EX-99.1
Published on April 28, 2009
|
Company Profile |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As
of March 31, 2009, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
159.0 million square feet (14.8 million square meters) in 48 markets within 14 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets. AMBs
portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built for
efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. The private capital revenue consists of
asset management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
| (1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio) and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (2) | Includes development properties available for sale or contribution. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 1 |
|
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | % Change | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 165,529 | $ | 171,858 | (3.7 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
135,352 | 109,543 | 23.6 | % | ||||||||
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
(122,350 | ) | 38,980 | (413.9 | %) | |||||||
FFO(1)
|
(102,186 | ) | 67,850 | (250.6 | %) | |||||||
FFO, excluding impairment charges(2)
|
79,402 | 67,850 | (4) | 17.0 | %(4) | |||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | (1.24 | ) | $ | 0.39 | (417.9 | %) | |||||
FFO(1)
|
(1.00 | ) | 0.65 | (253.8 | %) | |||||||
FFO, excluding impairment charges(2)
|
0.77 | 0.65 | (4) | 18.5 | %(4) | |||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.52 | (46.2 | %) | ||||||||
Financial
|
||||||
| - | Completed common equity offering of approximately 47.4 million shares, generating net proceeds of $553 million | |||||
| - | Completed $751 million of debt extensions and repayments | |||||
| - | Reduced AMBs share of debt by approximately $787 million | |||||
| - | Approximately $1.5 billion in capacity; consisting of $263 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents and $1.2 billion of availability on our lines of credit | |||||
| - | Recognized non-cash impairment charges of approximately $182 million or $1.77 FFO(1) per share, including $119 million, $56 million and $7 million for development assets, land and operating assets, respectively | |||||
Operations(3)
|
- | 1.1% cash basis same store NOI decline(1) in the first quarter | ||||
| - | 93.1% average occupancy; 92.2% occupancy at the end of the first quarter | |||||
| - | 2.2% trailing four quarter rent changes on renewals and rollover; (0.3)% in the first quarter | |||||
| - | Leased more than 6.6 msf, representing 1.0 msf of development assets and 5.6 msf of operating properties | |||||
Capital Deployment(3)
|
- | Completed approximately $304 million in contributions and sales, with gains of approximately $52 million | ||||
| - | Commenced approximately $29 million in previously committed development | |||||
Private Capital
|
- | Added approximately $185 million in properties to AMB Japan Fund I, L.P. | ||||
| - | Completed final investment for AMB Japan Fund I, L.P. and repaid balance of subscription line | |||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment charges. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (4) | There were no impairment charges for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 2 |
|
Funds From Operations(1) Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO by Business(1)(5)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Quarter Ended | |||||||||||
| 2007 | 2008 | March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.60 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.45 | 0.49 | 0.10 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO |
$ | 2.05 | $ | 2.01 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
58.4 | % | 68.8 | % | 55.8 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
1.61 | 0.73 | 0.32 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.32 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO |
$ | 1.29 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.26 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
36.8 | % | 13.4 | % | 33.8 | % | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.30 | 0.67 | 0.13 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.15 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.08 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
4.8 | % | 17.8 | % | 10.4 | % | ||||||
Total FFO |
$ | 3.51 | $ | 2.92 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | For a reconciliation of FFO from net income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
| (3) | FFO per share, excluding impairment charges is $0.77 and $2.92 year to date for 2009 and 2008, respectively. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment charges. | |
| (4) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
| (5) | Estimated FFO by Business for 2009 and 2008 represents FFO, excluding impairment charges. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment charges. | |
| (6) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 3 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 153,834 | $ | 161,935 | ||||
Private capital revenues |
11,695 | 9,923 | ||||||
Total revenues |
165,529 | 171,858 | ||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Property operating costs |
(49,568 | ) | (44,994 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(42,101 | ) | (40,969 | ) | ||||
General and administrative |
(31,249 | ) | (35,126 | ) | ||||
Fund costs |
(261 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||
Real estate impairment losses |
(165,979 | ) | | |||||
Other expenses(2)
|
662 | 92 | ||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(288,496 | ) | (121,219 | ) | ||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
33,286 | 17,820 | ||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
| 19,967 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
(34 | ) | 2,928 | |||||
Other (expenses) income(2)
|
(7,065 | ) | 4,415 | |||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(32,521 | ) | (29,957 | ) | ||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(6,334 | ) | 15,173 | |||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
(129,301 | ) | 65,812 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||
(Loss) income attributable to discontinued operations |
(12,669 | ) | 2,205 | |||||
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
18,946 | 1,718 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
6,277 | 3,923 | ||||||
Net (loss) income |
(123,024 | ) | 69,735 | |||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net loss (income) |
||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net loss (income) |
1,846 | (19,263 | ) | |||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(1,108 | ) | (4,741 | ) | ||||
Preferred unitholders |
(1,432 | ) | (1,432 | ) | ||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
5,320 | (1,367 | ) | |||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net loss (income) |
4,626 | (26,803 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) income after noncontrolling interests |
(118,398 | ) | 42,932 | |||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | ||||
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
$ | (122,350 | ) | $ | 38,980 | |||
Net
(loss) income per common share (diluted)(3) |
$ | (1.24 | ) | $ | 0.39 | |||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
98,916 | 99,668 | ||||||
| (1) | On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. | |
| (2) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan. | |
| (3) | Net (loss) income per common share (diluted) is calculated using the diluted two-class method. For 2008, 895,446 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding are also included in the weighted average common shares amount. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
$ | (122,350 | ) | $ | 38,980 | |||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
(18,946 | ) | (21,685 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
42,101 | 40,969 | ||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
1,358 | 704 | ||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(2,137 | ) | (1,634 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated joint ventures |
||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net (loss) income) |
(1,846 | ) | 19,263 | |||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net (loss) income) |
(5,320 | ) | 1,367 | |||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
1,108 | 528 | ||||||
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(3,712 | ) | (16,576 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||
AMBs share of net loss (income) |
34 | (2,928 | ) | |||||
AMBs share of FFO |
7,524 | 8,862 | ||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | (102,186 | ) | $ | 67,850 | |||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | (1.00 | ) | $ | 0.65 | |||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
102,353 | 103,646 | ||||||
Adjustments for impairment charges |
||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
$ | 165,979 | $ | | ||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
15,874 | | ||||||
AMBs share of real estate impairment losses from unconsolidated joint ventures |
4,611 | | ||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interest share of real estate impairment losses |
(4,876 | ) | | |||||
AMBs share of total impairment charges(1)
|
181,588 | | ||||||
Funds from operations, excluding impairment charges |
$ | 79,402 | $ | 67,850 | ||||
FFO, excluding impairment charges per common share and unit (diluted)(2)
|
$ | 0.77 | $ | 0.65 | ||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
|
| (2) | FFO, excluding impairment charges per common share and unit (diluted) is calculated using the diluted two-class method. 920,281 and 895,446 shares of unvested restricted stock outstanding are included in the weighted average common shares and units (diluted) amount at March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| As of | ||||||||
| March 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 5,949,909 | $ | 6,603,856 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(986,541 | ) | (970,737 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
4,963,368 | 5,633,119 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
432,503 | 431,322 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
881,431 | 609,023 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,277,302 | 6,673,464 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
282,298 | 251,231 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
145,266 | 160,528 | ||||||
Other assets |
208,069 | 216,425 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,912,935 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
Liabilities, stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,405,188 | $ | 1,522,571 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,054,250 | 1,153,926 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
380,663 | 920,850 | ||||||
Other debt |
392,613 | 392,838 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
374,908 | 345,259 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,607,622 | 4,335,444 | ||||||
Stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,661,648 | 2,291,695 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,885,060 | 2,515,107 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
280,033 | 293,367 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
77,561 | 77,561 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
62,659 | 80,169 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
420,253 | 451,097 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
3,305,313 | 2,966,204 | ||||||
Total liabilities, stockholders equity and noncontrolling interests |
$ | 6,912,935 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 6 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2)
|
||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 7,255 | $ | 6,807 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,938 | $ | 3,515 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 2,279 | $ | 314 | ||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 1,726 | $ | 159 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 724 | $ | 155 | ||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 2,229 | $ | 3,264 | ||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,030 | 6,863 | ||||||
Building improvements |
4,996 | 5,051 | ||||||
Sub-total |
12,255 | 15,178 | ||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(3,565 | ) | (4,452 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 8,690 | $ | 10,726 | ||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,392 | $ | 3,332 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,181 | $ | 2,898 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 869 | $ | 308 | ||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 527 | $ | 154 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 475 | $ | 154 | ||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 1,306 | $ | 2,900 | ||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
3,886 | 5,634 | ||||||
Building improvements |
4,077 | 4,379 | ||||||
Sub-total |
9,269 | 12,913 | ||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(1,231 | ) | (2,603 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 8,038 | $ | 10,310 | ||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. |
|
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 7 |
|
Operations Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Square | ||||||||||||||||
| Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
3,989,408 | $ | 32,990 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||
| 2 | United States Government |
1,395,896 | 20,921 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||
| 3 | FedEx Corporation |
1,469,895 | 15,099 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||
| 4 | Nippon Express |
1,029,415 | 11,853 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
| 5 | Sagawa Express |
728,791 | 11,199 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||
| 6 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
1,044,503 | 9,800 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||
| 7 | Panalpina |
1,316,351 | 8,746 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 8 | La Poste |
902,391 | 8,150 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 9 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
543,039 | 7,308 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||
| 10 | Kuehne + Nagel |
831,978 | 6,547 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
13,251,667 | $ | 132,613 | 15.8 | % | |||||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
7,234,948 | 49,871 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
20,486,615 | $ | 182,484 | 21.5 | % | |||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 8 |
![]() |
Operating Statistics(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
| March 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | March 31, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
133,136,434 | 131,508,119 | 116,813,431 | 100,912,256 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
88.1 | % | 76.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2)
|
92.2 | % | 95.1 | % | 92.9 | % | 94.8 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
94.8 | % | 96.0 | % | 94.9 | % | 96.2 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2)
|
93.1 | % | 94.9 | % | 93.5 | % | 94.6 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
94.9 | % | 95.5 | % | 95.0 | % | 95.6 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 5.8 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Trailing four quarters statistics |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2)
|
67.4 | % | 71.5 | % | 70.0 | % | 71.7 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
2.2 | % | 3.1 | % | 1.5 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
17.1 | 18.4 | 16.9 | 17.3 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.37 | $ | 1.43 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 3.10 | $ | 3.23 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.94 | $ | 2.02 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
21.4 | 22.0 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2)
|
73.0 | % | 73.5 | % | 73.0 | % | 72.7 | % | ||||||||
| Same Store Pool(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
| Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Increase in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3)
|
1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Increases in expenses(3)
|
9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(1.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||
NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(0.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was 2.1%, 9.8%, (0.9)% and (0.6)%, respectively, for increase in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, NOI excluding lease termination fees and NOI including lease termination fees. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 9 |
![]() |
Portfolio Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| % of Total | Year-to-Date | Trailing Four | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Owned and | AMBs Share | Annualized | Same Store NOI | Quarters Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Placed in | Square Feet | Managed Square | of Square | Year-to-Date | Base Rent | Growth Without | Change on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Feet as of | Feet as of | Ave rage | psf as of | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2008 | Square Feet | Square Feet(1) | Square Feet | 3/31/2009 | 3/31/2009 | 3/31/2009 | Occupancy | 3/31/2009 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
20,135,479 | | | (549,103 | ) | 19,586,376 | 14.7 | % | 53.9 | % | 93.3 | % | $ | 6.54 | 2.0 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,395,861 | | | (248,805 | ) | 13,147,056 | 9.9 | % | 52.7 | % | 92.5 | % | 5.42 | (2.2 | %) | (0.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
11,351,674 | | 334,952 | | 11,686,626 | 8.8 | % | 49.5 | % | 94.7 | % | 7.46 | (9.2 | %) | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,908,232 | | 657,600 | | 11,565,832 | 8.7 | % | 72.9 | % | 91.8 | % | 6.62 | 2.0 | % | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
8,645,277 | | | | 8,645,277 | 6.5 | % | 47.1 | % | 98.0 | % | 5.32 | 5.1 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,279,591 | | 192,806 | | 6,472,397 | 4.9 | % | 71.0 | % | 94.4 | % | 7.50 | (8.4 | %) | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,630,724 | | | | 2,630,724 | 2.0 | % | 92.7 | % | 90.1 | % | 19.10 | (5.2 | %) | (2.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,690,611 | | 253,701 | (195,754 | ) | 28,748,558 | 21.5 | % | 63.2 | % | 90.0 | % | 5.70 | (2.7 | %) | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal/WtdAvg |
102,037,449 | | 1,439,059 | (993,662 | ) | 102,482,846 | 77.0 | % | 59.5 | % | 92.6 | % | $ | 6.56 | (2.0 | %) | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
2,441,076 | | 1,122,983 | | 3,564,059 | 2.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 91.4 | % | $ | 4.51 | 29.2 | % | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
3,590,942 | | | | 3,590,942 | 2.7 | % | 47.4 | % | 92.1 | % | 5.93 | (9.8 | %) | (1.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | | | 2,890,526 | 2.2 | % | 21.6 | % | 98.0 | % | 4.75 | 3.0 | % | (6.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
419,845 | | | | 419,845 | 0.3 | % | 26.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 5.16 | (2.6 | %) | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
6,901,313 | | | | 6,901,313 | 5.2 | % | 35.4 | % | 95.1 | % | $ | 5.36 | (3.7 | %) | (5.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg
|
111,379,838 | | 2,562,042 | (993,662 | ) | 112,948,218 | 84.8 | % | 59.3 | % | 92.7 | % | $ | 6.42 | (2.0 | %) | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
3,432,527 | | 75,659 | | 3,508,186 | 2.6 | % | 22.1 | % | 95.9 | % | $ | 8.43 | (2.1 | %) | (13.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,191,670 | | | | 3,191,670 | 2.4 | % | 30.2 | % | 96.4 | % | 8.33 | (15.1 | %) | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
2,835,213 | | (4,478 | ) | | 2,830,735 | 2.1 | % | 20.6 | % | 99.4 | % | 9.68 | (12.3 | %) | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
343,077 | | | | 343,077 | 0.3 | % | 61.9 | % | 100.0 | % | 13.21 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg
|
9,802,487 | | 71,181 | | 9,873,668 | 7.4 | % | 25.7 | % | 97.2 | % | $ | 8.93 | (6.7 | %) | (7.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
5,263,053 | | | | 5,263,053 | 4.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 93.6 | % | $ | 13.87 | 11.4 | % | (2.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 93.6 | % | 10.86 | 25.1 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg
|
7,263,090 | | | | 7,263,090 | 5.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 93.6 | % | $ | 13.03 | 13.1 | % | (1.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
1,908,646 | | (11,246 | ) | | 1,897,400 | 1.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 89.1 | % | $ | 4.64 | 10.4 | % | 11.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.8 | % | 8.84 | 1.1 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
218,132 | | | | 218,132 | 0.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 6.12 | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total /Wtd Avg |
10,325,794 | | (11,246 | ) | | 10,314,548 | 7.8 | % | 43.7 | % | 93.4 | % | $ | 10.96 | 4.5 | % | (0.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total /Wtd Avg(2)
|
131,508,119 | | 2,621,977 | (993,662 | ) | 133,136,434 | 100.0 | % | 55.6 | % | 93.1 | % | $ | 6.97 | (1.1 | %) | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3)
|
7,495,659 | | | | 7,495,659 | 54.3 | % | 90.0 | % | 5.37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
139,003,778 | | 2,621,977 | (993,662 | ) | 140,632,093 | 55.5 | % | 92.9 | % | $ | 6.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline |
16,437,557 | 464,139 | (5) | (2,145,805 | )(6) | (2,962,717 | )(7) | 11,793,174 | 94.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale or Contribution(4)
|
4,553,798 | 2,239,765 | (5) | (161,471 | )(6) | (33,700 | )(7) | 6,598,392 | 84.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Subtotal |
20,991,355 | 2,703,904 | (2,307,276 | ) | (2,996,417 | ) | 18,391,566 | 90.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
159,995,133 | 2,703,904 | 314,701 | (3,990,079 | ) | 159,023,659 | 59.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (4) | Represents development projects available for sale or contribution that are not included in the operating portfolio. | |
| (5) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of development starts. For available for sale or contribution, represents new projects available. | |
| (6) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects placed in operations. | |
| (7) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in available for sale or contribution. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects disposed. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 10 |
|
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 11 |
|
Development Starts and Total Capital Deployment(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | ||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Other Americas |
189,337 | 12,116 | 41.4 | % | ||||||||
The Americas Total |
189,337 | $ | 12,116 | 41.4 | % | |||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||
France |
274,802 | $ | 17,118 | 58.6 | % | |||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Europe Total |
274,802 | $ | 17,118 | 58.6 | % | |||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
Total Development Starts |
464,139 | $ | 29,234 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)
|
9.0 | % | ||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | |||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
| $ | | |||||||||
Total Development Starts |
464,139 | 29,234 | ||||||||||
Total Capital Deployment |
464,139 | $ | 29,234 | |||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 12 |
|
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
95.6 | % | 79.1 | % | ||||
Contribution
Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 61,754 | $ | 242,667 | ||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(2)(3)
|
9.1 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||
Development Margin(3)
|
N/A | 20.6 | % | |||||
Square Footage or Acreage Contributed or Sold
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||||||
| Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(4) | ||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||
United States |
832,171 | 583,191 | 5 | |||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | |||||||||
The Americas Total |
832,171 | 583,191 | 5 | |||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||
France |
| | | |||||||||
Germany |
| | | |||||||||
Benelux |
| | | |||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | |||||||||
Europe Total |
| | | |||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||
Japan |
| 981,162 | | |||||||||
China |
| | | |||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | |||||||||
Asia Total |
| 981,162 | | |||||||||
Total |
832,171 | 1,564,353 | 5 | |||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
| (3) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (4) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 13 |
|
Development Pipeline(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| 2009 Expected Stabilizations | 2010 Expected Stabilizations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
2,040,849 | $ | 219,584 | 395,011 | $ | 41,682 | 2,435,860 | $ | 261,266 | 26.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
1,912,132 | 117,435 | 1,366,938 | 81,154 | 3,279,070 | 198,589 | 20.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
3,952,981 | $ | 337,019 | 1,761,949 | $ | 122,836 | 5,714,930 | $ | 459,855 | 46.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 973,832 | $ | 72,358 | 973,832 | $ | 72,358 | 7.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 413,958 | 46,079 | 413,958 | 46,079 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
504,719 | 46,197 | 453,515 | 52,749 | 958,234 | 98,946 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
436,916 | 36,717 | | | 436,916 | 36,717 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
941,635 | $ | 82,914 | 1,841,305 | $ | 171,186 | 2,782,940 | $ | 254,100 | 25.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
685,757 | $ | 112,175 | 417,833 | $ | 50,585 | 1,103,590 | $ | 162,760 | 16.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
China |
598,484 | 29,345 | 1,593,230 | 77,521 | 2,191,714 | 106,866 | 10.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
1,284,241 | $ | 141,520 | 2,011,063 | $ | 128,106 | 3,295,304 | $ | 269,626 | 27.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
6,178,857 | $ | 561,453 | 5,614,317 | $ | 422,128 | 11,793,174 | $ | 983,581 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
(71,095 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 912,486 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Projects | 27 | 16 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Funded-to-Date(4) | $ | 515,328 | $ | 309,019 | $ | 824,347 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs
Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
94.0 | % | 94.1 | % | 94.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs
Share of Amounts Invested to
Date(2)(4)
|
$ | 484,036 | $ | 287,096 | $ | 771,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Amounts Invested to Date
Percentage(2)(4)(5)(6)
|
91.8 | % | 72.3 | % | 83.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs
Share of Remainder to
Invest(2)(4)(6)
|
$ | 43,467 | $ | 110,196 | $ | 153,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
Average Estimated
Yield(2)(6)
|
7.6 | % | 7.1 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Pre-Leased(2) | 48.5 | % | 11.0 | % | 30.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Calculated as AMBs share of amounts funded to date to AMBs share of estimated total
investment. |
|
| (6) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 14 |
|
Completions and Properties Available for Sale or Contribution(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| Development Completions(2) | Available for Sale or Contribution as of March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended | Development | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2009 | Properties | Properties | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
3,334,475 | $ | 201,149 | 2,402,988 | $ | 126,856 | 1,235,188 | $ | 100,948 | 3,638,176 | $ | 227,804 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
1,527,531 | 99,154 | 404,548 | 26,343 | 2,607,850 | 170,530 | 3,012,398 | 196,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
4,862,006 | $ | 300,303 | 2,807,536 | $ | 153,199 | 3,843,038 | $ | 271,478 | 6,650,574 | $ | 424,677 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
101,461 | $ | 14,314 | 315,771 | $ | 26,805 | 67,274 | $ | 13,157 | 383,045 | $ | 39,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 139,608 | 17,871 | | | 139,608 | 17,871 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
96,520 | 16,830 | 207,232 | 32,433 | | | 207,232 | 32,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 585,971 | 67,255 | 178,262 | 27,459 | 764,233 | 94,714 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
197,981 | $ | 31,144 | 1,248,582 | $ | 144,364 | 245,536 | $ | 40,616 | 1,494,118 | $ | 184,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 2,148,194 | $ | 357,169 | | $ | | 2,148,194 | $ | 357,169 | ||||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | 1,897,400 | 59,763 | 1,897,400 | 59,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 394,080 | 21,738 | 218,132 | 17,993 | 612,212 | 39,731 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | 2,542,274 | $ | 378,907 | 2,115,532 | $ | 77,756 | 4,657,806 | $ | 456,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
5,059,987 | $ | 331,447 | 6,598,392 | $ | 676,470 | 6,204,106 | $ | 389,850 | 12,802,498 | $ | 1,066,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
(121,332 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 944,988 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
88.0 | % | 92.1 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5)
|
7.2 | % | 6.9 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-leased(2)
|
63.8 | % | 44.8 | % | 94.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Total investment includes estimated costs of completion. |
|
| (5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
Overview
|
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 15 |
![]() |
Land,
Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment
Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Land Inventory | The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
2,157 | 35,767,179 | 234 | 4,736,299 | 112 | 4,616,514 | 2,503 | 45,119,992 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
4 | | | | 16 | 456,529 | 20 | 456,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
(5 | ) | (101,068 | ) | | | | | (5 | ) | (101,068 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
(16 | ) | (189,337 | ) | (13 | ) | (274,802 | ) | | | (29 | ) | (464,139 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Site plan adjustments |
(4 | ) | (42,918 | ) | | | | (13,513 | ) | (4 | ) | (56,431 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
2,136 | 35,433,856 | 221 | 4,461,497 | 128 | 5,059,530 | 2,485 | (3) | 44,954,883 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4)
|
$ | 509,321 | $ | 111,063 | $ | 160,308 | $ | 780,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (153,834 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 626,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Value-Added Conversion Inventory(1)(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 29 | 2 | | | 29 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 228 | 13 | | | 235 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 257 | 15 | | | 264 | (5) | 17 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Inventory(1)(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | 329,140 | 1 | | | 369,940 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 1,327,512 | 4 | | | 1,368,312 | (6) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (3) | AMBs share of acres, square feet of estimated build out, and investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,261 acres, 40.9 million square feet and $483,366, respectively. | |
| (4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
| (5) | AMBs share is 216 acres. | |
| (6) | AMBs share is 750,674 square feet. | |
| (7) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 16 |
![]() |
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution |
|||||||||
| Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States |
Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
|
USD | 10 years |
March 2011; extendable 10 years |
||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution |
December 2012; extendable 4 years |
||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD |
3 years (next 2Q11)
|
Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico |
Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
|
USD | 7 years |
December 2011; extendable 7 years |
||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution |
June 2013; extendable 2 years |
||||||
AMB DFS Fund I(1)
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD |
Upon project sales
|
Perpetual | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR |
3 years (next 2Q10)
|
Open end | ||||||
YTD Additions to Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(1)
Gross Carrying Value of Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(2)
| (1) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 17 |
![]() |
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB's | Gross | AMB's | Estimated | Planned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | Capitalization | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
19% | 36,817,115 | $ | 3,330,260 | $ | 1,756,550 | $ | 40,000 | $ | 183,196 | $ | | $ | 3,330,000 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4)
|
21% | 9,236,263 | 1,162,141 | 671,683 | | 60,750 | | 1,162,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 7,263,090 | 1,405,788 | 797,535 | 8,082 | 78,526 | | 1,406,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 6,331,990 | 354,557 | 169,614 | 58,825 | 19,426 | 245,000 | 600,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
20% | 59,648,458 | 6,252,746 | 3,395,382 | 106,907 | 341,898 | 245,000 | 6,498,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 1,248,126 | 125,466 | | | 18,966 | 306,000 | (5) | 431,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
19% | 178,567 | 10,335 | 5,968 | | 844 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
16% | 1,426,693 | 135,801 | 5,968 | | 19,810 | 306,000 | 431,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(6)
|
20% | 61,075,151 | 6,388,547 | 3,401,350 | 106,907 | 361,708 | 551,000 | 6,929,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51% | 7,418,749 | (7) | 278,198 | 163,250 | | 50,596 | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
21% | 68,493,900 | $ | 6,666,745 | $ | 3,564,600 | $ | 106,907 | $ | 412,304 | $ | 551,000 | $ | 6,929,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 8,288,663 | $ | 463,167 | $ | 340,581 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20% | 8,006,081 | 535,023 | 231,396 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 2,172,137 | 157,039 | 82,906 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 18,466,881 | 1,155,229 | 654,883 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20% | 98,560 | 5,950 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
20% | 98,560 | 5,950 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 18,565,441 | 1,161,179 | 654,883 | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
92% | 2,196,134 | 212,156 | 21,416 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
63% | 1,107,004 | 255,851 | 133,272 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
46% | 21,868,579 | $ | 1,629,186 | $ | 809,571 | $ | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter ended March 31, 2009 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Loss | FFO(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Loss | FFO(8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
$ | 101,693 | $ | (13,528 | )(9) | $ | 31,632 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 22,386 | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 7,524 | ||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures
|
$ | 27,086 | $ | (4,443 | ) | $ | 6,249 | Partners | $ | 15,087 | $ | (1,288 | ) | $ | 3,712 | |||||||||||
| (1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
| (2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (3) | Through its investment in G. Accion, AMB holds an equity interest in various other unconsolidated ventures for approximately $20.2 million. | |
| (4) | The estimated investment capacity and planned gross capitalizations and investment capacities of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ends in June 2009. | |
| (6) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (8) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (9) | Excludes $3.8 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 18 |
|
Capitalization Summary (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Value
Coverage and Debt Ratios
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| March 31, 2009 | ||||
Interest coverage(2)
|
3.9x | |||
Fixed charge coverage(2)
|
2.7x | |||
Dividends per share-to-FFO per share |
(28.0 | %) | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)
|
58.7 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
43.6 | % | ||
Capital Structure(1)
| (1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 19 |
![]() |
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB Wholly-Owned | Consolidated Joint Venture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured | Total | Unconsolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Secured | Other | Consolidated | Joint | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 12,366 | $ | 129,508 | $ | 96,379 | $ | | $ | 238,253 | $ | 36,420 | $ | 274,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
250,000 | 265,862 | 325,941 | 414,582 | 120,161 | | 1,376,546 | 197,486 | 1,574,032 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
75,000 | 114,801 | 1,014 | 15,022 | 82,499 | | 288,336 | 666,754 | 955,090 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 1,093 | 2,670 | 388,383 | 50,000 | 442,146 | 437,020 | 879,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
500,000 | | 919 | 18,474 | 42,303 | | 561,696 | 710,807 | 1,272,503 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 616 | 405 | 6,481 | | 7,502 | 739,395 | 746,897 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | 664 | 16,271 | 17,611 | | 147,037 | 274,171 | 421,208 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
| | | | 16,231 | | 16,231 | 72,914 | 89,145 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
| | | | 1,272 | | 1,272 | 351,441 | 352,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 1,455 | | 126,455 | 183,194 | 309,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | 36,898 | | 36,898 | 5,844 | 42,742 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,062,491 | $ | 380,663 | $ | 342,613 | $ | 596,932 | $ | 809,673 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,242,372 | $ | 3,675,446 | $ | 6,917,818 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized discount |
(8,241 | ) | | | (1,315 | ) | (102 | ) | | (9,658 | ) | (3,939 | ) | (13,597 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,054,250 | $ | 380,663 | $ | 342,613 | $ | 595,617 | $ | 809,571 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,232,714 | $ | 3,671,507 | $ | 6,904,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2)
|
| | | | (461,930 | ) | (40,000 | ) | (501,930 | ) | (2,896,219 | ) | (3,398,149 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2)
|
$ | 1,054,250 | $ | 380,663 | $ | 342,613 | $ | 595,617 | $ | 347,641 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 2,730,784 | $ | 775,288 | $ | 3,506,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.3 | % | 1.1 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.8 | % | 5.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average maturity (years) |
4.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
146,219,201 | (3) | $ | 14.40 | $ | 2,105,556 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,435,522 | $ | 14.40 | 49,472 | ||||||||
Total |
149,654,723 | $ | 2,155,028 | |||||||||
| Total options outstanding | 8,317,048 | |||||||||||
| Dilutive effect of stock options(4) | | |||||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units(5) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.90 | % | $ | 312,267 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(6)
|
58.7 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization(2)(6)
|
63.9 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
43.6 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
47.5 | % | ||
| (1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.6 billion. Includes $265.9 million, $87.3 million and $27.5 million in Yen, Canadian dollar and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2009, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2009. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes 920,281 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
| (4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $15.71 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. All stock options were non-dilutive as of March 31, 2009. | |
| (5) | Units are exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder for preferred stock and redeemable at the option of AMB after a five year non-call period. | |
| (6) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 20 |
|
Capital Commitments (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Debt Maturing in 2009 through 2012(1)
| After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| AMB Wholly-owned Debt | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | | $ | 250,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| | 265,862 | 114,801 | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
11,705 | 325,000 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
128,822 | 183,632 | 244,736 | 2,340 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
140,527 | 758,632 | 585,598 | 117,141 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
13,362 | 2,616 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
| 26,238 | 31,631 | 50,528 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
15,414 | | 28,227 | 296,940 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
57,221 | 29,987 | 14,734 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
85,997 | 58,841 | 74,592 | 347,468 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
2,584 | 27,582 | 302,822 | 79,010 | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| 105,248 | 193,085 | 171,065 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 58,825 | 169,614 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
225 | 9,059 | 32,639 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | | 6,066 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
2,809 | 141,889 | 587,371 | 425,755 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
226,524 | 817,473 | 660,190 | 464,609 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
2,809 | 141,889 | 587,371 | 425,755 | ||||||||||||
Total |
229,333 | 959,362 | 1,247,561 | 890,364 | ||||||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 188,929 | $ | 813,903 | $ | 740,605 | $ | 363,830 | ||||||||
Development Pipeline Remainder to Fund
| AMB's Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Total | Invested to | Remainder to | Remainder of | AMB's | Remainder of | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investment(3)(4) | Date(3)(4) | Invest(3)(4) | Cash to Fund(3)(5) | Ownership % | Cash to Fund(3)(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (a - b) | (c) | (d) | (c x d) | |||||||||||||||||||
Development pipeline as of March 31, 2009 |
$ | 983,581 | $ | 824,347 | $ | 159,234 | $ | 139,340 | 96.9 | % | $ | 134,975 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2012 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
| (2) | Subject to certain conditions. | |
| (3) | Excluding impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Amounts remove the estimated capitalized interest component from the remainder to fund. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 21 |
|
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Income Items
| Actual | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, 2009 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 74,424 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 128,144 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1)
|
26.7 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
34,258 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to in-progress developments |
$ | (2,896 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to projects held for sale or contribution |
(5,863 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
(1,030 | ) | ||||||
NOI required to stabilize property acquired during the quarter |
| |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(2)
|
(9,789 | ) | ||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI related to operating properties(1)(3)
|
$ | 98,893 | ||||||
Development platform:(3)
|
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | 29,234 | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.11 | ||||||
Assets & Liabilities
| As of | ||||
| AMB's share of:(1) | March 31, 2009 | |||
Development, land, and contributed assets:(3)
|
||||
Development pipeline (funded-to-date)(4)
|
$ | 702,455 | ||
Development projects available for sale or contribution(4)
|
572,601 | |||
Operating projects available for sale or contribution(4)
|
323,568 | |||
Land held for future development(4)
|
483,366 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(5)
|
147,835 | |||
Total development, land and contributed assets |
$ | 2,229,825 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(3)
|
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,506,072 | ||
Preferred securities |
312,267 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 3,818,339 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(3)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 310,655 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
344,896 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(66,112 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(404,161 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 185,278 | ||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
| (4) | Assets are net of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (5) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to co-investment ventures during the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
Overview |
Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 22 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures. Estimated
acquisition capital expenditures include immediate building improvements that
are taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or
which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to
stabilization and incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are
incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue potential of an
existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the
amount of capitalized interest deducted from the determination of development
gains), tax, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, and
non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating
performance and liquidity. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors
relevant and useful information because it permits investors to view income from
its operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash
depreciation and amortization expense or non-development gains. By excluding
interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure AMBs operating
performance independent of its capital structure and indebtedness and,
therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its operating performance
between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its operating
performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in
other industries. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental
measure for reviewing its comparative performance with other companies because,
by excluding non-cash depreciation expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the
investing public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of
companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, AMB believes that
adjusted EBITDA helps investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service
obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and unit
distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating
performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating
performance, and comparing that performance to other companies, both in the real
estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability to meet
debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and
unit distributions. AMB believes investors should consider adjusted EBITDA, in
conjunction with net income (the primary measure of AMBs performance) and the
other required GAAP measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve their
understanding of AMBs operating results and liquidity, and to make more
meaningful comparisons of its performance between periods and as against other
companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and
non-development gains when assessing AMBs financial performance, an investor is
assessing the earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not taking into
account the eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection
with such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an
analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with AMBs required GAAP
presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs historical cash
expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital, capital
expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect
the cash required to make interest and principal payments on AMBs outstanding
debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance and liquidity, it does not represent net income or cash flow from
operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative
to those indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further,
AMBs computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by
other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net (loss) income for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (123,024 | ) | $ | 69,735 | |||
Depreciation and amortization |
42,101 | 40,969 | ||||||
Impairment charges |
165,979 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
7,497 | 6,529 | ||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||
AMBs share of net loss (income) |
34 | (2,928 | ) | |||||
AMBs share of FFO |
7,524 | 8,862 | ||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
9,664 | 5,921 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
32,521 | 29,957 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(6,277 | ) | (23,890 | ) | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(15,109 | ) | (32,850 | ) | ||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
9,974 | 3,348 | ||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
4,468 | 3,890 | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 135,352 | $ | 109,543 | ||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment
ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB believes that
AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures,
which enable both management and investors to assess the operations, earnings
and growth of AMB in light of AMBs ownership interest in its joint ventures and to
compare the applicable measure to that of other companies. In addition, it
allows for a more meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to that of
other companies that do not consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs
share of calculations are not intended to reflect actual liability should there
be a default under loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs
computation of AMBs share of measures may not be comparable to that of other
real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet
information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate information about
financial position. However, AMB considers balance sheet information reported on
an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash equivalents,
AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets, AMBs share of
deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net), and AMBs share of
accounts payable and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental measures to
help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance. See Reporting
Definitions for definitions of owned and managed and AMBs share of. AMB
believes that AMBs share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis
helps management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of AMBs total
real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating
activities. While such information is helpful to the investor, it does not
provide balance sheet information as defined by GAAP and is not a true
alternative to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of its share
of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis may not be comparable to
that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of
the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMB believes
that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables
both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its
leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies that do not
consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total debt is not intended to
reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of such
loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a
reconciliation of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the
following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs share of
total assets is the pro rata portion of total assets based on AMBs percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures
holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the
following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs
definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition of
market equity is the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock
and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share
of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per
the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted,
then the first positive rent value is used. Leases denominated in foreign
currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it
wholly owns or manages through its consolidated and unconsolidated
co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital Partners. Assets under
management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or
clients share of the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs
share of total market capitalization.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 23 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the total
rentable square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total
rentable square feet. Space is considered leased when the tenant has either taken
physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate investments
plus subsequently incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each real estate
investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles. AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because cash basis NOI
reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding the
effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis
rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI should not
be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it does not
reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses, depreciation and
amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in
development and construction activities that could materially impact results from
operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real
estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the three months ended March 31,
2009, refer to the SS NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMBs share
of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (dollars in
thousands):
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| March 31, 2009 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 104,266 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(3,392 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
(26,450 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
74,424 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
11,872 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
22,386 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
(9,789 | ) | ||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 98,893 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors, managed
by AMB from which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party acquisitions,
portfolio and asset management distributions or fees, as well as incentive
distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture operating results.
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMB's | Property | (loss) from | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Income | Cash | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures | Percentage | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | (loss) | NOI | FFO | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
19% | $ | 72,135 | $ | (20,641 | ) | $ | (8,140 | ) | $ | (8,141 | ) | $ | 48,070 | $ | 12,951 | ||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
21% | 22,933 | (4,747 | ) | (10,237 | ) | (10,237 | ) | 17,996 | (2,439 | ) | |||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 25,743 | (5,374 | ) | (1,809 | ) | (1,809 | ) | 19,926 | 9,364 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 9,461 | (1,291 | ) | 696 | (1) | 696 | (1) | 8,507 | 3,683 | (1) | |||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 50 | 149 | 3,303 | 3,303 | 199 | 3,303 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 12,768 | (3,750 | ) | 961 | 961 | 9,043 | 4,332 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20% | 14,706 | (3,768 | ) | 2,815 | 3,094 | 10,941 | 6,670 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 4,162 | (1,021 | ) | 726 | 726 | 3,113 | 1,843 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes $3.8 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial
measures represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based
on AMBs co-investment venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of
the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the
co-investment venture partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the
pro-rata portion of the co-investment venture partners share of carrying value
less the co-investment venture partners share of debt.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% leased
or properties that have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments,
renovations, land sales and value-added conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price less
closing costs, minus estimated total investment and any deferred rents, taxes or
third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions, divided by the
estimated total investment.
Estimated FFO by Business. Estimated FFO by Business is FFO generated by AMBs
Real Estate Operations, Development and Private Capital business. Estimated
Development and Private Capital FFO was determined by reducing Development
Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital revenues by their respective
estimated share of general and administrative expenses, also defined as
overhead. Developments and Private Capitals estimated allocation of total
general and administrative expenses was based on their respective percentage of
actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real
Estate Operations FFO represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO attributable
to Development and Private Capital. Management believes estimated FFO by
business line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance
because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of AMBs
respective businesses to other companies comparable businesses. Further, AMBs
computation of FFO by business line may not be comparable to that reported by
other real estate investment trusts as they may use different methodologies in
computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which
could be acquired through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment
venture partners plus AMBs funding obligations and estimated debt
capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development,
renovation, or expansion, including initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground
leases, buildings, and associated carry costs. Estimated total investments are
based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar
investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period
end.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual
cash NOI following occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total
investment. Yields exclude value added conversion projects and are calculated on
an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA
divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint
venture partners share of interest expense, including amortization of finance
costs and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued operations, AMBs share
of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized interest,
preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses fixed
charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge coverage is
relevant and useful to investors because it permits fixed income investors to
measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt, make
distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to its preferred
shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be comparable to
fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 24 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,521 | $ | 29,957 | ||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(3,174 | ) | (1,974 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(95 | ) | 981 | |||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(7,128 | ) | (14,297 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
9,664 | 5,921 | ||||||
Capitalized interest |
12,094 | 17,759 | ||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
1,432 | 1,432 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | ||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 49,263 | $ | 43,728 | ||||
Funds From Operations (FFO), Funds From Operations Per Share and Unit (FFOPS)
and FFO, excluding impairment charges (together with FFO and FFOPS, the FFO
Measures). AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most
appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, or
FFO, FFO per share and unit, or FFOPS, and FFO, excluding impairment charges, to
be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS
as FFO per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and
operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO as net income available to common
stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses)
from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real
estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata share of
FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO. AMB
believes that value-added conversion dispositions are in substance land sales and
as such should be included in FFO, consistent with the real estate investment
trust industrys long standing practice to include gains on the sale of land in
FFO. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO or FFOPS may not be consistent with the
views of others in the real estate investment trust industry, who may consider it
to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and may not be comparable to FFO
or FFOPS reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret the
current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In connection with the
formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets that are acquired with the
intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture. Some of the
properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to
be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to
include in its calculation of FFO gains or losses related to the contribution of
previously depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a change, if
instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes
such calculation of FFO will better reflect the value created as a result of the
contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the
contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO.
In addition to presenting FFO as described above, AMB presents FFO, excluding
impairment charges. AMB calculates FFO, excluding impairment charges, as FFO
less impairment charges and adjustments to derive AMBs share of impairment
charges from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. To the extent that
the book value of a land parcel or development asset exceeded the fair market
value of a property, based on its intended holding period, a non-cash impairment
charge was recognized for the shortfall. The impairment charges were principally
a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted values. Although difficult to predict,
these charges may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate markets. While not infrequent
or unusual in nature, these charges are subject to market fluctuations that can
have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operations. The economics
underlying these charges reflect market conditions in the short-term but can
obscure the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and strategies.
Management believes FFO, excluding impairment charges, is significant and useful
to both it and its investors because it more appropriately reflects the value and
strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the
volatility of the current economic environment. However, in addition to the
limitations of FFO Measures generally discussed below, FFO, excluding impairment
charges, does not present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition
and operating performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT
definition of
FFO and should not be considered a replacement of FFO as AMB
defines it or used as an alternative to net income or cash as defined by U.S.
GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets
in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate
assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and
amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically risen
or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that
use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures are
supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate investment trusts
that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items,
from net income available to common stockholders, as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB
believes that the use of the FFO Measures, combined with the required U.S. GAAP
presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating
results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making
comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful.
AMB considers the FFO Measures to be useful measures for reviewing comparative
operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses
related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real
estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures can help the investing
public compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between
periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO and FFOPS are relevant and
widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment trusts,
the FFO Measures do not represent cash flow from operations or net income as
defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to those
measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. The FFO
Measures also do not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures
related to AMBs real estate assets nor are the FFO Measures necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund AMBs future cash requirements. Management
compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures by providing investors with
financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed
discussion of the FFO Measures and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures to net
income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of
FFO from net income available to common stockholders.
The following table reconciles projected FFO from projected net income
available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009:
| 2009 | ||||||||
| Low | High | |||||||
Projected net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.17 | 1.17 | ||||||
AMBs share of projected gains on disposition of operating properties
recognized to date |
(0.14 | ) | (0.14 | ) | ||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations (FFO) |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.42 | ||||
AMBs share of non-cash impairment charges |
1.30 | 1.30 | ||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.23 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO, excluding AMBs share of non-cash impairment
charges and development gains(1)
|
$ | 1.41 | $ | 1.49 | ||||
Amounts are
expressed per share, except FFO and FFO, excluding AMBs share
of non-cash
impairment charges and development gains, which is expressed per share and unit.
(1) As Development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic
environment, management believes Projected FFO, excluding AMBs share of
non-cash impairment charges and development gains is the more appropriate and
useful measure to reflect its assessment of AMBs projected operating
performance.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues (excluding
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, reimbursable capital
revenue and lease termination fees) for properties in the pool at period end.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 25 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair
value being lower than carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by
AMBs share of interest expense which consists of consolidated interest expense
less joint venture partners share of interest expense, including amortization,
from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs share of interest expense
from unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage to measure
its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to
investors because it permits investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt. AMBs computation of interest coverage
may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Interest | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,521 | $ | 29,957 | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(95 | ) | 981 | |||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(7,128 | ) | (14,297 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated co-investment ventures |
9,664 | 5,921 | ||||||
Total interest |
$ | 34,962 | $ | 22,562 | ||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with
real estate developers, other real estate operators, or institutional investors
where AMB may or may not: have control, act as the manager and/or developer,
earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn incentive distributions or
promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development, leasing,
property management and/or accounting services for which it may receive market
compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures
represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on
AMBs joint venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the applicable
financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs
common stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing
price per share of its common stock at period end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of
its operating performance because it enables both management and investors to
analyze the fair value of its business. An assessment of the fair value of a
business involves estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various
methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its business
that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV
but has not presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on
assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). Net operating income is defined as rental revenue
(as calculated in accordance with GAAP), including reimbursements, less property
operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and
administrative expenses and interest expense. AMB considers NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because NOI reflects the
operating performance of the real estate portfolio. However, NOI should not be
viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it does not
reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and
amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in
development and construction activities that could materially impact results
from operations. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.
See same store net operating income for reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total
rentable square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by
total rentable square feet at period end. Space is considered leased when
the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10%
ownership interest, is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to
hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash flow
information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow information.
However, AMB considers cash flow information reported on an owned and managed
basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, AMBs
share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, gross lease
termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs share of net lease
termination fees, tenant improvements, lease commissions and other lease costs,
building improvements, Co-investment partners share of capital expenditures and
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be useful supplemental measures
to help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance and cash
flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, AMBs
share of and Co-investment venture partners share of. AMB believes that owned
and managed cash flow information helps management and investors make a
comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio
and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating performance and
activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is helpful
to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information as defined by GAAP and
are not true alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation
of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information may not be comparable to
that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting data.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represent projects where the acquired buildings are less than
75% leased and require significant capital expenditures (generally ranging from
10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the buildings up to operating standards
and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant capital
expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing basis) to
bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90%
leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements
and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital
expenditures do not include estimated acquisition capital expenditures which were
taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which
are incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference, weighted
by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month of a term commencement and the
net ABR due the last month of the former tenants term. If free rent is granted,
then the first positive full rent value is used as a point of comparison. The
rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent charges.
If either the previous or current lease terms are under 12 months, then they are
excluded from this calculation. If the lease is first generation or there is no
prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded from this calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income and Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI). AMB believes
that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our
operating performance for properties that are considered part of the same store
pool. In deriving SS NOI, AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including
reimbursements, less property operating expenses, both of which are calculated
in accordance with GAAP. Property operating expenses exclude depreciation,
amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. AMB
defines Cash-basis SS NOI to also exclude straight line rents and amortization
of lease intangibles. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful
supplemental performance measure because it reflects the operating performance
of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and
provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a
year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors
compare the operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to other
companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow
from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as
an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating
performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general and administrative expenses,
interest expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could
materially impact our results from operations. Further, AMBs computation of SS
NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may
use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 26 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from net
income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in
thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (123,024 | ) | $ | 69,735 | |||
Private capital income |
(11,695 | ) | (9,923 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
42,101 | 40,969 | ||||||
Impairment losses |
165,979 | | ||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
31,510 | 35,348 | ||||||
Total other income and expenses |
5,672 | (15,265 | ) | |||||
Total discontinued operations |
(6,277 | ) | (3,923 | ) | ||||
NOI |
104,266 | 116,941 | ||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(14,360 | ) | (25,299 | ) | ||||
Less non cash adjustments(1)
|
20 | (1,146 | ) | |||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 89,926 | $ | 90,496 | ||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior
year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both the
current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development properties for
both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store pool is set
annually and excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after
December 31, 2007.
Second
generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements,
lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second
generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred prior
to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second
generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage
vacant at acquisition.
Stabilized
cap rates are calculated as cash NOI stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%) divided by
total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the initial
purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt to market, buyers due
diligence and closing costs, lease intangible adjustments, estimated
acquisition capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to achieve
stabilization.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing tenants
divided by the square footage of all expiring and rented leases during the
reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or
buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square
footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless
otherwise noted).
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial
properties to a higher and better use, including office, residential, retail,
research & development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the
property for conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities
as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of the
value added conversion project is generally based on the underlying land value
based on its ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is ascribed
to the industrial building(s).
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 27 |
|
Contacts |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
||||||||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 28 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in connection
therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to cash sources to cover
future capital requirements, the consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our
plans to retire, extend and refinance debt and maintain fixed charge coverage at certain levels,
estimated cash savings from our current dividend policy, estimated net G&A reductions, our
opportunities and plans (including those regarding our global positioning and future capital
deployment, our projected funds from operations, compound annual growth rate of our business
divisions, future assets under management, same store and/or cash net operating income and other
financial and operational guidance, our capabilities to drive growth, our future performance
compared to peers and other market indices, rent growth, industrial and other market, GDP and trade
growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities (such as ship capacity expansion,
outsourcing trends, port market demand, port expansions, container growth, and escalating land
values), on-tarmac opportunities (such as air cargo growth, ability to access and leverage
positions, and expertise and key airport opportunities), hiring, performance and retention of key
personnel, access to resources, leveraging of relationships, continuation and effectiveness of
strategic drivers, information regarding our development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and
renovation projects (including stabilization dates, square feet at stabilization or completion,
sale or contribution dates, yields from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and
total investment amounts, scope, location and timing of development starts, margins, projected
gains and returns, sustainability, profitability, scope and scale of and demand for projects,
targeted value-added conversion projects, redevelopment and conversion timelines, entitlement and
repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength of lender and
customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of investments and market
entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates, acquisition capital and volume,
scope and build out potential of land inventory, co-investment venture and other estimated
investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures, performance, revenues and returns on
investment, target leverage, future incentive distribution, asset management, acquisition and other
private capital distributions and fees, timing of incentive distributions, private capital demand,
launching of additional funds, future balance sheet capacity, ability to maintain credit
extensions, our position to address debt maturities, interest rate changes, transition to open-end
funds, and access to secured and non-secured financings, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor
provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may
not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the
dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to
differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults
on or non-renewal of leases by tenants or renewal at lower than expected rent or failure to lease
at all or on expected terms, decreases in real estate values and impairment losses, increased
interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures, our failure to
obtain, renew or extend necessary outside financing, re-financing risks, risks related to our
obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment ventures and other debt, risks
related to debt and equity security financings (including dilution risk), difficulties in
identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully
integrate acquired properties and operations, our failure to divest properties we have contracted
to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any divestitures, our failure to contribute properties
to our co-investment ventures, risks and uncertainties affecting property development, value-added
conversions, redevelopment and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our
inability to obtain necessary permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to
qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax
structuring, failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings or comply with our debt
covenants, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, financial market
fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions, global trade or in the real estate sector,
inflation risks, changes in real estate and zoning laws, a downturn in the U.S., California or
global economy, risks related to doing business internationally and global expansion, risks of
opening offices globally, risks of changing personnel and roles,
losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with
acquired properties or otherwise and increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends
upon economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation,
legislation, population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.