U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): April 21, 2010
AMB PROPERTY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
001-13545
|
|
94-3281941 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation)
|
|
(Commission file number)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification
number) |
Pier 1, Bay 1, San Francisco, California 94111
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
415-394-9000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
n/a
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION.
On April 21, 2010, we issued a press release entitled AMB Property Corporation Announces
First Quarter 2010 Results, which sets forth disclosure regarding our results of operation for the
first quarter 2010. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1. This section
and the attached exhibit are provided under Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and are furnished to, but not
filed with, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 8.01 OTHER EVENTS.
On April 21, 2010, we reported results for the first quarter 2010. Funds from operations,
as adjusted, per fully diluted share and unit was $0.31 for the first quarter of 2010, as compared
to $0.77 for the same quarter in 2009. The year-over-year change was primarily due to higher
development gains in 2009 relative to 2010.
Net income available to common stockholders per fully diluted share for the first quarter of 2010
was a loss of $0.03, as compared to a loss of $1.24 for the same quarter in 2009, principally due
to non-cash impairment charges incurred in first quarter 2009.
Owned and Managed Portfolio Operating Results
Our operating results were in line with expectations for the first quarter of 2010. Our operating
portfolio was 90.5 percent occupied at March 31, 2010, with an average occupancy rate of 90.3
percent for the quarter. Cash-basis same store net operating income, without the effect of lease
termination fees, decreased 5.1 percent in the first quarter 2010 compared with the same period in
2009, driven primarily by lower average same store occupancies. For the trailing four quarters
ended March 31, 2010, average rents on renewals and rollovers in our operating portfolio decreased
9.1 percent.
Leasing Activity
During the quarter, we commenced leases totaling approximately 8.4 million square feet (784,000
square meters) in our global operating portfolio and leased approximately 1.2 million square feet
(107,000 square meters) in our global development portfolio.
Investment Activity
As previously announced, our two open-end funds received investments during the first quarter
comprising:
|
|
|
$150 million investment by us, consisting of
$100 million in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund (formerly AMB Alliance
Fund III) and $50 million in AMB Europe Fund I; and |
|
|
|
|
$50 million in new third-party equity in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. |
Additionally, AMB U.S. Logistics Fund cleared its redemption queue in the first quarter.
Subsequent to quarter end, new investments into AMB U.S. Logistics Fund totaled an additional $79
million, consisting of $50 million from us and $29 million from new and existing third-party equity
investors.
During the quarter, AMB U.S. Logistics Fund acquired two assets for a total investment of
approximately $45.6 million. We also acquired our first land parcel in Brazil through our joint
venture with Cyrela Commercial Properties (CCP). The 58 acres acquired are in Sao Paulo and have an
estimated build-out potential of 1.2 million square feet (108,000 square meters).
During the quarter, we completed dispositions of development assets totaling $22.9 million,
including approximately $12.5 million related to an installment sale completed in the first quarter
of 2010, at a stabilized cap rate of 8.2 percent. Development
gains recognized in FFO, as adjusted, for the quarter were $3.3 million with a margin of 13.6 percent.
Financing Activities
Our liquidity at March 31, 2010 was $1.2 billion, consisting of more than $900 million of
availability on our lines of credit and approximately $250 million of cash, cash equivalents and
restricted cash.
Subsequent to quarter end, we completed the issuance and sale of approximately 18.2
million shares of our common stock in a public offering at a price of $27.50 per share, generating
approximately $479 million in net proceeds. We intend to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, which may include equity investments in co-investment funds, acquisitions of properties, portfolios of properties or interests in property-owning or real estate-related entities; development, redevelopment or value-added
conversion activities; the repayment of indebtedness (which may include intercompany indebtedness); the redemption or other repurchase of
outstanding securities; loans to affiliated entities; capital expenditures and increasing our working capital. Pending such uses, we used
the net proceeds to reduce borrowings under our unsecured credit facilities and invested in short-term securities.
SUPPLEMENTAL EARNINGS MEASURES
Included in the footnotes to our attached financial statements is a discussion of why management
believes FFO, as adjusted, and FFOPS, as adjusted (or the FFO
Measures, as adjusted), are useful supplemental measures of operating performance, ways in which investors might use the FFO Measures,
as adjusted, when assessing our financial performance and the limitations of the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, as a measurement tool. Reconciliation from net income available to common stockholders to
the FFO Measures, as adjusted, is provided in the attached tables.
We define net operating income, or NOI, as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less
property operating expenses. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative
expenses, restructuring charges, real estate impairment losses, development profits (losses), gains
(losses) from sale or contribution of real estate interests, and interest expense. We believe that
net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a useful
supplemental measure
calculated to help investors understand our operating performance, excluding
the effects of costs and expenses which are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is
widely used by the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors
compare our operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment losses have
been excluded in deriving NOI because we do not consider our
impairment losses to be a property operating expense. We believe that the exclusion of impairment
losses from NOI is a common methodology used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment
losses relate to the changing values of our assets but do not reflect the current operating
performance of the assets with respect to their revenues or expenses. Our real estate impairment
losses are non-cash charges which represent the write down in the value of assets when estimated
fair value over the holding period is lower than current carrying value. The impairment charges
were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment
charges are not related to the current performance of our real estate operations and should be
excluded from our calculation of NOI.
We
consider cash-basis same store net operating income, or SS NOI to be a useful supplemental
measure of our operating performance for properties that are considered part of the same store
pool. We define SS NOI as NOI on a same store basis excluding straight line rents and amortization
of lease intangibles. Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both
the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the
current and prior reporting periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties
purchased and developments stabilized after December 31, 2008. We consider SS NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because it reflects the operating
performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of the aforementioned adjustments and
provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. In
addition, we believe that SS NOI helps investors compare the operating performance of our real
estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of
operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from
operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to those
measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general
and administrative expenses, interest expenses, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and
amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and
construction activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Further, our
computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating SS NOI. A reconciliation from net income to SS NOI is
provided below (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
(123,024 |
) |
Private capital income |
|
|
(7,445 |
) |
|
|
(11,695 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
48,634 |
|
|
|
42,125 |
|
Real estate impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,887 |
|
General and administrative and fund costs |
|
|
32,265 |
|
|
|
31,574 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses |
|
|
24,837 |
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(18,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI |
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
|
102,336 |
|
Less non same-store NOI |
|
|
(16,122 |
) |
|
|
(11,468 |
) |
Less non cash adjustments(1) |
|
|
(2,520 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
|
$ |
82,156 |
|
|
$ |
90,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less lease termination fees |
|
$ |
(638 |
) |
|
$ |
(783 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-basis same-store NOI, excluding lease termination fees |
|
$ |
81,518 |
|
|
$ |
89,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Owned and managed is defined by us as assets in which we have at least a
10 percent ownership interest, are the property or asset manager, and which we currently intend to
hold for the long-term.
We are an owner, operator and developer of global industrial real estate, focused on major hub and
gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As of March 31, 2010, we owned, or
had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through unconsolidated joint ventures, properties
and development projects expected to total approximately 155.7 million square feet (14.5 million
square meters) in 48 markets within 15 countries. We invest in properties located predominantly in
the infill submarkets of our targeted markets. Our portfolio comprises High Throughput
Distribution® facilitiesindustrial properties built for speed and located near
airports, seaports and ground transportation systems.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the information included in this report contains forward-looking statements, such as
those related to the use of proceeds of our equity offering, our ability to take advantage of
opportunities and preserve financial strength and information regarding our development projects
(including estimated build-out potential), which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-
looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking
statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use
of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks,
approximately, intends, plans, forecasting, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or
the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking
statements should not be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not
necessarily be accurate indicators of whether, or the time at which, such performance or results
will be achieved. There is no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in
forward-looking statements will occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily
dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able
to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which
reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in
the statements. All of our forward-looking statements are qualified
in their entirety by this statement. We assume no obligation to update or supplement forward-looking statements. The
following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially
from those set forth or contemplated
in the forward-looking statements: changes in general economic conditions in California, the U.S.
or globally (including financial market fluctuations), global trade or in the real estate sector
(including risks relating to decreasing real estate valuations and impairment charges); risks
associated with using debt to fund our business activities, including refinancing and
interest rate risks (including inflation risks); our failure to obtain, renew, or extend
necessary financing or access the debt or equity markets; our failure
to maintain our
current credit agency ratings or comply with our debt covenants; risks related to our
obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment venture and other debt; risks
associated with equity and debt securities financings and issuances (including the risk of
dilution); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers or renewal at lower than expected rent
or failure to lease at all or on expected terms; difficulties in identifying properties, portfolios
of properties, or interests in real-estate related entities or platforms to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and the failure of
acquisitions to perform as we expect; unknown liabilities acquired in connection with the acquired properties,
portfolios of properties, or inte
rests in real-estate related entities; our failure to
successfully integrate acquired properties and operations; risks and uncertainties affecting
property development, redevelopment and value-added conversion (including construction delays, cost
overruns, our inability to obtain necessary permits and financing, our
inability to lease properties at all or at favorable rents and terms, and public opposition to
these activities); our failure to set up additional funds, attract additional investment
in existing funds or to contribute properties to our co-investment ventures due to such factors as
our inability to acquire, develop, or lease properties that meet the investment criteria of such
ventures, or the co-investment ventures inability to access debt and equity capital to pay for
property contributions or their allocation of available capital to cover other capital
requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the disposition of properties to third parties
and our ability to effect such transactions on advantageous terms and to timely reinvest
proceeds
from any such dispositions; risks of doing business internationally and global expansion,
including unfamiliarity with the new markets and currency and hedging risks; risks of changing
personnel and roles; risks related to suspending, reducing or changing the companys dividends;
losses in excess of the companys insurance coverage; changes in local, state and federal laws and
regulatory requirements, including changes in real estate, tax and zoning laws; increases in real
property tax rates; risks associated with the companys tax structuring; increases in interest
rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures; environmental
uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; and our failure to qualify and maintain our
status as a real estate investment trust. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally,
various market conditions and fluctuations and those other risk factors discussed under the heading
Risk Factors and elsewhere in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
150,507 |
|
|
$ |
151,724 |
|
Private capital revenues |
|
|
7,445 |
|
|
|
11,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
157,952 |
|
|
|
163,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property operating costs |
|
|
(49,709 |
) |
|
|
(49,388 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(48,634 |
) |
|
|
(42,125 |
) |
General and administrative |
|
|
(31,951 |
) |
|
|
(31,313 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
(2,973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fund costs |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
Real estate impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175,887 |
) |
Other (expenses) income(1) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
(134,772 |
) |
|
|
(298,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development profits, net of taxes |
|
|
4,803 |
|
|
|
33,286 |
|
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
|
|
3,875 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Other income (expenses)(1) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(7,069 |
) |
Interest expense, including amortization |
|
|
(32,613 |
) |
|
|
(32,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income and expenses, net |
|
|
(23,646 |
) |
|
|
(6,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
|
(141,509 |
) |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to discontinued operations |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total discontinued operations |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
18,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(123,024 |
) |
Noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners share of net loss |
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
Preferred unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,432 |
) |
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
5,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
4,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to AMB Property Corporation |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(118,398 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
|
|
(3,952 |
) |
Allocation to participating securities(2) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(4,447 |
) |
|
$ |
(122,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share (diluted) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
|
|
148,666 |
|
|
|
98,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred
compensation plan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $919. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred
stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three months ended
March 31, 2010, there were 1,228 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, there were 895 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS, AS ADJUSTED(1)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarters Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(4,447 |
) |
|
$ |
(122,608 |
) |
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,946 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
48,634 |
|
|
|
42,125 |
|
Discontinued operations depreciation |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
Non-real estate depreciation |
|
|
(2,545 |
) |
|
|
(2,137 |
) |
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted, from consolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net loss) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(1,846 |
) |
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net loss) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(5,320 |
) |
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
FFO, as adjusted, attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(5,380 |
) |
|
|
(8,588 |
) |
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted, from unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMBs share of net (income) loss |
|
|
(3,875 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
|
|
14,453 |
|
|
|
12,135 |
|
Adjustments for impairment charges and restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,887 |
|
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation to participating securities(2) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds from operations, as adjusted(1) |
|
$ |
47,782 |
|
|
$ |
78,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
|
|
152,770 |
|
|
|
102,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) and Funds from
Operations per Share and Unit, as adjusted (FFOPS, as adjusted) (together with FFO, as adjusted,
and FFOPS, as adjusted, the FFO Measures, as adjusted). AMB believes that net income, as defined
by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from
operations, as adjusted (or FFO, as adjusted) and FFO, as adjusted, per share and unit (or FFOPS,
as adjusted) to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS, as
adjusted, as FFO, as adjusted, per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and
operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net income or loss available to
common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related
depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata share of FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated
and unconsolidated joint ventures. This calculation also includes adjustments for items as
described below. |
|
|
|
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of |
|
|
|
|
|
FFO, as adjusted. AMB believes gains from development should be included in FFO, as adjusted, to
more completely reflect the performance of one of our lines of business. AMB believes that
value-added conversion dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in
FFO, as adjusted, consistent with the real estate investment trust industrys long standing
practice to include gains on the sale of land in funds from operations. However, AMBs
interpretation of FFO, as adjusted, or FFOPS, as adjusted, may not be consistent with the views of
others in the real estate investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from
the NAREIT definition, and may not be comparable to funds from operations or funds from operations
per share and unit reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret the current
NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture,
AMB may warehouse assets that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly
formed venture. Some of the properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be
required to be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in
its calculation of FFO, as adjusted, gains or losses related to the contribution of previously
depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a
departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO, as adjusted,
will better reflect the value created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not
included gains or losses from the contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO,
as adjusted. |
|
|
|
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, to exclude impairment and restructuring charges, debt
extinguishment losses and the Series D preferred unit redemption discount. The impairment charges
were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs
associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses
generally included the costs of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of
senior unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing
environment, resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. The Series D preferred unit redemption
discount reflects the gain associated with the discount to liquidation preference in the Series D
preferred unit redemption price less costs incurred as a result of the redemption. Although
difficult to predict, these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or
unusual in nature, these items result from market fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects
on AMBs results of operations. The economics underlying these items reflect market and financing
conditions in the short-term but can obscure AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term
investment decisions and strategies. Management believes FFO, as adjusted, is significant and
useful to both it and its investors. FFO, as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the value and
strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the
current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of
its financing profile in response to the tightening of the capital markets. However, in addition to
the limitations of FFO Measures, as adjusted, generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not
present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial |
|
|
|
|
|
condition and operating performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of
funds from operations and should not be used as an alternative to net income or cash as defined by
U.S. GAAP. |
|
|
|
AMB believes that the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with
U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time,
as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are supplemental measures
of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders,
as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, combined with
the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of
operating results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making
comparisons of operating results among such companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, to be useful measures for reviewing comparative operating and financial
performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated
operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys real
estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While funds from operations and funds
from operations per share and unit are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance
of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, do not represent cash flow from
operations or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to
those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. The FFO Measures, as
adjusted, also do not consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to AMBs real
estate assets nor are the FFO Measures, as adjusted, necessarily indicative of cash available to
fund AMBs future cash requirements. Management compensates for the limitations of the FFO
Measures, as adjusted, by providing investors with financial statements prepared according to U.S.
GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, and a reconciliation of
the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP
measurement. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For
the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were 1,228 unvested restricted shares. For the three
months ended March 31, 2009, there were 895 unvested restricted shares. |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments in properties |
|
$ |
6,780,943 |
|
|
$ |
6,708,660 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,156,998 |
) |
|
|
(1,113,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in properties |
|
|
5,623,945 |
|
|
|
5,594,852 |
|
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
|
|
606,838 |
|
|
|
462,130 |
|
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
|
|
147,838 |
|
|
|
214,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments in real estate |
|
|
6,378,621 |
|
|
|
6,271,408 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
175,338 |
|
|
|
206,077 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
142,393 |
|
|
|
155,958 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
213,119 |
|
|
|
208,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,909,471 |
|
|
$ |
6,841,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured debt |
|
$ |
963,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,096,554 |
|
Unsecured senior debt |
|
|
1,155,945 |
|
|
|
1,155,529 |
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
|
715,998 |
|
|
|
477,630 |
|
Other debt |
|
|
477,884 |
|
|
|
482,883 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
344,656 |
|
|
|
338,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,658,376 |
|
|
|
3,550,638 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity |
|
|
2,676,198 |
|
|
|
2,716,604 |
|
Preferred equity |
|
|
223,412 |
|
|
|
223,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,899,610 |
|
|
|
2,940,016 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture partners |
|
|
291,283 |
|
|
|
289,909 |
|
Limited partnership unitholders |
|
|
60,202 |
|
|
|
61,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncontrolling interests |
|
|
351,485 |
|
|
|
351,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,251,095 |
|
|
|
3,291,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,909,471 |
|
|
$ |
6,841,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.
(d) Exhibits:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
99.1
|
|
AMB Property Corporation Press Release dated April 21, 2010. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMB Property Corporation
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: April 21, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Tamra D. Browne
|
|
|
|
Tamra D. Browne |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Secretary |
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
99.1
|
|
AMB Property Corporation Press Release dated April 21, 2010. |