EX-99.1
Published on July 21, 2010
Exhibit 99.1

|
Company Profile |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As
of June 30, 2010, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
156.1 million square feet (14.5 million square meters) in 48 markets within 15 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. Private capital revenue consists of asset
management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
The Americas |
Europe |
Asia |
||||||||||
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
121.0 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 11.6 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 12.1 msf | |||||||
Development
Portfolio(2)(3) |
4.8 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 2.5 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 4.1 msf | |||||||
Land Inventory(3)
|
2,228 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 232 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 141 acres | |||||||
| (1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio), value-added acquisitions and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (2) | Includes pre-stabilized development properties. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 1 |
|
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 158,618 | $ | 148,572 | 6.8 | % | $ | 315,596 | $ | 310,743 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
107,754 | 104,240 | 3.4 | % | 208,596 | 247,423 | (15.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
2,897 | 17,162 | (83.1 | %) | (1,548 | ) | (105,449 | ) | 98.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2)
|
51,408 | 55,409 | (7.2 | %) | 99,192 | 134,162 | (26.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.12 | (83.3 | %) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | 98.8 | % | ||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2)
|
0.30 | 0.37 | (18.9 | %) | 0.62 | 1.07 | (42.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.28 | 0.0 | % | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
| Financial(3) |
$1.5 billion in liquidity
Reduced AMBs share of total debt to share of total assets to 40.5% from 44.8% at the end of the first quarter
Completed common equity offering of 18.2 million shares, generating net proceeds of approximately $479 million
Subsequent to quarter end, closed two yen-denominated financing transactions in Japan totaling $189 million
|
|
| Operations(3) |
91.8% occupancy at the end of the second quarter; 90.1% average occupancy
Second quarter cash-basis same store NOI(1) decrease of 6.0%
62.8% second quarter tenant retention; 66.2% for the trailing four quarters
Commenced 7.9 msf of leases in the second quarter
|
|
| Capital Deployment(3) |
Leased 1.6 msf in the development portfolio; approximately 4.3 msf remaining to stabilize the development portfolio
Completed $35 million in contributions and dispositions in the second quarter
Acquired two properties(4) totaling approximately $42.7 million, including $29.4 million for AMB Europe Fund I and $13.3 million for AMB
Acquired 48 acre land parcel in Brazil, the second acquisition with our joint venture partner, CCP
|
|
| Private Capital |
Transferred two assets to AMB Europe Fund I in exchange for units with a fair value of $22.4 million
$79 million of equity investments into AMB U.S. Logistics Fund
including $50 million by AMB and $29 million by new and existing third-party investors
Subsequent to quarter end, received $93.3 million in new third-party equity commitments, including $50.5 million in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and
$42.8 million in AMB Europe Fund I
|
|
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (4) | Includes value-added acquisition. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 2 |
|
Overview
of Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1)(2)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)

Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business(1)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Quarter Ended | |||||||||||
| 2008 | 2009 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.52 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.46 | 0.32 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO,
as adjusted |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
68.6 | % | 72.2 | % | 109.7 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
0.72 | 0.63 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.33 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.42 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
13.5 | % | 20.1 | % | (14.5 | %) | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.65 | 0.27 | 0.08 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
17.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||||
Total FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 2.90 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||
Development Gains(1)(3)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Private Capital Revenue
(per diluted common share and unit)
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | For a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from net income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, please refer to AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2009. As a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from FFO for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 as presented in AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company has made adjusting increases of $0.3 million for loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2007 and increases of $2.9 million and $1.1 million for preferred unit redemption premiums in 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
| (3) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
| (4) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
| (5) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 3 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 151,773 | $ | 140,777 | $ | 301,306 | $ | 291,253 | ||||||||
Private capital revenues |
6,845 | 7,795 | 14,290 | 19,490 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
158,618 | 148,572 | 315,596 | 310,743 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs |
(48,474 | ) | (42,953 | ) | (97,853 | ) | (92,029 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(48,278 | ) | (38,523 | ) | (96,667 | ) | (80,427 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(30,093 | ) | (25,641 | ) | (62,043 | ) | (56,954 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
(872 | ) | (3,824 | ) | (3,845 | ) | (3,824 | ) | ||||||||
Fund costs |
(153 | ) | (322 | ) | (468 | ) | (584 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | (175,887 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expenses(1)
|
1,271 | (4,207 | ) | 80 | (3,545 | ) | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(126,599 | ) | (115,470 | ) | (260,796 | ) | (413,250 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
199 | | 5,002 | 33,286 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
5,193 | 4,284 | 9,068 | 4,250 | ||||||||||||
Other income(1)
|
448 | 7,528 | 737 | 459 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(32,626 | ) | (27,772 | ) | (65,239 | ) | (60,571 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(579 | ) | (657 | ) | (579 | ) | (657 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(27,365 | ) | (16,617 | ) | (51,011 | ) | (23,233 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
4,654 | 16,485 | 3,789 | (125,740 | ) | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations |
411 | 2,459 | 656 | 2,714 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
4,248 | 10,090 | 4,248 | 28,704 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
4,659 | 12,549 | 4,904 | 31,418 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
9,313 | 29,034 | 8,693 | (94,322 | ) | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net income |
(2,068 | ) | (4,949 | ) | (1,693 | ) | (2,771 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership
unitholders share of development profits |
21 | | (85 | ) | (1,108 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
| (1,432 | ) | | (2,864 | ) | ||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(75 | ) | (1,279 | ) | 125 | 4,041 | ||||||||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net income (loss) |
(2,122 | ) | (7,660 | ) | (1,653 | ) | (2,702 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation |
7,191 | 21,374 | 7,040 | (97,024 | ) | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (7,904 | ) | (7,904 | ) | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(342 | ) | (260 | ) | (684 | ) | (521 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 2,897 | $ | 17,162 | $ | (1,548 | ) | $ | (105,449 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.12 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
165,658 | 145,380 | 156,793 | 121,991 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 of $(1,615) and $(696), respectively. | |
| (2) | Represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, there were 1,222 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 2,897 | $ | 17,162 | $ | (1,548 | ) | $ | (105,449 | ) | ||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
(4,248 | ) | (10,090 | ) | (4,248 | ) | (28,704 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
48,278 | 38,523 | 96,667 | 80,427 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
243 | 793 | 514 | 2,348 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(2,012 | ) | (1,953 | ) | (4,557 | ) | (4,090 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from consolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net income) |
2,068 | 4,949 | 1,693 | 2,771 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) |
75 | 1,279 | (125 | ) | (4,041 | ) | ||||||||||
Limited
partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development
(losses) profits) |
(2 | ) | | 104 | 1,108 | |||||||||||
FFO, as adjusted attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(7,562 | ) | (7,151 | ) | (12,942 | ) | (15,739 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(5,193 | ) | (4,284 | ) | (9,068 | ) | (4,250 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
15,444 | 11,786 | 29,897 | 23,921 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments
for impairments, restructuring charges
and debt extinguishment |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 175,887 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| | | 5,966 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
872 | 3,824 | 3,845 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
579 | 657 | 579 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(31 | ) | (86 | ) | (73 | ) | (474 | ) | ||||||||
Funds from operations, as adjusted(1)
|
$ | 51,408 | $ | 55,409 | $ | 99,192 | $ | 134,162 | ||||||||
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
169,006 | 148,815 | 160,941 | 125,451 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, there were 1,222 unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| As of | ||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,834,736 | $ | 6,708,660 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,196,321 | ) | (1,113,808 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,638,415 | 5,594,852 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
687,201 | 462,130 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
131,155 | 214,426 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,456,771 | 6,271,408 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
240,694 | 206,077 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
156,655 | 155,958 | ||||||
Other assets |
205,872 | 208,515 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,059,992 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 944,787 | $ | 1,096,554 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,156,361 | 1,155,529 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
422,483 | 477,630 | ||||||
Other debt |
471,024 | 482,883 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
346,027 | 338,042 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,340,682 | 3,550,638 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
3,127,926 | 2,716,604 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
3,351,338 | 2,940,016 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
306,414 | 289,909 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
61,558 | 61,395 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
367,972 | 351,304 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,719,310 | 3,291,320 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,059,992 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 6 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 8,635 | $ | 6,911 | $ | 16,420 | $ | 14,166 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 5,462 | $ | 2,809 | $ | 10,353 | $ | 6,747 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 779 | $ | 1,448 | $ | 1,599 | $ | 3,727 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 587 | $ | 976 | $ | 1,164 | $ | 2,702 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 495 | $ | 268 | $ | 961 | $ | 992 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 9,761 | $ | 2,817 | $ | 16,030 | $ | 5,046 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
8,585 | 5,535 | 16,631 | 10,565 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
8,420 | 4,361 | 12,811 | 9,357 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
26,766 | 12,713 | 45,472 | 24,968 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(7,683 | ) | (5,285 | ) | (13,617 | ) | (8,850 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 19,083 | $ | 7,428 | $ | 31,855 | $ | 16,118 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,518 | $ | 1,542 | $ | 8,807 | $ | 4,934 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,127 | $ | 1,726 | $ | 7,986 | $ | 4,907 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 596 | $ | 563 | $ | 1,233 | $ | 1,432 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 448 | $ | 215 | $ | 892 | $ | 742 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 448 | $ | 121 | $ | 873 | $ | 596 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 6,555 | $ | 1,772 | $ | 11,149 | $ | 3,078 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,829 | 3,422 | 10,712 | 7,308 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
6,069 | 2,822 | 9,424 | 6,899 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
18,453 | 8,016 | 31,285 | 17,285 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(2,018 | ) | (1,509 | ) | (3,811 | ) | (2,740 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 16,435 | $ | 6,507 | $ | 27,474 | $ | 14,545 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 7 |
![]() |
Operations
Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Square | ||||||||||||||
| Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||
1 |
Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) | 3,466,691 | $ | 28,665 | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
2 |
United States Government | 1,355,450 | $ | 20,439 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||
3 |
Sagaw a Express | 1,054,754 | $ | 16,981 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||
4 |
FedEx Corporation | 1,400,090 | $ | 14,780 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
5 |
Nippon Express | 1,029,170 | $ | 14,337 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
6 |
BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn | 932,023 | $ | 9,236 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
7 |
Panalpina | 1,316,351 | $ | 8,898 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
8 |
Caterpillar Logistics Services | 543,039 | $ | 8,214 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
9 |
La Poste | 903,543 | $ | 7,389 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||
10 |
Kuehne + Nagel Inc. | 1,033,585 | $ | 7,140 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
| Subtotal | 13,034,696 | $ | 136,079 | 15.9 | % | |||||||||
| Top 11-20 Customers | 6,037,149 | 48,340 | 5.6 | % | ||||||||||
| Total | 19,071,845 | $ | 184,419 | 21.5 | % | |||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio, not including value-added acquisitions. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 8 |
|
Operating Statistics(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
136,703,087 | 134,762,036 | 127,522,980 | 127,647,708 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of ow ned & managed square feet |
93.3 | % | 94.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2)
|
91.8 | % | 90.5 | % | 91.4 | % | 90.2 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
90.5 | % | 92.2 | % | 91.1 | % | 92.3 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2)
|
90.1 | % | 90.3 | % | 89.7 | % | 90.0 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
91.1 | % | 93.1 | % | 91.2 | % | 93.5 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.4 | ||||||||||||
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | Trailing Four Quarters | |||||||||||||
| Ended June 30, 2010 | Ended March 31, 2010 | Ended June 30, 2010 | Ended March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2)
|
66.2 | % | 64.7 | % | 65.6 | % | 64.4 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
(11.2 | %) | (9.1 | %) | (11.2 | %) | (9.1 | %) | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
26.2 | 24.1 | 26.1 | 24.1 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.15 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.81 | $ | 2.71 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.96 | $ | 1.80 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
32.4 | 29.8 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2)
|
70.5 | % | 70.6 | % | 71.4 | % | 71.7 | % | ||||||||
| Same Store Pool(2) | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
| Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||
Decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3)
|
(4.1 | %) | (4.1 | %) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in expenses(3)
|
1.2 | % | (0.4 | %) | ||||
Decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(6.0 | %) | (5.5 | %) | ||||
Decrease in NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(6.3 | %) | (6.0 | %) | ||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio, not including value-added acquisitions. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (2.9)%, 5.9%, (6.5)% and (6.4)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (5.0)%, 1.5%, (7.8)% and (7.7)%, respectively, for increase in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 9 |
|
Portfolio Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| % of Total | Year-to-Date | Trailing Four | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Owned and | AMBs Share | Annualized | Same Store NOI | Quarters Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Placed in | Square Feet | Managed Square | of Square | Year-to-Date | Base Rent | Growth Without | Change on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Feet as of | Feet as of | Average | psf as of | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/31/2010 | Square Feet | Square Feet(1) | Square Feet | 6/30/2010 | 6/30/2010 | 6/30/2010 | Occupancy | 6/30/2010 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
19,093,158 | | 75 | (133,660 | ) | 18,959,573 | 13.9 | % | 59.4 | % | 91.8 | % | $ | 6.39 | (1.7 | %) | (14.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,118,853 | | | | 13,118,853 | 9.6 | % | 58.4 | % | 90.7 | % | 5.06 | (7.7 | %) | (16.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
11,637,089 | | 717,256 | | 12,354,345 | 9.0 | % | 57.5 | % | 86.1 | % | 7.36 | (8.3 | %) | (11.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,960,044 | | | | 10,960,044 | 8.0 | % | 77.3 | % | 91.2 | % | 6.40 | (8.7 | %) | (5.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
7,883,158 | | (583 | ) | | 7,882,575 | 5.8 | % | 57.6 | % | 89.4 | % | 5.33 | (18.3 | %) | (6.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,363,198 | | | | 6,363,198 | 4.7 | % | 75.4 | % | 95.6 | % | 7.20 | 5.7 | % | (28.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,467,838 | | | | 2,467,838 | 1.8 | % | 93.1 | % | 88.6 | % | 19.86 | (3.6 | %) | (3.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,962,427 | | (379 | ) | | 28,962,048 | 21.2 | % | 65.7 | % | 87.3 | % | 5.35 | (9.3 | %) | (16.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
100,485,765 | | 716,369 | (133,660 | ) | 101,068,474 | 74.0 | % | 64.5 | % | 89.9 | % | $ | 6.33 | (6.8 | %) | (12.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,059 | | 391 | | 3,564,450 | 2.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 97.9 | % | $ | 5.34 | 47.4 | % | (8.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
4,572,427 | | 421 | | 4,572,848 | 3.3 | % | 42.5 | % | 94.0 | % | 5.60 | (9.0 | %) | (15.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | | | 2,890,526 | 2.1 | % | 21.6 | % | 91.5 | % | 4.47 | (15.2 | %) | (9.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
893,500 | | | | 893,500 | 0.7 | % | 65.6 | % | 70.3 | % | 4.80 | (84.9 | %) | (8.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
8,356,453 | | 421 | | 8,356,874 | 6.1 | % | 37.7 | % | 90.6 | % | $ | 5.14 | (15.8 | %) | (12.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
112,406,277 | | 717,181 | (133,660 | ) | 112,989,798 | 82.7 | % | 63.6 | % | 89.9 | % | $ | 6.21 | (6.4 | %) | (12.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
4,097,378 | | 396 | | 4,097,774 | 3.0 | % | 44.5 | % | 97.0 | % | $ | 7.32 | (0.2 | %) | (20.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,200,022 | | 8,611 | | 3,208,633 | 2.3 | % | 41.2 | % | 95.9 | % | 7.65 | (1.5 | %) | (9.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
3,263,379 | | | | 3,263,379 | 2.4 | % | 43.4 | % | 85.8 | % | 8.91 | (16.0 | %) | (2.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
485,010 | 140,264 | 439,899 | | 1,065,173 | 0.8 | % | 72.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 10.31 | 0.3 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
11,045,789 | 140,264 | 448,906 | | 11,634,959 | 8.5 | % | 45.9 | % | 93.6 | % | $ | 8.11 | (5.2 | %) | (9.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
6,052,219 | | | 6,052,219 | 4.4 | % | 30.4 | % | 92.2 | % | $ | 15.00 | 3.1 | % | (10.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 86.9 | % | 12.45 | 1.3 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
8,052,256 | | | | 8,052,256 | 5.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 90.9 | % | $ | 14.35 | 2.7 | % | (4.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
2,103,669 | | 392,581 | | 2,496,250 | 1.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 81.9 | % | $ | 4.41 | (40.6 | %) | 17.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 96.3 | % | 9.34 | (1.5 | %) | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
218,119 | | 375,779 | | 593,898 | 0.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 91.0 | % | 6.75 | (19.7 | %) | (40.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
11,309,970 | | 768,360 | | 12,078,330 | 8.8 | % | 51.9 | % | 89.6 | % | $ | 11.66 | (16.8 | %) | (3.7 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd Avg(2)
|
134,762,036 | 140,264 | 1,934,447 | (133,660 | ) | 136,703,087 | 100.0 | % | 61.1 | % | 90.2 | % | $ | 6.87 | (5.5 | %) | (11.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3)
|
7,495,959 | | | | 7,495,959 | 51.8 | % | 84.8 | % | 5.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
142,257,995 | 140,264 | 1,934,447 | (133,660 | ) | 144,199,046 | 60.6 | % | 90.0 | % | $ | 6.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction-in-Progress |
3,683,146 | | (4) | 1,280 | (5) | (530,181 | )(6) | 3,154,245 | 86.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Stabilized Developments(2)
|
9,755,351 | 530,181 | (4) | (1,942,875 | )(5) | (19,144 | )(6) | 8,323,513 | 96.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Portfolio Subtotal |
13,438,497 | 530,181 | (1,941,595 | ) | (549,325 | ) | 11,477,758 | 93.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-added acquisitions(2)
|
| 467,345 | | | 467,345 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
155,696,492 | 1,137,790 | (7,148 | ) | (682,985 | ) | 156,144,149 | 63.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio as well as the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (4) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of development starts. For pre-stabilized developments, represents new projects available. | |
| (5) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects placed in operations. | |
| (6) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in pre-stabilized developments or disposed. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects disposed. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 10 |
|
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment (2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions, excludes land inventory purchases. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 11 |
|
Property Acquisitions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition | % of Total | Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
467,345 | $ | 13,338 | 31.2 | % | 1,155,277 | $ | 58,890 | 66.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
467,345 | $ | 13,338 | 31.2 | % | 1,155,277 | $ | 58,890 | 66.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
140,264 | 29,388 | 68.8 | % | 140,264 | 29,388 | 33.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
140,264 | $ | 29,388 | 68.8 | % | 140,264 | $ | 29,388 | 33.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
607,609 | $ | 42,726 | 100.0 | % | 1,295,541 | $ | 88,278 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
52.6 | % | 39.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate(3)
|
7.6 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition | % of Total | Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||||||||||
By Entity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
467,345 | $ | 13,338 | 31.2 | % | 467,345 | $ | 13,338 | 15.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
140,264 | 29,388 | 68.8 | % | 140,264 | 29,388 | 33.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
| | 0.0 | % | 687,932 | 45,552 | 51.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
607,609 | $ | 42,726 | 100.0 | % | 1,295,541 | $ | 88,278 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio and value-added acquisitions. | |
| (2) | Includes estimated total acquisition capital expenditures of approximately $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. | |
| (3) | Weighted average stabilized cap rate is defined as weighted average stabilized cash cap rate excluding the impact of straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 12 |
|
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter June 30, 2010 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
100.0 | % | 69.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 84.0 | % | ||||||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 10,018 | $ | 24,965 | $ | 10,018 | $ | 47,858 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(3)(4)
|
5.0 | % | 6.5 | % | 5.0 | % | 7.3 | % | ||||||||
Development
Margin, before real estate impairment losses(4)
|
N/A | (23.6 | %) | N/A | (9.2 | %) | ||||||||||
Development
Margin, net of real estate impairment losses(4)
|
N/A | 0.8 | % | N/A | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
133,660 | 19,144 | | 133,660 | 331,247 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
133,660 | 19,144 | | 133,660 | 331,247 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| 37,760 | | | 37,760 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| 141,933 | | | 141,933 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| 179,693 | | | 179,693 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
133,660 | 198,837 | | 133,660 | 510,940 | | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | Includes installment sale of 0.2 million square feet and $12.5 million initiated in the fourth quarter of 2009 and completed in the first quarter of 2010. | |
| (3) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
| (4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (5) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 13 |
|
Development Portfolio(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| 2010 Expected Completions(2) | 2011 Expected Completions(2) | Total Construction-in-Progress | Pre-Stabilized Developments(2) | Total Development Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 557,915 | $ | 66,267 | 557,915 | $ | 66,267 | 2,357,034 | $ | 222,980 | 2,914,949 | $ | 289,247 | 24.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
450,445 | 38,486 | | | 450,445 | 38,486 | 1,465,667 | 78,384 | 1,916,112 | 116,870 | 9.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
450,445 | $ | 38,486 | 557,915 | $ | 66,267 | 1,008,360 | $ | 104,753 | 3,822,701 | $ | 301,364 | 4,831,061 | $ | 406,117 | 34.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 692,754 | $ | 51,197 | 692,754 | $ | 51,197 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
427,832 | 42,855 | | | 427,832 | 42,855 | 139,608 | 16,502 | 567,440 | 59,357 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
125,227 | 21,034 | | | 125,227 | 21,034 | 655,366 | 78,658 | 780,593 | 99,692 | 8.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | 444,043 | 40,941 | 444,043 | 40,941 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
553,059 | $ | 63,889 | | $ | | 553,059 | $ | 63,889 | 1,931,771 | $ | 187,298 | 2,484,830 | $ | 251,187 | 21.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 2,569,041 | $ | 458,927 | 2,569,041 | $ | 458,927 | 38.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
525,768 | 21,801 | 1,067,058 | 54,869 | 1,592,826 | 76,670 | | | 1,592,826 | 76,670 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
525,768 | $ | 21,801 | 1,067,058 | $ | 54,869 | 1,592,826 | $ | 76,670 | 2,569,041 | $ | 458,927 | 4,161,867 | $ | 535,597 | 44.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,529,272 | $ | 124,176 | 1,624,973 | $ | 121,136 | 3,154,245 | $ | 245,312 | 8,323,513 | $ | 947,589 | 11,477,758 | $ | 1,192,901 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
(10,829 | ) | (70,761 | ) | (81,590 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated total investment, net of real estate impairment losses | $ | 234,483 | $ | 876,828 | $ | 1,111,311 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Projects |
5 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
91.5 | % | 63.7 | % | 77.8 | % | 97.1 | % | 93.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder to Invest |
$ | 4,046 | $ | 11,882 | $ | 15,928 | $ | 24,622 | $ | 40,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Remainder to Invest(2)(4)(5)
|
$ | 3,452 | $ | 7,713 | $ | 11,165 | $ | 23,859 | $ | 35,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5)
|
6.3 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield, net
of real estate impairment losses(2)
|
6.8 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.6 | % | 6.8 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-Leased(2)
|
51.3 | % | 55.0 | % | 53.2 | % | 51.8 | % | 52.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 14 |
|
Land, Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Land Inventory
| The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
2,182 | 36,793,284 | 221 | 4,347,936 | 141 | 5,144,921 | 2,544 | 46,286,141 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
48 | 728,791 | 11 | 377,479 | | | 59 | 1,106,270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(2 | ) | (31,363 | ) | | | | | (2 | ) | (31,363 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
2,228 | 37,490,712 | 232 | 4,725,415 | 141 | 5,144,921 | 2,601 | (3) | 47,361,048 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4)
|
$ | 630,812 | $ | 137,591 | $ | 150,932 | $ | 919,335 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (151,569 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 767,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs share of investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 589,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 9 | 1 | | | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 213 | 12 | | | 220 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 222 | 13 | | | 229 | (6) | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | | | | | 40,800 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 998,372 | 3 | | | 1,039,172 | (7) | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Does not include value-added acquisitions. | |
| (3) | AMBs share of acres and square feet of estimated build out including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,315 acres and 42.1 million square feet, respectively. | |
| (4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
| (5) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. | |
| (6) | AMBs share is 192 acres. | |
| (7) | AMBs share is 705,336 square feet. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 15 |
![]() |
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
| Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(1)
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD | Upon project sales | Perpetual(2) | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q13) | Open end | ||||||
| (1) | Effective January 1, 2010, the name of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III was changed to AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. | |
| (2) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
| (3) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
| (4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 16 |
|
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4)
|
34% | 36,744,490 | $ | 3,328,862 | $ | 1,619,728 | $ | | $ | 340,887 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4)
|
35% | 9,568,570 | 1,125,449 | 611,992 | | 127,377 | 325,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 7,263,090 | 1,576,575 | 871,075 | 9,046 | 81,764 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 6,332,411 | 358,415 | 165,499 | 148,438 | (5) | 18,329 | 245,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment
Ventures |
30% | 59,908,561 | 6,389,301 | 3,268,294 | 157,484 | 568,357 | 745,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 200,027 | 85,919 | | | 14,590 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4)
|
34% | 557,915 | 84,689 | 13,101 | | 24,081 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
24% | 757,942 | 170,608 | 13,101 | | 38,671 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(6) |
30% | 60,666,503 | 6,559,909 | 3,281,395 | 157,484 | 607,028 | 745,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51% | 7,419,049 | (7) | 286,600 | 158,392 | | 51,555 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
50% | | 36,517 | | | 13,139 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
31% | 68,085,552 | $ | 6,883,026 | $ | 3,439,787 | $ | 157,484 | $ | 671,722 | $ | 745,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 8,288,495 | $ | 477,336 | $ | 333,095 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20% | 7,318,208 | 516,071 | 188,110 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 2,170,337 | 159,817 | 76,443 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 17,777,040 | 1,153,224 | 597,648 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 17,777,040 | 1,153,224 | 597,648 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
81% | 2,876,490 | 293,090 | 52,329 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
59% | 320,297 | 229,730 | 88,536 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
46% | 20,973,827 | $ | 1,676,044 | $ | 738,513 | $ | 54,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 94,267 | $ | 5,277 | (9) | $ | 43,745 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 29,179 | $ | 5,193 | $ | 15,444 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 23,999 | $ | 4,169 | $ | 14,792 | Partners | $ | 13,070 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 7,562 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 190,943 | $ | 8,957 | (9) | $ | 88,468 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 57,478 | $ | 9,068 | $ | 29,897 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 47,418 | $ | 6,260 | $ | 27,284 | Partners | $ | 26,027 | $ | 2,694 | $ | 12,942 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
| (2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation), net of impairments, owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (3) | Through AMB Property Mexico, AMB holds an equity interest in various other non-core unconsolidated ventures for approximately $15.5 million. | |
| (4) | The estimated investment capacity and investment capacities of AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | Includes $89.6 million of shareholder loans. | |
| (6) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (8) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (9) | Includes $3.8 and $7.6 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 17 |
|
Capitalization Summary (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||
| June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Wholly-ow ned fixed charge coverage(2)
|
2.6 | x | 2.6 | x | ||||
Fixed charge coverage(2)
|
2.2 | x | 2.2 | x | ||||
Interest coverage(2)
|
2.7 | x | 2.7 | x | ||||
Dividends per share-to-FFO, as adjusted per share(2)
|
93.3 | % | 90.3 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)
|
45.5 | % | 45.5 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
40.5 | % | 40.5 | % | ||||
| (1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 18 |
![]() |
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB Wholly-Owned | Consolidated Joint Venture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured | Total | Total | Unconsolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Wholly-Owned | Secured | Other | Consolidated | Joint | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
$ | 65,000 | $ | | $ | 590 | $ | 66,354 | $ | 131,944 | $ | 51,919 | $ | | $ | 183,863 | $ | 150,761 | $ | 334,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
69,000 | 422,483 | 1,179 | 92,063 | 584,725 | 133,654 | | 718,379 | 605,085 | 1,323,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 414,955 | 27,765 | 442,720 | 413,102 | 50,000 | 905,822 | 455,799 | 1,361,621 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
293,897 | | | 19,686 | 313,583 | 68,090 | 4,300 | 385,973 | 701,348 | 1,087,321 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | | | 9,071 | | 9,071 | 722,787 | 731,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | | | 112,491 | 16,943 | | 129,434 | 264,175 | 393,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
250,000 | | | | 250,000 | 15,499 | | 265,499 | 72,737 | 338,236 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
| | | | | 490 | | 490 | 351,253 | 351,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 125,000 | 595 | | 125,595 | 183,194 | 308,789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
250,000 | | | | 250,000 | 26,298 | | 276,298 | 803 | 277,101 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | | 3,095 | | 3,095 | 5,041 | 8,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,165,388 | $ | 422,483 | $ | 416,724 | $ | 205,868 | $ | 2,210,463 | $ | 738,756 | $ | 54,300 | $ | 3,003,519 | $ | 3,512,983 | $ | 6,516,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized net (discounts) premiums |
(9,027 | ) | | | 406 | (8,621 | ) | (243 | ) | | (8,864 | ) | (5,325 | ) | (14,189 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,156,361 | $ | 422,483 | $ | 416,724 | $ | 206,274 | $ | 2,201,842 | $ | 738,513 | $ | 54,300 | $ | 2,994,655 | $ | 3,507,658 | $ | 6,502,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2)
|
| | | | | (422,234 | ) | (43,440 | ) | (465,674 | ) | (2,446,042 | ) | (2,911,716 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2)
|
$ | 1,156,361 | $ | 422,483 | $ | 416,724 | $ | 206,274 | $ | 2,201,842 | $ | 316,279 | $ | 10,860 | $ | 2,528,981 | $ | 1,061,616 | $ | 3,590,597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.4 | % | 0.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.6 | % | 4.7 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
average remaining maturity (years) |
5.6 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
168,279,950 | (3) | $ | 23.71 | $ | 3,989,918 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,313,670 | $ | 23.71 | 78,567 | ||||||||
Total |
171,593,620 | $ | 4,068,485 | |||||||||
Total options outstanding |
9,329,983 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options(4)
|
856,753 | |||||||||||
| Preferred Stock | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.80 | % | $ | 232,500 | ||||
|
Capitalization Ratios
|
||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(5)
|
45.5 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-
AMBs share of total market capitalization(2)(5)
|
48.4 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
40.5 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-
AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
43.2 | % | ||
| (1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.7 billion. Includes $309.1 million, $65.8 million, $23.5 million and $24.1 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2010, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2010. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes 1,221,660 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
| (4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $26.66 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. | |
| (5) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 19 |
|
Debt Maturities(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| AMB Wholly-Owned Debt | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | 65,000 | $ | 69,000 | $ | | $ | 293,897 | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| 332,565 | 89,918 | | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
| | 416, 724 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
65,798 | 91,318 | 28,358 | 20,400 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
130,798 | 492,883 | 535,000 | 314,297 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
| | | 39,543 | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
1,064 | | 3,926 | 202,194 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
| 41,663 | 291,433 | | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
| 54,601 | 30,218 | 18,607 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,064 | 96,264 | 325,577 | 260,344 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| 58,825 | 165,499 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
117,792 | 214,384 | 187,607 | 360,223 | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe
Fund I |
| | 5,217 | 4,127 | ||||||||||||
AMB U.S.
Logistics Fund |
| 163,767 | 76,720 | 284,786 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Joint Ventures |
9,059 | 31,545 | | 58,048 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
126,851 | 468,521 | 435,043 | 707,184 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
131,862 | 589,147 | 860,577 | 574,641 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
126,851 | 468,521 | 435,043 | 707,184 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 258,713 | $ | 1,057,668 | $ | 1,295,620 | $ | 1,281,825 | ||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 158,912 | $ | 680,357 | $ | 805,663 | $ | 580,945 | ||||||||
| (1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2013 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
| (2) | Subject to certain conditions. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 20 |
|
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Actual | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly-ow ned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 74,782 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 118,266 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1)
|
33.9 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
40,108 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to construction-in-progress |
$ | (368 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to pre-stabilized development projects(1)
|
(4,864 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
(119 | ) | ||||||
NOI required to stabilize properties acquired during the quarter(2)
|
35 | |||||||
Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI:(3)
|
5,096 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(4)
|
(220 | ) | ||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI from continuing operations related to operating properties(1)(5) |
$ | 114,670 | ||||||
Development platform:(4)
|
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.04 | ||||||
| As of | ||||
| AMBs share of:(1) | June 30, 2010 | |||
Development, land, value-added acquisitions and contributed assets, net of
real estate impairment losses:(5)
|
||||
Construction-in-progress (invested to date) |
$ | 169,079 | ||
Pre-stabilized development projects (invested to date)(1)
|
825,171 | |||
Value-added acquisitions(1)
|
13,115 | |||
Land held for future development |
589,075 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(6)
|
| |||
Total development, land, value-added acquisitions and contributed assets,
net of real estate impairment losses |
$ | 1,596,440 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(5)
|
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,590,597 | ||
Preferred securities |
232,500 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 3,823,097 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(5)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 332,477 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
353,311 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(100,100 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(391,676 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 194,012 | ||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes an adjustment to remove any NOI generated from value-added acquisitions. | |
| (3) | Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI include free rent granted in the quarter and non-property related revenues and expenses. | |
| (4) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
| (5) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
| (6) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended June 30, 2010. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 21 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures.
Estimated acquisition capital expenditures include immediate building
improvements that are taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase
of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating
standard or to stabilization and incremental building improvements and
leasing costs that are incurred in an effort to substantially increase the
revenue potential of an existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA, Wholly-owned Adjusted EBITDA and AMBs share of Adjusted EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the
amount of capitalized interest deducted from the determination of development
gains), tax, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges,
restructuring, losses on early extinguishment of debt and other non-cash
charges, stock based compensation amortization, and non-development gains, or
adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating performance and liquidity. AMB
considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors relevant and useful
information because it permits investors to view income from its operations
on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation and
amortization expense (including stock-based compensation amortization) or
non-development gains. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows
investors to measure AMBs operating performance independent of its capital
structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful
comparison of its operating performance between quarters as well as annual
periods and to compare its operating performance to that of other companies,
both in the real estate industry and in other industries. AMB considers
adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure for reviewing its
comparative performance with other companies because, by excluding non-cash
depreciation and amortization expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing
public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of companies
in other industries. The impairment charges were principally a result of
increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market
conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges
reflected costs associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost
structure. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the costs of
repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior
unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current
financing environment, resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs.
Although difficult to predict, these items may be recurring given the
uncertainty of the current economic climate and its adverse effects on the
real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or unusual in nature,
these items result from market fluctuations that can have inconsistent
effects on AMBs results of operation. The economics underlying these items
reflect market and financing conditions in the short-term but can obscure
AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and
strategies. Management believes adjusted EBITDA is significant and useful to
both it and its investors. Adjusted EBITDA more appropriately reflects the
value and strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance
isolated from the volatility of the current economic environment and
unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of its
financing profile in response to the tightening of the capital markets. As a
liquidity measure, AMB believes that adjusted EBITDA helps investors to
analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly
preferred share dividends and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted
EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating performance and liquidity; specifically
when assessing its operating performance, and comparing that performance to
other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries,
and when evaluating its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make
quarterly preferred share dividends and unit distributions. AMB believes
investors should consider adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income
(the primary measure of AMBs performance) and the other required GAAP
measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding of
AMBs operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful
comparisons of its performance
between periods and as against other
companies. By excluding interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
impairment charges, restructuring, debt extinguishment losses, stock based
compensation amortization and other non-cash charges and non-development
gains when assessing AMBs financial performance, an investor is assessing
the earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not taking into account the
eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection with such
operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical
tool and should be used in conjunction with AMBs required GAAP
presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs historical cash
expenditures or future cash requirements for working capital, capital
expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not
reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on AMBs
outstanding debt. While adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure
of operating performance and liquidity, it does not represent net income or
cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be considered
as an alternative to those indicators in evaluating operating performance or
liquidity. Further, AMBs computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be
comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies. Management compensates for
the limitations of adjusted EBITDA by providing investors with financial
statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along
with this detailed discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of
adjusted EBITDA to net income (or loss), a U.S. GAAP measurement.
AMB defines AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA to be AMB Property Corporations pro rata portion of adjusted EBITDA
based on its direct or indirect percentage of equity interests in its joint ventures and other investments.
AMB defines wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA to be that portion of adjusted EBITDA, which is solely attributable to assets
and activities that are 100% directly or indirectly owned by AMB Property Corporation plus cash distributions from joint venture relationships.
AMB includes these distributions as they are an additional source of cash flow available to service AMBs obligations.
AMB believes these supplemental measures are useful by providing investors with more comprehensive disclosure regarding
AMBs performance and its ability to cover its financial obligations on both a wholly owned basis and on a total portfolio basis.
(The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA, wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA and AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA from net loss for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 9,313 | $ | 29,034 | $ | 8,693 | $ | (94,322 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
48,278 | 38,523 | 96,667 | 80,427 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | | 175,887 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
872 | 3,824 | 3,845 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
579 | 657 | 579 | 657 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
5,921 | 4,837 | 12,925 | 12,334 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
32,626 | 27,772 | 65,239 | 60,571 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(4,659 | ) | (12,549 | ) | (4,904 | ) | (31,418 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
| | (1,546 | ) | | |||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1,604 | 2,154 | 2,895 | 5,374 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
2,782 | 1,925 | 2,982 | 11,899 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
651 | 4,573 | 1,170 | 11,976 | ||||||||||||
Less: Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
(5,193 | ) | (4,284 | ) | (9,068 | ) | (4,250 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(25,332 | ) | (26,814 | ) | (49,380 | ) | (53,937 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions from consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures |
8,555 | 8,771 | 17,850 | 19,270 | ||||||||||||
Wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA |
75,997 | 78,423 | 147,947 | 198,292 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from consolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(3,844 | ) | (4,783 | ) | (8,520 | ) | (12,019 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
25,332 | 26,814 | 49,380 | 53,937 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(13,804 | ) | (14,461 | ) | (27,019 | ) | (29,570 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures to AMB |
(4,711 | ) | (3,988 | ) | (9,330 | ) | (7,251 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
15,444 | 11,786 | 29,897 | 23,921 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
13, 340 | 10, 449 | 26, 241 | 20, 113 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 107,754 | $ | 104,240 | $ | 208,596 | $ | 247,423 | ||||||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated
co-investment ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB
believes that AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful
supplemental measures, which enable both management and investors to assess
the operations, earnings and growth of AMB in light of AMBs ownership
interest in its joint ventures and to compare the applicable measure to that
of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of
the applicable measure to that of other companies that do not consolidate any
of their joint ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not intended to
reflect actual liability should there be a default under loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of AMBs share of
measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they
may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet
information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate information about
financial position. However, AMB considers balance sheet information reported
on an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash, AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and
other assets, AMBs share of deferred rents receivable and deferred financing
costs (net), and AMBs share of accounts payable and other liabilities) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs
operating performance. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and
managed and AMBs share of. AMB believes that AMBs share of balance sheet
items on an owned and managed basis helps management and investors make a
comprehensive assessment of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a
better understanding of AMBs operating activities. While such information is
helpful to the investor, it does not provide balance sheet information as
defined by GAAP and is not a true alternative to such GAAP measurements.
Further, AMBs computation of its share of balance sheet items on an owned and
managed basis may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as
they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 22 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion
of the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMB believes
that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables
both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its
leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies that do not
consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total debt is not intended to
reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of such
loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a
reconciliation of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the
following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs share of
total assets is the pro rata portion of total gross book value of assets based
on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and
unconsolidated joint ventures holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the
following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs
definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition of
market equity is the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock
and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share
of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per
the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then
the first positive rent value is used. Leases denominated in foreign currencies
are translated using the currency exchange rate at period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it
wholly owns or manages through its consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment
ventures or for clients of AMB Capital Partners. Assets under management is
calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or clients share of
the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs share of total market
capitalization.
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the
total rentable square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by
total rentable square feet. Space is considered leased when the tenant has
either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate
investments plus subsequently incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each
real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles. AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because cash basis NOI
reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding the
effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash
basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI
should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it
does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or
trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact
results from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that
of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies
for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the quarter ended June 30,
2010, refer to the SS NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMBs
share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the quarter ended June
30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| June 30, 2010 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 103,299 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(4,518 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI from continuing operations |
(23,999 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
74,782 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
10,929 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
29,179 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
(220 | ) | ||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 114,670 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors,
managed by AMB from which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party
acquisitions, portfolio and asset management distributions or fees, as well
as incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture operating results.
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage(1) | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
34 | % | $ | 68,494 | $ | (18,562 | ) | $ | 4,292 | $ | 4,292 | $ | 47,267 | $ | 25,199 | |||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
35 | % | 20,548 | (3,905 | ) | 245 | 245 | 15,648 | 5,807 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 24,765 | (5,556 | ) | 4,063 | 4,063 | 19,004 | 10,728 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 6,540 | (650 | ) | (5,094 | ) (1) | (5,094 | ) (1) | 5,759 | (2,059 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | 8 | (185 | ) | (291 | ) | (255 | ) | (177 | ) | (162 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 10,770 | (3,637 | ) | (971 | ) | (971 | ) | 6,816 | 2,451 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 12,701 | (3,238 | ) | 2,492 | 2,495 | 9,347 | 5,733 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 3,944 | (974 | ) | 590 | 590 | 2,904 | 1,694 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes $3.8 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial
measures represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure
based on AMBs co-investment venture partners percentage of equity interest
in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted
for in the applicable financial measure.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the
co-investment venture partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the
pro-rata portion of the co-investment venture partners share of carrying
value less the co-investment venture partners share of debt.
Completion is generally defined as properties that have reached Stabilization
or properties that have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up
development, redevelopments,
land sales and value-added conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price
less closing costs, minus estimated total investment, before the impact of
cumulative real estate impairment losses, and any deferred rents, taxes or
third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions, divided by the
estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate
impairment losses.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 23 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business. Estimated FFO, as adjusted, by Business
is FFO, as adjusted generated by AMBs Real Estate Operations, Development and
Private Capital business. Estimated Development and Private Capital FFO, as
adjusted, was determined by reducing Development Profits, net of taxes, and
Private Capital revenues by their respective estimated share of general and
administrative expenses, also defined as overhead. Developments and Private
Capitals estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses was
based on their respective percentage of actual direct general and
administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate Operations FFO, as
adjusted represents total AMB FFO, as adjusted, less estimated FFO, as
adjusted, attributable to Development and Private Capital. Management believes
estimated FFO, as adjusted, by business line is a useful supplemental measure
of its operating performance because it helps the investing public compare the
operating performance of AMBs respective businesses to other companies
comparable businesses. Further, AMB s computation of FFO, as adjusted, by
business line may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate
investment trusts as they may use different methodologies in computing such
measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which
could be acquired through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment
venture partners plus AMBs funding obligations and estimated debt
capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total
estimated cost of development,
expansion, including initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground
leases, buildings, and associated carry costs. Estimated total investments are
based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar
investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period
end.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual
cash NOI following occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total
investment. Yields exclude value added conversion projects and are calculated
on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA
divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint
venture partners share of interest expense and amortization of finance costs
and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued operations, plus AMBs
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized
interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses
fixed charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge
coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits fixed income
investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding
debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to its
preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be
comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,626 | $ | 27,772 | $ | 65,239 | $ | 60,571 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(3,344 | ) | (3,033 | ) | (6,516 | ) | (6,207 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
3 | 145 | | 518 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
| (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
7,911 | 12,276 | 15,652 | 25,491 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
| 1,432 | | 2,864 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | 7,904 | 7,904 | ||||||||||||
Less: Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
(12,162 | ) | (14,089 | ) | (25,348 | ) | (27,855 | ) | ||||||||
Wholly-owned fixed charge |
28,986 | 28,454 | 56,931 | 63,282 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from consolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to consolidated joint ventures |
12,162 | 14,089 | 25,348 | 27,855 | ||||||||||||
Fixed charge attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(6,548 | ) | (7,953 | ) | (13,640 | ) | (15,790 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive fixed charge from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of capitalized interest from unconsolidated joint ventures |
328 | 162 | 593 | 400 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
13,340 | 10,449 | 26,241 | 20,113 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 48,268 | $ | 45,201 | $ | 95,473 | $ | 95,860 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) and Funds From
Operations Per Share and Unit, as adjusted (FFOPS, as adjusted) (together
with FFO, as adjusted and FFOPS, as adjusted, the FFO Measures, as
adjusted). AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most
appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, as
adjusted (or FFO, as adjusted) and FFO, as adjusted, per share and unit (or
FFOPS, as adjusted) to be useful supplemental measures of its operating
performance. AMB defines FFOPS, as adjusted, as FFO, as adjusted, per fully
diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and operating partnership
units. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net income (or loss) available to
common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or
losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real
estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata share of
FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. This
calculation also includes adjustments for items as described below.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including
those from value-added conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as
a component of FFO, as adjusted. AMB believes gains from development should be
included in FFO, as adjusted, to more completely reflect the performance of
one of our lines of business. AMB believes that value-added conversion
dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in
FFO, as adjusted, consistent with the real estate investment trust industrys
long standing practice to include gains on the sale of land in funds from
operations. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO, as adjusted, or FFOPS, as
adjusted, may not be consistent with the views of others in the real estate
investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the
NAREIT definition, and may not be comparable to funds from operations or funds
from operations per share and unit reported by other real estate investment
trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does.
In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets
that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly
formed venture. Some of the properties held for contribution may, under
certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this
circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO, as
adjusted, gains or losses related to the contribution of previously
depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a change, if
instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB
believes such calculation of FFO, as adjusted, will better reflect the value
created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains
or losses from the contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in
FFO, as adjusted.
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, to exclude impairment and
restructuring charges, debt extinguishment losses and the Series D preferred
unit redemption discount. The impairment charges were principally a result of
increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market
conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected
costs associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure.
Debt extinguishment losses generally included the costs of repurchasing debt
securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior unsecured debt to
manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing environment,
resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. The Series D preferred unit
redemption discount reflects the gain associated with the discount to
liquidation preference in the Series D preferred unit redemption price less
costs incurred as a result of the redemption. Although difficult to predict,
these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets.
While not infrequent or unusual in nature, these items result from market
fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of
operations. The economics underlying these items reflect market and financing
conditions in the short-term but can obscure AMBs performance and the value
of AMBs long-term investment decisions and strategies. Management believes
FFO, as adjusted, is significant and useful to both it and its investors. FFO,
as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the value and strength of AMBs
business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of
the current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting
from AMBs management of its financing profile in response to the tightening
of the capital markets. However, in addition to the limitations of FFO
Measures, as adjusted, generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not
present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition and operating
performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of funds
from operations and should not be used as an alternative to net income or cash
as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental
measures of its operating performance because historical cost accounting for
real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the
value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected
through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate
values have historically risen or fallen with market and
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 24 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
other conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered
presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use
historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, are supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate
investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization,
among other items, from net income available to common stockholders, as
defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, combined with the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been
beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real estate
investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of
operating results among such companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, to be useful measures for reviewing comparative
operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses
related to sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and
real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, can
help the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys
real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While funds
from operations and funds from operations per share are relevant and widely
used measures of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, the
FFO Measures, as adjusted, do not represent cash flow from operations or net
income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives
to those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. The
FFO Measures, as adjusted, also do not consider the costs associated with
capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor are the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, necessarily indicative of cash available to fund AMBs
future cash requirements. Management compensates for the limitations of the
FFO Measures, as adjusted, by providing investors with financial statements
prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the
FFO Measures, as adjusted, and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP
measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted for a
reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted, from net income available to common
stockholders.
The following table reconciles projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs
share of development gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted) from projected net
income available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2010:
| 2010 | ||||||||
| Low | High | |||||||
Projected net income available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.29 | 1.29 | ||||||
AMBs share of depreciation on development profits recognized to date |
(0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of gains on dispositions of operating properties recognized to date |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) |
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.26 | ||||
Restructuring charges |
0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of
development gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted)(1)
|
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.26 | ||||
Amounts are
expressed per share, except FFO, as adjusted, and Core FFO, as
adjusted, which are expressed per
share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic
environment, management believes Projected Core FFO, as adjusted is the more appropriate and useful measure to
reflect its assessment of AMBs projected operating performance.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues
(excluding straight-line rents and amortization of lease in tangibles ,
reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination fees) for properties in the
pool at period end.
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair
value being lower than carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by
AMBs share of interest expense which consists of consolidated interest
expense less joint venture partners share of interest expense, including
amortization, from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs share of
interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest
coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant
and useful to investors because it permits investors
to measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding
debt. AMBs computation of interest coverage may not be comparable to interest
coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,626 | $ | 27,772 | $ | 65,239 | $ | 60,571 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
3 | 145 | | 518 | ||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(6,142 | ) | (7,109 | ) | (12,918 | ) | (14,237 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated co-investment ventures |
13,340 | 10,449 | 26,241 | 20,113 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 39,827 | $ | 31,257 | $ | 78,562 | $ | 66,965 | ||||||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures,
with real estate developers, other real estate operators, or institutional
investors where AMB may or may not: have control, act as the manager and/or
developer, earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn incentive
distributions or promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide
development, leasing, property management and/or accounting services for which
it may receive market compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures
represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on
AMBs joint venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the applicable
financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs
common stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing
price per share of its common stock at period end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of
its operating performance because it enables both management and investors to
analyze the fair value of its business. An assessment of the fair value of a
business involves estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various
methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its business
that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV
but has not presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on
assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for
discussion of NOI and a reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable
square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable
square feet at period end. Space is considered leased when the tenant has
either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10%
ownership interest, is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to
hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash
flow information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow
information. However, AMB considers cash flow information reported on an owned
and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, gross lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs
share of net lease termination fees, tenant improvements, lease commissions and
other lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment partners share of
capital expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs
operating performance and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions
of owned and managed, AMBs share of and Co-investment venture partners
share of. AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow information helps
management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of
AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs
operating performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash
flow information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow
information as defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed supplemental cash
flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies,
as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 25 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting date.
Pre-stabilized development represents assets which have reached Completion but
have not yet reached Stabilization.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant
capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing
basis) to bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization
(generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building
improvements and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues.
Recurring capital expenditures do not include estimated acquisition capital
expenditures which were taken into consideration when underwriting the
purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to
operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference,
weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month of a term
commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the former tenants term.
If free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a
point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover
rent and premium rent charges. If either the previous or current lease terms
are under 12 months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the
lease is first generation or there is no prior lease for comparison, then it
is excluded from this calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI) and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property
operating expenses. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and
administrative expenses, restructuring charges, real estate impairment losses,
development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or contribution of real
estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a
useful supplemental measure calculated to help investors understand AMBs
operating performance, excluding the effects of gains (losses), costs and
expenses which are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is widely
used by the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps
investors compare AMBs operating performance with that of other companies.
Real estate impairment losses have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB
does not consider its impairment losses to be a property operating expense.
AMB believes that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common
methodology used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses
relate to the changing values of AMBs assets but do not reflect the current
operating performance of the assets with respect to their revenues or
expenses. AMBs real estate impairment losses are non-cash charges which
represent the write down in the value of assets when estimated fair value over
the holding period is lower than current carrying value. The impairment
charges were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization
rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted
underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment charges are not
related to the current performance of AMBs real estate operations and should
be excluded from its calculation of NOI.
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating
performance for properties that are considered part of the same store pool.
AMB defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on a same store basis excluding straight
line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See definition of same
store pool. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because it reflects the operating performance of the real
estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a
better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year
comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors compare the
operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to other companies.
While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of
real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations
or net income as defined by GAAP and
should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating
our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general
and administrative expenses, interest expenses, real estate impairment
losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that
could materially impact our results from operations. Further, AMBs
computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from
net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (dollars
in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 9,313 | $ | 29,034 | $ | 8,693 | $ | (94,322 | ) | |||||||
Private capital income |
(6,845 | ) | (7,795 | ) | (14,290 | ) | (19,490 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
48,278 | 38,523 | 96,667 | 80,427 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | | 175,887 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
30,246 | 25,963 | 62,511 | 57,538 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
872 | 3,824 | 3,845 | 3,824 | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
26,094 | 20,824 | 50,931 | 26,778 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(4,659 | ) | (12,549 | ) | (4,904 | ) | (31,418 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
103,299 | 97,824 | 203,453 | 199,224 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(17,894 | ) | (9,562 | ) | (33,440 | ) | (20,293 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments(1)
|
(2,698 | ) | 77 | (5,219 | ) | (350 | ) | |||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 82,707 | $ | 88,339 | $ | 164,794 | $ | 178,581 | ||||||||
Less lease termination fees |
$ | (596 | ) | $ | (478 | ) | $ | (1,233 | ) | $ | (1,261 | ) | ||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI, excluding lease termination fees |
$ | 82,111 | $ | 87,861 | $ | 163,561 | $ | 177,320 | ||||||||
| (1) Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. | ||
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior
year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both
the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development
properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store
pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2008.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements,
lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second
generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred prior
to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second
generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage
vacant at acquisition.
Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% occupied.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI or NOI, as applicable,
stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%) divided by total acquisition
cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the initial purchase price,
the effects of marking assumed debt to market, buyers due diligence, lease
intangible adjustments, estimated acquisition capital expenditures, and
leasing costs necessary to achieve stabilization. AMB defines cash NOI as NOI
excluding straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing
tenants divided by the square footage of all expiring and rented leases during
the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or
buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square
footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt
plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless
otherwise noted).
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 26 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Value-added acquistions represent unstabilized properties which AMB acquires
as a part of managements current belief that the discount in pricing
attributed to the operating challenges of the property could provide greater
returns, once stabilized, than the returns of stabilized properties, which
are not value added acquisitions. Value added acquisitions generally have one
or more of the following characteristics: (i) existing vacancy, typically in
excess of 20%, (ii) short-term lease rollover, typically during the first two
years of ownership, or (iii) significant capital improvement requirements,
typically in excess of 20% of the purchase price. AMB excludes value added
acquisitions from its owned and managed and consolidated operating statistics
prior to stabilization (generally 90% leased) in order to provide investors with data which it feels
better reflects the performance of its core portfolio.
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial
properties to a higher and better use, including office, residential, retail,
research & development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the
property for conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities
as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of
the value-added conversion project is generally based on the underlying land
value based on its ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is
ascribed to the industrial building(s).
Wholly-owned fixed charge coverage is defined as wholly-owned adjusted EBITDA
divided by wholly-owned fixed charges. AMB believes that wholly-owned fixed
charge coverage is useful to certain investors whose focus is to understand
AMBs ability to cover those fixed charges which arise only from obligations
which are solely AMBs with adjusted EBITDA which is solely attributed to 100% owned
assets and activities plus cash distributions from joint ventures. See Fixed Charge Coverage.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 27 |
|
Contacts |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam |
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger |
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier |
President, Europe and Asia; President, Private Capital | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly |
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward |
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
||||||||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 28 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in
connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to factors
regarding recovery of our operating performance, long term prospects
for AMB and industrial real estate, our buying advantage and investment opportunities available to us (including distressed
or strategic transactions), utilization of low yielding assets and acquiring assets in excess of
cost of capital, our investments in co-investment funds to be FFO, as adjusted, accretive and to
enhance NAV, recovery in fundamentals including rental rates, occupancy, real estate values, and
investor/customer interest, FFO, as adjusted, generated by increased occupancy, rental rate
recovery, lease up of the development portfolio, monetization of land bank and development
capability, and the formation of new ventures, utilization of development capacity to recover G&A,
our ability to outperform national occupancy rates, implementation of leasing strategies, the
consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our opportunities and plans (including
those regarding our global positioning and future capital deployment), estimated financial and
performance results, our projected funds from operations, future assets under management, same
store and/or cash net operating income, occupancy and other financial and operational guidance, our
future performance compared to peers and other market indices, rent growth, industrial and other
market, GDP and trade growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities, on-tarmac
opportunities, hiring, performance and retention of key personnel, leveraging of relationships,
continuation and effectiveness of strategic drivers, information regarding our development,
value-added conversion, redevelopment and value-added acquisition projects (including
stabilization or completion dates, square feet at stabilization or completion, sale or contribution
dates, yields from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and total investment
amounts, scope, location and timing of development starts and other projects, margins, projected
gains and returns, sustainability, profitability, demand for projects, targeted value-added
conversion and acquisition projects, intent of property use, redevelopment and conversion
timelines, entitlement and repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions,
strength of lender and customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of
investments and market entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates,
acquisition capital and volume, scope and build out and monetization potential of land inventory,
co-investment venture and other estimated investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures,
performance, revenues and returns on investment, target leverage, timing and amounts of incentive, asset management, acquisition and other private capital distributions and fees,
private capital demand, launching of additional joint ventures, termination of funds, planned gross
capitalization, future balance sheet capacity to cover capital requirements, our plans and ability
to retire, refinance and issue secured and unsecured debt and maintain fixed charge coverage at
certain levels, ability to exercise or maintain credit extensions, our position to maintain a solid
financial position, maintain leverage targets and address debt maturities and interest rate
changes, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Because these forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, there are
important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, forecasting, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements should not
be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate
indicators of whether, or the time at which, such performance or results will be achieved. There is
no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements will occur or
be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods
that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only
as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to
update or supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the
forward-looking statements: changes in general economic conditions in California, the U.S. or
globally (including financial market fluctuations), global trade or in the real estate sector
(including risks relating to decreasing real estate valuations and impairment charges); risks
associated with using debt to fund the companys business activities, including refinancing and
interest rate risks (including inflation risks); the companys failure to obtain, renew, or extend
necessary financing or access the debt or equity markets; the companys failure to maintain its
current credit agency ratings or comply with its debt covenants; risks related to the companys
obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment venture and other debt; risks
associated with equity and debt securities financings and issuances (including the risk of
dilution); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers or renewal at lower than expected rent
or failure to lease at all or on expected terms; difficulties in identifying properties, portfolios
of properties, or interests in real-estate related entities or platforms to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and the failure of acquisitions to perform as the
company expects; unknown
liabilities acquired in connection with the acquired properties, portfolios of properties, or
interests in real-estate related entities; the companys failure to successfully integrate acquired
properties and operations; risks and uncertainties affecting property development, redevelopment
and value-added conversion (including construction delays, cost overruns, the companys inability
to obtain necessary permits and financing, the companys inability to lease properties at all or at
favorable rents and terms, and public opposition to these activities); the companys failure to set
up additional funds, attract additional investment in existing funds or to contribute properties to
its co-investment ventures due to such factors as its inability to acquire, develop, or lease
properties that meet the investment criteria of such ventures, or the co-investment ventures
inability to access debt and equity capital to pay for property contributions or their allocation
of available capital to cover other capital requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the
disposition of properties to third parties and the companys ability to effect such transactions on
advantageous terms and to timely reinvest proceeds from any such dispositions; risks of doing
business internationally and global expansion, including unfamiliarity with the new markets and
currency and hedging risks; risks of changing personnel and roles; risks related to suspending,
reducing or changing the companys dividends; losses in excess of the companys insurance coverage;
changes in local, state and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including changes in real
estate, tax and zoning laws; increases in real property tax rates; risks associated with the
companys tax structuring; increases in interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected
capital expenditures; environmental uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; and our
failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust. Our success also
depends upon economic trends generally, various market conditions and fluctuations and those other
risk factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our most recent annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.