SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Highlights |
1 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
2 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
3 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations |
4 | |||
Adjusted EBITDA and Coverage Ratios |
5 | |||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
6 | |||
Industrial Operating and Leasing Statistics |
7 | |||
Industrial Market Operating Statistics |
8 | |||
Industrial Portfolio Overview |
9 | |||
Industrial Lease Expirations |
10 | |||
Top 25 Customers |
11 | |||
Historical Industrial Operating and Leasing Statistics |
12 | |||
Acquisitions |
13 | |||
Dispositions |
14 | |||
Private Capital Joint Venture Activity |
15 | |||
New Development & Renovation Projects |
16 | |||
Development & Renovation Projects in Process |
17 | |||
Development & Renovation Projects Stabilized, Sold or Contributed |
19 | |||
Completed Development Projects Available for Sale or Contribution |
20 | |||
Capitalization Summary |
21 | |||
Co-Investment Consolidated Joint Ventures |
22 | |||
Other Consolidated Joint Ventures |
23 | |||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, Mortgage Investments and Other Investments |
24 | |||
Reporting Definitions |
25 | |||
Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures |
26 | |||
AMB Property Corporation Contacts |
27 |
In the prior quarter, management restated AMBs previously issued financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 filed on Form 10-K/A and for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004 filed on Form 10-Q/A to reflect additional depreciation expense. The restatement affected the Companys depreciation expense, net income and earnings per share for the prior periods. The net impact of the restatement of depreciation expense on earnings per share results reduced EPS by $0.02 from $1.43 to $1.41 for 2001; by $0.04 from $1.37 to $1.33 for 2002 and by $0.06 from $1.47 to $1.41 for 2003. This restatement of depreciation expense did not impact the Companys previously reported funds from operations (FFO) per fully diluted share and unit as, in accordance with NAREITs FFO definition, the Company adds back real estate-related depreciation to calculate FFO. Please see the Companys October 12, 2004 earnings press release, its annual report for the year ended December 31, 2003 in Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A, its quarterly report for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 in Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A and its quarterly report for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 in Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A for more detail.
Cover: AMB CDG Cargo Center is a modern 501,000 square foot (46,525 square meter) on-airport cargo facility located at Paris Roissy Charles de Gaulle Airport. The property was acquired in October 2004 and is 100% leased to La Poste, Europes second largest postal service and AMBs fifth largest customer.
i
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
Quarters Ended December 31, | Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Change | 2003 | 2004 | Change | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 174,368 | 11.3 | % | $ | 156,735 | $ | 665,689 | 13.5 | % | $ | 586,629 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA (1) |
129,121 | 3.6 | % | 124,631 | 490,630 | 6.0 | % | 463,005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders (restated) (3) |
56,152 | 121.7 | % | 25,325 | 118,340 | 1.4 | % | 116,716 | ||||||||||||||||||||
FFO (2) |
56,285 | 8.5 | % | 51,865 | 207,314 | 11.1 | % | 186,666 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS (restated) (3) |
$ | 0.65 | 116.7 | % | $ | 0.30 | $ | 1.39 | (1.4 | %) | $ | 1.41 | ||||||||||||||||
FFO (2) |
0.62 | 5.1 | % | 0.59 | 2.30 | 8.0 | % | 2.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.425 | 2.4 | % | 0.415 | 1.70 | 2.4 | % | 1.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest coverage (1) |
3.2 | x | 3.2 | x | 3.0 | x | 3.1 | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge coverage (1) |
2.4 | x | 2.6 | x | 2.3 | x | 2.4 | x | ||||||||||||||||||||
FFO payout |
69 | % | 70 | % | 74 | % | 78 | % |
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2004 | September 30, 2004 | June 30, 2004 | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Capitalization |
||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt (4) |
$ | 2,395,046 | $ | 2,581,627 | $ | 2,363,536 | $ | 2,128,464 | 1,954,314 | |||||||||||
Preferred equity |
392,325 | 392,325 | 355,846 | 355,846 | 355,846 | |||||||||||||||
Market equity |
3,554,108 | 3,245,525 | 3,026,532 | 3,246,769 | 2,845,984 | |||||||||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 6,341,479 | $ | 6,219,477 | $ | 5,745,914 | $ | 5,731,079 | 5,156,144 | |||||||||||
Ratios |
||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total book capitalization (restated) (3)(4) |
54.0 | % | 56.3 | % | 54.6 | % | 51.8 | % | 49.6 | % | ||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization (4) |
37.8 | % | 41.5 | % | 41.1 | % | 37.1 | % | 37.9 | % | ||||||||||
Total common shares and units outstanding |
87,994,744 | 87,669,504 | 87,396,245 | 87,349,167 | 86,556,703 |
(1) | See the footnotes to the Adjusted EBITDA and Coverage Ratios. | |
(2) | See the footnotes to the Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations. | |
(3) | See Table of Contents for discussion of restated amounts for prior periods. | |
(4) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes the Companys share of total debt is a useful supplemental measure for its management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing the Companys financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
1
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2004 | September 30, 2004 | June 30, 2004 | March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Restated) (1) | (Restated) (1) | (Restated) (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in real estate: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,526,144 | $ | 6,302,529 | $ | 6,051,308 | $ | 5,730,654 | $ | 5,491,707 | ||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(615,646 | ) | (595,438 | ) | (560,877 | ) | (524,115 | ) | (485,559 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investments in properties |
5,910,498 | 5,707,091 | 5,490,431 | 5,206,539 | 5,006,148 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures |
55,166 | 48,601 | 52,579 | 54,006 | 52,009 | |||||||||||||||
Properties held for contribution, net |
| 11,854 | 11,143 | | | |||||||||||||||
Properties held for divestiture, net |
87,340 | 59,924 | 39,246 | 9,628 | 11,751 | |||||||||||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,053,004 | 5,827,470 | 5,593,399 | 5,270,173 | 5,069,908 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
146,593 | 174,323 | 146,136 | 150,903 | 156,663 | |||||||||||||||
Mortgages receivable |
13,738 | 23,068 | 23,594 | 23,620 | 43,145 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
109,028 | 102,078 | 96,524 | 92,081 | 88,452 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
64,580 | 94,711 | 76,958 | 69,669 | 51,391 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,386,943 | $ | 6,221,650 | $ | 5,936,611 | $ | 5,606,446 | $ | 5,409,559 | ||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,892,524 | $ | 1,617,944 | $ | 1,552,084 | $ | 1,457,630 | $ | 1,363,890 | ||||||||||
Unsecured senior debt securities |
1,003,940 | 1,025,000 | 1,025,000 | 1,025,000 | 925,000 | |||||||||||||||
Unsecured debt |
9,028 | 9,182 | 9,334 | 9,482 | 9,628 | |||||||||||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
351,699 | 583,864 | 428,502 | 261,369 | 275,739 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
262,286 | 278,350 | 256,574 | 208,614 | 187,095 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,519,477 | 3,514,340 | 3,271,494 | 2,962,095 | 2,761,352 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interests: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners |
828,622 | 701,639 | 698,549 | 662,235 | 658,723 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
278,378 | 278,378 | 241,899 | 241,873 | 241,899 | |||||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
89,326 | 88,026 | 88,190 | 89,036 | 90,448 | |||||||||||||||
Total minority interests |
1,196,326 | 1,068,043 | 1,028,638 | 993,144 | 991,070 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
1,567,936 | 1,536,063 | 1,533,275 | 1,547,995 | 1,553,764 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
103,204 | 103,204 | 103,204 | 103,212 | 103,373 | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,671,140 | 1,639,267 | 1,636,479 | 1,651,207 | 1,657,137 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,386,943 | $ | 6,221,650 | $ | 5,936,611 | $ | 5,606,446 | $ | 5,409,559 | ||||||||||
(1) | See Table of Contents for discussion of restated amounts for prior periods. |
2
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Restated) (1) | (Restated) (1) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 169,550 | $ | 151,242 | $ | 652,794 | $ | 573,292 | ||||||||
Private capital income |
4,818 | 5,493 | 12,895 | 13,337 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
174,368 | 156,735 | 665,689 | 586,629 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
(43,431 | ) | (39,699 | ) | (168,506 | ) | (152,023 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(43,168 | ) | (34,823 | ) | (160,026 | ) | (132,167 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | | (5,251 | ) | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
(13,987 | ) | (12,234 | ) | (58,956 | ) | (46,429 | ) | ||||||||
Fund costs |
(1,004 | ) | (186 | ) | (1,741 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(101,590 | ) | (86,942 | ) | (389,229 | ) | (336,695 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income |
72,778 | 69,793 | 276,460 | 249,934 | ||||||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures |
525 | 1,223 | 3,781 | 5,445 | ||||||||||||
Interest income and other, net |
682 | 865 | 3,958 | 4,009 | ||||||||||||
Gains from dispositions of real estate |
5,219 | | 5,219 | 7,429 | ||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
3,772 | 8,929 | 8,528 | 14,441 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including
amortization |
(39,401 | ) | (38,537 | ) | (157,852 | ) | (146,230 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(29,203 | ) | (27,520 | ) | (136,366 | ) | (114,906 | ) | ||||||||
Income before minority interests and
discontinued operations |
43,575 | 42,273 | 140,094 | 135,028 | ||||||||||||
Minority interests share of income: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of
income |
(10,000 | ) | (7,972 | ) | (37,817 | ) | (31,726 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners share of
development profits |
(64 | ) | (4,996 | ) | (958 | ) | (8,442 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
(5,395 | ) | (5,534 | ) | (20,161 | ) | (24,607 | ) | ||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(970 | ) | (888 | ) | (3,318 | ) | (2,890 | ) | ||||||||
Total minority interests share of
income |
(16,429 | ) | (19,390 | ) | (62,254 | ) | (67,665 | ) | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
27,146 | 22,883 | 77,840 | 67,363 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued
operations, net of minority interests |
1,108 | 2,078 | 5,626 | 18,869 | ||||||||||||
Gain from disposition of real estate,
net of minority interests |
29,680 | 3,317 | 42,005 | 42,896 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
30,788 | 5,395 | 47,631 | 61,765 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
57,934 | 28,278 | 125,471 | 129,128 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(1,782 | ) | (1,211 | ) | (7,131 | ) | (6,999 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred stock unit issuance costs |
| (1,742 | ) | | (5,413 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income available to common
stockholders |
$ | 56,152 | $ | 25,325 | $ | 118,340 | $ | 116,716 | ||||||||
Net income per common share
(diluted) |
$ | 0.65 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.41 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares
(diluted) |
86,263,305 | 83,667,798 | 85,368,626 | 82,852,528 | ||||||||||||
(1) | See Table of Contents for discussion of restated amounts for prior periods. |
3
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS (1)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 (2) | 2004 | 2003 (2) | |||||||||||||
(Restated) (3) | (Restated) (3) | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 57,934 | $ | 28,278 | $ | 125,471 | $ | 129,128 | ||||||||
Gain from disposition of real estate, net of minority interests |
(34,899 | ) | (3,317 | ) | (47,224 | ) | (50,325 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
43,168 | 34,823 | 160,026 | 132,167 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
1,451 | 2,321 | 7,324 | 10,170 | ||||||||||||
FF&E depreciation |
(363 | ) | (172 | ) | (871 | ) | (720 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners minority interests (NI) |
10,000 | 7,972 | 37,817 | 31,726 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (NI) |
970 | 888 | 3,318 | 2,890 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders minority interests (Development profits) |
213 | 229 | 435 | 344 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations minority interests (NI) |
678 | 640 | 4,573 | 4,991 | ||||||||||||
FFO attributable to minority interests |
(22,020 | ) | (17,756 | ) | (80,192 | ) | (65,603 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(525 | ) | (1,223 | ) | (3,781 | ) | (5,445 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
1,460 | 2,135 | 7,549 | 9,755 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(1,782 | ) | (1,211 | ) | (7,131 | ) | (6,999 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred stock unit issuance costs |
| (1,742 | ) | | (5,413 | ) | ||||||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 56,285 | $ | 51,865 | $ | 207,314 | $ | 186,666 | ||||||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 2.30 | $ | 2.13 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
91,003,313 | 88,360,432 | 90,120,250 | 87,616,365 | ||||||||||||
(1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes FFO is a useful supplemental measure of operating performance, of ways in which investors might use FFO when assessing AMBs financial performance, and of FFOs limitations as a measurement tool. | |
(2) | Effective January 1, 2003, the Company discontinued its practice of deducting amortization of investments in leasehold interests from FFO as such an adjustment is not provided for in NAREITs FFO definition. As a result, FFO for the periods presented has been adjusted to reflect the changes. | |
(3) | See Table of Contents for discussion of restated amounts for prior periods. |
4
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
ADJUSTED
EBITDA
(1) AND COVERAGE RATIOS
(dollars in thousands)
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Restated) (4) | (Restated) (4) | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 57,934 | $ | 28,278 | $ | 125,471 | $ | 129,128 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
43,168 | 34,823 | 160,026 | 132,167 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | | 5,251 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
2,501 | 2,075 | 10,444 | 8,075 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated JVs: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(525 | ) | (1,223 | ) | (3,781 | ) | (5,445 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
1,460 | 2,135 | 7,549 | 9,755 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
953 | 693 | 3,927 | 2,775 | ||||||||||||
Gains from dispositions of real estate |
(5,219 | ) | | (5,219 | ) | (7,429 | ) | |||||||||
Interest, including amortization |
39,401 | 38,537 | 157,852 | 146,230 | ||||||||||||
Total minority interests share of income |
16,429 | 19,390 | 62,254 | 67,665 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including (gains) losses |
(30,788 | ) | (5,395 | ) | (47,631 | ) | (61,765 | ) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
3,807 | 5,318 | 19,738 | 36,598 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 129,121 | $ | 124,631 | $ | 490,630 | $ | 463,005 | ||||||||
Interest |
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, including amortization - continuing operations |
$ | 39,401 | $ | 38,537 | $ | 157,852 | $ | 146,230 | ||||||||
Interest
expense, including amortization - discontinued operations |
570 | 279 | 2,215 | 2,568 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
953 | 693 | 3,927 | 2,775 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 40,924 | $ | 39,509 | $ | 163,994 | $ | 151,573 | ||||||||
Interest coverage (2) |
3.2 | x | 3.2 | x | 3.0 | x | 3.1 | x | ||||||||
Fixed charge |
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense, including amortization - continuing operations |
$ | 39,401 | $ | 38,537 | $ | 157,852 | $ | 146,230 | ||||||||
Amortization
of financing costs and debt premiums - continuing operations |
(790 | ) | (472 | ) | (290 | ) | (1,996 | ) | ||||||||
Interest
expense, including amortization - discontinued operations |
570 | 279 | 2,215 | 2,568 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of financing costs and debt premiums - discontinued operations |
(18 | ) | | (155 | ) | (53 | ) | |||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated JVs |
953 | 693 | 3,927 | 2,775 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
6,875 | 2,454 | 18,687 | 8,526 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
5,395 | 5,534 | 20,161 | 24,607 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
1,782 | 1,211 | 7,131 | 6,999 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 54,168 | $ | 48,236 | $ | 209,528 | $ | 189,656 | ||||||||
Fixed charge coverage (3) |
2.4 | x | 2.6 | x | 2.3 | x | 2.4 | x |
(1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes adjusted EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of operating performance and liquidity, of ways in which investors might use adjusted EBITDA when assessing AMBs financial performance, and of adjusted EBITDAs limitations as a measurement tool. | |
(2) | See Reporting Definitions for Interest coverage and Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes Interest coverage is a useful supplemental measure of liquidity. | |
(3) | See Reporting Definitions for Fixed charge coverage and Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes Fixed charge coverage is a useful supplemental measure of liquidity. | |
(4) | See Table of Contents for discussion of restated amounts for prior periods. |
5
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(dollars in thousands)
For the Quarters Ended | For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles |
$ | 4,320 | $ | 3,830 | $ | 16,281 | $ | 10,662 | |||||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,530 | $ | 2,017 | $ | 11,107 | $ | 6,672 | |||||||||||
AMBs share of unconsolidated JVs NOI
(1) |
$ | 2,204 | $ | 2,733 | $ | 10,859 | $ | 11,961 | |||||||||||
JV Partners share of cash basis NOI (1) |
$ | 34,824 | $ | 25,442 | $ | 123,881 | $ | 101,059 | |||||||||||
Discontinued
operations NOI - Held for Sale
(1) |
$ | 1,681 | $ | 1,860 | $ | 7,263 | $ | 7,477 | |||||||||||
Discontinued
operations NOI - Sold (1) |
$ | 2,125 | $ | 3,440 | $ | 12,425 | $ | 28,957 | |||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization |
$ | 2,501 | $ | 2,075 | $ | 10,444 | $ | 8,075 | |||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
$ | 6,875 | $ | 2,454 | $ | 18,687 | $ | 8,526 | |||||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 9,464 | $ | 6,977 | $ | 26,728 | $ | 19,091 | |||||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
6,848 | 5,103 | 24,247 | 21,031 | |||||||||||||||
Building improvements |
8,659 | 4,914 | 20,756 | 16,128 | |||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
24,971 | 16,994 | 71,731 | 56,250 | |||||||||||||||
JV Partners share of capital expenditures |
(6,438 | ) | (3,054 | ) | (18,059 | ) | (14,831 | ) | |||||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 18,533 | $ | 13,940 | $ | 53,672 | $ | 41,419 | |||||||||||
(1) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes NOI is a useful supplemental measure for our management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
6
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
INDUSTRIAL OPERATING AND LEASING STATISTICS
(dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts)
Year-to- | |||||||||||||
Operating Portfolio (1) | Quarter | Date | |||||||||||
Square feet owned at December 31, 2004 (3) |
90,278,803 | 90,278,803 | |||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at December 31, 2004 |
94.8 | % | 94.8 | % | |||||||||
Weighted average lease terms: |
|||||||||||||
Original |
6.1 years | 6.1 years | |||||||||||
Remaining |
3.3 years | 3.3 years | |||||||||||
Tenant retention |
68.1 | % | 66.8 | % | |||||||||
Same Space Leasing Activity: (4) |
|||||||||||||
Rent increases (decreases) on renewals and rollovers
(3) |
(12.4 | %) | (13.2 | %) | |||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.3 | 17.5 | |||||||||||
2nd Generation Leasing Activity: |
|||||||||||||
TIs and LCs per square foot: |
|||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 2.02 | $ | 1.73 | |||||||||
Re-tenanted |
4.24 | 2.70 | |||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 3.14 | $ | 2.27 | |||||||||
Square footage commencing (millions) |
5.3 | 22.5 |
Year-to- | ||||||||
Same Store Pool (2) | Quarter | Date | ||||||
Square feet in same store pool at December 31, 2004 |
74,516,427 | 74,516,427 | ||||||
% of total industrial square feet |
82.5 | % | 82.5 | % | ||||
Occupancy percentage at period end: |
||||||||
December 31, 2004 |
95.3 | % | 95.3 | % | ||||
December 31, 2003 |
93.4 | % | 93.4 | % | ||||
Tenant retention |
67.8 | % | 66.4 | % | ||||
Rent increases (decreases) on renewals and rollovers |
(13.6 | %) | (14.7 | %) | ||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
4.0 | 16.2 | ||||||
Cash basis NOI % change (5): |
||||||||
Revenues |
(0.6 | %) | (0.8 | %) | ||||
Expenses |
(3.3 | %) | (0.5 | %) | ||||
NOI (5) |
0.4 | % | (0.9 | %) | ||||
NOI without lease termination fees (5) |
0.7 | % | (0.9 | %) |
(1) | Includes all consolidated industrial operating properties and excludes industrial development and renovation projects. Excludes retail and other properties square feet of 474,368 with occupancy of 71.4% and annualized base rent of $3.8 million. | |
(2) | The same store pool excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after December 31, 2002. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(3) | In addition to owned square feet as of December 31, 2004, the Company manages, through its subsidiary, AMB Capital Partners, 0.4 million additional square feet of industrial, retail and other properties. The Company also has investments in 10.3 million square feet of operating industrial properties through its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(4) | Consists of second generation leases renewing or re-tenanting with current and prior lease terms greater than one year. | |
(5) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes NOI is a useful supplemental measure for our management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
7
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
INDUSTRIAL MARKET OPERATING STATISTICS (1)
As of December 31, 2004
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New | San | U.S. Hub and | Total | Total/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas/ | Los | Jersey/ | Francisco | On- | Gateway | Other | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta | Chicago | Ft. Worth | Angeles (2) | New York | Bay Area | Miami | Seattle | Tarmac (3) | Markets | Markets | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of buildings |
45 | 100 | 40 | 150 | 125 | 139 | 49 | 64 | 38 | 750 | 234 | 984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rentable square feet |
5,132,333 | 9,345,110 | 3,799,444 | 13,288,870 | 9,258,334 | 11,104,642 | 5,170,909 | 6,857,569 | 2,941,345 | 66,898,556 | 23,380,247 | 90,278,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of total rentable square feet |
5.7 | % | 10.4 | % | 4.2 | % | 14.7 | % | 10.3 | % | 12.3 | % | 5.7 | % | 7.6 | % | 3.2 | % | 74.1 | % | 25.9 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage |
92.4 | % | 94.2 | % | 91.8 | % | 98.3 | % | 94.5 | % | 93.8 | % | 93.1 | % | 96.7 | % | 96.3 | % | 95.0 | % | 94.2 | % | 94.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized base rent (000s) |
$ | 19,062 | $ | 41,483 | $ | 13,258 | $ | 81,890 | $ | 63,590 | $ | 71,966 | $ | 34,495 | $ | 34,916 | $ | 45,848 | $ | 406,508 | $ | 145,669 | $ | 552,177 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of total annualized base rent |
3.5 | % | 7.5 | % | 2.5 | % | 14.8 | % | 11.5 | % | 13.0 | % | 6.2 | % | 6.3 | % | 8.3 | % | 73.6 | % | 26.4 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of leases |
163 | 204 | 119 | 419 | 377 | 407 | 239 | 267 | 250 | 2,445 | 892 | 3,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annualized base rent per square foot |
$ | 4.02 | $ | 4.71 | $ | 3.80 | $ | 6.27 | $ | 7.27 | $ | 6.91 | $ | 7.17 | $ | 5.27 | $ | 16.19 | $ | 6.40 | $ | 6.61 | $ | 6.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease expirations as a % of ABR: (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
15.6 | % | 21.9 | % | 18.1 | % | 13.8 | % | 9.4 | % | 18.5 | % | 22.2 | % | 14.6 | % | 16.4 | % | 16.1 | % | 16.9 | % | 16.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
20.4 | % | 23.1 | % | 15.2 | % | 21.3 | % | 14.5 | % | 10.7 | % | 16.2 | % | 18.4 | % | 11.7 | % | 16.6 | % | 9.8 | % | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
13.6 | % | 25.0 | % | 14.5 | % | 14.1 | % | 14.5 | % | 16.5 | % | 22.0 | % | 18.9 | % | 5.9 | % | 16.0 | % | 16.1 | % | 16.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average lease terms: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original |
5.8 years | 5.6 years | 5.4 years | 6.1 years | 6.6 years | 5.2 years | 6.0 years | 5.7 years | 8.2 years | 6.0 years | 6.5 years | 6.1 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.2 years | 2.3 years | 3.5 years | 3.2 years | 3.8 years | 2.9 years | 3.1 years | 3.0 years | 4.4 years | 3.2 years | 3.6 years | 3.3 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenant retention: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
56.1 | % | 74.8 | % | 94.5 | % | 67.1 | % | 31.1 | % | 65.5 | % | 72.5 | % | 76.5 | % | 78.1 | % | 67.3 | % | 69.5 | % | 68.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-date |
62.6 | % | 60.1 | % | 76.6 | % | 61.7 | % | 65.9 | % | 65.3 | % | 72.0 | % | 66.7 | % | 75.4 | % | 65.4 | % | 71.4 | % | 66.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
(14.3 | %) | (6.5 | %) | (14.1 | %) | 2.7 | % | 6.4 | % | (51.3 | %) | (12.9 | %) | (5.7 | %) | (1.3 | %) | (17.8 | %) | 2.8 | % | (12.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same space SF leased |
36,250 | 593,642 | 283,650 | 528,714 | 249,397 | 576,025 | 302,335 | 257,419 | 181,689 | 3,009,121 | 1,329,957 | 4,339,078 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-date |
(12.4 | %) | (5.9 | %) | (13.1 | %) | (3.0 | %) | (3.9 | %) | (43.1 | %) | (5.1 | %) | (7.8 | %) | (2.7 | %) | (15.3 | %) | (3.6 | %) | (13.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same space SF leased |
1,218,861 | 2,263,609 | 1,181,607 | 2,749,944 | 1,032,006 | 2,411,216 | 1,031,103 | 1,376,509 | 667,358 | 13,932,213 | 3,553,563 | 17,485,776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Same store cash basis NOI % change(5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter |
(4.3 | %) | 21.2 | % | 15.9 | % | 2.8 | % | 11.6 | % | (12.8 | %) | (9.8 | %) | 6.9 | % | 2.1 | % | 0.8 | % | (0.7 | %) | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year-to-date |
(4.2 | %) | 1.9 | % | 0.9 | % | 2.8 | % | (3.1 | %) | (9.4 | %) | (2.6 | %) | 3.0 | % | 5.1 | % | (1.8 | %) | 1.9 | % | (0.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sq. feet owned in same store pool (6) |
4,943,591 | 7,254,655 | 3,532,884 | 11,778,861 | 6,182,388 | 10,696,621 | 4,348,139 | 4,857,434 | 2,404,378 | 55,998,951 | 18,517,476 | 74,516,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs pro rata share of square feet |
2,770,126 | 6,095,983 | 2,752,701 | 8,779,575 | 5,194,776 | 8,555,870 | 4,296,915 | 3,409,892 | 2,359,531 | 44,215,369 | 19,248,213 | 63,463,582 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total market square footage (7) |
6,066,769 | 13,893,317 | 4,708,441 | 17,320,438 | 10,793,255 | 11,563,682 | 5,791,707 | 7,033,554 | | 77,171,163 | 33,550,535 | 110,721,698 |
(1) | Includes all industrial consolidated operating properties and excludes industrial development and renovation projects. | |
(2) | The Company also has a 19.9 acre parking lot with 2,720 parking spaces and 12 billboard signs in the Los Angeles market immediately adjacent to LAX. | |
(3) | Includes domestic on-tarmac airport air cargo facilities at 14 airports. | |
(4) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
(5) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes NOI is a useful supplemental measure for our management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. | |
(6) | Same store pool at December 31, 2004 excludes properties purchased or developments stabilized after December 31, 2002. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(7) | Total market square footage includes industrial and retail operating properties, development properties, unconsolidated properties (100% SF), properties managed for third parties and reallocation of On-Tarmac properties into metro markets. |
8
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
INDUSTRIAL PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
As of December 31, 2004
Number | Rentable | % of Total | Annualized | % of Total | Annualized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Square | Rentable | Occupancy | Base Rent | Annualized | Number | Base Rent per | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buildings | Feet | Square Feet | Percentage | (000s) | Base Rent | of Leases | Square Foot | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic Hub Markets |
750 | 66,898,556 | 74.1 | % | 95.0 | % | $ | 406,508 | 73.6 | % | 2,445 | $ | 6.40 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other
Markets Domestic Target Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Austin |
10 | 1,656,254 | 1.8 | 99.5 | 11,125 | 2.0 | 36 | 6.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baltimore/Washington DC |
64 | 4,245,420 | 4.7 | 95.9 | 33,663 | 6.1 | 287 | 8.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boston |
36 | 4,309,262 | 4.8 | 93.0 | 27,781 | 5.0 | 100 | 6.94 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minneapolis |
38 | 3,942,806 | 4.4 | 95.4 | 17,047 | 3.1 | 172 | 4.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
148 | 14,153,742 | 15.7 | 95.3 | 89,616 | 16.2 | 595 | 6.64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic Non-Target Markets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charlotte |
21 | 1,317,864 | 1.5 | 85.1 | 5,720 | 1.0 | 66 | 5.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus |
1 | 240,000 | 0.3 | 90.0 | 547 | 0.1 | 10 | 2.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Houston |
1 | 410,000 | 0.5 | 100.0 | 2,172 | 0.4 | 1 | 5.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Memphis |
17 | 1,883,845 | 2.0 | 85.9 | 8,292 | 1.5 | 45 | 5.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Orleans |
5 | 410,839 | 0.5 | 96.8 | 1,998 | 0.4 | 50 | 5.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Newport News |
1 | 60,215 | 0.1 | 76.8 | 566 | 0.1 | 2 | 12.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando |
16 | 1,424,748 | 1.6 | 99.5 | 7,046 | 1.3 | 76 | 4.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Portland |
5 | 676,104 | 0.6 | 98.0 | 3,148 | 0.6 | 10 | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Diego |
5 | 276,167 | 0.3 | 91.4 | 1,955 | 0.4 | 20 | 7.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
72 | 6,699,782 | 7.4 | 91.7 | 31,444 | 5.8 | 280 | 5.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International
Target Markets
(1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amsterdam, Netherlands |
2 | 302,091 | 0.3 | 100.0 | 3,572 | 0.6 | 2 | 11.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frankfurt, Germany |
1 | 166,917 | 0.2 | 100.0 | 1,587 | 0.3 | 1 | 9.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City, Mexico |
1 | 120,251 | 0.1 | 0.0 | | 0.0 | 0 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paris, France |
4 | 1,022,063 | 1.2 | 100.0 | 8,148 | 1.5 | 4 | 7.97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo, Japan |
6 | 915,401 | 1.0 | 99.2 | 11,302 | 2.0 | 10 | 12.44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal/Weighted Average |
14 | 2,526,723 | 2.8 | 95.0 | 24,609 | 4.4 | 17 | 10.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Other Markets |
234 | 23,380,247 | 25.9 | 94.2 | 145,669 | 26.4 | 892 | $ | 6.61 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
984 | 90,278,803 | 100.0 | % | 94.8 | % | $ | 552,177 | 100.0 | % | 3,337 | $ | 6.45 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Annualized base rent for leases denominated in foreign currencies is translated using the currency exchange rate at December 31, 2004. |
9
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
INDUSTRIAL LEASE EXPIRATIONS (1)
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
% of | ||||||||||||
Square | Annualized | Annualized | ||||||||||
Feet | Base Rent (2) | Base Rent | ||||||||||
2005 |
14,200,643 | 94,933 | 16.3% | |||||||||
2006 |
13,835,724 | 86,126 | 14.8% | |||||||||
2007 |
14,814,005 | 93,156 | 16.0% | |||||||||
2008 |
12,130,342 | 74,372 | 12.8% | |||||||||
2009 |
11,265,930 | 69,045 | 11.9% | |||||||||
2010 |
6,500,185 | 51,201 | 8.8% | |||||||||
2011 |
3,826,000 | 30,917 | 5.3% | |||||||||
2012 |
3,301,422 | 29,505 | 5.1% | |||||||||
2013 |
1,080,898 | 12,466 | 2.2% | |||||||||
2014 and beyond |
4,748,401 | 39,831 | 6.8% | |||||||||
Total |
85,703,550 | $ | 581,552 | 100.0% | ||||||||
(1) | Schedule includes in-place leases and leases with future commencement dates. Schedule also includes leases in month-to-month and hold-over status totaling 2.7 million square feet. | |
(2) | Calculated as monthly rent at expiration multiplied by 12. Non-U.S. Dollar projects are converted to U.S. Dollars using the budgeted exchange rate at expiration. |
10
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
TOP 25 CUSTOMERS
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Percentage of | Percentage of | |||||||||||||
Aggregate | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
Aggregate Rentable | Leased | Annualized | Annualized | |||||||||||
Customer Name (1) | Number of Leases | Square Feet | Square Feet (2) | Base Rent (3) | Base Rent (4) | |||||||||
United States Government (5)(6) |
50 | 1,120,408 | 1.2% | $ | 18,767 | 3.4% | ||||||||
FedEx Corporation (5) |
24 | 1,264,178 | 1.4% | 13,869 | 2.5% | |||||||||
Deutsche Post World Net (5) |
30 | 985,081 | 1.1% | 8,233 | 1.5% | |||||||||
Harmonic Inc. |
4 | 285,480 | 0.3% | 6,424 | 1.2% | |||||||||
La Poste |
2 | 854,435 | 0.9% | 6,121 | 1.1% | |||||||||
Worldwide Flight Services (5) |
17 | 358,389 | 0.4% | 4,225 | 0.8% | |||||||||
International Paper Company |
7 | 525,893 | 0.6% | 4,100 | 0.7% | |||||||||
Exel, Inc. |
12 | 480,779 | 0.5% | 3,817 | 0.7% | |||||||||
BAX Global Inc. (5) |
8 | 256,877 | 0.3% | 3,805 | 0.7% | |||||||||
Panalpina, Inc. |
8 | 646,636 | 0.7% | 3,682 | 0.7% | |||||||||
Wells Fargo and Company |
7 | 280,494 | 0.3% | 3,498 | 0.6% | |||||||||
Forward Air Corporation |
7 | 462,714 | 0.5% | 3,314 | 0.6% | |||||||||
County of Los Angeles (7) |
11 | 213,230 | 0.2% | 3,157 | 0.6% | |||||||||
Eagle Global Logistics, L.P. |
8 | 520,243 | 0.6% | 3,122 | 0.6% | |||||||||
Expeditors International |
7 | 666,045 | 0.7% | 3,093 | 0.6% | |||||||||
Ahold NV |
7 | 680,565 | 0.8% | 2,880 | 0.5% | |||||||||
UPS |
15 | 416,496 | 0.5% | 2,832 | 0.5% | |||||||||
Aeroground Inc. |
5 | 208,867 | 0.2% | 2,741 | 0.5% | |||||||||
Nippon Express USA |
3 | 367,707 | 0.4% | 2,695 | 0.5% | |||||||||
United Air Lines Inc. (5) |
5 | 118,825 | 0.1% | 2,426 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Elmhult Limited Partnership |
4 | 661,149 | 0.7% | 2,318 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Intel International B.V. |
1 | 183,892 | 0.2% | 2,241 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Integrated Airline Services (5) |
6 | 233,656 | 0.3% | 2,229 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Applied Materials, Inc. |
1 | 290,557 | 0.3% | 2,152 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Tokyo Nohin Daiko Co Ltd. |
1 | 177,434 | 0.2% | 2,105 | 0.4% | |||||||||
Total |
12,260,030 | 13.6% | $ | 113,846 | 20.6% | |||||||||
(1) | Customer(s) may be a subsidiary of or an entity affiliated with the named customer. The Company also holds a lease at our Park One property adjacent to LAX with an ABR of $6,749, which is not included. | |
(2) | Computed as aggregate leased square feet divided by the aggregate leased square feet of the industrial and retail properties. | |
(3) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
(4) | Computed as aggregate annualized base rent divided by the aggregate annualized base rent of the industrial, retail and other properties. | |
(5) | Apron rental amounts (but not square footage) are included. | |
(6) | United States Government includes the United States Postal Service (USPS), United States Customs, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and various other U.S. governmental agencies. | |
(7) | County of Los Angeles includes Child Support Services Department, the Fire Department, the District Attorney, the Sheriffs Department and the City of Los Angeles. |
11
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
HISTORICAL INDUSTRIAL
OPERATING AND LEASING STATISTICS
Square Feet Owned (Quarterly, in thousands) Occupancy Percentage (Quarterly) Tenant Retention (Annual) Same Store NOI % Change (Annual) |
12
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
ACQUISITIONS
For the Quarter ended December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Square | Month of | Acquisition | Ownership | ||||||||||||||
Property Name | Location | Buildings | Feet | Acquisition | Cost | Percentage | ||||||||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
||||||||||||||||||
1. AMB CDG Cargo Center |
Paris, France | 1 | 500,795 | October | $ | 38,889 | 100% | |||||||||||
2. AMB Schiphol Distribution Center |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | 1 | 118,199 | December | 15,832 | 100% | ||||||||||||
3. AMB
Funabashi Distribution Centers 3 & 4 |
Funabashi, Japan | 2 | 301,591 | December | 21,482 | 100% | ||||||||||||
Total AMB Property Corporation Acquisitions |
4 | 920,585 | 76,203 | |||||||||||||||
AMB Alliance Fund II |
||||||||||||||||||
4. AMB District Industrial |
Itasca, IL | 1 | 50,755 | December | 2,230 | 21% | ||||||||||||
5. AMB Sivert Distribution |
Bensenville, IL | 1 | 49,875 | December | 2,657 | 21% | ||||||||||||
Total AMB Alliance Fund II Acquisitions |
2 | 100,630 | 4,887 | |||||||||||||||
AMB Alliance Fund III |
||||||||||||||||||
6. AMB Turnberry Distribution |
Hanover Park, IL | 5 | 1,678,910 | December | 98,736 | 20% | ||||||||||||
AMB Partners II |
||||||||||||||||||
7. AMB Shady Oak Industrial Center |
Eden Prairie, MN | 1 | 59,538 | December | 2,967 | 20% | ||||||||||||
8. AMB Northpoint Industrial Center |
Fridley, MN | 3 | 207,476 | December | 10,867 | 20% | ||||||||||||
9. AMB Industrial Park Business Center |
Plymouth, MN | 1 | 113,054 | December | 5,845 | 20% | ||||||||||||
Total AMB Partners II Acquisitions |
5 | 380,068 | 19,679 | |||||||||||||||
Total Fourth Quarter Acquisitions |
16 | 3,080,193 | $ | 199,505 | (1) | 51% | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate GAAP/Cash |
7.8%/7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date Acquisitions |
64 | 7,648,641 | $ | 695,169 | (2) | 72% | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate GAAP/Cash |
7.8%/7.5 | % |
(1) | Represents the total expected investment, including closing costs and estimated
acquisition capital of $2.8 million. |
|
(2) | Year-to-date total has been increased by $4.8 million representing a net non-cash increase to the acquisition cost associated with an intangible liability for the value attributable to below market leases and adjustments to the market value of assumed debt in accordance with SFAS 141, Business Combinations. |
13
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DISPOSITIONS
For the Quarter ended December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Number of | AMBs | |||||||||||||||||
Buildings | Square | Month of | Disposition | Ownership | ||||||||||||||
Property Name | Location | or Centers | Feet | Disposition | Price | Percentage | ||||||||||||
1. 1700
Wilmington Avenue - Artesia Bldg 26 |
Compton, CA | 1 | 64,000 | November | $ | 3,712 | 100% | |||||||||||
2. LA Media Tech Center Bldg 5 |
Los Angeles, CA | 1 | 83,252 | December | 17,930 | 49% | ||||||||||||
3. 9121 Red Branch Road |
Columbia, MD | 1 | 17,000 | December | 2,215 | 20% | ||||||||||||
4. Atlanta Portfolio |
Various, GA | 11 | 1,771,660 | December | 95,717 | 93% | ||||||||||||
Total Fourth Quarter Dispositions |
14 | 1,935,912 | $ | 119,574 | 85% | |||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date Dispositions |
24 | 3,122,616 | $ | 200,315 | 84% | |||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
6.8 | % |
14
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
PRIVATE CAPITAL JOINT VENTURE ACTIVITY
For the Quarter ended December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Square | Contribution | Ownership | |||||||||||||
Property Contributions | Location | Buildings | Feet | Value | Percentage | |||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico Fund |
||||||||||||||||
1. AMB-Accion Centro Logistico |
Guadalajara, Mexico | 5 | 687,088 | |||||||||||||
2. Mesquite Distribution Center |
Mexico City, Mexico | 2 | 345,057 | |||||||||||||
3. Agave Bldg 3 |
Mexico City, Mexico | 1 | 224,020 | |||||||||||||
Total AMB-SGP Mexico Fund Contributions |
8 | 1,256,165 | $ | 71,450 | 20% | |||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date Property Contributions |
8 | 1,256,165 | $ | 71,450 | 20% | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate |
9.5% |
15
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
NEW DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS (1)
For the Quarter ended December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | AMBs | |||||||||||
Stabilization | Square | Total | Ownership | |||||||||||
Projects | Location | Developer | Date | Feet | Investment (1) | Percentage | ||||||||
1.
Interstate Crossdock
(2)(4) |
Teterboro, NJ | AMB | Q3 05 | 616,992 | $ | 53,600 | 100% | |||||||
2. AMB Layline Distribution Center (2) |
Torrance, CA | AMB | Q1 06 | 250,000 | 26,300 | 100% | ||||||||
3. Highway
17 - 50 Broad Street
(2)(5) |
Carlstadt, NJ | AMB | Q2 06 | 120,000 | 8,700 | 100% | ||||||||
4. Highway
17 - 55 Madison Street
(2)(6) |
Carlstadt, NJ | AMB | Q2 06 | 150,446 | 11,900 | 100% | ||||||||
5. Northfield Building 700 |
Dallas, TX | Seefried Properties | Q3 06 | 108,640 | 6,000 | 20% | ||||||||
6. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 3 (3) |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Delta Group | Q1 08 | 313,229 | 44,300 | 50% | ||||||||
Total Fourth Quarter New Projects |
1,559,307 | $ | 150,800 | 82% | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (3) |
7.8% | |||||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date New Projects |
6,052,354 | $ | 648,500 | 84% | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (3) |
8.3% |
(1) | Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, third party developer earnouts (if triggered by stabilization) and associated carry costs. The estimates are based on the Companys current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 2004. | |
(2) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(3) | Yields on international projects are on an after-tax basis. | |
(4) | The estimated total investment represents $32.1 million for the existing building. The balance represents the additional renovation cost. | |
(5) | The estimated total investment represents $6.9 million for the existing building. The balance represents the additional renovation cost. | |
(4) | The estimated total investment represents $7.9 million for the existing building. The balance represents the additional renovation cost. |
16
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS IN PROCESS (1)
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Estimated | Estimated | AMBs | ||||||||||||||
Estimated | Square Feet | Total | Ownership | |||||||||||||
Projects | Location | Developer | Stabilization | at Stabilization | Investment (1) | Percentage | ||||||||||
2005 Deliveries |
||||||||||||||||
1. Dulles Commerce Center - Bldg 100 |
Dulles, VA | Seefried Properties | Q1 | 50,030 | $ | 4,000 | 20% | |||||||||
2. Nicholas Warehouse |
Elk Grove Village, IL | AMB | Q1 | 131,728 | 12,500 | 100% | ||||||||||
3. Patriot Distribution Center (3) |
Mansfield, MA | National Development | Q2 | 429,897 | 23,500 | 20% | ||||||||||
4. Agave Bldg 1 (5) |
Mexico City, Mexico | G.Accion | Q2 | 397,210 | 20,100 | 90% | ||||||||||
5. Somerville Distribution Center (3) |
Somerville, MA | Campanelli | Q2 | 197,384 | 17,900 | 20% | ||||||||||
6. MIA Logistics Center (3) |
Miami, FL | AMB | Q2 | 147,182 | 10,100 | 20% | ||||||||||
7. Airport South Bldg 500 |
Atlanta, GA | Seefried Properties | Q2 | 116,280 | 5,600 | 20% | ||||||||||
8. Sterling Distribution 2 (4) |
Chino, CA | Majestic Realty | Q2 | 490,000 | 17,100 | 40% | ||||||||||
9. Interstate Crossdock (3) |
Teterboro, NJ | AMB | Q3 | 616,992 | 53,600 | 100% | ||||||||||
10. Beacon Lakes 9 |
Miami, FL | Codina Development | Q3 | 206,656 | 10,200 | 79% | ||||||||||
11. Sterling Distribution 3 (4) |
Chino, CA | Majestic Realty | Q4 | 390,000 | 14,100 | 50% | ||||||||||
12. Spinnaker Logistics (3) |
Redondo Beach, CA | AMB-IAC | Q4 | 279,431 | 28,900 | 39% | ||||||||||
13. Encino Distribution Center (5) |
Mexico City, Mexico | G Accion | Q4 | 571,267 | 31,000 | 90% | ||||||||||
14. Narita Air Cargo 1 - Phase 1 Bldg B (5) |
Narita, Japan | AMB Blackpine | Q4 | 576,842 | 70,900 | 100% | ||||||||||
15. AMB West OHare Bldg 1 |
Elk Grove Village, IL | AMB | Q4 | 189,240 | 14,400 | 20% | ||||||||||
16. AMB Amagasaki Distribution Center (5) |
Osaka, Japan | AMB Blackpine | Q4 | 973,037 | 100,700 | 100% | ||||||||||
Total 2005 Deliveries |
5,763,176 | 434,600 | 76% | |||||||||||||
Leased/ Funded-to-date |
48% | $ | 274,800 | (2) | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (5) |
8.7% |
Continued on next page
(1) | Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion or development, including initial acquisition costs, third party developer earnouts (if triggered by stabilization) and associated carry costs. The estimates are based on the Companys current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Excludes 1,263 acres of land held for future development or sale (representing a potential 22.2 million square feet) totaling $224.8 million, including acquisition and carry costs. Non-US Dollar investments are translated to US Dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 2004. | |
(2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 deliveries was $209.9 million, $173.4 million, $1.5 million and $8.6 million, respectively, for a total of $393.4 million. | |
(3) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(4) | Represents projects in unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(5) | Yields on international projects are on an after-tax basis. |
17
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS IN PROCESS (1)
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
(continued)
Estimated | Estimated | AMBs | ||||||||||||||
Estimated | Square Feet | Total | Ownership | |||||||||||||
Projects | Location | Developer | Stabilization | at Stabilization | Investment (1) | Percentage | ||||||||||
2006 Deliveries |
||||||||||||||||
17. Dulles
Commerce Center - Bldg 150 |
Dulles, VA | Seefried Properties | Q1 | 71,880 | 5,800 | 20% | ||||||||||
18. AMB Layline Distribution Center (3) |
Torrance, CA | AMB | Q1 | 250,000 | 26,300 | 100% | ||||||||||
19. Nash Logistics Center |
El Segundo, CA | AMB - IAC | Q1 | 75,000 | 12,000 | 50% | ||||||||||
20. Narita Air Cargo 1 - Phase 1 Bldg A (5) |
Narita, Japan | AMB Blackpine | Q1 | 108,005 | 13,300 | 100% | ||||||||||
21. AMB West OHare Building 2 |
Elk Grove Village, IL | AMB | Q1 | 119,708 | 8,800 | 20% | ||||||||||
22. Highway 17 - 50 Broad Street (3) |
Carlstadt, NJ | AMB | Q2 | 120,000 | 8,700 | 100% | ||||||||||
23. Highway 17 - 55 Madison Street (3) |
Carlstadt, NJ | AMB | Q2 | 150,446 | 11,900 | 100% | ||||||||||
24. AMB Ohta Distribution Center (5) |
Tokyo, Japan | AMB Blackpine | Q2 | 816,866 | 195,100 | 100% | ||||||||||
25. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 2 (4) (5) |
Changi Airport, Singapore | Boustead Projects PTE | Q2 | 254,267 | 11,800 | 50% | ||||||||||
26. Dulles
Commerce Center - Bldg 200 |
Dulles, VA | Seefried Properties | Q2 | 97,232 | 7,300 | 20% | ||||||||||
27. Beacon Lakes 6 |
Miami, FL | Codina Development | Q2 | 203,720 | 11,100 | 79% | ||||||||||
28. Northfield Bldg 700 |
Dallas, TX | Seefried Properties | Q3 | 108,640 | 6,000 | 20% | ||||||||||
Total 2006 Deliveries |
2,375,764 | 318,100 | 89% | |||||||||||||
Leased/Funded-to-date |
0 | % | $ | 195,900 | (2) | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (5) |
7.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
2007 Deliveries |
||||||||||||||||
29. MAD Logistics Center (5) |
Madrid, Spain | Codina Torimbia | Q2 | 454,779 | 31,700 | 80% | ||||||||||
Total 2007 Deliveries |
454,779 | 31,700 | 80% | |||||||||||||
Leased/Funded-to-date |
0 | % | $ | 1,800 | (2) | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (5) |
8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
2008 Deliveries |
||||||||||||||||
30. AMB Fokker Logistics Center 3 (5) |
Amsterdam, Netherlands | Delta Group | Q1 | 313,229 | 44,300 | 50% | ||||||||||
Total 2008 Deliveries |
313,229 | 44,300 | 50% | |||||||||||||
Leased/Funded-to-date |
0 | % | $ | 17,300 | (2) | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (5) |
8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Scheduled Deliveries (1) |
8,906,948 | $ | 828,700 | 80% | ||||||||||||
Leased/Funded-to-date |
31 | % | $ | 489,800 | (2) | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Stabilized Cash Yield (5) |
8.3 | % |
(1) | Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion or development, including initial acquisition costs, third party developer earnouts (if triggered by stabilization) and associated carry costs. The estimates are based on the Companys current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Excludes 1,263 acres of land held for future development or sale (representing a potential 22.2 million square feet) totaling $224.8 million, including acquisition and carry costs. Non-US Dollar investments are translated to US Dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 2004. | |
(2) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date for 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 deliveries was $209.9 million, $173.4 million, $1.5 million and $8.6 million, respectively, for a total of $393.4 million. | |
(3) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(4) | Represents projects in unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(5) | Yields on international projects are on an after-tax basis. |
18
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
DEVELOPMENT & RENOVATION PROJECTS (1)
STABILIZED, SOLD OR CONTRIBUTED
For the Quarter ended December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | ||||||||||||||||||
Square | Total | Ownership | ||||||||||||||||
Projects Placed in Operations | Location | Developer | Feet | Investment (1) | Percentage | |||||||||||||
1. Sterling Distribution Center Bldg 1 (2) |
Chino, CA | Majestic Realty | 1,000,000 | $ | 36,100 | 40% | ||||||||||||
2. JFK Air Cargo - 179 149th Road (3) |
New York, NY | AMB | 15,578 | 2,200 | 100% | |||||||||||||
3. Chancellor (3) |
Orlando, FL | AMB | 201,600 | 8,300 | 100% | |||||||||||||
Total
Fourth Quarter Placed in Operations |
1,217,178 | $ | 46,600 | 54% | ||||||||||||||
Leased/Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Yield (4) |
100 | % | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
Year-to-Date Placed in Operations |
2,058,426 | $ | 88,900 | 50% | ||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Yield (4) |
9.4 | % |
AMBs | AMBs Recognized |
|||||||||||||||||
Sold or | Square | Ownership | Share of | |||||||||||||||
Projects Sold or Contributed | Location | Contributed | Feet | Sale Price | Percentage | Net Cash Gain | ||||||||||||
1. Orlando Central Park Land |
Orlando, FL | Sold | | $ | 1,416 | 100% | ||||||||||||
2. Carson Town Center E3 Land |
Carson, CA | Sold | | 6,869 | 95% | |||||||||||||
3. Central Business Park B |
SF Bay Area | Sold | 16,895 | 1,858 | 100% | |||||||||||||
4. Central Business Park F |
SF Bay Area | Sold | 22,460 | 2,471 | 100% | |||||||||||||
5. Agave Bldg 3 |
Mexico City, Mexico | Contributed | 224,020 | 15,500 | 90% | |||||||||||||
Total Fourth Quarter
Sold or Contributed |
263,375 | $ | 28,114 | 93% | $ | 3,921 | ||||||||||||
Total Year-to-Date
Sold or Contributed |
488,598 | $ | 55,901 | 94% | $ | 8,005 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion, or development, including
initial acquisition costs, Development Alliance Partner® earnouts (if triggered by
stabilization) and associated carry costs. The estimates are based on the Companys current
estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to
U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 2004. |
|
(2) | Represents projects in unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
(3) | Represents a renovation project. See Reporting Definitions. | |
(4) | Yields on international projects are on an after-tax basis. |
19
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
COMPLETED
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
AVAILABLE FOR SALE OR CONTRIBUTION
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
Estimated | Estimated | AMBs | ||||||||||||
Square Feet | Total | Ownership | ||||||||||||
Projects (1) | Location | Developer | at Completion | Investment (2) | Percentage | |||||||||
1. Wilsonville Phase II |
Watsonville, OR | Trammell Crow | 249,625 | $ | 11,000 | 100% | ||||||||
2. OHare Industrial - 701 Hilltop Drive |
Itasca, IL | Hamilton Partners | 60,810 | 2,900 | 100% | |||||||||
3. Central Business Park Bldgs A,C,D |
SF Bay Area | Harvest Properties | 55,123 | 5,300 | 100% | |||||||||
4. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 1 |
Changi Airport, Singapore | Boustead Projects PTE | 230,432 | 10,000 | 50% | |||||||||
Total Available
for Sale or Contribution |
595,990 | $ | 29,200 | 83% | ||||||||||
Funded-to-date |
$ | 25,400 | (3) |
(1) | Represents projects where development activities have been completed and which the Company intends to sell or contribute within two years of completion. | |
(2) | Represents total estimated cost of renovation, expansion, or development, including initial acquisition costs, carry and partner earnouts (if triggered by stabilization). The estimates are based on the Companys current estimates and forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at December 31, 2004. | |
(3) | AMBs share of amounts funded to date was $21.0 million. |
20
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CAPITALIZATION SUMMARY
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands, except share price)
AMB | Joint | Unsecured | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured | Venture | Senior debt | Unsecured | Credit | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Year | Debt (1) | Debt (1) | Securities | Debt | Facilities (2) | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 |
$ | 43,398 | $ | 65,802 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 647 | $ | | $ | 359,847 | ||||||||||||
2006 |
80,641 | 72,184 | 75,000 | 698 | 27,826 | 256,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
16,386 | 70,920 | 75,000 | 752 | 323,873 | 486,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
42,091 | 174,431 | 175,000 | 810 | | 392,332 | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
5,644 | 119,163 | 100,000 | 873 | | 225,680 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
71,471 | 149,960 | 75,000 | 941 | | 297,372 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
80,319 | 412,055 | 75,000 | 1,014 | | 568,388 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
133,781 | 177,833 | | 1,093 | | 312,707 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
1,985 | 117,346 | 53,940 | (3) | 920 | | 174,191 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2,105 | 3,777 | | 616 | | 6,498 | ||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
7,108 | 33,358 | 125,000 | 664 | | 166,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sub-total |
484,929 | 1,396,829 | 1,003,940 | 9,028 | 351,699 | 3,246,425 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized premiums |
3,510 | 7,256 | | | | 10,766 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total consolidated debt |
488,439 | 1,404,085 | 1,003,940 | 9,028 | 351,699 | 3,257,191 | ||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of unconsolidated
JV Debt (4) |
| 105,829 | | | | 105,829 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
488,439 | 1,509,914 | 1,003,940 | 9,028 | 351,699 | 3,363,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
JV partners share of
consolidated JV debt |
| (967,974 | ) | | | | (967,974 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
AMBs
share of total
debt (7) |
$ | 488,439 | $ | 541,940 | $ | 1,003,940 | $ | 9,028 | $ | 351,699 | $ | 2,395,046 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
5.3 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.6 | % | 7.5 | % | 1.9 | % | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
maturity (in years) |
5.4 | 6.1 | 4.6 | 9.8 | 2.4 | 5.1 |
Market Equity | ||||||||||||
Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
83,248,640 | $ | 40.39 | $ | 3,362,413 | |||||||
LP Units |
4,746,104 | 40.39 | 191,695 | |||||||||
Total |
87,994,744 | $ | 3,554,108 | |||||||||
Preferred Stock and Units (5) | ||||||||
Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D & E preferred units |
7.75 | % | $ | 90,789 | ||||
Series F preferred units |
7.95 | % | 10,057 | |||||
Series H preferred units |
8.13 | % | 42,000 | |||||
Series I preferred units |
8.00 | % | 25,500 | |||||
Series J preferred units |
7.95 | % | 40,000 | |||||
Series K preferred units |
7.95 | % | 40,000 | |||||
Series N
preferred
units (6) |
5.00 | % | 36,479 | |||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
7.29 | % | $ | 392,325 | ||||
Capitalization Ratios
Total debt-to-total market capitalization |
46.0 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total
market capitalization (7) |
37.8 | % | ||
Total debt plus preferred-to-total market capitalization |
51.4 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred-to-total market
capitalization (7) |
44.0 | % |
(1) | AMB secured debt and JV debt include debt related to international assets in the amount
of $269.5 million. Of this, $195.2 million is associated with assets located in Asia and the
remaining $74.3 million is related to assets located in Europe. |
|
(2) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $783.9 million. Includes Euro, Yen and Singapore dollar-based borrowings translated to US Dollars using the foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2004. | |
(3) | With certain exceptions, until November 10, 2005, the Company can require the purchaser to return these notes to the Company for cancellation for an obligation of equal dollar amount under a secured first mortgage loan. | |
(4) | The weighted average interest and maturity for the unconsolidated JV debt were 5.3% and 4.9 years, respectively. | |
(5) | Exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder and redeemable at the option of the Company after a specified non-call period, generally five years from issuance. | |
(6) | The Series N preferred units are putable at the option of the holder beginning June 1, 2005 and until January 15, 2006 at a price equal to $50 per unit, plus all accrued and unpaid distributions. Beginning September 25, 2006 and until September 25, 2009, the Series N preferred units are redeemable by the Company at a price equal to $49.75 per unit, plus all accrued and unpaid distributions. | |
(7) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes the Companys share of total debt is a useful supplemental measure for its management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing the Companys financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
21
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
CO-INVESTMENT CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | Gross | JV Partners | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Number of | Square | Book | Property | Share | |||||||||||||||||
Joint Ventures | Percentage | Buildings | Feet (1) | Value (2) | Debt | of Debt (10) | ||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Erie (4) |
50% | 26 | 2,502,052 | $ | 134,875 | $ | 50,338 | $ | 25,169 | |||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund I (5) |
21% | 100 | 5,829,368 | 415,191 | 223,704 | 177,313 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II (6) |
20% | 100 | 7,599,176 | 472,442 | 258,179 | 207,036 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP (7) |
50% | 73 | 8,589,823 | 418,129 | 245,454 | 122,382 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II (5) |
20% | 69 | 7,531,342 | 462,114 | 231,858 | 182,922 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS (8) |
39% | 30 | 1,218,592 | 74,498 | 34,977 | 21,504 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III (9) |
20% | 36 | 4,459,565 | 514,142 | 258,164 | 203,704 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Operating Joint Ventures |
27% | 434 | 37,729,918 | 2,491,391 | 1,302,674 | 940,030 | ||||||||||||||||
Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Erie (4) |
50% | | | 14,369 | | | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Partners II (6) |
20% | 7 | 841,754 | 43,758 | 6,136 | 4,860 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II (5) |
20% | 2 | 538,537 | 30,573 | 5,940 | 4,752 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS (8) |
39% | 1 | 279,431 | 25,545 | 9,429 | 5,797 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III (9) |
20% | 1 | 147,182 | 8,895 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Development Joint Ventures |
27% | 11 | 1,806,904 | 123,140 | 21,505 | 15,409 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Consolidated Joint Ventures |
27% | 445 | 39,536,822 | $ | 2,614,531 | $ | 1,324,179 | $ | 955,439 | |||||||||||||
Partners Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-investment Joint Ventures | Cash NOI (3) | Net Income | FFO | Cash NOI (3) | Net Income | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||
For the quarter ended December 31, 2004 |
$ | 49,909 | $ | 23,322 | $ | 29,940 | $ | 34,233 | $ | 8,580 | $ | 21,523 | ||||||||||||
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 |
$ | 186,082 | $ | 57,326 | $ | 106,280 | $ | 121,631 | $ | 34,344 | $ | 78,442 |
(1) | For development properties, this represents estimated square feet at completion of development for committed phases of development and renovation projects. | |
(2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
(3) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes NOI is a useful supplemental measure for our management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. | |
(4) | AMB Erie is a co-investment partnership formed in 1998 with the Erie Insurance Group. | |
(5) | AMB Institutional Alliance Funds I and II are co-investment partnerships with institutional investors, which invest through private REITs. | |
(6) | AMB Partners II is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with the City and County of San Francisco Employees Retirement System. | |
(7) | AMB-SGP is a co-investment partnership formed in 2001 with GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd, the real estate investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. | |
(8) | AMB-AMS is a co-investment partnership with three Dutch pension funds advised by Mn Services NV. | |
(9) | AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III is an open-ended co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with institutional investors, which invest through a private REIT. | |
(10) | JV partners share of debt is defined as total debt less the Companys share of total debt. See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes the Companys share of total debt is a useful supplemental measure for its management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing the Companys financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
22
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
OTHER CONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | Gross | JV Partners | ||||||||||||||||||
Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Share | ||||||||||||||||
Properties | Market | Percentage | Feet | Value (1) | Debt | of Debt (2) | ||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
Various | 92% | 2,403,711 | $ | 218,821 | $ | 49,869 | $ | 2,493 | |||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
Various | 81% | 2,026,726 | 122,170 | 21,104 | 9,149 | ||||||||||||||
Total Other Industrial Consolidated Joint Ventures |
88% | 4,430,437 | $ | 340,991 | $ | 70,973 | $ | 11,642 | ||||||||||||
Retail Joint Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1. Around Lenox |
Atlanta | 90% | 125,222 | $ | 22,273 | $ | 8,933 | $ | 893 | |||||||||||
2. Springs Gate Land |
Miami | 100% | | 6,767 | | | ||||||||||||||
Total Retail Consolidated Joint Ventures |
92% | 125,222 | $ | 29,040 | $ | 8,933 | $ | 893 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture entity and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
(2) | JV Partners Share of Debt is defined as total debt less the Companys share of total debt. See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes the Companys share of total debt is a useful supplemental measure for its management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing the Companys financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
23
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES,
MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS AND OTHER INVESTMENTS
As of December 31, 2004
(dollars in thousands)
AMBs | AMBs | AMBs | ||||||||||||||||
Alliance | Square | Net Equity | Ownership | Share | ||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Market | Partner | Feet | Investment | Percentage | of Debt (5) | ||||||||||||
Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||
1. AMB-SGP Mexico (1) |
Various | N/A | 1,256,165 | $ | 9,467 | 20% | $ | 3,214 | ||||||||||
Total Co-Investment Joint Ventures |
1,256,165 | 9,467 | 3,214 | |||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||
2. Elk Grove Du Page |
Chicago | Hamilton Partners | 4,046,721 | 33,664 | 56% | 37,826 | ||||||||||||
3. Pico Rivera |
Los Angeles | Majestic Realty | 855,600 | 676 | 50% | 17,751 | ||||||||||||
4. Monte Vista Spectrum |
Los Angeles | Majestic Realty | 576,852 | 236 | 50% | 9,302 | ||||||||||||
5. Industrial Fund I, LLC |
Various | Citigroup | 2,326,334 | 3,612 | 15% | 9,735 | ||||||||||||
6. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 1 |
Singapore | Boustead Projects | 230,432 | 2,633 | 50% | 2,390 | ||||||||||||
7. Sterling Distribution 1 |
Los Angeles | Majestic Realty | 1,000,000 | 550 | 40% | 13,982 | ||||||||||||
Total Other Industrial Operating
Joint Ventures |
9,035,939 | 41,371 | 52% | 90,986 | ||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint
Ventures (2) |
||||||||||||||||||
8. Sterling Distribution 2 |
Los Angeles | Majestic Realty | 490,000 | 707 | 40% | 5,327 | ||||||||||||
9. Sterling Distribution 3 |
Los Angeles | Majestic Realty | 390,000 | 620 | 50% | 3,800 | ||||||||||||
10. Nash Logistics Center |
Los Angeles | AMB - IAC | 75,000 | 1,412 | 50% | 2,502 | ||||||||||||
11. Singapore Airport Logistics Center Bldg 2 |
Singapore | Boustead Projects | 254,267 | 1,589 | 50% | | ||||||||||||
Total Other Industrial Development
Joint Ventures |
1,209,267 | 4,328 | 48% | 11,629 | ||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
11,501,371 | $ | 55,166 | 46% | $ | 105,829 | ||||||||||||
AMBs | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Ownership | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Investments | Market | Maturity | Receivable (3) | Rate | Percentage | |||||||||||||
1. Pier 1 (4) |
SF Bay Area | May 2026 | $ | 12,938 | 13.0% | 100% | ||||||||||||
2. Platinum Distribution Center |
No. New Jersey | November 2006 | 800 | 12.0% | 20% | |||||||||||||
$ | 13,738 | |||||||||||||||||
AMBs | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Ownership | |||||||||||||||||
Other Investments | Market | Property Type | Investment | Percentage | ||||||||||||||
1. Park One |
Los Angeles | Parking Lot | $ | 75,497 | 100% |
(1) | AMB-SGP Mexico is a co-investment partnership formed in 2004 with GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd, the real estate investment subsidiary of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation. Includes $8.1 million of shareholder loans outstanding at December 31, 2004 between the Company and the co-investment partnership. $5.0 million of this loan is expected to be replaced by third party debt in the first quarter of 2005. | |
(2) | Square feet for development alliance joint ventures represents estimated square feet at completion of development project. | |
(3) | The Company also holds inter-company loans that it eliminates in consolidations. | |
(4) | AMB also has a 0.1% unconsolidated equity interest (with a 33% economic interest) in this property, and has an option to purchase the remaining equity interest beginning January 1, 2007 and expiring December 31, 2009. | |
(5) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosures for a discussion of why management believes the Companys share of total debt is a useful supplemental measure for its management and investors, of ways to use this measure when assessing the Companys financial performance, and the limitations of the measure as a measurement tool. |
24
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
REPORTING DEFINITIONS
Acquisition/non-recurring capex includes immediate building improvements that were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to stabilization. Also includes incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue potential of an existing building.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is used.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated as AMBs share of total debt divided by the sum of total debt plus market equity and preferred stock and units at liquidation preference. AMBs share of total debt includes total consolidated debt plus AMBs pro rata share of the debt of unconsolidated joint ventures less JV partners share of debt. Market equity assumes conversion of all OP units into common stock.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% leased or properties for which we have held a certificate of occupancy or building has been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development and renovation cash yields are calculated from estimated NOI for the 12 months following occupancy stabilization (excluding straight-line rents) divided by the estimated total investment, including Development Alliance Partner® earnouts (if triggered by stabilization) and associated carrying costs.
Fixed charge coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total interest expense (including capitalized interest) plus preferred dividends and distributions.
Interest coverage is adjusted EBITDA divided by total GAAP interest expense.
Occupancy percentage represents the percentage of total rentable square feet owned, which is leased, including month-to-month leases, as of the date reported. Space is considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Percentage pre-leased represents the percentage of signed leases only.
Renovation projects represent projects where the acquired buildings are less than 75% leased and require significant capital expenditures (generally more than 10% - 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90% occupancy).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital expenditures do not include acquisition capital that was taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard.
Rent increases on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference, weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month after a term commencement date and the net ABR due the last month prior to the termination date of the former tenants term. If free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent charges. If either the previous or current lease terms are under 12 months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the lease is the first in the unit (first generation) and there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded from this calculation.
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents) of the same store properties from the prior year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store properties include all properties that were owned as of the end of both the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after December 31, 2002. Same store pool includes Park One parking lot in Los Angeles, California.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements, lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant at acquisition.
Square feet owned represents 100% of the square footage of properties either owned directly by the Company or which the Company has a controlling interest in (e.g. consolidated joint ventures) and excludes square footage of development properties prior to completion.
Stabilized GAAP cap rates rates are calculated as NOI, including straight-line rents, stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt to market, all due diligence and closing costs, SFAS 141 adjustments, planned immediate capital expenditures (acquisition capex), leasing costs necessary to achieve stabilization and, if applicable, any estimated costs required to buy-out AMBs joint venture partners. Cash rates are calculated excluding straight-line rents from NOI.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases renewed by existing tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and renewed leases during the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square footage of month-to-month leases.
25
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURES
Adjusted EBITDA. The Company uses adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating performance and liquidity. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors relevant and useful information because it permits fixed income investors to view income from its operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure the Companys operating performance independent of its capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its operating performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries. The Company considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its comparative performance with other companies because, by excluding non-cash depreciation expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, the Company believes that adjusted EBITDA helps fixed income and equity investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA in the same manner as the Company expects investors to when measuring the Companys operating performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating performance, and comparing that performance to other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share and unit distributions. The Company believes investors should consider adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of the Companys performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding of the Companys operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of the performance of its assets between periods and as against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization when assessing the Companys financial performance, an investor is assessing the earnings generated by the Companys operations, but not taking into account the eliminated expenses incurred in connection with such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with the Companys required GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the Companys historical cash expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on the Companys outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative to those indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, the Companys computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies.
Companys share of total debt. The Companys share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated ventures holding the debt. The Company believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint ventures. The Companys share of total debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of such loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures.
Interest coverage. The Company uses interest coverage to measure its liquidity. The Company considers interest coverage to provide investors relevant and useful information because it permits fixed income investors to measure the Companys ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt. The Companys computation of interest coverage may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
Fixed charge coverage. The Company uses fixed charge coverage to measure its liquidity. The Company considers fixed charge coverage to provide investors relevant and useful information because it permits fixed income investors to measure the Companys ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to its preferred shareholders. The Companys computation of fixed charge coverage may not be comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
Funds From Operations (FFO). The Company believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, the Company considers funds from operations, or FFO, as defined by NAREIT, to be a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance. FFO is defined as net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive the Companys pro rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. Further, the Company does not adjust FFO to eliminate the effects of non-recurring charges. The Company believes that FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is a meaningful supplemental measure of its operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, NAREIT created FFO as a supplemental measure of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that excludes historical cost depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income, as defined by GAAP. The Company believes that the use of FFO, combined with the required GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. The Company considers FFO to be a useful measure for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, FFO can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating the Companys liquidity or operating performance. FFO also does not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to the Companys real estate assets nor is FFO necessarily indicative of cash available to fund the Companys future cash requirements. Further, the Companys computation of FFO may not be comparable to FFO reported by other real estate investment trusts that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than the Company does.
Net Operating Income (NOI). Net operating income is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements, less property operating expenses, which excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses and interest expense. The Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure because NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio. However, NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact results from operations. Further, NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.
26
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION CONTACTS
Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
W. Blake Baird
|
President and Director | (415) 733-9407 | bbaird@amb.com | |||
Michael A. Coke
|
EVP, Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | mcoke@amb.com | |||
Bruce H. Freedman
|
EVP, Real Estate Operations | (617) 619-9301 | bfreedman@amb.com | |||
David S. Fries
|
EVP, Strategic Initiatives & Corporate Affairs Chairman, AMB China, Ltd. |
+86 (0)21 2402 8886 | dfries@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
EVP, Chief Investment Officer | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
EVP, Development | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, AMB Capital Partners | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Lauren L. Barr
|
VP, Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9477 | lbarr@amb.com | |||
Evaleen G. Andamo
|
Director, Investor Relations | (415) 733-9565 | eandamo@amb.com |
Corporate Headquarters | Other Principal Office Locations | Investor Relations | ||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Amsterdam Los Angeles | Tel: (877) 285-3111 (toll-free) | ||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Boston Shanghai | Fax: (415) 394-9001 | ||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
Chicago Tokyo | E-mail: ir@amb.com | ||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||
Fax: (415) 394-9001
|
||||
27