EXHIBIT 99.1
Published on April 18, 2007
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Highlights |
1 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations |
4 | |||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
5 | |||
Owned & Managed Operating Statistics, Top 10 Customers & Lease Expirations |
6 | |||
Largest Global Markets |
7 | |||
Portfolio Overview |
8 | |||
Capital Deployment |
9 | |||
Property
Contributions & Dispositions |
10 | |||
Development & Renovation Projects in Process |
11 | |||
Development Projects Placed in Operations and Projects Available for Sale or Contribution |
13 | |||
Land Inventory |
14 | |||
Capitalization Summary |
15 | |||
Unconsolidated & Consolidated Joint Ventures |
16 | |||
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis |
17 | |||
Reporting Definitions |
18 | |||
Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures |
19 | |||
Joint Venture Partner Information |
22 | |||
Contacts |
23 |
| Cover: | Beacon Lakes Bldg 6, a 206,500 square foot development, was stabilized during the quarter. The distribution facility is located in Beacon Lakes park in Miamis Airport West submarket, where AMB has completed 605,600 square feet and has another 347,100 square feet under development. When fully developed, the 436-acre Beacon Lakes park will total 5.8 million square feet. |
i
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2007 | Change | 2006 | ||||||||||
Operating Data |
||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 168,007 | (4.8 | %) | $ | 176,407 | (1) (2) | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA (3)
|
125,173 | (0.4 | %) | 125,630 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
21,730 | (7.1 | %) | 23,384 | ||||||||
FFO (3) |
56,873 | 16.7 | % | 48,739 | ||||||||
Per diluted share and unit: |
||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.23 | (11.5 | %) | $ | 0.26 | ||||||
FFO (3)
|
0.57 | 9.6 | % | 0.52 | ||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.50 | 8.7 | % | 0.46 | ||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||
Interest coverage (3) |
3.3 x | 3.0 x | ||||||||||
Fixed charge coverage (3) |
2.1 x | 2.3 x | ||||||||||
FFO payout |
88 | % | 88 | % | ||||||||
| As of | ||||||||
| March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Capitalization |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (3)
|
$ | 2,532,072 | $ | 3,088,624 | ||||
Preferred equity |
417,767 | 417,767 | ||||||
Market equity |
6,113,297 | 5,531,113 | ||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 9,063,136 | $ | 9,037,504 | ||||
Ratios |
||||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book capitalization (3) (4)
|
46.5 | % | 55.8 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization (3) (4)
|
27.9 | % | 34.2 | % | ||||
Total common shares and units outstanding |
103,985,326 | 94,371,491 | ||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. | |
| (2) | Pro forma revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 would have been $160,831, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (4) | See Reporting Definitions. |
1
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
| As of | ||||||||
| March 31, 2007 | December 31, 2006 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate: |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,777,738 | $ | 6,575,733 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(829,814 | ) | (789,693 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,947,924 | 5,786,040 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
279,422 | 274,381 | ||||||
Properties held for contribution, net |
144,961 | 154,036 | ||||||
Properties held for divestiture, net |
11,227 | 20,916 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,383,534 | 6,235,373 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
286,161 | 195,878 | ||||||
Mortgages and loans receivable (1)
|
18,711 | 18,747 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
141,647 | 133,998 | ||||||
Other assets (2)
|
146,930 | 129,516 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,976,983 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,648,336 | $ | 1,395,354 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,057,186 | 1,101,874 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
474,849 | 852,033 | ||||||
Other debt |
86,146 | 88,154 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
287,372 | 271,880 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,553,889 | 3,709,295 | ||||||
Minority interests: |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
506,611 | 555,201 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
180,292 | 180,298 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
112,823 | 102,061 | ||||||
Total minority interests |
799,726 | 837,560 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,399,951 | 1,943,240 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,417 | 223,417 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,623,368 | 2,166,657 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,976,983 | $ | 6,713,512 | ||||
| (1) | As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, includes a mortgage receivable from Pier 1, LLC, in the amount of $12.6 million and $12.7 million, respectively, maturing in May 2026 with an interest rate of 13.0%, and a loan receivable from G. Accion in the amount of $6.1 million, maturing in March 2010 with an interest rate of 10.0%. | |
| (2) | Includes AMBs 100% ownership interest in Park One, a 19.9 acre land parcel leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX, for approximately $75.7 million and $75.5 million as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. |
2
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Rental revenues (2)
|
$ | 162,082 | $ | 171,301 | ||||
Private capital income |
5,925 | 5,106 | ||||||
Total revenues |
168,007 | 176,407 | ||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Property operating costs (3)
|
(44,247 | ) | (44,143 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(41,029 | ) | (42,754 | ) | ||||
Impairment losses |
(257 | ) | | |||||
General and administrative |
(29,854 | ) | (22,855 | ) | ||||
Other expenses (4)
|
(912 | ) | (537 | ) | ||||
Fund costs |
(241 | ) | (614 | ) | ||||
Total costs and expenses |
(116,540 | ) | (110,903 | ) | ||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures (5)
|
2,113 | 2,088 | ||||||
Other income (4)
|
5,507 | 3,507 | ||||||
Gains from dispositions of real estate interests, net |
136 | | ||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
12,192 | 674 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(33,865 | ) | (39,153 | ) | ||||
Total other income and expenses |
(13,917 | ) | (32,884 | ) | ||||
Income from operations before minority interests |
37,550 | 32,620 | ||||||
Minority interests share of income: |
||||||||
Joint venture partners share of income |
(7,193 | ) | (8,539 | ) | ||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(595 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Preferred unitholders |
(3,699 | ) | (5,001 | ) | ||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(494 | ) | (730 | ) | ||||
Total minority interests share of income |
(11,981 | ) | (14,302 | ) | ||||
Income from continuing operations |
25,569 | 18,318 | ||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations, net of minority interests |
77 | 2,246 | ||||||
Gain from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
36 | 7,013 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
113 | 9,259 | ||||||
Net income |
25,682 | 27,577 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,096 | ) | ||||
Preferred unit redemption discount/(issuance costs) |
| (1,097 | ) | |||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 21,730 | $ | 23,384 | ||||
Net income per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.26 | ||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
95,098,711 | 90,179,329 | ||||||
| (1) | Effective October 1, 2006, AMB deconsolidated AMB Alliance Fund III on a prospective basis. | |
| (2) | Pro forma rental revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 would have been $155,725, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (3) | Pro forma property operating costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 would have been $40,169, if AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2006. | |
| (4) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan. | |
| (5) | Includes gains on sale of operating properties of $0.2 million and $0.5 million, for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
3
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 21,730 | $ | 23,384 | ||||
Gains from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
(172 | ) | (7,013 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
41,029 | 42,754 | ||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
(4 | ) | 514 | |||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,177 | ) | (1,000 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated JVs: |
||||||||
Joint venture partners minority interests (Net income) |
7,193 | 8,539 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Net income) |
494 | 730 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Development profits) |
583 | 32 | ||||||
Discontinued operations minority interests (Net income) |
(61 | ) | 113 | |||||
FFO attributable to minority interests |
(16,304 | ) | (20,435 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(2,113 | ) | (2,088 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of FFO |
5,675 | 3,209 | ||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 56,873 | $ | 48,739 | ||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
Weighted average common share and unit (diluted) |
99,776,750 | 94,567,680 | ||||||
Estimated FFO by business line (1)
|
||||||||
Capital Partners FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (2)
|
$ | 0.03 | $ | 0.02 | ||||
% of reported FFO |
5.3 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||
Development FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (2)
|
$ | 0.11 | $ | | ||||
% of reported FFO |
19.3 | % | | |||||
Real estate operations FFO per common share and unit (diluted) (3)
|
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.50 | ||||
% of reported FFO |
75.4 | % | 96.1 | % | ||||
Total FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.57 | $ | 0.52 | ||||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. In addition, management believes estimated FFO by business line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys respective business lines to other companies business lines. Further, AMBs computation of FFO by business line may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment trusts as they may use different methodologies in computing such measures. | |
| (2) | Estimated Capital Partners and Development FFO was determined by reducing Capital Partner Income and Development Profits, net of taxes by their respective estimated share of general and administrative expenses. Capital Partners and Developments estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses was based on their respective percentage of actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. | |
| (3) | Estimated Real Estate Operations FFO represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO attributable to Capital Partners and Development. |
4
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio: (1) (2) |
||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,619 | $ | 5,368 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,162 | $ | 4,043 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 118 | $ | 5,754 | ||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 143 | $ | 5,745 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 96 | $ | 5,745 | ||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 3,318 | $ | 3,821 | ||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
7,377 | 6,205 | ||||||
Building improvements |
2,998 | 3,844 | ||||||
Sub-total |
13,693 | 13,870 | ||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(5,046 | ) | (3,945 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 8,647 | $ | 9,925 | ||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,715 | $ | 5,146 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,729 | $ | 3,999 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 100 | $ | 5,754 | ||||
Net lease termination fees (3)
|
$ | 125 | $ | 5,745 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 93 | $ | 5,745 | ||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
5
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
OWNED AND MANAGED OPERATING STATISTICS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
| Operating Portfolio | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet owned at March 31, 2007 |
103,175,210 | 100,702,915 | ||||||
Occupancy percentage |
95.2 | % | 96.1 | % | ||||
Average occupancy percentage |
94.9 | % | 95.3 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
6.1 | 6.1 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
73.8 | % | 70.9 | % | ||||
| Quarter | ||||||||
Same
Space Leasing Activity:
(2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
2.8 | % | ||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
5.2 | |||||||
2nd Generation Leasing Activity: |
||||||||
TIs and LCs per square foot: |
||||||||
Retained |
$ | 0.99 | ||||||
Re-tenanted |
3.35 | |||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.80 | ||||||
Square footage commencing (millions) |
6.0 | |||||||
| Same Store Pool (1) | Quarter | Prior Quarter | ||||||
Square feet in same store pool at March 31, 2007 |
85,907,988 | 77,291,866 | ||||||
% of total square feet |
83.3 | % | 76.8 | % | ||||
Occupancy percentage at period end: |
||||||||
March 31, 2007 |
95.9 | % | 97.0 | % | ||||
March 31, 2006 |
95.0 | % | 96.3 | % | ||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
6.1 | 6.0 | ||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention |
74.0 | % | 72.5 | % | ||||
| Quarter | ||||||||
Same
Space Leasing Activity:
(2) |
||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers |
3.0 | % | ||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.3 | |||||||
Cash basis NOI % change: (3) |
||||||||
Revenues (4)
|
6.0 | % | ||||||
Expenses (4)
|
5.0 | % | ||||||
NOI (3) (4)
|
6.3 | % | ||||||
NOI without lease termination fees (3) (4)
|
6.3 | % | ||||||
TOP 10 CUSTOMERS
(dollars in thousands)
| % of | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number | Aggregate | Aggregate | % of | |||||||||||||||||
| of | Rentable | Leased | Aggregate | |||||||||||||||||
| Customer Name (6) | Leases | Square Feet | Square Feet | ABR (1) (5) | ABR (1) (5) | |||||||||||||||
1. United States Government (7) (8)
|
47 | 1,407,748 | 1.4 | % | $ | 20,391 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||||
2. Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) (7)
|
39 | 1,910,505 | 1.9 | % | 16,515 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||
3. FedEx Corporation (7)
|
31 | 1,481,619 | 1.5 | % | 14,986 | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||
4. Nippon Express |
15 | 1,041,058 | 1.0 | % | 9,976 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||
5. Harmonic Inc. |
4 | 285,480 | 0.3 | % | 9,250 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||||
6. Sagawa Express |
8 | 726,550 | 0.7 | % | 8,330 | 1.3 | % | |||||||||||||
7. BAX Global Inc/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn (7)
|
17 | 750,271 | 0.8 | % | 7,681 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||||
8. La Poste |
2 | 854,427 | 0.9 | % | 6,142 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
9. City and County of San Francisco |
1 | 559,605 | 0.6 | % | 5,714 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||
10. Panalpina, Inc. |
7 | 870,156 | 0.9 | % | 5,601 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Total |
9,887,419 | 10.0 | % | $ | 104,586 | 15.9 | % | |||||||||||||
LEASE EXPIRATIONS (9)
(dollars in thousands)
| Year | Square Feet | ABR (1) (5) (7) | % of ABR (1) (5) | |||||||||
2007 |
11,382,912 | $ | 71,751 | 10.2 | % | |||||||
2008 |
16,302,074 | 105,000 | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
2009 |
17,382,307 | 111,050 | 15.7 | % | ||||||||
2010 |
14,465,053 | 103,544 | 14.6 | % | ||||||||
2011 |
13,699,420 | 98,648 | 14.0 | % | ||||||||
2012 |
9,849,407 | 76,001 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||
2013 |
3,867,646 | 30,049 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
2014 |
5,126,553 | 37,035 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
2015 |
4,593,062 | 27,687 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||
2016 and beyond |
5,659,638 | 46,032 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||
Total |
102,328,072 | $ | 706,797 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, same store properties and annualized base rent (ABR), as applicable. | |
| (2) | Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. | |
| (3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (4) | For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, on a consolidated basis, the % change was 6.6%, 6.0%, 6.8% and 6.7%, respectively, for revenues, expenses, NOI and NOI without lease termination fees. | |
| (5) | ABR is reported net of all operating expense reimbursements. | |
| (6) | Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer. AMB also owns a 19.9 acre land parcel adjacent to LAX, which is leased to a parking lot operator with an ABR of $7.8 million, which is not included. | |
| (7) | Apron rental amounts (but not square footage) are included. | |
| (8) | United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), United States Customs, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and various other U.S. governmental agencies. | |
| (9) | Schedule represents spaces that expire on or after March 31, 2007. Schedule includes owned and managed operating properties. |
6
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
LARGEST GLOBAL MARKETS (1)
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
| Sub-Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| No. New | San | Largest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Southern | Jersey/ | Francisco | U.S. | South | Global | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California (2) | New York | Bay Area | Chicago | On-Tarmac | Florida | Seattle | Tokyo (4) | Paris (4) | Markets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rentable square feet |
15,485,516 | 10,684,097 | 10,555,779 | 12,340,950 | 2,681,328 | 5,678,594 | 7,430,072 | 2,986,749 | 1,885,532 | 69,728,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage |
95.7 | % | 97.8 | % | 96.2 | % | 92.6 | % | 94.0 | % | 97.1 | % | 96.6 | % | 93.0 | % | 98.4 | % | 95.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR (000s) (5)
|
$ | 95,894 | $ | 75,734 | $ | 71,335 | $ | 59,839 | $ | 45,968 | $ | 41,767 | $ | 35,382 | $ | 33,930 | $ | 16,050 | $ | 475,899 | ||||||||||||||||||||
% of total ABR (5)
|
14.5 | % | 11.5 | % | 10.8 | % | 9.1 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.3 | % | 5.4 | % | 5.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 72.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
ABR per square foot |
$ | 6.47 | $ | 7.25 | $ | 7.03 | $ | 5.23 | $ | 18.23 | $ | 7.58 | $ | 4.93 | $ | 12.22 | $ | 8.65 | $ | 7.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lease expirations as a % of ABR: (5)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
6.8 | % | 5.5 | % | 10.7 | % | 20.2 | % | 11.4 | % | 13.8 | % | 11.1 | % | 7.2 | % | 11.8 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
16.8 | % | 13.1 | % | 16.6 | % | 15.4 | % | 16.0 | % | 14.2 | % | 12.3 | % | 11.4 | % | 15.7 | % | 15.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
11.9 | % | 16.4 | % | 20.4 | % | 14.8 | % | 6.5 | % | 16.4 | % | 27.2 | % | 18.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 15.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average lease terms |
5.8 | 7.0 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trailing four quarter tenant retention: |
82.9 | % | 83.2 | % | 63.9 | % | 77.7 | % | 86.8 | % | 61.9 | % | 72.1 | % | 63.1 | % | | 76.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
5.2 | % | (3.6 | %) | 8.1 | % | (3.6 | %) | 4.0 | % | 12.5 | % | 7.2 | % | | | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Same space square feet leased |
922,844 | 960,200 | 672,682 | 465,248 | 96,235 | 392,280 | 236,200 | | | 3,745,689 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same store cash basis NOI % change: (6)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
0.5 | % | 12.4 | % | 5.2 | % | 8.8 | % | 0.8 | % | 17.5 | % | 5.2 | % | 19.1 | % | 32.0 | % | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Same store square feet as % of aggregate square feet (5)
|
85.8 | % | 87.0 | % | 98.5 | % | 75.9 | % | 100.0 | % | 89.8 | % | 93.6 | % | 39.2 | % | 54.2 | % | 85.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata % share of square feet (7)
|
60.5 | % | 52.3 | % | 74.3 | % | 56.0 | % | 92.9 | % | 78.6 | % | 52.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 61.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Based on annualized base rent and represents AMBs owned and managed portfolio. The markets included here are a subset of AMBs regions defined as East, Southwest, and West Central in North America, Europe and Asia. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | AMB also owns a 19.9 acre land parcel, which is leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX. | |
| (3) | Includes on-tarmac cargo facilities at 14 airports. | |
| (4) | At March 31, 2007, this represents our largest single market in Asia and Europe respectively. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of ABR and same store properties, as applicable. | |
| (6) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (7) | Calculated as AMBs pro rata share of square feet on the total stabilized portfolio as shown on the next page. |
7
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW (1)
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands, expect per square foot amounts)
| Rentable | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Occupancy | % of Total | ABR per | |||||||||||||||||
| Feet | Percentage | ABR (2) | ABR (2) | Square Foot (2) | ||||||||||||||||
Largest Global Markets |
69,728,617 | 95.6 | % | $ | 475,899 | 72.1 | % | $ | 7.14 | |||||||||||
Other Global Target Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
North America Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta |
4,622,651 | 94.5 | % | $ | 19,395 | 2.9 | % | $ | 4.44 | |||||||||||
Baltimore |
3,046,324 | 99.1 | % | 20,801 | 3.1 | % | 6.89 | |||||||||||||
Boston |
5,188,593 | 92.1 | % | 31,395 | 4.8 | % | 6.57 | |||||||||||||
Dallas |
4,842,119 | 92.8 | % | 21,186 | 3.2 | % | 4.72 | |||||||||||||
Mexico City |
2,021,424 | 91.4 | % | 11,433 | 1.7 | % | 6.18 | |||||||||||||
Minneapolis |
4,006,858 | 95.1 | % | 17,547 | 2.7 | % | 4.60 | |||||||||||||
Other Markets (3)
|
6,093,733 | 92.7 | % | 32,067 | 4.8 | % | 5.68 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
29,821,702 | 93.8 | % | $ | 153,824 | 23.2 | % | $ | 5.50 | |||||||||||
Europe Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam, Netherlands |
964,039 | 100.0 | % | $ | 8,489 | 1.3 | % | $ | 8.81 | |||||||||||
Frankfurt, Germany |
166,917 | 100.0 | % | 2,768 | 0.4 | % | 16.58 | |||||||||||||
Hamburg, Germany |
952,369 | 99.7 | % | 7,586 | 1.1 | % | 7.99 | |||||||||||||
Lyon, France |
262,491 | 100.0 | % | 1,781 | 0.3 | % | 6.78 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
2,345,816 | 99.9 | % | $ | 20,624 | 3.1 | % | $ | 8.80 | |||||||||||
Asia Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka, Japan |
965,155 | 95.7 | % | $ | 7,660 | 1.2 | % | $ | 8.30 | |||||||||||
Shanghai, China |
151,749 | 100.0 | % | 556 | 0.1 | % | 3.66 | |||||||||||||
Singapore, Singapore |
162,171 | 100.0 | % | 1,738 | 0.3 | % | 10.72 | |||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
1,279,075 | 96.7 | % | $ | 9,954 | 1.6 | % | $ | 8.04 | |||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total |
103,175,210 | 95.2 | % | $ | 660,301 | 100.0 | % | $ | 6.72 | |||||||||||
Other Non-Managed JVs |
7,359,173 | 96.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Stabilized Portfolio (2) |
110,534,383 | 95.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Development Projects (4) |
17,708,048 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Portfolio |
128,242,431 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes AMBs owned and managed operating and development properties, investments in operating properties through non-managed unconsolidated joint ventures, and recently completed developments that have not yet been placed in operations but are being held for sale or contribution. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of Annualized Base Rent (ABR) and completion/stabilization, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Other Markets includes other target markets (Austin, Guadalajara, Houston, Orlando and Querétaro) and non-target markets (Columbus and New Orleans). | |
| (4) | Development projects includes recently completed development projects available for sale or contribution totaling twelve projects and 3.0 million square feet. |
8
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2007
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | Square | |||||||
| Property Acquisitions | Market | Acquisition | Feet | |||||
AMB
Alliance Fund III |
||||||||
1. AMB Internationale Industrial |
Chicago | January | 138,242 | |||||
2. AMB Midwest Distribution Center |
Chicago | January | 701,889 | |||||
3. AMB Kingsland Distribution |
No. New Jersey/New York | January | 146,000 | |||||
4. AMB Crosstown |
Minneapolis | January | 120,000 | |||||
5. AMB Gibraltar R&D |
San Francisco Bay Area | February | 56,720 | |||||
6. AMB Capelin Distribution Center |
Southern California | March | 329,140 | |||||
Total AMB Alliance Fund III |
1,491,991 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (1) |
$ | 104,295 | ||||||
AMB Japan
Fund I |
||||||||
7. AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 6 |
Tokyo, Japan | February | 137,131 | |||||
Total AMB Japan Fund I |
137,131 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (1) |
$ | 17,283 | (2) | |||||
AMB
Property Corporation |
||||||||
8. Airport Logistics Center SGP |
Singapore, Singapore | March | 162,171 | |||||
Total AMB Property Corporation |
162,171 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (1) |
$ | 20,179 | (2) | |||||
Total First Quarter Property Acquisitions |
1,791,293 | |||||||
Acquisition Cost (1) |
$ | 141,757 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
32 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate (GAAP) |
5.9 | % | ||||||
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| New Development and Renovation Projects | Market | Stabilization (3) | at Stabilization | |||||
1. AMB Wille Distribution Center |
Chicago | Q407 | 253,410 | |||||
2. AMB Beacon Lakes Commerce Bank |
South Florida | Q407 | 101,345 | |||||
3. AMB Remington Lakes Distribution |
Chicago | Q308 | 228,413 | |||||
4. AMB Akechi Distribution Center |
Nagoya, Japan | Q408 | 979,357 | |||||
5. AMB ICN Logistics Center |
Incheon, Korea | Q408 | 362,745 | |||||
Total First Quarter New Projects |
1,925,270 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (3) |
$ | 190,744 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
98 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (3)
|
7.4 | % | ||||||
Total First Quarter Capital Deployment |
$ | 332,501 | ||||||
| (1) | Represents the total expected investment, including closing costs and estimated acquisition capital of $4.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, respectively. | |
| (2) | Non-U.S. Dollar assets are translated using the exchange rate on the date of acquisition. | |
| (3) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yields, as applicable. |
9
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PROPERTY CONTRIBUTIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2007
For the Quarter ended March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
1. AMB Corregidora Distribution Center |
Queretaro, Mexico | March | 95,949 | |||||
Total Contributions |
95,949 | |||||||
Contribution Value |
$ | 4,591 | ||||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
None |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||
Total First Quarter Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions |
95,949 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value |
$ | 4,591 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
80 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
9.3 | % | ||||||
| Month of | ||||||||
| Contribution/ | Square | |||||||
| Development Property Contributions and Dispositions (1) | Market | Disposition | Feet | |||||
Contributions |
||||||||
1. AMB Layline Distribution Center |
Southern California | March | 298,000 | |||||
2. Agave Industrial Park Bldg 4 |
Mexico City, Mexico | March | 217,514 | |||||
Total Contributions |
515,514 | |||||||
Contribution Value |
$ | 56,000 | ||||||
Dispositions |
||||||||
1. AMB Des Plaines Logistics Center (2)
|
Chicago | March | 126,053 | |||||
2. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E1 3 units (2)
|
South Florida | March | 19,750 | |||||
Total Dispositions |
145,803 | |||||||
Disposition Price |
$ | 24,698 | ||||||
Total First Quarter Development Property Contributions and Dispositions |
661,317 | |||||||
Total Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 80,698 | ||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage Sold or Contributed |
84 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.6 | % | ||||||
| (1) | AMB also contributed approximately 82 acres of land at cost plus associated carry to AMB DFS Fund I. | |
| (2) | Represents a project that was placed in projects available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, and was sold or contributed during the quarter. |
10
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2007 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
1. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 2A |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q2 | 118,166 | |||||
2. AMB Riverfront Distribution Center Bldg B |
Seattle | Q2 | 388,000 | |||||
3. AMB Gonesse Distribution Center |
Paris, France | Q2 | 598,161 | |||||
4. AMB Douglassingel Distribution Center |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q3 | 148,714 | |||||
5. AMB Port of Hamburg 1 |
Hamburg, Germany | Q3 | 414,701 | |||||
6. AMB Forest Park Freight Terminal |
Atlanta | Q3 | 142,000 | |||||
7. AMB Pearson Logistics Centre 1Bldg 200 |
Toronto, Canada | Q3 | 205,518 | |||||
8. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 3 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q3 | 628,784 | |||||
9. AMB Tres Rios Industrial Park Bldg 4 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q3 | 315,156 | |||||
10. AMB Arrayanes Bldg 2 |
Guadalajara, Mexico | Q4 | 473,720 | |||||
11. AMB Dublin (3)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
12. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 2 |
Toronto, Canada | Q4 | 281,358 | |||||
13. AMB Pearson Logistics Centre 1Bldg 100 |
Toronto, Canada | Q4 | 446,338 | |||||
14. AMB Sagamihara Distribution Center |
Sagamihara, Japan | Q4 | 543,056 | |||||
15. AMB Aurora Industrial (5)
|
Minneapolis | Q4 | 122,793 | |||||
16. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 3 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Q4 | 324,725 | |||||
17. AMB Hathaway (3)
|
San Francisco Bay Area | Q4 | | |||||
18. AMB Isle dAbeau Logistics Park Bldg. C |
Lyon, France | Q4 | 277,817 | |||||
19. AMB Redlands 2 |
Southern California | Q4 | 1,313,470 | |||||
20. AMB Torrance Matrix |
Southern California | Q4 | 161,785 | |||||
21. AMB Valley Distribution Center |
Seattle | Q4 | 749,970 | |||||
22. AMB Wille Distribution Center (4)
|
Chicago | Q4 | 253,410 | |||||
23. AMB Beacon Lakes Commerce Bank (4)
|
South Florida | Q4 | 101,345 | |||||
24. AMB Beacon Lakes Bldg 7 |
South Florida | Q4 | 193,090 | |||||
25. Platinum Triangle Land Phase 1 (3)
|
Southern California | Q4 | | |||||
Total 2007 Deliveries |
8,202,077 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1) |
$ | 700,122 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 551,290 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
93 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.8 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
32 | % | ||||||
Continued on next page
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007 and 2008 deliveries was $506.5 million and $394.1 million, respectively, for a total of $900.6 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. | |
| (5) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. |
11
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS IN PROCESS
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Estimated | ||||||||
| Estimated | Square Feet | |||||||
| 2008 Deliveries | Market | Stabilization (1) | at Stabilization (1) | |||||
26. AMB Steel Road |
Southern California | Q1 | 161,000 | |||||
27. AMB Amagasaki Distribution Center 2 |
Osaka, Japan | Q2 | 981,679 | |||||
28. Agave Industrial Park Bldg 5 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Q2 | 111,589 | |||||
29. AMB Le
Grand Roissy Distribution Mitry |
Paris, France | Q2 | 37,954 | |||||
30. AMB Shinkiba Distribution Center |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 328,764 | |||||
31. AMB Theodore Park Logistics Center |
Dusseldorf, Germany | Q2 | 140,566 | |||||
32. AMB Narita Air Cargo Center 1 Phase 1 Bldg C |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 348,891 | |||||
33. Platinum Triangle Land Phase 2 (3)
|
Southern California | Q2 | | |||||
34. AMB Barajas Logistics Park |
Madrid, Spain | Q2 | 427,133 | |||||
35. AMB Funabashi Distribution Center 5 |
Tokyo, Japan | Q2 | 469,254 | |||||
36. AMB Palmetto Distribution Center |
Orlando | Q2 | 406,400 | |||||
37. AMB Franklin Commerce Center |
No. New Jersey/New York | Q3 | 366,896 | |||||
38. AMB Lijnden Logistics Court 1 |
Lijnden, Netherlands | Q3 | 96,520 | |||||
39. AMB Nanko Naka Distribution Center |
Osaka, Japan | Q3 | 402,313 | |||||
40. AMB Remington Lakes Distribution (4)
|
Chicago | Q3 | 228,413 | |||||
41. AMB Pompano Center of Commerce Phase 1 |
South Florida | Q4 | 218,835 | |||||
42. AMB Akechi Distribution Center (4)
|
Nagoya, Japan | Q4 | 979,357 | |||||
43. AMB Siziano Business Park Bldg 1 |
Milan, Italy | Q4 | 436,916 | |||||
44. AMB ICN Logistics Center (4)
|
Incheon, Korea | Q4 | 362,745 | |||||
Total 2008 Deliveries |
6,505,225 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1) |
$ | 730,142 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 403,287 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
97 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.1 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
11 | % | ||||||
Total 2007 and 2008 Scheduled Deliveries |
14,707,302 | |||||||
Estimated Total Investment (1) |
$ | 1,430,264 | ||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 954,577 | (2) | |||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
95 | % | ||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (1)
|
7.5 | % | ||||||
% Pre-leased |
23 | % | ||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of completion/stabilization, estimated total investment and estimated yield, as applicable. | |
| (2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2007 and 2008 deliveries was $506.5 million and $394.1 million, respectively, for a total of $900.6 million. | |
| (3) | Represents a value-added conversion project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Represents a new development start for the quarter ended March 31, 2007. |
12
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PLACED IN OPERATIONS AND
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of March 31, 2007
PROJECTS AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| Projects Placed in Operations | Market | Square Feet | ||||
1. AMB Turnberry Distribution VI |
Chicago | 179,400 | ||||
Total First Quarter Placed in Operations |
179,400 | |||||
Total Investment (5) |
$ | 10,657 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
20 | % | ||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield (5)
|
8.0 | % | ||||
| Projects Available for Sale or Contribution (1) | Market | Square Feet | ||||
1. AMB BRU Air Cargo Center |
Brussels, Belgium | 102,655 | ||||
2. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 2 (2)
|
Singapore, Singapore | 250,758 | ||||
3. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 1 |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | 236,203 | ||||
4. Frankfurt Logistics Center 556 Phase II |
Frankfurt, Germany | 105,723 | ||||
5. AMB Milton 401 Business Park Bldg 1 |
Toronto, Canada | 375,241 | ||||
6. AMB Fengxian Logistics Center Bldgs 2, 4 & 6 (3)
|
Shanghai, China | 1,040,633 | ||||
7. Highway 17 55 Madison Street (3)
|
No. New Jersey/New York | 150,446 | ||||
8. AMB Jiuting Distribution Center 2 |
Shanghai, China | 187,866 | ||||
9. AMB Annagem Distribution Centre (4)
|
Toronto, Canada | 198,169 | ||||
10. AMB DFW Logistics Center 1 (4)
|
Dallas | 113,640 | ||||
11. AMB Beacon Lakes Village Phase 1 Bldg E1 5 units (4)
|
South Florida | 32,918 | ||||
12. AMB Beacon Lakes Bldg 6 (4)
|
South Florida | 206,494 | ||||
Total Available for Sale or Contribution |
3,000,746 | |||||
Total Investment (5) |
$ | 193,818 | ||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
86 | % | ||||
| (1) | Represents projects where development activities have been completed and which AMB intends to sell or contribute within two years of construction completion. | |
| (2) | Represents a project in an unconsolidated joint venture. | |
| (3) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (4) | Bold indicates a project placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter ended March 31, 2007. Projects placed in available for sale or contribution during the quarter totaled $57.1 million and 0.7 million square feet. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of stabilization, estimated total investment, estimated yields, AMBs share of, as applicable. |
13
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
LAND INVENTORY
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| North America | Europe | Asia | Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres (3) | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
1,604 | 25,534,071 | 53 | 1,037,254 | 78 | 3,904,640 | 1,735 | 30,475,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
422 | 6,728,837 | | | | | 422 | 6,728,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Starts |
(37 | ) | (583,168 | ) | | | (32 | ) | (1,342,102 | ) | (69 | ) | (1,925,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2007 |
1,989 | 31,679,740 | 53 | 1,037,254 | 46 | 2,562,538 | 2,088 | (4) | 35,279,532 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments (1)
|
$ | 400,017 | $ | 27,833 | $ | 97,903 | $ | 525,753 | (4) | $ | 1,942,500 | (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes initial acquisition cost and associated carry costs. | |
| (2) | Represents total estimated costs of development including initial land acquisition cost and associated carry costs assuming full build out of land inventory. | |
| (3) | AMB also has a 19.9 acre land parcel leased to a parking lot operator in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX. | |
| (4) | AMBs share of acres, square feet of estimated build out potential, and total investment including amounts held in unconsolidated joint ventures is 1,874 acres, 31,661,167 square feet and $399,818, respectively. |
14
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands, except share price)
| AMB | Joint | Unsecured | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured | Venture | Senior | Credit | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Year | Debt (1) | Debt (1) | Debt | Facilities (2) | Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
$ | 12,396 | $ | 49,349 | $ | 55,000 | $ | | $ | 14,215 | $ | 130,960 | ||||||||||||
2008 |
92,239 | 79,200 | 175,000 | | 810 | 347,249 | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
6,234 | 124,868 | 100,000 | | 873 | 231,975 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
72,026 | 122,620 | 250,000 | 474,849 | 941 | 920,436 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
6,335 | 197,466 | 75,000 | | 1,014 | 279,815 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
8,369 | 420,116 | | | 1,093 | 429,578 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
42,682 | 59,714 | 175,000 | | 65,920 | (6) | 343,316 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 |
245,273 | 4,076 | | | 616 | 249,965 | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2,199 | 18,780 | 112,491 | | 664 | 134,134 | ||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
4,804 | 54,995 | | | | 59,799 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| 19,091 | 125,000 | | | 144,091 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
492,557 | 1,150,275 | 1,067,491 | 474,849 | 86,146 | 3,271,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized premiums/(discount) |
1,480 | 4,024 | (10,305 | ) | | | (4,801 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated debt |
494,037 | 1,154,299 | 1,057,186 | 474,849 | 86,146 | 3,266,517 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of unconsolidated
JV Debt (3) (5)
|
| 30,930 | | | | 30,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
494,037 | 1,185,229 | 1,057,186 | 474,849 | 86,146 | 3,297,447 | ||||||||||||||||||
JV partners share of
consolidated JV debt
(5)
|
| (713,375 | ) | | | (52,000 | ) | (765,375 | ) | |||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (5)
|
$ | 494,037 | $ | 471,854 | $ | 1,057,186 | $ | 474,849 | $ | 34,146 | $ | 2,532,072 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
4.9 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.2 | % | 2.1 | % | 6.9 | % | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
maturity (in years) |
5.2 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 5.9 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
99,319,253 | $ | 58.79 | $ | 5,838,979 | |||||||
LP Units |
4,666,073 | 58.79 | 274,318 | |||||||||
Total |
103,985,326 | $ | 6,113,297 | |||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units (4) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series I preferred units (7)
|
8.00 | % | 25,500 | |||||
Series J preferred units (7)
|
7.95 | % | 40,000 | |||||
Series K preferred units |
7.95 | % | 40,000 | |||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
7.17 | % | $ | 417,767 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | |||||
Total debt-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
33.5 | % | |||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of
total market capitalization
(5) |
27.9 | % | |||
Total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization (5)
|
37.8 | % | |||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization (5)
|
32.5 | % | |||
| (1) | AMB secured debt includes debt related to European and Asian assets in the amount of $414.8 million and $47.5 million, respectively. | |
| (2) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1,182 million. Includes $342.5 million and $132.3 million in Yen and Canadian dollar based borrowings, respectively, translated to U.S. Dollars using the foreign exchange rates at March 31, 2007. | |
| (3) | The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated JV debt were 4.7% and 5.6 years, respectively. | |
| (4) | Exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder and redeemable at the option of AMB after a specified non-call period, generally five years from issuance. | |
| (5) | See Reporting Definitions and Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures. | |
| (6) | Maturity includes $65 million balance outstanding on a $65 million non-recourse credit facility obtained by AMB Partners II. | |
| (7) | Callable as of March 31, 2007. |
15
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
UNCONSOLIDATED AND CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES (1)
As of March 31, 2007
As of March 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
| AMB's | Gross | AMB's | 3rd Party | Planned | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Geographic | Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Equity | Gross | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Focus | Percentage | Feet (2) | Value (3) | Debt | Debt | Investment (8) | Committed | Capitalization | Capacity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
United States | 21 | % | 15,746,793 | $ | 1,469,392 | $ | 726,956 | $ | | $ | 135,914 | $ | 553,900 | $ | 1,469,000 | (4) | $ | 257,000 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I (6)
|
Japan | 20 | % | 3,951,904 | 625,523 | 390,027 | 100,017 | 32,184 | 420,000 | 2,100,000 | 1,460,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
Mexico | 20 | % | 3,050,915 | 184,487 | 135,955 | | 8,495 | 200,000 | 715,000 | 519,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
20 | % | 22,749,612 | 2,279,402 | 1,252,938 | 100,017 | 176,593 | 1,173,900 | 4,284,000 | 2,236,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
United States | 15 | % | | 110,242 | | | 16,622 | 425,000 | 500,000 | 270,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
53 | % | 7,684,931 | (5) | 290,898 | 182,830 | | 48,569 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
24 | % | 30,434,543 | $ | 2,680,542 | $ | 1,435,768 | $ | 100,017 | $ | 241,784 | $ | 1,598,900 | $ | 4,784,000 | $ | 2,506,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
United States | 20 | % | 9,913,375 | $ | 683,609 | $ | 322,094 | $ | 65,000 | $ | 193,000 | $ | 580,000 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
United States | 20 | % | 8,007,103 | 517,058 | 242,050 | | 195,000 | 490,000 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
United States | 50 | % | 8,287,424 | 445,718 | 350,073 | | 75,000 | 420,000 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
United States | 39 | % | 2,172,137 | 153,990 | 84,558 | | 49,000 | 228,000 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Erie |
United States | 50 | % | 821,712 | 52,643 | 20,459 | | 50,000 | 200,000 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,201,751 | 1,853,018 | 1,019,234 | 65,000 | $ | 562,000 | $ | 1,918,000 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 343 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
United States | 20 | % | n/a | 4,256 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures |
20 | % | | 4,599 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
30 | % | 29,201,751 | 1,857,617 | 1,019,234 | 65,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
91 | % | 2,871,846 | 252,773 | 64,498 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
88 | % | 3,814,446 | 333,124 | 70,567 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
44 | % | 35,888,043 | $ | 2,443,514 | $ | 1,154,299 | $ | 65,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 | Cash NOI (7) | Net Income | FFO (7) | Share of | Cash NOI (7) | Net Income | FFO (7) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 41,702 | $ | 6,161 | $ | 20,872 | AMB's | $ | 11,479 | $ | 2,113 | $ | 5,675 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
$ | 36,533 | $ | 5,648 | $ | 18,368 | Partner's | $ | 26,768 | $ | 4,077 | $ | 15,881 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | See Joint Venture Partner Information. | |
| (2) | For development properties, this represents estimated square feet upon completion for committed phases of development and renovation projects. | |
| (3) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (4) | The planned gross capitalization and investment capacity of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, as an open-end fund, is not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the Funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | Includes investments in 7.4 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. See Reporting Definitions for the definition of owned and managed. | |
| (6) | AMB Japan Fund I is a yen-denominated fund. U.S. dollar amounts are converted at the March 31, 2007 exchange rate. | |
| (7) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures and Reporting Definitions. | |
| (8) | AMB also has a 39% equity interest in G. Accion, a Mexican real estate company for approximately $37.6 million. G. Accion provides real estate management and development services in Mexico. |
16
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FOR NET ASSET VALUE ANALYSIS (1)
(dollars in thousands)
| For the Quarter | ||||
| Ended March 31, 2007 |
||||
AMBs Share of cash basis NOI |
||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 162,082 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(2,715 | ) | ||
Property operating costs |
(44,247 | ) | ||
JV Partners share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
(27,337 | ) | ||
AMBs share of transaction activity adjustments to NOI (1) (2) (3)
|
(2,451 | ) | ||
AMBs share of unconsolidated JVs cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
11,479 | |||
Total AMBs share of cash basis NOI (1) (2)
|
$ | 96,811 | ||
Private capital income |
$ | 5,925 | ||
AMBs share of land and development projects |
||||
AMBs share of land held for future development (2) (4)
|
$ | 399,818 | ||
AMBs share of developments and renovations in process (2) (4)
|
$ | 900,600 | ||
AMBs share of development projects held for contribution or sale (2) (4)
|
$ | 166,683 | ||
AMBs share of assets contributed to private capital joint ventures (2) (4)
|
$ | 12,454 | ||
AMBs share of total debt and preferred securities (1) (2) (4)
|
$ | 2,949,839 | ||
AMBs share of select balance sheet items (owned and managed portfolio): (1) (2)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 269,079 | ||
Mortgages and loans receivable |
18,711 | |||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
262,052 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(72,325 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(281,796 | ) | ||
AMBs share of other assets and liabilities |
$ | 195,721 | ||
| (1) | See Supplemental Financial Disclosures. | |
| (2) | See Reporting Definitions for definitions of AMBs share of, JV Partners share of and owned and managed, as applicable. | |
| (3) | Transaction activity adjustments to NOI stabilizes NOI for acquisitions and development completions and removes NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution. | |
| (4) | See Development & Renovation Projects in Process, Development Projects Available for Sale or Contribution and Sold or Contributed Projects, Operating Property Contributions and Dispositions or Capitalization Summary and their respective footnotes for further information. |
17
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
REPORTING DEFINITIONS
Acquisition/non-recurring capex includes immediate building
improvements that were taken into consideration when underwriting the
purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to
operating standard or to stabilization. Also includes incremental
building improvements and leasing costs that are incurred in an effort to
substantially increase the revenue potential of an existing building.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total book capitalization is
calculated using the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is
the pro rata portion of the total debt based on the Companys percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures
holding the debt. AMBs share of total book capitalization is defined as
the Companys share of total debt plus minority interests to preferred
unitholders and limited partnership unitholders plus stockholders
equity.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization
is calculated using the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt
is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on the Companys
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or
unconsolidated ventures holding the debt. The Companys definition of
total market capitalization is total debt plus preferred equity
liquidation preferences plus market equity. The Companys definition of
AMBs share of total market capitalization is the Companys share of
total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market
equity. The Companys definition of market equity is the total number
of outstanding shares of the Companys common stock and common limited
partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common
stock as of the period end.
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent
the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on the
Companys percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated
or unconsolidated ventures accounted for in the applicable financial
measure.
AMBs share of total market capitalization is defined as the
Companys share of total debt plus preferred equity liquidation
preferences plus market equity.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash
basis) per the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free
rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is used. Leases
denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the currency
exchange rate at quarter end.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90%
leased or properties for which we have held a certificate of occupancy or
building has been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of
development, renovation, or expansion, including initial acquisition
costs, prepaid ground leases and associated carry costs. Estimated total
investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change.
Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the
exchange rate at period end.
Estimated yields on development and renovation projects are calculated from
estimated annual NOI following occupancy stabilization divided by the
estimated total investment, including earnouts (if triggered by
stabilization), prepaid ground leases and associated carrying costs. Yields
exclude value-added conversion projects and are calculated on an after-tax
basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest
expense (including capitalized interest) plus preferred dividends and
distributions.
Interest coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest expense.
JV Partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent
the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on the
Companys joint venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of
the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures accounted for in the applicable
financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of the
Companys common stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by
the closing price per share of its common stock as of the period end.
Occupancy percentage represents the percentage of total rentable square
feet owned, which is leased, including month-to-month leases, as of the
date reported. Space is considered leased when the tenant has either taken
physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by the Company as assets in which the
Company has at least a 10% ownership interest, is the property or asset
manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Percentage pre-leased represents the percentage of signed leases only.
Preferred, with respect to its capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represents projects where the acquired buildings are
less than 75% leased and require significant capital expenditures
(generally more than 10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the
buildings up to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90%
occupancy).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building
improvements and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues.
Recurring capital expenditures do not include acquisition capital that
was taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building
or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard.
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference,
weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month after a term
commencement date and the net ABR due the last month prior to the
termination date of the former tenants term. If free rent is granted, then
the first positive full rent value is used as a point of comparison. The
rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent
charges. If either the previous or current lease terms are under 12 months,
then they are
excluded from this calculation. If the lease is the first in the unit
(first generation) and there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is
excluded from this calculation.
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding
straight-line rents) of the same store properties from the prior year
reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store properties include all properties that were owned as of the end
of both the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes
development properties for both the current and prior reporting periods.
The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and
developments stabilized after December 31, 2005.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant
improvements, lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during
leasing of second generation space divided by the total square feet leased.
Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are not included until
such space is leased. Second generation space excludes newly developed
square footage or square footage vacant at acquisition.
Stabilized GAAP cap rates for acquisitions are calculated as NOI,
including straight-line rents, stabilized to market occupancy (generally
95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis
includes the initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt
to market, all due diligence and closing costs, lease intangible
adjustments, planned immediate capital expenditures, leasing costs
necessary to achieve stabilization and, if applicable, any estimated costs
required to buy-out AMBs joint venture partners. For dispositions or
contributions, cap rates are calculated as NOI divided by total
disposition price or contribution value, as applicable.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases renewed by existing
tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and renewed leases
during the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that
default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants
and the square footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by the Company as total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity.
Value-added conversion project represents the repurposing of land or a
building site for more valuable uses and may include such activities as
rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting.
18
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Adjusted EBITDA. The Company uses adjusted earnings before interest, tax,
depreciation and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its
operating performance and liquidity. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA to
provide investors relevant and useful information because it permits fixed
income investors to view income from its operations on an unleveraged basis
before the effects of non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. By
excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure the
Companys operating performance independent of its capital structure and
indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its
operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to
compare its operating performance to that of other companies, both in the
real estate industry and in other industries. The Company considers adjusted
EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its comparative
performance with other companies because, by excluding non-cash depreciation
expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing public compare the
performance of a real estate company to that of companies in other
industries. As a liquidity measure, the Company believes that adjusted EBITDA
helps fixed income and equity investors to analyze its ability to meet debt
service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share and unit
distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as the
Company expects investors to when measuring the Companys operating
performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating
performance, and comparing that performance to other companies, both in the
real estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability
to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share and
unit distributions. The Company believes investors should consider adjusted
EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of the Companys
performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its performance and
liquidity, to improve their understanding of the Companys operating results
and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of the performance of
its assets between periods and as against other companies. By excluding
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization when assessing the Companys
financial performance, an investor is assessing the earnings generated by the
Companys operations, but not taking into account the eliminated expenses
incurred in connection with such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has
limitations as an analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with the
Companys required GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the
Companys historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for
working capital, capital expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted
EBITDA also does not reflect the cash required to make interest and principal
payments on the Companys outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a
relevant and widely used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it
does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP
and it should not be considered as an alternative to those indicators in
evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, the Companys
computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by
other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net income for the
quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 25,682 | $ | 27,577 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
41,029 | 42,754 | ||||||
Impairment losses |
257 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
5,108 | 4,829 | ||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(2,113 | ) | (2,088 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of FFO (2)
|
5,675 | 3,209 | ||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
4,068 | 2,027 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
33,865 | 39,153 | ||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
11,981 | 14,302 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(249 | ) | (9,259 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
(130 | ) | 3,126 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 125,173 | $ | 125,630 | ||||
Interest coverage. The Company uses interest coverage to measure its
liquidity. The Company believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to
investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure the Companys
ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt. The Companys
computation of interest coverage may not be comparable to interest coverage
reported by other companies.
The following table details total interest for the quarters ended March
31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Interest | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,865 | $ | 39,153 | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(142 | ) | 253 | |||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
4,068 | 2,027 | ||||||
Total interest |
$ | 37,791 | $ | 41,433 | ||||
Fixed charge coverage. The Company uses fixed charge coverage to measure
its liquidity. The Company believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and
useful to investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure the
Companys ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt, make
distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to its
preferred shareholders. The Companys computation of fixed charge coverage
may not be comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the
quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 33,865 | $ | 39,153 | ||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(850 | ) | (2,372 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(142 | ) | 253 | |||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
5 | (2 | ) | |||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
4,068 | 2,027 | ||||||
Capitalized interest |
14,542 | 8,533 | ||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
3,699 | 5,001 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,096 | ||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 59,139 | $ | 55,689 | ||||
Companys share of total debt. The Companys share of total debt is the
pro rata portion of the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest
in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt. The
Company believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental
measure, which enables both management and investors to analyze its leverage
and to compare its leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it
allows for a more meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other
companies that do not consolidate their joint ventures. The Companys share
of total debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability should there be
a default under any or all of such loans or a liquidation of the joint
ventures.
Net Asset Value (NAV). The Company believes NAV is a useful supplemental
measure of its operating performance because it enables both management and
investors to analyze the
fair value of its business. An assessment of the fair value of a business
involves estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various
methods. The Company has presented certain financial measures related to its
business that it believes the investing public might use to calculate its NAV
but has not presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on
assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
19
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Funds From Operations (FFO). The Company believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, the
Company considers funds from operations, or FFO, as defined by NAREIT, to
be a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance. FFO is
defined as net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP, less gains (or
losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and
real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive the Companys
pro rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
Further, the Company does not adjust FFO to eliminate the effects of
non-recurring charges. The Company believes that FFO, as defined by
NAREIT, is a meaningful supplemental measure of its operating performance
because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance
with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets
diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and
amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically
risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors
and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real
estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient.
Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance
for real estate investment trusts that excludes historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income, as
defined by GAAP. The Company believes that the use of FFO, combined with
the required GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the
understanding of operating results of real estate investment trusts among
the investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such
companies more meaningful. The Company considers FFO to be a useful
measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance
because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously
depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and
amortization, FFO can help the investing public compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to
other companies. While FFO is a relevant and widely used measure of
operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not
represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and
should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating
the Companys liquidity or operating performance. FFO also does not
consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to the
Companys real estate assets nor is FFO necessarily indicative of cash
available to fund the Companys future cash requirements. Further, the
Companys computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other
real estate investment trusts that do not define the term in accordance
with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT
definition differently than the Company does. See Consolidated Statements
of Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of FFO from net income.
Net Operating Income (NOI). Net operating income is defined as rental
revenue (as calculated in accordance with GAAP), including reimbursements,
less property operating expenses, which excludes depreciation,
amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense.
The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because NOI reflects the operating performance of the
real estate portfolio. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative
measure of financial performance since it does not reflect general and
administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization
costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development
and construction activities that could materially impact results from
operations. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real
estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating NOI.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI (see definition for
NOI) less straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. The
Company considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful
supplemental performance measure because cash basis NOI reflects the
operating performance of the real estate portfolio. However, cash-basis
NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial
performance since it does not reflect general and administrative expenses,
interest expenses, depreciation and
amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in
development and construction activities that could materially impact
results from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to
that of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different
methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
Same Store Net Operating Income (SS NOI). The Company believes that net
income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure.
However, the Company considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure
of our operating performance. For properties that are considered part of
the same store pool, see Reporting Definitions. In deriving SS NOI, the
Company defines NOI as rental revenue (as calculated in accordance
with GAAP), including reimbursements, less property operating expenses,
which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative
expenses and interest expense. For a discussion of cash-basis NOI, see
definition of cash-basis NOI. In addition, the Company believes that SS
NOI helps the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys real estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI is a
relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate
investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net
income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative
to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS
NOI also does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest
expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that
could materially impact our results from operations. Further, the
Companys computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other
real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for
calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated SS NOI and NOI from net
income for the quarters ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 25,682 | $ | 27,577 | ||||
Private capital income |
(5,925 | ) | (5,106 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
41,029 | 42,754 | ||||||
Impairment losses |
257 | | ||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
30,095 | 23,469 | ||||||
Total other income and expenses |
14,829 | 33,421 | ||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
11,981 | 14,302 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(113 | ) | (9,259 | ) | ||||
NOI |
117,835 | 127,158 | ||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(11,603 | ) | (24,911 | ) | ||||
Less non cash adjustments (1)
|
(1,141 | ) | (3,808 | ) | ||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 105,091 | $ | 98,439 | ||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
20
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes
that cash flow information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate
earnings information. However, AMB considers cash flow information
reported on an owned and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles, gross lease termination fees, net lease
termination fees, AMBs share of net lease termination fees, tenant
improvements, lease commissions and other lease costs, building
improvements, JV partners share of capital expenditures and AMBs share
of recurring capital expenditures) to be useful supplemental measures to
help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance and cash
flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed,
AMBs share of and JV partners share of. AMB believes that owned and
managed cash flow information helps investors make a comprehensive
assessment of the cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio and
provides a better understanding of AMBs operating performance and
activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is
helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information as
defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP measurements.
Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed supplemental cash flow
information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies,
as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
21
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
JOINT VENTURE PARTNER INFORMATION
AMB-SGP Mexico is a co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with a
subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. Includes $9.3 million of
shareholder loans outstanding at March 31, 2007 between the Company and
the co-investment partnership.
AMB Japan Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2005 with
institutional investors. This fund is yen-denominated. U.S. dollar
amounts are converted at the March 31, 2007 exchange rate.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III is an open-ended co-investment
partnership formed in 2004 with institutional investors, which invest
through a private REIT. Prior to October 1, 2006, the Company accounted
for AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III as a consolidated joint venture.
AMB DFS Fund I is a co-investment partnership formed in 2006 with a
subsidiary of GE Real Estate to build and sell properties in non-target
markets.
AMB Erie is a co-investment partnership formed in 1998 with the Erie Insurance Group.
AMB Partners II is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with the
City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System.
AMB-SGP is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with a subsidiary
of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd.
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II is a co-investment partnership
with institutional investors, which invest through a private REIT.
AMB-AMS is a co-investment partnership with three Dutch pension funds
advised by Mn Services NV and Cordares.
22
|
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2007 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONTACTS
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9415 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, North America | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Margan S. Mitchell
|
VP, Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9477 | mmitchell@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Manager, Investor Relations | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Other Office Locations | Investor Relations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Amsterdam | Chicago | New Jersey | Paris | Tel: (415) 394-9000 | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Atlanta | Dallas | New York | Shanghai | Fax: (415) 394-9001 | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
Baltimore | Frankfurt | Nagoya | Singapore | E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Beijing | Los Angeles | Narita | Tokyo | Website: www.amb.com | |||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001
|
Boston | Menlo Park | Osaka | Vancouver | ||||||
23
Some of the information included in this supplemental analyst package and the conference
call to be held in connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related
to development and renovation projects (including stabilization dates, square feet at stabilization
or completion, sale or contribution dates, weighted average estimated yields from such projects,
costs and total investment amounts), acquisition capital, build out potential of land inventory,
co-investment joint venture investment capacity, terms of the co-investment joint ventures, cost to
buy out joint venture partners, lease expirations, future debt summaries, and future business plans
(such as property divestitures and financings), which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor
provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are
necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may
not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the
dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to
differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults
on or non-renewal of leases by tenants, increased interest rates and operating costs, our failure
to obtain necessary outside financing, re-financing risks, risks related to debt and equity
security financings (including dilution risk), difficulties in identifying properties to acquire
and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and
operations, our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest
proceeds from any divestitures, risks and uncertainties affecting property development and
construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary
permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status
as a real estate investment trust, failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings,
environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, financial market fluctuations,
changes in general economic conditions or in the real estate sector, changes in real estate and
zoning laws, a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, risks related to doing business
internationally and global expansion, losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown
liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and increases in real
property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally, including interest
rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and certain other
matters discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006.
24