UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment
No. )
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
|
|
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ No fee required.
o Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction
computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the
amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it
was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as
provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously.
Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2006
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of AMB PROPERTY
CORPORATION. The Annual Meeting will be held on May 11, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., Pacific time, at AMB
Property Corporations headquarters, which are located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California
94111. Information about the Annual Meeting and the matters on which the stockholders will act is
included in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement that follow. Also
included is a proxy card and return envelope.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting. Whether or not you plan to
attend, please complete and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope as promptly as
possible. You may also vote your proxy via the internet or by telephone. Returning your proxy
does not deprive you of your right to attend the meeting and vote your shares in person.
AMBs 2005 Annual Report is also enclosed. We encourage you to read our Annual Report and
hope you will find its message interesting and useful. Thank you for your continued interest in
AMB.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
|
|
|
HAMID R. MOGHADAM
Chairman and CEO |
This proxy statement and accompanying form of proxy are first being mailed to you on or about
March 30, 2006.
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 11, 2006
To the Stockholders of AMB Property Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
TIME |
|
2:00 p.m., Pacific time, on May 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
PLACE |
|
AMB Property Corporation
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
|
|
1.
|
|
To elect ten directors to our Board of Directors to
serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders
and until their successors are duly elected and
qualified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
To ratify the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
To transact such other business as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) or
postponement(s) thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
RECORD DATE |
|
Holders of shares of our common stock of record at the close
of business on March 7, 2006 are entitled to notice of and
to vote at the Annual Meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
Our 2005 Annual Report is enclosed. |
|
|
|
|
|
PROXY VOTING |
|
It is important that your shares be
represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. You
can vote your shares by one of the following methods: vote by
proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mail using the instructions on
the enclosed proxy card. Any proxy may be revoked in the manner described in the accompanying
proxy statement at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors, |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Tamra D. Browne |
|
|
|
|
|
TAMRA D. BROWNE
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary |
March 30, 2006
San Francisco, California
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 11, 2006
PROXY STATEMENT
INTRODUCTION
General
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of
Directors of AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland corporation, of proxies from the holders of our
issued and outstanding shares of common stock to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders and
at any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on May 11, 2006
at our global headquarters, which are located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111,
beginning at 2:00 p.m., Pacific time (the Annual Meeting).
At the Annual Meeting, the items of business that you will be asked to consider and vote upon
are:
|
1. |
|
The election of ten directors to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders
and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; |
|
|
2. |
|
The ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006; and |
|
|
3. |
|
Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting. |
This proxy statement and accompanying form of proxy are being sent to holders of record of our
common stock at the close of business on the record date, which is March 7, 2006.
NO PERSON IS AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS OTHER THAN
THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND, IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION MUST NOT BE RELIED
UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED AND THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT SHALL, UNDER NO
CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF AMB PROPERTY
CORPORATION SINCE THE DATE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT.
Our global headquarters are located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111,
telephone (415) 394-9000. References herein to we, us and our refer to AMB Property
Corporation and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
Your vote is important. Because most of our stockholders cannot attend the Annual Meeting in
person, it is necessary for a large number to be represented by proxy. Stockholders generally have
a choice of voting by proxy over the Internet, by using a toll-free telephone number or by
completing a proxy card and mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. Check your proxy
card or the information forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see
which options are available to you. If you vote by proxy over the Internet, please be aware that
you may incur costs such as telecommunications and Internet access charges for which you will be
responsible. The Internet and telephone proxy voting facilities for stockholders of record will
close at 8:59 p.m., Pacific time, on May 10, 2006.
The Internet and telephone proxy voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders
by use of a control number and to allow stockholders to confirm that their instructions have been
properly recorded. The method by which you vote will in no way limit your right to vote at the
Annual Meeting if you later decide to attend in person. If your shares of common stock are held in
the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your
favor, from the holder of record, to be able to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is exercised by timely delivering to Tamra D.
Browne, the Secretary of AMB Property Corporation, a properly executed, later-dated proxy
(including an Internet or telephone vote) or by voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting. Mere
attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke a proxy.
AMB Property Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland.
Section 2-507 of the Maryland General Corporation Law authorizes the granting of proxies by
telephone or over the Internet. Accordingly, proxies granted by telephone or over the Internet, in
accordance with the procedures set forth on the proxy card, will be valid under Maryland law.
All shares of common stock entitled to vote and represented by properly completed proxies
received prior to the Annual Meeting and not revoked will be voted in accordance with the
instructions indicated on the accompanying proxy. If no instructions are indicated on a properly
completed proxy, the shares of common stock represented by that proxy will be voted as recommended
by the Board of Directors.
If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration,
including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the Annual Meeting to another
time or place, the persons named as proxies and acting thereunder will have discretion to vote on
those matters according to their best judgment to the same extent as the person delivering the
proxy would be entitled to vote. At the time this proxy statement went to press, we did not
anticipate that any other matters would be raised at the Annual Meeting.
Stockholders Entitled to Vote
Holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on the record date, March 7,
2006, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of March 7, 2006, there were
87,598,167 shares of our common stock outstanding. Each share of common stock is entitled
to one vote on each matter properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
Required Vote
A majority of the shares of common stock outstanding must be represented, in person or by
proxy, at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual
Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present and entitled to vote for
purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares of our
common stock for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does
not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received instructions
from the beneficial owner. For purposes of the Annual Meeting, however, there should not be any
broker non-votes because a broker who holds shares for a beneficial owner and does not receive
voting instructions from the beneficial owner generally has discretionary authority to vote on both
of the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting.
A plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the
election of directors (i.e., the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected).
Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of the election of directors and do
not have any effect on the result of the vote for the election of directors.
Cost of Proxy Solicitation
We are soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting from our stockholders. We will pay the cost
of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or
employees in person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means. These people will not be
specially compensated for their solicitation of proxies.
In accordance with the regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the New
York Stock Exchange, we will also reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and
fiduciaries for their expenses incurred in sending proxies and proxy materials to the beneficial
owners of shares of our common stock.
2
Advance Notice Procedures
Deadline for Submitting Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Our 2007 Proxy Statement. Rule
14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provides that certain stockholder proposals must be
included in the proxy statement for our annual meeting. For a stockholder proposal to be
considered for inclusion in the proxy statement for our 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, we
must receive it no later than November 30, 2006.
Deadline for Submitting Nominations for Director and Other Stockholder Proposals Outside of
Rule 14a-8. Under our Bylaws, nominations for director may be made only pursuant to the notice of
the meeting, by the Board or a committee of the Board, or by a stockholder entitled to vote who
delivered notice to us not less than 50 days nor more than 75 days prior to the meeting; provided,
however, that in the event that less than 65 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of
the meeting is given or made to stockholders, then, for notice to be timely, the stockholder must
deliver it to us not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day
on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made,
whichever first occurs.
Our Bylaws also provide that no business may be brought before an annual meeting except as
specified in the notice of the meeting or as otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the
direction of the Board of Directors or by a stockholder entitled to vote who has delivered notice
to us (containing certain information specified in our Bylaws) within the time limits described
above for delivering notice of a nomination for the election of a director. These requirements
apply to any matter that a stockholder wishes to raise at an annual meeting other than pursuant to
the procedures in Rule 14a-8.
A copy of the full text of our Bylaws may be obtained by writing to our Secretary at Pier 1,
Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111.
The date of this proxy statement is March 30, 2006.
3
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors. A majority of the Board must be
independent directors as defined by the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Our Board has
adopted the New York Stock Exchange listing standards of director independence. In general, an
independent director is a director who the Board affirmatively determines has no material
relationship with us. Under the New York Stock Exchanges rules, the following relationships are
considered material and will cause a director to be deemed not independent:
|
(i) |
|
a director who is, or within the past three years was, our employee, or who has an
immediate family member who is, or within the past three years has been, one of our
executive officers; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
a director who has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during
any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $100,000 in direct
compensation from us, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of
deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in
any way on continued service); |
|
|
(iii) |
|
a director who is (or has an immediate family member who is) a current partner or
employee of our internal or external auditor; |
|
|
(iv) |
|
a director who has an immediate family member who is a current employee of our internal
or external auditor and who participates in the firms audit, assurance or tax compliance
(but not tax planning) practice; |
|
|
(v) |
|
a director who was (or has an immediate family member who was) within the last three
years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that
time; |
|
|
(vi) |
|
a director who is or has been (or has an immediate family member who is or has been)
within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any
of our present executive officers simultaneously serve or served on that companys
compensation committee; and |
|
|
(vii) |
|
a director who is a current employee (or has an immediate family member who is a
current executive officer) of a company that has made payments to, or received payments
from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal
years, exceeds the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such other companys consolidated gross
revenues. |
Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that eight out of ten presently elected
directors (specifically, Afsaneh M. Beschloss, T. Robert Burke, David A. Cole, Lydia H. Kennard, J.
Michael Losh, Frederick W. Reid, Jeffrey L. Skelton and Thomas W. Tusher) are independent directors
in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange listing standards, our corporate governance
principles and our Bylaws. For J. Michael Losh, a majority of our Board, including the chair of
our Nominating and Governance Committee, waived the limitation contained in our corporate
governance principles that no director may serve on the boards of more than five other public
companies. All members of the Board serve a one-year term, which expires at the following annual
meeting of stockholders when their successors are duly elected and qualified.
The shares represented by the enclosed proxy will be voted for the election of each of the
nominees named below, unless you indicate in the proxy that your vote should be withheld from any
or all of them. Each nominee elected as a director will continue in office until his or her
successor has been duly elected and qualified, or until the earliest of his or her resignation,
retirement or death.
The Board of Directors has proposed the following nominees for election as directors at the
Annual Meeting: Hamid R. Moghadam, W. Blake Baird, Afsaneh M. Beschloss, T. Robert Burke, David A.
Cole, Lydia H. Kennard, J. Michael Losh, Frederick W. Reid, Jeffrey L. Skelton and Thomas W.
Tusher. Each of the nominees is currently serving as a director of AMB Property Corporation. The
Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as directors.
Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this proxy statement and to serve as a
director if elected. The principal occupation and certain other information regarding the nominees
are set forth below. Information about each nominees share ownership is set forth under the
section entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
4
Nominees For Director
|
|
|
Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Member, Executive Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
One of the founders (in 1983) of the
predecessor to AMB Property
Corporation, Mr. Moghadam has over 25
years of experience in real estate. He
is currently Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Moghadam holds
bachelors and masters degrees in
engineering from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and an M.B.A.
degree from the Graduate School of
Business at Stanford University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other
memberships:
|
|
Mr. Moghadam is a member of the board
of directors of Plum Creek Timber
Company and Stanford Management
Company, is a member of the advisory
board of the Wine Group and is a member
of the Stanford Business School
Advisory Counsel. He is a former Chair
of the Executive Committee and the
Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts and the Northern California
Chapter of the Young Presidents
Organization, is a founding member of
the Real Estate Roundtable, and has
served on various committees of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
|
|
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
Mr. Baird is President and a
Director of AMB Property
Corporation, and Chairman of its
Investment Committee. From January
1999 until December 1999, Mr. Baird
served as our Chief Investment
Officer. Prior to joining us in
January 1999, Mr. Baird was a
Managing Director of Morgan Stanley
& Co., most recently as head of
Real Estate Investment Banking for
the Western United States. Mr.
Baird spent 15 years at Morgan
Stanley and Dean Witter, the last
11 focusing on real estate. Mr.
Baird holds a B.S. in Economics
from the Wharton School (magna cum
laude) and a B.A. in History from
the College of Arts and Sciences
(magna cum laude) at the University
of Pennsylvania. He also holds an
M.B.A. from New York University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other memberships:
|
|
Mr. Baird is a member of the Young
Presidents Organization, and a
former member of the Board of
Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate
Investment Trusts. |
|
|
|
Afsaneh M. Beschloss |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Member, Nominating and Governance Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational experience:
|
|
Ms. Beschloss serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of The Rock Creek Group, an
investment company formerly called the Carlyle
Asset Management Group. From 1996 until 2001
when she founded The Rock |
5
|
|
|
|
|
Creek Group, Ms.
Beschloss held a number of positions at the
World Bank, serving as Director of Investments
and Chief Investment Officer of the World Bank
and later as Treasurer. Prior to these
positions, she served as Senior Manager for the
Energy Sector Management Program at the World
Bank and Investment Officer of the World Banks
Investment Management Department. Ms.
Beschloss also worked at J.P. Morgan, an
investment bank, at Shell International, an oil
and gas company, and also taught international
trade at Oxford University. She holds an
M.Phil (Honors) in economics from Oxford
University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other
memberships:
|
|
Ms. Beschloss is a member of the board of
directors of Temple-Inland, Inc., a corrugated
packaging, forest products and financial
products company. Ms. Beschloss is also a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Ford
Foundation, a private philanthropic foundation,
and is Chairman of its Investment Committee, a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Colonial
Williamsburg Foundation, a private historical
foundation, a member of the Sesame Workshop, a
non-profit educational organization, and a
member of the Investment Committee at the
Rockefeller Brothers Fund, a private
philanthropic fund. |
|
|
|
T. Robert Burke |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Chair, Executive Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
Mr. Burke is one of the founders (in
1983) of the predecessor to AMB
Property Corporation. From November
1997 to December 1999, Mr. Burke was
our Chairman of the Board. He was
formerly a senior real estate partner
with Morrison & Foerster LLP and, for
two years, served as that firms
Managing Partner for Operations. Mr.
Burke graduated from Stanford
University and holds a J.D. degree
from Stanford Law School. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other
memberships:
|
|
Mr. Burke is a former member of the
Board of Governors of the National
Association of Real Estate Investment
Trusts and is a Trustee of Stanford
University. Mr. Burke is also the
former Chairman of the Board of
Directors of the Pension Real Estate
Association. He is a member of the
board of the Prime Property Fund. |
|
|
|
David A. Cole |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2000 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Chair, Compensation Committee; Member, Nominating and Governance
Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
Mr. Cole was named Chairman of the
Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Kurt Salmon Associates in
January 1988. He retired as Chief
Executive Officer in December 1998
and continued to serve as Chairman
of the Board until January 2001.
Mr. Cole holds a bachelors degree
in engineering from Auburn
University and has successfully
completed the Advanced Management
Program at Harvard Business School. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other memberships:
|
|
Mr. Cole is Chairman Emeritus of
Kurt Salmon Associates, Inc., a
global management consulting firm,
and is Chairman of the Board of
Directors of PRG-Schultz
International, Inc., a publicly
traded provider of audit recovery |
6
|
|
|
|
|
services, and serves on their
governance and nominating
committee. He is also a member of
the board of directors of the
Voluntary Interindustry Commerce
Standards Committee and the
Advisory Board of Goizueza Business
School at Emory University. |
|
|
|
Lydia H. Kennard |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Chair, Nominating and Governance Committee; Member, Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
Since 2003, Ms. Kennard has been
the chairman of KDG Development
Construction Consulting, a program
and construction management firm.
From 1999 to 2003 and again from
October 2005 to the present, Ms.
Kennard has served as executive
director of Los Angeles World
Airports and, from 1994 to 1999,
was a deputy executive director for
Los Angeles World Airports. Ms.
Kennard was president of KDG prior
to joining the Los Angeles World
Airports in 1994. Before KDG, Ms.
Kennard served as an associate
attorney at McKenna & Fitting, a
real estate and construction law
firm, and was a member of the City
of Los Angeles Planning Commission.
Ms. Kennard holds a juris doctorate
from Harvard Law School, a masters
degree in city planning from the
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, and a bachelors degree
in urban planning and management
from Stanford University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other memberships:
|
|
Ms. Kennard serves on the boards of
IndyMac Bank, Intermec, Inc., an
industrial technologies company,
the UniHealth Foundation, the State
of California Air Resources Board
and the Board of Trustees of the
University of Southern California,
where she serves on the audit
committee. |
|
|
|
J. Michael Losh |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Chair, Audit Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
From July 2004 until his retirement
in 2005, Mr. Losh has served as
interim chief financial officer of
Cardinal Health, Inc., a health care
products and services company. Mr.
Losh spent 36 years with General
Motors Corporation, most recently as
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of General Motors
from July 1994 through August 2000
and as chairman of GMAC, General
Motors financial services group,
from July 1994 until April 1999. He
oversaw major capacity expansion
programs and integrated finance
functions when he served as finance
director of General Motors do Brazil
from 1979 to 1982 and as managing
director of General Motors de Mexico
from 1982 to 1984. Mr. Losh was
elected Vice President of General
Motors and General Manager of the
Pontiac Division in July 1984, and
in June 1989 was named Vice
President and General Manager of the
Oldsmobile Division. From 1992 to
1994, Mr. Losh served as Group Vice
President in charge of North
American Vehicle Sales, Service and
Marketing. Mr. Losh holds a B.S.
degree in Mechanical Engineering
from Kettering University and an
M.B.A. from Harvard University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other memberships:
|
|
Mr. Losh currently serves on the
boards of Cardinal Health, Inc.; AON
Corporation, an insurance and risk
management company, where he serves
on the governance and nominating and
compensation committees; Masco |
7
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation, a home improvement and
building products company, where he
serves on the audit committee; H.B.
Fuller Company, a chemical
manufacturer, where he serves on the
audit committee; TRW Automotive
Inc., an automotive product company,
where he serves on the audit
committee; and Metaldyne
Corporation, a metal-based product
company, where he serves on the
audit and compensation committees. |
|
|
|
Frederick W. Reid |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Member, Compensation Committee;
Member, Nominating and Governance
Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
Mr. Reid is the designated Chief
Executive Officer of Virgin
America, a startup airline project
currently in the process of
formation. Mr. Reid joined Virgin
America in April 2004. Previously,
Mr. Reid served as President and
Chief Operating Officer of Delta
from May 2001 to April 2004 and
served as Executive Vice President
and Chief Marketing Officer of
Delta from July 1998 to May 2001.
Before joining Delta, Mr. Reid
served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Lufthansa
German Airlines from April 1997 to
June 1998, as Executive Vice
President from 1996 to March 1997
and as Senior Vice President, The
Americas from 1991 to 1996. Between
1976 and 1991, Mr. Reid held
various management positions at Pan
American World Airways and American
Airlines, based in Western Europe,
the Middle East and South Asia. Mr.
Reid holds a B.A. degree in Asian
Studies from the University of
California at Berkeley. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other memberships:
|
|
He is a member of the Advisory
Board for the Taub Institute for
Research on Alzheimers Disease and
the Aging Brain. |
|
|
|
Jeffrey L. Skelton |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Member, Audit Committee; Member, Executive Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and
educational
experience:
|
|
Dr. Skelton is currently President and Chief
Executive Officer of Symphony Asset Management, a
subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc., an
investment management firm. Prior to founding
Symphony Asset Management in 1994, he was with
Wells Fargo Nikko Investment Advisors from January
1984 to December 1993, where he served in a variety
of capacities, including Chief Research Officer,
Vice Chairman, Co-Chief Investment Officer and
Chief Executive of Wells Fargo Nikko Investment
Advisors Limited in London. Dr. Skelton has a Ph.D.
in Mathematical Economics and Finance and an M.B.A.
degree from the University of Chicago, and was an
Assistant Professor of Finance at the University of
California at Berkeley, Walter A. Haas School of
Business. |
|
|
|
Directorships and
other memberships:
|
|
None. |
8
|
|
|
Thomas W. Tusher |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
Director since:
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
AMB Board Committees:
|
|
Member, Compensation Committee |
|
|
|
Recent business and educational
experience:
|
|
He was President and Chief Operating
Officer of Levi Strauss & Co. from 1984
through 1996, when he retired.
Previously, he was President of Levi
Strauss International from 1976 to 1984.
Mr. Tusher began his career at Levi
Strauss in 1969. He was a director of
the publicly-held Levi Strauss & Co.
from 1978 to 1985, and was named a
director of the privately-controlled
Levi Strauss & Co. in 1989, a position
he held until his retirement at the end
of 1996. Prior to joining Levi Strauss &
Co., Mr. Tusher was with Colgate
Palmolive from 1965 to 1969. Mr. Tusher
has a bachelors degree from the
University of California at Berkeley and
an M.B.A. degree from the Graduate
School of Business at Stanford
University. |
|
|
|
Directorships and other
memberships:
|
|
Mr. Tusher is a director of Amisfield
Wine Company in New Zealand. He is a
former director of Dash America (Pearl
Izumi), Cakebread Cellars, Great Western
Financial Corporation and the San
Francisco Chamber of Commerce. He is
also Chairman Emeritus and a member of
the advisory board of the Walter A. Haas
School of Business at the University of
California at Berkeley. Mr. Tusher is
also a director of the World Wildlife
Fund and a former director of the
Advisory Council of Stanford
Universitys Graduate School of
Business. |
Board of Directors Meetings and Attendance
Pursuant to the Maryland General Corporation Law and our Bylaws, our business, property and
affairs are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. Members of the Board are kept
informed of our business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board and our officers, by
reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings of the Board and its
committees.
During 2005, the Board held five meetings and acted by unanimous written consent one time.
Each incumbent director attended 75% or more of the total number of meetings of the Board and the
committees of the Board on which such directors served. Six directors attended the 2005 annual
meeting of stockholders. We do not currently have a policy with regard to Board members
attendance at annual meetings. The Nominating and Governance Committee selects a lead director
annually from the independent directors with at least one year of service. Jeffrey L. Skelton
served as lead director for the 2005 fiscal year and will continue to serve as lead director for
the 2006 fiscal year.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, an Executive
Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. Current committee charters are available on
our website at http://www.amb.com, and in print to be sent to any of our stockholders upon
request. Requests for such copies should be addressed to: AMB Property Corporation, Pier 1, Bay
1, San Francisco, California 94111, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone (415) 394-9000.
Audit Committee. Our Board of Directors has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee
established in accordance with section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Audit Committee currently consists of three independent directors, as defined by the New York
Stock Exchanges listing standards: Mr. Losh, the chair, Dr. Skelton and Ms. Kennard. Our Board
of Directors has determined that we have at least one audit committee financial expert, J. Michael
Losh, serving on our Audit Committee. Our Board has determined that Mr. Losh is independent as
this term is defined in Item 7(d)(3)(iv) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act. Our Board has
determined that Mr. Loshs simultaneous service on the audit committees of more than two other
public companies would not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors. The purposes of the Audit Committee are to (a) assist the Board in the
oversight of (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, (iii) the independent registered public accounting firms qualifications
and independence, (iv) our
9
internal control environment and risk management, including our Code of Business Conduct, and
(v) the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit
function, and (b) prepare the report of the Audit Committee, which is included in this proxy
statement. The Audit Committee held ten meetings during 2005.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee currently consists of three independent
directors, as defined by the New York Stock Exchanges listing standards: Mr. Cole, the chair, Mr.
Tusher and Mr. Reid. The function of the Compensation Committee is to discharge the Boards
responsibilities relating to compensation of our directors and executive officers. The
Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating our director and
employee compensation plans, policies and programs, including our Third Amended and Restated 1997
Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, our 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended,
our 401(k) plan, the Amended and Restated AMB Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and any
other incentive programs. During 2005, the Compensation Committee held seven meetings.
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee currently consists of Mr. Burke, the chair, Mr.
Moghadam and Dr. Skelton. The Executive Committee has the authority, within certain parameters, to
acquire, dispose of and finance investments for us (including the issuance by AMB Property, L.P. of
additional limited partnership units or other equity interests) and approve the execution of
contracts and agreements including those related to the borrowing of money by us and generally
exercise all other powers of the Board, except as prohibited by law. During 2005, the Executive
Committee acted once by unanimous written consent.
Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee currently
consists of four independent directors, as defined by the New York Stock Exchanges listing
standards: Ms. Kennard, the chair, Mr. Cole, Mr. Reid and Ms. Beschloss. The purposes of the
Nominating and Governance Committee are (a) to assist the Board by identifying individuals
qualified to become Board members and to recommend to the Board nominees for the next annual
meeting of stockholders, (b) to recommend to the Board the corporate governance principles
applicable to us, (c) to lead the Board in its annual review of its performance, and (d) to
recommend to the Board members and chairpersons of each committee. The Nominating and Governance
Committee met four times during 2005.
To identify potential nominees for the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee first
evaluates the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the
Board are considered for re-nomination, balancing the value of their continued service with that of
obtaining new perspectives and in view of our developing needs. If necessary, the Nominating and
Governance Committee then solicits ideas for possible candidates from a number of sources, which
can include other Board members, senior management, individuals personally known to members of the
Board and research. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also retain a third party to
assist it in identifying potential nominees, however, the committee has not done so in the past.
The Nominating and Governance Committee will also consider nominees to our Board recommended by
stockholders with respect to elections to be held at an annual meeting if notice of the nomination
is timely delivered in writing to our Secretary prior to the meeting. To be timely, the notice
must be delivered within the time permitted for submission of a stockholder proposal as described
under Advance Notice Procedures Deadline for Submitting Nominations for Director and Other
Stockholder Proposals Outside of Rule 14a-8. The notice must include:
|
|
|
information regarding the stockholder making the nomination, including name, address,
and the number of shares of our stock beneficially owned by the stockholder; |
|
|
|
|
a representation that the stockholder is entitled to vote at the annual meeting at
which directors will be elected, and that the stockholder intends to appear in person or
by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person(s) specified in the notice; |
|
|
|
|
the name and address of the person(s) being nominated and such other information
regarding each nominee that would be required in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions proxy rules if the person had been nominated
for election by the Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
a description of any arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and such
nominee and any other persons (including their names), pursuant to which the nomination
is made; and |
|
|
|
|
the consent of each such nominee to serve as a director if elected. |
The Nominating and Governance Committee will evaluate nominees recommended by stockholders
against the same criteria that it uses to evaluate other nominees. These criteria include the
candidates skills, experience and personal qualities, as well as the other factors discussed in
the Nominating and Governance Committee charter, which are evaluated in the context of the
perceived needs of the Board at any given point in time.
10
Compensation of Directors
The Boards overall compensation philosophy in connection with our non-employee directors is
to provide a mix of cash and equity-based compensation with a total compensation level targeted at
the 50th percentile of general industry and at or above the 75th percentile
of our peer companies based on an analysis performed by our compensation consultant, Towers Perrin.
Our officers who are also members of our Board of Directors are not paid any directors fees nor
granted equity as directors in addition to their regular employee compensation.
For meetings held during 2005, each non-employee director received $2,000 for each meeting of
the Board of Directors and $1,500 for each meeting of a committee of the Board of Directors
attended, and, for their service during 2005, the chairs of the Compensation Committee and the
Nominating & Governance Committee received an additional $8,000, the chair of the Audit Committee
received an additional $12,000, and the chair of the Executive Committee received an additional
$5,000. In addition, Dr. Skelton received an additional $8,000 for services performed as lead
director. Each non-employee director is also reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend
Board and committee meetings and educational programs.
Upon initial election to the Board, each non-employee director automatically receives an
initial stock option grant under our 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, to purchase
20,000 shares of our common stock. This initial stock option grant fully vests on the date of the
next annual meeting of stockholders and has a term of ten years within which it can be exercised.
In addition to the directors automatic initial stock option grants, we grant stock options
and/or restricted common stock to our non-employee directors on a discretionary basis under our
2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Such stock option grants are granted at an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The Board of Directors
determines the amount of stock options and/or restricted stock to be granted to non-employee
directors on an annual basis. In making this determination, the Board of Directors considers
analyses of our compensation consultant to determine competitive director compensation practices of
publicly traded real estate investment trusts and of publicly traded companies in general industry
having total market capitalizations comparable to us. We expect that non-employee directors
re-elected at each annual meeting of stockholders will be granted additional stock options and/or
restricted stock by the Board of Directors.
During 2005, upon re-election, each non-employee director received a subsequent grant of
restricted common stock, stock options or any combination of both, at their option, valued in
aggregate at $80,000 (so long as the restricted stock portion equaled at least 60% of the value of
their election). In addition to her initial grant of an option to purchase up to 20,000 shares of
our common stock granted on August 8, 2005, Ms. Beschloss also received 1,000 shares of our
restricted common stock on September 22, 2005 as compensation for her service during 2005. All of
Ms. Beschloss options fully vest on May 11, 2006, and her shares of restricted stock fully vest on
May 11, 2006.
Vote Required
A plurality of the votes cast at a meeting at which a quorum is present is required for the
election of directors (i.e., the nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected).
Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of the election of directors and do
not have any effect on the result of the vote for the election of directors. The Board recommends
a vote FOR the election of each of the ten director nominees to serve until the next annual meeting
of stockholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.
11
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, our Board of Directors has selected
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006 and has further directed that management submit the selection of our
independent registered public accounting firm for ratification by the stockholders at the Annual
Meeting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP has audited our financial statements since May 8, 2002.
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting and
will have the opportunity to make statements if they desire and to respond to appropriate questions
from stockholders.
Stockholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent
registered public accounting firm is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise. However, the Board
is submitting the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to our stockholders for ratification as a
matter of good corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit
Committee and the Board will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection
is ratified, the Audit Committee and the Board in their discretion may direct the appointment of a
different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if they
determine that such a change would be in the best interests of our stockholders.
Fees Paid to Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
During 2004 and 2005, we retained PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered
public accounting firm to provide services in the following categories and amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 |
|
|
Fiscal 2005 |
|
Audit Fees(1) |
|
$ |
1,745,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,486,807 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2) |
|
|
107,120 |
|
|
|
172,371 |
|
Tax Fees(3) |
|
|
533,596 |
|
|
|
535,274 |
|
All Other Fees(4) |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees |
|
$ |
2,388,116 |
|
|
$ |
2,196,452 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Audit Fees include amounts related to professional services rendered in
connection with the audits of our annual financial statements and those of
our subsidiaries, the reviews of our quarterly financial statements, the
audit of internal control over financial reporting and other services that
are normally provided by the auditor in connection with statutory and
regulatory filings or engagements. |
|
(2) |
|
Audit-Related Fees include amounts billed for assurance and
related services by the auditors that are reasonably related to the
performance of the audit or review of our financial statements but are not
reported under Audit Fees. These amounts primarily relate to businessmens
audits in connection with acquisition due diligence, consultations on
financial accounting and reporting standards and the audit of our 401(k)
plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Tax Fees include amounts billed for professional services rendered
by the accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These
amounts primarily relate to certain tax services, including tax advisory and
consulting services and tax advice relating to development, acquisition and
disposition activities. |
|
(4) |
|
All Other Fees include amounts related to technical research
tools. |
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided
by our independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to
one year and is detailed as to the particular services or category of services. The Audit
Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its chair for instances when approval outside of
the scope of services previously approved is necessary prior to an Audit Committee meeting. Our
independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to
the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered
public accounting firm in accordance with the pre-approval authority, and the fees for the services
performed to such date. In the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Audit Committee or its
chair approved all of the fees paid to the independent registered public accounting firm under the
categories Audit-Related, Tax and All Other Fees described above prior to the rendering of such
services.
The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is compatible with maintaining their independence, and determined it was
so.
12
Vote Required
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting, at which a quorum
is present, either in person or by proxy, is required to approve this proposal. Abstentions and
broker non-votes are not counted for purposes of the ratification of the selection of the
independent registered public accounting firm and do not have an effect on the result of the vote
for this proposal. The Board recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the selection of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2006.
13
CERTAIN INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following is a biographical summary of the experience of our executive officers:
|
|
|
Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Mr. Moghadam has served as our Chief Executive
Officer since November 1997 and as Chairman of the
Board since January 2000. |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Biographical information regarding Mr. Moghadam is
set forth under Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Nominees For Director. |
|
|
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Mr. Baird has served as our President since January
2000 and as a Director since May 2001. |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Biographical information regarding Mr. Baird is set
forth under Proposal 1: Election of Directors
Nominees For Director. |
|
|
|
Michael A. Coke |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Mr. Coke joined us in 1997 and served in a variety
of officer positions in our Financial Management
and Reporting Department prior to becoming our
Chief Financial Officer in January 1999. Prior to
joining us, Mr. Coke spent seven years with Arthur
Andersen LLP, where he most recently served as an
audit manager. At Arthur Andersen, he primarily
served public and private real estate companies,
including several public real estate investment
trusts, and specialized in real estate auditing and
accounting, mergers, initial public offerings and
business acquisition due diligence. Mr. Coke
received a bachelors degree in business
administration and accounting from California State
University at Hayward. He is a Certified Public
Accountant. |
|
|
|
Bruce H. Freedman |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Executive Vice President, Real Estate Operations |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Mr. Freedman joined AMB in 1995 and has over 30
years of experience in real estate finance and
investment. He also serves as Vice Chairman of our
Investment Committee. Mr. Freedman will retire
from full-time employment with us on April 1, 2006.
Before joining us, he served as President of
Allmerica Realty Advisors from 1992 to 1995 and as
Principal of Aldrich, Eastman & Waltch (AEW) from
1986 to 1992. Mr. Freedman is a cum laude graduate
of Babson College. He is a member of the Urban
Land Institute, Real Estate Finance Association, a
Board member of National Association of Industrial
and Office Parks (NAIOP) and holds the CRE
designation from the American Society of Real
Estate Counselors. His charitable and community
services activities include the Bullfinch Society
of Massachusetts General Hospital, Childrens
Hospital of Boston, and Newton-Wellesley Hospital. |
14
|
|
|
Guy F. Jaquier |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Executive Vice President, President Europe & Asia |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Mr. Jaquier joined us in June 2000 and served as
our Executive Vice President, Chief Investment
Officer from June 2000 to December 31, 2005. He
served as Vice Chairman of AMB Capital Partners,
LLC, one of our subsidiaries from January 2001
to December 2005, and currently serves as an
officer or director of a number of our other
subsidiaries, including, WestRock, Ltd., the
sole shareholder of AMB BlackPine Ltd., and AMB
Mexico Holdings, LLC. Mr. Jaquier has over 20
years of experience in real estate finance and
investments. Between 1998 and June 2000, Mr.
Jaquier served as Senior Investment Officer for
real estate at the California Public Employees
Retirement System, where his responsibilities
included managing a $12 billion real estate
portfolio. Prior to that, Mr. Jaquier spent 15
years at Lend Lease Real Estate Investments and
its predecessor, Equitable Real Estate, where he
held various transactions and management
positions. He holds a B.S. in Building
Construction Management from the University of
Washington and an M.B.A. from the Harvard
Graduate School of Business Administration. |
|
|
|
Eugene F. Reilly |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Executive Vice President, President North America |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Mr. Reilly joined us in October 2003 and has
over 20 years of experience in real estate
development, acquisition, disposition, financing
and leasing throughout the United States. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Reilly served as Chief
Investment Officer at Cabot Properties, Inc. Mr.
Reilly was a founding partner of Cabot
Properties, and his tenure there, including its
predecessor companies, spanned from 1992 to
2003. From 1985 to 1992, Mr. Reilly served in a
variety of capacities at National Development
Corporation, ultimately serving as Senior Vice
President. Mr. Reilly holds an A.B. in Economics
from Harvard College and was a member of the
National Association of Industrial and Office
Parks (NAIOP) where he has served on the
National Industrial Education Committee and is a
former member of the board of directors of the
Massachusetts chapter. |
|
|
|
John T. Roberts, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Age:
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
Position(s):
|
|
Executive Vice President, Private Capital;
President of AMB Capital Partners, LLC |
|
|
|
Biographical information:
|
|
Mr. Roberts has over 17 years of experience in
real estate finance and investment. Mr. Roberts
joined us in 1997 and has served in a variety of
officer positions in our Capital Markets
Department and our Private Capital group. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Roberts spent six years at
Ameritech Pension Trust, where he held the
position of Director, Real Estate Investments.
His responsibilities included managing a $1.6
billion real estate portfolio and developing and
implementing the trusts real estate program.
Prior to that, he worked for Richard Ellis, Inc.
and has experience in leasing and sales. Mr.
Roberts received a bachelors degree from Tulane
University in New Orleans and an M.B.A. degree
in finance and accounting from the Graduate
School of Business at the University of Chicago. |
15
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the annual base salary rates and other compensation paid for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 to the Chief Executive Officer and our five most
highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as
executive officers at the end of 2005 (collectively, the Named Executive Officers).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
Long-Term Compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Underlying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual |
|
Restricted Stock |
|
Annual Options |
|
Other Annual |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus(1) |
|
Compensation |
|
Award(s)(2) |
|
Granted(3) |
|
Compensation |
Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
564,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
(4) |
|
$ |
21,823 |
(5) |
|
$ |
5,005,088 |
(6) |
|
|
0 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
Chairman and CEO |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
488,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
17,841 |
(5) |
|
|
1,515,292 |
(7) |
|
|
142,718 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
437,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(4) |
|
|
15,133 |
(5) |
|
|
944,968 |
(8) |
|
|
315,088 |
(11) |
|
|
5,500 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
426,500 |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
(13) |
|
|
14,016 |
(5) |
|
$ |
2,707,939 |
(6) |
|
|
0 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
President and Director |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
413,000 |
|
|
|
372,500 |
|
|
|
5,877 |
(5) |
|
|
768,000 |
(7) |
|
|
46,601 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
412,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(13) |
|
|
3,364 |
(5) |
|
|
1,193,727 |
(8) |
|
|
60,679 |
(11) |
|
|
5,500 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Freedman |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
344,000 |
|
|
$ |
577,524 |
|
|
|
1,979 |
(5) |
|
$ |
1,200,000 |
(6) |
|
|
0 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
Executive
Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
325,500 |
|
|
|
0 |
(14) |
|
|
1,536 |
(5) |
|
|
1,077,482 |
(7) |
|
|
0 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
Operations |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
312,000 |
|
|
|
255,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(5) |
|
|
499,987 |
(8) |
|
|
0 |
(11) |
|
|
5,500 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
319,000 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
(15) |
|
|
8,248 |
(5) |
|
$ |
1,674,783 |
(6) |
|
|
0 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
300,500 |
|
|
|
273,500 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
(5) |
|
|
764,992 |
(7) |
|
|
0 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
Private Capital |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
287,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
(15) |
|
|
3,364 |
(5) |
|
|
687,464 |
(8) |
|
|
0 |
(11) |
|
|
5,500 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael A. Coke
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
319,000 |
|
|
$ |
123,912 |
(16) |
|
|
8,248 |
(5) |
|
$ |
1,232,528 |
(6) |
|
|
29,447 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
Executive Vice President |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
300,500 |
|
|
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
4,702 |
(5) |
|
|
309,984 |
(7) |
|
|
0 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
287,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
(16) |
|
|
3,364 |
(5) |
|
|
568,708 |
(8) |
|
|
33,373 |
(11) |
|
|
5,500 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eugene F. Reilly
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
$ |
319,000 |
|
|
$ |
495,647 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
(5) |
|
$ |
959,949 |
(6) |
|
|
0 |
(9) |
|
$ |
6,300 |
(12) |
Executive Vice President, |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
263,000 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
(18) |
|
|
1,536 |
(5) |
|
|
493,105 |
(7) |
|
|
0 |
(10) |
|
|
5,638 |
(12) |
President North America |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
58,814 |
(17) |
|
|
0 |
(18) |
|
|
0 |
(5) |
|
|
289,583 |
(8) |
|
|
8,737 |
(11) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined the amount of any such
bonus. The bonuses for 2005 were paid in 2006. The bonuses for 2004 were paid in 2005.
The bonuses for 2003 were paid in 2004. At the option of the Named Executive Officer, the
officer may receive his bonus in any combination of cash, restricted shares of our common
stock (valued at 125% of the cash bonus, with a three-year vesting period) or options to
purchase shares of our common stock (valued at 150% of the cash bonus in 2005 and 2004
based on a standardized discounted binomial value and 135% of the cash bonus in 2003 based
on our Black-Scholes value, with a three-year vesting period on options in excess of the
100% cash bonus value and immediate vesting of the remainder). |
|
(2) |
|
Dividends will be paid on the restricted stock granted to our directors, executive
officers and other employees. As of December 31, 2005, Mr. Moghadam held 90,725 shares of
our restricted stock, valued at $4,460,948, Mr. Baird held 74,848 shares of our restricted
stock, valued at $3,680,276, Mr. Freedman held 61,274 shares of our restricted stock,
valued at $3,012,843, Mr. Roberts held 47,672 shares of our restricted stock, valued at
$2,344,032, Mr. Coke held 36,918 shares of our restricted stock, valued at $1,815,258, and
Mr. Reilly held 18,502 shares of our restricted stock, valued at $909,743. Such
restricted stock values are based on the closing price per share of our common stock of
$49.17 on December 30, 2005. All of our restricted stock grants vest annually in either
three or five equal installments assuming continued employment. |
|
(3) |
|
In calculating the number of our stock options that our officers received in our
compensation program for (i) 2005 performance, the Compensation Committee used a value of
$6.52 per share, (ii) 2004 performance, the Compensation Committee used a value of $4.12
per share, and (iii) for 2003 performance, the Compensation Committee used a value of $4.12
per share. The values for 2005 and 2004 performance were determined by our independent
compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, using a discounted binomial methodology, based on a
standardized set of assumptions so that our compensation was comparable to, and remained
competitive with, that of our peer companies. However, for purposes of determining the
impact of stock option grants on our total compensation expense, we value the number of
shares subject to the stock option grants using a Black-Scholes methodology based on
company-specific assumptions. The Black-Scholes value of our stock options for 2005 awards
is $8.54 per share, and for 2004 awards, was $4.48 per share. For 2003 performance, we
used our Black-Scholes value of our stock options, $4.12 per share, both to calculate the
number of our stock options granted to our officers for 2003 awards and for purposes of
expensing such stock option grants over their vesting periods. For stock option grants
made to our Named Executive Officers for 2005 performance, the aggregate value of the
options received using Towers Perrins discounted binomial methodology is $191,994, and the
aggregate value of the options which we will expense over the vesting periods using our
Black-Scholes methodology is $251,477. |
|
(4) |
|
For performance in 2005, Mr. Moghadam was awarded a bonus of $1,444,110. In lieu of
receiving his 2005 bonus in cash, Mr. Moghadam elected to receive a grant of 34,767
restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2004, Mr. Moghadam was awarded a
bonus of $506,648. In lieu of receiving his 2004 bonus in cash, Mr. Moghadam elected to
receive a grant of 16,424 restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2003,
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Moghadam was awarded a bonus of $494,939. In lieu of receiving his 2003 bonus in cash, Mr.
Moghadam elected to receive an option to purchase up to 162,176 shares of our common stock. |
|
(5) |
|
The Named Executive Officers received reimbursements during each fiscal year for payment
of taxes with respect to parking and financial planning services, which is reflected in
this column. The aggregate amount of the perquisites and other personal benefits,
securities or property for each of the Named Executive Officers, which is comprised of an
allowance for parking and financial planning services, is less than the lesser of either
$50,000 or 10% of his salary and bonus paid in such year. |
|
(6) |
|
Based on 2005 performance, each of the Named Executive Officers received a grant of
restricted shares of our common stock on February 6, 2006 based on the fair market value of
our common stock on that date of $51.92. The grants of restricted shares were made under
the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, and vest annually in five equal
installments, beginning on January 1, 2007. Also, certain Named Executive Officers elected
to receive at least part of their 2005 bonus in restricted stock. The grants of restricted
shares with respect to the 2005 bonuses were made under the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, as amended, and vest annually in three equal installments, beginning on January 1,
2007. For 2005, in aggregate, Mr. Moghadam was awarded 96,400 shares of our restricted
stock, Mr. Baird was awarded 52,156 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Freedman was
awarded 23,112 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Roberts was awarded 33,257 shares of our
restricted stock, Mr. Coke was awarded 23,739 shares of our restricted stock, and Mr.
Reilly was awarded 18,489 shares of our restricted stock. |
|
(7) |
|
Based on 2004 performance, each of the Named Executive Officers received a grant of
restricted shares of our common stock on February 7, 2005 based on the fair market value of
our common stock on that date of $38.56. The grants of restricted shares were made under
the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, and vest annually in five equal
installments, beginning on January 1, 2006. Also, certain Named Executive Officers elected
to receive at least part of their 2004 bonus in restricted stock. The grants of restricted
shares with respect to the 2004 bonuses were made under the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, as amended, and vest annually in three equal installments, beginning on January 1,
2006. For 2004, in aggregate, Mr. Moghadam was awarded 39,297 shares of our restricted
stock, Mr. Baird was awarded 19,917 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Freedman was
awarded 27,943 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Roberts was awarded 19,839 shares of our
restricted stock, Mr. Coke was awarded 8,039 shares of our restricted stock, and Mr. Reilly
was awarded 12,788 shares of our restricted stock. |
|
(8) |
|
Based on 2003 performance, each of the Named Executive Officers received a grant of
restricted shares of our common stock on January 27, 2004 based on the fair market value of
our common stock on that date of $35.26. The grants of restricted shares were made under
the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, and vest annually in five equal
installments, beginning on January 1, 2005. Also, certain Named Executive Officers elected
to receive at least part of their 2003 bonus in restricted stock. The grants of restricted
shares with respect to the 2003 bonuses were made under the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive
Plan, as amended, and vest annually in three equal installments, beginning on January 1,
2005. For 2003, in aggregate, Mr. Moghadam was awarded 26,800 shares of our restricted
stock, Mr. Baird was awarded 33,855 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Freedman was
awarded 14,180 shares of our restricted stock, Mr. Roberts was awarded 19,497 shares of our
restricted stock, Mr. Coke was awarded 16,129 shares of our restricted stock, and Mr.
Reilly was awarded 8,917 shares of our restricted stock (which includes a grant of 6,500
restricted shares of our common stock awarded to Mr. Reilly upon commencement of his
employment with us that vest annually in five equal installments). |
|
(9) |
|
Based on 2005 performance, certain Named Executive Officers received options to purchase
shares of our common stock on February 6, 2006. All of these options become exercisable in
three equal annual installments, beginning on January 1, 2007, and have a term of not more
than 10 years. All option exercise prices are equal to the fair market value of our common
stock on the date of grant. |
|
(10) |
|
Based on 2004 performance, certain Named Executive Officers received options to purchase
shares of our common stock on February 7, 2005. All of these options become exercisable in
three equal annual installments, beginning on January 1, 2006, and have a term of not more
than 10 years. Also, certain Named Executive Officers elected to receive at least part of
their 2004 bonus in options. All of these options become exercisable in three equal annual
installments, beginning on January 1, 2006, and have a term of not more than 10 years. All
option exercise prices are equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date
of grant. |
|
(11) |
|
Based on 2003 performance, certain Named Executive Officers received options to purchase
shares of our common stock on January 27, 2004. All of these options become exercisable in
three equal annual installments, beginning on January 1, 2005, and have a term of not more
than 10 years. Also, certain Named Executive Officers elected to receive at least part of
their 2003 bonus in options. All of these options become exercisable in three equal annual
installments, beginning on January 1, 2004, and have a term of not more than 10 years. All
option exercise prices are equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date
of grant. |
|
(12) |
|
Under AMBs 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan, the company contributed the maximum
allowable matching contribution amounts under the plan for each of 2005, 2004 and 2003 to
each Named Executive Officer. |
|
(13) |
|
For performance in 2005, Mr. Baird was awarded a bonus of $902,419. In lieu of receiving
his entire 2005 bonus in cash, Mr. Baird elected to receive $400,000 in cash and a grant of
12,095 restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2003, Mr. Baird was
awarded a bonus of $355,000. In lieu of receiving his 2003 bonus in cash, Mr. Baird
elected to receive a grant of 12,585 restricted shares of our common stock. |
|
(14) |
|
For performance in 2004, Mr. Freedman was awarded a bonus of $262,000. In lieu of
receiving his 2004 bonus in cash, Mr. Freedman elected to receive a grant of 8,493
restricted shares of our common stock. |
|
(15) |
|
For performance in 2005, Mr. Roberts was awarded a bonus of $571,901. In lieu of
receiving his 2005 bonus in cash, Mr. Roberts elected to receive a grant of 13,768
restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2003, Mr. Roberts was awarded a
bonus of $230,000. In lieu of receiving his 2003 bonus in cash, Mr. Roberts elected to
receive a grant of 8,153 restricted shares of our common stock. |
|
(16) |
|
For performance in 2005, Mr. Coke was awarded a bonus of $495,647. In lieu of receiving
his entire 2005 bonus in cash, Mr. Coke elected to receive $123,912 in cash and a grant of
8,948 restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2003, Mr. Coke was awarded
a bonus of $250,000. In lieu of receiving his 2003 bonus in cash, Mr. Coke elected to
receive $125,000 in cash and a grant of 4,431 restricted shares of our common stock. |
|
(17) |
|
Mr. Reilly commenced employment with us on October 7, 2003. |
|
(18) |
|
For performance in 2004, Mr. Reilly was awarded a bonus of $125,000. In lieu of receiving
his entire 2004 bonus in cash, Mr. Reilly elected to receive $62,500 in cash and a grant of
2,026 restricted shares of our common stock. For performance in 2003, Mr. Reilly was
awarded a bonus of $25,000. In lieu of receiving his entire 2003 bonus in cash, Mr. Reilly
elected to receive a grant of 886 restricted shares of our common stock. |
17
Option Grants Relating to the Last Fiscal Year
The following table shows certain information relating to options to purchase shares of our
common stock granted to the Named Executive Officers in connection with performance in 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants(1) |
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realizable Value of |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Total Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Annual Rates of Common |
|
|
Underlying |
|
Granted to |
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price Appreciation for Option |
|
|
Options |
|
Employees in |
|
Price Per |
|
Expiration |
|
Term(3) |
Name |
|
Granted(#)(1) |
|
Fiscal Year(2) |
|
Share($) |
|
Date |
|
5% |
|
10% |
Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Bruce Freedman |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
John T. Roberts, Jr. |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Michael A. Coke |
|
|
29,447 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
51.92 |
|
|
|
2/6/2016 |
|
|
$ |
1,201,895 |
|
|
$ |
3,045,838 |
|
Eugene F. Reilly |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All options granted to Named Executive Officers with respect to 2005 were granted on
February 6, 2006 and become exercisable in three equal annual installments (rounded to
the nearest whole share of our common stock) on January 1, 2007, 2008 and 2009. All
options granted with respect to 2005 to Named Executive Officers vest fully on January
1, 2009 and have a term of not more than 10 years. The option exercise price is equal
to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. |
|
(2) |
|
The total number of shares of common stock underlying such options used in such
calculation is as of February 6, 2006, the grant date of the annual options relating to
2005 performance. |
|
(3) |
|
In accordance with the rules promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, these amounts are the hypothetical gains or option spreads that would
exist for the respective options based on assumed rates of annual compound share price
appreciation of 5% and 10% from the date the options were granted over the full option
term. No gain to the optionee is possible without an increase in the price of our
common stock, which would benefit all stockholders. Such amounts have been calculated
as the exercise price multiplied by the respective annual assumed growth rate
(compounded), less the exercise price of the underlying option, multiplied by the
number of options granted. |
Aggregated Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth certain information concerning exercised and unexercised
options held by the Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants(1) Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Securities Underlying |
|
Value of Unexercised In-the- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at |
|
Money Options at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2005(1) |
|
|
Shares Acquired |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
on Exercise (#) |
|
Realized ($) |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
|
Exercisable |
|
Unexercisable |
Hamid R. Moghadam |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3,204,773 |
|
|
|
402,420 |
|
|
$ |
80,377,439 |
|
|
$ |
6,182,703 |
|
W. Blake Baird |
|
|
261,200 |
|
|
|
5,524,332 |
|
|
|
396,985 |
|
|
|
127,902 |
|
|
$ |
9,105,870 |
|
|
$ |
1,957,844 |
|
Bruce Freedman |
|
|
370,835 |
|
|
|
6,065,310 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
John T. Roberts, Jr. |
|
|
128,482 |
|
|
|
3,245,514 |
|
|
|
338,777 |
|
|
|
21,945 |
|
|
$ |
7,789,732 |
|
|
$ |
483,887 |
|
Michael A. Coke |
|
|
283,015 |
|
|
|
5,407,133 |
|
|
|
156,667 |
|
|
|
44,715 |
|
|
$ |
3,447,511 |
|
|
$ |
804,867 |
|
Eugene F. Reilly |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,913 |
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
$ |
40,520 |
|
|
$ |
81,012 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on a price per share of our common stock of $49.17, the closing price per
share on the New York Stock Exchange on December 30, 2005. |
18
Equity Compensation Plan Information
We have two equity compensation plans: (1) the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan, as amended, and (2) the 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended. A
total of 18,950,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance pursuant to the plans.
Currently, awards under the stock option and incentive plans consist of non-qualified stock options
and restricted shares of common stock. Our stockholders have approved both stock option and
incentive plans. As of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to be |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities remaining |
|
|
issued upon exercise of |
|
Weighted-average exercise |
|
available for future issuance |
Plan Category |
|
outstanding options |
|
price of outstanding options |
|
under equity compensation plans |
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders |
|
|
9,148,437 |
|
|
$ |
27.13716 |
|
|
|
3,872,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders |
|
None |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
The Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, was adopted
by the Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders to enable executive officers, employees
and consultants of AMB Property Corporation and certain subsidiaries, and directors of AMB Property
Corporation, to participate in the ownership of AMB Property Corporation. The 1997 plan is
designed to attract and retain our executive officers, other key employees and directors, and to
provide incentives to such persons to maximize our performance. The 1997 plan currently covers an
aggregate of 8,950,000 shares of our common stock and will expire in 2007.
Employees and consultants of AMB Property Corporation and certain subsidiaries, and directors
of AMB Property Corporation, may receive options, stock payments, performance awards, restricted
stock, dividend equivalents, deferred stock and stock appreciation rights under the 1997 plan. Our
employees and consultants also may receive stock appreciation rights under the 1997 plan. In
addition, Non-Employee Directors (as defined in the 1997 plan) and our employees and consultants
may receive options to purchase shares of our common stock under the 1997 plan, however, we
generally are no longer issuing equity from this plan.
2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
The 2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, was adopted by the Board of Directors on
February 26, 2002 and approved by the stockholders on May 30, 2002 to enable executive officers,
employees and consultants of AMB Property Corporation and certain subsidiaries, and directors of
AMB Property Corporation, to participate in the ownership of AMB Property Corporation. The 2002
plan is designed to attract and retain our executive officers, other employees and directors, and
to provide incentives to such persons to maximize our performance. The 2002 plan currently covers
an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock and will expire in 2012.
Employees and consultants of AMB Property Corporation and certain subsidiaries, and directors
of AMB Property Corporation, may receive options, stock payments, performance awards, restricted
stock, dividend equivalents, deferred stock and stock appreciation rights under the 2002 plan.
Only employees of AMB Property Corporation or its subsidiaries that are corporations may receive
incentive stock options under the 2002 plan. New employees employed in our U.S. offices generally
receive initial grants of stock options or restricted stock under the 2002 plan when such employees
begin employment with us, which vest over a number of years, assuming continued employment.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Because the Board of Directors of AMB Property Corporation believes strongly in linking the
interests of our non-employee directors, senior officers and stockholders, the Board has
established stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors and senior officers. The
ownership guidelines specify a number of shares and/or partnership units that AMBs non-employee
directors and senior officers (Senior Vice Presidents and above) must accumulate and hold.
Non-employee directors are expected to own or acquire, by the later of September 2007 or three
years of first becoming a director, shares having a market value of at least $100,000. Senior
officers are expected to own or acquire a certain amount of shares or units by the later of
September 2009 or five years after the officers appointment to a senior position. The specific share and unit requirements for
senior officers are based on the equity market
19
value of a multiple of annual base salary
compensation, with the higher multiples applying to executive officers having the highest levels of
responsibility. Our chief executive officer is expected to hold shares and/or units worth at least
five times his base salary; our president and executive vice presidents are expected to hold shares
and/or units worth at least three times their base salary; and our senior vice presidents are
expected to hold shares and/or units worth at least one times their base salary.
401(k) Plan
Effective November 26, 1997, we established our Section 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan to
cover our eligible employees. The 401(k) plan currently permits our eligible employees to defer up
to 20% of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. Employees at least 50 years of age by the end of 2005 were eligible to
make additional 401(k) catch-up contributions to a maximum of $4,000. The employees elective
deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contributions to the 401(k) plan. We
currently make matching cash contributions to the 401(k) plan in an amount equal to 50% of the
first 6.0% of annual compensation deferred by each employee; however, we have reserved the right to
make greater matching contributions or discretionary profit sharing contributions in the future.
Participants employed by us prior to January 1, 2000 vest immediately in the matching
contributions, whereas participants employed by us on or after January 1, 2000 vest fully in the
matching contributions on the first anniversary of the commencement of their employment with us.
We made no discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan in 2005. Our employees are eligible to
participate in the 401(k) plan if they meet certain requirements concerning a minimum period of
credited service. In connection with the 401(k) plan, we paid approximately $0.65 million in cash
with respect to our matching contribution for the year ended December 31, 2005. Our common stock
is not an investment option available to employees pursuant to the terms of the 401(k) plan. The
401(k) plan qualifies under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, so that
contributions by employees to the 401(k) plan, and income earned on plan contributions, are not
taxable to employees until withdrawn from the 401(k) plan.
Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
During 2002, we amended and restated our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan which allows
our directors, management, and certain highly compensated employees, namely, our officers and the
officers of certain of our affiliates, to defer receiving certain of their compensation. The
Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan enables participants who are
employees to defer up to 100% of their annual base pay and up to 100% of the cash portion of their
annual bonuses on a pre-tax basis, participants who are non-employee members of our Board of
Directors to defer all or a portion of their meeting fees and/or committee chairmanship fees, and
participants who participate in our stock option and incentive plans to defer the receipt of
certain equity-based compensation that they receive under such plans, subject to restrictions.
This deferred compensation is our unsecured obligation. Participants select from various investment
options available under the plan to invest their elective deferrals. There are no guaranteed
returns for any of the investment options or for any participants in the plan. Company stock is
not an investment option available to either employees who elect to defer a portion of their annual
base pay or their cash bonus or non-employee directors who elect to defer all or a portion of their
meeting fees and/or chairmanship fees. When a participant defers the receipt of equity-based
compensation, the amounts must be deferred in our company stock, and at no time can these deferrals
into company stock be reinvested in any other investment option. Dividends earned on deferred
amounts must be invested in investments options other than our common stock.
The Company expects to adopt a new deferred compensation plan in 2006 that complies with
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations. During 2005, we believe that we
operated our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan in good faith compliance
with Section 409A guidance provided by the IRS.
We have reserved the right under The Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan to make discretionary matching contributions to participant accounts from time to time. We
made no discretionary contributions in 2005. The participants elective deferrals and any matching
contributions are 100% vested immediately. We pay all of the administrative costs of the plan.
The following Named Executive Officers participate in our Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan. With respect to 2005 compensation, Mr. Moghadam elected to defer 100% of his salary and 100%
of the restricted stock portion of his bonus and long-term incentive award under the plan; Mr.
Freedman elected to defer 50% of his salary, 100% of his cash bonus and 100% of the restricted
stock portion of his bonus and long-term compensation under the plan; Mr. Roberts elected to defer
22% of his salary and 100% of the restricted stock portion of his long-term compensation under the
plan; and Mr. Coke elected to defer 100% of the restricted stock portion of his bonus and long-term
compensation under the plan.
20
Employment Agreements; Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreements
Currently, there are no employment agreements between us and any of the Named Executive
Officers. However, each of our executive officers, including Named Executive Officers, has entered
into a Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreement with us which, other than in the case of
Messrs. Baird, Coke, Jaquier and Reilly, became effective on November 26, 1998, and which replaced
the employment agreements that generally had been entered into at the time of our initial public
offering. Mr. Baird entered into such an agreement with us on January 20, 1999, his first day of
employment; Messrs. Coke and Roberts entered into such agreements with us on January 1, 2000, when
they became Executive Vice Presidents; Mr. Jaquier entered into such an agreement with us on June
20, 2000, his first day of employment; and Mr. Reilly entered into such an agreement with us on
October 7, 2003, his first day of employment. In December 2004, each of our executive officers,
including the Named Executive Officers, executed an amended and restated Change in Control and
Noncompetition Agreement with us. The amended and restated agreements had an initial expiration
date of November 26, 2005, but are subject to automatic one-year extensions following the
expiration of the initial terms.
As amended and restated, the agreements provide for severance payments during the term of the
agreement in the event of a termination of the executive officers employment resulting from death,
disability or termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason within two years
following a change in control (as defined in the agreements). Upon death or disability, severance
benefits include base compensation, for a period of 12 months following the termination of
employment, and a bonus based on the most recent amount paid. In the event of a change in control,
severance benefits, payable following the change in control, include an amount equal to twice (i)
annual base compensation and (ii) a bonus calculated based on the average of the most recent
amounts paid over the last three years, as well as certain continuing insurance and other benefits.
In addition, the amended and restated agreements provide that, among other things, (a) following a
change in control, we are required to continue to provide health and dental benefits and life and
disability insurance to the executive and the executives eligible family members for a period of
24 months following such termination, (b) we are required to make gross-up payments of
excise taxes to the executive with respect to certain severance payments made to our executive
officers following a change in control such that after payment by the executive of all taxes, the
executive retains an amount of the gross-up payment equal to the excise tax imposed upon the
payments, and (c) upon a change of control, all options, restricted stock and other awards based
upon our equity securities held by the executive shall immediately become fully vested, exercisable
or payable, as the case may be.
For purposes of the agreements, a change in control will be deemed to have occurred if (i) our
stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation of AMB Property Corporation or an agreement for
the sale or disposition by AMB Property Corporation of all or substantially all of our assets, or
we dispose of more than 50% of our interest in AMB Property, L.P.; (ii) any person becomes the
beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities representing 40% or more of the combined
voting power of our then outstanding securities; (iii) during any period of two consecutive years,
individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute our Board of Directors, and any new
director whose election by the Board or nomination for election by our stockholders was approved by
a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors at
the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so
approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board of Directors; or (iv)
our stockholders approve a merger or consolidation of AMB Property Corporation with any other
corporation or other entity, other than (A) a merger or consolidation which would result in our
voting securities outstanding immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by
remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity) more
than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities of AMB Property Corporation or such
surviving entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation or (B) where more than
50% of the directors of AMB Property Corporation or the surviving entity after such merger or
consolidation were directors of AMB Property Corporation immediately before such merger or
consolidation.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Cole, the chair, Mr. Reid and Mr. Tusher.
There are no Compensation Committee interlocks and none of our employees participate on the
Compensation Committee.
21
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of AMB Property Corporations or AMB
Property, L.P.s previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate future filings, including this proxy
statement, in whole or in part, the following Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation, the Stock Performance Graph and the Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any such filings and shall not otherwise be deemed to be filed under
such Acts.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview
The Compensation Committee (the Committee) is responsible for overseeing all of our
executive management compensation. In this regard, the Committees role is to oversee AMBs
compensation plans and policies, annually review and determine all executive officers
compensation, and administer AMBs equity incentive plans (including reviewing and approving grants
to AMBs executive officers). The Committees charter reflects these various responsibilities, and
the Committee and the Board periodically review and revise the charter. The Board determines the
Committees membership. The Committee consists of the three directors listed below. Each director
meets the independence and other similar requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Committee meets at scheduled times during the year, and it
also considers and takes action by written consent. The Committee Chairman reports on Committee
actions and recommendations at Board meetings. The Committee also directly engages an outside
compensation consulting firm to assist the Committee in its review of the compensation for the
executive officers. As part of its function, the Compensation Committee has established policies
governing the compensation and benefits of all our executives. The Committee approves the
compensation of our executive officers, approves the bonus plan measures and goals, and reviews an
annual evaluation of our CEO to determine the CEOs compensation. In addition the Committee
reviews and makes recommendations concerning proposals by our management with respect to
compensation, bonuses, employment agreements and other benefits and policies respecting such
matters for our employees, including our executive officers. The Committee also administers the
Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, and the 2002 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, under which grants of stock options, share appreciation
rights, shares of restricted stock and other awards may be made to our employees, including the
executive officers. The Committee also administers the Section 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan
and the Amended and Restated 2002 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
Compensation Philosophy
The objective of our compensation programs is to compensate our employees in a manner that
promotes recruiting, motivating and retaining exceptional employees. Our compensation philosophy
is founded on a strong principle of pay for performance tied to shareholder value creation.
Annual Compensation
The compensation of most employees, including that of all officers, consists of three
elements:
1. |
|
Base Salary, which is intended to be competitive in the market for the scope and
responsibilities of the job performed and which is targeted at the median level of
compensation in the market for similar positions. Our peer group consists of companies
that comprise the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors. Base salaries for our executive officers
are reviewed annually by the Committee and adjustments may be made based on the executives
experience, responsibilities and performance. |
|
2. |
|
Annual Bonus Program, which is determined based on the achievement of various corporate
and individual performance goals and objectives. Our annual bonus program is a formal
organization-wide incentive program that is intended to encourage teamwork and innovation,
focus attention on specific business objectives and award the achievement of these
objectives. Corporate and individual performance goals and objectives are generally set and
communicated to our employees at the beginning of each fiscal year. |
|
|
|
Under our annual bonus program, employees are eligible to receive annual bonuses if these
corporate and individual performance objectives are achieved. Annual bonuses are paid once a
year, after assessing our financial, operational and strategic performance and the employees
individual performance. The Committee evaluates the individual performance of the Chief
Executive Officer and determines his aggregate annual bonus. Based on recommendations by the
Chief Executive |
22
|
|
Officer, the Committee approves the annual bonus of the President, and based on
recommendations by the Chief Executive Officer and President, the Committee approves the
annual bonuses of the other executive officers. Annual bonuses provide officers with the
opportunity to earn cash compensation in excess of their annual target compensation level,
but only in the event that corporate and/or individual goals have been exceeded. Our
officers may choose to receive all or a portion of their annual bonuses in cash, shares of
restricted stock (valued at 125% of the cash bonus, with three year vesting), stock options
(valued at 150% of the cash bonus, with three year vesting on the portion attributable to the
value above 100% of the cash bonus and immediate vesting on the portion attributable to the
100% value of the cash bonus), or any combination of the foregoing, subject to certain limits
on the aggregate number of options elected. This feature, which permits officers to take all
or a portion of their bonuses in restricted stock or stock options, is designed to further
align the interests of our officers with the interests of our stockholders, and to increase
the retention of our officers. |
|
|
|
The annual bonuses for each officer are weighted between the corporate and individual
performance objectives based on the level of the employee. Generally, the bonuses of
executive officers and other senior officers are weighted more heavily toward the achievement
of corporate performance levels while the bonuses of non-senior officers and other employees
are weighted more heavily toward the achievement of individual performance levels. |
|
|
|
Corporate performance is based on certain pre-established performance objectives, which are
established by the Committee in the beginning of each performance year. For 2005, the
Committee measured our performance against the following five key performance objectives
which were set forth in our 2005 business plan: FFO per share, operating results, capital
deployment, value creation, and the success of our private capital activities. |
|
|
|
Individual performance is measured on the basis of quantitative and qualitative performance
objectives that measure an individuals contribution to our success as outlined in their
individual goals and objectives approved by their supervisor in the first quarter of the
year. The annual bonus program is intended to provide incentives to create value for our
stockholders and to establish and maintain a performance and achievement-oriented environment
throughout the organization. |
|
3. |
|
Long Term Equity Incentive Program, which is intended to provide officers and other
employees with incentives to maximize our long-term performance and to promote the
interests of our stockholders by providing the opportunity for officers and other employees
to receive, in addition to annual bonuses, grants of stock options, restricted stock or
other equity-based awards upon approval of the Committee. |
|
|
|
In determining whether to award executive officers any long-term equity incentive grants for
the prior years performance, the Committee reviews and analyzes several factors. The
Committee bases the awards on the companys multi-year total shareholder return (TSR)
relative to a peer group comprised of the Cohen & Steers Realty Majors and our other
industrial peers. The Committee may also modify executive officers long-term equity
incentive awards based on individual performance. Members of executive management receiving
a long-term equity incentive award may choose to receive stock options, restricted stock or a
combination of both within certain guidelines. For officers and employees below the
executive level, awards are granted primarily on the basis of their individual performance
for that year. |
|
|
|
All shares of restricted stock granted with respect to the long-term equity incentive program
vest over a period of five years, at a rate of one-fifth of such grant, on January 1st of
each year, thereby encouraging the retention of officers and employees. Stock options awarded
under the long-term equity incentive program are granted on an annual basis with an exercise
price set at the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant and will only
be of value to the officer or employee if our stock price increases over time and vest over a
period of three years, at a rate of one-third of such grant, on January 1st of each year,
thereby encouraging the retention of officers and employees. |
|
|
|
In calculating the number of our stock options that an individual would receive under either
the annual bonus and/or long-term equity incentive program, the Committee uses a value
determined by our independent compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, using a discounted
binomial methodology, based on a standardized set of assumptions so that our compensation is
comparable to, and remains competitive with, that of our peer companies. For 2005
compensation, Towers Perrins discounted binomial value was $6.52 per share. However, for
purposes of determining the impact of stock option grants on our total compensation expense,
we value the number of shares subject to the stock option grants using a Black-Scholes
methodology based on company-specific assumptions. For 2005, our Black-Scholes value was
$8.54 per share. |
23
Perquisites
Each executive officer is provided company paid parking. Executive officers also are eligible
to receive financial planning assistance. Each executive is required to pay 30% of the financial
planning fee. AMBs health care, insurance and other welfare programs are the same for all
eligible employees, including officers. AMB has no outstanding loans to its executive officers,
and since at least our initial public offering in 1997, has not made any loans to its executive
officers. In addition, we will continue to comply with federal laws enacted in 2002 which prohibit
the company from making any new loans to its executive officers.
Chief Executive Officers Compensation
Mr. Moghadams compensation for 2005 was determined using the framework discussed under
Compensation Philosophy above. In determining Mr. Moghadams annual bonus, the Committee applied
a weighting of 80% toward our corporate performance and 20% toward his individual performance in
2005. Specifically, in awarding Mr. Moghadam his 2005 compensation, the Committee evaluated our
performance measured against our 2005 business plan, Mr. Moghadams achievement of individual
pre-established goals and relative pay versus that of our competitors CEOs. The Committee
considered the companys achievements for the year under Mr. Moghadams leadership, including the
following achievements: the company (i) exceeded the peer group annualized total shareholder return
metric established by the Committee; (ii) produced FFO per share results with an increase of 20%
over 2004; (iii) achieved total capital deployment of $1.1 billion, which was balanced between
domestic and international acquisition and development; (iv) disposed of $926.6 million of
properties; (v) exceeded its business plan target for core operating NOI and ended the year at
95.8% occupancy; (vi) expanded its market penetration to include Lyon, Milan, Brussels, Rotterdam,
Hamburg, Toronto, Vancouver and Shanghai; and (vii) completed a major organizational realignment
while producing solid results in all areas of the business.
Based upon such results and Mr. Moghadams leadership in our achievement of such results, Mr.
Moghadam received in 2005 total compensation of $5,790,911, comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Base Salary:
|
|
$564,000 |
|
|
|
Annual Bonus:
|
|
$1,805,137 (The Committee awarded Mr.
Moghadam a cash bonus in the amount of
$1,444,110 which he elected to receive
entirely in restricted stock. In accordance
with our bonus exchange program, he receives
shares equal to 125% of the value of his
cash bonus. Therefore, he was awarded
34,767 shares of restricted stock valued at
$51.92 per share on the date of the grant on
February 6, 2006, subject to a three year
vesting period.) |
|
|
|
Long-Term Equity Incentive Award:
|
|
$3,200,000 (Mr. Moghadam chose to receive
this award entirely in restricted stock.
Therefore, he was awarded 61,633 shares of
restricted stock at $51.92 per share on the
date of the grant on February 6, 2006,
subject to a five year vesting period.) |
|
|
|
Dividends on Unvested Restricted Stock:
|
|
$154,431 |
|
|
|
401(k) Company Matching Contribution:
|
|
$6,300 |
|
|
|
Other Benefits:
|
|
$39,220 (financial counseling and
parking)
$21,823 (tax reimbursement for such benefits) |
Mr. Moghadams base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentive awards and other benefits are
reviewed annually by the Committee. In determining Mr. Moghadams base salary for 2005, the
Committee considered that his base salary for 2004 was below median salaries for peer CEOs. Thus,
the Committee decided an increase was warranted in 2005 to better align his salary with our stated
compensation philosophy. Mr. Moghadam does not participate in or influence the decisions of the
Committee with respect to his compensation.
24
2005 Compensation of Other Named Executive Officers
During 2005, the Named Executive Officers in the Summary Compensation Table were granted
salary increases in accordance with the policies stated above. Annual cash incentive awards to
Messrs. Baird, Freedman, Roberts, Coke and Reilly were granted at above-target levels, pursuant to
achievement of individual and corporate performance objectives for 2005. In addition, these
executives were granted above-target long term incentive awards to reflect our out-performance of
our peer group with respect to total shareholder return.
Summary
The Committee believes the compensation programs for our executive officers are reasonable and
are competitive with compensation programs provided to similarly situated officers at our peer
companies. The Committee believes the annual incentive payments made to the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table in respect of the year 2005 are appropriate and
commensurate with the our 2005 financial and strategic performance and their individual
achievements during the year. The Committee believes the long term incentive opportunities
provided to our executive officers, in the form of stock options and restricted stock, are also
appropriate and are awarded in a manner consistent with our philosophy of basing a substantial
component of total executive compensation on the total returns realized by our stockholders.
Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deduction for compensation paid to
our Chief Executive Officer and the additional four most highly compensated officers who are
employed at fiscal year-end to $1.0 million per year, subject to certain performance, disclosure
and stockholder requirements. Grants of stock options and restricted stock under the 2002 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, are intended to qualify as performance based compensation,
which is not subject to the Section 162(m) deduction limitation. The Committee presently intends
that, so long as it is consistent with our overall compensation objectives and to the extent
reasonable, all executive compensation will be deductible for federal income tax purposes and, for
the year ended December 31, 2005, there were no exceptions. The Committee, however, may design
programs that recognize a full range of performance criteria important to our success, even where
compensation payable under such programs may not be deductible.
Respectfully,
David A. Cole, Chair
Frederick W. Reid
Thomas W. Tusher
25
Stock Performance Graph
The following line graph compares the change in our cumulative stockholder return on shares of
our common stock from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2005, to the cumulative total return of the
Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index and the NAREIT Equity REIT Total Return Index from December 31,
2000 to December 31, 2005. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 in the common stock of
AMB Property Corporation and each of the indices on December 31, 2000 and, as required by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, the reinvestment of all distributions. The return shown on the
graph is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
COMPARISON OF CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION,
S&P 500 INDEX AND NAREIT REIT TOTAL RETURN EQUITY INDEX
26
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
Membership and Role of the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Losh, Dr. Skelton and Ms. Kennard. Mr. Losh
serves as chair of the committee. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the members
of the Audit Committee meets the independence and experience requirements of our Bylaws, as well as
the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, as currently applicable to us. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter
adopted by the Board of Directors, which was amended and restated on December 9, 2004.
The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling the Boards oversight
responsibilities regarding the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements, our independent registered public accounting firms qualifications and
independence, our internal control environment and risk management and the performance of our
independent registered public accounting firm and our internal audit function. Management has the
primary responsibility for our financial statements and financial reporting process, including our
system of internal controls. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for
performing independent audits of our financial statements and our internal control over financial
reporting in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) and for expressing an opinion on the conformity of our audited financial statements with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and an opinion on our
internal control over financial reporting and our assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Review of Our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Our Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management our audited consolidated
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the audit of internal
control over financial reporting and managements assessment thereof as of December 31, 2005. The
Audit Committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered
public accounting firm the matters specified to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board in Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees, as
amended by the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
In addition, the Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the
letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence Standards Board, Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as amended, and the Audit Committee has discussed
the independence of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP with that firm.
Based on the reviews and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board
of Directors that our audited consolidated financial statements and our managements report on
internal control over financial reporting be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Respectfully,
J. Michael Losh, Chair
Jeffrey L. Skelton
Lydia H. Kennard
27
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information, as of March 7, 2006, regarding the
beneficial ownership of common stock and limited partnership units for (i) each person known by us
to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more, in the aggregate, of our outstanding common
stock and the operating partnerships outstanding limited partnership units, (ii) each director and
each Named Executive Officer and (iii) our directors and Named Executive Officers as a group.
Except as indicated below, the indicated person has sole voting and investment power with respect
to all of the shares of common stock and limited partnership units beneficially owned by such
person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock and |
|
Number of Options |
|
Percentage of |
|
Percentage of Outstanding |
|
|
Units Beneficially |
|
Exercisable Within 60 |
|
Outstanding Shares of |
|
Shares of Common Stock |
Name of Beneficial Owner (1) |
|
Owned(2) |
|
Days |
|
Common Stock(3) |
|
and Units(4) |
Hamid R. Moghadam(5) |
|
|
2,867,268 |
|
|
|
2,518,957 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
W. Blake Baird(6) |
|
|
338,613 |
|
|
|
413,094 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Bruce Freedman(7) |
|
|
222,151 |
|
|
|
130,058 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
John T. Roberts, Jr.(8) |
|
|
221,983 |
|
|
|
267,922 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Michael A. Coke(9) |
|
|
109,225 |
|
|
|
140,258 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Eugene F. Reilly |
|
|
38,360 |
|
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Afsaneh M. Beschloss |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
T. Robert Burke(10) |
|
|
826,854 |
|
|
|
123,919 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
David A. Cole (11) |
|
|
18,884 |
|
|
|
93,518 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Lydia H. Kennard |
|
|
2,706 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
J. Michael Losh |
|
|
7,256 |
|
|
|
47,227 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Frederick W. Reid |
|
|
6,606 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey L. Skelton, Ph.D. |
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
66,849 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Thomas W. Tusher |
|
|
32,376 |
|
|
|
135,169 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
All Directors and Named Executive Officers
as a group (12 persons)(12) |
|
|
4,702,176 |
|
|
|
3,982,796 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Morgan Stanley(13) |
|
|
4,952,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Barclays Global Investors, NA.(14) |
|
|
4,360,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents less than 0.1% of outstanding shares of common stock and limited partnership
units, based on 87,598,167 shares of common stock, and 4,385,207 limited partnership
units outstanding as of March 7, 2006. |
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for each of the persons listed is c/o AMB
Property Corporation, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California, 94111. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the number of shares of common stock and limited partnership units
beneficially owned by the person, excluding options for the purchase of shares of
common stock exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
The percentage of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person assumes that
all the limited partnership units held by a person are exchanged for shares of common
stock, that none of the limited partnership units held by other persons are so
exchanged, that all options for the purchase of shares of common stock exercisable
within 60 days of March 7, 2006 held by the person are exercised in full and that no
options for the purchase of shares of common stock held by other persons are exercised. |
|
(4) |
|
The percentage of shares of common stock and units beneficially owned by a person
assumes that all the limited partnership units held by a person are exchanged for
shares of common stock, that all of the limited partnership units held by other persons
are so exchanged, that all options for the purchase of shares of common stock
exercisable within 60 days of March 7, 2006 held by the person are exercised in full
and that no options for the purchase of shares of common stock held by other persons
are exercised. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes 388,126 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 2,479,142 shares, Mr. Moghadam shares
voting and investment power with his spouse with respect to 1,522,108 shares, 131,776
shares are indirectly held through a trust, and 667,635 shares are held through a rabbi
trust pursuant to our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan,
for which the trustee holds all voting power. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 25,569 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 313,044 shares, Mr. Baird shares voting and
investment power with his spouse with respect to 256,888 shares. |
28
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes 25,868 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 136,242 shares, 49,467 shares are
indirectly held as co-trustee through a trust, and 24,848 shares are held through a
rabbi trust pursuant to our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation
Plan, for which the trustee holds all voting power. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes 3,939 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 218,044 shares, 136,532 shares are held as
co-trustee through a family trust, 690 shares are indirectly held through custodial
accounts for his children and 48,565 shares are held through a rabbi trust pursuant to
our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, for which the
trustee holds all voting power. |
|
(9) |
|
Includes 8,439 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 100,786 shares, 47,886 are held as
co-trustee through a family trust, and 26,671 shares are held through a rabbi trust
pursuant to our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, for
which the trustee holds all voting power. |
|
(10) |
|
Includes 235,506 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. With respect to 591,348 shares, 163,350 shares are held in
custodial accounts for his children, and 1,557 shares are held through a rabbi trust
pursuant to our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan, for
which the trustee holds all voting power. |
|
(11) |
|
An additional 10,441 shares of common stock are held through a custodial trust for Mr.
Coles children, and he has disclaimed beneficial ownership of these securities. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes 687,447 limited partnership units, which are exchangeable for the same number
of shares of common stock. |
|
(13) |
|
Based upon information contained in a Schedule 13G/A, which was filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2006. With respect to 1,572 shares
of common stock, Morgan Stanley shares voting and dispositive power. The address of
Morgan Stanley is 1585 Broadway, New York, New York, 10036. |
|
(14) |
|
Based upon information contained in a Schedule 13G, which was filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2006. The address of Barclays
Global Investors, N.A. is 45 Fremont Street, 17th Floor, San Francisco, CA
94105. |
29
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
There are no relationships and/or related transactions that are reportable.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons
who are owners or beneficial owners of more than 10% of a registered class of our equity
securities, to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other of our equity securities.
Insiders are required by regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to furnish us
with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us or written
representations that no other reports were required, during the year ended December 31, 2005, all
of these executive officers, directors and beneficial owners of more than 10% of a
registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements
applicable to them, except that a Form 4 was filed late for Mr. Cole reflecting the deferral of
vested restricted stock into our Amended and Restated Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan and
a grant of restricted stock on May 12, 2005 as a result of an expired SEC filing code and for Ms.
Beschloss reflecting a grant of restricted stock on September 22, 2005. Such filings were made on
May 17, 2005 and October 5, 2005, respectively.
CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT
We have adopted a code of business conduct that applies to our directors, officers and
employees. Our code of business conduct, as well as our corporate governance principles, are
available on our website at http://www.amb.com and in print to be sent to any of our
stockholders upon request. Requests for such copies should be addressed to: AMB Property
Corporation, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone
(415) 394-9000. We will promptly disclose on our website any amendments to, and waivers from, our
code of business conduct relating to any of these specified officers.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the lead director or
with the independent directors, as a group, may do so by writing to Lead Director, AMB Property
Corporation, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California, 94111. The Nominating and Governance
Committee of our Board has approved a process for handling letters received by us and addressed to
the lead director or the independent directors of the Board. Under that process, our corporate
Secretary reviews all such correspondence and, on a regular basis, forwards to the lead director a
summary of all such correspondence along with copies of the correspondence that, in the Secretarys
opinion, deals with the functions of the Board of Directors or the committees thereof, or that the
Secretary otherwise determines requires the Boards attention. Directors may, at any time, review
the log of all such correspondence that we have received and request copies of any such
correspondence. Concerns related to our accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are
immediately brought to the attention of the chair of the Audit Committee and handled in accordance
with the Audit Committees procedures with respect to such matters.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and, in accordance therewith, file reports, proxy statements and other information with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Reports, proxy statements and other information filed
by us may be inspected without charge and copies obtained upon payment of prescribed fees from the
Public Reference Section of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at Room 1024, Judiciary
Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, or by way of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions website, http://www.sec.gov. You can inspect reports and other information
we file at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc., 20 Broad Street, New York, New York
10005.
We will provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of the proxy statement is
delivered, upon the written or oral request of any such persons, additional copies of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005. Requests for such copies should be
addressed to: AMB Property Corporation, Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111, Attn:
Investor Relations, telephone (415) 394-9000.
30
OTHER MATTERS
The Board of Directors does not know of any other matter that will be brought before the
Annual Meeting. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting, or any
adjournment or postponement thereof, which may properly be acted upon, the proxies solicited hereby
will be voted on such matter in accordance with the discretion of the proxy holders named therein.
March 30, 2006
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ Tamra D. Browne
TAMRA D. BROWNE
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
31
Dear Stockholder:
Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy.
Your vote counts and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.
Please mark the boxes on the proxy card to indicate how you wish your shares to be voted. Then
sign the card, detach it and return your proxy in the enclosed postage paid envelope.
Alternatively, you can vote by proxy over the Internet or by telephone. See the reverse side for
instructions. AMB Property Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Maryland. Section 2-507 of the Maryland General Corporation Law authorizes the granting of proxies
over the Internet or by telephone. Accordingly, proxies granted over the Internet or by telephone,
in accordance with the procedures set forth on this proxy card, will be valid under Maryland law.
Sincerely,
AMB Property Corporation
PROXY
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 11, 2006
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder of AMB Property Corporation acknowledges receipt of a copy of the
Annual Report, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Proxy Statement, each dated
March 30, 2006, and, revoking any proxy heretofore given, hereby appoints Hamid R. Moghadam, W.
Blake Baird, Michael A. Coke and Tamra D. Browne, and each of them, as proxies for the undersigned,
with full power of substitution in each of them, and hereby authorizes each of them to vote all the
shares of common stock of AMB Property Corporation held of record by the undersigned on March 7,
2006, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 11, 2006, or any adjournment or
postponement thereof, and otherwise to represent the undersigned at the meeting with all powers
possessed by the undersigned as if personally present at the meeting.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND MAY BE REVOKED PRIOR TO ITS
EXERCISE. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED
STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, IT WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR
LISTED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT AND FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF OUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDER ON ANY OTHER MATTER
THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
c/o COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
P.O. BOX 8694
EDISON, NJ 08818-8694
o
Your vote is important. Please vote immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
Vote-by-Internet
|
|
OR
|
|
Vote-by-Telephone |
Log on to the Internet and go to
|
|
|
|
Call toll-free |
http://www.eproxyvote.com/amb
|
|
|
|
1-877-PRX-VOTE (1-877-779-8683) |
If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, please do not mail your card.
|
|
|
Vote by Mail |
|
Mark, sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid
envelope furnished for that purpose. |
þ Please mark votes as in this example.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1 and 2.
1. Election of Directors
|
|
|
Nominees: |
|
(01) Hamid R. Moghadam, (02) W. Blake Baird, (03) Afsaneh M. Beschloss, (04) T. Robert
Burke, (05) David A. Cole, (06) Lydia H. Kennard, (07) J. Michael Losh, (08) Frederick W.
Reid, (09) Jeffrey L. Skelton, (10) Thomas W. Tusher. |
|
|
|
|
|
WITHHELD |
FOR ALL
|
|
FROM ALL |
NOMINEES
|
|
NOMINEES |
|
|
|
o
|
|
o |
o
For all nominees except as noted above
2. |
|
Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered
public accounting firm of AMB Property Corporation for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
ABSTAIN |
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
3. |
|
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon any other business that may
properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o MARK HERE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ADDRESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE AND |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE AT LEFT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign exactly as your name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign.
Executors, administrators, trustees, guardians or other fiduciaries should give
full title as such. If signing for a corporation, please sign in full
corporate name by a duly authorized officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature:
|
|
|
|
Date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|