UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission File Number:
001-13545
|
AMB Property
Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
94-3281941
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Pier 1, Bay 1,
San Francisco, California
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
94111
(Zip Code)
|
(415) 394-9000
(Registrants Telephone
Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large
accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer þ Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 3, 2007, there were 99,910,837 shares of
the Registrants common stock, $0.01 par value per
share, outstanding.
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
INDEX
PART I
Item 1. Financial
Statements
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
As of
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments in real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
1,274,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,351,123
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
3,757,804
|
|
|
|
4,038,474
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,375,056
|
|
|
|
1,186,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in properties
|
|
|
6,406,982
|
|
|
|
6,575,733
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
(854,227
|
)
|
|
|
(789,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in properties
|
|
|
5,552,755
|
|
|
|
5,786,040
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
|
|
349,534
|
|
|
|
274,381
|
|
Properties held for contribution,
net
|
|
|
245,632
|
|
|
|
154,036
|
|
Properties held for divestiture, net
|
|
|
45,146
|
|
|
|
20,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate
|
|
|
6,193,067
|
|
|
|
6,235,373
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
223,968
|
|
|
|
174,763
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
27,084
|
|
|
|
21,115
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,175 and $6,361,
respectively
|
|
|
166,449
|
|
|
|
133,998
|
|
Deferred financing costs, net
|
|
|
24,861
|
|
|
|
20,394
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
123,835
|
|
|
|
127,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,759,264
|
|
|
$
|
6,713,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt
|
|
$
|
1,340,702
|
|
|
$
|
1,395,354
|
|
Unsecured senior debt
|
|
|
1,057,498
|
|
|
|
1,101,874
|
|
Unsecured credit facilities
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
852,033
|
|
Other debt
|
|
|
85,110
|
|
|
|
88,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
3,045,494
|
|
|
|
3,437,415
|
|
Security deposits
|
|
|
38,994
|
|
|
|
36,106
|
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
55,891
|
|
|
|
48,967
|
|
Accounts payable and other
liabilities
|
|
|
184,036
|
|
|
|
186,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,324,415
|
|
|
|
3,709,295
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
(Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners
|
|
|
535,280
|
|
|
|
555,201
|
|
Preferred unitholders
|
|
|
77,563
|
|
|
|
180,298
|
|
Limited partnership unitholders
|
|
|
109,921
|
|
|
|
102,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests
|
|
|
722,764
|
|
|
|
837,560
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series L preferred stock,
cumulative, redeemable, $.01 par value,
2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,000,000 issued and
outstanding, $50,000 liquidation preference
|
|
|
48,017
|
|
|
|
48,017
|
|
Series M preferred stock,
cumulative, redeemable, $.01 par value,
2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,300,000 issued and
outstanding, $57,500 liquidation preference
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
|
|
55,187
|
|
Series O preferred stock,
cumulative, redeemable, $.01 par value,
3,000,000 shares authorized and 3,000,000 issued and
outstanding, $75,000 liquidation preference
|
|
|
72,127
|
|
|
|
72,127
|
|
Series P preferred stock,
cumulative, redeemable, $.01 par value,
2,000,000 shares authorized and 2,000,000 issued and
outstanding, $50,000 liquidation preference
|
|
|
48,081
|
|
|
|
48,086
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value,
500,000,000 shares authorized, 99,660,284 and 89,662,435
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,308,531
|
|
|
|
1,796,849
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
181,215
|
|
|
|
147,274
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,712,085
|
|
|
|
2,166,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,759,264
|
|
|
$
|
6,713,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
1
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
$
|
162,914
|
|
|
$
|
170,974
|
|
|
$
|
324,996
|
|
|
$
|
342,276
|
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
8,518
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
171,432
|
|
|
|
175,917
|
|
|
|
339,439
|
|
|
|
352,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(24,435
|
)
|
|
|
(23,765
|
)
|
|
|
(49,806
|
)
|
|
|
(48,065
|
)
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
(18,869
|
)
|
|
|
(19,824
|
)
|
|
|
(37,745
|
)
|
|
|
(39,667
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(41,483
|
)
|
|
|
(44,500
|
)
|
|
|
(82,504
|
)
|
|
|
(87,254
|
)
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,394
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
(5,394
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(30,260
|
)
|
|
|
(25,142
|
)
|
|
|
(60,114
|
)
|
|
|
(48,190
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
(2,051
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Fund costs
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
(116,463
|
)
|
|
|
(118,808
|
)
|
|
|
(232,995
|
)
|
|
|
(229,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME AND
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures, net
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests, net
|
|
|
74,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
45,698
|
|
|
|
41,188
|
|
|
|
46,372
|
|
Interest expense, including
amortization
|
|
|
(33,369
|
)
|
|
|
(44,310
|
)
|
|
|
(67,951
|
)
|
|
|
(83,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses, net
|
|
|
78,554
|
|
|
|
11,924
|
|
|
|
63,920
|
|
|
|
(21,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interests,
discontinued operations and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
133,523
|
|
|
|
69,033
|
|
|
|
170,364
|
|
|
|
101,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share of
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners share
of income before minority interests and discontinued operations
|
|
|
(8,067
|
)
|
|
|
(8,895
|
)
|
|
|
(15,260
|
)
|
|
|
(17,297
|
)
|
Joint venture partners and
limited partnership unitholders share of development
profits
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
(1,619
|
)
|
|
|
(3,136
|
)
|
|
|
(1,651
|
)
|
Preferred unitholders
|
|
|
(1,480
|
)
|
|
|
(4,024
|
)
|
|
|
(5,179
|
)
|
|
|
(9,025
|
)
|
Limited partnership unitholders
|
|
|
(4,001
|
)
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
(4,495
|
)
|
|
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests
share of income
|
|
|
(16,122
|
)
|
|
|
(14,879
|
)
|
|
|
(28,070
|
)
|
|
|
(29,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
117,401
|
|
|
|
54,154
|
|
|
|
142,294
|
|
|
|
72,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to discontinued
operations, net of minority interests
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
4,126
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
6,471
|
|
Gains from dispositions of real
estate, net of minority interests
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
17,073
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
24,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
21,199
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
30,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
118,269
|
|
|
|
75,353
|
|
|
|
143,951
|
|
|
|
102,737
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
118,269
|
|
|
|
75,353
|
|
|
|
143,951
|
|
|
|
102,930
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(3,952
|
)
|
|
|
(3,095
|
)
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
|
(6,191
|
)
|
Preferred unit redemption (issuance
costs) discount
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
111,390
|
|
|
$
|
72,335
|
|
|
$
|
133,120
|
|
|
$
|
95,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(after preferred stock dividends) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(after preferred stock dividends) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
98,937,407
|
|
|
|
87,317,494
|
|
|
|
95,631,984
|
|
|
|
86,915,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
101,361,013
|
|
|
|
90,135,659
|
|
|
|
98,305,299
|
|
|
|
90,147,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
2
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
223,417
|
|
|
|
89,662,435
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
1,796,849
|
|
|
$
|
147,274
|
|
|
$
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,166,657
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities and
derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,734
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,365,800
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
471,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,072
|
|
Stock-based compensation
amortization and issuance of restricted stock, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,305,433
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
21,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,920
|
|
Conversion of partnership units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,882
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,598
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,331
|
)
|
Reallocation of partnership interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,323
|
)
|
Offering costs
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
Dividends
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,083
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
223,412
|
|
|
|
99,660,284
|
|
|
$
|
995
|
|
|
$
|
2,308,531
|
|
|
$
|
181,215
|
|
|
$
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,712,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
3
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
143,951
|
|
|
$
|
102,930
|
|
Adjustments to net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles
|
|
|
(4,950
|
)
|
|
|
(11,300
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
82,504
|
|
|
|
87,254
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
5,394
|
|
Exchange losses
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
amortization
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
10,941
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
|
|
(10,366
|
)
|
Operating distributions received
from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
7,409
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests, net
|
|
|
(74,843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
(41,188
|
)
|
|
|
(46,372
|
)
|
Debt premiums, discounts and
finance cost amortization, net
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
5,247
|
|
Total minority interests
share of net income
|
|
|
28,070
|
|
|
|
29,041
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Joint venture partners share
of net income
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
Limited partnership
unitholders share of net income
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
Gains from dispositions of real
estate, net of minority interests
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
(24,087
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other assets
|
|
|
(29,194
|
)
|
|
|
13,635
|
|
Accounts payable and other
liabilities
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
(4,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
131,580
|
|
|
|
159,947
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash
|
|
|
(5,979
|
)
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
Cash paid for property acquisitions
|
|
|
(32,948
|
)
|
|
|
(311,507
|
)
|
Additions to land, buildings,
development costs, building improvements and lease costs
|
|
|
(537,709
|
)
|
|
|
(497,947
|
)
|
Net proceeds from divestiture of
real estate
|
|
|
402,614
|
|
|
|
149,559
|
|
Additions to interests in
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
(47,512
|
)
|
|
|
(5,121
|
)
|
Capital distributions received from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
13,633
|
|
Repayment of mortgage and loan
receivables
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
Cash transferred to unconsolidated
joint venture
|
|
|
(32,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(252,192
|
)
|
|
|
(643,225
|
)
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net
|
|
|
472,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
21,920
|
|
|
|
33,400
|
|
Borrowings on secured debt
|
|
|
509,033
|
|
|
|
196,149
|
|
Payments on secured debt
|
|
|
(237,541
|
)
|
|
|
(208,377
|
)
|
Borrowings on other debt
|
|
|
15,956
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
Payments on other debt
|
|
|
(19,347
|
)
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
Borrowings on unsecured credit
facilities
|
|
|
709,176
|
|
|
|
646,509
|
|
Payments on unsecured credit
facilities
|
|
|
(986,558
|
)
|
|
|
(252,828
|
)
|
Payment of financing fees
|
|
|
(10,956
|
)
|
|
|
(5,736
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuances of
senior debt
|
|
|
24,889
|
|
|
|
99,456
|
|
Payments on senior debt
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
Issuance costs on preferred stock
or units
|
|
|
(562
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Repurchase of preferred units
|
|
|
(102,735
|
)
|
|
|
(88,180
|
)
|
Contributions from co-investment
partners
|
|
|
30,335
|
|
|
|
124,185
|
|
Dividends paid to common and
preferred stockholders
|
|
|
(100,237
|
)
|
|
|
(86,536
|
)
|
Distributions to minority
interests, including preferred units
|
|
|
(78,182
|
)
|
|
|
(52,810
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
177,263
|
|
|
|
444,269
|
|
Net effect of exchange rate changes
on cash
|
|
|
(7,446
|
)
|
|
|
8,473
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
49,205
|
|
|
|
(30,536
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
174,763
|
|
|
|
232,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
223,968
|
|
|
$
|
202,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH
FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest, net of
capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
64,900
|
|
|
$
|
77,244
|
|
Non-cash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of properties
|
|
$
|
35,050
|
|
|
$
|
399,625
|
|
Assumption of secured debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,006
|
)
|
Assumption of other assets and
liabilities
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(19,096
|
)
|
Acquisition capital
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
|
(8,016
|
)
|
Minority interest contribution,
including units issues
|
|
|
(1,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid for property
acquisitions
|
|
$
|
32,948
|
|
|
$
|
311,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred unit redemption issuance
costs
|
|
$
|
2,927
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
Contribution of properties to
unconsolidated joint ventures, net
|
|
$
|
60,027
|
|
|
$
|
126,067
|
|
Purchase of equity interest of
unconsolidated joint venture, net
|
|
$
|
26,031
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
4
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
June 30, 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Formation of the Company
|
AMB Property Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the
Company), commenced operations as a fully integrated
real estate company effective with the completion of its initial
public offering on November 26, 1997. The Company elected
to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under
Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986 as amended (the Code), commencing with its
taxable year ended December 31, 1997, and believes its
current organization and method of operation will enable it to
maintain its status as a REIT. The Company, through its
controlling interest in its subsidiary, AMB Property, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (the Operating
Partnership), is engaged in the acquisition, development
and operation of industrial properties in key distribution
markets throughout North America, Europe and Asia. The Company
uses the terms industrial properties or
industrial buildings to describe various types of
industrial properties in its portfolio and uses these terms
interchangeably with the following: logistics facilities,
centers or warehouses; distribution facilities, centers or
warehouses; High Throughput
Distribution®
(HTD®)
facilities; or any combination of these terms. The Company uses
the term owned and managed to describe assets in
which it has at least a 10% ownership interest, for which it is
the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for
the long-term. Unless the context otherwise requires, the
Company means AMB Property Corporation, the
Operating Partnership and their other controlled subsidiaries.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company owned an approximate 95.8%
general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership,
excluding preferred units. The remaining approximate 4.2% common
limited partnership interests are owned by non-affiliated
investors and certain current and former directors and officers
of the Company. As the sole general partner of the Operating
Partnership, the Company has full, exclusive and complete
responsibility and discretion in the day-to-day management and
control of the Operating Partnership. Net operating results of
the Operating Partnership are allocated after preferred unit
distributions based on the respective partners ownership
interests. Certain properties are owned by the Company through
limited partnerships, limited liability companies and other
entities. The ownership of such properties through such entities
does not materially affect the Companys overall ownership
interests in the properties.
Through the Operating Partnership, the Company enters into
co-investment joint ventures with institutional investors. These
co-investment joint ventures provide the Company with an
additional source of capital and income. As of June 30,
2007, the Company had investments in five consolidated and five
unconsolidated co-investment joint ventures. Effective
October 1, 2006, the Company deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, on a prospective basis, due to the re-evaluation of
the Companys accounting for its investment in the fund in
light of changes to the partnership agreement regarding the
general partners rights effective October 1, 2006.
AMB Capital Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(AMB Capital Partners), provides real estate
investment services to clients on a fee basis. Headlands Realty
Corporation, a Maryland corporation, conducts a variety of
businesses that include development projects available for sale
or contribution to third parties and incremental income
programs. IMD Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation,
conducts a variety of businesses that also includes development
projects available for sale or contribution to third parties.
AMB Capital Partners, Headlands Realty Corporation and IMD
Holding Corporation are direct subsidiaries of the Operating
Partnership.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company owned or had investments
in, on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint
ventures, properties and development projects expected to total
approximately 136.7 million square feet (12.7 million
square meters) in 1,152 buildings in 44 markets within thirteen
countries. Additionally, as of June 30, 2007, the Company
managed, but did not have a significant ownership interest in,
industrial and other properties, totaling approximately
1.5 million square feet.
5
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Of the approximately 136.7 million square feet as of
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
on an owned and managed basis, which includes investments held
on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint
ventures, the Company owned or partially owned approximately
111.3 million square feet (principally warehouse
distribution buildings) that were 96.1% leased;
|
|
|
|
on an owned and managed basis, which includes investments held
on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint
ventures, the Company had investments in 46 industrial
development projects, which are expected to total approximately
15.7 million square feet upon completion;
|
|
|
|
on a consolidated basis, the Company owned nine development
projects, totaling approximately 2.2 million square feet,
which are available for sale or contribution;
|
|
|
|
through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, the Company
had investments in 46 industrial operating properties, totaling
approximately 7.3 million square feet; and
|
|
|
|
the Company held approximately 0.2 million square feet
through its investment in AMB Pier One, LLC. which is the
location of the Companys global headquarters.
|
|
|
2.
|
Interim
Financial Statements
|
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally
included in the annual financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments of a
normal, recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of
the Companys consolidated financial position and results
of operations for the interim periods. The interim results for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of future results. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and its Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Investments in Real Estate. Investments in
real estate and leasehold interests are stated at cost unless
circumstances indicate that cost cannot be recovered, in which
case, the carrying value of the property is reduced to its
estimated fair value. The Company also regularly reviews the
impact of above or below-market leases, in-place leases and
lease origination costs for acquisitions, and records an
intangible asset or liability accordingly. Carrying values for
financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a
property-by-property
basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable.
Impairment is recognized when estimated expected future cash
flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) are less than
the carrying value of the property. The estimation of expected
future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on
assumptions regarding current and future economics and market
conditions and the availability of capital. If impairment
analysis assumptions change, then an adjustment to the carrying
value of the Companys long-lived assets could occur in the
future period in which the assumptions change. To the extent
that a property is impaired, the excess of the carrying amount
of the property over its estimated fair value is charged to
earnings. As a result of leasing activity and the economic
environment, the Company re-evaluated the carrying value of its
investments and recorded an impairment charge on one of its
investments of $0.3 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2007.
6
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Reclassifications. Certain items in the
consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been
reclassified to conform to current classifications.
Comprehensive Income. The Company reports
comprehensive income in its Statement of Stockholders
Equity. Comprehensive income was $114.7 million and
$77.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. Comprehensive income was
$140.7 million and $104.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
International Operations. The U.S. dollar
is the functional currency for the Companys subsidiaries
operating in the United States and Mexico. Other than Mexico,
the functional currency for the Companys subsidiaries
operating outside the United States is generally the local
currency of the country in which the entity is located,
mitigating the effect of currency exchange gains and losses. The
Companys subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar translate their financial statements into
U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities are translated at the
exchange rate in effect as of the financial statement date. The
Company translates income statement accounts using the average
exchange rate for the period and significant nonrecurring
transactions using the rate on the transaction date. These gains
(losses) are included in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) as a separate component of stockholders equity.
The Companys international subsidiaries may have
transactions denominated in currencies other than their
functional currency. In these instances, non-monetary assets and
liabilities are reflected at the historical exchange rate,
monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at the exchange
rate in effect at the end of the period and income statement
accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate for the
period. These gains (losses) are included in the Companys
results of operations.
The Company also records gains or losses in the income statement
when a transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency
other than the entitys functional currency, is settled and
the functional currency cash flows realized are more or less
than expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the
transaction was initiated.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets. The Company
has classified as goodwill the cost in excess of fair value of
the net assets of companies acquired in purchase transactions.
As prescribed in the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) goodwill and certain indefinite lived intangible assets,
including excess reorganization value and certain trademarks,
are no longer amortized, but are subject to at least annual
impairment testing. The Company tests annually (or more often,
if necessary) for impairment under SFAS No. 142. The
Company determined that there was no impairment to goodwill and
intangible assets during the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In July 2006,
the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, (FIN 48), which clarifies
the accounting and disclosure for uncertainty in tax positions.
FIN 48 seeks to reduce the diversity in practice associated
with certain aspects of the recognition and measurement related
to accounting for income taxes. Adoption of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007 did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial statements.
The tax years 2002 through 2006 remain open to examination by
the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
|
|
3.
|
Real
Estate Acquisition and Development Activity
|
Acquisition Activity. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, on an owned and managed basis, the
Company acquired 23 industrial properties, aggregating
approximately 5.4 million square feet for a total expected
investment of $494.6 million (includes acquisition costs of
$487.6 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$7.0 million). Of the 23 industrial properties acquired,
three industrial properties aggregating approximately
0.2 million square feet for a total expected investment of
$16.6 million (includes acquisition costs of
$16.0 million
7
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and estimated acquisition capital of $0.6 million) were
acquired directly by the Company and 20 industrial properties
aggregating approximately 5.2 million square feet for a
total expected investment of $478.0 million (includes
acquisition costs of $471.6 million and estimated
acquisition capital of $6.4 million) were acquired through
four of its unconsolidated joint ventures. During the six months
ended June 30, 2007, on an owned and managed basis, the
Company acquired 31 industrial properties aggregating
approximately 7.2 million square feet for a total expected
investment of $636.4 million (includes acquisition costs of
$624.6 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$11.8 million). During the three months ended June 30,
2006, the Company acquired eight industrial properties,
aggregating approximately 2.5 million square feet for a
total expected investment of $246.8 million (includes
acquisition costs of $241.8 million and estimated
acquisition capital of $5.0 million). During the six months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company acquired 14 industrial
properties, aggregating approximately 4.6 million square
feet for a total expected investment of $400.1 million
(includes acquisition costs of $392.0 million and estimated
acquisition capital of $8.1 million).
Development Starts. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company initiated nine new
industrial development projects in North America and Asia and
one value-added conversion project in North America with a
total expected investment of $265.1 million, aggregating
approximately 3.2 million square feet. During the six
months ended June 30, 2007, the Company initiated 14 new
industrial development projects in North America and Asia
and one value-added conversion project in North America with a
total expected investment of $455.8 million, aggregating
approximately 5.1 million square feet. During the three
months ended June 30, 2006, the Company initiated four new
industrial development projects in North America and Asia with a
total estimated investment of $134.6 million, aggregating
an estimated 2.0 million square feet. During the six months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company initiated 11 new
industrial development projects in North America and Asia with a
total expected investment of $353.4 million, aggregating
approximately 4.9 million square feet.
Development Completions. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007, the Company completed nine
industrial projects with a total investment of
$225.9 million, aggregating approximately 2.2 million
square feet. One of these completed projects with a total
investment of $23.4 million and approximately
0.4 million square feet was contributed to an
unconsolidated joint venture, two projects with a total
investment of $12.4 million and aggregating approximately
0.2 million square feet were sold to third parties, and six
projects with a total investment of $190.1 million and
aggregating approximately 1.6 million square feet were
available for sale or contribution as of June 30, 2007.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
completed 16 industrial projects with a total investment of
$293.7 million, aggregating approximately 3.1 million
square feet. One of these completed projects with a total
investment of $10.7 million and approximately
0.2 million square feet was placed in operations, three
projects with a total investment of $42.2 million and
approximately 0.7 million square feet were contributed to
unconsolidated joint ventures, five projects with a total
investment of $35.9 million and aggregating approximately
0.3 million square feet were sold to third parties, and
seven projects with a total investment of $204.9 million
and aggregating approximately 1.9 million square feet were
available for sale or contribution as of June 30, 2007.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company
completed four industrial buildings with a total investment of
$55.0 million, aggregating approximately 0.5 million
square feet. Three of these completed buildings with a total
investment of $52.5 million and aggregating approximately
0.5 million square feet were placed in operations, and one
approximately 32,000 square foot building with a total
investment of $2.5 million was sold to a third party.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company
completed 11 industrial buildings with a total investment of
$347.3 million, aggregating 2.6 million square feet.
Five of these completed buildings with a total investment of
$77.5 million and aggregating approximately
0.8 million square feet were placed in operations, one
0.8 million square foot building with a total investment of
$177.9 million was contributed to an unconsolidated joint
venture, one approximately 32,000 square foot building with
a total investment of $2.5 million was sold to a third
party, and four buildings with a total investment of
$89.4 million and aggregating approximately
1.0 million square feet were available for sale or
contribution as of June 30, 2006.
Development Pipeline. As of June 30,
2007, the Company had 46 industrial projects in its development
pipeline, which are expected to total approximately
15.7 million square feet and have an aggregate estimated
8
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
investment of $1.5 billion upon completion. The Company has
an additional nine development projects available for sale or
contribution totaling approximately 2.2 million square
feet, with an aggregate estimated investment of
$227.1 million. As of June 30, 2007, the Company and
its joint venture partners had funded an aggregate of
$972.0 million and needed to fund an estimated additional
$490.0 million in order to complete its development
pipeline. The development pipeline, at June 30, 2007,
included projects expected to be completed through the second
quarter of 2009. In addition, during the three months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company acquired 515 acres of land
for industrial warehouse development in North America and Asia
for approximately $72.4 million. During the six months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company acquired 937 acres of
land for industrial warehouse development in North America and
Asia for approximately $113.2 million.
|
|
4.
|
Gains
from Dispositions of Real Estate Interests, Development Profits
and Discontinued Operations
|
Development Sales. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company sold three development
projects totaling approximately 0.2 million square feet for
an aggregate sale price of $20.9 million, resulting in an
after-tax gain of $3.0 million. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company sold five development projects
totaling approximately 0.3 million square feet for an
aggregate sale price of $45.6 million, resulting in an
after-tax gain of $6.3 million. During the three months
ended June 30, 2006, the Company sold an approximately
32,000 square foot development project for
$2.9 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of
$0.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2006,
the Company sold one land parcel and an approximately
32,000 square foot development project for an aggregate
sale price of $7.6 million, resulting in an after-tax gain
of $0.8 million. During the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company received approximately
$0.4 million in connection with the condemnation of a
parcel of land resulting in a loss of $1.0 million,
$0.8 million of which was the joint venture partners
share.
Discontinued Operations. The Company reports
its property divestitures as discontinued operations separately
as prescribed under the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets. During the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, the Company did not divest itself of any industrial
properties. During the three months ended June 30, 2006,
the Company divested itself of eight industrial buildings,
aggregating approximately 0.5 million square feet, for an
aggregate price of $37.1 million, with a resulting net gain
of $17.1 million. During the six months ended June 30,
2006, the Company divested itself of 12 industrial
buildings, aggregating approximately 0.9 million square
feet, for an aggregate price of $53.9 million, with a
resulting net gain of $24.1 million.
Development Contributions. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007, the Company contributed three
completed development projects aggregating 0.7 million
square feet and three completed development projects aggregating
0.5 million square feet to AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. and newly formed AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, respectively, both unconsolidated joint ventures. As a
result of these contributions, the Company recognized an
aggregate after-tax gain of $26.0 million, representing the
portion of the Companys interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
contributed four completed development projects aggregating
1.0 million square feet, three completed development
projects aggregating 0.5 million square feet and one
0.2 million square foot completed development project into
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS, and AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, respectively, all
unconsolidated joint ventures. In addition, two land parcels
were contributed into AMB DFS Fund I, LLC. As a result of
these contributions, the Company recognized an aggregate
after-tax gain of $34.9 million, representing the portion
of the Companys interest in the contributed properties
acquired by the third-party investors for cash. During the three
months ended June 30, 2006, the Company contributed one
completed development project totaling approximately
0.8 million square feet into AMB Japan Fund I, L.P.,
and one completed development project totaling approximately
0.6 million square feet into AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, both
unconsolidated joint ventures. As a result of these
contributions, the Company recognized an aggregate after-tax
gain of $46.6 million representing the portion of its
interest in the contributed properties acquired by the
third-party co-investors for cash. No other contributions were
made during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
9
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Gains from Sale or Contribution of Real Estate
Interests. During the three months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company contributed approximately
4.2 million square feet in operating properties, to its
newly formed unconsolidated co-investment joint venture, AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, a Euro-denominated open-ended
co-investment
joint venture, and contributed an approximate 0.2 million
square foot operating property into AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. for a total of approximately
$520.3 million. The Company recognized a gain of
$74.7 million on the contributions, representing the
portion of the Companys interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
contributed operating properties for approximately
$524.9 million, aggregating approximately 4.5 million
square feet, into AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. and AMB-SGP Mexico,
LLC. The Company recognized a gain of $74.8 million on the
contributions, representing the portion of the Companys
interest in the contributed properties acquired by the
third-party investors for cash. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2006, there were no comparable events.
Properties Held for Contribution. As of
June 30, 2007, the Company held for contribution to
co-investment joint ventures 12 industrial projects with an
aggregate net book value of $245.6 million, which, when
contributed to a joint venture, will reduce the Companys
average ownership interest in these projects from approximately
93% currently to an expected range of
15-20%.
Properties Held for Divestiture. As of
June 30, 2007, the Company held for divestiture five
industrial projects with an aggregate net book value of
$45.1 million. These properties either are not in the
Companys core markets, do not meet its current investment
objectives, or are included as part of its development-for-sale
program. The divestitures of the properties are subject to
negotiation of acceptable terms and other customary conditions.
Properties held for divestiture are stated at the lower of cost
or estimated fair value less costs to sell.
The following summarizes the condensed results of operations of
the properties held for divestiture and sold under
SFAS No. 144 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
$
|
(178
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,183
|
|
|
$
|
(241
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,232
|
|
Straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
Property operating expenses
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(739
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(2,195
|
)
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Other income and expenses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Interest, including amortization
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
Joint venture partners share
of (income) loss
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(139
|
)
|
Limited partnership
unitholders share of income
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to
discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
4,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
$
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, assets and
liabilities attributable to properties held for divestiture
under the provisions of SFAS No. 144 consisted of the
following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
Accounts payable and other
liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
10
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, debt
consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Wholly-owned secured debt, varying
interest rates from 1.1% to 9.0%, due December 2007 to January
2012 (weighted average interest rate of 6.0% and 5.6% at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)
|
|
$
|
220,968
|
|
|
$
|
368,332
|
|
Consolidated joint venture secured
debt, varying interest rates from 3.5% to 9.4%, due September
2007 to February 2024 (weighted average interest rates of 6.2%
and 6.5% at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively)
|
|
|
1,114,797
|
|
|
|
1,020,678
|
|
Unsecured senior debt securities,
varying interest rates from 3.5% to 8.0%, due August 2007 to
June 2018 (weighted average interest rates of 6.2% and 6.2% at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively and
of unamortized discounts of $10.0 million and
$10.6 million, respectively)
|
|
|
1,067,491
|
|
|
|
1,112,491
|
|
Other debt, varying interest rates
from 3.4% to 7.5%, due August 2007 to November 2015 (weighted
average interest rates of 6.4% and 6.6% at June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively)
|
|
|
85,110
|
|
|
|
88,154
|
|
Unsecured credit facilities,
variable interest rates, due February 2010 and June 2010
(weighted average interest rates of 2.1% and 3.1% at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
852,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt before unamortized net
(discounts)
|
|
|
3,050,550
|
|
|
|
3,441,688
|
|
Unamortized net discounts
|
|
|
(5,056
|
)
|
|
|
(4,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt
|
|
$
|
3,045,494
|
|
|
$
|
3,437,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt generally requires monthly principal and interest
payments. Some of the loans are cross-collateralized by multiple
properties. The secured debt is collateralized by deeds of trust
or mortgages on certain properties and is generally
non-recourse. As of June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, the total gross investment book value of those properties
securing the debt was $2.3 billion and $2.6 billion,
respectively, including $1.9 billion and $1.9 billion,
respectively, in consolidated joint ventures. As of
June 30, 2007, $1.1 billion of the secured debt
obligations bore interest at fixed rates with a weighted average
interest rate of 6.3% while the remaining $228.7 million
bore interest at variable rates (with a weighted average
interest rate of 5.3%).
On December 8, 2006, the Operating Partnership executed a
228.0 million Euros facility agreement (approximately
$308.5 million in U.S. dollars, using the exchange
rate at June 30, 2007), which provides that certain of the
Companys affiliates may borrow either acquisition loans,
up to a 100.0 million Euros sub-limit (approximately
$135.4 million in U.S. dollars, using the exchange
rate at June 30, 2007), or secured term loans, in
connection with properties located in France, Germany, the
Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Italy or Spain. On
March 21, 2007, the Operating Partnership increased the
facility amount limit from 228.0 million Euros to
328.0 million Euros (approximately $436.3 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007). Drawings under the term facility bear interest at a rate
of 65 basis points over EURIBOR and may occur until, and
mature on, April 30, 2014. Drawings under the acquisition
loan facility bear interest at a rate of 75 basis points
over EURIBOR and are repayable within six months of the date of
advance, unless extended. The Operating Partnership initially
guaranteed the acquisition loan facility and was the carve-out
indemnitor in respect of the term loans. According to the
facility agreement, these responsibilities will be transferred
upon the occurrence of certain events, and the Operating
Partnership will be fully discharged from all such obligations
upon such transfer. On June 12, 2007, AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS, assumed, and the Operating Partnership was
released from, all of the
11
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Operating Partnerships obligations and liabilities under
the facility agreement. On June 12, 2007, there were
200.7 million Euros (approximately $271.8 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007) of term loans and no acquisition loans outstanding
under the facility agreement.
As of June 30, 2007, the Operating Partnership had
outstanding an aggregate of $1.1 billion in unsecured
senior debt securities, which bore a weighted average interest
rate of 6.2% and had an average term of 4.5 years. These
unsecured senior debt securities include $300.0 million in
notes issued in June 1998, $205.0 million of medium-term
notes, which were issued under the Operating Partnerships
2000 medium-term note program, $275.0 million of
medium-term notes, which were issued under the Operating
Partnerships 2002 medium-term note program,
$175.0 million of medium-term notes, which were issued
under the Operating Partnerships 2006 medium-term note
program and approximately $112.5 million of
5.094% Notes Due 2015, which were issued to Teachers
Insurance and Annuity Association of America on July 11,
2005 in a private placement, in exchange for the cancelled
$100.0 million of notes that were issued in June 1998,
resulting in a discount of approximately $12.5 million. The
unsecured senior debt securities are subject to various
covenants. The Company guarantees the Operating
Partnerships obligations with respect to its unsecured
senior debt securities. Management believes that the Company and
the Operating Partnership were in compliance with their
financial covenants as of June 30, 2007.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had $85.1 million
outstanding in other debt which bore a weighted average interest
rate of 6.4% and had an average term of 5.0 years. Other
debt includes a $65.0 million non-recourse credit facility
obtained by AMB Partners II, L.P., a subsidiary of the Operating
Partnership, which had a $65.0 million balance outstanding
as of June 30, 2007. The Company also had
$20.1 million outstanding in other non-recourse debt.
The Operating Partnership has a $550.0 million (includes
Euros, Yen, British Pounds Sterling or U.S. dollar
denominated borrowings) unsecured revolving credit facility
which matures on June 1, 2010. The Company is a guarantor
of the Operating Partnerships obligations under the credit
facility. The line carries a one-year extension option and can
be increased to up to $700.0 million upon certain
conditions. The rate on the borrowings is generally LIBOR plus a
margin, based on the Operating Partnerships long-term debt
rating, which was 42.5 basis points as of June 30,
2007, with an annual facility fee of 15 basis points. The
four-year credit facility includes a multi-currency component,
under which up to $550.0 million can be drawn in
U.S. dollars, Euros, Yen or British Pounds Sterling. The
Operating Partnership uses the credit facility principally for
acquisitions, funding development activity and general working
capital requirements. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding
balance on this credit facility, using the exchange rate in
effect on June 30, 2007, was $43.4 million and the
remaining amount available was $489.3 million, net of
outstanding letters of credit of $17.3 million. The credit
agreement contains affirmative covenants, including compliance
with financial reporting requirements and maintenance of
specified financial ratios, and negative covenants, including
limitations on the incurrence of liens and limitations on
mergers or consolidations. Management believes that the Company
and the Operating Partnership were in compliance with their
financial covenants under this credit agreement at June 30,
2007.
AMB Japan Finance Y.K., a subsidiary of the Operating
Partnership, has a Yen-denominated unsecured revolving credit
facility with an initial borrowing limit of 45.0 billion
Yen, which, using the exchange rate in effect on June 30,
2007, equaled approximately $365.3 million
U.S. dollars. On June 15, 2007, AMB Japan Finance Y.K.
exercised an existing accordion feature to increase this
unsecured revolving credit facility to 55.0 billion Yen,
which using the exchange rate in effect on June 30, 2007,
equaled approximately $446.5 million U.S. dollars. The
Company, along with the Operating Partnership, guarantees the
obligations of AMB Japan Finance Y.K. under the credit facility,
as well as the obligations of any other entity in which the
Operating Partnership directly or indirectly owns an ownership
interest and which is selected from time to time to be a
borrower under and pursuant to the credit agreement. The
borrowers intend to use the proceeds from the facility to fund
the acquisition and development of properties and for other real
estate purposes in Japan, China and South Korea. Generally,
borrowers under the credit facility have the option to secure
all or a portion of the borrowings under the credit facility
with certain real estate
12
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assets or equity in entities holding such real estate assets.
The credit facility matures in June 2010 and has a one-year
extension option. The extension option is subject to the
satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of an
extension fee equal to 0.15% of the outstanding commitments
under the facility at that time. The rate on the borrowings is
generally TIBOR plus a margin, which is based on the credit
rating of the Operating Partnerships long-term debt and
was 42.5 basis points as of June 30, 2007. In
addition, there is an annual facility fee, payable in quarterly
amounts, which is based on the credit rating of the Operating
Partnerships long-term debt, and was 15 basis points
of the outstanding commitments under the facility as of
June 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding
balance on this credit facility, using the exchange rate in
effect on June 30, 2007, was $360.4 million in
U.S. dollars. The credit agreement contains affirmative
covenants, including financial reporting requirements and
maintenance of specified financial ratios, and negative
covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of liens and
limitations on mergers or consolidations. Management believes
that the Company, the Operating Partnership and AMB Japan
Finance Y.K. were in compliance with their financial covenants
under this credit agreement at June 30, 2007.
The Operating Partnership also has a $250.0 million
unsecured revolving credit facility. The Company along with the
Operating Partnership guarantee the obligations for such
subsidiaries and other entities controlled by the Operating
Partnership that are selected by the Operating Partnership from
time to time to be borrowers under and pursuant to their credit
facility. The credit facility includes a multi-currency
component under which up to $250.0 million can be drawn in
U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, Singapore dollars,
Canadian dollars and Euros. The line, which matures in February
2010 and carries a one-year extension option, can be increased
to up to $350.0 million upon certain conditions and the
payment of an extension fee equal to 0.15% of the outstanding
commitments. The rate on the borrowings is generally LIBOR plus
a margin, based on the credit rating of the Operating
Partnerships senior unsecured long-term debt, which was
60 basis points as of June 30, 2007, with an annual
facility fee based on the credit rating of the Operating
Partnerships senior unsecured long-term debt. The
borrowers intend to use the proceeds from the facility to fund
the acquisition and development of properties and general
working capital requirements. As of June 30, 2007, the
outstanding balance on this credit facility was approximately
$158.3 million. The credit agreement contains affirmative
covenants, including financial reporting requirements and
maintenance of specified financial ratios by the Operating
Partnership, and negative covenants, including limitations on
the incurrence of liens and limitations on mergers or
consolidations. Management believes that the Company and the
Operating Partnership were in compliance with their financial
covenants under this credit agreement at June 30, 2007.
On February 14, 2007, seven subsidiaries of AMB-SGP, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership, which is a subsidiary of the
Company, entered into a loan agreement for a $305 million
secured financing. On the same day, pursuant to the loan
agreement, the same seven subsidiaries delivered four promissory
notes to the two lenders, each of which matures on March 5,
2012. One note has a principal of $160 million and an
interest rate that is fixed at 5.29%. The second note has an
initial principal borrowing of $40 million with a variable
interest rate of 81 basis points above the one-month LIBOR
rate. The third note has an initial principal borrowing of
$84 million and a fixed interest rate of 5.90%. The fourth
note has an initial principal borrowing of $21 million and
bears interest at a variable rate of 135 basis points above
the one-month LIBOR rate.
13
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of June 30, 2007, the scheduled maturities of the
Companys total debt, excluding unamortized secured debt
premiums and discounts, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-owned
|
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
Senior Debt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
57,917
|
|
|
$
|
29,640
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,179
|
|
|
$
|
155,736
|
|
2008
|
|
|
69,188
|
|
|
|
79,398
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
324,396
|
|
2009
|
|
|
25,799
|
|
|
|
127,993
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
254,665
|
|
2010
|
|
|
65,905
|
|
|
|
95,179
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
974,209
|
|
2011
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
189,611
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
265,740
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
449,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
452,724
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,447
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,920
|
|
|
|
287,367
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,780
|
|
|
|
112,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
131,935
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,995
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,091
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub Total
|
|
|
220,968
|
|
|
|
1,114,797
|
|
|
|
1,067,491
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
85,110
|
|
|
|
3,050,550
|
|
Unamortized net discounts
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
(9,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt
|
|
$
|
222,193
|
|
|
$
|
1,118,509
|
|
|
$
|
1,057,498
|
|
|
$
|
562,184
|
|
|
$
|
85,110
|
|
|
$
|
3,045,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in the Company represent the limited
partnership interests in the Operating Partnership, limited
partnership interests in AMB Property II, L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, and interests held by certain third parties
in several real estate joint ventures, aggregating approximately
35.6 million square feet, which are consolidated for
financial reporting purposes. Such investments are consolidated
because the Company exercises significant rights over major
operating decisions such as approval of budgets, selection of
property managers, asset management, investment activity and
changes in financing. These joint venture investments do not
meet the variable interest entity criteria under FASB
Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities.
Effective October 1, 2006, the Company deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, on a prospective basis, due to the
re-evaluation
of the Companys accounting for its investment in the fund
in light of changes to the partnership agreement regarding the
general partners rights effective October 1, 2006.
Through the Operating Partnership, the Company enters into
co-investment joint ventures with institutional investors. The
Companys co-investment joint ventures are engaged in the
acquisition, ownership, operation, management and, in some
cases, the renovation, expansion and development of industrial
buildings in target markets in North America.
14
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys consolidated co-investment joint
ventures total investment and property debt at
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in
thousands) were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
in Real Estate(1)
|
|
|
Property Debt(2)
|
|
|
Other Debt
|
|
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Co-investment Joint Venture
|
|
Partner
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
AMB/Erie, L.P.
|
|
Erie Insurance Company and
affiliates
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,654
|
|
|
$
|
52,942
|
|
|
$
|
20,318
|
|
|
$
|
20,605
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
AMB Partners II, L.P.
|
|
City and County of
San Francisco Employees Retirement System
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
687,323
|
|
|
|
679,138
|
|
|
|
320,662
|
|
|
|
323,532
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
AMB-SGP, L.P.
|
|
Industrial JV Pte Ltd(3)
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
448,399
|
|
|
|
444,990
|
|
|
|
348,928
|
|
|
|
235,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund II, L.P.
|
|
AMB Institutional Alliance REIT II,
Inc.(4)
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
523,766
|
|
|
|
519,534
|
|
|
|
240,812
|
|
|
|
243,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB-AMS,
L.P.(5)
|
|
PMT, SPW and TNO(6)
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
155,235
|
|
|
|
153,563
|
|
|
|
84,118
|
|
|
|
78,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,867,377
|
|
|
$
|
1,850,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,014,838
|
|
|
$
|
901,784
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
$
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company also had other consolidated joint ventures with
total investments in real estate of $606.0 million as of
June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company also had other consolidated joint ventures with
property debt of $103.7 million as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
A subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte. Ltd., the real estate
investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment
Corporation. |
|
(4) |
|
Comprised of 14 institutional investors as stockholders and one
third-party limited partner as of June 30, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
AMB-AMS,
L.P. is a co-investment partnership with three Dutch pension
funds. |
|
(6) |
|
PMT is Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek, SPW is
Stichting Pensioenfonds voor de Woningcorporaties and TNO is
Stichting Pensioenfonds TNO. |
The following table details the minority interests as of
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Redemption/Callable
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Joint Venture Partners
|
|
$
|
535,280
|
|
|
$
|
555,201
|
|
|
N/A
|
Limited Partners in the Operating
Partnership
|
|
|
78,491
|
|
|
|
74,780
|
|
|
N/A
|
Series J preferred units
(liquidation preference of $40,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,883
|
|
|
Redeemed in April 2007
|
Series K preferred units
(liquidation preference of $40,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,932
|
|
|
Redeemed in April 2007
|
Held through AMB Property II, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Limited Partners
|
|
|
31,430
|
|
|
|
27,281
|
|
|
N/A
|
Series D preferred units
(liquidation preference of $79,767)
|
|
|
77,563
|
|
|
|
77,684
|
|
|
February 2012
|
Series I preferred units
(liquidation preference of $25,500)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,799
|
|
|
Repurchased in April 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests
|
|
$
|
722,764
|
|
|
$
|
837,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table distinguishes the minority interests
share of income, including minority interests share of
development profits, but excluding minority interests
share of discontinued operations for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Joint Venture Partners share
of income
|
|
$
|
8,067
|
|
|
$
|
8,895
|
|
|
$
|
15,260
|
|
|
$
|
17,297
|
|
Joint Venture Partners share
of development profits
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
Common limited partners in the
Operating Partnership
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
Series J preferred units
(redeemed in April 2007)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
Series K preferred units
(redeemed in April 2007)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
Held through AMB Property II, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common limited
partnership units
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Series D preferred units
(liquidation preference of $79,767)
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
Series E preferred units
(repurchased in June 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
Series F preferred units
(repurchased in September 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Series H preferred units
(repurchased in March 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Series I preferred units
(repurchased in April 2007)
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Series N preferred units
(repurchased in January 2006)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests
share of income
|
|
$
|
16,122
|
|
|
$
|
14,879
|
|
|
$
|
28,070
|
|
|
$
|
29,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has consolidated joint ventures that have finite
lives under the terms of the partnership agreements. As of
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the aggregate
book value of the joint venture minority interests in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets was approximately
$535.3 million and $555.2 million, respectively, and
the Company believes that the aggregate settlement value of
these interests was approximately $1.1 billion and
$1.0 billion, respectively. However, there can be no
assurance that the aggregate settlement value of the interests
will be as such. The aggregate settlement value is based on the
estimated liquidation values of the assets and liabilities and
the resulting proceeds that the Company would distribute to its
joint venture partners upon dissolution, as required under the
terms of the respective joint venture agreements. There can be
no assurance that the estimated liquidation values of the assets
and liabilities and the resulting proceeds that the Company
distributes upon dissolution will be the same as the actual
liquidation values of such assets, liabilities and proceeds
distributed upon dissolution. Subsequent changes to the
estimated fair values of the assets and liabilities of the
consolidated joint ventures will affect the Companys
estimate of the aggregate settlement value. The joint venture
agreements do not limit the amount to which the minority joint
venture partners would be entitled in the event of liquidation
of the assets and liabilities and dissolution of the respective
joint ventures.
On April 17, 2007, the Operating Partnership redeemed all
800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series J Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from a single
institutional investor and all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95%
Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units from another single institutional investor.
The Operating Partnership redeemed the Series J Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units for
$40.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid distributions
through April 16, 2007. The Operating Partnership redeemed
the Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units for $40.0 million, plus accrued and
unpaid distributions through April 16, 2007. Also, on
April 17, 2007, another of the Companys subsidiaries,
AMB Property II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,
repurchased all 510,000 of its outstanding
16
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units from a single institutional investor. AMB
Property II, L.P. repurchased the units for $25.5 million,
plus accrued and unpaid distributions through April 16,
2007, less applicable withholding, on the Series I
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units. The
Company wrote-off approximately $2.9 million in deferred
issuance costs related to the redemption of the Series J
and K units and the repurchase of the Series I units.
On January 29, 2007, the 7.75% Series D Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units of AMB Property
II, L.P., were transferred from one institutional investor to
another institutional investor. In connection with that
transfer, AMB Property II, L.P., agreed to amend the terms of
the Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units to, among other things, change the rate
applicable to the Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Limited Partnership Units from 7.75% to 7.18% and change the
date prior to which the Series D Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Limited Partnership Units may not be redeemed from
May 5, 2004 to February 22, 2012.
Effective January 27, 2006, Robert Pattillo Properties,
Inc. exercised its rights under its Put Agreement, dated
September 24, 2004, with the Operating Partnership, and
sold all 729,582 of its 5.00% Series N Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units in one of the
Companys subsidiaries, AMB Property II, L.P., to the
Operating Partnership for an aggregate price of
$36.6 million, including accrued and unpaid distributions.
Also on January 27, 2006, AMB Property II, L.P.,
repurchased all of the 5.00% Series N Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Limited Partnership Units from the Operating
Partnership for an aggregate price of $36.6 million and
cancelled all of the outstanding series N preferred units
as of such date.
On March 21, 2006, AMB Property II, L.P., repurchased all
840,000 of its outstanding 8.125% Series H Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from a single
institutional investor for an aggregate price of
$42.8 million, including accrued and unpaid distributions.
In addition, the Company recognized a reduction of income
available to common stockholders of $1.1 million for the
related original issuance costs.
On June 30, 2006, AMB Property II, L.P., repurchased all
220,440 of its outstanding 7.75% Series E Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from a single
institutional investor for an aggregate price of
$10.9 million, including accrued and unpaid distributions.
In addition, the Company recognized an increase in income
available to common stockholders of $0.1 million for the
discount on repurchase, net of original issuance costs.
On September 21, 2006, AMB Property II, L.P., repurchased
all 201,139 of its outstanding 7.95% Series F Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from a single
institutional investor for an aggregate price of
$10.0 million, including accrued and unpaid distributions.
17
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Investments
in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
The Companys unconsolidated joint ventures net
equity investments at June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006 (dollars in thousands) were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companys
|
|
|
|
Square
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
|
|
Feet
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Co-Investment Joint
Ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P.(1)
|
|
|
17,999,126
|
|
|
$
|
139,448
|
|
|
$
|
136,971
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS(2)
|
|
|
6,005,508
|
|
|
|
48,686
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
AMB Japan Fund I, L.P.(3)
|
|
|
4,877,468
|
|
|
|
44,905
|
|
|
|
31,811
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
AMB DFS Fund I, LLC(4)
|
|
|
1,218,483
|
|
|
|
17,833
|
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC(5)
|
|
|
4,688,440
|
|
|
|
12,839
|
|
|
|
7,601
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
Other Industrial Operating
Joint Ventures
|
|
|
7,669,507
|
|
|
|
49,361
|
|
|
|
47,955
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
G. Accion, S.A. de C.V.,
(G.Accion)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
36,462
|
|
|
|
38,343
|
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures
|
|
|
42,458,532
|
|
|
$
|
349,534
|
|
|
$
|
274,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. is an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, which invests through a private real estate
investment trust. Prior to October 1, 2006, the Company
accounted for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. as
a consolidated joint venture. |
|
(2) |
|
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, is an open-ended co-investment
venture formed in 2007 with institutional investors. This fund
is Euro-denominated. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the
exchange rate in effect on June 30, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
AMB Japan Fund I, L.P. is a co-investment partnership
formed in 2005 with institutional investors. This fund is
Yen-denominated. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the
exchange rate in effect on June 30, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
AMB DFS Fund I, LLC is a co-investment partnership formed
in 2006 with a subsidiary of GE Real Estate to build and sell
properties. |
|
(5) |
|
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, is a co-investment partnership formed in
2004 with Industrial (Mexico) JV Pte. Ltd., a subsidiary of GIC
Real Estate Pte. Ltd, the real estate investment subsidiary of
the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. |
On December 30, 2004, the Company formed AMB-SGP Mexico,
LLC, a joint venture with Industrial (Mexico) JV Pte. Ltd., a
subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte. Ltd., the real estate
investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment
Corporation, in which the Company retained an approximate 20%
interest. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, the
Company recognized a gain of approximately $0.1 million
from the contribution of one approximately 0.1 million
square foot operating property for $4.6 million. This gain
is presented in gains from sale or contribution of real estate
interests, net, on consolidated statements of operations. In
addition, the Company recognized development profits from the
contribution of one completed development project aggregating
approximately 0.2 million square feet with a contribution
value of $14.2 million. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company recognized development profits
of $3.4 million from the contribution of one completed
development project for $38.4 million aggregating
approximately 0.6 million square feet.
On June 30, 2005, the Company formed AMB Japan Fund I,
L.P., a joint venture with 13 institutional investors, in which
the Company retained an approximate 20% interest. The 13
institutional investors have committed 49.5 billion Yen
(approximately $401.9 million in U.S. dollars, using
the exchange rate at June 30, 2007) for an approximate
80% equity interest. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company recognized development profits
of $43.2 million from the contribution to this fund of one
completed development project for $243.0 million (using the
exchange rate on the date of contribution) aggregating
approximately 0.8 million square feet.
18
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On October 17, 2006, the Company formed AMB DFS
Fund I, LLC, a merchant development joint venture with GE
Real Estate (GE), in which the Company retained an
approximate 15% interest. The joint venture is expected to have
total investment capacity of approximately $500.0 million
to pursue development-for-sale opportunities primarily in
U.S. markets other than those the Company identifies as its
target markets. GE and the Company have committed
$425.0 million and $75.0 million of equity,
respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30,
2007, the Company recognized development profits from the
contribution to this fund of approximately 82 acres of land
with a contribution value of approximately $30.3 million.
Effective October 1, 2006, the Company deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, on a prospective basis, due to the
re-evaluation
of the Companys accounting for its investment in the fund
in light of changes to the partnership agreement regarding the
general partners rights effective October 1, 2006.
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
contributed one approximately 0.2 million square foot
operating property and three completed development projects
totaling approximately 0.7 million square feet to this fund
for approximately $74.8 million. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company contributed one approximately
0.2 million square foot operating property and four
completed development projects, aggregating approximately
1.0 million square feet for approximately
$116.6 million.
On June 12, 2007, the Company formed AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS, a Euro-denominated open-ended
co-investment joint venture with institutional investors, in
which the Company retained an approximate 20% interest. The
institutional investors have committed approximately
263.0 million Euros (approximately $356.2 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007) for an approximate 80% equity interest. During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
contributed approximately 4.2 million square feet of
operating properties and approximately 0.5 million square
feet of completed development projects to this fund for
approximately 439.0 million Euros (approximately
$584.0 million in U.S. dollars, using the exchange
rate at the date of contribution).
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
recognized gains from the contribution of real estate interests,
net, of approximately $74.7 million, representing the
portion of the Companys interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third party investors for cash, as a
result of the contribution of approximately 4.2 million
square feet of operating properties to AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, and one operating property to AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, the Company recognized gains from the
contribution of real estate interests, net, of approximately
$74.8 million, representing the portion of the
Companys interest in the contributed properties acquired
by the third party investors for cash, as a result of the
contribution of approximately 4.2 million square feet of
operating properties to AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, and two
operating properties to AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, and AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.
As a result of the contribution of six completed development
projects to AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, and AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., the Company
recognized development profits of approximately
$26.0 million during the three months ended June 30,
2007, representing the portion of the Companys interest in
the contributed properties acquired by the third party investors
for cash. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the
Company recognized development profits of approximately
$34.9 million, representing the portion of the
Companys interest in the contributed properties acquired
by the third party investors for cash, as a result of the
contribution of eight completed development projects and
approximately 82 acres of land to AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., and AMB DFS Fund I, LLC.
Under the agreements governing the joint ventures, the Company
and the other parties to the joint ventures may be required to
make additional capital contributions and, subject to certain
limitations, the joint ventures may incur additional debt.
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
exercised its option to purchase the remaining equity interest,
based on the fair market value as stipulated in the joint
venture agreement, in AMB Pier One, LLC,
19
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
for a nominal amount. AMB Pier One, LLC, is a joint venture
related to the 2000 redevelopment of the pier which houses the
Companys global headquarters in San Francisco,
California. As a result, the investment was consolidated as of
June 30, 2007.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company also had an approximate
39.0% unconsolidated equity interest in G.Accion, a Mexican real
estate company. G.Accion provides management and development
services for industrial, retail, residential and office
properties in Mexico. In addition, as of June 30, 2007, a
subsidiary of the Company also had an approximate 5% interest in
IAT Air Cargo Facilities Income Fund (IAT), a Canadian income
trust specializing in aviation-related real estate at
Canadas leading international airports. This equity
investment of approximately $2.9 million and
$2.7 million, respectively, is included in other assets on
the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006.
Holders of common limited partnership units of the Operating
Partnership and class B common limited partnership units of
AMB Property II, L.P. have the right, commencing generally on or
after the first anniversary of the holder becoming a limited
partner of the Operating Partnership or AMB Property II, L.P.,
as applicable (or such other date agreed to by the Operating
Partnership or AMB Property II, L.P. and the applicable unit
holders), to require the Operating Partnership or AMB Property
II, L.P., as applicable, to redeem part or all of their common
units or class B common limited partnership units, as
applicable, for cash (based upon the fair market value, as
defined in the applicable partnership agreement, of an
equivalent number of shares of common stock of the Company at
the time of redemption) or the Operating Partnership or AMB
Property II, L.P. may, in its respective sole and absolute
discretion (subject to the limits on ownership and transfer of
common stock set forth in the Companys charter), elect to
have the Company exchange those common units or class B
common limited partnership units, as applicable, for shares of
the Companys common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject
to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends,
issuance of certain rights, certain extraordinary distributions
and similar events. With each redemption or exchange of the
Operating Partnerships common units, the Companys
percentage ownership in the Operating Partnership will increase.
Common limited partners and class B common limited partners
may exercise this redemption right from time to time, in whole
or in part, subject to certain limitations. During the six
months ended June 30, 2007, the Operating Partnership
redeemed 306,882 of its common limited partnership units for an
equivalent number of shares of the Companys common stock.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company
issued approximately 8.4 million shares of its common stock
for net proceeds of approximately $472.1 million, which
proceeds were contributed to the Operating Partnership in
exchange for the issuance of approximately 8.4 million
general partnership units. As a result of the common stock
issuance, there was a significant reallocation of partnership
interests due to the difference in the Companys stock
price at issuance as compared to the book value per share at the
time of issuance. The Company intends to use the proceeds from
the offering for general corporate purposes and, over the long
term, to expand its global development business.
The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of preferred
stock for issuance, of which the following series were
designated as of June 30, 2007: 1,595,337 shares of
series D cumulative redeemable preferred, all of which are
outstanding; 2,300,000 shares of series L cumulative
redeemable preferred, of which 2,000,000 are outstanding;
2,300,000 shares of series M cumulative redeemable
preferred, all of which are outstanding; 3,000,000 shares
of series O cumulative redeemable preferred, all of which
are outstanding; and 2,000,000 shares of series P
cumulative redeemable preferred, all of which are outstanding.
20
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the dividends or distributions
paid or payable per share or unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Paying Entity
|
|
Security
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series L preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.406
|
|
|
$
|
0.406
|
|
|
$
|
0.813
|
|
|
$
|
0.813
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series M preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.422
|
|
|
$
|
0.422
|
|
|
$
|
0.844
|
|
|
$
|
0.844
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series O preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.438
|
|
|
$
|
0.438
|
|
|
$
|
0.875
|
|
|
$
|
0.875
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series P preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.428
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.856
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Common limited partnership units
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Series J preferred units(1)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
$
|
1.005
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Series K preferred units(1)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
$
|
1.005
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Class B common limited partnership
units
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series D preferred units
|
|
$
|
0.838
|
|
|
$
|
0.969
|
|
|
$
|
1.840
|
|
|
$
|
1.938
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series E preferred units(2)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.807
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
1.776
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series F preferred units(3)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series H preferred units(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.970
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series I preferred units(5)
|
|
$
|
0.244
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
1.244
|
|
|
$
|
2.000
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series N preferred units(6)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.215
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In April 2007, the Operating Partnership redeemed all of its
Series J and Series K preferred units. |
|
(2) |
|
In June 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding Series E preferred units. |
|
(3) |
|
In September 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding Series F preferred units. |
|
(4) |
|
In March 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding Series H preferred units. |
|
(5) |
|
In April 2007, AMB Property II, L.P., repurchased all of its
Series I preferred units. |
|
(6) |
|
The holder of the Series N preferred units exercised its
put option in January 2006 and sold all of its Series N
preferred units to the Operating Partnership and AMB Property
II, L.P. repurchased all of such units from the Operating
Partnership. |
In December 2005, the Companys board of directors approved
a new two-year common stock repurchase program for the
discretionary repurchase of up to $200.0 million of its
common stock. The Company did not repurchase or retire any of
its shares of common stock during the six months ended
June 30, 2007.
On May 10, 2007 at the Companys Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, the Companys stockholders approved the
adoption of the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan, which reserved for issuance under the plan an
additional 7.5 million shares of the Companys common
stock. With the inclusion of these shares, the Companys
stock incentive plans have approximately 10.2 million
shares of common stock still available for issuance as either
stock options or restricted stock grants, of which
9.5 million are eligible to be used for new grants. The
fair value of each option grant was generally estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The
Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and
forfeitures within the valuation model. Expected volatilities
are based on historical volatility of the Companys stock.
The risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the
option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect
at the time of the grant. The fair values of grants issued
during the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, were
$10.15 and $8.54, respectively. The weighted average grant date
fair value of restricted stock awards calculated as of the grant
dates of the awards and issued during the quarters ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, were $58.77 and $50.50,
respectively. The following
21
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assumptions are used for grants during the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively: dividend yields of
3.4% and 3.5%; expected volatility of 18.7% and 17.9%; risk-free
interest rates of 4.5% and 4.6%; and expected lives of six years.
As of June 30, 2007, approximately 6,054,697 options and
653,427 non-vested stock awards were outstanding under the
plans. There were 534,338 stock options granted, 1,305,433
options exercised, and 38,574 options forfeited during the six
months ended June 30, 2007. There were 270,653 restricted
stock awards made during the six months ended June 30,
2007. 208,211 non-vested stock awards vested and 20,564
non-vested stock awards were forfeited during the six months
ended June 30, 2007. The related stock option expense was
$1.3 million and $1.0 million and the related
restricted stock compensation expense was $3.0 million and
$5.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The related stock option expense was
$3.2 million and $3.1 million and the related restricted
stock compensation expense was $6.2 million and
$7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The expense is included in general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
22
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Companys only dilutive securities outstanding for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were
stock options and shares of restricted stock granted under its
stock incentive plans. The effect on income per share was to
increase weighted average shares outstanding. Such dilution was
computed using the treasury stock method. The computation of
basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) is
presented below (dollars in thousands, except share and per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
117,401
|
|
|
$
|
54,154
|
|
|
$
|
142,294
|
|
|
$
|
72,179
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(3,952
|
)
|
|
|
(3,095
|
)
|
|
|
(7,904
|
)
|
|
|
(6,191
|
)
|
Preferred unit redemption
discount/issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
(after preferred stock dividends)
|
|
|
110,522
|
|
|
|
51,136
|
|
|
|
131,463
|
|
|
|
64,968
|
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
21,199
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
30,558
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
111,390
|
|
|
$
|
72,335
|
|
|
$
|
133,120
|
|
|
$
|
95,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
98,937,407
|
|
|
|
87,317,494
|
|
|
|
95,631,984
|
|
|
|
86,915,959
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
dilution(1)
|
|
|
2,423,606
|
|
|
|
2,818,165
|
|
|
|
2,673,315
|
|
|
|
3,231,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common
shares
|
|
|
101,361,013
|
|
|
|
90,135,659
|
|
|
|
98,305,299
|
|
|
|
90,147,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(after preferred stock dividends) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per common
share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
(after preferred stock dividends) before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.56
|
|
|
$
|
1.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.34
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes anti-dilutive stock options of 623,347 and 437,228, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Excludes anti-dilutive stock options of 704,323 and 548,195, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
These weighted average shares relate to anti-dilutive stock
options, which is calculated using the treasury stock method,
and could be dilutive in the future. |
23
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has two lines of business, real estate operations
and private capital. Real estate operations is comprised of
various segments while private capital consists of a single
segment, on which the Company evaluates its performance:
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Operations. The Company operates
industrial properties and manages its business by geographic
markets. Such industrial properties typically comprise multiple
distribution warehouse facilities suitable for single or
multiple customers who are engaged in various types of
businesses. The geographic markets where the Company owns
industrial properties are managed separately because it believes
each market has its own economic characteristics and requires
its own operating, pricing and leasing strategies. Each market
is considered to be an individual operating segment. The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The
Company evaluates performance based upon property net operating
income of the combined properties in each segment, which are
listed below. In addition, the Companys development
business is included under real estate operations. It primarily
consists of the Companys development of real estate
properties that are subsequently contributed to a joint venture
fund in which the Company has an ownership interest in and acts
as manager for, or that are sold to third parties. The Company
evaluates performance of the development business by reported
operating segment based upon gains generated from the
disposition
and/or
contribution of real estate. The assets of the development
business generally include properties under development and land
held for development. During the period between the completion
of development of a property and the date the property is
contributed to an unconsolidated joint venture or sold to a
third party, the property and its associated rental income and
property operating costs are included in the real estate
operations segment because the primary activity associated with
the property during that period is leasing. Upon contribution or
sale, the resulting gain or loss is included as gains from
dispositions of real estate interests or development profits, as
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
Private Capital. The Company, through its
private capital group, AMB Capital Partners, LLC, provides real
estate investment, portfolio management and reporting services
to co-investment joint ventures and clients. The private capital
income earned consists of acquisition and development fees,
asset management fees and priority distributions, and promoted
interests and incentive distributions from the Companys
co-investment
joint ventures and AMB Capital Partners clients. With
respect to the Companys U.S. and Mexico funds and
joint ventures, the Company typically earns a 90 basis
points acquisition fee on the acquisition cost of third party
acquisitions, asset management priority distributions of 7.5% of
net operating income on stabilized properties, 70 basis
points of total projected costs as asset management fees on
renovation or development properties, and incentive
distributions of 15% of the return over a 9% internal rate of
return and 20% of the return over a 12% internal rate of return
to investors on a periodic basis or at the end of a funds
life. In Japan, the Company earns a 90 basis points
acquisition fee on the acquisition cost of third party
acquisitions, asset management priority distributions of 1.5% of
80% of the committed equity during the investment period and
then 1.5% of unreturned equity, and incentive distributions of
20% of the return over a 10% internal rate of return and 25% of
the return over a 13% internal rate of return to investors at
the end of a funds life. In Europe, the Company earns a
90 basis points acquisition fee on the acquisition cost of
third party acquisitions, asset management fees of 75 basis
points on the gross asset value of the fund, and incentive
distributions of 20% of the return over a 9% internal rate of
return and 25% of the return over a 12% internal rate of return
to investors on a periodic basis. The accounting policies of the
segment are the same as those described in the summary of
significant accounting policies under Note 2, Interim
Financial Statements. The Company evaluates performance based
upon private capital income.
|
24
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The segment information in the following tables for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2006 and as of
December 31, 2006, have been reclassified to conform to
current presentation.
Summary information for the reportable segments is as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Property NOI(2)
|
|
|
Development Gains
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Segments(1)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$
|
27,428
|
|
|
$
|
27,840
|
|
|
$
|
21,809
|
|
|
$
|
21,962
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
No. New Jersey/New York
|
|
|
17,561
|
|
|
|
20,400
|
|
|
|
11,932
|
|
|
|
14,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area
|
|
|
21,077
|
|
|
|
20,980
|
|
|
|
16,617
|
|
|
|
16,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
13,643
|
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
9,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-Tarmac
|
|
|
13,419
|
|
|
|
13,849
|
|
|
|
7,706
|
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Florida
|
|
|
11,055
|
|
|
|
10,319
|
|
|
|
7,246
|
|
|
|
6,809
|
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Seattle
|
|
|
9,106
|
|
|
|
9,768
|
|
|
|
7,131
|
|
|
|
7,683
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
Non U.S. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
10,208
|
|
|
|
7,961
|
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
6,291
|
|
|
|
15,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
1,928
|
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total markets
|
|
|
124,748
|
|
|
|
130,486
|
|
|
|
90,626
|
|
|
|
94,679
|
|
|
|
25,463
|
|
|
|
42,415
|
|
Other Markets
|
|
|
35,753
|
|
|
|
38,724
|
|
|
|
26,498
|
|
|
|
29,608
|
|
|
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
Straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
6,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
(4,390
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
(3,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
8,518
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
171,432
|
|
|
$
|
175,917
|
|
|
$
|
119,610
|
|
|
$
|
127,385
|
|
|
$
|
28,996
|
|
|
$
|
45,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Property NOI(2)
|
|
|
Development Gains
|
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
For the
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Segments(1)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$
|
53,847
|
|
|
$
|
55,255
|
|
|
$
|
42,598
|
|
|
$
|
43,780
|
|
|
$
|
9,340
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
No. New Jersey/New York
|
|
|
35,551
|
|
|
|
40,053
|
|
|
|
24,074
|
|
|
|
28,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area
|
|
|
42,688
|
|
|
|
42,535
|
|
|
|
33,723
|
|
|
|
33,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
26,480
|
|
|
|
27,272
|
|
|
|
18,221
|
|
|
|
19,072
|
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-Tarmac
|
|
|
26,879
|
|
|
|
27,904
|
|
|
|
14,982
|
|
|
|
15,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Florida
|
|
|
21,772
|
|
|
|
19,570
|
|
|
|
14,483
|
|
|
|
13,104
|
|
|
|
4,637
|
|
|
|
850
|
|
Seattle
|
|
|
18,430
|
|
|
|
19,122
|
|
|
|
14,325
|
|
|
|
14,929
|
|
|
|
5,161
|
|
|
|
(986
|
)
|
Non U.S. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
21,950
|
|
|
|
14,493
|
|
|
|
17,662
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
15,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
3,346
|
|
|
|
15,599
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
10,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total markets
|
|
|
250,943
|
|
|
|
261,803
|
|
|
|
181,587
|
|
|
|
190,700
|
|
|
|
37,613
|
|
|
|
43,089
|
|
Other Markets
|
|
|
68,862
|
|
|
|
78,767
|
|
|
|
50,525
|
|
|
|
58,721
|
|
|
|
3,575
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
Straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles
|
|
|
4,950
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
4,950
|
|
|
|
11,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
(9,594
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
(6,177
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
339,439
|
|
|
$
|
352,325
|
|
|
$
|
237,445
|
|
|
$
|
254,544
|
|
|
$
|
41,188
|
|
|
$
|
46,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The markets included are a subset of the Companys regions
defined as East, Southwest and West Central in North America,
Europe and Asia. |
|
(2) |
|
Property net operating income (NOI) is defined as
rental revenue, including reimbursements, less property
operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization,
general and administrative expenses and interest expense. For a
reconciliation of NOI to net income, see the table below. |
The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate and useful
supplemental performance measure because NOI reflects the
operating performance of the Companys real estate
portfolio on a segment basis, and the Company uses NOI to make
decisions about resource allocations and to assess regional
property level performance. However, NOI should not be viewed as
an alternative measure of the Companys financial
performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs,
capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development
and construction activities that could materially impact the
Companys results from operations. Further, the
Companys NOI may not be comparable to that of other real
estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating NOI.
26
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table is a reconciliation from NOI to reported net
income, a financial measure under GAAP (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Property NOI
|
|
$
|
119,610
|
|
|
$
|
127,385
|
|
|
$
|
237,445
|
|
|
$
|
254,544
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
28,996
|
|
|
|
45,698
|
|
|
|
41,188
|
|
|
|
46,372
|
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
8,518
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
14,443
|
|
|
|
10,049
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(41,483
|
)
|
|
|
(44,500
|
)
|
|
|
(82,504
|
)
|
|
|
(87,254
|
)
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,394
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
(5,394
|
)
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(30,260
|
)
|
|
|
(25,142
|
)
|
|
|
(60,114
|
)
|
|
|
(48,190
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(1,139
|
)
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
(2,051
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Fund costs
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(1,093
|
)
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
10,366
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,472
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
11,979
|
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests
|
|
|
74,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, including amortization
|
|
|
(33,369
|
)
|
|
|
(44,310
|
)
|
|
|
(67,951
|
)
|
|
|
(83,704
|
)
|
Total minority interests
share of income
|
|
|
(16,122
|
)
|
|
|
(14,879
|
)
|
|
|
(28,070
|
)
|
|
|
(29,041
|
)
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
21,199
|
|
|
|
1,657
|
|
|
|
30,558
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
118,269
|
|
|
$
|
75,353
|
|
|
$
|
143,951
|
|
|
$
|
102,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys total assets by reportable segments were
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets as of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
U.S. Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
$
|
911,325
|
|
|
$
|
895,610
|
|
No. New Jersey/New York
|
|
|
623,024
|
|
|
|
607,727
|
|
San Francisco Bay Area
|
|
|
739,570
|
|
|
|
703,660
|
|
Chicago
|
|
|
440,369
|
|
|
|
446,662
|
|
On-Tarmac
|
|
|
204,784
|
|
|
|
210,798
|
|
South Florida
|
|
|
347,772
|
|
|
|
371,603
|
|
Seattle
|
|
|
377,861
|
|
|
|
380,459
|
|
Non-U.S.
Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
313,261
|
|
|
|
723,326
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
556,561
|
|
|
|
434,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total markets
|
|
|
4,514,527
|
|
|
|
4,774,551
|
|
Other Markets
|
|
|
1,619,374
|
|
|
|
1,430,308
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
|
|
349,534
|
|
|
|
274,381
|
|
Non-segment assets
|
|
|
275,829
|
|
|
|
234,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,759,264
|
|
|
$
|
6,713,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Commitments
Lease Commitments. The Company has entered
into operating ground leases on certain land parcels, primarily
on-tarmac facilities and office space with remaining lease terms
of one to 55 years. Buildings and improvements subject to
ground leases are depreciated ratably over the lesser of the
terms of the related leases or 40 years.
Standby Letters of Credit. As of June 30,
2007, the Company had provided approximately $23.6 million
in letters of credit, of which $17.3 million were provided
under the Operating Partnerships $550.0 million
unsecured credit facility. The letters of credit were required
to be issued under certain ground lease provisions, bank
guarantees and other commitments.
Guarantees and Contribution Obligations. Other
than parent guarantees associated with unsecured debt or
contribution obligations as discussed in Part I,
Item 1: Notes 5 and 7 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, as of June 30,
2007, the Company had outstanding guarantees and contribution
obligations in the aggregate amount of $340.8 million as
described below.
As of June 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding guarantees
in the amount of $70.3 million in connection with certain
acquisitions. As of June 30, 2007, the Company also
guaranteed $27.1 million and $83.2 million on
outstanding loans on three of its consolidated joint ventures
and two of its unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively.
In addition, as of June 30, 2007, the Company has
guaranteed $13.2 million on outstanding property debt
incurred by its unconsolidated joint ventures. Such guarantees
will require payment by the Company of all or part of the
applicable joint ventures debt obligations upon certain
defaults by the joint venture. The Companys potential
obligations under these guarantees may be greater than the
Companys share of the applicable joint venture funds
debt obligations or the value of its share of any property
securing such debt.
Also, the Company has entered into contribution agreements in
connection with certain contributions of properties to its
unconsolidated joint venture funds. These contribution
agreements require the Company to make additional capital
contributions to the applicable joint venture fund upon certain
defaults by the joint venture of its debt obligations to the
lenders. Such additional capital contributions will cover all or
part of the applicable joint ventures debt obligation and
may be greater than the Companys share of the joint
ventures debt obligation or the value of its share of any
property securing such debt. The Companys contribution
obligations under these agreements will be reduced by the
amounts recovered by the lender and the fair market value of the
property, if any, used to secure the debt and obtained by the
lender upon default. The Companys potential obligations
under these contribution agreements are $147.0 million as
of June 30, 2007.
Performance and Surety Bonds. As of
June 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding performance and
surety bonds in an aggregate amount of $14.1 million. These
bonds were issued in connection with certain of its development
projects and were posted to guarantee certain tax obligations
and the construction of certain real property improvements and
infrastructure. The performance and surety bonds are renewable
and expire upon the payment of the taxes due or the completion
of the improvements and infrastructure.
Promoted Interests and Other Contractual
Obligations. Upon the achievement of certain
return thresholds and the occurrence of certain events, the
Company may be obligated to make payments to certain of its
joint venture partners pursuant to the terms and provisions of
their contractual agreements with the Operating Partnership.
From time to time in the normal course of the Companys
business, the Company enters into various contracts with third
parties that may obligate it to make payments, pay promotes or
perform other obligations upon the occurrence of certain events.
28
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Contingencies
Litigation. In the normal course of business,
from time to time, the Company may be involved in legal actions
relating to the ownership and operations of its properties.
Management does not expect that the liabilities, if any, that
may ultimately result from such legal actions will have a
material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Environmental Matters. The Company monitors
its properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic
substances. The Company is not aware of any environmental
liability with respect to the properties that would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, assets
or results of operations. However, there can be no assurance
that such a material environmental liability does not exist. The
existence of any such material environmental liability would
have an adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations and cash flow. The Company carries environmental
insurance and believes that the policy terms, conditions, limits
and deductibles are adequate and appropriate under the
circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the cost of such
coverage and current industry practice.
General Uninsured Losses. The Company carries
property and rental loss, liability, flood and terrorism
insurance. The Company believes that the policy terms,
conditions, limits and deductibles are adequate and appropriate
under the circumstances, given the relative risk of loss, the
cost of such coverage and current industry practice. In
addition, a significant number of the Companys properties
are located in areas that are subject to earthquake activity. As
a result, the Company has obtained limited earthquake insurance
on those properties. There are, however, certain types of
extraordinary losses, such as those due to acts of war, that may
be either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Although
the Company has obtained coverage for certain acts of terrorism,
with policy specifications and insured limits that it believes
are commercially reasonable, there can be no assurance that the
Company will be able to collect under such policies. Should an
uninsured loss occur, the Company could lose its investment in,
and anticipated profits and cash flows from, a property.
Captive Insurance Company. The Company has a
wholly-owned captive insurance company, Arcata National
Insurance Ltd. (Arcata), which provides insurance coverage for
all or a portion of losses below the deductible under the
Companys third-party policies. The captive insurance
company is one element of the Companys overall risk
management program. The Company capitalized Arcata in accordance
with the applicable regulatory requirements. Arcata establishes
annual premiums based on projections derived from the past loss
experience at the Companys properties. Annually, the
Company engages an independent third party to perform an
actuarial estimate of future projected claims, related
deductibles and projected expenses necessary to fund associated
risk management programs. Premiums paid to Arcata may be
adjusted based on this estimate. Like premiums paid to
third-party insurance companies, premiums paid to Arcata may be
reimbursed by customers pursuant to specific lease terms.
Through this structure, the Company believes that it has more
comprehensive insurance coverage at an overall lower cost than
would otherwise be available in the market.
29
AMB
PROPERTY CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On July 16, 2007, certain wholly-owned subsidiaries and the
Operating Partnership, each acting as a borrower, and the
Company and the Operating Partnership, as guarantors, entered
into a fifth amended and restated revolving credit agreement for
a $500 million unsecured revolving credit facility that
replaced the $250 million unsecured revolving credit
facility the Company executed on June 13, 2006. The fifth
amended and restated credit facility amends the fourth amended
and restated credit facility to, among other things, increase
the facility amount to $500 million with an option to
further increase the facility to $750 million, to extend
the maturity date to June 2011 and to allow for borrowing in
Indian Rupees. See Note 5, Debt, for a more detailed
discussion of the Companys credit facilities.
On or about August 9, 2007, the Company expects to settle a
repurchase of 114,638 shares of its common stock at an
average price of $50.27 per share or approximately
$5.8 million. This stock repurchase was made pursuant to
the Companys stock repurchase program approved by the
Companys board of directors in December 2005. This stock
repurchase program allows for the discretionary repurchase of up
to $200.0 million of the Companys common stock and
expires on December 31, 2007. The Company publicly
announced this stock repurchase program on December 7, 2005.
30
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Some of the information included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
contains forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to
the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these
forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the
forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The
events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by
the use of forward-looking terminology such as
believes, expects, may,
will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends,
plans, pro forma, estimates
or anticipates, or the negative of these words and
phrases, or similar words or phrases. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or
intentions. Forward-looking statements should not be read as
guarantees of future performance or results, and will not
necessarily be accurate indicators of whether, or the time at
which, such performance or results will be achieved. There is no
assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements will occur or be achieved.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on
assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise
and we may not be able to realize them.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual
results and future events to differ materially from those set
forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions or in the real estate
sector;
|
|
|
|
defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers or renewal
at lower than expected rent;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and the failure of
acquisitions to perform as we expect;
|
|
|
|
risks and uncertainties affecting property development and
renovation (including construction delays, cost overruns, our
inability to obtain necessary permits and financing, public
opposition to these activities, as well as the risks associated
with our expansion of and increased investment in our
development business);
|
|
|
|
risks of doing business internationally, including
unfamiliarity with new markets and currency risks;
|
|
|
|
risks of opening offices globally (including increasing
headcount);
|
|
|
|
a downturn in the California, U.S., or the global economy or
real estate conditions;
|
|
|
|
risks of changing personnel and roles;
|
|
|
|
losses in excess of our insurance coverage;
|
|
|
|
our failure to divest of properties on advantageous terms or
to timely reinvest proceeds from any such divestitures;
|
|
|
|
unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired
properties or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with using debt to fund acquisitions and
development, including re-financing risks;
|
|
|
|
risks related to our obligations in the event of certain
defaults under joint venture and other debt;
|
|
|
|
our failure to obtain necessary financing;
|
|
|
|
our failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with equity and debt securities financings
and issuances (including the risk of dilution);
|
|
|
|
changes in local, state and federal regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
|
increases in real property tax rates;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with our tax structuring;
|
|
|
|
increases in interest rates and operating costs or greater
than expected capital expenditures;
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
environmental uncertainties; and
|
|
|
|
our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real
estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended.
|
Our success also depends upon economic trends generally,
various market conditions and fluctuations and those other risk
factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors and
elsewhere in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. We caution you not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect our analysis only and speak as of the date of this
report or as of the dates indicated in the statements. All of
our forward-looking statements, including those in this report,
are qualified in their entirety by this statement. We assume no
obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms
AMB, the Company, we,
us and our refer to AMB Property
Corporation, AMB Property, L.P. and their other controlled
subsidiaries, and the references to AMB Property Corporation
include AMB Property, L.P. and their controlled subsidiaries. We
refer to AMB Property, L.P. as the operating
partnership. The following marks are our registered
trademarks:
AMB®;
High Throughput
Distribution®
(HTD®);
and Strategic Alliance
Programs®.
GENERAL
We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate
investment trust and expect that we have qualified, and will
continue to qualify, as a real estate investment trust for
federal income tax purposes beginning with the year ended
December 31, 1997. As a self-administered and self-managed
real estate investment trust, our own employees perform our
corporate administrative and management functions, rather than
our relying on an outside manager for these services. We manage
our portfolio of properties generally through direct property
management performed by our own employees. Additionally, within
our flexible operating model, we may from time to time establish
relationships with third-party real estate management firms,
brokers and developers that provide some property-level
administrative and management services under our direction.
Managements
Overview
The primary source of our revenue and earnings is rent received
from customers under long-term (generally three to ten years)
operating leases at our properties, including reimbursements
from customers for certain operating costs. We also produce
earnings from our private capital business, which consists of
acquisition and development fees, asset management fees and
priority distributions, and promoted interests and incentive
distributions from our co-investment joint ventures.
Additionally, we produce earnings from the disposition of
projects in our development-for-sale program and from the
contributions of development properties to our co-investment
joint ventures. Our long-term growth is driven by our ability to
maintain and increase occupancy rates or increase rental rates
at our properties, and by our ability to continue to develop and
acquire new properties.
Real estate fundamentals in the United States industrial markets
held steady during the second quarter of 2007. According to data
provided by Torto-Wheaton Research, availability was 9.3%,
unchanged from the prior quarter. The general trend remains
favorable with availability down 40 basis points from a
year ago. According to Torto-Wheaton Research, absorption in the
quarter was 34.3 million square feet, an increase from the
prior quarter, and construction completions in the quarter were
37.3 million square feet, also an increase from the prior
quarter, but 3.3 million square feet below the
18-year
quarterly average. We believe that net absorption for the second
half of 2007 will be moderately positive, which could drive
vacancy rates lower by year end. We think the strongest
industrial markets in the U.S. are the coastal markets tied
to global trade, including Southern California, which is our
largest market, South Florida, the San Francisco Bay Area,
Seattle, and to a lesser degree, Northern New Jersey/New York
(with the exception of the Exit 8A submarket). While we believe
that the broader Chicago market remains flat, the OHare
submarket remains strong and stands to benefit from the
OHare airports current modernization and expansion
program. Dallas continues to recover, and Atlanta continues to
suffer from a large increase in supply. Based on our assessment,
the operating environment in our U.S. on-tarmac business
remains good with improving cargo volumes and essentially no new
supply.
32
In Europe, we view the markets of Hamburg, Amsterdam and Madrid
as strong, with modest growth in the balance of Western Europe.
We believe that the majority of the demand for industrial real
estate in Western Europe comes from the replacement of obsolete
buildings. In Japan, we view the infill Tokyo submarkets where
we operate as generally healthy with solid demand for the kind
of facilities we own and develop.
On June 12, 2007, we announced the formation of AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS. This Euro-denominated, open-end commingled
funds investment focus is to acquire stabilized industrial
distribution properties, including those developed by us, near
high-volume airports, seaports and transportation networks, and
in the major metropolitan areas of Europe, with initial target
markets in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
Spain, the United Kingdom and Central/Eastern Europe. The gross
asset value of AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS was approximately
$613 million at formation and $719 million at
June 30, 2007.
Going forward, we think our co-investment program with
private-capital investors will continue to serve as a
significant source of revenues and capital for new investments.
Through these co-investment joint ventures, we typically earn
acquisition fees, asset management fees and priority
distributions, as well as promoted interests and incentive
distributions based on the performance of the co-investment
joint ventures; however, we cannot assure you that we will
continue to do so. Through contribution of development
properties to our co-investment joint ventures, we expect to
recognize value creation from our development pipeline. In
anticipation of the formation of future co-investment joint
ventures, we may also hold acquired properties for later
contribution to future funds. As of June 30, 2007, we owned
approximately 78.1 million square feet of our properties
(57.1% of the total operating and development portfolio) through
our consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment joint
ventures. We may make additional investments through these
co-investment joint ventures or new joint ventures in the future
and presently plan to do so.
We expect development to be a significant driver of our earnings
growth as we expand our land and development pipeline, and
contribute completed development projects into our co-investment
joint ventures or sell to third parties and recognize
development profits. We think development, renovation and
expansion of well-located, high-quality industrial properties
should generally continue to provide us with attractive
investment opportunities at higher rates of return than may be
obtained from the purchase of existing properties. Our
development opportunities in Mexico, Japan and China are
particularly attractive given the current lack of supply of
modern industrial distribution facilities in the major
metropolitan markets of these countries. Over the past five
years, since launching our global expansion, our annual
development starts have increased from $91 million in 2002
to $914 million in 2006. We believe value-added conversion
projects also create value for our stockholders. Such projects
represent the development or redevelopment of land or a building
site for a more valuable use. In addition to our committed
development pipeline, we hold a total of 2,438 acres for
future development or sale, 96% of which is in North America. We
currently estimate that these 2,438 acres of land could
support approximately 42.3 million square feet of future
development.
We believe that customer demand for new industrial space in
strategic markets tied to global trade will continue to outpace
supply. To capitalize on this demand, we intend to continue to
expand our development business in existing and into new markets
around the world. We expect that development starts will grow
from $914 million in 2006 to $1.6 billion by 2010. In
March 2007, we issued common equity, for the first time since
our 1997 initial public offering, to strengthen our balance
sheet to provide capital for our anticipated growth.
Our long-term capital allocation goal is to have approximately
50% of our owned and managed operating portfolio invested in
non-U.S. markets
(based on owned and managed annualized base rent). As of
June 30, 2007, our
non-U.S. operating
properties comprised 19.1% of our owned and managed operating
portfolio (based on annualized base rent) and 1.8% of our
consolidated operating portfolio (based on annualized base
rent). In addition to the United States, we include Canada and
Mexico as target countries in North America. In Europe, our
target countries currently are Belgium, France, Germany, Italy,
the Netherlands, Spain and the United Kingdom. In Asia, our
target countries currently are China, India, Japan, Singapore
and South Korea. We expect to add additional target countries
outside the United States in the future, including countries in
Central/Eastern Europe.
33
The table below summarizes key operating and leasing statistics
for our owned and managed operating properties as of and for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total/Weighted
|
|
Owned and Managed Property Data(1)
|
|
Global Markets(2)
|
|
|
Global Markets(3)
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
As of and for the three months
ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet
|
|
|
72,044,446
|
|
|
|
39,291,182
|
|
|
|
111,335,628
|
|
Occupancy percentage at period end
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
Same space square footage leased
|
|
|
3,356,475
|
|
|
|
1,159,959
|
|
|
|
4,516,434
|
|
Rent increases (decreases) on
renewals and rollovers(4)
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
As of and for the three months
ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet
|
|
|
48,924,541
|
|
|
|
47,696,087
|
|
|
|
96,620,628
|
|
Occupancy percentage at period end
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
94.2
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
Same space square footage leased
|
|
|
3,382,662
|
|
|
|
1,225,307
|
|
|
|
4,607,969
|
|
Rent increases (decreases) on
renewals and rollovers
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
As of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet
|
|
|
72,044,446
|
|
|
|
39,291,182
|
|
|
|
111,335,628
|
|
Occupancy percentage at period end
|
|
|
96.6
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
Same space square footage leased
|
|
|
6,929,972
|
|
|
|
2,810,971
|
|
|
|
9,740,943
|
|
Rent increases on renewals and
rollovers(4)
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
As of and for the six months ended
June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rentable square feet
|
|
|
48,924,541
|
|
|
|
47,696,087
|
|
|
|
96,620,628
|
|
Occupancy percentage at period end
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
94.2
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
Same space square footage leased
|
|
|
6,624,227
|
|
|
|
2,712,092
|
|
|
|
9,336,319
|
|
Rent decreases on renewals and
rollovers
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Owned and managed operating properties are defined as properties
in which we have at least a 10% ownership interest, for which we
are the property or asset manager, and which we intend to hold
for the long-term. |
|
(2) |
|
Our principal global markets are Chicago, Northern New
Jersey/New York City, Paris, the San Francisco Bay Area,
Seattle, South Florida, Southern California, Tokyo and U.S.
On-Tarmac. |
|
(3) |
|
Our other global markets in North America are Atlanta, Austin,
Baltimore, Boston, Columbus, Dallas, Guadalajara, Houston,
Mexico City, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Orlando, Querétaro,
Tijuana and Toronto. In Europe, our other global markets are
Amsterdam, Brussels, Frankfurt, Hamburg and Lyon. In Asia, our
other global markets are Osaka, Shanghai and Singapore. |
|
(4) |
|
For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, on a consolidated
basis, rent increases on renewals and rollovers were 1.4%, 0.7%
and 1.3%, for our principal global markets, other global markets
and total markets, respectively. For the year-to-date ended
June 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, rent increases on
renewals and rollovers were 2.0%, 2.1% and 2.0%, for our
principal global markets, other global markets and total
markets, respectively. |
We believe that higher occupancy levels in our portfolio, driven
in part by strengthening fundamentals in our markets tied to
global trade, are contributing to rental rate growth in our
portfolio. At June 30, 2007, our operating portfolios
occupancy rate was 96.1%, on an owned and managed basis, an
increase of 80 basis points from the prior quarter and
90 basis points from June 30, 2006. Rental rates on
lease renewals and rollovers in our portfolio
34
increased 2.0% in the second quarter of 2007, which we think
reflect the generally positive trends in real estate
fundamentals in our markets. Cash-basis same store net operating
income with and without the effect of lease termination fees,
grew by 5.8% in the second quarter of 2007, on an owned and
managed basis. See Supplemental Earnings Measures
below for a discussion of cash-basis same store net operating
income and a reconciliation of cash-basis same store net
operating income and net income. We currently expect that
cash-basis same store growth in our operating portfolio,
excluding lease termination fees, will be approximately 4% for
2007, on an owned and managed basis. We believe that market
rents have generally recovered from their lows and in many of
our markets are back to or above their prior peak levels of 2001.
To maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust,
we must pay dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually
at least 90% of our taxable income. As a result, we cannot rely
on retained earnings to fund our on-going operations to the same
extent that other corporations that are not real estate
investment trusts can. We must continue to raise capital in both
the debt and equity markets to fund our working capital needs,
acquisitions and developments. See Liquidity and Capital
Resources for a complete discussion of the sources of our
capital.
Summary
of Key Transactions
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we completed
the following significant capital deployment transactions and
other transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Formed an unconsolidated open-ended co-investment joint venture,
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, with the contribution of
$584.0 million of operating properties and completed
development projects to the fund;
|
|
|
|
Acquired, on an owned and managed basis, 23 properties in North
America, Asia and Europe aggregating approximately
5.4 million square feet, for $494.6 million;
|
|
|
|
Committed to ten development projects in North America and Asia
totaling 3.2 million square feet with an estimated total
investment of approximately $265.1 million;
|
|
|
|
Acquired 515 acres of land for development in North America
and Asia for approximately $72.4 million;
|
|
|
|
Sold three development projects totaling approximately
0.2 million square feet for an aggregate sale price of
$20.9 million;
|
|
|
|
Contributed three completed development projects, aggregating
approximately 0.7 million square feet, for approximately
$57.3 million to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P.;
|
|
|
|
Contributed one 0.2 million square foot operating property
to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., for
approximately $17.5 million; and
|
|
|
|
Exercised the purchase option for the remaining equity interest
of AMB Pier One, LLC, which is the location of our global
headquarters.
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we completed the
following significant capital deployment transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired, on an owned and managed basis, 31 properties in North
America, Asia and Europe aggregating approximately
7.2 million square feet, for $636.4 million;
|
|
|
|
Committed to 15 development projects in North America and Asia
totaling 5.1 million square feet with an estimated total
investment of approximately $455.8 million;
|
|
|
|
Acquired 937 acres of land for development in North America
and Asia for approximately $113.2 million;
|
|
|
|
Sold five development projects totaling approximately
0.3 million square feet for an aggregate sale price of
$45.6 million;
|
|
|
|
Contributed five completed development projects, aggregating
approximately 1.2 million square feet, for approximately
$113.3 million to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P., and AMB-SGP Mexico;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed two operating properties, aggregating approximately
0.3 million square feet, to AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, and AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., for approximately
$22.1 million;
|
|
|
|
Contributed two land parcels to AMB-DFS Fund I, LLC;
|
|
|
|
Formed an unconsolidated open-end co-investment joint venture,
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, with the contribution of
$584.0 million of operating properties and completed
development projects to the fund; and
|
|
|
|
Exercised the purchase option for the remaining equity interest
of AMB Pier One, LLC, which is the location of our global
headquarters.
|
See Part I, Item 1: Notes 3 and 4 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of our acquisition, development and
disposition activity.
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we completed
the following significant capital markets and other financing
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemed all 800,000 outstanding 7.95% Series J Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate
cost of $40.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid
distributions;
|
|
|
|
Redeemed all 800,000 outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate
cost of $40.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid
distributions;
|
|
|
|
Repurchased all 510,000 of AMB Property II, L.P.s
outstanding 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate cost of
$25.5 million, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, less
applicable withholding; and
|
|
|
|
Increased the capacity of our Yen credit facility by
10.0 billion Yen from 45.0 billion Yen to
55.0 billion Yen (an increase of approximately
$81.1 million in U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate
at June 30, 2007).
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we completed the
following significant capital markets and other financing
transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Raised approximately $472.1 million in net proceeds from
the issuance of approximately 8.4 million shares of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
Obtained long-term secured debt financings for our co-investment
joint ventures of $324.0 million with a weighted average
interest rate of 5.7%;
|
|
|
|
Obtained $122.1 million of debt (using the exchange rate at
June 30, 2007) with a weighted average interest rate
of 3.4% for international assets;
|
|
|
|
Refinanced $305.0 million of secured debt, with a weighted
average interest rate of 5.7% for AMB-SGP, L.P., one of our
co-investment joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
Expanded the European revolving credit facility agreement by
100.0 million Euro to 328.0 million Euro
(approximately $444.2 million in U.S. dollars, using
the exchange rate at June 30, 2007), which was assumed by
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, on June 12, 2007;
|
|
|
|
Refinanced the Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Limited Partnership Units to, among other things, change the
rate applicable from 7.75% to 7.18% and change the date prior to
which the series D preferred units may not be redeemed from
May 5, 2004 to February 22, 2012;
|
|
|
|
Increased the capacity of our Yen credit facility by
10.0 billion Yen from 45.0 billion Yen to
55.0 billion Yen (approximately $81.1 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007);
|
|
|
|
Redeemed all 800,000 outstanding 7.95% Series J Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate
cost of $40.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid
distributions;
|
|
|
|
Redeemed all 800,000 outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate
cost of $40.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid
distributions; and
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased all 510,000 of AMB Property II, L.P.s
outstanding 8.00% Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred
Limited Partnership Units for an aggregate cost of
$25.5 million, plus accrued and unpaid distributions, less
applicable withholding.
|
See Part I, Item 1: Notes 5, 6 and 8 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a
more detailed discussion of our capital markets transactions.
Critical
Accounting Policies
In the preparation of financial statements, we utilize certain
critical accounting policies. There have been no material
changes in our significant accounting policies included in the
notes to our audited financial statements included in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
THE
COMPANY
We acquire, develop and operate industrial properties in key
distribution markets throughout North America, Europe and Asia.
We use the terms industrial properties or
industrial buildings to describe various types of
industrial properties in our portfolio and use these terms
interchangeably with the following: logistics facilities,
centers or warehouses; distribution facilities, centers or
warehouses; High Throughput
Distribution®
(HTD®)
facilities; or any combination of these terms. We use the term
owned and managed to describe assets in which we
have at least a 10% ownership interest, for which we are the
property or asset manager, and which we intend to hold for the
long-term.
We commenced operations as a fully integrated real estate
company effective with the completion of our initial public
offering on November 26, 1997. Our strategy focuses on
providing properties for customers who value the efficient
movement of goods located mostly in the worlds busiest
distribution markets: large, supply-constrained locations with
proximity to airports, seaports and major highway systems. As of
June 30, 2007, we owned, or had investments in, on a
consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures,
properties and development projects expected to total
approximately 136.7 million square feet (12.7 million
square meters) and 1,152 buildings in 44 markets within thirteen
countries. Additionally, as of June 30, 2007, we managed,
but did not have a significant ownership interest in, industrial
and other properties totaling approximately 1.5 million
rentable square feet.
We operate our business primarily through our subsidiary, AMB
Property, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer
to as the operating partnership. As of June 30,
2007, we owned an approximate 95.8% general partnership interest
in the operating partnership, excluding preferred units. As the
sole general partner of the operating partnership, we have the
full, exclusive and complete responsibility for and discretion
in its day-to-day management and control.
Our investment strategy generally targets customers whose
businesses are tied to global trade, which, according to the
World Trade Organization, has grown more than three times the
world gross domestic product growth rate over the last
30 years. To serve the facility needs of these customers,
we seek to invest in major global distribution markets and
transportation hubs that, generally, are tied to global trade.
Our strategy is to be a leading provider of industrial
properties in supply-constrained submarkets of our target
markets. These submarkets are generally characterized by large
population densities and typically offer substantial consumer
concentrations, proximity to large clusters of
distribution-facility users and significant labor pools, and are
generally located near key international passenger and cargo
airports, seaports and major highway systems. When measured by
annualized base rent, on an owned and managed basis, the
substantial majority of our portfolio of industrial properties
is located in our target markets, and much of this is in in-fill
submarkets within our target markets. In-fill locations are
characterized by supply constraints on the availability of land
for competing projects as well as physical, political or
economic barriers to new development.
Further, in many of our target markets, we focus on
HTD®
facilities, which are buildings designed to facilitate the rapid
distribution of our customers products rather than storage
of goods. Our investment focus on
HTD®
assets is based on what we think to be a global trend toward
lower inventory levels and expedited supply chains.
HTD®
facilities generally have a variety of physical characteristics
that allow for the rapid transport of goods from point-
37
to-point. These physical characteristics could include numerous
dock doors, shallower building depths, fewer columns, large
truck courts and more space for trailer parking. We think these
building characteristics represent an important success factor
for time-sensitive customers such as air express, logistics and
freight forwarding companies, and that these facilities function
best when located in convenient proximity to transportation
infrastructure, such as major airports and seaports.
Of approximately 136.7 million square feet as of
June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
on an owned and managed basis, which include investments held on
a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures,
we owned or partially owned approximately 111.3 million
square feet (principally warehouse distribution buildings) that
were 96.1% leased;
|
|
|
|
on an owned and managed basis, which include investments held on
a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures,
we had investments in 46 industrial development projects, which
are expected to total approximately 15.7 million square
feet upon completion;
|
|
|
|
on a consolidated basis, we owned nine development projects,
totaling approximately 2.2 million square feet, which are
available for sale or contribution;
|
|
|
|
through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, we had
investments in 46 industrial operating properties, totaling
approximately 7.3 million square feet; and
|
|
|
|
we held approximately 0.2 million square feet through our
investment in AMB Pier One, LLC, which is the location of our
global headquarters.
|
Our global headquarters are located at Pier 1, Bay 1,
San Francisco, California 94111; our telephone number is
(415) 394-9000.
We maintain other office locations in Amsterdam, Atlanta,
Baltimore, Beijing, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Frankfurt, Los
Angeles, Menlo Park, Nagoya, Narita, New Jersey, New York,
Osaka, Paris, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Tokyo and Vancouver.
As of June 30, 2007, we employed 469 individuals: 181 in
our San Francisco headquarters, 60 in our Boston office, 49
in our Tokyo office, 35 in our Amsterdam office and the
remainder in our other offices. Our website address is
www.amb.com. Our annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 are available on our website free of charge as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish it to, the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. The public may read and copy these
materials at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may
obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a Web site that contains such reports, proxy
and information statements and other information whose Internet
address is
http://www.sec.gov.
Our Corporate Governance Principles and Code of Business Conduct
are also posted on our website. Information contained on our
website is not and should not be deemed a part of this report or
any other report or filing filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Operating
Strategy
We base our operating strategy on a variety of operational and
service offerings, including in-house acquisitions, development,
redevelopment, asset management, property management, leasing,
finance, accounting and market research. Our strategy is to
leverage our expertise across a large customer base, and
complement our internal management resources with long-standing
relationships with entrepreneurial real estate management and
development firms in certain of our target markets.
We believe that real estate is fundamentally a local business
and best operated by local teams in each market comprised of AMB
employees, local alliance partners or both. We intend to
continue to increase utilization of internal management
resources in target markets to achieve both operating
efficiencies and to expose our customers to the broadening array
of AMB service offerings, including access to multiple locations
worldwide and build-to-suit developments. We actively manage our
portfolio, whether directly or with an alliance partner, by
establishing leasing strategies, negotiating lease terms,
pricing, and level and timing of property improvements.
38
Growth
Strategies
Growth
through Operations
We seek to generate long-term internal growth through rent
increases on existing space and renewals on rollover space,
working to maintain a high occupancy rate at our properties and
to control expenses by capitalizing on the economies of scale
inherent in owning, operating and growing a large, global
portfolio. During the three months ended June 30, 2007,
rent on renewed and released space in our operating portfolio
increased 2.0%, on an owned and managed basis. This amount
excludes expense reimbursements, rental abatements, percentage
rents and straight-line rents. During the three months ended
June 30, 2007, cash-basis same store net operating income
increased by 5.8% on an owned and managed basis. While we think
that it is important to view real estate as a long-term
investment, past results are not necessarily an indication of
future performance. See Supplemental Earnings
Measures for a discussion of cash-basis same store net
operating income and a reconciliation of cash-basis same store
net operating income and net income and Part I,
Item 1: Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for detailed segment information,
including revenue attributable to each segment, gross investment
in each segment and total assets.
Growth
through Development and Value-Added Conversions
We think that development, redevelopment and expansion of
well-located, high-quality industrial properties generally
provide us with attractive investment opportunities at higher
rates of return than may be obtained from the purchase of
existing properties. Through the deployment of our in-house
development expertise, we seek to create value both through new
construction and acquisition and management of value-added
properties. Value-added conversion projects represent the
development or redevelopment of land or a building site for a
more valuable use and may include such activities as rezoning,
redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. Both new
development and value-added conversions require significant
management attention and capital investment to maximize their
return. Completed development properties are generally
contributed to our co-investment joint ventures and held in our
owned and managed portfolio or sold to third parties. We think
our global market presence and expertise will enable us to
continue to generate and capitalize on a diverse range of
development opportunities.
The multidisciplinary backgrounds of our employees should
provide us with the skills and experience to capitalize on
strategic renovation, expansion and development opportunities.
Many of our employees have specific experience in real estate
development, both with us and with local, national or
international development firms. Over the past five years, we
have significantly expanded our development staff. We pursue
development projects directly and in joint ventures, providing
us with the flexibility to pursue development projects
independently or in partnerships, depending on market
conditions, submarkets or building sites.
Growth
through Acquisitions and Capital Redeployment
Our acquisition experience and our network of property
management, leasing and acquisition resources should continue to
provide opportunities for growth. In addition to our internal
resources, we have long-term relationships with third-party
local property management firms, which may give us access to
additional acquisition opportunities, as such managers
frequently market properties on behalf of sellers. We think our
UPREIT structure, which enables us to acquire land and
industrial properties in the United States in exchange for
limited partnership units in the operating partnership or AMB
Property II, L.P., enhances our attractiveness to owners and
developers seeking to transfer properties on a tax-deferred
basis. In addition, we seek to redeploy capital from
non-strategic assets into properties that better fit our current
investment focus.
We are generally engaged in various stages of negotiations for a
number of acquisitions and dispositions that may include
individual properties, large multi-property portfolios or other
real estate companies. We cannot assure you that we will
consummate any of these transactions. Such transactions, if we
consummate them, may be material individually or in the
aggregate. Sources of capital for acquisitions may include
retained cash flow from operations, borrowings under our
unsecured credit facilities, other forms of secured or unsecured
debt financing, issuances of debt or preferred or common equity
securities by us or the operating partnership (including
issuances of units in the operating partnership or its
subsidiaries), proceeds from divestitures of properties,
assumption of debt related to the acquired properties and
private capital from our co-investment partners.
39
Growth
through Global Expansion
Our long-term capital allocation goal is to have approximately
50% of our owned and managed operating portfolio invested in
non-U.S. markets
(based on annualized base rent). As of June 30, 2007, our
non-U.S. operating
properties comprised 19.1% of our owned and managed operating
portfolio (based on annualized base rent) and 1.8% of our
consolidated operating portfolio (based on annualized base
rent). In addition to the United States, we include Canada and
Mexico as target countries in North America. In Europe, our
target countries currently are Belgium, France, Germany, Italy,
the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom. In Asia, our
target countries currently are China, India, Japan, Singapore
and South Korea. We expect to add additional target countries
outside the United States in the future.
Expansion into target markets outside the United States
represents a natural extension of our strategy to invest in
industrial property markets with high population densities,
close proximity to large customer clusters and available labor
pools, and major distribution centers serving global trade. Our
international expansion strategy mirrors our focus in the United
States on supply-constrained submarkets with political, economic
or physical constraints to new development. Our international
investments extend our offering of
HTD®
facilities for customers who value speed-to-market over storage.
Specifically, we are focused on customers whose business is
derived from global trade. In addition, our investments target
major consumer distribution markets and customers. We think that
our established customer relationships, our contacts in the air
cargo and logistics industries, our underwriting of markets and
investments and our strategic alliances with knowledgeable
developers and managers will assist us in competing
internationally. For a discussion of the amount of our revenues
attributable to the United States and international markets,
please see Part I, Item 1: Note 11 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Growth
through Co-Investments
We co-invest in properties with private capital investors
through partnerships, limited liability companies or joint
ventures. Our co-investment joint ventures are managed by our
private capital group and typically operate under the same
investment strategy that we apply to our other operations.
Typically, we will own a
15-50%
interest in our co-investment joint ventures. We expect our
co-investment program will continue to serve as a source of
capital for acquisitions and developments; however, we cannot
assure you that it will continue to do so. In addition, our
co-investment joint ventures typically allow us to earn
acquisition and development fees, asset management fees or
priority distributions, as well as promoted interests or
incentive distributions based on the performance of the
co-investment joint ventures. As of June 30, 2007, we owned
approximately 78.1 million square feet of our properties
(51.7% of the total operating and development portfolio) through
our consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
CONSOLIDATED
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Effective October 1, 2006, we deconsolidated AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., on a prospective
basis, due to the re-evaluation of the accounting for our
investment in the fund in light of changes to the partnership
agreement regarding the general partners rights effective
October 1, 2006. As a result, our results of operations
presented below are not comparable between years presented.
The analysis below includes changes attributable to same store
growth, acquisitions, development activity and divestitures.
Same store properties are those that we owned during both the
current and prior year reporting periods, excluding development
properties stabilized after December 31, 2005 (generally
defined as properties that are 90% leased or properties for
which we have held a certificate of occupancy or where building
has been substantially complete for at least 12 months).
As of June 30, 2007, same store industrial properties
consisted of properties aggregating approximately
73.6 million square feet. The properties acquired during
the three months ended June 30, 2007, consisted of three
properties, aggregating approximately 0.2 million square
feet. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, our
acquisitions consisted of eight properties, aggregating
approximately 2.5 million square feet. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007, property divestitures and
contributions consisted of 11 properties, aggregating
approximately 5.8 million square feet. During the three
months ended June 30, 2006, property divestitures consisted
40
of three properties, aggregating approximately 0.5 million
square feet. The properties acquired during the six months ended
June 30, 2007, consisted of four properties, aggregating
approximately 0.4 million square feet. During the six
months ended June 30, 2006, our acquisitions consisted of
14 properties, aggregating approximately 4.6 million square
feet. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, property
divestitures and contributions consisted of 14 properties,
aggregating approximately 6.4 million square feet. During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, property divestitures
consisted of six properties, aggregating approximately
0.9 million square feet. Our future financial condition and
results of operations, including rental revenues, may be
impacted by the acquisition of additional properties and
dispositions. Our future revenues and expenses may vary
materially from historical results.
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store
|
|
$
|
138.5
|
|
|
$
|
149.8
|
|
|
$
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
Development
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
%
|
Other industrial
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Non U.S. industrial
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental revenues
|
|
|
162.9
|
|
|
|
171.0
|
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
73.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
171.4
|
|
|
$
|
175.9
|
|
|
$
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial same store rental revenues decreased
$11.3 million from the prior year for the three month
period due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P., partially offset by an increase in
occupancy and rent increases on renewals and rollovers. Pro
forma same store rental revenues for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006, would have been $133.5 million, if AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. had been
deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. The properties
acquired during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
consisted of 27 properties, aggregating approximately
6.6 million square feet. The properties acquired during the
three months ended June 30, 2007, consisted of three
properties, aggregating approximately 0.2 million square
feet. The increase in rental revenues from development is
primarily due to increased occupancy at several of our
development projects where development activities have been
substantially completed. Other industrial revenues include
rental revenues from development projects that have reached
certain levels of operation and are not yet part of the same
store operating pool of properties. The increase in revenues
from
non-U.S. industrial
properties is primarily due to the acquisition of properties in
France, Germany, Mexico and the Netherlands during 2006. The
increase in private capital income of $3.6 million was
primarily due to an increase in acquisition fees and asset
management fees as a result of an increase in total assets under
management.
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Property operating costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
$
|
24.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs
|
|
$
|
43.3
|
|
|
$
|
43.6
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store
|
|
$
|
37.8
|
|
|
$
|
39.7
|
|
|
$
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
Development
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
Other industrial
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)%
|
Non U.S. industrial
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs
|
|
|
43.3
|
|
|
|
43.6
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
44.5
|
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
(466.7
|
)%
|
Fund costs
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(40.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
116.5
|
|
|
$
|
118.8
|
|
|
$
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store properties operating expenses decreased
$1.9 million from the prior year for the three month period
due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P. Pro forma same store operating
expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, would have
been $35.9 million, if AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. had been deconsolidated as of
January 1, 2006. The 2006 acquisitions consisted of 27
properties, aggregating approximately 6.6 million square
feet. The 2007 acquisitions consisted of three properties,
aggregating approximately 0.2 million square feet. The
increase in development operating costs is primarily due to
increased operations in certain development projects which have
been substantially completed. Other industrial expenses include
expenses from development properties that have reached certain
levels of operation and are not yet part of the same store
operating pool of properties. In 2006 and 2007, we continued to
acquire properties in France, Germany, Mexico and the
Netherlands, resulting in increased international operating
costs. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was
due to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. The increase in general and administrative
expenses was primarily due to additional staffing and the
opening of new satellite offices both domestically and
internationally. The impairment loss during the three month
period ended June 30, 2006, was taken on several non-core
assets as a result of leasing activities and changes in the
economic environment and the holding period of certain assets.
Other expenses increased approximately $1.4 million from
the prior year for the three month period due primarily to an
increase in losses on the non-qualified deferred compensation
plan and certain deal costs. Fund costs represent general and
administrative costs paid to third
42
parties associated with our co-investment joint ventures. The
decrease of fund costs from the prior year for the three month
period is due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and (Expenses)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures, net
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
$
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(78.3
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
195.5
|
%
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests, net
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)%
|
Interest expense, including
amortization
|
|
|
(33.4
|
)
|
|
|
(44.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expenses),
net
|
|
$
|
78.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
$
|
(66.7
|
)
|
|
|
560.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
ventures of approximately $6.5 million as compared to the
three months ended June 30, 2006, was primarily due to a
decrease in gains from the disposition of real estate by our
unconsolidated joint ventures, partially offset by the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. Other income increased approximately $4.3 million from
the prior year for the three month period due primarily to an
increase in interest income. During the three months ended
June 30, 2007, we contributed 4.2 million square feet
in operating properties to our newly formed unconsolidated
co-investment joint venture, AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, a
Euro-denominated open-ended co-investment joint venture, and
contributed a 0.2 million square foot operating property
into AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. for a total
of approximately $520.3 million. As a result of these
contributions, we recognized gains from the contribution of real
estate interests of approximately $74.7 million,
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash.
Development profits represent gains from the sale or
contribution of development projects including land. During the
three months ended June 30, 2007, we sold three completed
development projects totaling 0.2 million square feet for
approximately $20.9, resulting in an after-tax gain of
$3.0 million. In addition, we contributed three completed
development projects totaling 0.7 million square feet into
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., and three
completed development projects totaling 0.5 million square
feet into our newly formed AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, both
unconsolidated joint ventures, for a total of
$138.5 million. As a result of these contributions, we
recognized an aggregate after-tax gain of $26.0 million
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party co-investors for cash.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we sold an
approximately 32,000 square foot development project for
$2.9 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of
$0.1 million. In addition, we received approximately
$0.4 million in connection with the condemnation of a
parcel of land resulting in a loss of $1.0 million,
$0.8 million of which was the joint venture partners
share. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we
contributed one completed development project totaling
approximately 0.8 million square feet into AMB Japan
Fund I, L.P., and one completed development project
totaling approximately 0.6 million square feet into AMB-SGP
Mexico, LLC, both unconsolidated joint ventures. As a result of
these contributions, we recognized an aggregate after-tax gain
of $46.6 million representing the portion of our interest
in the contributed properties acquired by the third-party
co-investors for cash. The decrease in interest expense,
including amortization, was due primarily to decreased
borrowings on unsecured credit facilities and the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Income attributable to
discontinued operations, net of minority interests
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(87.8
|
)%
|
Gains from dispositions of real
estate, net of minority interests
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)
|
|
|
(97.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
21.2
|
|
|
$
|
(20.3
|
)
|
|
|
(95.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we did not
divest ourselves of any industrial buildings. The gains from
dispositions of $0.4 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 resulted primarily from the additional value
received from the disposition of properties in 2006. During the
three months ended June 30, 2006, we divested ourselves of
eight industrial buildings, aggregating approximately
0.5 million square feet for $37.1 million, with a
resulting net gain of approximately $17.1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
%
|
Preferred unit redemption
(issuance costs) discount
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(3,000.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock
|
|
$
|
(6.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
130.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2006, we issued 2,000,000 shares of 6.85%
Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The
increase in preferred stock dividends is due to the then newly
issued shares. On April 17, 2007, the operating partnership
redeemed all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series J
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and
all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units. In addition, on
April 17, 2007, AMB Property II, L.P., one of our
subsidiaries, repurchased all 510,000 of its outstanding 8.00%
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units. As a result of the redemptions and repurchase
during the three months ended June 30, 2007, we recognized
a reduction of income available to common stockholders of
$2.9 million for the original issuance costs. During the
three months ended June 30, 2006, AMB Property II, L.P.,
one of our subsidiaries, redeemed all 220,440 of its outstanding
7.75% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units and we recognized an increase in income
available to common stockholders of $0.1 million for the
discount on repurchase, net of original issuance costs.
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Rental revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store
|
|
$
|
277.2
|
|
|
$
|
300.6
|
|
|
$
|
(23.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)%
|
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
104.2
|
%
|
Development
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
111.5
|
%
|
Other industrial
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
Non U.S. industrial
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rental revenues
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
342.3
|
|
|
|
(17.3
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
339.4
|
|
|
$
|
352.3
|
|
|
$
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial same store rental revenues decreased
$23.4 million from the prior year for the six month period
due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P., partially offset by an increase in
occupancy and rent increases on renewals and rollovers. Pro
forma same store rental revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006, would have been $268.4 million, if AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. had been
deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. The 2006 acquisitions
consisted of 27 properties, aggregating approximately
6.6 million square feet. The 2007 acquisitions consisted of
four properties, aggregating approximately 0.4 million
square feet. The increase in rental revenues from development is
primarily due to increased occupancy at several of our
development projects where development activities have been
substantially completed. Other industrial revenues include
rental revenues from development projects that have reached
certain levels of operation and are not yet part of the same
store operating pool of properties. The increase in private
capital income of $4.4 million
44
was primarily due to an increase in acquisition fees and asset
management fees as a result of an increase in total assets under
management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Property operating costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses
|
|
$
|
49.9
|
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Real estate taxes
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs
|
|
$
|
87.6
|
|
|
$
|
87.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. industrial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store
|
|
$
|
76.5
|
|
|
$
|
80.1
|
|
|
$
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
2006 acquisitions
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
116.7
|
%
|
Development
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Other industrial
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
180.0
|
%
|
Non U.S. industrial
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property operating costs
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
|
|
87.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
82.5
|
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
%
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
(94.4
|
)%
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
900.0
|
%
|
Fund costs
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(54.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
233.0
|
|
|
$
|
229.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same store properties operating expenses showed a decrease
of $3.6 million from the prior year for the six month
period due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P. Pro forma same store operating
expenses for the year ended June 30, 2006, would have been
$72.4 million, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. The
2006 acquisitions consisted of 27 properties, aggregating
approximately 6.6 million square feet. The 2007
acquisitions consisted of four properties, aggregating
approximately 0.4 million square feet. The increase in
development operating costs is primarily due to increased
operations in certain development projects which have been
substantially completed. Other industrial expenses include
expenses from development properties that have reached certain
levels of operation and are not yet part of the same store
operating pool of properties. The increase in property operating
costs from
non-U.S. industrial
properties is primarily due to the acquisition of properties in
France, Germany, Mexico and the Netherlands during 2006. The
decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was due to the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. The increase in general and administrative expenses was
primarily due to additional staffing and the opening of new
satellite offices both domestically and internationally. The
impairment loss during the six months ended June 30, 2007
was taken on a non-core asset as a result of leasing activities
and changes in the economic environment. The impairment losses
during the six months ended June 30, 2006, were taken on
several non-core assets as a result of leasing activities and
changes in the economic environment and the holding period of
certain assets. Other expenses increased approximately
$1.8 million from the prior year for the six month period
due primarily to an increase in losses on the non-qualified
deferred compensation plan and certain deal costs. Fund costs
represent general and administrative costs paid to third parties
associated with our co-investment joint ventures. The decrease
of fund costs from the prior year for the six month period is
due primarily to the deconsolidation of AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and (Expenses)
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures, net
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
10.4
|
|
|
$
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.5
|
)%
|
Other income
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
110.5
|
%
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate interests, net
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Development profits, net of taxes
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)%
|
Interest expense, including
amortization
|
|
|
(68.0
|
)
|
|
|
(83.7
|
)
|
|
|
(15.7
|
)
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and (expenses),
net
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
$
|
(21.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(85.1
|
)
|
|
|
(401.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
ventures of approximately $6.5 million as compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2006, was primarily due to a
decrease in gains from the disposition of real estate by our
unconsolidated joint ventures, partially offset by the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P. Other income increased approximately $6.3 million from
the prior year for the six month period due primarily to an
increase in interest income and insurance proceeds related to
losses from hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. During the six months
ended June 30, 2007, we contributed 4.2 million square
feet in operating properties, to our newly formed unconsolidated
co-investment joint venture, AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, a
Euro-denominated open-ended co-investment joint venture,
contributed a 0.2 million square foot operating property
into AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., and
contributed an operating property aggregating approximately
0.1 million square feet into AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, for a
total of approximately $524.9 million. As a result of these
contributions, we recognized gains from contribution of real
estate interests of approximately $74.8 million,
representing the portion of our interest in the contributed
properties acquired by the third-party investors for cash.
Development profits represent gains from the sale or
contribution of development projects including land. During the
six months ended June 30, 2007, we sold five completed
development projects totaling 0.3 million square feet for
approximately $45.6 million, resulting in an after-tax gain
of $6.3 million. In addition, we contributed eight
completed development projects totaling 1.7 million square
feet and two land parcels into AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, our newly formed AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS and AMB DFS Fund I, LLC, four
of our unconsolidated joint ventures. As a result of these
contributions, we recognized an aggregate after-tax gain of
$34.9 million representing the portion of our interest in
the contributed assets acquired by the third-party co-investors
for cash. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, we
sold one land parcel and an approximately 32,000 square
foot development project for an aggregate sale price of
$7.6 million, resulting in an after-tax gain of
$0.8 million. During the six months ended June 30,
2006, we also contributed one completed development project
totaling approximately 0.8 million square feet into AMB
Japan Fund I, L.P., and one completed development project
totaling approximately 0.6 million square feet into AMB-SGP
Mexico, LLC. As a result of these contributions, we recognized
an aggregate after-tax gain of $46.6 million representing
the portion of our interest in the contributed properties
acquired by the third-party co-investors for cash. In addition,
we received approximately $0.4 million in connection with
the condemnation of a parcel of land resulting in a loss of
$1.0 million, $0.8 million of which was the joint
venture partners share. The decrease in interest expense,
including amortization, was due primarily to decreased
borrowings on unsecured credit facilities and the
deconsolidation of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III,
L.P., partially offset by refinancing costs associated with the
refinanced $305.0 million of secured debt for AMB-SGP,
L.P., one of our co-investment joint ventures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Income attributable to
discontinued operations, net of minority interests
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(80.0
|
)%
|
Gains from dispositions of real
estate, net of minority interests
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
|
(98.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
30.6
|
|
|
$
|
(28.9
|
)
|
|
|
(94.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we did not
divest ourselves of any industrial buildings. The gains from
dispositions of $0.4 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 resulted primarily from the additional value
received from the disposition of properties in 2006. During the
six months ended June 30, 2006, we divested ourselves of 12
industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 0.9 million
square feet, for an aggregate price of $53.9 million, with
a resulting net gain of $24.1 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
$
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred unit redemption
(issuance costs) discount
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
190.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock
|
|
$
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2006, we issued 2,000,000 shares of 6.85%
Series P Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. The
increase in preferred stock dividends is due to the then newly
issued shares. On April 17, 2007, the operating partnership
redeemed all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series J
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units and
all 800,000 of its outstanding 7.95% Series K Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units. In addition, on
April 17, 2007, AMB Property II, L.P., one of our
subsidiaries, repurchased all 510,000 of its outstanding 8.00%
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units. As a result of the redemptions and
repurchase, we recognized a reduction of income available to
common stockholders of $2.9 million for the original
issuance costs during the six months ended June 30, 2007.
During the six months ended June 30, 2006, AMB Property II,
L.P., redeemed all 840,000 of its outstanding 8.125%
Series H Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units and all 220,440 of its outstanding 7.75%
Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units. As a result, we recognized a decrease in
income available to common stockholders of $1.0 million for
the original issuance costs, net of discount.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Balance Sheet Strategy. In general, we use
unsecured lines of credit, unsecured notes, preferred stock and
common equity (issued by us
and/or the
operating partnership and its subsidiaries) to capitalize our
wholly-owned assets. Over time, we plan to retire non-recourse,
secured debt encumbering our wholly-owned assets and replace
that debt with unsecured notes where practicable. In managing
our co-investment joint ventures, in general, we use
non-recourse, secured debt to capitalize our co-investment joint
ventures.
We currently expect that our principal sources of working
capital and funding for acquisitions, development, expansion and
renovation of properties will include:
|
|
|
|
|
retained earnings and cash flow from operations;
|
|
|
|
private capital from co-investment partners;
|
|
|
|
net proceeds from contribution of properties and completed
development projects to our co-investment joint ventures;
|
|
|
|
proceeds from equity (common and preferred) or debt securities
offerings;
|
|
|
|
borrowings under our unsecured credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
other forms of secured or unsecured financing;
|
|
|
|
proceeds from limited partnership unit offerings (including
issuances of limited partnership units by our
subsidiaries); and
|
|
|
|
net proceeds from divestitures of properties.
|
We currently expect that our principal funding requirements will
include:
47
|
|
|
|
|
development, expansion and renovation of properties;
|
|
|
|
acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
debt service; and
|
|
|
|
dividends and distributions on outstanding common and preferred
stock and limited partnership units.
|
Cash flows. For the six months ended
June 30, 2007, cash provided by operating activities was
$131.6 million as compared to $159.9 million for the
same period in 2006. This change is primarily due to changes in
our assets and liabilities and an increase in general and
administrative expenses primarily due to additional staffing and
expenses for new initiatives, including our international and
development expansions and increased occupancy costs. Cash used
in investing activities was $252.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to cash used for
investing activities of $643.2 million for the same period
in 2006. This change is primarily due to an increase in proceeds
from divestitures of real estate due largely to the formation of
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, offset by a decrease in funds
used for property acquisitions, a decrease in capital
distributions received from unconsolidated joint ventures, and
an increase in additions to interests in unconsolidated joint
ventures. Cash provided by financing activities was
$177.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007,
as compared to cash provided by financing activities of
$444.3 million for the same period in 2006. This change is
due primarily to an increase in payments, on secured debt, other
debt, credit facilities, senior debt, the cost of repurchase of
preferred units, and a decrease in borrowings on other debt,
proceeds from issuances of senior debt, and contributions from
co-investment partners. This activity was partially offset by
the issuance of common stock and increased borrowings on secured
debt and credit facilities.
We believe our sources of working capital, specifically our cash
flow from operations, borrowings available under our unsecured
credit facilities and our ability to access private and public
debt and equity capital, are adequate for us to meet our
liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future. The
unavailability of capital could adversely affect our financial
condition, results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay
dividends on, and the market price of, our stock.
Capital
Resources
Property Divestitures. During the three and
six months ended June 30, 2007, we did not divest ourselves
of any operating industrial buildings. During the three months
ended June 30, 2006, we divested ourselves of eight
industrial buildings, aggregating approximately 0.5 million
square feet, for an aggregate price of $37.1 million, with
a resulting net gain of $17.1 million. During the six
months ended June 30, 2006, we divested ourselves of
12 industrial buildings, aggregating approximately
0.9 million square feet, for an aggregate price of
$53.9 million, with a resulting net gain of
$24.1 million.
Gains from Sale or Contribution of Real Estate
Interests. During the three months ended
June 30, 2007, we contributed approximately
4.2 million square feet in operating properties, to our
newly formed unconsolidated
co-investment
joint venture, AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, a
Euro-denominated open-ended co-investment joint venture, and
contributed an approximate 0.2 million square foot
operating property into AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. for a total of approximately
$520.3 million. We recognized a gain of $74.7 million
on the contributions, representing the portion of our interest
in the contributed properties acquired by the third-party
investors for cash. During the six months ended June 30,
2007, we contributed operating properties for approximately
$524.9 million, aggregating approximately 4.5 million
square feet, into AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, AMB
Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. and AMB-SGP Mexico,
LLC. We recognized a gain of $74.8 million on the
contributions, representing the portion of our interest in the
contributed properties acquired by the third-party investors for
cash. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2006,
there were no comparable events.
Development Starts. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, we initiated nine new industrial
development projects in North America and Asia and one value
added conversion project in North America with a total expected
investment of $265.1 million, aggregating approximately
3.2 million square feet. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we initiated 14 new industrial development
projects in North America and Asia and one value added
conversion project in North America with a total expected
investment of $455.8 million, aggregating approximately
5.1 million square feet. During the three months ended
June 30, 2006, we initiated
48
four new industrial development projects in North America and
Asia with a total estimated investment of $134.6 million,
aggregating an estimated 2.0 million square feet. During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, we initiated 11 new
industrial development projects in North America and Asia with a
total expected investment of $353.4 million, aggregating
approximately 4.9 million square feet.
Development Contributions. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007, we contributed three completed
development projects aggregating 0.7 million square feet
and three completed development projects aggregating
0.5 million square feet into AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P. and AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS,
respectively, both unconsolidated joint ventures. As a result of
these contributions, we recognized an aggregate after-tax gain
of $26.0 million, representing the portion of our interest
in the contributed properties acquired by the third-party
investors for cash. During the six months ended June 30,
2007, we contributed four completed development projects
aggregating 1.0 million square feet, three completed
development projects aggregating 0.5 million square feet
and one 0.2 million square foot completed development
project into AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P., AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS and AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC,
respectively, all unconsolidated joint ventures. In addition,
two land parcels were contributed into AMB DFS Fund I, LLC.
As a result of these contributions, we recognized an aggregate
after-tax gain of $34.9 million, representing the portion
of our interest in the contributed properties acquired by the
third-party investors for cash. During the three months ended
June 30, 2006, we contributed one completed development
project totaling approximately 0.8 million square feet into
AMB Japan Fund I, L.P., and one completed development
project totaling approximately 0.6 million square feet into
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC, both unconsolidated joint ventures. As a
result of these contributions, we recognized an aggregate
after-tax gain of $46.6 million representing the portion of
its interest in the contributed properties acquired by the
third-party co-investors for cash. No other contributions were
made during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Properties Held for Contribution. As of
June 30, 2007, we held for contribution to co-investment
joint ventures 12 industrial projects with an aggregate net book
value of $245.6 million, which, when contributed to a joint
venture, will reduce our current ownership interest from
approximately 93% to an expected range of
15-20%.
Properties Held for Divestiture. As of
June 30, 2007, we held for divestiture five industrial
projects with an aggregate net book value of $45.1 million.
These properties either are not in our core markets or do not
meet our current investment objectives, or are included as part
of our development-for-sale program. The divestitures of the
properties are subject to negotiation of acceptable terms and
other customary conditions. Properties held for divestiture are
stated at the lower of cost or estimated fair value less costs
to sell.
Co-Investment Joint Ventures. Through the
operating partnership, we enter into co-investment joint
ventures with institutional investors. These co-investment joint
ventures are managed by our private capital group and provide us
with an additional source of capital to fund certain
acquisitions, development projects and renovation projects, as
well as private capital income. We consolidate these joint
ventures for financial reporting purposes when they are not
variable interest entities and when we are the sole managing
general partner and control all major operating decisions.
However, in certain cases, our co-investment joint ventures are
unconsolidated because we do not control all major operating
decisions and the general partners do not have significant
rights under the Emerging Issue Task Force Issue
No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights.
Third-party equity interests in the joint ventures are reflected
as minority interests in the consolidated financial statements.
As of June 30, 2007, we owned approximately
78.1 million square feet of our properties (51.7% of the
total operating and development portfolio) through our
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. We may
49
make additional investments through these joint ventures or new
joint ventures in the future and presently plan to do so. Our
unconsolidated co-investment joint ventures at June 30,
2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated Co-Investment
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
Planned
|
|
Joint Venture
|
|
Partner
|
|
Ownership Percentage
|
|
|
Capitalization(1)
|
|
|
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC(2)
|
|
Industrial (Mexico) JV Pte Ltd
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
715,153
|
|
AMB Japan Fund I, L.P.(3)
|
|
Institutional investors
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,977,580
|
|
AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS(4)(6)
|
|
Institutional investors
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
942,863
|
|
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund
III, L.P.(5)(6)
|
|
AMB Institutional Alliance REIT
III, Inc.
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,874,461
|
|
AMB DFS Fund I, LLC(7)
|
|
Strategic Realty Ventures, LLC
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
$
|
446,821
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Planned capitalization includes anticipated debt and all
partners expected equity contributions. |
|
(2) |
|
AMB-SGP Mexico, LLC is a co-investment partnership formed in
2004 with Industrial (Mexico) JV Pte. Ltd., a subsidiary of GIC
Real Estate Pte. Ltd., the real estate investment subsidiary of
the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. |
|
(3) |
|
AMB Japan Fund I, L.P. is a co-investment partnership
formed in 2005 with 13 institutional investors. The fund is
Yen-denominated. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the
exchange rate in effect at June 30, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
AMB Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, is an open-ended co-investment
venture formed in 2007 with institutional investors. The fund is
Euro-denominated. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the
exchange rate in effect at June 30, 2007. |
|
(5) |
|
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. is an open-ended
co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional
investors, which invests through a private real estate
investment trust. Prior to October 1, 2006, we accounted
for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. as a
consolidated joint venture. |
|
(6) |
|
The planned gross capitalization and investment capacity of AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, and AMB Institutional
Alliance Fund III, L.P. as open-ended funds are not
limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross
book value of real estate assets plus estimated investment
capacity, as of the most recent quarter end. |
|
(7) |
|
AMB DFS Fund I, LLC is a co-investment partnership formed
in 2006 with a subsidiary of GE Real Estate to build and sell
properties. |
During the three months ended June 30, 2007, we exercised
our option to purchase the remaining equity interest, based on
the fair market value as stipulated in the joint venture
agreement, in AMB Pier One, LLC, for a nominal amount. AMB Pier
One, LLC, is a joint venture related to the 2000 redevelopment
of the pier that houses our global headquarters in
San Francisco, California. As a result, the investment was
consolidated as of June 30, 2007.
As of June 30, 2007, we also had an approximate 39.0%
unconsolidated equity interest in G.Accion, a Mexican real
estate company. G.Accion provides management and development
services for industrial, retail, residential and office
properties in Mexico. In addition, as of June 30, 2007, one
of our subsidiaries also had an approximate 5% interest in IAT
Air Cargo Facilities Income Fund (IAT), a Canadian income trust
specializing in aviation-related real estate at Canadas
leading international airports. This equity investment of
approximately $2.9 million and $2.7 million,
respectively, is included in other assets on the consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006.
Common and Preferred Equity. We have
authorized for issuance 100,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, of which the following series were designated as of
June 30, 2007: 1,595,337 shares of series D
preferred; 2,300,000 shares of series L cumulative
redeemable preferred, of which 2,000,000 are outstanding;
2,300,000 shares of series M cumulative redeemable
preferred, all of which are outstanding; 3,000,000 shares
of series O cumulative redeemable preferred, all of which
are outstanding; and 2,000,000 shares of series P
cumulative redeemable preferred, all of which are outstanding.
During the six months ended June 30, 2007, we issued
approximately 8.4 million shares of our common stock for
net proceeds of approximately $472.1 million, which were
contributed to the operating partnership in exchange
50
for the issuance of approximately 8.4 million general
partnership units. As a result of the common stock issuance,
there was a significant reallocation of partnership interests
due to the difference in our stock price at issuance as compared
to the book value per share at the time of issuance. We intend
to use the proceeds from the offering for general corporate
purposes and, over the long term, to expand our global
development business.
In December 2005, our board of directors approved a new two-year
common stock repurchase program for the discretionary repurchase
of up to $200.0 million of our common stock. We did not
repurchase or retire any shares of our common stock during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
Debt. In order to maintain financial
flexibility and facilitate the deployment of capital through
market cycles, we presently intend to operate with an our share
of total debt-to-our share of total market capitalization ratio
of approximately 45% or less. As of June 30, 2007, our
share of total debt-to-our share of total market capitalization
ratio was 32.2%. (See footnote 1 to the Capitalization Ratios
table below for our definitions of our share of total
market capitalization, market equity and
our share of total debt.) However, we typically
finance our co-investment joint ventures with secured debt at a
loan-to-value ratio of
50-65% per
our joint venture agreements. Additionally, we currently intend
to manage our capitalization in order to maintain an investment
grade rating on our senior unsecured debt. Regardless of these
policies, however, our organizational documents do not limit the
amount of indebtedness that we may incur. Accordingly, our
management could alter or eliminate these policies without
stockholder approval or circumstances could arise that could
render us unable to comply with these policies.
As of June 30, 2007, the aggregate principal amount of our
secured debt was $1.3 billion, excluding unamortized debt
premiums of $5.0 million. Of the $1.3 billion of
secured debt, $1.1 billion is secured by properties in our
joint ventures. The secured debt is generally non-recourse and
bears interest at rates varying from 1.1% to 9.4% per annum
(with a weighted average rate of 6.1%) and final maturity dates
ranging from September 2007 to February 2024. As of
June 30, 2007, $1.1 billion of the secured debt
obligations bear interest at fixed rates with a weighted average
interest rate of 6.3%, while the remaining $228.7 million
bear interest at variable rates (with a weighted average
interest rate of 5.3%).
On February 14, 2007, seven subsidiaries of AMB-SGP, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership, which is one of our
subsidiaries, entered into a loan agreement for a
$305 million secured financing. On the same day, pursuant
to the loan agreement, the same seven subsidiaries delivered
four promissory notes to the two lenders, each of which matures
on March 5, 2012. One note has a principal of
$160 million and an interest rate that is fixed at 5.29%.
The second is a $40 million note with an interest rate of
81 basis points above the one-month LIBOR rate. The third
note has a principal of $84 million and a fixed interest
rate of 5.90%. The fourth note has a principal of
$21 million and bears interest at a rate of 135 basis
points above the one-month LIBOR rate.
As of June 30, 2007, the operating partnership had
outstanding an aggregate of $1.1 billion in unsecured
senior debt securities, which bore a weighted average interest
rate of 6.2% and had an average term of 4.5 years. These
unsecured senior debt securities include $300.0 million in
notes issued in June 1998, $205.0 million of medium-term
notes, which were issued under the operating partnerships
2000 medium-term note program, $275.0 million of
medium-term notes, which were issued under the operating
partnerships 2002 medium-term note program,
$175.0 million of medium-term notes, which were issued
under the operating partnerships 2006 medium-term note
program and approximately $112.5 million of
5.094% Notes Due 2015, which were issued to Teachers
Insurance and Annuity Association of America on July 11,
2005 in a private placement, in exchange for the cancelled
$100.0 million of notes that were issued in June 1998,
resulting in a discount of approximately $12.5 million. The
unsecured senior debt securities are subject to various
covenants.
We guarantee the operating partnerships obligations with
respect to its senior debt securities. If we are unable to
refinance or extend principal payments due at maturity or pay
them with proceeds from other capital transactions, then our
cash flow may be insufficient to pay dividends to our
stockholders in all years and to repay debt upon maturity.
Furthermore, if prevailing interest rates or other factors at
the time of refinancing (such as the reluctance of lenders to
make commercial real estate loans) result in higher interest
rates upon refinancing, then the interest expense relating to
that refinanced indebtedness would increase. This increased
interest expense would adversely affect our financial condition,
results of operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends
on, and the market price of, our stock.
51
Credit Facilities. The operating partnership
has a $550.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility
which matures on June 1, 2010. We are a guarantor of the
operating partnerships obligations under the credit
facility. The line carries a one-year extension option and can
be increased to up to $700.0 million upon certain
conditions. The rate on the borrowings is generally LIBOR plus a
margin, based on the operating partnerships long-term debt
rating, which was 42.5 basis points as of June 30,
2007, with an annual facility fee of 15 basis points. The
four-year credit facility includes a multi-currency component,
under which up to $550.0 million can be drawn in
U.S. dollars, Euros, Yen or British Pounds Sterling. The
operating partnership uses the credit facility principally for
acquisitions, funding development activity and general working
capital requirements. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding
balance on this credit facility, using the exchange rate in
effect on June 30, 2007, was $43.4 million and the
remaining amount available was $489.3 million, net of
outstanding letters of credit of $17.3 million.
AMB Japan Finance Y.K., a subsidiary of the operating
partnership has a Yen-denominated unsecured revolving credit
facility with an initial borrowing limit of 45.0 billion
Yen, which, using the exchange rate in effect at June 30,
2007, equaled approximately $365.3 million
U.S. dollars. On June 15, 2007, AMB Japan Finance Y.K.
exercised an existing accordion feature to increase this
unsecured revolving credit facility to 55.0 billion Yen,
which using the exchange rate in effect at June 30, 2007,
equaled approximately $446.5 million U.S. dollars. We,
along with the operating partnership, guarantee the obligations
of AMB Japan Finance Y.K. under the credit facility, as well as
the obligations of any other entity in which the operating
partnership directly or indirectly owns an ownership interest
and which is selected from time to time to be a borrower under
and pursuant to the credit agreement. The borrowers intend to
use the proceeds from the facility to fund the acquisition and
development of properties and for other real estate purposes in
Japan, China and South Korea. Generally, borrowers under the
credit facility have the option to secure all or a portion of
the borrowings under the credit facility with certain real
estate assets or equity in entities holding such real estate
assets. The credit facility matures in June 2010 and has a
one-year extension option. The extension option is subject to
the satisfaction of certain conditions and the payment of an
extension fee equal to 0.15% of the outstanding commitments
under the facility at that time. The rate on the borrowings is
generally TIBOR plus a margin, which is based on the credit
rating of the operating partnerships long-term debt and
was 42.5 basis points as of June 30, 2007. In
addition, there is an annual facility fee, payable in quarterly
amounts, which is based on the credit rating of the operating
partnerships long-term debt, and was 15 basis points
of the outstanding commitments under the facility as of
June 30, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding
balance on this credit facility, using the exchange rate in
effect on June 30, 2007, was $360.4 million in
U.S. dollars. The credit agreement contains affirmative
covenants, including financial reporting requirements and
maintenance of specified financial ratios, and negative
covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of liens and
limitations on mergers or consolidations.
The operating partnership also has a $250.0 million
unsecured revolving credit facility. We, along with the
operating partnership, guarantee the obligations for such
subsidiaries and other entities controlled by us or the
operating partnership that are selected by the operating
partnership from time to time to be borrowers under and pursuant
to our credit facility. The credit facility includes a
multi-currency component under which up to $250.0 million
can be drawn in U.S. dollars, Hong Kong dollars, Singapore
dollars, Canadian dollars and Euros. The line, which matures in
February 2010 and carries a one-year extension option, can be
increased to up to $350.0 million upon certain conditions
and the payment of an extension fee equal to 0.15% of the
outstanding commitments. The rate on the borrowings is generally
LIBOR plus a margin, based on the credit rating of the operating
partnerships senior unsecured long-term debt, which was
60 basis points as of June 30, 2007, with an annual
facility fee based on the credit rating of the operating
partnerships senior unsecured long-term debt. The
borrowers intend to use the proceeds from the facility to fund
the acquisition and development of properties and general
working capital requirements. As of June 30, 2007, the
outstanding balance on this facility was approximately
$158.3 million. The credit agreement contains affirmative
covenants, including financial reporting requirements and
maintenance of specified financial ratios by the operating
partnership, and negative covenants, including limitations on
the incurrence of liens and limitations on mergers or
consolidations.
On December 8, 2006, we executed a 228.0 million Euros
facility agreement (approximately $308.5 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007), which provides that certain of our affiliates may borrow
either acquisition loans, up to a 100.0 million Euros
sub-limit (approximately $135.4 million in
U.S. dollars, using the exchange rate at June 30,
2007), or secured term loans, in connection with properties
located in France,
52
Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Italy or Spain. On
March 21, 2007, we increased the facility amount limit from
228.0 million Euros to 328.0 million Euros
(approximately $436.3 million in U.S. dollars, using
the exchange rate at June 30, 2007). Drawings under the
term facility bear interest at a rate of 65 basis points
over EURIBOR and may occur until, and mature on, April 30,
2014. Drawings under the acquisition loan facility bear interest
at a rate of 75 basis points over EURIBOR and are repayable
within six months of the date of advance, unless extended. We
initially guaranteed the acquisition loan facility and were the
carve-out indemnitor in respect of the term loans. According to
the facility agreement these responsibilities will be
transferred upon the occurrence of certain events, and we will
be fully discharged from all such obligations upon such
transfer. On June 12, 2007, AMB Europe Fund I,
FCP-FIS, assumed, and we were released from, all of our
obligations and liabilities under the facility agreement. On
June 12, 2007, there were 200.7 million Euros
(approximately $271.8 million in U.S. dollars, using
the exchange rate at June 30, 2007) of term loans and
no acquisition loans outstanding under the facility agreement.
The tables below summarize our debt maturities and
capitalization as of June 30, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
|
Our
|
|
|
Joint
|
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
Venture
|
|
|
Senior Debt
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Debt(1)
|
|
|
Debt(1)
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Facilities(2)
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
57,917
|
|
|
$
|
29,640
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,179
|
|
|
$
|
155,736
|
|
2008
|
|
|
69,188
|
|
|
|
79,398
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
324,396
|
|
2009
|
|
|
25,799
|
|
|
|
127,993
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
254,665
|
|
2010
|
|
|
65,905
|
|
|
|
95,179
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
941
|
|
|
|
974,209
|
|
2011
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
189,611
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
265,740
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,044
|
|
|
|
449,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
452,724
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,447
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,920
|
(5)
|
|
|
287,367
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,780
|
|
|
|
112,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
131,935
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,995
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,091
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
220,968
|
|
|
|
1,114,797
|
|
|
|
1,067,491
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
85,110
|
|
|
|
3,050,550
|
|
Unamortized premiums (discounts)
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
(9,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,056
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated debt
|
|
|
222,193
|
|
|
|
1,118,509
|
|
|
|
1,057,498
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
85,110
|
|
|
|
3,045,494
|
|
Our share of unconsolidated joint
venture debt(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,252
|
|
|
|
501,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt(4)
|
|
|
222,193
|
|
|
|
1,577,440
|
|
|
|
1,057,498
|
|
|
|
562,184
|
|
|
|
127,362
|
|
|
|
3,546,677
|
|
Joint venture partners share
of consolidated joint venture debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(717,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,000
|
)
|
|
|
(769,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of total debt(4)
|
|
$
|
222,193
|
|
|
$
|
859,627
|
|
|
$
|
1,057,498
|
|
|
$
|
562,184
|
|
|
$
|
75,362
|
|
|
$
|
2,776,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighed average interest rate
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Weighed average maturity (in years)
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our secured debt and joint venture debt include debt related to
European and Asian assets in the amount of $60.5 million
and $45.5 million, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars
using the exchange rate in effect on June 30, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of
approximately $1.2 billion. Includes $403.8 million
and $158.3 million in Yen and Canadian dollar-based
borrowings, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the
foreign exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2007. |
53
|
|
|
(3) |
|
The weighted average interest and average maturity for the
unconsolidated joint venture debt were 4.5% and 5.1 years,
respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Our share of total debt represents the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on our percentage of equity interest in each of
the consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures holding the
debt. We believe that our share of total debt is a meaningful
supplemental measure, which enables both management and
investors to analyze our leverage and to compare our leverage to
that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of our debt to that of other companies
that do not consolidate their joint ventures. Our share of total
debt is not intended to reflect our actual liability should
there be a default under any or all of such loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. The above table reconciles
our share of total debt to total consolidated debt, a GAAP
financial measure. |
|
(5) |
|
Maturity includes $65.0 million balance outstanding on a
$65.0 million non-recourse credit facility obtained by AMB
Partners II, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Equity as of June 30, 2007
|
|
Security
|
|
Shares/Units Outstanding
|
|
|
Market Price
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
99,660,284
|
|
|
$
|
53.22
|
|
|
$
|
5,303,920
|
|
Common limited partnership units(1)
|
|
|
4,402,174
|
|
|
|
53.22
|
|
|
|
234,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
104,062,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,538,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 1,258,713 class B common limited partnership units
issued by AMB Property II, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock and Units as of June 30, 2007
|
Security
|
|
Dividend Rate
|
|
|
Liquidation Preference
|
|
|
Redemption/Callable Date
|
|
Series D preferred units(1)
|
|
|
7.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
79,767
|
|
|
February 2012
|
Series L preferred stock
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
June 2008
|
Series M preferred stock
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
November 2008
|
Series O preferred stock
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
December 2010
|
Series P preferred stock
|
|
|
6.85
|
%
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
August 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average/total
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
312,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On January 29, 2007, all of the outstanding 7.75%
Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited
Partnership Units of AMB Property II, L.P. were transferred from
one institutional investor to another institutional investor. In
connection with that transfer, AMB Property II, L.P. agreed to
amend the terms of the Series D Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Limited Partnership Units to, among other things,
change the rate applicable to the Series D Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units from 7.75% to
7.18% and change the date prior to which the Series D
Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Limited Partnership Units may
not be redeemed from May 5, 2004 to February 22, 2012. |
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization Ratios as of June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Total debt-to-total market
capitalization(1)
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
Our share of total debt-to-our
share of total market capitalization(1)
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
Total debt plus preferred-to-total
market capitalization(1)
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
Our share of total debt plus
preferred-to-our share of total market capitalization(1)
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
Our share of total debt-to-our
share of total book capitalization(1)
|
|
|
48.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our definition of total market capitalization is
total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus
market equity. Our definition of our share of total market
capitalization is our share of total debt plus preferred
equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. Our
definition of market equity is the total number of
outstanding shares of our common stock and common limited
partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of
our common stock as of June 30, 2007. Our definition of
preferred is preferred |
54
|
|
|
|
|
equity liquidation preferences. Our share of total book
capitalization is defined as our share of total debt plus
minority interests to preferred unitholders and limited
partnership unitholders plus stockholders equity. Our
share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt
based on our percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt. We
believe that our share of total debt is a meaningful
supplemental measure, which enables both management and
investors to analyze our leverage and to compare our leverage to
that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of our debt to that of other companies
that do not consolidate their joint ventures. Our share of total
debt is not intended to reflect our actual liability should
there be a default under any or all of such loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. For a reconciliation of our
share of total debt to total consolidated debt, a GAAP financial
measure, please see the table of debt maturities and
capitalization above. |
Liquidity
As of June 30, 2007, we had $224.0 million in cash and
cash equivalents and $667.0 million of additional available
borrowings under our credit facilities. As of June 30,
2007, we had $27.1 million in restricted cash.
Our board of directors declared a regular cash dividend for the
quarter ended June 30, 2007 of $0.50 per share of common
stock, and the operating partnership announced its intention to
pay a regular cash distribution for the quarter ended
June 30, 2007 of $0.50 per common unit. The dividends and
distributions were payable on July 16, 2007 to stockholders
and unitholders of record on July 6, 2007. The
series L, M, O and P preferred stock dividends were payable
on July 16, 2007 to stockholders of record on July 6,
2007. The series I, J and K preferred unit quarterly
distributions were paid on April 17, 2007. The
series D preferred unit quarterly distributions were paid
on June 25, 2007. The following table sets forth the
dividends and distributions paid or payable per share or unit
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Paying Entity
|
|
Security
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series L preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.406
|
|
|
$
|
0.406
|
|
|
$
|
0.813
|
|
|
$
|
0.813
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series M preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.422
|
|
|
$
|
0.422
|
|
|
$
|
0.844
|
|
|
$
|
0.844
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series O preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.438
|
|
|
$
|
0.438
|
|
|
$
|
0.875
|
|
|
$
|
0.875
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
|
|
Series P preferred stock
|
|
$
|
0.428
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.856
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Common limited partnership units
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Series J preferred units(1)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
$
|
1.005
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
Operating Partnership
|
|
Series K preferred units(1)
|
|
$
|
0.011
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
$
|
1.005
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Class B common limited partnership
units
|
|
$
|
0.500
|
|
|
$
|
0.460
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
0.920
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series D preferred units
|
|
$
|
0.838
|
|
|
$
|
0.969
|
|
|
$
|
1.840
|
|
|
$
|
1.938
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series E preferred units(2)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.807
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
1.776
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series F preferred units(3)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.994
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
1.988
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series H preferred units(4)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.970
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series I preferred units(5)
|
|
$
|
0.244
|
|
|
$
|
1.000
|
|
|
$
|
1.244
|
|
|
$
|
2.000
|
|
AMB Property II, L.P.
|
|
Series N preferred units(6)
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
0.215
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In April 2007, the operating partnership redeemed all of its
series J and series K preferred units. |
|
(2) |
|
In June 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding series E preferred units. |
|
(3) |
|
In September 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding series F preferred units. |
|
(4) |
|
In March 2006, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
outstanding series H preferred units. |
|
(5) |
|
In April 2007, AMB Property II, L.P. repurchased all of its
series I preferred units. |
55
|
|
|
(6) |
|
The holder of the series N preferred units exercised its
put option in January 2006 and sold all of its series N
preferred units to the operating partnership and AMB Property
II, L.P. repurchased all of such units from the operating
partnership. |
The anticipated size of our distributions, using only cash from
operations, will not allow us to retire all of our debt as it
comes due. Therefore, we intend to also repay maturing debt with
net proceeds from future debt or equity financings, as well as
property divestitures. However, we may not be able to obtain
future financings on favorable terms or at all. Our inability to
obtain future financings on favorable terms or at all would
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price
of, our stock.
Capital
Commitments
Development Starts. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, we initiated nine new industrial
development projects in North America and Asia and one value
added conversion project in North America with a total expected
investment of $265.1 million, aggregating approximately
3.2 million square feet. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we initiated 14 new industrial development
projects in North America and Asia and one value added
conversion project in North America with a total expected
investment of $455.8 million, aggregating approximately
5.1 million square feet.
Development Pipeline. As of June 30,
2007, we had 46 industrial projects in our development pipeline,
which is expected to total approximately 15.7 million
square feet and have an aggregate estimated investment of
$1.5 billion upon completion. We have an additional nine
development projects available for sale or contribution totaling
approximately 2.2 million square feet, with an aggregate
estimated investment of $227.1 million. As of June 30,
2007, we and our joint venture partners had funded an aggregate
of $972.0 million and needed to fund an estimated
additional $490.0 million in order to complete our
development pipeline. The development pipeline, at June 30,
2007, included projects expected to be completed through the
second quarter of 2009. In addition, during the three months
ended June 30, 2007, we acquired 515 acres of land for
industrial warehouse development in North America and Asia for
approximately $72.4 million. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, we acquired 937 acres of land for
industrial warehouse development in North America and Asia for
approximately $113.2 million.
Acquisition Activity. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, on an owned and managed basis, we
acquired 23 industrial properties, aggregating approximately
5.4 million square feet for a total expected investment of
$494.6 million (includes acquisition costs of
$487.6 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$7.0 million). Of the 23 industrial properties acquired,
three industrial properties aggregating approximately
0.2 million square feet for a total expected investment of
$16.6 million (includes acquisition costs of
$16.0 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$0.6 million) were acquired directly by us and 20
industrial properties aggregating approximately 5.2 million
square feet for a total expected investment of
$478.0 million (includes acquisition costs of
$471.6 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$6.4 million) were acquired through four of our
unconsolidated joint ventures. During the six months ended
June 30, 2007, on an owned and managed basis, we acquired
31 industrial properties aggregating approximately
7.2 million square feet for a total expected investment of
$636.4 million (includes acquisition costs of
$624.6 million and estimated acquisition capital of
$11.8 million).
Lease Commitments. We have entered into
operating ground leases on certain land parcels, primarily
on-tarmac facilities and office space with remaining lease terms
from one to 55 years. These buildings and improvements
subject to ground leases are amortized ratably over the lesser
of the terms of the related leases or 40 years.
Co-Investment Joint Ventures. Through the
operating partnership, we enter into co-investment joint
ventures with institutional investors. These co-investment joint
ventures are managed by our private capital group and provide us
with an additional source of capital to fund acquisitions,
development projects and renovation projects, as well as private
capital income. As of June 30, 2007, we had investments in
co-investment joint ventures with a gross book value of
$1.9 billion, which are consolidated for financial
reporting purposes, and net equity investments in five
unconsolidated co-investment joint ventures of
$263.7 million and a gross book value of $3.5 billion.
As of June 30, 2007, we may make additional capital
contributions to current and planned co-investment joint
ventures of up to $153.0 million (using the exchange rates
at June 30, 2007) pursuant to the terms of the joint
venture
56
agreements. From time to time, we may raise additional equity
commitments for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P.,
an open-ended unconsolidated co-investment joint venture formed
in 2004 with institutional investors, which invests through a
private real estate investment partnership, and for AMB Europe
Fund I, FCP-FIS, an open-ended unconsolidated co-investment
joint venture formed in 2007 with institutional investors. This
would increase our obligation to make additional capital
commitments to these funds. Pursuant to the terms of the
partnership agreement of AMB Institutional Alliance
Fund III, L.P., and the management regulations of AMB
Europe Fund I, FCP-FIS, we are obligated to contribute 20%
of the total equity commitments until such time our total equity
commitment is greater than $150.0 million or
150.0 million Euros, respectively, at which time, our
obligation is reduced to 10% of the total equity commitments. We
expect to fund these contributions with cash from operations,
borrowings under our credit facilities, debt or equity issuances
or net proceeds from property divestitures, which could
adversely affect our cash flow.
Captive Insurance Company. In December 2001,
we formed a wholly owned captive insurance company, Arcata
National Insurance Ltd. (Arcata), which provides insurance
coverage for all or a portion of losses below the deductible
under our third-party policies. The captive insurance company is
one element of our overall risk management program. We
capitalized Arcata in accordance with the applicable regulatory
requirements. Arcata established annual premiums based on
projections derived from the past loss experience of our
properties. Annually, we engage an independent third party to
perform an actuarial estimate of future projected claims,
related deductibles and projected expenses necessary to fund
associated risk management programs. Premiums paid to Arcata may
be adjusted based on this estimate. Like premiums paid to
third-party insurance companies, premiums paid to Arcata may be
reimbursed by customers pursuant to specific lease terms.
Through this structure, we think that we have more comprehensive
insurance coverage at an overall lower cost than would otherwise
be available in the market.
Potential Contingent and Unknown
Liabilities. Contingent and unknown liabilities
may include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
liabilities for environmental conditions;
|
|
|
|
claims of customers, vendors or other persons dealing with our
predecessors prior to our formation or acquisition transactions
that had not been asserted prior to our formation or acquisition
transactions;
|
|
|
|
accrued but unpaid liabilities incurred in the ordinary course
of business;
|
|
|
|
tax liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
claims for indemnification by the officers and directors of our
predecessors and others indemnified by these entities.
|
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Standby Letters of Credit. As of June 30,
2007, we had provided approximately $23.6 million in
letters of credit, of which $17.3 million was provided
under the operating partnerships $550.0 million
unsecured credit facility. The letters of credit were required
to be issued under certain ground lease provisions, bank
guarantees and other commitments.
Guarantees and Contribution Obligations. Other
than parent guarantees associated with unsecured debt or
contribution obligations as discussed in Part I,
Item 1: Notes 5 and 7 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, as of June 30,
2007, we had outstanding guarantees and contribution obligations
in the aggregate amount of $340.8 million as described
below.
As of June 30, 2007, we had outstanding guarantees in the
amount of $70.3 million in connection with certain
acquisitions. As of June 30, 2007, we also guaranteed
$27.1 million and $83.2 million on outstanding loans
on three of our consolidated joint ventures and two of our
unconsolidated joint ventures, respectively.
In addition, as of June 30, 2007, we have guaranteed
$13.2 million on outstanding property debt incurred by our
unconsolidated joint ventures. Such guarantees will require
payment by us of all or part of the applicable joint
ventures debt obligations upon certain defaults by the
joint venture. Our potential obligations under these
57
guarantees may be greater than our share of the applicable joint
venture funds debt obligations or the value of our share
of any property securing such debt.
Also, we have entered into contribution agreements in connection
with certain contributions of properties to our unconsolidated
joint venture funds. These contribution agreements require us to
make additional capital contributions to the applicable joint
venture fund upon certain defaults by the joint venture of its
debt obligations to the lenders. Such additional capital
contributions will cover all or part of the applicable joint
ventures debt obligation and may be greater than our share
of the joint ventures debt obligation or the value of our
share of any property securing such debt. Our contribution
obligations under these agreements will be reduced by the
amounts recovered by the lender and the fair market value of the
property, if any, used to secure the debt and obtained by the
lender upon default. Our potential obligations under these
contribution agreements are $147.0 million as of
June 30, 2007.
Performance and Surety Bonds. As of
June 30, 2007, we had outstanding performance and surety
bonds in an aggregate amount of $14.1 million. These bonds
were issued in connection with certain of our development
projects and were posted to guarantee certain tax obligations
and the construction of certain real property improvements and
infrastructure. Performance and surety bonds are renewable and
expire upon the payment of the taxes due or the completion of
the improvements and infrastructure.
Promoted Interests and Other Contractual
Obligations. Upon the achievement of certain
return thresholds and the occurrence of certain events, we may
be obligated to make payments to certain of our joint venture
partners pursuant to the terms and provisions of their
contractual agreements with us. From time to time in the normal
course of our business, we enter into various contracts with
third parties that may obligate us to make payments, pay
promotes, or perform other obligations upon the occurrence of
certain events.
SUPPLEMENTAL
EARNINGS MEASURES
FFO. We believe that net income, as defined by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
or GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, we
consider funds from operations, or FFO, as defined by the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or
NAREIT, to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating
performance. FFO is defined as net income, calculated in
accordance with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions
of real estate held for investment purposes and real
estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive our pro
rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint
ventures. Further, we do not adjust FFO to eliminate the effects
of non-recurring charges. We believe that FFO, as defined by
NAREIT, is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating
performance because historical cost accounting for real estate
assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value
of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as
reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses.
However, since real estate values have historically risen or
fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors
and analysts have considered presentation of operating results
for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to
be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental
measure of operating performance for real estate investment
trusts that excludes historical cost depreciation and
amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by
GAAP. We believe that the use of FFO, combined with the required
GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the
understanding of operating results of real estate investment
trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of
operating results among such companies more meaningful. We
consider FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing our
comparative operating and financial performance because, by
excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously
depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate
depreciation and amortization, FFO can help the investing public
compare the operating performance of a companys real
estate between periods or as compared to other companies.
While FFO is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not
represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by
GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those
measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance.
FFO also does not consider the costs associated with capital
expenditures related to our real estate assets nor is FFO
necessarily indicative of cash available to fund our future cash
requirements. Further, our computation of FFO may not be
comparable to FFO reported by other real estate investment
trusts that do not define the term in accordance with the
current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT
definition differently than we do.
58
The following table reflects the calculation of FFO reconciled
from net income for the three and six months ended June 30,
2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands, except per share and unit
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income available to common
stockholders(1)
|
|
$
|
111,390
|
|
|
$
|
72,335
|
|
|
$
|
133,120
|
|
|
$
|
95,719
|
|
Gains from sale or contribution of
real estate, net of minority interests
|
|
|
(75,091
|
)
|
|
|
(17,073
|
)
|
|
|
(75,262
|
)
|
|
|
(24,087
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41,483
|
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
82,504
|
|
|
|
87,254
|
|
Discontinued operations
depreciation
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
452
|
|
Non-real estate depreciation
|
|
|
(1,401
|
)
|
|
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
|
(2,578
|
)
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive FFO from
consolidated joint ventures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners
minority interests (Net income)
|
|
|
8,067
|
|
|
|
8,895
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
|
|
17,297
|
|
Limited partnership
unitholders minority interests (Net income)
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
4,495
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Limited partnership
unitholders minority interests (Development profits)
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
Discontinued operations
minority interests (Net income)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
463
|
|
FFO attributable to minority
interests
|
|
|
(15,312
|
)
|
|
|
(21,748
|
)
|
|
|
(31,616
|
)
|
|
|
(42,183
|
)
|
Adjustments to derive FFO from
unconsolidated joint ventures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our share of net income
|
|
|
(1,748
|
)
|
|
|
(8,278
|
)
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
|
|
(10,366
|
)
|
Our share of FFO
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
2,096
|
|
|
|
11,480
|
|
|
|
5,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations
|
|
$
|
78,474
|
|
|
$
|
82,355
|
|
|
$
|
135,347
|
|
|
$
|
131,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic FFO per common share and
unit
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted FFO per common share
and unit
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
and units:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
103,382,918
|
|
|
|
91,702,701
|
|
|
|
100,193,117
|
|
|
|
91,302,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
105,806,524
|
|
|
|
94,520,866
|
|
|
|
102,866,432
|
|
|
|
94,534,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes losses from undepreciated land sales of
($0.2) million for the three months ended 2006. Includes
gains from undepreciated land sales of $0.2 million and
$0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006, respectively. |
SS NOI. We believe that net income, as defined
by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, we
consider same-store net operating income, or SS NOI and
cash-basis same store net operating income to be useful
supplemental measures of our operating performance. Properties
that are considered part of the same store pool include all
properties that were owned, or owned and managed, as the case
may be, as of the end of both the current and prior year
reporting periods and exclude development properties for both
the current and prior reporting periods. The same store pool is
set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2005 (generally defined as
properties that are 90% leased or properties for which we held a
certificate of occupancy or where building has been
substantially complete for at least 12 months). In deriving
59
same store net operating income, we define net operating income
as rental revenues (as calculated in accordance with GAAP),
including reimbursements, less property operating expenses,
which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and
administrative expenses and interest expense. In calculating
cash-basis same store net operating income, we exclude
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles from
the calculation of same store net operating income. We consider
cash-basis same store net operating income to be an appropriate
and useful supplemental performance measure because it reflects
the operating performance of our real estate portfolio excluding
effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of
actual cash-basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison.
In addition, we believe that same store net operating income and
cash-basis same store net operating income helps the investing
public compare our operating performance with that of other
companies. While same store net operating income and cash-basis
same store net operating income are relevant and widely used
measures of operating performance of real estate investment
trusts, they do not represent cash flow from operations or net
income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as
alternatives to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or
operating performance. Same store net operating income and
cash-basis same store net operating income also do not reflect
general and administrative expenses, interest expense,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction
activities that could materially impact our results from
operations. Further, our computation of same store net operating
income and cash-basis same store net operating income may not be
comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may
use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
The following table reconciles SS NOI and cash-basis SS NOI from
net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
118,269
|
|
|
$
|
75,353
|
|
|
$
|
143,951
|
|
|
$
|
102,930
|
|
Private capital income
|
|
|
(8,518
|
)
|
|
|
(4,943
|
)
|
|
|
(14,443
|
)
|
|
|
(10,049
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
41,483
|
|
|
|
44,500
|
|
|
|
82,504
|
|
|
|
87,254
|
|
Impairment losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,394
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
5,394
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
30,260
|
|
|
|
25,142
|
|
|
|
60,114
|
|
|
|
48,190
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Fund costs
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
Total other income and expenses
|
|
|
(78,554
|
)
|
|
|
(11,924
|
)
|
|
|
(63,920
|
)
|
|
|
21,201
|
|
Total minority interests
share of income
|
|
|
16,122
|
|
|
|
14,879
|
|
|
|
28,070
|
|
|
|
29,041
|
|
Total discontinued operations
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(21,199
|
)
|
|
|
(1,657
|
)
|
|
|
(30,558
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Income (NOI)
|
|
|
119,610
|
|
|
|
127,385
|
|
|
|
237,445
|
|
|
|
254,544
|
|
Less non same store NOI
|
|
|
(17,715
|
)
|
|
|
(29,568
|
)
|
|
|
(35,019
|
)
|
|
|
(59,034
|
)
|
Less non-cash adjustments(1)
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
(2,271
|
)
|
|
|
(5,962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-basis same store NOI
|
|
$
|
100,792
|
|
|
$
|
95,664
|
|
|
$
|
200,155
|
|
|
$
|
189,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
60
OWNED AND
MANAGED OPERATING AND LEASING STATISTICS
Owned and
Managed Operating and Leasing Statistics(1)
The following table summarizes key operating and leasing
statistics for all of our owned and managed operating properties
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Square feet owned(2)(3)
|
|
|
111,335,628
|
|
|
|
111,335,628
|
|
Occupancy percentage(3)
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
|
|
96.1
|
%
|
Average occupancy percentage
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
|
|
94.9
|
%
|
Weighted average lease terms
(years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Trailing four quarter tenant
retention
|
|
|
76.0
|
%
|
|
|
76.0
|
%
|
Same Space Leasing Activity(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent increases on renewals and
rollovers
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Same space square footage
commencing (millions)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Second Generation Leasing
Activity(5):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenant improvements and leasing
commissions per sq. ft.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
Re-tenanted
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
3.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square footage commencing
(millions)
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Schedule includes owned and managed operating properties which
we define as properties in which we have at least a 10%
ownership interest, for which we are the property or asset
manager, and which we intend to hold for the long-term. This
excludes development and renovation projects and recently
completed development projects available for sale or
contribution which have not reached 90% economic occupancy. |
|
(2) |
|
In addition to owned square feet as of June 30, 2007, we
managed, but did not have an ownership interest in,
approximately 0.4 million additional square feet of
properties. As of June 30, 2007, one of our subsidiaries
also managed approximately 1.1 million additional square
feet of properties representing the IAT portfolio on behalf of
the IAT Air Cargo Facilities Income Fund. As of June 30,
2007, we also had investments in 7.3 million square feet of
operating properties through our investments in non-managed
unconsolidated joint ventures. |
|
(3) |
|
On a consolidated basis, we had approximately 77.4 million
rentable square feet with an occupancy rate of 96.6% at
June 30, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting
with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. |
|
(5) |
|
Second generation tenant improvements and leasing commissions
per square foot are the total cost of tenant improvements,
leasing commissions and other leasing costs incurred during
leasing of second generation space divided by the total square
feet leased. Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are
not included until such space is leased. Second generation space
excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant
at acquisition. |
61
Owned and
Managed Same Store Operating Statistics(1)
The following table summarizes key operating and leasing
statistics for our owned and managed same store operating
properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
Same Store Pool(1)
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
Square feet in same store
pool(2)(3)
|
|
|
85,808,842
|
|
|
|
85,808,842
|
|
% of total square feet
|
|
|
77.1
|
%
|
|
|
77.1
|
%
|
Occupancy percentage(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
|
|
96.4
|
%
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
|
|
95.6
|
%
|
Weighted average lease terms
(years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Trailing four quarter tenant
retention
|
|
|
75.8
|
%
|
|
|
75.8
|
%
|
Same Space Leasing Activity(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent increases on renewals and
rollovers
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
Same space square footage
commencing (millions)
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Growth% increase (decrease)
(including straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(5)
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Expenses(5)
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Net operating income(5)(6)
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
Growth% increase (decrease)
(excluding straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(5)
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Expenses(5)
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Net operating income(5)(6)
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Same store properties are those properties that we owned and
managed during both the current and prior year reporting
periods, excluding properties purchased and development
properties stabilized after December 31, 2005 (generally
defined as properties that are 90% leased or properties for
which we have held a certificate of occupancy or where building
has been substantially complete for at least 12 months). |
|
(2) |
|
Schedule includes owned and managed operating properties which
we define as properties in which we have at least a 10%
ownership interest, for which we are the property or asset
manager, and which we intend to hold for the long-term. This
excludes development and renovation projects and recently
completed development projects available for sale or
contribution. |
|
(3) |
|
On a consolidated basis, we had approximately 73.6 million
square feet with an occupancy rate of 96.6% at June 30,
2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting
with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. |
|
(5) |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2007, on a consolidated
basis, the percentage change was 4.2%, 5.5% and 3.7%,
respectively, for revenues, expenses and net operating income
(including straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles) and 5.4%, 5.5% and 5.4%, respectively, for the
revenues, expenses and net operating income (excluding straight
line rents and amortization of lease intangibles). For the six
months ended June 30, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the
percentage change was 4.4%, 5.9% and 3.8%, respectively, for
revenues, expenses and net operating income (including
straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles) and
5.7%, 5.9% and 5.6%, respectively, for the revenues, expenses
and net operating income (excluding straight line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles). |
62
|
|
|
(6) |
|
See Part I, Item 2: Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Supplemental Earnings Measures for
a discussion of same store net operating income and cash-basis
same store net operating income and a reconciliation of same
store net operating income and cash-basis same store net
operating income and net income. |
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market
prices, interest rates and international exchange rates. Our
future earnings and cash flows are dependent upon prevailing
market rates. Accordingly, we manage our market risk by matching
projected cash inflows from operating, investing and financing
activities with projected cash outflows for debt service,
acquisitions, capital expenditures, distributions to
stockholders and unitholders, and other cash requirements. The
majority of our outstanding debt has fixed interest rates, which
minimize the risk of fluctuating interest rates. Our exposure to
market risk includes interest rate fluctuations in connection
with our credit facilities and other variable rate borrowings
and our ability to incur more debt without stockholder approval,
thereby increasing our debt service obligations, which could
adversely affect our cash flows. As of June 30, 2007, we
had one outstanding interest rate swap with a notional amount of
$25.0 million. See Financial Instruments below.
The table below summarizes the maturities and interest rates
associated with our fixed and variable rate debt outstanding
before net unamortized debt discounts of $5.1 million as of
June 30, 2007 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt(1)
|
|
$
|
136,417
|
|
|
$
|
258,350
|
|
|
$
|
185,284
|
|
|
$
|
411,593
|
|
|
$
|
248,314
|
|
|
$
|
966,902
|
|
|
$
|
2,206,860
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Variable rate debt(2)
|
|
$
|
19,319
|
|
|
$
|
66,046
|
|
|
$
|
69,381
|
|
|
$
|
562,616
|
|
|
$
|
17,426
|
|
|
$
|
108,902
|
|
|
$
|
843,690
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
Interest Payments
|
|
$
|
9,855
|
|
|
$
|
19,807
|
|
|
$
|
13,375
|
|
|
$
|
39,094
|
|
|
$
|
17,840
|
|
|
$
|
65,915
|
|
|
$
|
165,886
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 72.3% of all outstanding debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents 27.7% of all outstanding debt. |
If market rates of interest on our variable rate debt increased
or decreased by 10%, then the increase or decrease in interest
expense on the variable rate debt would be $2.7 million
(net of swaps) annually. As of June 30, 2007, the book
value and the estimated fair value of our total consolidated
debt (both secured and unsecured) was $3.0 billion and
$3.1 billion respectively, based on our estimate of current
market interest rates.
As of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, variable
rate debt comprised 27.7% and 37.1%, respectively, of all our
outstanding debt. Variable rate debt was $843.7 million and
$1.3 billion, respectively, as of June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006. The decrease is primarily due to lower
outstanding balances on our credit facilities. We believe this
decrease in our outstanding variable rate debt decreases our
risk associated with unfavorable interest rate fluctuations.
Financial Instruments. We record all
derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value as an asset or
liability, with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive
income or income. For revenues or expenses denominated in
non-functional currencies, we may use derivative financial
instruments to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk. Our
derivative financial instruments in effect at June 30, 2007
was one interest rate swap hedging cash flows of variable rate
borrowings based on U.S. Libor (USD).
The following table summarizes our financial instruments as of
June 30, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity Dates
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
Related Derivatives (in thousands)
|
|
June 9, 2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Notional Amount (U.S. Dollars)
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive Floating(%)
|
|
|
US LIBOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pay Fixed Rate(%)
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
International Operations. Our exposure to
market risk also includes foreign currency exchange rate risk.
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for our
subsidiaries operating in the United States and Mexico. The
functional currency for our subsidiaries operating outside the
United States is generally the local currency of the country in
which the entity is located, mitigating the effect of foreign
exchange gains and losses. Our subsidiaries whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar translate their financial
statements into U.S. dollars. Assets and liabilities are
translated at the exchange rate in effect as of the financial
statement date. We translate income statement accounts using the
average exchange rate for the period and significant
nonrecurring transactions using the rate on the transaction
date. The losses resulting from the translation are included in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate
component of stockholders equity and totaled
$0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Our international subsidiaries may have transactions denominated
in currencies other than their functional currency. In these
instances, non-monetary assets and liabilities are reflected at
the historical exchange rate, monetary assets and liabilities
are remeasured at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the
period and income statement accounts are remeasured at the
average exchange rate for the period. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2007, gains from remeasurement
included in our results of operations were $0.7 million and
$0.2 million, respectively.
We also record gains or losses in the income statement when a
transaction with a third party, denominated in a currency other
than the entitys functional currency, is settled and the
functional currency cash flows realized are more or less than
expected based upon the exchange rate in effect when the
transaction was initiated.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives, and our management is required to
apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship
of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments
in certain unconsolidated entities, which are accounted for
using the equity method of accounting. As we do not control or
manage these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures
with respect to such entities may be substantially more limited
than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated
subsidiaries.
As required by
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with participation
of our management, including our chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures that were in
effect as of the end of the quarter covered by this report.
Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer each concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
64
PART II
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
As of June 30, 2007, there were no pending legal
proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our
properties is the subject, the determination of which we
anticipate would have a material effect upon our financial
condition and results of operations.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes
to the risk factors previously disclosed under Item 1A. of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
We
face risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions
and developments, including refinancing and interest rate
risk.
As of June 30, 2007, we had total debt outstanding of
$3.0 billion. We guarantee the operating partnerships
obligations with respect to the senior debt securities
referenced in our financial statements. We are subject to risks
normally associated with debt financing, including the risk that
our cash flow will be insufficient to meet required payments of
principal and interest. We anticipate that we will repay only a
small portion of the principal of our debt prior to maturity.
Accordingly, we will likely need to refinance at least a portion
of our outstanding debt as it matures. There is a risk that we
may not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of
any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of our
existing debt. If we are unable to refinance or extend principal
payments due at maturity or pay them with proceeds of other
capital transactions, then we expect that our cash flow will not
be sufficient in all years to repay all such maturing debt and
to pay dividends to our stockholders. Furthermore, if prevailing
interest rates or other factors at the time of refinancing (such
as the reluctance of lenders to make commercial real estate
loans) result in higher interest rates upon refinancing, then
the interest expense relating to that refinanced indebtedness
would increase. Higher interest rates on newly incurred debt may
negatively impact us as well. If interest rates increase, our
interest costs and overall costs of capital will increase, which
could adversely affect our transaction and development activity,
financial condition, results of operation, cash flow, the market
price of our stock, our ability to pay principal and interest on
our debt and our ability to pay dividends to our stockholders.
In addition, if we mortgage one or more of our properties to
secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet
mortgage payments, then the property could be foreclosed upon or
transferred to the mortgagee with a consequent loss of income
and asset value. A foreclosure on one or more of our properties
could adversely affect our financial condition, results of
operations, cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the
market price of, our stock.
In addition, as of June 30, 2007, we have guaranteed
$13.2 million on outstanding property debt incurred by our
unconsolidated joint ventures. Such guarantees will require
payment by us of all or part of the applicable joint
ventures debt obligations upon certain defaults by the
joint venture. Our potential obligations under these guarantees
may be greater than our share of the applicable joint venture
funds debt obligations or the value of our share of any
property securing such debt. Also, we have entered into
contribution agreements in connection with certain contributions
of properties to our unconsolidated joint venture funds. These
contribution agreements require us to make additional capital
contributions to the applicable joint venture fund upon certain
defaults by the joint venture of its debt obligations to the
lenders. Such additional capital contributions will cover all or
part of the applicable joint ventures debt obligation and
may be greater than our share of the joint ventures debt
obligation or the value of our share of any property securing
such debt. Our contribution obligations under these agreements
will be reduced by the amounts recovered by the lender and the
fair market value of the property, if any, used to secure the
debt and obtained by the lender upon default. Our potential
obligations under these contribution agreements are
$147.0 million as of June 30, 2007. We intend to
continue to guarantee debt of our unconsolidated joint venture
funds and make additional contributions to our unconsolidated
joint venture funds in connection with property contributions to
the funds. Such payment obligations under such guarantees and
contribution obligations under such contribution agreements, if
required to be paid, could be of a magnitude that could
adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations,
cash flow and ability to pay dividends on, and the market price
of, our stock.
65
Adverse
changes in our credit ratings could negatively affect our
financing activity.
The credit ratings of our senior unsecured long-term debt and
preferred stock are based on our operating performance,
liquidity and leverage ratios, overall financial position and
other factors employed by the credit rating agencies in their
rating analyses of us. Our credit ratings can affect the amount
of capital we can access, as well as the terms of any financings
we may obtain. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
maintain our current credit ratings, and in the event our
current credit ratings are downgraded, we would likely incur
higher borrowing costs and may encounter difficulty in obtaining
additional financing. Also, a downgrade in our credit ratings
may trigger additional payments or other negative consequences
under our current and future credit facilities and debt
instruments. Since we depend on debt financing to fund our
acquisition and development activity, adverse changes in our
credit ratings could negatively impact our development and
acquisition activity, future growth, financial condition, and
the market price of our stock.
We may
not be successful in contributing properties to our joint
venture funds or disposing of properties to third
parties.
We regularly contribute properties that we acquire or develop to
our joint venture funds, or sell these properties to third
parties, and we intend to continue to contribute and sell
properties as opportunities arise and build our private capital
business. Our ability to contribute or sell properties on
advantageous terms is affected by competition from other owners
of properties that are trying to dispose of their properties,
current market conditions, including the capitalization rates
applicable to our properties, and other factors beyond our
control. Our ability to develop and timely lease properties will
impact our ability to contribute or sell these properties.
Continued access to debt and equity capital, in the private and
public markets, by our joint venture funds is necessary in order
for us to continue our strategy of contributing properties to
these funds. Should we not have sufficient properties available
that meet the investment criteria of current or future joint
venture funds, or should the joint venture funds have limited or
no access to capital on favorable terms, then these
contributions could be delayed resulting in adverse effects on
our liquidity and on our ability to meet projected earnings
levels in a particular reporting period. Failure to meet our
projected earnings levels in a particular reporting period could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
distributable cash flow and on the value of our securities.
Further, our inability to redeploy the proceeds from our
divestitures in accordance with our investment strategy could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
distributable cash flow, our ability to meet our debt
obligations in a timely manner and the value of our securities
in subsequent periods.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
None.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
66
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 10, 2007,
at which our stockholders voted to elect nine directors, who are
listed below, to our Board of Directors to serve until the next
annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are
duly elected and qualified. The stockholders votes with
respect to the election of directors were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Against
|
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
|
|
90,084,716
|
|
|
|
573,059
|
|
|
|
107,673
|
|
Afsaneh M. Beschloss
|
|
|
90,389,272
|
|
|
|
273,025
|
|
|
|
103,150
|
|
T. Robert Burke
|
|
|
90,566,898
|
|
|
|
95,825
|
|
|
|
102,724
|
|
David A. Cole
|
|
|
90,349,337
|
|
|
|
309,763
|
|
|
|
106,347
|
|
Lydia H. Kennard
|
|
|
90,065,395
|
|
|
|
593,045
|
|
|
|
107,008
|
|
J. Michael Losh
|
|
|
85,728,299
|
|
|
|
4,928,859
|
|
|
|
108,290
|
|
Frederick W. Reid
|
|
|
90,343,835
|
|
|
|
312,618
|
|
|
|
108,994
|
|
Jeffrey L. Skelton,Ph.D
|
|
|
90,156,070
|
|
|
|
460,004
|
|
|
|
149,373
|
|
Thomas W. Tusher
|
|
|
90,328,330
|
|
|
|
329,442
|
|
|
|
107,675
|
|
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 10, 2007, our
stockholders ratified the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. The
stockholders votes with respect to the ratification of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Absentions
|
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
|
89,114,467
|
|
|
1,592,025
|
|
|
|
58,956
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 10, 2007, our
stockholders approved the adoption of the Amended and Restated
2002 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. The stockholders
votes with respect to the approval were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Absentions
|
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
|
43,985,548
|
|
|
39,842,474
|
|
|
|
513,735
|
|
|
|
6,423,690
|
|
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 10, 2007, our
stockholders did not approve a stockholder proposal regarding
pay-for-superior performance. The stockholders votes with
respect to the proposal were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Absentions
|
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
|
33,029,827
|
|
|
50,427,378
|
|
|
|
884,553
|
|
|
|
6,423,690
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
67
Unless otherwise indicated below, the Commission file number to
the exhibit is
No. 001-13545.
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Articles Supplementary
Redesignating and Reclassifying 510,000 Shares of 8.00%
Series I Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of AMB
Property Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Articles Supplementary
Redesignating and Reclassifying 800,000 Shares of 7.95%
Series J Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of AMB
Property Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Articles Supplementary
Redesignating and Reclassifying 800,000 Shares of 7.95%
Series K Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of AMB
Property Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 16, 2007).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2002 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan of AMB Property Corporation and AMB
Property, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of AMB Property Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 15, 2007).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
dated August 9, 2007.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
18 U.S.C. § 1350
Certifications dated August 9, 2007. The certifications in
this exhibit are being furnished solely to accompany this report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and are not being filed
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference
into any of our filings, whether made before or after the date
hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
|
68
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
Registrant
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Hamid
R. Moghadam
|
Hamid R. Moghadam
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas
S. Olinger
|
Thomas S. Olinger
Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer)
Nina A. Tran
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 9, 2007
69