EX-99.1
Published on April 21, 2010
Exhibit 99.1
|
Company Profile |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As
of March 31, 2010, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
155.7 million square feet (14.5 million square meters) in 48 markets within 15 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. The private capital revenue consists of
asset management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
The Americas |
Europe |
Asia |
||||||||||
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
119.9 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 11.1 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 11.3 msf | |||||||
Development
Portfolio(2)(3)
|
5.6 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 2.9 msf | Development Portfolio(2)(3) | 4.9 msf | |||||||
Land Inventory(3)
|
2,182 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 221 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 141 acres | |||||||
| (1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio) and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (2) | Includes pre-stabilized development properties. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 1 |
|
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 157,952 | $ | 163,419 | (3.3 | %) | ||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
|
100,842 | 143,183 | (29.6 | %) | ||||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
(4,447 | ) | (122,608 | ) | 96.4 | % | ||||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2)
|
47,782 | 78,694 | (39.3 | %) | ||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.24 | ) | 97.6 | % | ||||
FFO, as adjusted(1)(2)
|
0.31 | 0.77 | (59.7 | %) | ||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.28 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
| Financial(3) |
$1.2 billion in liquidity
Completed $250 million of repayments, refinances and debt extensions
Subsequent to quarter end, completed
common equity offering of 18.2 million shares, generating net
proceeds of $479 million
|
|
| Operations(3) |
90.3% average occupancy; 90.5% occupancy at the end of the
first quarter
First quarter cash-basis same store
NOI(1) decrease of 5.1%
72.4% first quarter
tenant retention; 64.7% for the trailing four quarters
Commenced 8.4 msf of leases in the first quarter
|
|
| Capital Deployment(3) |
Reduced vacancy by 1.2 msf in the development portfolio; approximately 5.8 msf of vacancy remaining
to stabilize the development portfolio
Completed $22.9 million in development dispositions, with
gains recognized in FFO, as adjusted, of approximately $3.3 million(4); stabilized capitalization rate on dispositions
was 8.2%
Added two assets totaling $46 million to our AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(5) at an
8.2% stabilized cash cap rate
Entered Brazil by acquiring 58 acres with our joint venture partner,
CCP
|
|
| Private Capital |
$150 million investment by AMB consisting of $100 million in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(5)
and $50 million in AMB Europe Fund I
$50 million in new third-party equity in AMB U.S.
Logistics Fund(5)
No redemption queue in AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(5)
Subsequent to quarter end, $79 million of new equity investments into AMB U.S. Logistics
Fund(5) including $50 million by AMB and $29 million by new and existing third-party
investors
|
|
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (4) | Includes approximately $12.5 million of dispositions related to an installment sale completed in the first quarter of 2010, with a recognized gain of approximately $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2010. | |
| (5) | Effective January 1, 2010, the name of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III was changed to AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 2 |
|
Overview
of Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted(1)(2)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO, as adjusted by Business(1)(4)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Quarter Ended | |||||||||||
| 2008 | 2009 | March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.53 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.46 | 0.32 | 0.09 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO,
as adjusted |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
68.6 | % | 72.2 | % | 106.4 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
0.72 | 0.63 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.33 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.42 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
13.5 | % | 20.1 | % | (12.9 | %) | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.65 | 0.27 | 0.05 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
% of reported FFO, as adjusted |
17.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||||
Total FFO, as adjusted |
$ | 2.90 | $ | 2.09 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Development Gains(1)(3)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Private Capital Revenue
(per diluted common share and unit)
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | For a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from net income for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, please refer to AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2009. As a reconciliation of FFO, as adjusted from FFO for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 as presented in AMBs Supplemental Analyst Package for the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company has made adjusting increases of $0.3 million for loss on early extinguishment of debt in 2007 and increases of $2.9 million and $1.1 million for preferred unit redemption premiums in 2007 and 2006, respectively. | |
| (3) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
| (4) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, as adjusted. | |
| (5) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 3 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 150,507 | $ | 151,724 | ||||
Private capital revenues |
7,445 | 11,695 | ||||||
Total revenues |
157,952 | 163,419 | ||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||
Property operating costs |
(49,709 | ) | (49,388 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(48,634 | ) | (42,125 | ) | ||||
General and administrative |
(31,951 | ) | (31,313 | ) | ||||
Restructuring charges |
(2,973 | ) | | |||||
Fund costs |
(314 | ) | (261 | ) | ||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| (175,887 | ) | |||||
Other (expenses) income(1)
|
(1,191 | ) | 662 | |||||
Total costs and expenses |
(134,772 | ) | (298,312 | ) | ||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
4,803 | 33,286 | ||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
3,875 | (34 | ) | |||||
Other income (expenses)(1)
|
289 | (7,069 | ) | |||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(32,613 | ) | (32,799 | ) | ||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(23,646 | ) | (6,616 | ) | ||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(466 | ) | (141,509 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||
Loss attributable to discontinued operations |
(154 | ) | (461 | ) | ||||
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
| 18,946 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(154 | ) | 18,485 | |||||
Net loss |
(620 | ) | (123,024 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net loss |
375 | 1,846 | ||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
(106 | ) | (1,108 | ) | ||||
Preferred unitholders |
| (1,432 | ) | |||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
200 | 5,320 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
469 | 4,626 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to AMB Property Corporation |
(151 | ) | (118,398 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | ||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(344 | ) | (258 | ) | ||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (4,447 | ) | $ | (122,608 | ) | ||
Net loss per common share (diluted) |
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.24 | ) | ||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
148,666 | 98,916 | ||||||
| (1) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $919. | |
| (2) | Represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were 1,228 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, there were 895 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (4,447 | ) | $ | (122,608 | ) | ||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
| (18,946 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
48,634 | 42,125 | ||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
26 | 1,334 | ||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(2,545 | ) | (2,137 | ) | ||||
Adjustment for depreciation on development profits |
(1,546 | ) | | |||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from consolidated joint ventures |
||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net loss) |
(375 | ) | (1,846 | ) | ||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net loss) |
(200 | ) | (5,320 | ) | ||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Development profits) |
106 | 1,108 | ||||||
FFO, as adjusted attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(5,380 | ) | (8,588 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to derive FFO, as adjusted from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||
AMBs share of net (income) loss |
(3,875 | ) | 34 | |||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
14,453 | 12,135 | ||||||
Adjustments for impairment charges and restructuring charges |
||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| 175,887 | ||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| 5,966 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
2,973 | | ||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(42 | ) | (450 | ) | ||||
Funds from operations, as adjusted(1)
|
$ | 47,782 | $ | 78,694 | ||||
FFO, as adjusted per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.77 | ||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
152,770 | 102,353 | ||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were 1,228 unvested restricted shares. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, there were 895 unvested restricted shares. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| As of | ||||||||
| March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,780,943 | $ | 6,708,660 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,156,998 | ) | (1,113,808 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,623,945 | 5,594,852 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
606,838 | 462,130 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
147,838 | 214,426 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,378,621 | 6,271,408 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
175,338 | 206,077 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
142,393 | 155,958 | ||||||
Other assets |
213,119 | 208,515 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,909,471 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 963,893 | $ | 1,096,554 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
1,155,945 | 1,155,529 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
715,998 | 477,630 | ||||||
Other debt |
477,884 | 482,883 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
344,656 | 338,042 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,658,376 | 3,550,638 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,676,198 | 2,716,604 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,899,610 | 2,940,016 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
291,283 | 289,909 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
60,202 | 61,395 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
351,485 | 351,304 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,251,095 | 3,291,320 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,909,471 | $ | 6,841,958 | ||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 6 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2)
|
||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 7,785 | $ | 7,255 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,891 | $ | 3,938 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 820 | $ | 2,279 | ||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 576 | $ | 1,726 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 466 | $ | 724 | ||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 6,269 | $ | 2,229 | ||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
8,046 | 5,030 | ||||||
Building improvements |
4,391 | 4,996 | ||||||
Sub-total |
18,706 | 12,255 | ||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(5,934 | ) | (3,565 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 12,772 | $ | 8,690 | ||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 4,289 | $ | 3,392 | ||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 3,859 | $ | 3,181 | ||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 638 | $ | 869 | ||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 444 | $ | 527 | ||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 425 | $ | 475 | ||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 4,594 | $ | 1,306 | ||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
4,883 | 3,886 | ||||||
Building improvements |
3,355 | 4,077 | ||||||
Sub-total |
12,832 | 9,269 | ||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(1,793 | ) | (1,231 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 11,039 | $ | 8,038 | ||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 7 |
![]() |
Operations
Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
YTD Same Store Cash-basis NOI Growth Without Lease Termination
Fees(2)
YTD Average
Occupancy(2)
Rent Change on Renewals and Rollovers(2)(3)
Lease Expirations as % of Annualized Base Rent (ABR)(2)
Top Customers
| Square | ||||||||||||||||
| Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
3,446,106 | $ | 29,123 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||
| 2 | United States Government |
1,355,450 | $ | 20,287 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||
| 3 | Sagaw a Express |
1,057,004 | $ | 16,107 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||
| 4 | FedEx Corporation |
1,400,090 | $ | 14,713 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||
| 5 | Nippon Express |
1,029,170 | $ | 13,546 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
| 6 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
884,673 | $ | 8,959 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
| 7 | Panalpina |
1,316,351 | $ | 8,818 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
| 8 | La Poste |
903,543 | $ | 8,158 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
| 9 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
543,039 | $ | 7,772 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
| 10 | Kuehne + Nagel Inc. |
1,019,947 | $ | 7,288 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||
Subtotal |
12,955,373 | $ | 134,771 | 15.8 | % | |||||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
6,851,800 | 46,624 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
19,807,173 | $ | 181,395 | 21.2 | % | |||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 8 |
|
Operating Statistics(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
| March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
134,762,036 | 132,639,328 | 127,647,708 | 113,692,509 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
94.7 | % | 85.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2)
|
90.5 | % | 91.2 | % | 90.2 | % | 90.9 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
92.2 | % | 95.1 | % | 92.3 | % | 95.1 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2)
|
90.3 | % | 90.7 | % | 90.0 | % | 90.5 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
93.1 | % | 94.9 | % | 93.5 | % | 94.6 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Trailing four quarters statistics |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2)
|
64.7 | % | 61.2 | % | 64.4 | % | 61.1 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
(9.1 | %) | (6.9 | %) | (9.1 | %) | (7.7 | %) | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
24.1 | 21.7 | 24.1 | 20.2 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.15 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.71 | $ | 2.61 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.80 | $ | 1.73 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
29.8 | 27.0 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2)
|
70.6 | % | 70.9 | % | 71.7 | % | 71.9 | % | ||||||||
| Same Store Pool(2) | ||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||
| Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | March 31, 2010 | |||
Decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3)
|
(3.6 | %) | ||
Increase in expenses(3)
|
0.0 | % | ||
Decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(5.1 | %) | ||
Decrease in NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(5.8 | %) | ||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | For the quarter ended March 31, 2010, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (6.0)%, 0.6%, (9.1)% and (9.2)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 9 |
|
Portfolio Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| % of Total | Year-to-Date | Trailing Four | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Owned and | AMBs Share | Annualized | Same Store NOI | Quarters Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Placed in | Square Feet | Managed Square | of Square | Year-to-Date | Base Rent | Growth Without | Change on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Feet as of | Feet as of | Average | psf as of | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12/31/2009 | Square Feet | Square Feet(1) | Square Feet | 3/31/2010 | 3/31/2010 | 3/31/2010 | Occupancy | 3/31/2010 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
18,917,656 | 175,502 | | | 19,093,158 | 14.2 | % | 58.7 | % | 92.0 | % | $ | 6.47 | (3.5 | %) | (9.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,118,853 | | | | 13,118,853 | 9.7 | % | 57.2 | % | 91.6 | % | 5.04 | (6.6 | %) | (17.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
11,638,422 | | (1,333 | ) | | 11,637,089 | 8.6 | % | 53.9 | % | 85.7 | % | 7.79 | (9.6 | %) | (5.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,958,673 | | 1,371 | | 10,960,044 | 8.1 | % | 77.1 | % | 90.9 | % | 6.45 | (14.4 | %) | (5.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
7,883,158 | | | | 7,883,158 | 5.8 | % | 56.1 | % | 89.2 | % | 5.53 | (17.5 | %) | (2.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,363,198 | | | | 6,363,198 | 4.8 | % | 74.8 | % | 95.3 | % | 7.37 | 8.2 | % | (20.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,463,090 | | 4,748 | | 2,467,838 | 1.9 | % | 93.0 | % | 88.5 | % | 20.32 | (1.8 | %) | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,502,247 | 512,430 | 44,000 | (96,250 | ) | 28,962,427 | 21.5 | % | 64.8 | % | 87.7 | % | 5.50 | (8.9 | %) | (14.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
99,845,297 | 687,932 | 48,786 | (96,250 | ) | 100,485,765 | 74.6 | % | 63.4 | % | 90.0 | % | $ | 6.46 | (7.5 | %) | (10.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,059 | | | | 3,564,059 | 2.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 97.8 | % | $ | 5.62 | 58.6 | % | (4.3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
4,165,885 | | 406,542 | | 4,572,427 | 3.4 | % | 42.5 | % | 94.0 | % | 5.60 | (11.0 | %) | (15.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | | | 2,890,526 | 2.1 | % | 21.6 | % | 91.0 | % | 4.39 | (16.0 | %) | (12.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
893,500 | | | | 893,500 | 0.7 | % | 65.6 | % | 71.2 | % | 4.83 | (82.6 | %) | (8.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
7,949,911 | | 406,542 | | 8,356,453 | 6.2 | % | 37.7 | % | 90.5 | % | $ | 5.12 | (16.6 | %) | (14.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
111,359,267 | 687,932 | 455,328 | (96,250 | ) | 112,406,277 | 83.4 | % | 62.6 | % | 90.0 | % | $ | 6.34 | (7.1 | %) | (10.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
4,060,708 | | 36,670 | | 4,097,378 | 3.0 | % | 41.5 | % | 98.1 | % | $ | 8.10 | 3.5 | % | (24.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,192,628 | | 7,394 | | 3,200,022 | 2.4 | % | 37.9 | % | 95.9 | % | 8.50 | 14.2 | % | (4.8 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
3,267,362 | | (3,983 | ) | | 3,263,379 | 2.4 | % | 39.7 | % | 86.7 | % | 9.66 | (7.0 | %) | (1.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
343,077 | | 141,933 | | 485,010 | 0.4 | % | 76.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 13.02 | 7.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
10,863,775 | | 182,014 | | 11,045,789 | 8.2 | % | 41.5 | % | 94.1 | % | $ | 8.87 | 3.5 | % | (6.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
5,364,804 | | 687,415 | | 6,052,219 | 4.4 | % | 30.4 | % | 92.6 | % | $ | 14.50 | 4.1 | % | (3.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 85.2 | % | 11.91 | 0.3 | % | 6.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
7,364,841 | | 687,415 | | 8,052,256 | 5.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 90.7 | % | $ | 13.91 | 3.2 | % | (0.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
1,897,400 | | 206,269 | | 2,103,669 | 1.6 | % | 100.0 | % | 77.4 | % | $ | 4.31 | (47.3 | %) | 16.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 96.6 | % | 9.47 | (1.0 | %) | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
218,119 | | | | 218,119 | 0.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 90.2 | % | 6.10 | (44.2 | %) | (15.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
10,416,286 | | 893,684 | | 11,309,970 | 8.4 | % | 48.6 | % | 88.7 | % | $ | 11.72 | 0.0 | % | (1.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd Avg(2)
|
132,639,328 | 687,932 | 1,531,026 | (96,250 | ) | 134,762,036 | 100.0 | % | 59.7 | % | 90.3 | % | $ | 7.01 | (5.1 | %) | (9.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3)
|
7,495,959 | | | | 7,495,959 | 51.8 | % | 87.1 | % | 5.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
140,135,287 | 687,932 | 1,531,026 | (96,250 | ) | 142,257,995 | 59.3 | % | 90.1 | % | $ | 6.95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction-in-Progress |
5,260,930 | | (4) | 285 | (5) | (1,578,069 | )(6) | 3,683,146 | 86.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-Stabilized Developments(2)
|
9,667,775 | 1,578,067 | (4) | (1,477,501 | )(5) | (12,990 | )(6) | 9,755,351 | 95.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Portfolio Subtotal |
14,928,705 | 1,578,067 | (1,477,216 | ) | (1,591,059 | ) | 13,438,497 | 92.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
155,063,992 | 2,265,999 | 53,810 | (1,687,309 | ) | 155,696,492 | 62.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio as well as the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (4) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of development starts. For pre-stabilized developments, represents new projects available. | |
| (5) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects placed in operations. | |
| (6) | For construction-in-progress, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in pre-stabilized developments or disposed. For pre-stabilized developments, represents projects disposed. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 10 |
|
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio, excludes land inventory purchases. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 11 |
|
Property Acquisitions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition | % of Total | ||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | |||||||||||
The Americas |
|||||||||||||
United States |
687,932 | $ | 45,552 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
The Americas Total |
687,932 | $ | 45,552 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Europe |
|||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Asia |
|||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | |||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
687,932 | $ | 45,552 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
31.0 | % | |||||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cash Cap Rate(3)
|
8.2 | % | |||||||||||
| Acquisition | % of Total | |||||||||||
| Square Feet | Cost(2) | Acquisition Cost | ||||||||||
By Entity |
||||||||||||
AMB Property Corporation |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | |||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | 0.0 | % | ||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
687,932 | 45,552 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
687,932 | $ | 45,552 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | Includes estimated total acquisition capital expenditures of approximately $0.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | |
| (3) | Weighted average stabilized cap rate is defined as weighted average stabilized cash cap rate including the impact of straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 12 |
|
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
0.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | | $ | 22,893 | ||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(3)(4)
|
0.0 | % | 8.2 | % | ||||
Development Margin(4)
|
N/A | 13.6 | % | |||||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property(2) | |||||||||||
| Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | ||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||
United States |
| 312,103 | | |||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | |||||||||
The Americas Total |
| 312,103 | | |||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||
France |
| | | |||||||||
Germany |
| | | |||||||||
Benelux |
| | | |||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | |||||||||
Europe Total |
| | | |||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | |||||||||
China |
| | | |||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | |||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
| 312,103 | | |||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | Includes installment sale of 0.2 million square feet and $12.5 million initiated in the fourth quarter of 2009 and completed in the first quarter of 2010. | |
| (3) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
| (4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (5) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 13 |
|
Development Starts and Completions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Development Starts(2) | Development Completions(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | % of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 200,027 | $ | 18,624 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | 156,757 | 7,779 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 356,784 | $ | 26,403 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 352,313 | $ | 28,372 | 17.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | 448,123 | 53,772 | 33.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 800,436 | $ | 82,144 | 50.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 420,847 | $ | 54,415 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 420,847 | $ | 54,415 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 1,578,067 | $ | 162,962 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
0 | % | 90.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
Average Estimated
Yield(2)(4)
|
0.0 | % | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversions. | |
| (4) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 14 |
|
Development Portfolio(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| 2010 Expected Completions(2) | 2011 Expected Completions(2) | Total Construction-in-Progress | Pre-Stabilized Developments(2) | Total Development Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Square Feet | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
189,740 | $ | 17,385 | 557,915 | $ | 66,446 | 747,655 | $ | 83,831 | 2,903,334 | $ | 253,918 | 3,650,989 | $ | 337,749 | 25.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
450,445 | 40,297 | | | 450,445 | 40,297 | 1,465,667 | 78,384 | 1,916,112 | 118,681 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
640,185 | $ | 57,682 | 557,915 | $ | 66,446 | 1,198,100 | $ | 124,128 | 4,369,001 | $ | 332,302 | 5,567,101 | $ | 456,430 | 34.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
340,441 | $ | 28,137 | | $ | | 340,441 | $ | 28,137 | 352,313 | $ | 28,372 | 692,754 | $ | 56,509 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
426,552 | 47,309 | | | 426,552 | 47,309 | 139,608 | 18,218 | 566,160 | 65,527 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
125,227 | 23,220 | | | 125,227 | 23,220 | 655,366 | 86,834 | 780,593 | 110,054 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | 883,942 | 82,626 | 883,942 | 82,626 | 6.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
892,220 | $ | 98,666 | | $ | | 892,220 | $ | 98,666 | 2,031,229 | $ | 216,050 | 2,923,449 | $ | 314,716 | 23.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | | $ | | | $ | | 2,568,460 | $ | 434,390 | 2,568,460 | $ | 434,390 | 32.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
525,768 | 21,394 | 1,067,058 | 56,580 | 1,592,826 | 77,974 | 392,581 | 20,200 | 1,985,407 | 98,174 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | 394,080 | 26,577 | 394,080 | 26,577 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
525,768 | $ | 21,394 | 1,067,058 | $ | 56,580 | 1,592,826 | $ | 77,974 | 3,355,121 | $ | 481,167 | 4,947,947 | $ | 559,141 | 42.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,058,173 | $ | 177,742 | 1,624,973 | $ | 123,026 | 3,683,146 | $ | 300,768 | 9,755,351 | $ | 1,029,519 | 13,438,497 | $ | 1,330,287 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
(16,739 | ) | (80,259 | ) | (96,998 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated total investment, net of real estate impairment losses |
$ | 284,029 | $ | 949,260 | $ | 1,233,289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Projects |
7 | 2 | 9 | 34 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
91.4 | % | 62.7 | % | 79.7 | % | 95.7 | % | 92.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder to Invest |
$ | 12,402 | $ | 18,754 | $ | 31,156 | $ | 28,632 | $ | 59,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Remainder to Invest(2)(4)(5)
|
$ | 10,249 | $ | 13,163 | $ | 23,412 | $ | 26,913 | $ | 50,325 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5)
|
6.3 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.6 | % | 6.6 | % | 6.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield, net
of real estate impairment losses(2)
|
6.9 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-Leased(2)
|
21.3 | % | 24.5 | % | 22.7 | % | 55.8 | % | 46.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 15 |
|
Land, Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Land Inventory
| The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
2,126 | 35,605,530 | 221 | 4,347,936 | 141 | 5,144,921 | 2,488 | 45,098,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
58 | 1,162,103 | | | | | 58 | 1,162,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(2 | ) | 25,651 | | | | | (2 | ) | 25,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2010 |
2,182 | 36,793,284 | 221 | 4,347,936 | 141 | 5,144,921 | 2,544 | (3) | 46,286,141 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4)
|
$ | 606,017 | $ | 114,193 | $ | 143,461 | $ | 863,671 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (152,387 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 711,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs share of investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 552,710 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-Added Conversion Inventory(1)(5)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 9 | 1 | | | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 213 | 12 | | | 220 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 222 | 13 | | | 229 | (6) | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Inventory(1)(5)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | | | | | 40,800 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 998,372 | 3 | | | 1,039,172 | (7) | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (3) | AMBs share of acres and square feet of estimated build out including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,286 acres and 41.5 million square feet, respectively. | |
| (4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
| (5) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. | |
| (6) | AMBs share is 190 acres. | |
| (7) | AMBs share is 691,171 square feet. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 16 |
|
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
| Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(1)
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD | Upon project sales | Perpetual(2) | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q10) | Open end | ||||||
YTD Additions to Private
Capital Co-investment Ventures(3)
Gross Carrying Value of
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(4)
| (1) | Effective January 1, 2010, the name of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III was changed to AMB U.S. Logistics Fund. | |
| (2) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
| (3) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
| (4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 17 |
|
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4)
|
31% | 36,745,500 | $ | 3,319,697 | $ | 1,634,352 | $ | | $ | 295,080 | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4)
|
30% | 9,239,606 | 1,188,484 | 675,589 | | 106,685 | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20% | 7,263,090 | 1,491,114 | 826,325 | 8,560 | 81,373 | | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22% | 6,331,990 | 358,010 | 166,346 | 148,438 | (5) | 18,374 | 245,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
28% | 59,580,186 | 6,357,305 | 3,302,612 | 156,998 | 501,512 | 645,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15% | 200,027 | 85,617 | | | 14,394 | | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund(4)
|
31% | 557,915 | 83,291 | 13,101 | | 21,724 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
23% | 757,942 | 168,908 | 13,101 | | 36,118 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(6) |
28% | 60,338,128 | 6,526,213 | 3,315,713 | 156,998 | 537,630 | 645,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51% | 7,419,049 | (7) | 285,261 | 159,348 | | 51,095 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
50% | | 21,810 | | | 3,528 | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
29% | 67,757,177 | $ | 6,833,284 | $ | 3,475,061 | $ | 156,998 | $ | 592,253 | $ | 645,000 | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50% | 8,288,663 | $ | 474,246 | $ | 334,417 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20% | 7,318,208 | 514,810 | 189,405 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39% | 2,172,137 | 159,007 | 76,832 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 17,779,008 | 1,148,063 | 600,654 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
35% | 17,779,008 | 1,148,063 | 600,654 | 54,300 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
89% | 2,436,591 | 231,506 | 31,856 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
60% | 773,425 | 258,695 | 120,772 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
47% | 20,989,024 | $ | 1,638,264 | $ | 753,282 | $ | 54,300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selected Operating Results |
FFO, as | FFO, as | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 |
Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | adjusted(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 96,676 | $ | 3,680 | (9) | $ | 44,723 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 28,299 | $ | 3,875 | $ | 14,453 | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 23,195 | $ | 2,091 | $ | 12,492 | Partners | $ | 12,957 | $ | 166 | $ | 5,380 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
| (2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation), net of impairments, owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (3) | Through AMB Property Mexico, AMB holds an equity interest in various other non-core unconsolidated ventures for approximately $14.6 million. | |
| (4) | The estimated investment capacity and investment capacities of AMB U.S. Logistics Fund and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | Includes $89.6 million of shareholder loans. | |
| (6) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (8) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (9) | Includes $3.8 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 18 |
![]() |
Capitalization
Summary (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Value
Coverage and Debt Ratios
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| March 31, 2010 | ||||
Interest coverage(2)
|
2.6 | x | ||
Fixed charge coverage(2)
|
2.1 | x | ||
Dividends per share-to-FFO, as adjusted per share(2)
|
90.3 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)
|
46.6 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
44.8 | % | ||
Capital Structure(1)
| (1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 19 |
|
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB Wholly-Owned | Consolidated Joint Venture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured | Total | Unconsolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Secured | Other | Consolidated | Joint | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
$ | 65,000 | $ | 385,077 | $ | 1,591 | $ | 75,038 | $ | 66,406 | $ | | $ | 593,112 | $ | 157,100 | $ | 750,212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
69,000 | 330,921 | 2,186 | 87,933 | 136,178 | | 626,218 | 602,291 | 1,228,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 417,607 | 27,765 | 417,089 | 50,000 | 912,461 | 447,137 | 1,359,598 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
293,897 | | 920 | 19,693 | 50,026 | 4,300 | 368,836 | 684,008 | 1,052,844 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 616 | | 9,811 | | 10,427 | 778,764 | 789,191 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | 664 | | 17,610 | | 130,765 | 264,385 | 395,150 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
250,000 | | | | 16,231 | | 266,231 | 72,959 | 339,190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
| | | | 1,272 | | 1,272 | 351,488 | 352,760 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 1,455 | | 126,455 | 183,194 | 309,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
250,000 | | | | 29,910 | | 279,910 | 803 | 280,713 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | 7,528 | | 7,528 | 5,041 | 12,569 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,165,388 | $ | 715,998 | $ | 423,584 | $ | 210,429 | $ | 753,516 | $ | 54,300 | $ | 3,323,215 | $ | 3,547,170 | $ | 6,870,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized net (discounts) premiums |
(9,443 | ) | | | 182 | (234 | ) | | (9,495 | ) | (4,724 | ) | (14,219 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,155,945 | $ | 715,998 | $ | 423,584 | $ | 210,611 | $ | 753,282 | $ | 54,300 | $ | 3,313,720 | $ | 3,542,446 | $ | 6,856,166 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2)
|
| | | | (422,754 | ) | (43,440 | ) | (466,194 | ) | (2,534,902 | ) | (3,001,096 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2)
|
$ | 1,155,945 | $ | 715,998 | $ | 423,584 | $ | 210,611 | $ | 330,528 | $ | 10,860 | $ | 2,847,526 | $ | 1,007,544 | $ | 3,855,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.4 | % | 0.8 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.9 | % | 5.4 | % | 4.4 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average maturity (years) |
5.8 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
149,945,215 | (3) | $ | 27.24 | $ | 4,084,508 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,376,141 | $ | 27.24 | 91,966 | ||||||||
Total |
153,321,356 | $ | 4,176,474 | |||||||||
Total options outstanding |
9,381,333 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock
options(4)
|
| |||||||||||
| Preferred Stock | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.80 | % | $ | 232,500 | ||||
Capitalization Ratios |
||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(5)
|
46.6 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization(2)(5)
|
49.5 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
44.8 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
47.5 | % | ||
| (1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.6 billion. Includes $297.5 million of U.S. Dollar borrowings, as well as $292.0 million, $85.7 million, $15.5 million and $25.2 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2010, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2010. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes 1,228,034 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
| (4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $25.33 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. | |
| (5) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 20 |
|
Debt Maturities(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| AMB Wholly-owned Debt | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | 65,000 | $ | 69,000 | $ | | $ | 293,897 | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| 385,077 | 330,921 | | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
| | 418,566 | 1,798 | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
74,201 | 87,252 | 28,503 | 20,479 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
139,201 | 541,329 | 777,990 | 316,174 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
| | | 39,674 | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
1,064 | | 5,504 | 93,457 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
| 41,865 | 292,552 | | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
10,334 | 57,349 | 33,700 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
11,398 | 99,214 | 331,756 | 133,131 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
| 174,080 | 77,191 | 285,889 | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
111,465 | 203,193 | 178,258 | 341,824 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| 58,825 | 166,346 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | 5,846 | 4,732 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
9,059 | 31,773 | | 58,413 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
120,524 | 467,871 | 427,641 | 690,858 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
150,599 | 640,543 | 1,109,746 | 449,305 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
120,524 | 467,871 | 427,641 | 690,858 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 271,123 | $ | 1,108,414 | $ | 1,537,387 | $ | 1,140,163 | ||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 172,396 | $ | 720,040 | $ | 1,044,042 | $ | 536,429 | ||||||||
| (1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2013 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
| (2) | Subject to certain conditions. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 21 |
|
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Income Items
| Actual | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, 2010 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 73,314 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 119,871 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1)
|
32.1 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
38,537 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to construction-in-progress |
$ | (263 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to pre-stabilized development projects(1)
|
(6,137 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
| |||||||
NOI required to stabilize properties acquired during the quarter |
240 | |||||||
Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI:(2)
|
4,561 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(3)
|
(1,599 | ) | ||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI from continuing operations
related to operating properties(1)(4)
|
$ | 110,252 | ||||||
Development platform:(3)
|
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.05 | ||||||
Assets & Liabilities
| As of | ||||
| AMBs share of:(1) | March 31, 2010 | |||
Development, land, and contributed assets, net of
real estate impairment losses:(4)
|
||||
Construction-in-progress (invested to date) |
$ | 199,733 | ||
Pre-stabilized development projects (invested to date)(1)
|
878,443 | |||
Land held for future development (invested to date) |
552,710 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(5)
|
| |||
Total development, land and contributed assets,
net of real estate impairment losses |
$ | 1,630,886 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(4)
|
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,855,070 | ||
Preferred securities |
232,500 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 4,087,570 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(4)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 247,845 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
347,759 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(96,132 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(384,305 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 115,167 | ||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI include free rent granted in the quarter and non-property related revenues and expenses. | |
| (3) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
| (4) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
| (5) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 22 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures. Estimated
acquisition capital expenditures include immediate building improvements that are
taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or which are
incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to stabilization and
incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are incurred in an effort
to substantially increase the revenue potential of an existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the amount
of capitalized interest deducted from the determination of development gains), tax,
depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, restructuring, losses on early
extinguishment of debt and other charges, stock based compensation
amortization, and non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its
operating performance and liquidity. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to provide
investors relevant and useful information because it permits investors to view
income from its operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax,
non-cash depreciation and amortization expense (including stock-based compensation
amortization) or non-development gains. By excluding interest expense, adjusted
EBITDA allows investors to measure AMBs operating performance independent of its
capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful
comparison of its operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods
and to compare its operating performance to that of other companies, both in the
real estate industry and in other industries. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a
useful supplemental measure for reviewing its comparative performance with other
companies because, by excluding non-cash depreciation and amortization expense,
adjusted EBITDA can help the investing public compare the performance of a real
estate company to that of companies in other industries. The impairment charges
were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and
deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted values. The
restructuring charges reflected costs associated with AMBs reduction in global
headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses generally included the
costs of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of senior
unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing
environment, resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. Although difficult to
predict, these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets. While not
infrequent or unusual in nature, these items result from market fluctuations that
can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operation. The economics
underlying these items reflect market and financing conditions in the short-term
but can obscure AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term investment
decisions and strategies. Management believes adjusted EBITDA is significant and
useful to both it and its investors. Adjusted EBITDA more appropriately reflects
the value and strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance
isolated from the volatility of the current economic environment and unobscured by
costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of its financing profile in
response to the tightening of the capital markets. As a liquidity measure, AMB
believes that adjusted EBITDA helps investors to analyze its ability to meet debt
service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and unit
distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating
performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating performance,
and comparing that performance to other companies, both in the real estate industry
and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability to meet debt service
obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and unit distributions.
AMB believes investors should consider adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net
income (the primary measure of AMBs performance) and the other required GAAP
measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve their understanding of AMBs
operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of its
performance between periods and as against other companies. By excluding interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, restructuring, debt
extinguishment losses, stock based compensation amortization and other non-cash
charges and non-development gains when assessing AMBs financial performance, an
investor is assessing the earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not taking
into account the eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in
connection with such operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an
analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with AMBs required GAAP
presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs historical cash expenditures
or future cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures or
contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect the cash required to
make interest and principal payments on AMBs outstanding debt. While adjusted
EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance and
liquidity, it does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as
defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative to those
indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, AMBs
computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other
companies. Management compensates for the limitations of adjusted EBITDA by
providing investors with financial statements prepared according to U.S. GAAP,
along with this detailed discussion of adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of adjusted
EBITDA to net income (or loss), a U.S. GAAP measurement.
(The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net loss for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (620 | ) | $ | (123,024 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization |
48,634 | 42,125 | ||||||
Impairment charges |
| 175,887 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
2,973 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
7,004 | 7,497 | ||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||
AMBs share of net (income) loss |
(3,875 | ) | 34 | |||||
AMBs share of FFO, as adjusted |
14,453 | 12,135 | ||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
12,901 | 9,664 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
32,613 | 32,799 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
154 | (18,485 | ) | |||||
Adjustment
for depreciation on development profits |
(1,546 | ) | | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(13,215 | ) | (15,109 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
1,291 | 3,220 | ||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
200 | 9,974 | ||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
(125 | ) | 6,466 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 100,842 | $ | 143,183 | ||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment
ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB believes that AMBs
share of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures, which enable
both management and investors to assess the operations, earnings and growth of AMB
in light of AMBs ownership interest in its joint ventures and to compare the
applicable measure to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to that of other companies that do
not consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not
intended to reflect actual liability should there be a default under loans or a
liquidation of the joint ventures. AMB s computation of AMB s share of measures
may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet
information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate information about financial
position. However, AMB considers balance sheet information reported on an owned and
managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash,
AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets, AMBs share of deferred
rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net), and AMBs share of accounts
payable and other liabilities) to be useful supplemental measures to help the
investors better understand AMB s operating performance. See
Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed and AMBs share of.
AMB believes that AMBs share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis
helps management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of AMBs total real
estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating activities.
While such information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide balance sheet
information as defined by GAAP and is not a true alternative to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of its share of balance sheet items on an
owned and managed basis may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated
and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMB believes that its share of
total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables both management and
investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its leverage to that of other
companies. In addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its debt to
that of other companies that do not consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of
total debt is not intended to reflect its actual liability
should there be a default under any or all of such loans or a liquidation of the
joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a reconciliation of total debt and
AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the
following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the
total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated
and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs share of total assets is
the pro rata portion of total gross book value of assets based on AMBs percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures
holding the assets.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 23 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt. AMBs definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition of market equity is
the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common limited partnership units
multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the lease, as of a
certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is
used. Leases denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at
period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it wholly owns or manages
through its consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital
Partners. Assets under management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or
clients share of the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs share of total market
capitalization.
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the total rentable square
feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate investments plus subsequently
incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles. AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance
measure because cash basis NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio
excluding the effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis
rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI should not be viewed as an
alternative measure of financial performance since it does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expenses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing
costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact results
from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, refer to the SS
NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMBs share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| March 31, 2010 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 100,798 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(4,289 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI from continuing operations |
(23,195 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
73,314 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
10,238 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
28,299 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
(1,599 | ) | ||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 110,252 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors, managed by AMB from
which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party acquisitions, portfolio and asset management
distributions or fees, as well as incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture operating results.
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage(1) | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB U.S. Logistics Fund |
31 | % | $ | 68,521 | $ | (19,228 | ) | $ | 1,663 | $ | 1,663 | $ | 46,054 | $ | 22,269 | |||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
30 | % | 23,301 | (5,257 | ) | 339 | 339 | 18,404 | 8,488 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 25,468 | (5,433 | ) | 5,246 | 5,246 | 19,859 | 12,212 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 8,142 | (1,555 | ) | (4,789 | ) (1) | (4,789 | ) (1) | 6,264 | (1,732 | ) (1) | ||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | | (201 | ) | (283 | ) | (281 | ) | (201 | ) | (219 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 11,107 | (3,689 | ) | (672 | ) | (672 | ) | 6,742 | 2,798 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 12,725 | (3,415 | ) | 2,108 | 2,105 | 9,268 | 5,323 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 3,988 | (1,084 | ) | 527 | 527 | 2,927 | 1,590 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) Includes $3.8 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. | ||
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs co-investment venture partners
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures
accounted for in the applicable financial measure.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the co-investment venture
partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the pro-rata portion of the
co-investment venture partners share of carrying value less the co-investment venture partners
share of debt.
Completion is generally defined as properties that have reached Stabilization or properties that
have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments, renovations, land sales and
value-added conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price less closing costs,
minus estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses,
and any deferred rents, taxes or third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions,
divided by the estimated total investment, before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment
losses.
Estimated FFO, as adjusted by Business. Estimated FFO, as adjusted by Business is FFO, as adjusted, generated by AMBs Real
Estate Operations, Development and Private Capital business. Estimated Development and Private
Capital FFO, as adjusted, was determined by reducing Development Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital
revenues by their respective estimated share of general and administrative expenses, also defined
as overhead. Developments and Private Capitals estimated allocation of total general and
administrative expenses was based on their respective percentage of actual direct general and
administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate Operations FFO, as adjusted, represents total AMB FFO, as
adjusted, less estimated FFO, as adjusted, attributable to Development and Private Capital.
Management believes estimated FFO, as adjusted by business line is a useful supplemental measure of its
operating performance because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of
AMBs respective businesses to other companies comparable businesses. Further, AMBs computation
of FFO, as adjusted, by business line may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment
trusts as they may use different methodologies in computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which could be acquired
through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment venture partners plus AMBs funding
obligations and estimated debt capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development, renovation, or
expansion, including initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground leases, buildings, and associated
carry costs. Estimated total investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change.
Non-U.S. Dollar investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 24 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual cash NOI following
occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total investment. Yields exclude value added
conversion projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint venture partners share of interest
expense and amortization of finance costs and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued
operations, plus AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt,
capitalized interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses fixed
charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful
to investors because it permits fixed income investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay
dividends to its preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be
comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the quarters ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,613 | $ | 32,799 | ||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(3,172 | ) | (3,174 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(3 | ) | 373 | |||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
| (3 | ) | |||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(6,776 | ) | (7,128 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
12,901 | 9,664 | ||||||
Capitalized interest |
9,213 | 12,094 | ||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
| 1,432 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | ||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 48,728 | $ | 50,009 | ||||
Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) and Funds From Operations Per Share and
Unit, as adjusted (FFOPS, as adjusted) (together with FFO, as adjusted and FFOPS, as adjusted,
the FFO Measures, as adjusted). AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the
most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, as adjusted (or
FFO, as adjusted) and FFO, as adjusted, per share and unit (or FFOPS, as adjusted) to be useful
supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS, as adjusted, as FFO, as
adjusted, per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common stock and operating partnership
units. AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, as net income (or loss) available to common stockholders,
calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate
held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs
pro rata share of FFO, as adjusted, of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures. This
calculation also includes adjustments for items as described below.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO, as adjusted. AMB
believes gains from development should be included in FFO, as adjusted, to more completely reflect
the performance of one of our lines of business. AMB believes that value-added conversion
dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO, as adjusted,
consistent with the real estate investment trust industrys long standing practice to include gains
on the sale of land in funds from operations. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO, as adjusted, or
FFOPS, as adjusted, may not be consistent with the views of others in the real estate investment
trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and may not be
comparable to funds from operations or funds from operations per share and unit reported by other
real estate investment trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB
does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets that are
acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed venture. Some of the
properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be depreciated
under U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO, as
adjusted, gains or losses related to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to
joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a departure from the current NAREIT
definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO, as adjusted, will better reflect the value
created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the
contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO, as adjusted.
In addition, AMB calculates FFO, as adjusted, to exclude impairment and restructuring charges, debt
extinguishment losses and the Series D preferred unit redemption discount. The impairment charges
were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs
associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Debt extinguishment losses
generally included the costs of repurchasing debt securities. AMB repurchased certain tranches of
senior unsecured debt to manage its debt maturities in response to the current financing
environment, resulting in greater debt extinguishment costs. The Series D preferred unit redemption
discount reflects the gain associated with the discount to liquidation preference in the Series D
preferred unit redemption price less costs incurred as a result of the redemption. Although
difficult to predict, these items may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic
climate and its adverse effects on the real estate and financial markets. While not infrequent or
unusual in nature, these items result from market fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects
on AMBs results of operations. The economics underlying these items reflect market and financing
conditions in the short-term but can obscure AMBs performance and the value of AMBs long-term
investment decisions and strategies. Management believes FFO, as adjusted, is significant and
useful to both it and its investors. FFO, as adjusted, more appropriately reflects the value and
strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the
current economic environment and unobscured by costs (or gains) resulting from AMBs management of
its financing profile in response to the tightening of the capital markets. However, in addition to
the limitations of FFO Measures, as adjusted, generally discussed below, FFO, as adjusted, does not
present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition and operating performance. This
measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of funds from operations and should not be used
as an alternative to net income or cash as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with
U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time,
as reflected through depreciation and amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have
historically risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and analysts
have considered presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical
cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, are supplemental measures
of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders,
as defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, combined with
the required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of
operating results of real estate investment trusts among the investing public and making
comparisons of operating results among such companies more
meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to be useful measures for reviewing
comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to
sales of previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and
amortization, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, can help the investing public compare the operating
performance of a companys real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While
funds from operations and funds from operations per share are relevant and widely used measures of
operating performance of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures, as adjusted, do not
represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be
considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating
performance. The FFO Measures, as adjusted, also do not consider the costs associated with capital
expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor are the FFO Measures, as adjusted, necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund AMBs future cash requirements. Management compensates for the
limitations of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, by providing investors with financial statements
prepared according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures, as
adjusted, and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures, as adjusted, to net income available to common
stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations, as adjusted for a reconciliation of FFO, as
adjusted, from net income available to common stockholders.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 25 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
The following table reconciles projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of development
gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted) from projected net income available to common stockholders for
the year ended December 31, 2010:
| 2010 | ||||||||
| Low | High | |||||||
Projected net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 0.01 | $ | 0.08 | ||||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.29 | 1.29 | ||||||
AMBs
share of depreciation on development profits
recognized to date |
(0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations, as adjusted (FFO, as adjusted) |
$ | 1.26 | $ | 1.33 | ||||
Restructuring charges |
0.02 | 0.02 | ||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of
development gains (or Core FFO, as adjusted)(1)
|
$ | 1.26 | $ | 1.33 | ||||
Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO, as adjusted, and FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs
share of development gains, which is expressed per share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic environment, management
believes Projected FFO, as adjusted excluding AMBs share of development gains is the more
appropriate and useful measure to reflect its assessment of AMBs projected operating performance.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues (excluding straight-line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles, reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination
fees) for properties in the pool at period end.
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair value being lower than
carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by AMBs share of
interest expense which consists of consolidated interest expense less joint venture partners share
of interest expense, including amortization, from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage to
measure its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to investors because
it permits investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt.
AMBs computation of interest coverage may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other
companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| Interest | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 32,613 | $ | 32,799 | ||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
(3 | ) | 373 | |||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(6,776 | ) | (7,128 | ) | ||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated co-investment ventures |
12,901 | 9,664 | ||||||
Total interest |
$ | 38,735 | $ | 35,708 | ||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with real estate
developers, other real estate operators, or institutional investors where AMB may or may not: have
control, act as the manager and/or developer, earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn
incentive distributions or promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development,
leasing, property management and/or accounting services for which it may receive market
compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs joint venture partners percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock at period
end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of its operating
performance because it enables both management and investors to analyze the fair value of its
business. An assessment of the fair value of a business involves estimates and assumptions and can
be performed using various methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its
business that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV but has not
presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on assumptions or estimates that
should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for discussion of NOI and a
reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable square feet leased,
including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet at period end. Space is
considered leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10% ownership interest,
is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash flow information based
on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow information. However, AMB considers cash flow
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, gross
lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs share of net lease termination fees,
tenant improvements, lease commissions and other lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment
partners share of capital expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance
and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed, AMBs share of
and Co-investment venture partners share of. AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow
information helps management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of
AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs operating
performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash flow information is helpful
to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information as defined by GAAP and are not true
alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed
supplemental cash flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as
they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting date.
Pre-stabilized development represents assets which have reached Completion but have not yet reached
Stabilization.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represent projects where the acquired buildings are less than 75% leased and
require significant capital expenditures (generally ranging from 10% 25% of acquisition cost) to
bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant capital expenditures
(generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing basis) to bring the buildings up to operating
standards and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements and leasing costs
required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital expenditures do not include estimated
acquisition capital expenditures which were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase
of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference, weighted by square feet,
of the net ABR due the first month of a term commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the
former tenants term. If free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a
point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent
charges. If either the previous or current
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 26 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
lease terms are under 12 months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the lease is
first generation or there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded from this
calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI) and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property operating expenses. NOI
excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, restructuring charges,
real estate impairment losses, development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or
contribution of real estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a useful supplemental
measure calculated to help investors understand AMBs operating performance, excluding the effects
of costs and expenses which are not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is widely used by
the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors compare AMBs
operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment losses have been
excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not consider its impairment losses to be a property
operating expense. AMB believes that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common
methodology used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the changing
values of AMBs assets but do not reflect the current operating performance of the assets with
respect to their revenues or expenses. AMBs real estate impairment losses are non-cash charges
which represent the write down in the value of assets when estimated fair value over the holding
period is lower than current carrying value. The impairment charges were principally a result of
increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that adversely
impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment charges are not related to the
current performance of AMBs real estate operations and should be excluded from its calculation of
NOI.
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance for
properties that are considered part of the same store pool. AMB defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on
a same store basis excluding straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See
definition of same store pool. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because it reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio
excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental
growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors
compare the operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to other companies. While SS NOI
is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, it
does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be
considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating
performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and
leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact
our results from operations. Further, AMBs computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of
other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The
following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI
from net loss for the
quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | ||||||||
| March 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | (620 | ) | $ | (123,024 | ) | ||
Private capital income |
(7,445 | ) | (11,695 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
48,634 | 42,125 | ||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| 175,887 | ||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
32,265 | 31,574 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
2,973 | | ||||||
Total other income and expenses |
24,837 | 5,954 | ||||||
Total discontinued operations |
154 | (18,485 | ) | |||||
NOI |
100,798 | 102,336 | ||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(16,122 | ) | (11,468 | ) | ||||
Less non cash adjustments(1)
|
(2,520 | ) | (417 | ) | ||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 82,156 | $ | 90,451 | ||||
Less lease termination fees |
$ | (638 | ) | $ | (783 | ) | ||
Cash-basis same-store NOI, excluding lease termination fees |
$ | 81,518 | $ | 89,668 | ||||
| (1) Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. | ||
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents and amortization of
lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior year reporting period to the current year
reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both the current and prior
year reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the current and prior reporting
periods. The same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2008.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements, lease commissions and
other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second generation space divided by the total square
feet leased. Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are not included until such space is
leased. Second generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant at
acquisition.
Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% occupied.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI or NOI, as applicable, stabilized to market
occupancy (generally 95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis
includes the initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt to market, buyers due
diligence, lease intangible adjustments, estimated acquisition capital expenditures, and leasing
costs necessary to achieve stabilization. AMB defines cash NOI as NOI excluding straight line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing tenants divided by the
square footage of all expiring and rented leases during the reporting period, excluding the square
footage of tenants that default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants
and the square footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt plus preferred equity
liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless otherwise noted).
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial properties to a higher and
better use, including office, residential, retail, research & development or manufacturing.
Activities required to prepare the property for conversion to a higher and better use may include
such activities as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of the
value-added conversion project is generally based on the underlying land value based on its
ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is ascribed to the industrial building(s).
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 27 |
|
Contacts |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia; President, Private Capital | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
||||||||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 28 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2010 First Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in connection
therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to our growth of development
platform, factors regarding our buying advantage and investment opportunities available to us,
future investments in funds, reinstatement of utilization of low yielding assets and acquiring
assets in excess of cost of capital, fund investor distributions, our investments in co-investment
funds to be FFO, as adjusted, accretive and to enhance NAV, acquisition opportunities and advantages at
attractive pricing, ability to move quickly, stabilization of private market valuations,
consummation of acquisitions accretive to company on leverage neutral basis, recovery in
fundamentals including rental rates, occupancy, real estate values, and investor/customer interest,
FFO, as adjusted, generated by increased occupancy, rental rate recovery, lease up of the development portfolio,
monetization of land bank and development capability, and the formation of new ventures, seeding of
new joint ventures with AMB assets, pursuit of distressed and strategic acquisitions,
consolidations and other situations, utilization of development capacity to recover G&A, our
ability to outperform national occupancy rates, implementation of leasing strategies, our ability
to maintain leverage targets, cash sources to cover future capital requirements, the consummation
of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our plans to retire, extend and refinance debt and
maintain fixed charge coverage at certain levels, our opportunities and plans (including those
regarding our global positioning and future capital deployment), estimated financial and
performance results, our projected funds from operations, future assets under management, same
store and/or cash net operating income, occupancy and other financial and operational guidance, our
capabilities to drive growth, our future performance compared to peers and other market indices,
rent growth, industrial and other market, GDP and trade growth, market drivers, trends and
forecasts, port opportunities, on-tarmac opportunities, hiring, performance and retention of key
personnel, access to resources, leveraging of relationships, continuation and effectiveness of
strategic drivers, information regarding our development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and
renovation projects (including stabilization or completion dates, square feet at stabilization or
completion, sale or contribution dates, yields from such projects, our share of remaining funding,
costs and total investment amounts, scope, location and timing of development starts, margins,
projected gains and returns, sustainability, profitability, scope and scale of and demand for
projects, targeted value-added conversion projects, redevelopment and conversion timelines,
entitlement and repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength
of lender and customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of
investments and market entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates,
acquisition capital and volume, scope and build out and monetization potential of land inventory,
co-investment venture and other estimated investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures,
performance, revenues and returns on investment, target leverage, future incentive distribution,
asset management, acquisition and other private capital distributions and fees, timing of incentive
distributions, private capital demand, launching of additional funds, termination of funds, planned
gross capitalization, future balance sheet capacity, ability to exercise or maintain credit
extensions, our position to maintain a solid financial position and address debt maturities,
interest rate changes, transition to open-end funds, and access to secured and non-secured
financings, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
Because these forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties, there are
important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as
predictions of future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements
might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately,
intends, plans, forecasting, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of
these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking
statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements should not
be read as guarantees of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate
indicators of whether, or the time at which, such performance or results will be achieved. There is
no assurance that the events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements will occur or
be achieved. Forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods
that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only
as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to
update or supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the
forward-looking statements: changes in general economic conditions in California, the U.S. or
globally (including financial market fluctuations), global trade or in the real estate sector
(including risks relating to decreasing real estate valuations and impairment charges); risks
associated with using debt to fund the companys business activities, including refinancing and
interest rate risks (including inflation risks); the companys failure to obtain, renew, or extend
necessary financing or access the debt or equity markets; the companys failure to maintain its
current credit agency ratings or comply with its debt covenants; risks related to the companys
obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment venture and other debt; risks
associated with equity and debt securities financings and issuances (including the risk of
dilution); defaults on or non-renewal of leases by customers or renewal at lower than expected rent
or failure to lease at all or on expected terms; difficulties in identifying properties, portfolios
of properties, or interests in real-estate related entities or platforms to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions on advantageous terms and the failure of acquisitions to perform as the
company expects; unknown liabilities acquired in connection with the acquired properties,
portfolios of properties, or interests in real-
estate related entities; the companys failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and
operations; risks and uncertainties affecting property development, redevelopment and value-added
conversion (including construction delays, cost overruns, the companys inability to obtain
necessary permits and financing, the companys inability to lease properties at all or at favorable
rents and terms, and public opposition to these activities); the companys failure to set up
additional funds, attract additional investment in existing funds or to contribute properties to
its co-investment ventures due to such factors as its inability to acquire, develop, or lease
properties that meet the investment criteria of such ventures, or the co-investment ventures
inability to access debt and equity capital to pay for property
contributions or their allocation
of available capital to cover other capital requirements; risks and uncertainties relating to the
disposition of properties to third parties and the companys ability to effect such transactions on
advantageous terms and to timely reinvest proceeds from any such dispositions; risks of doing
business internationally and global expansion, including unfamiliarity with the new markets and
currency and hedging risks; risks of changing personnel and roles; risks related to suspending,
reducing or changing the companys dividends; losses in excess of the companys insurance coverage;
changes in local, state and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including changes in real
estate, tax and zoning laws; increases in real property tax rates; risks associated with the
companys tax structuring; increases in interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected
capital expenditures; environmental uncertainties; risks related to natural disasters; and our
failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust. Our success also
depends upon economic trends generally, various market conditions and fluctuations and those other
risk factors discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our most recent annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.