EXHIBIT 99.1
Published on July 17, 2007
| AMB Property Corporation Supplemental Analyst Package 2Q2007 Earnings Conference Call 7/18/2007 AMBEUROPE FUND 1 48 distribution facilities 4 countries 6.0 million square feet 557,929 square meters EUROPE FUND CONTRIBUTED PROPERTIES EXAMPLES 1. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 1 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Amsterdam 2. AMB BRU Air Cargo Center Zaventem Airport, Brussels 3. AMB FRA Logistics Center 556 Frankfurt International Airport, Frankfurt 4. AMB Gonesse Distribution Center 2 Roissy Charles De Gaulle Airport, Paris |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Highlights |
1 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations |
4 | |||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
5 | |||
Owned & Managed Operating Statistics, Top 10 Customers & Lease Expirations |
6 | |||
Principal Global Markets |
7 | |||
Portfolio Overview |
8 | |||
Capital Deployment |
9 | |||
Property Contributions & Dispositions |
11 | |||
Development Projects in Process |
12 | |||
Development Projects Placed in Operations and Projects Available for Sale or Contribution |
15 | |||
Land Inventory |
16 | |||
Capitalization Summary |
17 | |||
Unconsolidated & Consolidated Joint Ventures |
18 | |||
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis |
19 | |||
Reporting Definitions |
20 | |||
Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures |
21 | |||
Joint Venture Partner Information |
24 | |||
Contacts |
25 |
| Cover: | AMB Europe Fund I, a Euro-denominated open-end commingled fund investing in distribution facilities near high-volume airports, seaports and highway systems, and in the major metropolitan areas of Europe. As of June 30, 2007 the gross asset value of AMB Europe Fund I is approximately 531 million (US$719 million). |
i
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| Quarters Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2007 | Change | 2006 | 2007 | Change | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 171,432 | (2.5 | %) | $ | 175,917 | (1) (2) | $ | 339,439 | (3.7 | %) | $ | 352,325 | (1) (2) | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (3)
|
146,018 | (13.5 | %) | 168,832 | 271,191 | (7.9 | %) | 294,462 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
111,390 | 54.0 | % | 72,335 | 133,120 | 39.1 | % | 95,719 | ||||||||||||||||
FFO (3)
|
78,474 | (4.7 | %) | 82,355 | 135,347 | 3.2 | % | 131,094 | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 1.10 | 37.5 | % | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.35 | 27.4 | % | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||||||
FFO (3)
|
0.74 | (14.9 | %) | 0.87 | 1.32 | (5.0 | %) | 1.39 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.50 | 8.7 | % | 0.46 | 1.00 | 8.7 | % | 0.92 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest coverage (3)
|
4.0 x | 3.7 x | 3.6 x | 3.4 x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge coverage (3)
|
2.6 x | 2.8 x | 2.3 x | 2.5 x | ||||||||||||||||||||
FFO payout |
68 | % | 53 | % | 76 | % | 66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| As of | ||||||||
| June 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Capitalization |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (3)
|
$ | 2,776,864 | $ | 3,088,624 | ||||
Preferred equity |
312,267 | 417,767 | ||||||
Market equity |
5,538,204 | 5,531,113 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 8,627,335 | $ | 9,037,504 | ||||
Ratios |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book capitalization (3) (4)
|
48.9 | % | 55.8 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization (3) (4)
|
32.2 | % | 34.2 | % | ||||
Total common shares and units outstanding |
104,062,458 | 94,371,491 | ||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. | |
| (2) | Pro forma revenues for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $157,619 and $318,451, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (4) | See Reporting Definitions. |
1
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
| As of | ||||||||
| June 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate: |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,406,982 | $ | 6,575,733 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(854,227 | ) | (789,693 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties (1)
|
5,552,755 | 5,786,040 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
349,534 | 274,381 | ||||||
Properties held for contribution, net |
245,632 | 154,036 | ||||||
Properties held for divestiture, net |
45,146 | 20,916 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,193,067 | 6,235,373 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
251,052 | 195,878 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
166,449 | 133,998 | ||||||
Other assets |
148,696 | 148,263 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,759,264 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,340,702 | $ | 1,395,354 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,057,498 | 1,101,874 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
562,184 | 852,033 | ||||||
Other debt |
85,110 | 88,154 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
278,921 | 271,880 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,324,415 | 3,709,295 | ||||||
Minority interests: |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
535,280 | 555,201 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
77,563 | 180,298 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
109,921 | 102,061 | ||||||
Total minority interests |
722,764 | 837,560 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,488,673 | 1,943,240 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,417 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,712,085 | 2,166,657 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,759,264 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
| (1) | Includes AMBs 100% ownership interest in Park One, a 19.9 acre land parcel leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX, for approximately $76 million. |
2
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For
the Quarters Ended June 30, |
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues (2)
|
$ | 162,914 | $ | 170,974 | $ | 324,996 | $ | 342,276 | ||||||||
Private capital income |
8,518 | 4,943 | 14,443 | 10,049 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
171,432 | 175,917 | 339,439 | 352,325 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs (3)
|
(43,304 | ) | (43,589 | ) | (87,551 | ) | (87,732 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(41,483 | ) | (44,500 | ) | (82,504 | ) | (87,254 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment losses |
| (5,394 | ) | (257 | ) | (5,394 | ) | |||||||||
General and administrative |
(30,260 | ) | (25,142 | ) | (60,114 | ) | (47,997 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses (4)
|
(1,139 | ) | 296 | (2,051 | ) | (241 | ) | |||||||||
Fund costs |
(277 | ) | (479 | ) | (518 | ) | (1,093 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(116,463 | ) | (118,808 | ) | (232,995 | ) | (229,711 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (5)
|
1,748 | 8,278 | 3,861 | 10,366 | ||||||||||||
Other income (4)
|
6,472 | 2,258 | 11,979 | 5,765 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
74,707 | | 74,843 | | ||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
28,996 | 45,698 | 41,188 | 46,372 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(33,369 | ) | (44,310 | ) | (67,951 | ) | (83,704 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
78,554 | 11,924 | 63,920 | (21,201 | ) | |||||||||||
Income from operations before minority interests |
133,523 | 69,033 | 170,364 | 101,413 | ||||||||||||
Minority interests share of income: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of income |
(8,067 | ) | (8,895 | ) | (15,260 | ) | (17,297 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(2,574 | ) | (1,619 | ) | (3,136 | ) | (1,651 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
(1,480 | ) | (4,024 | ) | (5,179 | ) | (9,025 | ) | ||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(4,001 | ) | (341 | ) | (4,495 | ) | (1,068 | ) | ||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
(16,122 | ) | (14,879 | ) | (28,070 | ) | (29,041 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
117,401 | 54,154 | 142,294 | 72,372 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations, net of minority interests |
484 | 4,126 | 1,238 | 6,471 | ||||||||||||
Gains from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
384 | 17,073 | 419 | 24,087 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
868 | 21,199 | 1,657 | 30,558 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
118,269 | 75,353 | 143,951 | 102,930 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,095 | ) | (7,904 | ) | (6,191 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unit redemption (issuance costs) discount |
(2,927 | ) | 77 | (2,927 | ) | (1,020 | ) | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 111,390 | $ | 72,335 | $ | 133,120 | $ | 95,719 | ||||||||
Net income per common share (diluted) |
$ | 1.10 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.35 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
101,361,013 | 90,135,659 | 98,305,299 | 90,147,493 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. | |
| (2) | Pro forma rental revenues for the quarter and six months ended June, 2006 would have been $152,676 and $308,402, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (3) | Pro forma property operating costs for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $39,188 and $79,278, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (4) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan. | |
| (5) | Includes gains on sale of operating properties of $0.0 million and $7.7 million, for the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Includes gains on sale of operating properties of $0.0 million and $8.3 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
3
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
(1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For
the Quarters Ended June 30, |
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 111,390 | $ | 72,335 | $ | 133,120 | $ | 95,719 | ||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate, net of minority interests |
(75,091 | ) | (17,073 | ) | (75,262 | ) | (24,087 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
41,483 | 44,500 | 82,504 | 87,254 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
4 | (62 | ) | 8 | 452 | |||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,401 | ) | (1,068 | ) | (2,578 | ) | (2,068 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners minority interests (Net income) |
8,067 | 8,895 | 15,260 | 17,297 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Net income) |
4,001 | 341 | 4,495 | 1,068 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Development profits) |
1,251 | 2,208 | 1,801 | 2,240 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations minority interests (Net income (loss)) |
25 | 209 | (4 | ) | 463 | |||||||||||
FFO attributable to minority interests |
(15,312 | ) | (21,748 | ) | (31,616 | ) | (42,183 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(1,748 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (3,861 | ) | (10,366 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
5,805 | 2,096 | 11,480 | 5,305 | ||||||||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 78,474 | $ | 82,355 | $ | 135,347 | $ | 131,094 | ||||||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average common share and unit (diluted) |
105,806,524 | 94,520,866 | 102,866,432 | 94,534,263 | ||||||||||||
Estimated FFO by business line (1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital Partners FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.04 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
6.7 | % | 2.3 | % | 5.3 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
Development FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.24 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
32.4 | % | 55.1 | % | 27.4 | % | 34.6 | % | ||||||||
Real estate operations FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.45 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.89 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
60.9 | % | 42.6 | % | 67.3 | % | 62.5 | % | ||||||||
Total FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 1.32 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure. |
4
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio: (1) (2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,339 | $ | 6,235 | $ | 7,958 | $ | 11,603 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,237 | $ | 5,095 | $ | 5,399 | $ | 9,138 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 585 | $ | 296 | $ | 703 | $ | 6,050 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 578 | $ | 241 | $ | 721 | $ | 5,986 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 539 | $ | 147 | $ | 635 | $ | 5,892 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 5,835 | $ | 4,677 | $ | 9,153 | $ | 8,498 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
6,125 | 6,661 | 13,503 | 12,866 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
11,353 | 13,382 | 14,352 | 17,226 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
23,313 | 24,720 | 37,008 | 38,590 | ||||||||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(6,193 | ) | (6,911 | ) | (11,239 | ) | (10,856 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 17,120 | $ | 17,809 | $ | 25,769 | $ | 27,734 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,235 | $ | 6,154 | $ | 4,950 | $ | 11,300 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,069 | $ | 5,078 | $ | 4,798 | $ | 9,077 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 539 | $ | 296 | $ | 639 | $ | 6,050 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 534 | $ | 241 | $ | 659 | $ | 5,986 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 529 | $ | 147 | $ | 622 | $ | 5,892 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 5,299 | $ | 4,605 | $ | 8,042 | $ | 8,426 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,501 | 6,548 | 11,089 | 12,646 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
10,510 | 12,474 | 13,170 | 16,272 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
21,310 | 23,627 | 32,301 | 37,344 | ||||||||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(4,672 | ) | (6,036 | ) | (7,555 | ) | (9,859 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 16,638 | $ | 17,591 | $ | 24,746 | $ | 27,485 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
5
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
OWNED AND MANAGED OPERATING STATISTICS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
| Operating Portfolio | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet owned at June 30, 2007 |
111,335,628 | 103,175,210 | ||||||
Occupancy percentage |
96.1 | % | 95.3 | % | ||||
Average occupancy percentage |
94.9 | % | 94.9 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years): |
||||||||
Original |
6.0 | 6.1 | ||||||
Remaining |
3.4 | 3.4 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
76.0 | % | 73.8 | % | ||||
| Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||
Same Space Leasing Activity: (2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
2.0 | % | 2.4 | % | ||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.5 | 9.7 | ||||||
2nd Generation Leasing Activity: |
||||||||
TIs and LCs per square foot: |
||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.30 | $ | 1.12 | ||||
Re-tenanted |
2.86 | 3.07 | ||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 2.08 | $ | 1.94 | ||||
Square footage commencing (millions) |
5.7 | 11.7 | ||||||
| Same Store Pool (1) | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet in same store pool at June 30, 2007 |
85,808,842 | 85,907,988 | ||||||
% of total square feet |
77.1 | % | 83.3 | % | ||||
Occupancy percentage at period end: |
||||||||
June 30, 2007 |
96.4 | % | 95.9 | % | ||||
June 30, 2006 |
95.6 | % | 95.0 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years): |
||||||||
Original |
6.1 | 6.1 | ||||||
Remaining |
3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
75.8 | % | 74.0 | % | ||||
| Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||
Same Space Leasing Activity: (2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
1.6 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.3 | 8.5 | ||||||
Cash basis NOI % change: (3)
|
||||||||
Revenues (4)
|
5.5 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||
Expenses (4)
|
4.8 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||
NOI (3) (4)
|
5.8 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||
NOI without lease termination fees (3) (4)
|
5.8 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||
TOP 10 CUSTOMERS
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
| % of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Aggregate | Aggregate | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| of | Rentable | Leased | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||||
| Customer Name (6) | Leases | Square Feet | Square Feet | ABR (1) (5) | ABR (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||
1. Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) (7)
|
51 | 3,467,273 | 3.2 | % | $ | 26,007 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
2. United States Government (7) (8)
|
47 | 1,407,748 | 1.3 | % | 20,399 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||
3. FedEx Corporation (7)
|
31 | 1,528,182 | 1.4 | % | 15,314 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||
4. Nippon Express |
13 | 993,992 | 0.9 | % | 9,793 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||
5. Harmonic Inc. |
4 | 285,480 | 0.3 | % | 9,250 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
6. Sagaw a Express |
10 | 729,141 | 0.7 | % | 8,791 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||
7. BAX Global Inc/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn
(7)
|
17 | 750,271 | 0.7 | % | 7,705 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||
8. La Poste |
2 | 854,427 | 0.8 | % | 6,733 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
9. Panalpina, Inc. |
10 | 1,008,796 | 0.9 | % | 6,545 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
10. City and County of San Francisco |
1 | 559,605 | 0.5 | % | 5,714 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Total |
11,584,915 | 10.8 | % | $ | 116,251 | 16.1 | % | |||||||||||||
LEASE EXPIRATIONS (9)
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
| Year | Square Feet | ABR (1) (5) (7) | % of ABR (1) (5) | |||||||||
2007 |
8,498,761 | $ | 53,310 | 7.3 | % | |||||||
2008 |
16,205,000 | 103,462 | 14.1 | % | ||||||||
2009 |
19,420,934 | 122,659 | 16.7 | % | ||||||||
2010 |
15,436,190 | 112,806 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||
2011 |
13,988,406 | 101,581 | 13.9 | % | ||||||||
2012 |
11,448,715 | 88,731 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||
2013 |
5,623,328 | 38,278 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
2014 |
5,782,055 | 41,489 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||
2015 |
2,935,910 | 21,051 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
2016 and beyond |
7,068,199 | 49,665 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
Total |
106,407,498 | $ | 733,032 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, same store properties and annualized base rent (ABR), as applicable. | |
| (2) | Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. | |
| (3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (4) | For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the % change was 5.4%, 5.5%, 5.4% and 5.4%, respectively, for revenues, expenses, NOI and NOI without lease termination fees. For the year-to-date ended June 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the % change was 5.7%, 5.9%, 5.6% and 5.6%, respectively, for revenues, expenses, NOI and NOI without lease termination fees. | |
| (5) | ABR is reported net of all operating expense reimbursements. | |
| (6) | Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer. AMB also owns a 19.9 acre land parcel adjacent to LAX, which is leased to a parking lot operator with an ABR of $7.8 million, which is not included. | |
| (7) | Apron rental amounts (but not square footage) are included. | |
| (8) | United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), United States Customs, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and various other U.S. governmental agencies. | |
| (9) | Schedule represents spaces that expire on or after June 30, 2007. Schedule includes owned and managed operating properties. |
6
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PRINCIPAL GLOBAL MARKETS (1)
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. New | San | Principal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern | Jersey/ | Francisco | U.S. | South | Global | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California (2) | New York | Bay Area | Chicago | On-Tarmac (3) | Florida | Seattle | Tokyo (4) | Paris (4) | Markets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rentable square feet |
15,863,691 | 10,709,491 | 10,478,861 | 12,423,064 | 2,679,328 | 5,885,118 | 7,818,178 | 3,858,593 | 2,328,122 | 72,044,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage |
97.8 | % | 98.9 | % | 98.0 | % | 91.4 | % | 94.8 | % | 97.1 | % | 97.1 | % | 95.4 | % | 99.1 | % | 96.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR (000s) (5)
|
$ | 102,947 | $ | 76,849 | $ | 72,060 | $ | 59,670 | $ | 46,771 | $ | 43,533 | $ | 37,530 | $ | 41,271 | $ | 19,586 | $ | 500,217 | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of total ABR (5)
|
14.3 | % | 10.7 | % | 10.0 | % | 8.3 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.0 | % | 5.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 2.7 | % | 69.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR per square foot |
$ | 6.64 | $ | 7.25 | $ | 7.02 | $ | 5.25 | $ | 18.41 | $ | 7.62 | $ | 4.94 | $ | 11.21 | $ | 8.49 | $ | 7.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lease expirations as a % of ABR: (5)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
5.9 | % | 2.4 | % | 6.8 | % | 16.7 | % | 12.0 | % | 11.1 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.6 | % | 9.0 | % | 7.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
15.5 | % | 12.0 | % | 17.0 | % | 12.0 | % | 15.8 | % | 13.8 | % | 11.4 | % | 12.5 | % | 13.1 | % | 14.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
13.5 | % | 16.5 | % | 22.1 | % | 14.5 | % | 6.3 | % | 15.9 | % | 26.1 | % | 20.6 | % | 22.9 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average lease terms: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original |
5.6 | 6.9 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 8.7 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 4.8 | 6.8 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.2 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention: |
80.5 | % | 82.4 | % | 68.1 | % | 75.5 | % | 81.4 | % | 59.1 | % | 86.9 | % | 15.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 76.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
21.9 | % | 12.7 | % | (19.2 | %) | | (0.8 | %) | 17.7 | % | 13.0 | % | | | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Same space square feet leased |
641,925 | 710,653 | 730,719 | 442,764 | 144,203 | 152,169 | 534,042 | | | 3,356,475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date |
11.8 | % | 2.1 | % | (8.9 | %) | (1.7 | %) | (0.6 | %) | 13.8 | % | 11.1 | % | | | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Same space square feet leased |
1,567,446 | 1,670,853 | 1,382,589 | 739,569 | 252,975 | 546,298 | 770,242 | | | 6,929,972 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same store cash basis NOI % change: (6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
7.9 | % | 2.5 | % | 8.4 | % | (1.7 | %) | 4.1 | % | 9.7 | % | 3.7 | % | 14.4 | % | 22.3 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date |
4.2 | % | 7.3 | % | 7.6 | % | 3.4 | % | 2.5 | % | 13.4 | % | 4.4 | % | 16.6 | % | 26.8 | % | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Same store square feet as % of aggregate square feet (5)
|
83.8 | % | 86.8 | % | 98.3 | % | 75.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 86.6 | % | 88.9 | % | 30.3 | % | 43.9 | % | 82.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata share of square feet (7)
|
11,452,147 | 5,590,027 | 7,752,796 | 9,183,681 | 2,488,584 | 4,387,620 | 3,944,593 | 771,719 | 465,624 | 46,036,791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata % share of square feet (7)
|
59.7 | % | 52.2 | % | 74.0 | % | 55.8 | % | 92.9 | % | 74.6 | % | 50.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 58.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Based on annualized base rent and represents AMBs owned and managed portfolio. The markets included here are a subset of AMBs regions defined as East, Southwest, and West Central in North America, Europe and Asia. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | AMB also owns a 19.9 acre land parcel, which is leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX. | |
| (3) | Includes on-tarmac cargo facilities at 14 airports. | |
| (4) | At June 30, 2007, this represents our largest single market in Asia and Europe respectively. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of ABR and same store properties, as applicable. | |
| (6) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (7) | Calculated as AMBs pro rata share of square feet on the total stabilized portfolio as shown on the next page. |
7
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW (1)
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
| Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Occupancy | % of Total | ABR per | |||||||||||||||||
| Feet | Percentage | ABR (2) | ABR (2) | Square Foot (2) | ||||||||||||||||
Principal Global Markets |
72,044,446 | 96.6 | % | $ | 500,217 | 69.5 | % | $ | 7.19 | |||||||||||
Other Global Target Markets (6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
North America Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta |
4,622,651 | 94.9 | % | $ | 19,504 | 2.7 | % | $ | 4.45 | |||||||||||
Baltimore |
3,755,256 | 97.5 | % | 23,611 | 3.3 | % | 6.45 | |||||||||||||
Boston |
5,188,593 | 93.2 | % | 32,158 | 4.5 | % | 6.65 | |||||||||||||
Dallas |
5,103,641 | 93.7 | % | 22,734 | 3.2 | % | 4.75 | |||||||||||||
Mexico City |
2,022,489 | 95.8 | % | 12,055 | 1.7 | % | 6.22 | |||||||||||||
Minneapolis |
4,006,858 | 94.9 | % | 17,551 | 2.4 | % | 4.62 | |||||||||||||
Other Markets (3)
|
8,102,257 | 94.2 | % | 41,644 | 5.7 | % | 5.46 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
32,801,745 | 94.6 | % | $ | 169,257 | 23.5 | % | $ | 5.45 | |||||||||||
Europe Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam, Netherlands |
1,613,855 | 99.7 | % | $ | 15,363 | 2.0 | % | $ | 9.55 | |||||||||||
Brussels, Belgium |
100,169 | 100.0 | % | 1,369 | 0.2 | % | 13.67 | |||||||||||||
Frankfurt, Germany |
275,868 | 100.0 | % | 4,550 | 0.6 | % | 16.49 | |||||||||||||
Hamburg, Germany |
1,425,002 | 99.9 | % | 10,481 | 1.5 | % | 7.37 | |||||||||||||
Lyon, France |
262,491 | 100.0 | % | 1,827 | 0.3 | % | 6.96 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
3,677,385 | 99.8 | % | $ | 33,590 | 4.6 | % | $ | 9.15 | |||||||||||
Asia Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka, Japan |
1,018,875 | 91.1 | % | $ | 7,885 | 1.1 | % | $ | 8.50 | |||||||||||
Shanghai, China |
1,380,248 | 100.0 | % | 5,233 | 0.7 | % | 3.79 | |||||||||||||
Singapore, Singapore |
412,929 | 95.9 | % | 4,469 | 0.6 | % | 11.28 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
2,812,052 | 96.2 | % | $ | 17,587 | 2.4 | % | $ | 6.50 | |||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total |
111,335,628 | 96.1 | % | $ | 720,651 | 100.0 | % | $ | 6.74 | |||||||||||
Other (4)
|
7,495,659 | 95.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Stabilized Portfolio (2)
|
118,831,287 | 96.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Development Projects |
17,912,529 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Portfolio (5)
|
136,743,816 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes AMBs owned and managed operating and development properties, investments in operating properties through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, and recently completed developments that have not yet been placed in operations but are being held for sale or contribution. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of Annualized Base Rent (ABR) and completion/stabilization, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Other Markets includes other target markets (Austin, Guadalajara, Houston, Orlando and Querétaro) and non-target markets (Columbus and New Orleans). | |
| (4) | Includes investments in 7.4 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio and 151,606 square feet for its investment in AMB Pier One, LLC. | |
| (5) | Total Portfolio includes recently completed development projects available for sale or contribution totaling 13 projects and 3.8 million square feet. | |
| (6) | AMBs pro rata share of square feet and pro rata % share of square feet is 22,103,183 and 56.3%, respectively, for other global target markets. |
8
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | Square | |||||||
| Property Acquisitions | Market | Acquisition | Feet | |||||
AMB Alliance Fund III |
||||||||
1. AMB Baltimore Beltway Industrial |
Baltimore | April | 708,932 | |||||
2. AMB Topside Distribution Center |
Southern California | April | 107,154 | |||||
3. AMB Wayfarer Distribution Center |
Southern California | April | 129,499 | |||||
4. AMB Mittel Distribution Center |
Chicago | May | 82,114 | |||||
5. AMB Los Nietos Business Center 2 |
Southern California | June | 141,826 | |||||
6. AMB Maude R&D |
San Francisco Bay Area | June | 20,000 | |||||
7. AMB Port America Logistics Center 12-15 |
Dallas | June | 147,900 | |||||
Total AMB Alliance Fund III |
1,337,425 | |||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
||||||||
8. AMB Chiba Distribution Center 1 |
Toyko, Japan | June | 46,845 | |||||
9. AMB Fukuoka Distribution Center 1 |
Osaka, Japan | June | 53,720 | |||||
10 AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 7-9 |
Toyko, Japan | June | 503,219 | |||||
11. AMB Higashi Ogijima Distribution Center 2 |
Toyko, Japan | June | 176,861 | |||||
12. AMB Narashino Distribution Center 1 |
Toyko, Japan | June | 136,664 | |||||
13. AMB Saitama Distribution 5 |
Toyko, Japan | June | 8,255 | |||||
Total AMB Japan Fund I |
925,564 | |||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
||||||||
14. AMB Arena Distribution Centers |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | June | 270,906 | |||||
15. AMB Gonesse Distribution 3 & 4 |
Paris, France | June | 454,559 | |||||
16. AMB Waltershof 4-7 |
Hamburg, Germany | June | 474,796 | |||||
17. AMB Eemhaven Distribution 3 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | June | 145,054 | |||||
Total AMB Europe Fund I |
1,345,315 | |||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
||||||||
18. AMB Frontera Distribution Center |
Tijuana, Mexico | April | 264,103 | |||||
19. AMB Arbolada Distribution Center |
Guadalajara, Mexico | May | 222,113 | |||||
20. AMB Los Altos Industrial Park |
Guadalajara, Mexico | May | 1,151,955 | |||||
Total AMB-SGP Mexico |
1,638,171 | |||||||
Continued on next page
9
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Month of | Square | |||||||
| Property Acquisitions | Market | Acquisition | Feet | |||||
AMB Property Corporation |
||||||||
21. AMB Annagem Distribution Center II |
Toronto, Canada | April | 106,184 | |||||
22. AMB Portview (1)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | June | 26,697 | |||||
23. AMB Taft Distribution Center (1)
|
Houston | June | 66,000 | |||||
Total AMB Property Corporation |
198,881 | |||||||
Total Second Quarter Property Acquisitions |
5,445,356 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (2) (3)
|
$ | 494,610 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
22 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate (Using GAAP NOI)(6) |
6.6 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Property Acquisitions |
7,236,649 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (2) (3)
|
$ | 636,367 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
25 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate (Using GAAP NOI)(6)
|
6.5 | % | ||||||
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| New Development Projects | Market | Stabilization (4) | at Stabilization (4) | |||||
1. AMB Osgood Industrial (5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q407 | | |||||
2. AMB IAH Airfreight 7 |
Houston | Q208 | 239,500 | |||||
3. AMB El Segundo |
Southern California | Q408 | 217,740 | |||||
4. AMB Liberty Logistics Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q408 | 191,196 | |||||
5. AMB Minooka Distribution Center |
Chicago | Q408 | 1,000,743 | |||||
6. AMB Morgan Business Center Bldg 100 |
Savannah | Q408 | 343,030 | |||||
7. AMB Tsurumi Distribution Center 1 |
Tokyo, Japan | Q408 | 685,757 | |||||
8. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E2 |
South Florida | Q408 | 52,918 | |||||
9. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 4 |
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q109 | 265,050 | |||||
10. AMB Pacifico Bldgs 3 & 4 |
Tijuana, Mexico | Q109 | 194,977 | |||||
Total Second Quarter New Development Projects |
3,190,911 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (4)
|
$ | 265,134 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
69 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (4)
|
7.4 | % | ||||||
Total Second Quarter Capital Deployment |
$ | 759,744 | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Capital Deployment |
$ | 1,092,245 | ||||||
| (1) | Represents a future redevelopment project. | |
| (2) | Represents the total expected investment, including closing costs and estimated acquisition capital of $7.0 million and $11.8 million, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2007. | |
| (3) | Non-U.S. Dollar assets are translated using the exchange rate on the date of acquisition. | |
| (4) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yields, as applicable. | |
| (5) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (6) | See Reporting Definitions for definition of stabilized GAAP cap rates and Supplemental Financial Disclosures for discussion of NOI. |
10
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PROPERTY CONTRIBUTIONS & DISPOSITIONS
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
1. AMB Europe Fund I |
Europe | June | 4,231,348 | |||||
2. AMB Beacon Lakes 9 |
South Florida | June | 206,656 | |||||
Total Contributions |
4,438,004 | |||||||
Contribution Value (1)
|
$ | 520,260 | ||||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
None |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
Total Second Quarter Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions |
4,438,004 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value (1)
|
$ | 520,260 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
80 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.4 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions |
4,533,953 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value (1)
|
$ | 524,851 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
80 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.4 | % | ||||||
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Development Property Contributions and Dispositions | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
1. AMB Riverfront Distribution Center Bldg B (2)
|
Seattle | June | 388,000 | |||||
2. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 1 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | June | 236,203 | |||||
3. AMB Beacon Lakes Bldg 6 |
South Florida | June | 206,524 | |||||
4. AMB DFW
Logistics Center 1 |
Dallas | June | 113,640 | |||||
5. AMB FRA
Logistics Center 556 Phase II |
Frankfurt, Germany | June | 108,952 | |||||
6. AMB BRU Air Cargo Center |
Brussels, Belgium | June | 102,655 | |||||
Total Contributions |
1,155,974 | |||||||
Contribution Value (1)
|
$ | 138,540 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
32.0 | % | ||||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
1. AMB Forest Park Freight Terminal (2)
|
Atlanta | June | 142,000 | |||||
2. AMB
Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E1 4 units |
South Florida | June | 26,334 | |||||
3. AMB
Torrance Matrix 2 units (2)
|
Southern California | June | 11,770 | |||||
Total Dispositions |
180,104 | |||||||
Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 20,915 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
19.5 | % | ||||||
Total Second Quarter Development Property Contributions and Dispositions |
1,336,078 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 159,455 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
30.5 | % | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
83 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.0 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Development Property Contributions and Dispositions |
1,997,395 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 240,153 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
27.3 | % | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
84 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.2 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate on the date of contribution/disposition, as applicable. | |
| (2) | Represents a project that was placed in projects available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and was sold or contributed during the quarter. | |
| (3) | See Reporting Definitions for definition of development margin. |
11
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2007 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
1. AMB Altenwerder Distribution Center 1(3)
|
Hamburg, Germany | Q3 | 414,701 | |||||
2. AMB Dublin (4)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q3 | | |||||
3. AMB
Pearson Logistics Centre 1 Bldg 200 |
Toronto, Canada | Q3 | 205,518 | |||||
4. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 3 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q3 | 628,784 | |||||
5. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 4 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q3 | 315,156 | |||||
6. AMB Osgood Industrial (4) (5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
7. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 2 |
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q4 | 473,720 | |||||
8. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 2 |
Toronto, Canada | Q4 | 281,358 | |||||
9. AMB
Pearson Logistics Centre 1 Bldg 100 |
Toronto, Canada | Q4 | 446,338 | |||||
10. AMB Sagamihara Distribution Center |
Tokyo, Japan | Q4 | 543,056 | |||||
11. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 3 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q4 | 332,109 | |||||
12. AMB Hathaway (4)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
13. AMB Isle dAbeau Logistics Park Bldg. C |
Lyon, France | Q4 | 277,817 | |||||
14. AMB Wille Distribution Center |
Chicago | Q4 | 253,410 | |||||
15. AMB Beacon Lakes Commerce Bank |
South Florida | Q4 | 101,345 | |||||
16. AMB Beacon Lakes Bldg 7 |
South Florida | Q4 | 193,090 | |||||
Total 2007 Deliveries |
4,466,402 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 429,642 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 346,389 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
92 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.7 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
50 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $314.8 million, $570.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for a total of $894.2 million. | |
| (3) | Property was previously named AMB Port of Hamburg 1. | |
| (4) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (5) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. |
12
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2008 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
17. AMB Aurora Industrial (5)
|
Minneapolis | Q1 | 122,793 | |||||
18. AMB Valley Distribution Center |
Seattle | Q1 | 749,970 | |||||
19. AMB Amagasaki Distribution Center 2 |
Osaka, Japan | Q2 | 981,679 | |||||
20. AMB Agave Bldg 5 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q2 | 111,589 | |||||
21. AMB Redlands 2 |
Southern California | Q2 | 1,313,470 | |||||
22. AMB Le
Grand Roissy Distribution Mitry |
Paris, France | Q2 | 37,954 | |||||
23. AMB Shinkiba Distribution Center |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 333,668 | |||||
24. AMB Theodore Park Logistics Center |
Dusseldorf, Germany | Q2 | 140,566 | |||||
25. AMB Narita Air Cargo 1 Phase 1 Bldg C |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 348,891 | |||||
26. AMB IAH Airfreight 7 (4)
|
Houston | Q2 | 239,500 | |||||
27. AMB Platinum Triangle Land Phase 1 (3)
|
Southern California | Q2 | | |||||
28. AMB Barajas Logistics Park |
Madrid, Spain | Q2 | 444,043 | |||||
29. AMB Palmetto Distribution Center |
Orlando | Q2 | 406,400 | |||||
30. AMB Franklin Commerce Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q3 | 366,896 | |||||
31. AMB Lijnden Logistics Court 1 |
Lijnden, Netherlands | Q3 | 96,520 | |||||
32. AMB Nanko Naka Distribution Center |
Osaka, Japan | Q3 | 402,313 | |||||
33. AMB Remington Lakes Distribution |
Chicago | Q4 | 228,413 | |||||
34. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E2 (4)
|
South Florida | Q4 | 52,918 | |||||
35. AMB Pompano Center of Commerce Phase 1 |
South Florida | Q4 | 218,835 | |||||
36. AMB Liberty Logistics Center (4)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | Q4 | 191,196 | |||||
37. AMB Morgan Business Center Bldg 100 (4)
|
Savannah | Q4 | 343,030 | |||||
38. AMB El Segundo (4)
|
Southern California | Q4 | 217,740 | |||||
39. AMB Minooka Distribution Center (4)
|
Chicago | Q4 | 1,000,743 | |||||
40. AMB Tsurumi Distribution Center 1 (4)
|
Tokyo, Japan | Q4 | 685,757 | |||||
41. AMB ICN Logistics Center |
Seoul, Korea | Q4 | 362,745 | |||||
42. AMB Platinum Triangle Land Phase 2 (3)
|
Southern California | Q4 | | |||||
43. AMB Akechi Distribution Center |
Nagoya, Japan | Q4 | 979,357 | |||||
Total 2008 Deliveries |
10,376,986 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 976,350 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 611,832 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
91 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.3 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
14 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $314.8 million, $570.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for a total of $894.2 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. | |
| (5) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. |
13
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2009 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
44. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 4 (4)
|
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q1 | 265,050 | |||||
45. AMB Pacifico Bldgs 3 & 4 (4)
|
Tijuana, Mexico | Q1 | 194,977 | |||||
46. AMB Siziano Business Park Bldg 1 |
Milan, Italy | Q2 | 436,916 | |||||
Total 2009 Deliveries |
896,943 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 55,868 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 13,766 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
76 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
9.3 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
0 | % | ||||||
Total 2007, 2008 and 2009 Scheduled Deliveries |
15,740,331 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 1,461,860 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 971,987 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
90 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.5 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
23 | % | ||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $314.8 million, $570.9 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for a total of $894.2 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. |
14
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PLACED IN OPERATIONS AND
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of June 30, 2007
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Projects Placed in Operations | Market | Square Feet | ||||
None |
n/a | n/a | ||||
Total Year-to-Date Placed in Operations |
179,400 | |||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 10,657 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
20 | % | ||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
8.0 | % | ||||
| Development Projects Available for Sale or Contribution (1) | Market | Square Feet | ||||||
1. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 2 (3)
|
Singapore, Singapore | 250,758 | ||||||
2. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 1 |
Toronto, Canada | 375,241 | ||||||
3. AMB Fengxian Logistics Center Bldgs 2, 4 & 6 (4)
|
Shanghai, China | 1,040,633 | ||||||
4. Highway 17 55 Madison Street (4)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | 150,446 | ||||||
5. AMB Jiuting Distribution Center 2 |
Shanghai, China | 187,866 | ||||||
6. AMB Annagem Distribution Centre |
Toronto, Canada | 198,169 | ||||||
7. Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E1 1 unit |
South Florida | 6,583 | ||||||
8. AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 5 (5)
|
Tokyo, Japan | 469,254 | ||||||
9. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 2A (5)
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands | 118,166 | ||||||
10. AMB Gonesse Distribution Center (5)
|
Paris, France | 592,779 | ||||||
11. AMB Douglassingel Distribution Center (5)
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands | 148,714 | ||||||
12. AMB Steel Road (5)
|
Southern California | 161,000 | ||||||
13. AMB Torrance Matrix 22 units (5)
|
Southern California | 150,015 | ||||||
Total Available for Sale or Contribution |
3,849,624 | |||||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 305,306 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
92 | % | ||||||
% Leased |
85 | % | ||||||
| Operating Properties Available for Contribution (2) | Market | Square Feet | ||||
1. AMB Annagem Distribution Centre II (5)
|
Toronto, Canada | 106,184 | ||||
2. AMB Jiuting Distribution Center 1 (5)
|
Shanghai, China | 162,171 | ||||
3. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 3 (5)
|
Singapore, Singapore | 151,749 | ||||
Total Available for Contribution |
420,104 | |||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 33,063 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
100 | % | ||||
% Leased |
86 | % | ||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of estimated total investment and estimated yields, as applicable. | |
| (2) | Represents projects where development activities have been completed and which AMB intends to sell or contribute within two years of construction completion. | |
| (3) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. | |
| (4) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (5) | Represents an asset placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended June 30, 2007. Assets placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter totaled $258.9 million and 2.6 million square feet. |
15
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
LAND
INVENTORY
(1)
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| North America | Europe | Asia | Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres (4) | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2007 |
1,989 | 31,679,740 | 53 | 1,037,254 | 46 | 2,562,538 | 2,088 | 35,279,532 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
513 | 9,816,975 | | | 2 | 406,793 | 515 | 10,223,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Starts |
(157 | ) | (2,504,929 | ) | | | (8 | ) | (685,757 | ) | (165 | ) | (3,190,686 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
2,345 | 38,991,786 | 53 | 1,037,254 | 40 | 2,283,574 | 2,438 | (5) | 42,312,614 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments in Land (2)
|
$ | 419,784 | $ | 28,572 | $ | 84,562 | $ | 532,918 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Development Cost |
$ | 2,103,870 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes consolidated and unconsolidated investments. | |
| (2) | Includes initial acquisition cost and associated carry costs. | |
| (3) | Represents total estimated costs of development including initial land acquisition cost and associated carry costs assuming full build out of land inventory. | |
| (4) | AMB also has a 19.9 acre land parcel leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX. | |
| (5) | AMBs share of acres, square feet of estimated build out potential, and total investment including amounts held in unconsolidated joint ventures is 2,243 acres, 39,014,861 square feet and $423,701, respectively. |
16
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except share price)
| AMB | Joint | Unsecured | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured | Venture | Senior | Credit | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Year | Debt (1) | Debt (1) | Debt | Facilities (2) | Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 57,917 | $ | 29,640 | $ | 55,000 | $ | | $ | 13,179 | $ | 155,736 | ||||||||||||
2008 |
69,188 | 79,398 | 175,000 | | 810 | 324,396 | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
25,799 | 127,993 | 100,000 | | 873 | 254,665 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
65,905 | 95,179 | 250,000 | 562,184 | 941 | 974,209 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
115 | 189,611 | 75,000 | | 1,014 | 265,740 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
2,044 | 449,587 | | | 1,093 | 452,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| 46,447 | 175,000 | | 65,920 | (6) | 287,367 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| 4,076 | | | 616 | 4,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| 18,780 | 112,491 | | 664 | 131,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
| 54,995 | | | | 54,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| 19,091 | 125,000 | | | 144,091 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
220,968 | 1,114,797 | 1,067,491 | 562,184 | 85,110 | 3,050,550 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized premiums/(discount) |
1,225 | 3,712 | (9,993 | ) | | | (5,056 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated debt |
222,193 | 1,118,509 | 1,057,498 | 562,184 | 85,110 | 3,045,494 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of unconsolidated
JV Debt (3) (5)
|
| 458,931 | | | 42,252 | 501,183 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
222,193 | 1,577,440 | 1,057,498 | 562,184 | 127,362 | 3,546,677 | ||||||||||||||||||
JV partners share of
consolidated JV debt (5)
|
| (717,813 | ) | | | (52,000 | ) | (769,813 | ) | |||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (5)
|
$ | 222,193 | $ | 859,627 | $ | 1,057,498 | $ | 562,184 | $ | 75,362 | $ | 2,776,864 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.0 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.2 | % | 2.1 | % | 6.4 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
maturity (in years) |
1.6 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
99,660,284 | $ | 53.22 | $ | 5,303,920 | |||||||
LP Units |
4,402,174 | 53.22 | 234,284 | |||||||||
Total |
104,062,458 | $ | 5,538,204 | |||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units (4) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.90 | % | $ | 312,267 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | ||||
Total debt-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
37.7 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of
total market capitalization
(5)
|
32.2 | % | ||
Total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
41.1 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization (5)
|
35.8 | % | ||
| (1) | AMB secured debt includes debt related to European and Asian assets in the amount of $60.5 million and $45.5 million, respectively. | |
| (2) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1,247 million. Includes $403.8 million and $158.3 million in Yen and Canadian dollar based borrowings, respectively, translated to U.S. Dollars using the foreign exchange rates at June 30, 2007. | |
| (3) | The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated JV debt were 4.5% and 5.1 years, respectively. | |
| (4) | Exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder and redeemable at the option of AMB after a non-call period, five years from issuance. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions and Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (6) | Maturity includes $65 million balance outstanding on a $65 million non-recourse credit facility obtained by AMB Partners II. |
17
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
UNCONSOLIDATED
AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
(1)
As of June 30, 2007
As of June 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | Planned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Geographic | Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Focus | Percentage | Feet (2) | Value (3) | Debt | Debt | Investment (4) | Capacity | Capitalization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III (5)
|
United States | 20 | % | 17,999,126 | $ | 1,672,461 | $ | 793,729 | $ | 60,000 | $ | 139,448 | $ | 202,000 | $ | 1,874,461 | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I (6)
|
Japan | 20 | % | 4,877,468 | 757,580 | 477,701 | 95,673 | 44,905 | 1,220,000 | 1,977,580 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I (5) (6)
|
Europe | 20 | % | 6,005,508 | 718,863 | 418,568 | | 48,686 | 224,000 | 942,863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
Mexico | 20 | % | 4,688,440 | 253,153 | 113,397 | 55,851 | 12,839 | 462,000 | 715,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
20 | % | 33,570,542 | 3,402,057 | 1,803,395 | 211,524 | 245,878 | 2,108,000 | 5,510,057 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
United States | 15 | % | 1,218,483 | 118,821 | | | 17,833 | 328,000 | 446,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
53 | % | 7,669,507 | (7) | 291,921 | 181,060 | | 49,361 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
22 | % | 42,458,532 | $ | 3,812,799 | $ | 1,984,455 | $ | 211,524 | $ | 313,072 | $ | 2,436,000 | $ | 5,956,878 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
United States | 20 | % | 9,913,375 | $ | 686,368 | $ | 320,662 | $ | 65,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
United States | 20 | % | 8,007,103 | 519,473 | 240,812 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP
|
United States | 50 | % | 8,287,424 | 448,399 | 348,928 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
United States | 39 | % | 2,172,137 | 155,235 | 84,118 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Erie
|
United States | 50 | % | 821,712 | 52,654 | 20,318 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,201,751 | 1,862,129 | 1,014,838 | 65,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II
|
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 955 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 4,293 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures |
20 | % | | 5,248 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,201,751 | 1,867,377 | 1,014,838 | 65,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
92 | % | 2,196,134 | 207,530 | 29,180 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
71 | % | 4,214,731 | 398,506 | 74,491 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
42 | % | 35,612,616 | $ | 2,473,413 | $ | 1,118,509 | $ | 65,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007 | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | Share of | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 47,524 | $ | 6,272 | $ | 22,432 | AMBs | $ | 11,527 | $ | 1,748 | $ | 5,805 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
$ | 36,832 | $ | 8,224 | $ | 21,214 | Partners | $ | 26,672 | $ | 4,318 | $ | 14,929 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | Share of | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 87,004 | $ | 12,711 | $ | 42,961 | AMBs | $ | 23,066 | $ | 3,861 | $ | 11,480 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
$ | 73,365 | $ | 13,872 | $ | 39,582 | Partners | $ | 53,440 | $ | 8,395 | $ | 30,810 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | See Joint Venture Partner Information. | |
| (2) | For development properties, this represents estimated square feet upon completion for committed phases of development projects. | |
| (3) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (4) | AMB also has a 39% equity interest in G. Accion, a Mexican real estate company for approximately $36.5 million. G. Accion provides real estate management and development services in Mexico. | |
| (5) | The planned gross capitalizations and investment capacities of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the Funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (6) | AMB Japan Fund I is a yen-denominated fund. AMB Europe Fund I is a euro-denominated fund. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the June 30, 2007 exchange rate. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.4 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (8) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures and Reporting Definitions. |
18
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NET ASSET VALUE ANALYSIS (1)
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarter Ended |
||||
| June 30, 2007 | ||||
AMBs Share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 162,914 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(2,235 | ) | ||
Property operating costs |
(43,304 | ) | ||
JV Partners share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
(27,181 | ) | ||
AMBs share of transaction activity adjustments to NOI (1) (2) (3)
|
(9,650 | ) | ||
AMBs share of unconsolidated JVs cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
11,979 | |||
Total AMBs share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
$ | 92,523 | ||
Private capital income |
$ | 8,518 | ||
AMBs share of land and development projects |
||||
AMBs share of land held for future development (2) (4)
|
$ | 423,701 | ||
AMBs share of developments and renovations in process (2) (4)
|
$ | 894,200 | ||
AMBs share of development projects held for contribution or sale (2) (4)
|
$ | 280,882 | ||
AMBs share of assets contributed to private capital joint ventures (2) (4)
|
$ | 131,760 | ||
AMBs share of total debt and preferred securities (1) (2) (4)
|
$ | 3,089,131 | ||
AMBs share of select balance sheet items (owned and managed portfolio): (1) (2) |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 253,939 | ||
Mortgages and loans receivable |
4,546 | |||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
290,944 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(73,162 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(288,136 | ) | ||
AMBs share of other assets and liabilities |
$ | 188,131 | ||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Disclosures. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of AMBs share of, JV Partners share of and owned and managed, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Transaction activity adjustments to NOI stabilizes NOI for acquisitions and development completions and removes NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution. | |
| (4) | See Property Contributions & Dispositions, Development Projects in Process, Development Projects Placed in Operations & Projects Available for Sale or Contribution or Capitalization Summary and their respective footnotes for further information. |
19
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE | ||
|
2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
REPORTING DEFINITIONS
Acquisition/non-recurring capex includes immediate building
improvements that were taken into consideration when underwriting
the purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a
building up to operating standard or to stabilization. Also
includes incremental building improvements and leasing costs that
are incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue
potential of an existing building.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book
capitalization is calculated using the following definitions:
AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total
debt based on the Companys percentage of equity interest in each
of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt.
AMBs share of total book capitalization is defined as the
Companys share of total debt plus minority interests to preferred
unitholders and limited partnership unitholders plus stockholders
equity.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market
capitalization is calculated using the following definitions:
AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total
debt based on the Companys percentage of equity interest in each
of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt.
The Companys definition of total market capitalization is total
debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market
equity. The Companys definition of AMBs share of total market
capitalization is the Companys share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. The
Companys definition of market equity is the total number of
outstanding shares of the Companys common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per
share of its common stock as of the period end.
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent
the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on
the Companys percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated or unconsolidated ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure. The company believes that AMBs share
of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures,
which enables both management and investors to assess the
operations, earnings and growth of the company in light of the
companys ownership interest in its joint ventures and to compare
the applicable measure to that of other companies. In addition, it
allows for a more meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to
that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint
ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not intended to reflect
actual liability should there be a default under loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of AMBs share
of measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
these measures.
AMBs share of total market capitalization is defined as the
Companys share of total debt plus preferred equity
liquidation preferences plus market equity.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent
(cash basis) per the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by
12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value
is used. Leases denominated in foreign currencies are translated
using the currency exchange rate at quarter end.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that
are 90% leased or properties for which we have held a certificate
of occupancy or building has been substantially complete for at
least 12 months.
Development margin is calculated as the net after tax gain (before
any deferrals) on contributions and dispositions divided by the
estimated total investment.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of
development, renovation, or expansion, including initial
acquisition costs, prepaid ground leases and associated carry
costs. Estimated total investments are based on current forecasts
and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar investments are
translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
Estimated yields on development projects are
calculated from estimated annual NOI following occupancy
stabilization divided by the estimated total investment, including
earnouts (if triggered by stabilization), prepaid ground leases and
associated carrying costs. Yields exclude value-added conversion
projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international
projects.
Fixed charge coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total
interest expense (including capitalized interest) plus
preferred dividends and distributions.
Interest coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest expense.
JV Partners share of calculations for certain financial measures
represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure
based on the Companys joint venture partners percentage of equity
interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures
accounted for in the applicable financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares
of the Companys common stock and common limited partnership units
multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as of
the period end.
Occupancy percentage represents the percentage of total rentable
square feet owned, which is leased, including month-to-month leases,
as of the date reported. Space is considered leased when the tenant
has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by the Company as assets in which the
Company has at least a 10% ownership interest, is the property or
asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Percentage pre-leased represents the percentage of signed leases only.
Preferred, with respect to its capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represents projects where the acquired
buildings are less than 75% leased and require significant capital expenditures (generally more than
10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the buildings up to
operating standards and stabilization (generally 90% occupancy).
Redevelopment projects represent those that require significant
capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing
basis) to bring them up to operating standards and stabilization
(generally 90% occupancy).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building
improvements and leasing costs required to maintain current
revenues. Recurring capital expenditures do not include
acquisition capital that was taken into consideration when
underwriting the purchase of a building or which are incurred to
bring a building up to operating standard.
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the
difference, weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first
month after a term commencement date and the net ABR due the last
month prior to the termination date of the former tenants term. If
free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used
as a point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop
amounts, holdover rent and premium rent charges. If either the
previous or current lease terms are under 12 months, then they are
excluded from this calculation. If the lease is the first in the unit
(first generation) and there is no prior lease for comparison, then
it is excluded from this calculation.
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles) of the
same store properties from the prior year reporting period to the
current year reporting period.
Same store properties include all properties that were owned as of
the end of both the current and prior year reporting periods and
excludes development properties for both the current and prior
reporting periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes
properties purchased and developments stabilized after December 31,
2005.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant
improvements, lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred
during leasing of second generation space divided by the total
square feet leased. Costs incurred prior to leasing available space
are not included until such space is leased. Second generation space
excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant at
acquisition.
Stabilized GAAP cap rates for acquisitions are calculated as NOI,
including straight-line rents, stabilized to market occupancy
(generally 95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total
acquisition cost basis includes the initial purchase price, the
effects of marking assumed debt to market, all due diligence and
closing costs, lease intangible adjustments, planned immediate
capital expenditures, leasing costs necessary to achieve
stabilization and, if applicable, any estimated costs required to
buy-out AMBs joint venture partners. For dispositions or
contributions, cap rates are calculated as NOI divided by total
disposition price or contribution value, as applicable.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases renewed by
existing tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and
renewed leases during the reporting period, excluding the square
footage of tenants that default or buy-out prior to expiration of
their lease, short-term tenants and the square footage of
month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by the Company as total
debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market
equity.
Value-added conversion project represents the repurposing of land
or a building site for more valuable uses and may include such
activities as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and
retenanting.
20
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE | ||
|
2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Adjusted EBITDA. The Company uses adjusted earnings before
interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, and non-development
gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating performance
and liquidity. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA to provide
investors relevant and useful information because it permits fixed
income investors to view income from its operations on an unleveraged
basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation and amortization
expense or non-development gains. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows
investors to measure the Companys operating performance independent
of its capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a
more meaningful comparison of its operating performance between
quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its operating
performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate
industry and in other industries. The Company considers adjusted
EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its
comparative performance with other companies because, by excluding
non-cash depreciation expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing
public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of
companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, the Company
believes that adjusted EBITDA helps fixed income and equity investors
to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make
quarterly preferred share and unit distributions. Management uses
adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as the Company expects investors to
when measuring the Companys operating performance and liquidity;
specifically when assessing its operating performance, and comparing
that performance to other companies, both in the real estate industry
and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability to meet debt
service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share and unit
distributions. The Company believes investors should consider adjusted
EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of the
Companys performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its
performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding of the
Companys operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful
comparisons of the performance of its assets between periods and as
against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, and non-development gains when assessing the Companys financial
performance, an investor is assessing the earnings generated by the
Companys operations, but not taking into account the eliminated
expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection with such operations. As a result,
adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should be
used in conjunction with the Companys required GAAP presentations.
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the Companys historical cash
expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital, capital
expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not
reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on
the Companys outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant
and widely used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it
does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as defined
by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative to those
indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further,
the Companys computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to
EBITDA reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net income
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 118,269 | $ | 75,353 | $ | 143,951 | $ | 102,930 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
41,483 | 44,500 | 82,504 | 87,254 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| 5,394 | 257 | 5,394 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
4,295 | 6,112 | 9,403 | 10,941 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(1,748 | ) | (8,278 | ) | (3,861 | ) | (10,366 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO
|
5,805 | 2,096 | 11,480 | 5,305 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
4,249 | 2,428 | 8,317 | 4,455 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
33,369 | 44,310 | 67,951 | 83,704 | ||||||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
16,122 | 14,879 | 28,070 | 29,041 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(75,575 | ) | (21,199 | ) | (76,500 | ) | (30,558 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
(251 | ) | 3,237 | (381 | ) | 6,362 | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 146,018 | $ | 168,832 | $ | 271,191 | $ | 294,462 | ||||||||
AMBs share of select balance sheet items (owned and managed
portfolio). AMB believes that the financial information in the
consolidated balance sheets based on GAAP provides the most
appropriate earnings information. However, AMB considers AMBs share
of select balance sheet items reported on an owned and managed basis
(such as cash and cash equivalents, mortgages and loans receivable,
accounts receivable (net) and other assets, deferred rents
receivable and deferred financing costs (net) and accounts payable
and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental measures to help
both management and investors make a comprehensive assessment and
valuation of AMBs total real estate portfolio and its operating
performance and activities. (See Reporting Definitions for
definitions of owned and managed and AMBs share of.) While
these measures are helpful to the investor, they do not provide
balance sheet information as defined by GAAP and are not true
alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation
of these measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
these measures.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI (see definition
for NOI) less straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles. The Company considers cash-basis NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because
cash basis NOI reflects the operating performance of the real
estate portfolio excluding the effects of non-cash adjustments and
provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a
year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI should not be
viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it
does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest
expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures
and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction
activities that could materially impact results from operations.
Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real
estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies
for calculating cash-basis NOI.
Companys share of total debt. The Companys share of total debt is
the pro rata portion of the total debt based on its percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated
ventures holding the debt. The Company believes that its share of
total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables both
management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its
leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a
more meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies
that do not consolidate their joint ventures. The Companys share of
total debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability should
there be a default under any or all of such loans or a liquidation
of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Summary for a
reconciliation of total debt and the Companys share of total debt.
Estimated FFO by Business Line. Estimated FFO by Business Line is
FFO (See discussion of FFO) generated by the Companys Capital
Partners, development and real estate operations business lines.
Estimated Capital Partners and Development FFO was determined by
reducing Capital Partner Income and Development Profits, net of
taxes by their respective estimated share of general and
administrative expenses. Capital Partners and Developments
estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses
was based on their respective percentage of actual direct general
and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate
Operations FFO represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO
attributable to Capital Partners and Development. Management believes estimated FFO by business line is a useful
supplemental measure of its operating performance because it helps
the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys respective business lines to other companies comparable
business lines. Further, AMBs computation of FFO by business line
may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate
investment trusts as they may use different methodologies in
computing such measures.
21
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE | ||
|
2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as
interest expense including amortization of finance costs and debt
premiums from continuing and discontinuing operations and
amortization of financing costs and debt premiums from continuing and
discontinuing operations, the Companys share of interest expense
from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized interest,
preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. The
Company uses fixed charge coverage to measure its liquidity. The
Company believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful to
investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure the
Companys ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt,
make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to
its preferred shareholders. The Companys computation of fixed charge
coverage may not be comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by
other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,369 | $ | 44,310 | $ | 67,951 | $ | 83,704 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(1,185 | ) | (1,803 | ) | (2,035 | ) | (4,473 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(764 | ) | (1,036 | ) | (1,623 | ) | (1,024 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
(7 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
4,249 | 2,428 | 8,317 | 4,455 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
15,826 | 10,018 | 30,368 | 18,551 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
1,480 | 4,024 | 5,179 | 9,025 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,095 | 7,904 | 6,191 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 56,920 | $ | 61,034 | $ | 116,059 | $ | 116,426 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations (FFO). The Company believes that net
income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, the Company considers funds from operations, or FFO, as
defined by NAREIT, to be a useful supplemental measure of its operating
performance. FFO is defined as net income, calculated in accordance
with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held
for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and
adjustments to derive the Companys pro rata share of FFO of
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. Further, the Company
does not adjust FFO to eliminate the effects of non-recurring charges.
The Company believes that FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is a meaningful
supplemental measure of its operating performance because historical
cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP
implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and
amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many
industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of
operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost
accounting to be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a
supplemental measure of operating performance for real estate
investment trusts that excludes historical cost depreciation and
amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP.
The Company believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required
GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding
of operating results of real estate investment trusts among the
investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such
companies more meaningful. The Company considers FFO to be a useful
measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance
because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously
depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation
and amortization, FFO can help the investing public compare the
operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as
compared to other companies. While FFO is a relevant and widely used
measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it
does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined
by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those
measures in evaluating the Companys liquidity or operating
performance. FFO also does not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to the Companys real
estate assets nor is FFO necessarily indicative of cash available to
fund the Companys future cash requirements. Further, the Companys
computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other real
estate investment trusts that do not define the term in accordance
with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition
differently than the Company does. See Consolidated Statements of
Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of FFO from net income.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as interest expense
including amortization from continuing and discontinuing operations
and the Companys share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint
venture debt. The Company uses interest coverage to measure its
liquidity. The Company believes interest coverage is relevant and
useful to investors because it permits fixed income investors to
measure the Companys ability to meet its interest payments on
outstanding debt. The Companys computation of interest coverage may
not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details total interest for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,369 | $ | 44,310 | $ | 67,951 | $ | 83,704 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(764 | ) | (1,036 | ) | (1,623 | ) | (1,024 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
4,249 | 2,428 | 8,317 | 4,455 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 36,854 | $ | 45,702 | $ | 74,645 | $ | 87,135 | ||||||||
Net Asset Value (NAV). The Company believes NAV is a useful
supplemental measure of its operating performance because it enables
both management and investors to analyze the fair value of its
business. An assessment of the fair value of a business involves
estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various methods.
The Company has presented certain financial measures related to its
business that it believes may be useful to the investing public in
calculating its NAV but has not presented any specific methodology nor
provided any guidance on assumptions or estimates that should be used
in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). Net operating income is defined as
rental revenue (as calculated in accordance with GAAP), including
reimbursements, less property operating expenses, which excludes
depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses and
interest expense. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate and
useful supplemental performance measure because NOI reflects the
operating performance of the real estate portfolio. However, NOI
should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial
performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs,
capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and
construction activities that could materially impact results from
operations. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real
estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating NOI.
22
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE | ||
|
2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB
believes that cash flow information based on GAAP provides the most
appropriate earnings information. However, AMB considers cash flow
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, AMBs
share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles,
gross lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs
share of net lease termination fees, tenant improvements, lease
commissions and other lease costs, building improvements, JV
partners share of capital expenditures and AMBs share of
recurring capital expenditures) to be useful supplemental measures
to help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance
and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned
and managed, AMBs share of and JV partners share of. AMB
believes that owned and managed cash flow information helps
management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of the
cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a
better understanding of AMBs operating performance and activities.
While owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is
helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information
as defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed
supplemental cash flow information may not be comparable to that of
other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
these measures.
Same Store Net Operating Income (SS NOI). The Company believes
that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate
earnings measure. However, the Company considers SS NOI to be a
useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. For
properties that are considered part of the same store pool, see
Reporting Definitions. In deriving SS NOI, the Company defines NOI
as rental revenue (as calculated in accordance with GAAP),
including reimbursements, less property operating expenses, which
excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative
expenses and interest expense. For a discussion of cash-basis NOI,
see definition of cash-basis NOI. The Company believes that SS NOI
helps the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys real estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI
is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of
real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from
operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be
considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating our
liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not reflect
general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities
that could materially impact our results from operations. Further,
the Companys computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that
of other real estate companies, as they may use different
methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated SS NOI and NOI from net
income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 118,269 | $ | 75,353 | $ | 143,951 | $ | 102,930 | ||||||||
Private capital income |
(8,518 | ) | (4,943 | ) | (14,443 | ) | (10,049 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
41,483 | 44,500 | 82,504 | 87,254 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| 5,394 | 257 | 5,394 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
30,537 | 25,621 | 60,632 | 49,090 | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(77,415 | ) | (12,220 | ) | (61,869 | ) | 21,442 | |||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
16,122 | 14,879 | 28,070 | 29,041 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(868 | ) | (21,199 | ) | (1,657 | ) | (30,558 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
119,610 | 127,385 | 237,445 | 254,544 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(17,715 | ) | (29,568 | ) | (35,019 | ) | (59,034 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments (1)
|
(1,103 | ) | (2,153 | ) | (2,271 | ) | (5,962 | ) | ||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 100,792 | $ | 95,664 | $ | 200,155 | $ | 189,548 | ||||||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
23
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE | ||
|
2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
JOINT VENTURE PARTNER INFORMATION
AMB-SGP Mexico is a co-investment partnership formed in 2004
with a subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
AMB Japan Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2005 with
institutional investors. This fund is yen-denominated. U.S. dollar
amounts are converted at the June 30, 2007 exchange rate.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III is an open-ended co-investment
partnership formed in 2004 with institutional investors, which
invest through a private REIT. Prior to October 1, 2006, the Company
accounted for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III as a consolidated
joint venture.
AMB Europe Fund I is an open-ended co-investment venture formed in
2007 with institutional investors. This fund is euro-denominated.
U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the June 30, 2007 exchange
rate.
AMB DFS Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2006 with
a subsidiary of GE Real Estate to build and sell properties in
non-target markets.
AMB Erie is a co-investment partnership formed in 1998 with the Erie Insurance Group.
AMB Partners II is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with
the City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System.
AMB-SGP is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with a
subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II is a co-investment
partnership with institutional investors, which invest
through a private REIT.
AMB-AMS is a co-investment partnership with three Dutch pension
funds advised by Mn Services NV and Cordares.
24
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONTACTS
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, North America | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Margan S. Mitchell
|
VP, Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9477 | mmitchell@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Director, Investor Relations | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Dallas | New Jersey | Singapore | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | Atlanta | Frankfurt | New York | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | Baltimore | Los Angeles | Osaka | Vancouver | |||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | Beijing | Menlo Park | Paris | ||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001
|
Boston | Nagoya | Seoul | |||||||
| Chicago | Narita | Shanghai | ||||||||
25
Some of the information included in this supplemental analyst package and the conference call
to be held in connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to
development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and renovation projects (including stabilization dates, square feet at stabilization or
completion, sale or contribution dates, weighted average estimated yields from such projects, costs
and total investment amounts), acquisition capital, build out potential of land inventory,
co-investment joint venture investment capacity, terms of the co-investment joint ventures, cost to
buy out joint venture partners, lease expirations, future debt summaries, and future business plans
(such as property divestitures and financings), which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor
provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may
not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the
dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to
differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults
on or non-renewal of leases by tenants, increased interest rates and operating costs, our failure
to obtain necessary outside financing, re-financing risks, risks related to our obligations in the
event of certain defaults under joint venture and other debt, risks related to debt and equity
security financings (including dilution risk), difficulties in identifying properties to acquire
and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and
operations, our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest
proceeds from any divestitures, risks and uncertainties affecting property development and
construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary
permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status
as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring, failure to maintain our
current credit agency ratings, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters,
financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions or in the real estate sector,
changes in real estate and zoning laws, a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, risks
related to doing business internationally and global expansion, losses in excess of our insurance
coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and
increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally,
including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes
and certain other matters discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
26