earnings or other results due
to, among other reasons, the uncertainty of the underlying
assumptions and estimates. However, ProLogis is including this
unaudited prospective financial information that was made
available to the ProLogis board of trustees, the AMB board of
directors, J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley in connection
with the evaluation of the Merger. The inclusion of this
information should not be regarded as an indication that any of
ProLogis, AMB, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley or any other
recipient of this information considered, or now considers, it
to be necessarily predictive of actual future results.
The unaudited prospective financial information was, in general,
prepared solely for internal use and is subjective in many
respects. As a result, there can be no assurance that the
prospective results will be realized or that actual results will
not be significantly higher or lower than estimated. Since the
unaudited prospective financial information covers multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less predictive
with each successive year. AMB stockholders and ProLogis
shareholders are urged to review the SEC filings of ProLogis for
a description of risk factors with respect to the business of
ProLogis. See Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements and Where You Can Find
More Information. The unaudited prospective financial
information was not prepared with a view toward public
disclosure, nor was it prepared with a view toward compliance
with published guidelines of the SEC, the guidelines established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for
preparation and presentation of prospective financial
information, or GAAP. Neither the independent registered public
accounting firm of ProLogis, nor any other independent
accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any
procedures with respect to the unaudited prospective financial
information contained herein, nor have they expressed any
opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or
its achievability. The report of the independent registered
public accounting firm of ProLogis contained in the Annual
Report of ProLogis on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, which is incorporated
by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus, relates
to the historical financial information of ProLogis. It does not
extend to the unaudited prospective financial information and
should not be read to do so. Furthermore, the unaudited
prospective financial information does not take into account any
circumstances or events occurring after the date it was prepared.
62
The following table presents selected unaudited prospective
financial data for the fiscal years ending 2011 through 2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$
|
749
|
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
|
$
|
810
|
|
|
$
|
857
|
|
|
$
|
904
|
|
Core funds from operations (Core FFO)
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO)
|
|
$
|
339
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
For purposes of the unaudited prospective financial information
provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and presented
herein, EBITDA is calculated as net earnings plus
(i) depreciation and amortization (ii) non-cash cost
of share based compensation awards (iii) consolidated
interest expense (iv) income tax expense (v) preferred
dividends and net earnings attributable to non-controlling
interests, and (vi) changes in operating receivables and
distributions from unconsolidated funds, CDFS JVs and
unconsolidated investees; less (i) gains on dispositions of
non-development properties, and (ii) equity in earnings
from unconsolidated property funds, CDFS joint ventures, and
other unconsolidated investees.
For purposes of the unaudited prospective financial information
provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan Stanley and presented
herein, core funds from operations is calculated as operating
income less interest expense, preferred share dividends, and
other reconciling line items, adjusted for non-cash items,
non-recurring items, and gains. Adjusted funds from operations
is calculated as core funds from operations plus
(i) corporate depreciation, (ii) non-cash interest
expense, (iii) non-cash convertible interest expense and
(iv) non-cash cost of share based compensation awards; less
(i) straight line rent adjustments (FAS 13),
(ii) recurring tenant improvements and leasing commissions
and (iii) recurring capital expenditures.
In addition to the summary metrics presented above, ProLogis
also provided a 2011 estimate of net operating income of
$609 million. For purposes of the unaudited prospective
financial information provided to J.P. Morgan and Morgan
Stanley and presented herein, net operating income represents
ProLogis share of consolidated income statement rental
income less consolidated income statement rental expenses.
ProLogis and AMB calculate certain non-GAAP financial metrics
including EBITDA, AFFO and NOI using different methodologies.
The differences relate to the following categories:
(i) treatment of each companys share of income and
cash flow from joint ventures and other unconsolidated
investments (ii) treatment of minority interest share of
consolidated income and cash flow; and (iii) definitional
differences related to certain adjustments made to calculate
AFFO. ProLogis has made conforming methodology changes to the
financial data received from AMB. Consequently, the financial
metrics presented in each companys prospective financial
information disclosures and in the sections of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus with respect to the opinions of the
financial advisors to AMB and ProLogis may not be directly
comparable to one another.
In preparing the foregoing unaudited projected financial
information, ProLogis made a number of assumptions regarding,
among other things, interest rates, corporate financing
activities, including amount and timing of the issuance of
senior and secured debt, ProLogis common share price
appreciation and the timing and amount of common share
issuances, annual dividend levels, occupancy and customer
retention levels of its owned and managed portfolios, changes in
rent, the amount, timing and cost of existing and planned
developments,
lease-up
rates of existing and planned developments, the amount and
timing of asset sales and asset acquisitions, including the
return on such acquisitions, the formation of, and expected
terms of, including yield on, future fund formations, the amount
of income taxes paid, and the amount of general and
administrative costs.
No assurances can be given that the assumptions made in
preparing the above unaudited prospective financial information
will accurately reflect future conditions. The estimates and
assumptions underlying the unaudited prospective financial
information involve judgments with respect to, among other
things, future economic, competitive, regulatory and financial
market conditions and future business decisions which may not be
realized and that are inherently subject to significant
business, economic, competitive and regulatory uncertainties and
contingencies, including, among others, risks and uncertainties
described under Risk Factors and Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, all of
which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the
control of AMB
and/or
ProLogis and will be beyond the control of the combined company.
There can be
63
no assurance that the underlying assumptions will prove to be
accurate or that the projected results will be realized, and
actual results likely will differ, and may differ materially,
from those reflected in the unaudited prospective financial
information, whether or not the Merger is completed.
In addition, although presented with numerical specificity, the
above unaudited prospective financial information reflects
numerous assumptions and estimates as to future events made by
the management of ProLogis that the management of ProLogis
believed were reasonable at the time the unaudited prospective
financial information was prepared. The above unaudited
prospective financial information does not give effect to the
Merger. AMB stockholders and ProLogis shareholders are urged to
review the most recent SEC filings of ProLogis for a description
of the reported and anticipated results of operations and
financial condition and capital resources of ProLogis during
2010.
Readers of this joint proxy statement/prospectus are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on the unaudited prospective
financial information set forth above. No representation is made
by AMB, ProLogis or any other person to any AMB stockholder or
any ProLogis shareholder regarding the ultimate performance of
ProLogis compared to the information included in the above
unaudited prospective financial information. The inclusion of
unaudited prospective financial information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication
that such prospective financial information will be an accurate
prediction of future events, and such information should not be
relied on as such.
PROLOGIS DOES NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR OTHERWISE REVISE THE ABOVE
UNAUDITED PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL INFORMATION TO REFLECT
CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING AFTER THE DATE WHEN MADE OR TO REFLECT
THE OCCURRENCE OF FUTURE EVENTS, EVEN IN THE EVENT THAT ANY OR
ALL OF THE ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING SUCH PROSPECTIVE FINANCIAL
INFORMATION ARE NO LONGER APPROPRIATE, EXCEPT AS MAY BE REQUIRED
BY LAW.
Pro Forma
Operational Data of the Combined Company
The combined company will be named ProLogis, Inc.
and will be a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered
and self-managed REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The combined company is expected to be a leading global owner,
operator and developer of industrial real estate. The combined
company is expected to have a pro forma equity market
capitalization of approximately $14 billion, a total market
capitalization in excess of $24 billion and gross assets
owned and managed of approximately $46 billion. The
combined company will own or manage approximately
600 million square feet (approximately 55 million
square meters) of modern distribution facilities located in key
gateway markets and logistics corridors in 22 countries.
The geographic distribution of the combined companys real
estate is expected to be as set forth in the table below upon
the closing of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Feet
|
|
|
AUM(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars, in billions)
|
|
|
|
(In
millions)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Americas
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents owned/managed real
estate at 100% share.
|
|
(2) |
|
Defined as gross book value of
owned/managed properties.
|
64
The largest customers of the combined company by annualized base
rent, on an owned and managed basis, are expected to be as set
forth in the table below upon the closing of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Combined Annualized
|
|
|
|
Base
Rent(1)
|
|
|
Deusche Post World Net (DHL)
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
Kuehne + Nagel
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Home Depot
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
CEVA Logistics
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Unilever
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
SNCF
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
United States Government
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Sagawa Express
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Wincanton Logistics
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Nippon Express
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Top 10 customers
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Annualized base rent is calculated
as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the terms of the lease, as
of December 31, 2010 and including contractual rent
escalations multiplied by 12, excluding any free rent periods.
|
The lease expirations for the combined companys owned and
managed operating properties for leases in place as of
December 31, 2010, without giving effect to the exercise of
renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to
the scheduled expirations, is expected to be as set forth in the
table below upon the closing of the Merger:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized Base
|
|
|
|
Square
Feet(1)
|
|
|
Rent(2)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
(U.S. dollars, in thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
382,375
|
|
2012
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
445,723
|
|
2013
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
410,092
|
|
2014
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
341,774
|
|
2015
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
349,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
1,929,824
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedule includes leases that
expire on or after December 31, 2010. Schedule includes
owned and managed operating properties which are defined as
properties in which the combined company has at least a 10%
ownership interest, for which it is the property or asset
manager, and which the company currently intends to hold for the
long term.
|
|
(2) |
|
Annualized base rent is calculated
as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the terms of the lease, as
of December 31, 2010 and including contractual rent
escalations, multiplied by 12, excluding any free rent periods.
|
Interests
of AMB Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the AMB board of directors
that AMB stockholders vote on the approval of the Topco merger
(including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock
to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco merger),
AMB stockholders should be aware that some of the executive
officers and directors of AMB may have interests in the Topco
merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of the
stockholders of AMB, generally. The AMB board of directors was
aware of these interests and considered them, among other
matters, in approving the merger agreement and making its
recommendations that the AMB stockholders approve the Topco
merger. For purposes of all of the AMB agreements and plans
described below, the completion of the transactions contemplated
by the merger agreement will constitute a change in control of
AMB.
Following the consummation of the Merger, Mr. Hamid R.
Moghadam, Ms. Lydia H. Kennard, Mr. J. Michael Losh,
Mr. Jeffrey L. Skelton and Mr. Carl B. Webb, each of
whom is currently a member of the AMB board of directors, will
be elected to the board of directors of the combined company.
65
Change
in Control and Noncompetition Agreements
AMB LP has previously entered into Amended and Restated Change
in Control and Noncompetition Agreements with each of AMBs
executive officers (Mr. Hamid R. Moghadam, Mr. Thomas
S. Olinger, Mr. Guy F. Jaquier, and Mr. Eugene F.
Reilly). On January 30, 2011, AMB LP entered into letter
agreements with each of AMBs executive officers which,
conditioned upon and effective as of the consummation of the
Topco merger, amend those agreements (we refer to such amended
agreements as the CIC agreements). The general
purpose of such amendments was to provide that the vesting of
equity awards held by the AMB executive officers would
accelerate only upon a severance-qualifying termination
following a change in control (instead of immediate acceleration
following the change in control). The CIC agreements have terms
that renew annually unless either party provides notice of
intent not to renew. In the event of a change in control of AMB,
such as the Topco merger, the term of the CIC agreement
automatically extends until 24 months after the date of
such change in control. In the event of a subsequent change in
control that occurs within the 24 month period following
the consummation of the Topco merger, the term of the CIC
agreements will extend for a period of 24 months beginning
on the date of any such change in control.
If, during the term of the CIC agreement and within
24 months following a change in control, such as the Topco
merger, an executive officers employment is terminated by
AMB for any reason other than cause, death,
disability or retirement, or if the executive
officer resigns for good reason (each as defined
under the CIC Agreement and referred to as a
severance-qualifying termination), the executive
officer is entitled to the following (in addition to accrued but
unpaid compensation and benefits): (i) a lump-sum severance
amount equal to two times the sum of the executive
officers (x) annual base salary and (y) average
annual bonus received by the executive officer over the three
most recent years preceding his termination of employment;
(ii) for 24 months or the earlier expiration of the
executive officers COBRA continuation coverage,
reimbursement for COBRA premiums and life insurance coverage for
the executive officer and his eligible dependents and
(iii) a lump-sum cash payment of two times the matching or
profit sharing contributions to which the executive officer
would have been entitled under AMBs 401(k) Plan for the
year of termination. In the event that any payments or benefits
made to the executive officer would be subject to the excise tax
imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, the executive officer
would receive an additional payment such that he would be placed
in the same after-tax position as if no excise tax had been
imposed.
For the purposes of the CIC agreements, good reason
generally means any material diminution or reduction in the
executive officers position, authority, duties,
responsibilities or annual base compensation, an involuntary
relocation, a failure of AMB to continue the executive
officers participation, on a basis not materially less
favorable, in any material compensation or benefit plan in which
the executive officer was eligible to participate prior to the
change in control (other than an equity-based plan), a material
diminution in the authority, duties or responsibilities of the
supervisor to whom the executive officer reports or any other
action that constitutes a material breach of the CIC agreement,
except that (i) Mr. Moghadams position as
co-chief executive officer of the combined company with
Mr. Walter C. Rakowich, until the earlier of
(x) Mr. Rakowichs retirement or other
termination of employment or (y) January 1, 2013 and
(ii) Mr. Olingers position as Chief Integration
Officer of the combined company until the earlier of
(x) Mr. William E. Sullivans retirement or other
termination of employment or (y) January 1, 2013, in
each case will not constitute good reason under
their respective CIC agreements.
On January 30, 2011, AMB and each of Mr. Moghadam and
Mr. Olinger entered into letter agreements which further
provide that Mr. Moghadam will become the sole chief
executive officer of the combined company and Mr. Olinger
will become the chief financial officer of the combined company,
in each case no later than January 1, 2013.
As provided in the merger agreement, in connection with the
Topco merger, AMB may grant 20,000 shares of restricted
stock to each of Mr. Olinger, Mr. Jaquier and
Mr. Reilly.
Based on compensation and benefit levels in effect on
April 6, 2011, and assuming that the Topco merger was
completed on April 6, 2011 and, immediately thereafter,
each executive officer incurs a severance-qualifying
termination, each of Mr. Moghadam, Mr. Olinger,
Mr. Jaquier and Mr. Reilly would be entitled to
receive $6,673,119, $1,778,457, $2,014,046, and $2,078,713,
respectively, in cash severance payments under their CIC
66
agreements (including the COBRA and life insurance premium
reimbursement described above for the maximum available period).
Equity
Compensation Awards
Each of the CIC agreements provides that upon a
severance-qualifying termination or a termination of the
executive officers employment due to death or
disability, in each case during the two-year period
following the consummation of the Topco merger, all equity or
equity-based awards then held by the applicable executive
officer and which also have been held by the executive officer
at the time of the Topco merger will vest and all restrictions
will lapse.
Based on AMB equity compensation holdings as of April 6,
2011, and assuming that the Topco merger was completed on
April 6, 2011 and, immediately thereafter, each executive
officer incurs a severance-qualifying termination, as to
Mr. Moghadam, Mr. Olinger, Mr. Jaquier and
Mr. Reilly, (1) the number of options to purchase AMB
common stock that would vest in connection with such
severance-qualifying termination is 588,848, 34,265, 162,899 and
56,456, respectively, and (2) the number of shares of
restricted stock that would vest in connection with such
severance-qualifying termination is 140,486, 56,647, 85,921 and
117,065, respectively.
AMB
Deferred Compensation Plans
AMB currently maintains two deferred compensation plans for its
executive officers and non-employee directors: the Amended and
Restated 2005 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (which we
refer to as the 2005 Plan) and the Amended and
Restated 2002 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (which we
refer to as the 2002 Plan). Each of the executive
officers, with the exception of Mr. Reilly, participates in
one or both of the deferred compensation plans. Both the 2005
Plan and the 2002 Plan provide that upon a change in control of
AMB, such as the Topco merger, participants will receive a
lump-sum payment equal to his or her vested account balance.
Payments under the 2005 Plan are required to be made as soon as
possible after the change in control but in no event later than
the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year in which
the change in control occurs or (ii) the 15th day of
the third month following the date of the change in control.
Payments of vested account balances under the 2002 Plan, which
are treated as grandfathered for purposes of
Section 409A of the Code, are required to be made
immediately prior to the change in control unless the
administrator of such plan determines, in its sole discretion,
to defer payment for a period of up to 13 months after the
change in control.
AMB
2011 Supplemental Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan
On January 30, 2011, the AMB board of directors adopted the
new NQDC Plan, conditioned upon and effective as of the
consummation of the Topco merger. The purpose of the new NQDC
Plan is to provide the opportunity for participants in the 2002
Plan and the 2005 Plan (which we collectively referred to as the
old NQDC Plans) to continue to receive tax-deferred
earnings with respect to the shares or cash withheld to pay
taxes as a result of the required, non-waivable, distributions
from the old NQDC Plans which will be triggered by the
consummation of the Topco merger, as described above. These
grants would not make participants whole for taxes paid
on the required distributions; the intent is to compensate the
executives for the fact that those taxes will be paid earlier
than both they and AMB anticipated when deferrals under the old
NQDC Plans were made.
Each participant in the old NQDC Plans who remains employed (or,
as to non-employee director participants, a member of the
combined companys board) immediately following the
consummation of the Topco merger will receive an opening grant
under the new NQDC Plan at that time. The base amount of the
grant (i.e., the amount on which the value of the award will be
determined) will equal the taxes paid on distributions paid due
to the consummation of the Topco merger under the old NQDC
Plans. These grants will be in the form of combined company
stock units or cash credits to match the form of each
participants deemed investment under the old NQDC Plans.
Dividend equivalents on stock units held in the new NQDC Plan
will be deemed reinvested in additional stock units or directed
to other investments, at the participants election. Each
stock unit will entitle the applicable participant to a
distribution at a future date (selected by the participant in
accordance with Section 409A of the Code) of a number of
shares of the stock of the combined company equal to:
(i) with respect to the stock units credited at closing,
(x) the increase, if any, in the value of a share of
combined company stock after the closing,
67
divided by (y) the value of a share of combined company
stock on the distribution date, plus (ii) the total number
of stock units credited to such participants account in
respect of dividend equivalents. If a participant is credited
with a notional cash balance under the new NQDC Plan as of the
consummation of the Topco merger, the participant will receive
the notional earnings (if any) on that cash balance at
distribution. A trust (commonly known as a rabbi
trust) will be created to hold shares of combined company
stock and cash reflecting the opening account balances of stock
units and cash, respectively, in the new NQDC Plan, and the
accretions thereon. The participants in the new NQDC Plan will
be entitled to direct the plan trustee on how to vote the shares
held in the trust on a pro rata basis.
Assuming an aggregate state and federal tax rate of 45%, based
on the aggregate account balance of each of Mr. Moghadam,
Mr. Olinger, Mr. Jaquier and the two non-employee
directors (as a group), under the old NQDC Plans as of
April 8, 2011, the opening grant of each such executive
officer and the two non-employee directors (as a group), in the
new NQDC Plan will be $27,678,084, $132,806, $2,393,871 and
$451,483, respectively. Each participant will have the right to
vote the shares of stock of the combined company held in the
trust relating to the new NQDC Plan in proportion to the stock
units credited to the participants account.
Interests
of ProLogis Trustees and Executive Officers in the
Merger
In considering the recommendation of the ProLogis board of
trustees that ProLogis shareholders vote in favor of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger, ProLogis shareholders
should be aware that some of the executive officers and trustees
of ProLogis may have interests in the Merger that are different
from, or in addition to, those of the shareholders of ProLogis,
generally. The ProLogis board of trustees was aware of these
interests and considered them, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement and the Merger,
in approving the merger agreement and in recommending that the
ProLogis shareholders approve the Merger.
Following the consummation of the Merger, six persons selected
by ProLogis will be elected to the board of directors of the
combined company. One of those persons will be the ProLogis
chief executive officer, Mr. Walter C. Rakowich, who will
also become the co-chief executive officer and chairman of the
executive committee of the board of directors of the combined
company, and another will be Mr. Irving F. Lyons III, a
current member of the board of trustees of ProLogis, who will
become the lead independent director of the combined
corporation. Three of the remaining four persons selected by
ProLogis (Mr. George L. Fotiades, Ms. Christine Garvey
and Mr. D. Michael Steuert) are current members of the
ProLogis board of trustees.
Employment
and Executive Protection Agreements
Employment
Agreement with Walter C. Rakowich
Mr. Rakowich and ProLogis are currently parties to a Third
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of
January 7, 2009 which provides Mr. Rakowich with
payments and benefits if his employment is terminated under
certain circumstances (which we refer to as the Current
Agreement). On January 30, 2011, Mr. Rakowich
entered into an agreement with ProLogis pursuant to which he
waived any right that he would have to terminate employment with
ProLogis and receive payments and benefits under the terms of
the Current Agreement solely because he will be the co-chief
executive officer the combined company following the Topco
merger. Mr. Rakowichs Current Agreement otherwise
remains in effect and will expire by its terms on
December 31, 2011, subject to earlier termination in
accordance with its terms. ProLogis may also pay
Mr. Rakowich up to $20,000 to reimburse him for legal fees
incurred in preparation and negotiation of his new employment
agreement.
On January 30, 2011, Mr. Rakowich entered into a new
employment agreement with ProLogis (which we refer to as the
New Agreement) which will become effective on
January 1, 2012, provided that the Topco merger has
occurred by that date and provided that he is still employed on
that date, and which will expire on December 31, 2012,
subject to earlier termination in accordance with its terms. The
New Agreement generally provides that he will provide services
as the co-chief executive officer of the combined company and
will be primarily responsible for integration of the real estate
portfolios, as well as for operations, dispositions, capital
deployment and risk management following the Topco merger. The
New Agreement provides that, for 2012, Mr. Rakowich will
receive:
|
|
|
|
|
an annual base salary of $1,000,000;
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
a target bonus equal to 150% of his salary, with an actual
bonus, generally conditioned upon satisfaction of performance
criteria, of not less than zero or more than 200% of the target
bonus;
|
|
|
|
a target incentive award having an aggregate value of
$4,800,000, with an actual incentive award, generally
conditioned upon satisfaction of performance criteria, of not
less than 60% and not more than 160% of the target incentive
award; and
|
|
|
|
participation in standard benefit plans.
|
Certain performance payments are subject to
claw-back in the event of material modifications or
material restatements of the combined companys financial
statements. Mr. Rakowich is also entitled to coverage under
the combined companys directors and officers insurance and
to indemnification on the same basis as under his existing
employment agreement with ProLogis.
If Mr. Rakowichs employment terminates during the
term of the New Agreement for any reason, he will be entitled to
payments of accrued salary and vacation, bonuses for prior
periods and payments to which he is entitled under applicable
benefit plans (which we refer to as the Accrued
Benefits).
If his employment is terminated during the term of the New
Agreement by the combined company for cause (as defined in the
New Agreement) or if he terminates other than for good reason
(as defined in the New Agreement), he will not be entitled to
any payments or benefits other than the Accrued Benefits.
If his employment terminates during the term of the New
Agreement due to death or disability, he will be entitled to a
bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance
for that year and pro-rated through the date of termination and
a pro-rata portion of the Target Incentive Award for that year
(without regard to satisfaction of performance criteria). He
will also be fully vested in any incentive awards awarded for
prior periods, subject to satisfaction of applicable performance
criteria.
If his employment is terminated during the term of the New
Agreement by the combined company other than for cause or if he
resigns for good reason (each as defined under the New
Agreement) or upon expiration of the term of the New Agreement,
he will be entitled to:
|
|
|
|
|
his salary through the end of 2012;
|
|
|
|
$6,000,000;
|
|
|
|
his target bonus (provided that his employment does not
terminate as the result of the expiration of the term of the New
Agreement); and
|
|
|
|
continuing medical benefits through December 31, 2014
(subject to earlier termination if he becomes eligible to
receive comparable benefits through other employment).
|
The foregoing payments will generally be paid in installments
over two years following the termination and are conditioned
upon Mr. Rakowichs compliance with restrictive
covenants, including a non-compete and non-solicitation
provision. Also under such termination circumstances described
in the preceding paragraph, Mr. Rakowich will be entitled
to:
|
|
|
|
|
a lump sum payment of $12,000 in lieu of certain welfare
benefits;
|
|
|
|
vesting and payment of the incentive award to which he would
otherwise be entitled for 2012 (and if the incentive award for
2011 has not then been granted, the incentive award for 2011),
based on actual performance for the applicable period without
pro-ration, such payment to be made to Mr. Rakowich at the
same time as incentive awards for the applicable period are
otherwise provided to similarly situated corporate-level
executives; and
|
|
|
|
vesting of incentive awards for prior periods subject to
satisfaction of any performance conditions without pro-ration.
|
Termination payments and benefits are generally conditioned upon
Mr. Rakowichs release of claims.
69
The New Agreement also provides that if Mr. Rakowichs
employment is terminated prior to January 1, 2012 under
circumstances that would have entitled him to the foregoing
termination benefits under the New Agreement had he been
employed on January 1, 2012, he will be entitled to a
payment equal to $7,300,000, payable in a lump sum no later than
March 15, 2012, in addition to payments and benefits, if
any, to which he is entitled under the Current Agreement.
The New Agreement also provides that Mr. Rakowich will be
subject to confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation
restrictions during his employment and for a period thereafter
and that he may be entitled to certain reimbursement and
advancement of costs he incurs in enforcing the agreement.
The New Agreement, as well as the Current Agreement, will be
assumed by the combined company at the time of the Topco merger.
Executive
Protection Agreements with Edward S. Nekritz and William E.
Sullivan
ProLogis is currently party to Executive Protection Agreements
with each of Mr. Edward S. Nekritz and
Mr. William F. Sullivan. The Executive Protection
Agreements for Mr. Nekritz and Mr. Sullivan generally
provide that, for a period of 24 months following a change
of control, the executive is entitled to an annual salary that
is not less than that provided prior to such period, minimum
bonus requirements and participation in incentive compensation
and employee benefit plans. Prior to the amendments described
below, the Executive Protection Agreements with Mr. Nekritz
and Mr. Sullivan provide that if the executive
officers employment is terminated by ProLogis for any
reason other than death, Disability or
Cause, or if the executive officer resigns as a
result of a Constructive Discharge (each as defined
under the Executive Protection Agreement and referred to as a
qualifying termination), in each case during the
24-month
period following a change of control, the executive officer is
entitled to the following (in addition to accrued but unpaid
compensation): (i) a pro rata bonus payable for the
performance period in which the qualifying termination occurs,
with payment based on achievement of a target level of
performance for the period (regardless of actual performance for
the period), (ii) a lump sum severance amount equal to two
times the sum of the executives (x) annual base
salary and (y) target level of annual bonus for the fiscal
year in which the qualifying termination occurs; (iii) for
24 months following the qualifying termination, continued
medical and life insurance coverage for the executive officer
and his dependents, (iv) outplacement services for up to
twelve months following the qualifying termination, and
(v) full vesting in the executive officers interest
in ProLogis nonqualified savings plan. In addition, all
outstanding equity or equity-based awards held by the executive
officer will vest and become exercisable or payable. In the
event that any payments or benefits made to the executive
officer would be subject to the excise tax imposed by
Section 4999 of the Code, the executive officer would
receive an additional payment such that he would be placed in
the same after-tax position as if no excise tax had been
imposed; provided, however, that if a reduction in such payments
to an amount that is not less than 90% of the value of the
payments would result in no excise tax under Section 4999
of the Code, the payments shall be reduced in accordance with
the terms of the Executive Protection Agreement to the extent
required to avoid the excise tax.
For purposes of the Executive Protection Agreements for
Mr. Nekritz and Mr. Sullivan, a Constructive
Discharge would occur if the executive terminated
employment for good reason. Good reason is generally
defined for this purpose to mean a substantial adverse
alteration in the nature of the executive officers status
or responsibilities, a material failure to provide the executive
officer with compensation and benefits in accordance with the
agreement or ProLogis material breach of the agreement.
The Executive Protection Agreements with Mr. Nekritz and
Mr. Sullivan were amended, conditioned upon the Topco
merger, to provide that the consummation of the Topco merger
will be deemed to be a change in control for purposes of their
Executive Protection Agreements, and to make other changes
described below, although no payments will be made under such
agreements unless there is a qualifying termination event during
the term. In the case of Mr. Sullivan, the term of the
Executive Protection Agreement as amended, ends on
December 31, 2012. In the case of Mr. Nekritz, the
term of the agreement as amended, extends for a period of two
years following the Topco merger; provided, however, that if a
subsequent change in control (as defined in the Executive
Protection Agreements) occurs within the two-year term
commencing at the effective time of the Topco merger, the term
will be extended for an additional two-year period beginning
with the date of any such subsequent change in control.
70
The amendment to the Executive Protection Agreement for
Mr. Nekritz broadens the circumstances under which
Mr. Nekritz may terminate his employment during the term of
the agreement and receive benefits under the agreement to
include a relocation from the current ProLogis headquarters
location and certain reductions in pay. The amendment to
Mr. Sullivans agreement acknowledges that he will
receive benefits under the agreement if he terminates his
employment upon at least 30 days advance notice
following the effective date of the Topco merger and ending on
December 31, 2012. Finally, the amendments provide that
even though all outstanding equity awards held by the covered
executive officer at the time of termination would otherwise
vest upon a qualifying termination, with respect to awards that
are made in connection with the Topco merger that vest ratably
over three years, the executive officer will receive a pro-rata
portion of the tranche that would otherwise vest in the year of
termination based on the time elapsed since the last vesting
date.
The combined company is required to assume all rights, powers,
duties and obligations of ProLogis under the Executive
Protection Agreements at the effective time of the Topco merger.
All other terms and conditions of the Executive Protection
Agreements remain in effect.
Based on compensation and benefit levels in effect on
April 6, 2011, and assuming that the Merger was completed
on April 6, 2011 and, immediately thereafter, each
executive officer incurs a severance-qualifying termination,
each of Mr. Rakowich, Mr. Sullivan and
Mr. Nekritz will be entitled to receive $15,810,630,
$2,654,690 and $2,414,384, respectively, in cash severance
payments under their employment or executive protection
agreements, as applicable (not including the value of certain
medical, dental and life insurance benefits and outplacement
services estimated to be $25,840, $30,770 and $35,200,
respectively).
Employment
Agreement with Mr. Antenucci
Mr. Antenucci is not party to an Executive Protection
Agreement with ProLogis. Although he is a party to an employment
agreement with ProLogis pursuant to which he may be entitled to
severance payments and benefits under certain circumstances, Mr.
Antenuccis employment with ProLogis will terminate no
later than June 30, 2011 under circumstances unrelated to
the consummation of the Merger, and as such, any severance
payments or benefits that he may be entitled to receive, if
applicable, are not related to, or contingent upon, the Merger.
Equity
Compensation Awards
As mentioned above, each of the agreements provides that upon a
qualifying termination, certain equity and equity-based
incentive awards will become fully vested. In addition, in
connection with the Topco merger, Mr. Nekritz will receive
75,000 restricted share unit awards from ProLogis.
Based on ProLogis equity compensation holdings as of
April 6, 2011, and assuming that the Merger was completed
on April 6, 2011 and, immediately thereafter, each
executive officer incurs a qualifying termination which results
in full vesting of his equity or equity-based incentive awards,
as to Mr. Rakowich, Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Nekritz
(i) the number of options to purchase ProLogis common
shares that would vest in connection with such
severance-qualifying termination is 0, 198,453 and 130,476,
respectively and (ii) the number of restricted share units
that would vest in connection with such qualifying termination
is 0, 268,986 and 208,700, respectively, and (iii) the
number of performance shares and accrued dividend equivalents
that would vest in connection with such qualifying termination
is 0, 88,527 and 46,780, respectively. Mr. Rakowichs
equity or equity-based incentive awards (options to acquire
145,081 common shares, 470,988 restricted share units and
accrued dividend equivalents and 334,722 performance shares and
accrued dividend equivalents) will continue to vest in
accordance with their original vesting schedule.
Directors
and Management Following the Merger
Initial
Board Composition
Following the consummation of the Merger, the board of directors
of the combined company will have eleven members, consisting of
(i) Mr. Hamid R. Moghadam, the current chief executive
officer of AMB; (ii) Mr. Walter C. Rakowich, the
current chief executive officer of ProLogis;
(iii) Ms. Lydia H. Kennard, Mr. J. Michael Losh,
Mr. Jeffrey Skelton and Mr. Carl B. Webb, each of whom
was selected by the AMB board of directors and is currently a
member of the AMB board of directors; and
(iv) Mr. Irving F. Lyons III, Mr. George L.
Fotiades, Ms. Christine Garvey, Mr. D.
71
Michael Steuert and Mr. William D. Zollars, each of whom
were selected by the ProLogis board of trustees and each of whom
(other than Mr. Zollars) is currently a member of the
ProLogis board of trustees.
Mr. Moghadam will become the chairman of the board of the
combined company (which will not be an executive officer
position at the combined company), Mr. Rakowich will become
the chairman of the executive committee of the board, and
Mr. Lyons will become the lead independent director.
Mr. Zollars, age 63, was a trustee of ProLogis from
June 2001 to May 2010. Mr. Zollars has been the chairman of
the board and chief executive officer of YRC Worldwide Inc., a
holding company specializing in the transportation of
industrial, commercial, and retail goods, since November 1999.
Mr. Zollars is a director of Cerner Corporation (computer
integrated systems design) and CIGNA Corporation (hospital and
medical service plans).
Board
Committees
The board of directors of the combined company will have four
committees, consisting of an audit committee, a compensation
committee, an executive committee, and a nominating &
governance committee (which will include in its charter the
current responsibilities of the corporate responsibility
committee of ProLogis). Mr. Losh (chair), Ms. Garvey
and Mr. Steuert will serve as members of the audit
committee, Mr. Fotiades (chair), Mr. Webb and
Mr. Zollars will serve as members of the compensation
committee, Mr. Rakowich (chair), Mr. Lyons,
Mr. Moghadam and Mr. Skelton will serve as members of
the executive committee and Ms. Kennard (chair),
Mr. Skelton and Mr. Zollars will serve as members of
the nominating & governance committee. The role of the
executive committee will be to meet and act separately if board
action is required, the matter is time-sensitive and the full
board of directors is unavailable or unable to act in the
required time frame.
Officers
of the Combined Company
Upon the closing of the Merger, Mr. Moghadam and
Mr. Rakowich will become co-chief executive officers of the
combined company. On December 31, 2012, Mr. Rakowich
will resign as co-chief executive officer and as a member of the
board of directors, and Mr. Moghadam will become the sole
chief executive officer of the combined company and remain
chairman of the board of the combined company.
The bylaws of the combined company will provide that the
affirmative vote of at least 75% of the independent directors of
the combined company is required to take any of the following
actions:
|
|
|
|
|
removal of Mr. Moghadam from the office of co-chief
executive officer of the combined company prior to
December 31, 2012 or removal of Mr. Moghadam from the
office of chief executive officer or chairman of the board of
directors of the combined company prior to December 31,
2014;
|
|
|
|
removal of Mr. Rakowich as co-chief executive officer of
the combined company prior to December 31, 2012;
|
|
|
|
appointment of any person as chief executive officer or co-chief
executive officer of the combined company, other than, prior to
December 31, 2012, Mr. Moghadam or Mr. Rakowich,
or, after December 31, 2012 and prior to December 31,
2014, Mr. Moghadam;
|
|
|
|
appointment of any person, other than Mr. Moghadam, as
chairman or co-chairman of the board of directors of the
combined company prior to December 31, 2014;
|
|
|
|
failure to nominate Mr. Moghadam or Mr. Rakowich as a
director of the combined company in any election of directors
where the term of such directorship commences prior to
December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2012,
respectively; or
|
|
|
|
a material alteration, limitation or curtailment of the
authority granted pursuant to the bylaws of the combined company
to the chief executive officer, co-chief executive officer or
chairman of the board prior to December 31, 2014.
|
In addition, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the
independent directors of the combined company is required to
amend, modify or repeal, or adopt any bylaw provision
inconsistent with, the foregoing provisions.
72
The current chief financial officer of ProLogis,
Mr. William E. Sullivan, will become chief financial
officer of the combined company, and the current chief financial
officer of AMB, Mr. Thomas S. Olinger, will become chief
integration officer of the combined company. On
December 31, 2012, Mr. Sullivan will retire from the
combined company and Mr. Olinger will become the chief
financial officer of the combined company.
Following the closing of the Merger, Mr. Michael S. Curless
will act as chief investment officer of the combined company,
Mr. Guy F. Jaquier will act as chief executive officer,
private capital, Mr. Gary E. Anderson will act as chief
executive officer, Europe & Asia, Mr. Eugene F.
Reilly will act as chief executive officer, the Americas,
Mr. Edward S. Nekritz will act as chief legal officer and
general counsel, and Ms. Nancy Hemmenway will act as chief
human resources officer.
Treatment
of ProLogis Share Options and Other Equity-Based
Awards
Upon completion of the Topco merger, outstanding share options
to purchase ProLogis common shares, share unit awards with
respect to ProLogis common shares, dividend equivalent units
with respect to ProLogis common shares and performance share
awards denominated in ProLogis common shares will generally be
assumed by the combined company without any action on the part
of their holders, and converted into stock options, stock unit
awards, dividend equivalent units and performance stock awards
with respect to common stock of the combined company, on the
same terms and conditions (including the vesting schedule, if
applicable), except that:
|
|
|
|
|
each ProLogis share option will be exercisable for that number
of shares of common stock of the combined company equal to the
number of ProLogis common shares subject to the share option
multiplied by the exchange ratio (0.4464), and the per share
exercise price for the shares of common stock of the combined
company will be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the
original exercise price of each ProLogis common share subject to
such assumed ProLogis share option by the exchange ratio
(0.4464);
|
|
|
|
each ProLogis share unit award, dividend equivalent unit award
and performance share award will be converted into the right to
receive that number of shares of the common stock of the
combined company equal to the number of ProLogis common shares
subject to the respective award multiplied by the exchange ratio
(0.4464).
|
Equity awards of AMB will remain outstanding upon completion of
the Merger as equity awards of the combined company.
Participants in the ProLogis Employee Share Purchase Plan may
not increase their payroll deductions thereunder from those in
effect on January 30, 2011 and no employee may commence
participation in the plan following January 30, 2011. The
ProLogis Employee Share Purchase Plan will be automatically
suspended effective as of the earlier of June 30, 2011 or
the payroll period of ProLogis ending immediately prior to the
closing of the Topco merger, but in no event less than ten
business days prior to the closing of the Topco merger, and any
contributions made for the offering period in effect as of
January 30, 2011, the date of the merger agreement. will be
applied to the purchase of ProLogis common shares, and any cash
remaining in the ProLogis Employee Share Purchase Plan after
such suspension date will be promptly refunded to plan
participants.
Accounting
Treatment
The Merger will be accounted for as a purchase, as
that term is used under GAAP, for accounting and financial
reporting purposes. Under purchase accounting, the assets
(including identifiable intangible assets) and liabilities
(including executory contracts and other commitments) of AMB as
of the effective time of the Topco merger will be recorded at
their respective fair values and added to those of ProLogis. Any
excess of purchase price over the fair values is recorded as
goodwill. Consolidated financial statements of the combined
company issued after the Merger would reflect these fair values
and would not be restated retroactively to reflect the
historical consolidated financial position or results of
operations of AMB.
Regulatory
Approvals Required for the Merger
AMB and ProLogis are not required to make notifications under
the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules
promulgated thereunder by the Federal Trade Commission.
73
Competition approvals for the Merger were required and have been
obtained from the antitrust authorities in Canada, Germany and
Mexico. In particular, competition consents were sought from the
German antitrust authority (Bundeskartellamt), pursuant to the
German Competition Law (Act Against Restraints of Competition of
1998, as amended), and the Mexican competition commission,
Commission Federal de Competencia, pursuant to Article 20
of the Federal Law of Economic Competition. Competition consent
was also sought and obtained from the Canadian Competition
Bureau in Canada, pursuant to the Competition Act (Canada).
At any time before or after the combination, the Antitrust
Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal
Trade Commission, or a U.S. state attorney general could
take action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or
desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin
the combination or seeking divestiture of assets of AMB or
ProLogis or their respective subsidiaries. Private parties may
also bring legal actions under the antitrust laws under certain
circumstances. While AMB and ProLogis do not expect any such
action to be taken, they can give no assurance that a challenge
to the combination will not be made or, if made, would be
unsuccessful.
Exchange
of Shares in the Merger
At or prior to the effective time of the Merger, AMB will
appoint an exchange agent to handle the exchange of certificates
formerly representing ProLogis common shares for shares of
common stock of the combined company and the exchange of
certificates formerly representing ProLogis preferred shares for
shares of preferred stock of the combined company. Promptly
after the effective time of the Topco merger, the exchange agent
will send to each holder of record of ProLogis common shares and
ProLogis preferred shares at the effective time of the Merger
who holds such shares in certificated or book-entry form (which
we refer to as the ProLogis certificates), a letter
of transmittal and instructions for effecting the exchange of
the ProLogis certificates for the merger consideration the
holder is entitled to receive under the merger agreement. Upon
surrender of ProLogis certificates for cancellation along with
the executed letter of transmittal and other documents described
in the instructions, a former holder of ProLogis common shares
or ProLogis preferred shares will receive one or both of the
following: (i) one or more shares of common stock or
preferred stock of the combined company and (ii) cash in
lieu of fractional shares of common stock of the combined
company. After the closing of the Merger, ProLogis will not
register any transfers of the shares of ProLogis common shares
and ProLogis preferred shares. The shares of stock of the
combined company stock shareholders receive in the Merger will
be issued in book-entry form.
Because the Topco merger will occur immediately after the
ProLogis merger, ProLogis shareholders will not receive
certificates representing shares of New Pumpkin common stock or
preferred stock prior to the receipt of common stock and
preferred stock of the combined company to be issued in the
Topco merger.
If you are an AMB stockholder, you are not required to take any
action with respect to your AMB stock certificates. Such
certificates will continue to represent shares of the combined
company after the Topco merger. However, after the Topco merger
is completed, the exchange agent for the combined company will
send you a letter of transmittal and instructions for exchanging
your AMB stock certificates for stock certificates of the
combined company. Upon surrender of the certificates for
cancellation along with the executed letter of transmittal and
other required documents described in the instructions, an AMB
stockholder will receive a stock certificate of the combined
company.
Dividends
Each company plans to continue its current dividend policy until
the closing of the Merger. The parties each intend to pay
distributions on their preferred shares at their stated dividend
or distribution rates and quarterly dividends to their common
stockholders at a rate not in excess of $0.28 per share of AMB
common stock and $0.1125 per ProLogis common share. AMB and
ProLogis have agreed to coordinate their regular quarterly
dividends for their common stockholders so that, if one group of
common stockholders receives any dividend for a quarter, the
other group of common stockholders will also receive a dividend
for such quarter at the same time. AMB and ProLogis have agreed
that the other party, with notice to the other, can declare or
pay the minimum dividend as may be required in order for such
party to qualify as a REIT and to avoid to the extent reasonably
possible the incurrence of income or excise tax (which we refer
to as a REIT dividend). If one party declares a REIT
dividend, the other party can declare a dividend per share in
the same amount, as adjusted by the exchange ratio.
74
Following the closing of the Merger, the parties intend that the
combined company will maintain a dividend policy that will allow
it to maintain its status as a REIT and avoid to the extent
reasonably possible the incurrence of income or excise tax.
Listing
of AMB Common Stock and Preferred Stock
It is a condition to the completion of the Merger that the AMB
common stock, AMB Series R preferred stock, and AMB
Series S preferred stock issuable in the Topco merger and
the AMB common stock to be authorized and reserved for issuance
upon exchange or redemption of partnership units by limited
partners in certain of ProLogis partnerships, upon the
conversion or exchange of certain of ProLogis convertible
debt or upon exercise or settlement of options and other equity
awards to purchase AMB common stock issued in substitution for
ProLogis options and other equity awards be approved for listing
on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance.
De-Listing
and Deregistration of ProLogis Common Shares and Preferred
Shares
When the Merger is completed, the ProLogis common shares and
each series of ProLogis preferred shares currently listed on the
NYSE will cease to be quoted on the NYSE and will be
deregistered under the Exchange Act.
No
Appraisal or Dissenters Rights
Under
Section 8-501.1(j)
of the Maryland REIT Law (which we refer to as the
MRL) and
Section 3-202
of the Maryland General Corporation Law (we refer to the
Maryland General Corporation Law as the MGCL and we
refer to the MRL and the MGCL together as Maryland
law), holders of ProLogis common shares, ProLogis
Series C preferred shares, ProLogis Series F preferred
shares and ProLogis Series G preferred shares do not have
the right to receive the appraised value of their shares in
connection with the Merger because they are listed on the NYSE
and/or are
not entitled to vote on the Merger.
Litigation
Relating to the Merger
Following the announcement of the merger agreement, several
lawsuits were filed. Three of the actions were filed in the
District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado.
These cases have been consolidated, and on or about
April 1, 2011, plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action
complaint against ProLogis, the members of the ProLogis board of
trustees, AMB, New Pumpkin, Upper Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC and AMB
LP. The complaint alleges that ProLogis trustees breached
their fiduciary duties in connection with entering into the
merger agreement and that ProLogis, AMB, New Pumpkin, Upper
Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC and AMB LP aided and abetted the breaches
of those fiduciary duties. The complaint further alleges that
the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus forms a part contains material omissions
and misstatements. The plaintiffs seek, among other relief, an
order to (i) enjoin the defendants from consummating the
Merger unless and until ProLogis adopts and implements a
procedure or process reasonably designed to enter into a merger
agreement providing the best possible value for ProLogis
shareholders, (ii) direct the defendants to exercise their
fiduciary duties to obtain a transaction that is in the best
interests of ProLogis shareholders and to refrain from
entering into any transaction until the process for the sale or
merger of ProLogis is completed and the highest possible value
obtained, (iii) rescind the merger agreement, to the extent
already implemented, and (iv) award plaintiffs costs
and disbursements of the action. Defendants have moved to stay
the Colorado action in favor of the Maryland action described
below. Plaintiffs have moved for expedited discovery, and the
defendants have opposed that motion.
Two of the actions were filed in the Circuit Court of Maryland
for Baltimore City. The actions have been consolidated, and the
plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action and derivative
complaint on or about March 28, 2011. The Maryland
consolidated complaint names the same defendants as the Colorado
consolidated complaint. The complaint alleges that the members
of the ProLogis board of trustees breached their fiduciary
duties in connection with the Merger and that AMB and AMB LP
aided and abetted the breaches of those fiduciary duties. The
complaint further alleges that the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part is
misleading and incomplete. The plaintiffs in this action seek,
among other relief, an order to (i) enjoin, preliminarily
and permanently, the Merger, (ii) rescind the Merger in the
event it is consummated or award rescissory damages,
(iii) direct the defendants to account to plaintiffs and
all other members of the class for all
75
damages, profits and any special benefits defendants obtained
as a result of their breaches of fiduciary duties and
(iv) award plaintiffs the costs of the action. Defendants
moved to dismiss the Maryland action for failure to state a
claim and to stay all discovery pending a ruling on their motion
to dismiss; plaintiffs have moved for expedited discovery in
advance of a preliminary injunction hearing.
On April 15, 2011, the parties to the Maryland action
executed a memorandum of understanding that embodies their
agreement in principle on the structure of a proposed
settlement. The proposed settlement, which is subject to
confirmatory discovery and court approval following notice to
the class of all ProLogis shareholders during the period from
January 30, 2011 through the date of the consummation of
the Merger (which we refer to as the Class), would
dismiss all causes of action asserted in the Maryland
consolidated complaint and release all claims that members of
the Class may have arising out of or relating in any manner to
the Merger, including all claims being asserted in the Colorado
action. Pursuant to the terms of the proposed settlement,
defendants agreed to make certain disclosures to shareholders in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The parties reported to
the Maryland court on April 18, 2011 that they had reached
agreement on a proposed settlement and executed a memorandum of
understanding. On April 27, 2011, the parties to the
consolidated action in Colorado reached an agreement in
principle on the structure of a proposed settlement. Under the
proposed settlement, which is subject to confirmatory discovery
and approval of the Maryland court following notice to the
Class, defendants agreed to make additional disclosures in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The defendants believe that the claims asserted against them in
these lawsuits are without merit and, absent court approval of
the proposed settlement, intend to defend themselves vigorously
against the claims.
76
The
Merger Agreement
The following section summarizes material provisions of the
merger agreement. This summary does not purport to be complete
and may not contain all of the information about the merger
agreement that is important to you. This summary is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the merger
agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference herein.
The rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the
express terms and conditions of the merger agreement and not by
this summary or any other information contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. You are urged to read the merger
agreement carefully and in its entirety before making any
decisions regarding the Merger.
The merger agreement summary is included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus only to provide you with information
regarding the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, and
not to provide any other factual information about AMB or
ProLogis or their respective subsidiaries or businesses.
Accordingly, the representations and warranties and other
provisions of the merger agreement should not be read alone, but
instead should be read together with the information provided
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and in the
documents incorporated by reference herein. See Where You
Can Find More Information.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in
the merger agreement and described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus were made only for purposes of the merger
agreement and as of specific dates and may be subject to more
recent developments, were made solely for the benefit of the
other parties to the merger agreement and may be subject to
limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including
being qualified by reference to confidential disclosures, for
the purposes of allocating risk between the parties to the
merger agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts,
and may apply standards of materiality in a way that is
different from what may be viewed as material by you or other
investors. The representations and warranties contained in the
merger agreement do not survive the effective time of the
merger. Investors should not rely on the representations,
warranties and covenants or any description thereof as
characterizations of the actual state of facts or conditions of
AMB, ProLogis or any of their respective subsidiaries or
affiliates. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter
of the representations, warranties and covenants may change
after the date of the merger agreement, which subsequent
information may or may not be fully reflected in public
disclosures by AMB or ProLogis.
Form
of the Merger
The merger agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement and in
accordance with the applicable provisions of Maryland law and
the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, AMB and ProLogis
will combine through a multi-step process:
|
|
|
|
|
first, in the ProLogis merger, ProLogis will be reorganized into
an UPREIT structure by merging Pumpkin LLC with and into
ProLogis, with ProLogis continuing as the surviving entity and
as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of Upper Pumpkin and an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of New Pumpkin;
|
|
|
|
following the ProLogis merger, in the Topco merger, New Pumpkin
will be merged with and into AMB, with AMB continuing as the
surviving corporation under the name of ProLogis,
Inc.; and
|
|
|
|
following the Topco merger, the combined company will contribute
all of the outstanding equity interests of Upper Pumpkin to AMB
LP, which will be renamed ProLogis, L.P., in
exchange for the issuance of partnership interests in AMB LP to
the combined company.
|
Following the consummation of the Merger, ProLogis will continue
its existence as a subsidiary of the combined company. The
shares of common stock of the combined company will be listed
and traded on the NYSE under the symbol PLD.
Merger
Consideration
At the effective time of the ProLogis merger, upon the terms and
subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement,
(i) each outstanding ProLogis common share will be
converted into one newly issued share of common stock of New
Pumpkin, (ii) in a share exchange effected by the ProLogis
merger, each outstanding
77
ProLogis Series C preferred share will be exchanged for one
newly issued share of Series C Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock of New Pumpkin (which we refer to as New
Pumpkin Series C preferred stock), (iii) in a
share exchange effected by the ProLogis merger, each outstanding
ProLogis Series F preferred share will be exchanged for one
newly issued share of Series F Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock of New Pumpkin (which we refer to as New
Pumpkin Series F preferred stock) and (iv) in a
share exchange effected by the ProLogis merger, each outstanding
ProLogis Series G preferred share will be exchanged for one
newly issued share of Series G Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock of New Pumpkin (which we refer to as New
Pumpkin Series G preferred stock).
Pursuant to the Topco merger, upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in the merger agreement, (i) each
outstanding share of New Pumpkin common stock will be converted
into 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB common stock,
(ii) each outstanding share of New Pumpkin Series C
preferred stock will be converted into one newly issued share of
AMB Series Q preferred stock, (iii) each outstanding
share of New Pumpkin Series F preferred stock will be
converted into one newly issued share of AMB Series R
preferred stock and (iv) each outstanding share of New
Pumpkin Series G preferred stock will be converted into one
newly issued share of AMB Series S preferred stock.
AMB will not issue any fractional shares of AMB common stock in
the Topco merger. Instead, a holder of New Pumpkin common stock
who otherwise would have received a fraction of a share of AMB
common stock will receive an amount in cash, without interest,
equal to such fractional amount multiplied by the NYSE closing
price for a share of AMB common stock on the last trading day
immediately prior to the effective time of the Topco merger.
Each share of AMB common stock and AMB preferred stock will
remain outstanding following the effective time of the Topco
merger as shares of stock of the combined company.
As a result of the Merger, each outstanding right of a limited
partner in each of ProLogis Fraser, L.P. and ProLogis Limited
Partnership I to redeem or exchange such limited partners
partnership interests therein for ProLogis common shares (or
cash equivalents thereof) will be converted into the right to
redeem or exchange such partnership interests for shares of AMB
common stock (or cash equivalents thereof) adjusted by the
exchange ratio, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the merger agreement. Each outstanding right of a
holder of ProLogis convertible notes to convert such
convertible notes into ProLogis common shares will be converted
into the right to convert such convertible notes into shares of
AMB common stock, upon the terms and subject to the conditions
set forth in the merger agreement.
As a result of the contribution and the issuance, Upper Pumpkin
and, accordingly ProLogis, will become a wholly owned subsidiary
of AMB LP. Following the contribution and the issuance, AMB LP
shall change its name to ProLogis, L.P.
Treatment
of ProLogis Share Options and Other Equity-Based
Awards
Upon the completion of the Topco merger, each outstanding option
to purchase ProLogis common shares, whether or not then
exercisable, will be assumed by the combined company. Each such
option so assumed by the combined company will otherwise
continue to be subject to the same terms and conditions as
applicable immediately prior to the effective date of the Topco
merger, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
each such option will be exercisable for that number of shares
of common stock of the combined company equal to the product of
the number of ProLogis common shares that were subject to such
option immediately prior to the Topco merger, multiplied by the
exchange ratio (0.4464) and rounded down to the nearest whole
number of shares; and
|
|
|
|
the per share exercise price for the shares of common stock of
the combined company issuable upon exercise of such option will
be equal to the quotient determined by dividing the exercise
price of the option immediately prior to the Topco merger by the
exchange ratio (0.4464), rounded up to the nearest whole cent.
|
The foregoing provisions recognize and take into account that
each ProLogis common share will, at the effective time of the
ProLogis merger, be converted into a share of New Pumpkin common
stock.
78
On the effective date of the Topco merger, the following will
occur with respect to each outstanding share unit award with
respect to ProLogis common shares, dividend equivalent unit
award with respect to ProLogis common shares and performance
share award denominated in ProLogis common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
each such award, whether or not then vested or earned, will be
assumed by the combined company by virtue of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
each such award will be converted into the right to receive the
number of shares of common stock of the combined company equal
to the number of ProLogis common shares underlying or subject to
such award immediately prior to the Topco merger, multiplied by
the exchange ratio (0.4464) and rounded down to the nearest
whole number of shares; and
|
|
|
|
each such award will otherwise continue to be subject to the
same terms and conditions as applicable immediately prior to the
Topco merger effective date.
|
The foregoing provisions recognize and take into account that
each ProLogis common share will, at the effective time of the
ProLogis merger, be converted into a share of New Pumpkin common
stock.
The ProLogis board of trustees has agreed to adopt such
resolutions and take such other actions as may be required to
provide that with respect to ProLogis Employee Stock
Purchase Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
participants may not increase their payroll deductions under
such plan from those in effect on January 30, 2011, the
date of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
no new participants may join such plan following
January 30, 2011;
|
|
|
|
all participation in, and purchases under such plan will be
suspended effective as of the earlier of June 30, 2011 or
ProLogis payroll period ending immediately prior to the
closing of the Topco merger, but in no event less than ten
business days prior to the closing of the Topco merger (we refer
to this date as the suspension date), such that the
offering period in effect as of January 30, 2011, the date
of the merger agreement, will be the final offering period under
the plan until otherwise determined by the board of directors of
the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
with respect to any offering period under such plan in effect as
of January 30, 2011, ProLogis will ensure that such
offering period ends on the suspension date and that each
participants accumulated contributions for such offering
period will be applied to the purchase of ProLogis common shares
in accordance with the terms of the plan.
|
Any cash remaining in ProLogis Employee Share Purchase
Plan after the purchases occurring on the suspension date will
be promptly refunded to participants.
Closing;
Effective Time of the Merger
Unless the parties otherwise agree, the closing of the Merger,
the contribution and the issuance will take place on the date
that is the second business day after the satisfaction or waiver
of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement (other than
those conditions that, by their terms, are to be satisfied on
the closing date, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
those conditions at the time of closing).
Unless the parties otherwise agree, the ProLogis merger will
become effective following the close of business on the closing
date, and the Topco merger will become effective before the open
of business on the first business day following the closing
date. After the Topco merger becomes effective, the combined
company will change its name to ProLogis, Inc. The
contribution and the issuance will take place immediately after
the Topco merger becomes effective.
Charter
and Bylaws
The charter of AMB as in effect immediately prior to the Topco
merger will be the charter of the combined company following the
Topco merger, except that the name of the combined company will
be ProLogis, Inc. and,
79
if the charter amendment is approved by AMB stockholders at the
AMB special meeting, the charter amendment will become effective
upon consummation of the Topco merger.
Unless the parties otherwise agree, AMB has agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to submit the charter amendment to the
vote of its stockholders. The approval of the charter amendment
is not a condition to the parties obligations to effect
the Merger and other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement.
The bylaws of AMB as in effect immediately prior to the Topco
merger will be the bylaws of the combined company following the
Topco merger, except that amendments effected by the bylaw
amendment (as described under AMB Proposal 2:
Approval of the Bylaw Amendment) will become effective
upon the consummation of the Topco merger. Approval by the AMB
stockholders of the bylaw amendment is a condition to
parties obligations to effect the Merger and other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
Directors
and Management Following the Merger
The parties have agreed that following the consummation of the
Merger, the board of the directors of the combined company will
have eleven members. The members of the initial board of
directors of the combined company will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Hamid R. Moghadam, the current chief executive officer
of AMB;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Walter C. Rakowich, the current chief executive officer
of ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
Ms. Lydia H. Kennard, Mr. J. Michael Losh,
Mr. Jeffrey L. Skelton and Mr. Carl B. Webb, each of
whom was designated as a director by the AMB board of directors
and each of whom is currently a member of the AMB board of
directors; and
|
|
|
|
Mr. George L. Fotiades, Ms. Christine Garvey,
Mr. Irving F. Lyons III, Mr. D. Michael Steuert and
Mr. William D. Zollars each of whom was designated as a
director by the ProLogis board of trustees and each of whom
(other than Mr. Zollars) is currently a member of the
ProLogis board of trustees.
|
The board of directors of the combined company will have four
committees, consisting of an audit committee, a compensation
committee, an executive committee, and a nominating and
governance committee, which will include in its charter the
current responsibilities of ProLogis corporate
responsibility committee. The role of the executive committee
will be to meet and act separately if board action is required,
the matter is time-sensitive and the full board of directors is
unavailable or unable to act in the required time frame. The
members of the committees of the initial board of directors of
the combined companies have been mutually agreed on by the AMB
board of directors and the ProLogis board of trustees of
ProLogis and will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Audit Committee. Mr. Losh (chair),
Ms. Garvey and Mr. Steuert;
|
|
|
|
Compensation Committee. Mr. Fotiades
(chair), Mr. Webb and Mr. Zollars;
|
|
|
|
Nominating & Governance
Committee. Ms. Kennard (chair),
Mr. Skelton and Mr. Zollars; and
|
|
|
|
Executive Committee. Mr. Rakowich
(chair), Mr. Lyons, Mr. Moghadam and Mr. Skelton.
|
Upon the consummation of the Merger, (i) Mr. Moghadam
and Mr. Rakowich will become co-chief executive officers of
the combined company, (ii) Mr. William E. Sullivan,
the current chief financial officer of ProLogis, will become the
chief financial officer of the combined company,
(iii) Mr. Lyons will become the lead independent
director of the combined company, (iv) Mr. Moghadam
will become the chairman of the board of directors of the
combined company and (v) Mr. Rakowich will become the
chairman of the executive committee of the board of directors of
the combined company.
Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the bylaws of the
combined company, on December 31, 2012, (i) the
employment of Mr. Rakowich as co-chief executive officer
will terminate and Mr. Rakowich will retire as co-chief
executive officer and as a director of the combined company,
(ii) Mr. Moghadam will become the sole chief executive
officer (and will remain the chairman of the board of directors)
of the combined company, (iii) the employment of
Mr. Sullivan as the chief financial officer of the combined
company will terminate and Mr. Thomas
80
S. Olinger, the current chief financial officer of AMB, will
become the chief financial officer of the combined company.
Exchange
of Shares in the Merger
At or prior to the effective time of the Merger, AMB will
appoint an exchange agent who is reasonably acceptable to
ProLogis to handle the exchange of shares of New Pumpkin common
stock for shares of AMB common stock and the exchange of shares
of New Pumpkin preferred stock for shares of AMB preferred
stock. As soon as reasonably practicable after the effective
time of the Topco merger, the exchange agent will send to each
holder of record of New Pumpkin common stock and New Pumpkin
preferred stock at the effective time of the Topco merger who
holds shares of New Pumpkin common stock and New Pumpkin
preferred stock in certificated or book-entry form (including
certificates formerly evidencing ProLogis common shares and
ProLogis preferred shares as of immediately prior to the
effective time of the ProLogis merger) a letter of transmittal
and instructions for effecting the exchange of the ProLogis
certificates for the merger consideration the holder is entitled
to receive under the merger agreement. Upon surrender of stock
certificates for cancellation along with the executed letter of
transmittal and other documents described in the instructions, a
holder of New Pumpkin common stock or preferred stock will
receive one or both of the following: (i) one or more
shares of AMB common stock or preferred stock; and
(ii) cash in lieu of fractional shares of AMB common stock.
After the closing of the ProLogis merger, ProLogis will not
register any transfers of the shares of ProLogis common shares
and ProLogis preferred stock.
Holders of unexchanged shares of New Pumpkin common stock or New
Pumpkin preferred stock will not be entitled to receive any
dividends or other distributions payable on the shares of AMB
common stock or preferred stock, as applicable, until surrender
of their ProLogis certificates. Upon surrender, those holders
will receive accumulated dividends and distributions with a
record date after the effective time of the Topco merger,
without interest, payable on the shares of AMB common stock or
preferred stock, as applicable, as well as any cash owed in lieu
of fractional shares.
Representations
and Warranties of AMB and ProLogis
The merger agreement contains representations and warranties
made by each of AMB and ProLogis to each other. These
representations and warranties are subject to qualifications and
limitations agreed to by AMB and ProLogis in connection with
negotiating the terms of the merger agreement. Some of the
significant representations and warranties contained in the
merger agreement relate to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, standing and corporate power and charter documents;
|
|
|
|
capital structure;
|
|
|
|
authority relative to execution and delivery of, and performance
of obligations under, the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of, laws,
organizational documents or other obligations or contracts as a
result of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
required consents and approvals relating to the Merger;
|
|
|
|
SEC documents, financial statements, internal controls and
accounting or auditing practices;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information supplied or to be supplied in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and the registration statement of
which it forms a part;
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain litigation;
|
|
|
|
tax matters, including qualification as a REIT;
|
|
|
|
existence and validity of certain material contracts;
|
|
|
|
benefits matters and ERISA compliance;
|
|
|
|
collective bargaining agreements and other labor matters;
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes and non-existence of a material
adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
board approval of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
exemption from anti-takeover statutes;
|
|
|
|
required shareholder approval;
|
|
|
|
ownership of or interest in, and condition of, certain owned and
leased real property;
|
|
|
|
compliance with environmental laws;
|
|
|
|
ownership of or licenses to certain intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
possession of certain permits, licenses and other approvals from
governmental entities;
|
|
|
|
existence of insurance policies;
|
|
|
|
inapplicability of the Investment Company Act of 1940;
|
|
|
|
brokers and finders fees in connection with the
Merger and other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of opinions from each partys financial advisor.
|
The merger agreement also contains certain representations and
warranties of ProLogis with respect to its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC,
including their organization and authorization, lack of prior
business activities, lack of liabilities and execution and
approval of the merger agreement.
Many of the representations of AMB and ProLogis are qualified by
a material adverse effect standard (that is, they
will not be deemed to be untrue or incorrect unless their
failure to be true or correct, individually or in the aggregate,
would have a material adverse effect). Material adverse
effect for purposes of the merger agreement means any
event, development, change or occurrence that is materially
adverse to the financial condition, business or results of
operations AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, in each case
including its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, except that no
event, development, change or occurrence arising out of,
relating to or resulting from any of the following will
constitute a material adverse effect or will be considered in
determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred:
|
|
|
|
|
changes generally affecting the economy, financial or securities
markets or political or regulatory conditions, to the extent
such changes do not have a materially disproportionate effect on
the financial condition, business or results of operations of
AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, in each case including its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to other similarly
situated owners, operators and developers of industrial real
estate;
|
|
|
|
changes in the industrial real estate sector or changes
generally affecting owners, operators or developers of
industrial real estate, to the extent such changes do not have a
materially disproportionate effect on the financial condition,
business or results of operations of AMB or ProLogis, as
applicable, in each case including its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, relative to other similarly situated owners, operators
and developers of industrial real estate;
|
|
|
|
any change after the date of the merger agreement in law or the
interpretation thereof or GAAP or the interpretation thereof, to
the extent such changes do not have a materially
disproportionate effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, in each
case including its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
other similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate;
|
|
|
|
acts of war, armed hostility or terrorism or any worsening
thereof, to the extent such changes do not have a materially
disproportionate effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, in each
case including its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
other similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate;
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados or other natural disasters or
calamities, to the extent such changes do not have a materially
disproportionate effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, in each
case including its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, relative to
other similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate;
|
|
|
|
any change to the extent attributable to the negotiation,
execution or announcement of the merger agreement, including any
litigation resulting therefrom, and any adverse change in
customer, distributor, employee, supplier, financing source,
licensor licensee,
sub-licensee,
stockholder, joint venture partner or similar relationships,
including as a result of the identity of the other party;
|
|
|
|
any failure by AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, to meet any
internal or published industry analyst projections or forecasts
or estimates of revenues or earnings for any period (although
facts and circumstances giving rise to such failure that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of material adverse
effect may be taken into account in determining whether there
has been a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
any change in the price or trading volume of the common stock of
AMB or common shares of ProLogis, as applicable (although facts
and circumstances giving rise to such change that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of material adverse
effect may be taken into account in determining whether there
has been a material adverse effect);
|
|
|
|
compliance with the terms of, or the taking of any action
required by, the merger agreement; and
|
|
|
|
the outcome of certain litigation, claims or other proceedings.
|
Notwithstanding the above, any event, development, change or
occurrence that has caused or is reasonably likely to cause AMB
or ProLogis, as applicable, to fail to qualify as a REIT for
U.S. federal income tax purposes will be considered a material
adverse effect, unless such failure has been, or is able to be,
cured on commercially reasonable terms under the applicable
provisions of the Code.
Conduct
of Business
Under the merger agreement, between January 30, 2011 and
the earlier of the effective time of the Topco merger and the
termination of the merger agreement, subject to certain
exceptions, unless (i) expressly contemplated or permitted
by the merger agreement, (ii) required by applicable law or
regulation, or (iii) consented to by the other party (which
consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), each of AMB and ProLogis has agreed to conduct its
business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and to use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact
its business organization and maintain its existing relations
and goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributions,
creditors, lessors and tenants.
In addition, between January 30, 2011 and the earlier of
the effective time of the Topco merger, and the termination of
the merger agreement, subject to certain exceptions, unless
(i) expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger
agreement, (ii) required by applicable law or regulation,
or (iii) consented to by the other party (which consent may
not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), each of
AMB and ProLogis has agreed that it will not, and will cause its
subsidiaries not to:
|
|
|
|
|
enter into any new material line of business;
|
|
|
|
declare, set aside or pay any dividends or other distributions,
other than (i) as described under
Dividends, (ii) regular
distributions that are required to be made in respect of
partnership units of certain specified subsidiaries of each of
AMB and ProLogis, and (iii) dividends by or among an entity
and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or shares
of beneficial interest, as the case may be, or issue any other
securities in substitution for such shares;
|
|
|
|
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire its capital stock or
other securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares
of capital stock, except upon the exercise by a limited partner
in certain specified subsidiaries of each of AMB and ProLogis of
its right to redeem or exchange partnership units pursuant to
the terms of the related partnership agreements;
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell, or authorize any issuance, delivery or
sale of, shares of its capital stock or shares of beneficial
interest, as applicable, equity-based awards, voting debt or
convertible or exchangeable securities, except (i) in
connection with the exercise or settlement of existing equity
awards in accordance with the existing terms of the related
plans or awards, (ii) upon the exercise by a limited
partner in certain specified subsidiaries of each of AMB and
ProLogis of its right to redeem or exchange partnership units
pursuant to the terms of the related partnership agreements,
(iii) issuances by a subsidiary of AMB or ProLogis to AMB,
ProLogis or another subsidiary thereof, as applicable, or
(iv) issuances by ProLogis of ProLogis common shares upon
conversion of any of ProLogis existing convertible debt;
|
|
|
|
amend the charter, declaration of trust, bylaws or equivalent
governing documents of AMB, ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC, New Pumpkin, or certain significant subsidiaries of AMB or
ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
make acquisitions of businesses, entities, properties or assets,
other than (i) acquisitions for consideration with a fair
market value that does not exceed $50,000,000 individually or
$250,000,000 per calendar quarter in the aggregate and which
would not reasonably be expected to materially delay, impede or
affect the consummation of the Merger, (ii) internal
reorganizations or consolidations of subsidiaries that would not
present a material risk of a material delay in the consummation
of the Merger, (iii) acquisitions pursuant to agreements,
arrangements or understandings existing on January 30,
2011, or (iv) the creation of new subsidiaries organized to
continue or conduct activities otherwise permitted by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
sell, assign, encumber or otherwise dispose of any assets
(including capital stock of subsidiaries and indebtedness of
others owned by such party) which are material, individually or
in the aggregate, to AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, other than
(i) internal reorganizations or consolidations involving
existing subsidiaries that would not present a material risk of
any material delay in the consummation of the Merger,
(ii) dispositions disclosed in SEC filings of AMB or
ProLogis, as applicable, made prior to January 30, 2011,
(iii) other activities in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, (iv) other dispositions if
the fair market value of the total consideration received in
respect of such assets does not exceed $50,000,000 individually
or $250,000,000 per calendar quarter in the aggregate or
(v) the incurrence of indebtedness specifically permitted
pursuant to the provision described in the immediately
succeeding bullet;
|
|
|
|
incur, create, assume or guarantee any long-term indebtedness,
modify any of the material terms of any outstanding long-term
indebtedness, guarantee any long-term indebtedness or issue or
sell any long-term debt securities (or securities with the right
to acquire any long-term debt securities), other than
(i) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, (ii) certain qualifying debt incurred to
refinance or repay existing debt, (iii) indebtedness
between an entity and a subsidiary of which it owns at least 90%
of the voting interests, or between such 90% owned subsidiaries
of the same entity, (iv) other indebtedness incurred by
non-wholly owned subsidiaries of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable,
in individual amounts below certain thresholds, which thresholds
vary by currency, (v) certain indebtedness specified in the
disclosures made in connection with the merger agreement, or
(vi) certain borrowings under existing credit agreements in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
change its methods of accounting, except as required by changes
in GAAP as concurred in by such partys independent
auditors or as previously disclosed in an SEC filing by such
party;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or resolutions
providing for a liquidation, dissolution, restructuring,
recapitalization or reorganization;
|
|
|
|
terminate, cancel, renew or request or agree to any material
amendment or modification to or waiver under or assignment of,
any of certain specified types of material contracts, or enter
into or materially amend any contract that, if existing on
January 30, 2011, would have qualified as one of such types
of material contracts;
|
|
|
|
waive the excess share provision of its charter, in the case of
AMB, or declaration of trust, in the case of ProLogis, for
anyone other than the other parties to the merger agreement and
their subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
take or fail to take any action which would reasonably be
expected to cause such party to fail to qualify as a REIT;
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
take or fail to take any action which would reasonably be
expected to cause any subsidiary of such party to cease to be
treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for
U.S. federal income tax purposes or as a qualified REIT
subsidiary, a taxable REIT subsidiary or a REIT under the Code;
|
|
|
|
make or commit to make any capital expenditures in excess of
$50,000,000, other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
take or knowingly fail to take any action which could reasonably
be expected to prevent the ProLogis merger or the Topco merger
from qualifying as a reorganization under the Code;
|
|
|
|
make, change or rescind any material tax election or change a
material method of tax accounting, amend any material tax
return, settle or compromise any material income tax liability,
audit, assessment or claim, enter into any material closing
agreement related to taxes or knowingly surrender any right to
claim any material tax refund, in each case, except (i) in
the ordinary course of business, (ii) as necessary to
preserve the status of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, as a REIT
under the Code, or (iii) as necessary to qualify or
preserve the status of any subsidiary of AMB or ProLogis, as
applicable, as a partnership or disregarded entity for U.S.
federal income tax purposes or as a qualified REIT subsidiary, a
taxable REIT subsidiary or a REIT under the Code;
|
|
|
|
waive, release, assign, compromise or settle any claim, action
or proceeding, other than waivers, releases, assignments,
compromises or settlements that (i) with respect to the
payment of monetary damages, involve only the payment of
monetary damages (excluding any amounts payable under existing
property-level insurance policies) either equal to or lesser
than the amount specifically reserved with respect to the most
recent balance sheet of AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, filed
with the SEC prior to January 30, 2011, or that do not
exceed $10,000,000 individually or $100,000,000 in the
aggregate, (ii) do not involve the imposition of injunctive
relief against AMB, ProLogis, any of their subsidiaries or the
surviving corporation following the effective time of the Topco
merger, and (iii) do not provide for any admission of
material liability by AMB, ProLogis or any of their subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
increase the compensation or other benefits to directors,
officers or employees, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and as would not result in a
material increase in cost to AMB or ProLogis, as applicable;
|
|
|
|
enter into any employment, change of control, severance or
retention agreement with any director, officer or employee,
except for (i) agreements entered into with newly hired
employees or (ii) severance agreements entered into with
employees in connection with terminations of employment, in the
case of each of (i) and (ii) with employees who are
not executive officers, and in each case only in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice and as would
not result in a material increase in cost to AMB or ProLogis, as
applicable;
|
|
|
|
establish, adopt, enter into or amend any benefit plan or other
plan, policy, program or arrangement for the benefit of any
director, officer or employee or their beneficiaries, except as
permitted pursuant to the two preceding bullets or in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, in
each case only with respect to awards or grants made to newly
hired employees in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practice that would not result in a material increase
in cost to AMB or ProLogis, as applicable;
|
|
|
|
enter into or amend any collective bargaining agreement or
similar agreement, other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice that would not result in a
material increase in cost to ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
repay, refinance or replace any direct indebtedness maturing
within twelve months from January 30, 2011, subject to
certain exceptions;
|
|
|
|
form any new funds;
|
|
|
|
effect any deed in lieu of foreclosure, or sell, lease, assign
or encumber or transfer to a lender any property securing
indebtedness owed to such lender; or
|
|
|
|
agree to take or authorize any of the foregoing actions.
|
85
Other
Covenants and Agreements
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and
agreements, including covenants related to:
|
|
|
|
|
cooperation between AMB and ProLogis in the preparation of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus;
|
|
|
|
each partys agreement to (i) afford the
representatives of the other party access to its books,
contracts and records during normal business hours and
(ii) provide the other party, upon reasonable request, with
copies of certain information;
|
|
|
|
each partys agreement to maintain the confidentiality of
certain non-public information provided by the other party;
|
|
|
|
each partys agreement to use its reasonable best efforts
to take all actions reasonably appropriate to consummate the
Merger and other transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
each partys agreement to use its reasonable best efforts
to cooperate to obtain all governmental consents, clearances,
approvals, permits or authorizations required to complete the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
each partys agreement to (i) cooperate in all
respects in connection with any investigation or other inquiry,
(ii) promptly inform the other party of any communication
concerning the merger agreement or the transactions contemplated
thereby from or with any governmental entity, (iii) permit
the other party to review and comment on any proposed
communication to any government entity, (iv) consult with
the other party in advance of any meeting with any governmental
entity or in connection with a proceeding by a private party and
(v) resolve objections and avoid or eliminate impediments
to the closing of the Merger;
|
|
|
|
cooperation between AMB and ProLogis in connection with the
development of a joint communications plan and in connection
with press releases and other public statements with respect to
the Merger;
|
|
|
|
AMBs agreement to use its reasonable best efforts to cause
the shares of AMB common stock and preferred stock to be issued
in, or reserved for issuance in connection with, the Topco
merger to be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to
official notice of issuance, prior to the consummation of the
Merger;
|
|
|
|
the use by each party of reasonable best efforts to cause each
of the ProLogis merger and Topco merger to qualify as a
reorganization under the Code; and
|
|
|
|
cooperation between AMB and ProLogis to implement necessary or
appropriate agreements under each partys indentures or
other indebtedness with respect to financing matters.
|
Dividends
The merger agreement provides that between January 30, 2011
and the earlier of the effective time of the Topco merger and
the termination of the merger agreement, none of AMB, New
Pumpkin or ProLogis may make, declare, set aside for payment or
pay any dividend or other distribution to its respective
stockholders or shareholders without the prior written consent
of AMB (in the case of New Pumpkin or ProLogis) or ProLogis (in
the case of AMB), except that such written consent will not be
required for the authorization and payment of:
|
|
|
|
|
distributions at their respective stated dividend or
distribution rates with respect to AMB preferred stock and
ProLogis preferred shares; and
|
|
|
|
quarterly distributions at a rate not in excess of the regular
quarterly cash dividend most recently declared prior to
January 30, 2011 ($0.28 per share of AMB common stock and
$0.1125 per share of ProLogis common shares).
|
AMB and ProLogis have agreed to coordinate their regular
quarterly dividends for their common shareholders so that, if
one group of common shareholders receives any dividend for a
calendar quarter, the other group of common stockholders will
also receive a dividend for such calendar quarter with the same
record and payment dates. AMB and ProLogis have also agreed that
one party, with notice to the other, can declare or pay the
minimum dividend that may be required in order for such party to
qualify as a REIT and to avoid to the extent reasonably
86
possible the incurrence of income or excise tax. If one party
declares a REIT dividend, the other party can declare a dividend
per share in the same amount, as adjusted by the exchange ratio.
Conditions
to Completion of Merger
The obligations of AMB and ProLogis to complete the Merger are
subject to a number of conditions being satisfied or, where
legally permissible, waived. These conditions include, among
others:
|
|
|
|
|
the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding shares of AMB common stock to approve the Topco
merger;
|
|
|
|
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of AMB common stock to approve the bylaw
amendment;
|
|
|
|
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding ProLogis common shares to approve the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the approval for listing by the NYSE of shares of AMB common
stock, AMB Series R preferred stock and AMB Series S
preferred stock to be issued or reserved for issuance in
connection with the Topco merger;
|
|
|
|
the SEC having declared effective the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any judgment or other legal prohibition or
binding order of any court or other governmental entity that
prohibits the Merger;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any action taken or statute, rule, regulation or
order enacted by any governmental entity which makes the
consummation of the Merger illegal; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all requisite regulatory approvals and the
termination or expiration of all requisite waiting periods,
subject to the material adverse effect standard provided in the
merger agreement and summarized above.
|
In addition, the obligation of AMB to effect the Topco merger is
subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the following
additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of ProLogis set forth in the
merger agreement with respect to its capital structure and
authority to enter into the merger agreement and to consummate
the transactions contemplated thereby being true and correct in
all material respects as of January 30, 2011 and the
closing date (except to the extent made as of an earlier date,
in which case as of such earlier date);
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of ProLogis set forth in the
merger agreement with respect to all other matters being true
and correct as of January 30, 2011 and the closing date
(except to the extent made as of an earlier date, in which case
as of such earlier date), except for the failure to be true and
correct (without giving effect to any limitations as to
materiality or a material adverse effect) as would not have or
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
each of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC
having performed, in all material respects, all obligations
required to be performed under the merger agreement at or prior
to the closing date;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an officers certificate signed by the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer of ProLogis,
certifying that the three preceding conditions have been
satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion of AMBs counsel to the effect
that the Topco merger will qualify as a reorganization under the
Code; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from ProLogis counsel that,
since December 31, 1993, ProLogis has been organized and
operated in conformity with REIT requirements.
|
87
The obligation of ProLogis to effect the Merger is subject to
the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of AMB set forth in the
merger agreement with respect to its capital structure and
authority to enter into the merger agreement and to consummate
the transactions contemplated thereby being true and correct in
all material respects as of January 30, 2011 and the
closing date (except to the extent made as of an earlier date,
in which case as of such earlier date);
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of AMB set forth in the
merger agreement with respect to all other matters being true
and correct as of January 30, 2011 and the closing date
(except to the extent made as of an earlier date, in which case
as of such earlier date), except for the failure to be true and
correct (without giving effect to any limitations as to
materiality or a material adverse effect) as would not have or
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect;
|
|
|
|
each of AMB and AMB LP having performed, in all material
respects, all obligations required to be performed under the
merger agreement at or prior to the closing date;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an officers certificate signed by the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer of AMB, certifying
that the three preceding conditions have been satisfied;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion of ProLogis counsel to the
effect that each of the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger
will qualify as a reorganization under the Code; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from AMBs counsel that, since
December 31, 1997, AMB has been organized and operated in
conformity with REIT requirements.
|
No
Solicitation
Each company has agreed that, from the time of the execution of
the merger agreement, none of AMB or ProLogis, or their
respective subsidiaries, officers, trustees, directors or
representatives, will, directly or indirectly,
(i) initiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate
any inquiries or the making of any acquisition proposal,
(ii) participate in any discussions or negotiations with or
provide any confidential information to any person concerning an
acquisition proposal, (iii) approve or execute or enter
into any letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger
agreement, asset purchase or share exchange agreement, option
agreement or other similar agreement related to any acquisition
proposal, or (iv) propose or agree to any of the foregoing.
For purposes of the merger agreement, an acquisition
proposal means any proposal or offer with respect to, or a
transaction to effect, (i) a merger, reorganization, share
exchange, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction involving AMB,
ProLogis or any of their significant subsidiaries, (ii) any
purchase or sale of 20% or more of the consolidated assets
(including stock or other ownership interests of its
subsidiaries) of AMB or ProLogis, in each case taken as a whole
with each of its subsidiaries, or (iii) any tender or
exchange offer for its voting securities that, if consummated,
would result in any person (or the stockholders or other equity
interest holders of such person) beneficially owning securities
representing 20% or more of the total voting power of either AMB
or ProLogis (or of the surviving parent entity in such
transaction) or the voting power of any significant subsidiary
of either AMB or ProLogis (in each case other than any proposal
or offer made by one party to the merger agreement to another
such party). For purposes of the merger agreement, a
significant subsidiary is any subsidiary of AMB or
ProLogis that would constitute a significant subsidiary of such
party within the meaning of
Rule 1-02
of
Regulation S-X
promulgated by the SEC.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the AMB board of directors and
the ProLogis board of trustees will each be permitted, prior to
its respective special meeting of stockholders or shareholders,
subject to first entering into a confidentiality agreement and
subject to its compliance with the other provisions of this
covenant, to engage in discussion and negotiations with, or
provide information to, any person making an unsolicited bona
fide written acquisition proposal with respect to AMB or
ProLogis (but not with respect to any of their subsidiaries)
which did not result from a breach of the terms of this covenant
and which the board of directors or board of trustees, as the
case may be, concludes in good faith (after consultation with
outside legal counsel and financial advisors) constitutes, or is
reasonably likely to result in, a acquisition proposal that is
both (i) more favorable to its
88
stockholders or shareholders, as the case may be, than the
Merger, and (ii) is fully financed, reasonably likely to
receive all required governmental approvals and otherwise
reasonably capable of being completed on the terms proposed, in
each case taking into account all financial, regulatory, legal
and other aspects of such proposal and the person making the
proposal, and provided that the references to 20% or
more in the definition of acquisition proposal are
replaced with a reference to a majority (we refer to
any proposal meeting such criteria as a superior
proposal). The foregoing actions may be undertaken only if
the directors or trustees, as the case may be, conclude in good
faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that
failure to do so would be inconsistent with their duties under
applicable law.
Each party has agreed to notify the other party within
24 hours after receipt of an acquisition proposal or
receipt of any inquiry from any party relating to a possible
acquisition proposal, or if either party enters into discussions
or negotiations concerning any acquisition proposal or provides
nonpublic information to any person in connection with an
acquisition proposal. Each party has agreed to keep the other
party informed of the status and terms of any such proposals.
Neither party will submit to the vote of its shareholders or
stockholders, as the case may be, any alternative acquisition
proposal prior to the termination of the merger agreement.
The merger agreement required each of AMB and ProLogis and their
subsidiaries and representatives to, upon execution of the
merger agreement, immediately cease and terminate any existing
activities, discussions or negotiations with any third parties
conducted prior to the execution of the merger agreement
regarding an acquisition proposal, and prohibits each party from
releasing any third party from any confidentiality or standstill
agreement with respect to any acquisition proposal.
Reasonable
Best Efforts to Obtain Shareholder Vote
AMB has agreed to take all lawful action to hold a meeting of
its stockholders as promptly as practicable following the
effective date of the registration statement of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part for the purpose of
obtaining AMB stockholder approval of the Topco merger
(including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock
to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco merger)
and the bylaw amendment. Unless a permitted change in
recommendation has occurred as described below, the AMB board of
directors has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
obtain such stockholder approval, which includes issuing a
recommendation to its stockholders to approve the Topco merger.
AMB has agreed to submit the Topco merger to a vote of its
stockholders even if a permitted change in recommendation has
occurred.
ProLogis has agreed to take all lawful action to hold a meeting
of its shareholders as promptly as practicable following the
effective date of the registration statement of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part for the purpose of
obtaining ProLogis shareholder approval of the Merger. Unless a
permitted change in recommendation has occurred as described
below, the ProLogis board of trustees has agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain such shareholder approval,
which includes issuing a recommendation to its shareholders to
approve the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger. ProLogis has
agreed to submit the Merger to a vote of its shareholders even
if a permitted change in recommendation has occurred.
Each party has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to
cause the AMB stockholders meeting and the ProLogis shareholders
meeting to be held on the same date.
The AMB board of directors and the ProLogis board of trustees
have agreed they will not, and will not publicly propose to,
withhold, withdraw or modify in any manner adverse to the other
party its approval, recommendation or declaration of
advisability with respect to the merger agreement or the
transactions contemplated thereby (which we refer to as a
change in recommendation). Nevertheless, the AMB
board of directors or the ProLogis board of trustees may make a
change in recommendation in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if the board of directors or trustees, as the case may be, has
determined in good faith that an unsolicited bona fide written
acquisition proposal which it has received from a third party
and which did not result from any violation of the
non-solicitation covenant constitutes a superior proposal, and
that the failure to make such change in recommendation would be
inconsistent with the boards duties under applicable law,
subject to informing the other party of its decision to change
its recommendation; or
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
if a material development or change in circumstances, which does
not relate to an acquisition proposal and was neither known to
nor reasonably foreseeable by the directors or trustees, as the
case may be, as of January 30, 2011, has occurred after
such date, and the directors or trustees, as the case may be,
have reasonably determined that the failure to make such a
change in recommendation would be inconsistent with their duties
under applicable law.
|
Prior to making any change in recommendation, the AMB board of
directors of ProLogis board of trustees, as applicable, must
give five business days notice of its intention to do so to the
other party, which notice must contain certain information
relating to the acquisition proposal, development or change in
circumstances leading to the proposed change in recommendation,
and must engage in good faith discussions with the other party
regarding any adjustments or modifications to the terms of the
merger agreement proposed by such party. Following such five
business day period and prior to making any change in
recommendation, the party proposing to make a change in
recommendation must again reasonably determine in good faith
(after consultation with outside legal counsel, and taking into
account any adjustment or modification of the terms of the
merger agreement proposed by the other party) that failure to do
so would be inconsistent with its duties under applicable law.
Fees
and Expenses
Other than as provided in the provisions of the merger agreement
summarized below, all fees and expenses incurred in connection
with the Merger and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be paid by the party incurring those expenses,
whether or not the Topco merger is completed, provided that
(i) each party will share equally the expenses incurred in
connection with this joint proxy statement/prospectus and all
filings in connection with antitrust or other merger control
laws and (ii) if the Topco merger is completed, the
combined company will pay all property or transfer taxes imposed
on either party in connection with the Topco merger.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
Termination. The merger agreement may be
terminated at any time prior to the effective time of the Topco
merger, whether before or after the receipt of the requisite
stockholder and shareholder approvals, under the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of AMB and ProLogis;
|
|
|
|
by either AMB or ProLogis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
if any court or other governmental entity issues a final and
nonappealable order, decree or ruling or takes any other action
that permanently enjoins or otherwise prohibits the Merger,
provided that such right to terminate will not be available to
any party whose failure to comply with any provision of the
merger agreement has been the cause of such action;
|
|
|
|
if the Merger is not consummated on or before September 30,
2011, provided that such right to terminate will not be
available to any party whose failure to comply with any
provision of the merger agreement has been the cause of such
delay;
|
|
|
|
if there has been a breach by the other party of any covenants
or agreements or any of the representations and warranties set
forth in the merger agreement, which breach would result in the
related closing conditions set forth in the merger agreement not
being satisfied on the closing date, and such breach is not
cured or is not curable by September 30, 2011; or
|
|
|
|
if the required approvals of either AMB stockholders or ProLogis
shareholders have not been obtained upon a vote thereon at the
duly convened AMB stockholders meeting or ProLogis shareholders
meeting;
|
|
|
|
|
|
upon a change in recommendation of the ProLogis board of
trustees regarding the approval of the Merger;
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
if a meeting of ProLogis shareholders to approve the Merger has
not been called and held as promptly as practicable following
the date on which the registration statement of which the joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part becomes
effective; or
|
|
|
|
upon a material breach by ProLogis of its obligations under the
merger agreement regarding nonsolicitation of acquisition
proposals;
|
|
|
|
|
|
upon a change in recommendation of the AMB board of directors
regarding the approval of the Topco merger;
|
|
|
|
if a meeting of AMB stockholders to approve the Topco Merger and
the bylaw amendment, has not been called and held as promptly as
practicable following the date on which the registration
statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a
part becomes effective; or
|
|
|
|
upon a material breach by AMB of its obligations under the
merger agreement regarding nonsolicitation of acquisition
proposals.
|
Effect of Termination. If the merger agreement
is validly terminated, the agreement will become void and have
no effect, without any liability or obligation on the part of
any party, except that no party will be relieved or released
from any liabilities or damages arising out of its fraud or
willful and material breach of the merger agreement, and except
that the provisions of the merger agreement relating to
confidentiality, fees and expenses, effects of termination,
termination fees, , governing law, jurisdiction, waiver of jury
trial and specific performance will continue in effect
notwithstanding termination of the merger agreement.
Termination Fees. AMB has agreed to pay a
termination fee of $210 million plus expenses to ProLogis
in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if ProLogis terminates the merger agreement due to the AMB
stockholders meeting not being called and held as required by
the merger agreement and, after the date of the merger agreement
and prior to the date of such termination, an acquisition
proposal for AMB has been publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to the senior management or AMB board of directors
and not withdrawn prior to the date of termination;
|
|
|
|
if either party terminates the merger agreement due to the fact
that the AMB stockholders failed to approve the Topco merger and
the bylaw amendment at a meeting of the AMB stockholders held
for such purpose and, after the date of the merger agreement and
prior to the date of the meeting of AMB stockholders, an
acquisition proposal for AMB had been publicly announced and not
withdrawn prior to the date of the special meeting of AMB
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
if ProLogis terminates the merger agreement due to a change in
recommendation by the AMB board of directors and, within twelve
months of the termination date, AMB or any of its subsidiaries
executes a definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates,
an acquisition proposal (provided that for these purposes,
references to 20% or more in the definition of
acquisition proposal will be replaced with references to
35% or more); or
|
|
|
|
if ProLogis terminates the merger agreement due to a material
breach by AMB of its obligations regarding non-solicitation of
alternative proposals.
|
Such termination fee plus ProLogis expenses (up to
$20,000,000) will be the maximum amount owed by AMB in
connection with any termination of the merger agreement, except
in the case of any fraud or willful and material breach of the
merger agreement by AMB. The amount payable by AMB may also be
reduced to the extent necessary to maintain ProLogis
qualification as a REIT under the Code.
ProLogis has agreed to pay a termination fee of
$315 million plus expenses to AMB in the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if AMB terminates the merger agreement due to the ProLogis
shareholders meeting not being called and held as required by
the merger agreement and, after the date of the merger agreement
and prior to the date of such
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
termination, an acquisition proposal for ProLogis has been
publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the senior
management or board of trustees of ProLogis and not withdrawn
prior to the date of termination;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if either party terminates the merger agreement due to the fact
that ProLogis shareholders failed to approve the Merger at a
meeting of the ProLogis shareholders held for such purpose and,
after the date of the merger agreement and prior to the date of
the meeting of ProLogis shareholders, an acquisition proposal
for ProLogis had been publicly announced and not withdrawn prior
to the date of the special meeting of ProLogis shareholders;
|
|
|
|
if AMB terminates the merger agreement due to a change in
recommendation by the ProLogis board of trustees and , within
twelve months of the termination date, ProLogis or any of its
subsidiaries executes a definitive agreement with respect to, or
consummates, an acquisition proposals (provided that for these
purposes, references to 20% or more in the
definition of acquisition proposal will be replaced with
references to 35% or more); or
|
|
|
|
if AMB terminates the merger agreement due to a material breach
by ProLogis of its obligations regarding non-solicitation of
acquisition proposals.
|
Such termination fee plus AMBs expenses (up to
$20,000,000) will be the maximum amount owed by ProLogis in
connection with any termination of the merger agreement, except
in the case of any fraud or willful and material breach of the
merger agreement by ProLogis. The amount payable by ProLogis may
also be reduced to the extent necessary to maintain AMBs
qualification as a REIT under the Code.
If either party terminates the merger agreement due solely to a
change in the other partys recommendation to stockholders
or shareholders, as the case may be, or due to the other
partys breach of any covenants, agreements or
representations or warranties in the merger agreement, the
non-terminating party will pay the terminating partys
expenses in connection with the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including attorneys
fees and costs and banking and bankers fees and costs in
an amount up to $20 million.
Indemnification
and Insurance
The combined company will, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, exculpate, indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide
advancement of expenses to, each person who is or has been an
officer, director or trustee of AMB, ProLogis or their
respective subsidiaries against all losses, claims, damages,
costs, expenses, liabilities or judgments or amounts arising
from any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation based
in whole or in part on the fact that such person is or was a
director, trustee or officer of AMB, ProLogis or their
respective subsidiaries, or was serving at the request of any
such party as a trustee, director, officer, partner, or employee
of another entity, to the same extent such persons are
exculpated or indemnified as of January 30, 2011 by AMB,
ProLogis or their respective subsidiaries. Additionally, prior
to the effective date of the Topco merger, each of AMB and
ProLogis will use reasonable best efforts to obtain and fully
pay for tail directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary insurance policies with a
claim period of six years following the effective time of the
Topco merger for the current and former directors, trustees and
officers of AMB, ProLogis and their respective subsidiaries,
subject to certain limitations on cost and requirements on terms
set forth in the merger agreement. The combined company will
enter into indemnification agreements with each of its directors
and officers who does not have such an agreement as of
immediately prior to the effective time of the Topco merger.
Employee
Benefit Matters
From and after the effective date of the Topco merger, the AMB
and ProLogis benefit plans in effect as of such effective date
(other than certain ProLogis share plans), shall remain in
effect for the respective employees of each company, until such
time as the combined company shall otherwise determine, subject
to applicable laws and the terms of such plans. Nevertheless,
nothing in the merger agreement prohibits any amendment,
modification or termination of any benefit plan, arrangement or
agreement in accordance with their terms as in effect
immediately prior to the Topco merger effective date and nothing
prohibits the termination of employment of any AMB or ProLogis
employee.
92
With respect to any benefit plan in which any combined company
employees who were employees of AMB or ProLogis (or their
subsidiaries) prior to the Merger first become eligible to
participate on or after the effective date of the Topco merger,
the combined company will:
|
|
|
|
|
waive all pre-existing conditions, exclusions and waiting
periods with respect to such new plans in which employees may be
eligible to participate after the effective date of the Topco
merger, except to the extent such pre-existing conditions,
exclusions or waiting periods would apply under the analogous
AMB or ProLogis benefit plan;
|
|
|
|
provide each combined company employee and their eligible
dependents with credit for any co-payments and deductibles paid
prior to the Topco merger effective date (to the same extent
that such credit was given under the analogous AMB or ProLogis
benefit plan) in satisfying any applicable deductible or
out-of-pocket
requirements under any new plan; and
|
|
|
|
recognize all service of the combined company employees with
ProLogis and AMB for all purposes (including for purposes of
eligibility to participate, vesting credit, entitlement to
benefits and except with respect to defined benefit pension
plans benefit accrual) in any new plan in which such employees
may be eligible to participate, including any severance plan, to
the extent such service is taken into account under the
applicable new plan.
|
The foregoing will not apply to the extent it would result in
the duplication of benefits.
Amendment,
Extension and Waiver of the Merger Agreement
Amendment. At any time prior to the receipt of
stockholder or shareholder approval, the merger agreement may be
amended by authorization of the AMB board of directors and
ProLogis board of trustees. After any such stockholder or
shareholder approval, no amendment which requires further
approval by stockholders or shareholders may be made without
such further approval by such stockholders or shareholders.
Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the
effective time of the Topco merger, any party may
(i) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other party; (ii) waive
any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained
in the merger agreement or other merger documents and
(iii) waive compliance by the other party with any of the
agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement.
Governing
Law
The merger agreement is governed by the laws of the State of
Maryland (without giving effect to choice of law principles
thereof).
93
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following general discussion sets forth the anticipated
material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
ProLogis merger and the Topco merger to U.S. holders (as
defined below) of ProLogis common shares and the material
U.S. federal income tax consequences generally resulting
from the election of the combined company to be taxed as a REIT.
This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction, or
under any United States federal laws other than those pertaining
to income tax nor does it address tax consequences arising under
the unearned income Medicare contribution tax pursuant to the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. This
discussion is based upon the Code, the regulations promulgated
under the Code (which we refer to as Treasury
regulations) and court and administrative rulings and
decisions, all as in effect on the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. These laws may change, possibly
retroactively, and any change could affect the accuracy of the
statements and conclusions set forth in this discussion.
This discussion addresses only those ProLogis common
shareholders that hold their ProLogis common shares as a capital
asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code
(generally, property held for investment). Further, this
discussion does not address all aspects of U.S. federal
income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your
particular circumstances or that may be applicable to you if you
are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal
income tax laws, including if you are:
|
|
|
|
|
a financial institution;
|
|
|
|
a tax-exempt organization;
|
|
|
|
an S corporation or other pass-through entity (or an
investor in an S corporation or other pass-through entity);
|
|
|
|
an insurance company;
|
|
|
|
a mutual fund;
|
|
|
|
a dealer or broker in stocks and securities, or currencies;
|
|
|
|
a trader in securities that elects
mark-to-market
treatment;
|
|
|
|
a person that is subject to the alternative minimum tax
provisions of the Code;
|
|
|
|
a holder of ProLogis common shares that received ProLogis common
shares through the exercise of an employee stock option, through
a tax qualified retirement plan or otherwise as compensation;
|
|
|
|
a person that is not a U.S. holder (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
a person that has a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
a holder of ProLogis common shares that holds ProLogis common
shares as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale,
conversion or other integrated transaction; or
|
|
|
|
a United States expatriate.
|
Determining the actual tax consequences of the Merger to you may
be complex. They will depend on your specific situation and on
factors that are not within the control of AMB or ProLogis. You
should consult with your own tax advisor as to the tax
consequences of the Merger in your particular circumstances,
including the applicability and effect of the alternative
minimum tax and any state, local, foreign or other tax laws and
of changes in those laws.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
U.S. holder means a beneficial owner of
ProLogis common shares or AMB common stock, as the case may be,
that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes (i) an
individual citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a
corporation, or entity treated as a corporation, organized in or
under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the
District of Columbia, (iii) a trust if (a) a court
within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision
over the administration of the trust and one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (b) such trust has made a valid
election to be treated as a U.S. person for
U.S. federal income tax purposes or (iv) an estate,
the income of which is includible in gross income for
U.S. federal income tax purposes regardless of its source.
94
The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a partner in an
entity or arrangement that is treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and that holds ProLogis
common shares (or, after the Merger, common stock of the
combined company) generally will depend on the status of the
partner and the activities of the partnership. Partners in a
partnership holding ProLogis common shares (or, after the
Merger, common stock of the combined company) should consult
their own tax advisors.
Tax
Consequences of the ProLogis Merger and the Topco
Merger
Generally
The parties intend for each of the ProLogis merger and Topco
merger to be treated as a reorganization for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. It is a condition to the obligation of AMB
to complete the Topco merger that AMB receive an opinion from
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (or other AMB counsel
reasonably satisfactory to ProLogis), dated the closing date,
substantially to the effect that the Topco merger will qualify
as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. It is a condition to the obligation of ProLogis to
complete the Merger that ProLogis receive an opinion from Mayer
Brown LLP (or other ProLogis counsel reasonably satisfactory to
AMB), dated the closing date, substantially to the effect that
each of the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger will qualify as
a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of
the Code. These opinions will be based on representation letters
provided by AMB and ProLogis and on customary factual
assumptions. Neither of the opinions described above will be
binding on the Internal Revenue Service. AMB and ProLogis have
not sought and will not seek any ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service regarding any matters relating to the Merger
and, as a result, there can be no assurance that the Internal
Revenue Service will not assert, or that a court would not
sustain, a position contrary to any of the conclusions set forth
below.
Provided the ProLogis merger is treated for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, upon exchanging your ProLogis
common shares for New Pumpkin common stock, you generally will
not recognize gain or loss. The aggregate tax basis in the
shares of New Pumpkin common stock that you receive in the
ProLogis merger will equal your aggregate adjusted tax basis in
the ProLogis common shares you surrender. Your holding period
for the shares of New Pumpkin common stock that you receive in
the ProLogis merger will include your holding period for the
ProLogis common shares that you surrender in the exchange.
Provided the Topco merger is treated for U.S. federal
income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, upon exchanging your New
Pumpkin common stock for AMB common stock (other than cash
received in lieu of a fractional share), you generally will not
recognize gain or loss. The aggregate tax basis in the shares of
AMB common stock that you receive in the Topco merger, including
any fractional share interests deemed received and sold as
described below, will equal your aggregate adjusted tax basis in
the New Pumpkin common stock you surrender. Your holding period
for the shares of AMB common stock that you receive in the Topco
merger (including any fractional share interest deemed received
and sold as described below) will include your holding period
for the shares of New Pumpkin common stock that you surrender in
the exchange.
Cash
Instead of a Fractional Share
If you receive cash instead of a fractional share of AMB common
stock, you will be treated as having received the fractional
share of AMB common stock pursuant to the Topco merger and then
as having sold that fractional share of AMB common stock for
cash. As a result, you generally will recognize gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount of cash received and
the basis allocable to your fractional share of AMB common stock
as set forth above. This gain or loss generally will be capital
gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as
of the effective date of the Topco merger, the holding period
for the shares (including the holding period of New Pumpkin
common stock surrendered therefor) is greater than one year. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
95
Backup
Withholding
If you are a non-corporate holder of ProLogis common shares you
may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding
(currently at a rate of 28%) on any cash payments you receive.
You generally will not be subject to backup withholding,
however, if you:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish a correct taxpayer identification number, certify that
you are not subject to backup withholding on the substitute
Form W-9
or successor form included in the election form/letter of
transmittal you will receive and otherwise comply with all the
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules; or
|
|
|
|
provide proof that you are otherwise exempt from backup
withholding.
|
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will
generally be allowed as a refund or credit against your
U.S. federal income tax liability, provided you timely
furnish the required information to the Internal Revenue Service.
This summary of certain material U.S. federal income tax
consequences is for general information only and is not tax
advice. You are urged to consult your tax advisor with respect
to the application of U.S. federal income tax laws to your
particular situation as well as any tax consequences arising
under the U.S. federal estate or gift tax rules, or under
the laws of any state, local, foreign or other taxing
jurisdiction.
REIT
Qualification of AMB and ProLogis
It is a condition to the obligation of ProLogis to complete the
Merger that AMB receive an opinion from Latham &
Watkins LLP (or other AMB counsel reasonably satisfactory to
ProLogis) to the effect that, commencing with the taxable year
of AMB ended December 31, 1997, AMB has been organized and
operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification
and taxation as a REIT under the Code. The opinion of
Latham & Watkins LLP will rely upon customary
representations made by AMB about factual matters relating to
the organization and operation of AMB and its subsidiaries.
It is a condition to the obligation of AMB to complete the Topco
merger that ProLogis receive an opinion from Mayer Brown LLP (or
other ProLogis counsel reasonably satisfactory to AMB) to the
effect that, commencing with the taxable year of ProLogis ended
December 31, 1993, ProLogis has been organized and operated
in conformity with the requirements for qualification and
taxation as a REIT under the Code. The opinion of Mayer Brown
LLP will rely upon customary representations made by ProLogis
about factual matters relating to the organization and operation
of ProLogis and its subsidiaries.
Neither of the opinions described above will be binding on the
Internal Revenue Service.
The combined company intends to continue to operate in a manner
to qualify as a REIT following the Merger, but there is no
guarantee that the combined company will qualify or remain
qualified as a REIT. Qualification and taxation as a REIT depend
upon the ability of the combined company to meet, through actual
annual (or, in some cases, quarterly) operating results,
requirements relating to income, asset ownership, distribution
levels and diversity of share ownership, and the various REIT
qualification requirements imposed under the Code. Given the
complex nature of the REIT qualification requirements, the
ongoing importance of factual determinations and the possibility
of future changes in the circumstances of the combined company,
AMB and ProLogis cannot guarantee that the actual operating
results of the combined company will satisfy the requirements
for taxation as a REIT under the Code for any particular tax
year.
Tax
Liabilities and Attributes Inherited from ProLogis
If ProLogis failed to qualify as a REIT for any of its taxable
years, ProLogis would be liable for (and the combined company,
as the surviving corporation in the Topco merger, would be
obligated to pay) U.S. federal income tax on its taxable
income at regular corporate rates. Furthermore, after the Topco
merger, the asset and income tests will apply to all of the
assets of the combined company, including the assets the
combined company acquires from ProLogis, and to all of the
income of the combined company, including the income derived
from the assets the combined company acquires from ProLogis. As
a result, the nature of the assets that the combined
96
company acquires from ProLogis and the income the combined
company derives from those assets may have an effect on the tax
status of the combined company as a REIT.
Qualification as a REIT requires ProLogis to satisfy numerous
requirements, some on an annual and others on a quarterly basis,
as described below with respect to the combined company. There
are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations of
these requirements, and qualification as a REIT involves the
determination of various factual matters and circumstances which
were not entirely within the control of ProLogis.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Considerations Relating to the REIT
This section summarizes the material U.S. federal income
tax consequences generally resulting from the election of the
combined company to be taxed as a REIT.
The sections of the Code and the corresponding Treasury
regulations that relate to the qualification and taxation as a
REIT are highly technical and complex. The combined company
urges you to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific
tax consequences to you of ownership of the securities of the
combined company and of the election of the combined company to
be taxed as a REIT. Specifically, you should consult your own
tax advisor regarding the federal, state, local, foreign and
other tax consequences of such ownership and election, and
regarding potential changes in applicable tax laws.
The
Combined Companys Qualification as a REIT
General
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the combined company
will be treated as a continuation of AMB. AMB elected to be
taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code,
commencing with the taxable year of AMB ended December 31,
1997. AMB believes that AMB has been organized and has operated
in a manner that allows AMB to qualify for taxation as a REIT
under the Code commencing with the taxable year of AMB ended
December 31, 1997, and it is intended that the combined
company will continue to be organized and operated in this
manner. However, the qualification and taxation of the combined
company as a REIT depend upon the ability of the combined
company to meet the various qualification tests imposed under
the Code, including through actual annual operating results,
asset composition, distribution levels and diversity of stock
ownership, the results of which have not been and will not be
reviewed by the tax counsel of the combined company.
Accordingly, the actual results of the operations of the
combined company during any particular taxable year may not
satisfy those requirements, and no assurance can be given that
AMB has operated or that the combined company will continue to
operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a
REIT. See Failure to Qualify.
Provided the combined company qualifies for taxation as a REIT,
the combined company generally will not be required to pay
U.S. federal corporate income taxes on its net income that
is currently distributed to the stockholders. This treatment
substantially eliminates the double taxation that
ordinarily results from investment in a C corporation. Double
taxation means taxation once at the corporate level when income
is earned and once again at the stockholder level when that
income is distributed. The combined company will, however, be
required to pay U.S. federal income tax as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
First, the combined company will be required to pay tax at
regular corporate rates on any undistributed REIT taxable
income, including undistributed net capital gains.
|
|
|
|
Second, the combined company may be required to pay the
alternative minimum tax on items of tax preference
under some circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Third, if the combined company has (1) net income from the
sale or other disposition of foreclosure property
held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business or (2) other nonqualifying income from foreclosure
property, the combined company will be required to pay tax at
the highest corporate rate on this income. Foreclosure property
is generally property acquired through foreclosure or after a
default on a loan secured by the property or a lease of the
property.
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth, the combined company will be required to pay a 100% tax
on any net income from prohibited transactions. Prohibited
transactions are, in general, sales or other taxable
dispositions of property, other than foreclosure property, held
primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of
business.
|
|
|
|
Fifth, if the combined company fails to satisfy the 75% gross
income test or the 95% gross income test, as described below,
but has otherwise maintained its qualification as a REIT because
certain other requirements are met, the combined company will be
required to pay a tax equal to (1) the greater of
(A) the amount by which 75% of the gross income of the
combined company exceeds the amount qualifying under the 75%
gross income test, and (B) the amount by which 95% of the
gross income of the combined company exceeds the amount
qualifying under the 95% gross income test, multiplied by
(2) a fraction intended to reflect the profitability of the
combined company.
|
|
|
|
Sixth, if the combined company fails to satisfy any of the REIT
asset tests (other than a de minimis failure of the 5% or
10% asset tests), as described below, provided such failure is
due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and
nonetheless maintains its REIT qualification because of
specified cure provisions, the combined company will be required
to pay a tax equal to the greater of $50,000 or the highest
corporate tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the
nonqualifying assets that caused the combined company to fail
such test.
|
|
|
|
Seventh, if the combined company fails to satisfy any provision
of the Code that would result in its failure to qualify as a
REIT (other than a violation of the REIT gross income tests or
certain violations of the asset tests described below) and the
violation is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful
neglect, the combined company may retain its REIT qualification
but will be required to pay a penalty of $50,000 for each such
failure.
|
|
|
|
Eighth, the combined company will be required to pay a 4% excise
tax to the extent the combined company fails to distribute
during each calendar year at least the sum of (1) 85% of
the REIT ordinary income of the combined company for the year,
(2) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for the year
(other than capital gain the combined company elects to retain
and pay tax on) and (3) any undistributed taxable income
from prior periods.
|
|
|
|
Ninth, if the combined company acquires any asset from a
corporation that is or has been a C corporation in a transaction
in which the basis of the asset in the hands of the combined
company is determined by reference to the basis of the asset in
the hands of the C corporation, and the combined company
subsequently recognizes gain on the disposition of the asset
during the ten-year period (five-year period for gains
recognized in 2011) beginning on the date on which the
combined company acquired the asset, then the combined company
will be required to pay tax at the highest regular corporate tax
rate on this gain to the extent of the excess of (1) the
fair market value of the asset over (2) the adjusted basis
of the combined company in the asset, in each case determined as
of the date on which the combined company acquired the asset.
The results described in this paragraph with respect to the
recognition of gain assume that the necessary parties make or
refrain from making the appropriate elections under the
applicable Treasury regulations then in effect.
|
|
|
|
Tenth, the combined company will be required to pay a 100% tax
on any redetermined rents, redetermined
deductions or excess interest. In general,
redetermined rents are rents from real property that are
overstated as a result of services furnished by a taxable
REIT subsidiary of the combined company to any of its
tenants. See Requirements for Qualification as
a REIT Ownership of Interests in Taxable REIT
Subsidiaries. Redetermined deductions and excess interest
generally represent amounts that are deducted by a taxable REIT
subsidiary for amounts paid to the combined company that are in
excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on
arms length negotiations. See
Requirements for Qualification as a
REIT Redetermined Rents, Redetermined Deductions,
and Excess Interest.
|
Requirements
for Qualification as a REIT
The Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:
1. that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
98
2. that issues transferable shares or transferable
certificates to evidence its beneficial ownership;
3. that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for
Sections 856 through 860 of the Code;
4. that is not a financial institution or an insurance
company within the meaning of certain provisions of the Code;
5. that is beneficially owned by 100 or more persons;
6. not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock of
which is owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer
individuals (as defined in the Code to include certain entities)
during the last half of each taxable year; and
7. that meets other tests, described below, regarding the
nature of its income and assets and the amount of its
distributions.
The Code provides that conditions (1) through (4),
inclusive, must be met during the entire taxable year and that
condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of
a taxable year of twelve months, or during a proportionate part
of a taxable year of less than twelve months. Conditions
(5) and (6) above do not apply until after the first
taxable year for which an election is made to be taxed as a REIT.
For purposes of condition (6), specified tax-exempt entities are
treated as individuals, except that a look-through
exception applies with respect to pension funds.
AMB believes that AMB has been organized, has operated and has
issued sufficient shares of capital stock with sufficient
diversity of ownership to allow it to satisfy conditions
(1) through (7), inclusive during the relevant time
periods. In addition, AMBs charter provides, and the
combined companys charter will provide for restrictions on
the ownership and transfer of the combined company stock
intended to assist the combined company in continuing to satisfy
the share ownership requirements described in conditions
(5) and (6) above. These stock ownership and transfer
restrictions may not ensure that the combined company will, in
all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements
described in conditions (5) and (6) above. If the
combined company fails to satisfy these share ownership
requirements, except as provided in the next sentence, the
status of the combined company as a REIT will terminate. If,
however, the combined company complies with the rules contained
in applicable Treasury regulations that require the combined
company to ascertain the actual ownership of its stock and the
combined company does not know, or would not have known through
the exercise of reasonable diligence, that the combined company
failed to meet the requirement described in condition
(6) above, the combined company will be treated as having
met this requirement. See Failure to
Qualify.
In addition, the combined company may not maintain its status as
a REIT unless the taxable year is the calendar year. AMB has and
it is intended that the combined company will continue to have a
calendar taxable year.
Ownership of a Partnership Interest. The
combined company will own and operate one or more properties
through partnerships and limited liability companies treated as
partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Treasury
regulations provide that if the combined company is a partner in
a partnership, the combined company will be deemed to own its
proportionate share of the assets of the partnership based on
the interest of the combined company in the partnerships
capital, subject to special rules relating to the 10% asset test
described below. The combined company also will be deemed to be
entitled to its proportionate share of the income of the
partnership. The character of the assets and gross income of the
partnership retains the same character in the hands of the
combined company for purposes of Section 856 of the Code,
including satisfying the gross income tests and the asset tests.
In addition, for these purposes, the assets and items of income
of any partnership in which the combined company directly or
indirectly owns an interest include such partnerships
share of assets and items of income of any partnership in which
it owns an interest. Thus, the proportionate share of the
combined company of the assets and items of income of the
operating partnership, including the operating
partnerships share of these items for any partnership in
which the operating partnership owns an interest, are treated as
the assets and items of income of the combined company for
purposes of applying the requirements described in this
discussion, including the income and asset tests described
below. Included below under Tax Aspects of the
Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and the
Limited Liability Companies is a brief summary of the
rules governing the U.S. federal income taxation of
partnerships.
99
The combined company will have direct control of the operating
partnership and indirect control of some of the subsidiary
partnerships of the combined company, and intends to continue to
operate them in a manner consistent with the requirements for
qualification as a REIT. However, the combined company will be a
limited partner in certain partnerships. If a partnership in
which the combined company owns an interest takes or expects to
take actions that could jeopardize the status of the combined
company as a REIT or require the combined company to pay tax,
the combined company may be forced to dispose of its interest in
such entity. In addition, it is possible that a partnership
could take an action that could cause the combined company to
fail a REIT income or asset test, and that the combined company
would not become aware of such action in time to dispose of its
interest in the partnership or take other corrective action on a
timely basis. In that case, the combined company could fail to
qualify as a REIT unless it were entitled to relief, as
described below. See Failure to Qualify.
The treatment described in this paragraph also applies with
respect to the ownership of the combined company of interests in
limited liability companies or other entities or arrangements
that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income
tax purposes.
Ownership of Interests in Qualified REIT
Subsidiaries. AMB owns, and the combined company
will continue to own, 100% of the stock of a number of corporate
subsidiaries that AMB believes will be treated as qualified REIT
subsidiaries under the Code, and the combined company may
acquire additional qualified REIT subsidiaries in the future. A
corporation will qualify as a qualified REIT subsidiary if the
combined company owns 100% of its stock and it is not a
taxable REIT subsidiary, as described below. A
qualified REIT subsidiary is not treated as a separate
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. All
assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of
a qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as the assets,
liabilities and such items (as the case may be) of the combined
company for all purposes under the Code, including the REIT
qualification tests. For this reason, references in this
discussion to the income and assets of the combined company
include the income and assets of any qualified REIT subsidiary
the combined company owns. A qualified REIT subsidiary is not
required to pay U.S. federal income tax, and the ownership
of the combined company of the stock of a qualified REIT
subsidiary will not violate the restrictions on ownership of
securities, as described below under Asset
Tests.
Ownership of Interests in Taxable REIT
Subsidiaries. The taxable REIT subsidiaries of
the combined company will be corporations other than REITs and
qualified REIT subsidiaries in which the combined company
directly or indirectly holds stock, and that have made a joint
election with the combined company or with AMB or ProLogis prior
to the Merger to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries. A
taxable REIT subsidiary also includes any corporation other than
a REIT with respect to which one of the taxable REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company owns more than 35% of the
total voting power or value of the outstanding securities of
such corporation. Other than some activities relating to lodging
and health care facilities, a taxable REIT subsidiary may
generally engage in any business, including the provision of
customary or non-customary services to tenants of its parent
REIT. A taxable REIT subsidiary is subject to U.S. federal
income tax as a regular C corporation. In addition, the taxable
REIT subsidiaries of the combined company may be prevented from
deducting interest on debt funded directly or indirectly by the
combined company if certain tests regarding the taxable REIT
subsidiarys debt to equity ratio and interest expense are
not satisfied. The combined company will hold an interest in a
number of taxable REIT subsidiaries, and may acquire securities
in one or more additional taxable REIT subsidiaries in the
future. The combined companys ownership of securities of
taxable REIT subsidiaries will not be subject to the 5% or 10%
asset tests described below under Asset
Tests.
Affiliated REIT. Palmtree Acquisition
Corporation is a corporate subsidiary of ProLogis, and following
the Merger will be an indirect corporate subsidiary of the
combined company which intends to qualify as a REIT. Palmtree
Acquisition Corporation therefore needs to satisfy the REIT
tests discussed in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The
failure of Palmtree Acquisition Corporation to qualify as a REIT
could cause the combined company to fail to qualify as a REIT
because the combined company would then own more than 10% of the
securities of an issuer that was not a REIT, a qualified REIT
subsidiary or a taxable REIT subsidiary. ProLogis believes that
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation has been organized and operated
in a manner that will permit it to qualify as a REIT. As a REIT,
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation will be subject to the built-in
gain rules discussed above. Palmtree Acquisition Corporation is
the successor of Catellus Development Corporation, which was a C
corporation that elected to be treated as a REIT effective
January 1, 2004. Therefore, Palmtree Acquisition
Corporation could be subject to a corporate level tax at the
highest regular corporate rate (currently 35%) on any gain
recognized within ten years (reduced to five years for gain
recognized in 2011) of Catellus Development
100
Corporations conversion to a REIT from the sale of any
assets that Catellus Development Corporation held at the
effective time of its election to be a REIT, but only to the
extent of the built-in gain based on the fair market value of
those assets as of the effective date of the REIT election.
Palmtree Acquisition Corporation is not currently expected to
dispose of any assets if such disposition would result in the
imposition of a material tax liability unless such disposition
can be effected through a tax-deferred exchange of the property.
However, certain assets are subject to third party purchase
options that may require Palmtree Acquisition Corporation to
sell such assets, and those assets may carry deferred tax
liabilities that would be triggered on such sales.
Income Tests. The combined company must
satisfy two gross income requirements annually to maintain the
qualification of the combined company as a REIT. First, in each
taxable year, the combined company must derive directly or
indirectly at least 75% of its gross income (excluding gross
income from prohibited transactions, from certain hedging
transactions entered into after July 30, 2008 and from
certain foreign currency gains recognized after July 30,
2008) from investments relating to real property or
mortgages on real property, including rents from real
property and, in certain circumstances, interest, or from
certain types of temporary investments. Second, in each taxable
year, the combined company must derive at least 95% of its gross
income (excluding gross income from prohibited transactions,
from certain hedges of indebtedness, from certain other hedges
entered into after July 30, 2008 and from certain foreign
currency gains recognized after July 30, 2008) from
(i) these real property investments, (ii) dividends,
interest and gain from the sale or disposition of stock or
securities, or (iii) any combination of the foregoing. For
these purposes, the term interest generally does not
include any amount received or accrued, directly or indirectly,
if the determination of all or some of the amount depends in any
way on the income or profits of any person. However, an amount
received or accrued generally will not be excluded from the term
interest solely by reason of being based on a fixed
percentage or percentages of receipts or sales.
Rents the combined company receives from a tenant will qualify
as rents from real property for the purpose of
satisfying the gross income requirements described above only if
all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of rent must not be based in whole or in part on the
income or profits of any person. However, an amount the combined
company receives or accrues generally will not be excluded from
the term rents from real property solely because it
is based on a fixed percentage or percentages of receipts or
sales;
|
|
|
|
the combined company, or an actual or constructive owner of 10%
or more of the stock of the combined company, must not actually
or constructively own 10% or more of the interests in the assets
or net profits of the tenant or, if the tenant is a corporation,
10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of
stock entitled to vote or 10% or more of the total value of all
classes of stock of the tenant. Rents received from such a
tenant that is also a taxable REIT subsidiary, however, will not
be excluded from the definition of rents from real
property as a result of this condition if at least 90% of
the space at the property to which the rents relate is leased to
third parties, and the rents paid by the taxable REIT subsidiary
are substantially comparable to rents paid by other tenants for
comparable space. Whether rents paid by a taxable REIT
subsidiary are substantially comparable to rents paid by other
tenants is determined at the time the lease with the taxable
REIT subsidiary is entered into, extended and modified, if such
modification increases the rents due under such lease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if a lease with a
controlled taxable REIT subsidiary is modified and
such modification results in an increase in the rents payable by
such taxable REIT subsidiary, any such increase will not qualify
as rents from real property. For purposes of this
rule, a controlled taxable REIT subsidiary is a
taxable REIT subsidiary in which the combined company owns stock
possessing more than 50% of the voting power or more than 50% of
the total value;
|
|
|
|
rent attributable to personal property leased in connection with
a lease of real property must not be greater than 15% of the
total rent received under the lease. If this requirement is not
met, then the portion of the rent attributable to personal
property will not qualify as rents from real
property; and
|
|
|
|
the combined company generally must not operate or manage its
property or furnish or render services to its tenants, subject
to a 1% de minimis exception, other than customary
services through an independent contractor from whom the
combined company derives no revenue. The combined company may,
however, directly perform certain services that are
usually or customarily rendered in connection with
the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise
considered rendered to the occupant of the property.
Examples of such services include the provision of light, heat,
or other utilities, trash removal and general
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
maintenance of common areas. In addition, the combined company
may employ a taxable REIT subsidiary, which may be wholly or
partially owned by the combined company, to provide both
customary and non-customary services to the tenants of the
combined company without causing the rent the combined company
received from those tenants to fail to qualify as rents
from real property. Any amounts the combined company
receives from a taxable REIT subsidiary with respect to its
provision of non-customary services will, however, be
nonqualifying income under the 75% gross income test and, except
to the extent received through the payment of dividends, the 95%
gross income test.
|
The combined company generally does not intend to, and as the
general partner of the operating partnership does not intend to
permit the operating partnership to, take actions the combined
company believes will cause the combined company to fail to
satisfy any of the rental conditions described above. However,
the combined company may intentionally have taken and may
intentionally continue to take actions that fail to satisfy
these conditions to the extent the failure will not, based on
the advice of tax counsel, jeopardize the tax status of the
combined company as a REIT. In addition, with respect to the
limitation on the rental of personal property, the combined
company will not obtain appraisals of the real property and
personal property leased to tenants. Accordingly, there can be
no assurance that the IRS will agree with the determinations of
value of the combined company.
From time to time, the combined company may enter into hedging
transactions with respect to one or more of its assets or
liabilities. The hedging activities of the combined company may
include entering into interest rate swaps, caps and floors,
options to purchase these items, and futures and forward
contracts. Income from a hedging transaction, including gain
from the sale or disposition of such a transaction, that is
clearly and timely identified as a hedging transaction as
specified in the Code will not constitute gross income and thus
will be exempt from the 95% gross income test to the extent such
a hedging transaction is entered into on or after
January 1, 2005, and will not constitute gross income and
thus will be exempt from the 75% gross income test to the extent
such hedging transaction is entered into after July 30,
2008. Income and gain from a hedging transaction, including gain
from the sale or disposition of such a transaction, entered into
on or prior to July 30, 2008 will be treated as
nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% gross income test.
Income and gain from a hedging transaction, including gain from
the sale or disposition of such a transaction, entered into
prior to January 1, 2005 will be qualifying income for
purposes of the 95% gross income test. The term hedging
transaction, as used above, generally means any
transaction the combined company enters into in the normal
course of the business of the combined company primarily to
manage risk of (i) interest rate changes or fluctuations
with respect to borrowings made or to be made by the combined
company to acquire or carry real estate assets and (ii) for
hedging transactions entered into after July 30, 2008,
currency fluctuations with respect to an item of qualifying
income under the 75% or 95% gross income test (or any property
which generates such income or gain). To the extent that the
combined company does not properly identify such transactions as
hedges or hedges with other types of financial instruments, or
hedges other types of indebtedness, the income from those
transactions is not likely to be treated as qualifying income
for purposes of the gross income tests. It is intended that the
combined company will structure any hedging transactions in a
manner that does not jeopardize the status of the combined
company as a REIT.
The combined company will hold investments in certain entities
located outside the United States, and from time to time the
combined company may acquire additional properties outside of
the United States, through a taxable REIT subsidiary or
otherwise. These acquisitions could cause the combined company
to incur foreign currency gains or losses. Prior to
July 30, 2008, the characterization of any such foreign
currency gains for purposes of the REIT gross income tests was
unclear, although the IRS had indicated that REITs may apply the
principles of proposed Treasury Regulations to determine whether
such foreign currency gain constitutes qualifying income under
the REIT income tests. As a result, AMB anticipated that any
foreign currency gain AMB recognized relating to rents AMB
receives from any property located outside of the United States
were qualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross
income tests. Any foreign currency gains recognized after
July 30, 2008 to the extent attributable to specified items
of qualifying income or gain, or specified qualifying assets,
however, generally will not constitute gross income for purposes
of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, and will be exempt from
these tests.
The taxable REIT subsidiaries of the combined company may
provide certain services in exchange for a fee or derive other
income that would not qualify under the REIT gross income tests.
Such fees and other income do not accrue to the combined
company, but, to the extent the taxable REIT subsidiaries of the
combined company pay
102
dividends, the combined company generally will derive its
allocable share of such dividend income through the interest of
the combined company in the operating partnership. Such dividend
income qualifies under the 95%, but not the 75%, REIT gross
income test. The operating partnership may provide certain
management or administrative services to the taxable REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company. In addition, AMB Capital
Partners, LLC conducts an asset management business and receives
fees, which may include incentive fees, in exchange for the
provision of certain services to asset management clients. The
fees the combined company and AMB Capital Partners, LLC derive
as a result of the provision of such services will be
non-qualifying income to the combined company under both the 95%
and 75% REIT income tests. The amount of such dividend and fee
income will depend on a number of factors that cannot be
determined with certainty, including the level of services
provided by AMB Capital Partners, LLC, the taxable REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company and the operating
partnership. The combined company will monitor the amount of the
dividend income from the taxable REIT subsidiaries of the
combined company and the fee income described above, and will
take actions intended to keep this income, and any other
non-qualifying income, within the limitations of the REIT income
tests. However, there can be no guarantee that such actions will
in all cases prevent the combined company from violating a REIT
income test.
The aggregate amount of the nonqualifying income of the combined
company , from all sources, in any taxable year is not expected
to exceed the limit on nonqualifying income under the gross
income tests. If the combined company fails to satisfy one or
both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year,
the combined company may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the
year if the combined company is entitled to relief under certain
provisions of the Code. The combined company generally may make
use of the relief provisions if:
|
|
|
|
|
following the identification by the combined company of the
failure to meet the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any
taxable year, the combined company files a schedule with the IRS
setting forth each item of the gross income of the combined
company for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for
such taxable year in accordance with Treasury regulations to be
issued; and
|
|
|
|
the failure of the combined company to meet these tests was due
to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect.
|
It is not possible, however, to state whether in all
circumstances the combined company would be entitled to the
benefit of these relief provisions. For example, if the combined
company fails to satisfy the gross income tests because
non-qualifying income that the combined company intentionally
accrues or receives exceeds the limits on non-qualifying income,
the Internal Revenue Service could conclude that the failure of
the combined company to satisfy the tests was not due to
reasonable cause. If these relief provisions do not apply to a
particular set of circumstances, the combined company will not
qualify as a REIT. As discussed above in The
Combined Companys Qualification as a REIT
General, even if these relief provisions apply, and the
combined company retains its status as a REIT, a tax would be
imposed with respect to the non-qualifying income of the
combined company. The combined company may not always be able to
comply with the gross income tests for REIT qualification
despite periodic monitoring of its income.
Prohibited Transaction Income. Any gain the
combined company recognizes (including any net foreign currency
gain recognized after July 30, 2008) on the sale of
property held as inventory or other property held primarily for
sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, including
the share of the combined company of any such gain realized by
the qualified REIT subsidiaries of the combined company,
partnerships or limited liability companies, will be treated as
income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100%
penalty tax. Such prohibited transaction income could also
adversely affect the ability of the combined company to satisfy
the income tests for qualification as a REIT. Under existing
law, whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale
to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business is a
question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances
surrounding the particular transaction. The combined company
intends to hold its properties for investment with a view to
long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring,
developing and owning its properties and to make occasional
sales of the properties as are consistent with the investment
objectives of the combined company. The combined company does
not believe that any of the sales of the combined company were
prohibited transactions. However, the Internal Revenue Service
may contend that one or more of these sales is subject to the
100% penalty tax.
103
Redetermined Rents, Redetermined Deductions and Excess
Interest. Any redetermined rents, redetermined
deductions or excess interest the combined company generates
will be subject to a 100% penalty tax. In general, redetermined
rents are rents from real property that are overstated as a
result of services furnished by one of the taxable REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company to any of the tenants of
the combined company, and redetermined deductions and excess
interest represent amounts that are deducted by a taxable REIT
subsidiary for amounts paid to the combined company that are in
excess of the amounts that would have been deducted based on
arms length agreements. Rents the combined company
receives will not constitute redetermined rents if they qualify
under the safe harbor provisions contained in the Code.
It is intended that the combined company will deal with its
taxable REIT subsidiaries on a commercially reasonable
arms length basis, but the combined company may not always
satisfy the safe harbor provisions described above. These
determinations are inherently factual, and the Internal Revenue
Service has broad discretion to assert that amounts paid between
related parties should be reallocated to clearly reflect their
respective incomes. If the Internal Revenue Service successfully
made such an assertion, the combined company would be required
to pay a 100% penalty tax on the excess of an arms length
fee for tenant services over the amount actually paid.
Asset Tests. At the close of each quarter of
the taxable year of the combined company, the combined company
must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature and
diversification of the assets of the Combined company. First, at
least 75% of the value of the total assets of the combined
company, including assets held by the qualified REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company and the allocable share of
the combined company of the assets held by the partnerships and
limited liability companies in which the combined company owns
an interest, must be represented by real estate assets, cash,
cash items and government securities. For purposes of this test,
the term real estate assets generally means real
property (including interests in real property and interests in
mortgages on real property) and shares (or transferable
certificates of beneficial interest) in other REITs, as well as
any stock or debt instrument attributable to the investment of
the proceeds of a stock offering or a public offering of debt
with a term of at least five years, but only for the one-year
period beginning on the date the combined company receives such
proceeds.
Second, not more than 25% of the value of the total assets of
the combined company may be represented by securities, other
than those securities included in the 75% asset test.
Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, and
except for investments in other REITs, the qualified REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company and the taxable REIT
subsidiaries of the combined company, the value of any one
issuers securities may not exceed 5% of the value of the
total assets of the combined company, and the combined company
may not own more than 10% of the total vote or value of the
outstanding securities of any one issuer except, in the case of
the 10% value test, securities satisfying the straight
debt safe-harbor. Certain types of securities are
disregarded as securities solely for purposes of the 10% value
test, including, but not limited to, any loan to an individual
or an estate, any obligation to pay rents from real property and
any security issued by a REIT. In addition, solely for purposes
of the 10% value test, the determination of the interest of the
combined company in the assets of a partnership or limited
liability company in which the combined company owns an interest
will be based on the proportionate interest of the combined
company in any securities issued by the partnership or limited
liability company, excluding for this purpose certain securities
described in the Code.
Fourth, not more than 25% (20% for taxable years beginning prior
to January 1, 2009) of the value of the total assets
of the combined company may be represented by the securities of
one or more taxable REIT subsidiaries.
Through the operating partnership, the combined company will own
an interest in several corporations which have jointly elected
with AMB or ProLogis to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries,
and therefore will be taxable REIT subsidiaries of the combined
company following the Merger. Some of these corporations own the
stock of other corporations, which will also become the taxable
REIT subsidiaries of the combined company. So long as each of
these corporations qualifies as a taxable REIT subsidiary, the
combined company will not be subject to the 5% asset test, the
10% voting securities limitation or the 10% value limitation
with respect to the ownership of the combined company of their
securities. The combined company may acquire securities in other
taxable REIT subsidiaries in the future. AMB believes that the
aggregate value of the taxable REIT subsidiaries of AMB has not
exceeded and that the aggregate value of the combined
companys taxable REIT subsidiaries will not exceed 25% (or
20% for taxable years beginning prior to January 1,
2009) of the aggregate value of the gross assets of AMB or
104
the combined company, as applicable. Prior to the election to
treat these corporations as taxable REIT subsidiaries, AMB did
not own more than 10% of the voting securities of these
corporations. In addition, AMB believes that prior to the
election to treat these corporations as taxable REIT
subsidiaries of AMB, the value of the pro rata share of the
securities of these corporations held by AMB did not, in any
case, exceed 5% of the total value of the assets of AMB. With
respect to each issuer in which AMB currently owns securities,
that does not qualify as a REIT, a qualified REIT subsidiary or
a taxable REIT subsidiary, AMB believes that the value of the
securities of each issuer does not exceed 5% of the total value
of the assets of AMB and the ownership of AMB of the securities
of each issuer complies with the 10% voting securities
limitation and 10% value limitation. No independent appraisals
have been obtained to support these conclusions, and there can
be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree
with the determinations of value of AMB.
The asset tests must be satisfied at the close of each quarter
of the taxable year of the combined company in which the
combined company (directly or through the qualified REIT
subsidiaries, partnerships or limited liability companies of the
combined company) acquires securities in the applicable issuer,
and also at the close of each quarter of the taxable year of the
combined company in which the combined company increases its
ownership of securities of such issuer, including as a result of
increasing the interest of the combined company in the operating
partnership or other partnerships and limited liability
companies which own such securities, or acquire other assets.
For example, the indirect ownership of the combined company of
securities of each issuer will increase as a result of capital
contributions of the combined company to the operating
partnership or as limited partners exercise their
redemption/exchange rights. After initially meeting the asset
tests at the close of any quarter, the combined company will not
lose its status as a REIT for failure to satisfy the asset tests
at the end of a later quarter solely by reason of changes in
asset values (including, for taxable years beginning on or after
January 1, 2009, a change caused by changes in the foreign
currency exchange rate used to value foreign assets). If the
combined company fails to satisfy an asset test because the
combined company acquires securities or other property during a
quarter, the combined company may cure this failure by disposing
of sufficient non-qualifying assets within 30 days after
the close of that quarter. For this purpose, an increase in the
interests of the combined company in the operating partnership
or any other partnership or limited liability company in which
the combined company directly or indirectly owns an interest
will be treated as an acquisition of a portion of the securities
or other property owned by that partnership or limited liability
company.
Certain relief provisions may be available to the combined
company if the combined company discovers a failure to satisfy
the asset tests described above after the 30 day cure
period. Under these provisions, the combined company will be
deemed to have met the 5% and 10% asset tests if the value of
the nonqualifying assets of the combined company (1) does
not exceed the lesser of (a) 1% of the total value of the
assets of the combined company at the end of the applicable
quarter or (b) $10,000,000, and (2) the combined
company disposes of the nonqualifying assets or otherwise
satisfy such tests within (a) six months after the last day
of the quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests
is discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by
Treasury regulations to be issued. For violations of any of the
asset tests due to reasonable cause and not due to willful
neglect and that are, in the case of the 5% and 10% asset tests,
in excess of the de minimis exception described above, the
combined company may avoid disqualification as a REIT after the
30 day cure period by taking steps including (1) the
disposition of sufficient nonqualifying assets, or the taking of
other actions, which allow the combined company to meet the
asset tests within (a) six months after the last day of the
quarter in which the failure to satisfy the asset tests is
discovered or (b) the period of time prescribed by Treasury
regulations to be issued, (2) paying a tax equal to the
greater of (a) $50,000 or (b) the highest corporate
tax rate multiplied by the net income generated by the
nonqualifying assets, and (3) disclosing certain
information to the IRS.
Although AMB believes that AMB has satisfied the asset tests and
plans to take steps to ensure that the combined company
satisfies such tests for any quarter with respect to which
retesting is to occur, there can be no assurance that the
efforts of the combined company will always be successful, or
will not require a reduction in the operating partnerships
overall interest in an issuer. If the combined company fails to
cure any noncompliance with the asset tests in a timely manner,
and the relief provisions described above are not available, the
combined company would cease to qualify as a REIT. See
Failure to Qualify below.
105
Annual Distribution Requirements. To maintain
its qualification as a REIT, the combined company is required to
distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to its
stockholders in an amount at least equal to the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
90% of the REIT taxable income of the combined
company; and
|
|
|
|
90% of the after tax net income of the combined company, if any,
from foreclosure property; minus
|
|
|
|
the excess of the sum of certain items of the non-cash income of
the combined company over 5% of REIT taxable income
as described below.
|
The REIT taxable income of the combined company is
computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and the
net capital gain of the combined company. In addition, for
purposes of this test, non-cash income means income attributable
to leveled stepped rents, original issue discount on purchase
money debt, cancellation of indebtedness or a like-kind exchange
that is later determined to be taxable.
In addition, if the combined company disposes of any asset the
combined company acquired from a corporation which is or has
been a C corporation in a transaction in which the basis of
the combined company in the asset is determined by reference to
the basis of the asset in the hands of that C corporation,
within the ten-year period (five-year period for gains
recognized in 2011) following the acquisition by the
combined company of such asset, the combined company would be
required to distribute at least 90% of the after-tax gain, if
any, the combined company recognized on the disposition of the
asset, to the extent that gain does not exceed the excess of
(a) the fair market value of the asset on the date the
combined company acquired the asset over (b) the adjusted
basis of the combined company in the asset on the date the
combined company acquired the asset.
The combined company generally must pay the distributions
described above in the taxable year to which they relate, or in
the following taxable year if they are declared during the last
three months of the taxable year, payable to stockholders of
record on a specified date during such period and paid during
January of the following year. Such distributions are treated as
paid by the combined company and received by the combined
company stockholders on December 31 of the year in which they
are declared. In addition, at the election of the combined
company, a distribution will be treated as paid in a taxable
year if it is declared before the combined company timely files
its tax return for that year and paid on or before the first
regular dividend payment after such declaration, provided such
payment is made during the twelve month period following the
close of that year. Except as provided below, these
distributions are taxable to the combined company stockholders,
other than tax-exempt entities, as discussed below, in the year
in which paid. This is so even though these distributions relate
to the prior year for purposes of the 90% distribution
requirement of the combined company. The amount distributed must
not be preferential. To avoid being preferential, every
stockholder of the class of stock to which a distribution is
made must be treated the same as every other stockholder of that
class, and no class of stock may be treated other than according
to its dividend rights as a class. To the extent that the
combined company does not distribute all of its net capital gain
or distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its
REIT taxable income, as adjusted, the combined
company will be required to pay tax on the undistributed amount
at regular ordinary and capital gain corporate tax rates. AMB
believes it has made and intends that the combined company will
continue to make timely distributions sufficient to satisfy
these annual distribution requirements. In this regard, the
operating partnership agreement authorizes the combined company,
as general partner, to take such steps as may be necessary to
cause the operating partnership to distribute to its partners an
amount sufficient to permit the combined company to meet these
distribution requirements.
It is expected that the REIT taxable income of the
combined company will be less than its cash flow because of
depreciation and other non-cash charges included in computing
the REIT taxable income of the combined company.
Accordingly, it is anticipated that the combined company will
generally have sufficient cash or liquid assets to enable it to
satisfy the distribution requirements described above. However,
from time to time, the combined company may not have sufficient
cash or other liquid assets to meet these distribution
requirements due to timing differences between the actual
receipt of income and actual payment of deductible expenses, and
the inclusion of income and deduction of expenses in determining
the taxable income of the combined company. If these timing
differences occur, the combined company may be required to
borrow funds to pay dividends or pay dividends in the form of
taxable stock dividends in order to meet the distribution
requirements.
106
Under some circumstances, the combined company may be able to
rectify an inadvertent failure to meet the 90% distribution
requirement for a year by paying deficiency
dividends to the stockholders of the combined company in a
later year, which the combined company may include in its
deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. Thus, the
combined company may be able to avoid being taxed on amounts
distributed as deficiency dividends. However, the combined
company will be required to pay interest to the Internal Revenue
Service based upon the amount of any deduction taken for
deficiency dividends.
Furthermore, the combined company will be required to pay a 4%
excise tax to the extent the combined company fails to
distribute during each calendar year (or in the case of
distributions with declaration and record dates falling in the
last three months of the calendar year, by the end of January
immediately following such year) at least the sum of 85% of the
REIT ordinary income of the combined company for such year, 95%
of the REIT capital gain income of the combined company for the
year and any undistributed taxable income from prior periods.
Any REIT taxable income and net capital gain on which this
excise tax is imposed for any year is treated as an amount
distributed during that year for purposes of calculating the tax
in subsequent years.
Like-Kind Exchanges. AMB has in the past
disposed of properties in transactions intended to qualify as
like-kind exchanges under the Code, and the combined company may
continue this practice in the future. Such like-kind exchanges
are intended to result in the deferral of gain for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. The failure of any such
transaction to qualify as a like-kind exchange could subject the
combined company to U.S. federal income tax, possibly
including the 100% prohibited transaction tax, depending on the
facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction.
Earnings and Profits Distribution
Requirement. A REIT is not permitted to have
accumulated earnings and profits attributable to non-REIT years.
A REIT has until the close of its first taxable year in which it
has non-REIT earnings and profits to distribute all such
earnings and profits. The failure of the combined company to
comply with this rule would require that the combined company
pays a deficiency dividend to its stockholders, and
interest to the Internal Revenue Service, to distribute any
remaining earnings and profits. A failure to make this
deficiency dividend distribution would result in the loss of the
REIT status of the combined company. See
Failure to Qualify.
Failure
to Qualify
Specified cure provisions are available to the combined company
in the event that the combined company violates a provision of
the Code that would result in the failure of the combined
company to qualify as a REIT. Except with respect to violations
of the REIT income tests and asset tests (for which the cure
provisions are described above), and provided the violation is
due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, these
cure provisions generally impose a $50,000 penalty for each
violation in lieu of a loss of REIT status.
If the combined company fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT
in any taxable year, and the relief provisions of the Code do
not apply, the combined company will be required to pay tax,
including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on the taxable
income of the combined company at regular corporate rates.
Distributions to stockholders in any year in which the combined
company fails to qualify as a REIT will not be deductible by the
combined company and the combined company will not be required
to distribute any amounts to its stockholders. As a result, the
combined company anticipates that its failure to qualify as a
REIT would reduce the cash available for distribution by the
combined company to its stockholders. In addition, if the
combined company fails to qualify as a REIT, all distributions
to stockholders will be taxable as ordinary corporate dividends
to the extent of the current and accumulated earnings and
profits of the combined company. In this event, subject to
certain limitations of the Code, corporate distributees may be
eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Unless entitled
to relief under specific statutory provisions, the combined
company will also be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for
the four taxable years following the year during which the
combined company lost its qualification. It is not possible to
state whether in all circumstances the combined company would be
entitled to this statutory relief.
107
Tax
Aspects of the Operating Partnership, the Subsidiary
Partnerships and the Limited Liability Companies
General
Substantially all of the investments of the combined company
will be held (and after the Topco merger, will be held)
indirectly through the operating partnership and subsidiary
partnerships and limited liability companies. In general,
partnerships and limited liability companies that are classified
as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes are
pass-through entities which are not required to pay
U.S. federal income tax. Rather, partners or members of
such entities are allocated their proportionate shares of the
items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of the entity,
and are potentially required to pay tax on this income, without
regard to whether they receive a distribution from the entity.
The combined company will include in its income its
proportionate share of these partnership and limited liability
company items for purposes of the various REIT income tests and
in the computation of the REIT taxable income of the combined
company. Moreover, for purposes of the REIT asset tests and
subject to special rules relating to the 10% asset test
described above, the combined company will include its
proportionate share of assets held by the operating partnership
and its subsidiary partnerships and limited liability companies.
Entity
Classification
The ownership of the combined company of an interest in the
operating partnership involves special tax considerations,
including the possibility that the Internal Revenue Service
might challenge the status of the operating partnership or one
or more of the subsidiary partnerships or limited liability
companies as partnerships, as opposed to associations taxable as
corporations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the
operating partnership or one or more of the subsidiary
partnerships or limited liability companies were treated as an
association, they would be taxable as a corporation and
therefore be required to pay an entity-level income tax. In this
situation, the character of the assets and items of gross income
of the combined company would change and could prevent the
combined company from satisfying the asset tests and possibly
the income tests. This, in turn, could prevent the combined
company from qualifying as a REIT. In addition, a change in the
tax status of the operating partnership or one or more of the
subsidiary partnerships or limited liability companies might be
treated as a taxable event, in which case, the combined company
might incur a tax liability without any related cash
distributions.
Treasury regulations that apply for tax periods beginning on or
after January 1, 1997, provide that a domestic business
entity not otherwise organized as a corporation and which has at
least two members may elect to be treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Unless it elects
otherwise, an eligible entity in existence prior to
January 1, 1997, will have the same classification for
U.S. federal income tax purposes that it claimed under the
entity classification Treasury regulations in effect prior to
this date. In addition, an eligible entity which did not exist,
or did not claim a classification, prior to January 1,
1997, will be classified as a partnership (or disregarded
entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless it
elects otherwise. The operating partnership and the subsidiary
partnerships and limited liability companies intend to claim
classification as partnerships (or disregarded entities) under
these Treasury regulations. As a result, it is believed that
these partnerships and limited liability companies will be
classified as partnerships (or disregarded entities) for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Allocations
of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction
The net proceeds from the issuance of any preferred stock by the
combined company will be contributed to the operating
partnership in exchange for its preferred limited partnership
units. In addition, to the extent the combined company issues
preferred stock in exchange for preferred limited partnership
units of AMB Property II, L.P., the combined company will
contribute substantially all of such units to the operating
partnership in exchange for additional preferred limited
partnership units in the operating partnership. In each case,
the operating partnerships partnership agreement will
provide for preferred distributions of cash and preferred
allocations of income to the combined company with respect to
these newly issued preferred units. As a consequence, the
combined company will receive distributions from the operating
partnership that the combined company will use to pay dividends
on substantially all of the shares of preferred stock that the
combined company issues before any of the other partners in the
operating partnership (other than a holder of preferred units,
if such units are not then held by us) receive a distribution.
108
In addition, if necessary, income will be specially allocated to
the combined company, and losses will be allocated to the other
partners of the operating partnership, in amounts necessary to
ensure that the balance in the capital account of the combined
company will at all times be equal to or in excess of the amount
the combined company is required to pay on the preferred stock
then issued by the combined company upon liquidation or
redemption. Similar preferred distributions and allocations will
be made for the benefit of other holders of preferred limited
partnership units in the operating partnership. Except as
provided below, all remaining items of operating income and loss
will be allocated to the holders of common units in the
operating partnership in proportion to the number of units or
performance units held by each such unitholder. All remaining
items of gain or loss relating to the disposition of the
operating partnerships assets upon liquidation will be
allocated first to the partners in the amounts necessary, in
general, to equalize the per unit capital accounts of the
combined company and the limited partners, with any special
allocation of gain to the holders of performance units being
offset by a reduction in the gain allocation to the combined
company and to unitholders that were performance investors.
Certain limited partners have agreed to guarantee debt of the
operating partnership, either directly or indirectly under
limited circumstances. As a result of these guarantees, and
notwithstanding the foregoing discussion of allocations of
income and loss of the operating partnership to holders of
units, such limited partners could under limited circumstances
be allocated a disproportionate amount of gain or loss upon a
liquidation of the operating partnership.
If an allocation of income of a partnership or limited liability
company does not comply with the requirements of
Section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury regulations
thereunder, the item subject to the allocation will be
reallocated according to the partners or members
interests in the partnership or limited liability company. This
reallocation will be determined by taking into account all of
the facts and circumstances relating to the economic arrangement
of the partners or members with respect to such item. The
operating partnerships allocations of taxable income and
loss are intended to comply with the requirements of
Section 704(b) of the Code and the Treasury regulations
thereunder.
Tax
Allocations With Respect to the Properties
Under Section 704(c) of the Code, income, gain, loss and
deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property
that is contributed to a partnership or limited liability
company in exchange for an interest in the partnership or
limited liability company must be allocated in a manner so that
the contributing partner or member is charged with the
unrealized gain or benefits from the unrealized loss associated
with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of
the unrealized gain or unrealized loss is generally equal to the
difference between the fair market value and the adjusted tax
basis of the contributed property at the time of contribution as
adjusted from time to time. These allocations are solely for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, and do not affect the
book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements
among the partners or members. The operating partnership was
formed by way of contributions of appreciated property, i.e.,
property having an adjusted tax basis less than its fair market
value at the time of contribution. Moreover, subsequent to the
formation of the operating partnership, additional appreciated
property has been contributed to it in exchange for operating
partnership interests. The operating partnership agreement
requires that these allocations be made in a manner consistent
with Section 704(c) of the Code.
Treasury regulations issued under Section 704(c) of the
Code provide partnerships and limited liability companies with a
choice of several methods of accounting for book-tax
differences. AMB and its operating partnership have agreed to
use the traditional method to account for book-tax
differences for the properties initially contributed to the
operating partnership and for some assets acquired subsequently.
Under the traditional method, which is the least
favorable method from the perspective of the combined company,
the carryover basis of contributed interests in the properties
in the hands of the operating partnership of the combined
company (i) could cause the combined company to be
allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax
purposes than would be allocated to the combined company if all
contributed properties were to have a tax basis equal to their
fair market value at the time of the contribution and
(ii) could cause the combined company to be allocated
taxable gain in the event of a sale of such contributed
interests or properties in excess of the economic or book income
allocated to the combined company as a result of such sale, with
a corresponding benefit to the other partners in the operating
partnership of the combined company. An allocation described in
(ii) above might cause the combined company or
109
the other partners to recognize taxable income in excess of cash
proceeds in the event of a sale or other disposition of
property, which might adversely affect the ability of the
combined company to comply with the REIT distribution
requirements. See The Combined Companys
Qualification as a REIT. To the extent the depreciation of
the combined company is reduced, or the gain on sale of the
combined company is increased, stockholders may recognize
additional dividend income without an increase in distributions.
It has not yet been decided what method will be used to account
for book-tax differences for properties to be acquired by the
operating partnership in the future.
Any property acquired by the operating partnership in a
taxable transaction will initially have a tax basis equal to its
fair market value, and Section 704(c) of the Code will not
apply.
Certain
Dividends Paid in Stock
Recent guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service extends
and clarifies earlier guidance regarding certain part-stock and
part-cash dividends by REITs. Pursuant to this new guidance,
certain part-stock and part-cash dividends distributed by
publicly-traded REITs with respect to calendar years 2008
through 2011, and in some cases declared as late as
December 31, 2012, will be treated as distributions for
purposes of the REIT distribution requirements. Under the terms
of this guidance, up to 90% of the distributions of the combined
company could be paid in shares of the combined company common
stock. If the combined company makes such a distribution,
taxable stockholders would be required to include the full
amount of the dividend (i.e., the cash and the stock portion) as
ordinary income (subject to limited exceptions), to the extent
of its current and accumulated earnings and profits for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, as described below under
the headings Taxation to Holders of the Combined
Companys Common Stock
U.S. Holders Distributions Generally and
Taxation to Holders of the Combined Companys Common
Stock
Non-U.S. Holders
Distributions Generally. As a result, holders of the
combined company could recognize taxable income in excess of the
cash received and may be required to pay tax with respect to
such dividends in excess of the cash received. If a taxable
stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend, the sales
proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with
respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of the
stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to
non-U.S. holders,
the combined company may be required to withhold U.S. tax
with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a
portion of such dividend that is payable in stock.
Taxation
to Holders of the Combined Companys Common Stock
U.S.
Holders
Distributions Generally. Distributions out of
the current or accumulated earnings and profits of the combined
company, other than capital gain dividends discussed below, will
constitute dividends generally taxable to U.S. holders as
ordinary income. As long as the combined company qualifies as a
REIT, these distributions will not be eligible for the
dividends-received deduction in the case of U.S. holders
that are corporations. For purposes of determining whether
distributions to holders of the combined company stock are out
of current or accumulated earnings and profits, the earnings and
profits of the combined company will be allocated first to
distributions on the outstanding preferred stock of the combined
company and then to distributions on the outstanding the
combined company common stock.
To the extent that the combined company makes distributions in
excess of its current and accumulated earnings and profits,
these distributions will be treated first as a tax-free return
of capital to each U.S. holder. This treatment will reduce
the adjusted tax basis which each U.S. holder has in its
shares of the combined company stock by the amount of the
distribution, but not below zero. Distributions in excess of the
current and accumulated earnings and profits of the combined
company and in excess of a U.S. holders adjusted tax
basis in its shares will be taxable as capital gain, provided
that the shares have been held as capital assets. Such gain will
be taxable as long-term capital gain if the shares have been
held for more than one year. Dividends the combined company
declares in October, November, or December of any year and
payable to a stockholder of record on a specified date in any of
these months will be treated as both paid by the combined
company and received by the stockholder on December 31 of that
year, provided the combined company actually pays the dividend
on or before January 31 of the following year.
110
Stockholders may not include in their own income or on their tax
returns any of the net operating losses or capital losses of the
combined company.
Capital Gain Distributions. Distributions that
the combined company properly designates as capital gain
dividends will be taxable to U.S. holders as gain from the
sale or disposition of a capital asset, to the extent that such
gain does not exceed the actual net capital gain of the combined
company for the taxable year. If the combined company properly
designates any portion of a dividend as a capital gain dividend,
then the combined company intends to allocate a portion of the
total capital gain dividends paid or made available to holders
of all classes of the combined company stock for the year to the
holders of the combined company stock in proportion to the
amount that the total dividends of the combined company, as
determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, paid or
made available to the holders of the combined companys
stock for the year bears to the total dividends, as determined
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, paid or made
available to holders of all classes of the combined company
stock for the year.
Retention of Net Long-Term Capital Gains. The
combined company may elect to retain, rather than distribute as
a capital gain dividend, its net long-term capital gains. If the
combined company makes this election, the combined company would
pay tax on its retained net long-term capital gains. In
addition, to the extent the combined company designates, a
U.S. holder generally would:
|
|
|
|
|
include its proportionate share of the undistributed long-term
capital gains of the combined company in computing its long-term
capital gains in its return for its taxable year in which the
last day of the taxable year of the combined company falls;
|
|
|
|
be deemed to have paid the capital gains tax imposed on the
combined company on the designated amounts included in the
U.S. holders long-term capital gains;
|
|
|
|
receive a credit or refund for the amount of tax deemed paid by
it;
|
|
|
|
increase the adjusted basis of its stock by the difference
between the amount of includable gains and the tax deemed to
have been paid by it; and
|
|
|
|
in the case of a U.S. holder that is a corporation,
appropriately adjust its earnings and profits for the retained
capital gains as required by Treasury regulations to be
prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service.
|
Passive Activity Losses and Investment Interest
Limitations. Distributions the combined company
makes and gains arising from the sale or exchange by a
U.S. holder of the combined companys stock will not
be treated as passive activity income. As a result,
U.S. holders generally will not be able to apply any
passive losses against this income or gain. A
U.S. stockholder may elect to treat capital gain dividends,
capital gains from the disposition of stock and qualified
dividend income as investment income for purposes of computing
the investment interest limitation, but in such case, the
stockholder will be taxed at ordinary income rates on such
amount. Other distributions made by the combined company, to the
extent they do not constitute a return of capital, generally
will be treated as investment income for purposes of computing
the investment interest limitation.
Dispositions of the Combined Companys
Stock. If a U.S. holder sells or disposes of
its shares of the combined companys stock to a person
other than the combined company, it will recognize gain or loss
for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to
the difference between the amount of cash and the fair market
value of any property it receives on the sale or other
disposition and its adjusted basis in the shares for tax
purposes. This gain or loss, except as provided below, will be
long-term capital gain or loss if it has held the stock for more
than one year. In general, if a U.S. holder recognizes loss
upon the sale or other disposition of stock that it has held for
six months or less, the loss recognized will be treated as a
long-term capital loss to the extent the U.S. holder
received distributions from the combined company which were
required to be treated as long-term capital gains.
Tax Rates. The maximum tax rate of
non-corporate taxpayers for (i) capital gains, including
capital gain dividends, has generally been reduced
to 15% (although depending on the characteristics of the assets
which produced these gains and on designations which the
combined company may make, certain capital gain dividends may be
taxed at a 25% rate) and (ii) dividends has generally been
reduced to 15%. In general, dividends payable by REITs are not
eligible for the reduced tax rate on dividends, except to the
extent the REITs dividends are attributable either to
dividends received from taxable corporations (such as the
combined companys taxable REIT
111
subsidiaries), to income that was subject to tax at the
corporate/REIT level (for example, if the combined company
distributes taxable income that the combined company retained
and paid tax on in the prior taxable year) or to dividends
properly designated by the combined company as capital
gain dividends. After December 31, 2012, absent
Congressional action the maximum tax rate of non-corporate
taxpayers on capital gains is scheduled to increase to 20% and
the maximum tax rate of non-corporate taxpayers on dividends is
scheduled to increase to 39.6%.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding. The combined company reports to its
U.S. holders and the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
dividends paid during each calendar year, and the amount of any
tax withheld. A U.S. holder may be subject to backup
withholding with respect to dividends paid by the combined
company unless the holder is a corporation or is otherwise
exempt and, when required, demonstrates this fact or provides a
taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of
exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise complies with
the backup withholding rules. A U.S. holder that does not
provide the combined company with its correct taxpayer
identification number may also be subject to penalties imposed
by the Internal Revenue Service. Backup withholding is not an
additional tax. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be
creditable against the stockholders income tax liability.
Tax-Exempt
Holder
Except as described below, dividend income from the combined
company and gain arising upon the sale of shares generally will
not be unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt
stockholder. This income or gain will be unrelated business
taxable income, however, if the tax-exempt stockholder holds its
shares as debt financed property within the meaning
of the Code or if the shares are used in a trade or business of
the tax-exempt stockholder. Generally, debt financed property is
property, the acquisition or holding of which was financed
through a borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder.
For tax-exempt stockholders that are social clubs, voluntary
employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit
trusts, or qualified group legal services plans exempt from
U.S. federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7),
(c)(9), (c)(17) or (c)(20) of the Code, respectively, income
from an investment in the combined companys stock will
constitute unrelated business taxable income unless the
organization is able to properly claim a deduction for amounts
set aside or placed in reserve for specific purposes so as to
offset the income generated by its investment in the combined
company stock. These prospective investors should consult their
tax advisors concerning these set aside and reserve
requirements.
Notwithstanding the above, however, a portion of the dividends
paid by a pension held REIT will be treated as
unrelated business taxable income as to some trusts that hold
more than 10%, by value, of the interests of a REIT. A REIT will
not be a pension held REIT if it is able to satisfy
the not closely held requirement without relying on
the look-through exception with respect to certain
trusts. As a result of limitations on the transfer and ownership
of stock contained in the combined company charter, the combined
company does not expect to be classified as a pension-held
REIT, and as a result, the tax treatment described in this
paragraph should be inapplicable to the combined company
stockholders. However, because the combined companys stock
will be publicly traded, the combined company cannot guarantee
that this will always be the case.
Non-U.S.
Holders
The following discussion addresses the rules governing
U.S. federal income taxation of the ownership and
disposition of the combined company stock by
non-U.S. holders.
For purposes of this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of the combined companys common
stock that is not a U.S. holder. The rules governing the
U.S. federal income taxation of the ownership and
disposition of the combined company stock by
non-U.S. holders
are complex, and no attempt is made herein to provide more than
a brief summary. Accordingly, the discussion does not address
all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be
relevant to a
non-U.S. holder
in light of such stockholders particular circumstances and
does not address any state, local or foreign tax consequences.
The combined company urges
non-U.S. holders
to consult their tax advisors to determine the impact of
federal, state, local and foreign income tax laws on the
purchase, ownership, and disposition of shares of the combined
company stock, including any reporting requirements.
112
Distributions Generally. Distributions that
are neither attributable to gain from the sale or exchange by
the combined company of United States real property interests
nor designated by the combined company as capital gain dividends
will be treated as dividends of ordinary income to the extent
that they are made out of the current or accumulated earnings
and profits of the combined company. Such distributions
ordinarily will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal
income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty unless the distributions are
treated as effectively connected with the conduct by the
non-U.S. holder
of a United States trade or business. Under certain treaties,
however, lower withholding rates generally applicable to
dividends do not apply to dividends from a REIT. Certain
certification and disclosure requirements must be satisfied to
be exempt from withholding under the effectively connected
income exemption. Dividends that are treated as effectively
connected with such a trade or business will be subject to tax
on a net basis at graduated rates, in the same manner as
dividends paid to U.S. holders are subject to tax, and are
generally not subject to withholding. Any such dividends
received by a
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may also be subject to an additional
branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
Distributions in excess of the current and accumulated earnings
and profits of the combined company will not be taxable to a
non-U.S. holder
to the extent that such distributions do not exceed the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted basis in the combined company stock, but rather will
reduce the adjusted basis of such stock. To the extent that
these distributions exceed a
non-U.S. holders
adjusted basis in the combined company stock, they will give
rise to gain from the sale or exchange of such stock. The tax
treatment of this gain is described below. Except as otherwise
described below, the combined company expects to withhold United
States income tax at the rate of 30% on any distributions made
to a
non-U.S. holder
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
a lower treaty rate applies and the
non-U.S. holder
files with the combined company an Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
evidencing eligibility for that reduced treaty rate; or
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
files an Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8ECI
with the combined company claiming that the distribution is
income effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
trade or business.
|
However, amounts withheld should generally be refundable if it
is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact,
in excess of the combined companys current and accumulated
earnings and profits.
Capital Gain Dividends and Distributions Attributable to a
Sale or Exchange of United States Real Property
Interests. Distributions to a
non-U.S. holder
that the combined company properly designates as capital gain
dividends, other than those arising from the disposition of a
United States real property interest, generally should not be
subject to U.S. federal income taxation, unless:
1. the investment in the combined company stock is treated
as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
United States trade or business, in which case the
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to the same treatment as U.S. holders with
respect to such gain, except that a
non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign corporation may also be subject to the 30%
branch profits tax, as discussed above; or
2. the
non-U.S. holder
is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and
certain other conditions are met, in which case the nonresident
alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the
individuals capital gains.
Pursuant to the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act
(which we refer to as FIRPTA), distributions to a
non-U.S. holder
that are attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of
United States real property interests (whether or not designated
as capital gain dividends) will cause the
non-U.S. holder
to be treated as recognizing such gain as income effectively
connected with a United States trade or business.
Non-U.S. holders
would generally be taxed at the same rates applicable to
U.S. holders, subject to a special alternative minimum tax
in the case of nonresident alien individuals. The combined
company also will be required to withhold and to remit to the
Internal Revenue Service 35% (or less to the extent provided in
applicable Treasury regulations) of any distribution to a
non-U.S. holder
that is designated as a capital gain dividend, or, if greater,
35% (or less to the extent provided in applicable Treasury
regulations) of a distribution to the
non-U.S. holder
that could have been designated as a capital gain dividend. The
amount withheld is creditable against the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability. However, any
distribution with respect to any class of stock which is
regularly traded on an established securities market located in
the United States is not subject to FIRPTA, and therefore, not
subject to the 35% U.S. withholding
113
tax described above, if the
non-U.S. holder
did not own more than 5% of such class of stock at any time
during the one-year period ending on the date of the
distribution. Instead, such distributions will be treated as
ordinary dividend distributions.
Retention of Net Capital Gains. Although the
law is not clear on the matter, it appears that amounts the
combined company designates as retained capital gains in respect
of the capital stock held by U.S. holders generally should
be treated with respect to
non-U.S. holders
in the same manner as actual distributions by the combined
company of capital gain dividends. Under this approach, a
non-U.S. holder
would be able to offset as a credit against its
U.S. federal income tax liability resulting from its
proportionate share of the tax paid by the combined company on
such retained capital gains, and to receive from the Internal
Revenue Service a refund to the extent of the
non-U.S. holders
proportionate share of such tax paid by the combined company
exceeds its actual U.S. federal income tax liability.
Sale of the Combined Companys
Stock. Gain recognized by a
non-U.S. holder
upon the sale or exchange of the combined companys stock
generally will not be subject to United States taxation unless
such stock constitutes a United States real property
interest within the meaning of FIRPTA. The combined
companys stock will not constitute a United States
real property interest so long as the combined company is
a domestically-controlled qualified investment
entity. A domestically-controlled qualified
investment entity includes a REIT in which at all times
during a specified testing period less than 50% in value of its
stock is held directly or indirectly by
non-U.S. holders.
AMB believes, but cannot guarantee, that AMB has been a
domestically-controlled qualified investment entity,
but because AMBs capital stock is, and the combined
companys capital stock will be, publicly traded, no
assurance can be given that AMB is or the combined company will
continue to be a domestically-controlled qualified
investment entity.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, gain from the sale or exchange of
the combined companys stock not otherwise subject to
FIRPTA will be taxable to a
non-U.S. holder
if either (1) the investment in the combined companys
stock is treated as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
United States trade or business or (2) the
non-U.S. holder
is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more during the taxable year and
certain other conditions are met. In addition, even if the
combined company is a domestically controlled qualified
investment entity, upon disposition of the combined
companys stock (subject to the exception applicable to
regularly traded stock described above), a
non-U.S. holder
may be treated as having gain from the sale or exchange of a
United States real property interest if the
non-U.S. holder
(1) disposes of the combined companys stock within a
30-day
period preceding the ex-dividend date of a distribution, any
portion of which, but for the disposition, would have been
treated as gain from the sale or exchange of a United States
real property interest and (2) acquires, or enters into a
contract or option to acquire, other shares of the combined
companys stock within 30 days after such ex-dividend
date.
Even if the combined company does not qualify as a
domestically-controlled qualified investment entity
at the time a
non-U.S. holder
sells or exchanges the combined companys stock, gain
arising from such a sale or exchange would not be subject to
United States taxation under FIRPTA as a sale of a United
States real property interest if:
|
|
|
|
|
the combined companys stock is regularly
traded, as defined by applicable Treasury regulations, on
an established securities market such as the NYSE; and
|
|
|
|
such
non-U.S. holder
owned, actually and constructively, 5% or less of the combined
companys stock throughout the five-year period ending on
the date of the sale or exchange.
|
If gain on the sale or exchange of the combined companys
stock were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the
non-U.S. holder
would be subject to regular U.S. federal income tax with
respect to such gain in the same manner as a taxable
U.S. holder (subject to any applicable alternative minimum
tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of
nonresident alien individuals). In addition, if the sale or
exchange of the combined company stock were subject to taxation
under FIRPTA, and if shares of the combined company stock were
not regularly traded on an established securities
market, the purchaser of the stock would be required to withhold
and remit to the Internal Revenue Service 10% of the purchase
price.
114
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding. Generally, the combined company must
report annually to the Internal Revenue Service the amount of
dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder,
such holders name and address, and the amount of tax
withheld, if any. A similar report is sent to the
non-U.S. holder.
Pursuant to tax treaties or other agreements, the Internal
Revenue Service may make its reports available to tax
authorities in the
non-U.S. holders
country of residence.
Payments of dividends or of proceeds from the disposition of
stock made to a
non-U.S. holder
may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding
unless such holder establishes an exemption, for example, by
properly certifying its
non-United
States status on an Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8BEN
or another appropriate version of Internal Revenue Service
Form W-8.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding and
information reporting may apply if either AMB has or its paying
agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that a
non-U.S. holder
is a United States person.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the United
States income tax liability of persons subject to backup
withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If
withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund or
credit may be obtained, provided that the required information
is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
New
Legislation
Recently enacted legislation regarding foreign account tax
compliance, effective for payments made after December 31,
2012, imposes a withholding tax of 30% on certain payments
(including dividends on, and gross proceeds from the disposition
of, the combined companys common stock) made to certain
foreign financial institutions (including in their capacity as
agents or custodians for beneficial owners of the combined
companys common stock) and to certain other foreign
entities unless various information reporting and certain other
requirements are satisfied. Investors should consult with their
own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this
recently enacted legislation on their investment in the shares
of the combined companys common stock.
115
THE AMB
SPECIAL MEETING
Date,
Time and Place
The AMB special meeting will be held at AMB Property
Corporations global headquarters, which are located at
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, at
9:00 a.m., local time, on June 1, 2011.
Purpose
of the AMB Special Meeting
At the AMB special meeting, AMB stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the Topco merger, including the issuance
of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders
in connection with the Topco merger;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to amend the AMB bylaws, effective upon the
consummation of the Topco merger, to provide for certain
governance matters of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
a proposal to amend the AMB charter, effective upon the
consummation of the Topco merger, to change the approval
threshold for certain actions which may be taken by the board of
directors
and/or
stockholders of the combined company; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the AMB special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the above proposals if there are
insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve
such proposals.
|
Recommendation
of the AMB Board of Directors
The AMB board of directors unanimously has determined that the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement (including the Topco merger, the bylaw amendment and
the charter amendment) are advisable and in the best interests
of AMB and its stockholders and has unanimously approved the
merger agreement.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that
holders of AMB common stock vote FOR the Topco
merger, including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred
stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco
merger, FOR the bylaw amendment, FOR the
charter amendment and FOR the AMB adjournment
proposal.
AMB
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of shares of AMB common stock at the
close of business on April 21, 2011, the record date for
the AMB special meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the AMB special meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof. You may cast one vote for each share of
AMB common stock that you owned on the record date.
On the record date, there were approximately
169,550,440 shares of AMB common stock outstanding and
entitled to vote at the AMB special meeting.
On the record date, approximately 2.5% of the outstanding shares
of AMB common stock were held by AMB directors and executive
officers and their respective affiliates. AMB currently expects
that the directors and executive officers of AMB will vote their
shares in favor of the merger proposal, the bylaw amendment and
the charter amendment, although none has entered into any
agreements obligating them to do so.
Quorum
Shareholders who hold a majority of the total number of shares
of AMB common stock issued and outstanding on the record date
must be present or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum
at the AMB special meeting. All shares of AMB common stock
represented at the AMB special meeting, including abstentions
and broker non-votes (shares held by a broker, bank or nominee
that are represented at the meeting, but with respect to which
the broker,
116
bank or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of
such shares to vote on the particular proposal), will be treated
as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence
of a quorum at the AMB special meeting.
Required
Vote
The proposals at the AMB special meeting to approve the Topco
merger (including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred
stock to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco
merger) and to approve the charter amendment each require
approval by the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the
outstanding AMB common stock. The proposal to approve the bylaw
amendment requires approval by the affirmative vote of holders
of a majority of the outstanding AMB common stock. The proposal
to adjourn the AMB special meeting, if necessary or appropriate,
to solicit additional proxies requires approval by the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of AMB
common stock represented, in person or by proxy, at the AMB
special meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.
The approval of both the merger proposal (including the issuance
of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis shareholders
in connection with the Topco merger) and the bylaw amendment is
required for the completion of the Topco merger. The bylaw
amendment and the charter amendment will take effect only upon
the consummation of the Topco merger. However, approval of the
charter amendment is not a condition to (1) completion of
the Topco merger, (2) approval of the merger proposal or
(3) approval of the bylaw amendment.
Abstentions
and Broker Non-Votes
If you are an AMB stockholder and fail to vote, fail to instruct
your broker, bank or nominee to vote, or abstain from voting, it
will have the same effect as a vote against the merger proposal,
the bylaw amendment and the charter amendment. If you fail to
vote or fail to instruct your broker, bank or nominee to vote,
and as a result your shares are not represented at the meeting,
it will have no effect on the adjournment proposal, assuming a
quorum is present. If your shares are represented at the
meeting, but you abstain from voting or your shares are
otherwise not voted in favor of the adjournment proposal, it
will have the effect of a vote against that proposal.
Shares Held
in Street Name
If you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or if your
shares are held by a bank or nominee (that is, in street name),
you must provide the record holder of your shares with
instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the
voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee.
Please note that you may not vote shares held in street name by
returning a proxy card directly to AMB or by voting in person at
the AMB special meeting unless you provide a legal
proxy, which you must obtain from your broker, bank or
nominee. Further, brokers, banks or nominees who hold shares of
AMB common stock on behalf of their customers may not give a
proxy to AMB to vote those shares without specific instructions
from their customers.
If you are an AMB stockholder and you do not instruct your
broker, bank or nominee to vote, your broker, bank or nominee
may not vote those shares, and it will have the same effect as a
vote against the merger proposal, the bylaw amendment and the
charter amendment.
Voting of
Proxies
A proxy card is enclosed for your use. AMB requests that you
sign the accompanying proxy and return it promptly in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may also vote your shares by
telephone or through the Internet. Information and applicable
deadlines for voting proxies by telephone or through the
Internet are set forth on the enclosed proxy card. When the
accompanying proxy is returned properly executed, the shares of
AMB common stock represented by it will be voted at the AMB
special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof in
accordance with the instructions contained in the proxy.
If a proxy is signed and returned without an indication as to
how the shares of AMB common stock represented by the proxy are
to be voted with regard to a particular proposal, the AMB common
stock represented by the proxy will be voted in favor of each
such proposal. At the date hereof, AMB management has no
knowledge of any business that will be presented for
consideration at the special meeting and which would be required
to be set forth
117
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus other than the matters
set forth in the accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of
Stockholders of AMB. In accordance with the AMB bylaws and
Maryland law, business transacted at the AMB special meeting
will be limited to those matters set forth in such notice.
Nonetheless, if any other matter is properly presented at the
AMB special meeting for consideration, it is intended that the
persons named in the enclosed proxy and acting thereunder will
vote in accordance with their discretion on such matter.
Your vote is important. Accordingly, please sign and return
the enclosed proxy card whether or not you plan to attend the
AMB special meeting in person.
Revocability
of Proxies or Voting Instructions
If you are a holder of record of AMB common stock on the record
date for the AMB special meeting, you have the power to revoke
your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the AMB
special meeting. You can revoke your proxy in one of three ways:
|
|
|
|
|
you can send a signed notice of revocation;
|
|
|
|
you can grant a new, valid proxy bearing a later date; or
|
|
|
|
you can attend the AMB special meeting and vote in person, which
will automatically cancel any proxy previously given, or you can
revoke your proxy in person, but your attendance alone will not
revoke any proxy that you have previously given.
|
If you choose either of the first two methods, your notice of
revocation or your new proxy must be received by AMBs
Secretary at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111
no later than the beginning of the AMB special meeting. If you
have voted your shares by telephone or through the Internet, you
may revoke your prior telephone or Internet vote by recording
another vote using the telephone or Internet, or by signing and
returning a proxy card dated as of a date that is later than
your last telephone or Internet vote.
Plan participants who wish to revoke their voting instructions
must contact the applicable plan trustee and follow its
procedures.
Solicitation
of Proxies
In accordance with the merger agreement, the cost of proxy
solicitation for the AMB special meeting will be borne by AMB.
In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited by
officers and directors and regular employees of AMB, without
additional remuneration, by personal interview, telephone,
facsimile or otherwise. AMB will also request brokerage firms,
nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials
to the beneficial owners of shares held of record on the record
date and will provide customary reimbursement to such firms for
the cost of forwarding these materials. AMB has retained
MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in its solicitation of
proxies and has agreed to pay them a fee of $17,500, plus
reasonable expenses, for these services.
118
AMB
PROPOSALS
AMB
PROPOSAL 1: APPROVAL OF THE TOPCO MERGER
AMB is asking its stockholders to approve the Topco merger
(including the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock
to ProLogis shareholders in connection with the Topco merger).
For a detailed discussion of the terms and conditions of the
Topco merger, see The Merger The Merger
Agreement. As discussed in the section entitled The
Merger AMBs Reasons for the Topco Merger;
Recommendations of the AMB Board of Directors, after
careful consideration, the AMB board of directors, by a
unanimous vote of all directors, approved the merger agreement
and declared the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby (including the Topco merger, the bylaw
amendment and the charter amendment) to be advisable and in the
best interest of AMB and the stockholders of AMB.
Required
Vote
Approval of the proposal to approve the Topco merger (including
the issuance of AMB common stock and preferred stock to ProLogis
shareholders in connection with the Topco merger) requires the
affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the outstanding AMB
common stock. For purposes of this vote, an abstention or a
failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the Topco merger proposal.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that AMB
stockholders vote FOR the approval of the Topco
merger proposal.
The consummation of the Topco Merger is conditioned on the
approval of the bylaw amendment described in AMB
Proposal 2: Approval of the Bylaw Amendment.
119
AMB
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF THE BYLAW AMENDMENT
AMB proposes to amend the amended and restated bylaws of AMB,
effective upon the consummation of the Topco merger, in the form
attached as Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
If the bylaw amendment is approved, the AMB bylaws, which will
be the bylaws of the combined company, will provide that the
affirmative vote of at least 75% of the independent directors of
the combined company will be required to take any of the
following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
removal of Mr. Moghadam from the office of co-chief
executive officer prior to December 31, 2012 or removal of
Mr. Moghadam from the office of chief executive officer or
chairman of the board of directors of the combined company prior
to December 31, 2014;
|
|
|
|
removal of Mr. Rakowich as co-chief executive officer of
the combined company prior to December 31, 2012;
|
|
|
|
appointment of any person as chief executive officer or co-chief
executive officer of the combined company, other than, prior to
December 31, 2012, Mr. Moghadam or Mr. Rakowich,
or, after December 31, 2012 and prior to December 31,
2014, Mr. Moghadam;
|
|
|
|
appointment of any person, other than Mr. Moghadam, as
chairman or co-chairman of the board of directors of the
combined company prior to December 31, 2014;
|
|
|
|
failure to nominate Mr. Moghadam or Mr. Rakowich as a
director of the combined company in any election of directors
where the term of such directorship commences prior to
December 31, 2014 or December 31, 2012,
respectively; or
|
|
|
|
a material alteration, limitation or curtailment of the
authority granted pursuant to the bylaws of the combined company
to the chief executive officer, co-chief executive officer or
chairman of the board prior to December 31, 2014.
|
In addition, if the bylaw amendment is approved, the AMB bylaws,
which will be the bylaws of the combined company, will provide
that the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the independent
directors of the combined company will be required to amend,
modify or repeal, or adopt any bylaw provision inconsistent
with, the foregoing provisions.
The amended and restated bylaws will effect certain additional
changes to the AMB bylaws, which will be the bylaws of the
combined company, including:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in the number of positions on the AMB board of
directors from 10 to 11;
|
|
|
|
the creation of a lead independent director position
on the AMB board of directors;
|
|
|
|
the creation of a right of AMBs chief executive officer or
co-chief executive officers to call special meetings of AMB
stockholders or the AMB board of directors; and
|
|
|
|
the alteration of the structure and responsibilities of certain
committees of the AMB board of directors.
|
A copy of the proposed amended and restated bylaws of AMB, which
will be the bylaws of the combined company, is attached to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. You are urged
to read the amended and restated bylaws in full.
Required
Vote
The proposal to approve the bylaw amendment requires the
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding AMB
common stock. For purposes of this vote, an abstention or a
failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the bylaw proposal.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that AMB
stockholders vote FOR the approval of the bylaw
proposal.
The approval by AMB stockholders of the bylaw amendment is a
condition to the consummation of the Topco merger described in
AMB Proposal 1: Approval of the Topco Merger.
120
AMB
PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE CHARTER AMENDMENT
AMB proposes to amend the AMB charter, which will be the charter
of the combined company, effective upon the consummation of the
Topco merger, in the form attached as Annex C to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The proposed amendment is being
sought to provide each of the board of directors and the
stockholders of the combined company with increased flexibility
to take certain actions, and to harmonize certain provisions of
the charter of the combined company with the existing ProLogis
declaration of trust. If the proposed amendment is adopted,
stockholders of the combined company will be able to approve
certain corporate actions (including, for example, certain
amendments to the charter of the combined company, mergers,
consolidations, or the sale of substantially all of the assets
of the combined company) with a majority of votes entitled to be
cast on such matters, instead of requiring approval by
two-thirds of votes entitled to be cast on such matters. The
current ProLogis declaration of trust permits stockholders to
amend the ProLogis declaration of trust and approve of mergers
by a majority vote (instead of a two-thirds vote), and the AMB
charter amendment is intended to make the charter of the
combined company more consistent with the current ProLogis
declaration of trust in this respect. In addition, if the AMB
charter amendment is approved, the board of directors of the
combined company will have the right to make certain changes to
the permitted capital stock of the combined company without
obtaining a stockholder vote, which will provide additional
flexibility to the board of the combined company.
Specifically, if the proposed amendment is adopted:
|
|
|
|
|
the board of directors of the combined company will have the
right, with the approval of a majority of the entire board, and
without action by the stockholders of the combined company, to
amend the charter of the combined company to increase or
decrease the aggregate number of shares of stock of the combined
company or the number of shares of stock of any class or series
that the combined company has authority to issue; and
|
|
|
|
notwithstanding any provision of law permitting or requiring any
action to be taken or approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of shares entitled to cast a greater number of votes,
any such action shall be effective and valid if declared
advisable by the board of directors and taken or approved by the
affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast a
majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter;
provided that (i) any amendment to any provision of the
charter which expressly requires for any purpose a greater
proportion of the votes entitled to be cast shall require the
proportion of votes specified in that provision, (ii) any
amendment to this provision shall require the affirmative vote
of the holders of shares entitled to cast two-thirds of all of
the votes entitled to be cast on the matter and (iii) any
action requiring a different vote as expressly provided in the
charter shall require such different vote.
|
A copy of the proposed amendment to the AMB charter, which will
be the charter of the combined company, is attached to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C. You are urged
to read the charter amendment in full.
Required
Vote
Approval of the proposal to amend the charter requires the
affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the outstanding AMB
common stock. For purposes of this vote, an abstention or a
failure to vote will have the same effect as a vote against the
charter amendment.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that AMB
stockholders vote FOR the approval of the charter
amendment.
121
AMB
PROPOSAL 4: ADJOURNMENT OF THE AMB SPECIAL
MEETING
AMB stockholders are being asked to approve the adjournment of
the AMB special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit
additional proxies in favor of the above proposals if there are
insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve
such proposals.
If, at the AMB special meeting, the number of shares of AMB
common stock present or represented and voting in favor of the
merger proposal, the bylaw amendment or the charter amendment is
insufficient to approve the corresponding proposal, AMB may move
to adjourn the AMB special meeting in order to enable the AMB
board of directors to solicit additional proxies for approval of
such proposals.
AMB is asking its stockholders to authorize the holder of any
proxy solicited by the AMB board of directors to vote in favor
of granting discretionary authority to the proxy holders, and
each of them individually, to adjourn the AMB special meeting to
another time and place for the purpose of soliciting additional
proxies. If the AMB stockholders approve this proposal, AMB
could adjourn the AMB special meeting and any adjourned session
of the AMB special meeting and use the additional time to
solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of
proxies from AMB stockholders who have previously voted.
Required
Vote
Approval of the proposal to approve the adjournment of the AMB
special meeting requires the affirmative vote of holders of a
majority of the shares of AMB common stock represented, in
person or by proxy, at the AMB special meeting and entitled to
vote on the proposal.
The AMB board of directors unanimously recommends that AMB
stockholders vote FOR the approval of the proposal
to approve an adjournment of the AMB special meeting.
122
THE
PROLOGIS SPECIAL MEETING
Date,
Time and Place
The ProLogis special meeting will be held at ProLogis
world headquarters, 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239, at
9:00 a.m., local time, on June 1, 2011.
Purpose
of the ProLogis Special Meeting
At the ProLogis special meeting, ProLogis shareholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
a proposal to approve the adjournment of the ProLogis special
meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies in favor of the Merger proposal if there are
insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to approve
the Merger proposal.
|
Recommendation
of the ProLogis Board of Trustees
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously has determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Merger, are advisable and in the best interests of
ProLogis and its shareholders and has unanimously approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the Merger.
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously recommends that
holders of ProLogis common shares vote FOR the
Merger proposal and FOR the ProLogis adjournment
proposal.
ProLogis
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of ProLogis common shares at the close of
business on April 21, 2011, the record date for the
ProLogis special meeting, will be entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the ProLogis special meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof. You may cast one vote for each ProLogis
common share that you owned on the record date.
On the record date, there were approximately 570,550,345
ProLogis common shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the
ProLogis special meeting.
On the record date, less than 1% of the outstanding ProLogis
common shares were held by ProLogis trustees and executive
officers and their respective affiliates. ProLogis currently
expects that the trustees and executive officers of ProLogis
will vote their shares in favor of the proposal to approve the
Merger, although none has entered into any agreements obligating
them to do so.
Quorum
Shareholders who hold a majority of the total number of ProLogis
common shares issued and outstanding on the record date must be
present or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum at the
ProLogis special meeting. All ProLogis common shares represented
at the ProLogis special meeting, including abstentions and
broker non-votes (shares held by a broker, bank or nominee that
are represented at the meeting, but with respect to which the
broker, bank or nominee is not instructed by the beneficial
owner of such shares to vote on the particular proposal), will
be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence
or absence of a quorum at the ProLogis special meeting.
Required
Vote
The Merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis common shares. The
proposal to adjourn the ProLogis special meeting, if necessary
or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies requires the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter
by the holders of the ProLogis common shares represented, in
person or by proxy, at the ProLogis special meeting.
123
Abstentions
and Broker Non-Votes
If you are a ProLogis shareholder and fail to vote, fail to
instruct your broker, bank or nominee to vote, or abstain from
voting, it will have the same effect as a vote against the
merger proposal and will have no effect on the adjournment
proposal, assuming a quorum is present.
Shares Held
in Street Name
If you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or if your
shares are held by a bank or nominee (that is, in street name),
you must provide the record holder of your shares with
instructions on how to vote your shares. Please follow the
voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee.
Please note that you may not vote shares held in street name by
returning a proxy card directly to ProLogis or by voting in
person at the ProLogis special meeting unless you provide a
legal proxy, which you must obtain from your broker,
bank or nominee. Further, brokers, banks and nominees who hold
ProLogis common shares on behalf of their customers may not give
a proxy to ProLogis to vote those shares without specific
instructions from their customers.
If you are a ProLogis shareholder and you do not instruct your
broker, bank or nominee to vote, your broker, bank or nominee
may not vote those shares, and it will have the same effect as a
vote against the proposal to approve the Merger.
Voting of
Proxies
A proxy card is enclosed for your use. ProLogis requests that
you sign the accompanying proxy and return it promptly in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. You may also vote your shares by
telephone or through the Internet. Information and applicable
deadlines for voting by telephone or through the Internet are
set forth on the enclosed proxy card. When the accompanying
proxy is returned properly executed, the ProLogis common shares
represented by it will be voted at the ProLogis special meeting
or any adjournment or postponement thereof in accordance with
the instructions contained in the proxy.
If a proxy is signed and returned without an indication as to
how the ProLogis common shares represented by the proxy are to
be voted with regard to a particular proposal, the ProLogis
common shares represented by the proxy will be voted in favor of
each such proposal. At the date hereof, the management of
ProLogis has no knowledge of any business that will be presented
for consideration at the special meeting and which would be
required to be set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus other than the matters set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders of
ProLogis. In accordance with the bylaws of ProLogis and Maryland
law, business transacted at the ProLogis special meeting will be
limited to those matters set forth in such notice. Nonetheless,
if any other matter is properly presented at the ProLogis
special meeting for consideration, it is intended that the
persons named in the enclosed proxy and acting thereunder will
vote in accordance with their discretion on such matter.
Your vote is important. Accordingly, please sign and return
the enclosed proxy card whether or not you plan to attend the
ProLogis special meeting in person.
Revocability
of Proxies or Voting Instructions
If you are a holder of record of ProLogis common shares on the
record date for the ProLogis special meeting, you have the power
to revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at
the ProLogis special meeting. You can revoke your proxy in one
of three ways:
|
|
|
|
|
you can send a signed notice of revocation;
|
|
|
|
you can grant a new, valid proxy bearing a later date; or
|
|
|
|
you can attend the ProLogis special meeting and vote in person,
which will automatically cancel any proxy previously given, or
you can revoke your proxy in person, but your attendance alone
will not revoke any proxy that you have previously given.
|
124
If you choose either of the first two methods, your notice of
revocation or your new proxy must be received by the secretary
of ProLogis at 4545 Airport Way, Denver, Colorado 80239 no later
than the beginning of the ProLogis special meeting. If you have
voted your shares by telephone or through the Internet, you may
revoke your prior telephone or Internet vote by recording a
different vote using the telephone or Internet, or by signing
and returning a proxy card dated as of a date that is later than
your last telephone or Internet vote.
Plan participants who wish to revoke their voting instructions
must contact the applicable plan trustee and follow its
procedures.
Solicitation
of Proxies
In accordance with the merger agreement, the cost of proxy
solicitation for the ProLogis special meeting will be borne by
ProLogis. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be
solicited by officers and trustees and regular employees of
ProLogis, without additional remuneration, by personal
interview, telephone, facsimile or otherwise. ProLogis will also
request brokerage firms, nominees, custodians and fiduciaries to
forward proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares held
of record on the record date and will provide customary
reimbursement to such firms for the cost of forwarding these
materials. ProLogis has retained Georgeson Inc. to assist in its
solicitation of proxies and has agreed to pay them a fee of
$12,500, plus reasonable expenses, for these services.
125
PROLOGIS
PROPOSALS
PROLOGIS
PROPOSAL 1: APPROVAL OF THE MERGER
ProLogis is asking its shareholders to approve the Merger. For a
detailed discussion of the terms and conditions of the Merger,
see The Merger The Merger Agreement. As
discussed in the section entitled The Merger
ProLogis Reasons for the Merger; Recommendations of the
ProLogis Board of Trustees, after careful consideration,
the ProLogis board of trustees, by a unanimous vote of all
trustees, approved the merger agreement and declared the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the ProLogis merger and the Topco merger, to be advisable and in
the best interest of ProLogis and the shareholders of ProLogis.
Required
Vote
Approval of the merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of
holders of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis common shares.
For purposes of this vote, an abstention or a failure to vote
will have the same effect as a vote against the merger proposal.
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously recommends that
ProLogis shareholders vote FOR the approval of the
merger proposal.
126
PROLOGIS
PROPOSAL 2: ADJOURNMENT OF THE PROLOGIS SPECIAL
MEETING
ProLogis shareholders are being asked to approve the adjournment
of the ProLogis special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to
solicit additional proxies in favor of the merger proposal if
there are insufficient votes at the time of such adjournment to
approve the merger proposal.
If, at the ProLogis special meeting, the number of ProLogis
common shares present or represented and voting in favor of the
merger proposal is insufficient to approve such proposal,
ProLogis may move to adjourn the ProLogis special meeting in
order to enable the ProLogis board of trustees to solicit
additional proxies for approval of such proposal.
ProLogis is asking its shareholders to authorize the holder of
any proxy solicited by the ProLogis board of trustees to vote in
favor of granting discretionary authority to the proxy holders,
and each of them individually, to adjourn the ProLogis special
meeting to another time and place for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. If the ProLogis shareholders approve this
proposal, ProLogis could adjourn the ProLogis special meeting
and any adjourned session of the ProLogis special meeting and
use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including
the solicitation of proxies from ProLogis shareholders who have
previously voted.
Required
Vote
Approval of the proposal to approve the adjournment of the
ProLogis special meeting requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast on the matter by the holders of the
ProLogis common shares represented, in person or by proxy, at
the ProLogis special meeting.
The ProLogis board of trustees unanimously recommends that
ProLogis shareholders vote FOR the approval of the
proposal to approve an adjournment of the ProLogis special
meeting.
127
COMPARATIVE
STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares are traded on the
NYSE under the symbols AMB and PLD,
respectively. The following table presents trading information
for AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares on
January 26, 2011, the last trading day before ProLogis
common share and AMB common stock prices may have been affected
by market speculation regarding a potential transaction
involving the companies, January 28, 2011, the last trading
day before public announcement of the merger agreement, and
April 26, 2011, the latest practicable trading day before
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Common Stock
|
|
|
ProLogis Common Shares
|
|
Date
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
January 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
33.34
|
|
|
$
|
32.72
|
|
|
$
|
32.86
|
|
|
$
|
14.74
|
|
|
$
|
14.50
|
|
|
$
|
14.70
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
34.08
|
|
|
$
|
32.80
|
|
|
$
|
32.93
|
|
|
$
|
15.84
|
|
|
$
|
15.17
|
|
|
$
|
15.21
|
|
April 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
36.78
|
|
|
$
|
36.12
|
|
|
$
|
36.52
|
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
$
|
16.20
|
|
|
$
|
16.43
|
|
For illustrative purposes, the following table provides ProLogis
equivalent per share information on each of the specified dates.
ProLogis equivalent per share amounts are calculated by
multiplying AMB per share amounts by the exchange ratio of
0.4464.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Common Stock
|
|
|
ProLogis Equivalent Per Share
|
|
Date
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Close
|
|
|
January 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
33.34
|
|
|
$
|
32.72
|
|
|
$
|
32.86
|
|
|
$
|
14.88
|
|
|
$
|
14.61
|
|
|
$
|
14.67
|
|
January 28, 2011
|
|
$
|
34.08
|
|
|
$
|
32.80
|
|
|
$
|
32.93
|
|
|
$
|
15.21
|
|
|
$
|
14.64
|
|
|
$
|
14.70
|
|
April 26, 2011
|
|
$
|
36.78
|
|
|
$
|
36.12
|
|
|
$
|
36.52
|
|
|
$
|
16.42
|
|
|
$
|
16.12
|
|
|
$
|
16.18
|
|
The following tables set forth the high and low sales prices of
AMB common stock and ProLogis common shares as reported in the
NYSEs consolidated transaction reporting system, and the
quarterly cash dividends declared per share, for the calendar
quarters indicated.
AMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.03
|
|
|
$
|
9.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.75
|
|
|
$
|
13.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.96
|
|
|
$
|
15.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
27.43
|
|
|
$
|
20.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.60
|
|
|
$
|
21.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
29.17
|
|
|
$
|
23.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.97
|
|
|
$
|
22.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
32.18
|
|
|
$
|
26.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
36.47
|
|
|
$
|
31.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Second Quarter (through April 26, 2011)
|
|
$
|
36.78
|
|
|
$
|
34.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
ProLogis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Declared
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.68
|
|
|
$
|
4.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.77
|
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.30
|
|
|
$
|
6.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
15.04
|
|
|
$
|
10.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.71
|
|
|
$
|
11.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.67
|
|
|
$
|
9.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
12.22
|
|
|
$
|
9.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
14.97
|
|
|
$
|
11.66
|
|
|
$
|
0.1125
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.52
|
|
|
$
|
14.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.1125
|
|
Second Quarter (through April 26, 2011)
|
|
$
|
16.50
|
|
|
$
|
15.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary of the terms of AMB capital stock is not
complete and is qualified by reference to the AMB charter,
including any articles supplementary for AMB preferred stock,
and the AMB bylaws. You should read these documents for complete
information on AMB capital stock. The AMB charter, including any
articles supplementary for AMB preferred stock, and the AMB
bylaws are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. AMB files instruments that define the
rights of holders of its capital stock as exhibits to its annual
reports on
Form 10-K
and quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
filed with the SEC. Also, from time to time AMB might file an
amendment to these documents or a new instrument that defines
the rights of holders of its capital stock as an exhibit to a
current report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC. See Where You Can Find More
Information.
The description of capital stock in this section applies to the
capital stock of the combined company after the Merger.
Shares Authorized
AMB is currently authorized under its charter to issue an
aggregate of 600 million shares of capital stock,
consisting of 500 million shares of common stock,
$0.01 par value per share, and 100 million shares of
preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share, of which
2,300,000 shares are classified as Series L Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock, 2,300,000 shares are classified
as Series M Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
3,000,000 shares are classified as Series O Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock and 2,000,000 shares are
classified as Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock.
Shares Outstanding
As of April 21, 2011, the record date for the AMB special
meeting, there were:
|
|
|
|
|
169,550,440 outstanding shares of AMB common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series L preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
2,300,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series M preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series O preferred
stock; and
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series P preferred
stock.
|
All outstanding shares of AMB common stock are fully paid and
non-assessable.
Following the Merger, it is expected that there will be:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 424,244,115 outstanding shares of AMB common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 outstanding shares of the AMB Series L preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
2,300,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series M preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series O preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series P preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
2,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series Q preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series R preferred
stock; and
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 outstanding shares of AMB Series S preferred
stock.
|
AMB
Common Stock
Preemptive
Rights
AMB common stock has no preemptive rights.
130
Dividend
Rights
Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding
preferred stock, the holders of AMB common stock are entitled to
dividends when, as and if authorized by the AMB board of
directors and declared by AMB out of funds legally available for
that purpose.
Voting
Rights
Holders of AMB common stock are entitled to one vote per share
on each matter submitted for their vote at any meeting of AMB
stockholders for each share of AMB common stock held as of the
record date for the meeting. Holders of AMB common stock are not
permitted to cumulate their votes for the election of directors.
The AMB board of directors is not classified.
Liquidation
Preference
In the event that AMB is liquidated, dissolved or wound up, the
holders of AMB common stock will be entitled to a pro rata share
in any distribution to AMB stockholders, but only after
satisfaction of all of the liabilities of AMB and of the prior
rights of any outstanding class or series of AMB stock.
Sinking
Fund
AMB common stock does not have the benefit of any retirement or
sinking fund.
Listing
AMB common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol
AMB. Following completion of the Topco merger, the
shares of common stock of the combined company will be traded on
the NYSE under the symbol PLD.
Ownership
Limitation
To help AMB maintain its qualification as a REIT, among other
purposes, the AMB charter provides that, subject to certain
exceptions, no holder may own (including beneficial or
constructive ownership) in excess of 9.8% (by value or number of
shares, whichever is more restrictive) of AMBs common
stock. The AMB board of directors may waive the ownership limits
under certain circumstances. The AMB charter provides that
shares of common stock acquired or held in excess of the
ownership limit will be transferred to a trust for the benefit
of a designated charitable beneficiary, and that any person who
acquires shares of AMB common stock in violation of the
ownership limit will not be entitled to any dividends on the
shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds
from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser
of the price paid for the shares or the amount realized from the
sale. A transfer of shares in violation of the limit may be void
under certain circumstances.
New AMB
Preferred Stock to be Issued in Connection with the Topco
Merger
Upon completion of the Merger, (i) each outstanding
ProLogis Series C preferred share will be converted into
one share of AMB Series Q preferred stock, (ii) each
outstanding ProLogis Series F preferred share will be
converted into one share of AMB Series R preferred stock
and (iii) each outstanding ProLogis Series G preferred
share will be converted into one share of AMB Series S
preferred stock. We refer to the AMB Series Q preferred
stock, the AMB Series R preferred stock and the AMB
Series S preferred stock collectively as the new AMB
preferred stock. The following is a summary of the
material rights of holders of the new AMB preferred stock to be
issued to holders of ProLogis preferred shares.
Rank
With respect to distribution upon liquidation or dissolution,
each series of the new AMB preferred stock will rank on a parity
with each other and with each existing series of AMB preferred
stock and will rank senior to AMB common stock.
131
Dividends
Series Q preferred
stock. Holders of shares of AMB Series Q
preferred stock will be entitled to receive cumulative
preferential cash dividends when, as and if authorized by the
AMB board of directors and declared by AMB from funds legally
available for such purpose, at a rate per annum of 8.54% on a
stated liquidation preference of $50 per share. Dividends are
payable the last calendar day of March, June, September and
December or, if such date is not a business day, on the business
day immediately following thereafter. Dividend periods commence
on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each
year and end on and include the day preceding the first day of
the next succeeding dividend period.
Series R preferred
stock. Holders of shares of AMB Series R
preferred stock will be entitled to receive cumulative
preferential cash dividends when, as and if authorized by the
AMB board of directors and declared by AMB from funds legally
available for such purpose, at a rate per annum of 6.75% on a
stated liquidation preference of $25 per share. Dividends are
payable the last calendar day of March, June, September and
December or, if such date is not a business day, on the business
day immediately following thereafter. Dividend periods commence
on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each
year and end on and include the day preceding the first day of
the next succeeding dividend period.
Series S preferred
stock. Holders of shares of AMB Series S
preferred stock will be entitled to receive cumulative
preferential cash dividends when, as and if authorized by the
AMB board of directors and declared by AMB from funds legally
available for such purpose, at a rate per annum of 6.75% on a
stated liquidation preference of $25 per share. Dividends are
payable the last calendar day of March, June, September and
December or, if such date is not a business day, on the business
day immediately following thereafter. Dividend periods commence
on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each
year and end on and include the day preceding the first day of
the next succeeding dividend period.
Redemption
Shares of AMB Series R preferred stock and AMB
Series S preferred stock are fully redeemable at the option
of AMB, at a redemption price of $25 per share plus all accrued
and unpaid dividends, if any, without interest. Shares of AMB
Series Q preferred stock become fully redeemable on
November 13, 2026, at the option of AMB, at a redemption
price of $50 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends, if
any, without interest. If full cumulative dividends on a series
of new AMB preferred stock or any other series on parity
therewith have not been paid or declared and set apart for
payment, AMB cannot redeem, purchase or acquire shares of any
series of new AMB preferred stock other than pursuant to a
purchase or exchange offer made on the same terms to all holders
of such series or pursuant to a redemption made as a result of a
holder owning shares in excess of the ownership limitations
described below under Ownership Limitation.
Preemptive
Rights
The new AMB preferred stock will have no preemptive rights.
Voting
Rights
Holders of the new AMB preferred stock will have no voting
rights, except as described below or as provided by applicable
law.
If and when dividends payable on any series of the new AMB
preferred stock or on any series of parity stock have not been
declared and paid for six quarterly dividend periods (whether or
not consecutive), the number of members of the AMB board of
directors will be increased by two and the holders of such
series and of any series of parity stock will be entitled to
elect two directors to fill such positions, voting together as a
single class, until such dividends are paid or declared and set
aside for payment.
With respect to each series of the new AMB preferred stock,
unless provision is made for the redemption of all shares of the
applicable series of new AMB preferred stock, the affirmative
vote of at least two-thirds of the votes
132
entitled to be cast by holders of such series of preferred stock
and holders of any series of parity stock, voting together as a
single class, will be required for certain actions described
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment of charter. Any amendment,
alteration or repeal of any of the provisions of the AMB charter
or the instrument setting forth the terms of such series of new
AMB preferred stock that materially and adversely affects the
voting powers, rights or preferences of the holders of the
applicable series of new AMB preferred stock or such AMB
preferred stock; provided, that the authorization or creation
of, or the increase in the number of authorized shares of, any
equity securities that rank junior to or on a parity with such
series of new AMB preferred stock will not be deemed to
materially adversely affect the voting powers, rights or
preferences of the holders of the applicable series of new AMB
preferred stock; provided, further, that if any such amendment,
alteration or repeal would materially and adversely affect any
voting powers, rights or preferences of the applicable series of
new AMB preferred stock (or another series of parity stock
entitled to vote thereon) that are not enjoyed by some or all of
the other series otherwise entitled to vote on such matter, the
voting standard will be the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of
all series similarly affected;
|
|
|
|
Share exchange. A share exchange that affects
the applicable series of new AMB preferred stock, a
consolidation with or merger of AMB into another entity, or a
consolidation with or merger of another entity into AMB, unless
in each case each share of the applicable series of new AMB
preferred stock will either remain outstanding without a
material and adverse change to its terms or rights, or will be
converted into or exchanged for preferred shares of the
surviving entity having preferences, rights, voting powers,
restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other
distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions of
redemption thereof identical to that of a share of the
applicable series of new AMB preferred stock; or
|
|
|
|
Creation of senior stock. The authorization or
creation of, or the increase in the authorized amount of, any
shares of any class or any security convertible into shares of
any class ranking senior to the applicable series of new AMB
preferred stock in the distribution of assets on any
liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of AMB or in the payment of dividends.
|
When holders of shares of any series of new AMB preferred stock
have a vote, they have one vote per share. When holders of
shares of AMB Series Q preferred stock are entitled to vote
on a matter together with any other series of AMB preferred
stock, holders of AMB Series Q preferred stock and such
other series have one vote per $50 of stated liquidation
preference. When holders of shares of AMB Series R
preferred stock or Series S preferred stock are entitled to
vote on a matter together with any other series of AMB preferred
stock, holders of AMB Series R preferred stock, AMB
Series S preferred stock and such other series have one
vote per $25 of stated liquidation preference.
Liquidation
Preference
Series Q preferred stock. Upon the
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of AMB, holders of shares of AMB Series Q preferred stock
are entitled to receive, out of the assets of AMB that are
available for distribution to stockholders, before any
distribution is made to holders of common stock or other equity
securities designated as ranking junior to the AMB Series Q
preferred stock with respect to liquidation, a liquidation
distribution in the amount of $50 per share, plus any accrued
and unpaid dividends, if any. Distributions will be made pro
rata as to the AMB Series Q preferred stock and any other
equity securities designated as ranking on a parity with the AMB
Series Q preferred stock with respect to the payment of
dividends and distributions of assets upon any liquidation,
dissolution, distribution or
winding-up
of AMB and only to the extent of the assets of AMB, if any, that
are available after satisfaction of all liabilities to creditors.
Series R preferred stock. Upon the
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of AMB, holders of shares of AMB Series R preferred stock
are entitled to receive, out of the assets of AMB that are
available for distribution to stockholders, before any
distribution is made to holders of common stock or other equity
securities designated as ranking junior to the AMB Series R
preferred stock with respect to liquidation, a liquidation
distribution in the amount of $25 per share, plus any accrued
and unpaid dividends, if any. Distributions will be made pro
rata as to the AMB Series R preferred stock and any other
equity securities designated as ranking on a parity with the AMB
Series R preferred stock with respect to the payment of
dividends and distributions of assets
133
upon any liquidation, dissolution, distribution or
winding-up
of AMB and only to the extent of the AMB assets of AMB, if any,
that are available after satisfaction of all liabilities to
creditors.
Series S preferred stock. Upon the
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up
of AMB, holders of shares of AMB Series S preferred stock
are entitled to receive, out of the assets of AMB that are
available for distribution to stockholders, before any
distribution is made to holders of common stock or other equity
securities designated as ranking junior to the AMB Series S
preferred stock with respect to liquidation, a liquidation
distribution in the amount of $25 per share, plus any accrued
and unpaid dividends, if any. Distributions will be made pro
rata as to the AMB Series S preferred stock and any other
equity securities designated as ranking on a parity with the AMB
Series S preferred stock with respect to the payment of
dividends and distributions of assets upon any liquidation,
dissolution, distribution or
winding-up
of AMB and only to the extent of the assets of AMB, if any, that
are available after satisfaction of all liabilities to creditors.
Sinking
Fund
The new AMB preferred stock will not have the benefit of any
retirement or sinking fund.
Listing
The shares of AMB Series R preferred stock and AMB
Series S preferred stock issuable in connection with the
Topco merger will be listed on the NYSE. The shares of AMB
Series Q preferred stock issuable in connection with the
Topco merger will not be listed on any securities exchange.
Ownership
Limitation
Subject to certain exceptions, no holder of any series of the
new AMB preferred stock will be permitted to own in excess of
(i) 25% of such series or (ii) 9.8% of the authorized
and issued capital stock of AMB (by value or number of shares,
whichever is more restrictive), including the new AMB preferred
stock and all other AMB capital stock. The AMB board of
directors may waive the 9.8% ownership limit under certain
circumstances and may waive the 25% limit in its discretion. The
consequences of exceeding any of the ownership limits will be
set out in the instruments designating the rights of each series
of new AMB preferred stock, and will include the sale, transfer,
and/or
redemption of the applicable holders AMB stock.
Anti-takeover
Provisions in the AMB Charter and Bylaws
Certain provisions of the charter of AMB could make it less
likely that AMB management would be changed or someone would
acquire voting control of AMB without the consent of its board
of directors. These provisions could delay, deter or prevent
tender offers or takeover attempts that AMB stockholders might
believe are in their best interests, including tender offers or
takeover attempts that could allow AMB stockholders to receive
premiums over the market price of their common stock.
Restrictions
on Ownership and Transfer
For AMB to maintain its qualification as a REIT, not more than
50% of its outstanding stock may be owned, actually or
constructively, by five or fewer individuals during the last
half of a taxable year after the first taxable year for which a
REIT election is made. Furthermore, the stock must be held by a
minimum of 100 persons for at least 335 days of a
12-month
taxable year (or a proportionate part of a short tax year). In
addition, if AMB, or an owner of 10% or more of the parent
companys stock, actually or constructively owns 10% or
more of one of the customers of AMB (or a customer of any
partnership in which the company is a partner), then the rent
received by AMB (either directly or through any such
partnership) from that customer will not be qualifying income
for purposes of the REIT gross income tests of the Code.
In addition to the ownership limitations in the new AMB
preferred stock described above, to help AMB maintain its
qualification as a REIT, among other purposes, AMB prohibits the
ownership, actually or by virtue of the constructive ownership
provisions of the Code, by any single person, of more than the
ownership limit of 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever
is more restrictive) of the issued and outstanding shares of
each of AMBs
134
common stock and existing preferred stock (unless such
limitations are waived by the board of directors in accordance
with the instruments designating the rights of such stock). The
AMB charter provides that shares acquired or held in violation
of this ownership limit will be transferred to a trust for the
benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary. The AMB charter
further provides that any person who acquires shares in
violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any
dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or
receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in
excess of the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the
amount realized from the sale. A transfer of shares in violation
of the above limits may be void under certain circumstances. The
ownership limit may have the effect of delaying, deferring or
preventing a change in control and, therefore, could adversely
affect the parent companys stockholders ability to
realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the
shares of the parent companys common stock in connection
with such transaction.
Preferred
Stock
At any time, without stockholder approval, the AMB board of
directors can issue one or more new series of preferred stock.
In some cases, the issuance of preferred stock could discourage
or make more difficult attempts to take control of AMB through a
merger, tender offer, proxy context or otherwise. Preferred
stock with special voting rights or other features issued to
persons favoring AMB management could stop a takeover by
preventing the person trying to take control of AMB from
acquiring enough voting shares to take control.
Stockholders
Rights Plan
Although AMB does not have a stockholders rights plan as
of the date of this document, under Maryland law, the AMB board
of directors can adopt a rights plan without stockholder
approval. If adopted, a rights plan could operate to cause
substantial dilution to a person or group that attempts to
acquire AMB on terms not approved by the AMB board of directors.
Extraordinary
Actions
Currently, the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast
at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter is required to amend the AMB charter or approve certain
other extraordinary actions, such as mergers, which could
discourage or make more difficult attempts to take control of
AMB through a merger, tender offer, proxy context or otherwise.
If the charter amendment is approved by AMB stockholders, after
the effective time of the Topco merger, the affirmative vote of
stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast on the matter will be required to amend the
AMB charter, which will be the charter of the combined company,
or approve such other extraordinary actions, except as
specifically provided in the AMB charter.
Control
Share Acquisition Statute
Maryland has a statute that generally provides that holders of
control shares of a Maryland corporation acquired in a control
share acquisition have no voting rights except to the extent
approved by a vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be
cast on the matter. Shares owned by the acquiror, by officers or
by employees who are directors of the corporation are excluded
from shares entitled to vote on the matter. Control shares are
voting shares of stock which, if aggregated with all other
shares of stock owned by the acquiror or in respect of which the
acquiror is able to exercise or direct the exercise of voting
power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would
entitle the acquiror to exercise voting power in electing
directors within one of the following ranges of voting power:
(i) one-tenth or more but less than one-third;
(ii) one-third or more but less than a majority; or
(iii) a majority or more of all voting power. Control
shares do not include shares the acquiring person is then
entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained
stockholder approval. A control share acquisition means the
acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares, subject to
certain exceptions. AMB has opted out of this statute, which
could make it easier for stockholders to take control of AMB
through a merger, tender offer, proxy context or otherwise.
Business
Combination Act
Maryland has a statute that provides, generally, that
business combinations between a Maryland corporation
and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested
stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most
135
recent date on which the interested stockholder becomes an
interested stockholder. These business combinations include a
merger, consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances
specified in the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or
reclassification of equity securities. Subject to certain
exceptions, an interested stockholder is defined as:
(i) any person who beneficially owns ten percent or more of
the voting power of the corporations outstanding voting
stock; or (ii) an affiliate or associate of the corporation
who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in
question, was the beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the
voting power of the then outstanding stock of the corporation. A
person is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the
board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which
he otherwise would have become an interested stockholder.
However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may
provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after
the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined
by the board. After the five-year prohibition, any business
combination between the corporation and the interested
stockholder that does not meet certain fair price requirements
generally must be (1) recommended by the board of
directors, (2) approved by the affirmative vote of at least
80% of the votes of entitled to be cast by the holders of
outstanding voting stock and (3) approved by two-thirds of
the votes entitled to be cast by holders of voting stock of the
corporation other than shares held by the interested stockholder
with whom or with whose affiliate the business combination is to
be effected or held by an affiliate or associate of the
interested stockholder. AMB has opted out of the Maryland
Business Combination Act, which could make it easier for
stockholders to take control of AMB through a merger, tender
offer, proxy context or otherwise.
Subtitle
8
Subtitle 8 of Title 3 of the MGCL permits a Maryland
corporation with a class of equity securities registered under
the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to
elect to be subject, by provision in its charter or bylaws or a
resolution of its board of directors and notwithstanding any
contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to any or all of
five provisions: (1) a classified board; (2) a
two-thirds vote requirement for removing a director; (3) a
requirement that the number of directors be fixed only by vote
of the directors; (4) a requirement that a vacancy on the
board be filled only by the remaining directors and for the
remainder of the full term of the class of directors in which
the vacancy occurred; and (5) a majority requirement for
the calling of a special meeting of stockholders.
The AMB charter currently requires a two-thirds vote for the
removal of any director from its board of directors. The charter
amendment would not affect this requirement. See
Comparison of Rights of AMB Stockholders and ProLogis
Shareholders Removal of Directors.
136
COMPARISON
OF RIGHTS OF AMB STOCKHOLDERS
AND PROLOGIS SHAREHOLDERS
Both AMB and ProLogis are organized in Maryland. If the Merger
is consummated, shareholders of ProLogis will become
stockholders of AMB, which will be renamed ProLogis,
Inc. The rights of ProLogis shareholders are governed
currently by the MRL and the declaration of trust and bylaws of
ProLogis. Upon consummation of the Merger, the rights of the
former ProLogis shareholders who receive AMB common stock or
preferred stock will be governed by the MGCL and will be
governed by the charter and bylaws of AMB, rather than the
declaration of trust and bylaws of ProLogis.
The following is a summary of the material differences between
the rights of AMB stockholders (which will be the rights of
stockholders of the combined company following the Merger) and
ProLogis shareholders, but does not purport to be a complete
description of those differences or a complete description of
the terms of the AMB common stock subject to issuance in
connection with the Topco merger. The following summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the relevant
provisions of (i) Maryland law, (ii) the AMB charter,
(iii) the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of
ProLogis (which we refer to as the ProLogis declaration of
trust), (iv) the AMB bylaws, (v) the Amended and
Restated Bylaws of ProLogis (which we refer to as the
ProLogis bylaws), (vi) the proposed bylaw
amendment and (vii) the proposed charter amendment.
This section does not include a complete description of all
differences among the rights of AMB stockholders and ProLogis
shareholders, nor does it include a complete description of the
specific rights of such holders. Furthermore, the identification
of some of the differences in the rights of such holders as
material is not intended to indicate that other differences that
may be equally important do not exist. You are urged to read
carefully the relevant provisions of Maryland law, as well as
the governing corporate instruments of each of AMB and ProLogis,
copies of which are available, without charge, to any person,
including any beneficial owner to whom this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is delivered, by following the instructions
listed under Where You Can Find More Information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
Corporate Governance
|
|
AMB is a Maryland corporation that is a REIT for U.S. federal
income tax purposes.
|
|
ProLogis is a Maryland real estate investment trust that is a
REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rights of AMB stockholders are governed by the MGCL, the AMB
charter and the AMB bylaws.
|
|
The rights of ProLogis shareholders are governed by the MRL, the
ProLogis declaration of trust and the ProLogis bylaws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized Capital Stock or Shares of Beneficial Interest
|
|
AMB is authorized to issue an aggregate of 600 million shares of
capital stock, consisting of (1) 500 million shares of common
stock, $0.01 par value per share; and (2) 100 million
shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share.
|
|
ProLogis is authorized to issue an aggregate of 750 million
shares of beneficial interest, consisting of (1) 737,580,000
common shares of beneficial interest, $0.01 par value per
share; (2) 2,300,000 Series C cumulative redeemable preferred
shares, par value $0.01 per share; (3) 5,060,000 Series F
cumulative redeemable preferred shares, par value $0.01 per
share; and (4) 5,060,000 Series G cumulative redeemable
preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share.
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock. The AMB board of directors is
authorized, without stockholder action, to issue preferred stock
from time to time and to establish, amongst other things, the
designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional,
conversion, or other rights and qualifications, limitations and
restrictions thereof; the rates and times of payment of
dividends, the price and manner of redemption; the amount
payable in the event of liquidation, dissolution, and winding-up
or in the event of any merger or consolidation of or sale of
assets; the rights (if any) to convert the preferred stock into,
and/or to purchase, stock of any other class or series, the
terms of any sinking fund or redemption or purchase account (if
any) to be provided for shares of such class of preferred stock;
restrictions on ownership and transfer to preserve tax benefits;
and the voting powers (if any) of the holders of any class of
preferred stock generally or with respect to any particular
matter, which may be less than, equal to or greater than one
vote per share.
|
|
Preferred Shares. The board of trustees of ProLogis may
classify or reclassify any unissued shares from time to time by
setting or changing the preferences, conversion or other rights,
voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or
distributions, qualifications or terms or conditions of
redemption of the shares by filing articles supplementary
pursuant to Maryland law. The ProLogis board is authorized to
issue from the authorized but unissued shares of ProLogis
preferred shares in series and to establish from time to time
the number of preferred shares to be included in each such
series and to fix the designation and any preferences,
conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions,
limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and
conditions of redemption of the shares of each series. The
authority of the ProLogis board with respect to each unissued
series includes, determination of the following: number and
designation; dividend rates; voting rights; conversion rights;
redemption rights; liquidation preferences; sinking funds
provisions; and any other relative rights, preferences,
limitations and powers.
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Voting
|
|
Neither holders of AMB stock or ProLogis shares have the right
to cumulate their votes with respect to the election of
directors or trustees, as the case may be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size of the Board of Directors
|
|
The number of directors, which must be between five and 13, may be changed by the board of directors. Currently, the AMB board of directors consists of nine directors.
Upon completion of the Merger, the board of directors of the combined company will be increased to 11 directors.
|
|
The number of trustees, which must be between three and 15, may
be changed by the board of trustees. Currently, the ProLogis
board of trustees consists of ten trustees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Directors
|
|
At least a majority of the directors on the AMB board of
directors must be independent directors.
|
|
A majority of the trustees on the ProLogis board of trustees
must not be officers or employees of ProLogis.
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
Classified Board / Term of Directors
|
|
Neither the AMB board of directors nor the ProLogis board of
trustees is classified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generally, directors of AMB or trustees of ProLogis, as the case
may be, hold office for a term expiring at the next succeeding
annual meeting of stockholders or shareholders, respectively,
and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. In the
event of an increase or decrease in the size of the board, each
incumbent director or trustee will generally continue as a
director or trustee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removal of Directors
|
|
Directors may be removed, but only for cause, by the affirmative vote of holders of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast in the election of directors.
|
|
Trustees may be removed, but only for cause, by (1) the
affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast
in the election of trustees; or (2) the vote of two-thirds of
the trustees then in office.
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors
|
|
The bylaws of both AMB and ProLogis provide that, in the case of
a non-contested election, directors or trustees, as the case may
be, must receive a majority of affirmative votes cast for
election at a meeting at which a quorum is present. For this
purpose, a majority of the votes cast means that the number of
shares of AMB common stock or ProLogis common shares that are
cast and are voted for the election of a director or
trustee, as the case may be, must exceed the number of common
shares that are withheld from or voted against his or her
election. If a director or trustee fails to obtain a majority,
he or she must tender his or her resignation to the board. The
board will determine whether to accept the tendered resignation.
If the board determines to reject the tendered resignation, the
board must publicly announce its decision.
|
|
|
|
Filling Vacancies of Directors
|
|
Any vacancies on the AMB board of directors or the ProLogis
board of trustees can be filled by their stockholders or
shareholders, respectively, at an annual or special meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any vacancies on the AMB board of directors may also be filled
by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors, although less than a quorum, provided that a vacancy
caused by an increase in the number of directors may be filled
only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the entire board.
|
|
Any vacancies on the ProLogis board of trustees may also be
filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
trustees, although less than a quorum.
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charter Amendments
|
|
The affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter is required to amend the AMB charter.
After the effective time of the Topco merger and assuming the charter amendment is approved, the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter will be required to amend the charter of the combined company; provided that (i) any amendment to any provision of the charter of the combined company which expressly requires for any purpose a greater proportion of the votes entitled to be cast will require the proportion of votes specified in that provision and (ii) any amendment to the stockholder voting threshold established by the charter amendment will require the affirmative vote of the holders of shares entitled to cast two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.
|
|
The affirmative vote of shareholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter is required to amend the ProLogis declaration of trust.
The trustees may also amend the charter by a two-thirds vote to enable ProLogis to qualify as a REIT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bylaw Amendments
|
|
The AMB bylaws may be amended by (1) the AMB board of directors or (2) the affirmative vote of the majority of all outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote; provided, that certain sections of the bylaws relating to amendments, notice of meetings, affiliate transactions and control share acquisitions may only be amended by the affirmative vote of the majority of all outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote.
After the effective time of the Topco merger, the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the independent directors of the combined company will be required to amend, modify or repeal, or adopt any bylaw provision inconsistent with, certain provisions of the AMB bylaws, which will be the bylaws of the combined company, pertaining to features of the leadership structure of the combined company.
|
|
The power to amend the ProLogis bylaws vests in the board of
trustees of ProLogis by vote of a majority of the trustees,
subject to repeal or change by action of the shareholders of
ProLogis entitled to vote thereon.
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrevocable Board Resolutions
|
|
The AMB board of directors may designate any of its resolutions
to be irrevocable. Resolutions so designated may
not be revoked, altered or amended subsequently by the board of
directors without approval of a majority of the outstanding
shares of common stock entitled to vote.
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote on Merger, Consolidations or Sales of Substantially all
Assets
|
|
Generally, the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter is required to approve extraordinary actions, including a merger or similar business combination.
Upon the effective time of the Topco merger and assuming the AMB charter amendment is approved, the affirmative vote of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter will be required to approve extraordinary actions, including a merger or similar business combination.
|
|
Generally, the affirmative vote of shareholders entitled to cast
at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the
matter is required to approve a merger or similar business
combination.
|
|
|
|
Ownership Limitations
|
|
With certain exceptions, the actual, constructive or beneficial
ownership by any person of more than 9.8% (in value or number of
votes, whichever is more restrictive) of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock of AMB and the issued and
outstanding shares of ProLogis is generally prohibited. Each of
AMB and ProLogis requires its stockholders or shareholders,
respectively, to provide it with certain information relating to
maintenance of REIT status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 9.8% ownership limitation applies to preferred stock as well
as common stock.
|
|
The ownership limit threshold for each series of the outstanding
preferred shares of ProLogis is 25%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Meetings of the Stockholders
|
|
An annual meeting of AMB stockholders is required to be held each year during the month of May in San Francisco, at a time and place as designated by the AMB board of directors.
After the effective time of the Topco merger, the board of directors of the combined company will be able to hold the annual meeting at a time and place as designated by the board of directors of the combined company.
|
|
The annual meeting of ProLogis shareholders is required to be
held at a time and place as designated by the ProLogis board of
trustees.
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Meetings of the Stockholders
|
|
A special meeting of AMB stockholders may be called at any time
by the president, the chairman of the board, or a majority of
the directors, or by a committee of the board of directors which
has been duly designated by the board of directors to call such
meetings.
|
|
A special meeting of ProLogis shareholders may be called at any
time by a majority of the trustees or by the chairman or any
co-chairman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to certain exceptions, a special meeting will also be
called by the secretary upon the written request of AMB
stockholders entitled to cast at least 50% of the votes entitled
to be cast at the meeting.
|
|
A special meeting will also be called by the secretary upon the
written request of ProLogis shareholders holding in the
aggregate a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon the effective time of the Topco merger, the chief executive
officer and co-chief executive officers will also be able to
call a special meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business transacted at the special meeting of stockholders will
be limited to the purposes stated in the notice.
|
|
Business transacted at the special meeting of shareholders will
be limited to the purposes stated in the notice.
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland Business Combination Act
|
|
The Maryland Business Combination Act provides, generally, that
business combinations between a Maryland corporation
and an interested stockholder or an affiliate of an interested
stockholder are prohibited for five years after the most recent
date on which the interested stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder. These business combinations include a merger,
consolidation, share exchange, or, in circumstances specified in
the statute, an asset transfer or issuance or reclassification
of equity securities. Subject to certain exceptions, an
interested stockholder is defined as: (i) any person who
beneficially owns ten percent or more of the voting power of the
corporations outstanding stock; or (ii) an affiliate or
associate of the corporation who, at any time within the
two-year period prior to the date in question, was the
beneficial owner of ten percent or more of the voting power of
the then outstanding voting stock of the corporation. A person
is not an interested stockholder under the statute if the board
of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he
otherwise would have become an interested stockholder. However,
in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide
that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time
of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the
board. After the five-year prohibition, any business combination
between the corporation and the interested stockholder that does
not meet certain fair price requirements generally must be (1)
recommended by the board of directors, (2) approved by the
affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be
cast by the holders of outstanding voting stock and (3) approved
by two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of
voting stock of the corporation other than shares held by the
interested stockholder with whom or with whose affiliate the
business combination is to be effected or held by an affiliate
or associate of the interested stockholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB has opted not to be subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act.
The AMB board of directors may not revoke, alter or amend its prior resolution to opt out of the Maryland Business Combination Act, or otherwise elect to have any business combination of AMB be subject to such act without the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of AMB common stock entitled to vote.
|
|
ProLogis has opted not to be subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act only with respect to business combinations with Security Capital Group and its affiliates and successors.
The ProLogis board of trustees has by resolution opted out of the Maryland Business Combination Act with respect to the Merger.
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Rights Plan
|
|
Neither AMB nor ProLogis has a shareholder rights plan in
effect.
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rights of AMB Stockholders
|
|
Rights of ProLogis Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT Qualification
|
|
If the AMB board of directors determines that it is no longer in the best interests of AMB to qualify or continue to be qualified as a REIT and such determination is approved by the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the shares of the outstanding capital stock of AMB entitled to vote thereon, the board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate the REIT election of AMB pursuant to Section 856(g) of the Code.
|
|
The ProLogis board of trustees is required to seek to authorize ProLogis to pay such dividends and distributions as shall be necessary for ProLogis to qualify as a REIT under the Code (so long as such qualification, in the opinion of the ProLogis board of trustees, is in the best interests of ProLogis shareholders).
The ProLogis board of trustees, by a two-thirds vote, may amend provisions of the ProLogis declaration of trust from time to time to enable ProLogis to qualify as a REIT under the Code.
|
144
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
If the Merger is completed on the expected timetable, ProLogis
does not intend to hold a 2011 annual meeting of its
shareholders. If, however the Merger is not completed and the
ProLogis 2011 annual meeting is held, shareholder proposals
intended to be presented at the meeting must have been received
by ProLogis no later than December 3, 2010 in order to be
included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to
that meeting. In order to be included in the proxy statement,
such proposals must comply with the requirements as to form and
substance established by the SEC for such proposals. A
shareholder who wishes to make a proposal at the ProLogis annual
meeting without submitting the proposal in the proxy statement
and form of proxy relating to that meeting must comply with the
notice and other requirements set forth in the bylaws of
ProLogis. Pursuant to the current bylaws of ProLogis, that
notice must have been submitted in writing and delivered to the
secretary of ProLogis between January 14, 2011 and
February 13, 2011.
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at the 2011
annual meeting of AMB stockholders must have been received by
AMB no later than November 25, 2010 in order to be included
in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that
meeting. In order to be included in the proxy statement, such
proposals must comply with the requirements as to form and
substance established by the SEC for such proposals. A
stockholder who wishes to make a proposal at the AMB annual
meeting without submitting the proposal in the proxy statement
and form of proxy relating to that meeting must comply with the
notice and other requirements set forth in the AMB bylaws.
Pursuant to the current AMB bylaws, that notice must have been
submitted in writing and delivered to the secretary of AMB
between January 6, 2011 and February 5, 2011.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of AMB common stock and preferred
stock offered by this joint proxy statement/prospectus will be
passed on by Ballard Spahr LLP. Certain U.S. federal
income tax consequences relating to the Merger will be passed
upon for AMB by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and
Latham & Watkins LLP and for ProLogis by Mayer Brown
LLP.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of AMB Property Corporation and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting (which is included in
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting) incorporated into this prospectus by
reference to AMB Property Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been so
incorporated in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of ProLogis
as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the years
in the three-year period ending December 31, 2010, and
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
have been incorporated by reference herein and in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, in reliance upon the reports of KPMG
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, incorporated
by reference herein, and upon the authority of said firm as
experts in accounting and auditing.
OTHER
MATTERS
As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, neither
the AMB board of directors nor the ProLogis board of trustees
knows of any matters that will be presented for consideration at
either the AMB special meeting or the ProLogis special meeting
other than as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. In accordance with the AMB bylaws, the
bylaws of ProLogis and Maryland law, business transacted at the
AMB special meeting and the ProLogis special meeting will be
limited to those matters set forth in the respective
accompanying notices of the special meetings. Nonetheless, if
any other matter is properly presented at the AMB special
meeting or the ProLogis special meeting, or any adjournments or
postponements of the meeting, and are voted upon, including
matters incident to the conduct of the meeting, the enclosed
proxy card will confer discretionary authority on the
individuals named therein as proxies to vote the shares
represented thereby as to any such other matters. It is intended
that the persons named in the enclosed proxy card and acting
thereunder will vote in accordance with their discretion on any
such matter.
145
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
AMB and ProLogis file annual, quarterly and special reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC under the
Exchange Act. You may read and copy any of this information at
the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call
the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC
also maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy
and information statements, and other information regarding
issuers, including AMB and ProLogis, who file electronically
with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.
Investors may also consult the website of AMB or ProLogis for
more information concerning the Merger. The website of AMB is
www.AMB.com. The website of ProLogis is www.ProLogis.com.
Information included on these websites is not incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
AMB has filed with the SEC a registration statement of which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. The
registration statement registers the shares of AMB common stock
and preferred stock to be issued to ProLogis shareholders in
connection with the Merger. The registration statement,
including the attached exhibits and schedules, contains
additional relevant information about AMB common stock and
preferred stock. The rules and regulations of the SEC allow AMB
and ProLogis to omit certain information included in the
registration statement from this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
In addition, the SEC allows AMB and ProLogis to disclose
important information to you by referring you to other documents
filed separately with the SEC. This information is considered to
be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, except for
any information that is superseded by information included
directly in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference
the documents listed below that AMB has previously filed with
the SEC (File
No. 001-13545);
provided, however, that we are not incorporating
by reference, in each case, any documents, portions of documents
or information deemed to have been furnished and not filed in
accordance with SEC rules. They may contain important
information about AMB, its financial condition or other matters:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as amended by the
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
filed on March 10, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 23, 2011
and additional proxy materials filed April 26, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
filed on April 20, 2011 (two reports), February 3,
2011, February 1, 2011 and January 31, 2011 (other
than documents or portions of those documents not deemed to be
filed).
|
In addition, AMB incorporates by reference herein any future
filings it makes with the SEC under Section 11, 13(a),
13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and prior to the date of the
AMB special meeting. Such documents are considered to be a part
of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, effective as of the
date such documents are filed. In the event of conflicting
information in these documents, the information in the latest
filed document should be considered correct.
You can obtain any of the documents listed above from the SEC,
through the website of the SEC at the address described above or
from AMB by requesting them in writing or by telephone at the
following address:
AMB Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(415) 394-9000
These documents are available from AMB without charge, excluding
any exhibits to them unless the exhibit is specifically listed
as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part.
146
This joint proxy statement/prospectus also incorporates by
reference the documents listed below that ProLogis has
previously filed with the SEC (File
No. 001-12846);
provided, however, that we are not incorporating by reference,
in each case, any documents, portion of documents or information
deemed to have been furnished and not filed in accordance with
SEC rules. They contain important information about ProLogis,
its financial condition or other matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, as amended by the
Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
filed on March 28, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed March 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
filed April 26, 2011, March 3, 2011, February 4,
2011, February 1, 2011 and January 31, 2011
(other than documents or portions of those documents not deemed
to be filed).
|
In addition, ProLogis incorporates by reference herein any
future filings it makes with the SEC under Section 11,
13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and prior to the date of
the ProLogis special meeting. Such documents are considered to
be a part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, effective as
of the date such documents are filed. In the event of
conflicting information in these documents, the information in
the latest filed document should be considered correct.
You can obtain any of these documents from the SEC, through the
website of the SEC at the address described above, or ProLogis
will provide you with copies of these documents, without charge,
upon written or oral request to:
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, Colorado 80239
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone:
(800) 820-0181
If you are a stockholder of AMB or a shareholder of ProLogis and
would like to request documents, please do so by May 25,
2011 to receive them before the AMB special meeting and the
ProLogis special meeting. If you request any documents from AMB
or ProLogis, AMB or ProLogis will mail them to you by first
class mail, or by another equally prompt means, within one
business day after AMB or ProLogis receives your request.
This document is a prospectus of AMB and is a joint proxy
statement of AMB and ProLogis for the AMB special meeting and
the ProLogis special meeting. Neither AMB nor ProLogis has
authorized anyone to give any information or make any
representation about the Merger or AMB or ProLogis that is
different from, or in addition to, that contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus or in any of the materials that AMB
or ProLogis has incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Therefore, if anyone does give you
information of this sort, you should not rely on it. The
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
reads only as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus unless the information specifically
indicates that another date applies.
147
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Introduction
On January 30, 2011, AMB Property Corporation
(AMB) and ProLogis entered into a definitive
agreement (the Merger Agreement) to combine through
a merger of equals (the Merger). The terms of the
Merger are contained in the Merger Agreement that is described
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is attached as
Annex A. We encourage you to read the Merger Agreement
carefully.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, ProLogis shareholders
will receive 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB common stock
for each ProLogis common share that they own. This exchange
ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price
changes prior to closing. Changes in the price of AMB common
stock prior to the Merger will affect the market value of the
merger consideration that ProLogis shareholders will receive on
the closing date of the Merger. On January 30, 2011, the
date the Merger Agreement was signed, ProLogis had approximately
570,083,000 common shares outstanding. Subject to shareholder
approvals and the other closing conditions described in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, the Merger is expected to be
consummated in the second quarter of 2011.
Based on current information, it is expected that former
ProLogis shareholders will own approximately 60% and current AMB
stockholders will own approximately 40% of the common stock of
the combined company outstanding after consummation of the
Merger. After consideration of all applicable factors pursuant
to the business combination accounting rules, the Merger results
in a reverse acquisition in which AMB is considered the
legal acquirer because AMB is issuing its common
stock to ProLogis shareholders and ProLogis is the
accounting acquirer due to various factors including
that ProLogis shareholders will hold the largest portion of the
voting rights in the merged entity and ProLogis appointees will
represent a majority of the board of directors of the combined
entity.
Pro forma
information
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements combine the historical consolidated
financial statements of ProLogis and AMB as if the Merger had
previously occurred on the dates specified below. The
accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been prepared as if the
Merger had occurred as of that date. The accompanying unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2010 has been prepared as if the
Merger had occurred as of January 1, 2010.
Pro forma adjustments, and the assumptions on which they are
based, are described in the accompanying Notes to Unaudited Pro
Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are
referred to in this section as the Notes.
The pro forma adjustments and the purchase price allocation as
presented are based on estimates and certain information that is
currently available. The total merger consideration and the
assignment of fair values to AMBs assets and liabilities
has not been finalized, is subject to change and could vary
materially from the actual amounts at the time the Merger is
completed. The purchase price allocation will not be finalized
until after the Merger is consummated.
The pro forma information has been prepared in accordance with
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). All significant adjustments
necessary to reflect the effects of the Merger that can be
factually supported within the SEC regulations covering the
preparation of pro forma financial statements have been made.
The pro forma information is presented for illustrative purposes
only and is not necessarily indicative of the combined operating
results or financial position that would have occurred if such
transactions had been consummated on the dates and in accordance
with the assumptions described herein, nor is it necessarily
indicative of future operating results or financial position.
You are urged to read the pro forma information below together
with ProLogis and AMBs publicly available historical
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, which
are incorporated by reference elsewhere herein.
F-2
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Merger
Consideration
The pro forma financial information reflects estimated aggregate
consideration of approximately $6.2 billion for the Merger,
as calculated below due to ProLogis being the accounting
acquirer (in millions, except price per share):
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis shares and limited partnership units outstanding at
December 31, 2010 (assumed to be 60% of total shares of the
combined company)
|
|
|
570.8
|
|
Total shares of the combined company (for accounting purposes)
|
|
|
951.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of AMB shares to be issued (assumed to be 40% of total
shares of the combined company)
|
|
|
380.6
|
|
Multiplied by price of ProLogis common shares on April 25,
2011*
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated aggregate consideration*
|
|
$
|
6,195.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As ProLogis is the accounting acquirer, the calculation of the
purchase price for accounting purposes is based on ProLogis
shares. However, under the terms of the Merger Agreement,
ProLogis shareholders will receive 0.4464 of a newly issued
share of AMB common stock for each ProLogis common share that
they own. This will result in approximately 424.2 million common
shares of the combined company outstanding at the time of the
Merger. |
The estimated aggregate consideration has been determined based
on the closing price of ProLogis common shares on
April 25, 2011, the latest practicable date prior to the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, of $16.28. An
increase or decrease in share price of $1.00 results in an
increase or decrease to the total merger consideration of
$381 million. Pursuant to business combination accounting
rules, the final aggregate consideration will be based on the
price of ProLogis common shares as of the closing date
and, therefore, will be different from the amount shown above.
The above estimated aggregate consideration does not include an
estimate for the fair value of the precombination portion of
AMBs share-based compensation awards, as this amount is
not expected to be material to the total aggregate
consideration. In addition, we have not included an adjustment
to the pro forma statement of operations to reflect the change
in compensation expense as a result of the estimated fair value
of AMBs share-based compensation awards attributable to
the postcombination period as the impact is not expected to be
material.
Transaction
Costs
For purposes of the pro forma information, adjustments for
estimated transaction and integration costs for the Merger have
been excluded. These aggregate estimated transaction and
integration costs are expected to be approximately
$160 million to $180 million and include estimated
costs associated with investment banker advisory fees, legal and
accounting fees, termination and severance costs of both
companies, system conversion and other integration costs. These
costs will impact the results of operations and will be
recognized when incurred. Certain costs will be recognized
pre-merger by both ProLogis and AMB and the remainder will be
recognized by the combined company after the Merger.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein do not give effect to any potential cost
reductions or other operating efficiencies that we expect to
result from the Merger.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical,
|
|
|
ProLogis, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments in real estate properties
|
|
$
|
12,879,641
|
|
|
$
|
6,906,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,026,990
|
(B)
|
|
$
|
7,933,166
|
|
|
$
|
20,812,807
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
1,595,678
|
|
|
|
1,268,093
|
|
|
|
(1,268,093
|
)(C)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1,595,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment in properties
|
|
|
11,283,963
|
|
|
|
5,638,083
|
|
|
|
2,295,083
|
|
|
|
7,933,166
|
|
|
|
19,217,129
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
|
|
|
2,024,661
|
|
|
|
907,027
|
|
|
|
452,779
|
(D)
|
|
|
1,359,806
|
|
|
|
3,384,467
|
|
Notes receivable backed by real estate
|
|
|
302,144
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
302,144
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
574,791
|
|
|
|
242,098
|
|
|
|
21,792
|
(E)
|
|
|
263,890
|
|
|
|
838,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate
|
|
|
14,185,559
|
|
|
|
6,787,208
|
|
|
|
2,769,654
|
|
|
|
9,556,862
|
|
|
|
23,742,421
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
37,634
|
|
|
|
198,424
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
198,424
|
|
|
|
236,058
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
27,081
|
|
|
|
29,991
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
29,991
|
|
|
|
57,072
|
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
619,633
|
|
|
|
314,963
|
|
|
|
170,718
|
(F)
|
|
|
485,681
|
|
|
|
1,105,314
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
32,760
|
|
|
|
42,309
|
|
|
|
364,887
|
(G)
|
|
|
407,196
|
|
|
|
439,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,902,667
|
|
|
$
|
7,372,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,305,259
|
|
|
$
|
10,678,154
|
|
|
$
|
25,580,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
6,506,029
|
|
|
$
|
3,331,299
|
|
|
$
|
68,681
|
(H)
|
|
$
|
3,399,980
|
|
|
$
|
9,906,009
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
856,534
|
|
|
|
339,474
|
|
|
|
152,864
|
(I)
|
|
|
492,338
|
|
|
|
1,348,872
|
|
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
|
|
|
19,749
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
19,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,382,312
|
|
|
|
3,670,773
|
|
|
|
221,545
|
|
|
|
3,892,318
|
|
|
|
11,274,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
223,412
|
|
|
|
5,612
|
(J)
|
|
|
229,024
|
|
|
|
579,024
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
(3,149
|
)(K)
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
9,668,404
|
|
|
|
3,071,134
|
|
|
|
2,822,431
|
(K)
|
|
|
5,893,565
|
|
|
|
15,561,969
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
|
|
42,188
|
|
|
|
(42,188
|
)(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,160
|
)
|
Distributions in excess of net earnings
|
|
|
(2,515,722
|
)
|
|
|
(17,695
|
)
|
|
|
17,695
|
(K)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,515,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
7,505,223
|
|
|
|
3,320,723
|
|
|
|
2,800,401
|
|
|
|
6,121,124
|
(1)
|
|
|
13,626,347
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
15,132
|
|
|
|
325,590
|
|
|
|
264,776
|
(L)
|
|
|
590,366
|
|
|
|
605,498
|
|
Limited partnership unitholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,809
|
|
|
|
18,537
|
(L)
|
|
|
74,346
|
(1)
|
|
|
74,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
7,520,355
|
|
|
|
3,702,122
|
|
|
|
3,083,714
|
|
|
|
6,785,836
|
|
|
|
14,306,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
14,902,667
|
|
|
$
|
7,372,895
|
|
|
$
|
3,305,259
|
|
|
$
|
10,678,154
|
|
|
$
|
25,580,821
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Historical,
|
|
|
ProLogis, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical(A)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental income
|
|
$
|
771,308
|
|
|
$
|
602,640
|
|
|
$
|
1,832
|
(M)
|
|
$
|
604,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,375,780
|
|
Property management and other fees and incentives
|
|
|
120,326
|
|
|
|
30,860
|
|
|
|
(8,455
|
)(N)
|
|
|
22,405
|
|
|
|
142,731
|
|
Development management and other income
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
17,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
909,155
|
|
|
|
633,500
|
|
|
|
(6,623
|
)
|
|
|
626,877
|
|
|
|
1,536,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
|
223,924
|
|
|
|
188,710
|
|
|
|
−
|
(O)
|
|
|
188,710
|
|
|
|
412,634
|
|
Investment management expenses
|
|
|
40,659
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
−
|
(O)
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
52,733
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
165,981
|
|
|
|
114,390
|
|
|
|
−
|
(O)
|
|
|
114,390
|
|
|
|
280,371
|
|
Impairment of real estate properties
|
|
|
736,612
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
736,612
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
319,602
|
|
|
|
196,636
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
(P)
|
|
|
204,327
|
|
|
|
523,929
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
|
|
4,874
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
16,355
|
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
3,197
|
|
|
|
19,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,503,133
|
|
|
|
519,881
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
|
|
527,572
|
|
|
|
2,030,705
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(593,978
|
)
|
|
|
113,619
|
|
|
|
(14,314
|
)
|
|
|
99,305
|
|
|
|
(494,673
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from unconsolidated investees, net
|
|
|
23,678
|
|
|
|
17,372
|
|
|
|
(13,470
|
)(Q)
|
|
|
3,902
|
|
|
|
27,580
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
6,412
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(461,166
|
)
|
|
|
(130,338
|
)
|
|
|
25,002
|
(R)
|
|
|
(105,336
|
)
|
|
|
(566,502
|
)
|
Impairment of goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
(412,745
|
)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(412,745
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
10,825
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(1,891
|
)
|
|
|
8,934
|
|
Net gains on dispositions of investments in real estate
|
|
|
28,488
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
35,227
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses), net
|
|
|
(11,081
|
)
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
(7,037
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net
|
|
|
(201,486
|
)
|
|
|
(2,892
|
)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(2,892
|
)
|
|
|
(204,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(1,018,465
|
)
|
|
|
(105,576
|
)
|
|
|
11,532
|
|
|
|
(94,044
|
)
|
|
|
(1,112,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,612,443
|
)
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
|
(2,782
|
)
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
|
(1,607,182
|
)
|
Current income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
21,724
|
|
|
|
(2,928
|
)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(2,928
|
)
|
|
|
18,796
|
|
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(52,223
|
)
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
(50,604
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes
|
|
|
(30,499
|
)
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
(31,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,581,944
|
)
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
(2,782
|
)(O)
|
|
|
6,570
|
|
|
|
(1,575,374
|
)
|
Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(6,078
|
)
|
|
|
1,808
|
(S)
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(4,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations attributable to
controlling interests
|
|
|
(1,581,987
|
)
|
|
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
(974
|
)
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
(1,579,687
|
)
|
Less preferred share dividends and allocation to participating
securities
|
|
|
25,424
|
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
|
|
−
|
|
|
|
16,269
|
|
|
|
41,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common
shares
|
|
$
|
(1,607,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
(974
|
)(O)
|
|
$
|
(13,969
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,621,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic(T)
|
|
|
491,744
|
|
|
|
161,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,808
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Diluted(T)
|
|
|
491,744
|
|
|
|
161,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
416,808
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations per share attributable to
common shares
Basic(T)
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
Net loss from continuing operations per share attributable to
common shares
Diluted(T)
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
F-5
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Basis of Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation |
The following preliminary allocation of the AMB purchase price
is based on the preliminary estimate of the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of AMB as of
December 31, 2010. The final determination of the
allocation of the purchase price will be based on the fair value
of such assets and liabilities as of the actual consummation
date of the Merger and will be completed after the Merger is
consummated. Such final determination of the purchase price may
be significantly different from the preliminary estimates used
in the pro forma financial statements.
The estimated purchase price of AMB of $6.2 billion (as
calculated in the manner described above) is allocated to the
assets and liabilities to be assumed based on the following
preliminary basis as of December 31, 2010 (dollar amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in properties
|
|
$
|
7,933,166
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated investees
|
|
|
1,359,806
|
|
Assets held for sale
|
|
|
263,890
|
|
Cash, accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
714,096
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
407,196
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
(3,399,980
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(492,338
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(590,366
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated purchase price
|
|
$
|
6,195,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pro Forma Adjustments determined using foreign
currency exchange rates at December 31, 2010, if applicable. |
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
The AMB Historical amounts include the reclassification of
certain AMB balances to conform to the ProLogis presentation as
described below:
|
Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from affiliate were classified as a component of
Accounts Receivable and Other Assets. This balance has
been reclassified to Investments In and Advances to
Unconsolidated Investees to conform to ProLogis
presentation.
|
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
AMB includes only expenses directly related to unconsolidated
investees in Investment Management Expenses. ProLogis
includes the direct expenses associated with the asset
management of the property funds provided by individuals who are
assigned to our investment management segment. ProLogis also
allocates the costs of the property management function to the
properties owned by ProLogis (reported in Rental
Expenses) and the properties included in the Investment
Management Segment (included in Investment Management
Expenses), by using the square feet owned at the beginning
of each quarter by the respective portfolios. AMBs
allocated Investment Management Expenses have been
reclassified to conform to ProLogis presentation.
|
|
|
|
AMB includes Interest Income and Foreign Currency
Exchange Gains (Losses) in Other Income (Expense).
ProLogis presents these balances as separate line items within
the same section of the income statement. AMBs interest
income and foreign currency exchange gains have been
reclassified to conform to ProLogis presentation.
|
|
|
|
AMB includes Current Income Tax Expense and Deferred
Income Tax Expense as a component of General and
Administrative Expenses. ProLogis presents both current and
deferred income tax expense as separate line items following
Earnings (Loss) Before Income Taxes. AMBs current
and deferred income tax balances have been reclassified to
conform to ProLogis presentation.
|
F-6
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Balance
Sheet Adjustments
|
|
|
|
(B)
|
AMBs real estate assets have been adjusted to their
estimated fair value as of December 31, 2010. We estimated
the fair value generally by applying a capitalization rate to
estimated net operating income of a property, recent third party
appraisals or other available market data. We determined the
capitalization rates that were appropriate by market based on
recent appraisals, transactions or other market data. The fair
value also includes a portfolio premium that we estimate a third
party would be willing to pay for the entire portfolio.
|
|
|
(C)
|
AMBs historical accumulated depreciation balance is
eliminated.
|
|
|
(D)
|
AMBs investments in joint ventures have been adjusted to
their estimated fair value as of December 31, 2010. The
fair values for the investments were calculated using similar
valuation methods as those used for consolidated real estate
assets and debt.
|
|
|
(E)
|
As of December 31, 2010, AMB had ten properties held for
sale and eight properties held for contribution to
unconsolidated investees that were classified as held for sale
and carried at the lesser of cost or fair value less costs to
sell. Adjustments to AMBs historical balances associated
with these properties reflect the real estate assets at their
estimated fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
|
(F)
|
Adjustments to AMBs historical balance of accounts
receivable and other assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of deferred financing costs, net
|
|
$
|
(38,079
|
)
|
Elimination of straight-line rent receivable
|
|
|
(81,661
|
)
|
Adjustment to reflect certain corporate and other assets at fair
value
|
|
|
(46,495
|
)
|
Recognition of value of acquired in place leases and leases that
have above market rents
|
|
|
215,215
|
|
Recognition of value of existing management agreements
|
|
|
121,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
170,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of in place leases was calculated based upon our
best estimate of the costs to obtain tenants, primarily leasing
commissions, in each of the applicable markets. An asset or
liability (see note I) was recognized for acquired leases
with favorable or unfavorable rents based on our best estimate
of current market rents in each of the applicable markets. The
recognition of value of existing management agreements was
calculated by discounting future expected cash flows under these
agreements.
|
|
|
|
(G)
|
Reflects estimated goodwill from the purchase price allocation
of $407.2 million and the elimination of AMBs
historical goodwill of $42.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
(H)
|
AMBs debt balances have been adjusted to the estimated
fair value as of December 31, 2010. Fair value was
estimated based on contractual future cash flows discounted
using borrowing spreads and market interest rates that would
have been available for the issuance of debt with similar terms
and remaining maturities.
|
F-7
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
|
|
|
|
(I)
|
Adjustments to AMBs historical balance of accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of deferred revenue
|
|
$
|
(4,250
|
)
|
Elimination of the liability associated with acquired in place
leases that have below market lease rates
|
|
|
(7,440
|
)
|
Recognition of a liability associated with acquired in place
leases that have below market lease rates
|
|
|
122,554
|
|
Adjustment to deferred tax liabilities as a result of certain
fair market value adjustments
|
|
|
42,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
152,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(J)
|
Fair value adjustment to AMBs preferred stock based on
quoted market prices as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
(K)
|
Adjustments represent the elimination of historical AMB balances
and the issuance of AMB common stock in the Merger.
|
|
|
|
|
(L)
|
The adjustment for non-controlling interests in consolidated
joint ventures as of December 31, 2010 is based on the
non-controlling interests share in the fair value
adjustments described above. The adjustment for the limited
partnership unitholders represents the allocation of the
purchase price to the limited partners based on the number of
units outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
|
Statement of Operations Adjustments The pro
forma adjustments to the Statement of Operations assume that a
purchase price allocation done as of January 1, 2010 would
have been equivalent to the amounts (in U. S. dollars) assigned
based on the purchase price allocation done as of
December 31, 2010 and reflected in the Pro Forma Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
|
|
|
|
(M)
|
Rental income is adjusted to: (i) remove $15.4 million
of AMBs historical straight-line rent; (ii) recognize
$33.1 million of total minimum lease payments provided
under the acquired leases on a straight-line basis over the
remaining term from January 1, 2010; (iii) remove
$0.9 million of AMBs historical amortization of the
asset or liability created from previous acquisitions of leases
with favorable or unfavorable rents; and (iv) amortization
of the asset or liability from the acquired leases with
favorable or unfavorable rents relative to estimated market
rents, including a reduction of $33.7 million from
amortization of the asset and an increase of $18.7 million
from amortization of the liability, both from January 1,
2010. We amortized the asset or liability from the acquired
leases with favorable or unfavorable rents relative to estimated
market rents using the remaining lease term associated with
these leases, which approximated 5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
(N)
|
We have adjusted management fee income to reflect the
amortization of the intangible asset recognized based on the
estimated fair value of the acquired management contracts. The
fair value of the acquired management contracts was estimated by
discounting the expected future cash flows and the amortization
is calculated based on the estimated remaining term of the
related property fund or joint venture management agreement,
which approximated 14 years.
|
|
|
|
|
(O)
|
We expect that the Merger will create operational and general
and administrative cost savings, including property management
costs, investment management expenses, costs associated with
corporate administration and infrastructure, including
duplicative public company costs. There can be no assurance that
we will be successful in achieving these anticipated cost
savings. As these adjustments cannot be factually supported, we
have not included any estimate of the expected future cost
savings.
|
|
|
|
|
(P)
|
Depreciation and amortization expense is adjusted to:
(i) remove $196.6 million of AMBs historical
depreciation and amortization expense; (ii) recognize real
estate depreciation expense of $188.7 million as a result
of the adjustment of AMB real estate assets to estimated fair
value as of January 1, 2010; (iii) reflect
amortization expense of $14.3 million on intangible assets
recognized related to the estimated
|
F-8
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
value of in-place leases as of January 1, 2010; and
(iv) recognize depreciation expense of $1.3 million on
corporate and other non-real estate assets based on the
estimated fair value as of January 1, 2010. For purposes of
this adjustment, we estimated the depreciable and
non-depreciable components and used an estimated average useful
life of 25 years for industrial properties, five years
for corporate and other assets and the remaining lease term
associated with the in-place leases that approximated five years.
|
|
|
|
(Q)
|
We adjusted AMBs investment in unconsolidated investees to
fair value. As a result, we adjusted the equity in earnings that
AMB recognized from these investees to reflect the impact from
the amortization of these fair value adjustments would have had
on our earnings from these unconsolidated investees.
|
|
|
|
|
(R)
|
As of January 1, 2010, we reflected AMBs debt at fair
value. The adjustment to interest expense includes:
(i) removal of AMBs historical interest expense of
$130.3 million, including amortization of deferred
financing costs; and (ii) recognition of interest expense
of $105.3 million based on the estimated fair value of
acquired debt as of January 1, 2010 and net of adjustment
to capitalized interest. The fair value represented a weighted
average interest rate of 4.25% as of December 31, 2010 (see
note H).
|
|
|
|
|
(S)
|
An adjustment of $1.8 million was made to reflect:
(i) the adjustment to the income allocated to
noncontrolling interests in the joint ventures that AMB
consolidates; and (ii) the adjustment related to the
limited partnership unitholders ownership percentage of 1.2% in
the consolidated results of AMB Property, L.P. The adjustment
was calculated based on AMBs historical ratio of Net
Earnings Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests to
Earnings (Loss) from Continuing Operations multiplied by
the net impact of the purchase accounting adjustments to
continuing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
(T)
|
The calculation of basic and diluted loss from continuing
operations attributable to common shares per share were as
follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
ProLogis, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to common shares
|
|
$
|
(1,607,411
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,621,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding Basic and
Diluted
|
|
|
491,744
|
|
|
|
161,988
|
|
|
|
416,808
|
(*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations per common share
Basic and Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The pro forma weighted average shares outstanding assumes the
issuance of 254,820,000 AMB common shares on
January 1, 2010. The shares were calculated based on the
number of ProLogis common shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2010 and used the exchange ratio of 0.4464 to
calculate the number of shares of AMB common stock issued in the
Merger. Since we have a loss from continuing operations, both
basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were the
same. |
F-9
Annex A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
AMB PROPERTY, L.P.
PROLOGIS
UPPER PUMPKIN LLC
NEW PUMPKIN INC.
and
PUMPKIN LLC
Dated as of January 30, 2011
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE I THE MERGERS
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
1.1.
|
|
|
The Mergers
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.2.
|
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.3.
|
|
|
Charter and Bylaws
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
1.4.
|
|
|
Tax Consequences
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II EFFECT OF THE MERGERS ON THE SHARES OF
BENEFICIAL INTEREST OR CAPITAL STOCK OF THE CONSTITUENT
CORPORATIONS; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
2.1.
|
|
|
Effect on Membership Interests, Shares of Beneficial Interest or
Capital Stock
|
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
2.2.
|
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-5
|
|
|
2.3.
|
|
|
Structure
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
2.4.
|
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
|
2.5.
|
|
|
Adjustments to Prevent Dilution
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
2.6.
|
|
|
Lost Certificates
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
3.1.
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties of AMB
|
|
|
A-8
|
|
|
3.2.
|
|
|
Representations and Warranties of ProLogis
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
4.1.
|
|
|
Covenants of AMB
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
4.2.
|
|
|
Covenants of ProLogis
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.1.
|
|
|
Preparation of Proxy Statement; Stockholders Meetings
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
5.2.
|
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
5.3.
|
|
|
Reasonable Best Efforts
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
5.4.
|
|
|
Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
A-37
|
|
|
5.5.
|
|
|
Stock Exchange Listing
|
|
|
A-39
|
|
|
5.6.
|
|
|
Equity Awards and Employee Matters
|
|
|
A-40
|
|
|
5.7.
|
|
|
Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
5.8.
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
A-43
|
|
|
5.9.
|
|
|
Exculpation; Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
5.10.
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
A-45
|
|
|
5.11.
|
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
5.12.
|
|
|
Additional Agreements
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
5.13.
|
|
|
Tax Matters
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
5.14.
|
|
|
Financing Cooperation
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
6.1.
|
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
6.2.
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of AMB
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
6.3.
|
|
|
Conditions to Obligations of ProLogis
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
A-i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
7.1.
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
A-48
|
|
|
7.2.
|
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
7.3.
|
|
|
Amendment
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
7.4.
|
|
|
Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
8.1.
|
|
|
Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and Agreements
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
8.2.
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
8.3.
|
|
|
Interpretation
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.4.
|
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.5.
|
|
|
Entire Agreement; No Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.6.
|
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.7.
|
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.8.
|
|
|
Assignment
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
8.9.
|
|
|
Submission to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
8.10.
|
|
|
Enforcement
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
8.11.
|
|
|
WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
A-ii
INDEX OF
DEFINED TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Agreement
|
|
|
51
|
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
|
51
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
39
|
|
Agreement
|
|
|
1
|
|
AMB
|
|
|
1
|
|
AMB Base Amount
|
|
|
70
|
|
AMB Benefit Plans
|
|
|
19
|
|
AMB Charter Amendments
|
|
|
4
|
|
AMB Common Stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
AMB D&O Insurance
|
|
|
61
|
|
AMB Employees
|
|
|
20
|
|
AMB Foreign Plan
|
|
|
19
|
|
AMB II Partnership Agreement
|
|
|
75
|
|
AMB II Partnership Unit
|
|
|
75
|
|
AMB Intellectual Property
|
|
|
23
|
|
AMB LP
|
|
|
1
|
|
AMB Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
75
|
|
AMB Material Contracts
|
|
|
18
|
|
AMB Maximum Premium
|
|
|
61
|
|
AMB New Preferred Stock
|
|
|
7
|
|
AMB Partnership Agreement
|
|
|
76
|
|
AMB Partnership Unit
|
|
|
76
|
|
AMB Preferred Stock
|
|
|
12
|
|
AMB Properties
|
|
|
21
|
|
AMB Property
|
|
|
21
|
|
AMB Property II
|
|
|
76
|
|
AMB Required Vote
|
|
|
21
|
|
AMB SEC Documents
|
|
|
14
|
|
AMB Series Q Preferred Stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
AMB Series R Preferred Stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
AMB Series S Preferred Stock
|
|
|
7
|
|
AMB Stock Plans
|
|
|
12
|
|
AMB Stockholders Meeting
|
|
|
48
|
|
AMB Tax Protection Agreement
|
|
|
17
|
|
Articles of Merger
|
|
|
3
|
|
Articles of ProLogis Merger
|
|
|
2
|
|
Articles of Topco Merger
|
|
|
3
|
|
Benefit Plans
|
|
|
76
|
|
Blue Sky Laws
|
|
|
14
|
|
Business Day
|
|
|
76
|
|
CERCLA
|
|
|
77
|
|
Certificate of ProLogis Merger
|
|
|
2
|
|
certificates
|
|
|
8
|
|
Change in AMB Recommendation
|
|
|
52
|
|
A-iii
|
|
|
|
|
Change in ProLogis Recommendation
|
|
|
52
|
|
Closing
|
|
|
4
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
4
|
|
Code
|
|
|
2
|
|
Confidentiality Agreement
|
|
|
49
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
76
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
3
|
|
Controlled Group Liability
|
|
|
76
|
|
DLLCA
|
|
|
2
|
|
Environmental Laws
|
|
|
76
|
|
EPCRA
|
|
|
77
|
|
ERISA
|
|
|
77
|
|
ESPP Participants
|
|
|
57
|
|
ESPP Suspension Date
|
|
|
57
|
|
Exchange Act
|
|
|
14
|
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
|
7
|
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
|
8
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
77
|
|
Form S-4
|
|
|
47
|
|
GAAP
|
|
|
77
|
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
|
14
|
|
Hazardous Materials
|
|
|
77
|
|
HMTA
|
|
|
77
|
|
Indemnified Liabilities
|
|
|
61
|
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
|
61
|
|
IRS
|
|
|
77
|
|
Issuance
|
|
|
3
|
|
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
|
47
|
|
Law
|
|
|
78
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
78
|
|
Maryland REIT Law
|
|
|
2
|
|
Mergers
|
|
|
3
|
|
MGCL
|
|
|
3
|
|
New Plans
|
|
|
58
|
|
New Pumpkin
|
|
|
1
|
|
New Pumpkin Common Stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Pumpkin Preferred Stock
|
|
|
6
|
|
New Pumpkin Series C Preferred Stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Pumpkin Series F Preferred Stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
New Pumpkin Series G Preferred Stock
|
|
|
5
|
|
Notice of Recommendation Change
|
|
|
53
|
|
Permits
|
|
|
23
|
|
Person
|
|
|
78
|
|
ProLogis
|
|
|
1
|
|
A-iv
|
|
|
|
|
ProLogis Base Amount
|
|
|
71
|
|
ProLogis Benefit Plans
|
|
|
32
|
|
ProLogis Board Approval
|
|
|
34
|
|
ProLogis Certificates
|
|
|
7
|
|
ProLogis Common Share
|
|
|
5
|
|
ProLogis D&O Insurance
|
|
|
61
|
|
ProLogis DEU
|
|
|
56
|
|
ProLogis Effective Time
|
|
|
3
|
|
ProLogis Employees
|
|
|
33
|
|
ProLogis ESPP
|
|
|
57
|
|
ProLogis Foreign Plan
|
|
|
32
|
|
ProLogis Intellectual Property
|
|
|
37
|
|
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect
|
|
|
78
|
|
ProLogis Material Contracts
|
|
|
31
|
|
ProLogis Maximum Premium
|
|
|
61
|
|
ProLogis Merger
|
|
|
2
|
|
ProLogis Partnership Unit
|
|
|
79
|
|
ProLogis Partnerships
|
|
|
79
|
|
ProLogis Performance Shares
|
|
|
56
|
|
ProLogis Preferred Shares
|
|
|
25
|
|
ProLogis Properties
|
|
|
35
|
|
ProLogis Property
|
|
|
35
|
|
ProLogis Required Vote
|
|
|
35
|
|
ProLogis RSU
|
|
|
55
|
|
ProLogis SEC Documents
|
|
|
27
|
|
ProLogis Series C Preferred Shares
|
|
|
25
|
|
ProLogis Series F Preferred Shares
|
|
|
25
|
|
ProLogis Series G Preferred Shares
|
|
|
25
|
|
ProLogis Share Option
|
|
|
55
|
|
ProLogis Share Plans
|
|
|
25
|
|
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting
|
|
|
48
|
|
ProLogis Tax Protection Agreement
|
|
|
31
|
|
ProLogis Termination Fee
|
|
|
70
|
|
Pumpkin LLC
|
|
|
1
|
|
Qualifying Income
|
|
|
70
|
|
RCRA
|
|
|
77
|
|
Refinancing Debt
|
|
|
79
|
|
REIT
|
|
|
79
|
|
REIT Dividend
|
|
|
63
|
|
REIT Requirements
|
|
|
70
|
|
Relevant Partnership
|
|
|
80
|
|
Relevant Partnership Units
|
|
|
80
|
|
Representatives
|
|
|
79
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
|
|
14
|
|
SDAT
|
|
|
2
|
|
A-v
|
|
|
|
|
SEC
|
|
|
79
|
|
Securities Act
|
|
|
13
|
|
Significant Subsidiary
|
|
|
79
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
79
|
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
|
54
|
|
Surviving Corporation
|
|
|
3
|
|
Surviving Corporation Employees
|
|
|
58
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
79
|
|
Tax Guidance
|
|
|
70
|
|
Tax Protection Agreement
|
|
|
80
|
|
Tax Return
|
|
|
80
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
79
|
|
to AMBs knowledge
|
|
|
80
|
|
to ProLogiss knowledge
|
|
|
80
|
|
to the knowledge of AMB
|
|
|
80
|
|
to the knowledge of ProLogis
|
|
|
80
|
|
Topco Effective Time
|
|
|
3
|
|
Topco Merger
|
|
|
3
|
|
TSCA
|
|
|
77
|
|
Upper Pumpkin
|
|
|
1
|
|
Violation
|
|
|
13
|
|
Voting Debt
|
|
|
12
|
|
A-vi
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER, dated as of January 30,
2011 (this Agreement), is by and among AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation
(AMB), AMB PROPERTY, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (AMB LP), PROLOGIS, a Maryland
real estate investment trust (ProLogis), NEW
PUMPKIN INC., a Maryland corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of ProLogis (New Pumpkin), UPPER
PUMPKIN LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly
owned subsidiary of New Pumpkin (Upper
Pumpkin), and PUMPKIN LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Upper Pumpkin
(Pumpkin LLC).
WHEREAS, it is proposed that: (a) at the ProLogis Effective
Time, ProLogis and Pumpkin LLC shall merge pursuant to the
ProLogis Merger, in which (i) each outstanding ProLogis
Common Share shall be converted into one share of New Pumpkin
Common Stock and (ii) pursuant to a share exchange effected
by the ProLogis Merger, each outstanding ProLogis Series C
Preferred Share, ProLogis Series F Preferred Share and
ProLogis Series G Preferred Share shall be exchanged for
one share of New Pumpkin Series C Preferred Stock, New
Pumpkin Series F Preferred Stock and New Pumpkin
Series G Preferred Stock, respectively; and
(b) effective on the Business Day immediately after the
date of the ProLogis Effective Time, ProLogis, as a domestic
eligible entity with a single owner, shall make a
check-the-box
election pursuant to Treasury
Regulation Section 301.7701-3(c)
to be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, in each case, as more
fully described in this Agreement and on the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, it is further proposed that: (a) at the Topco
Effective Time, New Pumpkin and AMB shall merge pursuant to the
Topco Merger, in which (i) each outstanding share of New
Pumpkin Common Stock shall be converted into the right to
receive 0.4464 of a newly issued share of AMB Common Stock and
(ii) each outstanding share of New Pumpkin Series C
Preferred Stock, New Pumpkin Series F Preferred Stock and
New Pumpkin Series G Preferred Stock shall be converted
into one share of AMB Series Q Preferred Stock, AMB
Series R Preferred Stock and AMB Series S Preferred
Stock, respectively; and (b) immediately after the Topco
Merger, all of the outstanding equity interest in Upper Pumpkin
shall be contributed to AMB LP in exchange for equity interests
in AMB LP pursuant to the Contribution and Issuance, in each
case, as more fully described in this Agreement and on the terms
and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, each of the Board of Directors of AMB and the Board of
Trustees of ProLogis has approved this Agreement and declared
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,
including (in the case of ProLogis) the ProLogis Merger and (in
the case of AMB and ProLogis) the Topco Merger, to be advisable
and in the best interests of AMB and ProLogis, respectively, and
the stockholders of AMB and the shareholders of ProLogis,
respectively, on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in this Agreement;
WHEREAS, AMB, in its capacity as the general partner of AMB LP,
has taken all actions required for the execution of this
Agreement by AMB LP and to approve the consummation by AMB LP of
the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Issuance;
WHEREAS, each of the Board of Directors of New Pumpkin, the sole
member of Upper Pumpkin and the sole member of Pumpkin LLC has
taken all actions required for the execution of this Agreement
by New Pumpkin, Upper Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC, respectively, and
to approve the consummation by New Pumpkin, Upper Pumpkin and
Pumpkin LLC, respectively, of the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the ProLogis Merger, the Topco Merger and the
Contribution, as applicable;
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to make certain
representations, warranties and agreements in connection with
the execution of this Agreement and to prescribe various
conditions to the Mergers; and
WHEREAS, for federal income tax purposes, it is intended that
each of the Mergers shall qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and this Agreement is
intended to be and is adopted as a separate plan of
reorganization for each Merger for purposes of
Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.
A-1
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged,
intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as
follows:
ARTICLE I
THE MERGERS
1.1. The Mergers.
(a) The ProLogis Merger. (i) Upon
the terms and subject to satisfaction or waiver of the
conditions set forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Title 8 of the Corporations
and Associations Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, as
amended (the Maryland REIT Law), and the
Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (the
DLLCA), at the ProLogis Effective Time,
Pumpkin LLC shall be merged with and into ProLogis (the
ProLogis Merger). As a result of the ProLogis
Merger, the separate existence of Pumpkin LLC shall cease, and
ProLogis shall continue as the surviving entity of the ProLogis
Merger as a direct wholly owned Subsidiary of Upper Pumpkin and
as an indirect wholly owned Subsidiary of New Pumpkin. The
ProLogis Merger will have the effects set forth in the Maryland
REIT Law and the DLLCA.
(ii) The parties shall cause the ProLogis Merger to be
consummated by filing as soon as practicable on the Closing Date
(A) articles of merger for the ProLogis Merger (the
Articles of ProLogis Merger) with the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of the State of Maryland
(the SDAT), in such form as required
by, and executed in accordance with the relevant provisions of,
the Maryland REIT Law, and (B) a certificate of merger for
the ProLogis Merger (the Certificate of ProLogis
Merger) with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware, in such form as required by, and executed in
accordance with the relevant provisions of, the DLLCA. The
ProLogis Merger shall become effective following the close of
business on the Closing Date, with such date and time specified
in the Articles of ProLogis Merger, or on such other date and
time as shall be agreed to by AMB and ProLogis and specified in
the Articles of ProLogis Merger (such other date and time not to
exceed 30 days after the Articles of ProLogis Merger are
accepted for record by the SDAT) and the Certificate of ProLogis
Merger (the date and time the ProLogis Merger becomes effective
being the ProLogis Effective Time).
(iii) ProLogis shall elect to be disregarded as an entity
separate from its owner pursuant to Treasury
Regulation Section 301.7701-3.
Such election shall be effective on the Business Day immediately
after the date of the ProLogis Effective Time.
(b) The Topco Merger. (i) Upon the
terms and subject to satisfaction or waiver of the conditions
set forth in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Maryland
General Corporation Law (the MGCL), at the
Topco Effective Time, New Pumpkin shall be merged with and into
AMB (the Topco Merger and, together
with the ProLogis Merger, the Mergers).
As a result of the Topco Merger, the separate existence of New
Pumpkin shall cease, and AMB shall continue as the surviving
corporation of the Topco Merger (the Surviving
Corporation) with its corporate name changed to
ProLogis Inc. The Topco Merger will have the effects
set forth in the MGCL.
(ii) The parties shall cause the Topco Merger to be
consummated by filing as soon as practicable on the Closing Date
articles of merger for the Topco Merger (the Articles
of Topco Merger and, together with the Articles of
ProLogis Merger and the Certificate of ProLogis Merger, the
Articles of Merger) with the SDAT, in
such form as required by, and executed in accordance with the
relevant provisions of, the MGCL. The Topco Merger shall become
effective before the open of business on the first Business Day
following the date of the ProLogis Effective Time, with such
date and time specified in the Articles of Topco Merger, or on
such other date and time as shall be agreed to by AMB and
ProLogis and specified in the Articles of Topco Merger (such
other date and time not to exceed 30 days after the
Articles of Topco Merger are accepted for record by the SDAT)
(the date and time the Topco Merger becomes effective being the
Topco Effective Time).
(c) Contribution and
Issuance. (i) Immediately after the Topco
Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall contribute all
of the outstanding equity interests of Upper Pumpkin to AMB LP
(the Contribution) in exchange for the
issuance by AMB LP of (A) a number of newly issued AMB
Partnership Units equal to the aggregate number of shares of AMB
Common Stock issued in the Topco Merger and (B) a number of
newly issued
A-2
preferred units of AMB LP equal to the aggregate number of, and
with substantially identical rights and preferences as, shares
of AMB New Preferred Stock newly issued pursuant to
Section 2.1(b)(i) ((A) and (B) together, the
Issuance). As a result of the
Contribution, Upper Pumpkin shall become a wholly owned
subsidiary of AMB LP. Following the Contribution, AMB LP shall
change its name to ProLogis, L.P.
(ii) The parties shall cause the Contribution and the
Issuance to be consummated on the Closing Date immediately after
the Topco Effective Time by executing an assignment and
assumption agreement or other instrument of transfer or
conveyance (in each case, in form and substance reasonably
acceptable to the parties hereto) to sell, transfer and convey
to AMB LP all of the outstanding equity interests in Upper
Pumpkin and by issuing to the Surviving Corporation evidence of
ownership of the AMB Partnership Units and preferred units of
AMB LP issued in the Issuance.
1.2. Closing. The closing of the
Mergers, the Contribution and the Issuance (the
Closing) will take place on the date (the
Closing Date) that is the second
Business Day after the satisfaction or waiver (subject to
applicable Law) of the conditions set forth in Article VI
(excluding conditions that, by their terms, are to be satisfied
on the Closing Date, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver
of those conditions as of the Closing), unless another date is
agreed to in writing by the parties hereto. The Closing shall be
held at the offices of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,
51 West 52nd Street, New York, NY 10019, unless
another place is agreed to in writing by the parties hereto.
1.3. Charter and
Bylaws. (a) The charter of AMB as in effect
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time shall be the
charter of the Surviving Corporation, except that the name of
Surviving Corporation shall be ProLogis Inc. and
except for such amendments to the charter of AMB that are
approved by the AMB stockholders pursuant to
Section 1.3(b). The Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation
shall be in the form set forth on Exhibit A. The
Declaration of Trust of ProLogis as in effect immediately prior
to the ProLogis Effective Time shall be the Declaration of Trust
of the surviving entity of the ProLogis Merger. The Bylaws of
ProLogis as in effect immediately prior to the ProLogis
Effective Time shall be the Bylaws of the surviving entity of
the ProLogis Merger.
(b) Unless AMB and ProLogis otherwise agree, AMB shall use
reasonable best efforts to submit to the vote of its
stockholders an amendment to the charter of AMB so that,
following such amendment, (i) the board of directors of
AMB, with the approval of a majority of the entire board and
without action by the AMB stockholders, may amend the charter of
AMB to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares of
stock of AMB or the number of shares of stock of any class or
series that AMB has authority to issue; (ii) the charter of
AMB may be amended by the affirmative vote of the holders of at
least a majority of the shares of AMB Common Stock then
outstanding and entitled to vote thereon; and (iii) if any
AMB stockholder approval is required for any action, such action
shall be effective and valid if declared advisable by the board
of directors of AMB and taken or approved by a vote of a
majority of the shares of AMB Common Stock then outstanding and
entitled to vote thereon (the amendments set forth in clauses
(i), (ii) and (iii), the AMB Charter
Amendments). The parties agree that the approval of,
and implementation of, any or all of the AMB Charter Amendments
shall not be a condition to the parties obligation to
effect the Mergers or the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
1.4. Tax Consequences. It is
intended that each of the Mergers shall qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, and that this Agreement is
intended to be, and is adopted as, a separate plan of
reorganization for each Merger for purposes of
Sections 354 and 361 of the Code.
ARTICLE II
EFFECT OF
THE MERGERS ON THE SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST OR
CAPITAL
STOCK OF THE
CONSTITUENT CORPORATIONS; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
2.1. Effect on Membership Interests, Shares of
Beneficial Interest or Capital Stock.
(a) Membership Interests of Pumpkin LLC and ProLogis
Shares of Beneficial Interest and New Pumpkin Capital
Stock. As of the ProLogis Effective Time, by
virtue of the ProLogis Merger and without any action on the
A-3
part of the holder of any shares of beneficial interest of
ProLogis, shares of capital stock of New Pumpkin or any
membership interests in Pumpkin LLC, the following shall occur:
(i) Membership Interests of Pumpkin
LLC. Each membership interest of Pumpkin LLC
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the ProLogis
Effective Time shall be automatically converted into and become
one fully paid and nonassessable common share of beneficial
interest, par value $0.01 per share, of the surviving entity of
the ProLogis Merger, and such share of beneficial interest of
the surviving entity shall be owned by Upper Pumpkin.
(ii) Conversion of ProLogis Common Shares of Beneficial
Interest. Each common share of beneficial
interest, par value $0.01 per share, of ProLogis
(ProLogis Common Share) issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the ProLogis Effective Time
shall be automatically converted into one newly issued share of
common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Pumpkin
(New Pumpkin Common Stock). As a result of
the ProLogis Merger, all ProLogis Common Shares shall no longer
be outstanding and shall automatically be cancelled and retired
and shall cease to exist, and each certificate previously
evidencing ProLogis Common Shares shall thereafter represent the
shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock into which such ProLogis
Common Shares were converted (and, following the Topco Effective
Time, shares of AMB Common Stock into which such shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock have been converted pursuant to
Section 2.1(b)).
(iii) Exchange of ProLogis Preferred Shares of
Beneficial Interest. Pursuant to a share exchange
effected by the ProLogis Merger, (A) each ProLogis
Series C Preferred Share issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the ProLogis Effective Time shall be automatically
exchanged for one newly issued share of Series C Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New
Pumpkin (New Pumpkin Series C Preferred
Stock), (B) each ProLogis Series F Preferred
Share issued and outstanding immediately prior to the ProLogis
Effective Time shall be automatically exchanged for one newly
issued share of Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Pumpkin (New
Pumpkin Series F Preferred Stock) and
(C) each ProLogis Series G Preferred Share issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the ProLogis Effective Time
shall be automatically exchanged for one newly issued share of
Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of New Pumpkin (New Pumpkin
Series G Preferred Stock and, together with the
New Pumpkin Series C Preferred Stock and the New Pumpkin
Series F Preferred Stock, the New Pumpkin
Preferred Stock). As a result of such share exchange,
all ProLogis Preferred Shares shall no longer be outstanding and
shall automatically be cancelled and retired and shall cease to
exist, and each certificate previously evidencing ProLogis
Preferred Shares shall thereafter represent the shares of New
Pumpkin Preferred Stock for which such ProLogis Preferred Shares
were exchanged (and, following the Topco Effective Time, shares
of AMB Preferred Stock into which such shares of New Pumpkin
Preferred Stock have been converted pursuant to
Section 2.1(b)).
(iv) Conversion of Rights to Redeem or Exchange ProLogis
Partnership Units and Rights to Convert Convertible
Debt. Each right of a limited partner in a
ProLogis Partnership to redeem or exchange its ProLogis
Partnership Units for ProLogis Common Shares (or cash
equivalents thereof) pursuant to the partnership agreement of
the applicable ProLogis Partnership outstanding immediately
prior to the ProLogis Effective Time shall be automatically
converted into the right to redeem or exchange such ProLogis
Partnership Units for a number of shares of New Pumpkin Common
Stock (or cash equivalents thereof) equal to the number of
ProLogis Common Shares that such limited partner would have
received if the redemption or exchange occurred immediately
prior to the ProLogis Effective Time, as such number of shares
may be adjusted and on the terms pursuant to the agreements
governing such ProLogis Partnership Units. Each right of a
holder of ProLogiss convertible debt to convert such
convertible debt into ProLogis Common Shares outstanding
immediately prior to the ProLogis Effective Time shall be
converted into the right to convert such convertible debt into a
number of shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock equal to the number
of ProLogis Common Shares that such holder would have received
if the conversion occurred immediately prior to the ProLogis
Effective Time (as such number of shares may be adjusted and on
the terms pursuant to the agreements governing such convertible
debt), pursuant to the adoption of a supplemental indenture as
contemplated pursuant to Section 5.14.
A-4
(b) New Pumpkin Capital Stock. As of the
Topco Effective Time, by virtue of the Topco Merger and without
any action on the part of any holder of any shares of capital
stock of New Pumpkin or AMB, the following shall occur:
(i) Conversion of New Pumpkin Common Stock and New
Pumpkin Preferred Stock. Subject to
Section 2.2(e), (A) each share of New Pumpkin Common
Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time shall be automatically converted into the right
to receive 0.4464 (the Exchange Ratio)
of a newly issued share of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, of AMB (AMB Common Stock),
(B) each share of New Pumpkin Series C Preferred Stock
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Topco Effective
Time shall be automatically converted into the right to receive
one newly issued share of Series Q Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of AMB (AMB
Series Q Preferred Stock), (C) each share of
New Pumpkin Series F Preferred Stock issued and outstanding
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time shall be
automatically converted into the right to receive one newly
issued share of Series R Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of AMB (AMB
Series R Preferred Stock), and (D) each
share of New Pumpkin Series G Preferred Stock issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time shall
be automatically converted into the right to receive one newly
issued share of Series S Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of AMB (AMB
Series S Preferred Stock and, together with the
AMB Series Q Preferred Stock and the AMB Series R
Preferred Stock, the AMB New Preferred
Stock). As a result of the Topco Merger, all shares of
New Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock shall
no longer be outstanding and shall be automatically cancelled
and retired and shall cease to exist, and each ProLogis
Certificate shall thereafter represent the right to receive the
shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB New Preferred Stock, as
applicable, into which such shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock
and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock were converted. ProLogis
Certificates shall be exchanged for certificates representing
whole shares of AMB Common Stock and shares of AMB New Preferred
Stock, as applicable, issued in consideration therefor upon the
surrender of such certificates in accordance with
Section 2.2, without interest.
(ii) Conversion of Rights to Redeem or Exchange New
Pumpkin Partnership Units and Rights to Convert Convertible
Debt. Each right of a limited partner in a
ProLogis Partnership to redeem or exchange its ProLogis
Partnership Units for shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock (or
cash equivalents thereof) pursuant to Section 2.1(a)(iv)
shall be automatically converted into the right to redeem or
exchange such ProLogis Partnership Units for that number of
shares of AMB Common Stock (or cash equivalents thereof) equal
to the product of the number of shares of New Pumpkin Common
Stock that such limited partner would have received if the
redemption or exchange occurred immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio, as such number
of shares may be adjusted and on the terms pursuant to the
agreements governing such ProLogis Partnership Units. Each right
of a holder of ProLogiss convertible debt to convert such
convertible debt into shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock
pursuant to Section 2.1(a)(iv) shall be converted into the
right to convert such convertible debt into that number of
shares of AMB Common Stock equal to the product of the number of
shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock that such holder would have
received if the conversion occurred immediately prior to the
Topco Effective Time multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (as such
number of shares may be adjusted and on the terms pursuant to
the agreements governing such convertible debt), pursuant to the
adoption of a supplemental indenture as contemplated pursuant to
Section 5.14.
(c) AMB Capital Stock. Each share of AMB
Common Stock and AMB Preferred Stock shall remain outstanding
following the Topco Effective Time as shares of the Surviving
Corporation.
2.2. Exchange of Certificates.
(a) Exchange Agent. As of the Topco
Effective Time, AMB shall deposit, or shall cause to be
deposited, with a bank or trust company designated by AMB and
reasonably acceptable to ProLogis (the Exchange
Agent), for the benefit of the holders of certificates
or evidence of shares in book-entry form which immediately prior
to the Topco Effective Time represented shares of New Pumpkin
Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock (including
certificates formerly evidencing ProLogis Common Shares and
ProLogis Preferred Shares as of immediately prior to the
ProLogis Effective Time, and collectively, the ProLogis
Certificates), for exchange
A-5
in accordance with this Article II, certificates or, at
AMBs option, evidence of shares in book-entry form
(collectively certificates) representing the
shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB New Preferred Stock issuable
pursuant to Section 2.1 in exchange for such shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock. Such
certificates for shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB New
Preferred Stock so deposited, together with any dividends or
distributions with respect thereto, are hereinafter referred to
as the Exchange Fund.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As soon as
reasonably practicable after the Topco Effective Time, the
Exchange Agent shall mail to each holder of record of shares of
New Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time whose shares were
converted into the right to receive shares of AMB Common Stock
and AMB New Preferred Stock pursuant to Section 2.1,
(i) a letter of transmittal (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to the
ProLogis Certificates shall pass, only upon delivery of the
ProLogis Certificates to the Exchange Agent, and which shall be
in such form and have such other provisions as AMB and ProLogis
may reasonably specify) and (ii) instructions for use in
effecting the surrender of the ProLogis Certificates in exchange
for certificates representing shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB
New Preferred Stock. Upon surrender of a ProLogis Certificate
for cancellation to the Exchange Agent together with such letter
of transmittal, duly executed, and such other documents as the
Exchange Agent may reasonably require, the holder of such
ProLogis Certificate shall be entitled to receive in exchange
therefor a certificate representing that number of whole shares
of AMB Common Stock and AMB New Preferred Stock which such
holder has the right to receive in respect of the ProLogis
Certificate surrendered pursuant to the provisions of this
Article II (after taking into account all shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock then held
by such holder), and the ProLogis Certificate so surrendered
shall forthwith be cancelled. In the event of a transfer of
ownership of ProLogis Common Shares or ProLogis Preferred Shares
which is not registered in the transfer records of ProLogis or a
transfer of ownership of New Pumpkin Common Stock or New Pumpkin
Preferred Stock which is not registered in the transfer records
of New Pumpkin, a certificate representing the proper number of
shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB New Preferred Stock, as
applicable, may be issued to a transferee if the ProLogis
Certificate representing the applicable New Pumpkin Common Stock
or New Pumpkin Preferred Stock is presented to the Exchange
Agent, accompanied by all documents reasonably required to
evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence that any
applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 2.2, each
ProLogis Certificate shall be deemed at any time after the Topco
Effective Time to represent only the right to receive AMB Common
Stock or AMB New Preferred Stock into which the shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Stock represented
by such ProLogis Certificate have been converted as provided in
this Article II and the right to receive upon such
surrender cash in lieu of any fractional shares of AMB Common
Stock as provided in this Section 2.2.
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions
declared or made with respect to AMB Common Stock or AMB New
Preferred Stock with a record date after the Topco Effective
Time shall be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered ProLogis
Certificate with respect to the shares of AMB Common Stock or
AMB New Preferred Stock, as the case may be, represented
thereby, and no cash payment in lieu of fractional shares shall
be paid to any such holder pursuant to Section 2.2(e),
until the holder of such ProLogis Certificate shall surrender
such ProLogis Certificate. Subject to the effect of applicable
Laws, following the surrender of any such ProLogis Certificate,
there shall be paid to the holder of the certificates
representing whole shares of AMB Common Stock or AMB New
Preferred Stock issued in exchange therefor, without interest,
(i) at the time of such surrender the amount of any cash
payable with respect to a fractional share of AMB Common Stock
to which such holder is entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(e)
and the amount of dividends or other distributions with a record
date after the Topco Effective Time theretofore paid (but
withheld pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence) with
respect to such whole shares of AMB Common Stock or AMB New
Preferred Stock, as the case may be, and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Topco Effective Time
but prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to
surrender payable with respect to such whole shares of AMB
Common Stock or AMB New Preferred Stock, as the case may be.
(d) No Further Ownership Rights. All
shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred
Stock issued upon conversion of ProLogis Common Shares and
ProLogis Preferred Shares in accordance with the terms hereof,
and all shares of AMB Common Stock and AMB New Preferred Stock
issued upon conversion of
A-6
shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred
Stock (including any cash paid pursuant to Section 2.2(c)
or 2.2(e)) shall be deemed to have been issued in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to such ProLogis Common
Shares and ProLogis Preferred Shares and such shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock and New Pumpkin Preferred Shares,
respectively; subject, however, to the Surviving
Corporations obligation to pay any dividends or make any
other distributions with a record date prior to the ProLogis
Effective Time which may have been declared or made by ProLogis
or New Pumpkin on such ProLogis Common Shares or ProLogis
Preferred Shares or shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock or New
Pumpkin Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement on or prior to the ProLogis Effective Time and which
remain unpaid at the ProLogis Effective Time, and there shall be
no further registration of transfers on the stock transfer books
of the Surviving Corporation of the ProLogis Common Shares and
ProLogis Preferred Shares which were outstanding immediately
prior to the ProLogis Effective Time or of the shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock or New Pumpkin Preferred Stock which were
outstanding immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time. If,
after the Topco Effective Time, ProLogis Certificates are
presented to the Surviving Corporation for any reason, they
shall be cancelled and exchanged as provided in this
Article II.
(e) No Fractional Shares. No certificates
or scrip representing fractional shares of AMB Common Stock
shall be issued upon the surrender for exchange of ProLogis
Certificates representing New Pumpkin Common Stock, and such
fractional share interests will not entitle the owner thereof to
vote or to any rights of a stockholder of the Surviving
Corporation. In lieu thereof, upon surrender of the applicable
ProLogis Certificates, AMB shall pay each holder of New Pumpkin
Common Stock an amount in cash equal to the product obtained by
multiplying (i) the fractional share interest to which such
holder (after taking into account all shares of New Pumpkin
Common Stock held at the Topco Effective Time by such holder)
would otherwise be entitled by (ii) the closing price on
the NYSE, as reported on the consolidated tape at the close of
the NYSE regular session of trading, for a share of AMB Common
Stock on the last trading day immediately preceding the Topco
Effective Time.
(f) Termination of Exchange Fund. Any
portion of the Exchange Fund that remains undistributed to the
stockholders of New Pumpkin for nine months after the Topco
Effective Time shall be delivered to the Surviving Corporation,
upon demand, and any stockholders of New Pumpkin who have not
theretofore complied with this Article II shall thereafter
look only to the Surviving Corporation for payment of their
claim for AMB Common Stock or AMB New Preferred Stock and any
cash in lieu of fractional shares of AMB Common Stock.
(g) No Liability. None of AMB, ProLogis,
New Pumpkin or the Surviving Corporation shall be liable to any
holder of shares of ProLogis Common Shares, ProLogis Preferred
Shares, New Pumpkin Common Stock or New Pumpkin Preferred Stock
for shares of AMB Common Stock or AMB New Preferred Stock (or
dividends or other distributions with respect thereto) or cash
from the Exchange Fund delivered to a public official pursuant
to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar law.
(h) Withholding. AMB shall be entitled to
deduct and withhold from the consideration otherwise payable
pursuant to this Agreement to any holder of shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock or New Pumpkin Preferred Stock such amounts
as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the
making of such payment under the Code and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder, or any provision of state,
local or foreign tax law. To the extent that amounts are so
withheld by AMB, such withheld amounts shall be treated for all
purposes of this Agreement as having been paid to the holder of
the shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock or New Pumpkin Preferred
Stock in respect of which such deduction and withholding was
made by AMB.
2.3. Structure. Each party hereto
shall cooperate with and agree to any reasonable changes
requested by the other parties regarding the structure of the
transactions contemplated herein (including with respect to the
restructuring transactions set forth in Section 2.3 of the
ProLogis Disclosure Letter), which cooperation shall include
entering into appropriate amendments to this Agreement;
provided that any such changes do not have an adverse
effect on either the holders of the AMB Common Stock, AMB
Preferred Stock, ProLogis Common Shares or ProLogis Preferred
Shares, or on the Surviving Corporation being structured as an
UPREIT, including any adverse effect on the expected time by
which the Mergers shall be consummated.
2.4. Further Assurances. If at any
time following the Topco Effective Time the Surviving
Corporation shall consider or be advised that any deeds, bills
of sale, assignments or assurances or any other acts or things
are necessary, desirable or proper (a) to vest, perfect or
confirm, of record or otherwise, in the Surviving Corporation
its
A-7
right, title or interest in, to or under any of the rights,
privileges, powers, franchises, properties or assets of any
party hereto, or (b) otherwise to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement, the Surviving Corporation and its proper
officers and directors or their designees shall be authorized to
execute and deliver, in the name and on behalf of any such
Person, all such deeds, bills of sale, assignments and
assurances and to do, in the name and on behalf of any such
Person, all such other acts and things as may be necessary,
desirable or proper to vest, perfect or confirm the Surviving
Corporations right, title or interest in, to or under any
of the rights, privileges, powers, franchises, properties or
assets of such party and otherwise to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement.
2.5. Adjustments to Prevent
Dilution. If, at any time during the period
between the date of this Agreement and the Topco Effective Time,
there is a change in the number of issued and outstanding
ProLogis Common Shares, shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock or
shares of AMB Common Stock, or securities convertible or
exchangeable into ProLogis Common Shares or shares of New
Pumpkin Common Stock or shares of AMB Common Stock, in each
case, as a result of a reclassification, stock split (including
reverse stock split), stock dividend or stock distribution,
recapitalization, merger, subdivision, issuer tender or exchange
offer or other similar transaction, the Exchange Ratio shall be
equitably adjusted to reflect such change.
2.6. Lost Certificates. If any
ProLogis Certificate shall have been lost, stolen or destroyed,
upon the making of an affidavit of that fact by the Person
claiming such ProLogis Certificate to be lost, stolen or
destroyed and, if requested by AMB, the posting by such Person
of a bond, in such reasonable amount as AMB may direct, as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against it with
respect to such ProLogis Certificate, the Exchange Agent (or, if
subsequent to the termination of the Exchange Fund and subject
to Section 2.2(f), the Surviving Corporation) shall
deliver, in exchange for such lost, stolen or destroyed ProLogis
Certificate, the shares of AMB Common Stock or AMB New Preferred
Stock, as applicable, into which such shares of New Pumpkin
Common Stock or New Pumpkin Preferred Stock were converted
pursuant to Section 2.1(b), any cash in lieu of fractional
shares and any dividends and distributions deliverable in
respect thereof pursuant to this Agreement.
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
3.1. Representations and Warranties of
AMB. Except (x) as set forth in the AMB
Disclosure Letter (it being understood that any matter disclosed
pursuant to any section or subsection of the AMB Disclosure
Letter shall be deemed to be disclosed for all purposes of this
Agreement and the AMB Disclosure Letter, as long as the
relevance of such disclosure is reasonably apparent) or
(y) as disclosed in the AMB SEC Documents filed with the
SEC prior to the date hereof (other than disclosures in the
Risk Factors or Forward Looking
Statements sections of such reports or any other
disclosures in such reports to the extent they are predictive or
forward-looking in nature), as long as the relevance of such
disclosure is reasonably apparent, AMB represents and warrants
to ProLogis as follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and Power. AMB
and each of its Subsidiaries is duly organized, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its
organization, with the corporate, partnership or limited
liability company (as the case may be) power and authority to
own and operate its business as presently conducted. AMB and
each of its Subsidiaries is duly qualified as a foreign
corporation or other entity to do business and is in good
standing in each jurisdiction where the ownership and operation
of its properties or the nature of its activities makes such
qualification necessary, except for such failures to be so
qualified as would not have, or would not reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material
Adverse Effect. AMB has previously made available to ProLogis
true and correct copies of the charter, certificate of
partnership, bylaws, partnership agreement or other
organizational documents, as applicable, of AMB and AMB LP, and
their Significant Subsidiaries, as in effect as of the date
hereof.
(b) Capital Structure. (i) The
authorized capital stock of AMB consists of
500,000,000 shares of AMB Common Stock and
100,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per
share (the AMB Preferred Stock). As of the
close of business on January 26, 2011
(A) 168,764,823 shares of AMB Common Stock were issued
and outstanding, 8,627,029 shares of AMB Common Stock were
reserved for issuance upon the exercise or payment of
outstanding stock or share options, stock or share units or
other equity-based awards under The
A-8
Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
of AMB Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P., and the
Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan of AMB
Property Corporation and AMB Property, L.P., each as amended
(collectively, the AMB Stock Plans) (and no
shares of AMB Common Stock were reserved for issuance upon the
exercise or payment of any such awards other than under the AMB
Stock Plans), and no shares of AMB Common Stock were held by
Subsidiaries of AMB, (B) 9,300,000 shares of AMB
Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding (consisting of
2,000,000 shares of Series L Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, 2,300,000 shares of Series M
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares of
Series O Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and
2,000,000 shares of Series P Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock), and no shares of AMB Preferred Stock were
reserved for issuance, (C) 170,594,142 AMB Partnership
Units were issued and outstanding, of which 2,058,730 AMB
Partnership Units were owned by the Persons and in the amounts
indicated in Section 3.1(b)(i) of the AMB Disclosure Letter
and 168,535,412 AMB Partnership Units were owned by AMB,
and (D) 18,590,763 AMB II (Class A and
B) Partnership Units were issued and outstanding, of which
983,013 AMB II (Class B) Partnership Units were
owned by the Persons and in the amounts indicated in
Section 3.1(b)(i) of the AMB Disclosure Letter and
17,607,750 AMB II (Class A) Partnership Units
were owned by AMB. All outstanding shares of AMB Common Stock
and AMB Preferred Stock and all outstanding AMB Partnership
Units and AMB II Partnership Units have been duly authorized and
validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable and not
subject to preemptive rights.
(ii) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness
having the right to vote on any matters on which stockholders
may vote (Voting Debt) of AMB are issued or
outstanding.
(iii) Except for (A) this Agreement, the AMB
Partnership Agreement and the AMB II Partnership Agreement,
(B) outstanding AMB Partnership Units and AMB II
Partnership Units, and (C) stock or share options, stock or
share units and deferred stock or shares issued and outstanding
under the AMB Stock Plans (which represented, as of
January 26, 2011, the right to acquire up to an aggregate
of 8,627,029 shares of AMB Common Stock), there are no
options, warrants, calls, rights, commitments or agreements of
any character to which AMB or any Subsidiary of AMB is a party
or by which it or any such Subsidiary is bound obligating AMB or
any Subsidiary of AMB to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of capital stock or
any Voting Debt or stock appreciation rights of AMB or of any
Subsidiary of AMB or obligating AMB or any Subsidiary of AMB to
grant, extend or enter into any such option, warrant, call,
right, commitment or agreement. There are no outstanding
contractual obligations of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries
(1) to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares
of capital stock of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries or
(2) pursuant to which AMB or any of its Subsidiaries is or
could be required to register shares of AMB Common Stock or
other securities under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the Securities Act).
(c) Authority. (i) Each of AMB and
AMB LP has all requisite corporate or limited partnership power
and authority to execute, deliver and perform their obligations
under this Agreement, and, subject to the receipt of the AMB
Required Vote, to consummate the transactions contemplated
hereby. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by AMB and
AMB LP and the performance by AMB and AMB LP of their
obligations hereunder and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by the Board of
Directors of AMB (in the case of AMB) and the general partner of
AMB LP (in the case of AMB LP) and all other necessary corporate
or limited partnership action on the part of AMB and AMB LP,
respectively, other than the receipt of the AMB Required Vote,
and no other corporate or limited partnership proceedings on the
part of AMB or AMB LP are necessary to authorize this Agreement
or the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been
duly and validly executed and delivered by AMB and AMB LP and
constitutes a valid and binding obligation of each of AMB and
AMB LP enforceable against AMB and AMB LP in accordance with its
terms, subject to the effects of bankruptcy, insolvency,
fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium and other
similar laws of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights generally and general equitable
principles.
(ii) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by AMB
and AMB LP does not, and the consummation by AMB and AMB LP of
the transactions contemplated hereby will not, (A) subject
to the receipt of the Required AMB Vote, conflict with, or
result in any violation of, or constitute a default (with or
without notice or lapse of time, or both) under, or give rise to
a right of termination, cancellation or acceleration of any
A-9
obligation or the loss of a material benefit under, or the
creation of a lien, pledge, security interest, charge or other
encumbrance on any assets (any such conflict, violation,
default, right of termination, cancellation or acceleration,
loss or creation, a Violation) pursuant to,
any provision of the organizational documents of AMB or any of
its Significant Subsidiaries, or (B) subject to obtaining
or making the consents, approvals, orders, authorizations,
registrations, declarations and filings referred to in paragraph
(iii) below, result in any Violation of any Contract, AMB
Benefit Plan or other Law applicable to AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective properties or assets, which
Violation under this clause (B) only would have, or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
(iii) Except for (A) the applicable requirements, if
any, of state securities or blue sky laws
(Blue Sky Laws), (B) filings, consents
or approvals, if any, required under the Laws of foreign
jurisdictions governing antitrust or merger control matters,
(C) required filings under the U.S. Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act) and the Securities Act, (D) any filings
required under the rules and regulations of the NYSE,
(E) the filing of Articles Supplementary for the AMB
New Preferred Stock with, and the acceptance for record of such
Articles Supplementary by, the SDAT, and (F) the
filing of the Articles of Merger with, and the acceptance for
record of the Articles of Merger by, the SDAT and the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware (as applicable) pursuant to
the MGCL, the Maryland REIT Law and the DLLCA, no consent,
approval, order or authorization of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, any court, administrative agency or
commission or other governmental authority or instrumentality,
domestic or foreign, or industry self-regulatory organization (a
Governmental Entity), is required by or with
respect to AMB or any of its Subsidiaries in connection with the
execution and delivery of this Agreement by AMB and AMB LP or
the consummation by AMB and AMB LP of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby, the failure to make or obtain
which would have, or would reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
(d) SEC Documents; Regulatory
Reports. (i) AMB has timely filed or
furnished to the SEC all reports, schedules, statements and
other documents required to be filed or furnished by it under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act since December 31,
2009 together with all certifications required pursuant to the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act) (such documents, as
supplemented or amended since the time of filing, and together
with all information incorporated by reference therein and
schedules and exhibits thereto, the AMB SEC
Documents). As of their respective dates, the AMB SEC
Documents at the time filed (or, if amended or superseded by a
filing prior to the date of this Agreement, as of the date of
such filing) complied in all material respects with the
applicable requirements of the Securities Act, the Exchange Act
and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the
SEC promulgated thereunder applicable to such AMB SEC Documents,
and none of the AMB SEC Documents when filed contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. The financial statements
of AMB included in the AMB SEC Documents complied as to form, as
of their respective dates of filing with the SEC, in all
material respects with all applicable accounting requirements
and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with
respect thereto (except, in the case of unaudited statements, as
permitted by
Form 10-Q
of the SEC), have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied
on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may
be disclosed therein) and fairly present in all material
respects the consolidated financial position of AMB and its
consolidated Subsidiaries and the consolidated results of
operations, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows
of such companies as of the dates and for the periods shown.
(ii) AMB has established and maintains a system of internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f) of
the Exchange Act) sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting. AMB
(A) has designed and maintains disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and
15d 15(e) of the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable
assurance that all information required to be disclosed by AMB
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and is
accumulated and communicated to AMBs management as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure, and (B) has disclosed, based on its most recent
evaluation of internal
A-10
control over financial reporting, to AMBs outside auditors
and the audit committee of the Board of Directors of AMB
(1) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
AMBs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and (2) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in AMBs internal control over financial
reporting. Since December 31, 2009, any material change in
internal control over financial reporting required to be
disclosed in any AMB SEC Report has been so disclosed.
(iii) Since December 31, 2009, (A) neither AMB
nor any of its Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of AMB, any
Representative of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries has received or
otherwise obtained knowledge of any material complaint,
allegation, assertion or claim, whether written or oral,
regarding the accounting or auditing practices, procedures,
methodologies or methods of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries or
their respective internal accounting controls relating to
periods after December 31, 2009, including any material
complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries has engaged in questionable accounting or auditing
practices (except for any of the foregoing after the date hereof
which have no reasonable basis), and (B) to the knowledge
of AMB, no attorney representing AMB or any of its Subsidiaries,
whether or not employed by AMB or any of its Subsidiaries, has
reported evidence of a material violation of securities Laws,
breach of fiduciary duty or similar violation, relating to
periods after December 31, 2009, by AMB or any of its
officers, directors, employees or agents to the Board of
Directors of AMB or any committee thereof or to any director or
executive officer of AMB.
(e) Information Supplied. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by AMB for inclusion or
incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, and (ii) the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
will, at the date of mailing to stockholders or shareholders and
at the times of the meetings of stockholders or shareholders to
be held in connection with the Mergers, contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading. The Joint Proxy Statement/
Prospectus will comply as to form in all material respects with
the requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations of the SEC thereunder, except that no representation
or warranty is made by AMB with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by ProLogis for inclusion or incorporation by reference in the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
(f) Compliance with Applicable Laws. AMB
and each of its Subsidiaries is in compliance with all Laws
applicable to their operations or with respect to which
compliance is a condition of engaging in the business thereof,
except to the extent that failure to comply would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect. Neither AMB nor any
of its Subsidiaries has received any written notice since
January 1, 2010 asserting a failure, or possible failure,
to comply with any such Law, the subject of which written notice
has not been resolved as required thereby or otherwise to the
reasonable satisfaction of the party sending the notice, except
for (A) matters being contested in good faith and set forth
in Section 3.1(f) of the AMB Disclosure Letter and
(B) such failures as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
(g) Legal Proceedings. There is no suit,
action, investigation or proceeding (whether judicial, arbitral,
administrative or other) pending or, to the knowledge of AMB,
threatened, against or affecting AMB or any of its Subsidiaries
as to which there is a significant possibility of an adverse
outcome which would have, or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse
Effect, nor is there any judgment, decree, injunction, rule or
order of any Governmental Entity or arbitrator outstanding
against AMB or any Subsidiary of AMB which would have, or
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
A-11
(h) Taxes. Except as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect:
(i) AMB and each of its Subsidiaries have (A) duly
filed (or there have been filed on their behalf) with the
appropriate taxing authority all Tax Returns required to be
filed by them (after giving effect to any extensions), and such
Tax Returns are true, correct and complete, (B) duly paid
in full (or there has been paid on their behalf), or made
adequate provision for, all Taxes required to be paid by them,
and (C) withheld and paid all Taxes required to have been
withheld and paid in connection with amounts paid or owing to
any employee, independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or
other party;
(ii) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries has received a
written claim, or to the knowledge of AMB, an unwritten claim,
by any authority in a jurisdiction where any of them does not
file Tax Returns that it is or may be subject to taxation by
that jurisdiction;
(iii) there are no disputes, audits, examinations or
proceedings pending (or threatened in writing), or claims
asserted, for Taxes upon AMB or any of its Subsidiaries and
neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any
litigation or administrative proceeding relating to Taxes;
(iv) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries has requested,
has received or is subject to any written ruling of a taxing
authority or has entered into any written agreement with a
taxing authority with respect to any Taxes;
(v) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries has granted any
extension or waiver of the limitation period for the assessment
or collection of Tax that remains in effect;
(vi) there are no Tax allocation or sharing agreements or
similar arrangements with respect to or involving AMB or any of
its Subsidiaries, and, after the Closing Date, neither AMB nor
any of its Subsidiaries shall be bound by any such Tax
allocation or sharing agreements or similar arrangements or have
any liability thereunder for amounts due in respect of periods
prior to the Closing Date;
(vii) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries (A) has
been a member of an affiliated group filing a consolidated
federal income Tax Return (other than a group the common parent
of which was AMB or a Subsidiary of AMB) or (B) has any
liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than AMB or any of
its Subsidiaries) under Treasury Reg-ulation
Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign law), as a
transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise;
(viii) AMB (A) for all taxable years commencing with
its taxable year ended December 31, 2001 through its
taxable year ended December 31 immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time, has elected and has been subject to federal
taxation as a REIT and has satisfied all requirements to qualify
as a REIT, and has so qualified, for federal Tax purposes for
such years, (B) at all times since such date, has operated
in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for federal Tax
purposes and will continue to operate (in each case, without
regard to the REIT distribution requirements in the year that
includes the Topco Effective Time) through the Topco Effective
Time in such a manner so as to so qualify for the taxable year
that includes the Closing Date, and (C) has not taken or
omitted to take any action that could reasonably be expected to
result in a challenge by the IRS or any other taxing authority
to its status as a REIT, and no such challenge is pending or, to
AMBs Knowledge, threatened. Each Subsidiary of AMB has
been since the later of its acquisition or formation and
continues to be treated for federal and state income Tax
purposes as (A) a partnership (or a disregarded entity) and
not as a corporation or an association or publicly traded
partnership taxable as a corporation, (B) a qualified
REIT subsidiary within the meaning of Section 856(i)
of the Code, (C) a taxable REIT subsidiary
within the meaning of Section 856(l) of the Code, or
(D) a REIT. Section 3.2(h) of the AMB Disclosure
Letter sets forth each asset of AMB and AMB Subsidiary which
would be subject to rules similar to Section 1374 of the
Code. With respect to each such asset, Section 3.2(h) of
the AMB Disclosure Letter sets forth (A) the amount of any
gain that could be subject to Tax pursuant to such rules, based
on the estimate of value of such asset at the relevant date that
a determination thereof is required to be made under such rules
and (B) the date after which such gain will no longer be
subject to Tax pursuant to such rules;
A-12
(ix) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries has
participated in any listed transaction within the
meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(2);
(x) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries (other than
taxable REIT subsidiaries) has or has had any earnings and
profits attributable to such entity or any other corporation in
any non-REIT year within the meaning of Section 857 of the
Code;
(xi) there are no Tax Protection Agreements to which AMB or
any of its Subsidiaries is a party (an AMB Tax
Protection Agreement) currently in force, and no
person has raised, or to the knowledge of AMB threatened to
raise, a material claim against AMB or any of its Subsidiaries
for any breach of any AMB Tax Protection Agreement and none of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will give rise
to any liability or obligation to make any payment under any AMB
Tax Protection Agreement;
(xii) as of the date of this Agreement, AMB is not aware of
any fact or circumstance that could reasonably be expected to
prevent the ProLogis Merger or the Topco Merger from qualifying
as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code; and
(xiii) neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries has
constituted either a distributing corporation or a
controlled corporation (within the meaning of
Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a distribution of
stock qualifying for tax-free treatment under Section 355
of the Code (A) in the two years prior to the date of this
Agreement or (B) in a distribution which could otherwise
constitute part of a plan or series of related
transactions (within the meaning of Section 355(e) of
the Code) in conjunction with the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(i) Material Contracts. As of the date
hereof, neither AMB nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or
bound by any Contract (i) required to be filed as an
exhibit to AMBs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) or (10) of
Regulation S-K
under the Exchange Act, (ii) any partnership, joint
venture, co-investment or similar agreement with any third
parties requiring aggregate payments after the date hereof by
AMB or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to any such partnership,
joint venture, co-investment or similar agreement in excess of
$150,000,000, (iii) any Contract limiting in any material
respect the ability of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries to engage
in any line of business in any geographic area, (iv) any
Contract or executed binding letter of intent involving the
future disposition or acquisition of assets or properties with a
fair market value in excess of $250,000,000, or any merger,
consolidation or similar business combination transaction,
(v) any Contract relating to development, construction,
capital expenditures or purchase of materials, supplies,
equipment or other assets or properties (other than purchase
orders for such items in the ordinary course of business) in
each case requiring aggregate payments by AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries in excess of $100,000,000 during their remaining
term, or (vi) any Contract evidencing a capitalized lease
obligation or other indebtedness to any Person, or any guaranty
thereof, in excess of $100,000,000, other than any Contract in
respect of a ground lease or office leases or obligations
thereunder (all such Contracts to which AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by as of the date of this
Agreement are referred to herein as the AMB Material
Contracts). Except as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect, each of the AMB
Material Contracts is a valid and binding obligation of AMB, or
the Subsidiary of AMB that is a party thereto, and, to
AMBs knowledge, the other parties thereto, enforceable
against AMB and its Subsidiaries and, to AMBs knowledge,
the other parties thereto in accordance with its terms, subject
to the effects of bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance,
reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and general equitable principles. None of AMB or any
of its Subsidiaries is, and to AMBs knowledge no other
party is, in breach, default or violation (and no event has
occurred or not occurred through AMBs or any Subsidiary of
AMBs action or inaction or, to AMBs knowledge,
through the action or inaction of any third party, that with
notice or the lapse of time or both would constitute a breach,
default or violation) of any term, condition or provision of any
AMB Material Contract to which AMB or any Subsidiary of AMB is
now a party, or by which any of them or their respective
properties or assets may be bound, except for such breaches,
defaults or violations as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
A-13
(j) Benefit
Plans. (i) Section 3.1(j)(i) of the AMB
Disclosure Letter lists all material Benefit Plans sponsored,
maintained or contributed by AMB or any of its Subsidiaries (the
AMB Benefit Plans) for the benefit of current
or former directors, officers or employees of AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries or any dependants or beneficiaries thereof.
(iii) AMB has delivered or made available to ProLogis a
true, correct and complete copy of each AMB Benefit Plan and,
with respect thereto, if applicable, (A) all amendments,
trust (or other funding vehicle) agreements, summary plan
descriptions and insurance contracts, (B) the most recent
annual report (Form 5500 series including, where
applicable, all schedules and actuarial and accountants
reports) filed with the Internal Revenue Service and the most
recent actuarial report or other financial statement relating to
such AMB Benefit Plan, and (C) the most recent
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (if
applicable) for such AMB Benefit Plan.
(iv) Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB
Material Adverse Effect, (A) each AMB Benefit Plan,
including any AMB Benefit Plan established or maintained outside
of the United States or for the benefit of current or former
employees of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries residing outside the
United States (each, an AMB Foreign Plan),
has been maintained and administered in compliance with its
terms and with applicable Law, including ERISA and compliance
with Section 409A of the Code to avoid income inclusion
under Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code, (B) each AMB
Benefit Plan intended to be qualified under Section 401(a)
of the Code has received a favorable determination or opinion
letter from the Internal Revenue Service or is entitled to rely
on an advisory or opinion letter issued with respect to an
Internal Revenue Service approved master and prototype or volume
submitter plan, and there are no existing circumstances or any
events that have occurred that could reasonably be expected to
adversely affect the qualified status of any such Benefit Plan,
(C) neither AMB nor its Subsidiaries has engaged in a
transaction that has resulted in, or could result in, the
assessment of a civil penalty upon AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries pursuant to Section 502(i) of ERISA or a tax
imposed pursuant to Section 4975 or 4976 of the Code that
has not been satisfied in full, (D) there does not now
exist, nor do any circumstances exist that would reasonably be
expected to result in, any Controlled Group Liability that would
be a liability of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries, and
(E) there are no pending or, to AMBs knowledge,
threatened claims by or on behalf of any AMB Benefit Plan, by
any employee or beneficiary covered under any AMB Benefit Plan
or otherwise involving any AMB Benefit Plan (other than routine
claims for benefits).
(v) None of AMB, any of its Subsidiaries or any other
entity (whether or not incorporated) that, together with AMB or
a Subsidiary of AMB, would be treated as a single employer under
Section 414 of the Code or Section 4001(b) of ERISA,
maintains, contributes to, or participates in, or has ever
during the past six (6) years maintained, contributed to,
or participated in, or otherwise has any obligation or liability
in connection with: (A) a Benefit Plan subject to
Title IV or Section 302 of ERISA or Section 412
or 4971 of the Code, (B) a multiple employer welfare
arrangement (as defined in Section 3(40) of ERISA), a
multiple employer plan (as defined in
Section 413(c) of the Code) or a multiemployer
plan (as defined in Section 3(37) of ERISA), or
(C) any plan or arrangement which provides retiree medical
or welfare benefits, except as required by applicable Law.
(vi) Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB
Material Adverse Effect: (A) each AMB Foreign Plan required
to be registered with applicable regulatory authorities has been
so registered and has been maintained in good standing,
(B) the fair market value of the assets of each funded AMB
Foreign Plan, the liability of each insurer for any AMB Foreign
Plan funded through insurance or the book reserve established
for any AMB Foreign Plan (as applicable), together with any
accrued contributions in respect of any such AMB Foreign Plan,
is sufficient to procure or provide for the anticipated accrued
benefit obligations, as of the Closing Date, with respect to all
current and former participants in such plan according to the
actuarial assumptions and valuations most recently used to
determine employer contributions to, or the value of liabilities
of, such AMB Foreign Plan and no transaction contemplated by
this Agreement shall cause such assets or insurance obligations
to be less than such benefit obligations, and (C) any and
all amounts required to be accrued with respect to any AMB
Foreign Plan, or pursuant to any statutory requirements
pertaining to employee benefits, mandatory contributions,
retirement
A-14
plans or similar benefits in respect of
non-U.S. employees,
have been properly and timely accrued, including accruals
relating to any severance, termination pay or profit sharing
benefits.
(k) Employment and Labor Matters. (i)
(A) Except in accordance with applicable Law, neither AMB
nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any
material collective bargaining or similar agreement or work
rules or practices with any labor union, works council, labor
organization or employee association applicable to employees of
AMB or any of its Subsidiaries, (B) there are no strikes or
lockouts with respect to any employees of AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries (AMB Employees), (C) to the
knowledge of AMB, there is no union organizing effort pending or
threatened against AMB or any of its Subsidiaries,
(D) there is no unfair labor practice, labor dispute (other
than routine individual grievances) or labor arbitration
proceeding pending or, to the knowledge of AMB, threatened with
respect to AMB Employees, and (E) there is no slowdown or
work stoppage in effect or, to the knowledge of AMB, threatened
with respect to AMB Employees; except, with respect to
clauses (B) and (D) hereof, as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
(ii) Except for such matters as would not have, or would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect, AMB and its
Subsidiaries are, and have been, in compliance with all
applicable Laws respecting (A) employment and employment
practices, (B) terms and conditions of employment and wages
and hours, (C) unfair labor practices, and
(D) occupational safety and health and immigration.
(l) Absence of Certain Changes. Since
December 31, 2009, (i) AMB and its Subsidiaries have
conducted their respective businesses in the ordinary course in
all material respects, (ii) there has not been an AMB
Material Adverse Effect, and (iii) AMB and its Subsidiaries
have not taken any action that, if taken after the date of this
Agreement without the prior written consent of ProLogis, would
constitute a breach of Section 4.1(b)(ii),
Section 4.1(b)(v) (solely to the extent relating to
proposed amendments to charters, bylaws or equivalent governing
documents), Section 4.1(b)(vi) (solely to the extent
relating to acquisitions that would reasonably be expected to
materially delay, impede or affect the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement in the manner
contemplated hereby), Section 4.1(b)(ix), Section 4.1(b)(x)
(solely to the extent relating to AMB or its Significant
Subsidiaries), Section 4.1(b)(xii) or
Section 4.1(b)(xvi), or agreed to do any of the foregoing.
(m) Board Approval. The Board of
Directors of AMB, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote
of those voting at a meeting duly called and held, has
(i) approved this Agreement and declared this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Topco
Merger, to be advisable and in the best interests of AMB and its
stockholders, and (ii) resolved to recommend that the
stockholders of AMB approve the Topco Merger and direct that
such matter be submitted for consideration by AMB stockholders
at the AMB Stockholders Meeting. AMB, in its capacity as the
general partner of AMB LP, has taken all actions required for
the execution of this Agreement by AMB LP and the consummation
by AMB LP of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the
Issuance. No state takeover statute is applicable to this
Agreement, the Topco Merger or the other transactions
contemplated hereby or thereby.
(n) Vote Required. The affirmative vote
of the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of AMB
Common Stock to approve the Topco Merger and the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
AMB Common Stock to approve the amendments to Article VII
and Article VIII of AMBs Bylaws set forth on
Exhibit A (together, the AMB Required
Vote) is the only vote of the holders of any class or
series of AMB capital stock necessary to approve and adopt this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including
the Topco Merger.
(o) Properties. (i) Except as would
not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse
Effect, AMB or a Subsidiary of AMB owns fee simple title to or
has a valid leasehold interest in, each of the real properties
reflected as an asset on the most recent balance sheet of AMB
included in the AMB SEC Documents (each an AMB
Property and collectively the AMB
Properties), in each case free and clear of all Liens
except for (A) debt and other matters set forth in
Section 3.1(o)(i) of the AMB Disclosure Letter,
(B) inchoate mechanics, workmens,
repairmens and other inchoate Liens imposed for
construction work in progress or otherwise incurred in the
ordinary course of
A-15
business, (C) mechanics, workmens and
repairmens Liens (other than inchoate Liens for work in
progress) which have heretofore been bonded or insured,
(D) all matters disclosed on existing title policies or
surveys, (E) real estate Taxes and special assessments not
yet due and payable or which are being contested in good faith
in the ordinary course of business, and (F) Liens and other
encumbrances that would not cause a material adverse effect on
the value or use of the affected property. Except as would not
have, or would not reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect, none of AMB
nor any Subsidiary of AMB has received written notice to the
effect that there are any condemnation proceedings that are
pending or, to the knowledge of AMB, threatened with respect to
any material portion of any of the AMB Properties. Except for
the owners of the properties in which AMB or any Subsidiary of
AMB has a leasehold interest and except for any AMB Property
that is held by a joint venture or fund, no Person other than
AMB or a Subsidiary of AMB has any ownership interest in any of
the AMB Properties.
(ii) Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB
Material Adverse Effect, policies of title insurance or updates
or endorsements have been issued, insuring AMBs or the
applicable Subsidiary of AMBs fee simple title to each of
the AMB Properties owned by AMB and acquired in the past five
years, in amounts at least equal to the purchase price paid for
ownership of such AMB Property or such entity that owned such
AMB Properties at the time of the issuance of each such policy,
and no material claim has been made against any such policy that
has not been resolved.
(iii) AMB and any Subsidiary of AMB (A) have not
received written notice of any structural defects, or violation
of Law, relating to any AMB Property which would have, or would
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect and (B) have not
received written notice of any physical damage to any AMB
Property which would have, or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse
Effect for which there is not insurance in effect covering the
cost of the restoration and the loss of revenue.
(iv) Except for secured loan documents entered into in the
ordinary course of business, there are no written agreements
which restrict AMB or any Subsidiary of AMB from transferring
any of the AMB Properties, and none of the AMB Properties is
subject to any restriction on the sale or other disposition
thereof (other than rights of first offer or rights of first
refusal or tenant options as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect) or on the financing
or release of financing thereon.
(v) AMB and the Subsidiaries of AMB have good and
sufficient title to, or are permitted to use under valid and
existing leases, all personal and non-real properties and assets
reflected in their books and records as being owned by them or
reflected on the most recent balance sheet of AMB included in
the AMB SEC Documents (except as since sold or otherwise
disposed of in the ordinary course of business) or used by them
in the ordinary course of business, free and clear of all Liens,
and except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, an AMB
Material Adverse Effect.
(p) Environmental Matters. Except as
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect:
(i) (A) AMB, each AMB Subsidiary and each of the AMB
Properties is in compliance with all applicable Environmental
Laws; (B) there is no litigation, investigation, request
for information or other proceeding pending or, to the knowledge
of AMB, threatened against AMB or any AMB Subsidiary under any
applicable Environmental Laws; and (C) AMB has not received
any written notice of violation or potential liability under any
applicable Environmental Laws that remains unresolved, or that
any judicial, administrative or compliance order has been issued
against AMB or any AMB Subsidiary which remains unresolved.
(ii) To the knowledge of AMB, neither AMB nor any AMB
Subsidiary has used, generated, stored, treated or handled any
Hazardous Materials on the AMB Properties in a manner that would
reasonably be expected to result in liability under any
Environmental Law, and there are currently no underground
storage tanks, active or abandoned, used for the storage of
Hazardous materials on, in or under any AMB Properties in
violation of applicable Environmental Laws. To the knowledge of
AMB, neither AMB nor
A-16
any AMB Subsidiary has caused a release of Hazardous Materials
on the AMB Properties and, to the knowledge of AMB, no other
Person has caused a release or threatened release of Hazardous
Materials on the AMB Properties.
(iii) To the knowledge of AMB, all Hazardous Material which
has been removed from any AMB Properties was handled,
transported and disposed of at the time of removal in compliance
with applicable Environmental Laws.
(q) Intellectual Property. Except as
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse
Effect, (i) AMB and its Subsidiaries own or have a valid
license to use all trademarks, service marks, trade names and
copyrights (including any registrations or applications for
registration of any of the foregoing) (collectively, the
AMB Intellectual Property) necessary to carry
on their business substantially as currently conducted, and
(ii) neither AMB nor any such Subsidiary has received any
notice of infringement of or conflict with, and to AMBs
knowledge, there are no infringements of or conflicts with, the
rights of others with respect to the use of any AMB Intellectual
Property.
(r) Permits. Except as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect, (i) the permits,
licenses, approvals, variances, exemptions, orders, franchises,
certifications and authorizations from Governmental Entities and
accreditation and certification agencies, bodies or other
organizations, including building permits and certificates of
occupancy (collectively, Permits) held by AMB
and its Subsidiaries are valid and sufficient in all respects
for all business presently conducted by AMB and its Subsidiaries
and for the operation of the properties of AMB and its
Subsidiaries, (ii) all applications required to have been
filed for the renewal of such Permits have been duly filed on a
timely basis with the appropriate Governmental Entities, and all
other filings required to have been made with respect to such
Permits have been duly made on a timely basis with the
appropriate Governmental Entities, and (iii) neither AMB
nor any of its Subsidiaries has received any claim or notice
indicating that AMB or any of its Subsidiaries is currently not
in compliance with the terms of any such Permits, and to
AMBs knowledge no such noncompliance exists.
(s) Insurance. AMB and its Subsidiaries
have obtained and maintained in full force and effect insurance
in such amounts, on such terms and covering such risks as
AMBs management believes is reasonable and customary for
its business. AMB or the applicable Subsidiary of AMB has paid,
or caused to be paid, all premiums due under such policies and
is not in default with respect to any obligations under such
policies in any material respect. All such policies are valid,
outstanding and enforceable and neither AMB nor any of its
Subsidiaries has agreed to modify or cancel any of such
insurance policies nor has AMB or any of its Subsidiaries
received any notice of any actual or threatened modification or
cancellation of such insurance other than in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice or such as is normal
and customary in AMBs industry.
(t) Investment Company Act of
1940. Neither AMB nor any Subsidiary of AMB is,
or on the Closing Date will be, required to be registered as an
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended.
(u) Brokers or Finders. Neither AMB nor
any of its Subsidiaries has employed any broker or finder or
incurred any liability for any brokerage fees, commissions or
finders fees in connection with the Mergers or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except that AMB has
employed J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as its financial
advisor.
(v) Opinion of AMB Financial Advisor. AMB
has received the opinion of its financial advisor,
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC to the effect that, as of the
date of the opinion and subject to the assumptions and
limitations set forth therein, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from
a financial point of view, to AMB.
3.2. Representations and Warranties of
ProLogis. Except (x) as set forth in the
ProLogis Disclosure Letter (it being understood that any matter
disclosed pursuant to any section or subsection of the ProLogis
Disclosure Letter shall be deemed to be disclosed for all
purposes of this Agreement and the ProLogis Disclosure Letter,
as long as the relevance of such disclosure is reasonably
apparent) or (y) as disclosed in the ProLogis SEC Documents
filed with the SEC prior to the date hereof (other than
disclosures in the Risk Factors or Forward
Looking Statements
A-17
sections of such reports or any other disclosures in such
reports to the extent they are predictive or forward-looking in
nature), as long as the relevance of such disclosure is
reasonably apparent, ProLogis represents and warrants to AMB as
follows:
(a) Organization, Standing and
Power. ProLogis and each of its Subsidiaries is
duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the
laws of the jurisdiction of its organization, with the
corporate, partnership or limited liability company (as the case
may be) power and authority to own and operate its business as
presently conducted. ProLogis and each of its Subsidiaries is
duly qualified as a foreign corporation or other entity to do
business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the
ownership and operation of its properties or the nature of its
activities makes such qualification necessary, except for such
failures to be so qualified as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect. ProLogis has
previously made available to AMB true and correct copies of the
declaration of trust, charter, articles of organization,
certificates of formation, bylaws, limited liability company
agreements, or other organizational documents, as applicable, of
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, and Pumpkin LLC, and their
respective Significant Subsidiaries, as in effect as of the date
hereof.
(b) Capital Structure. (i) The
authorized shares of beneficial interest of ProLogis consist of
737,580,000 ProLogis Common Shares, 2,300,000 Series C
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest,
par value $0.01 per share, of ProLogis (the ProLogis
Series C Preferred Shares), 5,060,000
Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of
Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per share, of ProLogis (the
ProLogis Series F Preferred Shares), and
5,060,000 shares of Series G Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest, par value $0.01 per
share, of ProLogis (the ProLogis Series G
Preferred Shares and together with the ProLogis
Series C Preferred Shares and the ProLogis Series F
Preferred Shares, the ProLogis Preferred
Shares). The authorized capital stock of New Pumpkin
consists of 737,580,000 shares of New Pumpkin Common Stock,
2,300,000 shares of New Pumpkin Series C Preferred
Stock, 5,060,000 shares of New Pumpkin Series F
Preferred Stock and 5,060,000 shares of New Pumpkin
Series G Preferred Stock. From the date hereof until
immediately prior to the ProLogis Merger, all of the capital
stock or other equity interests of each of New Pumpkin, Upper
Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC shall be owned, directly or indirectly,
by ProLogis. As of the close of business on January 26,
2011, (A) 570,082,784 ProLogis Common Shares were issued
and outstanding, 7,390,935 ProLogis Common Shares were reserved
for issuance upon the exercise or payment of outstanding share
options, share units, dividend equivalents, performance shares
or other equity-based awards under the ProLogis 2006 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, ProLogis 1997 Long-Term Incentive Plan and
ProLogis 2000 Share Option Plan for Outside Trustees
(collectively, the ProLogis Share Plans) (and
no ProLogis Common Shares were reserved for issuance upon the
exercise or payment of any such awards other than under the
ProLogis Share Plans or the ProLogis ESPP), no Common Shares
were reserved for issuance upon the exercise of options under
the ProLogis ESPP, no ProLogis Common Shares were held by
Subsidiaries of ProLogis, 41,224,363 ProLogis Common Shares were
reserved for issuance upon the conversion of ProLogiss
convertible debt, and 1,739,502 ProLogis Common Shares were
reserved for issuance under ProLogiss 1999 Dividend
Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan, (B) 12,000,000
ProLogis Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding (including
2,000,000 Series C Preferred Shares, 5,000,000
Series F Preferred Shares and 5,000,000 Series G
Preferred Shares), and no ProLogis Preferred Shares were
reserved for issuance, and (C) 759,913 ProLogis Partnership
Units were issued and outstanding, including 447,426 partnership
units of ProLogis Fraser, L.P., and 312,487 partnership units of
ProLogis Limited Partnership I. All outstanding ProLogis Common
Shares and shares of ProLogis Preferred Stock and all
outstanding ProLogis Partnership Units have been duly authorized
and validly issued and are fully paid and non-assessable and not
subject to preemptive rights.
(ii) No Voting Debt of ProLogis is issued or outstanding.
(iii) Except for (A) this Agreement,
(B) outstanding ProLogis Partnership Units and
(C) share options, share units, deferred shares and
dividend equivalents issued and outstanding under the ProLogis
Share Plans and the ProLogis ESPP (which represented, as of
January 26, 2011, the right to acquire up to an aggregate
of 7,390,935 ProLogis Common Shares), there are no options,
warrants, calls, rights, commitments or agreements of any
character to which ProLogis or any Subsidiary of ProLogis is a
party or by which it or any such Subsidiary is bound obligating
ProLogis or any Subsidiary of ProLogis to issue, deliver or
sell, or cause to be
A-18
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of beneficial
interest or capital stock or any Voting Debt or stock
appreciation rights of ProLogis or of any Subsidiary of ProLogis
or obligating ProLogis or any Subsidiary of ProLogis to grant,
extend or enter into any such option, warrant, call, right,
commitment or agreement. There are no outstanding contractual
obligations of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries (1) to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any shares of beneficial
interest or capital stock of ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries, or (2) pursuant to which ProLogis or any of
its Subsidiaries is or could be required to register ProLogis
Common Shares or other securities under the Securities Act.
(c) Authority. (i) Each of ProLogis,
Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC has all requisite
trust, corporate or limited liability company power and
authority to execute, deliver and perform their obligations
under this Agreement, and, subject to the receipt of the
ProLogis Required Vote, to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of this
Agreement by ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin
LLC and the performance by ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin
and Pumpkin LLC of their obligations hereunder and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby have been
duly authorized by the Board of Trustees of ProLogis (in the
case of ProLogis), the Board of Directors of New Pumpkin (in the
case of New Pumpkin), the sole member of Upper Pumpkin (in the
case of Upper Pumpkin) and the sole member of Pumpkin LLC (in
the case of Pumpkin LLC) and all other necessary trust,
corporate or limited liability company action on the part of
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC, other than
the receipt of the ProLogis Required Vote, and no other trust,
corporate or limited liability company proceedings on the part
of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin or Pumpkin LLC are
necessary to authorize this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby. This Agreement has been duly and validly
executed and delivered by ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin
and Pumpkin LLC and constitutes a valid and binding obligation
of each of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC
enforceable against ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and
Pumpkin LLC in accordance with its terms, subject to the effects
of bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance,
reorganization, moratorium and other similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors rights
generally and general equitable principles.
(ii) The execution and delivery of this Agreement by
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC does not,
and the consummation by ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and
Pumpkin LLC of the transactions contemplated hereby will not,
(A) subject to the receipt of the Required ProLogis Vote,
conflict with, or result in any Violation of, any provision of
the organizational documents of ProLogis or any of its
Significant Subsidiaries, or (B) subject to obtaining or
making the consents, approvals, orders, authorizations,
registrations, declarations and filings referred to in paragraph
(iii) below, result in any Violation of any Contract,
ProLogis Benefit Plan or Law applicable to ProLogis, Upper
Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC or any of its Subsidiaries
or their respective properties or assets, which Violation under
this clause (B) only would have, or would reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect.
(iii) Except for (A) the applicable requirements, if
any, of Blue Sky Laws, (B) filings, consents or approvals,
if any, required under the Laws of foreign jurisdictions
governing antitrust or merger control matters, (C) required
filings under the Exchange Act and the Securities Act,
(D) any filings required under the rules and regulations of
the NYSE, (E) the filing of Articles Supplementary for
the New Pumpkin Preferred Stock with, and the acceptance for
record of such Articles Supplementary by, the SDAT, and
(F) the filing of the Articles of Merger with, and the
acceptance for record of the Articles of Merger by, the SDAT and
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (as applicable)
pursuant to the MGCL, the Maryland REIT Law and the DLLCA, no
consent, approval, order or authorization of, or registration,
declaration or filing with, any Governmental Entity, is required
by or with respect to ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries in
connection with the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC or the
consummation by ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin
LLC of the transactions contemplated hereby and there- by, the
failure to make or obtain which would have, or would reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect.
(d) SEC Documents; Regulatory
Reports. (i) ProLogis has timely filed or
furnished to the SEC all reports, schedules, statements and
other documents required to be filed or furnished by it under
the Securities
A-19
Act or the Exchange Act since December 31, 2009 together
with all certifications required pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act (such documents, as supplemented or amended since the time
of filing, and together with all information incorporated by
reference therein and schedules and exhibits thereto, the
ProLogis SEC Documents). As of their
respective dates, the ProLogis SEC Documents at the time filed
(or, if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date of
this Agreement, as of the date of such filing) complied in all
material respects with the applicable requirements of the
Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and
the rules and regulations of the SEC promulgated thereunder
applicable to such ProLogis SEC Documents, and none of the
ProLogis SEC Documents when filed contained any untrue statement
of a material fact or omitted to state a material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. The financial statements of ProLogis
included in the ProLogis SEC Documents complied as to form, as
of their respective dates of filing with the SEC, in all
material respects with all applicable accounting requirements
and with the published rules and regulations of the SEC with
respect thereto (except, in the case of unaudited statements, as
permitted by
Form 10-Q
of the SEC), have been prepared in accordance with GAAP applied
on a consistent basis during the periods involved (except as may
be disclosed therein) and fairly present in all material
respects the consolidated financial position of ProLogis and its
consolidated Subsidiaries and the consolidated results of
operations, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows
of such companies as of the dates and for the periods shown.
(ii) ProLogis has established and maintains a system of
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a 15(f) and 15d 15(f) of
the Exchange Act) sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting. ProLogis
(A) has designed and maintains disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a 15(e) and
15d 15(e) of the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable
assurance that all information required to be disclosed by
ProLogis in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms and is accumulated and communicated to ProLogiss
management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure, and (B) has disclosed, based on its
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to ProLogiss outside auditors and the audit
committee of the Board of Trustees of ProLogis (1) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect ProLogiss
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information and (2) any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in ProLogiss internal control over
financial reporting. Since December 31, 2009, any material
change in internal control over financial reporting required to
be disclosed in any ProLogis SEC Report has been so disclosed.
(iii) Since December 31, 2009, (A) neither
ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries nor, to the knowledge of
ProLogis, any Representative of ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries has received or otherwise obtained knowledge of any
material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim, whether
written or oral, regarding the accounting or auditing practices,
procedures, methodologies or methods of ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries or their respective internal accounting controls
relating to periods after December 31, 2009, including any
material complaint, allegation, assertion or claim that ProLogis
or any of its Subsidiaries has engaged in questionable
accounting or auditing practices (except for any of the
foregoing after the date hereof which have no reasonable basis),
and (B) to the knowledge of ProLogis, no attorney
representing ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, whether or not
employed by ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, has reported
evidence of a material violation of securities Laws, breach of
fiduciary duty or similar violation, relating to periods after
December 31, 2009, by ProLogis or any of its officers,
trustees, employees or agents to the Board of Trustees of
ProLogis or any committee thereof or to any trustee or executive
officer of ProLogis.
(e) Information Supplied. None of the
information supplied or to be supplied by ProLogis for inclusion
or incorporation by reference in (i) the
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading, and (ii) the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
will, at the date of mailing to stockholders or shareholders and
at the times of the meetings of stockholders or shareholders to
be held in connection with the Mergers, contain
A-20
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The
Joint Proxy Statement/ Prospectus will comply as to form in all
material respects with the requirements of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations of the SEC thereunder, except that no
representation or warranty is made by ProLogis with respect to
statements made or incorporated by reference therein based on
information supplied by AMB for inclusion or incorporation by
reference in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
(f) Compliance with Applicable
Laws. ProLogis and each of its Subsidiaries is in
compliance with all Laws applicable to their operations or with
respect to which compliance is a condition of engaging in the
business thereof, except to the extent that failure to comply
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect. Neither ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries has
received any written notice since January 1, 2010 asserting
a failure, or possible failure, to comply with any such Law, the
subject of which written notice has not been resolved as
required thereby or otherwise to the reasonable satisfaction of
the party sending the notice, except for (i) matters being
contested in good faith and set forth in Section 3.2(f) of
the ProLogis Disclosure Letter, and (ii) such failures as
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect.
(g) Legal Proceedings. There is no suit,
action, investigation or proceeding (whether judicial, arbitral,
administrative or other) pending or, to the knowledge of AMB,
threatened, against or affecting ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries as to which there is a significant possibility of
an adverse outcome which would have, or would reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect, nor is there any judgment, decree,
injunction, rule or order of any Governmental Entity or
arbitrator outstanding against ProLogis or any Subsidiary of
ProLogis which would have, or would reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material
Adverse Effect.
(h) Taxes. Except as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect:
(i) ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC and
each of their Subsidiaries have (A) duly filed (or there
have been filed on their behalf) with the appropriate taxing
authority all Tax Returns required to be filed by them (after
giving effect to any extensions), and such Tax Returns are true,
correct and complete, (B) duly paid in full (or there has
been paid on their behalf), or made adequate provision for, all
Taxes required to be paid by them, and (C) withheld and
paid all Taxes required to have been withheld and paid in
connection with amounts paid or owing to any employee,
independent contractor, creditor, stockholder or other party;
(ii) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC or any of their Subsidiaries has received a written claim,
or to the knowledge of ProLogis, an unwritten claim, by any
authority in a jurisdiction where any of them does not file Tax
Returns that it is or may be subject to taxation by that
jurisdiction;
(iii) there are no disputes, audits, examinations or
proceedings pending (or threatened in writing), or claims
asserted, for Taxes upon ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin,
Pumpkin LLC or any of their Subsidiaries and none of ProLogis,
Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or any of their
Subsidiaries is a party to any litigation or administrative
proceeding relating to Taxes;
(iv) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC or any of their Subsidiaries has requested, has received or
is subject to any written ruling of a taxing authority or has
entered into any written agreement with a taxing authority with
respect to any Taxes;
(v) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC or any of their Subsidiaries has granted any extension or
waiver of the limitation period for the assessment or collection
of Tax that remains in effect;
A-21
(vi) there are no Tax allocation or sharing agreements or
similar arrangements with respect to or involving ProLogis,
Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or any of their
Subsidiaries, and, after the Closing Date, none of ProLogis,
Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or any of their
Subsidiaries shall be bound by any such Tax allocation or
sharing agreements or similar arrangements or have any liability
thereunder for amounts due in respect of periods prior to the
Closing Date;
(vii) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC or any of their Subsidiaries (A) has been a member of
an affiliated group filing a consolidated federal income Tax
Return (other than a group the common parent of which was
ProLogis or a Subsidiary of ProLogis) or (B) has any
liability for the Taxes of any Person (other than any of
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or any of
their Subsidiaries) under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6
(or any similar provision of state, local, or foreign law), as a
transferee or successor, by contract, or otherwise;
(viii) ProLogis (A) for all taxable years commencing
with its taxable year ended December 31, 2001 through its
taxable year ended December 31 immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time, has elected and has been subject to federal
taxation as a REIT and has satisfied all requirements to qualify
as a REIT, and has so qualified, for federal Tax purposes for
such years, (B) at all times since such date, has operated
in such a manner so as to qualify as a REIT for federal Tax
purposes and will continue to operate (in each case, without
regard to the REIT distribution requirements in the year that
includes the Topco Effective Time) through the Topco Effective
Time in such a manner so as to so qualify for the taxable year
that includes the Closing Date, and (C) has not taken or
omitted to take any action that could reasonably be expected to
result in a challenge by the IRS or any other taxing authority
to its status as a REIT, and no such challenge is pending or, to
ProLogiss Knowledge, threatened. Each Subsidiary of
ProLogis has been since the later of its acquisition or
formation and continues to be treated for federal and state
income Tax purposes as (A) a partnership (or a disregarded
entity) and not as a corporation or an association or publicly
traded partnership taxable as a corporation, (B) a
qualified REIT subsidiary within the meaning of
Section 856(i) of the Code, (C) a taxable REIT
subsidiary within the meaning of Section 856(l) of
the Code, or (D) a REIT. Section 3.2(h) of the
ProLogis Disclosure Letter sets forth each asset of ProLogis and
ProLogis Subsidiary which would be subject to rules similar to
Section 1374 of the Code. With respect to each such asset,
Section 3.2(h) of the ProLogis Disclosure Letter sets forth
(A) the amount of any gain that could be subject to Tax
pursuant to such rules, based on the estimate of value of such
asset at the relevant date that a determination thereof is
required to be made under such rules and (B) the date after
which such gain will no longer be subject to Tax pursuant to
such rules;
(ix) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin, Pumpkin
LLC or any of their Subsidiaries has participated in any
listed transaction within the meaning of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.6011-4(b)(2);
(x) neither ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries (other
than taxable REIT subsidiaries) has or has had any earnings and
profits attributable to such entity or any other corporation in
any non-REIT year within the meaning of Section 857 of the
Code;
(xi) there are no Tax Protection Agreements to which any of
ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, new Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or any of
their Subsidiaries is a party (a ProLogis Tax
Protection Agreement) currently in force, and no
person has raised, or to the knowledge of ProLogis threatened to
raise, a material claim against ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries for any breach of any ProLogis Tax Protection
Agreement and none of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement will give rise to any liability or obligation to make
any payment under any ProLogis Tax Protection Agreement;
(xii) as of the date of this Agreement, ProLogis is not
aware of any fact or circumstance that could reasonably be
expected to prevent the ProLogis Merger or the Topco Merger from
qualifying as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code; and
(xiii) none of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin,
Pumpkin LLC or any of their Subsidiaries has constituted either
a distributing corporation or a controlled
corporation (within the meaning of
Section 355(a)(1)(A) of the Code) in a distribution of
stock qualifying for tax-free treatment under Section 355
of the Code (A) in the two years prior to the date of this
Agreement or (B) in a distribution
A-22
which could otherwise constitute part of a plan or
series of related transactions (within the meaning
of Section 355(e) of the Code) in conjunction with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(i) Material Contracts. As of the date
hereof, neither ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party
to or bound by any Contract (i) required to be filed as an
exhibit to ProLogiss Annual Report on
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) or (10) of
Regulation S-K
under the Exchange Act, (ii) any partnership, joint
venture, co-investment or similar agreement with any third
parties requiring aggregate payments after the date hereof by
ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries of ProLogis pursuant to any
such partnership, joint venture, co-investment or similar
agreement in excess of $150,000,000, (iii) any Contract
limiting in any material respect the ability of ProLogis or any
of its Subsidiaries to engage in any line of business in any
geographic area, (iv) any Contract or executed binding
letter of intent involving the future disposition or acquisition
of assets or properties with a fair market value in excess of
$250,000,000, or any merger, consolidation or similar business
combination transaction (v) any Contract relating to
development, construction, capital expenditures or purchase of
materials, supplies, equipment or other assets or properties
(other than purchase orders for such items in the ordinary
course of business) in each case requiring aggregate payments by
ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries in excess of $100,000,000
during their remaining term, or (vi) any Contract
evidencing a capitalized lease obligation or other indebtedness
to any Person, or any guaranty thereof, in excess of
$100,000,000, other than any Contract in respect of a ground
lease or office leases or obligations thereunder (all such
Contracts to which ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party to or bound by as of the date of this Agreement are
referred to herein as the ProLogis Material
Contracts). Except as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect, each of the
ProLogis Material Contracts is a valid and binding obligation of
ProLogis or the Subsidiary of ProLogis that is a party thereto,
and, to ProLogiss knowledge, the other parties thereto,
enforceable against ProLogis and its Subsidiaries and, to
ProLogiss knowledge, the other parties thereto in
accordance with its terms, subject to the effects of bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, reorganization, moratorium
and other similar laws of general applicability relating to or
affecting creditors rights generally and general equitable
principles. None of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries is, and
to ProLogiss knowledge no other party is, in breach,
default or violation (and no event has occurred or not occurred
through ProLogiss or any Subsidiary of ProLogiss
action or inaction or, to ProLogiss knowledge, through the
action or inaction of any third party, that with notice or the
lapse of time or both would constitute a breach, default or
violation) of any term, condition or provision of any ProLogis
Material Contract to which ProLogis or any Subsidiary of
ProLogis is now a party, or by which any of them or their
respective properties or assets may be bound, except for such
breaches, defaults or violations as would not have, or would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Benefit
Plans. (i) Section 3.2(j)(i) of the
ProLogis Disclosure Letter lists all material Benefit Plans
sponsored, maintained or contributed by ProLogis or any of its
Subsidiaries (the ProLogis Benefit Plans) for
the benefit of current or former directors, officers or
employees of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries or any
dependants or beneficiaries thereof.
(ii) ProLogis has delivered or made available to AMB a
true, correct and complete copy of each ProLogis Benefit Plan
and, with respect thereto, if applicable, (A) all
amendments, trust (or other funding vehicle) agreements, summary
plan descriptions and insurance contracts, (B) the most
recent annual report (Form 5500 series including, where
applicable, all schedules and actuarial and accountants
reports) filed with the Internal Revenue Service and the most
recent actuarial report or other financial statement relating to
such ProLogis Benefit Plan, and (C) the most recent
determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (if
applicable) for such ProLogis Benefit Plan.
(iii) Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect, (A) each ProLogis Benefit Plan,
including any ProLogis Benefit Plan established or maintained
outside of the United States or for the benefit of current or
former employees of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries residing
outside the United States (each, a ProLogis Foreign
Plan), has been maintained and administered in
compliance with its terms and with applicable Law, including
ERISA and compliance with Section 409A of the Code to avoid
income inclusion under Section 409A(a)(1) of the Code,
(B) each ProLogis Benefit Plan intended to be qualified
under Section 401(a) of the Code has
A-23
received a favorable determination or opinion letter from the
Internal Revenue Service or is entitled to rely on an advisory
or opinion letter issued with respect to an Internal Revenue
Service approved master and prototype or volume submitter plan,
and there are no existing circumstances or any events that have
occurred that could reasonably be expected to adversely affect
the qualified status of any such Benefit Plan, (C) neither
ProLogis nor its Subsidiaries has engaged in a transaction that
has resulted in, or could result in, the assessment of a civil
penalty upon ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to
Section 502(i) of ERISA or a tax imposed pursuant to
Section 4975 or 4976 of the Code that has not been
satisfied in full, (D) there does not now exist, nor do any
circumstances exist that would reasonably be expected to result
in, any Controlled Group Liability that would be a liability of
ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, and (E) there are no
pending or, to ProLogiss knowledge, threatened claims by
or on behalf of any ProLogis Benefit Plan, by any employee or
beneficiary covered under any ProLogis Benefit Plan or otherwise
involving any ProLogis Benefit Plan (other than routine claims
for benefits.
(iv) None of ProLogis, any of its Subsidiaries or any other
entity (whether or not incorporated) that, together with
ProLogis or a Subsidiary of ProLogis, would be treated as a
single employer under Section 414 of the Code or
Section 4001(b) of ERISA, maintains, contributes to, or
participates in, or has ever during the past six (6) years
maintained, contributed to, or participated in, or otherwise has
any obligation or liability in connection with: (A) a
Benefit Plan subject to Title IV or Section 302 of
ERISA or Section 412 or 4971 of the Code, (B) a
multiple employer welfare arrangement (as defined in
Section 3(40) of ERISA), a multiple employer
plan (as defined in Section 413(c) of the Code) or a
multiemployer plan (as defined in Section 3(37)
of ERISA), or (C) any plan or arrangement which provides
retiree medical or welfare benefits, except as required by
applicable Law.
(v) Except as would not have, or reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material
Adverse Effect: (A) each ProLogis Foreign Plan required to
be registered with applicable regulatory authorities has been so
registered and has been maintained in good standing,
(B) the fair market value of the assets of each funded
ProLogis Foreign Plan, the liability of each insurer for any
ProLogis Foreign Plan funded through insurance or the book
reserve established for any ProLogis Foreign Plan (as
applicable), together with any accrued contributions in respect
of any such ProLogis Foreign Plan, is sufficient to procure or
provide for the anticipated accrued benefit obligations, as of
the Closing Date, with respect to all current and former
participants in such plan according to the actuarial assumptions
and valuations most recently used to determine employer
contributions to, or the value of liabilities of, such ProLogis
Foreign Plan and no transaction contemplated by this Agreement
shall cause such assets or insurance obligations to be less than
such benefit obligations, and (C) any and all amounts
required to be accrued with respect to any ProLogis Foreign
Plan, or pursuant to any statutory requirements pertaining to
employee benefits, mandatory contributions, retirement plans or
similar benefits in respect of
non-U.S. employees,
have been properly and timely accrued, including accruals
relating to any severance, termination pay or profit sharing
benefits.
(k) Employment and Labor Matters.
(i) (A) Except in accordance with applicable Law,
neither ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or
bound by any material collective bargaining or similar agreement
or work rules or practices with any labor union, works council,
labor organization or employee association applicable to
employees of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, (B) there
are no strikes or lockouts with respect to any employees of
ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries (ProLogis
Employees), (C) to the knowledge of ProLogis,
there is no union organizing effort pending or threatened
against ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, (D) there is
no unfair labor practice, labor dispute (other than routine
individual grievances) or labor arbitration proceeding pending
or, to the knowledge of ProLogis, threatened with respect to
ProLogis Employees, and (E) there is no slowdown or work
stoppage in effect or, to the knowledge of ProLogis, threatened
with respect to ProLogis Employees except, with respect to
clauses (B) and (D) hereof, as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect.
(ii) Except for such matters as would not have, or would
not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect, ProLogis and its
Subsidiaries are, and have been, in compliance with all
applicable Laws respecting (A) employment and employment
practices, (B) terms and
A-24
conditions of employment and wages and hours, (C) unfair
labor practices, and (D) occupational safety and health and
immigration.
(l) Absence of Certain Changes. Since
December 31, 2009, (i) ProLogis and its Subsidiaries
have conducted their respective businesses in the ordinary
course in all material respects, (ii) there has not been a
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect and (iii) ProLogis and its
Subsidiaries have not taken any action that, if taken after the
date of this Agreement without the prior written consent of AMB,
would constitute a breach of Section 4.2(b)(ii),
Section 4.2(b)(v) (solely to the extent relating to
proposed amendments to charters, bylaws or equivalent governing
documents), Section 4.2(b)(vi) (solely to the extent
relating to acquisitions that would reasonably be expected to
materially delay, impede or affect the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement in the manner
contemplated hereby), Section 4.2(b)(vii),
Section 4.2(b)(ix), Section 4.2(b)(x) (solely to the
extent relating to ProLogis or its Significant Subsidiaries),
Section 4.2(b)(xii) or Section 4.2(b)(xvi), or agreed
to do any of the foregoing.
(m) Board Approval. The Board of Trustees
of ProLogis, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote of
those voting at a meeting duly called and held (the
ProLogis Board Approval), has
(i) approved this Agreement and declared this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Mergers, to
be advisable and in the best interests of ProLogis and its
shareholders, (ii) upon the terms and subject to the
conditions of this Agreement, resolved to recommend that the
shareholders of ProLogis approve the Mergers and direct that
such matter be submitted for consideration by ProLogis
shareholders at the ProLogis Shareholders Meeting, and
(iii) taken all appropriate and necessary actions to render
any and all limitations on ownership of ProLogis Common Shares,
as set forth in ProLogiss Declaration of Trust,
inapplicable to the Mergers and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The Board of Directors of New
Pumpkin, by resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote of those
voting at a meeting duly called and held, has (i) approved
this Agreement and declared this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby, including the Mergers, to be advisable and
in the best interests of New Pumpkin and its stockholders upon
the terms and subject to the conditions of this Agreement,
(ii) resolved to recommend that the stockholders of New
Pumpkin approve the Topco Merger, and (iii) taken all
appropriate and necessary actions to render any and all
limitations on ownership of New Pumpkin Common Stock, as set
forth in New Pumpkins charter, inapplicable to the Mergers
and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. No
state takeover statute is applicable to this Agreement, the
Mergers or the other transactions contemplated hereby or thereby.
(n) Vote Required. The affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of the outstanding ProLogis Common
Shares to approve the Mergers (the ProLogis Required
Vote) is the only vote of the holders of any class or
series of ProLogis shares of beneficial interest necessary to
approve and adopt this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby (including the Mergers).
(o) Properties. (i) Except as would
not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect, ProLogis, or a Subsidiary of ProLogis owns fee simple
title to or has a valid leasehold interest in, each of the real
properties reflected as an asset on the most recent balance
sheet of ProLogis included in the ProLogis SEC Documents (each a
ProLogis Property and collectively the
ProLogis Properties), in each case free and
clear of all Liens except for (A) debt and other matters
set forth in Section 3.2(o)(i) of the ProLogis Disclosure
Letter, (B) inchoate mechanics, workmens,
repairmens and other inchoate Liens imposed for
construction work in progress or otherwise incurred in the
ordinary course of business, (C) mechanics,
workmens and repairmens Liens (other than inchoate
Liens for work in progress) which have heretofore been bonded or
insured, (D) all matters disclosed on existing title
policies or surveys, (E) real estate Taxes and special
assessments not yet due and payable or which are being contested
in good faith in the ordinary course of business, and
(F) Liens and other encumbrances that would not cause a
material adverse effect on the value or use of the affected
property. Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect, none of ProLogis, nor any Subsidiary of
ProLogis has received written notice to the effect that there
are any condemnation proceedings that are pending or, to the
knowledge of ProLogis, threatened with respect to any material
portion of any of the ProLogis Properties. Except for the owners
of the properties in which ProLogis or any Subsidiary of
ProLogis has a leasehold interest and except for any ProLogis
Property that is held by a
A-25
joint venture or fund, no Person other than ProLogis or a
Subsidiary of ProLogis has any ownership interest in any of the
ProLogis Properties.
(ii) Except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect, policies of title insurance or updates
or endorsements have been issued, insuring ProLogiss or
the applicable Subsidiary of ProLogiss fee simple title to
each of the ProLogis Properties owned by ProLogis and acquired
in the past five years, in amounts at least equal to the
purchase price paid for ownership of such ProLogis Property or
such entity that owned such ProLogis Properties at the time of
the issuance of each such policy, and no material claim has been
made against any such policy that has not been resolved.
(iii) ProLogis or any Subsidiary of ProLogis (A) have
not received written notice of any structural defects, or
violation of Law, relating to any ProLogis Property which would
have, or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or
in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect, and
(B) have not received written notice of any physical damage
to any ProLogis Property which would have, or would reasonably
be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect for which there is not
insurance in effect covering the cost of the restoration and the
loss of revenue.
(iv) Except for secured loan documents entered into in the
ordinary course of business, there are no written agreements
which restrict ProLogis or any Subsidiary of ProLogis from
transferring any of the ProLogis Properties, and none of the
ProLogis Properties is subject to any restriction on the sale or
other disposition thereof (other than rights of first offer or
rights of first refusal or tenant options as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect) or on the
financing or release of financing thereon.
(v) ProLogis and the Subsidiaries of ProLogis have good and
sufficient title to, or are permitted to use under valid and
existing leases, all personal and non-real properties and assets
reflected in their books and records as being owned by them or
reflected on the most recent balance sheet of ProLogis included
in the ProLogis SEC Documents (except as since sold or otherwise
disposed of in the ordinary course of business) or used by them
in the ordinary course of business, free and clear of all Liens,
and except as would not have, or would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis
Material Adverse Effect.
(p) Environmental Matters. Except as
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect:
(i) (A) ProLogis, each ProLogis Subsidiary and each of
the ProLogis Properties is in compliance with all applicable
Environmental Laws; (B) there is no litigation,
investigation, request for information or other proceeding
pending or, to the knowledge of ProLogis, threatened against
ProLogis or any ProLogis Subsidiary under any applicable
Environmental Laws; and (C) ProLogis has not received any
written notice of violation or potential liability under any
applicable Environmental Laws that remains unresolved, or that
any judicial, administrative or compliance order has been issued
against ProLogis or any ProLogis Subsidiary which remains
unresolved;
(ii) To the knowledge of ProLogis, neither ProLogis nor any
ProLogis Subsidiary has used, generated, stored, treated or
handled any Hazardous Materials on the ProLogis Properties in a
manner that would reasonably be expected to result in liability
under any Environmental Law, and there are currently no
underground storage tanks, active or abandoned, used for the
storage of Hazardous materials on, in or under any ProLogis
Properties in violation of applicable Environmental Laws. To the
knowledge of ProLogis, neither ProLogis nor any Subsidiary of
ProLogis has caused a release of Hazardous Materials on the
ProLogis Properties and, to the knowledge of ProLogis, no other
Person has caused a release or threatened release of Hazardous
Materials on the ProLogis Properties.
(iii) To the knowledge of ProLogis, all Hazardous Material
which has been removed from any ProLogis Properties was handled,
transported and disposed of at the time of removal in compliance
with applicable Environmental Laws.
A-26
(q) Intellectual Property. Except as
would not have, or would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect, (i) ProLogis and its Subsidiaries own or have a
valid license to use all trademarks, service marks, trade names
and copyrights (including any registrations or applications for
registration of any of the foregoing) (collectively, the
ProLogis Intellectual Property) necessary to
carry on their business substantially as currently conducted,
and (ii) neither ProLogis nor any such Subsidiary has
received any notice of infringement of or conflict with, and to
ProLogiss knowledge, there are no infringements of or
conflicts with, the rights of others with respect to the use of
any ProLogis Intellectual Property.
(r) Permits. Except as would not have, or
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect, (i) the
Permits held by ProLogis and its Subsidiaries are valid and
sufficient in all respects for all business presently conducted
by ProLogis and its Subsidiaries and for the operation of the
properties of ProLogis and its Subsidiaries, (ii) all
applications required to have been filed for the renewal of such
Permits have been duly filed on a timely basis with the
appropriate Governmental Entities, and all other filings
required to have been made with respect to such Permits have
been duly made on a timely basis with the appropriate
Governmental Entities, and (iii) neither ProLogis nor any
of its Subsidiaries has received any claim or notice indicating
that ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries is currently not in
compliance with the terms of any such Permits, and to
ProLogiss knowledge no such noncompliance exists.
(s) Insurance. ProLogis and its
Subsidiaries have obtained and maintained in full force and
effect insurance in such amounts, on such terms and covering
such risks as ProLogiss management believes is reasonable
and customary for its business. ProLogis or the applicable
Subsidiary of ProLogis has paid, or caused to be paid, all
premiums due under such policies and is not in default with
respect to any obligations under such policies in any material
respect. All such policies are valid, outstanding and
enforceable and neither ProLogis nor any of its Subsidiaries has
agreed to modify or cancel any of such insurance policies nor
has ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries received any notice of
any actual or threatened modification or cancellation of such
insurance other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or such as is normal and customary
in ProLogiss industry.
(t) Investment Company Act of
1940. Neither ProLogis nor any Subsidiary of
ProLogis is, or on the Closing Date will be, required to be
registered as an investment company under the Investment Company
Act of 1940, as amended.
(u) Activities of Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin
LLC. Upper Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC were formed on
January 25, 2011, and New Pumpkin was incorporated on
January 26, 2011, in each case solely for the purpose of
engaging in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
Each of Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC has engaged
in no other business activities, has no liabilities or
obligations and has conducted its operations only as
contemplated hereby.
(v) Brokers or Finders. Neither ProLogis
nor any of its Subsidiaries has employed any broker or finder or
incurred any liability for any brokerage fees, commissions or
finders fees in connection with the Mergers or the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, except that
ProLogis has employed Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated as its financial advisor.
(w) Opinion of ProLogis Financial
Advisor. ProLogis has received the opinion of its
financial advisor, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
to the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and subject to
the assumptions and limitations set forth therein, the Exchange
Ratio is fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
ProLogis Common Shares.
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
4.1. Covenants of
AMB. (a) From and after the date hereof
until the earlier of the Topco Effective Time or termination of
this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and except as
(i) expressly contemplated or permitted by this Agreement,
(ii) set forth in Section 4.1(a) of the AMB Disclosure
Letter, (iii) required by applicable Law or
A-27
the regulations or requirements of any stock exchange or
regulatory organization applicable to AMB or any of its
Subsidiaries, or (iv) with ProLogiss prior written
consent (which consent is not to be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed), AMB agrees as to itself and its
Subsidiaries that such entities shall carry on their respective
businesses in the ordinary course consistent with practice and
shall use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve AMBs
business organization intact, and maintain its existing
relations and goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors,
creditors, lessors and tenants; provided, however,
that no action by AMB and its Subsidiaries with respect to
matters specifically addressed by any provision of
Section 4.1(b) shall be deemed a breach of this sentence
unless such action would constitute a breach of such other
provision.
(b) AMB agrees as to itself and its Subsidiaries that, from
the date hereof until the earlier of the Topco Effective Time or
termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and
except as (1) expressly contemplated or permitted by this
Agreement, (2) set forth in Section 4.1(b) of the AMB
Disclosure Letter, (3) required by applicable Law or the
regulations or requirements of any stock exchange or regulatory
organization applicable to AMB or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(4) with ProLogiss prior written consent (which
consent is not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), such entities shall not:
(i) enter into any new material line of business;
(ii) except (A) as permitted by Section 5.10,
(B) for the regular distributions that are required to be
made in respect of the AMB Partnership Units and AMB II
Partnership Units in connection with any dividends paid on the
AMB Common Stock, and (C) for dividends by a Subsidiary of
AMB to AMB or a Subsidiary of AMB, declare, set aside or pay any
dividends on or make other distributions in respect of any of
its capital stock, partnership interests, or other equity
interests;
(iii) split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or issue or authorize or propose the issuance of any other
securities in respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for,
shares of its capital stock, or repurchase, redeem or otherwise
acquire, or permit any Subsidiary to redeem, purchase or
otherwise acquire any shares of its capital stock or any
securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of its
capital stock (except upon the exercise by a limited partner in
AMB LP of its right to redeem its AMB Partnership Units pursuant
to the AMB Partnership Agreement or a limited partner in AMB II
LP of its right to redeem its AMB II Partnership Units pursuant
to the AMB II Partnership Agreement);
(iv) except for (A) issuances of AMB Common Stock upon
the exercise or settlement of stock options, stock appreciation
rights, units or other equity rights or obligations under the
AMB Stock Plans in accordance with the terms of the applicable
AMB Stock Plan and applicable awards in effect on the date of
this Agreement, and issuances of stock options and other equity
or equity-based awards under the AMB Stock Plans in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice,
(B) exchanges of AMB Partnership Units for AMB Common Stock
in accordance with the AMB Partnership Agreement,
(C) exchanges of AMB II Partnership Units for AMB Common
Stock in accordance with the AMB II Partnership Agreement, and
(D) issuances by a Subsidiary of its capital stock to its
parent or to another Subsidiary of AMB, issue, deliver or sell,
or authorize or propose the issuance, delivery or sale of, any
shares of its capital stock, any Voting Debt, any stock
appreciation rights, stock options, restricted shares or other
equity-based awards (whether discretionary, formulaic or
automatic grants and whether under the AMB Stock Plans or
otherwise) or any securities convertible into or exercisable or
exchangeable for, or any rights, warrants or options to acquire,
any such shares or Voting Debt, or enter into any agreement with
respect to any of the foregoing;
(v) amend or propose to amend its charter, bylaws or
equivalent governing documents of AMB or AMB LP or their
respective Significant Subsidiaries, or enter into, or, except
as permitted by Section 4.1(b)(vi) or 4.1(b)(vii), permit
any Subsidiary to enter into, a plan of consolidation, merger or
reorganization with any person other than a wholly owned
Subsidiary of AMB;
(vi) other than acquisitions (whether by means of merger,
share exchange, consolidation, tender offer, asset purchase or
otherwise) and other business combinations (collectively,
Acquisitions) (A) that would not
reasonably be expected to materially delay, impede or affect the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
in the manner contemplated hereby and (B) for which the
fair market value of the total consideration paid by AMB and its
Subsidiaries in such Acquisitions does not exceed $50,000,000
A-28
individually, or $250,000,000 per calendar quarter in the
aggregate, acquire, by merging or consolidating with, by
purchasing a substantial equity interest in or a substantial
portion of the assets of, by forming a partnership or joint
venture with, or by any other manner, any business or any
corporation, partnership, association or other business
organization or division thereof or otherwise acquire any
assets; provided, however, that the foregoing
shall not prohibit (A) internal reorganizations or
consolidations involving existing Subsidiaries that would not
present a material risk of any material delay in the
consummation of the Mergers, (B) acquisitions pursuant to
agreements, arrangements or understandings existing on the date
of this Agreement, or (C) the creation of new Subsidiaries
organized to conduct or continue activities otherwise permitted
by this Agreement;
(vii) other than (A) internal reorganizations or
consolidations involving existing Subsidiaries that would not
present a material risk of any material delay in the
consummation of the Mergers, (B) dispositions referred to
in AMB SEC Documents filed prior to the date of this Agreement,
(C) other activities in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, and (D) other dispositions
of assets (including Subsidiaries) if the fair market value of
the total consideration received therefrom does not exceed in
$50,000,000 individually, or $250,000,000 per calendar quarter
in the aggregate, sell, assign, encumber (except for such
encumbrances pursuant to any action permitted under
clauses (A) through (G) of Section 4.1(b)(viii)
or under Section 4.1(b)(xix)) or otherwise dispose of any
of its assets (including capital stock of its Subsidiaries and
indebtedness of others held by AMB and its Subsidiaries) which
are material, individually or in the aggregate, to AMB;
(viii) incur, create or assume any long-term indebtedness
for borrowed money (or modify any of the material terms of any
such outstanding long-term indebtedness), guarantee any such
long-term indebtedness or issue or sell any long-term debt
securities or warrants or rights to acquire any long-term debt
securities of AMB or any of its Subsidiaries or guarantee any
long-term debt securities of others, other than
(A) Refinancing Debt, (B) indebtedness of any wholly
owned Subsidiary of AMB to AMB or to another wholly owned
Subsidiary of AMB, (C) indebtedness of any Subsidiary of
AMB to or among one of its wholly owned Subsidiaries,
(D) any new indebtedness that is not Refinancing Debt by
any Subsidiary of AMB that is not a wholly owned Subsidiary of
AMB in an individual amount less than $100,000,000 (for
U.S. dollar denominated debt or the equivalent for yen,
Canadian dollar, Yuan (RMB), Singapore dollar, Brazilian Real,
or Peso denominated debt), 100,000,0000 (for euro
denominated debt) or £100,000,000 (for sterling denominated
debt), (E) indebtedness as set forth in
Section 4.1(b)(viii) of the AMB Disclosure Letter,
(F) any borrowings under AMBs Credit Agreement dated
as of November 29, 2010, Fourth Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of November 10, 2010, Credit Agreement
dated as of October 15, 2009 and Fifth Amended and Restated
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of July 16, 2007 in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice, or
(G) in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice (including property releases, property substitutions,
interest rate hedges and foreign exchange hedges);
provided that, solely for purposes of the foregoing in
this clause (viii), wholly owned Subsidiary of AMB
means a Subsidiary of AMB, at least 90% of the outstanding
voting securities of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by
AMB;
(ix) except as disclosed in any AMB SEC Document filed
prior to the date of this Agreement, change its methods of
accounting in effect at December 31, 2010, except as
required by changes in GAAP as concurred in by AMBs
independent auditors;
(x) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or
resolutions providing for or authorizing such a liquidation or a
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
(xi) except for any action permitted under clauses (A)
through (G) of Section 4.1(b)(viii) or under
Section 4.1(b)(xix), terminate, cancel, renew or request or
agree to any material amendment or material modification to,
material change in, or material waiver under or assignment of,
any AMB Material Contract or enter into or materially amend any
Contract that, if existing on the date of this Agreement, would
be an AMB Material Contract;
(xii) waive the excess share provision of AMBs
charter for any Person (other than ProLogis, New Pumpkin or any
Subsidiary thereof);
A-29
(xiii) take any action, or fail to take any action, which
would reasonably be expected to cause AMB to fail to qualify as
a REIT or any of its Subsidiaries to cease to be treated as a
partnership or disregarded entity for federal income tax
purposes or as a qualified REIT subsidiary, a taxable REIT
subsidiary or a REIT under the applicable provisions of
Section 856 of the Code, as the case may be;
(xiv) make or commit to make any capital expenditures in
excess of $50,000,000 in the aggregate, other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(xv) take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action,
which action or failure to act could be reasonably expected to
prevent the ProLogis Merger or the Topco Merger from qualifying
as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code;
(xvi) make, change or rescind any material Tax election or
change a material method of Tax accounting, amend any material
Tax Return, or settle or compromise any material federal, state,
local or foreign income Tax liability, audit, claim or
assessment, or enter into any material closing agreement related
to Taxes, or knowingly surrender any right to claim any material
Tax refund except in each case (x) in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice, (y) as required
by law, or (z) as necessary (i) to preserve the status
of AMB as a REIT under the Code, or (ii) to qualify or
preserve the status of any Subsidiary of AMB as a partnership or
disregarded entity for federal income tax purposes or as a
qualified REIT subsidiary, a taxable REIT subsidiary or a REIT
under the applicable provisions of Section 856 of the Code,
as the case may be;
(xvii) waive, release, assign, settle or compromise any
claim, action or proceeding, other than waivers, releases,
assignments, settlements or compromises that (A) with
respect to the payment of monetary damages, involve only the
payment of monetary damages (excluding any portion of such
payment payable under an existing property-level insurance
policy) (x) equal to or lesser than the amounts
specifically reserved with respect thereto on the most recent
balance sheet of AMB and its consolidated Subsidiaries included
in the AMB SEC Reports or (y) that do not exceed
$10,000,000 individually or $100,000,000 in the aggregate,
(B) do not involve the imposition of injunctive relief
against AMB or any of its Subsidiaries or the Surviving
Corporation following the Topco Effective Time, and (C) do
not provide for any admission of material liability by AMB or
any of its Subsidiaries;
(xviii) (A) except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice that would not result in a
material increase in cost to AMB, increase the compensation or
other benefits payable or provided to AMB directors, officers or
employees, (B) enter into any employment, change of
control, severance or retention agreement with any director,
officer or employee of AMB except (1) for agreements
entered into with any newly-hired employees or (2) for
severance agreements entered into with employees in connection
with terminations of employment, in each case, for employees who
are not executive officers and only in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice that would not result in
a material increase in cost to AMB, (C) establish, adopt,
enter into or amend any AMB Benefit Plan or any other plan,
policy, program or arrangement for the benefit of any current or
former directors, officers or employees or any of their
beneficiaries, except as permitted pursuant to clause (A)
or (B) above or in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice that would not result in a
material increase in cost to AMB; provided,
however, that the foregoing exception shall not apply to
any equity based plan, policy, program or arrangement (or award
under any of the foregoing), other than with respect to awards
or grants made to newly-hired employees in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice that would not result
in a material increase in cost to AMB, or (D) enter into or
amend any collective bargaining agreement or similar agreement,
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice that would not result in a material increase in cost to
AMB;
(xix) repay, refinance or replace any direct indebtedness
of AMB maturing within 12 months from the date of this
Agreement, unless such repayment, refinancing or replacement is
made using proceeds from borrowings under AMBs Credit
Agreement dated as of November 29, 2010, Fourth Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 10, 2010,
Credit Agreement dated as of October 15, 2009, Fifth
Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of
July 16, 2007 or available working capital;
(xx) form any new funds;
A-30
(xxi) effect any deed in lieu of foreclosure, or sell,
lease, assign, encumber or transfer to a lender any property
securing indebtedness owed to such lender; or
(xxii) agree to, or make any commitment to, take, or
authorize, any of the actions prohibited by this
Section 4.1.
4.2. Covenants of
ProLogis. (a) From and after the date hereof
until the earlier of the Topco Effective Time or termination of
this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and except as
(i) expressly contemplated or permitted by this Agreement,
(ii) set forth in Section 4.2(a) of the ProLogis
Disclosure Letter, (iii) required by applicable Law or the
regulations or requirements of any stock exchange or regulatory
organization applicable to ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries,
or (iv) with AMBs prior written consent (which
consent is not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or
delayed), ProLogis agrees as to itself and its Subsidiaries that
such entities shall carry on their respective businesses in the
ordinary course consistent with practice and shall use
commercially reasonable efforts to preserve ProLogiss
business organization intact, and maintain its existing
relations and goodwill with customers, suppliers, distributors,
creditors, lessors and tenants; provided, however,
that no action by ProLogis and its Subsidiaries with respect to
matters specifically addressed by any provision of
Section 4.2(b) shall be deemed a breach of this sentence
unless such action would constitute a breach of such other
provision.
(b) ProLogis agrees as to itself and its Subsidiaries that,
from the date hereof until the earlier of the Topco Effective
Time or termination of this Agreement in accordance with its
terms, and except as (1) expressly contemplated or
permitted by this Agreement, (2) set forth in
Section 4.2(b) of the ProLogis Disclosure Letter,
(3) required by applicable Law or the regulations or
requirements of any stock exchange or regulatory organization
applicable to ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries, or
(4) with AMBs prior written consent (which consent is
not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), such
entities shall not:
(i) enter into any new material line of business;
(ii) except (A) as permitted by Section 5.10,
(B) for the regular distributions that are required to be
made in respect of the ProLogis Partnership Units in connection
with any dividends paid on the ProLogis Common Shares, and
(C) for dividends by a Subsidiary of ProLogis to its parent
or a Subsidiary of ProLogis, declare, set aside or pay any
dividends on or make other distributions in respect of any of
its shares of beneficial interest, partnership interests, or
other equity interests;
(iii) split, combine or reclassify any of its shares of
beneficial interest or issue or authorize or propose the
issuance of any other securities in respect of, in lieu of or in
substitution for, its shares of beneficial interest, or
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, or permit any
Subsidiary to redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of its
shares of beneficial interest or any securities convertible into
or exercisable for any of its shares of beneficial interest
(except upon the exercise by a limited partner in a ProLogis
Partnership of its right to redeem or exchange its ProLogis
Partnership Units pursuant to the partnership agreement of the
applicable ProLogis Partnership);
(iv) except for (A) issuances of ProLogis Common
Shares upon the exercise or settlement of share options, share
appreciation rights, units or other equity rights or obligations
under the ProLogis Share Plans or the ProLogis ESPP in
accordance with the terms of the applicable ProLogis Share Plan
or the ProLogis ESPP and applicable awards in effect on the date
of this Agreement and issuances of share options and other
equity or equity based awards under the ProLogis Share Plans in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(B) exchanges of partnership units of the ProLogis
Partnerships for ProLogis Common Shares, in accordance with the
partnership agreement of the applicable ProLogis Partnership,
(C) issuances by a Subsidiary of its capital stock to its
parent or to another Subsidiary of ProLogis, and
(D) issuances of ProLogis Common Shares upon conversion of
any of ProLogiss convertible debt outstanding as of the
date hereof, issue, deliver or sell, or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any of its shares of beneficial
interest, any Voting Debt, any share appreciation rights, share
options, restricted shares or other equity-based awards (whether
discretionary, formulaic or automatic grants and whether under
the ProLogis Share Plans or otherwise) or any securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for, or any
rights, warrants or options to acquire, any such shares or
Voting Debt, or enter into any agreement with respect to any of
the foregoing;
A-31
(v) amend or propose to amend its Declaration of Trust,
Bylaws or equivalent governing documents of ProLogis, Upper
Pumpkin, Pumpkin LLC or New Pumpkin or their respective
Significant Subsidiaries, or enter into, or, except as permitted
by Section 4.2(b)(vi) or 4.2(b)(vii), permit any Subsidiary
to enter into, a plan of consolidation, merger or reorganization
with any person other than a wholly owned Subsidiary of ProLogis;
(vi) other than Acquisitions (A) that would not
reasonably be expected to materially delay, impede or affect the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
in the manner contemplated hereby and (B) for which the
fair market value of the total consideration paid by ProLogis
and its Subsidiaries in such Acquisitions does not exceed
$50,000,000 individually, or $250,000,000 per calendar quarter
in the aggregate, acquire, by merging or consolidating with, by
purchasing a substantial equity interest in or a substantial
portion of the assets of, by forming a partnership or joint
venture with, or by any other manner, any business or any
corporation, partnership, association or other business
organization or division thereof or otherwise acquire any
assets; provided, however, that the foregoing
shall not prohibit (A) internal reorganizations or
consolidations involving existing Subsidiaries that would not
present a material risk of any material delay in the
consummation of the Mergers, (B) acquisitions pursuant to
agreements, arrangements or understandings existing on the date
of this Agreement, or (C) the creation of new Subsidiaries
organized to conduct or continue activities otherwise permitted
by this Agreement;
(vii) other than (A) internal reorganizations or
consolidations involving existing Subsidiaries that would not
present a material risk of any material delay in the
consummation of the Mergers, (B) dispositions referred to
in ProLogis SEC Documents filed prior to the date of this
Agreement, (C) other activities in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, and (D) other
dispositions of assets (including Subsidiaries) if the fair
market value of the total consideration received therefrom does
not exceed $50,000,000 individually, or $250,000,000 per
calendar quarter in the aggregate, sell, assign, encumber
(except for such encumbrances pursuant to any action permitted
under clauses (A) through (G) of
Section 4.2(b)(viii) or under Section 4.2(b)(xix)) or
otherwise dispose of any of its assets (including capital stock
of its Subsidiaries and indebtedness of others held by ProLogis
and its Subsidiaries) which are material, individually or in the
aggregate, to ProLogis;
(viii) incur, create or assume any long-term indebtedness
for borrowed money (or modify any of the material terms of any
such outstanding long-term indebtedness), guarantee any such
long-term indebtedness or issue or sell any long-term debt
securities or warrants or rights to acquire any long-term debt
securities of ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries or guarantee
any long-term debt securities of others, other than
(A) Refinancing Debt, (B) indebtedness of any wholly
owned Subsidiary of ProLogis to ProLogis or to another wholly
owned Subsidiary of ProLogis, (C) indebtedness of any
Subsidiary of ProLogis to or among one of its wholly owned
Subsidiaries, (D) any new indebtedness that is not
Refinancing Debt by any Subsidiary of ProLogis that is not a
wholly owned Subsidiary of ProLogis in an individual amount less
than $100,000,000 (for U.S. dollar denominated debt or the
equivalent for yen, Canadian dollar, Yuan (RMB), Singapore
dollar, Brazilian Real, or Peso denominated
debt), £100,000,0000 (for euro denominated debt) or
eth100,000,000 (for sterling denominated debt),
(E) indebtedness as set forth in Section 4.2(b)(viii)
of the ProLogis Disclosure Letter, (F) any borrowings under
the ProLogis Global Credit Agreement in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice, or (G) in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
(including property releases, property substitutions, interest
rate hedges and foreign exchange hedges); provided that
solely for purposes of the foregoing in this clause (viii),
wholly owned Subsidiary of ProLogis means a
Subsidiary of ProLogis, at least 90% of the outstanding voting
securities of which are owned, directly or indirectly, by
ProLogis;
(ix) except as disclosed in any ProLogis SEC Document filed
prior to the date of this Agreement, change its methods of
accounting in effect at December 31, 2010, except as
required by changes in GAAP as concurred in by ProLogiss
independent auditors;
(x) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or
resolutions providing for or authorizing such a liquidation or a
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
A-32
(xi) except for any action permitted under clauses (A)
through (G) of Section 4.2(b)(viii) or under
Section 4.2(b)(xix), terminate, cancel, renew or request or
agree to any material amendment or material modification to,
material change in, or material waiver under or assignment of,
any ProLogis Material Contract or enter into or materially amend
any Contract that, if existing on the date of this Agreement,
would be a ProLogis Material Contract;
(xii) waive the excess share provision of ProLogiss
Declaration of Trust for any Person (other than AMB or any of
its Subsidiaries);
(xiii) take any action, or fail to take any action, which
would reasonably be expected to cause ProLogis to fail to
qualify as a REIT or any of its Subsidiaries to cease to be
treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for federal
income tax purposes or as a qualified REIT subsidiary, a taxable
REIT subsidiary or a REIT under the applicable provisions of
Section 856 of the Code, as the case may be;
(xiv) make or commit to make any capital expenditures in
excess of $50,000,000, other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(xv) take any action, or knowingly fail to take any action,
which action or failure to act could be reasonably expected to
prevent the ProLogis Merger or the Topco Merger from qualifying
as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code;
(xvi) make, change or rescind any material Tax election or
change a material method of Tax accounting, amend any material
Tax Return, or settle or compromise any material federal, state,
local or foreign income Tax liability, audit, claim or
assessment, or enter into any material closing agreement related
to Taxes, or knowingly surrender any right to claim any material
Tax refund except in each case (x) in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice, (y) as required
by law, or (z) as necessary (i) to preserve the status
of ProLogis as a REIT under the Code, or (ii) to qualify or
preserve the status of any Subsidiary of ProLogis as a
partnership or disregarded entity for federal income tax
purposes or as a qualified REIT subsidiary, a taxable REIT
subsidiary or a REIT under the applicable provisions of
Section 856 of the Code, as the case may be;
(xvii) waive, release, assign, settle or compromise any
claim, action or proceeding, other than waivers, releases,
assignments, settlements or compromises that (A) with
respect to the payment of monetary damages, involve only the
payment of monetary damages (excluding any portion of such
payment payable under an existing property-level insurance
policy) (x) equal to or lesser than the amounts
specifically reserved with respect thereto on the most recent
balance sheet of ProLogis and its consolidated Subsidiaries
included in the ProLogis SEC Reports or (y) that do not
exceed $10,000,000 individually or $100,000,000 in the
aggregate, (B) do not involve the imposition of injunctive
relief against ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries or the
Surviving Corporation following the Topco Effective Time, and
(C) do not provide for any admission of material liability
by ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries;
(xviii) (A) except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice that would not result in a
material increase in cost to ProLogis, increase the compensation
or other benefits payable or provided to ProLogis directors,
officers or employees, (B) enter into any employment,
change of control, severance or retention agreement with any
director, officer or employee of ProLogis except (1) for
agreements entered into with any newly-hired employees or
(2) for severance agreements entered into with employees in
connection with terminations of employment, in each case, for
employees who are not executive officers and only in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that
would not result in a material increase in cost to ProLogis,
(C) establish, adopt, enter into or amend any ProLogis
Benefit Plan or any other plan, policy, program or arrangement
for the benefit of any current or former directors, officers or
employees or any of their beneficiaries, except as permitted
pursuant to clause (A) or (B) above or in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice that would not
result in a material increase in cost to ProLogis;
provided, however, that the foregoing exception
shall not apply to any equity based plan, policy, program or
arrangement (or award under any of the foregoing), other than
with respect to awards or grants made to newly-hired employees
in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice
that would not result in a material increase in cost to
ProLogis, or (D) enter into or amend any collective
bargaining agreement or similar agreement, except in the
A-33
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice that
would not result in a material increase in cost to ProLogis;
(xix) repay, refinance or replace any direct indebtedness
of ProLogis maturing within 12 months from the date of this
Agreement, unless such repayment, refinancing or replacement is
made using proceeds from borrowings under the ProLogis Global
Credit Agreement or available working capital;
(xx) form any new funds;
(xxi) effect any deed in lieu of foreclosure, or sell,
lease, assign, encumber or transfer to a lender any property
securing indebtedness owed to such lender; or
(xxii) agree to, or make any commitment to, take, or
authorize, any of the actions prohibited by this
Section 4.2.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
5.1. Preparation of Proxy Statement; Stockholders
Meetings. (a) As promptly as reasonably
practicable following the date hereof, each of the parties
hereto shall cooperate in preparing and shall cause to be filed
with the SEC mutually acceptable proxy materials which shall
constitute the proxy statement/prospectus relating to the
matters to be submitted to the AMB stockholders at the AMB
Stockholders Meeting and to the ProLogis shareholders at the
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting (such joint proxy
statement/prospectus, and any amendments or supplements thereto,
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), and
AMB (and, if required, New Pumpkin) shall prepare and file with
the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-4
(of which the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall be a part)
with respect to the issuance of AMB Common Stock in the Topco
Merger (and, if required, with respect to the issuance of the
New Pumpkin Common Stock in the Pumpkin Merger) (such
Form S-4,
and any amendments or supplements thereto, the
Form S-4).
Each of the parties hereto shall use reasonable best efforts to
have the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus cleared by the SEC and
the
Form S-4
declared effective by the SEC and to keep the
Form S-4
effective as long as is necessary to consummate the Topco Merger
and the transactions contemplated thereby. AMB and ProLogis
shall, as promptly as practicable after receipt thereof, provide
the other party with copies of any written comments and advise
the other party of any oral comments with respect to the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4
received from the SEC. Each party shall cooperate and provide
the other party with a reasonable opportunity to review and
comment on any amendment or supplement to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
prior to filing such with the SEC, and each party will provide
the other party with a copy of all such filings made with the
SEC. Each party shall use its reasonable best efforts to take
any action required to be taken under any applicable state
securities laws in connection with the Mergers, and each party
shall furnish all information concerning it and the holders of
its capital stock or shares of beneficial interest as may be
reasonably requested in connection with any such action. Each
party will advise the other party, promptly after it receives
notice thereof, of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order, the
suspension of the qualification of the AMB Common Stock issuable
in connection with the Mergers for offering or sale in any
jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC for amendment of the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4.
If, at any time prior to the Topco Effective Time, any
information relating to either of the parties, or their
respective affiliates, officers, trustees or directors, should
be discovered by either party, and such information should be
set forth in an amendment or supplement to any of the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus so that such documents
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, the party that discovers such information
shall promptly notify the other party hereto and, to the extent
required by law, rules or regulations, an appropriate amendment
or supplement describing such information shall be promptly
filed with the SEC and disseminated to the stockholders of AMB
and the shareholders of ProLogis.
(b) AMB shall duly take all lawful action to call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its stockholders as
promptly as practicable following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective (the AMB Stockholders
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the AMB Required
Vote. Unless a Change in AMB Recommendation has occurred in
accordance with Section 5.4, the Board of Directors of AMB
shall use its reasonable best efforts to
A-34
obtain from the stockholders of AMB the AMB Required Vote. AMB
covenants that, unless a Change of AMB Recommendation has
occurred in accordance with Section 5.4, AMB will, through
its Board of Directors, recommend to its stockholders approval
of the Topco Merger and further covenants that the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
will include such recommendation. Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions of this Section 5.1(b), if, on a date for which
the AMB Stockholders Meeting is scheduled, AMB has not received
proxies representing a sufficient number of shares of AMB Common
Stock to obtain the AMB Required Vote, whether or not a quorum
is present, AMB shall have the right to make one or more
successive postponements or adjournments of the AMB Stockholders
Meeting; provided that the AMB Stockholders Meeting is
not postponed or adjourned to a date that is more than
30 days after the date for which the AMB Stockholders
Meeting was originally scheduled (excluding any adjournments or
postponements required by applicable Law). Nothing contained in
this Agreement shall be deemed to relieve AMB of its obligation
to submit the Topco Merger to its stockholders for a vote on the
approval thereof. AMB agrees that, unless this Agreement shall
have been terminated in accordance with Section 7.1, its
obligations to hold the AMB Stockholders Meeting pursuant to
this Section 5.1(b) shall not be affected by the
commencement, public proposal, public disclosure or
communication to AMB of any Acquisition Proposal or by any
Change in AMB Recommendation.
(c) ProLogis shall duly take all lawful action to call,
give notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders
as promptly as practicable following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective (the ProLogis Shareholders
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the ProLogis
Required Vote. Unless a Change in ProLogis Recommendation has
occurred in accordance with Section 5.4, the Board of
Trustees of ProLogis shall use its reasonable best efforts to
obtain from the shareholders of ProLogis the ProLogis Required
Vote. ProLogis covenants that, unless a Change of ProLogis
Recommendation has occurred in accordance with Section 5.4,
ProLogis will, through its Board of Trustees, recommend to its
shareholders approval of the Mergers and further covenants that
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
will include such recommendation. Notwithstanding the foregoing
provisions of this Section 5.1(c), if, on a date for which
the ProLogis Shareholders Meeting is scheduled, ProLogis has not
received proxies representing a sufficient number of ProLogis
Common Shares to obtain the ProLogis Required Vote, whether or
not a quorum is present, ProLogis shall have the right to make
one or more successive postponements or adjournments of the
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting; provided that the ProLogis
Shareholders Meeting is not postponed or adjourned to a date
that is more than 30 days after the date for which the
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting was originally scheduled
(excluding any adjournments or postponements required by
applicable Law). Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be
deemed to relieve ProLogis of its obligation to submit the
Mergers to its shareholders for a vote on the approval thereof.
ProLogis agrees that, unless this Agreement shall have been
terminated in accordance with Section 7.1, its obligations
to hold the ProLogis Shareholders Meeting pursuant to this
Section 5.1(c) shall not be affected by the commencement,
public proposal, public disclosure or communication to ProLogis
of any Acquisition Proposal or by any Change in ProLogis
Recommendation.
(d) Each of the parties hereto shall use their reasonable
best efforts to cause the AMB Stockholders Meeting and the
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting to be held on the same date.
5.2. Access to
Information. (a) Upon reasonable notice,
each of the parties hereto shall (and shall cause each of their
respective Subsidiaries to) afford to the Representatives of the
other, access, during normal business hours during the period
prior to the Topco Effective Time, to all its properties (other
than for purposes of invasive testing), books, contracts and
records and, during such period, each of the parties hereto
shall (and shall cause each of their respective Subsidiaries to)
make available to the other, upon the others reasonable
request, (i) a copy of each report, schedule, registration
statement and other document filed or received by it during such
period pursuant to the requirements of Federal or state
securities laws, or the rules and regulations of self regulatory
organizations (other than reports or documents which such party
is not permitted to disclose under applicable Law) and
(ii) all other information concerning its business,
properties and personnel as such other party may reasonably
request. Neither party nor any of its Subsidiaries shall be
required to provide access to or to disclose information where
such access or disclosure would violate or prejudice the rights
of its customers, jeopardize the attorney-client privilege of
the institution in possession or control of such information or
contravene any law, rule, regulation, order, judgment, decree or
binding agreement entered into prior to the date of this
Agreement. The parties will make appropriate substitute
disclosure arrangements under circumstances in which the
restrictions of the preceding sentence apply.
A-35
(b) The parties will hold any such information which is
nonpublic in confidence to the extent required by, and in
accordance with, the provisions of the letter dated
December 31, 2010, between AMB and ProLogis (the
Confidentiality Agreement), which
Confidentiality Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
(c) No such investigation by either AMB or ProLogis shall
affect the representations and warranties of the other.
5.3. Reasonable Best
Efforts. (a) Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, each of the parties hereto shall
use its reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken,
all actions and to do promptly, or cause to be done promptly,
and to assist and cooperate with each other in doing, all things
necessary, proper or advisable under applicable Law to
consummate and make effective the Mergers and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including preparing
and filing as promptly as practicable all documentation to
effect all necessary filings, notices, petitions, statements,
registrations, submissions of information, applications and
other documents necessary to consummate the Mergers and the
other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In
furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each of the
parties hereto agrees to (i) use its reasonable best
efforts to cooperate with the other party in determining which
filings are required to be made prior to the Closing with, and
which consents, clearances, approvals, permits or authorizations
are required to be obtained prior to the Closing from, any
Governmental Entity in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the Mergers
and the other transactions contemplated hereby and in timely
making all such filings, (ii) promptly furnish the other
party, subject in appropriate cases to appropriate
confidentiality agreements to limit disclosure to outside
lawyers and consultants, with such information and reasonable
assistance as such other party and its affiliates may reasonably
request in connection with their preparation of necessary
filings, registrations and submissions of information to any
Governmental Entity, (iii) supply as promptly as reasonably
practicable any additional information and documentary material
that may be requested pursuant to any applicable Laws by any
Governmental Entity, and (iv) take or cause to be taken all
other actions necessary, proper or advisable to obtain
applicable clearances, consents, authorizations, approvals or
waivers and cause the expiration or termination of the
applicable waiting periods with respect to the Mergers under any
applicable Laws as promptly as practicable.
(b) Each of the parties hereto shall, in connection with
the efforts referenced in Section 5.3(a), use its
reasonable best efforts to (i) cooperate in all respects
with each other in connection with any investigation or other
inquiry, including any proceeding initiated by a private party;
(ii) promptly notify the other party of any communication
concerning this Agreement or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby to that party from or with any Governmental
Entity and consider in good faith the views of the other party
and keep the other party reasonably informed of the status of
matters related to the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, including furnishing the other with any written
notices or other communications received by such party from, or
given by such party to, any U.S. or foreign Governmental
Entity and of any communication received or given in connection
with any proceeding by a private party, in each case regarding
any of the transactions contemplated hereby, except that any
materials concerning one partys valuation of the other
party may be redacted; and (iii) permit the other party to
review in draft any proposed communication to be submitted by it
to any Governmental Entity with reasonable time and opportunity
to comment, and consult with each other in advance of any
in-person or telephonic meeting or conference with any
Governmental Entity or, in connection with any proceeding by a
private party, with any other Person, and, to the extent
permitted by the applicable Governmental Entity or Person, not
agree to participate in any meeting or discussion with any
Governmental Entity relating to any filings or investigations
concerning this Agreement and or any of the transactions
contemplated hereby unless it consults with the other party and
its Representatives in advance and invites the other
partys Representatives to attend in accordance with
applicable Laws.
(c) In furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing,
each of the parties hereto shall (i) use its reasonable
best efforts to resolve objections, if any, as may be asserted
with respect to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
under any Laws, including defending any lawsuits or other legal
proceedings, whether judicial or administrative, challenging
this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby (including seeking to have any stay,
temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction entered by
any court or other Governmental Entity vacated or reversed), and
(ii) take, or cause to be taken, all such further actions
as may be necessary to resolve such objections, if any, as any
Governmental Entity or any other Person may assert under any Law
with respect to the Mergers and the other transactions
contemplated hereby, and to avoid or eliminate each and
A-36
every impediment under any Law so as to enable the Closing to
occur as promptly as reasonably practicable, including
(x) proposing, negotiating, committing to and effecting, by
consent decree, hold separate order or otherwise, the sale,
divestiture, license or disposition of any assets of AMB,
ProLogis or any of their respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates,
and (y) otherwise taking or committing to take any actions
that after the Closing would limit the freedom of AMB, ProLogis
or their respective Subsidiaries or Affiliates
freedom of action with respect to one or more of AMBs,
ProLogiss or their Subsidiaries businesses or
assets, in each case as may be required in order to effect the
satisfaction of the conditions to the Mergers set forth in
Article VI and to avoid the entry of, or to effect the
dissolution of, any injunction, temporary restraining order or
other order in any suit or proceeding that would otherwise have
the effect of preventing or delaying the Closing; provided,
however, that neither AMB nor ProLogis shall be required to
become subject to, or consent or agree to or otherwise take any
action with respect to, any Order, requirement, condition,
understanding or agreement of or with a Governmental Entity to
sell, to license, to hold separate or otherwise dispose of, or
to conduct, restrict, operate, or otherwise change their assets
or businesses, unless such Order, requirement, condition,
understanding or agreement is conditioned upon the occurrence of
the Closing.
(d) Each of AMB, the Board of Directors of AMB, ProLogis
and the Board of Trustees of ProLogis shall, if any state
takeover statute or similar statute becomes applicable to this
Agreement, the Mergers, or any other transactions contemplated
hereby or thereby, use all reasonable best efforts to ensure
that the Mergers and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement may be consummated as promptly as practicable on the
terms contemplated hereby or thereby and otherwise to minimize
the effect of such statute or regulation on this Agreement, the
Mergers and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
(e) Each party shall reasonably consult and cooperate with
the other in connection with any renegotiation or dissolution of
any of their respective funds.
5.4. Acquisition
Proposals. (a) Each of AMB and ProLogis
agrees that neither it nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any of
the officers, trustees and directors of it or its Subsidiaries
shall, and that it shall cause its and its Subsidiaries
Representatives not to, directly or indirectly,
(i) initiate, solicit, knowingly encourage or facilitate
any inquiries or the making of any proposal or offer with
respect to, or a transaction to effect, a merger,
reorganization, share exchange, consolidation, business
combination, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or
similar transaction involving it or any of its Significant
Subsidiaries or any purchase or sale of 20% or more of the
consolidated assets (including stock or other ownership
interests of its Subsidiaries) of it and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, or any purchase or sale of, or tender or exchange
offer for, its voting securities that, if consummated, would
result in any person (or the stockholders or other equity
interest holders of such person) beneficially owning securities
representing 20% or more of its total voting power (or of the
surviving parent entity in such transaction) or the voting power
of any of its Significant Subsidiaries (any such proposal, offer
or transaction (other than a proposal or offer made by one party
to this Agreement or an affiliate thereof) being hereinafter
referred to as an Acquisition Proposal),
(ii) participate in any discussions with or provide any
confidential information or data to any person relating to an
Acquisition Proposal, or engage in any negotiations concerning
an Acquisition Proposal, or knowingly facilitate any effort or
attempt to make or implement an Acquisition Proposal,
(iii) approve or execute or enter into any letter of
intent, agreement in principle, merger agreement, asset purchase
or share exchange agreement, option agreement or other similar
agreement related to any Acquisition Proposal (an
Acquisition Agreement), or (iv) propose
or agree to do any of the foregoing.
(b) (i) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of
Directors of AMB and the Board of Trustees of ProLogis shall
each be permitted, prior to its respective meeting of
stockholders or shareholders to be held pursuant to
Section 5.1, and subject to compliance with the other terms
of this Section 5.4 and to first entering into a
confidentiality agreement having provisions that are no less
favorable to such party than those contained in the
Confidentiality Agreement, to engage in discussions and
negotiations with, or provide any nonpublic information or data
to, any Person in response to an unsolicited bona fide
written Acquisition Proposal by such Person first made after
the date of this Agreement (that did not result from a breach of
this Section 5.4) and which the Board of Directors of AMB
or the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, as applicable, concludes
in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel
and financial advisors) constitutes or is reasonably likely to
result in a Superior Proposal, if and only to the extent that
the directors of AMB or the trustees of ProLogis, as applicable,
conclude in good faith (after consultation with their outside
legal counsel) that failure to do so would be inconsistent with
their
A-37
duties under applicable Law. AMB or ProLogis, as applicable,
shall provide the other with a copy of any nonpublic information
or data provided to a third party pursuant to the prior sentence
prior to or simultaneously with furnishing such information to
such third party.
(ii) Each party shall notify the other party promptly (but
in no event later than 24 hours) after receipt of any
Acquisition Proposal, or any request for nonpublic in- formation
relating to such party or any of its Subsidiaries by any person
that informs such party or any of its Subsidiaries that it is
considering making, or has made, an Acquisition Proposal, or any
inquiry from any person seeking to have discussions or
negotiations with such party relating to a possible Acquisition
Proposal. Such notice shall be made orally and confirmed in
writing, and shall indicate the identity of the person making
the Acquisition Proposal, inquiry or request and the material
terms and conditions of any inquiries, proposals or offers
(including a copy thereof if in writing and any related
documentation or correspondence). Each party shall also
promptly, and in any event within 24 hours, notify the
other party, orally and in writing, if it enters into
discussions or negotiations concerning any Acquisition Proposal
or provides nonpublic information or data to any person in
accordance with this Section 5.4(b) and keep the other
party informed of the status and terms of any such proposals,
offers, discussions or negotiations on a current basis,
including by providing a copy of all material documentation or
correspondence relating thereto.
(iii) Except as provided in Section 5.4(b)(iv) or
Section 5.4(b)(v), neither the Board of Directors of AMB,
the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, nor any committee thereof
shall withhold, withdraw or modify in any manner adverse to the
other party, or propose publicly to withhold, withdraw or modify
in any manner adverse to the other party, the approval,
recommendation or declaration of advisability by the Board of
Directors of AMB or the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, as
applicable, or any such committee thereof with respect to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby (a
Change in AMB Recommendation or a
Change in ProLogis Recommendation,
respectively).
(iv) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, with respect to an Acquisition Proposal, the Board of
Directors of AMB or Board of Trustees of ProLogis, as
applicable, may make a Change in AMB Recommendation or a Change
in ProLogis Recommendation, as applicable, if and only if
(A) an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition
Proposal (that did not result from a breach of this
Section 5.4) is made to AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, by
a third party, and such Acquisition Proposal is not withdrawn,
(B) the Board of Directors of AMB or the Board of Trustees
of ProLogis, as applicable, has concluded in good faith (after
consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial
advisors) that such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior
Proposal, (C) the directors of AMB or the trustees of
ProLogis, as applicable, have concluded in good faith (after
consultation with their outside legal counsel) that failure to
do so would be inconsistent with their duties under applicable
Law, (D) five Business Days shall have elapsed since the
party proposing to take such action has given written notice to
the other party advising such other party that the notifying
party intends to take such action and specifying in reasonable
detail the reasons therefor, including the terms and conditions
of any such Superior Proposal that is the basis of the proposed
action (a Notice of Recommendation Change)
(it being understood that any amendment to any material term of
such Superior Proposal shall require a new Notice of
Recommendation Change and a new five-Business-Day period),
(E) during such five-Business-Day period, the notifying
party has considered and, at the reasonable request of the other
party, engaged in good faith discussions with such party
regarding, any adjustment or modification of the terms of this
Agreement proposed by the other party, and (F) the
directors or trustees, as applicable, of the party proposing to
take such action, following such
five-Business-Day
period, again reasonably determines in good faith (after
consultation with outside legal counsel, and taking into account
any adjustment or modification of the terms of this Agreement
proposed by the other party) that failure to do so would be
inconsistent with their duties under applicable Law.
(v) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, in circumstances not involving or relating to an
Acquisition Proposal, the Board of Directors of AMB or Board of
Trustees of ProLogis, as applicable, may make a Change in AMB
Recommendation or a Change in ProLogis Recommendation, as
applicable, if and only if (A) a material development or
change in circumstances has occurred or arisen after the date of
this Agreement that was neither known to such party nor
reasonably foreseeable as of the date of this Agreement (and
which change or development does not relate to an Acquisition
Proposal), (B) the directors or trustees, as applicable, of
the party proposing to take such action have first reasonably
determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal
counsel) that failure to do so would be inconsistent with their
duties under applicable Law, (C) five Business Days
A-38
shall have elapsed since the party proposing to take such action
has given a Notice of Recommendation Change to the other party
advising that the notifying party intends to take such action
and specifying in reasonable detail the reasons therefor,
(D) during such five-Business-Day period, the notifying
party has considered and, at the reasonable request of the other
party, engaged in good faith discussions with such party
regarding, any adjustment or modification of the terms of this
Agreement proposed by the other party, and (E) the
directors or trustees, as applicable, of the party proposing to
take such action, following such five-Business-Day period, again
reasonably determine in good faith (after consultation with
outside legal counsel, and taking into account any adjustment or
modification of the terms of this Agreement proposed by the
other party) that failure to do so would be inconsistent with
their duties under applicable Law.
(vi) Nothing contained in this Section 5.4 shall
prohibit either party or its Subsidiaries from taking and
disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or from making a statement
contemplated by Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
or
Rule 14d-9
promulgated under the Exchange Act, or from issuing a
stop, look and listen statement pending disclosure
of its position thereunder; provided, however,
that compliance with such rules shall not in any way limit or
modify the effect that any action taken pursuant to such rules
has under any other provision of this Agreement, including
Section 7.1(d) or (e), as applicable, and provided,
further that any such disclosure that addresses or relates
to the approval, recommendation or declaration of advisability
by the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees of such party, as
applicable, with respect to this Agreement or an Acquisition
Proposal shall be deemed to be a Change in AMB Recommendation or
Change in ProLogis Recommendation, as applicable, unless the
Board of Directors or Board of Trustees, as applicable, of such
party, in connection with such communication publicly states
that its recommendation with respect to this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby has not changed or refers to
the prior recommendation of such party, without disclosing any
Change in AMB Recommendation or Change in ProLogis
Recommendation, as applicable.
(c) Each of AMB and ProLogis agrees that (i) it will
and will cause its Subsidiaries, and its and their
Representatives to, cease immediately and terminate any and all
existing activities, discussions or negotiations with any third
parties conducted heretofore with respect to any Acquisition
Proposal, and (ii) it will not release any third party
from, or waive any provisions of, any confidentiality or
standstill agreement to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. Each of AMB and
ProLogis agrees that it will use its reasonable best efforts to
promptly inform its and its Subsidiaries respective
Representatives of the obligations undertaken in this
Section 5.4.
(d) Nothing in this Section 5.4 shall (x) permit
either party to terminate this Agreement or (y) affect any
other obligation of the parties under this Agreement. Neither
party shall submit to the vote of its stockholders or
shareholders any Acquisition Proposal other than the Mergers
prior to the termination of this Agreement.
(e) For purposes of this Agreement, Superior
Proposal for AMB or ProLogis means a bona fide
written Acquisition Proposal that the Board of Directors of
AMB or Board of Trustees of ProLogis, respectively, concludes in
good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and
outside legal counsel, taking into account all legal, financial,
regulatory and other aspects of the proposal and the person
making the proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation), (i) is more favorable to the stockholders of
AMB or shareholders of ProLogis, respectively, than the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and (ii) is
fully financed, reasonably likely to receive all required
governmental approvals on a timely basis and otherwise
reasonably capable of being completed on the terms proposed;
provided that, for purposes of this definition of
Superior Proposal, the term Acquisition Proposal
shall have the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 5.4(a), except that the reference to 20% or
more in the definition of Acquisition Proposal
shall be deemed to be a reference to a majority and
Acquisition Proposal shall only be deemed to refer
to a transaction involving AMB or ProLogis, respectively.
5.5. Stock Exchange Listing. AMB
shall use reasonable best efforts to cause (a) the shares
of AMB Common Stock, the AMB Series R Preferred Stock and
the AMB Series S Preferred Stock to be issued in the Topco
Merger, (b) the shares of AMB Common Stock to be reserved
for issuance upon exercise or settlement of ProLogis Share
Options, ProLogis RSUs, ProLogis Performance Shares and ProLogis
DEUs, (c) the shares of AMB Common Stock to be reserved for
issuance upon exchange or redemption of ProLogis Partnership
Units by a limited partner in
A-39
a ProLogis Partnership pursuant to the partnership agreement of
the applicable ProLogis Partnership, and (d) the shares of
AMB Common Stock to be reserved for issuance upon conversion or
exchange of ProLogiss convertible debt by holders thereof
to be approved for listing on the NYSE, subject to official
notice of issuance, prior to the Closing Date.
5.6. Equity Awards and Employee Matters
(a) ProLogis Equity Awards.
(i) ProLogis Share Options. At the Topco
Effective Time, each outstanding option to purchase ProLogis
Common Shares (recognizing and taking into account that each
ProLogis Common Share will, at the ProLogis Effective Time, be
con- verted into a share of New Pumpkin Common Stock in
accordance with Section 2.1 of this Agreement), other than
options under the ProLogis ESPP (each, a ProLogis Share
Option), whether or not exercisable at the Topco
Effective Time, will be assumed by the Surviving Corporation by
virtue of the Mergers and without any action on the part of the
holder thereof. Subject to, and in accordance with, the terms of
the applicable ProLogis Share Plan and award agreement or other
agreement or other document evidencing ProLogis Share Options,
from and after the Topco Effective Time, each ProLogis Share
Option so assumed by the Surviving Corporation under this
Agreement will otherwise continue to have, and be subject to,
the same terms and conditions (including vesting schedule) as
were applicable to the corresponding ProLogis Share Option
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time as set forth in
the applicable ProLogis Share Plan (including any applicable
award agreement, other agreement or other document evidencing
such ProLogis Share Option) immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time, except that, from and after the Topco Effective
Time, (A) each ProLogis Share Option, when exercisable,
will be exercisable for that number of whole shares of AMB
Common Stock equal to the product of the number of ProLogis
Common Shares that were subject to such ProLogis Share Option
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time multiplied by the
Exchange Ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole number of
shares of AMB Common Stock and (B) the per share exercise
price for the shares of AMB Common Stock issuable upon exercise
of such assumed ProLogis Share Option will be equal to the
quotient determined by dividing the exercise price of each
ProLogis Common Share subject to such assumed ProLogis Share
Option by the Exchange Ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole
cent.
(ii) ProLogis Share Unit Awards. At the
Topco Effective Time, each outstanding share unit award with
respect to ProLogis Common Shares (recognizing and taking into
account that each such ProLogis Common Share will, at the
ProLogis Effective Time, be converted into a share of New
Pumpkin Common Stock in accordance with Section 2.1 of this
Agreement) under a ProLogis Share Plan (each, a
ProLogis RSU), whether or not vested as of
the Topco Effective Time, will be assumed by the Surviving
Corporation by virtue of the Mergers and without any action on
the part of the holder thereof. Subject to, and in accordance
with, the terms of the applicable ProLogis Share Plan and any
applicable award agreement or other agreement or other document
evidencing ProLogis RSUs, each ProLogis RSU so assumed shall be
converted, at the Topco Effective Time, into the right to
receive the number of shares of AMB Common Stock equal to the
number of ProLogis Common Shares subject to the ProLogis RSU,
multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest
whole number of shares of AMB Common Stock) and, from and after
the Topco Effective Time, will otherwise continue to have, and
be subject to, the same terms and conditions (including vesting
schedule) as were applicable to the corresponding ProLogis RSU
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time and any
obligations in respect thereof shall be payable or distributable
in accordance with the terms of the applicable ProLogis Share
Plan (including any applicable award agreements or other
agreements or other documents evidencing such ProLogis RSU)
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time.
(iii) ProLogis Dividend Equivalent
Units. At the Topco Effective Time, each
outstanding dividend equivalent unit award with respect to
ProLogis Common Shares (recognizing and taking into account that
each such ProLogis Common Share will, at the ProLogis Effective
Time, be converted into a share of New Pumpkin Common Stock in
accordance with Section 2.1 of this Agreement) under a
ProLogis Share Plan (each, a ProLogis DEU),
whether or not vested as of the Topco Effective Time, will be
assumed by the Surviving Corporation by virtue of the Mergers
and without any action on the part of the holder thereof.
Subject to, and in accordance with, the terms of, the applicable
ProLogis Share Plan and any applicable award agreement or other
agreement or other document evidencing ProLogis DEUs, each
ProLogis DEU so assumed shall be converted, at the Topco
Effective Time, into the right to receive the number of shares
of AMB Common Stock equal to the number of ProLogis Common
Shares
A-40
subject to the ProLogis DEU, multiplied by the Exchange Ratio
(rounded down to the nearest whole number of shares of AMB
Common Stock) and, from and after the Topco Effective Time, will
otherwise continue to have, and be subject to, the same terms
and conditions (including vesting schedule) as were applicable
to the corresponding ProLogis DEU immediately prior to the Topco
Effective Time and any obligations in respect thereof shall be
payable or distributable in accordance with the terms of the
applicable ProLogis Share Plan (including any applicable award
agreements or other agreements or other documents evidencing
such ProLogis DEU) immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time.
(iv) ProLogis Performance
Shares. Effective as of the Topco Effective Time,
each outstanding performance share award under a ProLogis Share
Plan which is denominated in ProLogis Common Shares (recognizing
and taking into account that each such ProLogis Common Share
will, at the ProLogis Effective Time, be converted into a share
of New Pumpkin Common Stock in accordance with this Agreement)
(collectively, the ProLogis Performance
Shares), whether or not vested or earned as of the
Topco Effective Time, will be assumed by the Surviving
Corporation by virtue of the Mergers and without any action on
the part of the holder thereof. Subject to, and in accordance
with the terms of, the applicable ProLogis Share Plan and any
applicable award agreement or other agreement or other document
evidencing ProLogis Performance Shares, each ProLogis
Performance Share so assumed shall be converted, at the Topco
Effective Time, into the right to be eligible to receive a
number
of shares
of AMB Common Stock equal to the number of ProLogis Common
Shares underlying or subject to the ProLogis Performance Shares,
multiplied by the Exchange Ratio (rounded down to the nearest
whole number of shares of AMB Common Stock), and, from and after
the Topco Effective Time, will otherwise continue to have, and
be subject to, the same terms and conditions (including vesting
schedule) as were applicable to the corresponding ProLogis
Performance Shares immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time
and any obligations in respect thereof shall be payable or
distributable in accordance with the terms of the applicable
ProLogis Share Plan (including any applicable award agreements
or other agreements or other documents evidencing such ProLogis
Performance Shares) immediately prior to the Topco Effective
Time.
(v) ProLogis ESPP. The Board of Trustees
of ProLogis shall adopt such resolutions or take such other
actions as may be required to provide that with respect to
ProLogiss Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
ProLogis ESPP): (A) participants in the
ProLogis ESPP (ESPP Participants) may not
increase their payroll deductions under the ProLogis ESPP from
those in effect on the date of this Agreement; (B) no new
ESPP Participants may commence participation in the ProLogis
ESPP following the date of this Agreement; (C) all
participation in and purchases under the ProLogis ESPP shall be
suspended effective as of the earlier of (I) June 30,
2010 or (II) ProLogiss payroll period ending
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time but in no event
less than 10 business days prior to the Topco Effective Time
(the ESPP Suspension Date), such that the
offering period in effect as of the date of the Agreement will
be the final offering period under the ProLogis ESPP until
otherwise determined by the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation after the Topco Effective Time; and (D) with
respect to any offering period under the ProLogis ESPP in effect
as of the date of the Agreement, ProLogis shall ensure that such
offering period ends at the ESPP Suspension Date and that each
ESPP Participants accumulated contributions for such
offering period are applied to the purchase of ProLogis Common
Shares in accordance with the terms of the ProLogis ESPP unless
the ESPP Participant has previously withdrawn from such offering
period in accordance with the terms of the ProLogis ESPP. Any
cash remaining in the ProLogis ESPP after purchases occurring on
the ESPP Suspension Date shall be refunded to ProLogis ESPP
participants promptly following the ESPP Suspension Date.
(vi) General. Prior to the Topco
Effective Time, ProLogis and AMB agree that ProLogis shall, and
shall be permitted under this Agreement to, take all corporate
action necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Section.
From and after the Topco Effective Time, unless the compensation
committee of the Board of Directors of the Surviving Corporation
determines otherwise, all references to ProLogis in each
ProLogis Share Plan and in each agreement evidencing any
ProLogis Options, ProLogis RSUs, ProLogis DEUs, or any other
ProLogis equity-based award, including any ProLogis Performance
Shares, shall be deemed (A) for all purposes relating to
employment, consultancy or directorship (or words of similar
meaning) to refer to the Surviving Corporation and its
Subsidiaries and (B) for all other purposes, to refer to
the Surviving Corporation.
A-41
(b) Employee Matters.
(i) From and after the Topco Effective Time, the AMB
Benefit Plans and the ProLogis Benefit Plans in effect as of the
Topco Effective Time (other than the ProLogis Share Plans) shall
remain in effect with respect to employees and former employees
of AMB or ProLogis and their Subsidiaries (the
Surviving Corporation Employees),
respectively, covered by or eligible for such plans at the Topco
Effective Time, until such time as the Surviving Corporation
shall otherwise determine, subject to applicable Laws and the
terms of such plans; provided that nothing herein shall
prohibit any amendment, modification or termination of any such
AMB Benefit Plans, ProLogis Benefit Plans, arrangements or
agreements in accordance with their terms as in effect
immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time or the termination
of the employment of any AMB Employee or ProLogis Employee to
the extent permitted by applicable Law.
(ii) With respect to any Benefit Plans in which any
Surviving Corporation Employees who were employees of AMB or
ProLogis (or their Subsidiaries) prior to the Topco Effective
Time first become eligible to participate on or after the Topco
Effective Time, and in which such Surviving Corporation
Employees did not participate prior to the Topco Effective Time
(the New Plans), the Surviving Corporation
shall: (A) waive all pre-existing conditions, exclusions
and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage
requirements applicable to the Surviving Corporation Employees
and their eligible dependents under any New Plans in which such
employees may be eligible to participate after the Topco
Effective Time, except to the extent such pre-existing
conditions, exclusions or waiting periods would apply under the
analogous AMB Benefit Plan or ProLogis Benefit Plan, as the case
may be; (B) provide each Surviving Corporation Employee and
their eligible dependents with credit for any co-payments and
deductibles paid prior to the Topco Effective Time under an AMB
Benefit Plan or ProLogis Benefit Plan (to the same extent that
such credit was given under the analogous Benefit Plan prior to
the Topco Effective Time) in satisfying any applicable
deductible or
out-of-pocket
requirements under any New Plans; and (C) recognize all
service of the Surviving Corporation Employees with ProLogis and
AMB, and their respective affiliates, for all purposes
(including for purposes of eligibility to participate, vesting
credit, entitlement to benefits, and, except with respect to
defined benefit pension plans benefit accrual) in any New Plan
in which such employees may be eligible to participate after the
Topco Effective Time, including any severance plan, to the
extent such service is taken into account under the applicable
New Plan; provided that the foregoing shall not apply to
the extent it would result in duplication of benefits.
(iii) ProLogis and AMB agree that (A) the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including
the Mergers, shall constitute a change of control,
change in control or term of similar import for
purposes of all of the AMB Benefit Plans; (B) except as set
forth in Section 5.6(b)(iii) of the ProLogis Disclosure
Letter, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, including the Mergers, shall not constitute a
change of control, change in control or
term of similar import for purposes of any of the ProLogis
Benefit Plans; and (C) AMB shall take the actions set forth
in Section 5.6(b)(iii) of the AMB Disclosure Letter.
Effective as of the Topco Effective Time, the Surviving
Corporation shall assume all of ProLogiss rights, powers,
duties and obligations under each of the agreements set forth in
Section 5.6(b)(iii) of the ProLogis Disclosure Letter and
shall be substituted for ProLogis thereunder for all purposes.
(iv) Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, the
provisions of this Section 5.6(b) are solely for the
benefit of the parties to this Agreement, and no current or
former director, officer, employee or independent contractor or
any other person shall be a third-party beneficiary of this
Agreement, and nothing herein shall be construed as an amendment
to any AMB Benefit Plan, ProLogis Benefit Plan or other
compensation or benefit plan or arrangement for any purpose.
5.7. Fees and Expenses. Whether or
not the Topco Merger is consummated, all costs and expenses
incurred in connection with this Agreement and the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby shall be paid by the party
incurring such expense, except as otherwise provided in
Section 7.2 and except that (a) if the Topco Merger is
consummated, the Surviving Corporation shall pay, or cause to be
paid, any and all property or transfer taxes imposed on either
party in connection with the Topco Merger, and (b) expenses
incurred in connection with filing, printing and mailing the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
and in connection with any filings required under the Laws
governing antitrust or merger control matters related to the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be shared
equally by AMB and ProLogis.
A-42
5.8. Governance. (a) AMB and
the Board of Directors of AMB shall take all actions necessary
so that, as of the Topco Effective Time, the number of directors
that will comprise the full Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation shall be 11. The members of the initial Board of
Directors of the Surviving Corporation as of the Topco Effective
Time shall consist of (i) the current Chief Executive
Officer of AMB, (ii) the current Chief Executive Officer of
ProLogis, (iii) four individuals to be selected by the
current members of the Board of Directors of AMB (in addition to
the current Chief Executive Officer of AMB), which four members
shall be designated by AMB no later than February 28, 2011,
following consultation with the Board of Trustees of ProLogis,
and (iv) five individuals to be selected by the current
members of the Board of Trustees of ProLogis (in addition to the
current Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis), which five members
shall be designated by ProLogis no later than February 28,
2011, following consultation with the Board of Directors of AMB.
In the event that, prior to the Closing, (A) any designee
of AMB to the Board of Directors of the Surviving Corporation is
unable to serve on the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation, a replacement shall be designated by the
independent members of the Board of Directors of AMB, following
consultation with the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, or
(B) any designee of ProLogis to the Board of Directors of
the Surviving Corporation is unable to serve on the Board of
Directors of the Surviving Corporation, a replacement shall be
designated by the independent members of the Board of Trustees
of ProLogis, following consultation with the Board of Directors
of AMB. Beginning at the Topco Effective Time, and until his
resignation or replacement in such position in accordance with
the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation, Mr. Irving F.
Lyons, III will become the lead independent director of the
Surviving Corporation.
(b) The Board of Directors of the Surviving Corporation
will have four committees, consisting of an Audit Committee, a
Compensation Committee, an Executive Committee, and a
Nominating & Governance Committee (which will include
in its charter the current responsibilities of ProLogiss
Corporate Responsibility Committee). The representation of the
individuals designated by ProLogis and the individuals
designated by AMB on the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation will be duplicated as nearly as possible on each
committee of the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation, and ProLogis and AMB shall mutually agree upon and
designate the prospective members of the committees of the Board
of Directors of the Surviving Corporation, and the chairs of
such committees, by no later than February 28, 2011. The
Executive Committee will meet and act separately only if board
action is required, the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation is unavailable and the matter is time-sensitive, as
set forth in the Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation. In the
event that, prior to the Closing, (i) any committee
designee of AMB is unable to serve on such committee, a
replacement shall be designated by the independent members of
the Board of Directors of AMB, following consultation with the
Board of Trustees of ProLogis, or (ii) any committee
designee of ProLogis is unable to serve on such committee, a
replacement shall be designated by the independent members of
the Board of Trustees of ProLogis, following consultation with
the Board of Directors of AMB.
(c) At or prior to the Topco Effective Time, the Board of
Directors or officers of AMB shall take such actions as are
necessary to cause the persons indicated in Exhibit B to be
elected or appointed to the offices of the Surviving Corporation
specified in such Exhibit as of the Topco Effective Time.
(d) Effective as of the Topco Effective Time, (i) the
current Chief Executive Officer of AMB shall be the
non-executive Chairman of the Board and (ii) the current
Chief Executive Officer of ProLogis shall be the chairman of the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation.
(e) Subject to the rights of the Board of Directors of the
Surviving Corporation as set forth in the Bylaws of the
Surviving Corporation, on December 31, 2012: (i) the
employment of Walter C. Rakowich shall automatically terminate,
without action by the Board of Directors of the Surviving
Corporation or any other person or party, and he shall thereupon
retire as co-Chief Executive Officer and as a Director of the
Surviving Corporation, and Hamid R. Moghadam shall then become
the sole Chief Executive Officer (and shall remain non-executive
Chairman of the Board) of the Surviving Corporation, and
(ii) the employment of William E. Sullivan shall
automatically terminate, without action by the Board of
Directors of the Surviving Corporation or any other person or
party, and he shall thereupon retire as Chief Financial Officer
of the Surviving Corporation and Thomas S. Olinger will become
the Chief Financial Officer of the Surviving Corporation.
A-43
(f) The headquarters of the Surviving Corporation will be
located in San Francisco, California. ProLogiss
existing headquarters facilities in Denver, Colorado will become
the operations headquarters of the Surviving Corporation.
(g) The common stock of the Surviving Corporation will
trade under the ticker symbol PLD.
(h) The logo of the Surviving Corporation shall be
ProLogiss current logo.
5.9. Exculpation; Indemnification; Directors
and Officers Insurance. (a) From and
after the Topco Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall,
to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Law, exculpate,
indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of
expenses to, each person who is now, or has been at any time
prior to the date hereof or who becomes prior to the Topco
Effective Time, an officer, director or trustee of AMB, ProLogis
or their respective Subsidiaries (the Indemnified
Parties) against all losses, claims, damages, costs,
expenses, liabilities or judgments or amounts arising from any
claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation based in whole
or in part on the fact that such person is or was a director,
trustee or officer of AMB, ProLogis or their respective
Subsidiaries, or was prior to the Topco Effective Time serving
at the request of any such party as a trustee, director,
officer, partner, officer or employee of another Person, and
pertaining to any matter existing or occurring, or any acts or
omissions occurring, at or prior to the Topco Effective Time,
whether asserted or claimed prior to, or at or after, the Topco
Effective Time (including matters, acts or omissions occurring
in connection with the approval of this Agreement and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby)
(Indemnified Liabilities) to the same extent
such persons are exculpated or indemnified or have the right to
advancement of expenses as of the date of this Agreement by AMB,
ProLogis or any of their respective Subsidiaries pursuant to any
of their organizational documents in existence on the date
hereof.
(b) Prior to the Topco Effective Time, each of AMB and
ProLogis shall use reasonable best efforts to obtain and fully
pay for a tail prepaid insurance policies with a
claim period of six (6) years from and after the Topco
Effective Time from an insurance carrier believed to be sound
and reputable with respect to directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary insurance (AMB
D&O Insurance and ProLogis D&O
Insurance) for the current and former directors,
trustees and officers of AMB, ProLogis and their respective
Subsidiaries as to such Persons status as a director,
trustee or officer of AMB, ProLogis or their respective
Subsidiaries and for facts or events that occurred at or prior
to the Topco Effective Time, which AMB D&O Insurance and
ProLogis D&O Insurance (i) shall not have an annual
premium in excess of 250% of the last annual premium paid by AMB
(in the case of AMB D&O Insurance) or ProLogis (in the case
of ProLogis D&O Insurance) (250% of such last annual
premium paid by AMB, the AMB Maximum Premium
and 250% of such last annual premium paid by ProLogis, the
ProLogis Maximum Premium) prior to the date
hereof for its existing directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary insurance, (ii) has
terms, conditions, retentions and limits of coverage at least as
favorable as the existing directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary insurance for AMB (in the case
of the AMB D&O Insurance) and ProLogis (in the case of the
ProLogis D&O Insurance) with respect to matters existing or
occurring prior to the Topco Effective Time (including with
respect to acts or omissions occurring in connection with this
Agreement and consummation of the transaction contemplated
hereby); provided, however, that if terms, conditions,
retentions and limits of coverage at least as favorable as the
existing directors and officers liability insurance
and fiduciary insurance for AMB or ProLogis cannot be obtained
or can be obtained only by paying an annual premium in excess of
the AMB Maximum Premium (in the case of the AMB D&O
Insurance) or the ProLogis Maximum Premium (in the case of the
ProLogis D&O Insurance), AMB, ProLogis and the Surviving
Corporation, as the case may be, shall only be required to
obtain as much similar insurance as is reasonably practicable
for an annual premium equal to the AMB Maximum Premium (in the
case of the AMB D&O Insurance) or the ProLogis Maximum
Premium (in the case of the ProLogis D&O Insurance), and
(iii) the Surviving Corporation after the Topco Effective
Time shall maintain such policies in full force and effect for
its full six (6) year term and to continue to honor its
respective obligations thereunder. If AMB or ProLogis for any
reason fails to obtain such tail prepaid insurance
as of the Topco Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall
continue to maintain in effect, for a period of six
(6) years from and after the Topco Effective Time for the
current and former directors, trustees and officers of AMB,
ProLogis and their respective Subsidiaries as to such
Persons status as a director, trustee or officer with AMB,
ProLogis or their respective Subsidiaries, as the case may be,
and for facts or events that occurred at or prior to the Topco
Effective Time, the existing directors and officers
liability insurance and fiduciary insurance for AMB and
ProLogis, which insurance (i) shall not have an annual
premium in excess of
A-44
the AMB Maximum Premium (in the case of the AMB insurance) or
the ProLogis Maximum Premium (in the case of the ProLogis
insurance), (ii) has terms, conditions, retentions and
limits of coverage at least as favorable as the existing
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary insurance for AMB and ProLogis, as applicable, with
respect to matters existing or occurring prior to the Topco
Effective Time (including with respect to acts or omissions
occurring in connection with this Agreement and consummation of
the transaction contemplated hereby); provided, however,
that if terms, conditions, retentions and limits of coverage at
least as favorable as such existing insurance cannot be obtained
or can be obtained only by paying an annual premium in excess of
the AMB Maximum Premium or the ProLogis Maximum Premium, as
applicable, the Surviving Corporation shall only be required to
obtain as much similar insurance as is reasonably practicable
for an annual premium equal to the AMB Maximum Premium or the
ProLogis Maximum Premium, as applicable, and (iii) the
Surviving Corporation shall maintain such policies in full force
and effect for its full six (6) year term and continue to
honor its obligations thereunder.
(c) If the Surviving Corporation or any of its successors
or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into any other
person and shall not be the continuing or surviving corporation
or entity of such consolidation or merger, or
(ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all of its
properties and assets to any person, then, and in each such
case, to the extent necessary, proper provision shall be made so
that the successors and assigns of the Surviving Corporation, as
the case may be, shall assume the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.9.
(d) The provisions of this Section 5.9 (i) are
intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by,
each Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and representatives,
and (ii) are in addition to, and not in substitution for,
any other rights to indemnification or contribution that any
such person may have by contract or otherwise.
(e) The Surviving Corporation will enter into
indemnification agreements with each member of its board of
directors and its executive officers, to the extent that such
member of the board of directors or executive officer does not
have an indemnification agreement with the Surviving Corporation
as of immediately prior to the Topco Effective Time.
5.10. Dividends. (a) From and
after the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the Topco
Effective Time and termination of this Agreement, none of AMB,
ProLogis or New Pumpkin shall make, declare or set aside any
dividend or other distribution to its respective stockholders or
shareholders without the prior written consent of AMB (in the
case of ProLogis or New Pumpkin) or ProLogis (in the case of
AMB); provided, however, that the written consent
of the other party shall not be required for the authorization
and payment of (i) distributions at their respective stated
dividend or distribution rates with respect to AMB Preferred
Stock and ProLogis Preferred Shares and (ii) quarterly
distributions at a rate not in excess of the regular quarterly
cash dividend most recently declared prior to the date of this
Agreement with respect to each of the shares of AMB Common Stock
and ProLogis Common Shares, respectively (it being agreed that
the timing of any such quarterly distributions will be
coordinated so that, if either the holders of AMB Common Stock
or the holders of ProLogis Common Shares receives a distribution
for a particular quarter prior to the Closing Date, then the
holders of ProLogis Common Shares and the holders of AMB Common
Stock, respectively, shall receive a distribution for such
quarter prior to the Closing Date); provided, however,
that the record and payment dates for ProLogiss and
AMBs distributions pursuant to this Section 5.10(a)
shall be the same as the other partys record and payment
dates.
(b) Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything else to the
contrary in this Agreement, each of AMB and ProLogis, as
applicable, shall be permitted to declare and pay a dividend to
its stockholders or shareholders, the record date and payment
date for which shall be the close of business on the last
Business Day prior to the Closing Date, distributing any amounts
determined by such party (in each case in consultation with the
other party) to be the minimum dividend required to be
distributed in order for such party to qualify as a REIT and to
avoid to the extent reasonably possible the incurrence of income
or excise Tax (any dividend paid pursuant to this paragraph, a
REIT Dividend).
(c) If either party determines that it is necessary to
declare a REIT Dividend, it shall notify the other party at
least 20 days prior to the date for the AMB Stockholders
Meeting, in the case of a declaration by AMB, or the ProLogis
Shareholders Meeting, in the case of a declaration by ProLogis,
and such other party shall be entitled to declare a dividend per
share payable (i) in the case of AMB, to holders of AMB
Common Stock, in an amount per share of AMB Common Stock equal
to the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the REIT Dividend
declared by
A-45
ProLogis with respect to each ProLogis Common Share by
(B) the Exchange Ratio and (ii) in the case of
ProLogis, to holders of ProLogis Common Shares, in an amount per
ProLogis Common Share equal to the product of (x) the REIT
Dividend declared by AMB with respect to each share of AMB
Common Stock and (y) the Exchange Ratio. The record date
and payment date for any dividend payable pursuant to this
Section 5.10(c) shall be the close of business on the last
Business Day prior to the Closing Date.
(d) If, and to the extent, the terms of any series of AMB
Preferred Stock or ProLogis Preferred Shares require the payment
of a dividend or other distribution by reason of a payment of a
REIT Dividend or a dividend paid pursuant to
Section 5.10(c), AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, shall
declare and pay any such required dividends or other
distributions.
5.11. Public Announcements. AMB and
ProLogis shall use reasonable best efforts (a) to develop a
joint communications plan, (b) to ensure that all press
releases and other public statements with respect to the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be consistent with such
joint communications plan, and (c) except in respect of any
announcement required by applicable Law or by obligations
pursuant to any listing agreement with or rules of any
securities exchange, to consult with each other before issuing
any press release or, to the extent practical, otherwise making
any public statement with respect to this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby. In addition to the foregoing,
except to the extent disclosed in or consistent with the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus in accordance with the provisions of
Section 5.1 or as otherwise permitted under
Section 5.4, no party shall issue any press release or
otherwise make any public statement or disclosure concerning the
other party or the other partys business, financial
condition or results of operations without the consent of such
other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed. Each party shall provide the other party with its
stockholder or shareholder lists and allow and facilitate the
other partys contact with its stockholders or shareholders
and prospective investors and following a Change in AMB
Recommendation or Change in ProLogis Recommendation, as the case
may be, such contacts may be made without regard to the above
limitations of this Section 5.11.
5.12. Additional Agreements. In
case at any time after the Topco Effective Time any further
action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement or to vest the Surviving Corporation with full
title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals, immunities
and franchises of AMB, ProLogis or New Pumpkin, the proper
officers, directors and trustees of each party to this Agreement
shall take all such necessary action.
5.13. Tax Matters. AMB, ProLogis
and New Pumpkin agree to use their reasonable best efforts to
cause each of the ProLogis Merger and the Topco Merger to
qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. ProLogis, as a domestic
eligible entity with a single owner, shall elect pursuant to
Treasury
Regulation Section 301.7701-3(c)
to be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner effective
no later than the Business Day immediately after the date of the
ProLogis Effective Time and shall file not later than the
Business Day immediately after the date of the ProLogis
Effective Time a properly completed and executed Form 8832
with the IRS to effect such election.
5.14. Financing Cooperation. The
parties hereto shall cooperate in good faith to implement
necessary or appropriate arrangements under each partys
indentures or other indebtedness with respect to financing
matters concerning ProLogis, AMB and the Surviving Corporation.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
6.1. Conditions to Each Partys
Obligation. The respective obligation of each
party to effect the Mergers shall be subject to the satisfaction
prior to the Closing Date of the following conditions:
(a) Stockholder Approval. AMB shall have
obtained the AMB Required Vote, and ProLogis shall have obtained
the ProLogis Required Vote.
(b) NYSE Listing. The shares of
(i) AMB Common Stock, AMB Series R Preferred Stock and
AMB Series S Preferred Stock to be issued in the Topco
Merger, (ii) AMB Common Stock to be reserved for issuance
upon exercise or settlement of ProLogis Share Options, ProLogis
RSUs, ProLogis Performance Shares and ProLogis DEUs,
(iii) AMB Common Stock to be reserved for issuance upon
exchange or redemption of
A-46
ProLogis Partnership Units by a limited partner in a ProLogis
Partnership pursuant to the partnership agreement of the
applicable ProLogis Partnership, and (iv) AMB Common Stock
to be reserved for issuance upon the conversion or exchange of
ProLogiss convertible debt outstanding as of the date of
this Agreement shall have been authorized for listing on the
NYSE upon official notice of issuance.
(c) Form S-4. The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall
not be the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a
stop order.
(d) No Injunctions or Restraints;
Illegality. No temporary restraining order,
preliminary or permanent injunction or other order issued by any
court of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or
prohibition preventing the consummation of the Mergers shall be
in effect. There shall not be any action taken, or any statute,
rule, regulation or order enacted, entered, enforced or deemed
applicable to the Mergers, by any Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction which makes the consummation of the
Mergers illegal.
(e) Regulatory Approvals. Any regulatory
approval or waiting period required in connection with the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have been
obtained or met and shall remain in full force and effect,
except to the extent that the failure to obtain such approval or
meet such waiting period would not have, and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a material adverse effect on the business, financial
condition or results of operations of AMB, ProLogis and their
Subsidiaries, on a combined basis.
6.2. Conditions to Obligations of
AMB. The obligation of AMB to effect the Topco
Merger is subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions unless waived by AMB:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) The representations and
warranties of ProLogis set forth in Section 3.2(b) and
Section 3.2(c) shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing
Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the
extent made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such
date), and (ii) the other representations and warranties of
ProLogis set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct
as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as
though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent
expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such
date), except, in the case of this clause (ii), where the
failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and
correct (without giving effect to any limitation as to
materiality or ProLogis Material Adverse Effect) has
not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of ProLogis
Entities. Each of ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New
Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC shall have performed in all material
respects all obligations required to be performed by it under
this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Tax Opinion. AMB shall have received
the opinion of its counsel, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &
Katz (or other AMB counsel reasonably satisfactory to ProLogis),
in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to AMB, dated the
Closing Date, to the effect that, on the basis of facts,
representations and assumptions set forth in such opinion, the
Topco Merger will qualify as a reorganization within
the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering
such opinion, counsel may require and rely upon customary
representations contained in certificates of officers of
ProLogis and AMB, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance
to it.
(d) REIT Opinion. ProLogis shall have
received a tax opinion of Mayer Brown LLP (or other ProLogis
counsel reasonably satisfactory to AMB), dated as of the Closing
Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to AMB,
opining that, commencing with ProLogiss taxable year ended
December 31, 1993, ProLogis has been organized and operated
in conformity with the requirements for qualification and
taxation as a REIT under the Code. In rendering such opinion,
such counsel may require and rely upon customary representations
contained in a certificate of officers of ProLogis.
(e) Closing Certificate. AMB shall have
received a certificate signed on behalf of ProLogis by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of ProLogis, dated
as of the Closing Date, to the effect that the conditions set
forth in Section 6.2(a) and Section 6.2(b) have been
satisfied.
A-47
6.3. Conditions to Obligations of
ProLogis. The obligation of ProLogis to effect
the Mergers is subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions unless waived by ProLogis:
(a) Representations and
Warranties. (i) The representations and
warranties of AMB set forth in Section 3.1(b) and
Section 3.1(c) shall be true and correct in all material
respects as of the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing
Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the
extent made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such
date), and (ii) the other representations and warranties of
AMB set forth in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of
the date of this Agreement and as of the Closing Date as though
made on and as of the Closing Date (except to the extent
expressly made as of an earlier date, in which case as of such
date), except, in the case of this clause (ii), where the
failure of such representations and warranties to be so true and
correct (without giving effect to any limitation as to
materiality or AMB Material Adverse Effect) has not
had, and would not reasonably be expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, an AMB Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Performance of Obligations of
AMB. Each of AMB and AMB LP shall have performed
in all material respects all obligations required to be
performed by it under this Agreement at or prior to the Closing
Date.
(c) Tax Opinion. ProLogis shall have
received the opinion of its counsel, Mayer Brown LLP (or other
ProLogis counsel reasonably satisfactory to AMB), in form and
substance reasonably satisfactory to ProLogis, dated the Closing
Date, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations
and assumptions set forth in such opinion, each of the Mergers
will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning
of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion,
counsel may require and rely upon customary representations
contained in certificates of officers of ProLogis and AMB,
reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to it.
(d) REIT Opinion. AMB shall have received
a tax opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP (or other AMB
counsel reasonably satisfactory to ProLogis), dated as of the
Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to
ProLogis, opining that, commencing with AMBs taxable year
ended December 31, 1997, AMB has been organized and
operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification
and taxation as a REIT under the Code. In rendering such
opinion, such counsel may require and rely upon customary
representations contained in a certificate of officers of AMB.
(e) Closing Certificate. ProLogis shall
have received a certificate signed on behalf of AMB by the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AMB, dated as
of the Closing Date, to the effect that the conditions set forth
in Section 6.3(a) and Section 6.3(b) have been
satisfied.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
AND AMENDMENT
7.1. Termination. This Agreement
may be terminated at any time prior to the Topco Effective Time,
by action taken or authorized by the Board of Directors or Board
of Trus- tees, as applicable, of the terminating party or
parties, whether before or after approval of the Mergers by the
stockholders of AMB or shareholders of ProLogis:
(a) by mutual consent of AMB and ProLogis in a written
instrument;
(b) by either AMB or ProLogis, upon written notice to the
other party, if any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued an order, decree or ruling or
taken any other action permanently enjoining or otherwise
prohibiting the Mergers, and such order, decree, ruling or other
action has become final and nonappealable; provided,
however, that the right to terminate this Agreement under
this Section 7.1(b) shall not be available to any party
whose failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement has
been the cause of, or resulted in, such action;
(c) by either AMB or ProLogis, upon written notice to the
other party, if the Mergers shall not have been consummated on
or before September 30, 2011; provided, however,
that the right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 7.1(c) shall not be available to any party whose
failure to comply with any provision of this Agreement has been
the cause of, or resulted in, the failure of the Mergers to
occur on or before such date;
A-48
(d) by AMB, upon written notice to ProLogis, (i) upon
a Change in ProLogis Recommendation, (ii) if the ProLogis
Shareholders Meeting shall not have been called and held as
required by Section 5.1(c), or (iii) upon a material
breach by ProLogis of its obligations pursuant to
Section 5.4;
(e) by ProLogis, upon written notice to AMB, (i) upon
a Change in AMB Recommendation, (ii) if the AMB
Stockholders Meeting shall not have been called and held as
required by Section 5.1(b), or (iii) upon a material
breach by AMB of its obligations pursuant to Section 5.4;
(f) by either AMB or ProLogis, upon written notice to the
other party, if there shall have been a breach by the other
party of any of the covenants or agreements or any of the
representations or warranties set forth in this Agreement on the
part of such other party, which breach, either individually or
in the aggregate, would result in, if occurring or continuing on
the Closing Date, the failure to be satisfied of the condition
set forth in Section 6.2(a) or (b) or
Section 6.3(a) or (b), as the case may be, unless such
breach is reasonably capable of being cured, and the other party
shall continue to use its reasonable best efforts to cure such
breach, prior to September 30, 2011; or
(g) by either AMB or ProLogis, if the AMB Required Vote or
ProLogis Required Vote shall not have been obtained upon a vote
taken thereon at the duly convened AMB Stockholders Meeting or
ProLogis Shareholders Meeting, as the case may be.
7.2. Effect of
Termination. (a) In the event of termination
of this Agreement by either AMB or ProLogis as provided in
Section 7.1, this Agreement shall forthwith become void and
there shall be no liability or obligation on the part of AMB or
ProLogis or their respective officers, directors or trustees,
except with respect to Section 5.2(b), Section 5.7,
this Section 7.2 and Article VIII, which shall survive
such termination and except that no party shall be re- lieved or
released from any liabilities or damages arising out of its
fraud or willful and material breach of this Agreement.
(b) AMB shall pay ProLogis, by wire transfer of immediately
available funds, the AMB Termination Fee in the following
circumstances as described below:
(i) if (A) ProLogis shall terminate this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.1(e)(ii) and (B) at any time
after the date of this Agreement but prior to the date of such
termination, an Acquisition Proposal for AMB shall have been
publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the senior
management or Board of Directors of AMB and not withdrawn prior
to the date of such termination, then AMB shall pay ProLogis the
AMB Termination Fee within three Business Days after termination
of this Agreement;
(ii) if (A) either party shall terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(g) because the AMB
Required Vote shall not have been received and (B) at any
time after the date of this Agreement and at or before the date
of the AMB Stockholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal for AMB
shall have been publicly announced and not withdrawn prior to
the date of the AMB Stockholders Meeting, then AMB shall pay
ProLogis the AMB Termination Fee within three Business Days
after termination of this Agreement;
(iii) if (A) ProLogis shall terminate this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.1(e)(i) and (B) within twelve
(12) months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, AMB or any of its Subsidiaries executes any
definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any
Acquisition Proposal, then AMB shall pay ProLogis the AMB
Termination Fee within three Business Days after the earlier of
execution of such agreement or consummation of such Acquisition
Proposal (it being understood that, for purposes of this clause
(iii), the term Acquisition Proposal shall have the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 5.4(a) except that
the reference to 20% or more in the definition of
Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be a
reference to 35% or more); or
(iv) if ProLogis shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(e)(iii), then AMB shall pay ProLogis the AMB
Termination Fee within three Business Days after the termination
of this Agreement.
A-49
(c) ProLogis shall pay AMB, by wire transfer of immediately
available funds, the ProLogis Termination Fee in the following
circumstances as described below:
(i) if (A) AMB shall terminate this Agreement pursuant
to Section 7.1(d)(ii), and (B) at any time after the
date of this Agreement but prior to the date of such
termination, an Acquisition Proposal for ProLogis shall have
been publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the senior
management or Board of Trustees of ProLogis and not withdrawn
prior to the date of such termination, then ProLogis shall pay
AMB the ProLogis Termination Fee within three Business Days
after termination of this Agreement;
(ii) if (A) either party shall terminate this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(g) because the ProLogis
Required Vote shall not have been received, and (B) at any
time after the date of this Agreement and at or before the date
of the ProLogis Shareholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal
for ProLogis shall have been publicly announced and not
withdrawn prior to the date of the ProLogis Shareholders
Meeting, then ProLogis shall pay AMB the ProLogis Termination
Fee within three Business Days after termination of this
Agreement;
(iii) if (A) AMB shall terminate this Agreement
pursuant to Section 7.1(d)(i), and (B) within twelve
(12) months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, ProLogis or any of its Subsidiaries executes any
definitive agreement with respect to, or consummates, any
Acquisition Proposal, then ProLogis shall pay AMB the ProLogis
Termination Fee within three Business Days after the earlier of
execution of such agreement or consummation of such Acquisition
Proposal (it being understood that, for purposes of this clause
(iii), the term Acquisition Proposal shall have the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 5.4(a) except that
the reference to 20% or more in the definition of
Acquisition Proposal shall be deemed to be a
reference to 35% or more); or
(iv) if AMB shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(d)(iii), then ProLogis shall pay AMB the
ProLogis Termination Fee within three Business Days after
termination of this Agreement.
(d) If AMB shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
(i) Section 7.1(d)(i) due solely to a Change in
ProLogis Recommendation pursuant to Section 5.4(b)(v), or
(ii) Section 7.1(f), ProLogis shall pay the AMB
Expenses to AMB within three Business Days after termination of
this Agreement.
(e) If ProLogis shall terminate this Agreement pursuant to
(i) Section 7.1(e)(i) due solely to a Change in AMB
Recommendation pursuant to Section 5.4(b)(v), or
(ii) Section 7.1(f), AMB shall pay the ProLogis
Expenses to ProLogis within three Business Days after
termination of this Agreement.
(f) In no event shall this Section 7.2 require
(i) AMB to pay any amount in excess of the sum of the AMB
Termination Fee plus the ProLogis Expenses, or
(ii) ProLogis to pay any amount in excess of the sum of the
ProLogis Termination Fee plus the AMB Expenses, in each case
except as set forth in Section 7.2(g) or in the case of
such partys fraud or willful and material breach of this
Agreement.
(g) If either AMB or ProLogis fails to pay all amounts due
to the other party under this Section 7.2 on the dates
specified, then either AMB or ProLogis, as applicable, shall pay
all costs and expenses (including legal fees and expenses)
incurred by such other party in connection with any action or
proceeding (including the filing of any lawsuit) taken by it to
collect such unpaid amounts, together with interest on such
unpaid amounts at the prime lending rate prevailing at such
time, as published in the Wall Street Journal, from the date
such amounts were required to be paid until the date actually
received by such other party.
(h) The AMB Termination Fee shall be an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the AMB Base Amount (as
defined below) and (ii) the maximum amount, if any, that
can be paid to ProLogis without causing it to fail to meet the
requirements of Sections 856(c)(2) and (3) of the Code
(the REIT Requirements) for such year
determined as if (a) the payment of such amount did not
constitute Qualifying Income, and (b) ProLogis has
$1,000,000 of income from unknown sources during such year which
was not Qualifying Income (in addition to any known or
anticipated income of ProLogis which was not Qualifying Income),
in each case as determined by independent accountants to
ProLogis. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event ProLogis
receives Tax Guidance providing that ProLogiss receipt of
the AMB Base Amount would either constitute Qualifying Income or
would be excluded from gross income within the meaning of the
REIT Requirements, the AMB Termination Fee shall be an amount
equal to the AMB Base Amount and AMB shall, upon receiving
notice that ProLogis has received the Tax Guidance, pay to
A-50
ProLogis the unpaid AMB Base Amount within five Business Days.
In the event that ProLogis is not able to receive the full AMB
Base Amount due to the above limitations, AMB shall place the
unpaid amount in escrow by wire transfer within three days of
termination and shall not release any portion thereof to
ProLogis unless and until ProLogis receives either one or a
combination of the following once or more often: (i) a
letter from ProLogiss independent accountants indicating
the maximum amount that can be paid at that time to ProLogis
without causing ProLogis to fail to meet the REIT Requirements
(calculated as described above) or (ii) the Tax Guidance,
in either of which events AMB shall pay to ProLogis the lesser
of the unpaid AMB Base Amount or the maximum amount stated in
the letter referred to in (i) above within five Business
Days after AMB has been notified thereof. The obligation of AMB
to pay any unpaid portion of the AMB Termination Fee shall
terminate on the December 31 following the date which is five
years from the date of this Agreement. Amounts remaining in
escrow after the obligation of AMB to pay the AMB Termination
Fee terminates shall be released to AMB. Qualifying
Income shall mean income described in
Sections 856(c)(2)(A) (H) and
856(c)(3)(A) (I) of the Code. Tax
Guidance shall mean a reasoned opinion from outside
counsel or a ruling from the IRS. The AMB Base
Amount shall mean, (i) in the case of a payment
owing pursuant to Section 7.2(e), the Expenses of ProLogis,
and (ii) in the case of a payment owing pursuant to
Section 7.2(b), the sum of (A) $210,000,000 and
(B) the Expenses of ProLogis.
The ProLogis Termination Fee shall be an
amount equal to the lesser of (i) the ProLogis Base Amount
(as defined below) and (ii) the maximum amount, if any,
that can be paid to AMB without causing it to fail to meet the
REIT Requirements for such year determined as if (a) the
payment of such amount did not constitute Qualifying Income, and
(b) AMB has $1,000,000 of income from unknown sources
during such year which was not Qualifying Income (in addition to
any known or anticipated income of AMB which was not Qualifying
Income), in each case as determined by independent accountants
to AMB. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event AMB receives
Tax Guidance providing that AMBs receipt of the ProLogis
Base Amount would either constitute Qualifying Income or would
be excluded from gross income within the meaning of the REIT
Requirements, the ProLogis Termination Fee shall be an amount
equal to the ProLogis Base Amount and ProLogis shall, upon
receiving notice that AMB has received the Tax Guidance, pay to
AMB the unpaid ProLogis Base Amount within five Business Days.
In the event that AMB is not able to receive the full ProLogis
Base Amount due to the above limitations, ProLogis shall place
the unpaid amount in escrow by wire transfer within three days
of termination and shall not release any portion thereof to AMB
unless and until AMB receives either one or a combination of the
following once or more often: (i) a letter from AMBs
independent accountants indicating the maximum amount that can
be paid at that time to AMB without causing AMB to fail to meet
the REIT Requirements (calculated as described above) or
(ii) the Tax Guidance, in either of which events ProLogis
shall pay to AMB the lesser of the unpaid ProLogis Base Amount
or the maximum amount stated in the letter referred to in
(i) above within five Business Days after ProLogis has been
notified thereof. The obligation of ProLogis to pay any unpaid
portion of the ProLogis Termination Fee shall terminate on the
December 31 following the date which is five years from the date
of this Agreement. Amounts remaining in escrow after the
obligation of ProLogis to pay the ProLogis Termination Fee
terminates shall be released to ProLogis. The ProLogis
Base Amount shall mean (i) in the case of a
payment owing pursuant to Section 7.2(d), the Expenses of
AMB, and (ii) in the case of a payment owing pursuant to
Section 7.2(c), the sum of (A) $315,000,000 and
(B) the Expenses of AMB.
7.3. Amendment. This Agreement may
be amended by the parties hereto, by action taken or authorized
by the Board of Directors of AMB or the Board of Trustees of
ProLogis, as applicable, at any time before or after approval of
the matters presented in connection with the Mergers by the
stockholders of AMB or shareholders of ProLogis, but, after any
such approval, no amendment shall be made which by law requires
further approval by such stockholders or shareholders without
such further approval by such stockholders or shareholders. This
Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in writing
signed on behalf of each of the parties hereto.
7.4. Extension; Waiver. At any time
prior to the Topco Effective Time, the parties hereto, by action
taken or authorized by the Board of Directors of AMB or the
Board of Trustees of ProLogis, as applicable, may, to the extent
legally allowed, (a) extend the time for the performance of
any of the obligations or other acts of the other party hereto,
(b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and
warranties contained herein or in any document delivered
pursuant hereto, and (c) waive compliance with any of the
agreements or conditions contained herein. Any agreement on the
part of a party hereto to any such extension or waiver shall be
valid only if set forth in a written instrument signed on behalf
of such party. The failure of a party to assert any of its
rights under this Agreement or
A-51
otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of those rights. No
single or partial exercise of any right, remedy, power or
privilege hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise
thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy, power or
privilege. Any waiver shall be effective only in the specific
instance and for the specific purpose for which given and shall
not constitute a waiver to any subsequent or other exercise of
any right, remedy, power or privilege hereunder.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
8.1. Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties
and Agreements. None of the representations,
warranties, covenants and agreements in this Agreement or in any
instrument delivered pursuant to this Agreement, including any
rights arising out of any breach of such representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements, shall survive the Topco
Effective Time, except for those covenants and agreements
contained herein and therein that by their terms apply or are to
be performed in whole or in part after the Topco Effective Time.
8.2. Notices. All notices and other
communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be
delivered personally, by telecopy or telefacsimile, by a
recognized courier service, or by registered or certified mail,
return receipt requested, postage prepaid, and in each case
shall be deemed duly given on the date of actual delivery, upon
confirmation of receipt. All notices hereunder shall be
delivered as set forth below, or pursuant to such other
instructions as may be designated in writing by the party to
receive such notice, and a copy of each notice shall also be
sent via
e-mail.
(a) if to AMB or AMB LP, to:
AMB Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
Attention: General Counsel
Fax No.:
(415) 394-9000
with a copy to:
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West
52nd
Street
New York, New York 10019
|
|
|
|
Attention:
|
Adam O. Emmerich
|
Robin Panovka
David K. Lam
Fax No.:
(212) 403-2000
|
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
aoemmerich@wlrk.com
|
rpanovka@wlrk.com
dklam@wlrk.com
(b) if to ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New Pumpkin or Pumpkin
LLC, to:
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, Colorado 80239
Attention: General Counsel
Fax No.:
(303) 567-5761
A-52
with copies to:
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
77 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3100
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Attention: Michael T. Blair
Fax No.:
(312) 899-0361
E-mail:
blairm@gtlaw.com
and
Mayer Brown LLP
71 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Attention: Edward J. Schneidman
Fax No.:
(312) 706-8200
E-mail:
eschneidman@mayerbrown.com
8.3. Interpretation. When a
reference is made in this Agreement to Sections, Exhibits or
Schedules, such reference shall be to a Section of or Exhibit or
Schedule to this Agreement unless otherwise indicated. The table
of contents and headings contained in this Agreement are for
reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement. Whenever the words
include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The phrase made available in this
Agreement shall mean that the information referred to has been
made available if requested by the party to whom such
information is to be made available. The phrases
herein, hereof, hereunder
and words of similar import shall be deemed to refer to this
Agreement as a whole, including the Exhibits and Schedules
hereto, and not to any particular provision of this Agreement.
Any pronoun shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine
and neuter forms.
8.4. Counterparts. This Agreement
may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be
considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective
when counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and
delivered to each other party (including by means of electronic
delivery), it being understood that the parties need not sign
the same counterpart. Signatures to this Agreement transmitted
by facsimile transmission, by electronic mail in portable
document format (.pdf) form, or by any other
electronic means intended to preserve the original graphic and
pictorial appearance of a document, will have the same effect as
physical delivery of the paper document bearing the original
signature.
8.5. Entire Agreement; No Third-Party
Beneficiaries. This Agreement (including the
documents and the instruments referred to herein)
(a) constitutes the entire agreement and supersedes all
prior agreements and understandings, both written and oral,
between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof,
other than the Confidentiality Agreement, which shall survive
the execution and delivery of this Agreement, and
(b) except as provided in Section 5.9(d) or as
otherwise provided herein, is not intended to confer upon any
person other than the parties hereto any rights or remedies
hereunder.
8.6. Governing Law. This Agreement
shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Maryland (without giving effect to choice of law
principles thereof).
8.7. Severability. Any term or
provision of this Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in
any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective
to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability and, unless
the effect of such invalidity or unenforceability would prevent
the parties from realizing the major portion of the economic
benefits of the Mergers that they currently anticipate obtaining
therefrom, shall not render invalid or unenforceable the
remaining terms and provisions of this Agreement or affect the
validity or enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of
this Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of
this Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision
shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.
8.8. Assignment. Neither this
Agreement nor any of the rights, interests or obligations of the
parties hereunder shall be assigned by any of the parties hereto
(whether by operation of law or otherwise) without the prior
A-53
written consent of the other parties, and any attempt to make
any such assignment without such consent shall be null and void.
Subject to the preceding sentence, this Agreement will be
binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the
parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
8.9. Submission to
Jurisdiction. Each party hereto irrevocably
submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of the State of
Maryland and the federal courts of the United States of America
located in the State of Maryland, for the purposes of any suit,
action or other proceeding arising out of this Agreement or any
transaction contemplated hereby. Each party hereto agrees to
commence any action, suit or proceeding relating hereto in a
Maryland state court or, if such action, suit or proceeding may
not be brought in such court for reasons of subject matter
jurisdiction, in a federal court of the United States located in
the State of Maryland. Each party hereto irrevocably and
unconditionally waives any objection to the laying of venue of
any action, suit or proceeding arising out of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated hereby in the courts of the State
of Maryland and the federal courts of the United States of
America located in the State of Maryland, and hereby further
irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead
or claim in any such court that any such action, suit or
proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Each party hereto further irrevocably
consents to the service of process out of any of the
aforementioned courts in any such suit, action or other
proceeding by the mailing of copies thereof by registered mail
to such party at its address set forth in this Agreement, such
service of process to be effective upon acknowledgment of
receipt of such registered mail; provided that nothing in
this Section shall affect the right of any party to serve legal
process in any other manner permitted by Law. The consent to
jurisdiction set forth in this Section shall not constitute a
general consent to service of process in the State of Maryland
and shall have no effect for any purpose except as provided in
this Section. The parties hereto agree that a final judgment in
any such suit, action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may
be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in
any other manner provided by Law.
8.10. Enforcement. The parties
agree that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any
of the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in
accordance with their specific terms on a timely basis or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that the parties
shall be entitled to an injunction or other equitable relief to
prevent breaches of this Agreement and to enforce specifically
the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any court
identified in the Section above, this being in addition to any
other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.
8.11. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. EACH OF
THE PARTIES HEREBY WAIVES TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY JUDICIAL
PROCEEDING INVOLVING, DIRECTLY, IN ANY MATTERS (WHETHER SOUNDING
IN TORT, CONTRACT OR OTHERWISE) IN ANY WAY ARISING OUT OF,
RELATED TO, OR CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS
CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
ARTICLE IX
DEFINITIONS
AMB II Partnership Agreement means the
Fifteenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of AMB Property II, L.P., dated as of February 19, 2010, as
amended from time to time.
AMB II Partnership Unit has the meaning
assigned to Partnership Unit in the AMB II
Partnership Agreement.
AMB Material Adverse Effect means an event,
development, change or occurrence that is materially adverse to
the financial condition, business or results of operations of
AMB and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole; provided,
however, that an AMB Material Adverse Effect shall not
include any event, development, change or occurrence arising out
of, relating to or resulting from: (a) changes generally
affecting the economy, financial or securities markets or
political or regulatory conditions; (b) changes in the
industrial real estate sector or changes generally affecting
owners, operators or developers of industrial real estate;
(c) any change after the date hereof in Law or the
interpretation thereof or GAAP or the interpretation thereof;
(d) acts of war, armed hostility or terrorism or any
worsening thereof; (e) earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados or
other natural disasters or calamities; (f) any change to
the extent attributable to the negotiation, execution or
announcement of this Agreement, including any litigation
resulting therefrom, and any adverse change in customer,
distributor, employee, supplier, financing source, licensor,
A-54
licensee,
sub-licensee,
stockholder, joint venture partner or similar relationships,
including as a result of the identity of ProLogis; (g) any
failure by AMB to meet any internal or published industry
analyst projections or forecasts or estimates of revenues or
earnings for any period (it being understood and agreed that the
facts and circumstances giving rise to such failure that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of an AMB Material
Adverse Effect may be taken into account in determining whether
there has been an AMB Material Adverse Effect); (h) any
change in the price or trading volume of AMB Common Stock (it
being understood and agreed that the facts and circumstances
giving rise to such change that are not otherwise excluded from
the definition of an AMB Material Adverse Effect may be taken
into account in determining whether there has been an AMB
Material Adverse Effect); (i) compliance with the terms of,
or the taking of any action required by, this Agreement; and
(j) the outcome of any litigation, claim or other
proceeding described in the AMB Disclosure Letter or
specifically disclosed in the AMB SEC Documents; and
provided, further, that (x) if any event,
development, change or occurrence described in any of clauses
(a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) has had a materially
disproportionate effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of AMB and its Subsidiaries relative to
other similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate, then the incremental impact of such
event on AMB and its Subsidiaries relative to other similarly
situated owners, operators and developers of industrial real
estate shall be taken into account for purposes of determining
whether an AMB Material Adverse Effect has occurred, and
(y) if any event, development, change or occurrence has
caused or is reasonably likely to cause AMB to fail to qualify
as a REIT for federal Tax purposes, such event, development,
change or occurrence shall be considered an AMB Material Adverse
Effect, unless such failure has been, or is able to be, cured on
commercially reasonable terms under the applicable provisions of
the Code.
AMB Partnership Agreement means the Twelfth
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB LP,
dated as of August 25, 2006, as amended from time to time.
AMB Partnership Unit has the meaning assigned
to Partnership Unit in the AMB Partnership Agreement.
AMB Property II means AMB Property II, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership.
Benefit Plan means, with respect to any
entity, any compensation or employee benefit plan, program,
policy, agreement or other arrangement, including any
employee benefit plans (within the meaning of
Section 3(3) of ERISA, whether or not subject to ERISA),
including any bonus, cash- or equity-based incentive, deferred
compensation, stock purchase, health, medical, dental,
disability, accident, life insurance, or vacation, paid time
off, perquisite, fringe benefit, severance, change of control,
retention, employment, separation, retirement, pension, or
savings, plan, program, policy, agreement or arrangement.
Business Day means any day other than a
Saturday, Sunday or other day on which the banks in New York are
authorized by law or executive order to be closed.
Contract means any contract, agreement,
lease, license, note, bond, mortgage, indenture, commitment or
other instrument or obligation.
Controlled Group Liability means any and all
liabilities (i) under Title IV of ERISA,
(ii) under Section 302 of ERISA, (iii) under
Sections 412 and 4971 of the Code, or (iv) as a result
of a failure to comply with the continuation coverage
requirements of Section 601 et seq. of ERISA and
Section 4980B of the Code, other than, in each case, such
liabilities that arise solely out of, or relate solely to,
Benefit Plans, in the case of the Controlled Group Liabilities
relating to AMB and its Affiliates, set forth on
Section 3.1(j)(i) of the AMB Disclosure Letter and, in the
case of the Controlled Group Liabilities relating to ProLogis
and its Affiliates, set forth on Section 3.2(j)(i) of the
ProLogis Disclosure Letter.
Environmental Laws means any federal, state
or local law, statute, ordinance, order, decree, rule,
regulation or policies relating (a) to releases,
discharges, emissions or disposals to air, water, land or
groundwater of Hazardous Materials; (b) to the use,
handling or disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls, asbestos or
urea formaldehyde or any other Hazardous Material; (c) to
the treatment, storage, disposal or management of Hazardous
Materials; (d) to exposure to toxic, hazardous or other
controlled, prohibited or regulated substances; or (e) to
the transportation, release or any other use of Hazardous
Materials, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601, et
seq. (CERCLA), the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.
(RCRA), the Toxic Substances Control Act,
15 U.S.C. 2601, et seq. (TSCA),
those
A-55
portions of the Occupational, Safety and Health Act,
29 U.S.C. 651, et seq. relating to Hazardous
Materials exposure and compliance, the Clean Air Act,
42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq., the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., the Safe
Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300f, et seq., the
Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1802
et seq. (HMTA) and the Emergency
Planning and Community Right to Know Act, 42 U.S.C. 11001,
et seq. (EPCRA), and other comparable
state and local laws and all rules and regulations promulgated
pursuant thereto or published thereunder.
ERISA means the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Expenses of any party means the cash amount
necessary to fully reimburse such party and its Subsidiaries for
all
out-of-pocket
fees and expenses incurred (whether or not billed) at any time
(whether before or after the date of this Agreement) prior to
the termination of this Agreement by any of them or on their
behalf in connection with the Mergers, the Contribution, the
Issuance, the preparation of this Agreement, their due diligence
investigation of the other party and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (including any currency or
interest rate hedging activities in connection with the
transactions contemplated hereby), including (a) all fees
and expenses of counsel, investment banking firms or financial
advisors (and their respective counsel and other
Representatives), accountants, experts and consultants to such
party and its Subsidiaries in connection with the Mergers, the
Contribution, the Issuance, the preparation of this Agreement,
their due diligence investigation of the other parties and the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and (b) all
fees and expenses payable to banks, investment banking firms and
other financial institutions (and their respective counsel and
other Representatives) in connection with any refinancing of any
indebtedness of either party, or anticipated indebtedness of the
Surviving Corporation, or any of the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement; provided, however,
that the aggregate amount of the Expenses of any party for
purposes of this Agreement shall not exceed $20,000,000.
GAAP means United States generally accepted
accounting principles.
Hazardous Materials means each and every
element, compound, chemical mixture, contaminant, pollutant,
material, waste or other substance which is defined, determined
or identified as hazardous or toxic under applicable
Environmental Laws or the release of which is regulated under
Environmental Laws. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Hazardous Materials include
hazardous substances as defined in RCRA,
extremely hazardous substances as defined in EPCRA,
hazardous waste as defined in RCRA, hazardous
materials as defined in HMTA, a chemical substance
or mixture as defined in TSCA, crude oil, petroleum
products or any fraction thereof, radioactive materials,
including source, byproduct or special nuclear materials,
asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, chlorinated
fluorocarbons and radon.
IRS means the U.S. Internal Revenue
Service or any successor agency.
Law means any federal, state, local or
foreign law (including common law), statute, ordinance, rule,
regulation, judgment, order, injunction, decree or agency
requirement of any Governmental Entity.
Lien means any lien, claim, pledge, option,
charge, security interest, deed of trust, mortgage, restriction
or encumbrance of any kind or nature whatsoever.
Person means an individual, a corporation, a
partnership, a limited liability company, an association, a
trust, or any other entity, group (as such term is used in
Section 13 of the Exchange Act) or organization, including
a Governmental Entity, and any permitted successors and assigns
of such Person.
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect means an
event, development, change or occurrence that is materially
adverse to the financial condition, business or results of
operations of ProLogis and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole;
provided, however, that a ProLogis Material Adverse
Effect shall not include any event, development, change or
occurrence arising out of, relating to or resulting from:
(a) changes generally affecting the economy, financial or
securities markets or political or regulatory conditions;
(b) changes in the industrial real estate sector or changes
generally affecting owners, operators or developers of
industrial real estate; (c) any change after the date
hereof in Law or the interpretation thereof or GAAP or the
interpretation thereof; (d) acts of war, armed hostility or
terrorism or any worsening thereof; (e) earthquakes,
hurricanes, tornados or other natural disasters or calamities;
(f) any change to the extent attributable to the
negotiation, execution or announcement of this Agreement,
including any litigation resulting therefrom, and any adverse
change in customer, distributor, employee, supplier, financing
A-56
source, licensor, licensee,
sub-licensee,
shareholder, joint venture partner or similar relationships,
including as a result of the identity of AMB; (g) any
failure by ProLogis to meet any internal or published industry
analyst projections or forecasts or estimates of revenues or
earnings for any period (it being understood and agreed that the
facts and circumstances giving rise to such failure that are not
otherwise excluded from the definition of a ProLogis Material
Adverse Effect may be taken into account in determining whether
there has been a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect); (h) any
change in the price or trading volume of ProLogis Common Shares
(it being understood and agreed that the facts and circumstances
giving rise to such change that are not otherwise excluded from
the definition of a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect may be
taken into account in determining whether there has been a
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect); (i) compliance with the
terms of, or the taking of any action required by, this
Agreement; and (j) the outcome of any litigation, claim or
other proceeding described in the ProLogis Disclosure Letter or
specifically disclosed in the ProLogis SEC Documents; and
provided, further, that (x) if any event,
development, change or occurrence described in any of clauses
(a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) has had a materially
disproportionate effect on the financial condition, business or
results of operations of ProLogis and its Subsidiaries relative
to other similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate, then the incremental impact of such
event on ProLogis and its Subsidiaries relative to other
similarly situated owners, operators and developers of
industrial real estate shall be taken into account for purposes
of determining whether a ProLogis Material Adverse Effect has
occurred, and (y) if any event, development, change or
occurrence has caused or is reasonably likely to cause ProLogis
to fail to qualify as a REIT for federal Tax purposes, such
event, development, change or occurrence shall be considered a
ProLogis Material Adverse Effect, unless such failure has been,
or is able to be, cured on commercially reasonable terms under
the applicable provisions of the Code.
ProLogis Partnerships means ProLogis Fraser,
L.P. and ProLogis Limited Partnership I.
ProLogis Partnership Unit has the meaning
assigned to Partnership Unit in the governing
document for the relevant ProLogis Partnership.
Refinancing Debt means indebtedness issued in
exchange for, or the net proceeds of which are used to refinance
or refund, then outstanding indebtedness (including the
principal amount, accrued interest and premium, if any, of such
indebtedness plus any fees and expenses incurred in connection
with such refinancing); provided that such new
indebtedness does not mature prior to the stated maturity of the
indebtedness to be refinanced or refunded, and that:
(1) the material terms and conditions of the indebtedness
to be refinanced are at competitive market terms and
(2) the aggregate principal amount of such new indebtedness
does not exceed the aggregate principal amount of the
indebtedness to be refinanced.
REIT means a real estate investment trust
within the meaning of Sections 856 through 860 of the Code.
Representatives means, with respect to any
Person, such Persons officers, trustees, directors,
employees, agents, or representatives (including investment
bankers, financial or other advisors or consultants, auditors,
accountants, attorneys, brokers, finders or other agents).
SEC means the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Significant Subsidiary means any Subsidiary
of AMB or ProLogis, as the case may be, that would constitute a
Significant Subsidiary of such party within the meaning of
Rule 1-02
of
Regulation S-X
of the SEC.
Subsidiary means, with respect to any Person,
any corporation, partnership, limited liability company, joint
venture, real estate investment trust, or other organization,
whether incorporated or unincorporated, or other legal entity of
which (i) such Person directly or indirectly owns or
controls at least a majority of the capital stock or other
equity interests having by their terms ordinary voting power to
elect a majority of the board of directors or others performing
similar functions; (ii) such Person is a general partner,
manager or managing member; or (iii) such Person holds a
majority of the equity economic interest.
Tax or Taxes means all
federal, state, local, foreign and other taxes, levies, fees,
imposts, assessments, impositions or other similar government
charges, including income, estimated income, business,
occupation, franchise, real property, payroll, personal
property, sales, transfer, stamp, use, employment, commercial
rent or withholding (including dividend withholding and
withholding required pursuant to Section 1445 and 1446 of
the Code), occupancy, premium, gross receipts, profits, windfall
profits, deemed profits, license, lease, severance,
A-57
capital, production, corporation, ad valorem, excise, duty or
other taxes, including interest, penalties and additions (to the
extent applicable) thereto, whether disputed or not and
including any obligation to indemnify or otherwise assume or
succeed to the tax liability of any other person.
Tax Protection Agreement means any agreement
pursuant to which (i) any liability to direct or indirect
holders of units in a partnership that is a Subsidiary of AMB or
ProLogis (a Relevant Partnership) or any
interests in any Subsidiary of any Relevant Partnership (any
such units or interests, Relevant Partnership
Units) relating to Taxes may arise, whether or not as
a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement; (ii) in connection with the deferral of
income Taxes of a direct or indirect holder of Relevant
Partnership Units, a party to such agreement has agreed to
(a) maintain a minimum level of debt or continue a
particular debt, (b) retain or not dispose of assets for a
period of time that has not since expired, (c) make or
refrain from making Tax elections, (d) operate (or refrain
from operating) in a particular manner, (e) use (or refrain
from using) a specified method of taking into account book-tax
disparities under Section 704(c) of the Code with respect
to one or more assets of such party or any of its Subsidiaries,
(f) use (or refrain from using) a particular method for
allocating one or more liabilities of such party or any of its
Subsidiaries under Section 752 of the Code
and/or
(g) only dispose of assets in a particular manner;
(iii) any persons, whether or not partners in any Relevant
Partnership, have been or are required to be given the
opportunity to guaranty or assume debt of such Relevant
Partnership or any Subsidiary of such Relevant Partnership or
are so guarantying or have so assumed such debt;
and/or
(iv) any other agreement that would require any Relevant
Partnership or the general partner of such Relevant Partnership
or any Subsidiary of such Relevant Partnership to consider
separately the interests of the limited partners of such
Relevant Partnership or the holder of interests in such
Subsidiary in connection with any transaction or other action.
Tax Return shall mean any report, return,
document, declaration or other information or filing required to
be supplied to any taxing authority or jurisdiction (foreign or
domestic) with respect to Taxes, including any schedule or
attachment thereto and any amendment thereof, any information
returns, any documents with respect to or accompanying payments
of estimated Taxes, or with respect to or accompanying requests
for the extension of time in which to file any such report,
return, document, declaration or other information.
to AMBs knowledge or to the
knowledge of AMB means the actual knowledge of any of
the persons listed in Section 9.1 of the AMB Disclosure
Letter.
to ProLogiss knowledge or to
the knowledge of ProLogis means the actual knowledge
of any of the persons listed in Section 9.1 of the ProLogis
Disclosure Letter.
[Remainder
of this page intentionally left blank]
A-58
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMB, AMB LP, ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New
Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC have caused this Agreement to be signed
by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, all as
of the date first set forth above.
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Hamid
R. Moghadam
|
Name: Hamid R. Moghadam
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman of the Board and
|
Chief Executive Officer
AMB PROPERTY, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AMB Property Corporation,
its sole general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Hamid
R. Moghadam
|
Name: Hamid R. Moghadam
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman of the Board and
|
Chief Executive Officer
PROLOGIS
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Walter
C. Rakowich
|
Name: Walter C. Rakowich
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
UPPER PUMPKIN LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Walter
C. Rakowich
|
Name: Walter C. Rakowich
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
[Signature
Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]
A-59
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Walter
C. Rakowich
|
Name: Walter C. Rakowich
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
PUMPKIN LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Walter
C. Rakowich
|
Name: Walter C. Rakowich
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
[Signature
Page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]
A-60
AMENDMENT
NO. 1
TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
AMB PROPERTY, L.P.
PROLOGIS
UPPER PUMPKIN LLC
NEW PUMPKIN INC.
and
PUMPKIN LLC
Amendment dated as of March 9, 2011
A-61
AMENDMENT
NO. 1
TO
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
This AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of March 9, 2011 (this
Amendment), to the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, dated as of January 30, 2011 (the Merger
Agreement), is by and among AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION,
a Maryland corporation (AMB), AMB PROPERTY,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (AMB
LP), PROLOGIS, a Maryland real estate investment trust
(ProLogis), NEW PUMPKIN INC., a Maryland
corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of ProLogis
(New Pumpkin), UPPER PUMPKIN LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of New
Pumpkin (Upper Pumpkin), and PUMPKIN LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary
of Upper Pumpkin (Pumpkin LLC).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the parties to the Merger Agreement desire to amend and
supplement certain terms of the Merger Agreement as described
herein; and
WHEREAS, all capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to such terms in the Merger Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of the
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements contained
herein, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Amendments.
(a) The references to ProLogis Inc. in
Sections 1.1(b)(i) and 1.3(a) of the Merger Agreement and
in Exhibit A of the Merger Agreement are hereby replaced
with ProLogis, Inc.
(b) The reference to June 30, 2010 in
Section 5.6(a)(v)(C)(I) of the Merger Agreement is hereby
replaced with June 30, 2011.
(c) The first section under the heading Meetings of
the Board of Directors in Article III of
Exhibit A of the Merger Agreement is hereby renumbered as
Section 6, and all following sections of such Article III
are hereby renumbered accordingly. The reference to
Section 16 in the second paragraph of the last
section of Article III of Exhibit A of the Merger
Agreement is hereby replaced with a reference to
Section 18. The reference to
Section 9 in Section 1 of Article VII
of Exhibit A of the Merger Agreement is hereby replaced
with a reference to Section 11. The reference
to Section 10 in Section 2 of
Article VII of Exhibit A of the Merger Agreement is
hereby replaced with a reference to Section 12.
(d) The reference to ProLogis Property, L.P. in
the last section under the heading Meetings of the Board
of Directors in Article III of Exhibit A of the
Merger Agreement is hereby replaced with a reference to
ProLogis, L.P.
2. Miscellaneous.
(a) Sections 8.4, 8.6, 8.7, 8.9, and 8.11 of the
Merger Agreement are restated herein in full, with the exception
that references to this Agreement shall be
references to this Amendment (other than such
reference in the fourth sentence of Section 8.9 of the
Agreement, which shall be a reference to Section 8.2
of the Agreement).
(b) The headings contained in this Amendment are for
reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
(c) This Amendment (including the documents and the
instruments referred to herein) (i) constitutes the entire
agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings, both written and oral, between the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof, and (ii) is not
intended to confer upon any person other than the parties hereto
any rights or remedies hereunder.
(d) Neither this Amendment nor any of the rights, interests
or obligations of the parties hereunder shall be assigned by any
of the parties hereto (whether by operation of law or otherwise)
without the prior written consent of the other parties, and any
attempt to make any such assignment without such consent shall
be null and void. Subject to the preceding sentence, this
Amendment will be binding upon, inure to the benefit of and be
enforceable by the parties and their respective successors and
permitted assigns.
A-62
3. Remainder of Merger Agreement. Except
as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by
implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way
affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants or
agreements contained in the Merger Agreement, all of which shall
continue to be in full force and effect.
[Remainder
of page left intentionally blank]
A-63
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMB, AMB LP, ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin, New
Pumpkin and Pumpkin LLC have caused this Amendment to be signed
by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized, all as
of the date first set forth above.
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
S. Olinger
|
Name: Thomas S. Olinger
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
AMB PROPERTY, L.P.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
AMB Property Corporation,
its sole general partner
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
S. Olinger
|
Name: Thomas S. Olinger
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
PROLOGIS
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
E. Sullivan
|
Name: William E. Sullivan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
UPPER PUMPKIN LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
E. Sullivan
|
Name: William E. Sullivan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
[Signature
Page to Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement]
A-64
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
E. Sullivan
|
Name: William E. Sullivan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
PUMPKIN LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
E. Sullivan
|
Name: William E. Sullivan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
[Signature
Page to Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement]
A-65
Annex
B
SEVENTH
AMENDED AND RESTATED
BYLAWS
of
PROLOGIS, INC.
ARTICLE I
OFFICES
Section 1. The
principal executive office of ProLogis, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Corporation), shall be located at
such place or places as the board of directors may designate.
Section 2. The
Corporation may also have offices at such other places as the
board of directors may from time to time determine or the
business of the Corporation may require.
ARTICLE II
MEETINGS
OF STOCKHOLDERS
Section 1. All
meetings of the stockholders shall be held at such place as may
be fixed from time to time by the board of directors and stated
in the notice of the meeting.
Section 2. An
annual meeting of stockholders shall be held on such date and at
such time as may be determined from time to time by resolution
adopted by the board of directors, at which the stockholders
shall elect a board of directors, and transact such other
business as may properly be brought before the meeting in
accordance with these bylaws. To be properly brought before the
annual meeting, business must be either (i) specified in
the notice of annual meeting (or any supplement or amendment
thereto) given by or at the direction of the board of directors,
(ii) otherwise brought before the annual meeting by or at
the direction of the board of directors, or (iii) otherwise
brought before the annual meeting by a stockholder of the
Corporation entitled to vote on the matter at the meeting who
complies with the notice procedures set forth in this
Section 2 of Article II and who was a stockholder of
record both at the time of giving of notice provided for in this
Section 2 of Article II and at the time of the annual
meeting. In addition to any other applicable requirements, for
business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a
stockholder, such business must be a proper matter for action by
the stockholders and the stockholder must have given timely
notice thereof in writing to the secretary of the Corporation.
To be timely, a stockholders notice must be delivered to
or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the
Corporation, not less than ninety (90) days nor more than
one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the first
anniversary of the preceding years annual meeting;
provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual
meeting is advanced or delayed by more than thirty
(30) days from the first anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be
timely must be so received not more than one hundred twenty
(120) days prior to the date of the annual meeting and not
less than the later of ninety (90) days prior to the date
of the annual meeting or, if less than one hundred
(100) days notice or prior public disclosure of the
date of the annual meeting is given or made to stockholders, the
close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on
which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed
or such public disclosure was made. In no event shall any
postponement or adjournment of an annual meeting, or the
announcement thereof, commence a new time period for the giving
of a stockholders notice as described above. A
stockholders notice to the secretary shall set forth
(a) as to each matter the stockholder proposes to bring
before the annual meeting (i) a brief description of the
business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the
reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting,
(ii) the name and record address of the stockholder
proposing such business, (iii) the class, series and number
of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are
beneficially owned by the stockholder, and (iv) any
material interest of the stockholder in such business and any
material interest of any Stockholder Associated Person (as
defined below) in such business, individually or in the
aggregate, including any anticipated benefit to the stockholder
or the Stockholder Associated Person therefrom, and (b) as
to the stockholder giving the notice and any Stockholder
Associated Person (i) the name and record address (and
current address, if different) of the
B-1
stockholder and the Stockholder Associated Person, (ii) the
class, series and number of shares of capital stock of the
Corporation which are beneficially owned or owned of record by
the stockholder and by such Stockholder Associated Person, if
any, and the nominee holder for, and the number of, shares owned
beneficially but not of record by such stockholder and by any
such Stockholder Associated Person, (iii) whether and the
extent to which any hedging or other transaction or series of
transactions has been entered into by or on behalf of, or any
other agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any
short position or any borrowing or lending of shares of stock)
has been made, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss
to or manage risk of stock price changes for, or to increase the
voting power of, such stockholder or any such Stockholder
Associated Person with respect to any share of stock of the
Corporation, and a general description of whether and the extent
to which such stockholder or such Stockholder Associated Person
has engaged in such activities with respect to shares of stock
or other equity interests of any other company, and (iv) to
the extent known by the stockholder giving the notice, the name
and address of any other stockholder supporting the proposal of
other business on the date of such stockholders notice.
For purposes of these bylaws, Stockholder Associated
Person shall mean, with respect to any stockholder,
(x) any person controlling, directly or indirectly, or
acting in concert with, such stockholder, (y) any
beneficial owner of shares of stock of the Corporation owned of
record or beneficially by such stockholder, and (z) any
person controlling, controlled by or under common control with
such Stockholder Associated Person. Notwithstanding anything in
these bylaws to the contrary, no business shall be conducted at
the annual meeting except in accordance with the procedures set
forth in this Section 2 of Article II and no person
shall be eligible for election as a director of the Corporation
unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Section 2(a) of Article III. The officer of the
Corporation presiding at an annual meeting shall, if the facts
warrant, determine that business was not properly brought before
the annual meeting in accordance with the provisions of this
Section 2 of Article II, and if he should so
determine, he shall so declare to the annual meeting and any
such business not properly brought before the meeting shall not
be transacted.
Section 3. A
majority of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to
vote at any meeting of stockholders, the holders of which are
present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business except as otherwise
provided by law, by the Corporations charter or by these
bylaws. A quorum, once established, shall not be broken by the
withdrawal of enough votes to leave less than a quorum and the
votes present may continue to transact business until
adjournment. If, however, such quorum shall not be present or
represented at any meeting of the stockholders, a majority of
the voting stock represented in person or by proxy may adjourn
the meeting from time to time until a date not more than
120 days after the original record date, without notice
other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum shall be
present or represented. At such adjourned meeting at which a
quorum shall be present or represented, any business may be
transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as
originally notified. If the adjournment is for more than
120 days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is
fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned
meeting shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to
vote thereat.
Section 4. When
a quorum is present at any meeting, the vote of the holders of a
majority of the stock having voting power present in person or
represented by proxy shall decide any question brought before
such meeting, unless the question is one upon which, by express
provision of the Maryland General Corporation Law
(MGCL) or the rules of any securities exchange on
which the Corporations capital stock is listed or the
Corporations charter or these bylaws, a different vote is
required, in which case such express provision shall govern and
control the decision of such question.
Section 5. At
each meeting of the stockholders, each stockholder having the
right to vote may vote in person or may authorize another person
or persons to act for him by proxy in any manner permitted by
applicable law. All proxies must be filed with the secretary of
the Corporation at the beginning of each meeting in order to be
counted in any vote at the meeting. Subject to the provisions of
the charter of the Corporation, each stockholder shall have one
vote for each share of stock having voting power registered in
his name on the books of the Corporation on the record date set
by the board of directors as provided in Section 6 of
Article V.
Section 6.
a. Subject to clause (d) below of this Section 6
of Article II, a favorable vote of a majority of the
aggregate of (x) the votes cast for a director
nominee and (y) the votes cast against a
director nominee (or if directors are to
B-2
be elected upon a favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast
but in such circumstances stockholders generally are not offered
the opportunity to cast a vote against a director
nominee but instead are offered the opportunity to
withhold votes, any votes designated to be
withheld from voting in respect of a director
nominee, which for these limited purposes will be deemed a vote
cast and have the affect of a vote against), at a
meeting of the stockholders duly called and held at which a
quorum is present, shall be required to elect such director
nominee. For purposes of determining whether a director nominee
has received a favorable vote of a majority of the aggregate of
the votes cast, a majority of the aggregate votes cast means
that the number of shares voted for a director must
exceed the number of votes cast against that
director (or, if the director is nevertheless to be elected upon
a favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast but
stockholders generally are not offered the opportunity to cast a
vote against the director nominee but instead are
offered the opportunity to withhold votes, then the
number of shares voted for a director must exceed
the number of votes withheld from voting in respect
of such director nominee, which for these limited purposes will
be deemed a vote cast). A vote will be considered withheld from
a director nominee only if a stockholder is provided the
opportunity to and does affirmatively withhold authority to vote
for such director nominee in any proxy granted by such
stockholder, in any event in accordance with instructions
contained in the proxy statement or accompanying proxy card
circulated for the meeting of stockholders at which the election
of directors is to be held or in a ballot to be submitted by
such stockholder in person at such meeting. A broker
non-vote or abstention (or similar expression) shall not
in any event be deemed a vote cast for these purposes.
b. If an otherwise incumbent director is not re-elected but
would nevertheless for any reason otherwise remain in office,
the director shall tender his or her resignation to the Board,
subject to subsequent acceptance. The Nominating &
Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board on
whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other
action should be taken. The Board will act on the
Committees recommendation and publicly disclose its
decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from
the date of the certification of the election results. The
director who tenders his or her resignation will not participate
in the Boards decision.
c. Directors properly elected shall hold office until the
next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors
shall be duly elected and qualified. Directors need not be
stockholders. If, for any cause, the Board of Directors shall
not have been elected at an annual meeting, they may be elected
as soon thereafter as convenient at a special meeting of the
stockholders called for that purpose in the manner provided in
these bylaws.
d. The foregoing to the contrary notwithstanding, in the
event that the number of director nominees is expected to exceed
the number of directors to be elected at a meeting (a
Contested Election), with the determination that the
number of director nominees is expected to exceed the number of
directors to be elected, and, therefore, that an election of
directors is a Contested Election, being made by the secretary
of the Corporation as of the close of the applicable stockholder
notice of nomination period set forth in Section 8 of
Article II or Section 2(a) of Article III based
on whether one or more stockholder notices of nomination were
timely filed in accordance with Section 8 of
Article II or Section 2(a) of Article III, as
applicable (provided that the secretary shall also be able to
consider such other facts and circumstances as may be reasonably
relevant to the determination that an election of directors is a
Contested Election, and provided further that any determination
that an election of directors is a Contested Election shall be
determinative only as to the timeliness of a stockholder notice
of nomination and not otherwise as to its validity), then a
plurality of all the votes cast at such meeting shall be
sufficient to elect a director, and therefore, and for the
avoidance of doubt, the director nominees shall not be elected
at such meeting by a favorable vote of a majority of the votes
cast. In such case where an election of directors is determined
to be a Contested Election, stockholders shall be permitted to
vote only for or to designate their votes to be
withheld in respect of a director nominee, and shall
not in such circumstance be permitted to vote
against a nominee; and under such circumstances a
vote designated to be withheld, although present for
purposes of establishing the presence of a quorum, will not be
deemed a vote cast or a vote against. If, prior to
thirty days prior to the time the Corporation mails its initial
proxy statement in connection with the election of directors at
a meeting, one or more stockholder notices of nomination are
withdrawn such that the number of nominees for election as
director no longer exceeds the number of directors to be
elected, then the election shall not be considered a Contested
Election, but in all other cases, once an election is determined
to be a Contested Election, a plurality of all the votes cast at
such meeting shall be sufficient to elect a director.
B-3
Section 7. Special
meetings of the stockholders, for any purpose or purposes,
unless otherwise proscribed by the charter, may be called at any
time by the chief executive officer, a co-chief executive
officer, the president, the chairman of the board, or by a
majority of the directors, or by a committee of the board of
directors which has been duly designated by the board of
directors and whose powers and authority, as provided in a
resolution of the board of directors or these bylaws, include
the power to call such meetings. In addition, a special meeting
of the stockholders of the Corporation shall be called by the
secretary of the Corporation on the written request of
stockholders entitled to cast at least fifty percent (50%) of
all votes entitled to be cast at the meeting, except that, in
the case of a special meeting called to consider any matter
which is substantially the same as a matter voted on at any
special meeting for the stockholders held during the preceding
twelve (12) months, the secretary of the Corporation shall
not be required to call any such special meeting unless
requested by stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all of
the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting.
Section 8. Business
transacted at any special meeting of stockholders shall be
limited to the purposes stated in the notice. Where the
Corporations notice of meeting specifies that directors
are to be elected at such special meeting, nominations of
persons for election to the board of directors may be made only
(i) pursuant to the Corporations notice of meeting,
(ii) by or at the direction of the board of directors,
(iii) by any committee of persons appointed by the board of
directors with authority therefor or (iv) by a stockholder
as provided in this Section 8 of Article II. In the
event a special meeting of stockholders is called for the
purpose of electing one or more directors to the board of
directors, any stockholder of the Corporation entitled to vote
at the meeting who complies with the notice procedures set forth
in this Section 8 of Article II and who was a
stockholder of record both at the time of giving of notice
provided for in this Section 8 of Article II and at
the time of the special meeting, may nominate a person or
persons, as the case may be, for election as a director as
specified in the Corporations notice of meeting if the
stockholders notice containing the information required by
Section 2(a) of Article III shall have been delivered
to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of
the Corporation not more than 120 days prior to the date of
the special meeting and not less than the later of 90 days
prior to the date of the special meeting or, if less than
100 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of
the meeting and of the nominees proposed by the board of
directors to be elected at such meeting is given or made to
stockholders, the close of business on the tenth (10th) day
following the day on which such notice was mailed or such public
disclosure was made. In no event shall any postponement or
adjournment of a special meeting, or the announcement thereof,
commence a new time period for the giving of a
stockholders notice as described above.
Section 9. Whenever
stockholders are required or permitted to take any action at a
meeting, a written notice of the meeting shall be given which
notice shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting, and,
in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for
which the meeting is called. The written notice of any meeting
shall be given to each stockholder entitled to vote at such
meeting not less than 10 nor more than 90 days before the
date of the meeting. If mailed, notice is given when deposited
in the United States mail, postage prepaid, directed to the
stockholder at his address as it appears on the records of the
Corporation.
Section 10. Notwithstanding
any other provision of the charter of the Corporation or these
bylaws, Subtitle 7 of Title 3 of the MGCL (as the same may
hereafter be amended from time to time) shall not apply to the
voting rights of any shares of stock of the Corporation now or
hereafter held by any existing or future stockholder of the
Corporation (regardless of the identity of such stockholder).
ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
Section 1. The
board of directors shall consist of a minimum of five
(5) and a maximum of thirteen (13) directors. The
number of directors shall be fixed or changed from time to time,
within the minimum and maximum, by the then elected directors,
provided that at least a majority of the directors shall be
Independent Directors, as defined from time to time by the
Listing Standards of the New York Stock Exchange and any other
relevant laws, rules and regulations. Any determination by the
board of directors as to the qualification of any director as an
Independent Director shall be conclusive for all
purposes. Until increased or decreased by the directors pursuant
to these bylaws, the exact number of directors shall be eleven
(11). The directors need not be stockholders. Except as provided
in Section 2 of this Article III and in
Article VIII with respect to vacancies, the
B-4
directors shall be elected as provided in the charter at each
annual meeting of the stockholders, and each director elected
shall hold office until his successor is elected and qualified
or until his death, retirement, resignation or removal.
Section 2. (a) Nominations
of persons for election to the board of directors of the
Corporation at the annual meeting of stockholders may be made
only (i) pursuant to the Corporations notice of
meeting; (ii) by or at the direction of the board of
directors or (iii) by any committee of persons appointed by
the board of directors with authority therefor or by any
stockholder of the Corporation entitled to vote for the election
of directors at the meeting who complies with the notice
procedures set forth in this Section 2(a) of
Article III and who was a stockholder of record both at the
time of giving of notice provided for in this Section 2(a)
of Article III and at the time of the annual meeting. Such
nominations by any stockholder shall be made pursuant to timely
notice in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be
timely, a stockholders notice shall be delivered to or
mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the
Corporation not less than 90 days nor more than
120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding
years annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event
that the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by
more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting, notice by the stockholder
to be timely must be so received not more than 120 days
prior to the date of the annual meeting and not less than the
later of 90 days prior to the date of the annual meeting
or, if less than 100 days notice or prior public disclosure
of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, the
close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on
which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such
public disclosure was made. In no event shall any postponement
or adjournment of an annual meeting, or the announcement
thereof, commence a new time period for the giving of a
stockholders notice as described above. Such
stockholders notice to the Secretary shall set forth
(i) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to
nominate for election or re-election as a director, (a) the
name, age, business address and residence address of the person,
(b) the principal occupation or employment of the person,
(c) the class, series and number of shares of capital stock
of the Corporation which are beneficially owned or owned of
record by the person, the date such shares were acquired and the
investment intent of such acquisition, (d) any other
information relating to the person that is required to be
disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors
pursuant to the Rules and Regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission under Section 14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (e) such persons
written consent to serve as a director if elected, and
(f) a statement whether such person, if elected or
re-elected, or as a condition thereto, will tender an
irrevocable resignation effective upon such persons
failure to receive the required vote for re-election at the next
meeting at which such person would face re-election and upon
acceptance of such resignation by the Board, in accordance with
the Corporations Corporate Governance Principles (and
assuming that such person would otherwise remain in office as a
director notwithstanding such failure); and (ii) as to the
stockholder giving the notice and any Stockholder Associated
Person (a) the name and record address (and current
address, if different) of the stockholder and the Stockholder
Associated Person, (b) the class, series and number of
shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are
beneficially owned or owned of record by the stockholder and by
such Stockholder Associated Person, if any, and the nominee
holder for, and the number of, shares owned beneficially but not
of record by such stockholder and by any such Stockholder
Associated Person, (c) whether and the extent to which any
hedging or other transaction or series of transactions has been
entered into by or on behalf of, or any other agreement,
arrangement or understanding (including any short position or
any borrowing or lending of shares of stock) has been made, the
effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to or manage risk
of stock price changes for, or to increase the voting power of,
such stockholder or any such Stockholder Associated Person with
respect to any share of stock of the Corporation, and a general
description of whether and the extent to which such stockholder
or such Stockholder Associated Person has engaged in such
activities with respect to shares of stock or other equity
interests of any other company, and (d) to the extent known
by the stockholder giving the notice, the name and address of
any other stockholder supporting the nominee for election or
re-election as a director on the date of such stockholders
notice. The Corporation may require any proposed nominee to
furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by
the Corporation to determine the eligibility of such proposed
nominee to serve as a director of the Corporation or that could
be material to a reasonable stockholders understanding of
the independence, or lack thereof, of such nominee. Except as
may otherwise be provided in these bylaws or any other agreement
relating to the right to designate nominees for election to the
board of directors, no person shall be eligible for election as
a director of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance
with the procedures set forth in this Section 2(a) of
Article III. The officer of the Corporation presiding
B-5
at an annual meeting shall, if the facts warrant, determine that
a nomination was not made in accordance with the foregoing
procedure, and if he should so determine, he shall so declare to
the meeting and the defective nomination shall be disregarded.
(b) Except as may otherwise be provided pursuant to
Article IV of the Corporations charter with respect
to any rights of holders of preferred stock to elect additional
directors and any other requirement in these bylaws or other
agreement relating to the right to designate nominees for
election to the board of directors, should a vacancy in the
board of directors occur or be created (whether arising through
death, retirement or resignation), such vacancy shall be filled
by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors, even though less than a quorum of the board of
directors or, in the case of a vacancy resulting from an
increase in the number of directors, by a majority of the entire
board of directors. In the case of a vacancy created by the
removal of a director, the vacancy shall be filled by the
stockholders of the Corporation entitled to elect the director
who was removed at the next annual meeting of stockholders or at
a special meeting of stockholders called for such purpose,
provided, however, that such vacancy may be filled by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors,
subject to approval by the stockholders entitled to elect the
director who was removed at the next annual meeting of
stockholders or at a special meeting of stockholders called for
such purpose. A director so elected to fill a vacancy shall
serve for the remainder of the term.
Section 3. The
property and business of the Corporation shall be managed by or
under the direction of its board of directors. In addition to
the powers and authorities by these bylaws expressly conferred
upon it, the board may exercise all such powers of the
Corporation and do all such lawful acts and things as are not by
statute or by the Corporations charter or by these bylaws
directed or required to be exercised or done by the stockholders.
Section 4. Subject
to Article VIII, the board of directors shall elect a
chairman of the board of directors who shall hold that position
until a successor is elected and qualified. The chairman of the
board of directors shall preside at meetings of the stockholders
and shall set the agenda for meetings of the board of directors.
Section 5. Regardless
of whether the chairman of the board of directors is an
Independent Director, the Independent Directors of the board of
directors may elect an Independent Director to be the Lead
Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director may conduct
separate meetings of the Independent Directors and perform other
duties appropriate to his or her responsibilities, including:
(a) preparing, in consultation with the chairman of the
board of directors, committee chairs, and other directors, the
agendas for meetings of the board of directors;
(b) coordinating the activities of the other Independent
Directors; (c) approving, in consultation with other
Independent Directors, the retention and compensation of
consultants who report directly to the board of directors;
(d) reviewing with the chief executive officer (or each
co-chief executive officer) such chief executive officers
performance evaluation conducted by the Independent Directors;
(e) presiding at non-management meetings of the Independent
Directors and conveying to management directors the results of
deliberations among non-management directors; and
(f) acting as representative of the non-management for
communication with interested parties.
MEETINGS
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 6. The
directors may hold their meetings and have one or more offices,
and keep the books of the Corporation, outside the State of
Maryland.
Section 7. Regular
meetings of the board of directors may be held at such time and
place as shall from time to time be determined by resolution of
the board, and no additional notice shall be required.
Section 8. Special
meetings of the board of directors may be called by the chief
executive officer, a co-chief executive officer, the president
or the chairman of the board of directors on forty-eight
hours notice to each director, either personally or by
mail or by telegram; special meetings shall be called by the
chief executive officer, a co-chief executive officer, the
president or the secretary in like manner and on like notice on
the written request of two directors unless the board consists
of only one director, in which case special meetings shall be
called by the chief executive officer, a co-chief executive
officer, the president or the secretary in like manner and on
like notice on the written request of the sole director.
Section 9. Unless
otherwise restricted by the Corporations charter or these
bylaws, any action required or permitted to be taken at any
meeting of the board of directors or of any committee thereof
may be taken without a
B-6
meeting, if all members of the board or committee, as the case
may be, consent thereto in writing, and the writing or writings
are filed with the minutes of proceedings of the board or
committee.
Section 10. Unless
otherwise restricted by the Corporations charter or these
bylaws, members of the board of directors, or any committee
designated by the board of directors, may participate in a
meeting of the board of directors, or any committee, by means of
conference telephone or similar communications equipment by
means of which all persons participating in the meeting can hear
each other, and such participation in a meeting shall constitute
presence in person at such meeting.
Section 11. By
virtue of resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors prior to
or at the time of adoption of these Bylaws and designated
irrevocable, any business combination (as defined in
Section 3-601(e)
of the MGCL) between the Corporation and any of its present or
future stockholders, or any affiliates or associates of the
Corporation or any present or future stockholder of the
Corporation, or any other person or entity or group of persons
or entities, is exempt from the provisions of Subtitle 6 of
Title 3 of the MGCL entitled Special Voting
Requirements, including, but not limited to, the
provisions of
Section 3-602
of such Subtitle. The Board of Directors may not revoke, alter
or amend such resolution, or otherwise elect to have any
business combination of the Corporation be subject to the
provisions of Subtitle 6 of Title 3 of the MGCL without the
approval of the holders of the issued and outstanding shares of
Common Stock of the Corporation by the affirmative vote of a
majority of all votes entitled to be cast in respect of such
shares of Common Stock.
Section 12. Notwithstanding
any other provision of these bylaws, all actions which the board
of directors may take to approve a transaction between
(i) the Corporation, ProLogis, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (the Operating Partnership), or any
subsidiary of the Corporation or the Operating Partnership, on
the one hand, and (ii) (a) any executive officer or
director of the Corporation, the Operating Partnership or any
subsidiary of the Corporation or the Operating Partnership, or
(b) any limited partner of the Operating Partnership or
(c) any affiliate of the foregoing executive officer,
director or limited partner (not including the Corporation, the
Operating Partnership or any subsidiary of the Corporation or
the Operating Partnership), on the other hand, shall require,
for valid approval, the approval of a majority of the
Independent Directors; provided, however, that this approval
requirement shall not apply to arrangements between the
Corporation or the Operating Partnership and any executive
officer or director acting in the executive officers or
directors position as such, including but not limited to
employment agreements and compensation matters.
RESIGNATION
FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 13. A
director may resign at any time upon written notice to the
Corporations board of directors, chairman of the board of
directors, chief executive officer, co-chief executive officer,
president or secretary. Any such resignation shall take effect
at the time or upon the satisfaction of any condition specified
therein or, if no time or condition is specified, upon receipt
thereof, and the acceptance of such resignation, unless required
by the terms thereof (including for example any resignation
contemplated by Section 6(b) of Article II), shall not
be necessary to make such resignation effective.
COMMITTEES
OF DIRECTORS
Section 14. The
board of directors may, by resolution passed by a majority of
the whole board, designate one or more committees, each such
committee to consist of not less than the minimum number of
directors required for committees of the board of directors
under the MGCL. The board may designate one or more directors as
alternate members of any committee, who may replace any absent
or disqualified member at any meeting of the committee. Any such
committee, to the extent provided in the resolution of the board
of directors, and to the maximum extent permitted under the
MGCL, shall have and may exercise all the powers and authority
of the board of directors in the management of the business and
affairs of the Corporation, and may authorize the seal of the
Corporation to be affixed to all papers which may require it;
but no such committee shall have the power or authority in
reference to amending the charter, adopting an agreement of
merger or consolidation, recommending to the stockholders the
sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the
Corporations property and assets, recommending to the
stockholders a dissolution of the Corporation or a revocation of
a dissolution or any other matter requiring the
B-7
approval of the stockholders of the Corporation, or amending the
bylaws of the Corporation; and no such committee shall have the
power or authority to authorize or declare a dividend, to
authorize the issuance of stock (except that, if the board of
directors has given general authorization for the issuance of
stock providing for or establishing a method or procedure for
determining the maximum number or the maximum aggregate offering
price of shares to be issued, or both, a committee of the board
of directors may, in accordance with that general authorization
or any stock option or other plan or program adopted by the
board of directors: authorize or fix the terms of stock subject
to classification or reclassification, including the
designations and any of the preferences, conversion or other
rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to
dividends, qualifications, or terms or conditions of redemption
of such shares; within the limits established by the board of
directors, fix the number of any such class or series of stock
or authorize the increase or decrease in the number of shares of
any series or class; and otherwise establish the terms on which
any stock may be issued, including the price and consideration
for such stock), or to approve any merger or share exchange,
regardless of whether the merger or share exchange requires
stockholder approval.
Section 15. The
Corporation shall from and after the incorporation have the
following committees, the specific authority and members of
which shall be as designated herein, in such committees
charter or otherwise by resolution of the board of directors:
(i) An Executive Committee, which shall meet and act
separately only if action by the board of directors is required,
the board of directors is unavailable, and the matter to be
acted upon is time-sensitive.
(ii) An Audit Committee, which shall consist solely of
Independent Directors and which shall engage the independent
public accountants, review with the independent public
accountants the plans and results of the audit engagement,
approve professional services provided by the independent public
accountants, review the independence of the independent public
accountants, consider the range of audit and non-audit fees and
review the adequacy of the Corporations internal
accounting controls.
(iii) A Compensation Committee, which shall consist solely
of Independent Directors and which shall determine compensation
for the Corporations executive officers, and will review
and make recommendations concerning proposals by management with
respect to compensation, bonus, employment agreements and other
benefits and policies respecting such matters for the executive
officers of the Corporation.
(iv) A Nominating and Governance Committee, which shall,
among other things, submit nominations for members of the Board
of Directors, recommend composition of the committees of the
Board of Directors, review the size and composition of the Board
of Directors, review guidelines for corporate governance,
provide assistance to the board of directors in reviewing the
Corporations activities, goals and policies concerning
environmental stewardship and social responsibility matters, and
conduct annual reviews of the board of directors and the chief
executive officer or co-chief executive officers.
Section 16. Each
committee shall keep regular minutes of its meetings and report
the same to the board of directors when required. The presence
of a majority of the total membership of any committee shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any
meeting of such committee and the act of a majority of those
present shall be necessary and sufficient for the taking of any
action thereat.
COMPENSATION
OF DIRECTORS
Section 17. Unless
otherwise restricted by the charter of the Corporation or these
bylaws, the board of directors shall have the authority to fix
the compensation of non-employee directors. The non-employee
directors may be paid their expenses, if any, of attendance at
each meeting of the board of directors and may be paid a fixed
sum for attendance at each meeting of the board of directors or
a stated salary as director. Officers of the Corporation who are
also members of the board of directors shall not be paid any
directors fees.
INDEMNIFICATION
Section 18. The
Corporation shall indemnify, in the manner and to the maximum
extent permitted by law, any person (or the estate of any
person) who is or was a party to, or is threatened to be made a
party to, any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
proceeding, whether or not by or in the right of the
Corporation, and
B-8
whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative, or
otherwise, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a
director or officer of the Corporation or that such person while
a director or officer of the Corporation, is or was serving at
the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, trustee,
partner, member, agent or employee of another corporation,
partnership, limited liability company, association, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise. To the maximum extent
permitted by law, the indemnification provided herein shall
include expenses (including attorneys fees), judgments,
fines and amounts paid in settlement, and any such expenses may
be paid by the Corporation in advance of the final disposition
of such action, suit or proceeding.
Neither the amendment nor repeal of this Section 18 of this
Article III, nor the adoption or amendment of any other
provision of the charter or bylaws of the Corporation
inconsistent with this Section, shall apply to or affect in any
respect the applicability of the preceding paragraph with
respect to any act or failure to act which occurred prior to
such amendment, repeal or adoption.
The indemnification and reimbursement of expenses provided
herein shall not be deemed to limit the right of the Corporation
to indemnify any other person against any liability and expenses
to the fullest extent permitted by law, nor shall it be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which any person seeking
indemnification from the Corporation may be entitled under any
agreement, the charter or bylaws of the Corporation, a vote of
stockholders or Independent Directors, or otherwise, both as to
action in such persons official capacity as an officer or
director and as to action in another capacity, at the request of
the Corporation, while acting as an officer or director of the
Corporation.
ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
Section 1. Subject
to Article VIII, the officers of this Corporation shall be
chosen by the board of directors and shall include a president,
a vice president, a secretary and a treasurer. Subject to
Article VIII, the Corporation may also have at the
discretion of the board of directors such other officers as are
desired, including a chairman of the board, additional vice
presidents, a chief executive officer or co-chief executive
officers, a chief financial officer, a chief operating officer,
one or more managing directors, one or more assistant
secretaries and one or more assistant treasurers, and such other
officers as may be appointed in accordance with the provisions
of Section 3 of this Article IV. In the event there
are two or more vice presidents, then one or more may be
designated as executive vice president, senior vice president,
vice president/acquisitions or other similar or dissimilar
title. At the time of the election of officers, the directors
may by resolution determine the order of their rank. Any number
of offices may be held by the same person, unless the charter or
these bylaws otherwise provide, except that one individual may
not simultaneously hold the office of president and vice
president.
Section 2. The
board of directors, at its first meeting after each annual
meeting of stockholders, shall choose the officers of the
Corporation.
Section 3. Subject
to Article VIII, the board of directors may appoint such
other officers and agents as it shall deem necessary who shall
hold their offices for such terms and shall exercise such powers
and perform such duties as shall be determined from time to time
by the board.
Section 4. The
salaries of all officers and agents of the Corporation shall be
fixed by the board of directors, provided, however, that the
compensation of the Corporations executive officers shall
be determined by the Compensation Committee.
Section 5. The
officers of the Corporation shall hold office until their
successors are chosen and qualify in their stead. Subject to
Article VIII, any officer elected or appointed by the board
of directors may be removed at any time, with or without cause,
by the affirmative vote of majority of the board of directors.
If the office of any officer or officers becomes vacant for any
reason, the vacancy shall be filled by the board of directors.
Section 6. Any
officer may resign at any time upon written notice to the
Corporations board of directors, chairman of the board of
directors, chief executive officer, co-chief executive officer,
president or secretary. Any such resignation shall take effect
at the time specified therein or, if the time is not specified,
upon receipt thereof, and the acceptance of such resignation,
unless required by the terms thereof, shall not be necessary to
make such
B-9
resignation effective. Any such resignation will not prejudice
the rights, if any, of the Corporation under any contract to
which the officer is a party.
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Section 7. The
chief executive officer or co-chief executive officers shall,
subject to the control of the board of directors, have general
supervision, direction and control of the business and officers
of the Corporation. The chief executive officer or co-chief
executive officers shall preside at all meetings of the
stockholders and, in the absence of the chairman of the board of
directors, or if there be none, at all meetings of the board of
directors. The chief executive officer or co-chief executive
officers shall have the general powers and duties of management
usually vested in the office of chief executive officer of
corporations, and shall have such other powers and duties as may
be prescribed by the board of directors or these bylaws.
PRESIDENT
Section 8. In
the absence or disability of the chief executive officer or the
co-chief executive officers, as applicable, or the absence of a
designation of a chief executive officer or co-chief executive
officers, as applicable, by the board of directors, the
president shall perform all the duties of the chief executive
officer, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and be
subject to all the restrictions upon the chief executive officer
or co-chief executive officers. The president shall have the
general powers and duties of management usually vested in the
office of president of corporations, and shall have such other
powers and duties as may be prescribed by the board of directors
or these bylaws.
CHIEF
OPERATING OFFICER
Section 9. Subject
to such supervisory powers, if any, as may be given by the board
of directors to the chief executive officer or co-chief
executive officers, as applicable and the president, if there be
such an officer, the chief operating officer shall, subject to
the control of the board of directors, have the supervision,
direction and control of the day to day operations of the
Corporation. He shall have the general powers and duties of
management usually vested in the office of chief operating
officer of corporations, and shall have such other powers and
duties as may be prescribed by the board of directors or these
bylaws.
VICE
PRESIDENTS
Section 10. In
the absence or disability of the chief executive officer or the
co-chief executive officers, as applicable, the president, the
vice presidents, in order of their rank as fixed by the board of
directors, or if not ranked, the vice president designated by
the board of directors, shall perform all the duties of the
president, and when so acting, shall have all the powers of and
be subject to all the restrictions upon the president. The vice
presidents shall have such other duties as from time to time may
be prescribed by the board of directors or these bylaws.
SECRETARY
AND ASSISTANT SECRETARY
Section 11. The
secretary shall attend all sessions of the board of directors
and all meetings of the stockholders and record all votes and
the minutes of all proceedings in a book to be kept for that
purpose; and shall perform like duties for the standing
committees when required by the board of directors. He shall
give, or cause to be given, notice of all meetings of the
stockholders and of the board of directors, and shall perform
such other duties as may be prescribed by the board of directors
or the bylaws. He shall keep in safe custody the seal of the
Corporation, and when authorized by the board, affix the same to
any instrument requiring it, and when so affixed it shall be
attested by his signature or by the signature of an assistant
secretary. The board of directors may give general authority to
any other officer to affix the seal of the Corporation and to
attest the affixing by his signature.
Section 12. The
assistant secretary, or if there be more than one, the assistant
secretaries in the order determined by the board of directors,
or if there be no such determination, the assistant secretary
designated by the
B-10
board of directors, shall, in the absence or disability of the
secretary, perform the duties and exercise the powers of the
secretary and shall perform such other duties and have such
other powers as the board of directors may from time to time
prescribe.
CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER, TREASURER AND ASSISTANT TREASURERS
Section 13. The
chief financial officer of the Corporation shall have the
custody of the corporate funds and securities and shall keep
full and accurate accounts of receipts and disbursements in
books belonging to the Corporation and shall deposit all moneys,
and other valuable effects in the name and to the credit of the
Corporation, in such depositories as may be designated by the
board of directors. He shall disburse the funds of the
Corporation as may be ordered by the board of directors, taking
proper vouchers for such disbursements, and shall render to the
board of directors, at its regular meetings, or when the board
of directors so requires, an account of all his transactions as
chief financial officer and of the financial condition of the
Corporation. If required by the board of directors, he shall
give the Corporation a bond, in such sum and with such surety or
sureties as shall be satisfactory to the board of directors, for
the faithful performance of the duties of his office and for the
restoration to the Corporation, in case of his death,
resignation, retirement or removal from office, of all books,
papers, vouchers, money and other property of whatever kind in
his possession or under his control belonging to the
Corporation. If no other person then be appointed to the
position of treasurer of the Corporation, the person holding the
office of chief financial officer shall also be the treasurer of
the Corporation.
Section 14. The
treasurer or assistant treasurer, or if there shall be more than
one, the assistant treasurers in the order determined by the
board of directors, or if there be no such determination, the
treasurer or assistant treasurer designated by the board of
directors, shall, in the absence or disability of the chief
financial officer, perform the duties and exercise the powers of
the chief financial officer and shall perform such other duties
and have such other powers as the board of directors may from
time to time prescribe.
ARTICLE V
CERTIFICATES
OF STOCK
Section 1. Every
holder of stock of the Corporation shall be entitled to have a
certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation by, the
chief executive officer or any co-chief executive officer, the
president or a vice president, and countersigned by the
secretary or an assistant secretary, or the treasurer or an
assistant treasurer of the Corporation, certifying the number of
shares of capital stock represented by the certificate owned by
such stockholder in the Corporation.
Section 2. Any
or all of the signatures on the certificate may be a facsimile.
In case any officer, transfer agent, or registrar who has signed
or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate
shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or
registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by
the Corporation with the same effect as if he were such officer,
transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue. Such
certificates need not be sealed with the corporate seal of the
Corporation.
Section 3. If
the Corporation shall be authorized to issue more than one class
of stock or more than one series of any class, the powers,
designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional
or other special rights of each class of capital stock or series
thereof and the qualification, limitations or restrictions of
such preferences
and/or
rights shall be set forth in full or summarized on the face or
back of the certificate which the Corporation shall issue to
represent such class or series of stock, provided that, in lieu
of the foregoing requirements, there may be set forth on the
face or back of the certificate which the Corporation shall
issue to represent such class or series of stock, a statement
that the Corporation will furnish without charge to each
stockholder who so requests the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other
special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences
and/or
rights. In addition, in the event that any stock issued by the
Corporation is subject to a restriction on its transferability,
the stock certificate shall on its face or back contain a full
statement of the restriction or state that the Corporation will
furnish information about the restriction to the stockholder on
request and without charge.
B-11
LOST,
STOLEN OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES
Section 4. The
board of directors may direct a new certificate or certificates
to be issued in place of any certificate or certificates
theretofore issued by the Corporation alleged to have been lost,
stolen or destroyed, upon the making of an affidavit of that
fact by the person claiming the certificate of stock to be lost,
stolen or destroyed. When authorizing such issue of a new
certificate or certificates, the board of directors may, in its
discretion and as a condition precedent to the issuance thereof,
require the owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate
or certificates, or his legal representative, to advertise the
same in such manner as it shall require
and/or to
give the Corporation a bond in such sum as it may direct as
indemnity against any claim that may be made against the
Corporation with respect to the certificate alleged to have been
lost, stolen or destroyed.
TRANSFERS
OF STOCK
Section 5. Upon
surrender to the Corporation, or the transfer agent of the
Corporation, of a certificate for shares duly endorsed or
accompanied by proper evidence of succession, assignment or
authority to transfer, it shall be the duty of the Corporation
to issue a new certificate to the person entitled thereto,
cancel the old certificate and record the transaction upon its
books, subject, however, to the Ownership Limit (as defined in
the charter of the Corporation) and other restrictions on
transferability applicable thereto from time to time.
FIXING
RECORD DATE
Section 6. In
order that the Corporation may determine the stockholders
entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting of the
stockholders, or any adjournment thereof, or to express consent
to corporate action in writing without a meeting, or entitled to
receive payment of any dividend or other distribution or
allotment of any rights, or entitled to exercise any rights in
respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock or for
the purpose of any other lawful action, the board of directors
may fix a record date which shall not be more than 90 nor less
than 10 days before the date of such meeting, nor more than
90 days prior to any other action. A determination of
stockholders of record entitled to notice of or to vote at a
meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the
meeting; provided, however, that the board of directors may fix
a new record date for the adjourned meeting. A meeting of
stockholders convened on the date for which it was called may be
adjourned from time to time without further notice to a date not
more than 120 days after the original record date.
REGISTERED
STOCKHOLDERS
Section 7. The
Corporation shall be entitled to treat the holder of record of
any share or shares of stock as the holder in fact thereof and
accordingly shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or
other claim or interest in such share on the part of any other
person, whether or not it shall have express or other notice
thereof, save as expressly provided by the laws of the State of
Maryland.
ARTICLE VI
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
DIVIDENDS
Section 1. Dividends
upon the capital stock of the Corporation, subject to the
provisions of the Corporations charter, if any, may be
authorized and declared by the board of directors at any regular
or special meeting, pursuant to law. Dividends may be paid in
cash, in property, or in shares of the capital stock, subject to
the provisions of the Corporations charter and the MGCL.
Section 2. Before
payment of any dividend there may be set aside out of any funds
of the Corporation available for dividends such sum or sums as
the directors from time to time, in their absolute discretion,
think proper as a reserve fund to meet contingencies, or for
equalizing dividends, or for repairing or maintaining any
property of the Corporation, or for such other purpose as the
directors shall think conducive to the interests of the
Corporation, and the directors may abolish any such reserve.
B-12
CHECKS
Section 3. All
checks or demands for money and notes of the Corporation shall
be signed by such officer or officers as the board of directors
may from time to time designate.
FISCAL
YEAR
Section 4. The
fiscal year of the Corporation shall be fixed by resolution of
the board of directors.
SEAL
Section 5. The
corporate seal shall have inscribed thereon the name of the
Corporation, the year of its organization and the words
Corporate Seal, Maryland. Said seal may be used by
causing it or a facsimile thereof to be impressed or affixed or
reproduced or otherwise.
NOTICES
Section 6. Whenever,
under the provisions of the MGCL or of the charter of the
Corporation or of these bylaws, notice is required to be given
to any director or stockholder, it shall not be construed to
mean personal notice, but such notice may be given in writing,
by mail, addressed to such director or stockholder, at his
address as it appears on the records of the Corporation, with
postage thereon prepaid, and such notice shall be deemed to be
given at the time when the same shall be deposited in the United
States mail. Notice to directors may also be given by telegram,
telecopy or cable.
Section 7. Whenever
any notice is required to be given under the provisions of the
MGCL or of the charter of the Corporation or of these bylaws, a
waiver thereof in writing, signed by the person or persons
entitled to said notice, whether before or after the time stated
therein, shall be deemed equivalent thereto.
ANNUAL
STATEMENT
Section 8. The
board of directors may present at each annual meeting of
stockholders, and when called for by vote of the stockholders
shall present to any annual or special meeting of the
stockholders, a full and clear statement of the business and
condition of the Corporation.
ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENTS
Section 1. Except
as otherwise set forth in these bylaws, including
Article VIII, these bylaws may be altered, amended or
repealed or new bylaws may be adopted by the vote of a majority
of the board of directors or by the affirmative vote of a
majority of all votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the
issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the
Corporation. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,
this Section 1 of Article VII, Section 11 of
Article III and Section 10 of Article II hereof
may not be altered, amended or repealed except by the
affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast
by the holders of the issued and outstanding shares of Common
Stock of the Corporation.
Section 2. Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary herein, this Section 2 of
Article VII, Section 12 of Article III and
Section 9 of Article II hereof may not be altered,
amended or repealed except by the affirmative vote of a majority
of all votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the issued
and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation.
B-13
ARTICLE VIII
CERTAIN
GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Section 1. The
board of directors has resolved that: (a) Hamid R. Moghadam
and Walter C. Rakowich shall serve as the co-chief executive
officers of the Corporation, effective as
of ,
2011 and until the earliest to occur of
(i) December 31, 2012, (ii) such persons
removal in accordance with Section 2 of this
Article VIII or (iii) such persons death or
resignation; (b) Hamid R. Moghadam shall serve as chairman
of the board of directors of the Corporation, effective as
of ,
2011 and until the earlier to occur of (i) such
persons removal in accordance with Section 2 of this
Article VIII or (ii) such persons death or
resignation; and (c) Walter C. Rakowichs employment
with the Company shall automatically terminate on
December 31, 2012, without action by the board of directors
or any other person or party, and he shall thereupon retire as
co-chief executive officer and as a director of the Corporation,
and Hamid R. Moghadam shall then become the sole chief executive
officer (and shall remain chairman of the board of directors) of
the Corporation.
Section 2. The
affirmative vote of Independent Directors consisting of at least
75% of the Independent Directors shall be required to
(a) remove Hamid R. Moghadam as co-chief executive officer,
chief executive officer or chairman of the board of directors
prior to December 31, 2014; (b) remove Walter C.
Rakowich as co-chief executive officer prior to
December 31, 2012; (c) appoint any person (other than
Hamid R. Moghadam and Walter C. Rakowich) as co-chief executive
officer prior to December 31, 2012; (d) appoint any
person (other than Hamid R. Moghadam) as chief executive officer
or co-chief executive officer on or after December 31, 2012
and prior to December 31, 2014; (e) appoint any person
(other than Hamid R. Moghadam) as chairman or co-chairman of the
board of directors prior to December 31, 2014;
(f) fail to nominate Hamid R. Moghadam as a director of the
Corporation in any election of directors where the term of such
directorship commences prior to December 31, 2014;
(g) fail to nominate Walter C. Rakowich as a director of
the Corporation in any election of directors where the term of
such directorship commences prior to December 31, 2012; or
(h) materially alter, limit or curtail the authority
granted pursuant to these bylaws to the chief executive officer,
co-chief executive officer or the chairman of the board at any
time prior to December 31, 2014. Prior to December 31,
2014, the provisions of this Article VIII may be modified,
amended or repealed, and any bylaw provision inconsistent with
the provisions of this Section 2 of this Article VIII
may be adopted, only by an affirmative vote of at least 75% of
the Independent Directors. In the event of any inconsistency
between any provision of this Article VIII and any other
provision of these bylaws, the provisions of this
Article VIII will control.
The undersigned, Secretary of ProLogis, Inc., a Maryland
corporation (the Corporation), hereby certifies that
the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Bylaws of
the Corporation with all amendments to the date of this
Certificate.
WITNESS the signature of the undersigned and the seal of the
Corporation this
day
of ,
2011.
[ ]
[ ]
Secretary
B-14
Annex C
PROLOGIS,
INC.
ARTICLES OF
AMENDMENT
ProLogis, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
Corporation), hereby certifies to the State
Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:
FIRST:
(1) The charter of the Corporation (the
Charter) is hereby amended by adding the following
text to the end of the first paragraph of Article IV:
The Board of Directors of the Corporation, with the approval of
a majority of the entire Board, and without action by the
stockholders of the Corporation, may amend the Charter of the
Corporation to increase or decrease the aggregate number of
shares of stock of the Corporation or the number of shares of
stock of any class or series that the Corporation has authority
to issue.
(2) The Charter is hereby further amended by adding a new
Article XIII reading as follows:
ARTICLE XIII
EXTRAORDINARY
ACTIONS
Notwithstanding any provision of law permitting or requiring any
action to be taken or approved by the affirmative vote of the
holders of shares entitled to cast a greater number of votes,
any such action shall be effective and valid if declared
advisable by the Board of Directors and taken or approved by the
affirmative vote of holders of shares entitled to cast a
majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter;
provided, that (i) any amendment to any provision of this
Charter which expressly requires for any purpose a greater
proportion of the votes entitled to be cast shall require the
proportion of votes specified in that provision, (ii) any
amendment to this Article XIII shall require the
affirmative vote of the holders of shares entitled to cast
two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter
and (iii) any action requiring a different vote as
expressly provided in this Charter shall require such different
vote.
SECOND:
The amendments to the Charter of the Corporation set forth above
were advised by the entire Board of Directors of the Corporation
and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation as required
by law.
THIRD:
The undersigned officer acknowledges these Articles of Amendment
to be the corporate act of the Corporation and as to all matters
or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned
officer acknowledges that to the best of his knowledge,
information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all
material respects and that this statement is made under the
penalties for perjury.
[Remainder
of Page Intentionally Blank.]
C-1
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ProLogis, Inc. has caused these Articles of
Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf by the
undersigned officer and its corporate seal to be affixed and
attested to by its Secretary on
this
day
of ,
2011.
C-2
Annex D
January 30,
2011
The Board of
Directors
AMB Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
Members of the Board of Directors:
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to AMB Property Corporation (the
Company) of the Exchange Ratio (as defined below) in
the proposed Transaction (as defined below) contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement) by and
among the Company, AMB Property, L.P., ProLogis (the
Merger Partner), New Pumpkin Inc. (New
Pumpkin), Upper Pumpkin LLC and Pumpkin LLC (Pumpkin
LLC). Pursuant to the Agreement, among other things,
(i) Pumpkin LLC will merge with and into the Merger Partner
(the Pumpkin Merger) and (ii) following the
Pumpkin Merger, New Pumpkin will merge with and into the Company
(the Transaction) and each issued and outstanding
share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New Pumpkin
will be automatically converted into the right to receive 0.4464
(the Exchange Ratio) newly issued shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (Company
Common Stock).
In connection with preparing our opinion, we have
(i) reviewed a draft dated January 29, 2011 of the
Agreement; (ii) reviewed certain publicly available
business and financial information concerning the Merger Partner
and the Company and the industries in which they operate;
(iii) compared the financial and operating performance of
the Merger Partner and the Company with publicly available
information concerning certain other companies we deemed
relevant and reviewed the current and historical market prices
of the common shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.01 per
share, of the Merger Partner (Merger Partner Common
Stock) and the Company Common Stock and certain publicly
traded securities of such other companies; (iv) reviewed
certain internal financial data, analyses and forecasts prepared
or approved by management of the Merger Partner or management of
the Company relating to their respective businesses, as well as
the estimated amount and timing of the cost savings and related
expenses and synergies expected to result from the Transaction
(the Synergies); and (v) performed such other
financial studies and analyses and considered such other
information as we deemed appropriate for the purposes of this
opinion.
In addition, we have held discussions with certain members of
the management of the Merger Partner and the management of the
Company with respect to certain aspects of the Transaction, and
the past and current business operations of the Merger Partner
and the Company, the financial condition and future prospects
and operations of the Merger Partner and the Company, the
effects of the Transaction on the financial condition and future
prospects of the Company, and certain other matters we believed
necessary or appropriate to our inquiry.
In giving our opinion, we have relied upon and assumed the
accuracy and completeness of all information that was publicly
available or was furnished to or discussed with us by the Merger
Partner and the Company or otherwise reviewed by or for us, and
we have not independently verified (nor have we assumed
responsibility or liability for independently verifying) any
such information or its accuracy or completeness. We have not
conducted or been provided with any valuation or appraisal of
any assets or liabilities (including real estate assets and
liabilities), nor have we evaluated the solvency of the Merger
Partner, the Company or any other party to the Agreement under
any state or federal laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency or
similar matters. In relying on financial analyses and forecasts
provided to us or derived therefrom, including the Synergies, we
have assumed that they have been reasonably prepared based on
assumptions reflecting the best currently available estimates
and judgments by management of the Merger Partner or management
of the Company, as applicable, as to the expected future results
of operations and financial condition of the Merger Partner and
the Company, respectively, to which such analyses or forecasts
relate. We express no view as to such analyses or forecasts
(including the Synergies) or the assumptions on which they were
based. We have also assumed that each of the Pumpkin Merger and
the Transaction will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for
United States federal income tax purposes, and will be
consummated as described in the Agreement, and that the
definitive Agreement will not differ in any material respects
from the draft thereof furnished to us. We have also assumed
that the representations and warranties made by the Company and
the Merger
D-1
Partner in the Agreement and any related agreements are and will
be true and correct in all respects material to our analysis. We
are not legal, regulatory or tax experts and have relied on the
assessments made by advisors to the Company with respect to such
issues. We have further assumed that all governmental,
regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the
consummation of the Transaction will be obtained without any
material adverse effect on the Merger Partner or the Company or
on the contemplated benefits of the Transaction.
Our opinion is necessarily based on economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that
subsequent developments may affect this opinion and that we do
not have any obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm this
opinion. Our opinion is limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, to the Company of the Exchange Ratio in
the proposed Transaction and we express no opinion as to the
fairness of the Transaction to the holders of any class of
securities, creditors or other constituencies of the Company or
as to the underlying decision by the Company to engage in the
Transaction. Furthermore, we express no opinion with respect to
the amount or nature of any compensation to any officers,
directors, or employees of any party to the Transaction, or any
class of such persons relative to the Exchange Ratio in the
Transaction or with respect to the fairness of any such
compensation. We are expressing no opinion herein as to the
price at which the Merger Partner Common Stock or the Company
Common Stock will trade at any future time.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Company with respect
to the proposed Transaction and will receive a fee from the
Company for our services, a substantial portion of which will
become payable only if the proposed Transaction is consummated.
In addition, the Company has agreed to indemnify us for certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. During the two years
preceding the date of this letter, we and our affiliates have
had commercial and investment banking relationships with the
Company and the Merger Partner, respectively, for which we and
such affiliates have received customary compensation. Such
services for the Company during such period have included acting
as joint bookrunner for the Companys offerings of Company
Common Stock in April 2010 and March 2009, respectively, its
offering of debt securities in August 2010 and November 2010,
respectively, and as dealer manager for the Companys
tender offers for certain of its outstanding debt securities in
May 2009 and December 2009, respectively. Such services for the
Merger Partner during such period have included acting as joint
bookrunner for the Merger Partners offering of Merger
Partner Common Stock in October 2010, its offering of
convertible notes in March 2010 and its offering of debt
securities in August 2009, as solicitation agent for the Merger
Partners consent solicitation with respect to certain of
its debt securities in September 2009, as co-managing
underwriter of the Merger Partners offering of Merger
Partner Common Stock in April 2009 and as dealer manager for the
Merger Partners tender offer for certain of its
outstanding debt securities in May 2009. In addition, our
commercial banking affiliate is an agent bank and a lender under
certain outstanding credit facilities of the Company and one of
its affiliates and a lender to the Merger Partner, for which it
receives customary compensation or other financial benefits. In
the ordinary course of our businesses, we and our affiliates may
actively trade the debt and equity securities of the Company or
the Merger Partner for our own account or for the accounts of
customers and, accordingly, we may at any time hold long or
short positions in such securities.
On the basis of and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion
as of the date hereof that the Exchange Ratio in the proposed
Transaction is fair, from a financial point of view, to the
Company.
The issuance of this opinion has been approved by a fairness
opinion committee of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. This
letter is provided to the Board of Directors of the Company (in
its capacity as such) in connection with and for the purposes of
its evaluation of the Transaction. This opinion does not
constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of the Company as
to how such shareholder should vote with respect to the
Transaction or any other matter. Except as set forth in our
engagement letter with the Company or in the next sentence, this
opinion may not be disclosed, referred to, or communicated (in
whole or in part) to any third party for any purpose whatsoever
except with our prior written approval. This opinion may be
reproduced in full in any proxy or information statement mailed
to shareholders of the Company (as well as in any prospectus or
registration statement containing any such proxy or information
statement) but may not otherwise be disclosed publicly in any
manner without our prior written approval.
Very truly
yours,
/s/ J.P.
MORGAN SECURITIES
LLC
J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC
D-2
Annex E
[Letterhead
of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated]
January 30,
2011
Board of Trustees
ProLogis
4545 Airport Way
Denver, CO 80239
Members of the Board of Trustees:
We understand that AMB Property Corporation (AMB),
AMB Operating Partnership, L.P. (AMB LP), ProLogis
(ProLogis), New ProLogis Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of ProLogis (New ProLogis), Upper
ProLogis LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of New ProLogis
(Upper ProLogis) and ProLogis LLC, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Upper ProLogis (ProLogis LLC), propose
to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, substantially in
the form of the draft dated as of January 30, 2011 (the
Merger Agreement), which provides, among other
things, for (i) the merger (the ProLogis
Merger) of ProLogis LLC with and into ProLogis;
(ii) immediately after the ProLogis Merger, the merger (the
Topco Merger and, together with the ProLogis Merger,
the Mergers) of New ProLogis with and into AMB (as
the surviving corporation of the Topco Merger, the
Surviving Corporation) and (iii) concurrently
with the Topco Merger, the contribution of all of the
outstanding equity interests of Upper ProLogis by the Surviving
Corporation to AMB LP in exchange for equity interests in AMB LP
(the Contribution and Issuance and, together with
the Mergers, the Transaction). Pursuant to the
ProLogis Merger, each outstanding common share of beneficial
interest, par value $0.01 per share (the ProLogis Common
Stock), of ProLogis will be converted into one newly
issued share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of New
ProLogis (the New ProLogis Common Stock). Pursuant
to the Topco Merger, each share of New ProLogis Common Stock
will be converted into the right to receive 0.4464 shares
(the Exchange Ratio) of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the AMB Common Stock) of AMB. The
terms and conditions of the Transaction are more fully set forth
in the Merger Agreement.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether the Exchange Ratio
pursuant to the Merger Agreement is fair from a financial point
of view to the holders of shares of the ProLogis Common Stock.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of ProLogis and AMB,
respectively;
|
|
|
2)
|
Reviewed certain internal financial statements and other
financial and operating data concerning ProLogis and AMB,
respectively;
|
|
|
3)
|
Reviewed certain financial projections prepared by the
managements of ProLogis and AMB, respectively;
|
|
|
4)
|
Reviewed information relating to certain strategic, financial
and operational benefits anticipated from the Transaction,
prepared by the managements of ProLogis and AMB, respectively;
|
|
|
5)
|
Discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of ProLogis, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the Transaction, with senior
executives of ProLogis;
|
|
|
6)
|
Discussed the past and current operations and financial
condition and the prospects of AMB, including information
relating to certain strategic, financial and operational
benefits anticipated from the Transaction, with senior
executives of AMB;
|
|
|
7)
|
Reviewed the pro forma impact of the Transaction on AMBs
FFO per share, cash flow, consolidated capitalization and
financial ratios;
|
|
|
8)
|
Reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the
ProLogis Common Stock and the AMB Common Stock;
|
E-1
|
|
|
|
9)
|
Compared the financial performance of ProLogis and AMB and the
prices and trading activity of the ProLogis Common Stock and AMB
Common Stock with that of certain other publicly-traded
companies comparable with ProLogis and AMB, respectively, and
their securities;
|
|
|
|
|
10)
|
Reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain comparable acquisition transactions;
|
|
|
11)
|
Participated in discussions and negotiations among
representatives of ProLogis and AMB and certain parties and
their financial and legal advisors;
|
|
|
12)
|
Reviewed the Merger Agreement and certain related
documents; and
|
|
|
13)
|
Performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as we have deemed appropriate.
|
We have assumed and relied upon, without independent
verification, the accuracy and completeness of the information
that was publicly available or supplied or otherwise made
available to us by ProLogis and AMB, and formed a substantial
basis for this opinion. With respect to the financial
projections, including information relating to certain
strategic, financial and operational benefits anticipated from
the Transaction, we have assumed that they have been reasonably
prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the respective managements of
ProLogis and AMB of the future financial performance of ProLogis
and AMB. In addition, we have assumed that the Mergers and the
Contribution and Issuance will each be consummated in accordance
with the terms set forth in the Merger Agreement without any
waiver, amendment or delay of any terms or conditions,
including, among other things, that the Mergers will be treated
as a tax-free reorganization, pursuant to the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. Morgan Stanley has assumed that in
connection with the receipt of all the necessary governmental,
regulatory or other approvals and consents required for the
proposed Transaction, no delays, limitations, conditions or
restrictions will be imposed that would have a material adverse
effect on the contemplated benefits expected to be derived in
the proposed Transaction. We are not legal, tax or regulatory
advisors. We are financial advisors only and have relied upon,
without independent verification, the assessment of AMB and
ProLogis and their legal, tax or regulatory advisors with
respect to legal, tax or regulatory matters. We express no
opinion with respect to the fairness of the amount or nature of
the compensation to any of ProLogiss officers, trustees or
employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the
consideration to be received by the holders of shares of the
ProLogis Common Stock in the Transaction. We also express no
opinion as to the relative fairness of any portion of the merger
consideration to holders of any series of common or preferred
shares of ProLogis. We have not made any independent valuation
or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of ProLogis or AMB,
nor have we been furnished with any such appraisals. Our opinion
is necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date
hereof may affect this opinion and the assumptions used in
preparing it, and we do not assume any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm this opinion.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Trustees of
ProLogis in connection with the Transaction and will receive a
fee for our services, a significant portion of which is
contingent upon the closing of the Transaction. In the two years
prior to the date hereof, we have provided financial advisory
and financing services for AMB and ProLogis and have received
fees in connection with such services. Morgan Stanley may also
seek to provide such services to AMB and ProLogis in the future
and expects to receive fees for the rendering of these services.
Please note that Morgan Stanley is a global financial services
firm engaged in the securities, investment management and
individual wealth management businesses. Our securities business
is engaged in securities underwriting, trading and brokerage
activities, foreign exchange, commodities and derivatives
trading, prime brokerage, as well as providing investment
banking, financing and financial advisory services. Morgan
Stanley, its affiliates, directors and officers may at any time
invest on a principal basis or manage funds that invest, hold
long or short positions, finance positions, and may trade or
otherwise structure and effect transactions, for their own
account or the accounts of its customers, in debt or equity
securities or loans of AMB, ProLogis, or any other company, or
any currency or commodity, that may be involved in the
Transaction, or any related derivative instrument.
This opinion has been approved by a committee of Morgan Stanley
investment banking and other professionals in accordance with
our customary practice. This opinion is for the information of
the Board of Trustees of ProLogis and may not be used for any
other purpose without our prior written consent, except that a
copy of this opinion may
E-2
be included in its entirety in any filing ProLogis is required
to make with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Transaction if such inclusion is required by
applicable law. In addition, this opinion does not in any manner
address the prices at which the AMB Common Stock will trade
following consummation of the Transaction or at any time and
Morgan Stanley expresses no opinion or recommendation as to how
the shareholders of AMB and ProLogis should vote at the
shareholders meeting to be held in connection with the
Transaction.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion on
the date hereof that the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the Merger
Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to the holders
of shares of the ProLogis Common Stock.
Very truly yours,
MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
Guy Metcalfe
Managing Director
E-3
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 20.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
|
Section 2-418
of the Maryland General Corporation Law permits a corporation to
indemnify its directors and officers and certain other parties
against judgments, penalties, fines, settlements, and reasonable
expenses actually incurred by them in connection with any
proceeding to which they may be made or threatened to be made a
party by reason of their service in those or other capacities
unless it is established that (i) the act or omission of
the director or officer was material to the matter giving rise
to the proceeding and (a) was committed in bad faith or
(b) was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty;
(ii) the director or officer actually received an improper
personal benefit in money, property or services; or
(iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, the director
or officer had reasonable cause to believe that the act or
omission was unlawful. Indemnification may be made against
judgments, penalties, fines, settlements and reasonable expenses
actually incurred by the director or officer in connection with
the proceeding; provided, however, that if the proceeding is one
by or in the right of the corporation, indemnification may not
be made with respect to any proceeding in which the director or
officer has been adjudged to be liable to the corporation. In
addition, a director or officer may not be indemnified with
respect to any proceeding charging improper personal benefit to
the director or officer, whether or not involving action in the
directors or officers official capacity, in which
the director or officer was adjudged to be liable on the basis
that personal benefit was improperly received. The termination
of any proceeding by conviction, or upon a plea of nolo
contendere or its equivalent, or an entry of any order of
probation prior to judgment, creates a rebuttable presumption
that the director or officer did not meet the requisite standard
of conduct required for indemnification to be permitted.
In addition,
Section 2-418
of the Maryland General Corporation Law requires that, unless
prohibited by its charter, a corporation indemnify any director
or officer who is made or threatened to be made a party to any
proceeding by reason of service in that capacity against
reasonable expenses incurred by the director or officer in
connection with the proceeding, or any claim, issue or matter in
the proceeding, in the event that the director or officer is
successful, on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the
proceeding, or in the defense of any such claim, issue or matter
in the proceeding.
AMB Property Corporations charter and bylaws require the
indemnification by the company of its directors and officers to
the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. AMB Property
Corporation has purchased directors and officers
liability insurance for the benefit of its directors and
officers.
AMB Property Corporation has entered into indemnification
agreements with each of its executive officers and directors.
The indemnification agreements require, among other matters,
that AMB Property Corporation indemnify its executive officers
and directors to the maximum extent permitted by law and
reimburse the executive officers and directors for all related
expenses as incurred, subject to return if it is subsequently
determined that indemnification is not permitted.
The Partnership Agreement of AMB Property, L.P. requires AMB
Property, L.P. to indemnify AMB Property Corporation, the
directors and officers of AMB Property Corporation, and such
other persons as AMB Property Corporation may from time to time
designate against any loss or damage, including reasonable legal
fees and court costs incurred by the person by reason of
anything it may do or refrain from doing for or on behalf of AMB
Property, L.P. or in connection with its business or affairs
unless it is established that: (i) the act or omission of
the indemnified person was material to the matter giving rise to
the proceeding and either was committed in bad faith or was the
result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (ii) the
indemnified person actually received an improper personal
benefit in money, property or services; or (iii) in the
case of any criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had
reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was
unlawful.
|
|
Item 21.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
The exhibits listed below in the Exhibit Index
are part of this registration statement and are numbered in
accordance with Item 6.01 of
Regulation S-K.
II-1
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:
(1) to file, during any period in which offers or sales are
being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration
statement:
(i) to include any prospectus required by
section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act of 1933);
(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events
arising after the effective date of the registration statement
(or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which,
individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change
in the information set forth in the registration statement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in the
volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of
securities offered would not exceed that which was registered)
and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated
maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of
prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes
in volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the
maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the
Calculation of Registration Fee table in the
effective registration statement; and
(iii) to include any material information with respect to
the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the
registration statement or any material change to such
information in the registration statement.
(2) that, for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective
amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof;
(3) to remove from registration by means of a
post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered
which remain unsold at the termination of the offering;
(4) that, for the purpose of determining liability under
the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant
is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to
Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to
an offering, other than registration statements relying on
Rule 430B or other than prospectus filed in reliance on
Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in
the registration statement as of the date it is first used after
effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made
in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the
registration statement or made in a document incorporated or
deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement
or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will,
as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such
first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in
the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the
registration statement or made in any such document immediately
prior to such date of first use.
(5) that for the purpose of determining liability of the
registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:
(i) any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the
undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be
filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) any free writing prospectus relating to the offering
prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used
or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) the portion of any other free writing prospectus
relating to the offering containing material information about
the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on
behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) any other communication that is an offer in the
offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
II-2
(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes as
follows: that prior to any public reoffering of the securities
registered hereunder through use of a prospectus which is a part
of this registration statement, by any person or party who is
deemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of
Rule 145(c), the issuer undertakes that such reoffering
prospectus will contain the information called for by the
applicable registration form with respect to reofferings by
persons who may be deemed underwriters, in addition to the
information called for by the other Items of the applicable form.
(c) The undersigned registrant undertakes that every
prospectus (i) that is filed pursuant to paragraph
(a) immediately preceding, or (ii) that purports to
meet the requirements of section 10(a)(3) of the Securities
Act of 1933 and is used in connection with an offering of
securities subject to Rule 415, will be filed as a part of
an amendment to this registration statement and will not be used
until such amendment is effective, and that, for purposes of
determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each
such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(d) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to
directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant
pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the
registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933
as is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment
by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director,
officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act of 1933 and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
(e) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act
of 1933, each filing of the registrants annual report
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an
employee benefit plans annual report pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration
statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement
relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of
such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial
bona fide offering thereof.
(f) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13
of this form, within one business day of receipt of such
request, and to send the incorporated documents by first class
mail or other equally prompt means. This includes information
contained in documents filed subsequent to the effective date of
the registration statement through the date of responding to the
request.
(g) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
this registration statement when it became effective.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of San Francisco, State of
California, on April 28, 2011.
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
Name: Tamra D. Browne
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Hamid
R. Moghadam
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
S. Olinger
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Nina
A. Tran
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer and
Senior Vice President
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
T.
Robert Burke
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
David
A. Cole
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Lydia
H. Kennard
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
J.
Michael Losh
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Frederick
W. Reid
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Jeffrey
L. Skelton
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Thomas
W. Tusher
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Carl
B. Webb
|
|
Director
|
|
April 28, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By: /s/ Tamra
D. Browne
Name:
Tamra D. Browne, Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-5
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among AMB Property
Corporation, AMB Property, L.P., ProLogis, Upper Pumpkin LLC,
New Pumpkin Inc. and Pumpkin LLC dated January 30, 2011 and
amended as of March 9, 2011 (included as Annex A to
the joint proxy statement/prospectus included in this
registration statement).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of AMB Property Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to AMB Property
Corporations Registration Statement on
form S-11
(No. 333-35915)).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights
and preferences of the 6 1/2% Series L Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.16 to AMB Property Corporations
Form 8-A
filed on June 20, 2003).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights
and preferences of the 6 3/4% Series M Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.17 to AMB Property Corporations
Form 8-A
filed on November 12, 2003).
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights
and preferences of the 7.00% Series O Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.19 to AMB Property Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed on December 12, 2005).
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights
and preferences of the 6.85% Series P Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.18 to AMB Property Corporations
Registration Statement on
Form 8-A
filed on August 24, 2006).
|
|
3
|
.6
|
|
Articles Supplementary Reestablishing and Refixing the
Rights and Preferences of the 7.75%
Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as
7.18% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 22, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.7
|
|
Articles Supplementary Redesignating and Reclassifying
510,000 Shares of 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to AMB Property Corporations Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
Articles Supplementary Redesignating and Reclassifying
800,000 Shares of 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to AMB Property Corporations Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.9
|
|
Articles Supplementary Redesignating and Reclassifying
800,000 Shares of 7.95% Series K Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.3 to AMB Property Corporations Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.10
|
|
Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of AMB Property Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to AMB Property
Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 25, 2008).
|
|
3
|
.11
|
|
Articles Supplementary Redesignating and Reclassifying
1,595,337 Shares of 7.18% Series D Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to AMB Property Corporations
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 22, 2009).
|
|
3
|
.12
|
|
Form of Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of
ProLogis, Inc. (included as Annex C to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus included in this registration statement).
|
|
3
|
.13*
|
|
Form of Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the
rights and preferences of the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
3
|
.14*
|
|
Form of Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the
rights and preferences of the Series R Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
3
|
.15*
|
|
Form of Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the
rights and preferences of the Series S Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
3
|
.16
|
|
Form of Seventh Amended and Restated Bylaws of ProLogis, Inc.
(included as Annex B to the joint proxy statement/prospectus
included in this registration statement).
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock of the combined company.
|
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.2*
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Series Q Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
4
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Series R Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
4
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Series S Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock.
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Ballard Spahr LLP regarding the legality of the
common stock and preferred stock to be issued in the Topco
merger.
|
|
8
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz.
|
|
8
|
.2*
|
|
Opinion of Mayer Brown LLP.
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed
Charges and Preferred Share Dividends (AMB Property Corporation).
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 21.1 to AMB Property
Corporations Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010).
|
|
21
|
.2
|
|
Subsidiaries of AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 21.2 to AMB Property Corporations Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010).
|
|
21
|
.3
|
|
Subsidiaries of ProLogis (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 21.1 to ProLogis
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010).
|
|
23
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm.
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP, independent registered public accounting
firm.
|
|
23
|
.3*
|
|
Consent of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (included as
part of its opinion filed as Exhibit 8.1 hereto and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
23
|
.4*
|
|
Consent of Mayer Brown LLP (included as part of its opinion
filed as Exhibit 8.2 hereto and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
23
|
.5*
|
|
Consent of Ballard Spahr LLP regarding the legality of the
common stock and preferred stock to be issued in the Topco
merger (included as part of its opinion filed as
Exhibit 5.1 hereto and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
99
|
.1*
|
|
Consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.
|
|
99
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated.
|
|
99
|
.3*
|
|
Form of Proxy of AMB Property Corporation.
|
|
99
|
.4*
|
|
Form of Proxy of ProLogis.
|
|
99
|
.5
|
|
Consent of Walter C. Rakowich to be named as a director.
|
|
99
|
.6
|
|
Consent of Irving F. Lyons III, to be named as a director.
|
|
99
|
.7
|
|
Consent of George L. Fotiades to be named as a director.
|
|
99
|
.8
|
|
Consent of Christine Garvey to be named as a director.
|
|
99
|
.9
|
|
Consent of D. Michael Steuert to be named as a director.
|
|
99
|
.10
|
|
Consent of William D. Zollars to be named as a director.
|
II-7