EX-99.1
Published on October 21, 2009
| SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
|
Company Profile |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe and Asia. As
of September 30, 2009, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected to total approximately
156.1 million square feet (14.5 million square meters) in 47 markets within 14 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. The private capital revenue consists of
asset management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as well as incentive
distributions.
The Americas |
Europe |
Asia |
||||||||||
Operating Portfolio(1)
|
118.4 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 10.6 msf | Operating Portfolio(1) | 10.3 msf | |||||||
Development Pipeline(2)(3)
|
7.5 msf | Development Pipeline(2)(3) | 3.5 msf | Development Pipeline(2)(3) | 5.8 msf | |||||||
Land Inventory(3)
|
2,146 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 219 acres | Land Inventory(3) | 150 acres | |||||||
| (1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio) and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (2) | Includes development properties available for sale or contribution. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 1 |
|
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | % Change | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1)
|
$ | 157,535 | $ | 158,477 | (0.6 | %) | $ | 471,228 | $ | 535,278 | (12.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
152,570 | 136,472 | 11.8 | % | 390,577 | 410,606 | (4.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available
to common stockholders |
62,790 | 23,728 | 164.6 | % | (42,513 | ) | 134,834 | (131.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||
FFO(2)
|
106,521 | 71,112 | 49.8 | % | 55,505 | 247,136 | (77.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
FFO, excluding
impairment and
restructuring
charges(3)
|
106,521 | 71,112 | 49.8 | % | 239,989 | 247,136 | (2.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.24 | 79.2 | % | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 1.36 | (124.3 | %) | |||||||||||
FFO(2)
|
0.71 | 0.69 | 2.9 | % | 0.42 | 2.39 | (82.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
FFO, excluding impairment
and restructuring
charges(3)
|
0.71 | 0.69 | 2.9 | % | 1.80 | 2.39 | (24.7 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.52 | (46.2 | %) | 0.84 | 1.56 | (46.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Financial
|
||
|
Approximately $1.3 billion in capacity; consisting of $201 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, and $1.1
billion of availability on our lines of credit
Completed approximately $1.1 billion of debt extensions, repurchases, repayments and refinances year-to-date; $122 million in the third quarter(4)
|
||
Operations(4)
|
(4.0)% year-to-date cash basis same store NOI;(2) (7.0)% in the third quarter
91.5% year-to-date average occupancy; 90.4% in the third quarter
(3.9)% trailing four quarter rent changes on renewals and rollover; (10.3)% in the third quarter
Commenced leases of more than 21.2 msf year-to-date; 9.9 msf in the third quarter
|
|
Capital Deployment(4)
|
Completed approximately $670 million in contributions and sales year-to-date; $209 million in the third quarter
Cap rate on contribution and sales year-to-date was 6.7%
Reduced remaining cash to fund the development pipeline to $54 million
Transferred two assets to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in
exchange for additional equity equal to 100% of the fair value of the
assets, for an aggregate price of $33 million
|
|
| (1) | On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. Pro forma rental revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have been $435,053 if AMB Partners II had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2008. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (4) | Owned and managed portfolio. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 2 |
|
Funds From Operations(1) Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO by Business(1)(2)(6)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||
| 2007 | 2008 | Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations,
net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.95 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.45 | 0.48 | 0.26 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO |
$ | 2.04 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
58.4 | % | 68.8 | % | 67.3 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
1.60 | 0.72 | 0.65 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.32 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.17 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO |
$ | 1.28 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
36.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 26.7 | % | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.30 | 0.66 | 0.20 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.09 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
5.0 | % | 18.0 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||
Total FFO |
$ | 3.49 | $ | 2.89 | $ | 1.80 | ||||||
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | For all years presented, amounts per diluted common share and unit have been restated in accordance with FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, effective January 1, 2009, to present amounts net of allocation to participating securities for unvested restricted shares outstanding at each respective period end. Previously reported FFO per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.78, $3.51, $3.12, $2.75 and $2.30, respectively. Previously reported development gains per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.73, $1.61, $1.11, $0.47 and $0.09, respectively. Previously reported estimated FFO by business per diluted common share and unit for 2008 and 2007 were $2.92 and $3.51, respectively. Previously reported private capital revenue per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.67, $0.30, $0.48, $0.47 and $0.14, respectively. | |
| (3) | For a reconciliation of FFO from net income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
| (4) | FFO per share, excluding impairment and restructuring charges is $1.80 and $2.39 year-to-date for 2009 and 2008, respectively. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (5) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
| (6) | Estimated FFO by Business for 2009 and 2008 represents FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (7) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 3 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues(1)
|
$ | 149,649 | $ | 148,975 | $ | 443,852 | $ | 474,440 | ||||||||
Private capital revenues |
7,886 | 9,502 | 27,376 | 60,838 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
157,535 | 158,477 | 471,228 | 535,278 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs(1)
|
(46,621 | ) | (43,189 | ) | (139,438 | ) | (135,232 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(47,166 | ) | (45,799 | ) | (128,133 | ) | (126,001 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(27,156 | ) | (34,413 | ) | (83,836 | ) | (103,323 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| | (3,824 | ) | | |||||||||||
Fund costs |
(240 | ) | (312 | ) | (824 | ) | (919 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | (174,410 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other expenses(2)
|
(3,049 | ) | 1,088 | (8,070 | ) | 1,926 | ||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(124,232 | ) | (122,625 | ) | (538,535 | ) | (363,549 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
1,220 | 28,026 | 34,506 | 76,248 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate
interests, net |
| | | 19,967 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint
ventures, net |
3,257 | 5,372 | 7,507 | 14,359 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expenses) (2)
|
4,941 | (4,238 | ) | 6,498 | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(28,855 | ) | (33,303 | ) | (90,843 | ) | (100,835 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(19,437 | ) | (4,143 | ) | (42,332 | ) | 9,676 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
13,866 | 31,709 | (109,639 | ) | 181,405 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income attributable to discontinued operations |
1,162 | 3,040 | 1,641 | 8,232 | ||||||||||||
Development gains, net of taxes |
53,002 | | 53,002 | | ||||||||||||
Gains (losses) from sale of real estate interests, net of
taxes |
8,434 | (12 | ) | 37,138 | 2,865 | |||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
62,598 | 3,028 | 91,781 | 11,097 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
76,464 | 34,737 | (17,858 | ) | 192,502 | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net income |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net income |
(6,058 | ) | (4,194 | ) | (8,829 | ) | (29,881 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership
unitholders share of development profits |
(1,388 | ) | (1,090 | ) | (2,445 | ) | (7,204 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
(1,431 | ) | (1,431 | ) | (4,295 | ) | (4,295 | ) | ||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(447 | ) | 129 | 3,543 | (3,020 | ) | ||||||||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net
income |
(9,324 | ) | (6,586 | ) | (12,026 | ) | (44,400 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to
AMB Property Corporation |
67,140 | 28,151 | (29,884 | ) | 148,102 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (11,856 | ) | (11,856 | ) | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(3)
|
(398 | ) | (471 | ) | (773 | ) | (1,412 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 62,790 | $ | 23,728 | $ | (42,513 | ) | $ | 134,834 | |||||||
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.43 | $ | 0.24 | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 1.36 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
145,659 | 98,832 | 129,860 | 99,268 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. Pro forma rental revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have been $435,053, and pro forma operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 would have been $125,195, if AMB Partners II had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2008. | |
| (2) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $2,675 and $6,854, respectively. | |
| (3) | Represents net income attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were 920 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were 905 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 62,790 | $ | 23,728 | $ | (42,513 | ) | $ | 134,834 | |||||||
(Gains) losses from sale or contribution of real estate
interests, net of taxes |
(8,434 | ) | 12 | (37,138 | ) | (22,832 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
47,166 | 45,799 | 128,133 | 126,001 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
69 | 1,190 | 1,877 | 3,553 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,927 | ) | (1,997 | ) | (6,017 | ) | (5,786 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated joint
ventures |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests
(Net income) |
6,058 | 4,194 | 8,829 | 29,881 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling
interests (Net income (loss) ) |
447 | (129 | ) | (3,543 | ) | 3,020 | ||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling
interests (Development profits) |
1,388 | 1,090 | 2,445 | 2,795 | ||||||||||||
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(8,587 | ) | (8,819 | ) | (19,450 | ) | (41,812 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated joint
ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(3,257 | ) | (5,372 | ) | (7,507 | ) | (14,359 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
11,079 | 11,589 | 30,389 | 32,727 | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(271 | ) | (173 | ) | | (886 | ) | |||||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 106,521 | $ | 71,112 | $ | 55,505 | $ | 247,136 | ||||||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.71 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 2.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
149,088 | 102,802 | 133,351 | 103,241 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for impairment and restructuring charges |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
$ | | $ | | $ | 174,410 | $ | | ||||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| | 7,443 | | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of real estate impairment losses from
unconsolidated joint ventures |
| | 4,611 | | ||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interest share of
real estate impairment losses |
| | (4,876 | ) | | |||||||||||
AMBs share of total impairment charges(1)
|
| | 181,588 | | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges(1)
|
| | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
| | (928 | ) | | |||||||||||
Funds from operations, excluding impairment and
restructuring charges |
$ | 106,521 | $ | 71,112 | $ | 239,989 | $ | 247,136 | ||||||||
FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges per
common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.71 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 2.39 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
149,088 | 102,802 | 133,351 | 103,241 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were 920 unvested restricted shares. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were 905 unvested restricted shares. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| As of | ||||||||
| September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 6,584,837 | $ | 6,603,856 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,062,681 | ) | (970,737 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
5,522,156 | 5,633,119 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
459,612 | 431,322 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
348,349 | 609,023 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,330,117 | 6,673,464 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
200,696 | 251,231 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
135,164 | 160,528 | ||||||
Other assets |
207,289 | 216,425 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,873,266 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,398,212 | $ | 1,522,571 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
871,379 | 1,153,926 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
510,951 | 920,850 | ||||||
Other debt |
391,459 | 392,838 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
351,085 | 345,259 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,523,086 | 4,335,444 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,701,631 | 2,291,695 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,925,043 | 2,515,107 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
285,108 | 293,367 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
77,561 | 77,561 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
62,468 | 80,169 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
425,137 | 451,097 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,350,180 | 2,966,204 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,873,266 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 6 |
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 5,975 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 20,141 | $ | 18,746 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,179 | $ | 4,135 | $ | 8,926 | $ | 10,567 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,759 | $ | 266 | $ | 5,486 | $ | 656 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 1,214 | $ | 197 | $ | 3,916 | $ | 408 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 852 | $ | 146 | $ | 1,844 | $ | 334 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 8,651 | $ | 4,610 | $ | 13,697 | $ | 12,102 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
8,952 | 6,228 | 19,517 | 20,200 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
4,262 | 11,902 | 13,619 | 27,220 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
21,865 | 22,740 | 46,833 | 59,522 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(8,642 | ) | (5,778 | ) | (17,492 | ) | (17,382 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 13,223 | $ | 16,962 | $ | 29,341 | $ | 42,140 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 1,969 | $ | 3,010 | $ | 6,903 | $ | 9,050 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 1,965 | $ | 3,357 | $ | 6,872 | $ | 8,755 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,383 | $ | 198 | $ | 2,815 | $ | 557 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 855 | $ | 136 | $ | 1,597 | $ | 319 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 726 | $ | 135 | $ | 1,322 | $ | 318 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 4,860 | $ | 3,312 | $ | 7,938 | $ | 9,639 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,965 | 5,321 | 13,273 | 16,719 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
3,214 | 9,483 | 10,113 | 22,462 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
14,039 | 18,116 | 31,324 | 48,820 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(1,928 | ) | (1,977 | ) | (4,668 | ) | (8,616 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 12,111 | $ | 16,139 | $ | 26,656 | $ | 40,204 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 7 |
|
Operations Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Square | ||||||||||||||||
| Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
3,646,550 | $ | 31,384 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||
| 2 | United States Government |
1,355,450 | 20,701 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||
| 3 | FedEx Corporation |
1,400,090 | 14,503 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||
| 4 | Nippon Express |
1,029,170 | 13,989 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||
| 5 | Sagawa Express |
728,791 | 12,359 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||
| 6 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
1,029,204 | 10,103 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||
| 7 | La Poste |
902,391 | 9,003 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||
| 8 | Panalpina |
1,316,351 | 8,573 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 9 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
543,039 | 8,099 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 10 | CEVA Logistics, Inc. |
1,110,953 | 7,188 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
13,061,989 | $ | 135,902 | 16.0 | % | |||||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
5,987,999 | 46,933 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
19,049,988 | $ | 182,835 | 21.5 | % | |||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 8 |
|
Operating
Statistics(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
| September 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
131,789,032 | 131,901,732 | 114,643,564 | 115,425,681 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
87.0 | % | 87.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2)
|
91.0 | % | 90.5 | % | 90.8 | % | 90.4 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
95.4 | % | 95.2 | % | 95.6 | % | 95.2 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2)
|
90.4 | % | 91.1 | % | 90.3 | % | 91.2 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
95.3 | % | 94.6 | % | 95.1 | % | 94.6 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.1 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Trailing four quarters statistics |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2)
|
61.1 | % | 62.1 | % | 59.5 | % | 62.9 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
(3.9 | %) | 0.2 | % | (4.8 | %) | (0.2 | %) | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
19.6 | 16.8 | 17.5 | 15.6 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.19 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.80 | $ | 2.85 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.80 | $ | 1.84 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
25.3 | 21.0 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2)
|
72.0 | % | 72.6 | % | 72.0 | % | 72.7 | % | ||||||||
| Same Store Pool(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3)
|
(4.1 | %) | (1.7 | %) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in expenses(3)
|
3.8 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(7.0 | %) | (4.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(6.1 | %) | (3.2 | %) | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (4.0)%, 2.6%, (6.7)% and (5.3)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (1.2)%, 3.6%, (3.2)% and (2.4)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 9 |
![]() |
Portfolio Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| % of Total | Year-to-Date | Trailing Four | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Owned and | AMBs Share | Annualized | Same Store NOI | Quarters Rent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Placed in | Square Feet | Managed Square | of Square | Year-to-Date | Base Rent | Growth Without | Change on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| as of | Acquired | Operations | Disposed | as of | Feet as of | Feet as of | Average | psf as of | Lease | Renewals and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6/30/2009 | Square Feet | Square Feet(1) | Square Feet | 9/30/2009 | 9/30/2009 | 9/30/2009 | Occupancy | 9/30/2009 | Termination Fees(2) | Rollovers(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
19,392,144 | | (329,140 | ) | (145,348 | ) | 18,917,656 | 14.4 | % | 55.6 | % | 91.8 | % | $ | 6.40 | (0.6 | %) | (2.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
12,967,656 | | 178,567 | (39,248 | ) | 13,106,975 | 9.9 | % | 54.1 | % | 90.6 | % | 5.19 | 0.6 | % | (9.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
11,643,359 | | (2,810 | ) | | 11,640,549 | 8.8 | % | 50.8 | % | 91.5 | % | 7.64 | (7.3 | %) | 3.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
10,993,686 | | 598 | | 10,994,284 | 8.3 | % | 72.0 | % | 88.9 | % | 6.67 | (7.4 | %) | (3.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
7,885,024 | | (2,143 | ) | | 7,882,881 | 6.0 | % | 51.6 | % | 95.1 | % | 5.47 | (0.4 | %) | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,363,198 | | | | 6,363,198 | 4.8 | % | 72.8 | % | 94.2 | % | 7.35 | (2.3 | %) | (6.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,630,724 | | | (167,723 | ) | 2,463,001 | 1.9 | % | 92.4 | % | 89.9 | % | 20.10 | (4.7 | %) | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,657,922 | | 301,810 | (96,105 | ) | 28,863,627 | 21.9 | % | 63.0 | % | 89.0 | % | 5.59 | (7.1 | %) | (6.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
100,533,713 | | 146,882 | (448,424 | ) | 100,232,171 | 76.0 | % | 60.5 | % | 91.0 | % | $ | 6.51 | (4.2 | %) | (3.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,059 | | | | 3,564,059 | 2.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 94.3 | % | $ | 5.42 | (18.0 | %) | 2.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
3,590,942 | | | | 3,590,942 | 2.7 | % | 47.4 | % | 90.0 | % | 5.72 | (19.5 | %) | (12.1 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | | | 2,890,526 | 2.2 | % | 21.6 | % | 98.0 | % | 4.54 | 1.7 | % | (10.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
419,845 | | 189,337 | | 609,182 | 0.5 | % | 49.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 5.68 | (2.3 | %) | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
6,901,313 | | 189,337 | | 7,090,650 | 5.4 | % | 37.1 | % | 94.0 | % | $ | 5.21 | (9.4 | %) | (11.8 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
110,999,085 | | 336,219 | (448,424 | ) | 110,886,880 | 84.1 | % | 60.2 | % | 91.2 | % | $ | 6.38 | (4.5 | %) | (4.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
3,786,003 | | (635 | ) | | 3,785,368 | 2.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 97.4 | % | $ | 9.07 | (9.5 | %) | (13.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,191,670 | | 140 | | 3,191,810 | 2.4 | % | 30.2 | % | 96.5 | % | 9.14 | (10.3 | %) | (2.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
3,267,362 | | | | 3,267,362 | 2.5 | % | 31.2 | % | 93.6 | % | 10.27 | (17.1 | %) | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
343,077 | | | | 343,077 | 0.3 | % | 61.9 | % | 100.0 | % | 14.74 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
10,588,112 | | (495 | ) | | 10,587,617 | 8.1 | % | 30.7 | % | 96.1 | % | $ | 9.63 | (9.7 | %) | (6.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
5,263,053 | | | | 5,263,053 | 4.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 91.6 | % | $ | 15.34 | 6.8 | % | (3.6 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 92.8 | % | 12.36 | 5.8 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
7,263,090 | | | | 7,263,090 | 5.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 91.9 | % | $ | 14.53 | 6.7 | % | (0.5 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
1,897,400 | | | | 1,897,400 | 1.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 82.6 | % | $ | 4.47 | 6.9 | % | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.4 | % | 9.39 | (3.2 | %) | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
218,119 | | | | 218,119 | 0.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 83.5 | % | 6.02 | 0.0 | % | (9.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
10,314,535 | | | | 10,314,535 | 7.8 | % | 43.7 | % | 90.6 | % | $ | 12.08 | 0.4 | % | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd Avg(2)
|
131,901,732 | | 335,724 | (448,424 | ) | 131,789,032 | 100.0 | % | 56.6 | % | 91.5 | % | $ | 7.10 | (4.0 | %) | (3.9 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3)
|
7,495,659 | | 300 | | 7,495,959 | 51.8 | % | 86.9 | % | 5.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
139,397,391 | | 336,024 | (448,424 | ) | 139,284,991 | 56.3 | % | 91.4 | % | $ | 7.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline |
9,005,567 | | (5) | (666,344 | ) (6) | (1,494,182 | ) (7) | 6,845,041 | 95.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale or Contribution(4)
|
8,477,234 | 1,494,182 | (5) | 3,458 | (6) | (3,276 | ) (7) | 9,971,598 | 88.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Subtotal |
17,482,801 | 1,494,182 | (662,886 | ) | (1,497,458 | ) | 16,816,639 | 91.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
156,880,192 | 1,494,182 | (326,862 | ) | (1,945,882 | ) | 156,101,630 | 60.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (4) | Represents development projects available for sale or contribution that are not included in the operating portfolio. | |
| (5) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of development starts. For available for sale or contribution, represents new projects available. | |
| (6) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects placed in operations. | |
| (7) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in available for sale or contribution. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects disposed. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 10 |
|
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Development
Pipeline by Region as of September 30,
2009(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Development
Starts(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Acquisition
Volume
(3)
(Acquisition Cost (2))
(Acquisition Cost (2))
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio, excludes land inventory purchases. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 11 |
![]() |
Development Starts and Total Capital Deployment(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 96,250 | $ | 7,248 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | 189,337 | 12,116 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 285,587 | $ | 19,364 | 32.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 274,802 | $ | 17,118 | 28.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 0.0 | % | 125,227 | 24,121 | 39.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 400,029 | $ | 41,239 | 68.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Development Starts |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 685,616 | $ | 60,603 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage |
0.0 | % | 80.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)
|
0.0 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | |||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||
Total Development Starts |
| | 685,616 | 60,603 | ||||||||||||
Total Capital Deployment |
| $ | | 685,616 | $ | 60,603 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 12 |
![]() |
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
83.9 | % | 96.0 | % | 63.9 | % | 87.6 | % | ||||||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 31,651 | $ | 177,444 | (2) | $ | 174,921 | $ | 495,075 | |||||||
Weighted
Average Stabilized Cap
Rate(3)(4)
|
7.6 | % | 6.0 | % | 8.1 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||
Development
Margin(4)
|
N/A | 34.5 | % | N/A | 17.1 | % | ||||||||||
Square Footage or Acreage Contributed or Sold
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
280,701 | 599,179 | 21 | 2,480,066 | 1,852,779 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | | | 318,850 | | ||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
280,701 | 599,179 | 21 | 2,480,066 | 2,171,629 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | | 981,162 | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | | 981,162 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
280,701 | 599,179 | 21 | 2,480,066 | 3,152,791 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | Includes the transfer of two assets to AMB Alliance Fund III in exchange for units in the fund. | |
| (3) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
| (4) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (5) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 13 |
![]() |
Development Pipeline(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| 2009 Expected Stabilizations | 2010 Expected Stabilizations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
446,250 | $ | 24,617 | 395,011 | $ | 41,779 | 841,261 | $ | 66,396 | 12.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
689,676 | 38,677 | 874,456 | 59,960 | 1,564,132 | 98,637 | 18.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,135,926 | $ | 63,294 | 1,269,467 | $ | 101,739 | 2,405,393 | $ | 165,033 | 30.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
274,802 | $ | 18,910 | 692,754 | $ | 61,203 | 967,556 | $ | 80,113 | 14.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 426,552 | 51,270 | 426,552 | 51,270 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
67,823 | 12,463 | 573,352 | 83,439 | 641,175 | 95,902 | 17.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
342,625 | $ | 31,373 | 1,692,658 | $ | 195,912 | 2,035,283 | $ | 227,285 | 41.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 420,847 | $ | 56,777 | 420,847 | $ | 56,777 | 10.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
China |
392,215 | 19,701 | 1,591,303 | 78,671 | 1,983,518 | 98,372 | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
392,215 | $ | 19,701 | 2,012,150 | $ | 135,448 | 2,404,365 | $ | 155,149 | 28.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,870,766 | $ | 114,368 | 4,974,275 | $ | 433,099 | 6,845,041 | $ | 547,467 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses | (33,377 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses | $ | 514,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Projects |
7 | 15 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Invested to Date(4)
|
$ | 104,821 | $ | 371,530 | $ | 476,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average
Ownership Percentage |
100.0 | % | 91.4 | % | 93.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Amounts
Invested to Date(2)(4)
|
$ | 104,821 | $ | 341,024 | $ | 445,845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Amounts Invested
to
Date
Percentage(2)(4)(5)(6)
|
91.7 | % | 86.2 | % | 87.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Share of Remainder to
Invest(2)(4)(6)
|
$ | 9,547 | $ | 54,637 | $ | 64,184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average
Estimated
Yield(2)(6)
|
8.0 | % | 6.8 | % | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent Pre-Leased(2)
|
54.5 | % | 8.3 | % | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Calculated as AMBs share of amounts funded to date to AMBs share of estimated total investment. | |
| (6) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 14 |
![]() |
Completions and Properties Available for Sale or Contribution(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
| Development Completions(2) | Available for Sale or Contribution as of September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | Development | Operating | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | Properties | Properties | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,235,307 | $ | 123,536 | 5,028,778 | $ | 377,484 | 3,515,937 | $ | 282,752 | 202,863 | $ | 7,572 | 3,718,800 | $ | 290,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
491,286 | 32,848 | 3,241,392 | 207,590 | 1,612,216 | 94,794 | 189,337 | 11,818 | 1,801,553 | 106,612 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,726,593 | $ | 156,384 | 8,270,170 | $ | 585,074 | 5,128,153 | $ | 377,546 | 392,200 | $ | 19,390 | 5,520,353 | $ | 396,936 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 101,461 | $ | 14,314 | 37,760 | $ | 5,197 | 345,091 | $ | 38,964 | 382,851 | $ | 44,161 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | 139,608 | 19,743 | | | 139,608 | 19,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | 533,147 | 53,803 | 207,232 | 35,830 | 436,627 | 38,572 | 643,859 | 74,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
436,916 | 40,562 | 436,916 | 40,562 | 1,022,887 | 116,641 | 178,262 | 30,261 | 1,201,149 | 146,902 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
436,916 | $ | 40,562 | 1,071,524 | $ | 108,679 | 1,407,487 | $ | 177,411 | 959,980 | $ | 107,797 | 2,367,467 | $ | 285,208 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 685,757 | $ | 115,280 | 2,835,609 | $ | 519,990 | | $ | | 2,835,609 | $ | 519,990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | 206,269 | 9,755 | 206,269 | 9,762 | 1,897,400 | 59,438 | 2,103,669 | $ | 69,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | 394,080 | 25,341 | 218,132 | 20,883 | 612,212 | 46,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 892,026 | $ | 125,035 | 3,435,958 | $ | 555,093 | 2,115,532 | $ | 80,321 | 5,551,490 | $ | 635,414 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,163,509 | 196,946 | 10,233,720 | $ | 818,788 | 9,971,598 | $ | 1,110,050 | 3,467,712 | $ | 207,508 | 13,439,310 | $ | 1,317,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses | (119,486 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses | $ | 1,198,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs Weighted Average
Ownership Percentage |
81.8 | % | 90.8 | % | 94.4 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average
Estimated
Yield(2)(5)
|
7.4 | % | 7.2 | % | 6.9 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent
Pre-leased(2)
|
56.2 | % | 60.0 | % | 48.5 | % | 94.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Total investment includes estimated costs of completion. | |
| (5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 15 |
![]() |
Land, Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
Land Inventory
| The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
2,132 | 35,355,530 | 219 | 4,336,270 | 150 | 5,678,820 | 2,501 | 45,370,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site plan adjustments |
14 | 310,000 | | | | | 14 | 310,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2009 |
2,146 | 35,665,530 | 219 | 4,336,270 | 150 | 5,678,820 | 2,515 | (3) | 45,680,620 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4)
|
$ | 574,545 | $ | 114,565 | $ | 188,757 | $ | 877,867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (154,264 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 723,603 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs share of investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 574,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-Added Conversion Inventory(1)(7)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 9 | 1 | | | 9 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 218 | 12 | | | 225 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 227 | 13 | | | 234 | (5) | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Inventory(1)(7)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | | | | | 40,800 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 998,372 | 3 | | | 1,039,172 | (6) | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (3) | AMBs share of acres and square feet of estimated build out including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,281 acres and 41.4 million square feet, respectively. | |
| (4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
| (5) | AMBs share is 179 acres. | |
| (6) | AMBs share is 691,171 square feet. | |
| (7) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 16 |
|
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
| Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD | Upon project sales | Perpetual(1) | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q10) | Open end | ||||||
YTD Additions to Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(2)
Gross Carrying Value of
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(3)
| (1) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
| (2) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
| (3) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 17 |
|
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | Planned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | Capitalization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
23 | % | 36,642,807 | $ | 3,326,710 | $ | 1,743,345 | $ | | $ | 214,119 | $ | | $ | 3,327,000 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4)
|
21 | % | 9,235,628 | 1,284,643 | 736,785 | | 60,942 | | 1,285,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 7,263,090 | 1,552,458 | 865,304 | 8,920 | 79,949 | | 1,552,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 6,331,990 | 356,614 | 168,003 | 58,825 | 19,392 | 245,000 | 602,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
22 | % | 59,473,515 | 6,520,425 | 3,513,437 | 67,745 | 374,402 | 245,000 | 6,766,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | 1,232,216 | 116,410 | | | 17,601 | | 116,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
23 | % | | 24,041 | 6,376 | | 4,010 | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
16 | % | 1,232,216 | 140,451 | 6,376 | | 21,611 | | 116,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(5)
|
21 | % | 60,705,731 | 6,660,876 | 3,519,813 | 67,745 | 396,013 | 245,000 | 6,882,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51 | % | 7,418,749 | (6) | 278,644 | 161,215 | | 49,802 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
23 | % | 68,124,480 | $ | 6,939,520 | $ | 3,681,028 | $ | 67,745 | $ | 445,815 | $ | 245,000 | $ | 6,882,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP
|
50 | % | 8,288,663 | $ | 467,250 | $ | 337,070 | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
20 | % | 7,318,208 | 511,558 | 196,280 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 2,172,137 | 158,192 | 80,103 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
35 | % | 17,779,008 | 1,137,000 | 613,453 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
35 | % | 17,779,008 | 1,137,000 | 613,453 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
89 | % | 2,436,591 | 229,203 | 33,107 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
61 | % | 770,442 | 269,711 | 136,378 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
47 | % | 20,986,041 | $ | 1,635,914 | $ | 782,938 | $ | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | Cash NOI(7) | Net Income | FFO(7) | Share of | Cash NOI(7) | Net Income | FFO(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 97,666 | $ | 7,580 | (8) | $ | 48,689 | (8) | AMBs | $ | 21,307 | $ | 3,257 | $ | 11,079 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 27,102 | $ | 6,782 | $ | 16,373 | Partners | $ | 15,083 | $ | 3,887 | $ | 8,587 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 | Cash NOI(7) | Net Income | FFO(7) | Share of | Cash NOI(7) | Net Income | FFO(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 298,008 | $ | 7,522 | (8) | $ | 129,127 | (8) | AMBs | $ | 65,462 | $ | 7,507 | $ | 30,389 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 81,413 | $ | 10,011 | $ | 36,710 | Partners | $ | 44,996 | $ | 7,861 | $ | 19,450 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
| (2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation), net of impairments, owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (3) | Through AMB Property Mexico, AMB holds an equity interest in various other non-core unconsolidated ventures for approximately $13.8 million. | |
| (4) | The estimated investment capacity and planned gross capitalizations and investment capacities of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
| (6) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (7) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (8) | Excludes $3.9 million and $11.5 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 18 |
|
Capitalization Summary (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Value
|
Coverage and Debt Ratios
| For the Quarter Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||
| September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Interest coverage(2)
|
4.6 | x | 3.9 | x | ||||
Fixed charge coverage(2)
|
3.4 | x | 2.8 | x | ||||
Dividends per share-to-FFO per share(2)(3)
|
39.4 | % | 46.7 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)
|
48.6 | % | 48.6 | % | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
43.1 | % | 43.1 | % | ||||
Capital
Structure(1)
| (1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | FFO per share excludes impairment and restructuring charges. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 19 |
|
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except share and share price) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB Wholly-Owned | Consolidated Joint Venture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured | Total | Unconsolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Secured | Other | Consolidated | Joint | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,212 | $ | 110,171 | $ | 38,583 | $ | | $ | 159,966 | $ | 11,703 | $ | 171,669 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
75,000 | 393,555 | 325,941 | (2) | 425,870 | 116,198 | | 1,336,564 | 210,509 | 1,547,073 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
75,000 | 117,396 | 1,014 | 15,516 | 108,474 | | 317,400 | 619,140 | 936,540 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 1,093 | 28,126 | 387,102 | 50,000 | 466,321 | 456,406 | 922,727 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
491,480 | | 919 | 19,927 | 49,938 | | 562,264 | 724,824 | 1,287,088 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 616 | 405 | 6,481 | | 7,502 | 868,277 | 875,779 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,492 | | 664 | 16,271 | 17,610 | | 147,037 | 248,300 | 395,337 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
| | | | 16,231 | | 16,231 | 73,156 | 89,387 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
| | | | 1,272 | | 1,272 | 351,697 | 352,969 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 1,455 | | 126,455 | 183,194 | 309,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | 39,809 | | 39,809 | 5,844 | 45,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 878,972 | $ | 510,951 | $ | 341,459 | $ | 616,286 | $ | 783,153 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,180,821 | $ | 3,753,050 | $ | 6,933,871 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized discount |
(7,593 | ) | | | (1,012 | ) | (215 | ) | | (8,820 | ) | (4,277 | ) | (13,097 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 871,379 | $ | 510,951 | $ | 341,459 | $ | 615,274 | $ | 782,938 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,172,001 | $ | 3,748,773 | $ | 6,920,774 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(3)
|
| | | | (437,769 | ) | (40,000 | ) | (477,769 | ) | (2,899,484 | ) | (3,377,253 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(3)
|
$ | 871,379 | $ | 510,951 | $ | 341,459 | $ | 615,274 | $ | 345,169 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 2,694,232 | $ | 849,289 | $ | 3,543,521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.4 | % | 0.8 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.5 | % | 4.9 | % | 5.8 | % | 4.2 | % | 4.7 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average maturity (years) |
4.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
146,307,353 | (4) | $ | 22.95 | $ | 3,357,754 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,377,641 | $ | 22.95 | 77,517 | ||||||||
Total |
149,684,994 | $ | 3,435,271 | |||||||||
Total options outstanding |
8,199,308 | |||||||||||
Dilutive effect of
stock options(5)
|
326,797 | |||||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units(6) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.90 | % | $ | 312,267 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(3)(7)
|
48.6 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization(3)(7)
|
52.9 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(3)
|
43.1 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total assets(3)
|
46.9 | % | ||
| (1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.6 billion. Includes $45.5 million of U.S. Dollar borrowings, as well as $294.6 million, $90.7 million, $53.4 million and $26.7 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2009, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2009. | |
| (2) | Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the $325 million term loan was replaced with a $345 million term loan, and the maturity was extended to 2012. | |
| (3) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (4) | Includes 920,413 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
| (5) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $22.95 for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. | |
| (6) | Units are exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder for preferred stock and redeemable at the option of AMB after a five year non-call period. | |
| (7) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 20 |
|
Capital Commitments (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Debt Maturing in 2009 through 2012 as of September 30, 2009 (1)
| After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| AMB Wholly-owned Debt | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| | 393,555 | 117,396 | ||||||||||||
Other Debt(3)
|
10,987 | | | 325,000 | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
109,823 | 194,425 | 244,617 | 28,792 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
120,810 | 269,425 | 713,172 | 471,188 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
| 2,578 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
| 10,094 | 31,228 | 5,605 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
| 14,414 | 27,846 | 294,810 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
34,242 | 53,680 | 26,347 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
34,242 | 80,766 | 85,421 | 300,415 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
| 27,301 | 185,905 | 78,119 | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| 116,150 | 212,409 | 187,267 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 58,825 | 168,003 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
| 9,059 | 32,214 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | | 6,520 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
| 152,510 | 489,353 | 439,909 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
155,052 | 350,191 | 798,593 | 771,603 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
| 152,510 | 489,353 | 439,909 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 155,052 | $ | 502,701 | $ | 1,287,946 | $ | 1,211,512 | ||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 141,763 | $ | 345,385 | $ | 856,153 | $ | 710,658 | ||||||||
Development Pipeline Remainder to Fund
| AMBs Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Total | Invested to | Remainder to | Remainder of | AMBs | Remainder of | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investment(4)(5) | Date(4)(5) | Invest(4)(5) | Cash to Fund(4)(6) | Ownership % | Cash to Fund(4)(6) | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (a - b) | (c) | (d) | (c x d) | |||||||||||||||||||
Development pipeline as of September 30, 2009
|
$ | 547,467 | $ | 476,351 | $ | 71,116 | $ | 59,821 | 90.0 | % | $ | 53,839 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2012 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
| (2) | Subject to certain conditions. | |
| (3) | Subsequent to September 30, 2009, the $325 million term loan was replaced with a $345 million term loan, and the maturity was extended to 2012. | |
| (4) | Excluding impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (5) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (6) | Amounts remove the estimated capitalized interest component from the remainder to fund. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 21 |
|
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Income Items
| Actual | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||
| September 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 73,959 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 124,787 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1)
|
26.7 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
33,322 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to in-progress developments |
$ | (1,061 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to projects held for sale or contribution |
(8,928 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
| |||||||
NOI required to stabilize properties acquired during the quarter |
| |||||||
Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI:(2)
|
2,147 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(3)
|
(7,842 | ) | ||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI from continuing operations
related to operating properties(1)(4)
|
$ | 99,439 | ||||||
Development platform:(3)
|
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.05 | ||||||
Assets & Liabilities
| As of | ||||
| AMBs share of:(1) | September 30, 2009 | |||
Development, land, and contributed assets:(4)
|
||||
Development pipeline (invested to date)(5)
|
$ | 412,816 | ||
Development projects available for sale or contribution(5)
|
937,661 | |||
Operating projects available for sale or contribution(5)
|
174,602 | |||
Land held for future development(5)
|
574,934 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(6)
|
26,207 | |||
Total development, land and contributed assets |
$ | 2,126,220 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(4)
|
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,543,521 | ||
Preferred securities |
312,267 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 3,855,788 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(4)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 239,692 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
340,841 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(61,779 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(373,833 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 144,921 | ||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Other adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI include free rent granted in the quarter and non-property related revenues and expenses. | |
| (3) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
| (4) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
| (5) | Assets are net of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (6) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended September 30, 2009. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 22 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures.
Estimated acquisition capital expenditures include immediate building
improvements that are taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase
of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating
standard or to stabilization and incremental building improvements and leasing
costs that are incurred in an effort to substantially increase the revenue
potential of an existing building.
Adjusted
EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the
amount of capitalized interest deducted from the determination of development
gains), tax, depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, restructuring
and other non-cash charges, stock based compensation amortization, and
non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating
performance and liquidity. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors
relevant and useful information because it permits investors to view income
from its operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash
depreciation and amortization expense or non-development gains. By excluding
interest expense, adjusted EBITDA allows investors to measure AMBs operating
performance independent of its capital structure and indebtedness and,
therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its operating performance
between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare its operating
performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in
other industries. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental
measure for reviewing its comparative performance with other companies because,
by excluding non-cash depreciation expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the
investing public compare the performance of a real estate company to that of
companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, AMB believes that
adjusted EBITDA helps investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service
obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and unit
distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating
performance and liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating
performance, and comparing that performance to other companies, both in the
real estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating its ability
to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share
dividends and unit distributions. AMB believes investors should consider
adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of AMBs
performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its performance and
liquidity, to improve their understanding of AMBs operating results and
liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of its performance between
periods and as against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, impairment charges, and non-development gains
when assessing AMBs financial performance, an investor is assessing the
earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not taking into account the
eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection with such
operations. As a result, adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool
and should be used in conjunction with AMBs required GAAP presentations.
Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs historical cash expenditures or future
cash requirements for working capital, capital expenditures or contractual
commitments. Adjusted EBITDA also does not reflect the cash required to make
interest and principal payments on AMBs outstanding debt. While adjusted
EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance and
liquidity, it does not represent net income or cash flow from operations as
defined by GAAP and it should not be considered as an alternative to those
indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, AMBs
computation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by
other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net (loss) income for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 76,464 | $ | 34,737 | $ | (17,858 | ) | $ | 192,502 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,166 | 45,799 | 128,133 | 126,001 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | 174,410 | | ||||||||||||
Non-cash restructuring charges |
| | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
4,731 | 5,118 | 17,065 | 16,741 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint
ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(3,257 | ) | (5,372 | ) | (7,507 | ) | (14,359 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
11,079 | 11,589 | 30,389 | 32,727 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
9,646 | 13,699 | 29,759 | 24,430 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
28,855 | 33,303 | 90,843 | 100,835 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(9,596 | ) | (3,028 | ) | (38,779 | ) | (31,064 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(14,975 | ) | (10,398 | ) | (44,545 | ) | (67,505 | ) | ||||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties
sold or contributed |
1,226 | 7,257 | 14,085 | 19,043 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
1,231 | 3,768 | 10,758 | 11,255 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 152,570 | $ | 136,472 | $ | 390,577 | $ | 410,606 | ||||||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the
pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs percentage
of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment
ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB believes that
AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures,
which enable both management and investors to assess the operations, earnings
and growth of AMB in light of AMBs ownership interest in its joint ventures
and to compare the applicable measure to that of other companies. In addition,
it allows for a more meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to that of
other companies that do not consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs
share of calculations are not intended to reflect actual liability should
there be a default under loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs
computation of AMBs share of measures may not be comparable to that of other
real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating
these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet
information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate information about
financial position. However, AMB considers balance sheet information reported
on an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash equivalents
and restricted cash, AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets,
AMBs share of deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net),
and AMBs share of accounts payable and other liabilities) to be useful
supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs operating
performance. See Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed
and AMBs share of. AMB believes that AMBs share of balance sheet items on
an owned and managed basis helps management and investors make a comprehensive
assessment of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better
understanding of AMBs operating activities. While such information is helpful
to the investor, it does not provide balance sheet information as defined by
GAAP and is not a true alternative to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs
computation of its share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis
may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of
the total debt based on its percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMB believes
that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which
enables both management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare
its leverage to that of other companies. In addition, it allows for a more
meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies that do not
consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total debt is not intended to
reflect its actual liability should there be a default under any or all of such
loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See Capitalization Detail for a
reconciliation of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using
the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of
the total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs share of
total assets is the pro rata portion of total gross book value of assets based
on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and
unconsolidated joint ventures holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using
the following definitions: AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of
the total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs
definition of total market capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. AMBs definition
of market equity is the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common
stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per
share of its common stock as of the period end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per
the lease, as of a certain date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted,
then the first positive rent value is used. Leases denominated in foreign
currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it
wholly owns or manages through its consolidated and unconsolidated
co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital Partners. Assets under
management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or
clients share of the carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs
share of total market capitalization.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 23 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the
total rentable square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by
total rentable square feet. Space is considered leased when the tenant has
either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate
investments plus subsequently incurred capital expenditures. Generally, each
real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and
amortization of lease intangibles. AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an
appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because cash basis NOI
reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding the
effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash
basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. However, cash-basis NOI
should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance since it
does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or
trends in development and construction activities that could materially impact
results from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that
of other real estate investment trusts, as they may use different methodologies
for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the three months ended September
30, 2009, refer to the SS NOI definition. The following table reconciles AMBs
share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
(dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| September 30, 2009 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 103,028 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(1,969 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI from continuing operations |
(27,100 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
73,959 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
12,019 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
21,303 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
(7,842 | ) | ||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 99,439 | ||
Co-investment
Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors,
managed by AMB from which AMB receives acquisition fees for third-party
acquisitions, portfolio and asset management distributions or fees, as well as
incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the
co-investment venture partners pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the
pro-rata portion of the co-investment venture partners share of carrying
value less the co-investment venture partners share of debt.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% leased
or properties that have been substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments,
renovations, land sales and value-added conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price
less closing costs, minus estimated total investment and any deferred rents,
taxes or third party promotes before any deferrals on contributions, divided by
the estimated total investment.
Estimated FFO by Business. Estimated FFO by Business is FFO generated by AMBs
Real Estate Operations, Development and Private Capital business. Estimated
Development and Private Capital FFO was determined by reducing Development
Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital revenues by their respective
estimated share of general and administrative expenses, also defined as
overhead. Developments and Private Capitals estimated allocation of total
general and administrative expenses was based on their respective percentage of
actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real
Estate Operations FFO represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO attributable
to Development and Private Capital. Management believes estimated FFO by
business line is a useful supplemental measure of its operating performance
because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of
AMBs respective businesses to other companies comparable businesses. Further,
AMBs computation of FFO by business line may not be comparable to that
reported by other real estate investment trusts as they may use different
methodologies in computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which
could be acquired through the use of its equity commitments from co-investment
venture partners plus AMBs funding obligations and estimated debt
capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development,
renovation, or expansion, including initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground
leases, buildings, and associated carry costs. Estimated total investments are
based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar
investments are translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period
end.
Co-investment venture operating results.
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
23 | % | $ | 67,777 | $ | (19,651 | ) | $ | (369 | ) | $ | (660 | ) | $ | 45,166 | $ | 20,447 | |||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
21 | % | 25,025 | (4,913 | ) | 2,547 | 2,547 | 19,618 | 10,254 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 25,197 | (5,749 | ) | 3,650 | 3,650 | 19,215 | 10,805 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 10,498 | (2,529 | ) | 792 | 792 | 7,774 | 3,739 | (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | (32 | ) | (86 | ) | (166 | ) | (166 | ) | (118 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 11,905 | (3,450 | ) | 289 | 289 | 8,339 | 3,786 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 13,447 | (3,012 | ) | 3,279 | 3,274 | 10,478 | 6,614 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 3,872 | (973 | ) | 514 | 514 | 2,959 | 1,608 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes $3.9 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial
measures represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure
based on AMBs co-investment venture partners percentage of equity interest in
each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted for
in the applicable financial measure.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual
cash NOI following occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total
investment. Yields exclude value added conversion projects and are calculated
on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA
divided by fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint
venture partners share of interest expense and amortization of finance costs
and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued operations, plus AMBs
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized
interest, preferred unit distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses
fixed charge coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB believes fixed charge
coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits fixed income
investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding
debt, make distributions to its preferred unitholders and pay dividends to its
preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge coverage may not be
comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 24 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 28,855 | $ | 33,303 | $ | 90,843 | $ | 100,835 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(3,048 | ) | (1,887 | ) | (9,300 | ) | (7,042 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
| (462 | ) | (192 | ) | (530 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
| (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(5,633 | ) | (3,979 | ) | (19,870 | ) | (28,468 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
9,646 | 13,699 | 29,759 | 24,430 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
9,760 | 13,980 | 32,680 | 48,907 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
1,431 | 1,431 | 4,295 | 4,295 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | 11,856 | 11,856 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 44,963 | $ | 60,034 | $ | 140,067 | $ | 154,273 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations (FFO), Funds From Operations Per Share and Unit
(FFOPS) and FFO, Excluding Impairment and Restructuring charges (together with
FFO and FFOPS, the FFO Measures).
AMB believes that net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate
earnings measure. However, AMB considers funds from operations, or FFO, FFO per
share and unit, or FFOPS, and FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring
charges, to be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB
defines FFOPS as FFO per fully diluted weighted average share of AMBs common
stock and operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO as net income
available to common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less
gains (or losses) from dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes
and real estate-related depreciation, and adjustments to derive AMBs pro rata
share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including
those from value-added conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a
component of FFO. AMB believes gains from development should be included in FFO
to more completely reflect the performance of one of our lines of business. AMB
believes that value-added conversion dispositions are in substance land sales
and as such should be included in FFO, consistent with the real estate
investment trust industrys long standing practice to include gains on the sale
of land in FFO. However, AMBs interpretation of FFO or FFOPS may not be
consistent with the views of others in the real estate investment trust
industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT definition, and
may not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate investment
trusts that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than AMB does.
In connection with the formation of a joint venture, AMB may warehouse assets
that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed
venture. Some of the properties held for contribution may, under certain
circumstances, be required to be depreciated under U.S. GAAP. If this
circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO gains or
losses related to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to
joint ventures. Although such a change, if instituted, will be a departure from
the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO will better
reflect the value created as a result of the
contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses from the
contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO.
In addition to presenting FFO as described above, AMB presents FFO, excluding
impairment and restructuring charges. AMB calculates FFO, excluding impairment
and restructuring charges, as FFO less impairment and restructuring charges and
adjustments to derive AMBs share of impairment charges from consolidated and
unconsolidated joint ventures. To the extent that the book value of a land
parcel or development asset exceeded the fair market value of a property, based
on its intended holding period, a non-cash impairment charge was recognized for
the shortfall. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in
estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in market conditions that
adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges reflected costs associated
with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Although difficult
to predict, these charges may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current
economic climate and its adverse effects on the real estate markets. While not
infrequent or unusual in nature, these charges are subject to market
fluctuations that can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operations.
The economics underlying these charges reflect market conditions in the
short-term but can obscure the value of AMBs long-term investment decisions and
strategies. Management believes FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring
charges, is significant and useful to both it and its investors because it more
appropriately reflects the value and
strength of AMBs business model and its potential performance isolated from
the volatility of the current economic environment. However, in addition to the
limitations of FFO Measures generally discussed below, FFO, excluding
impairment and restructuring charges, does not present a comprehensive measure
of AMBs financial condition and operating performance. This measure is a
modification of the NAREIT definition of FFO and should not be considered a
replacement of FFO as AMB defines it or used as an alternative to net income or
cash as defined by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures are meaningful supplemental measures of its
operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets
in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate
assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation and
amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically
risen or fallen with market and other conditions, many industry investors and
analysts have considered presentation of operating results for real estate
companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO
Measures are supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate
investment trusts that exclude historical cost depreciation and amortization,
among other items, from net income available to common stockholders, as defined
by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, combined with the
required U.S. GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the
understanding of operating results of real estate investment trusts among the
investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such
companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures to be useful measures
for reviewing comparative operating and financial performance because, by
excluding gains or losses related to sales of previously depreciated operating
real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization, the FFO
Measures can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a
companys real estate between periods or as compared to other companies. While
FFO and FFOPS are relevant and widely used measures of operating performance
of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures do not represent cash flow
from operations or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be
considered as alternatives to those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or
operating performance. The FFO Measures also do not consider the costs
associated with capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor
are the FFO Measures necessarily indicative of cash available to fund AMBs
future cash requirements. Management compensates for the limitations of the
FFO Measures by providing investors with financial statements prepared
according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures
and a reconciliation of the FFO Measures to net income available to common
stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of
FFO from net income available to common stockholders.
The following table reconciles projected FFO from projected net income
available to common stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2009:
| 2009 | ||||||||
| Low | High | |||||||
Projected
net (loss) income available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.30 | 1.30 | ||||||
AMBs share of projected gains on disposition of operating properties
recognized to date |
(0.23 | ) | (0.23 | ) | ||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.03 | ) | (0.03 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations (FFO) |
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.75 | ||||
AMBs share of non-cash impairment charges |
1.32 | 1.32 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.64 | ) | (0.64 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO, excluding AMBs share of non-cash impairment
charges, restructuring charges and development gains(1)
|
$ | 1.45 | $ | 1.46 | ||||
Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO and FFO, excluding AMBs share of
non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains, which
is expressed per share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic
environment, management believes Projected FFO, excluding AMBs share of
non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains is the
more appropriate and useful measure to reflect its assessment of AMBs
projected operating performance.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 25 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues
(excluding straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles,
reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination fees) for properties in the
pool at period end.
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair
value being lower than carry value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by
AMBs share of interest expense which consists of consolidated interest expense
less joint venture partners share of interest expense, including amortization,
from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs share of interest expense
from unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage to measure
its liquidity. AMB believes interest coverage is relevant and useful to
investors because it permits investors to measure AMBs ability to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt. AMBs computation of interest coverage
may not be comparable to interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 28,855 | $ | 33,303 | $ | 90,843 | $ | 100,835 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
| (462 | ) | (192 | ) | (530 | ) | |||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(5,633 | ) | (3,979 | ) | (19,870 | ) | (28,468 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated co-investment
ventures |
9,646 | 13,699 | 29,759 | 24,430 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 32,868 | $ | 42,561 | $ | 100,540 | $ | 96,267 | ||||||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with
real estate developers, other real estate operators, or institutional investors
where AMB may or may not: have control, act as the manager and/or developer,
earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn incentive distributions or
promoted interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development, leasing,
property management and/or accounting services for which it may receive market
compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures
represent the pro-rata portion of the applicable financial measure based on
AMBs joint venture partners percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the applicable
financial measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs
common stock and common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing
price per share of its common stock at period end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of
its operating performance because it enables both management and investors to
analyze the fair value of its business. An assessment of the fair value of a
business involves estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various
methods. AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its business
that it believes may be useful to the investing public in calculating its NAV
but has not presented any specific methodology nor provided any guidance on
assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for
discussion of NOI and a reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable
square feet leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total
rentable square feet at period end. Space is considered leased when the tenant
has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10%
ownership interest, is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to
hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash
flow information based on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow
information. However, AMB considers cash flow information reported on an owned
and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles, gross lease termination fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs
share of net lease termination fees, tenant improvements, lease commissions and
other lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment partners share of
capital expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs
operating performance and cash flow. See Reporting Definitions for definitions
of owned and managed, AMBs share of and Co-investment venture partners
share of. AMB believes that owned and managed cash flow information helps
management and investors make a comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of
AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding of AMBs
operating performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental cash
flow information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow
information as defined by GAAP and are not true alternatives to such GAAP
measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed supplemental cash
flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies,
as they may use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting data.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represent projects where the acquired buildings are less
than 75% leased and require significant capital expenditures (generally ranging
from 10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring the buildings up to operating
standards and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant
capital expenditures (generally more than 25% of acquired cost or existing
basis) to bring the buildings up to operating standards and stabilization
(generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements
and leasing costs required to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital
expenditures do not include estimated acquisition capital expenditures which
were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or
which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference,
weighted by square feet, of the net ABR due the first month of a term
commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the former tenants term. If
free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a
point of comparison. The rental amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover
rent and premium rent charges. If either the previous or current lease terms
are under 12 months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the lease
is first generation or there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is
excluded from this calculation.
Same
Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI)
and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property
operating expenses. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and
administrative expenses, restructuring charges, real estate impairment losses,
development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or contribution of real
estate interests, and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as
defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, NOI is a
useful supplemental measure calculated to help investors understand AMBs
operating performance, excluding the effects of costs and expenses which are
not related to the performance of the assets. NOI is widely used by the real
estate industry as a useful supplemental measure, which helps investors compare
AMBs operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate
impairment losses have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not
consider its impairment losses to be a property operating expense. AMB believes
that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common methodology used
in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the
changing values of AMBs assets but do not reflect the current operating
performance of the assets with respect to their revenues or expenses. AMBs
real estate impairment losses are non-cash charges which represent the write
down in the value of assets when estimated fair value over the holding period
is lower than current carrying value. The impairment charges were principally a
result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration in
market conditions that adversely impacted underlying real estate values.
Therefore, the impairment charges are not related to the current performance of
AMBs real estate operations and should be excluded from its calculation of
NOI.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 26 |
![]() |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
|
|
||||
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating
performance for properties that are considered part of the same store pool. AMB
defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on a same store basis excluding straight line
rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See definition of same store
pool. AMB considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental
performance measure because it reflects the operating performance of the real
estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and provides a
better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year
comparison. In addition, AMB believes that SS NOI helps investors compare the
operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to other companies.
While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of
real estate investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations
or net income as defined by GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative
to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or operating performance. SS NOI
also does not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses,
real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital
expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction
activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Further,
AMBs computation of SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from net
income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 76,464 | $ | 34,737 | $ | (17,858 | ) | $ | 192,502 | |||||||
Private capital income |
(7,886 | ) | (9,502 | ) | (27,376 | ) | (60,838 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,166 | 45,799 | 128,133 | 126,001 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | 174,410 | | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
27,396 | 34,725 | 84,660 | 104,242 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
22,486 | 3,055 | 50,402 | (11,602 | ) | |||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(62,598 | ) | (3,028 | ) | (91,781 | ) | (11,097 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
103,028 | 105,786 | 304,414 | 339,208 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(20,876 | ) | (18,712 | ) | (53,305 | ) | (78,851 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments(1)
|
(43 | ) | (374 | ) | 855 | (2,161 | ) | |||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 82,109 | $ | 86,700 | $ | 251,964 | $ | 258,196 | ||||||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents
and amortization of lease intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior
year reporting period to the current year reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both
the current and prior year reporting periods and excludes development
properties for both the current and prior reporting periods. The same store
pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments
stabilized after December 31, 2007.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements,
lease commissions and other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second
generation space divided by the total square feet leased. Costs incurred prior
to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second
generation space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage
vacant at acquisition.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI stabilized to market occupancy
(generally 95%) divided by total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost
basis includes the initial purchase price, the effects of marking assumed debt
to market, buyers due diligence and closing costs, lease intangible
adjustments, estimated acquisition capital expenditures, and leasing costs
necessary to achieve stabilization.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing tenants
divided by the square footage of all expiring and rented leases during the
reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that default or
buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square
footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt plus
preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity (unless otherwise
noted).
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial
properties to a higher and better use, including office, residential, retail,
research & development or manufacturing. Activities required to prepare the
property for conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities
as rezoning, redesigning, reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of
the value-added conversion project is generally based on the underlying land
value based on its ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is
ascribed to the industrial building(s).
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 27 |
![]() |
Contacts |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
||||||||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 28 |
| During the third quarter of 2009, AMB leased approximately 9.8 million square feet (915,000 square meters) in its global operating portfolio. The company also leased more than 935,000 square feet (86,000 square meters) of its development pipeline. Highlights from the first quarter include leasing in: 1. Madrid AMB Barajas Logistic Park 5. Miami Pompano Center of Commerce 2. Port of Rouen AMB Port of Rouen 6. Savannah AMB Morgan Business Center 3. Osaka AMB Amagasaki Distribution Center | 7. San Francisco Pacific Business Center 4. Chicago AMB Turnberry Distribution Center 8. Seoul AMB ICN Logistic Center |
|
Forward Looking Statements |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in connection
therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to cash sources to cover
future capital requirements, the consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our
plans to retire, extend and refinance debt and maintain fixed charge coverage at certain levels,
estimated cash savings from our current dividend policy, estimated net G&A reductions, our
opportunities and plans (including those regarding our global positioning and future capital
deployment), our projected funds from operations, compound annual growth rate of our business
divisions, future assets under management, same store and/or cash net operating income and other
financial and operational guidance, our capabilities to drive growth, our future performance
compared to peers and other market indices, rent growth, industrial and other market, GDP and trade
growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities (such as ship capacity expansion,
outsourcing trends, port market demand, port expansions, container growth, and escalating land
values), on-tarmac opportunities (such as air cargo growth, ability to access and leverage
positions, and expertise and key airport opportunities), hiring, performance and retention of key
personnel, access to resources, leveraging of relationships, continuation and effectiveness of
strategic drivers, information regarding our development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and
renovation projects (including stabilization dates, square feet at stabilization or completion,
sale or contribution dates, yields from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and
total investment amounts, scope, location and timing of development starts, margins, projected
gains and returns, sustainability, profitability, scope and scale of and demand for projects,
targeted value-added conversion projects, redevelopment and conversion timelines, entitlement and
repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength of lender and
customer relationships, lease expirations, performance and value-creation of investments and market
entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates, acquisition capital and volume,
scope and build out potential of land inventory, co-investment venture and other estimated
investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures, performance, revenues and returns on
investment, target leverage, future incentive distribution, asset management, acquisition and other
private capital distributions and fees, timing of incentive distributions, private capital demand,
launching of additional funds, termination of funds, future balance sheet capacity, ability to
maintain credit extensions, our position to address debt maturities, interest rate changes,
transition to open-end funds, and access to secured and non-secured financings, which are made
pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely
on the forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events or circumstances
reflected in forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking
statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will,
should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates
or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify
forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking
statements are necessarily dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or
imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this
report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or supplement
forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and
future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking
statements: defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants or renewal at lower than expected rent
or failure to lease at all or on expected terms, decreases in real estate values and impairment
losses, our failure to obtain, renew or extend financing or re-financing, risks related to debt and
equity security financings (including dilution risk), our failure to divest properties we have
contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any divestitures, failure to maintain our
current credit agency ratings or comply with our debt covenants, international currency and hedging
risks, financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions, global trade or in
the real estate sector, inflation risks, a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy,
increased interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures, risks
related to suspending, reducing, or changing our dividends, our failure to contribute properties to
our co-investment ventures, risks related to our obligations in the event of certain defaults under
co-investment ventures and other debt, difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in
effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations,
risks and uncertainties affecting property development, value-added conversions, redevelopment and
construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain necessary
permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status
as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring, environmental
uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, changes in real estate and zoning laws, risks
related to doing business internationally and global expansion, risks of opening offices globally,
risks of changing personnel and roles, losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown
liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or otherwise and increases in real
property tax rates. Our success also
depends upon economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental
regulation, legislation, population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading
Risk Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.