FORM 10-K - AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K


(Mark One)
þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 001-13545

AMB Property Corporation

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		94-3281941
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California		94111
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(415) 394-9000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Common Stock, $.01 par value 8 1/2% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Title of Class)		New York Stock Exchange (Name of Exchange on Which Registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

The aggregate market value of common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant (based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange) on March 20, 2002, was $2,312,576,459.

As of March 20, 2002, there were 84,063,121 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III incorporates by reference the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders which the Registrant anticipates will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of its fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I
	Item 1. Business
	Item 2. Properties
	Item 3. Legal Proceedings
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
	Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters
	Item 6. Selected Financial and Other Data
	Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	For the Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999
	Item 7a. Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
	Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
	Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
	Items 10, 11, 12 and 13.
PART IV
	Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
First Amendment to the Fifth Amended and Restated
First Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated
Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option
Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated
2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan
Second Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated
Exhibit 10.26
Subsidiaries of AMB Property Corporation
Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP
Letter, dated March 28, 2002,

PART I


Item 1.	*Business*

General

AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland corporation, is one of the leading owners and operators of industrial real estate nationwide. Our investment strategy is to become a leading provider of High Throughput Distribution, or HTD, properties located near key passenger and cargo airports, highway systems and ports in major metropolitan areas, such as Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas/ Fort Worth, Northern New Jersey/ New York City, the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Miami, and Seattle. Within each of our markets, we focus our investments in in-fill submarkets. In-fill sub-markets are characterized by supply constraints on the availability of land for competing projects as well as by having physical, political, or economic barriers to new development. High Throughput Distribution facilities are designed to serve the high-speed, high-value freight handling needs of today’s supply chain, as opposed to functioning as long-term storage facilities. We believe that the growth of the airfreight and ocean-going container business and the outsourcing of supply chain management to third party logistics companies are indicative of the changes that are occurring in the supply chain and the manner in which goods are distributed. In addition, we believe that inventory levels as a percentage of final sales are falling and that goods are moving more rapidly through the supply chain. As a result, we intend to focus our investment activities primarily on industrial properties that we believe will benefit from these changes.

As of December 31, 2001, we owned and operated 905 industrial buildings and seven retail centers, totaling approximately 81.6 million rentable square feet, located in 26 markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, our industrial and retail properties were 94.5% and 89.3% leased, respectively. As of December 31, 2001, through our subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, LLC, we also managed industrial buildings and retail centers, totaling approximately 2.7 million rentable square feet on behalf of various clients. In addition, we have invested in 40 industrial buildings, totaling approximately 4.9 million rentable square feet, through unconsolidated joint ventures.

As of December 31, 2001, we had seven retail centers and three industrial properties, which were held for divestiture. During 2001, we disposed of 26 industrial buildings and two retail buildings, aggregating approximately 3.2 million rentable square feet, for an aggregate price of $193.4 million. Over the next few years, we intend to dispose of non-strategic assets and redeploy the resulting capital into industrial properties in supply constrained markets in the U.S. and internationally that better fit our current investment focus.

Through our subsidiary, AMB Property, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, we are engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of primarily industrial properties in target markets nationwide. We refer to AMB Property, L.P. as the “operating partnership”. As of December 31, 2001, we owned an approximate 94.4% general partnership interest in the operating partnership, excluding preferred units. As the sole general partner of the operating partnership, we have the full, exclusive, and complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the operating partnership.

We are self-administered and self-managed and expect that we have qualified and will continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes beginning with the year ending December 31, 1997. As a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, our own employees perform our administrative and management functions, rather than our relying on an outside manager for these services. Our principal executive office is located at Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, CA 94111, and our telephone number is (415) 394-9000. We also maintain a regional office in Boston, Massachusetts. As of December 31, 2001, we employed 179 individuals, 134 at our San Francisco headquarters and 45 in our Boston office.

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to AMB Property Corporation, the operating partnership and the other controlled subsidiaries, and the references to AMB Property Corporation include the operating partnership and the other controlled subsidiaries. The following marks are our registered trademarks: AMB®; Customer Alliance Partners®; Customer Alliance Program®;

Development Alliance Partners®; Development Alliance Program®; eSpace®; Institutional Alliance Partners®; Institutional Alliance Program®; Management Alliance Partners®; Management Alliance Program®; UPREIT Alliance Partners®; and UPREIT Alliance Program®. The following marks are our unregistered trademarks: Broker Alliance Partners^TM; Broker Alliance Program^TM; HTD^TM; High Throughput Distribution^TM; iSpace^TM; Strategic Alliance Partners^TM; and Strategic Alliance Programs^TM.

Co-investment Joint Ventures

Through the operating partnership, we enter into co-investment joint ventures with institutional investors. These co-investment joint ventures provide us with an additional source of capital to fund certain acquisitions, development projects, and renovation projects. As of December 31, 2001, we had investments in five co-investment joint ventures with a gross book value of $1.3 billion, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes and which are discussed below. We believe that our co-investment program will also continue to serve as a source of capital for acquisitions and developments.

The operating partnership is the managing general partner of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P. and, together with one of our other affiliates, owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 21% of the partnership interests in the Alliance Fund I. The Alliance Fund I is a co-investment partnership between us and AMB Institutional Alliance REIT I, Inc., a limited partner of the Alliance Fund I, which includes 15 institutional investors as stockholders. The Alliance Fund I is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund I had received equity contributions from third party investors totaling $169.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total capitalization of $378.0 million.

We formed AMB Partners II, L.P. with the City and County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System to acquire, develop, and redevelop distribution facilities nationwide. On February 14, 2001, AMB Partners II received an equity contribution from CCSFERS of $50.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $250.0 million. The operating partnership is the managing general partner of AMB Partners II and owned, as of December 31, 2001, 50% of AMB Partners II.

We formed AMB-SGP, L.P. with a subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, to own and operate, through a private real estate investment trust, distribution facilities nationwide. On March 23, 2001, AMB-SGP received an equity contribution from GIC of $75.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $335.0 million. The operating partnership is the managing general partner of AMB-SGP and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50.3% of AMB-SGP.

We formed AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II, L.P., in which AMB Alliance REIT II, Inc. became a partner on June 28, 2001. The operating partnership is the managing general partner and, together with one of our other affiliates, owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 20% of the partnership interests in the Alliance Fund II. The Alliance Fund II is a co-investment partnership between us and AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II, Inc., a limited partner of the Alliance Fund II, which includes 12 institutional investors as stockholders as of December 31, 2001. The Alliance Fund II is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund II had received equity commitments from third party investors totaling $195.4 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $488.0 million.

The operating partnership, together with one of our other affiliates, owns, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50% of the partnership interests in AMB/ Erie. L.P. or “Erie”. Erie is a co-investment partnership between the operating partnership and various entities related to Erie Indemnity Company, and is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, Erie had received equity

contributions from third party investors totaling $14.0 million, which, when combined with debt financings and the Company’s investment, created a total capitalization of $129.0 million.

Acquisition and Development Activity

During 2001, we invested $428.3 million in operating properties, consisting of 65 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 6.8 million square feet, including the investment of $219.5 million in 36 industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 3.8 million square feet, for three of our co-investment joint ventures.

During 2001, we also contributed $539.2 million in operating properties, consisting of 111 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 10.8 million square feet, to three of our co-investment joint ventures. During 2001, we recognized gains of $17.8 million on the contributions, which represents the portion of the contributed properties acquired by our third-party co-investors..

As of December 31, 2001, we and our co-investment partners had in our development pipeline: (1) 12 industrial projects, which will total approximately 3.1 million square feet and have a total estimated investment of $154.4 million upon completion; and (2) two development projects available for sale, which will total approximately 0.6 million square feet and have an aggregate estimated investment of $50.0 million upon completion. As of December 31, 2001, we and our Development Alliance Partners have funded an aggregate of $127.3 million and will need to fund an estimated additional $77.1 million in order to complete projects currently under construction.

Operating Strategy

We are a full-service real estate company with in-house expertise in acquisitions, development and redevelopment, asset management and leasing, finance and accounting, and market research. We have long-standing relationships with many real estate management and development firms across the country, our Strategic Alliance Partners.

We believe that real estate is fundamentally a local business and that the most effective way for us to operate is by forging alliances with service providers in every market. We believe that these collaborations allow us to: (1) leverage our national presence with the local market expertise of brokers, developers, and property managers; (2) improve the operating efficiency and flexibility of our national portfolio; (3) strengthen customer satisfaction and retention; and (4) provide a continuous pipeline of growth.

We believe that our partners give us local market expertise and flexibility allowing us to focus on our core competencies: developing and refining our strategic approach to real estate investment and management and raising private capital to finance growth and enhance returns to stockholders.

Growth Strategies


	*Growth Through Operations*

We seek to generate internal growth through rent increases on existing space and renewals on re-tenanted space. We do this by seeking to maintain a high occupancy rate at our properties and by seeking to control expenses by capitalizing on the economies of owning, operating, and growing a large national portfolio. As of December 31, 2001, our industrial properties and retail centers were 94.5% leased and 89.3% leased, respectively. During 2001, we increased average industrial base rental rates (on a cash basis) by 20.4% from the expiring rent for that space, on leases entered into or renewed during the period. This amount excludes expense reimbursements, rental abatements, and percentage rents. During 2001, we also increased same-store net operating income by 6.3% on our industrial properties.


	*Growth Through Acquisitions and Capital Redeployment*

We believe that our significant acquisition experience, our alliance-based operating strategy, and our extensive network of property acquisition sources will continue to provide opportunities for external growth. We believe that our relationships with third party local property management firms through our Management

Alliance Program also will create acquisition opportunities, as such managers market properties on behalf of sellers. Our operating structure also enables us to acquire properties through our UPREIT Alliance Program in exchange for limited partnership units in the operating partnership, thereby enhancing our attractiveness to owners and developers seeking to transfer properties on a tax-deferred basis. In addition to acquisitions, we seek to redeploy capital from non-strategic assets into properties that better fit our current investment focus.

We are generally in various stages of negotiations for a number of acquisitions and dispositions, which may include acquisitions and dispositions of individual properties, acquisitions of large multi-property portfolios, and acquisitions of other real estate companies. There can be no assurance that we will consummate any of these transactions. Such transactions, if we consummate them, may be material individually or in the aggregate. Sources of capital for acquisitions may include undistributed cash flow from operations, borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, other forms of secured or unsecured debt financing, issuances of debt or equity securities by us or the operating partnership (including issuances of units in the operating partnership or its subsidiaries), proceeds from divestitures of properties, and assumption of debt related to the acquired properties.


	*Growth Through Development*

We believe that renovation and expansion of properties and development of well-located, high-quality industrial properties should continue to provide us with attractive opportunities for increased cash flow and a higher rate of return than we may obtain from the purchase of fully leased, renovated properties. Value-added properties are typically characterized as properties with available space or near-term leasing exposure, undeveloped land acquired in connection with another property that provides an opportunity for development, or properties that are well located but require redevelopment or renovation. Value-added properties require significant management attention or capital investment to maximize their return. We believe that we have developed the in-house expertise to create value through acquiring and managing value-added properties and believe that our national market presence and expertise will enable us to continue to generate and capitalize on these opportunities. Through our Development Alliance Program, we have established strategic alliances with national and regional developers to enhance our development capabilities.

The multidisciplinary backgrounds of our employees should provide us with the skills and experience to capitalize on strategic renovation, expansion, and development opportunities. Several of our officers have extensive experience in real estate development, both with us and with national development firms. We generally pursue development projects in joint ventures with local developers. This way, we leverage the development skill, access to opportunities, and capital of such developers, and we eliminate the need and expense of an in-house development staff. Under a typical joint venture agreement with a Development Alliance Partner, we would fund 95% of the construction costs and our partner would fund 5%. Upon completion, we generally would purchase our partner’s interest in the joint venture.


	*Growth Through Co-Investments*

We co-invest with third party partners (some of whom may be clients of AMB Capital Partners, LLC, to the extent such clients commit new investment capital), through partnerships, limited liability companies, or joint ventures. We currently use a co-investment formula with each third party whereby we will own at least a 20% interest in all ventures. In general, we control all significant operating and investment decisions of our co-investment entities. We believe that our co-investment program will continue to serve as a source of capital for acquisitions and developments; however, there can be no assurance that it will continue to do so.


	*Growth Through Developments for Sale*

The operating partnership, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, Headlands Realty Corporation, conducts a variety of businesses that include incremental income programs, such as our development projects available for sale to third parties. Such development properties include value-added conversion projects and build-to-sell projects. During 2001, we completed and sold two value-added conversion projects for a net gain of $13.2 million. As of December 31, 2001, we were developing two projects for sale to third parties.


	*AMB Capital Partners*

AMB Capital Partners, LLC provides real estate investment management services on a fee basis to clients. On December 31, 2001, AMB Investment Management, Inc. was reorganized through a series of related transactions into AMB Capital Partners. On May 31, 2001, the operating partnership began consolidating its investment in AMB Investment Management by acquiring 100% of its common stock for $0.3 million. Prior to May 31, 2001, the operating partnership owned 100% of AMB Investment Management’s non-voting preferred stock (representing a 95% economic interest therein) and reflected its investment using the equity method.

BUSINESS RISKS

See: “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Business Risks” for a complete discussion of the various risks that could adversely affect us.

Item 2. Properties

We operate industrial and retail properties nationwide and manage our business both by property type and by market. Industrial properties consist primarily of warehouse distribution facilities suitable for single or multiple customers and are typically comprised of multiple buildings that are leased to customers engaged in various types of businesses. As of December 31, 2001, we operated industrial properties in eight hub and gateway markets in addition to 18 other markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, we operated retail properties in Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, and Baltimore. Retail properties are generally leased to one or more anchor customers, such as grocery and drug stores, and various retail businesses. See “Item 14. Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for segment information related to our operations.

INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2001, we owned 905 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 81.6 million rentable square feet, located in 26 markets nationwide. Our industrial properties accounted for $494.9 million, or 96.8%, of our total annualized base rent as of December 31, 2001. Our industrial properties were 94.5% leased to over 2,900 customers, the largest of which accounted for no more than 1.3% of our annualized base rent from our industrial properties.

Property Characteristics. Our industrial properties, which consist primarily of warehouse distribution facilities suitable for single or multiple customers, are typically comprised of multiple buildings. The following table identifies type and characteristics of our industrial buildings:


Building Type	Description	% of Portfolio

Warehouse	15,000-75,000 SF, single or multi-customer		40.3%
Bulk Warehouse	Over 75,000 SF, single or multi-customer		37.8%
Flex Industrial	May include assembly or R&D, single or multi-customer, higher parking ratios		9.6%
Light Industrial	Smaller customers, 15,000 SF or less, higher office finish		7.3%
Trans-Shipment	Unique configurations for truck terminals and specialized cross-docking		1.8%
Air Cargo	On-tarmac or airport land for transfer of air cargo goods		1.6%
Office	Single or multi-customer, used strictly for office		1.5%

Lease Terms. Our industrial properties are typically subject to lease on a “triple net basis,” in which customers pay their proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance, and operating costs, or are subject to leases on a “modified gross basis,” in which customers pay expenses over certain threshold levels. Lease terms typically range from three to ten years, with an average of six years, excluding renewal options. The majority of the industrial leases do not include renewal options.

Overview of Major Target Markets. Our industrial properties are located near key passenger and air cargo airports, key interstate highways, and sea ports in major metropolitan areas, such as Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas/ Fort Worth, Northern New Jersey, the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Miami, and Seattle. We believe our industrial properties’ strategic location, transportation network and infrastructure, and large consumer and manufacturing bases support strong demand for industrial space.

Within these metropolitan areas, our industrial properties are concentrated in locations with limited new construction opportunities within established, relatively large submarkets, which we believe should provide a higher rate of occupancy and rent growth than properties located elsewhere. These in-fill locations are typically near major passenger and air cargo facilities, seaports or convenient to major highways and rail lines, and are proximate to a diverse labor pool. There is typically broad demand for industrial space in these centrally located submarkets due to a diverse mix of industries and types of industrial uses, including warehouse distribution, light assembly and manufacturing. We generally avoid locations at the periphery of metropolitan areas where there are fewer supply constraints.

Industrial Market Operating Statistics

As of December 31, 2001, we operated in eight hub and gateway markets, in addition to 18 other markets nationwide. The following table represents properties in which we own a fee simple interest or a controlling interest (consolidated), and excludes properties in which we only own a non-controlling interest (unconsolidated) and properties under development.


											No. New			San												Total			Total
								Dallas/			Jersey/			Francisco			Southern									Hub			Other
		Atlanta			Chicago(1)			Ft. Worth			New York			Bay Area			California(2)			Miami			Seattle			Markets			Markets			Total

Square feet owned			6,010,428			8,101,685			5,589,196			6,047,153			11,192,942			11,904,910			4,432,368			3,763,469			56,952,144			24,598,736			81,550,880
Occupancy Percentage			91.0	%		95.8	%		96.8	%		91.8	%		94.9	%		95.9	%		94.9	%		88.2	%		94.2	%		95.2	%		94.5	%
Annualized base rent (000’s)		$	24,372		$	35,097		$	25,942		$	38,372		$	99,624		$	64,589		$	31,958		$	19,812		$	339,766		$	123,651		$	463,417
Annualized base rent per square foot		$	4.46		$	4.52		$	4.79		$	6.91		$	9.38		$	5.66		$	7.76		$	5.97		$	6.33		$	5.28		$	6.01
Lease expirations as a percentage of ABR:(3) 2002			15.8	%		11.0	%		18.5	%		9.7	%		11.4	%		14.0	%		21.9	%		17.1	%		13.7	%		18.4	%		14.9	%
	2003.		14.5	%		26.9	%		17.2	%		21.7	%		13.6	%		17.8	%		12.0	%		29.0	%		17.5	%		12.9	%		16.3	%
	2004.		16.5	%		17.0	%		17.6	%		14.1	%		15.0	%		18.4	%		21.4	%		20.7	%		16.9	%		13.6	%		16.0	%
Weighted average lease terms
	Original		5.3 years			6.7 years			5.6 years			6.4 years			5.9 years			6.6 years			5.9 years			5.3 years			6.1 years			6.8 years			6.3 years
	Remaining		3.1 years			2.9 years			2.9 years			3.5 years			3.1 years			3.4 years			2.9 years			2.5 years			3.1 years			3.6 years			3.3 years
Tenant Retention (year-to-date)			69.9	%		84.4	%		71.7	%		65.2	%		34.4	%		73.5	%		62.9	%		77.0	%		67.6	%		65.2	%		66.8	%
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers			0.5	%		8.3	%		7.6	%		12.9	%		56.2	%		20.6	%		-4.3	%		9.1	%		21.3	%		19.1	%		20.4	%
Square feet leased			772,074			1,496,943			833,228			481,766			1,385,835			1,075,779			1,100,524			812,412			7,958,561			3,988,612			11,947,173
Same store cash basis NOI growth			-4.9	%		1.1	%		9.7	%		3.1	%		23.7	%		4.3	%		-0.5	%		-0.4	%		8.1	%		2.6	%		6.3	%
Square feet owned in same store pool(4)			4,258,623			6,942,817			4,737,897			3,652,692			7,563,658			5,625,212			2,193,976			3,479,316			38,454,191			21,711,246			60,165,437

(1) We also have an ownership interest in 36 industrial buildings totaling 4.0 million square feet in the Chicago market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(2) We also have an ownership interest in 4 industrial buildings totaling 0.9 million square feet in the Southern California market through an unconsolidated joint venture.

(3) Calculated as monthly rent at expiration multiplied by 12.

(4) Same store pool as of December 31, 2001, excludes properties purchased or developments stabilized after December 31, 1999.

Industrial Property Summary

As of December 31, 2001, our 905 industrial buildings were diversified across 26 markets nationwide. The average age of our industrial properties is 20 years (since the property was built or substantially renovated).

The following table represents properties in which we own a fee simple interest or a controlling interest (consolidated), and excludes properties in which we only own a non-controlling interest (unconsolidated).


						Total		Percentage								Percentage					Annualized
						Rentable		of Total						Annualized		of Total					Base Rent
				Number of		Square		Rentable			Percentage			Base Rent		Annualized			Number		per Leased
Industrial Properties				Buildings		Feet(3)		Square Feet			Leased			(000’s)		Base Rent			of Leases		Square Foot

Hub and Gateway Markets:
	Atlanta				55		6,010,428		7.4	%		91.0	%	$	24,372		5.3	%		171	$	4.46
	Chicago(1)				91		8,101,685		9.9			95.8			35,097		7.6			190		4.52
	Dallas/ Ft. Worth				65		5,589,196		6.9			96.8			25,942		5.6			211		4.79
	Northern New Jersey/ New York City				67		6,047,153		7.4			91.8			38,372		8.3			228		6.91
	San Francisco Bay Area				142		11,192,942		13.7			94.9			99,624		21.5			386		9.38
	Southern California(2)				144		11,904,910		14.6			95.9			64,589		13.9			352		5.66
	Miami				42		4,342,361		5.3			94.9			31,958		6.9			219		7.76
	Seattle				42		3,763,469		4.6			88.2			19,812		4.3			163		5.97

		Subtotal/ Weighted Average			648		56,952,144		69.8			94.2			339,766		73.4			1,920		6.33
Other Markets:
	Austin				9		1,365,873		1.7			93.5			9,754		2.1			28		7.64
	Baltimore/ Washington D.C.				60		3,790,944		4.6			96.3			28,704		6.2			279		7.86
	Boston				39		4,632,528		5.7			99.6			22,866		4.9			56		4.96
	Charlotte				10		729,836		0.9			55.4			1,665		0.4			24		4.12
	Cincinnati				6		812,053		1.0			92.7			2,587		0.6			12		3.44
	Columbus				2		465,433		0.6			100.0			1,415		0.3			2		3.04
	Houston				28		2,788,474		3.4			92.8			9,907		2.1			136		3.83
	Memphis				17		1,883,845		2.3			98.6			9,537		2.1			47		5.13
	Minneapolis				42		4,441,909		5.5			96.9			17,836		3.8			204		4.14
	New Orleans				5		411,689		0.5			99.7			2,004		0.4			47		4.88
	Newport News				1		60,215		0.1			100.0			745		0.2			3		12.37
	Orlando				19		1,845,494		2.3			96.0			7,476		1.6			85		4.22
	Portland				5		676,104		0.8			98.4			2,816		0.6			10		4.23
	San Diego				5		276,167		0.3			86.8			1,974		0.4			19		8.23
	Other On-Tarmac				9		418,172		0.5			86.4			4,365		0.9			36		12.08

		Subtotal/ Weighted Average			257		24,598,736		30.2			95.2			123,651		26.6			988		5.28

			Total/ Weighted Average		905		81,550,880		100.0	%		94.5	%	$	463,417		100.0	%		2,908	$	6.01

(1) We also have an ownership interest in 36 industrial buildings totaling 4.0 million square feet in the Chicago market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(2) We also have an ownership interest in 4 industrial buildings totaling 0.9 million square feet in the Southern California market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(3) In addition to owned square feet as of December 31, 2001, we manage, through our subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, 2.0 million, 0.6 million, and 0.1 million additional square feet of industrial, retail, and other properties, respectively.

Industrial Property Lease Expirations

The following table summarizes the lease expirations for our industrial properties for leases in place as of December 31, 2001, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to the scheduled expirations.


				Annualized		Percentage of
		Rentable		Base		Annualized
		Square		Rent		Base
Year of Lease Expiration(1)		Feet		(000s)(2)		Rent

2002(3)			13,350,901	$	73,908		14.9	%
2003			14,728,382		80,699		16.3
2004			12,906,827		79,341		16.0
2005			11,288,977		74,129		15.0
2006			8,784,213		57,282		11.6
2007			5,079,752		32,259		6.5
2008			3,435,363		17,830		3.6
2009			2,473,353		15,053		3.1
2010			1,878,760		27,908		5.6
Thereafter			3,116,389		36,448		7.4

	Total/ Weighted Average		77,042,917	$	494,857		100.0	%

(1) Schedule includes executed leases that commence after December 31, 2001. Schedule excludes leases expiring December 31, 2001.

(2) Calculated as monthly rent at expiration multiplied by 12.

(3) Includes month-to-month leases and hold-over customers.

Customer Information

Largest Property Customers. Our 25 largest industrial property customers by annualized base rent are set forth in the table below.


						Percentage of					Percentage of
		Number		Aggregate		Aggregate					Aggregate
		of		Rentable		Leased			Annualized		Annualized
Industrial Customer Name(1)		Leases		Square Feet		Square Feet(2)			Base Rent		Base Rent(3)

FedEx Corporation			27		586,238		0.7	%	$	6,251		1.3	%
International Paper Company			7		557,299		0.7			4,353		0.9
Abgenix, Inc.			2		97,887		0.1			3,489		0.7
Harmonic Inc.			2		198,480		0.3			3,481		0.7
United Liquors, Ltd.			2		755,000		1.0			3,286		0.7
Hyseq, Inc.			3		59,300		0.1			3,176		0.7
Novera Optics, Inc.			1		55,610		0.1			2,776		0.6
Wells Fargo and Company			5		215,052		0.3			2,663		0.6
Integrated Airline Services(4)			4		231,161		0.3			2,595		0.5
County of Los Angeles(5)			9		168,519		0.2			2,586		0.5
CNF Inc.			11		358,165		0.5			2,307		0.5
Forward Air Corporation			7		344,765		0.4			2,212		0.5
Exel plc			7		520,404		0.7			2,168		0.5
Applied Materials, Inc.			1		290,557		0.4			2,152		0.4
Iron Mountain Records Management			9		415,008		0.5			2,106		0.4
Acer America Corporation			4		261,932		0.3			2,067		0.4
United States Government(4)(6)			11		421,063		0.5			2,065		0.4
Cirrus Logic			1		48,384		0.1			2,032		0.4
FMI International			2		367,771		0.5			1,999		0.4
Danzas AEI International			6		288,476		0.4			1,965		0.4
AM Cosmetics Inc.			1		326,500		0.4			1,954		0.4
Airborne Express(4)			7		242,967		0.3			1,950		0.4
NCS Pearson			1		226,076		0.3			1,919		0.4
Johnson & Johnson			4		129,449		0.2			1,918		0.4
Rite Aid Corporation			3		550,116		0.7			1,883		0.4

	Total				7,716,179		9.9	%	$	65,353		13.6	%

(1) Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer.

(2) Computed as aggregate leased square feet divided by the aggregate leased square feet of the industrial and retail properties.

(3) Computed as aggregate annualized base rent divided by the aggregate annualized base rent of the industrial and retail and other properties.

(4) Apron rental amount (but not square footage) are included.

(5) County of Los Angeles includes Children’s Services, the Fire Department, the District Attorney’s Office, the Sheriff, and the Unified School District.

(6) United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), U.S. Customs, and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

OPERATING AND LEASING STATISTICS

Total Industrial Portfolio Summary

The following table summarizes key operating and leasing statistics for all of our industrial properties as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999.

Industrial Operating and Leasing Statistics (1)


			2001			2000			1999

Square feet owned at December 31(2)				81,550,880			77,795,989			65,194,364
Occupancy percentage at December 31				94.5	%		96.4	%		95.9	%
Weighted average lease term:
	Original			6.3 years			6.4 years			6.4 years
	Remaining			3.3 years			3.5 years			3.5 years
Tenant retention				66.8	%		59.0	%		72.0	%
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers				20.4	%		25.6	%		12.9	%
	SF leased			11,947,173			11,940,560			7,567,062
Second generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions per sq. ft.:
	Renewals		$	0.99		$	1.22		$	1.22
	Re-tenanted(3)			3.25			2.27			2.74

		Weighted average(3)	$	2.05		$	1.86		$	1.64

Recurring capital expenditures:
	Tenant improvements		$	8,168		$	10,237		$	10,515
	Lease commissions and other lease costs			19,822			17,679			10,430
	Building improvements			19,852			11,031			5,521

		Sub-total		47,842			38,947			26,466
	JV Partners’ share of capital expenditures			(5,824	)		(3,323	)		(1,576	)

		Our share of recurring capital expenditures	$	42,018		$	35,624		$	24,890

(1) Includes all consolidated operating properties and excludes development and renovation projects.

(2) In addition to owned square feet as of December 31, 2001, we manage, through our subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, 2.7 million additional square feet of industrial, retail, and other properties. We also have investments in 4.9 million square feet of industrial properties through our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.

(3) Consists of all leases renewing or re-tenanting with lease terms greater than one year.

Industrial Same Store Operating Statistics

The following table summarizes key operating and leasing statistics for our same store properties as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999. For an explanation of our same store properties, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.”


		2001			2000			1999

Square feet in same store pool			60,165,437			52,145,350			35,128,748
	% of total industrial square feet		73.8	%		68.8	%		53.8	%
Occupancy percentage at period end			94.6	%		96.8	%		96.2	%
Tenant retention			64.5	%		59.2	%		69.2	%
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers			23.5	%		27.0	%		12.8	%
	SF leased		9,964,366			9,868,579			4,994,868
Cash basis net operating income growth % increase
	Revenues		6.4	%		7.3	%		4.3	%
	Expenses		6.9	%		3.5	%		(0.6	)%
	NOI		6.3	%		8.5	%		5.9	%

RETAIL PROPERTIES

At December 31, 2001, we owned ten retail centers aggregating approximately 1.3 million rentable square feet. Our retail properties accounted for $16.1 million, or 3.2%, of annualized base rent at December 31, 2001. Our retail properties were 89.3% leased to over 160 customers. Our retail properties have an average age of nine years since they were built, expanded, or renovated.

During 2001, we sold two retail properties totaling approximately 0.3 million rentable square feet. As of December 31, 2001, we had seven retail centers, aggregating approximately 1.3 million rentable square feet, held for divestiture.

Retail Property Summary

The following table sets forth the rentable square footage of our retail centers as of December 31, 2001, and represents properties in which we own a fee simple interest or a controlling interest (consolidated). Around Lenox, Howard & Western, Mazzeo Drive, Northridge Plaza, Palm Aire, Springsgate, and The Plaza at Delray are all properties held for divestiture as of December 31, 2001.


											Annualized
		Total					Annualized				Base Rent
		Rentable		Percentage			Base Rent		Number		per Leased
Retail Properties		Square Feet		Leased			(000’s)(1)		of Leases		Square Foot(2)

Around Lenox(3)(4)			121,517		71.9	%	$	2,139		16	$	24.47
Beacon Center			150,245		100.0			2,395		8		15.94
Charles & Chase			48,000		100.0			300		1		6.25
Howard & Western(4)			88,544		88.0			1,088		10		13.97
Mazzeo Drive(4)			88,420		100.0			717		1		8.11
Northridge Plaza(3)(4)			229,010		90.7			3,190		34		15.35
Novato Fair Shopping Center(3)			126,069		93.3			955		18		8.12
Palm Aire(3)(4)			130,865		100.0			1,709		29		13.06
Springs Gate(3)(4)			n/a		n/a			n/a		n/a		n/a
The Plaza at Delray(3)(4)			331,863		80.2			3,559		43		13.37

	Total/ Weighted Average		1,314,533		89.3	%	$	16,052		160	$	13.67

(1) Annualized base rent means the monthly contractual amount under existing leases at December 31, 2001, multiplied by 12. This amount excludes expense reimbursements, rental abatements, and percentage rents.

(2) Calculated as total Annualized Base Rent divided by total rentable square feet actually leased as of December 31, 2001.

(3) We hold an interest in this property through a joint venture interest in a limited partnership.

(4) This property is held for divestiture.

Development Pipeline

The following table sets forth the properties owned by us as of December 31, 2001, which were undergoing renovation, expansion, or new development. No assurance can be given that any of such projects will be completed on schedule or within budgeted amounts.

Industrial Development and Renovation Deliveries


							Estimated		Estimated			Estimated		Our
					Development		Stabilization		Square Feet			Total		Ownership
Project			Location		Alliance Partner^™		Date		at Completion			Investment(1)		Percentage



		(Dollars in thousands)
2002 Deliveries
	1.	Portland Air Cargo		Portland, OR		Trammell Crow Company		February		159,000		$	12,800		95	%
	2.	Van Nuys (Buildings 3 - 6)		Van Nuys, CA		Trammell Crow Company		February		315,000			23,000		95	%
	3.	Monte Vista Spectrum		Chino, CA		Majestic Realty		June		577,000			23,200		50	%
	4.	Cabot Business Park (Lot 1 - 2)		Mansfield, MA		National Development of NE		June		114,000			14,600		90	%
	5.	Dulles Airport park (Phase I)		Dulles, VA		Seefried Properties		July		168,000			12,000		21	%
	6.	Suwanee Creek (Phase IV) )		Atlanta, GA		Seefried Properties		August		233,000			7,600		100	%
	7.	Airport South Building 800		College Park, GA		Seefried Properties		September		60,000			3,200		50	%
	8.	Airport South Building 900		College Park, GA		Seefried Properties		September		30,000			1,700		50	%
	9.	Southfield Logistics Center(3)		Forest Park, GA		None		October		799,000			17,600		21	%
	10.	Airport South Building 400		College Park, GA		Seefried Properties		December		103,000			4,800		50	%

		Total 2002 Deliveries								2,558,000			120,500		64	%
		% Pre-leased/funded-to-date(2)								61	%	$	91,900
2003 Deliveries
	11.	Carson Town Center, SE		Carson, CA		Mar Ventures		May		349,000			23,100		95	%
	12.	Houston Air Cargo		Houston, TX		Trammell Crow Company		October		156,000			10,800		19	%

		Total 2003 Deliveries								505,000			33,900		71	%

		% Pre-leased/funded-to-date(2)								14	%	$	9,300
		Total Scheduled Deliveries(1)								3,063,000		$	154,400		66	%

		% Pre-leased/funded-to-date(2)								54	%	$	100,300

(1) Represents total estimated cost or renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, debt and equity carry, and partner earnouts. The estimates are based on our current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Excludes 268 acres of land and other acquisition-related costs totaling approximately $44.3 million.

(2) As of December 31, 2001, our share of such amounts funded to date was $57.8 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for a total of $66.3 million funded to date.

(3) Represents a renovation project.

HEADLANDS REALTY CORPORATION(1)

Development Projects Held for Sale


				Development	Estimated		Estimated			Estimated		Our
				Alliance	Stabilization		Square Feet at			Total		Ownership
Project(2)			Market	Partner^TM	Date		Completion			Investment(3)		Percentage


			(Dollars in thousands)
Development Properties Value-Added Conversion(4)
	None
Build-to-Sell(5)
1. Novato Fair Shopping Center			SF Bay Area	AIG		August 2002		134,000		$	15,700		50	%
2. Carson Town Center SW			Southern California	Mar Ventures		July 2003		431,000			34,300		100	%

	Total Build-to-Sell Properties							565,000			50,000		84	%

		% Pre-leased/funded-to-date(6)						32	%		27,000
		Total Scheduled Deliveries						565,000		$	50,000		84	%

		% Pre-leased/funded-to-date(6)						32	%		27,000

(1) Headlands Realty Corporation is a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary.

(2) Headlands Realty Corporation intends to sell these properties within two years of completion.

(3) Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, debt and equity carry, and partner earnouts. The estimates are based on the Company’s current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change.

(4) Represents existing properties or land that Headlands Realty is leasing from the operating partnership and is upgrading for sale to a third party.

(5) Represents build-to-suit and speculative development or redevelopment.

(6) As of December 31, 2001, our share of amounts funded to date was $20.5 million.

Properties Held Through Joint Ventures, Limited Liability Companies, and Partnerships


	*Consolidated:*

As of December 31, 2001, we held interests in joint ventures, limited liability companies, and partnerships with third parties, which are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. Such investments are consolidated because: (1) we own a majority interest; or (2) we exercise significant control over major operating decisions such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, and changes in financing. Under the agreements governing the joint ventures, we and the other party to the joint venture may be required to make additional capital contributions, and subject to certain limitations, the joint ventures may incur additional debt. Such agreements also impose certain restrictions on the transfer of joint venture interests by us or the other party to the joint venture and provide certain rights to us or the other party to the joint venture to sell its interest to the joint venture or to the other joint venture partner on terms specified in the agreement. All of the joint ventures terminate in 2024 or later, but may end earlier if a joint venture ceases to hold any interest in or have any obligations relating to the property held by the joint venture. See “Item 14. Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Industrial Consolidated Joint Ventures


				Our											JV Partners’
				Ownership			Number of		Square		Gross Book				Share
Joint Ventures				Percentage			Buildings		Feet(1)		Value(2)		Debt		of Debt


				(Dollars in thousands)
Operating Properties:
Co-investment joint ventures:
	AMB-SGP(3)				50	%		59		6,783,749	$	304,902	$	206,790	$	103,395
	AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I(4)				21	%		100		4,947,862		356,298		155,856		124,090
	AMB Erie(5)				50	%		52		3,855,178		195,218		101,431		50,941
	AMB Partners II(6)				50	%		47		3,637,122		184,426		113,485		58,492
	AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II(4)				20	%		33		3,600,936		223,184		208,215		166,572

		Total co-investment joint ventures			37	%		291		22,824,847		1,264,028		785,777		503,490
Other Joint Ventures					92	%		33		2,778,065		233,124		48,814		2,626

	Total Operating Properties				45	%		324		25,602,912		1,497,152		835,591		506,116

Development Alliance Joint Ventures:
	AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I(4)				21	%		5		1,123,000		29,564		8,453		6,678
	AMB Partners II(6)				50	%		3		193,000		7,488		—		—
	Other Development Alliance Joint Ventures				93	%		9		937,000		31,503		—		—

	Total Development Alliances				57	%		17		2,253,000		68,555		8,453		6,678

			Total Industrial Consolidated Joint Ventures		46	%		341		27,855,912	$	1,565,707	$	844,044	$	512,794

(1) For development properties, this represents estimated square feet at completion of development for committed phases of development and renovation projects.

(2) Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets.

(3) A co-investment partnership with GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of the government of Singapore Investment Corporation.

(4) Represents a co-investment partnership with a private institutional REIT.

(5) Represents a co-investment partnership with the Erie Insurance Group.

(6) Represents a co-investment partnership with the City and County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System.

Retail Consolidated Joint Ventures


				Our									JV Partners’
				Ownership			Square		Gross Book				Share
Properties		Market		Percentage			Feet(1)		Value(2)		Debt		of Debt


		(Dollars in thousands)
Development Alliance Joint Venture
1. Springs Gate(3)(4)			Miami		100	%		—	$	10,214	$	—	$	—

Subtotal					100	%		—		10,214		—		—

Other Joint Ventures
2. Around Lenox(3)			Atlanta		90	%		121,517		20,925		9,730		973
3. Palm Aire(3)			Miami		100	%		130,865		19,905		7,071		1,011
4. Northridge Plaza(3)			Miami		100	%		229,010		36,341		—		—
5. Plaza Delray(3)			Miami		98	%		331,863		39,165		22,029		4,428

Subtotal								813,255		116,336		38,830		6,412

	Total				98	%		813,255	$	126,550	$	38,830	$	6,412

(1) For development properties, this represents estimated square feet at completion of development project.

(2) Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets.

(3) Included as part of retail properties held for divestiture.

(4) Represents 39 acres of land for future development.


	*Unconsolidated and Mortgage Investments:*

As of December 31, 2001, we held interests in three equity investment joint ventures that are unconsolidated in our financial statements. The management and control over significant aspects of these investments are with the third party joint venture partner. In addition, as of December 31, 2001, we held two mortgage investments from which we receive interest income.

Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

And Mortgage Investments


						Our		Our			Our
				Total		Net Equity		Ownership			Share
Properties		Market		Square Feet(1)		Investment		Percentage			of Debt


		(Dollars in thousands)
Operating Joint Ventures:
1. Elk Grove Du Page			Chicago		4,046,721	$	59,447		56	%	$	15,300
2. Pico Rivera			Southern California		855,600		9,430		50	%		17,084

Total Operating Joint Ventures					4,902,321		68,918		55	%		32,084

Development Alliance Joint Venture:
3. Monte Vista Spectrum			Southern California		577,000		2,179		50	%		6,844

	Total Unconsolidated Joint
	Ventures				5,479,321	$	71,097		55	%	$	38,928

Mortgage

Properties

Market

Maturity

Receivable

Rate

Mortgage Investment

1. Pier 1

SF Bay Area

May 2026

13,214

13.00

2. Manhattan Village Shopping Center(2)

Southern California

September 2002

74,000

9.50

Total Mortgage Investments

87,214

(1) Square feet for development alliance joint ventures represents estimated square feet at completion of development project.

(2) We re-negotiated this mortgage and received a $5.0 million pay-down on the principal balance and increased the interest rate to 9.5% from 8.75% in 2001.

Secured Debt

As of December 31, 2001, we had $1.2 billion of indebtedness, net of unamortized premiums, secured by deeds of trust on 99 properties. As of December 31, 2001, the total gross investment value of those properties secured by debt was $2.3 billion. Of the $1.2 billion of secured indebtedness, $759.4 million was joint venture debt. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Item 14. Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included in this report. We believe that as of December 31, 2001, the value of the properties securing the respective obligations in each case exceeded the principal amount of the outstanding obligations.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

As of December 31, 2001, there were no pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our properties are the subject, the adverse determination of which we anticipate would have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

PART II

Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters

Our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on November 21, 1997, under the symbol “AMB.” As of March 15, 2002, there were approximately 382 holders of record of our common stock (excluding shares held through The Depository Trust Company, as nominee). Set forth below are the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock, as reported on the NYSE composite tape, and the distribution per share paid by us during the period from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2001.


Year		High		Low		Distribution

2001
	1st Quarter		25.56		23.71		0.395
	2nd Quarter		25.76		22.90		0.395
	3rd Quarter		26.64		23.35		0.395
	4th Quarter		26.21		23.30		0.395
2000
	1st Quarter		21.50		19.25		0.37
	2nd Quarter		23.63		21.25		0.37
	3rd Quarter		24.94		23.00		0.37
	4th Quarter		26.06		23.25		0.37
1999
	1st Quarter		22.94		20.50		0.35
	2nd Quarter		23.50		20.56		0.35
	3rd Quarter		23.00		20.00		0.35
	4th Quarter		21.13		18.13		0.35

Item 6. Selected Financial and Other Data

SELECTED COMPANY AND PREDECESSOR FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA

The following table sets forth selected consolidated historical financial and other data for AMB Property Corporation and its predecessor on an historical basis as of and for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, and 1997. Prior to November 26, 1997 (our initial public offering date), AMB Property Corporation’s predecessor provided real estate investment management services to institutional investors.


															Pro Forma(1)			Historical(2)
			2001			2000			1999			1998			1997			1997


			(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Data
	Total revenues		$	600,845		$	480,207		$	448,183		$	358,887		$	284,674		$	56,062
	Income before minority interests			165,672			165,599			159,321			123,750			103,903			18,885
	Net income available to common stockholders			125,053			113,282			167,603			108,954			99,508			18,228
	Net income per common share:
		Basic(3)		1.49			1.35			1.94			1.27			1.16			1.39
		Diluted(3)		1.47			1.35			1.94			1.26			1.15			1.38
	Dividends per common share			1.58			1.48			1.40			1.37			1.37			0.13
Other Data
	EBITDA(4)		$	431,543		$	349,353		$	318,319		$	252,353		$	195,218
	Operating earnings(5)			93,631			112,138			116,810			108,954			99,508
	Funds from operations(6)			213,513			208,651			191,147			170,407			147,409
	Cash flows provided by (used in):
		Operating activities		288,562			261,175			190,391			177,180			131,621
		Investing activities		(363,152	)		(726,499	)		63,732			(793,366	)		(607,768	)
		Financing activities		127,303			452,370			(240,721	)		604,202			553,199
Balance Sheet Data
	Investments in real estate at cost		$	4,530,711		$	4,026,597		$	3,249,452		$	3,369,060					$	2,442,999
	Total assets			4,760,893			4,425,626			3,621,550			3,562,885						2,506,255
	Total consolidated debt(7)			2,135,664			1,836,276			1,270,037			1,368,196						685,652
	Our share of total debt			1,655,386			1,681,161			1,168,218			1,348,107						672,945
	Stockholders’ equity			1,752,342			1,767,930			1,829,259			1,765,360						1,668,030

(1) Pro forma 1997 financial and other data has been prepared as if our formation transactions, our initial public offering, and certain property acquisitions and divestitures in 1997 had occurred on January 1, 1997.

(2) The historical 1997 results represent our predecessor’s historical financial and other data for the period January 1, 1997 through November 25, 1997. The financial and other data of AMB Property Corporation and the properties acquired in our formation transactions have been included from November 26, 1997 to December 31, 1997.

(3) Basic and diluted net income per share equals the net income available to common stockholders divided by 84,174,644 and 85,214,066 shares, respectively for 2001; 83,697,170 and 84,155,306 shares, respectively, for 2000; 86,271,862 and 86,347,487 shares, respectively, for 1999; 85,876,383 and 86,235,176 shares, respectively, for 1998; and pro forma net income divided by 85,874,513 and 86,156,556 shares, respectively, for 1997.

(4) EBITDA is computed as income before divestiture of properties, net of minority interests and impairment charges, and minority interests plus interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We believe that in addition to cash flows and net income, EBITDA is a useful financial performance measure for assessing the operating performance of a real estate investment trust because, together with net income and cash flows, EBITDA provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a real estate investment trust to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Includes our pro rata share of EBITDA in an unconsolidated joint venture. EBITDA is not a measurement of operating performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operations, or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. EBITDA may not be indicative of our historical operating results nor our potential future results. While EBITDA is frequently used as a measure of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other real estate investment trusts.

(5) Operating earnings represents income before gains from dispositions of real estate, net of minority interests and impairment reserves on properties held for divestiture and operating properties, less minority interests’ share of net income and preferred stock dividends. It excludes the preferred unit redemption premium. We believe that in addition to cash flows and net income, operating earnings is a useful financial performance measure for assessing the operating performance of a real estate investment trust because, together with

net income and cash flows, operating earnings provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a real estate investment trust to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Operating earnings is not a measurement of operating performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operations, or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Operating earnings may not be indicative of our historical operating results nor our potential future results. While operating earnings is frequently used as a measure of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other real estate investment trusts.

(6) Funds from Operations, or FFO, is defined as income from operations before minority interest, gains or losses from sale of real estate, and extraordinary losses plus real estate depreciation and adjustment to derive our pro rata share of the FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures, less minority interests’ pro rata share of the FFO of consolidated joint ventures and preferred stock dividends. In accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust White Paper on funds from operations, we include the effects of straight-line rents in funds from operations. We believe that funds from operations is an appropriate measure of performance for a real estate investment trust. While funds from operations is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and it should not be considered as an alternative to these indicators in evaluating liquidity or operating performance. Further, funds from operations as disclosed by other real estate investment trusts may not be comparable.

(7) Secured debt includes unamortized debt premiums of approximately $6.8 million, $9.9 million, $10.1 million, $15.2 million, and $18.3 million as of December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively. See Notes 2 and 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the notes to consolidated financial statements. Statements contained in this discussion that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Such statements relate to our future performance and plans, results of operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and operating improvements and costs. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “pro forma,” “estimates,” or “anticipates‘ or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans, or intentions. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely upon them as predictions of future events. There is no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements will occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data, or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:

• defaults or non-renewal of leases by customers;

• increased interest rates and operating costs;

• our failure to obtain necessary outside financing;

• difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions;

• our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations;

• our failure to divest of properties that we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any such divestitures;

• risks and uncertainties affecting property development and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary permits, and public opposition to these activities);

• our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

• environmental uncertainties;

• risks related to natural disasters;

• financial market fluctuations;

• changes in real estate and zoning laws;

• increases in real property tax rates; and

• risks of doing business internationally.

Our success also depends upon economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes, and those other risk factors discussed in the section entitled “Business Risks” in this report. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak as of the date of this report or as of the dates indicated in the statements.

GENERAL

We commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company in connection with the completion of our initial public offering on November 26, 1997, and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with our initial tax return for the year ended December 31, 1997. AMB Property Corporation and the operating partnership were formed shortly before the consummation of our initial public offering.

We generate revenue primarily from rent received from customers at our properties, including reimbursements from customers for certain operating costs. In addition, our growth is, in part, dependent on our ability to increase occupancy rates or increase rental rates at our properties and our ability to continue the acquisition and development of additional properties. Our income would be adversely affected if a significant number of customers were unable to pay rent or if we were unable to rent our industrial space on favorable terms. Certain significant expenditures associated with an investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and maintenance costs) generally do not decline when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property. Moreover, as the general partner of the operating partnership, we generally will be liable for all of the operating partnership’s unsatisfied obligations other than non-recourse obligations, including the operating partnership’s obligations as the general partner of the co-investment joint ventures. Any such liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and contingencies as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

REIT Compliance. We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1997. We currently intend to operate so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code and believe that our current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code to enable us to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust. However, it is possible that we have been organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow us to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify.

Qualification as a real estate investment trust requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual and others on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in order to qualify as a real estate investment trust, we must derive at least 95% of our gross income in any year from qualifying sources. In addition, we must pay dividends to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly basis. These provisions and the applicable treasury regulations are more complicated in our case because we hold our assets through the operating partnership. Legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a real estate investment trust or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification. However, we are not aware of any pending tax legislation that would adversely affect our ability to operate as a real estate investment trust.

If we fail to qualify as a real estate investment trust in any taxable year, then we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a real estate investment trust for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification. If we lose our real estate investment trust status, then our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved and we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders. In addition, our annual fee on our unsecured credit facility may increase and certain rights that preferred limited partnership unitholders in our affiliates have to exchange their preferred units for shares of our preferred stock may be triggered.

Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate are stated at cost unless circumstances indicate that cost cannot be recovered, in which case, the carrying value of the property is reduced to estimated fair value. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable. Impairment is recognized when estimated expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) are less than the carrying amount of the property. The estimation of expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions regarding current and future market conditions and the availability of capital. If impairment analysis assumptions change, then an adjustment to the carrying amount of our long-lived assets could occur in the future period in which the assumptions change. To the extent that a property is impaired, the excess of the carrying amount of the property over its estimated fair value is charged to income. We evaluated our properties held for divestiture and operating properties for impairment and reduced their carrying value by $18.6 million and $5.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. We believe that there are no additional impairments of the carrying values of our investments in real estate at December 31, 2001.

Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. We have non-controlling limited partnership interests in three separate unconsolidated joint ventures. We account for the joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. We have a 56.1% interest in a joint venture, which owns an aggregate of 36 industrial buildings totaling approximately 4.0 million square feet. We also have a 50% interest in each of two other operating and development alliance joint ventures. Our net equity investment in these joint ventures is shown as Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures on our consolidated balance sheets.

Investments in Other Companies. Investments in other companies were accounted for on a cost basis and realized gains and losses were included in current earnings. For our investments in private companies, we periodically reviewed our investments to determine if the value of such investments had been permanently impaired. During 2001, we recognized a loss on our investments in other companies totaling $20.8 million, including our investment in Webvan Group, Inc. We had previously recognized gains and losses on our investment in Webvan Group, Inc. as a component of other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2001, we had realized a loss on 100% of our investments in other companies.

Rental Revenues. We record rental revenue from long-term operating leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases and maintain an allowance for estimated losses that may result from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If customers fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than our bad-debt reserves, then we may have to recognize additional bad debt charges in future periods.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The analysis below includes changes attributable to acquisitions, development activity and divestitures and the changes resulting from properties that we owned during both the current and prior year reporting periods, excluding development properties prior to being stabilized (generally defined as 90% leased or 12 months after we receive a certificate of occupancy for the building). We refer to these properties as the same store properties. For the comparison between the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, the same store industrial properties consisted of properties aggregating approximately 60.2 million square feet. The properties acquired in 2000 consisted of 145 buildings, aggregating approximately 10.5 million square feet, and the properties acquired during 2001 consisted of 65 buildings, aggregating 6.8 million square feet. In 2000, property divestitures consisted of one retail center and 25 industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 2.5 million square feet, and property divestitures during 2001 consisted of 24 industrial and two retail buildings, aggregating approximately 3.2 million square feet. Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, may be impacted by the acquisition of additional properties and dispositions. Our future revenues and expenses may vary materially from historical rates.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2001 and 2000


Rental Revenues		2001		2000		$ Change			% Change


		(Dollars in millions)
Same store		$	400.2	$	376.7	$	23.5			6.2	%
2000 acquisitions			97.1		25.6		71.5			279.3	%
2001 acquisitions			22.8		—		22.8			—
Developments			27.0		14.6		12.4			84.9	%
Divestitures			10.9		37.1		(26.2	)		(70.6	)%
Straight-line rents			10.1		10.2		(0.1	)		(1.0	)%

	Total	$	568.1	$	464.2	$	103.9			22.4	%

The growth in rental revenues in same store properties resulted primarily from the incremental effect of cash rental rate increases on renewals and rollovers, fixed rent increases on existing leases, and reimbursement of expenses, partially offset by lower average occupancies. During 2001, the same store rent increases on industrial renewals and rollovers (cash basis) was 23.5% on 10.0 million square feet leased.


Investment Management and Other Income	2001		2000		$ Change		% Change

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures	$	5.5	$	5.2	$	0.3		5.8	%
Investment management income		11.0		4.3		6.7		155.8	%
Interest and other income		16.3		6.5		9.8		150.8	%

Total	$	32.8	$	16.0	$	16.8		105.0	%

The $6.7 million increase in investment management income was due primarily to increased asset management and acquisition fees and priority distributions from our co-investment joint ventures. The $9.8 million increase in interest and other income was primarily due to interest income from our mortgage note on the retail center that we sold in 2000 and from interest income resulting from higher average cash balances.


Property Operating Expenses and Real Estate Taxes			2001		2000		$ Change			% Change

(Exclusive of depreciation and amortization)
Rental expenses			$	69.0	$	50.6	$	18.4			36.4	%
Real estate taxes				69.2		57.2		12.0			21.0	%

	Property operating expenses		$	138.2	$	107.8	$	30.4			28.2	%

Same store			$	93.2	$	87.2	$	6.0			6.9	%
2000 acquisitions				27.9		7.1		20.8			293.0	%
2001 acquisitions				4.4		—		4.4			—
Developments				9.6		4.3		5.3			123.3	%
Divestitures				3.1		9.2		(6.1	)		(66.3	)%

		Total	$	138.2	$	107.8	$	30.4			28.2	%

The increase in same store properties’ operating expenses primarily relates to increases in common area maintenance expenses of $2.3 million, real estate taxes of $2.5 million, and insurance expense of $0.8 million.


Other Expenses		2001		2000		$ Change		% Change

Interest, including amortization		$	129.0	$	90.3	$	38.7		42.9	%
Depreciation and amortization			111.4		90.4		21.0		23.2	%
General and administrative			35.8		23.7		12.1		51.1	%

	Total	$	276.2	$	204.4	$	71.8		35.1	%

The increase in interest expense was primarily due to the issuance of additional unsecured senior debt securities and an increase in secured debt balances, partially offset by decreased borrowings on our unsecured credit facility. The secured debt issuances were primarily for our co-investment joint ventures’ properties. The increase in depreciation expense was due to the increase in our net investment in real estate. The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased personnel and occupancy costs. In addition, the consolidation of AMB Investment Management, Inc. (predecessor-in-interest to AMB Capital Partners, LLC) and Headlands Realty Corporation on May 31, 2001, resulted in an increase in general and administrative expenses of $4.9 million.

During 2001, we recognized $20.8 million of losses on investments in other companies, related to our investment in Webvan Group, Inc. and other technology-related companies. The loss reflects a 100% write-down of the book value of the investments.

During 2001, we retired $55.2 million of secured debt prior to maturity primarily in connection with property divestitures and early prepayments. We recognized a net extraordinary loss of $0.6 million related to the early retirement of debt, resulting from prepayment penalties, partially offset by the write-off of debt premiums.

For the Years Ended December 31, 2000 and 1999


Rental Revenues		2000		1999		$ Change			% Change


		(Dollars in millions)
Same store		$	314.4	$	293.3	$	21.1			7.2	%
1999 acquisitions			85.1		41.0		44.1			107.6	%
2000 acquisitions			28.0		—		28.0			—
Developments			7.0		4.2		2.8			66.7	%
Divestitures			19.5		90.4		(70.9	)		(78.4	)%
Straight-line rents			10.2		10.8		(0.6	)		(5.6	)%

	Total	$	464.2	$	439.7	$	24.5			5.6	%

The growth in rental revenues in same store properties resulted primarily from the incremental effect of cash rental rate increases, fixed rent increases on existing leases, increases in occupancy and reimbursement of expenses, partially offset by a decrease in straight-line rents. During 2000, the same store base rents increase on renewals and rollovers (cash basis) was 28.0% on 9.8 million square feet leased.


Investment Management and Other Income		2000		1999		$ Change		% Change

Equity earnings in unconsolidated joint ventures		$	5.2	$	4.7	$	0.5		10.6	%
Investment management and other income			10.8		3.8		7.0		184.2	%

	Total	$	16.0	$	8.5	$	7.5		88.2	%

The $7.0 million increase in investment management and other income was due primarily to increased acquisition fees from AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P., interest income, and development fees.


Property Operating Expenses		2000		1999		$ Change			% Change

Rental expenses		$	50.6	$	51.7	$	(1.1	)		(2.1	)%
Real estate taxes			57.2		56.2		1.0			1.8	%

	Property operating expenses	$	107.8	$	107.9	$	(0.1	)		(0.1	)%

Same store		$	72.1	$	69.6	$	2.5			3.6	%
1999 acquisitions			20.4		12.2		8.2			67.2	%
2000 acquisitions			7.7		—		7.7			—
Developments			2.5		1.8		0.7			38.9	%
Divestitures			5.1		24.3		(19.2	)		(79.0	)%

	Total	$	107.8	$	107.9	$	(0.1	)		(0.1	)%

The change in same store properties’ operating expenses primarily relates to increases in real estate taxes of $2.0 million for 2000, partially offset by decreases in insurance of $0.6 million.


Other Expenses		2000		1999		$ Change			% Change

Interest expense		$	90.3	$	88.7	$	1.6			1.8	%
Depreciation expense			90.4		67.0		23.4			34.9	%
General and administrative expense			23.7		25.2		(1.5	)		(6.0	)%

	Total	$	204.4	$	180.9	$	23.5			13.0	%

The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increase in the outstanding balance under our unsecured credit facility. The increase in depreciation expense was primarily due to lower than normal depreciation expense in 1999 and increases in our investments in real estate. Under the required accounting for assets held for sale, we discontinued depreciation of a substantial portion of our retail portfolio after we committed to dispose of a portion of the portfolio in March 1999. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was due to increased allocations to AMB Investment Management, Inc. (predecessor-in-interest to AMB Capital Partners, LLC), partially offset by increased personnel costs.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

We currently expect that our principal sources of working capital and funding for acquisitions, development, expansion, and renovation of properties will include: (1) cash flow from operations; (2) borrowings under our unsecured credit facility; (3) other forms of secured or unsecured financing; (4) proceeds from equity or debt offerings by us or the operating partnership (including issuances of limited partnership units in the operating partnership or its subsidiaries); and (5) net proceeds from divestitures of properties. Additionally, we believe that our private capital co-investment program will also continue to serve as a source of capital for acquisitions and developments. We believe that our sources of working capital, specifically our cash flow

from operations and borrowings available under our unsecured credit facility, and our ability to access private and public debt and equity capital, are adequate for us to meet our liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.

Capital Resources

Property Divestitures. In 2001, we divested ourselves of 24 industrial and two retail buildings for an aggregate price of $193.4 million, with a resulting net gain of $24.1 million, net of minority interest partners’ share.

Properties Held for Divestiture. We have decided to divest ourselves of three industrial properties and seven retail centers, which are not in our core markets or which do not meet our strategic objectives. The divestitures of the properties are subject to negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions. As of December 31, 2001, the net carrying value of the properties held for divestiture was $157.2 million.

Co-investment Joint Ventures. We consolidate the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of our five co-investment joint ventures. We consolidate these joint ventures for financial reporting purposes because we are the sole managing general partner and, as a result, control all of the major operating decisions. Third-party equity interests in the joint ventures are reflected as minority interests in the consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2001, we owned approximately 26.9 million square feet of our properties through these entities. We may make additional investments through these joint ventures or new joint ventures in the future and presently plan to do so. The inability to obtain new joint venture partners could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

During 2001, we contributed $539.2 million in operating properties, consisting of 111 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 10.8 million square feet, to three of our co-investment joint ventures. We recognized a gain of $17.8 million related to these contributions, representing the portion of the contributed properties acquired by the third party co-investors.

We formed AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II, L.P. to acquire, develop, and redevelop distribution facilities nationwide, in which AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II, Inc. became a partner on June 28, 2001. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund II had received total equity commitments from third party investors of $195.4 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $488.6 million. We are the managing general partner of the Alliance Fund II and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 20% of the co-investment joint venture.

We formed AMB-SGP, L.P. with a subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation, to own and operate, through a private real estate investment trust, distribution facilities nationwide. On March 23, 2001, AMB-SGP, L.P. received an equity contribution from GIC of $75.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $335.0 million. We are the managing general partner of AMB-SGP, L.P. and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50.3% of the co-investment joint venture.

We formed AMB Partners II, L.P. with the City and County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System to acquire, develop, and redevelop distribution facilities nationwide. On February 14, 2001, Partners II received an equity contribution from CCSFERS of $50.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and our investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $250.0 million. We are the managing general partner of Partners II and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50% of the co-investment joint venture.

The operating partnership, together with one of our other affiliates, owns, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 21% of the partnership interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P. The Alliance Fund I is a co-investment partnership between the operating partnership and AMB Institutional Alliance REIT I, Inc., which includes 15 institutional investors as stockholders, and is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings in target markets

nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund I had received equity contributions from third party investors totaling $169.0 million, which, when combined with debt financings and our investment, creates a total capitalization of $378.0 million.

The operating partnership, together with one of our other affiliates, owns, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50% of the partnership interests in AMB/ Erie. L.P. Erie is a co-investment partnership between the operating partnership and various entities related to Erie Indemnity Company, and is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, Erie had received equity contributions from third party investors totaling $13.7 million, which, when combined with debt financings and our investment, created a total capitalization of $129.0 million.

Credit Facilities. In May 2000, the operating partnership entered into a $500.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement. We guarantee the operating partnership’s obligations under the credit facility. The credit facility matures in May 2003, has a one-year extension option, and is subject to a 15 basis point annual facility fee, which is based on our credit rating. The operating partnership has the ability to increase available borrowings to $700.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase its commitments. We use our unsecured credit facility principally for acquisitions and for general working capital requirements. Borrowings under our credit facility currently bear interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points, which is based on our credit rating. Increases in interest rates on this indebtedness could increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. Accordingly, in the future, we may engage in transactions to limit our exposure to rising interest rates. As of December 31, 2001, there was an outstanding balance of $12.0 million on our unsecured credit facility. Monthly debt service payments on our credit facility are interest only. The total amount available under our credit facility fluctuates based upon the borrowing base, as defined in the agreement governing the credit facility. At December 31, 2001, the remaining amount available under our unsecured credit facility was $488.0 million (excluding the additional $200.0 million of potential additional capacity).

In July 2001, the Alliance Fund II obtained a $150.0 million credit facility from Bank of America N.A. Borrowings currently bear interest at LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points. As of December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance was $123.5 million and the remaining amount available was $26.5 million. The credit facility is secured by the unfunded capital commitments of the third party investors in the Alliance REIT II and the Alliance Fund II.

Equity. In December 2001, AMB Property II, L.P., one of our subsidiaries, repurchased all of its outstanding 2,200,000 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from three institutional investors. The units were redeemed for an aggregate cost of $115.7 million, including accrued and unpaid dividends totaling $1.3 million and a premium of $4.4 million. The Series C Preferred Units had a par value of $110.0 million.

In September 2001, the operating partnership issued and sold 800,000 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units at a price of $50.00 per unit in a private placement. Distributions are cumulative from the date of issuance and payable quarterly in arrears. The Series J Preferred Units are redeemable by the operating partnership on or after September 21, 2006, subject to certain conditions, for cash at a redemption price equal to $50.00 per unit, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon, if any, to the redemption date. The Series J Preferred Units are exchangeable, at specified times and subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of our Series J Preferred Stock. The operating partnership used the net proceeds of $38.9 million for general corporate purposes, which may include the partial repayment of indebtedness or the acquisition or development of additional properties.

In March 2001, AMB Property II, L.P., one of our subsidiaries, issued and sold 510,000 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units at a price of $50.00 per unit in a private placement. Distributions are cumulative from the date of issuance and payable quarterly in arrears at a rate per unit equal to $4.00 per annum. The Series I Preferred Units are redeemable by AMB Property II, L.P. on or after March 21, 2006, subject to certain conditions, for cash at a redemption price equal to $50.00 per unit,

plus accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon, if any, to the redemption date. The Series I Preferred Units are exchangeable, at specified times and subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of our Series I Preferred Stock. AMB Property II, L.P. used the net proceeds of $24.9 million to repay advances from the operating partnership and to make a loan to the operating partnership. The operating partnership used the funds to partially repay borrowings under its unsecured credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The loan bears interest at 8.0% per annum and is payable on demand.

During 2001, we redeemed 223,092 and 635,798 common limited partnership units of the operating partnership for cash and shares of our common stock, respectively.

Our board of directors approved a stock repurchase program in 1999 for the repurchase of up to $100.0 million worth of our common stock. During 2001, we repurchased 1,392,600 shares of our common stock at an average purchase price of $23.62 per share under the program. Under the program to date, we have repurchased 2,836,200 shares our common stock at an average purchase price of $21.22 per share. Our stock repurchase program expired in December 2001. Our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $100.0 million worth of our common stock. The new stock repurchase program expires in December 2003 and no repurchases were made under the new program in 2001.

Debt. As of December 31, 2001, the aggregate principal amount of our secured debt was $1.2 billion, excluding unamortized debt premiums of $6.8 million. The secured debt bears interest at rates varying from 4.0% to 10.6% per annum (with a weighted average rate of 7.3%) and final maturity dates ranging from February 2002 to June 2023. All of the secured debt bears interest at fixed rates, except for three loans with an aggregate principal amount of $52.4 million as of December 31, 2001, which bear interest at variable rates (with a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% at December 31, 2001).

In August 2000, the operating partnership commenced a medium-term note program for the issuance of up to $400.0 million in principal amount of medium-term notes, which will be guaranteed by us. As of December 31, 2001, the operating partnership had issued $380.0 million of medium-term notes under this program, leaving $20.0 million available for issuance. However, on January 14, 2002, the operating partnership issued and sold the remaining $20.0 million of the notes under this program to Lehman Brothers, Inc., as principal. We have guaranteed the notes, which mature on January 17, 2007, and bear interest at 5.90% per annum. The operating partnership used the net proceeds of $19.9 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. In January 2001, the operating partnership issued and sold $25.0 million of the notes under this program to A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., as principal. We have guaranteed the notes, which mature on January 30, 2006, and bear interest at 6.90% per annum. The operating partnership used the net proceeds of $24.9 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. In March 2001, the operating partnership issued and sold $50.0 million of the notes under this program to First Union Securities, Inc., as principal. We have guaranteed the notes, which mature on March 7, 2011, and bear interest at 7.00% per annum. The operating partnership used the net proceeds of $49.7 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. In September 2001, the operating partnership issued and sold $25.0 million of the notes under this program to Lehman Brothers, Inc., as principal. We have guaranteed the notes, which mature on September 6, 2011, and bear interest at 6.75% per annum. The operating partnership used the net proceeds of $24.8 million for general corporate purposes and to acquire and develop additional properties.

We guarantee the operating partnership’s obligations with respect to the senior debt securities. If we are unable to refinance or extend principal payments due at maturity or pay them with proceeds of other capital transactions, then we expect that our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to pay dividends to our stockholders and to repay all such maturing debt. Furthermore, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to that refinanced indebtedness would increase. This increased interest expense would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. In addition, if we mortgage one or more of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments,

then the property could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value. A foreclosure on one or more of our properties could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Mortgage Receivables. In September 2000, we sold our retail center located in Los Angeles, California. As of December 31, 2001, we carried a 9.50% mortgage note in the principal amount of $74.0 million on the retail center. The maturity date of the mortgage note, which was originally scheduled to mature on October 1, 2001, has been extended to September 30, 2002. Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we also hold a mortgage loan receivable on AMB Pier One, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture. The note bears interest at 13.0% and matures in May 2026. As of December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance on the note was $13.2 million.

In order to maintain financial flexibility and facilitate the deployment of capital through market cycles, we presently intend to operate with a debt-to-total market capitalization ratio of approximately 45% or less. At December 31, 2001, our debt-to-total market capitalization ratio was 44.7%. Additionally, we currently intend to manage our capitalization in order to maintain an investment grade rating on our senior unsecured debt. In spite of these policies, our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. Accordingly, our board of directors could alter or eliminate these policies or circumstances could arise that could render us unable to comply with these policies.

The tables below summarize our debt maturities and capitalization as of December 31, 2001:

Debt


			REIT			Joint			Unsecured
			Secured			Venture			Senior Debt			Credit			Total
			Debt(1)			Debt			Securities			Facilities(1)			Debt


			(Dollars in thousands)
2002			$	28,193		$	68,505		$	—		$	—		$	96,698
2003				76,295			13,577			—			135,500			225,372
2004				65,284			47,607			—			—			112,891
2005				62,826			37,796			250,000			—			350,622
2006				94,965			74,115			25,000			—			194,080
2007				30,198			25,682			55,000			—			110,880
2008				33,619			147,552			175,000			—			356,171
2009				5,176			32,351			—			—			37,527
2010				52,780			71,966			75,000			—			199,746
2011				1,311			167,878			75,000			—			244,189
Thereafter				3,307			72,345			125,000			—			200,652

	Subtotal			453,954			759,374			780,000			135,500			2,128,828
	Unamortized premiums			5,090			1,746			—			—			6,836

		Total consolidated debt		459,044			761,120			780,000			135,500			2,135,664
Our share of unconsolidated joint venture debt(2)				—			38,928			—			—			38,928

		Total debt		459,044			800,048			780,000			135,500			2,174,592
Joint venture partners’ share of consolidated joint venture debt				—			(420,406	)		—			(98,800	)		(519,206	)

	Our share of total debt		$	459,044		$	379,642		$	780,000		$	36,700		$	1,655,386

Weighed average interest rate				8.1	%		7.1	%		7.3	%		2.8	%		7.1	%
Weighed average maturity (in years)				4.7			7.4			7.6			1.6			6.5

(1) The 2003 maturity includes a $125.0 million credit facility obtained by the Alliance Fund II, which we expect to repay with capital contributions and secured debt proceeds and had an outstanding balance of $123.5 million at December 31, 2001. The operating partnership also has a $500.0 million credit facility that had an outstanding balance of $12.0 million at December 31, 2001.

(2) The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated joint venture debt were 6.3% and 7.0 years, respectively.

Market Equity


		Shares/Units
		Outstanding		Market Price		Market Value


		(Dollars in thousands, except share price)
Common stock			83,821,829	$	26.00	$	2,179,368
Common limited partnership units			4,969,027		26.00		129,195

	Total		88,790,856			$	2,308,563

Preferred Stock and Units


		Dividend			Liquidation		Redemption
		Rate			Preference		Provisions


		(Dollars in thousands)
Series A preferred stock			8.50	%	$	100,000		July 2003
Series B preferred units			8.63	%		65,000		November 2003
Series D preferred units			7.75	%		79,767		May 2004
Series E preferred units			7.75	%		11,022		August 2004
Series F preferred units			7.95	%		19,872		March 2005
Series G preferred units			7.95	%		1,000		August 2005
Series H preferred units			8.13	%		42,000		September 2005
Series I preferred units			8.00	%		25,500		March 2006
Series J preferred units			7.95	%		40,000		September 2006

	Weighted average/total		8.18	%	$	384,161

Capitalization Ratios


Total debt-to-total market capitalization	44.7	%
Our share of total debt-to-total market capitalization	38.1	%
Total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization	52.6	%
Our share of total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization	46.9	%
Our share of total debt-to-total book capitalization	44.9	%

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2001, we had approximately $81.7 million in cash, restricted cash, and cash equivalents, and $488.0 million of additional available borrowings under our credit facility. We also had $26.5 million of additional available borrowing under our Alliance Fund II credit facility. To fund acquisitions, development activities, and capital expenditures and to provide for general working capital requirements, we intend to use: (1) cash from operations; (2) borrowings under our credit facility; (3) other forms of secured and unsecured financing; (4) proceeds from any future debt or equity offerings by us or the operating partnership (including issuances of limited partnership units in the operating partnership or its subsidiaries); (5) proceeds from divestitures of properties; and (6) private capital. The unavailability of capital would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Our board of directors declared a regular cash dividend for the quarter ending December 31, 2001, of $0.395 per share of common stock and the operating partnership declared a regular cash distribution for the quarter ending December 31, 2001, of $0.395 per common unit. The dividends and distributions were payable on December 24, 2001, to stockholders and unitholders of record on December 14, 2001. The Series A, B, E, F, G, and J preferred stock and unit dividends and distributions were also payable on January 15, 2002, to stockholders and unitholders of record on January 4, 2002. The Series D, H, and I preferred unit distributions were payable on December 25, 2001, to unitholders of record on December 10, 2001. The following table sets forth the dividend payments and distributions for 2001 and 2000:


Security	Paying Entity		2001		2000

Common stock		AMB Property Corporation	$	1.58	$	1.48
Operating partnership units		Operating Partnership	$	1.58	$	1.48
Series A preferred stock		AMB Property Corporation	$	2.13	$	2.13
Series A preferred units		Operating Partnership	$	2.13	$	2.13
Series B preferred units		Operating Partnership	$	4.31	$	4.31
Series C preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.88	$	4.38
Series D preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.88	$	3.88
Series E preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.88	$	3.88
Series F preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.98	$	3.09
Series G preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.98	$	1.35
Series H preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	4.06	$	1.30
Series I preferred units		AMB Property II, L.P	$	3.04		n/a
Series J preferred units		Operating Partnership	$	1.24		n/a

The anticipated size of our distributions, using only cash from operations, will not allow us to retire all of our debt as it comes due. Therefore, we intend to also repay maturing debt with net proceeds from future debt or equity financings, as well as property divestitures. However, we may not be able to obtain future financings on favorable terms or at all. Our inability to obtain future financings on favorable terms or at all would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Capital Commitments

Developments. In addition to recurring capital expenditures, which consist of building improvements and leasing costs incurred to renew or re-tenant space, as of December 31, 2001, we are developing 12 projects representing a total estimated investment of $154.4 million upon completion and two development projects available for sale representing a total estimated investment of $50.0 million upon completion. Of this total, $127.3 million had been funded as of December 31, 2001, and an estimated $77.1 million is required to complete current and planned projects. We expect to fund these expenditures with cash from operations, borrowings under our credit facility, debt or equity issuances, and net proceeds from property divestitures, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flow. We may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms for development projects and we may not complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing such properties and generating cash flow. This could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. We have no other material capital commitments.

Acquisitions. During 2001, we invested $428.3 million in 65 operating industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 6.8 million rentable square feet. We funded these acquisitions and initiated development and renovation projects through private capital contributions, borrowings under our credit facility, cash, debt and equity issuances, and net proceeds from property divestitures.

Lease Commitments. We have entered into operating ground leases on certain land parcels with periods up to 40 years and a lease on a building in New York City. Future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2001, were as follows (dollars in thousands):


2002	$	6,823
2003		7,720
2004		7,921
2005		8,159
2006		8,480
Thereafter		146,335

	$	185,438

These operating lease payments are being amortized ratably over the terms of the related leases.

Captive Insurance Company. We have responded to recent trends towards increasing costs and decreasing coverage availability in the insurance markets by obtaining higher-deductible property insurance from third party insurers and by forming a wholly-owned captive insurance company, Arcata National Insurance Ltd. in December 2001. Arcata will generally provide insurance coverage for losses below the increased deductible under the third party policies. Premiums paid to Arcata have a retrospective component, so that if expenses, including losses, are less than premiums collected, the excess will be returned to the property owners (and, in turn, as appropriate, to the customers) and conversely, if expenses, including losses, are greater than premiums collected, an additional premium, not in excess of the difference, will be charged. Through this structure, we believe that we have been able to obtain insurance for our portfolio with more comprehensive coverage at a projected overall lower cost than would otherwise be available in the market.

Potential Unknown Liabilities. Unknown liabilities may include the following: (1) liabilities for clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions; (2) claims of customers, vendors, or other persons dealing with our predecessors prior to our formation transactions that had not been asserted prior to our formation transactions; (3) accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; (4) tax liabilities; and (5) claims for indemnification by the officers and directors of our predecessors and others indemnified by these entities.

Funds From Operations

We believe that funds from operations, or FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, is an appropriate measure of performance for a real estate investment trust. While funds from operations is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and it should not be considered as an alternative to those indicators in evaluating liquidity or operating performance. Further, funds from operations as disclosed by other real estate investment trusts may not be comparable.

FFO is defined as income from operations before minority interest, gains or losses from sale of real estate, and extraordinary items plus real estate depreciation and adjustment to derive our pro rata share of FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures, less minority interests’ pro rata share of FFO of consolidated joint ventures and perpetual preferred stock dividends. In accordance with the NAREIT White Paper on funds from operations, we include the effects of straight-line rents in funds from operations. Further, we do not adjust FFO to eliminate the effects of non-recurring charges.

The following table reflects the calculation of funds from operations for the years ended December 31, (dollars in thousands):


		2001			2000			1999

Income before minority interests		$	165,672		$	165,599		$	159,321
Gains on developments held for sale			13,169			—			—
Real estate related depreciation and amortization:
	Total depreciation and amortization		111,414			90,358			67,035
	Furniture, fixtures, and equipment depreciation and ground lease amortization(1)		(1,963	)		(1,114	)		(1,002	)
FFO attributable to minority interests(2)			(40,144	)		(15,055	)		(8,182	)
Adjustments to derive FFO in unconsolidated joint venture(3):
	Our share of net income		(5,467	)		(5,212	)		(4,701	)
	Our share of FFO		8,014			7,188			6,677
Series A preferred stock dividends			(8,500	)		(8,500	)		(8,500	)
Preferred unit distributions			(28,682	)		(24,613	)		(19,501	)

	FFO	$	213,513		$	208,651		$	191,147

(1) Ground lease amortization represents the amortization of our investments in ground lease properties, for which we do not have a purchase option.

(2) Represents FFO attributable to minority interests in consolidated joint ventures whose interests are not exchangeable into common stock. The minority interests’ share of net operating income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $65.0 million, $25.0 million, and $12.5 million, respectively.

(3) Our share of net operating income for years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $10.2 million, $8.3 million, and $8.0 million, respectively.

BUSINESS RISKS

Our operations involve various risks that could have adverse consequences to us. These risks include, among others:

General Real Estate Risks


	*There Are Factors Outside of Our Control that Affect the Performance and Value of Our Properties*

Real property investments are subject to varying degrees of risk. The yields available from equity investments in real estate depend on the amount of income earned and capital appreciation generated by the related properties as well as the expenses incurred in connection with the properties. If our properties do not generate income sufficient to meet operating expenses, including debt service and capital expenditures, then our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders could be adversely affected. Income from, and the value of, our properties may be adversely affected by the general economic climate, local conditions such as oversupply of industrial space, or a reduction in demand for industrial space, the attractiveness of our properties to potential customers, competition from other properties, our ability to provide adequate maintenance and insurance, and an increase in operating costs. Periods of economic slowdown or recession in the United States and in other countries, rising interest rates, or declining demand for real estate, or public perception that any of these events may occur would result in a general decrease in rents or an increased occurrence of defaults under existing leases, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Future terrorist attacks in the United States may result in declining economic activity, which could harm the demand for and the value of our properties. To the extent that our customers are impacted by future attacks, their businesses similarly could be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to honor their existing leases. Our properties are currently concentrated predominantly in the industrial real estate sector. Our concentration in a certain property type exposes us to the risk of economic downturns in this sector to a

greater extent than if our portfolio also included other property types. As a result of such concentration, economic downturns in the industrial real estate sector could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. In addition, revenues from properties and real estate values are also affected by factors such as the cost of compliance with regulations, the potential for liability under applicable laws (including changes in tax laws), interest rate levels, and the availability of financing. Our income would be adversely affected if a significant number of customers were unable to pay rent or if we were unable to rent our industrial space on favorable terms. Certain significant expenditures associated with an investment in real estate (such as mortgage payments, real estate taxes, and maintenance costs) generally do not decline when circumstances cause a reduction in income from the property.


	*We May Be Unable to Renew Leases or Relet Space as Leases Expire*

We are subject to the risks that leases may not be renewed, space may not be relet, or the terms of renewal or reletting (including the cost of required renovations) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Leases on a total of 14.9% of our industrial properties (based on annualized base rent) as of December 31, 2001, will expire on or prior to December 31, 2002. In addition, numerous properties compete with our properties in attracting customers to lease space, particularly with respect to retail centers. The number of competitive commercial properties in a particular area could have a material adverse effect on our ability to lease space in our properties and on the rents that we are able to charge. Our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock could be adversely affected if we are unable to promptly relet or renew the leases for all or a substantial portion of expiring leases, if the rental rates upon renewal or reletting is significantly lower than expected, or if our reserves for these purposes prove inadequate.


	*Real Estate Investments are Illiquid*

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to vary our portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. The limitations in the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations on a real estate investment trust holding property for sale may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting dividends to our stockholders. The relative illiquidity of our holdings and Internal Revenue Code prohibitions and related regulations could impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our investments and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.


	*A Significant Number of Our Properties Are Located in California*

Our industrial properties located in California as of December 31, 2001, represented approximately 28.7% of the aggregate square footage of our industrial operating properties as of December 31, 2001, and 35.9% of our annualized base rent. Annualized base rent means the monthly contractual amount under existing leases as of December 31, 2001, multiplied by 12. This amount excludes expense reimbursements and rental abatements. Our revenue from, and the value of, our properties located in California may be affected by a number of factors, including local real estate conditions (such as oversupply of or reduced demand for industrial properties) and the local economic climate. Business layoffs, downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics, and other factors may adversely impact the local economic climate. A downturn in either the California economy or in California real estate conditions could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and our ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. Certain of our properties are also subject to possible loss from seismic activity.

Some Potential Losses Are not Covered by Insurance

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage, and rental loss insurance covering all of our properties, with policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances given relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage, and industry practice. There are, however, certain losses that are not generally insured because it is not economically feasible to insure against them,

including losses due to acts of terrorism, riots or acts of war. Certain losses such as losses due to floods or seismic activity may be insured subject to certain limitations including large deductibles or co-payments and policy limits. If an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occurs with respect to one or more of our properties, then we could lose the capital we invested in the properties, as well as the anticipated future revenue from the properties and, in the case of debt, which is with recourse to us, we would remain obligated for any mortgage debt or other financial obligations related to the properties. Moreover, as the general partner of the operating partnership, we generally will be liable for all of the operating partnership’s unsatisfied obligations other than non-recourse obligations, including any obligations incurred by the operating partnership as the general partner of the co-investment joint ventures. Any such liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

A number of our properties are located in areas that are known to be subject to earthquake activity, including California where, as of December 31, 2001, 291 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 23.4 million square feet (representing 28.7% of our industrial operating properties based on aggregate square footage and 35.9% based on annualized base rent) are located. We carry replacement cost earthquake insurance on all of our properties located in areas historically subject to seismic activity, subject to coverage limitations and deductibles that we believe are commercially reasonable. This insurance coverage also applies to the properties managed by AMB Capital Partners, LLC, with a single aggregate policy limit and deductible applicable to those properties and our properties. Through an annual analysis prepared by outside consultants, we evaluate our earthquake insurance coverage in light of current industry practice and determine the appropriate amount of earthquake insurance to carry. We may incur material losses in excess of insurance proceeds and we may not be able to continue to obtain insurance at commercially reasonable rates.

We Are Subject to Risks and Liabilities In Connection With Properties Owned Through Joint Ventures, Limited Liability Companies, and Partnerships

As of December 31, 2001, we had ownership interests in several joint ventures, limited liability companies, or partnerships with third parties, as well as interests in three unconsolidated entities. As of December 31, 2001, we owned approximately 34.1 million square feet (excluding three unconsolidated joint ventures) of our properties through these entities. We may make additional investments through these ventures in the future and presently plan to do so. Such partners may share certain approval rights over major decisions. Partnership, limited liability company, or joint venture investments may involve risks such as the following: (1) our partners, co-members, or joint venturers might become bankrupt (in which event we and any other remaining general partners, members, or joint venturers would generally remain liable for the liabilities of the partnership, limited liability company, or joint venture); (2) our partners, co-members, or joint venturers might at any time have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our business interests or goals; (3) our partners, co-members, or joint venturers may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions, requests, policies, or objectives, including our current policy with respect to maintaining our qualification as a real estate investment trust; and (4) agreements governing joint ventures, limited liability companies, and partnerships often contain restrictions on the transfer of a joint venturer’s, member’s, or partner’s interest or “buy-sell” or other provisions, which may result in a purchase or sale of the interest at a disadvantageous time or on disadvantageous terms.

We will, however, generally seek to maintain sufficient control of our partnerships, limited liability companies, and joint ventures to permit us to achieve our business objectives. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of available funds that we may invest in partnerships, limited liability companies, or joint ventures. The occurrence of one or more of the events described above could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

We May be Unable to Consummate Acquisitions on Advantageous Terms

We intend to continue to acquire primarily industrial properties. Acquisitions of properties entail risks that investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations. Estimates of the costs of improvements

necessary for us to bring an acquired property up to market standards may prove inaccurate. In addition, there are general investment risks associated with any real estate investment. Further, we anticipate significant competition for attractive investment opportunities from other major real estate investors with significant capital including both publicly traded real estate investment trusts and private institutional investment funds. We expect that future acquisitions will be financed through a combination of borrowings under our unsecured credit facility, proceeds from equity or debt offerings by us or the operating partnership (including issuances of limited partnership units by the operating partnership or its subsidiaries), and proceeds from property divestitures, which could have an adverse effect on our cash flow. We may not be able to acquire additional properties. Our inability to finance any future acquisitions on favorable terms or the failure of acquisitions to conform with our expectations or investment criteria, or our failure to timely reinvest the proceeds from property divestitures could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

We May be Unable to Complete Renovation and Development on Advantageous Terms

The real estate development business, including the renovation and rehabilitation of existing properties, involves significant risks. These risks include the following: (1) we may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms for development projects and we may not complete construction on schedule or within budget, resulting in increased debt service expense and construction costs and delays in leasing such properties and generating cash flow; (2) we may not be able to obtain, or we may experience delays in obtaining, all necessary zoning, land-use, building, occupancy, and other required governmental permits and authorizations; (3) new or renovated properties may perform below anticipated levels, producing cash flow below budgeted amounts; (4) substantial renovation as well as new development activities, regardless of whether or not they are ultimately successful, typically require a substantial portion of management’s time and attention that could divert management’s time from our day-to-day operations; and (5) activities that we finance through construction loans involve the risk that, upon completion of construction, we may not be able to obtain permanent financing or we may not be able to obtain permanent financing on advantageous terms. These risks could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

We May be Unable to Complete Divestitures on Advantageous Terms

We have decided to divest ourselves of four retail centers and one industrial property, which are not in our core markets or which do not meet our strategic objectives. The divestitures of the properties are subject to negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions. Our ability to dispose of properties on advantageous terms is dependent upon factors beyond our control, including competition from other owners (including other real estate investment trusts) that are attempting to dispose of industrial and retail properties and the availability of financing on attractive terms for potential buyers of our properties. Our inability to dispose of properties on favorable terms or our inability to redeploy the proceeds of property divestitures in accordance with our investment strategy could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Debt Financing


	*We Could Incur More Debt*

We operate with a policy of incurring debt, either directly or through our subsidiaries, only if upon such incurrence our debt-to-total market capitalization ratio would be approximately 45% or less. The aggregate amount of indebtedness that we may incur under our policy varies directly with the valuation of our capital stock and the number of shares of capital stock outstanding. Accordingly, we would be able to incur additional indebtedness under our policy as a result of increases in the market price per share of our common stock or other outstanding classes of capital stock, and future issuance of shares of our capital stock. However, our organizational documents do not contain any limitation on the amount of indebtedness that we may incur. Accordingly, our board of directors could alter or eliminate this policy. If we change this policy, then we could

become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.


	*Scheduled Debt Payments Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition*

We are subject to risks normally associated with debt financing, including the risks that cash flow will be insufficient to pay dividends to our stockholders, that we will be unable to refinance existing indebtedness on our properties (which in all cases will not have been fully amortized at maturity) and that the terms of refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of existing indebtedness. As of December 31, 2001, we had total debt outstanding of approximately $2.1 billion.

In addition, we guarantee the operating partnership’s obligations with respect to the senior debt securities referenced in our financial statements. If we are unable to refinance or extend principal payments due at maturity or pay them with proceeds of other capital transactions, then we expect that our cash flow will not be sufficient in all years to pay dividends to our stockholders and to repay all such maturing debt. Furthermore, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to that refinanced indebtedness would increase. This increased interest expense would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. In addition, if we mortgage one or more of our properties to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, then the property could be foreclosed upon or transferred to the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income and asset value. A foreclosure on one or more of our properties could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.


	*Rising Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect Our Cash Flow*

As of December 31, 2001, we had $123.5 million outstanding under our Alliance Fund II secured credit facility, $12.0 million outstanding under our unsecured credit facility, and we had four secured loans with an aggregate principal amount of $52.4 million, which bear interest at variable rates (with weighted average interest rate of 3.8% as of December 31, 2001). In addition, we may incur other variable rate indebtedness in the future. Increases in interest rates on this indebtedness could increase our interest expense, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. Accordingly, in the future, we may engage in transactions to limit our exposure to rising interest rates.


	*We Are Dependent on External Sources of Capital*

In order to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code, we are required each year to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends-paid deduction and by excluding any net capital gain) and we are subject to tax on our income to the extent it is not distributed. Because of this distribution requirement, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs, including capital needs in connection with acquisitions, from cash retained from operations. As a result, to fund capital needs, we rely on third party sources of capital, which we may not be able to obtain on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third party sources of capital depends upon a number of factors, including: (1) general market conditions; (2) the market’s perception of our growth potential; (3) our current and potential future earnings and cash distributions; and (4) the market price of our capital stock. Additional debt financing may substantially increase our debt-to-total capitalization ratio.


	*We Could Default on Cross-Collateralized and Cross-Defaulted Debt*

As of December 31, 2001, we had 22 non-recourse secured loans, which are cross collateralized by 48 properties. As of December 31, 2001, we had $551.9 million (not including unamortized debt premium) outstanding on these loans. If we default on any of these loans, then we could be required to repay the

aggregate of all indebtedness, together with applicable prepayment charges, to avoid foreclosure on all the cross-collateralized properties within the applicable pool. Foreclosure on our properties, or our inability to refinance our loans on favorable terms, could adversely impact our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. In addition, our credit facilities and the senior debt securities of the operating partnership contain certain cross-default provisions, which are triggered in the event that our other material indebtedness is in default. These cross-default provisions may require us to repay or restructure the credit facilities and the senior debt securities in addition to any mortgage or other debt that is in default, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Contingent or Unknown Liabilities Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition

Our predecessors have been in existence for varying lengths of time up to 18 years. At the time of our formation we acquired the assets of these entities subject to all of their potential existing liabilities. There may be current liabilities or future liabilities arising from prior activities that we are not aware of and therefore have not disclosed in this report. We assumed these liabilities as the surviving entity in the various merger and contribution transactions that occurred at the time of our formation. Existing liabilities for indebtedness generally were taken into account in connection with the allocation of the operating partnership’s limited partnership units or shares of our common stock in the formation transactions, but no other liabilities were taken into account for these purposes. We do not have recourse against our predecessors or any of their respective stockholders or partners or against any individual account investors with respect to any unknown liabilities. Unknown liabilities might include the following: (1) liabilities for clean-up or remediation of undisclosed environmental conditions; (2) claims of customers, vendors, or other persons dealing with our predecessors prior to the formation transactions that had not been asserted prior to the formation transactions; (3) accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business; (4) tax liabilities; and (5) claims for indemnification by the officers and directors of our predecessors and others indemnified by these entities.

Certain customers may claim that the formation transactions gave rise to a right to purchase the premises that they occupy. We do not believe any such claims would be material and, to date, no such claims have been filed. See “— Government Regulations — We Could Encounter Costly Environmental Problems” below regarding the possibility of undisclosed environmental conditions potentially affecting the value of our properties. Undisclosed material liabilities in connection with the acquisition of properties, entities and interests in properties, or entities could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Our Access to Timely Financial Reporting and to Capital Markets May be Impaired if Arthur Andersen LLP is Unable to Perform Required Audit-Related Services

On March 14, 2002, our independent public accountant, Arthur Andersen LLP, was indicted on federal obstruction of justice charges arising from the U.S. government’s investigation of Enron Corporation. Arthur Andersen LLP has indicated that it intends to contest vigorously the indictment. The Securities and Exchange Commission has said that it will continue accepting financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, and interim financial statements reviewed by it, so long as Arthur Andersen LLP is able to make certain representations to its clients. Our access to the capital markets and our ability to make timely filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission could be impaired if the Securities and Exchange Commission ceases accepting financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, if Arthur Andersen LLP becomes unable to make the required representations to us or if for any other reason Arthur Andersen LLP is unable to perform required audit-related services for us. However, we believe that our sources of working capital, specifically our cash flow from operations and borrowings available under our unsecured credit facility, are adequate for us to meet our liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.

Conflicts of Interest


	*Some of Our Directors and Executive Officers Are Involved in Other Real Estate Activities and Investments*

Some of our executive officers own interests in real estate-related businesses and investments. These interests include minority ownership of Institutional Housing Partners, L.P., a residential housing finance company, and ownership of Aspire Development, Inc. and Aspire Development, L.P., developers that own property not suitable for ownership by us. Aspire Development, Inc. and Aspire Development, L.P. have agreed not to initiate any new development projects not contemplated at our initial public offering in November 1997. These entities have also agreed that they will not make any further investments in industrial properties other than those currently under development at the time of our initial public offering. The continued involvement in other real estate-related activities by some of our executive officers and directors could divert management’s attention from our day-to-day operations. Most of our executive officers have entered into non-competition agreements with us pursuant to which they have agreed not to engage in any activities, directly or indirectly, in respect of commercial real estate, and not to make any investment in respect of industrial real estate, other than through ownership of not more than 5% of the outstanding shares of a public company engaged in such activities or through the existing investments referred to in this report. State law may limit our ability to enforce these agreements.


	*Certain of Our Executive Officers and Directors May Have Conflicts of Interest with Us in Connection with Other Properties that They Own or Control*

As of December 31, 2001, Aspire Development, L.P. owns interests in three retail development projects in the U.S., one of which is a single freestanding Walgreens drugstore and two of which are Walgreens drugstores plus shop buildings, which are less than 10,000 feet. In addition, Messrs. Moghadam and Burke, each a founder and director, own less than 1% interests in two partnerships that own office buildings in various markets; these interests have negligible value. Luis A. Belmonte, an executive officer, owns less than a 10% interest, representing an estimated value of $150,000, in a limited partnership, which owns an office building located in Oakland, California.

In addition, several of our executive officers individually own: (1) less than 1% interests in the stocks of certain publicly-traded real estate investment trusts; (2) certain interests in and rights to developed and undeveloped real property located outside the United States; and (3) certain other de minimus holdings in equity securities of real estate companies.

Thomas W. Tusher, a member of our board of directors, is a limited partner in a partnership in which Messrs. Moghadam and Burke are general partners and which owns a 75% interest in an office building. Mr. Tusher owns a 20% interest in the partnership, valued at approximately $1.7 million. Messrs. Moghadam and Burke each have a 26.7% interest in the partnership, each valued at approximately $2.2 million.

We believe that the properties and activities set forth above generally do not directly compete with any of our properties. However, it is possible that a property in which an executive officer or director, or an affiliate of an executive officer or director, has an interest may compete with us in the future if we were to invest in a property similar in type and in close proximity to that property. In addition, the continued involvement by our executive officers and directors in these properties could divert management’s attention from our day-to-day operations. Our policy prohibits us from acquiring any properties from our executive officers or their affiliates without the approval of the disinterested members of our board of directors with respect to that transaction.


	*Our Role as General Partner of the Operating Partnership May Conflict with the Interests of Stockholders*

As the general partner of the operating partnership, we have fiduciary obligations to the operating partnership’s limited partners, the discharge of which may conflict with the interests of our stockholders. In addition, those persons holding limited partnership units will have the right to vote as a class on certain amendments to the partnership agreement of the operating partnership and individually to approve certain

amendments that would adversely affect their rights. The limited partners may exercise these voting rights in a manner that conflicts with the interests of our stockholders. In addition, under the terms of the operating partnership’s partnership agreement, holders of limited partnership units will have certain approval rights with respect to certain transactions that affect all stockholders but which they may not exercise in a manner that reflects the interests of all stockholders.


	*Our Directors, Executive Officers, and Significant Stockholders Could Act in a Manner that is Not in the Best Interest of All Stockholders*

As of March 20, 2002, we believe that our two largest stockholders, Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (with respect to various client accounts for which Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. serves as investment advisor) and ABP Investments U.S. (with respect to various client accounts for which ABP Investments U.S. serves as investment advisor) beneficially owned 14.0% of our outstanding common stock. In addition, our executive officers and directors beneficially owned 4.3% of our outstanding common stock as of March 20, 2002, and will have influence on our management and operation and, as stockholders, will have influence on the outcome of any matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. This influence might be exercised in a manner that is inconsistent with the interests of other stockholders. Although there is no understanding or arrangement for these directors, officers, and stockholders and their affiliates to act in concert, these parties would be in a position to exercise significant influence over our affairs if they choose to do so.

Government Regulations

Many laws and governmental regulations are applicable to our properties and changes in these laws and regulations, or their interpretation by agencies and the courts, occur frequently.


	*Costs of Compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act*

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act, places of public accommodation must meet certain federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act might require us to remove structural barriers to handicapped access in certain public areas where such removal is “readily achievable.” If we fail to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, then we might be required to pay fines to the government or damages to private litigants. The impact of application of the Americans with Disabilities Act to our properties, including the extent and timing of required renovations, is uncertain. If we are required to make unanticipated expenditures to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, then our cash flow and the amounts available for dividends to our stockholders may be adversely affected.


	*We Could Encounter Environmental Problems*

Federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment impose liability on a current or previous owner or operator of real estate for contamination resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances or petroleum products at the property. A current or previous owner may be required to investigate and clean up contamination at or migrating from a site. These laws typically impose liability and clean-up responsibility without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or caused the presence of the contaminants. Even if more than one person may have been responsible for the contamination, each person covered by the environmental laws may be held responsible for all of the clean-up costs incurred. In addition, third parties may sue the owner or operator of a site for damages based on personal injury, property damage, or other costs, including investigation and clean-up costs, resulting from environmental contamination present at or emanating from that site.

Environmental laws also govern the presence, maintenance, and removal of asbestos. These laws require that owners or operators of buildings containing asbestos properly manage and maintain the asbestos, that they adequately inform or train those who may come into contact with asbestos, and that they undertake special precautions, including removal or other abatement in the event that asbestos is disturbed during renovation or

demolition of a building. These laws may impose fines and penalties on building owners or operators for failing to comply with these requirements and may allow third parties to seek recovery from owners or operators for personal injury associated with exposure to asbestos fibers. Some of our properties may contain asbestos-containing building materials.

Some of our properties are leased or have been leased, in part, to owners and operators of businesses that use, store, or otherwise handle petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. These operations create a potential for the release of petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. Some of our properties are adjacent to or near other properties that have contained or currently contain petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. In addition, certain of our properties are on, are adjacent to, or are near other properties upon which others, including former owners or customers of the properties, have engaged or may in the future engage in activities that may release petroleum products or other hazardous or toxic substances. From time to time, we may acquire properties, or interests in properties, with known adverse environmental conditions where we believe that the environmental liabilities associated with these conditions are quantifiable and the acquisition will yield a superior risk-adjusted return. Environmental issues for each property are evaluated and quantified prior to acquisition. The costs of environmental investigation, clean-up, and monitoring are underwritten into the cost of the acquisition and appropriate environmental insurance is obtained for the property. In connection with certain divested properties, we have agreed to remain responsible for, and to bear the cost of, remediating or monitoring certain environmental conditions on the properties.

All of our properties were subject to a Phase I or similar environmental assessments by independent environmental consultants at the time of acquisition. Phase I assessments are intended to discover and evaluate information regarding the environmental condition of the surveyed property and surrounding properties and include an historical review, a public records review, an investigation of the surveyed site and surrounding properties, and preparation and issuance of a written report. We may perform additional Phase II testing if recommended by the independent environmental consultant. Phase II testing may include the collection and laboratory analysis of soil and groundwater samples, completion of surveys for asbestos-containing building materials, and any other testing that the consultant considers prudent in order to test for the presence of hazardous materials.

None of the environmental assessments of our properties has revealed any environmental liability that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations taken as a whole. Furthermore, we are not aware of any such material environmental liability. Nonetheless, it is possible that the assessments do not reveal all environmental liabilities and that there are material environmental liabilities of which we are unaware or that known environmental conditions may give rise to liabilities that are materially greater than anticipated. Moreover, the current environmental condition of our properties may be affected by customers, the condition of land, operations in the vicinity of the properties (such as releases from underground storage tanks), or by third parties unrelated to us. If the costs of compliance with existing or future environmental laws and regulations exceed our budgets for these items, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock could be adversely affected.


	*Our Financial Condition Could be Adversely Affected if We Fail to Comply with Other Regulations*

Our properties are also subject to various federal, state, and local regulatory requirements such as state and local fire and life safety requirements. If we fail to comply with these requirements, then we might incur fines by governmental authorities or be required to pay awards of damages to private litigants. We believe that our properties are currently in substantial compliance with all such regulatory requirements. However, these requirements may change or new requirements may be imposed, which could require significant unanticipated expenditures by us. Any such unanticipated expenditure could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.

Federal Income Tax Risks


	*Our Failure to Qualify as a Real Estate Investment Trust Would Have Serious Adverse Consequences to Stockholders*

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1997. We currently intend to operate so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code and believe that our current organization and method of operation comply with the rules and regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code to enable us to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust. However, it is possible that we have been organized or have operated in a manner that would not allow us to qualify as a real estate investment trust, or that our future operations could cause us to fail to qualify. Qualification as a real estate investment trust requires us to satisfy numerous requirements (some on an annual and others on a quarterly basis) established under highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations, and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control. For example, in order to qualify as a real estate investment trust, we must derive at least 95% of our gross income in any year from qualifying sources. In addition, we must pay dividends to stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our real estate investment trust taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding capital gains) and must satisfy specified asset tests on a quarterly basis. These provisions and the applicable treasury regulations are more complicated in our case because we hold our assets through the operating partnership. Legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions could significantly change the tax laws with respect to qualification as a real estate investment trust or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification. However, we are not aware of any pending tax legislation that would adversely affect our ability to operate as a real estate investment trust.

If we fail to qualify as a real estate investment trust in any taxable year, then we will be required to pay federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates. Unless we are entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a real estate investment trust for the four taxable years following the year during which we lost qualification. If we lose our real estate investment trust status, then our net earnings available for investment or distribution to stockholders would be significantly reduced for each of the years involved. In addition, we would no longer be required to make distributions to our stockholders.

We Pay Some Taxes

Even if we qualify as a real estate investment trust, we will be required to pay certain state and local taxes on our income and property. In addition, we will be required to pay federal and state income tax on the net taxable income, if any, from the activities conducted through AMB Capital Partners, LLC and Headlands Realty Corporation. AMB Capital Partners, LLC and Headlands Realty Corporation, as taxable REIT subsidiaries, are also subject to tax on their income, reducing their cash available for distribution to us.


	*Certain Property Transfers May Generate Prohibited Transaction Income*

From time to time, we may transfer or otherwise dispose of some of our properties. Under the Internal Revenue Code, any gain resulting from transfers of properties that we hold as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business would be treated as income from a prohibited transaction. We would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on that income. Since we acquire properties for investment purposes, we believe that any transfer or disposal of property by us would not be deemed by the Internal Revenue Service to be a prohibited transaction with any resulting gain allocable to us being subject to a 100% penalty tax. However, whether property is held for investment purposes is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. The Internal Revenue Service may contend that certain transfers or disposals of properties by us are prohibited transactions. While we believe that the Internal Revenue Service would not prevail in any such dispute, if the IRS were to successfully argue that a transfer or disposition of property constituted a prohibited transaction, then we would be required to pay

a 100% penalty tax on any gain allocable to us from the prohibited transaction. In addition, any income from a prohibited transaction may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the income tests for qualification as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes.

We Are Dependent On Our Key Personnel

We depend on the efforts of our executive officers. While we believe that we could find suitable replacements for these key personnel, the loss of their services or the limitation of their availability could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock. We do not have employment agreements with any of our executive officers.

We May Be Unable to Manage Our Growth

Our business has grown rapidly and continues to grow through property acquisitions and developments. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock could be adversely affected.

We May Be Unable to Effectively Manage Our International Growth

We may acquire properties in foreign countries. Local markets affect our operations and, therefore, we would be subject to economic fluctuations in foreign locations. Our international operations also would be subject to the usual risks of doing business abroad such as the revaluation of currencies, revisions in tax treaties or other laws governing the taxation of revenues, restrictions on the transfer of funds, and, in certain parts of the world, political instability. We cannot predict the likelihood that any such developments may occur. Further, we may enter into agreements with non-U.S. entities that are governed by the laws of, and are subject to dispute resolution in, the courts of another country or region. We cannot accurately predict whether such a forum would provide us with an effective and efficient means of resolving disputes that may arise. Even if we are able to obtain a satisfactory decision through arbitration or a court proceeding, we could have difficulty enforcing any award or judgment on a timely basis. Our business has grown rapidly and continues to grow through property acquisitions and developments. If we fail to effectively manage our international growth, then our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price of, our stock could be adversely affected.

Ownership of Our Stock


	*Limitations in Our Charter and Bylaws Could Prevent a Change in Control*

Certain provisions of our charter and bylaws may delay, defer, or prevent a change in control or other transaction that could provide the holders of our common stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the common stock. To maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes, not more than 50% in value of our outstanding stock may be owned, actually or constructively, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year after the first taxable year for which a real estate investment trust election is made. Furthermore, our common stock must be held by a minimum of 100 persons for at least 335 days of a 12-month taxable year (or a proportionate part of a short tax year). In addition, if we, or an owner of 10% or more of our stock, actually or constructively owns 10% or more of one of our customers (or a tenant of any partnership in which we are a partner), then the rent received by us (either directly or through any such partnership) from that tenant will not be qualifying income for purposes of the real estate investment trust gross income tests of the Internal Revenue Code. To facilitate maintenance of our qualification as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes, we will prohibit the ownership, actually or by virtue of the constructive ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, by any single person of more than 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and more than 9.8% (by value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of the issued and outstanding shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and we will also prohibit the ownership, actually or constructively, of any shares of our other preferred stock by any single

person so that no such person, taking into account all of our stock so owned by such person, may own in excess of 9.8% of our issued and outstanding capital stock. We refer to this limitation as the “ownership limit.” Shares acquired or held in violation of the ownership limit will be transferred to a trust for the benefit of a designated charitable beneficiary. Any person who acquires shares in violation of the ownership limit will not be entitled to any dividends on the shares or be entitled to vote the shares or receive any proceeds from the subsequent sale of the shares in excess of the lesser of the price paid for the shares or the amount realized from the sale. A transfer of shares in violation of the above limits may be void under certain circumstances. The ownership limit may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a change in control and, therefore, could adversely affect our stockholders’ ability to realize a premium over the then-prevailing market price for the shares of our common stock in connection with such transaction.

Our charter authorizes us to issue additional shares of common and preferred stock and to establish the preferences, rights, and other terms of any series or class of preferred stock that we issue. Although our board of directors has no intention to do so at the present time, it could establish a series or class of preferred stock that could delay, defer, or prevent a transaction or a change in control that might involve a premium price for the common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our charter and bylaws and Maryland law also contain other provisions that may delay, defer, or prevent a transaction, including a change in control, that might involve payment of a premium price for the common stock or otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders. Those provisions include the following: (1) the provision in the charter that directors may be removed only for cause and only upon a two-thirds vote of stockholders, together with bylaw provisions authorizing the board of directors to fill vacant directorships; (2) the provision in the charter requiring a two-thirds vote of stockholders for any amendment of the charter; (3) the requirement in the bylaws that the request of the holders of 50% or more of our common stock is necessary for stockholders to call a special meeting; (4) the requirement of Maryland law that stockholders may only take action by written consent with the unanimous approval of all stockholders entitled to vote on the matter in question; and (5) the requirement in the bylaws of advance notice by stockholders for the nomination of directors or proposal of business to be considered at a meeting of stockholders.

These provisions may impede various actions by stockholders without approval of our board of directors, which in turn may delay, defer or prevent a transaction involving a change of control.


	*We Could Change Our Investment and Financing Policies without a Vote of Stockholders*

Subject to our current investment policy to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (unless a change is approved by our board of directors under certain circumstances), our board of directors will determine our investment and financing policies, our growth strategy and our debt, capitalization, distribution, and operating policies. Although the board of directors has no present intention to revise or amend these strategies and policies, the board of directors may do so at any time without a vote of stockholders. Accordingly, stockholders will have no control over changes in our strategies and policies (other than through the election of directors), and any such changes may not serve the interests of all stockholders and could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.


	*If We Issue Additional Securities, then the Investment of Existing Stockholders Will Be Diluted*

We have authority to issue shares of common stock or other equity or debt securities in exchange for property or otherwise. Similarly, we may cause the operating partnership to issue additional limited partnership units in exchange for property or otherwise. Existing stockholders will have no preemptive right to acquire any additional securities issued by us or the operating partnership and any issuance of additional equity securities could result in dilution of an existing stockholder’s investment.


	*The Large Number of Shares Available for Future Sale Could Adversely Affect the Market Price of Our Common Stock*

We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of shares of our common stock, or the availability of shares of our common stock for future sale, will have on its market price. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market (or upon exchange of limited partnership units in the operating partnership) or the perception that such sales (or exchanges) might occur could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

All shares of common stock issuable upon the redemption of limited partnership units in the operating partnership will be deemed to be “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act and may not be transferred unless registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available, including any exemption from registration provided under Rule 144. In general, upon satisfaction of certain conditions, Rule 144 permits the holder to sell certain amounts of restricted securities one year following the date of acquisition of the restricted securities from us and, after two years, permits unlimited sales by persons unaffiliated with us. Commencing generally on the first anniversary of the date of acquisition of common limited partnership units (or such other date agreed to by the operating partnership and the holders of the units), the operating partnership may redeem common limited partnership units at the request of the holders for cash (based on the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of common stock at the time of redemption) or, at the option of the operating partnership, exchange the common limited partnership units for an equal number of shares of our common stock, subject to certain antidilution adjustments. The operating partnership had issued and outstanding 4,969,027 common limited partnership units as of December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2001, we had reserved 8,072,818 shares of common stock for issuance under our Stock Option and Incentive Plan (not including shares that we have already issued) and, as of December 31, 2001, we had granted to certain directors, officers, and employees options to purchase 7,437,219 shares of common stock (excluding forfeitures and 330,176 shares that we have issued pursuant to the exercise of options). As of December 31, 2001, we had granted 549,738 restricted shares of common stock, 2,732 of which have been forfeited. In addition, we may issue additional shares of common stock and the operating partnership may issue additional limited partnership units in connection with the acquisition of properties. In connection with the issuance of common limited partnership units to other transferors of properties, and in connection with the issuance of the performance units, we have agreed to file registration statements covering the issuance of shares of common stock upon the exchange of the common limited partnership units. We have also filed a registration statement with respect to the shares of common stock issuable under our Stock Option and Incentive Plan. These registration statements and registration rights generally allow shares of common stock covered thereby, including shares of common stock issuable upon exchange of limited partnership units, including performance units, or the exercise of options or restricted shares of common stock, to be transferred or resold without restriction under the Securities Act. We may also agree to provide registration rights to any other person who may become an owner of the operating partnership’s limited partnership units.

Future sales of the shares of common stock described above could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The existence of the operating partnership’s limited partnership units, options, and shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exchange of limited partnership units, and the exercise of options and registration rights referred to above, also may adversely affect the terms upon which we are able to obtain additional capital through the sale of equity securities.


	*Various Market Conditions Affect the Price of Our Stock*

As with other publicly-traded equity securities, the market price of our stock will depend upon various market conditions, which may change from time to time. Among the market conditions that may affect the market price of our stock are the following: (1) the extent of investor interest in us; (2) the general reputation of real estate investment trusts and the attractiveness of their equity securities in comparison to other equity securities (including securities issued by other real estate-based companies); (3) our financial performance; (4) general stock and bond market conditions, including changes in interest rates on fixed income securities, that may lead prospective purchasers of our stock to demand a higher annual yield from future dividends; and

(5) terrorist activity may adversely affect the markets in which our securities trade, possibly increasing market volatility and causing the further erosion of business and consumer confidence and spending. Other factors such as governmental regulatory action and changes in tax laws could also have a significant impact on the future market price of our stock.


	*Earnings and Cash Dividends, Asset Value, and Market Interest Rates Affect the Price of Our Stock*

The market value of the equity securities of a real estate investment trust generally is based primarily upon the market’s perception of the real estate investment trust’s growth potential and its current and potential future earnings and cash dividends. It is based secondarily upon the real estate market value of the underlying assets. For that reason, shares of our stock may trade at prices that are higher or lower than the net asset value per share. To the extent that we retain operating cash flow for investment purposes, working capital reserves, or other purposes, these retained funds, while increasing the value of our underlying assets, may not correspondingly increase the market price of our stock. Our failure to meet the market’s expectations with regard to future earnings and cash dividends likely would adversely affect the market price of our stock. Another factor that may influence the price of our stock will be the distribution yield on the stock (as a percentage of the price of the stock) relative to market interest rates. An increase in market interest rates might lead prospective purchasers of our stock to expect a higher distribution yield, which would adversely affect the market price of the stock. If the market price of our stock declines significantly, then we might breach certain covenants with respect to debt obligations, which might adversely affect our liquidity and ability to make future acquisitions and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.

Item 7a. Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our future earnings and cash flows are dependent upon prevalent market rates. Accordingly, we manage our market risk by matching projected cash inflows from operating, investing, and financing activities with projected cash outflows for debt service, acquisitions, capital expenditures, distributions to stockholders and unitholders, and other cash requirements. The majority of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates, which minimizes the risk of fluctuating interest rates. Our exposure to market risk includes: (1) interest rate fluctuations in connection with our credit facilities and other variable rate borrowings; and (2) our ability to incur more debt without stockholder approval, thereby increasing our debt service obligations, which could adversely affect our cash flows. As of December 31, 2001, we had no interest rate caps or swaps. See “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources — Capital Resources — Market Capitalization.”

The table below summarizes the market risks associated with our fixed and variable rated debt outstanding before unamortized debt premiums of $6.8 million as of December 31, 2001:



	Expected Maturity Date
																			Total
	2002			2003			2004			2005			2006			Thereafter			Debt

Fixed rate debt(1)	$	73,603		$	89,319		$	92,364		$	350,029		$	186,452		$	1,149,166		$	1,940,933
Average interest rate		8.3	%		7.8	%		8.0	%		7.3	%		7.3	%		7.5	%		7.5	%
Variable rate debt(2)	$	23,093		$	136,053		$	20,526		$	594		$	7,629			—		$	187,895
Average interest rate		3.5	%		2.8	%		4.1	%		3.5	%		3.5	%		—			3.0	%

(1) Represents 91.2% of all outstanding debt.

(2) Represents 8.9% of all outstanding debt.

If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increased by 10% (or 30 basis points), then the increase in interest expense on the variable rate debt would be $0.6 million annually.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See “Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports of Form 8-K.”

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

PART III

Items 10, 11, 12 and 13.


	Directors and Executive Officers of AMB Property Corporation, Executive Compensation, Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management, and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The information required by Item 10, Item 11, Item 12, and Item 13 will be contained in a definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders which we anticipate will be filed no later than 120 days after the end of our fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A and accordingly these items have been omitted in accordance with General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.

PART IV

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules:

The following consolidated financial information is included as a separate section of this report on Form 10-K.


	Page

Report of Independent Public Accountants		F-
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2001 and 2000		F-
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999		F-
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999		F-
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999		F-
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation		S-

All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule or because the information required is included in the financial statements and notes thereto.

(a)(3) Exhibits:


Exhibit
Number		Description


3.1		Articles of Incorporation of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registrations Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
3.2		Certificate of Correction of AMB Property Corporation’s Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8 1/2% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
3.3		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8 5/8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 1999).
3.4		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 1999).
3.5		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).
3.6		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.75% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 14, 1999).
3.7		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2000).
3.8		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2000).
3.9		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.125% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2000).


Exhibit
Number		Description


3.10		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2001).
3.11		Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2001).
3.12		Articles Supplementary redesignating and reclassifying all 2,200,000 Shares of the 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2001).
3.13		Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
4.1		Form of Certificate for Common Stock of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
4.2		Form of Certificate for 8.5% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5(2) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998).
4.3		$30,000,000 7.925% Fixed Rate Note No. 1 dated August 18, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated August 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
4.4		$25,000,000,000 7.925% Fixed Rate Note No. 2 dated September 12, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated September 12, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
4.5		$50,000,000 8.00% Fixed Rate Note No. 3 dated October 26, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated October 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
4.6		$25,000,000 8.000% Fixed Rate Note No. 4 dated October 26, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated October 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
4.7		$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 5 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
4.8		$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 6 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
4.9		$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 7 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
4.10		Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
4.11		First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998 by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).


Exhibit
Number		Description


	4.12	Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.13	Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.14	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K/ A filed on November 9, 2000).
	4.15	Specimen of 7.10% Notes due 2008 (included in the First Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.16	Specimen of 7.50% Notes due 2018 (included in the Second Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.17	Specimen of 6.90% Reset Put Securities due 2015 (included in the Third Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.18	$25,000,000 6.90% Fixed Rate Note No. 8 dated January 9, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated January 9, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2001).
	4.19	$50,000,000 7.00% Fixed Rate Note No. 9 dated March 7, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated March 7, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2001).
	4.20	$25,000,000 6.75% Fixed Rate Note No. 10 dated September 6, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated September 6, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2001).
	4.21	$20,000,000 5.90% Fixed Rate Note No. 11 dated January 17, 2002, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated January 17, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2002).
10.1		Distribution Agreement dated August 15, 2000 by and among AMB Property Corporation, AMB Property, L.P., Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, Banc of America Securities LLC, Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., Chase Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/ A filed on November 9, 2000).
10.2		Terms Agreement dated as of December 14, 2000, by and between Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
10.3		Terms Agreement dated as of January 4, 2001, by and between A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2001).
10.4		Terms Agreement dated as of March 2, 2001, by and among First Union Securities, Inc., AMB Property, L.P. and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Registrants’ current report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2001).


Exhibit
Number		Description


10.5		Fifth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property, L.P. dated September 21, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to AMB Property Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2001).
10.6		First Amendment to the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property, L.P. dated January 1, 2002.
10.7		Form of Registration Rights Agreement among AMB Property Corporation and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
10.8		Form of Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreement between AMB Property Corporation and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
10.9		Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on June 15, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
10.10		Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on August 4, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
10.11		Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on December 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
10.12		Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Purchase Plan, dated July 9, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
10.13		Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
10.14		Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated December 6, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2001).
10.15		First Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated January 1, 2002.
10.16		Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2000, among AMB Property, L.P., the banks listed therein, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, the Chase Manhattan Bank, as Documentation Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookmanagers, Bank one, NA, Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, PNC Bank National Association and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Managing Agents and Banks Trust Company and Dresdner Bank AG, New York and Grand Cayman Branches, as Co-Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2000).
10.17		Guaranty of Payment made as of May 24, 2000, between AMB Property Corporation and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as administrative agent for the banks listed on the signature page of the Revolving Credit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2000).


Exhibit
Number		Description


10.18		Credit Agreement dated as of September 27, 1999, among AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P., AMB Institutional Alliance REIT I, Inc., the Lenders and issuing parties thereto, BT Realty Resources, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
10.19		Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 23, 2001, among AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II, L.P., AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II, Inc., the banks and financial institutions listed therein, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Dresdner Bank AG, as Syndication Agent, and Bank One, NA, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).
10.20		Terms Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., AMB Property, L.P., and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2001).
10.21		Terms Agreement dated as of January 14, 2002, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., AMB Property, L.P., and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2002).
10.22		Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
10.23		Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
10.24		2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
10.25		Second Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated February 25, 2002.
10.26		AMB Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
21.1		Subsidiaries of AMB Property Corporation.
23.1		Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
24.1		Powers of Attorney (included in Part IV of this Form 10-K).
99.1		Letter, dated March 28, 2002, from AMB Property Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

• AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 3, 2001, in connection with the issuance and sale by AMB Property, L.P. of 800,000 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and the filing by AMB Property Corporation Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

• AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 16, 2001, in connection with its third quarter 2001 earnings release.

• AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on December 7, 2001, in connection with the repurchase and redemption of all its outstanding 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units.

• AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on January 23, 2002, in connection with its issuance of $20.0 million of senior unsecured notes by AMB Property, L.P. under its medium-term note program.

• AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on January 24, 2002, in connection with its fourth quarter 2001 earnings release.

See Item 14(a)(3) above.

(d) Financial Statement Schedules:

See Item 14(a)(1) and (2) above.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, AMB Property Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 28, 2002.

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

By: /s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM

Hamid R. Moghadam

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, the undersigned officers and directors of AMB Property Corporation, hereby severally constitute Hamid R. Moghadam, W. Blake Baird, David S. Fries, and Michael A. Coke, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power to them, and each of them singly, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, the Form 10-K filed herewith and any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, and generally to do all such things in our names and in our capacities as officers and directors to enable AMB Property Corporation to comply with the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Form 10-K and any and all amendments thereto.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of AMB Property Corporation and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Name	Title	Date

/s/ HAMID R. MOGHADAM Hamid R. Moghadam	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)	March 28, 2002

/s/ W. BLAKE BAIRD W. Blake Baird	President and Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ T. ROBERT BURKE T. Robert Burke	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ DANIEL H. CASE III Daniel H. Case III	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ DAVID A. COLE David A. Cole	Director	March 28, 2002


Name	Title	Date


/s/ LYNN M. SEDWAY Lynn M. Sedway	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ JEFFREY L. SKELTON, PH.D. Jeffrey L. Skelton, Ph.D.	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ THOMAS W. TUSHER Thomas W. Tusher	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ CARYL B. WELBORN, ESQ. Caryl B. Welborn, Esq.	Director	March 28, 2002

/s/ MICHAEL A. COKE Michael A. Coke	Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)	March 28, 2002

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of AMB Property Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AMB Property Corporation (a Maryland corporation) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These consolidated financial statements and the schedule referred to below are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AMB Property Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental Schedule III, Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and are not part of the basic financial statements. The schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Francisco, California

January 22, 2002

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 2001 and 2000


			2001			2000


			(Dollars in thousands, except
			share amounts)
ASSETS

Investments in real estate:
	Land		$	1,064,422		$	833,325
	Buildings and improvements			3,285,110			2,915,537
	Construction in progress			181,179			277,735

		Total investments in properties		4,530,711			4,026,597
	Accumulated depreciation and amortization			(265,653	)		(177,467	)

		Net investments in properties		4,265,058			3,849,130
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures				71,097			80,432
Properties held for divestiture, net				157,174			197,146

		Net investments in real estate		4,493,329			4,126,708
Cash and cash equivalents				73,071			20,358
Restricted cash				8,661			22,364
Mortgages receivable				87,214			115,969
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $9,354 and $7,677, respectively				70,794			69,874
Investments in affiliated companies				-			35,731
Investments in other companies, net				-			15,965
Other assets				27,824			18,657

		Total assets	$	4,760,893		$	4,425,626

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Debt:
	Secured debt		$	1,220,164		$	940,276
	Unsecured senior debt securities			780,000			680,000
	Alliance Fund II credit facility			123,500			-
	Unsecured credit facility			12,000			216,000

		Total debt		2,135,664			1,836,276
Accounts payable				73,310			56,577
Other liabilities				65,291			90,465

		Total liabilities		2,274,265			1,983,318
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Minority interests				734,286			674,378
Stockholders’ equity:
	Series A preferred stock, cumulative, redeemable, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 4,000,000 issued and outstanding, $100,000 liquidation preference			96,100			96,100
	Common stock $.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 83,821,829 and 84,138,751 issued and outstanding			838			841
	Additional paid-in capital			1,627,764			1,638,655
	Retained earnings			27,640			36,066
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss			-			(3,732	)

		Total stockholders’ equity		1,752,342			1,767,930

		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,760,893		$	4,425,626

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999


				2001			2000			1999


				(Dollars in thousands,
				except share and per share amounts)
REVENUES
	Rental revenues			$	568,066		$	464,164		$	439,658
	Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures				5,467			5,212			4,701
	Investment management income				10,972			4,282			1,511
	Interest and other income				16,340			6,549			2,313

		Total revenues			600,845			480,207			448,183
EXPENSES
	Property operating expenses				69,016			50,566			51,739
	Real estate taxes				69,180			57,164			56,184
	Interest, including amortization				128,985			90,270			88,681
	Depreciation and amortization				111,414			90,358			67,035
	General and administrative				35,820			23,750			25,223
	Loss on investments in other companies				20,758			2,500			—

		Total expenses			435,173			314,608			288,862

		Income before minority interests and net gains from disposition of real estate			165,672			165,599			159,321
	Minority interests’ share of income				(63,541	)		(44,961	)		(34,011	)
	Gains from dispositions of real estate, net of minority interests:
		Gains on developments held for sale			13,169			—			—
		Net gains from disposition of real estate, net of impairment charges of $18.6 million, $5.9 million, and $0.5 million, respectively			23,259			1,144			53,283

			Total net gains from dispositions of real estate		36,428			1,144			53,283

			Net income before extraordinary items		138,559			121,782			178,593
		Extraordinary items (early debt extinguishments)			(606	)		—			(2,490	)

		Net income			137,953			121,782			176,103
		Series A preferred stock dividends			(8,500	)		(8,500	)		(8,500	)
		Preferred unit redemption premium			(4,400	)		—			—

			Net income available to common stockholders	$	125,053		$	113,282		$	167,603

BASIC INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
		Before extraordinary items		$	1.49		$	1.35		$	1.94
		Extraordinary items			—			—			(0.03	)

			Net income available to common stockholders	$	1.49		$	1.35		$	1.94

DILUTED INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
		Before extraordinary items		$	1.47		$	1.35		$	1.97
		Extraordinary items			—			—			(0.03	)

			Net income available to common stockholders	$	1.47		$	1.35		$	1.94

WEIGHED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
		Basic			84,174,644			83,697,170			86,271,862

		Diluted			85,214,066			84,155,306			86,347,487

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999



						Common Stock												Accumulated
			Series A									Additional						Other
			Preferred			Number						Paid-in			Retained			Comprehensive
			Stock			of Shares			Amount			Capital			Earnings			Income			Total


			(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
AMB Property Corporation
Balance as of December 31, 1998			$	96,100			85,917,520		$	859		$	1,668,401		$	—		$	—		$	1,765,360
Comprehensive income:
	Net income			8,500			—			—			—			167,603			—
	Unrealized gains on securities			—			—			—			—			—			28,993
		Total comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			205,096
	Issuance of restricted stock, net			—			98,368			1			2,214			—			—			2,215
	Retirement of common stock			—			(1,443,600	)		(14	)		(27,286	)		—			—			(27,300	)
	Exercise of stock options			—			25,000			—			526			—			—			526
	Conversion of Operating Partnership units			—			535,753			5			11,048			—			—			11,053
	Deferred compensation			—			—			—			(3,080	)		—			—			(3,080	)
	Deferred compensation amortization			—			—			—			952			—			—			952
	Reallocation of Limited Partners’
		Interest in Operating Partnership		—			—			—			3,451			—			—			3,451
	Dividends			(8,500	)		—			—			—			(120,514	)		—			(129,014	)

Balance as of December 31, 1999				96,100			85,133,041			851			1,656,226			47,089			28,993			1,829,259
Comprehensive income:
	Net income			8,500			—			—			—			113,282			—
	Unrealized loss on securities			—			—			—			—			—			(32,725	)
		Total comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			89,057
	Issuance of restricted stock, net			—			161,996			2			3,268			—			—			3,270
	Retirement of common stock			—			(1,465,926	)		(15	)		(29,303	)		—			—			(29,318	)
	Exercise of stock options			—			103,217			1			2,179			—			—			2,180
	Conversion of Operating Partnership units			—			206,423			2			4,911			—			—			4,913
	Deferred compensation			—			—			—			(3,270	)		—			—			(3,270	)
	Deferred compensation amortization			—			—			—			1,022			—			—			1,022
	Reallocation of limited partners’ interests in Operating Partnership			—			—			—			3,622			—			—			3,622
	Dividends			(8,500	)		—			—			—			(124,305	)		—			(132,805	)

Balance as of December 31, 2000				96,100			84,138,751			841			1,638,655			36,066			(3,732	)		1,767,930
Comprehensive income:
	Net income			8,500			—			—			—			129,453			—
	Preferred unit redemption premium			—			—			—			—			(4,400	)		—
	Reversal of unrealized loss on securities			—			—			—			—			—			3,732
		Total comprehensive income		—			—			—			—			—			—			137,285
	Issuance of restricted stock, net			—			237,920			2			5,851			—			—			5,853
	Exercise of stock options			—			201,960			2			4,272			—			—			4,274
	Conversion of Operating Partnership units			—			635,798			7			15,248			—			—			15,255
	Retirement of common stock			—			(1,392,600	)		(14	)		(32,878	)		—			—			(32,892	)
	Deferred compensation			—			—			—			(5,853	)		—			—			(5,853	)
	Deferred compensation amortization			—			—			—			2,725			—			—			2,725
	Reallocation of limited partners’ interest in Operating Partnership			—			—			—			(256	)		—			—			(256	)
	Dividends			(8,500	)		—			—			—			(133,479	)		—			(141,979	)

Balance as of December 31, 2001			$	96,100			83,821,829		$	838		$	1,627,764		$	27,640		$	—		$	1,752,342

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999


				2001			2000			1999


				(Dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income				$	137,953		$	121,782		$	176,103
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization				111,414			90,358			67,035
	Loss on investments in other companies				20,758			2,500			—
	Straight-line rents				(10,093	)		(10,203	)		(10,847	)
	Amortization of debt premiums and financing costs				(2,947	)		(6,055	)		(3,009	)
	Deferred compensation amortization				(2,725	)		(1,022	)		(952	)
	Minority interests				63,541			44,961			34,011
	Gains from dispositions of real estate				(36,428	)		(1,144	)		(53,283	)
	Non-cash portion of extraordinary items				(615	)		—			(6,058	)
	Equity in loss of AMB Investment Management				43			3,159			875
	Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures				(5,467	)		(5,212	)		(4,701	)
	Changes in assets and liabilities:
		Other assets			19,753			(35,620	)		6,151
		Other liabilities			(6,625	)		57,671			(14,934	)

			Net cash provided by operating activities		288,562			261,175			190,391
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents					13,703			(4,002	)		(98,480	)
Cash paid for property acquisitions					(402,208	)		(604,872	)		(399,891	)
Additions to buildings, development costs, and other first generation improvements					(174,651	)		(153,534	)		(152,643	)
Additions to second generation building improvements and lease costs					(47,842	)		(40,573	)		(27,289	)
Additions to interests in unconsolidated joint ventures					—			(13,158	)		(7,789	)
Distributions received from unconsolidated joint ventures					5,341			4,295			3,787
Net proceeds from divestiture of real estate					242,505			85,345			746,037

			Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(363,152	)		(726,499	)		63,732
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock					4,274			2,180			732
Retirement of common stock					(32,892	)		—			(27,300	)
Borrowings on secured debt					362,052			156,797			36,174
Payments on secured debt					(88,866	)		(71,822	)		(117,463	)
Borrowings on unsecured credit facility					210,000			510,000			327,000
Payments on unsecured credit facility					(414,000	)		(377,000	)		(478,000	)
Borrowings on Alliance Fund I credit facility					—			—			80,000
Payments on Alliance Fund I credit facility					—			(80,000	)		—
Borrowings on Alliance Fund II credit facility					125,000			—			—
Payments on Alliance Fund II credit facility					(1,500	)		—			—
Payment of financing fees					(7,296	)		(6,364	)		(242	)
Net proceeds from issuances of senior debt securities					99,406			278,183			—
Net proceeds from issuances of preferred units					63,727			61,413			88,476
Contributions from co-investment partners					134,770			153,872			14,611
Redemption of Series C preferred units					(114,400	)		—			—
Dividends paid to common and preferred stockholders					(141,979	)		(130,680	)		(133,266	)
Distributions to minority interests, including preferred units					(70,993	)		(44,209	)		(31,443	)

			Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		127,303			452,370			(240,721	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					52,713			(12,954	)		13,402
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					20,358			33,312			19,910

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	73,071		$	20,358		$	33,312

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest				$	147,637		$	90,138		$	89,627
Non-cash transactions:
		Acquisition of properties		$	428,254		$	729,972		$	471,905
		Assumption of debt			(9,724	)		(125,100	)		(57,480	)
		Acquisition capital			(16,322	)		—			—
		Minority interest’s contribution, including units issued			—			—			(14,534	)

			Net cash paid	$	402,208		$	604,872		$	399,891

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2001 and 2000

1. Organization and Formation of the Company

AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate company effective with the completion of its initial public offering on November 26, 1997. The Company elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997, and believes its current organization and method of operation will enable it to maintain its status as a real estate investment trust. The Company, through its controlling interest in its subsidiary, AMB Property, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of industrial buildings primarily in eight hub markets and gateway cities. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company” means AMB Property Corporation, the Operating Partnership, and its other controlled subsidiaries.

As of December 31, 2001, the Company owned an approximate 94.4% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership, excluding preferred units. The remaining 5.6% limited partner interest is owned by non-affiliated investors and certain current and former directors and officers of the Company. For local law purposes, certain properties are owned through limited partnerships and limited liability companies. The ownership of such properties through such entities does not materially affect the Company’s overall ownership interests in the properties. As the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, the Company has full, exclusive, and complete responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and control of the Operating Partnership. Net operating results of the Operating Partnership are allocated after preferred unit distributions based on the respective partners’ ownership interests.

Through the Operating Partnership, the Company enters into co-investment joint ventures with institutional investors. See note 10. These co-investment joint ventures provide the Company with an additional source of capital to fund certain acquisitions and development and renovation projects. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had investments in five co-investment joint ventures, which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes.

AMB Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“AMB Capital Partners”), the predecessor-in-interest to AMB Investment Management, Inc. (“AMB Investment Management”), provides real estate investment services to clients on a fee basis. Headlands Realty Corporation, a Maryland corporation, conducts a variety of businesses that include incremental income programs, such as the Company’s CustomerAssist Program and development projects available for sale to third parties. On December 31, 2001, AMB Investment Management was reorganized through a series of related transactions into AMB Capital Partners. The Operating Partnership is the managing member of AMB Capital Partners. On May 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership acquired 100% of the common stock of AMB Investment Management and Headlands Realty Corporation from current and former executive officers of the Company, a former executive officer of AMB Investment Management, and a director of Headlands Realty Corporation, thereby acquiring 100% of both entities’ capital stock. The Operating Partnership began consolidating its investments in AMB Investment Management and Headlands Realty Corporation on May 31, 2001. Prior to May 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership reflected its investment using the equity method. The impact of consolidating AMB Investment Management and Headlands Realty Corporation was not material.

As of December 31, 2001, the Company owned 905 industrial buildings and seven retail centers, located in 26 markets throughout the United States (unaudited). The Company’s strategy is to become a leading provider of High Throughput Distribution, or HTD, properties in supply-constrained, in fill submarkets located near key international passenger and cargo airports, highway systems, and sea ports in major metropolitan areas, such as Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas/ Fort Worth, Northern New Jersey/ New York City, the San Francisco Bay Area, Southern California, Miami, and Seattle. As of December 31, 2001, the industrial buildings, principally warehouse distribution buildings, encompassed approximately 81.6 million rentable

F-5

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

square feet and were 94.5% leased to over 2,900 customers (unaudited). As of December 31, 2001, the retail centers, principally grocer-anchored community shopping centers, encompassed approximately 1.3 million rentable square feet and were 89.3% leased to more than 160 customers (unaudited).

As of December 31, 2001, through AMB Capital Partners, the Company also managed industrial buildings and retail centers, totaling approximately 2.7 million rentable square feet on behalf of various clients (unaudited). In addition, the Company has invested in industrial buildings, totaling approximately 4.9 million rentable square feet, through unconsolidated joint ventures (unaudited).

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company, its wholly-owned qualified REIT subsidiaries, the Operating Partnership, and joint ventures (the “Joint Ventures”), in which the Company has a controlling interest. Third-party equity interests in the Operating Partnership and the Joint Ventures are reflected as minority interests in the consolidated financial statements. The Company also has three non-controlling limited partnership interests in three separate unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, which are accounted for under the equity method. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.

Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate are stated at cost unless circumstances indicate that cost cannot be recovered, in which case, the carrying value of the property is reduced to estimated fair value. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable. Impairment is recognized when estimated expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) are less than the carrying value of the property. The estimation of expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions regarding current and future economics and market conditions and the availability of capital. If impairment analysis assumptions change, then an adjustment to the carrying value of the Company’s long-lived assets could occur in the future period in which the assumptions change. To the extent that a property is impaired, the excess of the carrying amount of the property over its estimated fair value is charged to income and is included with gains from disposition of real estate, net on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company evaluated its properties held for divestiture and operating properties for impairment and reduced their carrying value by $18.6 million and $5.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. The management of the Company believes that there are no additional impairments of the carrying values of its investments in real estate at December 31, 2001.

F-6

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Depreciation and amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the real estate investments. The estimated lives and components of depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, are as follows:


Depreciation and Amortization Expenses			Estimated Lives		2001		2000		1999


					(Dollars in thousands)
Building costs				40	$	73,462	$	62,097	$	54,198
Buildings and improvements:
	Roof/ HVAC/parking lots			10		3,836		2,404		1,106
	Plumbing/signage			7		805		484		144
	Painting and other			5		7,664		6,345		2,546
Tenant improvements				Term of the related lease		12,305		9,165		4,091
Lease commissions				Term of the related lease		11,311		8,641		3,902

		Total real estate depreciation				109,383		89,136		65,987
Other depreciation and amortization				Various		2,031		1,222		1,048

		Total depreciation and amortization			$	111,414	$	90,358	$	67,035

The cost of buildings and improvements includes the purchase price of the property or interest in property, including legal fees and acquisition costs. Project costs directly associated with the development and construction of a real estate project, which include interest and property taxes, are capitalized as construction in progress. Capitalized interest related to construction projects for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $13.7 million, $15.5 million, and $10.9 million, respectively.

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Maintenance expenditures include planned major maintenance activities such as painting, paving, HVAC, and roofing repair costs. The Company expenses costs as incurred and does not accrue in advance of planned major maintenance activities. Significant renovations or betterments that extend the economic useful life of assets are capitalized.

Reverse Exchanges. Reverse exchanges represent loan agreements with third parties, whereby the Company loans substantially all funds to the third party to acquire a real estate investment that we intend to acquire in a Section 1031 exchange. The loan is secured by the real estate investment and title is held by the third party. Upon acquisition of the property by the third party, the Company records the asset as an investment in real estate and records the rental income and expenses associated with the property as the Company retains the risk of loss and the benefits of the asset. At December 31, 2001, the Company had one property in a reverse exchange valued at $10.9 million.

Concentration of Credit Risk. Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in competition for customers to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a material impact on the Company’s ability to lease space and on the amount of rent received. As of December 31, 2001, the Company did not have any single tenant that accounted for greater than 1.3% of rental revenues.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash held in financial institutions and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash includes cash held in escrow in connection with property purchases, exchange funds, and capital improvements.

F-7

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable includes all current accounts receivable, other accruals, and deferred rent receivable of $37.9 million and $28.0 million at December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective-interest method over the term of the related loan. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, deferred financing costs were $17.5 million and $10.7 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $8.5 million and $4.7 million, respectively. Such amounts are included in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Investments in Other Companies. Investments in other companies were accounted for on a cost basis and realized gains and losses were included in current earnings. For its investments in private companies, the Company periodically reviewed its investments and management determined if the value of such investments had been permanently impaired. During 2001, the Company recognized losses on its investments in other companies totaling $20.8 million, including its investment in Webvan Group, Inc. The Company had previously recognized gains and losses on its investment in Webvan Group, Inc. as a component of other comprehensive income. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had realized a loss on 100% of its investments in other companies.

Debt Premiums. Debt premiums represent the excess of the fair value of debt over the principal value of debt assumed in connection with the Company’s initial public offering and subsequent acquisitions. The debt premiums are being amortized into interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the net unamortized debt premium was $6.8 million and $9.9 million, respectively, and are included as a component of secured debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Rental Revenues. The Company, as a lessor, retains substantially all of the benefits and risks of ownership of the properties and accounts for its leases as operating leases. Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases. Reimbursements from customers for real estate taxes and other recoverable operating expenses are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. Differences between estimated and actual amounts are recognized in the subsequent year. In addition, the Company nets its bad debt expense against rental income for financial reporting purposes.

Investment Management Income. Investment management income consists primarily of asset management fees and acquisition and disposition fees earned by AMB Capital Partners from joint ventures and clients. Investment management income also includes priority distributions from the Operating Partnership’s co-investment joint ventures of $2.3 million in 2001.

Interest and Other Income. Interest and other income consists primarily of interest income from mortgages receivable and on cash and cash equivalents.

Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income consists of net income and unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in equity securities and is presented in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

Derivatives. The Company adopted FASB Statement No. 133 on derivatives on January 1, 2001. The adoption did not impact its financial position or results of operations as the Company does not utilize derivative instruments in its operations. FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by Statement No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statement, as amended, requires that changes in the derivative’s fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.

F-8

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Reclassifications. Certain items in the consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform with current classifications with no effect on results of operations.

3. Transactions with Affiliates

Prior to January 1, 2002, the Company and AMB Capital Partners had an agreement that allowed for the sharing of certain costs and employees. Additionally, the Company provided AMB Capital Partners with certain acquisition-related services. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company allocated $3.2 million, $2.8 million, and $2.7 million, respectively, for shared costs to AMB Capital Partners.

The Company and AMB Capital Partners share common office space under lease obligations. Such lease obligations are charged to the Company and AMB Capital Partners at cost. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company paid $0.9 million, $1.4 million, and $1.3 million, respectively, for occupancy costs related to the lease obligations of the affiliate.

As of May 31, 2001, the Company held all of the outstanding capital stock of AMB Investment Management, Inc., the predecessor-in-interest to AMB Capital Partners, LLC. On December 31, 2001, AMB Investment Management was reorganized through a series of related transactions into AMB Capital Partners. On May 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership acquired 100% of the common stock of AMB Investment Management from current and former executive officers of the Company and a former executive officer of AMB Investment Management, thereby owning 100% of the entities’ capital stock, for $0.3 million. The Operating Partnership began consolidating its investment in AMB Investment Management on May 31, 2001. Prior to May 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership owned 100% of AMB Investment Management’s non-voting preferred stock (representing a 95% economic interest therein) and reflected its investment using the equity method.

4. Real Estate Acquisition and Development Activity (square footage information is unaudited)

During 2001, the Company invested $428.3 million in operating properties, consisting of 65 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 6.8 million square feet, which included the investment of $219.5 million in 36 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 3.8 million square feet through three of the Company’s co-investment joint ventures.

During 2001, the Company also contributed operating properties valued at $539.2 million, consisting of 111 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 10.8 million square feet, to three of its co-investment joint ventures. The properties contributed to the co-investment joint ventures were reflected at the Company’s historical cost because the Company controls these joint ventures and, therefore, they were under common control. The Company recognized a gain of $17.8 million related to these contributions representing the portion of the contributed properties acquired by the third party co-investors.

During 2001, the Company completed industrial and retail developments valued at $148.0 million and $73.9 million, respectively, aggregating approximately 2.3 million and $0.4 million square feet, respectively. The Company also initiated new industrial development projects valued at $9.7 million aggregating approximately 0.2 million square feet.

As of December 31, 2001, the Company had in its development pipeline: (1) 12 industrial projects, which will total approximately 3.1 million square feet and have an aggregate estimated investment by the Company and, in certain instances, the Company’s co-investors of $154.4 million upon completion; and (2) two development projects available for sale, which will total approximately 0.6 million square feet and have an aggregate estimated investment of $50.0 million upon completion. As of December 31, 2001, the Company and its Development Alliance Partners have funded an aggregate of $127.3 million and will need to fund an estimated additional $77.1 million in order to complete current and planned projects.

F-9

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

During 2000, the Company invested $730.0 million in operating properties, consisting of 145 industrial buildings aggregating approximately 10.5 million square feet. Of this, $185.6 million was acquired by the Alliance Fund I, consisting of 44 industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 2.6 million square feet. The Company also initiated 17 new development projects, aggregating approximately 4.5 million square feet, with a total estimated cost of $224.0 million upon completion. In 2000, the Company also completed 12 development projects, aggregating approximately 3.1 million square feet, at a total aggregate cost of $144.3 million.

5. Property Divestitures and Properties Held for Divestiture

Property Divestitures. During 2001, the Company divested itself of 24 industrial and two retail buildings, aggregating approximately 3.2 million square feet (unaudited), for an aggregate price of $193.4 million, with a resulting net gain of $24.1 million, which is net of minority interests’ share. The resulting net gain is before impairment charges of $18.6 million and the gain on the Company’s contributed properties of $17.8 million.

During 2000, the Company divested itself of 25 industrial buildings and one retail center, aggregating approximately 2.5 million square feet (unaudited), for an aggregate price of $175.7 million, with a resulting net gain of $7.0 million. The resulting net gain is before impairment charges of $5.9 million. The retail center was located in Los Angeles, California, aggregated approximately 0.4 million square feet, and sold for $89.0 million. The Company carries a 9.5% mortgage note in the principal amount of $74.0 million on the retail center sale. The mortgage note matures in September 2002.

Properties Held for Divestiture. The Company has decided to divest itself of seven retail centers and three industrial properties, which are not in its core markets or which do not meet its strategic objectives. The divestitures of the properties are subject to negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions. Properties held for divestiture are stated at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less costs to sell.

The following summarizes the condensed results of operations of the properties held for divestiture for the years ended December 31:


		2001			2000			1999


		(Dollars in thousands)
Rental revenues		$	20,203		$	16,990		$	15,993
Property operating expenses and real estate taxes			(8,067	)		(6,289	)		(5,691	)

	Net operating income		12,136			10,701			10,302
Depreciation expense			(1,864	)		(2,206	)		(2,161	)
Interest expense			(3,546	)		(4,216	)		(3,870	)

	Net income	$	6,726		$	4,279		$	4,271

6. Mortgages Receivable

In September 2000, the Company sold a retail center located in Los Angeles, California. As of December 31, 2001, the Company carried a 9.5% mortgage note in the principal amount of $74.0 million on the retail center. The maturity date of the mortgage note was extended to September 30, 2002. During 2001, the Company renegotiated this mortgage and received a $5.0 million pay-down on the principal balance and increased the interest rate to 9.5% from 8.75%. The Company has a first lien against the retail center as collateral for the mortgage note and believes that the underlying value of the retail center is equal to or greater than the fair value of the mortgage note.

F-10

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the Company also holds a mortgage loan receivable on AMB Pier One, LLC, an unconsolidated joint venture. The note bears interest at 13.0% and matures in May 2026. As of December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance on the note was $13.2 million.

7. Debt

Debt consisted of the following, as of December 31:


				2001		2000


				(Dollars in thousands)
REIT Secured debt, varying interest rates from 4.0% to 10.4% due July 2002 to April 2014 (weighted average interest rate of 8.1% as of December 31, 2001)				$	453,954	$	568,650
Joint venture secured debt, varying interest rates from 5.9% to 10.6% due February 2002 to June 2023 (weighted average interest rate of 7.1% as of December 31, 2001)					759,374		361,768
Unsecured senior debt securities, weighted average interest rate of 7.3%, due June 2005 to June 2018					780,000		680,000
Unsecured credit facility, variable interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% (interest rate of 2.8% as of December 31, 2001), due May 2003					12,000		216,000
Alliance Fund II credit facility, variable interest at LIBOR plus 0.875% (weighted average interest rate of 2.8% as of December 31, 2001)					123,500		—

		Subtotal			2,128,828		1,826,418
	Unamortized premiums				6,836		9,858

			Total consolidated debt	$	2,135,664	$	1,836,276

Secured debt generally requires monthly principal and interest payments. The secured debt is secured by deeds of trust on certain properties. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the total gross investment book value of those properties securing the debt was $2.3 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, including $1.2 billion and $0.7 billion, respectively, in joint ventures. All of the secured debt bears interest at fixed rates, except for three loans with an aggregate principal amount of $52.4 million as of December 31, 2001, and two loans with an aggregate principal amount of $29.8 million as of December 31, 2000, which bear interest at variable rates (weighted average interest rate of 3.8% as of December 31, 2001). The secured debt has various financial and non-financial covenants. Management believes that the Company and the Operating Partnership were in material compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2001 and 2000. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had 22 non-recourse secured loans, which are cross collateralized by 48 properties. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had $551.9 million (not including unamortized debt premiums) outstanding on these loans. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the estimated fair value of the REIT and joint venture secured debt was $1.2 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.

Interest on the senior debt securities is payable semi-annually. The 2015 notes are putable and callable in June 2005. The senior debt securities are subject to various financial and non-financial covenants. Management believes that the Company was in material compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2001 and 2000. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the estimated fair value of the unsecured senior debt was $802.4 million and $689.4 million, respectively.

In August 2000, the Operating Partnership commenced a medium-term note program for the issuance of up to $400.0 million in principal amount of medium-term notes, which will be guaranteed by the Company. As of December 31, 2001, the Operating Partnership had issued $380.0 million of medium-term notes under

F-11

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

this program, leaving $20.0 million available for issuance. However, on January 14, 2002, the Operating Partnership issued and sold the remaining $20.0 million of the notes under this program to Lehman Brothers, Inc., as principal. The Company has guaranteed the notes, which mature on January 17, 2007, and bear interest at 5.90% per annum. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of $19.9 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. In September 2001, the Operating Partnership issued and sold $25.0 million of the notes under this program to Lehman Brothers Inc., as principal. The Company guaranteed the notes, which mature on September 6, 2011, and bear interest at 6.75%. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of $24.8 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. In March 2001, the Operating Partnership issued and sold $50.0 million of the notes under this program to First Union Securities, Inc., as principal. The Company guaranteed the notes, which mature on March 7, 2011, and bear interest at 7.00%. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of $49.7 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. The notes have various financial and non-financial covenants. In January 2001, the Operating Partnership issued and sold $25.0 million of the notes under this program to A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., as principal. The Company guaranteed the notes, which mature on January 30, 2006, and bear interest at 6.90%. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of $24.9 million for general corporate purposes, to partially repay indebtedness, and to acquire and develop additional properties. Management believes that the Company and the Operating Partnership were in material compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2001.

In May 2000, the Operating Partnership entered into a $500.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement. The Company guarantees the Operating Partnership’s obligations under the credit facility. The credit facility matures in May 2003, has a one-year extension option, and is subject to a 15 basis point annual facility fee based on the Company’s credit rating. The credit facility has various financial and non-financial covenants. Management believes that the Company and the Operating Partnership were in material compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2001. The Operating Partnership has the ability to increase available borrowings to $700.0 million by adding additional banks to the facility or obtaining the agreement of existing banks to increase their commitments. Monthly debt service payments on the credit facility are interest only. The total amount available under the credit facility fluctuates based upon the borrowing base, as defined in the agreement governing the credit facility. As of December 31, 2001, the remaining amount available under the credit facility was $488.0 million (excluding the additional $200.0 million of potential additional capacity).

In July 2001, AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II, L.P. (“Alliance Fund II”) obtained a $150.0 million credit facility from Bank of America, N.A. Borrowings currently bear interest at LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points. The credit facility is secured by the unfunded capital commitments of the third party investors in AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II, Inc. (“Alliance REIT II”) and the Alliance Fund II. As of December 31, 2001, the outstanding balance was $123.5 million and the remaining amount available was $26.5 million. The credit facility has various financial and non-financial covenants. Management believes that the Company and the Operating Partnership were in material compliance with these covenants at December 31, 2001.

During 2001, the Operating Partnership retired $55.2 million of secured debt prior to maturity. The Operating Partnership recognized a net extraordinary loss of $0.6 million related to the early debt retirement.

F-12

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001, the scheduled maturities of the Company’s total debt, excluding unamortized debt premiums, were as follows:


			Joint		Unsecured
			Venture		Senior
	Secured		Secured		Debt		Credit
	Debt		Debt		Securities		Facilities		Total


	(Dollars in thousands)
2002	$	28,193	$	68,505	$	—	$	—	$	96,698
2003		76,295		13,577		—		135,500		225,372
2004		65,284		47,607		—		—		112,891
2005		62,826		37,796		250,000		—		350,622
2006		94,965		74,115		25,000		—		194,080
2007		30,198		25,682		55,000		—		110,880
2008		33,619		147,552		175,000		—		356,171
2009		5,176		32,351		—		—		37,527
2010		52,780		71,966		75,000		—		199,746
2011		1,311		167,878		75,000		—		244,189
Thereafter		3,307		72,345		125,000		—		200,652

	$	453,954	$	759,374	$	780,000	$	135,500	$	2,128,828

8. Leasing Activity

Future minimum rental income due under noncancelable leases with customers in effect as of December 31, 2001, is as follows


		(Dollars in thousands)

2002		$	493,020
2003			436,519
2004			345,816
2005			251,224
2006			179,831
Thereafter			509,636

	Total	$	2,216,046

The schedule does not reflect future rental revenues from the renewal or replacement of existing leases and excludes property operating expense reimbursements.

In addition to minimum rental payments, certain customers pay reimbursements for their pro rata share of specified operating expenses, which amounted to $116.7 million, $77.9 million, and $81.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. These amounts are included as rental income and operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Certain of the leases also provide for the payment of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenant’s revenues. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company recognized percentage rent revenues related to its retail properties of $0.5 million, $0.8 million, and $2.0 million, respectively. Some leases contain options to renew.

F-13

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

9. Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that it currently distribute at least 90% of its taxable income to its stockholders. It is management’s current intention to adhere to these requirements and maintain the Company’s REIT status. As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to corporate level federal income tax on net income it distributes currently to its stockholders. As such, no provision for federal income taxes has been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, then it will be subject to federal income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) and may not be able to qualify as a REIT for four subsequent taxable years. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, the Company may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property and to federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed taxable income.

The following reconciles net income available to common stockholders to taxable income available to common stockholders for the years ended December 31:


			2001			2000			1999


			(Dollars in thousands)
Net income available to common stockholders			$	125,053		$	113,282		$	167,603
	Add: Book depreciation and amortization			111,414			90,358			67,035
	Less: Tax depreciation and amortization			(117,400	)		(87,338	)		(69,264	)
		Book/tax difference on gain on divestiture of real estate		(7,563	)		24,688			(15,001	)
		Other book/tax differences, net(1)		15,943			(5,723	)		(12,722	)

Taxable income available to common stockholders			$	127,447		$	135,267		$	137,651

(1) Primarily due to straight-line rent, prepaid rent, and debt premium amortization timing differences.

For income tax purposes, distributions paid to common stockholders consist of ordinary income, capital gains, or a combination thereof. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company elected to distribute all of its taxable capital gain. Dividends paid per share for the years ended December 31, were taxable as follows:



	2001				2000				1999


Ordinary income	$	1.29	81.9	%	$	1.21	82.0	%	$	1.14	74.6	%
Capital gains		0.24	14.9	%		0.20	13.2	%		0.28	18.5	%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain		0.05	3.2	%		0.07	4.8	%		0.11	6.9	%

Dividends paid or payable	$	1.58	100.0	%	$	1.48	100.0	%	$	1.53	100.0	%

10. Minority Interests

Minority interests in the Company represent the limited partnership interests in the Operating Partnership and interests held by certain third parties in several real estate joint ventures, aggregating approximately 28.7 million square feet (unaudited), which are consolidated for financial reporting purposes (unaudited). Such investments are consolidated because: (1) the Company owns a majority interest; or (2) the Company exercises significant control over major operating decisions such as approval of budgets, selection of property managers, and changes in financing.

F-14

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The Operating Partnership, together with one of the Company’s other affiliates, owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 21% of the partnership interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P. (“Alliance Fund I”). The Alliance Fund I is a co-investment partnership between the Operating Partnership and AMB Institutional Alliance REIT I, Inc. (“Alliance REIT I”), which includes 15 institutional investors as stockholders, and is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of primarily industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund I had received equity contributions from third party investors totaling $169.0 million, which, when combined with debt financings and the Company’s investment, creates a total capitalization of $378.0 million. The Operating Partnership is the managing general partner of the Alliance Fund I.

The Company formed AMB Partners II, L.P. (“Partners II”) with the City and County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System (“CCSFERS”) to acquire, manage, develop, and redevelop distribution facilities nationwide. On February 14, 2001, Partners II received an equity contribution from CCSFERS of $50.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and the Company’s investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $250.0 million. The Operating Partnership is the managing general partner of Partners II and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50% of Partners II.

The Company formed AMB-SGP, L.P. (“AMB-SGP”) with a subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (“GIC”), to own and operate, through a private real estate investment trust, distribution facilities nationwide. On March 23, 2001, AMB-SGP received an equity contribution from GIC of $75.0 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and the Company’s investment in properties, creates a total planned capitalization of $335.0 million. The Operating Partnership is the managing general partner of AMB-SGP and owned, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 50.3% of AMB-SGP.

The Company formed the Alliance Fund II, in which the Alliance REIT II became a partner on June 28, 2001. The Operating Partnership owns, as of December 31, 2001, approximately 20% of the partnership interests in the Alliance Fund II. The Alliance Fund II is a co-investment partnership between the Operating Partnership and the Alliance REIT II. The Alliance REIT II included 14 institutional investors as stockholders as of December 31, 2001. The Alliance Fund II is engaged in the acquisition, ownership, operation, management, renovation, expansion, and development of primarily industrial buildings in target markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Alliance Fund II had received equity commitments from third party investors of $195.4 million, which, when combined with anticipated debt financings and the Company’s investment, creates a total planned capitalization of $488.6 million. The Operating Partnership is the managing general partner of the Alliance Fund II.

F-15

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table distinguishes the minority interest liability and the minority interests’ share of net income:



		Minority Interest				Minority Interest Share of Net
		Liability				Income for the years ended
		As of December 31,				December 31,

		2001		2000		2001		2000		1999


		(Dollars in thousands)
Joint venture partners		$	359,514	$	240,671	$	27,156	$	12,306	$	5,721
Limited partners in the Operating Partnership			98,785		115,654		7,703		8,042		8,789
Series B Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $65,000)			62,319		62,319		5,608		5,608		5,608
Series J Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $40,000)			38,906		—		873		—		—
Held through AMB Property II, L.P.:
	Series C Preferred Units		—		105,845		8,540		9,624		9,624
	Series D Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $79,767)		77,687		77,687		6,180		6,180		3,949
	Series E Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $11,022)		10,788		10,789		856		856		320
	Series F Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $19,872)		19,597		19,534		1,580		1,228		—
	Series G Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $1,000)		954		957		80		27		—
	Series H Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $42,000)		40,915		40,922		3,412		1,090		—
	Series I Preferred Units (liquidation preference of $25,500)		24,821		—		1,553		—		—

		$	734,286	$	674,378	$	63,541	$	44,961	$	34,011

11. Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company has non-controlling limited partnership interests in three separate unconsolidated joint ventures. The Company accounts for the joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. Under the agreements governing the joint ventures, the Company and the other party to the joint venture may be required to make additional capital contributions, and subject to certain limitations, the joint ventures may incur additional debt. The Company has a 56.1% interest in a joint venture, which owns an aggregate of 36 industrial buildings totaling approximately 4.0 million square feet. The Company also has a 50% interest in each of two other operating and development alliance joint ventures. The Company’s net equity investment in these joint ventures is shown as Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, the Company’s share of net operating income was $10.2 million, $8.3 million, and $8.0 million, respectively.

12. Stockholders’ Equity

On December 5, 2001, AMB Property II, L.P. (“AMB Property II”), one of the Company’s subsidiaries, repurchased all of its 2,200,000 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from three institutional investors. The Series C Preferred Units were redeemed for an aggregate cost of $115.7 million, including accrued and unpaid dividends totaling $1.3 million and a premium of $4.4 million

F-16

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

that is reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Series C Preferred Units had a par value of $110.0 million.

On September 21, 2001, the Operating Partnership issued and sold 800,000 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units at a price of $50.00 per unit in a private placement. Distributions are cumulative from the date of issuance and payable quarterly in arrears. The Series J Preferred Units are redeemable by the Operating Partnership on or after September 21, 2006, subject to certain conditions, for cash at a redemption price equal to $50.00 per unit, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon, if any, to the redemption date. The Series J Preferred Units are exchangeable, at specified times and subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of the Company’s Series J Preferred Stock. The Operating Partnership used the net proceeds of $38.9 million for general corporate purposes, which may include the partial repayment of indebtedness or the acquisition or development of additional properties.

On March 21, 2001, AMB Property II issued and sold 510,000 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units at a price of $50.00 per unit in a private placement. Distributions are cumulative from the date of issuance and payable quarterly in arrears at a rate per unit equal to $4.00 per annum. The Series I Preferred Units are redeemable by AMB Property II on or after March 21, 2006, subject to certain conditions, for cash at a redemption price equal to $50.00 per unit, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions thereon, if any, to the redemption date. The Series I Preferred Units are exchangeable, at specified times and subject to certain conditions, on a one-for-one basis, for shares of the Company’s Series I Preferred Stock. AMB Property II used the net proceeds of $24.9 million to repay advances from the Operating Partnership and to make a loan to the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership used the funds to partially repay borrowings under its unsecured credit facility and for general corporate purposes. The loan bears interest at 8.0% per annum and is payable on demand.

During 2001, the Company redeemed 223,092 and 635,798 common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership for cash and shares of its common stock, respectively. Holders of common limited partnership units of the Operating Partnership have the right, commencing generally on or after the first anniversary of the holder becoming a limited partner of the Operating Partnership (or such other date agreed to by the Operating Partnership and the applicable unit holders), to require the Operating Partnership to redeem part or all of their common units for cash (based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of common stock at the time of redemption) or the Operating Partnership may, in its sole and absolute discretion (subject to the limits on ownership and transfer of common stock set forth in the Company’s charter) elect to have the Company exchange those common units for shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends, issuance of certain rights, certain extraordinary distributions and similar events. The Company presently anticipates that the Operating Partnership will generally elect to have it issue shares of its common stock in exchange for common units in connection with a redemption request; however, the Operating Partnership has paid cash, and may in the future pay cash, for a redemption of common units. With each redemption or exchange, the Company’s percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase. Common limited partners may exercise this redemption right from time to time, in whole or in part, subject to the limitations that limited partners may not exercise the right set forth in the Company’s charter if such exercise would result in any person actually or constructively owning shares of common stock in excess of the ownership limit or any other amount specified by the board of directors, assuming common stock was issued in the exchange.

The Company’s board of directors approved a stock repurchase program in 1999 for the repurchase of up to $100.0 million worth of common stock. During 2001, the Company repurchased 1,392,600 shares of its common stock at an average purchase price of $23.62 per share under this program. Through December 31, 2001, the Company has repurchased 2,836,200 shares of its common stock at an average purchase price of $21.22 per share. During 2000, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock. The Company’s stock repurchase program expired in December 2001. The Company’s board of directors approved

F-17

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

a new stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $100.0 million worth of common stock. The new stock repurchase program expires in December 2003 and no repurchases were made under the new program in 2001.

The following table sets forth the dividend payments per share or unit for the years ended December 31:


Security	Paying Entity		2001		2000		1999

Common Stock		Company	$	1.58	$	1.48	$	1.40
OP Units		Operating Partnership	$	1.58	$	1.48	$	1.40
Series A Preferred Stock		Company	$	2.13	$	2.13	$	2.13
Series A Preferred Units		Operating Partnership	$	2.13	$	2.13	$	2.13
Series B Preferred Units		Operating Partnership	$	4.31	$	4.31	$	4.31
Series C Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.88	$	4.38	$	4.38
Series D Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.88	$	3.88	$	2.48
Series E Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.88	$	3.88	$	1.30
Series F Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.98	$	3.09		n/a
Series G Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.98	$	1.35		n/a
Series H Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	4.06	$	1.30		n/a
Series I Preferred Units		AMB Property II, L.P.	$	3.04		n/a		n/a
Series J Preferred Units		Operating Partnership	$	1.24		n/a		n/a

13. Stock Incentive Plan, 401(k) Plan, and Deferred Compensation Plan

Stock Incentive Plan. In November 1997, the Company established a Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Stock Incentive Plan”) for the purpose of attracting and retaining eligible officers, directors, and employees. The Company has reserved for issuance 8,950,000 shares of Common Stock under the Stock Incentive Plan. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had 7,437,219 non-qualified options outstanding granted to certain directors, officers, and employees. Each option is exchangeable for one share of the Company’s Common Stock. The options have a weighted average exercise price of $22.16 and the exercise prices range from $18.94 to $26.53. Each option’s exercise price is equal to the Company’s market price on the date of grant. The options had an original ten-year term and generally vest pro rata in annual installments over a three- or four-year period from the date of grant.

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations in accounting for its Stock Incentive Plan. Opinion 25 measures compensation cost using the intrinsic value based method of accounting. Under this method, compensation cost is the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan as of December 31, 2001.

As permitted by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation,” the Company has not changed the method of accounting for stock options but has provided the additional required disclosures. Had compensation cost for the Company’s stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma net income available to common stockholders would have been reduced by $3.9 million, $2.7 million, and $3.2 million and pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share would have been reduced to $1.44 and $1.42, and $1.32 and $1.31, and $1.92 and $1.92, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999.

F-18

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively: dividend yields of 6.4%, 6.5%, and 7.2%; expected volatility of 14.9%, 13.3%, and 18.5%; risk-free interest rates of 5.2%, 6.1%, and 5.4%; and expected lives of 10 years for each year.

Following is a summary of the option activity for the years ended December 31:


						Options
				Weighted		Exercisable
	Shares Under			Average		at Year
	Option			Exercise Price		End


	(Options in thousands)
Outstanding as of December 31, 1998		4,384		$	21.40		622

Granted		451			22.24
Exercised		(25	)		—
Forfeited		(300	)		—

Outstanding as of December 31, 1999.		4,510			21.44		1,832

Granted		1,565			20.86
Exercised		(103	)		21.11
Forfeited		(205	)		21.21

Outstanding as of December 31, 2000.		5,767			20.83		3,326

Granted		1,924			24.61
Exercised		(202	)		21.15
Forfeited		(52	)		22.45

Outstanding as of December 31, 2001.		7,437		$	22.16		4,623

Remaining average contractual life		7.5 years

Fair value of options granted during the year	$	1.84

In 2001, 2000, and 1999, under the Stock Incentive Plan, the Company issued 238,790, 162,229, and 100,000 restricted shares, respectively, to certain officers of the Company as part of the performance pay program and in connection with employment with the Company. As of December 31, 2001, 2,732 shares of restricted stock have been forfeited. The 547,006 outstanding restricted shares are subject to repurchase rights, which generally lapse over a period from three to five years.

401(k) Plan. In November 1997, the Company established a Section 401(k) Savings/ Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which is a continuation of the 401(k) Plan of the predecessor, to cover eligible employees of the Company and any designated affiliates. During 2001 and 2000, the 401(k) Plan permitted eligible employees of the Company to defer up to 20% of their annual compensation, subject to certain limitations imposed by the Code. The employees’ elective deferrals are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) Plan. During 2001 and 2000, the Company matched the employee contributions to the 401(k) Plan in an amount equal to 50% of the first 5.5% of annual compensation deferred by each employee. The Company may also make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) Plan. In 2001 and 2000, the Company paid $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for its 401(k) match.

Deferred Compensation Plan. Effective September 1, 1999, the Company established a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for officers of the Company and certain of its affiliates. As of January 1, 2002, the plan enables participants to defer income up to 100% of annual base pay and up to 100% of annual bonuses on

F-19

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

a pre-tax basis. The Company may make discretionary matching contributions to participant accounts at any time. The Company made no such discretionary matching contributions in 2001, 2000, or 1999. The participant’s elective deferrals and any matching contributions are immediately 100% vested. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the total amount of compensation deferred was $1.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

14. Income Per Share

The Company’s only dilutive securities outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 were stock options and restricted stock granted under its stock incentive plan. The effect on income per share was to increase weighted average shares outstanding. Such dilution was computed using the treasury stock method.


			2001		2000		1999

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
	Basic			84,174,644		83,697,170		86,271,862
	Stock options and restricted stock			1,039,422		458,136		75,625

		Diluted		85,214,066		84,155,306		86,347,487

15. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Lease Commitments. The Company has entered into operating ground leases on certain land parcels with periods up to 40 years and a lease on a building in New York City. Future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable operating leases in effect as of December 31, 2001, were as follows:


		(Dollars in thousands)
2002		$	6,823
2003			7,720
2004			7,921
2005			8,159
2006			8,480
Thereafter			146,335

	Total lease commitments	$	185,438

These operating lease payments are being amortized ratably over the terms of the related leases.

Contingencies

Litigation. In the normal course of business, from time to time, the Company may be involved in legal actions relating to the ownership and operations of its properties. In management’s opinion, the liabilities, if any, that may ultimately result from such legal actions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

Environmental Matters. The Company monitors its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, assets, or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that such a material environmental liability does not exist. The existence of any such material environmental liability would have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and cash flow.

F-20

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

General Uninsured Losses. The Company carries property and rental loss, liability, flood, and environmental insurance. The Company believes that the policy terms and conditions, limits, and deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such coverage, and industry practice. In addition, certain of the Company’s properties are located in areas that are subject to earthquake activity; therefore, the Company has obtained limited earthquake insurance on those properties. There are, however, certain types of extraordinary losses that may be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Should an uninsured loss occur, the Company could lose its investment in, and anticipated profits and cash flows from, a property.

Captive Insurance Company. The Company has responded to recent trends towards increasing costs and decreasing coverage availability in the insurance markets by obtaining higher-deductible property insurance from third party insurers and by forming a wholly-owned captive insurance company, Arcata National Insurance Ltd. (“Arcata”) in December 2001. Arcata will generally provide insurance coverage for losses below the increased deductible under the third party policies. Premiums paid to Arcata have a retrospective component, so that if expenses, including losses, are less than premiums collected, the excess will be returned to the property owners (and, in turn, as appropriate, to the customers) and conversely, if expenses, including losses, are greater than premiums collected, an additional premium, not in excess of the difference, will be charged. Through this structure, The Company believes that it will be able to obtain insurance for its portfolio with more comprehensive coverage at a projected overall lower cost than would otherwise be available in the market.

16. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

Selected quarterly financial data for 2001 and 2000 is as follows:



		Quarter (Unaudited)(1)

		March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31			Year
2001

		(Dollars in thousands)
Total revenues		$	144,834		$	146,026		$	155,457		$	154,528		$	600,845
Income before minority interests and gains (losses)			40,670			29,553			49,355			46,094			165,672
Minority interests’ share of income			(12,997	)		(16,974	)		(17,979	)		(15,591	)		(63,541	)
Total gains (losses) from disposition of real estate			16,767			17,792			114			1,755			36,428
Extraordinary items (early debt extinguishments)			—			(438	)		87			(255	)		(606	)

	Net income		44,440			29,933			31,577			32,003			137,953
Preferred stock dividends			(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(8,500	)
Preferred unit redemption premium			—			—			—			(4,400	)		(4,400	)

	Net income available to common stockholders	$	42,315		$	27,808		$	29,452		$	25,478		$	125,053

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE(2)
	Basic	$	0.50		$	0.33		$	0.35		$	0.31		$	1.49

	Diluted	$	0.50		$	0.33		$	0.34		$	0.30		$	1.47

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
	Basic		83,895,993			84,461,544			84,395,107			83,264,975			84,174,644

	Diluted		84,720,917			85,378,727			85,644,840			84,338,812			85,214,066

F-21

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



		Quarter (Unaudited)

		March 31			June 30			September 30			December 31			Year
2000

		(Dollars in thousands)
Total revenues		$	110,323		$	113,479		$	121,371		$	135,034		$	480,207
Income before minority interests and gains (losses)			40,465			39,774			42,116			43,244			165,599
Minority interests’ share of income			(9,409	)		(10,183	)		(13,085	)		(12,284	)		(44,961	)
Total gains (losses) from disposition of real estate			(11	)		416			5,815			(5,076	)		1,144

	Net income		31,045			30,007			34,846			25,884			121,782
Preferred stock dividends			(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(2,125	)		(8,500	)

	Net income available to common stockholders	$	28,920		$	27,882		$	32,721		$	23,759		$	113,282

NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE(2)
	Basic	$	0.34		$	0.33		$	0.39		$	0.28		$	1.35

	Diluted	$	0.34		$	0.33		$	0.39		$	0.28		$	1.35

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
	Basic		83,849,157			83,848,883			84,115,613			83,814,658			83,697,170

	Diluted		83,863,198			84,125,277			84,725,109			84,528,547			84,155,306

(1) Certain reclassifications have been made to the quarterly data to conform with the annual presentation with no net effect to net income or per share amounts.

(2) The sum of quarterly financial data may vary from the annual data due to rounding.

17. Segment Information

The Company operates industrial and retail properties nationwide and manages its business both by property type and by market. Industrial properties consist primarily of warehouse distribution facilities suitable for single or multiple customers and are typically comprised of multiple buildings that are leased to customers engaged in various types of businesses. As of December 31, 2001, the Company operated industrial properties in eight hub and gateway markets in addition to 18 other markets nationwide. As of December 31, 2001, the Company operated retail properties in Miami, Atlanta, Chicago, the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, and Baltimore. The Company does not separately report its retail operations by market. Retail properties are generally leased to one or more anchor customers, such as grocery and drug stores, and various retail businesses. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating income of the combined properties in each segment. The Company’s geographic markets for industrial properties are managed separately because each market requires different operating, pricing, and leasing strategies.

During the first quarter of 2001, the Company split its industrial segment into geographic hub and gateway markets and other markets. Within the hub and gateway market categorization, the Company operates in eight major U.S. markets. The other industrial markets category captures all of the Company’s

F-22

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

other smaller markets nationwide. The 2000 and 1999 rental revenue and net operating income disclosure below has been restated to reflect this change. Summary information for the reportable segments is as follows:



				Rental Revenues(1)						Property NOI(1)(2)

Segments				2001		2000		1999		2001		2000		1999


				(Dollars in thousands)
Industrial hub & gateway markets:
	Atlanta			$	28,268	$	23,458	$	17,085	$	27,726	$	19,368	$	13,932
	Chicago				41,195		38,228		35,155		28,389		26,447		24,887
	Dallas/ Fort Worth				25,210		24,081		20,177		17,641		16,984		14,003
	Northern New Jersey/ New York City				44,924		34,618		19,626		31,648		26,444		15,568
	San Francisco Bay Area				106,229		79,155		59,741		88,925		64,972		47,673
	Southern California				61,627		37,187		29,207		49,102		30,366		23,812
	Miami				33,176		22,853		15,741		24,366		16,775		12,349
	Seattle				23,229		22,081		12,587		18,634		18,048		10,392

		Total hub & gateway markets			363,858		281,661		209,319		281,431		219,404		162,616
	Total other industrial markets				169,684		145,516		134,778		122,124		107,568		98,011

		Total industrial markets			533,542		427,177		344,097		403,555		326,972		260,627
	Total retail markets				24,431		26,784		84,713		16,222		19,259		60,260

			Total properties	$	557,973	$	453,961	$	428,810	$	419,777	$	346,231	$	320,887

(1) Excludes straight-line rents of $10.1 million, $10.2 million, and $10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

(2) Property net operating income (NOI) is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements and excluding straight-line rents, less property level operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, and interest expense.

F-23

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)



				Total Gross Investment(1)
				As of December 31,

				2001		2000

Industrial hub & gateway markets:
	Atlanta			$	271,663	$	225,555
	Chicago				330,127		295,398
	Dallas/ Fort Worth				171,263		189,265
	Northern New Jersey/ New York City				406,077		313,739
	San Francisco Bay Area				806,528		641,142
	Southern California				694,602		554,671
	Miami				288,046		281,710
	Seattle				193,154		185,150

		Total hub & gateway markets			3,161,460		2,686,630
	Total other industrial markets				1,321,959		1,160,433

		Total industrial markets			4,483,419		3,847,063
	Total retail markets				47,292		179,534

			Total properties	$	4,530,711	$	4,026,597

(1) Excludes net properties held for divestiture of $157.2 million and $197.1 million, respectively.

The Company uses property net operating income as an operating performance measure. The following table reconciles total reportable segment revenue and property net operating income to rental revenues and income before minority interests and net gains from disposition of real estate:



			For the Years Ended December 31,

			2001			2000			1999


			(Dollars in thousands)
Rental Revenues
Total rental revenues for reportable segments			$	557,973		$	453,961		$	428,810
Straight-line rents				10,093			10,203			10,848

		Total rental revenues	$	568,066		$	464,164		$	439,658

Income before minority interests and net gains from disposition of real estate
Property net operating income for reportable segments			$	419,777		$	346,231		$	320,887
Straight-line rents				10,093			10,203			10,848
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures				5,467			5,212			4,701
Investment management income				10,972			4,282			1,511
Other income				16,340			6,549			2,313
Less:
	Interest, including amortization			(128,985	)		(90,270	)		(88,681	)
	Depreciation and amortization			(111,414	)		(90,358	)		(67,035	)
	General, administrative, and other			(35,820	)		(23,750	)		(25,223	)
	Loss on investments in other companies			(20,758	)		(2,500	)		—

		Income before minority interests and gains	$	165,672		$	165,599		$	159,321

F-24

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

18. New Accounting Pronouncements

In June and August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, and 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under FASB Statement No. 143, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation must be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. FASB Statement No. 144 retains FASB Statement No. 121’s, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of, fundamental provisions for the: (1) recognition and measurement of impairment of long-lived assets to be held and used; and (2) measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale. The Company does not believe that either FASB Statement No. 143 or No. 144 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. FASB Statement No. 143 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, and FASB Statement No. 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 141, Business Combinations, and 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under FASB Statement No. 141, business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001, must use the purchase method of accounting. The pooling of interest method of accounting is prohibited. Under FASB Statement No. 142, intangible assets acquired in a business combination must be recorded separately from goodwill if they arise from contractual or other legal right or are separable from the acquired entity and can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented, or exchanged, regardless of the acquirer’s intent to do so. The Company does not believe that either FASB Statement No. 141 or No. 142 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. FASB Statement No. 141 was effective for business combinations initiated after July 1, 2001, and FASB Statement No. 142 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001.

F-25

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Acer Distribution Center		1		CA		IND	$	0	$	3,146	$	9,479	$	1,295	$	3,146	$	10,773	$	13,920	$	850		1997		5-40
Activity Distribution Center		4		CA		IND		4,925		3,736		11,248		1,130		3,736		12,378		16,115		984		1997		5-40
Addison Business Center		1		IL		IND		—		1,060		3,228		83		1,060		3,311		4,371		267		2000		5-40
Addison Technology Center		1		TX		IND		—		899		2,696		494		899		3,191		4,090		250		1998		5-40
Airport South Business Park		4		GA		IND		17,629		7,718		14,658		214		7,718		14,872		22,589		1,380		2001		5-40
Albrae Business Center		1		CA		IND		—		6,299		6,227		38		6,299		6,266		12,564		767		2001		5-40
Alsip Industrial		1		IL		IND		—		1,200		3,744		233		1,200		3,977		5,177		316		1998		5-40
Alvarado Business Center		5		CA		IND		21,710		7,783		23,757		485		7,783		24,242		32,025		1,956		1997		5-40
AMB Meadowlands Park		9		NJ		IND		—		5,838		17,923		803		5,838		18,727		24,564		1,500		2000		5-40
AMB O’Hare Rosemont		14		IL		IND		8,000		3,131		8,995		742		3,131		9,737		12,868		786		1999		5-40
AMB Port O’Hare		2		IL		IND		—		4,913		5,761		—		4,913		5,761		10,675		652		2001		5-40
Amwiler-Gwinnett Industial Portfolio		9		GA		IND		12,892		6,641		19,964		2,346		6,641		22,310		28,951		1,768		1997		5-40
Anaheim Industrial		1		CA		IND		—		1,457		4,341		333		1,457		4,674		6,130		374		1997		5-40
Ardenwood Corporate Park		4		CA		IND		9,502		7,321		22,002		1,924		7,321		23,926		31,246		1,908		1997		5-40
Artesia Industrial Portfolio		25		CA		IND		51,025		22,758		68,254		6,095		22,758		74,349		97,107		5,931		1997		5-40
Arthur Distribution Center		1		IL		IND		4,950		2,726		5,216		20		2,726		5,236		7,961		486		2001		5-40
Atlanta South Business Park		9		GA		IND		—		8,047		24,180		1,160		8,047		25,340		33,386		2,039		1997		5-40
Atlantic Business Center (Formerly Peachtree North East)		3		GA		IND		—		2,197		6,592		1,488		2,197		8,079		10,277		628		1998		5-40
Atlantic Distribution Center		1		GA		IND		3,945		1,519		4,679		106		1,519		4,786		6,305		385		2000		5-40
Beacon Centre — OP		18		FL		IND		70,552		31,704		96,681		7,675		31,705		104,355		136,060		8,310		2000		5-40
Beacon Centre — AF I		4		FL		IND		17,618		7,229		22,238		466		7,230		22,703		29,933		1,828		2000		5-40
Beacon Centre — Headlands		2		FL		RET		—		4,692		14,373		52		4,692		14,425		19,117		1,168		2000		5-40
Beacon Industrial Park		8		FL		IND		17,006		10,466		31,437		6,486		10,466		37,923		48,389		2,955		1997		5-40
Bedford Warehouse		1		IL		IND		—		1,354		3,225		—		1,354		3,225		4,579		280		2001		5-40
Belden Avenue		3		IL		IND		10,930		4,812		15,186		493		4,812		15,678		20,491		1,251		1997		5-40
Bell Ranch Distribution		5		CA		IND		—		6,904		12,915		22		6,904		12,937		19,840		1,212		2001		5-40
Beltway Distribution		1		VA		IND		—		4,800		15,159		5,253		4,800		20,412		25,212		1,540		1999		5-40
Bennington Corporate Center		2		MD		IND		—		2,671		8,181		962		2,671		9,144		11,815		722		2000		5-40
Bensenville Industrial Park		13		IL		IND		38,663		20,799		62,438		6,958		20,799		69,396		90,195		5,509		1997		5-40
Black River		1		WA		IND		—		1,845		3,559		62		1,845		3,622		5,466		334		2001		5-40
Blue Lagoon Business Park		2		FL		IND		11,001		4,945		14,875		797		4,945		15,672		20,617		1,259		1997		5-40

S-1

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Boston Industrial Portfolio		20		MA		IND		19,056		19,320		56,900		16,155		19,320		73,055		92,375		5,642		1998		5-40
Braemar Business Center		2		MA		IND		—		1,422		4,613		685		1,422		5,297		6,720		410		1998		5-40
Brennan Distribution		1		CA		IND		—		3,683		3,022		—		3,683		3,022		6,705		410		2001		5-40
Bridgeview Industrial (Formerly Lake Michigan Industrial)		1		IL		IND		—		1,332		3,996		11		1,332		4,007		5,339		326		1997		5-40
Burnsville Business Center		1		MN		IND		—		932		2,796		1,028		932		3,824		4,757		291		1998		5-40
BWI Air Cargo Centre		1		MD		IND		3,035		—		6,367		86		0		6,453		6,453		394		2000		5-40
Cabot Business Park		16		MA		IND		—		17,231		51,726		20,082		21,118		67,921		89,039		5,438		1998		5-40
Cabot Business Park (KYKJ)		2		MA		IND		—		1,396		2,310		15,365		1,396		17,674		19,070		1,165		1998		5-40
Carson Industrial		12		CA		IND		—		4,231		10,418		3,561		4,231		13,980		18,211		1,112		1999		5-40
Cascade Business Center		4		OR		IND		—		2,825		7,860		1,966		2,825		9,826		12,651		773		1998		5-40
Central Bay		2		CA		IND		7,400		3,896		7,400		330		3,896		7,731		11,626		710		2001		5-40
Chancellor		1		FL		IND		2,707		1,587		4,802		213		1,587		5,016		6,603		403		1997		5-40
Chancellor Square		3		FL		IND		15,636		7,575		22,721		2,453		7,575		25,174		32,749		2,000		1998		5-40
Charles and Chase		1		MD		RET		—		751		2,287		10		751		2,297		3,047		186		1998		5-40
Chartwell Distribution Center		1		CA		IND		—		2,711		8,191		32		2,711		8,223		10,934		668		2000		5-40
Chemway Industrial Portfolio		5		NC		IND		—		2,875		8,625		860		2,875		9,485		12,360		755		1998		5-40
Chicago Industrial Portfolio		1		IL		IND		1,634		762		2,285		231		762		2,516		3,278		200		1997		5-40
Chicago Ridge Freight Terminal		1		IL		IND		—		3,705		3,576		—		3,705		3,576		7,282		445		2001		5-40
Chicago/ O’Hare Industrial Portfolio		5		IL		IND		—		4,816		9,603		75		4,816		9,678		14,495		885		2001		5-40
Circle Freeway		1		OH		IND		—		530		1,591		574		530		2,166		2,696		165		1998		5-40
Columbia Business Center		9		MD		IND		4,026		3,856		11,736		1,493		3,856		13,229		17,085		1,043		1999		5-40
Component Drive Ind Port		3		CA		IND		—		12,688		6,974		323		12,688		7,297		19,985		1,221		2001		5-40
Concord Industrial Portfolio		10		CA		IND		9,883		3,872		11,647		1,859		3,872		13,506		17,378		1,061		1999		5-40
Corporate Park/ Hickory Hill		7		TN		IND		16,137		6,789		20,366		853		6,789		21,219		28,008		1,711		1998		5-40
Corporate Square Industrial		6		MN		IND		—		4,024		12,113		1,376		4,024		13,489		17,513		1,070		1997		5-40
Corridor Industrial		1		MD		IND		2,433		996		3,019		133		996		3,152		4,147		253		1999		5-40
Crysen Industrial		1		DC		IND		2,823		1,425		4,275		668		1,425		4,943		6,368		389		1998		5-40
D/FW Int’l Air Cargo — AF I		1		TX		IND		4,700		—		19,683		1,830		0		21,513		21,513		1,314		1999		5-40
D/FW Air Cargo 2		1		TX		IND		—		—		4,286		13,779		0		18,065		18,065		1,103		1999		5-40

S-2

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Dado Distribution		1		CA		IND		—		7,221		3,739		23		7,221		3,762		10,983		671		2001		5-40
Dallas Industrial (Formerly Taxas Industrial Fortfolio)		12		TX		IND		—		5,938		17,836		3,402		5,938		21,238		27,176		1,660		1997		5-40
Dayton Air Cargo Centre		5		OH		IND		6,810		—		7,163		324		0		7,487		7,487		457		2000		5-40
Del Amo Industrial Center		1		CA		IND		—		2,529		7,651		37		2,529		7,688		10,217		624		2000		5-40
DFW Air Cargo Centre		3		TX		IND		6,234		—		20,632		139		0		20,770		20,770		1,269		2000		5-40
DFW Airfreight Portfolio		6		TX		IND		6,800		950		8,492		400		950		8,892		9,842		601		2000		5-40
Diablo Industrial Park		14		CA		IND		9,539		3,653		10,045		1,598		3,653		11,644		15,297		934		1999		5-40
Dixie Highway		2		KY		IND		—		1,700		5,149		120		1,700		5,268		6,969		426		1997		5-40
Dock’s Corner		1		NJ		IND		36,869		5,125		22,516		26,973		12,502		42,112		54,614		3,336		1997		5-40
Dock’s Corner II		1		NJ		IND		—		2,272		6,917		349		2,272		7,267		9,539		583		1997		5-40
Doolittle Distribution Center		1		CA		IND		—		2,644		8,014		137		2,644		8,151		10,794		659		2000		5-40
Dowe Industrial Center		2		CA		IND		—		2,665		8,034		1,263		2,665		9,297		11,962		731		1997		5-40
Dublin Industrial Portfolio		1		CA		IND		—		2,980		9,042		117		2,980		9,158		12,138		741		2000		5-40
Dulles Airport — Alliance		1		VA		IND		8,453		767		3,669		885		767		4,554		5,321		325		2000		5-40
East Bay Doolittle		1		CA		IND		—		7,128		11,023		416		7,128		11,440		18,568		1,134		2001		5-40
East Bay Whipple		1		CA		IND		7,000		5,333		8,126		2		5,333		8,128		13,462		822		2001		5-40
East Valley Warehouse		1		WA		IND		—		6,813		20,511		1,294		6,813		21,805		28,618		1,748		1999		5-40
Eaves Distribution Center		3		CA		IND		8,327		11,893		12,708		—		11,893		12,708		24,601		1,503		2001		5-40
Edenvale Business Center		1		MN		IND		—		919		2,411		667		919		3,078		3,997		244		1998		5-40
Edgewater Industrial Center		1		CA		IND		—		4,038		15,113		2,551		4,038		17,664		21,701		1,325		2000		5-40
Elk Grove Village Industrial		10		IL		IND		18,381		6,874		21,143		1,083		6,874		22,226		29,100		1,777		1997		5-40
Elmwood Business Park		5		LA		IND		—		4,163		12,488		1,193		4,163		13,680		17,843		1,090		1998		5-40
Empire Drive		1		KY		IND		—		1,590		4,815		252		1,590		5,066		6,657		407		1997		5-40
Executive Drive		1		IL		IND		—		1,399		4,236		672		1,399		4,908		6,306		385		1997		5-40
Fairway Drive Industrial		4		CA		IND		10,829		4,233		9,677		3,383		4,233		13,061		17,294		1,056		1997		5-40
Ford Distribution Cntr		8		CA		IND		—		25,443		23,529		—		25,443		23,529		48,971		2,991		2001		5-40
Fordyce Distribution Center		1		CA		IND		7,600		4,340		8,335		255		4,340		8,590		12,930		790		2001		5-40
Garland Industrial		20		TX		IND		19,477		8,161		24,484		4,005		8,161		28,489		36,650		2,238		1998		5-40
Gateway 58		3		MD		IND		—		3,256		9,940		9		3,256		9,949		13,205		807		2000		5-40
Gateway Commerce Center		5		MD		IND		—		4,083		12,336		1,200		4,083		13,536		17,620		1,076		1999		5-40
Gateway Corporate Center		9		WA		IND		27,000		9,981		32,201		766		9,981		32,967		42,949		2,623		1999		5-40
Gateway North		6		WA		IND		14,000		5,932		18,365		263		5,932		18,629		24,560		1,500		1999		5-40

S-3

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Greater Dallas Industrial Portfolio		6		TX		IND		—		6,269		18,414		6,589		6,269		25,003		31,272		1,910		1997		5-40
Greater Houston Industrial Portfolio		14		TX		IND		—		6,197		18,592		4,715		6,197		23,307		29,504		1,802		1998		5-40
Greenwood Industrial		3		MD		IND		—		4,729		14,188		1,209		4,729		15,397		20,126		1,229		1998		5-40
Hamilton Parkway (Formerly Lake Michigan Industrial)		1		IL		IND		—		1,554		4,703		134		1,554		4,837		6,391		390		1997		5-40
Harris Business Center — AF I		10		CA		IND		27,657		19,194		26,368		881		19,194		27,248		46,442		2,837		2000		5-40
Harris Business Center — AF II		10		CA		IND		33,500		13,376		40,428		3,236		13,376		43,664		57,040		3,484		2000		5-40
Harvest Business Park		3		WA		IND		—		2,371		7,153		915		2,371		8,068		10,439		638		1997		5-40
Hawthorne LAX Cargo Center		1		CA		IND		6,550		2,775		8,377		209		2,775		8,586		11,361		694		2000		5-40
Hayward Industrial — Hathaway		2		CA		IND		—		4,473		13,546		48		4,473		13,593		18,066		1,103		2000		5-40
Hayward Industrial — Wiegman		1		CA		IND		6,525		2,773		8,393		373		2,773		8,766		11,539		705		2000		5-40
Hempstead Highway Distribution Center		2		TX		IND		—		1,255		9,087		726		1,255		9,812		11,067		676		2000		5-40
Hintz Building		1		IL		IND		—		420		1,259		269		420		1,527		1,947		119		1998		5-40
Holton Drive		1		KY		IND		—		2,633		7,899		368		2,633		8,267		10,900		666		1997		5-40
Houston Industrial (Formerly Texas Industrial Portfolio)		5		TX		IND		—		3,009		9,066		1,271		3,009		10,337		13,345		815		1997		5-40
Houston Service Center		3		TX		IND		—		3,800		11,401		2,590		3,800		13,991		17,791		1,087		1998		5-40
Industrial Drive		1		OH		IND		—		1,743		5,230		360		1,743		5,589		7,332		448		1997		5-40
International Multifoods		1		CA		IND		—		1,613		4,879		941		1,613		5,820		7,433		454		1997		5-40
Itasca Industrial Portfolio		6		IL		IND		—		6,416		19,289		2,047		6,416		21,336		27,753		1,695		1997		5-40
Jacksonville Air Cargo Centre		1		FL		IND		3,150		—		3,028		—		0		3,028		3,028		185		2000		5-40
Jamesburg		3		NJ		IND		22,987		11,700		35,101		1,099		11,700		36,200		47,901		2,926		1998		5-40
Janitrol		1		OH		IND		—		1,797		5,390		246		1,797		5,635		7,432		454		1997		5-40
JFK Air Cargo — OP		15		NY		IND		—		15,434		45,660		1,677		15,434		47,337		62,771		3,834		2000		5-40
JFK Air Cargo — AF I		15		NY		IND		19,410		10,260		30,128		1,912		10,260		32,040		42,300		2,584		2000		5-40
JFK Airport Park		1		NY		IND		—		2,350		7,251		422		2,350		7,673		10,022		612		2000		5-40
Junction Industrial Park		4		CA		IND		—		7,875		23,975		1,091		7,875		25,067		32,942		2,012		1999		5-40
Kent Centre Corporate Park		4		WA		IND		—		3,042		9,165		690		3,042		9,855		12,897		788		1997		5-40
Kingsport Industrial Park		7		WA		IND		16,534		7,919		23,798		2,216		7,919		26,014		33,934		2,073		1997		5-40

S-4

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
L.A. County Industrial Portfolio		6		CA		IND		28,076		9,233		28,247		674		9,233		28,921		38,154		2,330		1997		5-40
LA Media Tech Center		7		CA		IND		22,716		12,810		12,531		16,051		12,810		28,582		41,392		2,528		1998		5-40
Laurelwood Drive		2		CA		IND		—		2,750		8,538		115		2,750		8,653		11,403		696		1997		5-40
Lawrence SSF		1		CA		IND		—		2,870		5,521		1,093		2,870		6,614		9,484		579		2001		5-40
LAX Air Cargo Centre		3		CA		IND		7,825		—		13,445		95		0		13,540		13,540		827		2000		5-40
Lincoln Industrial Center		1		TX		IND		—		671		2,052		211		671		2,262		2,933		179		1997		5-40
Linden Industrial		1		NJ		IND		—		900		2,753		48		900		2,800		3,700		226		1999		5-40
Locke Drive		1		MA		IND		—		1,074		3,227		69		1,074		3,296		4,369		267		1998		5-40
Lonestar		7		TX		IND		16,817		7,129		21,428		1,951		7,129		23,379		30,508		1,863		1997		5-40
Los Nietos		4		CA		IND		8,236		2,517		7,624		118		2,517		7,742		10,259		627		1999		5-40
MCI I Air Cargo Centre		1		MO		IND		5,445		—		5,793		44		0		5,838		5,838		357		2000		5-40
MCI II Air Cargo Centre		1		MO		IND		9,535		—		8,134		—		0		8,134		8,134		497		2000		5-40
Mahwah Corporate Center		6		NJ		IND		—		9,762		29,285		1,140		9,762		30,425		40,187		2,454		1998		5-40
Marietta Industrial		3		GA		IND		—		1,830		5,489		800		1,830		6,289		8,119		496		1998		5-40
Martin/ Scott Ind Port		2		CA		IND		—		9,052		5,309		98		9,052		5,407		14,459		883		2001		5-40
Meadow Lane 495		1		NJ		IND		—		838		2,594		156		838		2,750		3,588		219		1999		5-40
Meadowlands AF II		4		NJ		IND		12,400		6,755		13,093		938		6,755		14,030		20,785		1,269		2001		5-40
Meadowlands Cross Dock		1		NJ		IND		—		1,110		3,485		935		1,110		4,419		5,529		338		2000		5-40
Meadowridge		3		MD		IND		—		3,716		11,147		298		3,716		11,446		15,161		926		1998		5-40
Melrose Park		1		IL		IND		—		2,936		9,190		1,177		2,936		10,367		13,303		812		1997		5-40
Mendota Heights		1		MN		IND		668		1,367		4,565		1,946		1,367		6,511		7,878		481		1998		5-40
Metric Center		5		TX		IND		—		10,968		32,944		640		10,968		33,584		44,552		2,721		1997		5-40
Miami Airport Business Center		6		FL		IND		—		6,400		19,634		1,130		6,400		20,764		27,164		1,659		1999		5-40
Milmont Page Business Center		3		CA		IND		9,541		3,076		9,338		98		3,076		9,436		12,512		764		1997		5-40
Minneapolis Distribution Portfolio		4		MN		IND		—		6,227		18,692		1,893		6,227		20,585		26,811		1,638		1997		5-40
Minneapolis Industrial Portfolio IV		4		MN		IND		7,612		4,938		14,854		1,743		4,938		16,597		21,535		1,315		1997		5-40
Minneapolis Industrial V		7		MN		IND		5,476		4,426		13,317		1,511		4,426		14,828		19,254		1,176		1997		5-40
Minnetonka		10		MN		IND		11,648		6,690		20,380		2,707		6,690		23,088		29,778		1,819		1998		5-40
Moffett Business Center (MBC Industrial)		4		CA		IND		11,881		5,892		17,716		3,193		5,892		20,909		26,802		1,637		1997		5-40
Moffett Distribution		7		CA		IND		—		26,916		11,277		—		26,916		11,277		38,193		2,333		2001		5-40

S-5

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Moffett Park R&D Portfolio		14		CA		IND		—		14,807		44,462		7,850		14,805		52,315		67,120		4,099		1997		5-40
Moonachie Industrial		2		NJ		IND		4,825		2,731		5,228		100		2,731		5,328		8,058		492		2001		5-40
Murray Hill Parkway		2		NJ		IND		—		1,670		2,568		5,009		1,670		7,577		9,247		565		1999		5-40
NDP — Chicago (Formerly Glen Ellyn Rd. & Mitel Drive)		3		IL		IND		—		1,496		4,487		654		1,496		5,141		6,637		405		1998		5-40
NDP — Los Angeles		6		CA		IND		9,758		5,948		17,844		1,118		5,948		18,962		24,909		1,521		1998		5-40
NDP — Seattle		4		WA		IND		—		3,888		11,663		659		3,888		12,322		16,209		990		1998		5-40
Newark Airport I& II		2		NJ		IND		3,766		1,755		5,400		117		1,755		5,516		7,271		444		2000		5-40
Nicholas Warehouse		1		IL		IND		—		2,599		1,883		177		2,599		2,060		4,659		285		2001		5-40
Norcross/ Brookhollow Portfolio		4		GA		IND		—		3,721		11,180		630		3,721		11,810		15,531		949		1997		5-40
Normandie Industrial		1		CA		IND		—		2,398		7,491		740		2,398		8,231		10,628		649		2000		5-40
Northbrook Distribution Center		1		GA		IND		—		1,170		3,823		495		1,170		4,318		5,488		335		2000		5-40
Northpointe Commerce		2		CA		IND		—		1,773		5,358		331		1,773		5,690		7,463		456		1997		5-40
Northwest Crossing Distribution Center		2		TX		IND		—		745		4,792		1,342		745		6,134		6,879		420		2000		5-40
Northwest Distribution Center		3		WA		IND		—		3,533		10,751		761		3,533		11,512		15,044		919		1997		5-40
Novato Fair Shopping Center		1		CA		RET		—		4,393		8,424		202		4,393		8,626		13,018		795		2001		5-40
Oakland Ridge Industrial Center		12		MD		IND		7,023		5,571		16,933		4,614		5,571		21,546		27,118		1,656		1999		5-40
O’Hare Industrial Portfolio		15		IL		IND		—		7,357		22,112		2,004		7,357		24,116		31,473		1,922		1997		5-40
Orlando Central Park		2		FL		IND		—		1,779		979		8,945		1,779		9,924		11,703		715		1998		5-40
Pacific Business Center		2		CA		IND		9,119		5,417		16,291		795		5,417		17,086		22,504		1,374		1997		5-40
Pacific Service Center		1		GA		IND		—		504		1,511		620		504		2,131		2,635		161		1998		5-40
Pardee Drive		1		CA		IND		1,583		619		1,850		—		619		1,850		2,468		151		1999		5-40
Parkway Business Center		1		MN		IND		—		475		1,425		456		475		1,881		2,356		144		1998		5-40
Patuxent Range Road		2		MD		IND		—		1,696		5,127		429		1,696		5,556		7,252		443		1997		5-40
Patuxent Alliance 8280		1		MD		IND		—		887		1,706		10		887		1,716		2,603		159		2001		5-40
Peninsula Business Center III		1		VA		IND		—		992		2,976		65		992		3,041		4,033		246		1998		5-40
Penn James Office Warehouse		2		MN		IND		—		1,991		6,013		738		1,991		6,751		8,742		534		1997		5-40
Pioneer Alburtis		5		CA		IND		7,150		2,433		7,166		285		2,433		7,451		9,884		604		1999		5-40
Porete Avenue Warehouse		1		NJ		IND		8,811		4,067		12,202		9,552		4,067		21,754		25,822		1,577		1998		5-40

S-6

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
Port Northwest Phase I		2		TX		IND		7,450		1,825		1,438		9,234		1,825		10,672		12,496		763		1999		5-40
Presidents Drive		6		FL		IND		—		3,687		11,307		1,657		3,687		12,964		16,651		1,017		1997		5-40
Preston Court		1		MD		IND		—		2,313		7,192		261		2,313		7,452		9,765		596		1997		5-40
Production Drive		1		KY		IND		—		425		1,286		338		425		1,624		2,049		125		1997		5-40
Richardson Tech Center II		1		TX		IND		1,929		530		1,577		—		530		1,577		2,107		129		1997		5-40
Riverside Business Center (Formerly North GSW)		2		TX		IND		—		1,000		—		10,654		1,000		10,654		11,654		712		1998		5-40
Round Lake Business Center		1		MN		IND		—		875		2,625		463		875		3,088		3,963		242		1998		5-40
Sand Lake Service Center		6		FL		IND		—		—		—		2,150		0		2,150		2,150		131		1998		5-40
Santa Barbara Court		1		MD		IND		—		1,617		5,029		881		1,617		5,910		7,527		460		1997		5-40
Scripps Sorrento		1		CA		IND		—		1,110		3,330		32		1,110		3,363		4,473		273		1998		5-40
Sea Tac I Air Cargo Centre		2		WA		IND		5,074		—		15,594		51		0		15,645		15,645		956		2000		5-40
Sea Tac II Air Cargo Centre		1		WA		IND		—		—		3,056		89		0		3,145		3,145		192		2000		5-40
Seattle Airport Industrial		1		WA		IND		—		619		1,923		119		619		2,043		2,661		163		2000		5-40
Shawnee Industrial		1		GA		IND		—		2,481		7,531		2,026		2,481		9,557		12,038		735		1999		5-40
Silicon Valley R&D Portfolio*		6		CA		IND		—		8,024		24,205		4,349		8,024		28,554		36,579		2,234		1997		5-40
Slauson Distribution Center		8		CA		IND		20,500		7,806		23,552		1,197		7,806		24,748		32,555		1,988		2000		5-40
South Bay Industrial		8		CA		IND		18,392		14,992		45,016		4,356		14,992		49,372		64,364		3,931		1997		5-40
South Point Business Park		5		NC		IND		8,623		3,130		10,452		825		3,130		11,277		14,407		880		1998		5-40
South Ridge at Hartsfield		1		GA		IND		4,195		2,096		4,008		28		2,096		4,036		6,132		374		2001		5-40
Southfield Industrial Portfolio		13		GA		IND		35,661		12,855		35,730		4,471		12,855		40,201		53,056		3,240		1997		5-40
Southside Distribution Center		1		GA		IND		1,388		766		2,480		—		766		2,480		3,246		198		2001		5-40
Stadium Business Park		9		CA		IND		4,477		3,768		11,345		620		3,768		11,965		15,733		961		1997		5-40
Sunrise Industrial		4		FL		IND		13,001		6,266		18,798		651		6,266		19,449		25,715		1,571		1998		5-40
Suwannee Creek Distribution Center		3		GA		IND		14,015		4,922		—		19,157		4,922		19,157		24,079		1,471		1998		5-40
Sylvan		1		GA		IND		—		1,946		5,905		150		1,946		6,055		8,001		489		1999		5-40
Systematics		1		CA		IND		—		911		2,773		40		911		2,813		3,724		227		1997		5-40
Technology I		2		MD		IND		—		1,657		5,049		103		1,657		5,153		6,809		416		1999		5-40
Technology II		9		MD		IND		1,942		10,206		3,761		27,416		10,206		31,178		41,384		2,528		1999		5-40
TechRidge Phase IA		3		TX		IND		15,304		7,132		19,044		2,607		7,132		21,651		28,783		1,758		2000		5-40
TechRidge Phase II		1		TX		IND		11,662		7,261		13,484		214		7,261		13,699		20,960		1,280		2001		5-40
Teterboro Meadowlands 15		1		NJ		IND		9,900		4,961		9,618		1,226		4,961		10,844		15,805		965		2001		5-40

S-7

AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION

SCHEDULE III

CONSOLIDATED REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)

As of December 31, 2001



									Initial Cost to Company						Gross Amount Carried at 12/31/01
													Costs Capitalized										Year of
	No. of										Building &		Subsequent to				Building &		Total		Accumulated		Construction/		Depreciable Life
Property	Bldgs./Ctrs.		Location		Type		Encumbrances		Land		Improvements		Acquisition		Land		Improvements		Costs(1)(2)		Depreciation		Acquisition		(Years)


	(In thousands, except number of buildings/centers)
The Rotunda		2		MD		IND		12,852		4,400		17,736		2,229		4,400		19,965		24,366		1,488		1999		5-40
Torrance Commerce Center		6		CA		IND		—		2,045		6,136		542		2,045		6,678		8,724		533		1998		5-40
Twin Cities		2		MN		IND		—		4,873		14,638		3,286		4,873		17,923		22,796		1,392		1997		5-40
Two South Middlesex		1		NJ		IND		—		2,247		6,781		453		2,247		7,234		9,481		579		1997		5-40
Valwood		2		TX		IND		3,718		1,983		5,989		1,069		1,983		7,058		9,041		552		1997		5-40
Van Nuys Airport Industrial		3		CA		IND		—		2,481		7,508		5,020		2,481		12,528		15,010		917		2000		5-40
Viscount		1		FL		IND		—		984		3,016		325		984		3,341		4,325		264		1997		5-40
Walnut Drive (Formerly East Walnut Drive)		1		CA		IND		—		964		2,918		41		964		2,959		3,922		240		1997		5-40
Watson Industrial Center		1		CA		IND		4,600		2,417		4,617		159		2,417		4,775		7,192		439		2001		5-40
Weigman Road		1		CA		IND		—		1,563		4,688		219		1,563		4,907		6,470		395		1997		5-40
West North Carrier		1		TX		IND		3,010		1,375		4,165		187		1,375		4,352		5,727		350		1997		5-40
West Pac Air Cargo Centre		1		PA		IND		—		—		9,716		89		0		9,805		9,805		599		2000		5-40
Williams & Bouroughs		4		CA		IND		6,650		2,337		6,981		1,612		2,337		8,594		10,931		668		1999		5-40
Willow Lake Industrial Park		10		TN		IND		29,137		11,997		35,990		11,885		11,997		47,875		59,872		3,657		1998		5-40
Willow Park Industrial Portfolio		21		CA		IND		5,077		25,590		76,771		7,824		25,590		84,595		110,185		6,730		1998		5-40
Wilmington Avenue Wharehouse		2		CA		IND		—		3,849		11,605		2,582		3,849		14,187		18,036		1,102		1999		5-40
Wilsonville		1		OR		IND		—		3,407		13,493		58		3,407		13,551		16,958		1,036		1998		5-40
Windsor Court		1		IL		IND		—		766		2,338		94		766		2,432		3,198		195		1997		5-40
Wood Dale Industrial (Includes Bonnie Lane)		5		IL		IND		9,029		2,967		8,456		750		2,967		9,206		12,173		743		1999		5-40
Yosemite Drive		1		CA		IND		—		2,350		7,051		334		2,350		7,385		9,736		595		1997		5-40
Zanker/ Charcot Industrial		5		CA		IND		—		5,282		15,887		1,073		5,282		16,961		22,243		1,359		1997		5-40

Total		906					$	1,170,947	$	1,053,157	$	2,847,345	$	449,030	$	1,064,430	$	3,285,110	$	4,349,532	$	265,653

S-8

(1) Reconciliation of total cost to consolidated balance sheet caption as of December 31, 2001:


Total per Schedule III(3)		$	4,349,532
Construction in process(4)			181,179

	Total investments in properties	$	4,530,711

(2) As of December 31, 2001, the aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of investments in real estate was $4,092,163.

(3) A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2001, is as follows:


Investment in Real Estate:
	Balance at beginning of year	$	3,748,862
	Acquisition of properties		411,932
	Improvements, including properties under development/redevelopment		309,325
	Consolidation of Headlands Realty		40,001
	Divestiture of properties		(194,427	)
	Adjustment for properties held for divestiture		33,839

	Balance at end of year	$	4,349,532

Accumulated Depreciation:
	Balance at beginning of year	$	177,467
	Depreciation expense		109,383
	Adjustment for properties divested		(12,737	)
	Adjustment for contributed properties		(20,992	)
	Adjustment for properties held for divestiture		8,029
	Consolidation of Headlands Realty		203
	Asset impairment		4,300

	Balance at end of year	$	265,653

(4) Includes $127.3 million of fundings for development projects as of December 31, 2001.

S-9

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
Number		Description

	3.1	Articles of Incorporation of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
	3.2	Certificate of Correction of AMB Property Corporation’s Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8 1/2% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
	3.3	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8 5/8% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 1999).
	3.4	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 1999).
	3.5	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.75% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999).
	3.6	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.75% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 14, 1999).
	3.7	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2000).
	3.8	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2000).
	3.9	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.125% Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2000).
	3.10	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 23, 2001).
	3.11	Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2001).
	3.12	Articles Supplementary redesignating and reclassifying all 2,200,000 Shares of the 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2001).
	3.13	Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.11 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
	4.1	Form of Certificate for Common Stock of AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
	4.2	Form of Certificate for 8.5% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5(2) of Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998).
	4.3	$30,000,000 7.925% Fixed Rate Note No. 1 dated August 18, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated August 18, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).


Exhibit
Number		Description

	4.4	$25,000,000,000 7.925% Fixed Rate Note No. 2 dated September 12, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated September 12, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
	4.5	$50,000,000 8.00% Fixed Rate Note No. 3 dated October 26, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated October 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
	4.6	$25,000,000 8.000% Fixed Rate Note No. 4 dated October 26, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated October 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000).
	4.7	$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 5 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
	4.8	$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 6 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
	4.9	$50,000,000 7.20% Fixed Rate Note No. 7 dated December 19, 2000, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated December 19, 2000 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
	4.10	Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.11	First Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998 by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.12	Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.13	Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 30, 1998, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.14	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property Corporation and State Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K/ A filed on November 9, 2000).
	4.15	Specimen of 7.10% Notes due 2008 (included in the First Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.16	Specimen of 7.50% Notes due 2018 (included in the Second Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.17	Specimen of 6.90% Reset Put Securities due 2015 (included in the Third Supplemental Indenture incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-49163)).
	4.18	$25,000,000 6.90% Fixed Rate Note No. 8 dated January 9, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated January 9, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2001).


Exhibit
Number		Description

	4.19	$50,000,000 7.00% Fixed Rate Note No. 9 dated March 7, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated March 7, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2001).
	4.20	$25,000,000 6.75% Fixed Rate Note No. 10 dated September 6, 2001, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated September 6, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2001).
	4.21	$20,000,000 5.90% Fixed Rate Note No. 11 dated January 17, 2002, attaching the Parent Guarantee dated January 17, 2002 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2002).
	10.1	Distribution Agreement dated August 15, 2000 by and among AMB Property Corporation, AMB Property, L.P., Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, Banc of America Securities LLC, Banc One Capital Markets, Inc., Chase Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., and Salomon Smith Barney Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/ A filed on November 9, 2000).
	10.2	Terms Agreement dated as of December 14, 2000, by and between Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2001).
	10.3	Terms Agreement dated as of January 4, 2001, by and between A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and AMB Property, L.P. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 31, 2001).
	10.4	Terms Agreement dated as of March 2, 2001, by and among First Union Securities, Inc., AMB Property, L.P. and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of Registrants’ current report on Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2001).
	10.5	Fifth Amended and Restated Partnership Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property, L.P. dated September 21, 2001 (incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 10.1 to AMB Property Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2001).
	10.6	First Amendment to the Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property, L.P. dated January 1, 2002.
	10.7	Form of Registration Rights Agreement among AMB Property Corporation and the persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-35915)).
	10.8	Form of Change in Control and Noncompetition Agreement between AMB Property Corporation and Executive Officers (incorporated by reference to AMB Property Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).
	10.9	Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on June 15, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
	10.10	Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on August 4, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
	10.11	Agreement for Purchase and Exchange entered into as of March 9, 1999, by and among AMB Property, L.P., AMB Property II, L.P., Long Gate, L.L.C. and BPP Retail, LLC, regarding the transaction which closed on December 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
	10.12	Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Purchase Plan, dated July 9, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).


Exhibit
Number		Description

	10.13	Second Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1999).
	10.14	Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated December 6, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 7, 2001).
	10.15	First Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated January 1, 2002.
	10.16	Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of May 24, 2000, among AMB Property, L.P., the banks listed therein, Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, the Chase Manhattan Bank, as Documentation Agent, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookmanagers, Bank one, NA, Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft, PNC Bank National Association and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as Managing Agents and Banks Trust Company and Dresdner Bank AG, New York and Grand Cayman Branches, as Co-Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2000).
	10.17	Guaranty of Payment made as of May 24, 2000, between AMB Property Corporation and Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as administrative agent for the banks listed on the signature page of the Revolving Credit Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2000).
	10.18	Credit Agreement dated as of September 27, 1999, among AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I, L.P., AMB Institutional Alliance REIT I, Inc., the Lenders and issuing parties thereto, BT Realty Resources, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999).
	10.19	Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 23, 2001, among AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II, L.P., AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II, Inc., the banks and financial institutions listed therein, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Dresdner Bank AG, as Syndication Agent, and Bank One, NA, as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of AMB Property Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001).
	10.20	Terms Agreement dated as of August 30, 2001, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., AMB Property, L.P., and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2001).
	10.21	Terms Agreement dated as of January 14, 2002, by and among Lehman Brothers Inc., AMB Property, L.P., and AMB Property Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of AMB Property Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 23, 2002).
	10.22	Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
	10.23	Amendment No. 1 to the Third Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
	10.24	2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
	10.25	Second Amendment to Tenth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AMB Property II, L.P., dated February 25, 2002.
	10.26	AMB Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.
	21.1	Subsidiaries of AMB Property Corporation.
	23.1	Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP.
	24.1	Powers of Attorney (included in Part IV of this Form 10-K).
	99.1	Letter, dated March 28, 2002, from AMB Property Corporation to the Securities and Exchange Commission.


(1)	We also have an ownership interest in 36 industrial buildings totaling 4.0 million square feet in the Chicago market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(2)	We also have an ownership interest in 4 industrial buildings totaling 0.9 million square feet in the Southern California market through an unconsolidated joint venture.

(3)	Calculated as monthly rent at expiration multiplied by 12.

(4)	Same store pool as of December 31, 2001, excludes properties purchased or developments stabilized after December 31, 1999.


(1)	We also have an ownership interest in 36 industrial buildings totaling 4.0 million square feet in the Chicago market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(2)	We also have an ownership interest in 4 industrial buildings totaling 0.9 million square feet in the Southern California market through our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture.

(3)	In addition to owned square feet as of December 31, 2001, we manage, through our subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, 2.0 million, 0.6 million, and 0.1 million additional square feet of industrial, retail, and other properties, respectively.


(1)	Schedule includes executed leases that commence after December 31, 2001. Schedule excludes leases expiring December 31, 2001.

(2)	Calculated as monthly rent at expiration multiplied by 12.

(3)	Includes month-to-month leases and hold-over customers.


(1)	Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer.

(2)	Computed as aggregate leased square feet divided by the aggregate leased square feet of the industrial and retail properties.

(3)	Computed as aggregate annualized base rent divided by the aggregate annualized base rent of the industrial and retail and other properties.

(4)	Apron rental amount (but not square footage) are included.

(5)	County of Los Angeles includes Children’s Services, the Fire Department, the District Attorney’s Office, the Sheriff, and the Unified School District.

(6)	United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), U.S. Customs, and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).


(1)	Includes all consolidated operating properties and excludes development and renovation projects.

(2)	In addition to owned square feet as of December 31, 2001, we manage, through our subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, 2.7 million additional square feet of industrial, retail, and other properties. We also have investments in 4.9 million square feet of industrial properties through our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.

(3)	Consists of all leases renewing or re-tenanting with lease terms greater than one year.


(1)	Annualized base rent means the monthly contractual amount under existing leases at December 31, 2001, multiplied by 12. This amount excludes expense reimbursements, rental abatements, and percentage rents.

(2)	Calculated as total Annualized Base Rent divided by total rentable square feet actually leased as of December 31, 2001.

(3)	We hold an interest in this property through a joint venture interest in a limited partnership.

(4)	This property is held for divestiture.


(1)	Represents total estimated cost or renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, debt and equity carry, and partner earnouts. The estimates are based on our current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Excludes 268 acres of land and other acquisition-related costs totaling approximately $44.3 million.

(2)	As of December 31, 2001, our share of such amounts funded to date was $57.8 million and $8.5 million, respectively, for a total of $66.3 million funded to date.

(3)	Represents a renovation project.


(1)	Headlands Realty Corporation is a wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary.

(2)	Headlands Realty Corporation intends to sell these properties within two years of completion.

(3)	Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, debt and equity carry, and partner earnouts. The estimates are based on the Company’s current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change.

(4)	Represents existing properties or land that Headlands Realty is leasing from the operating partnership and is upgrading for sale to a third party.

(5)	Represents build-to-suit and speculative development or redevelopment.

(6)	As of December 31, 2001, our share of amounts funded to date was $20.5 million.


(1)	For development properties, this represents estimated square feet at completion of development for committed phases of development and renovation projects.

(2)	Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets.

(3)	A co-investment partnership with GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of the government of Singapore Investment Corporation.

(4)	Represents a co-investment partnership with a private institutional REIT.

(5)	Represents a co-investment partnership with the Erie Insurance Group.

(6)	Represents a co-investment partnership with the City and County of San Francisco Employees’ Retirement System.


(1)	For development properties, this represents estimated square feet at completion of development project.

(2)	Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets.

(3)	Included as part of retail properties held for divestiture.

(4)	Represents 39 acres of land for future development.


(1)	Square feet for development alliance joint ventures represents estimated square feet at completion of development project.

(2)	We re-negotiated this mortgage and received a $5.0 million pay-down on the principal balance and increased the interest rate to 9.5% from 8.75% in 2001.


(1)	Pro forma 1997 financial and other data has been prepared as if our formation transactions, our initial public offering, and certain property acquisitions and divestitures in 1997 had occurred on January 1, 1997.

(2)	The historical 1997 results represent our predecessor’s historical financial and other data for the period January 1, 1997 through November 25, 1997. The financial and other data of AMB Property Corporation and the properties acquired in our formation transactions have been included from November 26, 1997 to December 31, 1997.

(3)	Basic and diluted net income per share equals the net income available to common stockholders divided by 84,174,644 and 85,214,066 shares, respectively for 2001; 83,697,170 and 84,155,306 shares, respectively, for 2000; 86,271,862 and 86,347,487 shares, respectively, for 1999; 85,876,383 and 86,235,176 shares, respectively, for 1998; and pro forma net income divided by 85,874,513 and 86,156,556 shares, respectively, for 1997.

(4)	EBITDA is computed as income before divestiture of properties, net of minority interests and impairment charges, and minority interests plus interest expense, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. We believe that in addition to cash flows and net income, EBITDA is a useful financial performance measure for assessing the operating performance of a real estate investment trust because, together with net income and cash flows, EBITDA provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a real estate investment trust to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Includes our pro rata share of EBITDA in an unconsolidated joint venture. EBITDA is not a measurement of operating performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operations, or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. EBITDA may not be indicative of our historical operating results nor our potential future results. While EBITDA is frequently used as a measure of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other real estate investment trusts.

(5)	Operating earnings represents income before gains from dispositions of real estate, net of minority interests and impairment reserves on properties held for divestiture and operating properties, less minority interests’ share of net income and preferred stock dividends. It excludes the preferred unit redemption premium. We believe that in addition to cash flows and net income, operating earnings is a useful financial performance measure for assessing the operating performance of a real estate investment trust because, together with


	net income and cash flows, operating earnings provides investors with an additional basis to evaluate the ability of a real estate investment trust to incur and service debt and to fund acquisitions and other capital expenditures. Operating earnings is not a measurement of operating performance calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be considered as a substitute for operating income, net income, cash flows from operations, or other statement of operations or cash flow data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Operating earnings may not be indicative of our historical operating results nor our potential future results. While operating earnings is frequently used as a measure of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements, it is not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled captions of other real estate investment trusts.

(6)	Funds from Operations, or FFO, is defined as income from operations before minority interest, gains or losses from sale of real estate, and extraordinary losses plus real estate depreciation and adjustment to derive our pro rata share of the FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures, less minority interests’ pro rata share of the FFO of consolidated joint ventures and preferred stock dividends. In accordance with the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust White Paper on funds from operations, we include the effects of straight-line rents in funds from operations. We believe that funds from operations is an appropriate measure of performance for a real estate investment trust. While funds from operations is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and it should not be considered as an alternative to these indicators in evaluating liquidity or operating performance. Further, funds from operations as disclosed by other real estate investment trusts may not be comparable.

(7)	Secured debt includes unamortized debt premiums of approximately $6.8 million, $9.9 million, $10.1 million, $15.2 million, and $18.3 million as of December 31, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, and 1997, respectively. See Notes 2 and 7 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.


	•	defaults or non-renewal of leases by customers;

	•	increased interest rates and operating costs;

	•	our failure to obtain necessary outside financing;

	•	difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions;

	•	our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations;

	•	our failure to divest of properties that we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any such divestitures;

	•	risks and uncertainties affecting property development and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary permits, and public opposition to these activities);

	•	our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

	•	environmental uncertainties;

	•	risks related to natural disasters;


	•	financial market fluctuations;

	•	changes in real estate and zoning laws;

	•	increases in real property tax rates; and

	•	risks of doing business internationally.


(1)	The 2003 maturity includes a $125.0 million credit facility obtained by the Alliance Fund II, which we expect to repay with capital contributions and secured debt proceeds and had an outstanding balance of $123.5 million at December 31, 2001. The operating partnership also has a $500.0 million credit facility that had an outstanding balance of $12.0 million at December 31, 2001.

(2)	The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated joint venture debt were 6.3% and 7.0 years, respectively.


(1)	Ground lease amortization represents the amortization of our investments in ground lease properties, for which we do not have a purchase option.

(2)	Represents FFO attributable to minority interests in consolidated joint ventures whose interests are not exchangeable into common stock. The minority interests’ share of net operating income for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $65.0 million, $25.0 million, and $12.5 million, respectively.

(3)	Our share of net operating income for years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, was $10.2 million, $8.3 million, and $8.0 million, respectively.


(1)	Represents 91.2% of all outstanding debt.

(2)	Represents 8.9% of all outstanding debt.


	•	AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 3, 2001, in connection with the issuance and sale by AMB Property, L.P. of 800,000 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and the filing by AMB Property Corporation Articles Supplementary establishing and fixing the rights and preferences of the 7.95% Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

	•	AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on October 16, 2001, in connection with its third quarter 2001 earnings release.

	•	AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on December 7, 2001, in connection with the repurchase and redemption of all its outstanding 8.75% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units.

	•	AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on January 23, 2002, in connection with its issuance of $20.0 million of senior unsecured notes by AMB Property, L.P. under its medium-term note program.

	•	AMB Property Corporation filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on January 24, 2002, in connection with its fourth quarter 2001 earnings release.



	Hamid R. Moghadam
	Chairman of the Board and
	Chief Executive Officer


	ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

	San Francisco, California
	January 22, 2002


(1)	Primarily due to straight-line rent, prepaid rent, and debt premium amortization timing differences.


(1)	Certain reclassifications have been made to the quarterly data to conform with the annual presentation with no net effect to net income or per share amounts.

(2)	The sum of quarterly financial data may vary from the annual data due to rounding.


(1)	Excludes straight-line rents of $10.1 million, $10.2 million, and $10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

(2)	Property net operating income (NOI) is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements and excluding straight-line rents, less property level operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, and interest expense.


(1)	Excludes net properties held for divestiture of $157.2 million and $197.1 million, respectively.


(1)	Reconciliation of total cost to consolidated balance sheet caption as of December 31, 2001:


(2)	As of December 31, 2001, the aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes of investments in real estate was $4,092,163.

(3)	A summary of activity for real estate and accumulated depreciation for the year ended December 31, 2001, is as follows:


(4)	Includes $127.3 million of fundings for development projects as of December 31, 2001.