EX-99.1
Published on July 28, 2009
|
Company Profile |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
AMB Property Corporation® is a leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real
estate, focused on major hub and gateway distribution markets in the Americas, Europe
and Asia. As of June 30, 2009, AMB owned or had investments in, on a consolidated basis or through
unconsolidated joint ventures, properties and development projects expected
to total approximately 156.9 million square feet (14.6 million square meters) in 48 markets within
14 countries.
AMB invests in properties located predominantly in the infill submarkets of its targeted markets.
AMBs portfolio is comprised primarily of High Throughput Distribution® facilities built
for efficiency and located near airports, seaports, ground transportation systems, and population
concentrations.
Through its private capital group, AMB provides real estate investment, portfolio management and
reporting services to co-investment ventures and clients. The private capital
revenue consists of asset management distributions and fees, acquisition and development fees as
well as incentive distributions.
| (1) | The operating portfolio includes the owned and managed portfolio and operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage (excluded from the owned and managed portfolio) and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (2) | Includes development properties available for sale or contribution. |
|
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 1 |
|
Highlights (dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST
PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | % Change | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues(1)
|
$ | 147,370 | $ | 202,540 | (27.2 | %) | $ | 309,350 | $ | 372,659 | (17.0 | %) | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
101,695 | 164,591 | (38.2 | %) | 237,047 | 274,134 | (13.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
17,162 | 72,401 | (76.3 | %) | (105,449 | ) | 111,029 | (195.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||
FFO(2)
|
50,948 | 108,827 | (53.2 | %) | (51,433 | ) | 176,064 | (129.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||
FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges(3)
|
54,748 | 108,827 | (49.7 | %) | 133,482 | 176,064 | (24.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Per diluted share and unit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPS |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.73 | (83.6 | %) | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | 1.12 | (176.8 | %) | |||||||||||
FFO(2)
|
0.34 | 1.05 | (67.6 | %) | (0.41 | ) | 1.70 | (124.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||
FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges(3)
|
0.37 | 1.05 | (64.8 | %) | 1.06 | 1.70 | (37.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
0.28 | 0.52 | (46.2 | %) | 0.56 | 1.04 | (46.2 | %) | ||||||||||||||||
| | Approximately $1.2 billion in capacity; consisting of $209 million of consolidated cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, and $1.0 billion of availability on our lines of credit | |||
Financial |
| Completed the repurchase of $183 million in unsecured senior bonds at par at a yield-to-maturity of 6.3% | ||
| | Completed approximately $1.0 billion of debt extensions, repurchases, repayments and refinances year-to-date; $241 million in the second quarter | |||
| | (2.7)% year-to-date cash basis same store NOI;(2) (4.1)% in the second quarter | |||
Operations(4)
|
| 92.0% year-to-date average occupancy; 91.1% in the second quarter | ||
| | 0.2% trailing four quarter rent changes on renewals and rollover; (2.5)% in the second quarter | |||
| | Leased more than 11.4 msf year-to-date; 5.8 msf in the second quarter | |||
| | Completed approximately $461 million in contributions and sales year-to-date; $156 million in the second quarter | |||
| | Cap rate on contribution and sales year-to-date was 6.9% | |||
Capital Deployment(4)
|
| Commenced approximately $31 million in previously committed development | ||
| | Reduced remaining cash to fund the development pipeline to $89 million | |||
| (1) | On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. Pro forma rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been $141,235 and $281,806, respectively, if AMB Partners II had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2008. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (4) | Owned and managed portfolio. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 2 |
|
Funds From Operations(1) Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Funds From Operations(1)(2)(3)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Estimated FFO by Business(1)(2)(6)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | For the Six Months | |||||||||||
| 2007 | 2008 | Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||
Real estate operations, net of unallocated overhead |
$ | 1.59 | $ | 1.51 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||
Overhead reallocation |
0.45 | 0.48 | 0.17 | |||||||||
Real estate operations FFO |
$ | 2.04 | $ | 1.99 | $ | 0.81 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
58.4 | % | 68.8 | % | 76.0 | % | ||||||
Development Gains |
1.60 | 0.72 | 0.26 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.32 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||
Development FFO |
$ | 1.28 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
36.6 | % | 13.2 | % | 14.5 | % | ||||||
Private Capital Revenues |
0.30 | 0.66 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Overhead allocation |
(0.13 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||
Private Capital FFO |
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
% of reported FFO |
5.0 | % | 18.0 | % | 9.5 | % | ||||||
Total FFO |
$ | 3.49 | $ | 2.89 | $ | 1.06 | ||||||
Development Gains(1)(2)(5)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
Private Capital Revenue(2)
(per diluted common share and unit)
(per diluted common share and unit)
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
|
| (2) | For all years presented, amounts per diluted common share and unit have been restated in accordance with FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, effective January 1, 2009, to present amounts net of allocation to participating securities for unvested restricted shares outstanding at each respective period end. Previously reported FFO per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.78, $3.51, $3.12, $2.75 and $2.30, respectively. Previously reported development gains per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.73, $1.61, $1.11, $0.47 and $0.09, respectively. Previously reported estimated FFO by business per diluted common share and unit for 2008 and 2007 were $2.92 and $3.51, respectively. Previously reported private capital revenue per diluted common share and unit for 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $0.67, $0.30, $0.48, $0.47 and $0.14, respectively. | |
| (3) | For a reconciliation of FFO from net income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004, refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
| (4) | FFO per share, excluding impairment and restructuring charges is $1.06 and $1.70 year to date for 2009 and 2008, respectively. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (5) | Excludes co-investment venture partners share of development gains. | |
| (6) | Estimated FFO by Business for 2009 and 2008 represents FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. See page 5 for a reconciliation to derive FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges. | |
| (7) | Management revenues consist of asset management distributions or fees, acquisition fees for third party acquisitions and priority distributions, as well as market compensation for development and other services. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 3 |
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues(1)
|
$ | 139,575 | $ | 161,127 | $ | 289,860 | $ | 321,323 | ||||||||
Private capital revenues |
7,795 | 41,413 | 19,490 | 51,336 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
147,370 | 202,540 | 309,350 | 372,659 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating costs(1)
|
(42,513 | ) | (46,209 | ) | (91,205 | ) | (90,692 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(38,724 | ) | (39,730 | ) | (80,460 | ) | (80,214 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(25,363 | ) | (33,744 | ) | (56,609 | ) | (68,869 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
(3,824 | ) | | (3,824 | ) | | ||||||||||
Fund costs |
(322 | ) | (384 | ) | (584 | ) | (606 | ) | ||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | (161,067 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other expenses(2)
|
(5,684 | ) | (1,422 | ) | (5,022 | ) | (1,330 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
(116,430 | ) | (121,489 | ) | (398,771 | ) | (241,711 | ) | ||||||||
Other income and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Development profits, net of taxes |
| 30,402 | 33,286 | 48,222 | ||||||||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net |
| | | 19,967 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net |
4,284 | 6,059 | 4,250 | 8,987 | ||||||||||||
Other income(2)
|
8,595 | 1,883 | 1,529 | 6,293 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(29,329 | ) | (36,532 | ) | (61,986 | ) | (67,603 | ) | ||||||||
Total other income and expenses, net |
(16,450 | ) | 1,812 | (22,921 | ) | 15,866 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
14,490 | 82,863 | (112,342 | ) | 146,814 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) attributable to discontinued operations |
4,454 | 4,008 | (10,684 | ) | 8,074 | |||||||||||
Gains from sale of real estate interests, net of taxes |
10,090 | 1,159 | 28,704 | 2,547 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
14,544 | 5,167 | 18,020 | 10,621 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
29,034 | 88,030 | (94,322 | ) | 157,435 | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of net (income) loss |
(4,949 | ) | (6,424 | ) | (2,771 | ) | (25,687 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners and limited partnership unitholders share of development profits |
| (1,371 | ) | (1,108 | ) | (6,113 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred unitholders |
(1,432 | ) | (1,432 | ) | (2,864 | ) | (2,864 | ) | ||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
(1,279 | ) | (1,784 | ) | 4,041 | (2,820 | ) | |||||||||
Total noncontrolling interests share of net (income) loss |
(7,660 | ) | (11,011 | ) | (2,702 | ) | (37,484 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation |
21,374 | 77,019 | (97,024 | ) | 119,951 | |||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(3,952 | ) | (3,952 | ) | (7,904 | ) | (7,904 | ) | ||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(3)
|
(260 | ) | (666 | ) | (521 | ) | (1,018 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 17,162 | $ | 72,401 | $ | (105,449 | ) | $ | 111,029 | |||||||
Net income (loss) per common share (diluted) |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.73 | $ | (0.86 | ) | $ | 1.12 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares (diluted) |
145,380 | 99,269 | 121,991 | 99,482 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | On July 1, 2008, the partners of AMB Partners II (previously, a consolidated co-investment venture) contributed their interests in AMB Partners II to AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III in exchange for interests in AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, an unconsolidated co-investment venture. Pro forma rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been $141,235 and $281,806, respectively, and pro forma operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 would have been $41,387 and $80,619, respectively, if AMB Partners II had been deconsolidated as of January 1, 2008. | |
| (2) | Includes changes in liabilities and assets associated with AMBs deferred compensation
plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 of $5,462 and $4,179, respectively. |
|
| (3) | Represents net income (loss) attributable to AMB Property Corporation, net of preferred stock dividends, allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, there were 893 unvested restricted shares outstanding. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 4 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations(1) (in thousands, except per share data) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 17,162 | $ | 72,401 | $ | (105,449 | ) | $ | 111,029 | |||||||
Gains from sale or contribution of real estate interests, net of taxes |
(10,090 | ) | (1,159 | ) | (28,704 | ) | (22,514 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
38,724 | 39,730 | 80,460 | 80,214 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations depreciation |
592 | 1,162 | 2,315 | 2,351 | ||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(1,953 | ) | (2,155 | ) | (4,090 | ) | (3,789 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from consolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) |
4,949 | 6,424 | 2,771 | 25,687 | ||||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling interests (Net income (loss)) |
1,279 | 1,784 | (4,041 | ) | 2,820 | |||||||||||
Limited partnership unitholders noncontrolling
interests (Development profits) |
| 1,175 | 1,108 | 1,704 | ||||||||||||
FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(7,151 | ) | (16,417 | ) | (10,863 | ) | (32,993 | ) | ||||||||
Adjustments to derive FFO from unconsolidated joint ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net income |
(4,284 | ) | (6,059 | ) | (4,250 | ) | (8,987 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
11,786 | 12,276 | 19,310 | 21,138 | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(66 | ) | (335 | ) | | (596 | ) | |||||||||
Funds from operations |
$ | 50,948 | $ | 108,827 | $ | (51,433 | ) | $ | 176,064 | |||||||
FFO per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 1.05 | $ | (0.41 | ) | $ | 1.70 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
148,815 | 103,241 | 125,427 | 103,457 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments
for impairment and restructuring charges |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
$ | | $ | | $ | 161,067 | $ | | ||||||||
Discontinued operations real estate impairment losses |
| | 20,786 | | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of real estate impairment losses from unconsolidated joint ventures |
| | 4,611 | | ||||||||||||
Joint venture partners noncontrolling interest share of real estate impairment losses |
| | (4,876 | ) | | |||||||||||
AMBs share of total impairment charges(1)
|
| | 181,588 | | ||||||||||||
Restructuring
charges |
3,824 | | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities(2)
|
(24 | ) | | (497 | ) | | ||||||||||
Funds
from operations, excluding impairment and restructuring charges |
$ | 54,748 | $ | 108,827 | $ | 133,482 | $ | 176,064 | ||||||||
FFO,
excluding impairment and restructuring charges per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 1.05 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.70 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares and units (diluted) |
148,815 | 103,241 | 125,451 | 103,457 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Represents amount of FFO allocated to outstanding unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 930 unvested restricted shares. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, there were 893 unvested restricted shares. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 5 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| As of | ||||||||
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Total investments in properties |
$ | 5,835,793 | $ | 6,603,856 | ||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,014,490 | ) | (970,737 | ) | ||||
Net investments in properties |
4,821,303 | 5,633,119 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures |
434,008 | 431,322 | ||||||
Properties held for sale or contribution, net |
1,072,543 | 609,023 | ||||||
Net investments in real estate |
6,327,854 | 6,673,464 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
209,345 | 251,231 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
142,288 | 160,528 | ||||||
Other assets |
205,761 | 216,425 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,885,248 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
Liabilities and equity |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Secured debt |
$ | 1,383,862 | $ | 1,522,571 | ||||
Unsecured senior debt |
871,369 | 1,153,926 | ||||||
Unsecured credit facilities |
594,942 | 920,850 | ||||||
Other debt |
392,113 | 392,838 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
351,049 | 345,259 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,593,335 | 4,335,444 | ||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common equity |
2,647,890 | 2,291,695 | ||||||
Preferred equity |
223,412 | 223,412 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,871,302 | 2,515,107 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
||||||||
Joint venture partners |
280,714 | 293,367 | ||||||
Preferred unitholders |
77,561 | 77,561 | ||||||
Limited partnership unitholders |
62,336 | 80,169 | ||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
420,611 | 451,097 | ||||||
Total equity |
3,291,913 | 2,966,204 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,885,248 | $ | 7,301,648 | ||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 6 |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
AMBs Owned and Managed Portfolio:(1)(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 6,911 | $ | 5,154 | $ | 14,166 | $ | 11,961 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 2,809 | $ | 2,917 | $ | 6,747 | $ | 6,432 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 1,448 | $ | 76 | $ | 3,727 | $ | 390 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 976 | $ | 52 | $ | 2,702 | $ | 211 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 268 | $ | 33 | $ | 992 | $ | 188 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 2,817 | $ | 4,228 | $ | 5,046 | $ | 7,492 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
5,535 | 7,109 | 10,565 | 13,972 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
4,361 | 10,267 | 9,357 | 15,318 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
12,713 | 21,604 | 24,968 | 36,782 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(5,285 | ) | (7,152 | ) | (8,850 | ) | (11,604 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 7,428 | $ | 14,452 | $ | 16,118 | $ | 25,178 | ||||||||
AMBs Consolidated Portfolio: |
||||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 1,542 | $ | 2,708 | $ | 4,934 | $ | 6,040 | ||||||||
AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
$ | 1,726 | $ | 2,500 | $ | 4,907 | $ | 5,398 | ||||||||
Gross lease termination fees |
$ | 563 | $ | 51 | $ | 1,432 | $ | 359 | ||||||||
Net lease termination fees(3)
|
$ | 215 | $ | 29 | $ | 742 | $ | 183 | ||||||||
AMBs share of net lease termination fees |
$ | 121 | $ | 29 | $ | 596 | $ | 183 | ||||||||
Recurring capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant improvements |
$ | 1,772 | $ | 3,427 | $ | 3,078 | $ | 6,327 | ||||||||
Lease commissions and other lease costs |
3,422 | 5,764 | 7,308 | 11,398 | ||||||||||||
Building improvements |
2,822 | 8,600 | 6,899 | 12,979 | ||||||||||||
Sub-total |
8,016 | 17,791 | 17,285 | 30,704 | ||||||||||||
Co-investment venture partners share of capital expenditures |
(1,509 | ) | (4,036 | ) | (2,740 | ) | (6,639 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures |
$ | 6,507 | $ | 13,755 | $ | 14,545 | $ | 24,065 | ||||||||
| (1) | See Reporting Definitions. | |
| (2) | See Supplemental Financial Measures Disclosure for a discussion of owned and managed supplemental cash flow information. | |
| (3) | Net lease termination fees are defined as gross lease termination fees less the associated straight-line rent balance. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 7 |
|
Operations Overview(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Same Store Cash-basis NOI Growth Without Lease Termination Fees(2)
Average Occupancy(2)
Rent Change on Renewals and Rollovers(2)(3)
Lease Expirations as % of Annualized Base Rent (ABR)(2)
Top Customers
| Square | ||||||||||||||||
| Feet | ABR | % of ABR | ||||||||||||||
| 1 | Deutsche Post World Net (DHL) |
3,903,160 | $ | 33,402 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
| 2 | United States Government |
1,395,896 | 21,016 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||
| 3 | FedEx Corporation |
1,469,895 | 15,149 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||
| 4 | Nippon Express |
1,029,170 | 13,221 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||
| 5 | Sagaw a Express |
728,791 | 11,504 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
| 6 | BAX Global/Schenker/Deutsche Bahn |
1,044,503 | 10,071 | 1.2 | % | |||||||||||
| 7 | La Poste |
902,391 | 8,633 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 8 | Panalpina |
1,316,351 | 8,499 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||
| 9 | Caterpillar Logistics Services |
543,039 | 7,539 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||
| 10 | Kuehne + Nagel |
831,978 | 6,817 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
13,165,174 | $ | 135,851 | 16.2 | % | |||||||||||
Top 11-20 Customers |
6,477,625 | 46,864 | 5.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Total |
19,642,799 | $ | 182,715 | 21.7 | % | |||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Represents trailing four quarter data. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 8 |
|
Operating Statistics(1) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Owned & Managed Portfolio(2) | Same Store Pool(2) | |||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | Quarter Ended | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Square feet |
131,901,732 | 133,136,434 | 115,425,681 | 116,813,431 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of owned & managed square feet |
87.5 | % | 88.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
||||||||||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end(2)
|
90.5 | % | 92.2 | % | 90.4 | % | 92.9 | % | ||||||||
Occupancy percentage at period end (prior year) |
95.2 | % | 94.8 | % | 95.2 | % | 94.9 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage(2)
|
91.1 | % | 93.1 | % | 91.2 | % | 93.5 | % | ||||||||
Average occupancy percentage (prior year) |
94.6 | % | 94.9 | % | 94.6 | % | 95.0 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average lease terms (years) |
||||||||||||||||
Original |
6.2 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 6.2 | ||||||||||||
Remaining |
3.5 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Trailing four quarters statistics |
||||||||||||||||
Tenant retention(2)
|
62.1 | % | 67.4 | % | 62.9 | % | 70.0 | % | ||||||||
Rent change on renewals and rollovers(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Percentage |
0.2 | % | 2.2 | % | (0.1 | %) | 1.5 | % | ||||||||
Same space square footage commencing (millions) |
16.8 | 17.1 | 15.6 | 16.9 | ||||||||||||
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot(2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Retained |
$ | 1.33 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||||||
Re-tenanted |
$ | 2.85 | $ | 3.10 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average |
$ | 1.84 | $ | 1.94 | ||||||||||||
Second generation square footage commencing (millions) |
21.0 | 21.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross operating margin(2)
|
72.6 | % | 73.0 | % | 72.7 | % | 73.0 | % | ||||||||
| Same Store Pool(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| Cash Basis NOI percent change(2) | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in revenues excluding lease termination fees(3)
|
(2.8 | %) | (0.7 | %) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in expenses(3)
|
0.9 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI excluding lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(4.1 | %) | (2.7 | %) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in NOI including lease termination fees(2)(3)
|
(3.4 | %) | (1.9 | %) | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | For the quarter ended June 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was (1.7)%, (1.6)%, (1.7)% and (1.2)%, respectively, for decrease in revenues excluding lease termination fees, decrease in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, on a consolidated basis, the percent change was 0.3%, 4.1%, (1.3)% and (0.9)%, respectively, for increase in revenues excluding lease termination fees, increase in expenses, decrease in NOI excluding lease termination fees and decrease in NOI including lease termination fees. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 9 |
|
Portfolio Overview |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Square Feet as of 3/31/2009 |
Acquired Square Feet |
Placed in Operations Square Feet(1) |
Disposed Square Feet |
Square Feet as of 6/30/2009 |
% of Total Owned and Managed Square Feet as of 6/30/2009 |
AMBs Share of Square Feet as of 6/30/2009 |
Year-to-Date Average Occupancy |
Annualized Base Rent psf as of 6/30/2009 |
Year-to-Date Same Store NOI Growth Without Lease Termination Fees(2) |
Trailing Four Quarters Rent Change on Renewals and Rollovers(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Southern California |
19,586,376 | | | (194,232 | ) | 19,392,144 | 14.7 | % | 53.9 | % | 91.7 | % | $ | 6.46 | 0.2 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chicago |
13,147,056 | | | (179,400 | ) | 12,967,656 | 9.8 | % | 53.1 | % | 91.3 | % | 5.44 | 3.8 | % | (0.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No. New Jersey/New York |
11,686,626 | | (7,193 | ) | (36,074 | ) | 11,643,359 | 8.8 | % | 49.5 | % | 92.2 | % | 7.63 | (8.8 | %) | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
11,565,832 | | 85,454 | (657,600 | ) | 10,993,686 | 8.3 | % | 71.5 | % | 89.9 | % | 6.65 | (3.8 | %) | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
8,645,277 | | | (760,253 | ) | 7,885,024 | 6.0 | % | 49.7 | % | 96.3 | % | 5.50 | 4.9 | % | 10.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Florida |
6,472,397 | | (2,600 | ) | (106,599 | ) | 6,363,198 | 4.8 | % | 71.9 | % | 93.2 | % | 7.41 | (2.1 | %) | (0.5 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. On-Tarmac |
2,630,724 | | | | 2,630,724 | 2.0 | % | 92.7 | % | 90.5 | % | 19.40 | (2.8 | %) | (0.4 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other U.S. Markets |
28,748,558 | | | (90,636 | ) | 28,657,922 | 21.8 | % | 63.1 | % | 89.5 | % | 5.69 | (5.1 | %) | (2.1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
102,482,846 | | 75,661 | (2,024,794 | ) | 100,533,713 | 76.2 | % | 59.7 | % | 91.4 | % | $ | 6.59 | (2.5 | %) | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3,564,059 | | | | 3,564,059 | 2.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 93.5 | % | $ | 4.99 | (6.9 | %) | (3.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico City |
3,590,942 | | | | 3,590,942 | 2.7 | % | 47.4 | % | 90.8 | % | 5.55 | (16.3 | %) | (5.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guadalajara |
2,890,526 | | | | 2,890,526 | 2.2 | % | 21.6 | % | 98.0 | % | 4.64 | 0.5 | % | (7.6 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Mexico Markets |
419,845 | | | | 419,845 | 0.3 | % | 26.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 5.24 | (3.0 | %) | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
6,901,313 | | | | 6,901,313 | 5.2 | % | 35.4 | % | 94.4 | % | $ | 5.13 | (8.2 | %) | (6.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total / Wtd Avg |
112,948,218 | | 75,661 | (2,024,794 | ) | 110,999,085 | 84.1 | % | 59.5 | % | 91.6 | % | $ | 6.45 | (2.7 | %) | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
3,508,186 | | 277,817 | | 3,786,003 | 2.9 | % | 27.8 | % | 97.2 | % | $ | 8.74 | (9.7 | %) | (11.2 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
3,191,670 | | | | 3,191,670 | 2.4 | % | 30.2 | % | 96.1 | % | 8.85 | (13.4 | %) | (0.3 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
2,830,735 | | 436,627 | | 3,267,362 | 2.5 | % | 31.2 | % | 96.4 | % | 10.00 | (18.4 | %) | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe Markets |
343,077 | | | | 343,077 | 0.3 | % | 61.9 | % | 100.0 | % | 15.19 | 100.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
9,873,668 | | 714,444 | | 10,588,112 | 8.1 | % | 30.7 | % | 96.7 | % | $ | 9.36 | (11.3 | %) | (5.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo |
5,263,053 | | | | 5,263,053 | 4.0 | % | 20.0 | % | 91.9 | % | $ | 14.28 | 7.1 | % | (2.4 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Osaka |
2,000,037 | | | | 2,000,037 | 1.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 93.1 | % | 11.30 | 12.5 | % | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Japan Markets |
| | | | | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan Subtotal / Wtd Avg |
7,263,090 | | | | 7,263,090 | 5.5 | % | 20.0 | % | 92.2 | % | $ | 13.44 | 7.8 | % | (1.0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
1,897,400 | | | | 1,897,400 | 1.4 | % | 100.0 | % | 88.9 | % | $ | 4.57 | 8.0 | % | 11.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Singapore |
935,926 | | | | 935,926 | 0.7 | % | 100.0 | % | 98.5 | % | 9.30 | (1.7 | %) | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia Markets |
218,132 | | (13 | ) | | 218,119 | 0.2 | % | 100.0 | % | 88.3 | % | 5.56 | 0.0 | % | (9.9 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total / Wtd Avg |
10,314,548 | | (13 | ) | | 10,314,535 | 7.8 | % | 43.7 | % | 92.1 | % | $ | 11.35 | 1.8 | % | (1.0 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned and Managed Total / Wtd
Avg(2)
|
133,136,434 | | 790,092 | (2,024,794 | ) | 131,901,732 | 100.0 | % | 55.9 | % | 92.0 | % | $ | 7.08 | (2.7 | %) | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Real Estate Investments(3)
|
7,495,659 | | | | 7,495,659 | 54.3 | % | 89.0 | % | 5.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Portfolio |
140,632,093 | | 790,092 | (2,024,794 | ) | 139,397,391 | 55.8 | % | 91.8 | % | $ | 6.98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pipeline |
11,793,174 | 221,477 | (5) | (520,941 | )(6) | (2,488,143 | )(7) | 9,005,567 | 92.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale or Contribution(4)
|
6,598,392 | 2,169,293 | (5) | (277,817 | )(6) | (12,634 | )(7) | 8,477,234 | 87.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Subtotal |
18,391,566 | 2,390,770 | (798,758 | ) | (2,500,777 | ) | 17,482,801 | 90.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Global Portfolio |
159,023,659 | 2,390,770 | (8,666 | ) | (4,525,571 | ) | 156,880,192 | 59.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents assets placed in operations from development and may include positive/(negative) remeasurements of square footage as operating assets. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes operating properties held through AMBs investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage and are therefore excluded from the owned and managed portfolio and the location of AMBs global headquarters. | |
| (4) | Represents development projects available for sale or contribution that are not included in the operating portfolio. | |
| (5) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of development starts. For available for sale or contribution, represents new projects available. | |
| (6) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in operations. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects placed in operations. | |
| (7) | For development pipeline, represents square footage of completed development projects placed in available for sale or contribution. For available for sale or contribution, represents projects disposed. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 10 |
|
Capital Deployment Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Development Pipeline by Region as of June 30, 2009(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Development Starts(1)
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
(Estimated Total Investment(2))
Acquisition Volume(3)
(Acquisition Cost(2))
(Acquisition Cost(2))
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. Estimated total investment is before the impact of real estate impairment losses. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Owned and managed portfolio, excludes land inventory purchases. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 11 |
|
Development Starts and Total Capital Deployment(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
96,250 | $ | 7,248 | 23.1 | % | 96,250 | $ | 7,248 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| | 0.0 | % | 189,337 | 12,116 | 20.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
96,250 | $ | 7,248 | 23.1 | % | 285,587 | $ | 19,364 | 32.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | 274,802 | $ | 17,118 | 28.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
125,227 | 24,121 | 76.9 | % | 125,227 | 24,121 | 39.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
125,227 | $ | 24,121 | 76.9 | % | 400,029 | $ | 41,239 | 68.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
China |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| $ | | 0.0 | % | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Development Starts |
221,477 | $ | 31,369 | 100.0 | % | 685,616 | $ | 60,603 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
| AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 61.6 | % | 80.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2) | 7.2 | % | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | |||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2) | |||||||||||||
Total Acquisitions |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||
Total Development Starts |
221,477 | 31,369 | 685,616 | 60,603 | ||||||||||||
Total Capital Deployment |
221,477 | $ | 31,369 | 685,616 | $ | 60,603 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. |
|
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 12 |
|
Contributions and Dispositions(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||||||||
AMBs Ownership Contributed and Disposed |
32.1 | % | 95.5 | % | 59.5 | % | 83.0 | % | ||||||||
Contribution Value and Disposition Price |
$ | 81,516 | $ | 74,964 | $ | 143,270 | $ | 317,631 | ||||||||
Weighted Average Stabilized Cap Rate(2)(3)
|
7.6 | % | 7.9 | % | 8.3 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||||||
Development Margin(3)
|
N/A | (14.9 | %) | N/A | 9.3 | % | ||||||||||
Square Footage or Acreage Contributed or Sold
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Property | Development Property | Operating Property | Development Property | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(4) | Square Feet | Square Feet | Land Acreage(4) | |||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,367,194 | 670,409 | | 2,199,365 | 1,253,600 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
| 318,850 | | | 318,850 | | ||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,367,194 | 989,259 | | 2,199,365 | 1,572,450 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| | | | 981,162 | | ||||||||||||||||||
China |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
| | | | 981,162 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,367,194 | 989,259 | | 2,199,365 | 2,553,612 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | Excludes value-added conversions, development for sale, and land sales. | |
| (3) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (4) | Represents acreage for land sales and value-added conversion projects. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 13 |
|
Development Pipeline(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| 2009 Expected Stabilizations | 2010 Expected Stabilizations | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | % of Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Square Feet at | Total | Estimated | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Stabilization(2) | Investment(2)(3) | Investment(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
1,681,557 | $ | 176,870 | 395,011 | $ | 41,682 | 2,076,568 | $ | 218,552 | 28.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
1,180,962 | 72,904 | 875,533 | 58,102 | 2,056,495 | 131,006 | 17.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
2,862,519 | $ | 249,774 | 1,270,544 | $ | 99,784 | 4,133,063 | $ | 349,558 | 46.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 973,832 | $ | 76,623 | 973,832 | $ | 76,623 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | 413,958 | 48,794 | 413,958 | 48,794 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
67,705 | 11,946 | 578,742 | 79,979 | 646,447 | 91,925 | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
436,916 | 38,881 | | | 436,916 | 38,881 | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
504,621 | $ | 50,827 | 1,966,532 | $ | 205,396 | 2,471,153 | $ | 256,223 | 33.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Asia |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
| $ | | 417,833 | $ | 53,147 | 417,833 | $ | 53,147 | 7.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
China |
392,215 | 19,494 | 1,591,303 | 79,719 | 1,983,518 | 99,213 | 13.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
392,215 | $ | 19,494 | 2,009,136 | $ | 132,866 | 2,401,351 | $ | 152,360 | 20.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total |
3,759,355 | $ | 320,095 | 5,246,212 | $ | 438,046 | 9,005,567 | $ | 758,141 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
(51,441 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses | $ | 706,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Projects | 18 | 16 | 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Invested to Date(4) | $ | 289,853 | $ | 355,337 | $ | 645,190 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 89.1 | % | 91.6 | % | 90.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs Share of Amounts Invested to Date(2)(4) | $ | 257,150 | $ | 325,742 | $ | 582,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs Share of Amounts Invested to Date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage(2)(4)(5)(6)
|
90.2 | % | 81.2 | % | 84.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs Share of Remainder to Invest(2)(4)(6) | $ | 28,017 | $ | 75,408 | $ | 103,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(6) | 7.5 | % | 7.0 | % | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Pre-Leased(2) | 44.2 | % | 11.8 | % | 25.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Calculated as AMBs share of amounts funded to date to AMBs share of estimated total investment. | |
| (6) | Calculated using estimated total investment before the impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 14 |
|
Completions and Properties Available for Sale or Contribution(1) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Development Completions(2) | Available for Sale or Contribution as of June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended | For the Six Months Ended | Development | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | Properties | Properties | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | Total | Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | Square Feet | Investment(3) | Square Feet | Investment(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
458,996 | $ | 52,799 | 3,793,471 | $ | 253,948 | 2,763,896 | $ | 158,168 | 577,588 | $ | 46,533 | 3,341,484 | $ | 204,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Americas |
1,222,575 | 75,588 | 2,750,106 | 174,742 | 1,308,273 | 72,813 | 2,607,850 | 184,398 | 3,916,123 | 257,211 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Americas Total |
1,681,571 | $ | 128,387 | 6,543,577 | $ | 428,690 | 4,072,169 | $ | 230,981 | 3,185,438 | $ | 230,931 | 7,257,607 | $ | 461,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
France |
| $ | | 101,461 | $ | 14,314 | 37,954 | $ | 4,981 | 345,091 | $ | 37,346 | 383,045 | $ | 42,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
| | | | 139,608 | 18,924 | | | 139,608 | 18,924 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benelux |
436,627 | 36,973 | 533,147 | 53,803 | 207,232 | 34,344 | 436,627 | 36,973 | 643,859 | 71,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Europe |
| | | | 585,971 | 74,245 | 178,262 | 31,152 | 764,233 | 105,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe Total |
436,627 | $ | 36,973 | 634,608 | $ | 68,117 | 970,765 | $ | 132,494 | 959,980 | $ | 105,471 | 1,930,745 | $ | 237,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Japan |
685,757 | $ | 115,280 | 685,757 | $ | 115,280 | 2,833,951 | $ | 483,382 | | $ | | 2,833,951 | $ | 483,382 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
China |
206,269 | 9,755 | 206,269 | 9,755 | 206,269 | 9,755 | 1,897,400 | 59,938 | 2,103,669 | 69,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Asia |
| | | | 394,080 | 23,431 | 218,132 | 19,335 | 612,212 | 42,766 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Total |
892,026 | $ | 125,035 | 892,026 | $ | 125,035 | 3,434,300 | $ | 516,568 | 2,115,532 | $ | 79,273 | 5,549,832 | $ | 595,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3,010,224 | 290,395 | 8,070,211 | $ | 621,842 | 8,477,234 | $ | 880,043 | 6,260,950 | $ | 415,675 | 14,738,184 | $ | 1,295,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
(135,216 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total investment, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 1,160,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs Weighted Average Ownership Percentage | 100.0 | % | 93.5 | % | 95.2 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted Average Estimated Yield(2)(5) | 7.0 | % | 7.1 | % | 7.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percent Pre-leased(2) | 56.3 | % | 61.0 | % | 42.3 | % | 94.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes value-added conversion projects. | |
| (4) | Total investment includes estimated costs of completion. | |
| (5) | Calculated using estimated total investment before impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 15 |
|
Land, Value-Added Conversion, and Redevelopment Inventory(1)(2) (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| The Americas | Europe | Asia | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | Estimated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | Build Out Potential | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | Acres | (square feet) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
2,136 | 35,433,856 | 221 | 4,461,497 | 128 | 5,059,530 | 2,485 | 44,954,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | 22 | 619,290 | 22 | 619,290 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development starts |
(9 | ) | (96,250 | ) | (4 | ) | (125,227 | ) | | | (13 | ) | (221,477 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Site plan adjustments |
5 | 17,924 | 2 | | | | 7 | 17,924 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2009 |
2,132 | 35,355,530 | 219 | 4,336,270 | 150 | 5,678,820 | 2,501 | (3) | 45,370,620 | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Land(4)
|
$ | 538,770 | $ | 107,940 | $ | 176,950 | $ | 823,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | (154,105 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses |
$ | 669,555 | (3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value-Added Conversion Inventory(1)(7)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of | Number of | Number of | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Time Frame | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | Acres | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
| | 29 | 2 | | | 29 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
7 | 2 | 218 | 12 | | | 225 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
7 | 2 | 247 | 14 | | | 254 | (5) | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Redevelopment Inventory(1)(7)
| East Region | West Region | Central Region | The Americas | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | Square | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redevelopment Time Frame | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | Feet | Projects | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 years or less |
40,800 | 1 | 329,140 | 1 | | | 369,940 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3+ years |
| | 998,372 | 3 | | | 998,372 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,800 | 1 | 1,327,512 | 4 | | | 1,368,312 | (6) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (2) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated co-investment ventures. | |
| (3) | AMBs share of acres, square feet of estimated build out, and investment in land, net of cumulative real estate impairment losses including amounts held in unconsolidated co-investment ventures is 2,277 acres, 41.4 million square feet and $525,849, respectively. | |
| (4) | Represents actual cost incurred to date including initial acquisition, infrastructure, and associated carry costs. | |
| (5) | AMBs share is 198 acres. | |
| (6) | AMBs share is 750,674 square feet. | |
| (7) | East, West and Central regions represent AMBs geographic division of the Americas. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 16 |
|
Private Capital Co-investment Ventures Overview (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Date | Geographic | Functional | Incentive Distribution | |||||||||
| Co-investment Venture | Established | Focus | Principal Venture Investors | Currency | Frequency | Term | ||||||
AMB-SGP
|
March 2001 | United States | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 10 years | March 2011; extendable 10 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II
|
June 2001 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2014 (estimated) | ||||||
AMB-AMS
|
June 2004 | United States | Various | USD | At dissolution | December 2012; extendable 4 years | ||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III
|
October 2004 | United States | Various | USD | 3 years (next 2Q11) | Open end | ||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico
|
December 2004 | Mexico | Subsidiary of GIC Real Estate Pte Ltd. | USD | 7 years | December 2011; extendable 7 years | ||||||
AMB Japan Fund I
|
June 2005 | Japan | Various | JPY | At dissolution | June 2013; extendable 2 years | ||||||
AMB DFS Fund I(1)
|
October 2006 | United States | GE Real Estate | USD | Upon project sales | Perpetual | ||||||
AMB Europe Fund I
|
June 2007 | Europe | Various | EUR | 3 years (next 2Q10) | Open end | ||||||
YTD Additions to Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(1)
Gross Carrying Value of Private Capital Co-investment Ventures(2)
| (1) | Additions to private capital co-investment ventures include both acquisitions from third parties as well as assets contributed to co-investment ventures from AMB. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 17 |
|
Joint Ventures Financial Summary (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMBs | Gross | AMBs | Estimated | Planned | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Square | Book | Property | Other | Net Equity | Investment | Gross | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Joint Ventures | Percentage | Feet(1) | Value(2) | Debt | Debt | Investment(3) | Capacity | Capitalization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-Investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
19 | % | 36,393,478 | $ | 3,305,545 | $ | 1,738,726 | $ | 40,000 | $ | 185,610 | $ | | $ | 3,306,000 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I(4)
|
21 | % | 9,236,263 | 1,231,380 | 711,179 | | 61,943 | | 1,231,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 7,263,082 | 1,444,717 | 817,244 | 8,302 | 79,008 | | 1,445,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 6,331,990 | 356,433 | 168,814 | 58,825 | 19,757 | 245,000 | 601,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
20 | % | 59,224,813 | 6,338,075 | 3,435,963 | 107,127 | 346,318 | 245,000 | 6,583,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | 1,235,492 | 116,899 | | | 17,464 | | (5) | 117,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III(4)
|
19 | % | 178,567 | 10,531 | 5,939 | | 887 | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
15 | % | 1,414,059 | 127,430 | 5,939 | | 18,351 | | 117,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures(6)
|
20 | % | 60,638,872 | 6,465,505 | 3,441,902 | 107,127 | 364,669 | 245,000 | 6,700,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
51 | % | 7,418,749 | (7) | 278,399 | 162,276 | | 50,049 | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
21 | % | 68,057,621 | $ | 6,743,904 | $ | 3,604,178 | $ | 107,127 | $ | 414,718 | $ | 245,000 | $ | 6,700,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 8,288,663 | $ | 464,954 | $ | 339,335 | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 7,219,648 | 504,514 | 197,559 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 2,172,137 | 157,522 | 82,473 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Co-investment Ventures |
35 | % | 17,680,448 | 1,126,990 | 619,367 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 98,560 | 5,988 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Development Co-investment Ventures |
20 | % | 98,560 | 5,988 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
35 | % | 17,779,008 | 1,132,978 | 619,367 | 50,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
89 | % | 2,388,940 | 241,522 | 33,237 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Industrial Development Joint Ventures |
61 | % | 770,442 | 249,872 | 128,694 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Consolidated Joint Ventures |
47 | % | 20,938,390 | $ | 1,624,372 | $ | 781,298 | $ | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | FFO(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | FFO(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 98,649 | $ | 6,831 | (9) | $ | 46,504 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 21,769 | $ | 4,284 | $ | 11,786 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 27,225 | $ | 7,672 | $ | 14,088 | Partners | $ | 14,826 | $ | 2,102 | $ | 7,151 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Results For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 |
Cash NOI(8) | Net (Loss) Income |
FFO(8) | Share of | Cash NOI(8) | Net Income | FFO(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 200,342 | $ | (58 | )(9) | $ | 80,438 | (9) | AMBs | $ | 44,155 | $ | 4,250 | $ | 19,310 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
$ | 54,311 | $ | 3,229 | $ | 20,337 | Partners | $ | 29,913 | $ | 814 | $ | 10,863 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | For development properties, represents the estimated square feet upon completion for the committed phases of development projects. | |
| (2) | Represents the book value of the property (before accumulated depreciation) owned by the joint venture and excludes net other assets. Development book values include uncommitted land. | |
| (3) | Through its investment in G. Accion, AMB holds an equity interest in various other unconsolidated ventures for approximately $19.3 million. | |
| (4) | The estimated investment capacity and planned gross capitalizations and investment capacities of AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III and AMB Europe Fund I, as open-end funds, are not limited. The planned gross capitalization represents the gross book value of real estate assets as of the most recent quarter end, and the investment capacity represents estimated capacity based on the funds current cash and leverage limitations as of the most recent quarter end. | |
| (5) | For AMB DFS Fund I, the investment period ended in June 2009. The fund will terminate upon completion and disposition of assets currently owned and under development by the fund. | |
| (6) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures for unconsolidated co-investment venture operating results. | |
| (7) | Includes investments in 7.3 million square feet of operating properties through AMBs investment in unconsolidated joint ventures that it does not manage which it excludes from its owned and managed portfolio. | |
| (8) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (9) | Excludes $3.8 million and $7.6 million of interest expense on shareholder loans for AMB-SGP Mexico for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 18 |
|
Capitalization Summary (dollars in millions) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Value
Coverage and Debt Ratios
| For the Quarter Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||
| June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||
Interest coverage(2)
|
3.1x | 3.5x | ||||||
Fixed charge coverage(2)
|
2.2x | 2.5x | ||||||
Dividends per share-to-FFO per share(2)(3)
|
82.4% | (136.6% | ) | |||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)
|
53.1% | 53.1% | ||||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
44.0% | 44.0% | ||||||
Capital Structure(1)
| (1) | Debt amounts represent AMBs share of debt and preferred securities. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | FFO per share includes real estate impairment losses. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 19 |
|
Capitalization Detail (dollars in thousands, except shares and share price) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| AMB Wholly-Owned | Consolidated Joint Venture | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unsecured | Total | Unconsolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior | Credit | Other | Secured | Secured | Other | Consolidated | Joint | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt | Facilities(1) | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Debt | Venture Debt | Debt | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,865 | $ | 130,845 | $ | 79,644 | $ | | $ | 222,354 | $ | 22,930 | $ | 245,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
75,000 | 479,482 | 325,941 | 419,368 | 110,917 | | 1,410,708 | 200,990 | 1,611,698 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
75,000 | 115,460 | 1,014 | 15,036 | 83,193 | | 289,703 | 672,504 | 962,207 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
| | 1,093 | 2,683 | 386,920 | 50,000 | 440,696 | 442,797 | 883,493 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
491,795 | | 920 | 19,416 | 39,222 | | 551,353 | 710,493 | 1,261,846 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 616 | 405 | 6,481 | | 7,502 | 777,870 | 785,372 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
112,491 | | 664 | 16,271 | 17,609 | | 147,035 | 274,300 | 421,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
| | | | 16,231 | | 16,231 | 73,051 | 89,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
| | | | 1,272 | | 1,272 | 351,585 | 352,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
125,000 | | | | 1,455 | | 126,455 | 183,194 | 309,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | | | 38,538 | | 38,538 | 5,844 | 44,382 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 879,286 | $ | 594,942 | $ | 342,113 | $ | 604,024 | $ | 781,482 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,251,847 | $ | 3,715,558 | $ | 6,967,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized discount |
(7,917 | ) | | | (1,460 | ) | (184 | ) | | (9,561 | ) | (4,253 | ) | (13,814 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 871,369 | $ | 594,942 | $ | 342,113 | $ | 602,564 | $ | 781,298 | $ | 50,000 | $ | 3,242,286 | $ | 3,711,305 | $ | 6,953,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Joint venture partners share of debt(2)
|
| | | | (437,562 | ) | (40,000 | ) | (477,562 | ) | (2,932,806 | ) | (3,410,368 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of total debt(2)
|
$ | 871,369 | $ | 594,942 | $ | 342,113 | $ | 602,564 | $ | 343,736 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 2,764,724 | $ | 778,499 | $ | 3,543,223 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
6.4 | % | 0.8 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.7 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.8 | % | 4.2 | % | 4.8 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average maturity (years) |
4.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 4.6 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Market Equity | ||||||||||||
| Security | Shares | Price | Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
146,253,416 | (3) | $ | 18.81 | $ | 2,751,027 | ||||||
LP Units |
3,435,522 | $ | 18.81 | 64,622 | ||||||||
Total |
149,688,938 | $ | 2,815,649 | |||||||||
| Total options outstanding | 8,253,496 | |||||||||||
| Dilutive effect of stock options(4) | 61,443 | |||||||||||
| Preferred Stock and Units(5) | ||||||||
| Dividend | Liquidation | |||||||
| Security | Rate | Preference | ||||||
Series D preferred units |
7.18 | % | $ | 79,767 | ||||
Series L preferred stock |
6.50 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Series M preferred stock |
6.75 | % | 57,500 | |||||
Series O preferred stock |
7.00 | % | 75,000 | |||||
Series P preferred stock |
6.85 | % | 50,000 | |||||
Weighted Average/Total |
6.90 | % | $ | 312,267 | ||||
| Capitalization Ratios | ||||
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization(2)(6)
|
53.1 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total market capitalization(2)(6)
|
57.8 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
44.0 | % | ||
AMBs share of total debt plus preferred-to-AMBs share of total assets(2)
|
47.9 | % | ||
| (1) | Represents three credit facilities with total capacity of approximately $1.6 billion. Includes $165.0 million of U.S. Dollar borrowings, as well as $273.5 million, $87.7 million, $41.0 million and $27.7 million in Yen, Canadian dollar, Euro and Singapore dollar-based borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2009, respectively, translated to U.S. dollars using the foreign exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2009. | |
| (2) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. | |
| (3) | Includes 930,321 shares of unvested restricted stock. | |
| (4) | Computed using the treasury stock method and an average share price of $18.08 for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. | |
| (5) | Units are exchangeable under certain circumstances by the unitholder for preferred stock and redeemable at the option of AMB after a five year non-call period. | |
| (6) | Total Market Capitalization is defined as total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus market equity. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 20 |
|
Capital Commitments (dollars in thousands) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Debt Maturing in 2009 through 2012(1)
| After Extension Options(2) | ||||||||||||||||
| AMB Wholly-owned Debt | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured Senior Debt |
$ | | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | $ | | ||||||||
Credit Facilities |
| | 479,482 | 115,460 | ||||||||||||
Other Debt |
11,421 | 325,000 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Secured Debt |
130,385 | 188,403 | 244,677 | 2,316 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
141,806 | 588,403 | 799,159 | 117,776 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
13,294 | 2,597 | | | ||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
| 10,157 | 31,432 | 5,655 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
15,414 | | 28,038 | 295,883 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
43,069 | 49,089 | 15,699 | | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
71,777 | 61,843 | 75,169 | 301,538 | ||||||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
| 27,443 | 301,136 | 78,568 | ||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
| 108,110 | 198,021 | 175,010 | ||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
| | 58,825 | 168,814 | ||||||||||||
Other Industrial Operating Joint Ventures |
150 | 9,059 | 32,428 | | ||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
| | | 6,338 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
150 | 144,612 | 590,410 | 428,730 | ||||||||||||
Total Consolidated |
213,583 | 650,246 | 874,328 | 419,314 | ||||||||||||
Total Unconsolidated |
150 | 144,612 | 590,410 | 428,730 | ||||||||||||
Total |
213,733 | 794,858 | 1,464,738 | 848,044 | ||||||||||||
Total AMBs Share |
$ | 181,014 | $ | 652,649 | $ | 955,180 | $ | 355,546 | ||||||||
Development Pipeline Remainder to Fund
| AMBs Share of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Total | Invested to | Remainder to | Remainder of | AMBs | Remainder of | |||||||||||||||||||
| Investment(3)(4) | Date(3)(4) | Invest(3)(4) | Cash to Fund(3)(5) | Ownership % | Cash to Fund(3)(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) | (b) | (a - b) | (c) | (d) | (c x d) | |||||||||||||||||||
Development pipeline as of June 30, 2009 |
$ | 758,141 | $ | 645,190 | $ | 112,951 | $ | 96,724 | 91.7 | % | $ | 88,678 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes scheduled principal amortization of debt maturing in years subsequent to 2012 as well as debt premiums and discounts. | |
| (2) | Subject to certain conditions. | |
| (3) | Excluding impact of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (4) | Amounts include capitalized interest as applicable. | |
| (5) | Amounts remove the estimated capitalized interest component from the remainder to fund. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 21 |
|
Supplemental Information for Net Asset Value Analysis (NAV) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Income Items
| Actual | ||||||||
| Quarter Ended | ||||||||
| June 30, 2009 | ||||||||
Real Estate: |
||||||||
Wholly owned property cash NOI from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 68,429 | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures: |
||||||||
Total cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
$ | 124,714 | ||||||
AMBs share of joint ventures(1)
|
27.4 | % | ||||||
AMBs share of cash NOI from joint ventures from continuing operations(1)
|
34,141 | |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI: |
||||||||
NOI attributed to in-progress developments |
$ | (2,440 | ) | |||||
NOI attributed to projects held for sale or contribution |
(5,740 | ) | ||||||
NOI attributed to contributed developments |
| |||||||
NOI required to stabilize property acquired during the quarter |
| |||||||
Adjustments to AMBs share of cash NOI(2)
|
(8,180 | ) | ||||||
Total AMBs share of cash NOI related to operating properties(1)(3)
|
$ | 94,390 | ||||||
Development platform:(3)
|
||||||||
Development starts |
$ | 31,369 | ||||||
Private capital platform: |
||||||||
Total private capital revenue per common share and unit (diluted) |
$ | 0.05 | ||||||
Assets & Liabilities
| As of | ||||
| AMBs share of:(1) | June 30, 2009 | |||
Development, land, and contributed assets:(3)
|
||||
Development
pipeline (funded to date)(4)
|
$ | 534,549 | ||
Development projects available for sale or contribution(4)
|
772,190 | |||
Operating projects available for sale or contribution(4)
|
350,525 | |||
Land held for future development(4)
|
525,849 | |||
Assets contributed to co-investment ventures(5)
|
| |||
Total development, land and contributed assets |
$ | 2,183,113 | ||
Debt and preferred securities:(3)
|
||||
Total debt |
$ | 3,543,223 | ||
Preferred securities |
312,267 | |||
Total debt and preferred securities |
$ | 3,855,490 | ||
Other balance sheet items:(3)
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 250,605 | ||
Accounts receivable (net) and other assets |
352,184 | |||
Deferred rents receivable and deferred financing costs (net) |
(60,036 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(380,261 | ) | ||
Total other balance sheet items |
$ | 162,492 | ||
| (1) | See reporting definitions and supplemental financial measures disclosures. |
|
| (2) | Transaction activity adjustments remove NOI generated from in-progress developments, contributed developments, and projects held for sale or contribution as the value of this real estate is reflected in AMBs share of development, land, and contributed assets as detailed above. The adjustments also include stabilized NOI for acquisitions. | |
| (3) | Includes investments held through unconsolidated joint ventures. | |
| (4) | Assets are net of cumulative real estate impairment losses. | |
| (5) | Represents AMBs share of assets contributed to unconsolidated co-investment ventures during the three months ended June 30, 2009. |
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 22 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Acquisition Cost includes estimated acquisition capital expenditures. Estimated
acquisition capital
expenditures include immediate building improvements that are taken into consideration when
underwriting the
purchase of a building or which are incurred to bring a building up to operating standard or to
stabilization and
incremental building improvements and leasing costs that are incurred in an effort to substantially
increase the
revenue potential of an existing building.
Adjusted EBITDA. AMB uses adjusted earnings before interest (including the amount of capitalized
interest
deducted from the determination of development gains), tax, depreciation and amortization,
impairment
charges, restructuring and other non-cash charges, stock based compensation amortization, and non-development gains, or adjusted EBITDA, to measure both its operating performance and liquidity. AMB
considers adjusted EBITDA to provide investors relevant and useful information because it permits
investors to
view income from its operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash
depreciation and
amortization expense or non-development gains. By excluding interest expense, adjusted EBITDA
allows
investors to measure AMBs operating performance independent of its capital structure and
indebtedness and,
therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of its operating performance between quarters as
well as
annual periods and to compare its operating performance to that of other companies, both in the
real estate
industry and in other industries. AMB considers adjusted EBITDA to be a useful supplemental measure
for
reviewing its comparative performance with other companies because, by excluding non-cash
depreciation
expense, adjusted EBITDA can help the investing public compare the performance of a real estate
company to
that of companies in other industries. As a liquidity measure, AMB believes that adjusted EBITDA
helps
investors to analyze its ability to meet debt service obligations and to make quarterly preferred
share dividends
and unit distributions. Management uses adjusted EBITDA when measuring AMBs operating performance
and
liquidity; specifically when assessing its operating performance, and comparing that performance to
other
companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries, and when evaluating its
ability to meet debt
service obligations and to make quarterly preferred share dividends and unit distributions. AMB
believes
investors should consider adjusted EBITDA, in conjunction with net income (the primary measure of
AMBs
performance) and the other required GAAP measures of its performance and liquidity, to improve
their
understanding of AMBs operating results and liquidity, and to make more meaningful comparisons of
its
performance between periods and as against other companies. By excluding interest, taxes,
depreciation and
amortization, impairment charges, and non-development gains when assessing AMBs financial
performance,
an investor is assessing the earnings generated by AMBs operations, but not taking into account
the
eliminated expenses or non-development gains incurred in connection with such operations. As a
result,
adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should be used in conjunction with AMBs
required
GAAP presentations. Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect AMBs historical cash expenditures or future
cash
requirements for working capital, capital expenditures or contractual commitments. Adjusted EBITDA
also does
not reflect the cash required to make interest and principal payments on AMBs outstanding debt.
While
adjusted EBITDA is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance and liquidity, it
does not
represent net income or cash flow from operations as defined by GAAP and it should not be
considered as an
alternative to those indicators in evaluating operating performance or liquidity. Further, AMBs
computation of
adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA from net (loss) income for the three and six months
ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 29,034 | $ | 88,030 | $ | (94,322 | ) | $ | 157,435 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
38,724 | 39,730 | 80,460 | 80,214 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
| | 161,067 | | ||||||||||||
Non-cash restructuring charges |
3,824 | | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation amortization and other non-cash charges |
4,837 | 5,094 | 12,334 | 11,623 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to derive adjusted EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures: |
||||||||||||||||
AMBs share of net (income) loss |
(4,284 | ) | (6,059 | ) | (4,250 | ) | (8,987 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of FFO |
11,786 | 12,276 | 19,310 | 21,138 | ||||||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense |
10,449 | 4,810 | 20,113 | 10,731 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
29,329 | 36,532 | 61,986 | 67,603 | ||||||||||||
Total discontinued operations, including gains |
(14,544 | ) | (5,167 | ) | (18,020 | ) | (30,588 | ) | ||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(14,461 | ) | (24,257 | ) | (29,570 | ) | (57,107 | ) | ||||||||
Capitalized interest attributable to development properties sold or contributed |
1,925 | 8,438 | 11,899 | 11,786 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued operations adjusted EBITDA |
5,076 | 5,164 | 12,216 | 10,286 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 101,695 | $ | 164,591 | $ | 237,047 | $ | 274,134 | ||||||||
AMBs share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata portion of the
applicable
financial measure based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of
the consolidated and
unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted for in the applicable financial measure. AMB
believes that
AMBs share of calculations are meaningful and useful supplemental measures,
which enable both
management and investors to assess the operations, earnings and growth of AMB in light of AMBs
ownership
interest in its joint ventures and to compare the applicable measure to that of other companies. In
addition, it
allows for a more meaningful comparison of the applicable measure to that of other companies that
do not
consolidate any of their joint ventures. AMBs share of calculations are not intended to reflect
actual liability
should there be a default under loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. AMBs computation of
AMBs share
of measures may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use
different
methodologies for calculating these measures.
AMBs share of Other Balance Sheet Items. AMB believes that balance sheet information based on
GAAP
provides the most appropriate information about financial position. However, AMB considers balance
sheet
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as AMBs share of cash and cash
equivalents and
restricted cash, AMBs share of accounts receivable (net) and other assets, AMBs share of deferred
rents
receivable and deferred financing costs (net), and AMBs share of accounts payable and other
liabilities) to be
useful supplemental measures to help the investors better understand AMBs operating performance.
See
Reporting Definitions for definitions of owned and managed and AMBs share of. AMB believes
that AMBs
share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis helps management and investors make a
comprehensive assessment of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a better understanding
of AMBs
operating activities. While such information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide
balance sheet
information as defined by GAAP and is not a true alternative to such GAAP measurements. Further,
AMBs
computation of its share of balance sheet items on an owned and managed basis may not be comparable
to
that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating these
measures.
AMBs share of total debt. AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt
based on its
percentage of equity interest in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding
the debt.
AMB believes that its share of total debt is a meaningful supplemental measure, which enables both
management and investors to analyze its leverage and to compare its leverage to that of other
companies. In
addition, it allows for a more meaningful comparison of its debt to that of other companies that
do not
consolidate their joint ventures. AMBs share of total debt is not intended to reflect its actual
liability should
there be a default under any or all of such loans or a liquidation of the joint ventures. See
Capitalization Detail
for a reconciliation of total debt and AMBs share of total debt.
AMBs share of total debt-to-AMBs share of total assets is calculated using the following
definitions:
AMBs share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs percentage of
equity interest
in each of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs share of
total assets is
the pro rata portion of total assets based on AMBs percentage of equity interest in each of the
consolidated
and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the assets.
AMBs share of total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated using the following
definitions: AMBs
share of total debt is the pro rata portion of the total debt based on AMBs percentage of equity
interest in each
of the consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures holding the debt. AMBs definition of total
market
capitalization is AMBs share of total debt plus preferred equity liquidation preferences plus
market equity.
AMBs definition of market equity is the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common
stock and
common limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock as
of the period
end.
Annualized base rent (ABR) is calculated as monthly base rent (cash basis) per the lease, as of a
certain
date, multiplied by 12. If free rent is granted, then the first positive rent value is used.
Leases denominated in
foreign currencies are translated using the currency exchange rate at period end.
Assets Under Management is AMBs estimate of the value of the real estate it wholly owns or
manages
through its consolidated and unconsolidated co-investment ventures or for clients of AMB Capital
Partners.
Assets under management is calculated by adding the co-investment venture partners or clients
share of the
carrying value of its real estate investment to AMBs share of total market capitalization.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 23 |
![]() |
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Average occupancy percentage represents the daily weighted occupancy of the total rentable square feet
leased, including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet. Space is considered leased
when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Carrying value is the sum of the most recent valuation of real estate investments plus subsequently incurred
capital expenditures. Generally, each real estate investment is valued once a year.
Cash-basis NOI. Cash-basis NOI is defined as NOI less straight line rents and amortization of lease
intangibles.
AMB considers cash-basis NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure
because
cash basis NOI reflects the operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding the
effects of non-cash
adjustments and provides a better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year
comparison.
However, cash-basis NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of financial performance
since it does
not reflect general and administrative expenses, interest expenses, depreciation and amortization
costs, capital
expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in development and construction activities that could
materially impact
results from operations. Further, cash-basis NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate
investment
trusts, as they may use different methodologies for calculating cash-basis NOI.
For a reconciliation of NOI from net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009, refer to the
SS NOI
definition. The following table reconciles AMBs share of cash-basis NOI from NOI for the quarter
ended June 30,
2009 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarter Ended | ||||
| June 30, 2009 | ||||
NOI |
$ | 97,062 | ||
Straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles |
(1,542 | ) | ||
Consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
(27,091 | ) | ||
Wholly-owned property cash NOI |
68,429 | |||
AMBs share of consolidated joint venture cash NOI |
12,372 | |||
AMBs share of unconsolidated joint venture cash NOI |
21,769 | |||
AMBs share of transaction adjustments |
(8,180 | ) | ||
AMBs share of cash-basis NOI |
$ | 94,390 | ||
Co-investment Ventures are Joint Ventures with institutional investors, managed by AMB from which AMB
receives acquisition fees for third-party acquisitions, portfolio and asset management distributions or fees, as
well as incentive distributions or promoted interests.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of debt is the co-investment venture partners
pro-rata portion of total debt.
Co-investment venture partners (or co-investors) share of equity is the pro-rata portion of the co-investment venture partners share of carrying value less the co-investment venture partners share of debt.
Completion/Stabilization is generally defined as properties that are 90% leased or properties that have been
substantially complete for at least 12 months.
Development activities include ground-up development, redevelopments, renovations, land sales and value-added conversions.
Development margin is calculated as contribution value or disposition price less closing costs,
minus
estimated total investment and any deferred rents, taxes or third party promotes before any
deferrals on
contributions, divided by the estimated total investment.
Estimated FFO by Business. Estimated FFO by Business is FFO generated by AMBs Real Estate
Operations, Development and Private Capital business. Estimated Development and Private Capital FFO
was
determined by reducing Development Profits, net of taxes, and Private Capital revenues by their
respective
estimated share of general and administrative expenses, also defined as overhead. Developments and
Private
Capitals estimated allocation of total general and administrative expenses was based on their
respective
percentage of actual direct general and administrative expenses incurred. Estimated Real Estate
Operations
FFO represents total AMB FFO less estimated FFO attributable to Development and Private Capital.
Management believes estimated FFO by business line is a useful supplemental measure of its
operating
performance because it helps the investing public compare the operating performance of AMBs
respective
businesses to other companies comparable businesses. Further, AMBs computation of FFO by business
line
may not be comparable to that reported by other real estate investment trusts as they may use
different
methodologies in computing such measures.
Estimated investment capacity is AMBs estimate of the gross real estate which could be acquired
through
the use of its equity commitments from co-investment venture partners plus AMBs funding
obligations and
estimated debt capitalization.
Estimated total investment represents total estimated cost of development, renovation, or
expansion,
including initial acquisition costs, prepaid ground leases, buildings, and associated carry costs.
Estimated total
investments are based on current forecasts and are subject to change. Non-U.S. Dollar investments
are
translated to U.S. Dollars using the exchange rate at period end.
Co-investment venture operating results.
| For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| AMBs | Property | (Loss) from | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ownership | Operating | Continuing | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unconsolidated Co-investment Ventures | Percentage | Revenues | Expenses | Operations | Income (Loss) | Cash NOI | FFO | |||||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III |
19 | % | $ | 69,204 | $ | (18,102 | ) | $ | 3,317 | $ | 4,343 | $ | 48,332 | $ | 24,064 | |||||||||||||
AMB Europe Fund I |
21 | % | 24,179 | (4,988 | ) | 1,188 | 1,188 | 18,438 | 9,219 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Japan Fund I |
20 | % | 23,950 | (5,768 | ) | 3,635 | 3,635 | 18,018 | 10,328 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP Mexico |
22 | % | 9,819 | (1,317 | ) | 739 | (1) | 739 | (1) | 7,011 | 3,839 | |||||||||||||||||
AMB DFS Fund I |
15 | % | | (118 | ) | (5,370 | ) | (5,370 | ) | (118 | ) | (5,370 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Consolidated Co-investment Ventures |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AMB-SGP |
50 | % | 11,745 | (3,423 | ) | 281 | 281 | 8,426 | 3,647 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB Institutional Alliance Fund II |
20 | % | 13,124 | (3,324 | ) | 1,957 | 5,829 | 10,037 | 5,585 | |||||||||||||||||||
AMB-AMS |
39 | % | 4,162 | (920 | ) | 781 | 781 | 3,243 | 1,906 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes $3.8 million of interest expense on loans from co-investment venture partners. |
Co-investment venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs co-investment venture partners percentage of
equity interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated co-investment ventures accounted for in the
applicable financial measure.
Estimated yields on development projects are calculated from estimated annual cash NOI following
occupancy stabilization divided by the estimated total investment. Yields exclude value added
conversion
projects and are calculated on an after-tax basis for international projects.
Fixed charge coverage. Fixed charge coverage is defined as Adjusted EBITDA divided by fixed
charges.
Fixed charges consist of interest expense less joint venture partners share of interest expense
and
amortization of finance costs and debt premiums, from continuing and discontinued operations, plus
AMBs
share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint venture debt, capitalized
interest, preferred unit
distributions and preferred stock dividends. AMB uses fixed charge coverage to measure its
liquidity. AMB
believes fixed charge coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits fixed income
investors to
measure AMBs ability to meet its interest payments on outstanding debt, make distributions to its
preferred
unitholders and pay dividends to its preferred shareholders. AMBs computation of fixed charge
coverage may
not be comparable to fixed charge coverage reported by other companies.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 24 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
The following table details the calculation of fixed charges for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009
and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Fixed charge | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 29,329 | $ | 36,532 | $ | 61,986 | $ | 67,603 | ||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums continuing operations |
(3,033 | ) | (3,182 | ) | (6,207 | ) | (5,155 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
41 | (6 | ) | (190 | ) | (139 | ) | |||||||||
Amortization of financing costs and debt premiums discontinued operations |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(7,109 | ) | (10,192 | ) | (14,237 | ) | (24,489 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated joint ventures |
10,449 | 4,810 | 20,113 | 10,731 | ||||||||||||
Capitalized interest |
10,826 | 17,168 | 22,920 | 34,927 | ||||||||||||
Preferred unit distributions |
1,432 | 1,432 | 2,864 | 2,864 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3,952 | 3,952 | 7,904 | 7,904 | ||||||||||||
Total fixed charge |
$ | 45,886 | $ | 50,511 | $ | 95,149 | $ | 94,239 | ||||||||
Funds From Operations (FFO), Funds From Operations Per Share and Unit (FFOPS) and FFO,
Excluding Impairment and Restructuring charges (together with FFO and FFOPS, the FFO Measures). AMB believes that
net income, as defined by U.S. GAAP, is the most appropriate earnings measure. However, AMB
considers
funds from operations, or FFO, FFO per share and unit, or FFOPS, and FFO, excluding impairment
charges, to
be useful supplemental measures of its operating performance. AMB defines FFOPS as FFO per fully
diluted
weighted average share of AMBs common stock and operating partnership units. AMB calculates FFO as
net
income available to common stockholders, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, less gains (or
losses) from
dispositions of real estate held for investment purposes and real estate-related depreciation, and
adjustments to
derive AMBs pro rata share of FFO of consolidated and unconsolidated joint ventures.
Unless stated otherwise, AMB includes the gains from development, including those from value-added
conversion projects, before depreciation recapture, as a component of FFO. AMB believes that
value-added
conversion dispositions are in substance land sales and as such should be included in FFO,
consistent with the
real estate investment trust industrys long standing practice to include gains on the sale of land
in FFO.
However, AMBs interpretation of FFO or FFOPS may not be consistent with the views of others in the
real
estate investment trust industry, who may consider it to be a divergence from the NAREIT
definition, and may
not be comparable to FFO or FFOPS reported by other real estate investment trusts that interpret
the current
NAREIT definition differently than AMB does. In connection with the formation of a joint venture,
AMB may
warehouse assets that are acquired with the intent to contribute these assets to the newly formed
venture. Some
of the properties held for contribution may, under certain circumstances, be required to be
depreciated under
U.S. GAAP. If this circumstance arises, AMB intends to include in its calculation of FFO gains or
losses related
to the contribution of previously depreciated real estate to joint ventures. Although such a
change, if instituted,
will be a departure from the current NAREIT definition, AMB believes such calculation of FFO will
better reflect
the value created as a result of the contributions. To date, AMB has not included gains or losses
from the
contribution of previously depreciated warehoused assets in FFO.
In addition to presenting FFO as described above, AMB presents FFO, excluding impairment and
restructuring
charges. AMB calculates FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, as FFO less impairment and
restructuring
charges and adjustments to derive AMBs share of impairment charges from consolidated and
unconsolidated
joint ventures. To the extent that the book value of a land parcel or development asset exceeded
the fair market
value of a property, based on its intended holding period, a non-cash impairment charge was
recognized for the
shortfall. The impairment charges were principally a result of increases in estimated
capitalization rates and
deterioration in market conditions that adversely impacted values. The restructuring charges
reflected costs
associated with AMBs reduction in global headcount and cost structure. Although difficult to
predict, these
charges may be recurring given the uncertainty of the current economic climate and its adverse
effects on the
real estate markets. While not infrequent or unusual in nature, these charges are subject to market
fluctuations
that can have inconsistent effects on AMBs results of operations. The economics underlying these
charges
reflect market conditions in the short-term but can obscure the value of AMBs long-term investment
decisions
and strategies. Management believes FFO, excluding impairment and restructuring charges, is
significant and
useful to both it and its investors because it more appropriately reflects the value and strength
of AMBs
business model and its potential performance isolated from the volatility of the current economic
environment.
However, in addition to the limitations of FFO Measures generally discussed below, FFO, excluding
impairment
and restructuring charges, does not present a comprehensive measure of AMBs financial condition
and
operating performance. This measure is a modification of the NAREIT definition of FFO and should
not be
considered a replacement of FFO as AMB defines it or used as an alternative to net income or cash
as defined
by U.S. GAAP.
AMB believes that the FFO Measures are meaningful supplemental measures of its operating
performance
because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with U.S. GAAP implicitly
assumes that
the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as reflected through depreciation
and
amortization expenses. However, since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with
market and other
conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered presentation of operating results
for real
estate companies that use historical cost accounting to be insufficient. Thus, the FFO Measures are
supplemental measures of operating performance for real estate investment trusts that exclude
historical cost
depreciation and amortization, among other items, from net income available to common stockholders,
as
defined by U.S. GAAP. AMB believes that the use of the FFO Measures, combined with the required
U.S.
GAAP presentations, has been beneficial in improving the understanding of operating results of real
estate
investment trusts among the investing public and making comparisons of operating results among such
companies more meaningful. AMB considers the FFO Measures to be useful measures for reviewing
comparative operating and financial performance because, by excluding gains or losses related to
sales of
previously depreciated operating real estate assets and real estate depreciation and amortization,
the FFO
Measures can help the investing public compare the operating performance of a companys real estate
between periods or as compared to other companies. While FFO and FFOPS are relevant and widely
used
measures of operating performance of real estate investment trusts, the FFO Measures do not
represent cash
flow from operations or net income as defined by U.S. GAAP and should not be considered as
alternatives to
those measures in evaluating AMBs liquidity or operating performance. The FFO Measures also do not
consider the costs associated with capital expenditures related to AMBs real estate assets nor are
the FFO
Measures necessarily indicative of cash available to fund AMBs future cash requirements.
Management
compensates for the limitations of the FFO Measures by providing investors with financial
statements prepared
according to U.S. GAAP, along with this detailed discussion of the FFO Measures and a
reconciliation of the
FFO Measures to net income available to common stockholders, a U.S. GAAP measurement.
See Consolidated Statements of Funds from Operations for a reconciliation of FFO from net income
available
to common stockholders.
The following table reconciles projected FFO from projected net income available to common
stockholders for
the year ended December 31, 2009:
| 2009 | ||||||||
| Low | High | |||||||
Projected net loss available to common stockholders |
$ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.64 | ) | ||
AMBs share of projected depreciation and amortization |
1.20 | 1.20 | ||||||
AMBs share of projected gains on disposition of operating properties
recognized to date |
(0.18 | ) | (0.18 | ) | ||||
Impact of additional dilutive securities, other, rounding |
(0.04 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Projected Funds From Operations (FFO) |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.34 | ||||
AMBs share of non-cash impairment charges |
1.32 | 1.32 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
0.03 | 0.03 | ||||||
AMBs share of development gains recognized to date |
(0.24 | ) | (0.24 | ) | ||||
Projected FFO, excluding AMBs share of non-cash impairment
charges, restructuring charges and development gains(1)
|
$ | 1.41 | $ | 1.45 | ||||
Amounts are expressed per share, except FFO and FFO, excluding AMBs share of non-cash impairment
charges, restructuring
charges and development gains, which is expressed per share and unit.
(1) As development gains are difficult to predict in the current economic environment, management
believes Projected FFO,
excluding AMBs share of non-cash impairment charges, restructuring charges and development gains is the more appropriate
and useful measure to
reflect its assessment of AMBs projected operating performance.
Gross operating margin is calculated as NOI divided by gross revenues (excluding straight-line
rents and
amortization of lease intangibles, reimbursable capital revenue and lease termination fees) for
properties in the
pool at period end.
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 25 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Impairment charges represent the write down of assets due to estimated fair value being lower than
carry
value.
Interest coverage. Interest coverage is defined as adjusted EBITDA divided by AMBs share of
interest
expense which consists of consolidated interest expense less joint venture partners share of
interest expense,
including amortization, from continuing and discontinued operations and AMBs share of interest
expense from
unconsolidated joint venture debt. AMB uses interest coverage to measure its liquidity. AMB
believes interest
coverage is relevant and useful to investors because it permits investors to measure AMBs ability
to meet its
interest payments on outstanding debt. AMBs computation of interest coverage may not be comparable
to
interest coverage reported by other companies.
The following table details AMBs share of total interest for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 and
2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| Interest | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization continuing operations |
$ | 29,329 | $ | 36,532 | $ | 61,986 | $ | 67,603 | ||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization discontinued operations |
41 | (6 | ) | (190 | ) | (139 | ) | |||||||||
Joint venture partners share of interest expense |
(7,109 | ) | (10,192 | ) | (14,237 | ) | (24,489 | ) | ||||||||
AMBs share of interest expense from unconsolidated co-investment ventures |
10,449 | 4,810 | 20,113 | 10,731 | ||||||||||||
Total interest |
$ | 32,710 | $ | 31,144 | $ | 67,672 | $ | 53,706 | ||||||||
Joint Ventures are all joint ventures, including Co-Investment Ventures, with real estate
developers, other real
estate operators, or institutional investors where AMB may or may not: have control, act as the
manager
and/or developer, earn asset management distributions or fees, or earn incentive distributions or
promoted
interests. In certain cases, AMB might provide development, leasing, property management and/or
accounting
services for which it may receive market compensation.
Joint venture partners share of calculations for certain financial measures represent the pro-rata
portion of the applicable financial measure based on AMBs joint venture partners percentage of equity
interest in each of the consolidated or unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for in the applicable financial
measure.
Market equity is defined as the total number of outstanding shares of AMBs common stock and common
limited partnership units multiplied by the closing price per share of its common stock at period
end.
Net Asset Value (NAV). AMB believes NAV is a useful supplemental measure of its operating
performance
because it enables both management and investors to analyze the fair value of its business. An
assessment of
the fair value of a business involves estimates and assumptions and can be performed using various
methods.
AMB has presented certain financial measures related to its business that it believes may be useful
to the
investing public in calculating its NAV but has not presented any specific methodology nor provided
any
guidance on assumptions or estimates that should be used in the calculation.
Net Operating Income (NOI). See same store net operating income for discussion of NOI and a
reconciliation of NOI from net income.
Occupancy percentage at period end represents the percentage of total rentable square feet leased,
including month-to-month leases, divided by total rentable square feet at period end. Space is
considered
leased when the tenant has either taken physical or economic occupancy.
Owned and managed is defined by AMB as assets in which AMB has at least a 10% ownership interest,
is the property or asset manager, and which it intends to hold for the long-term.
Owned and Managed Supplemental Cash Flow Information. AMB believes that cash flow information
based on GAAP provides the most appropriate cash flow information. However, AMB considers cash flow
information reported on an owned and managed basis (such as straight-line rents and amortization of
lease
intangibles, AMBs share of straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, gross lease
termination
fees, net lease termination fees, AMBs share of net lease termination fees, tenant improvements,
lease
commissions and other lease costs, building improvements, Co-investment partners share of capital
expenditures and AMBs share of recurring capital expenditures) to be useful supplemental measures
to help
the investors better understand AMBs operating performance and cash flow. See Reporting
Definitions for
definitions of owned and managed, AMBs share of and Co-investment venture partners share
of. AMB
believes that owned and managed cash flow information helps management and
investors make a
comprehensive assessment of the cash flow of AMBs total real estate portfolio and provides a
better
understanding of AMBs operating performance and activities. While owned and managed supplemental
cash
flow information is helpful to the investor, it does not provide cash flow information as defined
by GAAP and are
not true alternatives to such GAAP measurements. Further, AMBs computation of owned and managed
supplemental cash flow information may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as
they may
use different methodologies for calculating these measures.
Percent pre-leased represents the executed lease percentage of total square feet as of the
reporting data.
Preferred, with respect to the capitalization ratios, is defined as preferred equity liquidation
preferences.
Renovation projects represent projects where the acquired buildings are less than 75% leased and
require
significant capital expenditures (generally ranging from 10% 25% of acquisition cost) to bring
the buildings up
to operating standards and stabilization (generally 90% leased).
Redevelopment projects represent those buildings that require significant capital expenditures
(generally more
than 25% of acquired cost or existing basis) to bring the buildings up to operating standards and
stabilization
(generally 90% leased).
Recurring capital expenditures represents non-incremental building improvements and leasing costs
required
to maintain current revenues. Recurring capital expenditures do not include estimated acquisition
capital
expenditures which were taken into consideration when underwriting the purchase of a building or
which are
incurred to bring a building up to operating standards.
Rent changes on renewals and rollovers are calculated as the difference, weighted by square feet,
of the net
ABR due the first month of a term commencement and the net ABR due the last month of the former
tenants
term. If free rent is granted, then the first positive full rent value is used as a point of
comparison. The rental
amounts exclude base stop amounts, holdover rent and premium rent charges. If either the previous
or current
lease terms are under 12 months, then they are excluded from this calculation. If the lease is
first generation or
there is no prior lease for comparison, then it is excluded from this calculation.
Same Store Net Operating Income, Cash-basis SS NOI (SS NOI) and Net Operating Income (NOI).
AMB defines NOI as rental revenues, including reimbursements, less property operating expenses.
NOI
excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, restructuring charges,
real estate
impairment losses, development profits (losses), gains (losses) from sale or contribution of real
estate interests,
and interest expense. AMB believes that net income, as defined by GAAP, is the most appropriate
earnings
measure. However, NOI is a useful supplemental measure calculated to help investors understand
AMBs
operating performance, excluding the effects of costs and expenses which are not related to the
performance of
the assets. NOI is widely used by the real estate industry as a useful supplemental measure,
which helps
investors compare AMBs operating performance with that of other companies. Real estate impairment
losses
have been excluded in deriving NOI because AMB does not consider its impairment losses to be a
property
operating expense. AMB believes that the exclusion of impairment losses from NOI is a common
methodology
used in the real estate industry. Real estate impairment losses relate to the changing values of
AMBs assets
but do not reflect the current operating performance of the assets with respect to their revenues
or expenses.
AMBs real estate impairment losses are non-cash charges which represent the write down in the
value of
assets when estimated fair value over the holding period is lower than current carrying value. The
impairment
charges were principally a result of increases in estimated capitalization rates and deterioration
in market
conditions that adversely impacted underlying real estate values. Therefore, the impairment
charges are not
related to the current performance of AMBs real estate operations and should be excluded from its
calculation
of NOI.
AMB considers SS NOI to be a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance for
properties that
are considered part of the same store pool. AMB defines Cash-basis SS NOI as NOI on a same store
basis
excluding straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See definition of same store
pool. AMB
considers SS NOI to be an appropriate and useful supplemental performance measure because it
reflects the
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 26 |
|
Reporting Definitions / Supplemental Financial Measures |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
operating performance of the real estate portfolio excluding effects of non-cash adjustments and
provides a
better measure of actual cash basis rental growth for a year-over-year comparison. In addition, AMB
believes
that SS NOI helps investors compare the operating performance of AMBs real estate as compared to
other
companies. While SS NOI is a relevant and widely used measure of operating performance of real
estate
investment trusts, it does not represent cash flow from operations or net income as defined by GAAP
and
should not be considered as an alternative to those measures in evaluating our liquidity or
operating
performance. SS NOI also does not reflect general and administrative
expenses, interest expenses, real estate impairment losses, depreciation and amortization costs, capital expenditures and leasing costs, or trends in
development and
construction activities that could materially impact our results from operations. Further, AMBs
computation of
SS NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different
methodologies for calculating SS NOI.
The following table reconciles consolidated cash-basis SS NOI and NOI from net income for the three
and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
| For the Quarters Ended | For the Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 29,034 | $ | 88,030 | $ | (94,322 | ) | $ | 157,435 | |||||||
Private capital income |
(7,795 | ) | (41,413 | ) | (19,490 | ) | (51,336 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
38,724 | 39,730 | 80,460 | 80,214 | ||||||||||||
Real estate impairment losses |
| | 161,067 | | ||||||||||||
General and administrative and fund costs |
25,685 | 34,128 | 57,193 | 69,475 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
3,824 | | 3,824 | | ||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
22,134 | (390 | ) | 27,943 | (14,536 | ) | ||||||||||
Total discontinued operations |
(14,544 | ) | (5,167 | ) | (18,020 | ) | (10,621 | ) | ||||||||
NOI |
97,062 | 114,918 | 198,655 | 230,631 | ||||||||||||
Less non same-store NOI |
(11,487 | ) | (26,839 | ) | (24,030 | ) | (51,783 | ) | ||||||||
Less non cash adjustments(1)
|
844 | (607 | ) | 853 | (1,794 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash-basis same-store NOI |
$ | 86,419 | $ | 87,472 | $ | 175,478 | $ | 177,054 | ||||||||
| (1) | Non-cash adjustments include straight line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
Same store NOI growth is the change in the NOI (excluding straight-line rents and amortization of
lease
intangibles) of the same store pool from the prior year reporting period to the current year
reporting period.
Same store pool includes all properties that are owned as of the end of both the current and
prior year
reporting periods and excludes development properties for both the current and prior reporting
periods. The
same store pool is set annually and excludes properties purchased and developments stabilized after
December 31, 2007.
Second generation TIs and LCs per square foot are total tenant improvements, lease commissions and
other leasing costs incurred during leasing of second generation space divided by the total square feet leased.
Costs incurred prior to leasing available space are not included until such space is leased. Second generation
space excludes newly developed square footage or square footage vacant at acquisition.
Stabilized cap rates are calculated as cash NOI stabilized to market occupancy (generally 95%)
divided by
total acquisition cost. The total acquisition cost basis includes the initial purchase price, the
effects of marking
assumed debt to market, buyers due diligence and closing costs, lease intangible adjustments, estimated
acquisition capital expenditures, and leasing costs necessary to achieve stabilization.
Tenant retention is the square footage of all leases rented by existing tenants divided by the square footage
of all expiring and rented leases during the reporting period, excluding the square footage of tenants that
default or buy-out prior to expiration of their lease, short-term tenants and the square footage of month-to-month leases.
Total market capitalization is defined by AMB as AMBs share of total debt plus preferred equity
liquidation
preferences plus market equity (unless otherwise noted).
Value-added conversion projects represent the repurposing of industrial properties to a higher and
better
use, including office, residential, retail, research & development or manufacturing. Activities
required to prepare
the property for conversion to a higher and better use may include such activities as rezoning, redesigning,
reconstructing and retenanting. The sales price of the value-added conversion project is generally based on
the underlying land value based on its ultimate use and as such, little to no residual value is ascribed to the
industrial building(s).
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 27 |
|
Contacts |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
| Contact Name | Title | Phone | E-mail Address | |||
Hamid R. Moghadam
|
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer | (415) 733-9401 | hmoghadam@amb.com | |||
Thomas S. Olinger
|
Chief Financial Officer | (415) 733-9405 | tolinger@amb.com | |||
Guy F. Jaquier
|
President, Europe and Asia | (415) 733-9406 | gjaquier@amb.com | |||
Eugene F. Reilly
|
President, The Americas | (617) 619-9333 | ereilly@amb.com | |||
John T. Roberts, Jr.
|
President, Private Capital; President, AMB Capital Partners, LLC | (415) 733-9408 | jroberts@amb.com | |||
Tracy A. Ward
|
Vice President, IR & Corporate Communications | (415) 733-9565 | tward@amb.com |
| Corporate Headquarters | Investor Relations | Other Primary Office Locations | ||||||||
AMB Property Corporation
|
Tel: (415) 394-9000 | Amsterdam | Boston | Chicago | Los Angeles | |||||
Pier 1, Bay 1
|
Fax: (415) 394-9001 | México City | Shanghai | Singapore | Tokyo | |||||
San Francisco, CA 94111
|
E-mail: ir@amb.com | |||||||||
Tel: (415) 394-9000
|
Website: www.amb.com | |||||||||
Fax: (415) 394-9001 |
||||||||||
| Overview | Financial Results | Operations | Capital Deployment | Private Capital | Capitalization | NAV | Reporting Definitions | 28 |
|
Forward-Looking Statements |
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE 2009 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call |
||
Some of the information included in this report and the presentations to be held in connection therewith contains forward-looking statements, such as those related to cash sources to
cover future capital requirements, the consummation of asset sales marketed, under contract or LOI, our plans to retire, extend and refinance debt and maintain fixed charge
coverage at certain levels, estimated cash savings from our current dividend policy, estimated net G&A reductions, our opportunities and plans (including those regarding our global
positioning and future capital deployment), our projected funds from operations, compound annual growth rate of our business divisions, future assets under management, same store
and/or cash net operating income and other financial and operational guidance, our capabilities to drive growth, our future performance compared to peers and other market indices,
rent growth, industrial and other market, GDP and trade growth, market drivers, trends and forecasts, port opportunities (such as ship capacity expansion, outsourcing trends, port
market demand, port expansions, container growth, and escalating land values), on-tarmac opportunities (such as air cargo growth, ability to access and leverage positions, and
expertise and key airport opportunities), hiring, performance and retention of key personnel, access to resources, leveraging of relationships, continuation and effectiveness of
strategic drivers, information regarding our development, value-added conversion, redevelopment and renovation projects (including stabilization dates, square feet at stabilization or
completion, sale or contribution dates, yields from such projects, our share of remaining funding, costs and total investment amounts, scope, location and timing of development
starts, margins, projected gains and returns, sustainability, profitability, scope and scale of and demand for projects, targeted value-added conversion projects, redevelopment and
conversion timelines, entitlement and repositioning potential of land), ability to deliver customer solutions, strength of lender and customer relationships, lease expirations,
performance and value-creation of investments and market entry opportunities, real estate valuations, capitalization rates, acquisition capital and volume, scope and build out
potential of land inventory, co-investment venture and other estimated investment capacity, terms of the co-investment ventures, performance, revenues and returns on investment,
target leverage, future incentive distribution, asset management, acquisition and other private capital distributions and fees, timing of incentive distributions, private capital demand,
launching of additional funds, termination of funds, future balance sheet capacity, ability to maintain credit extensions, our position to address debt maturities, interest rate changes,
transition to open-end funds, and access to secured and non-secured financings, which are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, and you should not rely on the forward-looking statements as predictions of
future events. The events or circumstances reflected in forward-looking statements might not occur. You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking
terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, approximately, intends, plans, pro forma, estimates or anticipates or the negative of these words
and phrases or similar words or phrases. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily
dependent on assumptions, data or methods that may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We caution you not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis only and speak only as of the date of this report or the dates indicated in the statements. We assume no obligation to update or
supplement forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in
the forward-looking statements: defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants or renewal at lower than expected rent or failure to lease at all or on expected terms, decreases in
real estate values and impairment losses, our failure to obtain, renew or extend financing or re-financing, risks related to debt and equity security financings (including dilution risk),
our failure to divest properties we have contracted to sell or to timely reinvest proceeds from any divestitures, failure to maintain our current credit agency ratings or comply with our
debt covenants, international currency and hedging risks, financial market fluctuations, changes in general economic conditions, global trade or in the real estate sector, inflation risks,
a downturn in the U.S., California or global economy, increased interest rates and operating costs or greater than expected capital expenditures, risks related to suspending, reducing,
or changing our dividends, our failure to contribute properties to our co-investment ventures, risks related to our obligations in the event of certain defaults under co-investment
ventures and other debt, difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, our failure to successfully integrate acquired properties and operations, risks and
uncertainties affecting property development, value-added conversions, redevelopment and construction (including construction delays, cost overruns, our inability to obtain
necessary permits and public opposition to these activities), our failure to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, risks related to our tax structuring,
environmental uncertainties, risks related to natural disasters, changes in real estate and zoning laws, risks related to doing business internationally and global expansion, risks of
opening offices globally, risks of changing personnel and roles, losses in excess of our insurance coverage, unknown liabilities acquired in connection with acquired properties or
otherwise and increases in real property tax rates. Our success also depends upon economic trends generally, including interest rates, income tax laws, governmental regulation,
legislation, population changes and certain other matters discussed under the heading Risk Factors and elsewhere in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.