Exhibit 99.1
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION® ANNOUNCES SECOND QUARTER RESULTS
SAN FRANCISCO, July 17, 2007 AMB Property Corporation® (NYSE:AMB), a leading
global developer and owner of industrial real estate, today reported results for the second quarter
and first six months of 2007.
Funds from operations per fully diluted share and unit (FFOPS) was $0.74 for the second quarter
of 2007, as compared to $0.87 for the same quarter in 2006. The current quarter results include
$0.27 per share of development profits, as compared to $0.48 per share in the second quarter of
2006. FFOPS results in the second quarter exceeded the high end of the companys previous guidance
by $0.07 per share, primarily due to the better than expected performance of
the operating portfolio and the timing of development gains. FFOPS for the six months ended June
30, 2007 was $1.32, as compared to $1.39 for the same period in 2006.
Net income available to common stockholders per fully diluted share (EPS) for the second quarter
of 2007 was $1.10, as compared to $0.80 for the same quarter in 2006. EPS for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 was $1.35 as compared to $1.06 for the same period in 2006. The increases for the
quarter and year-to-date were due primarily to the gain on the contribution of operating properties
to the companys Europe Fund I, which was formed in the second quarter
of 2007.
Owned and Managed Portfolio Operating Results
AMBs operating portfolio occupancy at June 30, 2007 was 96.1%, up 80 basis points from
March 31, 2007 and 90 basis points from June 30, 2006. Benefiting from occupancy gains and rising
rents in many of the companys markets, cash-basis same store net operating income (SSNOI) in the
second quarter of 2007 increased 5.8% over the same period in 2006. In the second quarter of 2007,
rents on lease renewals and rollovers in AMBs operating portfolio increased 2.0%, as compared to a
decline of 0.9% in the second quarter of 2006.
Global trade continues to expand at more than three times world GDP. Many of our customers are
reconfiguring their distribution networks to improve efficiencies, driving the demand for new
facilities in our target markets. Our solid performance in the quarter reflects this dynamic, said
Hamid R. Moghadam, AMB chairman and CEO. Our operating portfolio grew by nearly
8.0 million square feet in the quarter, and at the same time, our occupancy level improved and is
on target to meet our annual forecast. Market rents continue to rise in many of our markets,
resulting in our portfolios fourth consecutive quarter of positive rent growth on rollover.
Importantly, conversations with our customers point to continued growth in both sea container
traffic and air cargo volumes for the remainder of 2007, which puts us in a good position for the
balance of the year.
Pier 1,
Bay 1 San Francisco, California 94111 United States Main + 1 415
394 9000 Fax +1 415 394 9001
Page 2
Investment Activity
New development starts in the quarter totaled approximately 3.2 million square feet in nine
projects in North America and Asia, and one value-added conversion project in San Francisco, with
an estimated total investment of $265 million. At quarter end, AMBs development pipeline totaled
15.7 million square feet in 41 projects globally and five value-added conversion projects in
California, with an estimated total investment of $1.5 billion.
The companys development business includes contributions of stabilized properties to affiliated
private capital funds or sale of projects to third parties. During the second quarter, AMB
contributed or sold nine development projects totaling 1.3 million square feet for a gross sale
price of $159 million.
During the quarter, AMB acquired 5.4 million square feet of industrial distribution space in
23 properties at a total acquisition cost of approximately $495 million, $478 million of which was
acquired for four of the companys co-investment funds: AMB Alliance Fund III, AMB Japan Fund I,
AMB Europe Fund I and AMB-SGP Mexico. The acquisitions during the quarter expanded the companys
presence in several of its target markets in North America, Europe and Asia, and included entry
into the companys fifth Mexico target market, Tijuana.
We have spent the past several years building a global platform with local-market development,
acquisition and management teams focused on understanding and meeting our customers rapidly
evolving real estate requirements. During the second quarter, we deployed a record level of
capital, highlighting the ability of our regional teams to source attractive investment
opportunities and to meet customer needs, added Mr. Moghadam. Further, our proven track record in
making quality investments allows us to continue to grow our private capital franchise, boosting
returns on invested capital and providing us with an important source of recurring
incomebenefiting both our private capital and public equity investors.
As previously announced, AMB formed AMB Europe Fund I during the quarter with an initial
contribution of 4.2 million square feet of operating properties and 0.5 million square feet of
development properties. This open-end co-investment fund, with a current gross asset value of
approximately $719 million, is the companys 10th active fund and the 11th
fund formed since AMBs 1997 initial public offering. The fund targets investments of distribution
facilities in many major European metropolitan areas with dynamic and diverse economies tied to
global trade, including markets in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, the
United Kingdom and Central/Eastern Europe.
Additions and Promotions of Company Officers
During the quarter, Peter Schuijlenburg joined AMB as vice president, general manager for the
companys business in Germany. Mr. Schuijlenburg is located in AMBs Frankfurt office. The company
announced the following officer promotions during the quarter: Bobby Bransfield was promoted to
senior vice president, and Ken Kwan, Mary Lang, Jason Leong, Rowena Manlapaz and David Mims were
promoted to vice president.
Page 3
Supplemental Earnings Measure
AMB reports FFOPS and unit in accordance with the standards established by the National
Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. Included in the footnotes to the companys attached
financial statements is a discussion of why management believes FFOPS is a useful supplemental
measure of operating performance, ways in which investors might use FFOPS when assessing the
companys financial performance and FFOPSs limitations as a measurement tool. Reconciliation from
net income to funds from operations and FFOPS is provided in the attached tables and published in
AMBs quarterly supplemental analyst package, available on the companys website at www.amb.com.
The company believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, the company considers cash-basis same store net operating income (SSNOI) to be a useful
supplemental measure of its operating performance. Properties that are considered part of the same
store pool include all properties that were owned as of the end of both the current and prior year
reporting periods and exclude development properties for both the current and prior reporting
periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2005. In deriving SSNOI, the company defines NOI as rental revenues
(as calculated in accordance with GAAP), including reimbursements, less straight-line rents,
amortization of lease intangibles, and property operating expenses, which excludes depreciation,
amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. The company considers SSNOI
to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because it reflects the operating
performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a
better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, the
company believes that SSNOI helps the investing public compare the companys operating performance
with that of other companies. While SSNOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating
performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or
net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in
evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. SSNOI also does not reflect general and
administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, capital
expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could
materially impact its results from operations. Further, the companys computation of SSNOI may not
be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating SSNOI. Reconciliation from net income to SSNOI is published in the companys quarterly
supplemental analyst package, available on the companys website at www.amb.com.
Owned and managed is defined by the company as assets in which the company has at least a 10%
ownership interest, is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the
long-term.
Conference Call and Supplemental Information
The company will host a conference call to discuss its second quarter 2007 results on
Wednesday, July 18, 2007 at 1:00 PM EDT. Stockholders and interested parties may listen to a live
broadcast of the conference call by dialing 877 447 8218 (from the U.S. and Canada) or +1 706 643
7823 (from all other countries) and using reservation code 5562755. A webcast can be accessed
through a link
Page 4
titled Q2 2007 Earnings Conference Call located on the home page of the companys website at
www.amb.com.
If you are unable to listen to the live conference call, a telephone and webcast replay will be
available after 3:00 PM EDT on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 until 8:00 PM EDT on Friday,
August 17, 2007. The telephone replay can be accessed by dialing 800 642 1687 (from the U.S.
and Canada) or +1 706 645 9291 (from all other countries) and using reservation code 5562755. The
webcast replay can be accessed through the link on the companys website at www.amb.com.
AMB Property Corporation.® Local partner to global trade.
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading global developer and owner of industrial
real estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets throughout North America, Europe
and Asia. As of June 30, 2007, AMB owned, or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
136.7 million square feet (12.7 million square meters) in 44 markets within
13 countries. AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its
targeted markets. The companys portfolio is comprised of High Throughput Distribution®
facilitiesindustrial properties built for speed and located near airports, seaports and ground
transportation systems.
AMBs press releases are available on the company website at www.amb.com or by contacting the
Investor Relations department at +1 415 394 9000.
Some of the information included in this press release contains forward-looking statements,
such as those related to demand for our product, occupancy levels and rental rate growth, growth in
sea container traffic and air cargo volumes, development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and
renovation projects (including our ability to lease such projects, square feet at stabilization or
completion, costs and total investment amounts), and our ability to grow our private capital
business and returns on invested capital and source investment opportunities, and our ability to
accomplish future business plans (such as expansion into additional markets) and to meet our
forecasts and business goals, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are
important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of these words and
phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by
discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent
on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to
realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this press release or the dates
indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to
differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults
on or non-renewal of leases by tenants, increased interest rates and operating costs, our failure
to obtain necessary outside financing, re-financing risks, risks related to our obligations in the
event of certain defaults under joint venture and other debt, risks related to debt and equity
security financings (including dilution risk), difficulties in identifying properties to acquire
and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and
operations, our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest
proceeds from any divestitures, risks and uncertainties affecting property development and
construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary
permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status
as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring, failure to maintain our
current credit agency ratings, environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters,
financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions or in the real estate sector,
changes in real estate and zoning laws, a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, risks
related to doing business internationally and global expansion, losses in excess of our insurance
coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and
increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally,
including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation,
population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading Risk
Factors and
elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
AMB CONTACTS
Margan S. Mitchell
Vice President, Corporate Communications
Direct +1 415 733 9477
Fax +1 415 477 2177
Email mmitchell@amb.com
Page 5
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in properties |
|
$ |
6,406,982 |
|
|
$ |
6,575,733 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(854,227 |
) |
|
|
(789,693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in properties (1) |
|
|
5,552,755 |
|
|
|
5,786,040 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
349,534 |
|
|
|
274,381 |
|
Properties held for contribution, net |
|
|
245,632 |
|
|
|
154,036 |
|
Properties held for divestiture, net |
|
|
45,146 |
|
|
|
20,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate |
|
|
6,193,067 |
|
|
|
6,235,373 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
251,052 |
|
|
|
195,878 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
166,449 |
|
|
|
133,998 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
148,696 |
|
|
|
148,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,759,264 |
|
|
$ |
6,713,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
1,340,702 |
|
|
$ |
1,395,354 |
|
Unsecured senior debt |
|
|
1,057,498 |
|
|
|
1,101,874 |
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
|
562,184 |
|
|
|
852,033 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
85,110 |
|
|
|
88,154 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
278,921 |
|
|
|
271,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,324,415 |
|
|
|
3,709,295 |
|
Minority interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners |
|
|
535,280 |
|
|
|
555,201 |
|
Preferred unitholders |
|
|
77,563 |
|
|
|
180,298 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
109,921 |
|
|
|
102,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests |
|
|
722,764 |
|
|
|
837,560 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity |
|
|
2,488,673 |
|
|
|
1,943,240 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
223,412 |
|
|
|
223,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,712,085 |
|
|
|
2,166,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,759,264 |
|
|
$ |
6,713,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes AMBs 100% ownership interest in Park One, a 19.9 acre land parcel leased
to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX, for approximately
$76 million. |
Page 6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues (2) |
|
$ |
162,914 |
|
|
$ |
170,974 |
|
|
$ |
324,996 |
|
|
$ |
342,276 |
|
Private capital income |
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
|
4,943 |
|
|
|
14,443 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
171,432 |
|
|
|
175,917 |
|
|
|
339,439 |
|
|
|
352,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs (3) |
|
|
(43,304 |
) |
|
|
(43,589 |
) |
|
|
(87,551 |
) |
|
|
(87,732 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(41,483 |
) |
|
|
(44,500 |
) |
|
|
(82,504 |
) |
|
|
(87,254 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(5,394 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(30,260 |
) |
|
|
(25,142 |
) |
|
|
(60,114 |
) |
|
|
(47,997 |
) |
Other expenses (4) |
|
|
(1,139 |
) |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(2,051 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
Fund costs |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
(116,463 |
) |
|
|
(118,808 |
) |
|
|
(232,995 |
) |
|
|
(229,711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (5) |
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
8,278 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
10,366 |
|
Other income (4) |
|
|
6,472 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
11,979 |
|
|
|
5,765 |
|
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
|
|
74,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes |
|
|
28,996 |
|
|
|
45,698 |
|
|
|
41,188 |
|
|
|
46,372 |
|
Interest expense, including amortization |
|
|
(33,369 |
) |
|
|
(44,310 |
) |
|
|
(67,951 |
) |
|
|
(83,704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
78,554 |
|
|
|
11,924 |
|
|
|
63,920 |
|
|
|
(21,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before minority interests |
|
|
133,523 |
|
|
|
69,033 |
|
|
|
170,364 |
|
|
|
101,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests share of income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners share of income |
|
|
(8,067 |
) |
|
|
(8,895 |
) |
|
|
(15,260 |
) |
|
|
(17,297 |
) |
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
|
|
(1,619 |
) |
|
|
(3,136 |
) |
|
|
(1,651 |
) |
Preferred unitholders |
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
(4,024 |
) |
|
|
(5,179 |
) |
|
|
(9,025 |
) |
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
(4,001 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minority interests share of income |
|
|
(16,122 |
) |
|
|
(14,879 |
) |
|
|
(28,070 |
) |
|
|
(29,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
117,401 |
|
|
|
54,154 |
|
|
|
142,294 |
|
|
|
72,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income attributable to discontinued operations, net of minority interests |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
4,126 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Gains from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
17,073 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
24,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
21,199 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
30,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
118,269 |
|
|
|
75,353 |
|
|
|
143,951 |
|
|
|
102,930 |
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
|
|
(3,095 |
) |
|
|
(7,904 |
) |
|
|
(6,191 |
) |
Preferred unit redemption (issuance costs) discount |
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
111,390 |
|
|
$ |
72,335 |
|
|
$ |
133,120 |
|
|
$ |
95,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share (diluted) |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
|
|
101,361,013 |
|
|
|
90,135,659 |
|
|
|
98,305,299 |
|
|
|
90,147,493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective
basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma rental revenues for the quarter and six months ended June, 2006 would have
been $152,676 and $308,402, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been
deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
Pro forma property operating costs for the quarter and six months ended June 30,
2006 would have been $39,188 and $79,278, respectively, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had
been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred
compensation plan. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes gains on sale of operating properties of $0.0 million and $7.7 million, for
the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Includes gains on sale of operating
properties of $0.0 million and $8.3 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. |
Page 7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS(1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
111,390 |
|
|
$ |
72,335 |
|
|
$ |
133,120 |
|
|
$ |
95,719 |
|
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate, net of minority interests |
|
|
(75,091 |
) |
|
|
(17,073 |
) |
|
|
(75,262 |
) |
|
|
(24,087 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
41,483 |
|
|
|
44,500 |
|
|
|
82,504 |
|
|
|
87,254 |
|
Discontinued operations depreciation |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation |
|
|
(1,401 |
) |
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated JVs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners minority interests (Net income) |
|
|
8,067 |
|
|
|
8,895 |
|
|
|
15,260 |
|
|
|
17,297 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Net income) |
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
4,495 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Development profits) |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
2,240 |
|
Discontinued operations minority interests (Net income (loss)) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
463 |
|
FFO attributable to minority interests |
|
|
(15,312 |
) |
|
|
(21,748 |
) |
|
|
(31,616 |
) |
|
|
(42,183 |
) |
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated JVs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of net income |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(8,278 |
) |
|
|
(3,861 |
) |
|
|
(10,366 |
) |
AMBs share of FFO |
|
|
5,805 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
11,480 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations |
|
$ |
78,474 |
|
|
$ |
82,355 |
|
|
$ |
135,347 |
|
|
$ |
131,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common share and unit (diluted) |
|
|
105,806,524 |
|
|
|
94,520,866 |
|
|
|
102,866,432 |
|
|
|
94,534,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated FFO by business line (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Partners FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
% of reported FFO |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
2.3 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Development FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1) |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
% of reported FFO |
|
|
32.4 |
% |
|
|
55.1 |
% |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
34.6 |
% |
Real estate operations FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (1) |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
% of reported FFO |
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
67.3 |
% |
|
|
62.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
|
$ |
0.74 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Funds From Operations and Funds from Operations per Share and Unit. The company
believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However,
the company considers funds from operations, or FFO, as defined by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, and funds from operations per fully diluted share and unit, or
FFOPS, to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. FFO is defined as net
income, calculated in accordance with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate
held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive the
companys pro rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. FFOPS is FFO per
share of fully diluted weighted average company common stock share and partnership unit. Further,
the company does not adjust FFO or FFOPS to eliminate the effects of non-recurring charges. The
company believes that FFO and FFOPS, as defined by NAREIT, are meaningful supplemental measures of
its operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance
with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time,
as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO and FFOPS as supplemental measures of
operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation
and amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. The company believes that the use of FFO and FFOPS, combined with the required GAAP
presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real
estate investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results
among such companies more meaningful. The company considers FFO and FFOPS to be useful measures for
reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses
related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate
depreciation and amortization, FFO and FFOPS can help the investing public compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO
and |
Page 8
FFOPS are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance of real estate investment
trusts, they do not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should
not be considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating the companys liquidity or
operating performance. FFO and FFOPS also do not consider the costs associated with capital
expenditures related to the companys real estate assets nor are FFO or FFOPS necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund the companys future cash requirements. Further, the companys
computation of FFO and FFOPS may not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate
investment trusts that do not define the terms in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or
that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the company does. Estimated FFO by
Business Line is FFO generated by the Companys Capital Partners, development and real estate
operations business lines. Estimated Capital Partners and Development FFO was determined by
reducing Capital Partner Income and Development Profits, net of taxes by their respective estimated
share of general and administrative expenses. Capital Partners and Developments estimated
allocation of total general and administrative expenses was based on their respective percentage of
actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate Operations FFO
represents total Company FFO less estimated FFO attributable to Capital Partners and Development.
Management believes estimated FFO by business line is a useful supplemental measure of its
operating performance because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys respective business lines to other companies comparable business lines. Further, AMBs
computation of FFO by business line may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate
investment trusts as they may use different methodologies in computing such measures.