U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): April 28, 2009
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
001-13545
|
|
94-3281941 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission file number)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer identification |
incorporation)
|
|
|
|
number) |
|
|
|
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California
|
|
94111 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
415-394-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
n/a
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2. below):
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b)) |
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c)) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.
On April 28, 2009, we issued a press release entitled AMB Property Corporation Announces First
Quarter 2009 Results, which sets forth disclosure regarding our results of operation for the first
quarter 2009. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. This section and the
attached exhibit are provided under Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and are furnished to, but not filed with,
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.
On April 28, 2009, we reported results for the first quarter 2009. Funds from operations per fully
diluted share and unit was a $1.00 loss for the first quarter of 2009, as compared to $0.65 for the
same quarter in 2008.
Consistent with our previous announcement, we recognized non-cash impairment charges in the first
quarter of 2009, related to valuation of our development and
operating assets and land holdings,
totaling approximately $182 million. The impairment charges are primarily attributed to changes in
leasing and valuation assumptions. Excluding the impact of the impairments, funds from operations
per fully diluted share and unit would have been $0.77 for the first quarter of 2009.
Net income available to common stockholders per fully diluted share for the first quarter of 2009
was a loss of $1.24, as compared to $0.39 for the same quarter in 2008. The loss was attributable
to impairment charges that we incurred in the quarter.
Financing Activities
As previously announced, we completed the issuance and sale of 47.4 million shares of our common
stock in a public offering at a price of $12.15 per share, generating $553 million in net proceeds.
The proceeds from the offering were used to reduce borrowings under our unsecured credit
facilities.
In addition to the reduction of our credit facilities, we have repaid, refinanced or extended
approximately $751 million of our debt during the first quarter of 2009. Our share of total debt
was reduced by approximately $787 million during the quarter,
and at March 31, 2009, our share of
total debt to share of total assets was 43.6 percent, as compared to 51.1 percent at the end of the
fourth quarter 2008.
Contributions and Dispositions
Year-to-date we have completed contributions and sales of approximately $391 million.
During the first quarter, we completed contributions and sales totaling approximately $304 million,
with gains of approximately $52 million, consisting of the following:
§ |
|
The contribution of one asset to AMB Japan Fund I and the sale of five development
properties and a land parcel in the U.S. for an aggregate price of approximately $243 million,
with a gain of more than $33 million and an average development margin of 20.6 percent; and |
§ |
|
The sale of eight properties from our operating portfolio in the U.S. for an aggregate
sales price of approximately $62 million, with a gain of
approximately $19 million. |
Subsequent to quarter end, we completed sales in our development and operating portfolio totaling
approximately $87 million,
including two development properties for an aggregate sales price of approximately $50 million, and
two properties from our operating portfolio for an aggregate sales price of approximately $37
million. The year-to-date stabilized capitalization rate for its
asset sales in the U.S. was approximately 8.5 percent.
We have other assets in our operating and development portfolios that are currently under contract
for sale or scheduled for contribution in 2009, subject to certain conditions, for an aggregate
sales price of approximately $219 million. We also have approximately $51 million of operating and
development properties for sale that are currently under non-binding letters of intent.
Investment Activity
We commenced two previously committed build-to-suit developments in Paris, France and Monterrey,
Mexico, totaling 464,000 square feet (43,100 square meters) during the quarter, with a total
estimated investment of $29 million.
Our global development pipeline at quarter end, which included investments held through
unconsolidated joint ventures, totaled approximately 11.8 million square feet (1.1 million square
meters) scheduled for delivery through 2010, with an estimated total investment of $983.6 million
before the recognition of the impairment charges. Our share of the remaining cash to fund the
completion of our development pipeline is projected to be $135 million. The development pipeline
was approximately 31 percent leased as of March 31, 2009, with approximately 7 million square feet
(650,800 square meters) of leasing remaining in order to stabilize the pipeline.
Leasing Activity
During the first quarter of 2009, we leased more than 1.0 million square feet
(94,500 square meters) of our development pipeline. In our global operating portfolio, we leased
approximately 5.6 million square feet (519,000 square meters) in the first quarter.
Owned and Managed Portfolio Operating Results
Our operating portfolio was 92.2 percent occupied at March 31, 2009, with an average occupancy
rate of 93.1 percent for the first quarter of 2009. Cash basis same store net operating income,
without the effects of lease termination fees, decreased 1.1 percent in the first quarter compared
with the same period in 2008, driven primarily by lower average same
store occupancies. Average rent change on renewals and rollovers in our operating portfolio
was flat for the quarter and 2.2 percent for the trailing four quarters ended March 31, 2009.
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS MEASURES
Included in the footnotes to our attached financial statements is a discussion of why management
believes FFO, FFOPS and FFO, excluding impairment charges (or the FFO Measures) are useful
supplemental measures of operating performance, ways in which investors might use the FFO Measures
when assessing our financial performance and the FFO Measures limitations as a
measurement tool. Reconciliation from net income to the FFO Measures are provided in the attached
tables.
We believe that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However,
we consider cash-basis same store net operating income (or SS NOI) to be a useful supplemental
measure of our operating performance. Properties that are considered part of the same store pool
include all properties that were owned as of the end of both the current and prior year reporting
periods and exclude development properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The
same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after
December 31, 2007. In deriving SS NOI, we define NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements,
less property operating expenses, both of which are calculated in accordance with GAAP. Property
operating expenses exclude depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses and
interest expense. We define SS NOI to also exclude straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles. We consider SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure
because it reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of
non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a
year-over-year comparison. In addition, we believe that SS NOI helps the investing public compare
our operating performance with that of other companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used
measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow
from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to
those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not
reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs,
capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that
could materially impact our results from operations. Further, our computation of SS NOI may not be
comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating SS NOI. Reconciliation from net income to SS NOI is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(123,024 |
) |
|
$ |
69,735 |
|
Private capital income |
|
|
(11,695 |
) |
|
|
(9,923 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
42,101 |
|
|
|
40,969 |
|
Impairment losses |
|
|
165,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative and fund costs |
|
|
31,510 |
|
|
|
35,348 |
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
(15,265 |
) |
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
(6,277 |
) |
|
|
(3,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI |
|
|
104,266 |
|
|
|
116,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less non same-store NOI |
|
|
(14,360 |
) |
|
|
(25,299 |
) |
Less non cash adjustments(1) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
|
$ |
89,926 |
|
|
$ |
90,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Owned
and managed is defined by us as assets in which we have at least a 10
percent ownership interest, are the property or asset manager, and
which we currently intend to
hold for the long-term.
We are an owner, operator and developer of industrial real estate, focused on major hub and gateway
distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As of March 31, 2009, we owned, or had
investments in, on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and
development projects expected to total approximately 159.0 million square feet (14.8 million square
meters) in 48 markets within 14 countries. We invest in properties located predominantly in the
infill submarkets of our targeted markets. Our portfolio is comprised of High Throughput
Distribution® facilitiesindustrial properties built for speed and located near
airports, seaports and ground transportation systems.
Forward Looking Statements
Some of the information included in this report contains forward-looking statements such as those
related to assets under contract, scheduled for contribution, under letters of intent, currently
marketed and selected to sell, our development projects (including completion, timing of
stabilization and delivery, our share of remaining funding required, our ability to lease such
projects, square feet at stabilization or completion, costs and total investment amounts), our
ability to meet our business goals, our ability to weather the economic downturn and grow our
business, estimated dilutive impact of the equity offering, and projected
near-term capitalization rates, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there
are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of these words and
phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by
discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent
on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to
realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in
the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. The
following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially
from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults on or non-renewal
of leases by tenants or renewal at lower than expected rent or failure to lease at all or on
favorable terms, decreases in real estate values and impairment losses, increased interest rates
and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures, our failure to obtain, renew or
extend necessary financing, re-financing risks, risks related to our obligations in the event of
certain
defaults under co-investment ventures and other debt, risks related to debt and equity security
financings (including dilution risk), difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations,
our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any
divestitures, our failure to contribute properties to our co-investment ventures, risks and
uncertainties affecting property development, value-added conversions, redevelopment and
construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary
permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status
as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring, failure to maintain our
current credit agency ratings or to comply with our debt covenants, environmental uncertainties,
risks related to natural disasters, financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic
conditions,
global trade or in the real estate sector, inflation risks, changes in real estate and
zoning laws, a continued or prolonged downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, risks
related to doing business internationally and global expansion, risks of opening offices globally,
risks of changing personnel and roles, losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown
liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and increases in real
property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally, including interest
rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and certain other
matters discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(1)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
153,834 |
|
|
$ |
161,935 |
|
Private capital revenues |
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
9,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
165,529 |
|
|
|
171,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs |
|
|
(49,568 |
) |
|
|
(44,994 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(42,101 |
) |
|
|
(40,969 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(31,249 |
) |
|
|
(35,126 |
) |
Fund costs |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
Real estate impairment losses |
|
|
(165,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other expenses(2) |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
(288,496 |
) |
|
|
(121,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes |
|
|
33,286 |
|
|
|
17,820 |
|
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,967 |
|
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
2,928 |
|
Other (expenses) income(2) |
|
|
(7,065 |
) |
|
|
4,415 |
|
Interest expense, including amortization |
|
|
(32,521 |
) |
|
|
(29,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses, net |
|
|
(6,334 |
) |
|
|
15,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(129,301 |
) |
|
|
65,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income attributable to discontinued operations |
|
|
(12,669 |
) |
|
|
2,205 |
|
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
|
|
18,946 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
6,277 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(123,024 |
) |
|
|
69,735 |
|
Noncontrolling interests share of net loss (income) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners share of net loss (income) |
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
(19,263 |
) |
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
(4,741 |
) |
Preferred unitholders |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
(1,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncontrolling interests share of net loss (income) |
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
(26,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income after noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(118,398 |
) |
|
|
42,932 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(122,350 |
) |
|
$ |
38,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income per common share
(diluted)(3) |
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares (diluted) |
|
|
98,916 |
|
|
|
99,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated
co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated
co-investment venture. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred
compensation plan. |
|
(3) |
|
Net (loss) income per common share (diluted) is calculated
using the diluted two-class method. For 2008, 895,446 shares of
unvested restricted stock outstanding are also included in
the weighted average common shares amount. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(1)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(122,350 |
) |
|
$ |
38,980 |
|
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
|
|
(18,946 |
) |
|
|
(21,685 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
42,101 |
|
|
|
40,969 |
|
Discontinued operations depreciation |
|
|
1,358 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation |
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net (loss) income) |
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
|
|
19,263 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net (loss) income) |
|
|
(5,320 |
) |
|
|
1,367 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(3,712 |
) |
|
|
(16,576 |
) |
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of net loss (income) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(2,928 |
) |
AMBs share of FFO |
|
|
7,524 |
|
|
|
8,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations |
|
$ |
(102,186 |
) |
|
$ |
67,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
|
$ |
(1.00 |
) |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
|
|
102,353 |
|
|
|
103,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate impairment losses |
|
$ |
165,979 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
|
|
15,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of real estate impairment losses from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interest share of real estate impairment losses |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of total impairment charges |
|
|
181,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations, excluding impairment charges |
|
$ |
79,402 |
|
|
$ |
67,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO,
excluding impairment charges per common share and unit (diluted)(2) |
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Funds From Operations (FFO), Funds From Operations Per Share and Unit (FFOPS)
and FFO, excluding impairment charges (together with FFO and FFOPS, the FFO Measures). AMB
believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, AMB considers funds from operations, or FFO, FFO per share and unit, or FFOPS, and FFO,
excluding impairment charges, to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB
defines FFOPS as FFO per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and operating
partnership units. AMB calculates FFO as net income available to common stockholders, calculated in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for
investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata
share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. |
AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added conversion projects,
before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO. AMB believes that value-added conversion
dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO, consistent with the
real estate investment trust industrys long standing practice to include gains on the sale of land
in FFO. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO or FFOPS may not be consistent with the views of
others in the real estate investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from
the NAREIT definition, and may not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate
investment trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In
connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets that are acquired with
the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture. Some of the properties held for
contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If
this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO gains or losses related
to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a
change, if instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition,
AMB believes such calculation of FFO will better reflect the value created as a result of the
contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the contribution of previously
depreciated warehoused assets in FFO.
In addition to presenting FFO as described above, AMB presents FFO, excluding impairment charges.
AMB calculates FFO, excluding impairment charges, as FFO less impairment charges and adjustments to
derive AMBs share of impairment charges from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. To
the extent that the book value of a land parcel or development asset exceeded the fair market value
of a property, based on its intended holding period, a non-cash impairment charge was recognized
for the shortfall. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in estimated
capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted values.
Although difficult to predict, these charges may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current
economic climate and its adverse effects on the real estate markets. While not infrequent or
unusual in nature, these charges are subject to market fluctuations that can have inconsistent
effects on AMBs results of operations. The economics underlying these charges reflect market
conditions in the short-term but can obscure the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and
strategies. Management believes FFO, excluding impairment charges, is significant and useful to
both it and its investors because it more appropriately reflects the value and strength of AMBs
business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the current economic
environment. However, in addition to the limitations of FFO Measures generally discussed below,
FFO, excluding impairment charges, does not present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial
condition and operating performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of FFO
and should not be considered a replacement of FFO as AMB defines it or used as an alternative to
net income or cash as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures are meaningful supplemental measures of its operating
performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP
implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as
reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures are supplemental measures of operating
performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and
amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders, as defined by
U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, combined with the required U.S. GAAP
presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real
estate investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results
among such companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures to be useful measures for
reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses
related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate
depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures can help the investing public compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO
and FFOPS are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment
trusts, the FFO Measures do not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by
U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating AMBs
liquidity or operating performance. The FFO Measures also do not consider the costs associated with
capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor are the FFO Measures necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund AMBs future cash requirements. Management compensates for
the limitations of the FFO Measures by providing investors with financial statements prepared
according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures and a
reconciliation of the FFO Measures to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP
measurement.
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
FFO, excluding impairment charges per common share and unit (diluted) is
calculated using the diluted two-class method. 920,281 and 895,446 shares of unvested restricted
stock outstanding are included in the weighted average common shares and units (diluted) amount at
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in properties |
|
$ |
5,949,909 |
|
|
$ |
6,603,856 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(986,541 |
) |
|
|
(970,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in properties |
|
|
4,963,368 |
|
|
|
5,633,119 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
432,503 |
|
|
|
431,322 |
|
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
|
|
881,431 |
|
|
|
609,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate |
|
|
6,277,302 |
|
|
|
6,673,464 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
282,298 |
|
|
|
251,231 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
145,266 |
|
|
|
160,528 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
208,069 |
|
|
|
216,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,912,935 |
|
|
$ |
7,301,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
1,405,188 |
|
|
$ |
1,522,571 |
|
Unsecured senior debt |
|
|
1,054,250 |
|
|
|
1,153,926 |
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
|
380,663 |
|
|
|
920,850 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
392,613 |
|
|
|
392,838 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
374,908 |
|
|
|
345,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,607,622 |
|
|
|
4,335,444 |
|
Stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity |
|
|
2,661,648 |
|
|
|
2,291,695 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
223,412 |
|
|
|
223,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,885,060 |
|
|
|
2,515,107 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners |
|
|
280,033 |
|
|
|
293,367 |
|
Preferred unitholders |
|
|
77,561 |
|
|
|
77,561 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
62,659 |
|
|
|
80,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncontrolling interests |
|
|
420,253 |
|
|
|
451,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
|
|
3,305,313 |
|
|
|
2,966,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
|
$ |
6,912,935 |
|
|
$ |
7,301,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(d) Exhibits:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
99.1
|
|
AMB Property Corporation Press Release dated April 28, 2009. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: April 28, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Tamra D. Browne
|
|
|
|
Tamra D. Browne |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary |
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
99.1
|
|
AMB Property Corporation Press Release dated April 28, 2009. |