EXHIBIT 99.1
Published on October 16, 2007
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Highlights |
1 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations |
4 | |||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
5 | |||
Owned & Managed Operating Statistics, Top 10 Customers & Lease Expirations |
6 | |||
Principal Global Markets |
7 | |||
Portfolio Overview |
8 | |||
Capital Deployment |
9 | |||
Property Contributions & Dispositions |
11 | |||
Development Projects in Process |
12 | |||
Development Projects Placed in Operations and Projects Available for Sale or Contribution |
15 | |||
Land Inventory |
16 | |||
Capitalization Summary |
17 | |||
Unconsolidated & Consolidated Joint Ventures |
18 | |||
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis |
19 | |||
Reporting Definitions |
20 | |||
Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures |
21 | |||
Joint Venture Partner Information |
24 | |||
Contacts |
25 |
| Cover: | AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 5 has been contributed to AMB Japan Fund I. The 469,627 square foot multi-story facility is proximate to the Wangan Expressway that connects the Narita International Airport to the Tokyo CBD. AMBs portfolio in the Funabashi submarket of Tokyo totals 1.8 million square feet. |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| Quarters Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2007 | Change | 2006 | 2007 | Change | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 166,304 | (7.8 | %) | $ | 180,335 | (1) | $ | 499,830 | (5.3 | %) | $ | 527,577 | (1) | ||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (2)
|
165,782 | 10.2 | % | 150,503 | 436,973 | (1.8 | %) | 444,965 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
69,155 | 130.8 | % | 29,963 | 202,275 | 60.9 | % | 125,682 | ||||||||||||||||
FFO (2)
|
104,235 | 52.6 | % | 68,286 | 239,582 | 20.2 | % | 199,380 | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.69 | 109.1 | % | $ | 0.33 | $ | 2.04 | 46.8 | % | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||||||
FFO (2)
|
0.99 | 37.5 | % | 0.72 | 2.31 | 10.0 | % | 2.10 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.50 | 8.7 | % | 0.46 | 1.50 | 8.7 | % | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest coverage (2)
|
4.7 x | 3.3 x | 4.0 x | 3.3 x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge coverage (2)
|
3.1 x | 2.4 x | 2.6 x | 2.5 x | ||||||||||||||||||||
FFO payout |
51 | % | 64 | % | 65 | % | 66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| As of | ||||||||
| September 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Capitalization |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (2)
|
$ | 3,049,098 | $ | 3,088,624 | ||||
Preferred equity |
312,267 | 417,767 | ||||||
Market equity |
6,163,731 | 5,531,113 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 9,525,096 | $ | 9,037,504 | ||||
Ratios |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book capitalization (2) (3)
|
51.4 | % | 55.8 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization (2) (3)
|
32.0 | % | 34.2 | % | ||||
Total common shares and units outstanding |
103,055,202 | 94,371,491 | ||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. Pro forma revenues for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $160,262 and $473,935, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (3) | See Reporting Definitions. |
1
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
| As of | ||||||||
| September 30, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate: |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,548,426 | $ | 6,575,733 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(884,336 | ) | (789,693 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,664,090 | 5,786,040 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
360,272 | 274,381 | ||||||
Properties held for contribution, net |
258,568 | 154,036 | ||||||
Properties held for divestiture, net |
63,733 | 20,916 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,346,663 | 6,235,373 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
400,011 | 195,878 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
159,269 | 133,998 | ||||||
Other assets |
157,235 | 148,263 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,063,178 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,364,557 | $ | 1,395,354 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,002,810 | 1,101,874 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
818,325 | 852,033 | ||||||
Other debt |
145,104 | 88,154 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
333,034 | 271,880 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,663,830 | 3,709,295 | ||||||
Minority interests: |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
516,948 | 555,201 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
77,561 | 180,298 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
103,773 | 102,061 | ||||||
Total minority interests |
698,282 | 837,560 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,477,654 | 1,943,240 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,417 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,701,066 | 2,166,657 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 7,063,178 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
2
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues (1)
|
$ | 158,740 | $ | 172,845 | $ | 477,823 | $ | 510,038 | ||||||||
Private capital income |
7,564 | 7,490 | 22,007 | 17,539 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
166,304 | 180,335 | 499,830 | 527,577 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs (1)
|
(43,028 | ) | (44,540 | ) | (129,926 | ) | (131,671 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(40,865 | ) | (46,914 | ) | (122,433 | ) | (133,514 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | (257 | ) | (5,394 | ) | ||||||||||
General and administrative |
(35,145 | ) | (25,641 | ) | (95,259 | ) | (73,638 | ) | ||||||||
Other expenses (2)
|
(944 | ) | (893 | ) | (2,995 | ) | (1,134 | ) | ||||||||
Fund costs |
(261 | ) | (495 | ) | (779 | ) | (1,588 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(120,243 | ) | (118,483 | ) | (351,649 | ) | (346,939 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (3)
|
3,425 | 2,239 | 7,286 | 12,605 | ||||||||||||
Other income (2)
|
7,956 | 2,911 | 20,012 | 8,716 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
| | 74,843 | | ||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
48,298 | 23,517 | 89,486 | 69,889 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(28,896 | ) | (43,966 | ) | (96,394 | ) | (127,487 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
30,783 | (15,299 | ) | 95,233 | (36,277 | ) | ||||||||||
Income from operations before minority interests |
76,844 | 46,553 | 243,414 | 144,361 | ||||||||||||
Minority interests share of income: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of income |
(5,889 | ) | (12,014 | ) | (21,149 | ) | (29,310 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(2,115 | ) | (1,150 | ) | (5,196 | ) | (2,735 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
(1,431 | ) | (3,791 | ) | (6,610 | ) | (12,816 | ) | ||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(614 | ) | 17 | (4,998 | ) | (994 | ) | |||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
(10,049 | ) | (16,938 | ) | (37,953 | ) | (45,855 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
66,795 | 29,615 | 205,461 | 98,506 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations, net of minority interests |
2,403 | 3,559 | 7,271 | 13,476 | ||||||||||||
Gains from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
3,912 | 213 | 4,329 | 24,335 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
6,315 | 3,772 | 11,600 | 37,811 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
73,110 | 33,387 | 217,061 | 136,317 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,440 | ) | (11,856 | ) | (9,631 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unit redemption (issuance costs) discount
|
(3 | ) | 16 | (2,930 | ) | (1,004 | ) | |||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 69,155 | $ | 29,963 | $ | 202,275 | $ | 125,682 | ||||||||
Net income per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.69 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 2.04 | $ | 1.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
100,914,340 | 91,058,029 | 99,311,137 | 90,458,810 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. Pro forma rental revenues for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $152,772 and $456,396, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. Pro forma property operating costs for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2006 would have been $40,298 and $118,974, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (2) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan. | |
| (3) | There were no gains on sale of operating properties for the quarters ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Includes gains on sale of operating properties of $0.0 million and $8.3 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
3
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 69,155 | $ | 29,963 | $ | 202,275 | $ | 125,682 | ||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate, net of minority interests |
(3,912 | ) | (213 | ) | (79,172 | ) | (24,335 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
40,865 | 46,914 | 122,433 | 133,514 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
117 | 1,810 | 1,061 | 2,916 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,387 | ) | (1,001 | ) | (3,965 | ) | (3,069 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners minority interests (Net income) |
5,889 | 12,014 | 21,149 | 29,310 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Net income (loss)) |
614 | (17 | ) | 4,998 | 994 | |||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Development profits) |
2,115 | 1,086 | 3,861 | 3,260 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations minority interests (Net income) |
107 | 410 | 267 | 1,032 | ||||||||||||
FFO attributable to minority interests |
(15,731 | ) | (24,471 | ) | (47,347 | ) | (66,654 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(3,425 | ) | (2,239 | ) | (7,286 | ) | (12,605 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
9,828 | 4,030 | 21,308 | 9,335 | ||||||||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 104,235 | $ | 68,286 | $ | 239,582 | $ | 199,380 | ||||||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.99 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 2.31 | $ | 2.10 | ||||||||
Weighted average common share and unit (diluted) |
105,109,868 | 95,117,597 | 103,777,347 | 94,734,736 | ||||||||||||
Estimated FFO by business line (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Capital Partners FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.09 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
3.0 | % | 5.6 | % | 4.3 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
Development FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.69 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
43.4 | % | 29.3 | % | 34.2 | % | 32.8 | % | ||||||||
Real estate operations FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1)
|
$ | 0.53 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
% of reported FFO |
53.6 | % | 65.1 | % | 61.5 | % | 62.9 | % | ||||||||
Total FFO
per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.99 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 2.31 | $ | 2.10 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure. |
4
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio: (1) (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 6,246 | $ | 5,966 | $ | 14,204 | $ | 17,569 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,039 | $ | 3,859 | $ | 9,438 | $ | 12,997 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,100 | $ | 406 | $ | 1,803 | $ | 6,456 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 1,045 | $ | 296 | $ | 1,766 | $ | 6,282 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 546 | $ | 177 | $ | 1,181 | $ | 6,069 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 6,655 | $ | 4,887 | $ | 15,808 | $ | 13,385 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,562 | 5,723 | 19,065 | 18,589 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
10,123 | 13,076 | 24,475 | 30,302 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
22,340 | 23,686 | 59,348 | 62,276 | ||||||||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(6,508 | ) | (5,864 | ) | (17,747 | ) | (16,720 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 15,832 | $ | 17,822 | $ | 41,601 | $ | 45,556 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,817 | $ | 4,890 | $ | 8,767 | $ | 16,190 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,554 | $ | 3,644 | $ | 8,352 | $ | 12,721 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 519 | $ | 406 | $ | 1,158 | $ | 6,456 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 464 | $ | 296 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 6,282 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 431 | $ | 177 | $ | 1,053 | $ | 6,069 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 6,229 | $ | 4,891 | $ | 14,271 | $ | 13,317 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
4,811 | 5,654 | 15,900 | 18,300 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
9,139 | 12,958 | 22,309 | 29,230 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
20,179 | 23,503 | 52,480 | 60,847 | ||||||||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(4,742 | ) | (5,718 | ) | (12,297 | ) | (15,577 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 15,437 | $ | 17,785 | $ | 40,183 | $ | 45,270 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. |
|
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
5
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
OWNED AND MANAGED OPERATING STATISTICS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
| Operating Portfolio | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet owned at September 30, 2007 |
114,030,439 | 111,335,628 | ||||||
Occupancy percentage |
95.5 | % | 96.1 | % | ||||
Average occupancy percentage |
95.4 | % | 94.9 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years): |
||||||||
Original |
6.1 | 6.0 | ||||||
Remaining |
3.5 | 3.4 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
72.8 | % | 76.0 | % | ||||
| Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||
Same Space Leasing Activity: (2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
8.9 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.0 | 14.4 | ||||||
2nd Generation Leasing Activity: |
||||||||
TIs and LCs per square foot: |
||||||||
Retained |
$ | 0.94 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
Re-tenanted |
4.23 | 3.42 | ||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 2.22 | $ | 2.03 | ||||
Square footage commencing (millions) |
5.5 | 17.2 | ||||||
| Same Store Pool (1) | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet in same store pool at September 30, 2007 |
85,480,766 | 85,808,842 | ||||||
% of total square feet |
75.0 | % | 77.1 | % | ||||
Occupancy percentage at period end: |
||||||||
September 30, 2007 |
96.2 | % | 96.4 | % | ||||
September 30, 2006 |
96.1 | % | 95.6 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years): |
||||||||
Original |
6.1 | 6.1 | ||||||
Remaining |
3.1 | 3.2 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
72.3 | % | 75.8 | % | ||||
| Quarter | Year-to-Date | |||||||
Same Space Leasing Activity: (2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
9.2 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
3.7 | 12.9 | ||||||
Cash basis NOI % change: (3) |
||||||||
Revenues (4)
|
6.3 | % | 5.9 | % | ||||
Expenses (4)
|
9.3 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||
NOI (3) (4)
|
5.3 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||
NOI without lease termination fees (3) (4)
|
5.1 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||
TOP 10 CUSTOMERS (5)
(dollars in thousands)
| % of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Aggregate | Aggregate | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| of | Rentable | Leased | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||||
| Customer Name (8) | Leases | Square Feet | Square Feet | ABR (1)(7) | ABR (1)(7) | |||||||||||||||
1. Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) (9)
|
53 | 3,547,522 | 3.3 | % | $ | 26,837 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||
2. United States Government (9) (10)
|
47 | 1,407,748 | 1.3 | % | 20,516 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||
3. FedEx Corporation (9)
|
31 | 1,517,523 | 1.4 | % | 15,577 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||||
4. Nippon Express |
13 | 987,076 | 0.9 | % | 10,011 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||
5. Sagawa Express |
10 | 729,141 | 0.7 | % | 9,433 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
6. BAX Global Inc/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn (9)
|
19 | 803,514 | 0.7 | % | 8,374 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||
7. La Poste |
2 | 902,391 | 0.8 | % | 7,837 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||
8. Panalpina, Inc. |
10 | 1,033,796 | 0.9 | % | 6,779 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
9. Expeditors International |
7 | 1,238,693 | 1.1 | % | 6,192 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
10. City and
County of San Francisco |
1 | 559,605 | 0.5 | % | 5,714 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Total |
12,727,009 | 11.6 | % | $ | 117,270 | 15.9 | % | |||||||||||||
LEASE EXPIRATIONS (6)
(dollars in thousands)
| Year | Square Feet | ABR (1) (7) (9) | % of ABR (1) (7) | |||||||||
2007 |
5,036,552 | $ | 32,408 | 4.1 | % | |||||||
2008 |
14,942,983 | 98,821 | 12.5 | % | ||||||||
2009 |
19,878,985 | 127,723 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||
2010 |
16,473,590 | 121,835 | 15.4 | % | ||||||||
2011 |
16,085,884 | 118,413 | 15.0 | % | ||||||||
2012 |
12,161,194 | 101,704 | 12.9 | % | ||||||||
2013 |
6,793,579 | 46,463 | 5.9 | % | ||||||||
2014 |
6,559,572 | 53,644 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
2015 |
3,836,440 | 30,696 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
2016 and beyond |
7,943,877 | 58,161 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Total |
109,712,656 | $ | 789,868 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, same store properties and annualized base rent (ABR), as applicable. | |
| (2) | Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. | |
| (3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (4) | For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the % change was 6.5%, 6.5%, 6.5% and 6.3%, respectively, for revenues, expenses, NOI and NOI without lease termination fees. For the year-to-date ended September 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the % change was 5.8%, 6.1%, 5.7% and 5.6%, respectively, for revenues, expenses, NOI and NOI without lease termination fees. | |
| (5) | Schedule includes customers in our owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (6) | Schedule represents spaces that expire on or after September 30, 2007. Schedule includes owned and managed operating properties. | |
| (7) | ABR is reported net of all operating expense reimbursements. | |
| (8) | Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer. | |
| (9) | Apron rental amounts (but not square footage) are included. | |
| (10) | United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), United States Customs, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and various other U.S. governmental agencies. |
6
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PRINCIPAL GLOBAL MARKETS (1)
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
| Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. New | San | Principal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern | Jersey/ | Francisco | U.S. | South | Global | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California | New York | Bay Area | Chicago | On-Tarmac (2) | Florida | Seattle | Tokyo (3) | Paris (3) | Markets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rentable square feet |
15,966,939 | 11,115,945 | 10,147,211 | 12,423,064 | 2,679,328 | 6,119,659 | 7,891,551 | 4,374,922 | 3,108,673 | 73,827,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage |
97.2 | % | 99.1 | % | 96.5 | % | 91.4 | % | 94.3 | % | 98.6 | % | 97.3 | % | 96.3 | % | 90.2 | % | 96.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR (000s) (4)
|
$ | 103,979 | $ | 78,687 | $ | 62,307 | $ | 60,618 | $ | 46,723 | $ | 45,837 | $ | 39,095 | $ | 49,931 | $ | 23,827 | $ | 511,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of total ABR (4)
|
14.1 | % | 10.6 | % | 8.4 | % | 8.2 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.3 | % | 6.8 | % | 3.2 | % | 69.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR per square foot |
$ | 6.70 | $ | 7.14 | $ | 6.36 | $ | 5.34 | $ | 18.49 | $ | 7.60 | $ | 5.09 | $ | 11.86 | $ | 8.50 | $ | 7.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lease
expirations as a % of ABR:
(4)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
4.5 | % | 0.9 | % | 3.5 | % | 9.6 | % | 9.5 | % | 8.6 | % | 1.8 | % | 0.7 | % | 3.7 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
13.0 | % | 9.0 | % | 18.3 | % | 12.4 | % | 13.8 | % | 13.0 | % | 11.2 | % | 6.0 | % | 5.9 | % | 11.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
13.3 | % | 17.3 | % | 25.5 | % | 14.2 | % | 6.0 | % | 15.1 | % | 25.7 | % | 22.8 | % | 15.0 | % | 17.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average lease terms: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original |
5.7 | 7.5 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 8.7 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 5.0 | 6.1 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.1 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention: |
75.6 | % | 82.8 | % | 62.7 | % | 64.3 | % | 85.4 | % | 59.5 | % | 89.4 | % | 60.6 | % | 76.8 | % | 74.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
1.6 | % | 9.7 | % | 5.6 | % | 1.1 | % | 24.5 | % | 24.7 | % | 30.5 | % | (42.2 | %) | 4.7 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Same space square feet leased |
499,897 | 297,661 | 408,865 | 383,250 | 67,268 | 210,156 | 731,048 | 11,531 | 1,292 | 2,610,968 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date |
8.9 | % | 3.0 | % | (5.1 | %) | (0.2 | %) | 1.6 | % | 17.4 | % | 19.3 | % | 0.6 | % | 10.6 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Same space square feet leased |
2,066,386 | 1,980,755 | 1,824,865 | 1,128,903 | 274,616 | 749,350 | 1,501,290 | 171,560 | 550,046 | 10,247,771 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same store cash basis NOI % change: (5)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
7.4 | % | 10.4 | % | (2.0 | %) | 5.3 | % | 1.8 | % | 9.0 | % | 3.9 | % | 18.8 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-Date |
5.3 | % | 9.4 | % | 2.1 | % | 4.0 | % | 2.3 | % | 11.9 | % | 4.2 | % | 17.3 | % | 18.3 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Same store square feet as % of aggregate square feet (4)
|
83.2 | % | 83.2 | % | 98.2 | % | 75.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 83.3 | % | 88.1 | % | 26.8 | % | 34.4 | % | 79.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata share of square feet (6)
|
9,752,961 | 5,587,391 | 7,405,900 | 6,838,081 | 2,485,169 | 4,409,086 | 3,935,702 | 876,459 | 621,735 | 41,912,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata % share of square feet (6)
|
61.1 | % | 50.3 | % | 73.0 | % | 55.0 | % | 92.8 | % | 72.0 | % | 49.9 | % | 20.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 56.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Based on annualized base rent and represents AMBs owned and managed portfolio. The markets included here are a subset of AMBs regions defined as East, Southwest, and West Central in North America and Europe and Asia. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | Includes on-tarmac cargo facilities at 14 airports. | |
| (3) | At September 30, 2007, these represent our largest single markets in Asia and Europe, respectively. | |
| (4) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of ABR and same store properties, as applicable. | |
| (5) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (6) | Calculated as AMBs pro rata share of square feet on the Owned and Managed portfolio. |
7
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW (1)
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
| Rentable | AMB's Pro Rata | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | % Share of | Occupancy | % of Total | ABR per | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Feet | Square Feet | Percentage | ABR (2) | ABR (2) | Square Foot (2) | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal Global Markets |
73,827,292 | 56.8 | % | 96.1 | % | $ | 511,004 | 69.1 | % | $ | 7.20 | |||||||||||||
Other Global Target Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta |
4,624,026 | 50.1 | % | 94.6 | % | $ | 19,565 | 2.6 | % | $ | 4.47 | |||||||||||||
Baltimore |
3,755,256 | 71.9 | % | 98.7 | % | 23,908 | 3.2 | % | 6.45 | |||||||||||||||
Boston |
5,188,593 | 72.4 | % | 91.2 | % | 31,626 | 4.3 | % | 6.69 | |||||||||||||||
Dallas |
5,103,893 | 55.9 | % | 94.1 | % | 22,934 | 3.1 | % | 4.78 | |||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
2,134,089 | 20.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 13,432 | 1.8 | % | 6.29 | |||||||||||||||
Minneapolis |
4,129,770 | 79.1 | % | 93.1 | % | 17,847 | 2.4 | % | 4.64 | |||||||||||||||
Other Markets (3)
|
8,204,094 | 48.9 | % | 94.0 | % | 42,582 | 5.8 | % | 5.52 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
33,139,721 | 58.3 | % | 94.4 | % | $ | 171,894 | 23.2 | % | $ | 5.49 | |||||||||||||
Europe Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam, Netherlands |
1,880,498 | 20.0 | % | 95.2 | % | $ | 18,139 | 2.5 | % | $ | 10.13 | |||||||||||||
Brussels, Belgium |
100,169 | 20.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 1,462 | 0.2 | % | 14.60 | |||||||||||||||
Frankfurt, Germany |
275,868 | 20.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 4,811 | 0.7 | % | 17.44 | |||||||||||||||
Hamburg, Germany |
1,425,002 | 19.8 | % | 99.9 | % | 10,935 | 1.4 | % | 7.68 | |||||||||||||||
Lyon, France |
262,491 | 20.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 1,903 | 0.3 | % | 7.25 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
3,944,028 | 19.9 | % | 97.7 | % | $ | 37,250 | 5.1 | % | $ | 9.67 | |||||||||||||
Asia Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka, Japan |
1,018,875 | 20.0 | % | 91.1 | % | $ | 8,443 | 1.2 | % | $ | 9.10 | |||||||||||||
Shanghai, China |
1,382,817 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 5,347 | 0.7 | % | 3.87 | |||||||||||||||
Singapore, Singapore |
717,706 | 100.0 | % | 69.9 | % | 5,430 | 0.7 | % | 10.83 | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
3,119,398 | 73.9 | % | 90.2 | % | $ | 19,220 | 2.6 | % | $ | 6.83 | |||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total |
114,030,439 | 56.4 | % | 95.5 | % | $ | 739,368 | 100.0 | % | $ | 6.79 | |||||||||||||
Other (4) |
7,495,659 | 93.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Stabilized Portfolio (2) |
121,526,098 | 95.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Development Projects |
19,249,545 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Portfolio (5) |
140,775,643 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes AMBs owned and managed operating and development properties, investments in operating properties through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, and recently completed developments that have not yet been placed in operations but are being held for sale or contribution. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of ABR and completion/stabilization, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Other Markets includes other target markets (Austin, Guadalajara, Houston, Orlando, Querétaro, Tijuana and Toronto) and non-target markets (Columbus and New Orleans). | |
| (4) | Includes investments in 7.4 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio and 151,606 square feet for its investment in AMB Pier One, LLC. | |
| (5) | Total Portfolio includes recently completed development projects available for sale or contribution totaling ten projects and 2.5 million square feet. |
8
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | Square | |||||||
| Property Acquisitions | Market | Acquisition | Feet | |||||
AMB Alliance Fund III |
||||||||
1. AMB Bluefin Distribution Center |
South Florida | July | 234,541 | |||||
2. AMB Eagle Creek |
Minneapolis | August | 122,912 | |||||
3. AMB Midland Distribution Center |
Seattle | August | 73,086 | |||||
4. AMB New Durham Industrial Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | September | 452,374 | |||||
5. AMB Pearl Distribution Center |
Southern California | September | 103,248 | |||||
Total AMB Alliance Fund III |
986,161 | |||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
||||||||
6. AMB Saitama Distribution Center 4 |
Tokyo, Japan | July | 44,566 | |||||
Total AMB Japan Fund I |
44,566 | |||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
||||||||
7. AMB Orleans Distribution Center 1 |
Paris, France | July | 122,924 | |||||
Total AMB Europe Fund I |
122,924 | |||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
||||||||
8. AMB Tuas Distribution Center 1 |
Singapore, Singapore | September | 199,321 | |||||
9. AMB Changi North Distribution Center 1 |
Singapore, Singapore | September | 105,456 | |||||
Total AMB Property Corporation |
304,777 | |||||||
Total Third Quarter Property Acquisitions |
1,458,428 | |||||||
Acquisition
Cost (1) (2)
|
$ | 116,259 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
32 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate (Using GAAP NOI) (3)
|
6.6 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Property Acquisitions |
8,796,882 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (1) (2)
|
$ | 752,626 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
26 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate (Using GAAP NOI) (3)
|
6.5 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | Represents the total expected investment, including closing costs and estimated acquisition capital of $2.7 million and $14.5 million, respectively, for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2007. | |
| (2) | Non-U.S. Dollar assets are translated using the exchange rate on the date of acquisition. | |
| (3) | See Reporting Definitions for definition of stabilized GAAP cap rates and Supplemental Financial Disclosures for discussion of NOI. |
9
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITAL
DEPLOYMENT
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in
thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| New Development Project | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
1. AMB DFW Distribution Center IV & V |
Dallas | Q208 | 396,060 | |||||
2. AMB Le Grand Roissy Distribution Genevilliers |
Paris, France | Q208 | 67,274 | |||||
3. AMB Manzanita R&D (2)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q408 | 26,615 | |||||
4. AMB I-78 Distribution Center Bldg 100 |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q109 | 700,000 | |||||
5. AMB Tripoint (2)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q109 | 167,296 | |||||
6. AMB Rogers Distribution Center |
Minneapolis | Q109 | 147,160 | |||||
7. AMB Portview Commerce Center Bldg 100 |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q109 | 143,756 | |||||
8. AMB Agua Fria Bldgs 1&2 |
Monterrey, Mexico | Q209 | 276,288 | |||||
9. AMB Boom Distribution Center |
Brussels, Belgium | Q209 | 437,014 | |||||
10. AMB Riverfront Distribution Center Bldg A |
Seattle | Q209 | 388,000 | |||||
11. AMB Arques Business Center (2)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q309 | 82,000 | |||||
Total Third Quarter New Development Projects |
2,831,463 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1) |
$ | 232,997 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
97 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.5 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date New Projects |
7,947,644 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1) |
$ | 688,875 | ||||||
Total Third Quarter Capital Deployment |
$ | 349,256 | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Capital Deployment |
$ | 1,441,501 | ||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yields, as applicable. | |
| (2) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. |
10
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PROPERTY CONTRIBUTIONS & DISPOSITIONS
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
None |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
1. JFK Air Cargo - 1 |
No. New Jersey/New York | September | 45,920 | |||||
Total Third Quarter Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions |
45,920 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 7,550 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
100 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate (3)
|
5.1 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions |
4,579,873 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 532,401 | ||||||
AMBs
Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
80 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate (3)
|
6.4 | % | ||||||
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Development Property Contributions and Dispositions | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
1. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 2A |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | September | 117,929 | |||||
2. AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 5 |
Tokyo, Japan | September | 469,627 | |||||
3. AMB Gonesse Distribution Center |
Paris, France | September | 598,161 | |||||
4. AMB Douglassingel Distribution Center |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | September | 148,714 | |||||
Total Contributions |
1,334,431 | |||||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
1. AMB Torrance Matrix 6 units |
Southern California | September | 42,585 | |||||
2. AMB Osgood Industrial (2) (4)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | September | n/a | |||||
3. AMB Pacific Coast Business Park Land (5)
|
Southern California | September | n/a | |||||
Total Dispositions |
42,585 | |||||||
Total Third Quarter Development Property Contributions and Dispositions |
1,377,016 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 245,324 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
34.7 | % | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
82 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate (3)
|
5.5 | % | ||||||
Total Year-to-Date Development Property Contributions and Dispositions |
3,374,411 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price (1)
|
$ | 485,477 | ||||||
Development Margin (3)
|
31.0 | % | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
83 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate (3)
|
5.8 | % | ||||||
| (1) | Translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate on the date of contribution/disposition, as applicable. | |
| (2) | Represents a project that was placed in projects available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, and was sold or contributed during the quarter. | |
| (3) | See Reporting Definitions for definition of development margin and stabilized cash cap rates. | |
| (4) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (5) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. |
11
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2007 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
1. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 2 |
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q4 | 473,720 | |||||
2. AMB Pearson Logistics Centre 1 Bldg 100 |
Toronto, Canada | Q4 | 446,338 | |||||
3. AMB Sagamihara Distribution Center |
Tokyo, Japan | Q4 | 543,056 | |||||
4. AMB Isle dAbeau Logistics Park Bldg. C |
Lyon, France | Q4 | 277,817 | |||||
5. AMB Wille Distribution Center |
Chicago | Q4 | 253,410 | |||||
6. AMB Beacon Lakes Commerce Bank |
South Florida | Q4 | 101,345 | |||||
Total 2007 Deliveries |
2,095,686 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 209,477 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 168,022 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
97 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.0 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
71 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $163.8 million, $689.3 million and $156.9 million, respectively, for a total of $1,010.0 million. |
12
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2008 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
7. AMB Aurora Industrial (5)
|
Minneapolis | Q1 | 122,793 | |||||
8. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 2 |
Toronto, Canada | Q1 | 281,441 | |||||
9. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 3A and 3B |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q1 | 221,413 | |||||
10. AMB Valley Distribution Center |
Seattle | Q1 | 749,970 | |||||
11. AMB Amagasaki Distribution Center 2 |
Osaka, Japan | Q2 | 981,679 | |||||
12. AMB Beacon Lakes Bldg 7 |
South Florida | Q2 | 193,090 | |||||
13. AMB Redlands 2 |
Southern California | Q2 | 1,313,470 | |||||
14. AMB DFW Distribution Center IV & V (4)
|
Dallas | Q2 | 396,060 | |||||
15. AMB Le Grand Roissy Distribution Genevilliers (4)
|
Paris, France | Q2 | 67,274 | |||||
16. AMB Le Grand Roissy Distribution Mitry |
Paris, France | Q2 | 37,954 | |||||
17. AMB Shinkiba Distribution Center |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 333,668 | |||||
18. AMB Theodorpark Logistics Center |
Frankfurt, Germany | Q2 | 139,608 | |||||
19. AMB Narita Air Cargo 1 Phase 1 Bldg C |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 348,891 | |||||
20. AMB IAH Airfreight 7 |
Houston | Q2 | 239,500 | |||||
21. AMB Palmetto Distribution Center |
Orlando | Q2 | 406,400 | |||||
22. AMB Lijnden Logistics Court 1 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q3 | 96,520 | |||||
23. AMB Nanko Naka Distribution Center |
Osaka, Japan | Q3 | 402,313 | |||||
24. AMB Franklin Commerce Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q3 | 366,896 | |||||
25. AMB Manzanita R&D (4) (5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | 26,615 | |||||
26. AMB Remington Lakes Distribution |
Chicago | Q4 | 228,413 | |||||
27. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E2 |
South Florida | Q4 | 52,918 | |||||
28. AMB Pompano Center of Commerce Phase 1 |
South Florida | Q4 | 218,835 | |||||
29. AMB Barajas Logistics Park |
Madrid, Spain | Q4 | 444,043 | |||||
30. AMB Liberty Logistics Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q4 | 191,196 | |||||
31. AMB El Segundo (6)
|
Southern California | Q4 | 217,740 | |||||
32. AMB Platinum Triangle Land Phase 1 (3)
|
Southern California | Q4 | | |||||
33. AMB Dublin (3)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
34. AMB ICN Logistics Center |
Seoul, Korea | Q4 | 362,745 | |||||
35. AMB Akechi Distribution Center |
Nagoya, Japan | Q4 | 979,357 | |||||
Total 2008 Deliveries |
9,420,802 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 966,131 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 751,440 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
92 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.4 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
32 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $163.8 million, $689.3 million and $156.9 million, respectively, for a total of $1,010.0 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. | |
| (5) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (6) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. |
13
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
(continued)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2009 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization(1) | at Stabilization(1) | |||||
36. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 4 |
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q1 | 253,597 | |||||
37. AMB Pacifico Bldgs 3&4 |
Tijuana, Mexico | Q1 | 195,945 | |||||
38. AMB I - 78 Distribution Center Bldg 100 (4)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | Q1 | 700,000 | |||||
39. AMB Tripoint (4) (5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q1 | 167,296 | |||||
40. AMB Minooka Distribution Center (6)
|
Chicago | Q1 | 1,000,743 | |||||
41. AMB Rogers Distribution Center (4)
|
Minneapolis | Q1 | 147,160 | |||||
42. AMB Portview Commerce Center Bldg 100 (4)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | Q1 | 143,756 | |||||
43. AMB Morgan Business Center Bldg 100 |
Savannah | Q2 | 343,030 | |||||
44. AMB Agua Fria Bldgs 1&2 (4)
|
Monterrey, Mexico | Q2 | 276,288 | |||||
45. AMB Boom Distribution Center (4)
|
Brussels, Belgium | Q2 | 437,014 | |||||
46. AMB Tsurumi Distribution Center 1 |
Tokyo Japan | Q2 | 685,757 | |||||
47. AMB Riverfront Distribution Center Bldg A (4)
|
Seattle | Q2 | 388,000 | |||||
48. AMB Siziano Business Park Bldg 1 |
Milan, Italy | Q2 | 436,916 | |||||
49. AMB Arques Business Center (4) (5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q3 | 82,000 | |||||
50. AMB
Hathaway(3)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
51. AMB Platinum Triangle Land Phase 2 (3)
|
Southern California | Q4 | | |||||
Total 2009 Deliveries |
5,257,502 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 443,224 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 178,930 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
87 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.5 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
0 | % | ||||||
Total 2007, 2008 and 2009 Scheduled Deliveries |
16,773,990 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 1,618,832 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 1,098,392 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
91 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.4 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
27 | % | ||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007, 2008 and 2009 deliveries was $163.8 million, $689.3 million and $156.9 million, respectively, for a total of $1,010.0 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. | |
| (5) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (6) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. |
14
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PLACED IN OPERATIONS AND
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of September 30, 2007
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Projects Placed in Operations | Market | Square Feet | ||||
None |
n/a | n/a | ||||
Total Year-to-Date Placed in Operations |
179,400 | |||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 10,657 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
20 | % | ||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
8.0 | % | ||||
| Development and Value-Added Conversion Projects | ||||||
| Available for Sale or Contribution (1) (2) | Market | Square Feet | ||||
1. AMB Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 2 (3) (6)
|
Singapore, Singapore | 250,758 | ||||
2. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 1 |
Toronto, Canada | 375,241 | ||||
3. AMB Fengxian Logistics Center Bldgs 2, 4 & 6 (4) (6)
|
Shanghai, China | 1,040,633 | ||||
4. AMB Highway 17 55 Madison Street (4)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | 150,446 | ||||
5. AMB Jiuting Distribution Center 2 (6)
|
Shanghai, China | 190,435 | ||||
6. AMB Annagem Distribution Centre (6)
|
Toronto, Canada | 198,169 | ||||
7. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E1 1 unit |
South Florida | 6,583 | ||||
8. AMB Steel Road |
Southern California | 161,000 | ||||
9. AMB Torrance Matrix 16 units |
Southern California | 107,430 | ||||
10. AMB Altenwerder Distribution Center 1 (5)
|
Hamburg, Germany | 414,701 | ||||
11. AMB Agave 5 (5) (6)
|
Mexico City, Mexico | 111,600 | ||||
12. AMB Pearson Logistics Centre 1-Bldg 200 (5)
|
Toronto, Canada | 205,518 | ||||
13. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 3 (5)
|
Mexico City, Mexico | 628,784 | ||||
14. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 4 (5)
|
Mexico City, Mexico | 315,156 | ||||
15. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 4A (5)
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands | 110,696 | ||||
16. AMB
Moffett Business Center Industrial
(7)(5)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | | ||||
Total Available for Sale or Contribution |
4,267,150 | |||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 320,297 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
89 | % | ||||
% Leased |
78 | % | ||||
| Operating Properties Available for Contribution | Market | Square Feet | ||||
1. AMB Annagem Distribution Centre II |
Toronto, Canada | 106,184 | ||||
2. AMB Jiuting Distribution Center 1 |
Shanghai, China | 151,749 | ||||
3. AMB Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 3 |
Singapore, Singapore | 162,171 | ||||
4. AMB Tuas Distribution Center 1 |
Singapore, Singapore | 199,321 | ||||
5. AMB Changi North Distribution Center 1 |
Singapore, Singapore | 105,456 | ||||
Total Available for Contribution |
724,881 | |||||
Total Investment (1)
|
$ | 51,339 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
100 | % | ||||
% Leased |
64 | % | ||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of estimated total investment and estimated yields, as applicable. | |
| (2) | Represents projects where development activities have been completed and which AMB intends to sell or contribute within two years of construction completion. | |
| (3) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. | |
| (4) | Represents a redevelopment project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (5) | Represents an asset placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended September 30, 2007. Assets placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter totaled $179.7 million and 1.8 million square feet. | |
| (6) | Represents a project that is at least 90% leased and is included in the owned and managed operating portfolio. | |
| (7) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. |
15
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
LAND INVENTORY (1)
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| North America | Europe | Asia | Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
2,345 | 38,991,786 | 53 | 1,037,254 | 40 | 2,283,574 | 2,438 | 42,312,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
92 | 1,444,220 | | | 16 | 398,264 | 108 | 1,842,484 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
(2 | ) | | | | | | (2 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
(139 | ) | (2,327,175 | ) | | | | | (139 | ) | (2,327,175 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Redesign adjustments |
| | | 261,909 | | | | 261,909 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2007 |
2,296 | 38,108,831 | 53 | 1,299,163 | 56 | 2,681,838 | 2,405 | (5) | 42,089,832 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments in Land (2)
|
$ | 439,224 | $ | 29,982 | $ | 93,124 | $ | 562,330 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Development Cost |
$ | 2,230,774 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes consolidated and unconsolidated investments. | |
| (2) | Includes initial acquisition cost and associated carry costs. | |
| (3) | Represents total estimated costs of development including initial land acquisition cost and associated carry costs assuming full build out of land inventory. | |
| (4) | AMBs share of acres, square feet of estimated build out potential, and total investment including amounts held in unconsolidated joint ventures is 2,196 acres, 38,372,635 square feet and $453,729, respectively. |
16
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except share price)
| AMB | Joint | Unsecured | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured | Venture | Senior | Credit | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Year | Debt (1) | Debt (1) | Debt | Facilities (2) | Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 57,564 | $ | 11,256 | $ | | $ | | $ | 13,173 | $ | 81,993 | ||||||||||||
2008 |
90,800 | 72,774 | 175,000 | | 810 | 339,384 | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
25,799 | 146,333 | 100,000 | | 873 | 273,005 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
65,905 | 95,365 | 250,000 | 604,873 | 941 | 1,017,084 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
115 | 189,640 | 75,000 | 213,452 | 1,014 | 479,221 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
2,044 | 459,082 | | | 61,093 | (6) | 522,219 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| 46,366 | 175,000 | | 65,920 | (7) | 287,286 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| 4,076 | | | 616 | 4,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| 18,780 | 112,491 | | 664 | 131,935 | ||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
| 54,995 | | | | 54,995 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| 19,091 | 125,000 | | | 144,091 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
242,227 | 1,117,758 | 1,012,491 | 818,325 | 145,104 | 3,335,905 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized premiums/(discount) |
1,129 | 3,443 | (9,681 | ) | | | (5,109 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated debt |
243,356 | 1,121,201 | 1,002,810 | 818,325 | 145,104 | 3,330,796 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMBs
share of unconsolidated JV Debt (3) (5) |
| 505,285 | | | 31,478 | 536,763 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
243,356 | 1,626,486 | 1,002,810 | 818,325 | 176,582 | 3,867,559 | ||||||||||||||||||
JV partners share of
consolidated JV debt (5)
|
| (718,461 | ) | | | (100,000 | ) | (818,461 | ) | |||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (5)
|
$ | 243,356 | $ | 908,025 | $ | 1,002,810 | $ | 818,325 | $ | 76,582 | $ | 3,049,098 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
5.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.1 | % | 3.4 | % | 6.2 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
maturity (in years) |
1.2 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 4.8 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
98,910,419 | $ | 59.81 | $ | 5,915,832 | |||||||
LP Units |
4,144,783 | 59.81 | 247,899 | |||||||||
Total |
103,055,202 | $ | 6,163,731 | |||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units (4) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.90 | % | $ | 312,267 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | ||||
Total debt-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
37.4 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of
total market capitalization (5) |
32.0 | % | ||
Total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
40.4 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-
AMBs share of total market capitalization (5) |
35.3 | % | ||
| (1) | AMB secured debt includes debt related to European and Asian assets in the amount of $63.7 million and $67.1 million, respectively. | |
| (2) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1,529 million. Includes $402.7 million, $194.2 million, $102.6 million, $84.6 million and $19.3 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro, British Pounds and Singapore dollar based borrowings, respectively, translated to U.S. Dollars using the foreign exchange rates at September 30, 2007. | |
| (3) | The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated JV debt were 4.7% and 5.3 years, respectively. | |
| (4) | Exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder and redeemable at the option of AMB after a non-call period, five years from issuance. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions and Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (6) | Maturity includes $60 million balance outstanding on a $70 million non-recourse credit facility obtained by AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II. | |
| (7) | Maturity includes $65 million balance outstanding on a $65 million non-recourse credit facility obtained by AMB Partners II. |
17
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
UNCONSOLIDATED AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES (1)
As of September 30, 2007
As of September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| AMB's | Gross | AMB's | Estimated | Planned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Geographic | Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Focus | Percentage | Feet (2) | Value (3) | Debt | Debt | Investment (4) | Capacity | Capitalization | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III (5)
|
United States | 19 | % | 18,985,658 | $ | 1,756,192 | $ | 851,791 | $ | | $ | 137,759 | $ | 345,000 | $ | 2,101,192 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I (5) (6)
|
Europe | 21 | % | 7,052,701 | 924,376 | 559,340 | | 50,246 | 235,000 | 1,159,376 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I (6)
|
Japan | 20 | % | 5,393,797 | 903,387 | 546,415 | 102,657 | 54,191 | 1,280,000 | 2,183,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
Mexico | 20 | % | 4,791,996 | 253,538 | 112,925 | 55,851 | 12,556 | 451,000 | 704,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
20 | % | 36,224,152 | 3,837,493 | 2,070,471 | 158,508 | 254,752 | 2,311,000 | 6,148,493 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
United States | 15 | % | 1,218,483 | 133,680 | | | 20,319 | 274,000 | 407,680 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
53 | % | 7,669,507 | (7) | 293,008 | 179,480 | | 49,866 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
22 | % | 45,112,142 | $ | 4,264,181 | $ | 2,249,951 | $ | 158,508 | $ | 324,937 | $ | 2,585,000 | $ | 6,556,173 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Consolidated Joint Ventures | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
United States | 20 | % | 9,914,742 | $ | 689,350 | $ | 321,358 | $ | 65,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
United States | 20 | % | 8,007,103 | 521,837 | 239,560 | 60,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
United States | 50 | % | 8,287,592 | 451,648 | 347,802 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
United States | 39 | % | 2,172,137 | 155,955 | 83,647 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Erie |
United States | 50 | % | 821,712 | 52,650 | 20,175 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,203,286 | 1,871,440 | 1,012,542 | 125,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 1,366 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 4,357 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures |
20 | % | | 5,723 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,203,286 | 1,877,163 | 1,012,542 | 125,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
92 | % | 2,196,134 | 208,092 | 28,999 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
81 | % | 4,480,759 | 437,682 | 79,660 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
44 | % | 35,880,179 | $ | 2,522,937 | $ | 1,121,201 | $ | 125,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | Share of | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 63,951 | $ | 5,184 | $ | 32,131 | AMB's | $ | 15,278 | $ | 3,425 | $ | 9,828 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
$ | 37,913 | $ | 7,654 | $ | 21,094 | Partner's | $ | 27,311 | $ | 3,380 | $ | 15,304 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | Share of | Cash NOI (8) | Net Income | FFO (8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 150,955 | $ | 17,895 | $ | 75,092 | AMB's | $ | 38,344 | $ | 7,286 | $ | 21,308 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
$ | 111,278 | $ | 21,526 | $ | 60,676 | Partner's | $ | 80,751 | $ | 11,775 | $ | 46,114 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | See Joint Venture Partner Information. | |
| (2) | For development properties, this represents estimated square feet upon completion for committed phases of development projects. | |
| (3) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (4) | AMB also has a 39% equity interest in G. Accion, a Mexican real estate company for approximately $35.3 million. G. Accion provides real estate management and development services in Mexico. | |
| (5) | The planned gross capitalizations and investment capacities of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the Funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (6) | AMB Japan Fund I is a yen-denominated fund. AMB Europe Fund I is a euro-denominated fund. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the September 30, 2007 exchange rate. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.4 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (8) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures and Reporting Definitions. |
18
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NET ASSET VALUE ANALYSIS (1)
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarter | ||||
| Ended | ||||
| September 30, 2007 | ||||
AMBs Share of cash basis NOI (1) (2) |
||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 158,740 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(3,817 | ) | ||
Property operating costs |
(43,028 | ) | ||
JV Partners share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
(27,674 | ) | ||
AMBs share of transaction activity adjustments to NOI (1) (2) (3)
|
(7,771 | ) | ||
AMBs share of unconsolidated JVs cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
15,278 | |||
Total AMBs share of cash basis NOI (1) (2) |
$ | 91,728 | ||
Private capital income |
$ | 7,564 | ||
AMBs share of land and development projects |
||||
AMBs share of land held for future development (2) (4)
|
$ | 453,729 | ||
AMBs share of developments and renovations in process (2) (4)
|
$ | 1,010,000 | ||
AMBs share of development projects held for contribution or sale (2) (4)
|
$ | 285,064 | ||
AMBs share of assets contributed to private capital joint ventures (2) (4)
|
$ | 43,572 | ||
AMBs share of total debt and preferred securities (1) (2) (4) |
$ | 3,361,365 | ||
AMBs share of select balance sheet items (owned and managed portfolio): (1) (2) |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 384,326 | ||
Mortgages and loans receivable |
4,593 | |||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
297,997 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(78,868 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(349,386 | ) | ||
AMBs share of other assets and liabilities |
$ | 258,662 | ||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Disclosures. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of AMBs share of, JV Partners share of and owned and managed, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Transaction activity adjustments to NOI stabilizes NOI for acquisitions and development completions and removes NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution. | |
| (4) | See Property Contributions & Dispositions, Development Projects in Process, Development Projects Placed in Operations & Projects Available for Sale or Contribution, Land Inventory or Capitalization Summary and their respective footnotes for further information. |
19
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
REPORTING DEFINITIONS
Acquisition/non-recurring capex includes immediate building improvements
that were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building
or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to
stabilization. Also includes incremental building improvements and leasing
costs that are incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue
potential of an existing building.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book capitalization is
calculated using the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the
pro rata portion of the total debt based on the Companys percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures
holding the debt. AMBs share of total book capitalization is defined as the
Companys share of total debt plus minority interests to preferred
unitholders and limited partnership unitholders plus stockholders equity.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization is
calculated using the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the
pro rata portion of the total debt based on the Companys percentage of equity
interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the
debt. The Companys definition of total market capitalization is total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. The Companys
definition of AMBs share of total market capitalization is the Companys
share of total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market
equity. The Companys definition of market equity is the total number of
outstanding shares of the Companys common stock and common limited partnership
units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as of the
period end.
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on the Companys
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated
ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. The company
believes that AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful
supplemental measures, which enables both management and investors to assess
the operations, earnings and growth of the company in light of the companys
ownership interest in its joint ventures and to compare the applicable measure
to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful
comparison of the applicable measure to that of other companies that do not
consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not
intended to reflect actual liability should there be a default under loans or
a liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of AMBs share of
measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they
may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total market capitalization is defined as the Companys share
of total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market
equity.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis)
per the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is
granted, then the first positive rent value is used. Leases denominated in
foreign currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at quarter
end.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90%
leased or properties for which we have held a certificate of occupancy or
building has been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development margin is calculated as gross sales price less closing costs,
minus total investment cost , and any deferred rents, taxes or third party
promotes before any deferrals on contributions, divided by the estimated
total investment.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of
development, renovation, or expansion, including initial acquisition
costs, prepaid ground leases and associated carry costs. Estimated total
investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change.
Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rate at period end.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual
NOI following occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total
investment, including earnouts (if triggered by stabilization), prepaid ground
leases and associated carrying costs. Yields exclude value-added conversion
projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest expense
(including capitalized interest) plus preferred dividends and distributions.
Interest coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest expense.
JV Partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent
the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on the
Companys joint venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of
the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures accounted for in the applicable
financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of the
Companys common stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by the
closing price per share of its common stock as of the period end.
Occupancy percentage represents the percentage of total rentable square
feet owned, which is leased, including month-to-month leases, as of the
date reported. Space is considered leased when the tenant has either taken
physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by the Company as assets in which the
Company has at least a 10% ownership interest, is the property or asset
manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Percentage pre-leased represents the percentage of signed leases only.
Preferred, with respect to its capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represents projects where the acquired buildings are less
than 75% leased and require significant capital expenditures (generally more
than 10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the buildings up to operating
standards and stabilization (generally 90% occupancy).
Redevelopment projects represent those that require significant capital
expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing basis) to
bring them up to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90%
occupancy).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements
and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital
expenditures do not include acquisition capital that was taken into
consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which are
incurred to bring a building up to operating standard.
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference,
weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month after a term
commencement date and the net ABR due the last month prior to the termination
date of the former tenants term. If free rent is granted, then the first
positive full rent value is used as a point of comparison. The rental amounts
exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent charges. If either
the previous or current lease terms are under 12 months, then they are excluded
from this calculation. If the lease is the first in the unit (first
generation) and there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded
from this calculation.
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles) of the same store properties
from the prior year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store properties include all properties that were owned as of the end of
both the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development
properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store
pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2005.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements,
lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second
generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred
prior to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased.
Second generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square
footage vacant at acquisition.
Stabilized cash cap rates for dispositions or contributions are calculated as
cash-basis NOI, see definition of cash-basis NOI included in Supplemental
Financial Disclosures, divided by total disposition price or contribution
value, as applicable.
Stabilized GAAP cap rates for acquisitions are calculated as NOI, including
straight-line rents, stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%) divided
by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the
initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt to market, all
due diligence and closing costs, lease intangible adjustments, planned
immediate capital expenditures, leasing costs necessary to achieve
stabilization and, if applicable, any estimated costs required to buy-out
AMBs joint venture partners.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases renewed by existing
tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and renewed leases during
the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or
buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square
footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by the Company as total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity.
Value-added conversion project represents the repurposing of land or a
building site for more valuable uses and may include such activities as
rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting.
20
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Adjusted EBITDA. The Company uses adjusted earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation and amortization, and non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA,
to measure both its operating performance and liquidity. The Company
considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors relevant and useful
information because it permits fixed income investors to view income from its
operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash
depreciation and amortization expense or non-development gains. By excluding
interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure the Companys
operating performance independent of its capital structure and indebtedness
and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its operating
performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its
operating performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate
industry and in other industries. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA to be
a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its comparative performance with
other companies because, by excluding non-cash depreciation expense, adjusted
EBITDA can help the investing public compare the performance of a real estate
company to that of companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, the
Company believes that adjusted EBITDA helps fixed income and equity investors
to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly
preferred share and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA in
the same manner as the Company expects investors to when measuring the
Companys operating performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing
its operating performance, and comparing that performance to other companies,
both in the real estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating
its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred
share and unit distributions. The Company believes investors should consider
adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of the
Companys performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its
performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding of the Companys
operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of
the performance of its assets between periods and as against other companies.
By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-development gains
when assessing the Companys financial performance, an investor is assessing
the earnings generated by the Companys operations, but not taking into
account the eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in
connection with such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations
as an analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with the Companys
required GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the Companys
historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital,
capital expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does
not reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on the
Companys outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely
used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it does not represent
net income or cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not
be considered as an alternative to those indicators in evaluating operating
performance or liquidity. Further, the Companys computation of adjusted
EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net income for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 73,110 | $ | 33,387 | $ | 217,061 | $ | 136,317 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
40,865 | 46,914 | 122,433 | 133,514 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | 257 | 5,394 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
4,114 | 3,445 | 13,517 | 14,386 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(3,425 | ) | (2,239 | ) | (7,286 | ) | (12,605 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
9,828 | 4,030 | 21,308 | 9,335 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
6,033 | 2,146 | 14,350 | 6,601 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of development profits, net of taxes |
| | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
28,896 | 43,966 | 96,394 | 127,487 | ||||||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
10,049 | 16,938 | 37,953 | 45,855 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(6,315 | ) | (3,772 | ) | (86,443 | ) | (37,811 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
2,627 | 5,688 | 7,429 | 16,492 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 165,782 | $ | 150,503 | $ | 436,973 | $ | 444,965 | ||||||||
AMBs share of select balance sheet items (owned and managed
portfolio). AMB believes that the financial information in the consolidated
balance sheets based on GAAP provides the most appropriate earnings
information. However, AMB considers AMBs share of select balance sheet
items reported on an owned and managed basis (such as cash and cash
equivalents, mortgages and loans receivable, accounts receivable (net) and
other assets, deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net)
and accounts payable and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental
measures to help both management and investors make a comprehensive
assessment and valuation of AMBs total real estate portfolio and its
operating performance and activities. (See Reporting Definitions for
definitions of owned and managed and AMBs share of.) While these
measures are helpful to the investor, they do not provide balance sheet
information as defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of these measures may not be
comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI (see definition for
NOI) less straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. The
Company considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful
supplemental performance measure because cash basis NOI reflects the
operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding the effects
of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis
rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI
should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance
since it does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest
expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that
could materially impact results from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI
may not be comparable to that of other real estate investment trusts, as
they may use different methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
Companys share of total debt. The Companys share of total debt is the pro
rata portion of the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest
in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt.
The Company believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful
supplemental measure, which enables both management and investors to
analyze its leverage and to compare its leverage to that of other
companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
debt to that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint
ventures. The Companys share of total debt is not intended to reflect
its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of such
loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Summary
for a reconciliation of total debt and the Companys share of total debt.
Estimated FFO by Business Line. Estimated FFO by Business Line is FFO (See
discussion of FFO) generated by the Companys Capital Partners,
development and real estate operations business lines. Estimated Capital
Partners and Development FFO was determined by reducing Capital Partner
Income and Development Profits, net of taxes by their respective estimated
share of general and administrative expenses. Capital Partners and
Developments estimated allocation of total general and administrative
expenses was based on their respective percentage of actual direct general
and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate Operations FFO
represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO attributable to Capital
Partners and Development. Management believes estimated FFO by business
line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance because
it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys respective business lines to other companies comparable
business lines. Further, AMBs computation of FFO by business line may not
be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment trusts as
they may use different methodologies in computing such measures.
21
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as interest
expense including amortization of finance costs and debt premiums from
continuing and discontinuing operations and amortization of financing costs
and debt premiums from continuing and discontinuing operations, the Companys
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized
interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. The
Company uses fixed charge coverage to measure its liquidity. The Company
believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it
permits fixed income investors to measure the Companys ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its preferred
unitholders and pay dividends to its preferred shareholders. The Companys
computation of fixed charge coverage may not be comparable to fixed charge
coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 28,896 | $ | 43,966 | $ | 96,394 | $ | 127,487 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(1,473 | ) | (1,612 | ) | (3,508 | ) | (6,085 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
| (91 | ) | (1,170 | ) | (932 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (5 | ) | |||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
6,033 | 2,146 | 14,350 | 6,601 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
15,227 | 11,383 | 45,595 | 29,934 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
1,431 | 3,791 | 6,610 | 12,816 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,440 | 11,856 | 9,631 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 54,066 | $ | 63,021 | $ | 170,125 | $ | 179,447 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations (FFO) and Funds From Operations Per Share and
Unit (FFOPS). The Company believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is
the most appropriate earnings measure. However, the Company considers funds
from operations, or FFO, and FFO per share and unit, or FFOPS, to be useful
supplemental measures of its operating performance. Currently and
historically, the Company calculates FFO as defined by NAREIT as net income,
calculated in accordance with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions
of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related
depreciation, and adjustments to derive the Companys pro rata share of FFO
of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. However, if the
circumstance arises, the Company intends to include in its calculation of FFO
gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated real estate held
for contribution to our joint ventures. Although such a change, if
instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition, the
Company believes such calculation of FFO will better reflect the value
created as a result of the contributions. The Company defines FFOPS as FFO
per fully diluted weighted average share of company common stock and
operating partnership unit. The Company does not adjust FFO to eliminate the
effects of non-recurring charges. The Company believes that FFO and FFOPS are
meaningful supplemental measures of its operating performance because
historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP
implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization
expenses. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen
with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have
considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that
use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, FFO and FFOPS are
supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate investment
trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization, among
other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. The Company believes that
the use of FFO and FFOPS, combined with the required GAAP presentations, has
been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real
estate investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of
operating results among such companies more meaningful. The Company considers
FFO and FFOPS to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial
performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of
previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate
depreciation and amortization, FFO and FFOPS can help the investing public
compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods
or as compared to other companies. While FFO and FFOPS are relevant and
widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment
trusts, these measures do not represent cash flow from operations or net
income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to
those measures in evaluating the Companys liquidity or operating
performance. FFO and FFOPS also do not consider the costs associated with
capital expenditures related to the Companys real estate assets nor are FFO
or FFOPS necessarily indicative of cash available to fund the Companys
future cash requirements. Further, the Companys computation of FFO or FFOPS
may not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate
investment trusts that do not define FFO or FFOPS in accordance with the
current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition
differently than the Company does. See Consolidated Statements of Funds from
Operations for a reconciliation of FFO from net income.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as interest expense including
amortization from continuing and discontinuing operations and the Companys
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt. The Company
uses interest coverage to measure its liquidity. The Company believes
interest coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits
fixed income investors to measure the Companys ability to meet its interest
payments on outstanding debt. The Companys computation of interest coverage
may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details total interest for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 28,896 | $ | 43,966 | $ | 96,394 | $ | 127,487 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
| (91 | ) | (1,170 | ) | (932 | ) | |||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
6,033 | 2,146 | 14,350 | 6,601 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 34,929 | $ | 46,021 | $ | 109,574 | $ | 133,156 | ||||||||
Net Asset Value (NAV). The Company believes NAV is a useful
supplemental measure of its operating performance because it enables both
management and investors to analyze the fair value of its business. An
assessment of the fair value of a business involves estimates and assumptions
and can be performed using various methods. The Company has presented certain
financial measures related to its business that it believes may be useful to
the investing public in calculating its NAV but has not presented any
specific methodology nor provided any guidance on assumptions or estimates
that should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). Net operating income is defined as rental
revenue (as calculated in accordance with GAAP), including reimbursements,
less property operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization,
general and administrative expenses and interest expense. The Company
considers NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance
measure because NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate
portfolio. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of
financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, capital
expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction
activities that could materially impact results from operations. Further, NOI
may not be comparable to that of other real estate investment trusts, as they
may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.
22
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes
that cash flow information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate
earnings information. However, AMB considers cash flow information reported on an owned and
managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, gross lease termination fees, net lease termination fees,
AMBs share of net lease termination fees, tenant improvements, lease
commissions and other lease costs, building improvements, JV partners
share of capital expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital
expenditures) to be useful supplemental measures to help the investors
better understand AMBs operating performance and cash flow. See Reporting
Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, AMBs share of and
JV partners share of. AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow
information helps management and investors make a comprehensive assessment
of the cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a
better understanding of AMBs operating performance and activities. While
owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is helpful to the
investor, it does not provide cash flow information as defined by GAAP and
are not true alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs
computation of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information may
not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Same Store Net Operating Income (SS NOI). The Company believes that net
income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, the Company considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure
of our operating performance. For properties that are considered part of
the same store pool, see Reporting Definitions. In deriving SS NOI, the
Company defines NOI as rental revenue (as calculated in accordance with
GAAP), including reimbursements, less property operating expenses, which
excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses
and interest expense. For a discussion of cash-basis NOI, see definition
of cash-basis NOI. The Company believes that SS NOI helps the investing
public compare the operating performance of a companys real estate as
compared to other companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used
measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does
not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP
and should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in
evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not
reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing
costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could
materially impact our results from operations. Further, the Companys
computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated SS NOI and NOI from net income
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars
in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 73,110 | $ | 33,387 | $ | 217,061 | $ | 136,317 | ||||||||
Private capital income |
(7,564 | ) | (7,490 | ) | (22,007 | ) | (17,539 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
40,865 | 46,914 | 122,433 | 133,514 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | 257 | 5,394 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
35,406 | 26,136 | 96,038 | 75,226 | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(29,839 | ) | 16,192 | (92,238 | ) | 37,411 | ||||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
10,049 | 16,938 | 37,953 | 45,855 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(6,315 | ) | (3,772 | ) | (11,600 | ) | (37,811 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
115,712 | 128,305 | 347,897 | 378,367 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(13,932 | ) | (30,631 | ) | (48,372 | ) | (89,011 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments (1)
|
(261 | ) | (2,384 | ) | (2,596 | ) | (8,445 | ) | ||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 101,519 | $ | 95,290 | $ | 296,929 | $ | 280,911 | ||||||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
23
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
JOINT VENTURE PARTNER INFORMATION
AMB-SGP Mexico is a co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with a
subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
AMB Japan Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2005 with
institutional investors. This fund is yen-denominated. U.S. dollar
amounts are converted at the September 30, 2007 exchange rate.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III is an open-ended co-investment
partnership formed in 2004 with institutional investors, which invest
through a private REIT. Prior to October 1, 2006, the Company accounted
for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III as a consolidated joint venture.
AMB Europe Fund I is an open-ended co-investment venture formed in 2007
with institutional investors. This fund is euro-denominated. U.S. dollar
amounts are converted at the September 30, 2007 exchange rate.
AMB DFS Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2006 with a
subsidiary of GE Real Estate to build and sell properties in non-target
markets.
AMB Erie is a co-investment partnership formed in 1998 with the Erie Insurance Group.
AMB Partners II is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with the
City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System.
AMB-SGP is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with a subsidiary
of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II is a co-investment partnership
with institutional investors, which invest through a private REIT.
AMB-AMS is a co-investment partnership with three Dutch pension funds
advised by Mn Services NV and Cordares.
24
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONTACTS
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Margan S. Mitchell
|
VP, Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9477 | mmitchell@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Director, Investor Relations | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Dallas | New Jersey | Shenzhen | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | Atlanta | Frankfurt | New York | Singapore | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | Baltimore | Los Angeles | Osaka | Tokyo | |||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | Beijing | Menlo Park | Paris | Vancouver | |||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001
|
Boston | Nagoya | Seoul | |||||||
| Chicago | Narita | Shanghai | ||||||||
25
Some of the information included in this supplemental analyst package and the conference call
to be held in connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to
development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and renovation projects (including stabilization
dates, square feet at stabilization or completion, sale or contribution dates, weighted average
estimated yields from such projects, costs and total investment amounts), acquisition capital,
build out potential of land inventory, co-investment joint venture investment capacity, terms of
the co-investment joint ventures, cost to buy out joint venture partners, lease expirations, future
debt summaries, and future business plans (such as property divestitures and financings), which are
made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because
these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements,
and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The
events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify
forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects,
may, will, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or
anticipates or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also
identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be
incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the
date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or
supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual
results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the
forward-looking statements: defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants, increased interest
rates and operating costs, our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, re-financing risks,
risks related to our obligations in the event of certain defaults under joint venture and other
debt, risks related to debt and equity security financings (including dilution risk), difficulties
in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully
integrate acquired properties and operations, our failure to divest properties we have contracted
to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any divestitures, risks and uncertainties affecting
property development and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability
to obtain necessary permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and
maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring,
failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings, environmental uncertainties, risks related
to natural disasters, financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions or in
the real estate sector, changes in real estate and zoning laws, a downturn in the U.S., California
or global economy, risks related to doing business internationally and global expansion, losses in
excess of our insurance coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired
properties or otherwise and increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon
economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation,
legislation, population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and
in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
26